[Bug 217654] Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 17 13:45:12 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217654





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-02-17 08:45 EST -------
Well, 
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > * Scriptlets
> Seems to me, the next best choice is /etc or even /.  At least for now, I've
> changed it to /.
Okay.

Almost clean.  For -2:
* Version/Release specific dependency:
  - Usually the dependency against main package should be release specific.
    i.e.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Requires:       tmda = %{version}-%{release}
-------------------------------------------------------------

* Cosmetic issue: consistent macro use
  - Well, you use both
--------------------------------------------------------------
%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
%{_initrddir}
--------------------------------------------------------------
   Please unify them.

* Again documentation:
  - Maybe the following documents are useful?
--------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS (usually this should be included)
--------------------------------------------------------------

* For -emacs package:
  - Well, I don't think it is useful to split only one file with 27K 
    and to create another package with have no dependency essentially.
    And.. tmda.el is installed in main package as a documentation.

    IMO simply unifying .el file into main package and having both
    %{_datadir}/emacs and %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp directories owned
    also by main package, removing emacs dependency is simpler.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list