[Bug 226448] Merge Review: sysklogd
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 20 16:53:19 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: sysklogd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226448
jpo at di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt
------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-02-20 11:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> fixed in sysklogd-1.4.1-47.fc7
> 3) I think "no". I didn't find many "Require: logrotate" in spec files of
> packages, which rotate its files.
In the syslog-ng.spec there is a requirement for logrotate: syslog-ng installs
a file in the /etc/logrotate.d directory which is owned by the logrotate package.
$ rpm -qf /etc/logrotate.d/
logrotate-3.7.4-12.fc6
> 4e) I have renamed logrotate.d/syslog but not going to do the same for
> init.t/syslog. I'm worry it could make more problems.
The rename broke the usage of syslog-ng as a sysklogd replacement. Syslog-ng
needs to ship the same file as sysklogd (same MD5 digest to avoid file
conflicts): logrotate doesn't like that two different configuration scripts
rotate the same log files.
jpo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list