[Bug 226448] Merge Review: sysklogd

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sysklogd


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226448





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-02-20 22:44 EST -------
Thanks Peter. 

1. good. ok. 
2. Not sure what to do here... The package review guidelines say: 
"- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task."

Is there anyone you might be able to ask to find out the reason for the
sysklogd-<sersion>rh.tar.gz source? It looks like notting used to maintain this
package around that time, perhaps we could ask him?

3. good. ok. 

4. a) b) c) d) good. ok. 
e) ok. I understand your reasoning, although I am not sure what problems
renaming the init file would cause. 
f) ok. 

5. You can read about the dist tag here: 
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
basically this allows you to ship the same version in diffrent branches, and
have the fc6 version have a .fc6, and so on, so upgrades work. 

6. ok, none of them seem package related to me... 

Sorry for the breakage in syslog-ng Jose. ;( 

So, the only blocker I see left is point #2. Perhaps notting can enlighten us. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.