[Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613





------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com  2007-02-15 10:41 EST -------
Wrt concerns:
1) yes, I guess it would be possible if we come up with some simple rules,
e.g. such builds would be possible only if there weren't any changes checked
in on the branch other than in libjava/ since the last gcc rpm built by myself
and it used a release tag with dot inside (the former because things being
checked there means a new gcc from me is in the works, the latter e.g. to not
get out of sync e.g. with rawhide gcc)
3) even with separate libgcj the BuildRequires of gcc couldn't be trimmed down,
as building untested gcj/jc1 is not an option - even with separate libgcj gcc
build would need to build libgcj itself and run tests against it, only it
wouldn't be installed by gcc subpackages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.