[Bug 229927] New: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229927

           Summary: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and
                    Morphological Analyzer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-0.94-0.1.pre2.fc7.src.rpm
Mockbuild log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-mecab.log
Description: 
MeCab is a open source morphological analyzer which uses 
CRF (Conditional Random Fields) as the estimation of parameters.

rpmlint on binary rpms:
-----------------------------------------------------
1. E: mecab no-binary
2. W: mecab no-documentation
3. W: mecab-base conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mecabrc
4. W: mecab-devel no-dependency-on mecab
5. W: mecab-devel no-documentation
-----------------------------------------------------
1. mecab binary rpm is a dummy package which pulls
   mecab-base and mecab-dic (I will sumbit later) so
   actually mecab rpm is empty.
   * mecab requires mecab-base and mecab-dic
   * mecab-dic requires mecab-base and mecab-devel to rebuild
3. This file is expected to be overwritten by mecab-dic
   package so I will not mark this file as noreplace.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.