From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 00:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010032.l010WaXD023805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-12-31 19:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > > dachary | poker-interface is a shared library (really a python module but a > shared library) Considering where it is placed on disk.. doesn't this mean you need to run ldconfig in the postinstall scriptlet? What is confusing is why its placed in /usr/lib/poker-network/poker-interface instead of under /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokerclient2d ? I don't think its really meant to be in the general ldconfig path. If its meant as a library to be used from python bindings only, its best to place it into the python module tree of interest. There are several examples of this sort of .so inclusion in the python module directory already in Fedora space, python-numeric being one specific case. And shouldn't the filename end with the .so extention for clarity? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 01:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010159.l011xAuH024882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-12-31 20:59 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and built. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209219] Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010412.l014CegP027415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:13:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209220] Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010413.l014DZFC027499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-pgsql - pgsql plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209220 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 23:13 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209215 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010413.l014DkK1027519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 23:13 EST ------- *** Bug 209220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:14:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010414.l014EIQW027597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 23:14 EST ------- *** Bug 209219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:14:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209219] Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010414.l014EIKS027584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-sqlite - Sqlite plugin for libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-12-31 23:14 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209215 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218887] Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010426.l014Q7mN028230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 04:27:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221016] Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010427.l014R00t028310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Moodin - Splash engine for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221016 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 07:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 02:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010733.l017X6eV031788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 02:32 EST ------- NOTE: One month has passed since my comment #11. Unless I can receive some response from Thibaud within one week, I will close this bug as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 08:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 03:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701010827.l018RNgL032412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 03:27 EST ------- Well, for prelude-lml: * -devel package issues - First of all, is this package of any sense? I don't know how only installing one header file without providing any .so symlink libraries can be used for any other applications. For example, /usr/include/prelude-lml/prelude-lml.h contains ------------------------------------------------------------ const char *lml_log_entry_get_message(const lml_log_entry_t *log_entry); ------------------------------------------------------------ However, to what library should I actually link to use this function *lml_log_entry_get_message ? The other things are: - prelude-lml.h includes: ------------------------------------------------------------- #include #include ------------------------------------------------------------- This means that -devel package should need "Requires: libprelude-devel" - The description of Requires is wrong. * BuildRequires: -------------------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: libprelude, libprelude-devel, pcre-devel -------------------------------------------------------------- - "libprelude" is not necessary - mockbuild log says: -------------------------------------------------------------- checking for pcre-config... /usr/bin/pcre-config checking for pcre_get_named_substring in -lpcre... yes checking fam.h usability... no checking fam.h presence... no checking for fam.h... no checking for FAMOpen in -lfam... no checking whether FILENAME_MAX is declared... yes checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes *** Dumping configuration *** - Enable FAM support : no - Enable unsupported rulesets: : yes + make -------------------------------------------------------------- Why is FAM support disabled? NOTE: fam.h is included in gamin-devel. * For debuginfo issue: - Mockbuild log says: --------------------------------------------------------------- + rm -f /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/prelude-lml/debug.la + rm -f /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/prelude-lml/pcre.la + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/prelude-lml extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-lml/pcre.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-lml/debug.so cpio: prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/src/.libs/prelude-lmlS.c: No such file or directory <- THIS LINE 377 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump --------------------------------------------------------------- The description of "THIS LINE" means that a needed file for debugging this package is missing and this should be fixed. Again mockbuild log says --------------------------------------------------------------- creating .libs/prelude-lmlS.c (cd .libs && gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -fno-builtin "prelude-lmlS.c") rm -f .libs/prelude-lmlS.c .libs/prelude-lml.nm .libs/prelude-lml.nmS .libs/prelude-lml.nmT --------------------------------------------------------------- "rm -f .libs/prelude-lmlS.c" is wrong and this should not be done. * Documentation - Some %doc files are encoded with non-UTF-8 encodings. Please change to UTF-8. --------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 13:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 08:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011300.l01D0irU012664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 13:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 08:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011312.l01DCUcX012900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-01-01 08:12 EST ------- Gawain, so what do we do make sure firefox15 profile is not modified? firefox2 IMHO must be completely parallel-installable (e.g. separate home-dirs for both firefox15 and firefox2) IMHO, otherwise it's unsuitable for Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 13:17:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 08:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011317.l01DHReM013065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-01 08:17 EST ------- NO. scigraphica should own the libdir and libscigraphica should add to it - NOT the other way around! