[Bug 225288] Merge Review: at
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 20 15:50:30 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-20 10:50 EST -------
Let me offer some comments on the rpmlint output.
W: at strange-permission atd.init 0775
W: at strange-permission test.pl 0755
Generally these aren't worth bothering with, but having a file group writable
in your checkout could be problematic. I don't see that, but I think my umask
doesn't allow it. Someone should try to understand where this is coming from.
E: at non-readable /etc/pam.d/atd 0640
I think this is OK, albeit different from what most other packages do. (They
use 0644).
E: at non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/at/spool 0700
E: at non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/at 0700
E: at non-readable /etc/at.deny 0600
E: at non-readable /var/spool/at/.SEQ 0600
These are necessitated by security.
W: at hidden-file-or-dir /var/spool/at/.SEQ
That's just the file that at uses; it's OK for it to be hidden.
E: at setuid-binary /usr/bin/at root 04755
E: at non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/at 04755
These are necessary.
W: at dangerous-command-in-%post chown
I'm not really sure why these are here as opposed to just being part of
%files. Perhaps rpm would keep creating .SEQ.rpmnew files endlessly otherwise?
If so then I think it's OK.
W: at service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/atd
It's allowable for a service to be on by default, especially in the case of a
daemon that everyone expects to be there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list