[Bug 226448] Merge Review: sysklogd

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 20 16:53:19 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sysklogd


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226448


jpo at di.uminho.pt changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jpo at di.uminho.pt




------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt  2007-02-20 11:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> fixed in sysklogd-1.4.1-47.fc7

> 3) I think "no". I didn't find many "Require: logrotate" in spec files of 
> packages, which rotate its files.

In the syslog-ng.spec there is a requirement for logrotate: syslog-ng installs
a file in the /etc/logrotate.d directory which is owned by the logrotate package.

   $ rpm -qf /etc/logrotate.d/
   logrotate-3.7.4-12.fc6

> 4e) I have renamed logrotate.d/syslog but not going to do the same for 
> init.t/syslog. I'm worry it could make more problems.

The rename broke the usage of syslog-ng as a sysklogd replacement. Syslog-ng
needs to ship the same file as sysklogd (same MD5 digest to avoid file
conflicts): logrotate doesn't like that two different configuration scripts
rotate the same log files.

jpo

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list