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 13:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 08:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011343.l01Dhffh013568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-01 08:43 EST ------- FYI firefox2-2.0.0.1-2.1.fc6.src.rpm builds just fine on FC6/x86_64. Thanks. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218887] Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011403.l01E3HAo014971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218887 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-01-01 09:03 EST ------- Actually, perhaps should you contact Neal Becker to ask him if you can take over the packaging of fxload. The review request at bug #118478 seems stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011408.l01E8FwK015348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2007-01-01 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Gawain, so what do we do make sure firefox15 profile is not modified? firefox2 > IMHO must be completely parallel-installable (e.g. separate home-dirs for both > firefox15 and firefox2) IMHO, otherwise it's unsuitable for Extras IT is not an elegant solution, but the .desktop file uses the -ProfileManager switch. I'm not sure that we can automatically create another profile and copy everything over. If some one else has some pointers on if/how this can be done, I would love to hear about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:26:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221084] New: Review Request: dkms - Dynamic Kernel Module Support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221084 Summary: Review Request: dkms - Dynamic Kernel Module Support Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Matt_Domsch at dell.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/dkms/dkms.spec SRPM URL: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/dkms-2.0.13-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package contains the framework for the Dynamic Kernel Module Support (DKMS) method for installing kernel module RPMS. DKMS has been included in Fedora Extras since March 15, 2005, though we couldn't find a formal review ticket for it. Gary Lerhaupt, Matt Domsch, and Tom Callaway all reviewed the spec at that time prior to its importation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011430.l01EUGsb016342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.10-12.at.src.rpm * Sun Dec 31 2006 Axel Thimm - 1.5.10-12 - Add %%{_libdir}/libfakeroot to %%files. - Add %%check. * Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm - 1.5.10-11 - Extend the %%description a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:31:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011431.l01EV2Og016361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakechroot-2.5-11.at.src.rpm * Sun Dec 31 2006 Axel Thimm - 2.5-11 - Add %%{_libdir}/fakechroot to %%files. - Fix license (is LGPL, not GPL). - Add commented %%check (currently broken). - Add ldd.fake and save/restoremode.sh to %%doc * Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm - 2.5-10 - Extend the %%description a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:31:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011431.l01EVr25016383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-01-01 09:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > IT is not an elegant solution, but the .desktop file uses the -ProfileManager > switch. heh, that's why I missed it -- I started firefox2 from the command line :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220890] Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011433.l01EX6MT016490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcdaudio - Control operation of a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220890 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/libcdaudio-0.99.12p2-8.at.src.rpm * Fri Dec 29 2006 Axel Thimm - 0.99.12p2-8 - Change Group tag. - Fix libcdaudio-config for libdir != %%{_prefix}/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011442.l01EgSFV016694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-WrapI18N.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-WrapI18N-0.06-2.at.src.rpm * Sat Dec 30 2006 Axel Thimm - 0.06-2 - Add ownership of some perl folders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011442.l01EgaRv016703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:42 EST ------- Too bad, that would had been a nice addition to rpmlint. Anyway even more thanks for spotting this with eyeballs. :) Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/perl-Text-CharWidth-0.04-2.at.src.rpm * Sat Dec 30 2006 Axel Thimm - 0.04-2 - Add ownership of some perl folders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 14:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 09:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011450.l01EoPbf016821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 09:50 EST ------- Please consider also upgrade paths to F?7, a firefox2 user in FC6 would be rather annoyed finding his half year old profile imported over instead of what this package would maintain. And this kind of upgrade path would only be possible from the main ff package. E.g. in any case Chris cooperation is a must for this package (Obsoleting/Providing this package and catering for collecting user data) and if he gets that much involved, then perhaps it would be more worth to him to issue an ff2 update for FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 15:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 10:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011508.l01F82jH017199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 10:08 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Unsure: > > Does the -devel need ldconfig to be run? > I believe the package guildline says it has to be done > for the package and its > subpackage that contains