[Bug 217351] Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel® PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351





------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net  2007-02-26 11:50 EST -------
http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-firmware-3.0-7.src.rpm
http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-firmware.spec

* Mon Feb 26 2007 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net> 3.0-7
- Move from a symlink to using a copy for the LICENSE (cleaner and easier).

I've got one last doubt : Is the name of the package OK? I recall naming it like
this to have it as explicit as possible, ("firmware" instead of plain "fw"), but
now that the latest 3945 cousin is a "microcode", with the package/file called
"ucode", I'm not sure what do do...
1) Use "fw" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and "ucode" for ipw3945
2) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and use "microcode" for ipw3945
3) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and use "ucode" for ipw3945 (my choice)
4) Keep "firmware" for ipw2100/ipw2200 and also use it for ipw3945

...maybe this should be raised on the packagers mailing-list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.