[Bug 229826] Review Request: <Chmsee> - <a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko>

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: <Chmsee> - <a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko>


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-02-24 10:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why don't make chmsee conflicts with gnochm for now, so yum could prompt before
> download?

That's wrong. There should be no conflict in fedora except if there
is a good reason. Having an icon in common is not a good reason.

> Adding chm mime-type to gnome themes is too slow to happen.

Indeed, we must find a short term solution.

> Besides
> that, from my point of view chmsee is better than gnochm so it worth a push.
Thanks.

Whether chmsee is better than gnochm or not is not relevant.
Both should be in fedora and installable in parallel.
The fact that they both handle the same mimetype is also not
an issue at all. (xchm and kchmviewer also handle the chm
mimetype).

chmsee don't seem to show the index?

I'd like to see chmsee in fedora too.

After some thinking, I think I found a solution: use the same
file for
/usr/share/icons/gnome/48x48/mimetypes/gnome-mime-application-x-chm.png
for both packages. That way they may coexist nicely. Does that
looks good to you?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.