a *.so. It is not necessary. As when you try "ldconfig -v" and it returns like: ------------------------------------------------- libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 ------------------------------------------------- ldconfig checks libraries with somajor if the library has somajor/sominor. and .so files are not (necessary to be) checked. (In reply to comment #8) > The scigraphica directory must belong to the > application and not the library. Umm.. Ownership distribution between libraries <-> applications is of second importance or less. First of all, "all directories created during installation must belong to some package". You can install libscigraphica without any applications which may use this library. %{_libdir}/scigraphica/ _must_ be owned by this package. There are other issues. ---------------------------------- /usr/share/aclocal/libscigraphica-2.0.m4 ---------------------------------- This should be in -devel package and owning aclocal m4 files means -devel package should need "Requires: automake" libscigraphica-2.0.pc says: ----------------------------------- Requires: glib-2.0 gtk+-2.0 gtkextra-2.0 ----------------------------------- This means that -devel package should require ????-devel as well as pkgconfig (Please check "Requires" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) And.. this package contains many documentations (xml/header files, etc) and image files and keeping timestamps on these files are strongly recommended. Please keep timestamps on these files. (I have not tried, however for many cases ----------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" install ------------------------------------------------------ works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 15:25:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 10:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011525.l01FPC9l017522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 10:25 EST ------- Please correct libscigraphica first. Apparently --------------------------------------- BuildRequires: gtk2-devel gtk+extra-devel BuildRequires: pkgconfig --------------------------------------- This should be required by libscigraphica-devel, not by BuildRequires of this package. ---------------------------------------- %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig ---------------------------------------- This is not necessary because no libraries installed by this package are installed under default path on which ldconfig tries to search. (In reply to comment #5) > NO. > scigraphica should own the libdir and libscigraphica > should add to it - NOT the > other way around! See my comments on bug 220967. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 16:05:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011605.l01G5ncJ018087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-01 11:05 EST ------- Yes, I'll do the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 16:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011614.l01GESRS018227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-01 11:14 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-1.src.rpm changelog - New stable release 1.5.1.5 - Fixed symlink-should-be-relative rpmlint issues - Removed numerous entries on kmenu - Added examples in a new -doc package - Building pdf handbook for different languages - Breaking down -doc package for different languages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 16:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011651.l01GpPbl018832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209217] Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011700.l01H0Dah019122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb-mysql - mysql plugin for libpreludedb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209217 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 12:00 EST ------- This package is now a subpackage of libpreludedb. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 209215 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209215] Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011700.l01H0PEN019140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpreludedb - Provides an abstraction layer for the libprelude https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209215 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 12:00 EST ------- *** Bug 209217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011704.l01H4agA019294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:07:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011707.l01H7uTA019425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-01 12:07 EST ------- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011724.l01HOOOR019832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-01 12:24 EST ------- Pretty simple and straight-forward. * builds in mock environment. * MUST: SOURCE matches upstream APPROVED. I'll leave these up to you to consider: * SHOULD: Summary shouldn't include pkg name (ie, don't include Kio_resources) * SHOULD: Description is too long, imo. Could probably omit 2nd paragraph. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:39:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011739.l01HdUE8020496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-01 12:39 EST ------- Thanks Rex :) * Mon Jan 01 2007 Chitlesh Goorah - 0.2-2 - Removed package name from summary - Fixed description, since it was too long -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 17:56:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011756.l01HuPTA020985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 12:56 EST ------- Well, A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines = Licensing -- is not LGPL and this is correct * Use rpmlint ------------------------------------------------- W: fakechroot doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/fakechroot-2.5/ldd.fake /usr/bin/perl ------------------------------------------------- Well.. I understood first when I read the following. ------------------------------------------------- doc-file-dependency : An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. ------------------------------------------------- For this package, ------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --requires fakechroot /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl <- THIS libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -------------------------------------------------- and /usr/bin/perl is actually not necessary. When I all changed the permission of %doc files to 0644, -------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpm -qp --requires fakechroot-2.5-11.1.i386.rpm /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) ---------------------------------------------------- and the dependency for /usr/bin/perl disappears. Change the permission of %doc files to 0644. (However, I think this is somewhat bug of rpmbuild?) B. