[Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098





------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com  2007-02-23 19:10 EST -------
Sorry, I got tied up with other things. Updated package:

http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/openjpeg-1.1-2.src.rpm
http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/openjpeg.spec

* Sat Feb 17 2007 Callum Lerwick <seg at haxxed.com> 1.1-2
- Move header to a subdirectory.
- Fix makefile patch to preserve timestamps during install.

I hate using macros unless there's a really good reason. The package name is
very unlikely to change, and on the rare occasion that it might, a search and
replace isn't a big deal. So I avoid using %{name}

The no-doc warning on the devel package is ignoreable. The main package has
docs. Hmmm, I actually need to go over the docs, README.linux shouldn't be
packaged and ChangeLog might be better in the devel package. And where's the
license...

I figure the purpose of the makefile patch is self evident, based on the name
and by taking a look at it. I put in a comment for the others because otherwise
it would not be clear that they're there for the benefit of another package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.