[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617





------- Additional Comments From majain at redhat.com  2007-02-27 08:14 EST -------
bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.1.2.fc7 has the following things fixed...

(In reply to comment #1)
> Random notes:
> * rpmlint output:
> W: bitmap-fonts invalid-license distributable
> W: bitmap-fonts no-url-tag
> W: bitmap-fonts-cjk invalid-license distributable
> W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-url-tag
> W: bitmap-fonts-cjk no-documentation
> 
> * It seems that the Lucida fonts are not free software. See the LU_LEGALNOTICE
> in the package.
> 
> * As this is actually three different set of fonts, the version (0.3) is quite
> arbitrary. Also, at least ucs-fonts has released a newer version in 2006, while
> the version in bitmap-fonts is from 2003.
> 
> * Release is complicated (5.1.1) for no real reason. Should be changed to
> integer value (6?).

FIXXED

> * BuildRoot should be changed to
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

FIXED

> * In the "cjk" subpackage summary, CJK should be spelled with capital letters.

FIXED

> * "Prereq" should be replaced by "Requires" (see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#tags)

FIXED

Others - added the dist tag.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.