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = This is okay, except for written in A. Please fix the issues in A. Other things are okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (fakechroot) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 18:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011801.l01I1nOb021129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 13:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > = Licensing -- is not LGPL and this is correct I meant "Licensing -- is now LGPL and this is correct".... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 18:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011818.l01IIi94021454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 13:18 EST ------- Another issue. -------------------------------------------------------------- + make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1' Making all in pixmaps make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/pixmaps' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/pixmaps' Making all in scigraphica make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/scigraphica' Making all in widgets make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libscigraphica-2.1.1/scigraphica/widgets' if /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../../pixmaps -I../../scigraphica -I../../scigraphica/dialogs -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/gtkextra-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I/usr/include/python2. 5/Numeric/ -DWITH_NUMERIC_PYTHON -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O -W -Wall -DWITH_WARNINGS -MT gtkplotart.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/gtkplotart.Tpo" \ ......... This means that gcc optimizes this code finally by "-O", not "-O2"? If so, this should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 18:21:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011821.l01ILTrR021527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-01 13:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > The scigraphica directory must belong to the > > application and not the library. > Umm.. Ownership distribution between libraries <-> applications is > of second importance or less. > > First of all, "all directories created during installation must > belong to some package". You can install libscigraphica without > any applications which may use this library. %{_libdir}/scigraphica/ > _must_ be owned by this package. > So Paul what do think about this? I actually know people that use libscigraphica without needing scigraphica. > There are other issues. > ---------------------------------- All fixed. Happy new year to one and all. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 18:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701011822.l01IMjjH021572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-01 13:22 EST ------- With fixes, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 20:00:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012000.l01K0W6d023756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 ------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com 2007-01-01 15:00 EST ------- Any news with this package? I've already seen it in Debian. I'll be happy to see it in Fedora as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 20:47:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012047.l01KlN2C024652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 ------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com 2007-01-01 15:47 EST ------- I'm pasting a part of a private mail between me and Dan, at his request. On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > > About the spec file - why do you manually edit the Makefile instead of > > running ./configure during %build ? > > > > and in %install > > $(MAKE) DESTDIR=$(DEB_DESTDIR) install > > > > $(DEB_DESTDIR) has the path for the debian package build root. > > > > I think it will look much more cleaner with these changes. Suggestions are based on aspell-ar package from Debian (which I maintain with others). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 20:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012053.l01Kr7vN024875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |149781 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 21:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220889] Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012113.l01LDAC0025253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakechroot - Gives a fake chroot environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220889 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Component|915resolution |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-01 16:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Final changelog entry: * Mon Jan 1 2007 Axel Thimm - 2.5-12 - Remove executable bits from scripts in documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 21:52:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012152.l01Lqg8N026309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-01 16:52 EST ------- Removed the Rezlooks-Aerials theme since it required an extra metacity theme and icon theme. New spec url is the same as the old one. New SRPM url: http://www.krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 22:02:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012202.l01M2rQc026589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-01-01 17:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > fixed and built in the development tree, awaiting signing. Thanks for the great work Jef, would you push this package for FC6 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 22:05:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012205.l01M5fK4026801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-01 17:05 EST ------- Soon it will be, Terje :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 22:39:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:39:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189830] Review Request: xmms-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012239.l01Md28L027420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189830 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xmms- |Review Request: xmms- |scrobber - Audioscrobbler |scrobbler - Audioscrobbler |plugin for XMMS |plugin for XMMS ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-01 17:38 EST ------- Fix typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 22:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221108] New: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221108 Summary: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/openarena/openarena.