[Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 25 14:32:50 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-02-25 09:32 EST -------
Well,
* x11 version problem
----------------------------------------------------------
[tasaka1 at localhost xblast]$ xblast-x11
could not load font 24
could not load font 18
could not load font 14
-----------------------------------------------------------
- turns out that this is because x11 version is not compiled
with "-DMINI_XBLAST" (check x11_config.c). x11 version still
requests vera font, however vera font is not in the font
search path.
BYW according to x11_config.c, x11 version requires some font
from xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859???? (note: I think that these
font packages are not so usual for non-American/European users
like me).
* gettext translation character corruption
- well, x11 version does not use gettext, so the sentences
are always English and have no problem.
- some character corruption occurs on -sdl version (currently
I created a link as /usr/share/xblast/locale -> ../locale)
on both de_DE and fr_FR.
* Directory ownership:
> Actually by doing things that way, combined
> with the circular deps this has chances are that
> the directory will not be removed, because xblast-data
> could be removed after xblast-data at which moment it will not be
> empty.
- Okay. I catched what you mean. You want to remove
all packages related to xblast by "yum remove xblast", right?
Your opinition is reasonable and for this I respect your
choice.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list