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/openarena/openarena-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: OpenArena is an open-source content package for Quake III Arena licensed under the GPL, effectively creating a free stand-alone game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 1 22:49:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701012249.l01MnYl9027685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-01 17:49 EST ------- concerning the debuging thing I got the following information from upstream: >This is the way automake+libtool handle building the program. More >specifically, this is related to the handling of pre-opened modules. >You will notice similar behavior with prelude-manager, but this is all >generated libtool code. because of the missing .so symlink libraries in the -devel I got this: >The prelude-lml.h header provide the necessary API for contributor to >write LML plugins. The function (*lml_log_entry_get_message, used in your >example) is a public function available from the LML >core. Plugin loaded by >LML have access to LML public symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 02:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:26:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020226.l022QvZr032223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-01 21:26 EST ------- 1.4 final shouldn't be that different from the last beta. Hopefully I'll have new SRPMS up in a day or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 02:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020239.l022daFK032498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-01 21:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Another issue. > 5/Numeric/ -DWITH_NUMERIC_PYTHON -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 > -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O -W -Wall -DWITH_WARNINGS -MT > gtkplotart.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/gtkplotart.Tpo" \ > ......... > > This means that gcc optimizes this code finally by "-O", not > "-O2"? If so, this should be fixed. This is caused by the configure scripts assuming it building a CVS checkout (the developers have enabled some extra debugging options for CVS builds, and mistakingly shipped a configure script generated in a CVS checkout). Regenerating the configure script should have worked, but it failed because some expected file are not shipped in the released package. I've fixed it and some other issues I noticed while looking at this. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 02:44:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020244.l022iRUo032586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-01 21:44 EST ------- I discovered building this package (as is in last spec) fails when python-numarry is installed. This is because the configure script is kinda confused by python-numarry and python-numeric both providing 'arrayobject.h'. This is resolved in this build. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 03:07:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020307.l0237qGO000431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 22:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > concerning the debuging thing I got the following information from upstream: > > >This is the way automake+libtool handle building the program. More > >specifically, this is related to the handling of pre-opened modules.> >You will notice similar behavior with prelude-manager, but this is all > >generated libtool code. Then? actually .libs/prelude-lmlS.o is used in prelude-lml as -------------------------------------------------- gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=g eneric -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wnested-externs -Wunused -o prelude-lml -pthread .libs/prelude-lmlS.o prelude-lml.o udp-server.o regex.o log-entry.o log-source.o log-plugins.o lml-options.o file-server.o lml-alert.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl -lpcre ../libmissing/.libs/libmissing.a -------------------------------------------------- and debugging prelude-lml actually needs prelude-lmlS.c, so prelude-lmlS.c should not be removed. > because of the missing .so symlink libraries in the -devel I got this: > > >The prelude-lml.h header provide the necessary API for contributor to > >write LML plugins. The function (*lml_log_entry_get_message, used in your > >example) is a public function available from the LML >core. Plugin loaded by > >LML have access to LML public symbols. Well, then what library actually provides *lml_log_entry_get_message? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 03:41:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020341.l023fW1I002145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 22:41 EST ------- Well, some minor things and issues. Minor: * BuildRequies pkgconfig, gtk2-devel is not necessary. These are (finally) required by gtk+extra-devel ? Group: Development/Libraries (main) Usually "Development" is used for -devel package and the group of this type is "System Environment/Libraries". Should be fixed: * %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}/ is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 03:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020358.l023wxfS003420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 22:58 EST ------- Actually I know this application because I use this for cowsaver, one of hacks which can be used for xscreensaver. I will review this. * Use "cp -p" to keep timestamps ("Timestamps" in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * Please fix the description of man package according to installed paths. * How about randomize a cow which is choosen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020405.l0245BsD003897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-01 23:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144618) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144618&action=view) wrapper script I use to randomize cowsay c.f. "animalsay", which I use for cowsaver to randomize animal used by cowsay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020423.l024NIvg005673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|171543, 219954 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:28:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020428.l024S8dp006201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-01 23:28 EST ------- pec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-3.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Dec 31 2006 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-4 - Add full path to exec in desktop file - Add pkgconfig to devel subpackage - Convert icons to png format and store in icons directory - Update TODO Jef: Can you test the icons out on this release? Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020431.l024VJ0p006529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-01 23:31 EST ------- I am unable to download above links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020431.l024VVqL006561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-01 23:31 EST ------- I am unable to download SPEC and SRPMS files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 04:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020449.l024nQIq008482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-01 23:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > pec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec > SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-3.src.rpm Ack, this is supposed to be: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-4.src.rpm I apologize, I am notoriously bad for copy&pasting without updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 06:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020613.l026Dpsc011476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-01-02 01:13 EST ------- Menu entry and menu icons appear to be working in this release. I think the only important thing left is the issue of whether /usr/lib/poker-network/poker-interface should be moved to /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokerclient2d and if it should be renamed to poker-interface.so for clarity. the python add-on package naming issue is less clear since there are already poker-whatever packages in the tree which you'd have to also rename to meet the python-whatever guidance. I'm not going to block on that since these poker-* packages make a consistent naming group. If someone else has a problem with it, you'll have to go into the tree later and rename and do some virtual providing. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 06:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020615.l026FM0x011508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-01-02 01:15 EST ------- Ville I don't have a Fedora account since I haven't been sponsored yet. I forgot to state that this was an unofficial review, but Jeffrey knew that because I was providing several unofficial reviews for his packages. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 08:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 03:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701020827.l028RsJV014332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 ------- Additional Comments From rvokal at redhat.com 2007-01-02 03:27 EST ------- I fixed that by uploading a new ssh key. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 11:09:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 06:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021109.l02B9kut027981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-02 06:09 EST ------- Sorry, they were moved internally (into my "submit to extras folder") while the site building scripts were running and they missed it. They have been resurrected now, please retry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 11:09:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 06:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021109.l02B9veX027999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-02 06:09 EST ------- Sorry, they were moved internally (into my "submit to extras folder") while the site building scripts were running and they missed it. They have been resurrected now, please retry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 11:46:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 06:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021146.l02BkK9s029505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-02 06:46 EST ------- from upstream: prelude-lmlS.c problem: >I'm not aware of any way to prevent removal of this file. I can also >tell that this file is not necessary for debugging (it's only used by >libtool as a way of setting up preopening). what library actually provides *lml_log_entry_get_message: >The symbol is exported from the Prelude-LML binary. A binary can export >symbol, as a library does. Dynamically loaded modules have access to >theses exported symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 12:29:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021229.l02CTQtv031695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-02 07:29 EST ------- more from upstream concerning the removed prelude-lmlS.c file: >More information: specifically, the generated file reference plugins >initialization symbols in a global structure available to the >application (named lt_preloaded_symbols). >This is only used in conjunction with --static, on platform that does >not support dynamic library loading. On those platform, the plugin code >is linked statically to the application, and in order to emulate the >plugin loading, the table is looked up and referenced symbols are >called. >This is named dl-preopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 13:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021301.l02D1ZaF000679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-02 08:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144637) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144637&action=view) Chitlesh's gerbv patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 13:02:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021302.l02D2OqE000731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-02 08:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144638) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144638&action=view) Chitlesh's gerbv spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 13:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021305.l02D5sDt000855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-02 08:05 EST ------- Hello, I've recently attached a patch and my gerbv file which I was working on some months ago. My spec file will help you fix the issues pointed by Michael's review. However, I missed out some materials on the "doc" directory, probably you can add them to the spec file. :) By the way, I'm the geda suite packager for fedora:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 15:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021516.l02FGX2C011956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 16:01:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021601.l02G1dPB015878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From rds204 at zepler.net 2007-01-02 11:01 EST ------- Chitlesh said: > By the way, I'm the geda suite packager for fedora:) Sorry, didn't mean to step on anyone's feet! Michael: Thanks for the feedback, I'll try and resubmit within the next few days. When I originally submitted, I didn't realise that there was this maintainership problem (err... I think I must have been blind or something). Perhaps this package shouldn't go into extras because of lack of upstream maintenance. I've posted about this on the gEDA-devel mailing list to see whether anyone's thinking about maintaining it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 16:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021607.l02G7iH8016765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-02 11:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > >The prelude-lml.h header provide the necessary API for contributor to > >write LML plugins. Ah.. for plugins... I see. (In reply to comment #9) > from upstream: > > prelude-lmlS.c problem: > >I'm not aware of any way to prevent removal of this file. I can also > >tell that this file is not necessary for debugging (it's only used by > >libtool as a way of setting up preopening). It may be, however, there is a easy fix so fixing this is preferable IMO. ----------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q sed -i.debug -e '/nlist/s|\$rm|: $rm|' ltmain.sh ----------------------------------------------- By the way, for encoding issue, doesn't the following make effect for you? -------------------------------------------------- %build %configure make for f in ChangeLog NEWS ; do iconv -f ISO-8859-15 -t UTF-8 $f > ${f}.tmp && mv -f ${f}.tmp ${f} || rm -f ${f}.tmp done --------------------------------------------------- And.. does parallel make fail on this package? Also, please fix the rest issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 16:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021641.l02GfF6W018852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-02 11:38 EST ------- all problems are fixed now (thanks for the provided patch to ltmain.sh), execpt the encoding problems. althought I called iconv I still get this: [tscherf at tiffy SPECS]$ rpm -qpd /home/tscherf/redhat/RPMS/i386/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.i386.rpm|xargs file /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/AUTHORS: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/COPYING: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/HACKING.README: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/README: ASCII English text don't know what is going wrong, when calling iconv this way: %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} iconv -f ISO8859-15 -t UTF-8 NEWS > NEWS.utf8 && \ %{__mv} NEWS.utf8 NEWS iconv -f ISO8859-15 -t UTF-8 ChangeLog > ChangeLog.utf8 && \ %{__mv} ChangeLog.utf8 Chang here is the new package: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml.spec ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-02 11:41 EST ------- all problems are fixed now (thanks for the provided patch to ltmain.sh), execpt the encoding problems. althought I called iconv I still get this: [tscherf at tiffy SPECS]$ rpm -qpd /home/tscherf/redhat/RPMS/i386/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.i386.rpm|xargs file /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/AUTHORS: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/COPYING: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/HACKING.README: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/README: ASCII English text don't know what is going wrong, when calling iconv this way: %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} iconv -f ISO8859-15 -t UTF-8 NEWS > NEWS.utf8 && \ %{__mv} NEWS.utf8 NEWS iconv -f ISO8859-15 -t UTF-8 ChangeLog > ChangeLog.utf8 && \ %{__mv} ChangeLog.utf8 Chang here is the new package: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-lml.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 16:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:41:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021641.l02Gf3J3018792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-02 11:40 EST ------- No, it doesn't... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 16:44:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021644.l02Givj1019060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-01-02 11:43 EST ------- You seem to be confused. This is not Gentoo, but Fedora. Please post a link to both the proposed spec file and src.rpm. You'll be able to import the package yourself after it passes review and after you're sponsored. Have you read the articles you were pointed to in comment #6 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:05:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] New: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qwtplot3d.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qwtplot3d-0.2.6-1.src.rpm Description: QwtPlot3D is not a program, but a feature-rich Qt/OpenGL-based C++ programming library, providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers It is needed at least by LabPlot. I have managed to get rpmlint silent apart from one, harmless error. Package builds in mock (fc6/i386). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:06:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021706.l02H6QIR020902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221027 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:06:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021706.l02H6WSL020922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |221163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021710.l02HAeri021485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-01-02 12:10 EST ------- To use system-wide qwtplot3d, pass --enable-system-qwtplot3d to configure and export QWT3D_PATH=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib. For netcdf, please see bug #221022. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021715.l02HFB4w021902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-02 12:15 EST ------- ok, so what do we do here? This package has been waiting for around 3 months now. What is the config file issue you are waiting on? Can it be patched in the fedora package until upstream addresses it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021726.l02HQMS2022760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-02 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > What is the config file issue you are waiting on? When the user don't have any config file, the default config is put in his personal directory (in the .ivman subdirectory, if I recall well). Therefore if there is an update of the default config file it isn't taken into account for the users. This is fine for power users using ivman, but not for normal users. And I think ivman may be usefull for normal users with lightweight desktops. If this is shipped as is, it won't be possible to change users config files, although this may be desirable sometime. > Can it be patched in the fedora package until upstream addresses it? I don't think it would be wise, it hasn't even been accepted by upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 17:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021739.l02Hd6jo023725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 12:39 EST ------- Thanks for review! I have uploaded new SRPM and Spec files: Spec URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/cowsay/cowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.nonlogic.org/cowsay/cowsay-3.03-2.src.rpm I hope it's good enough right now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021808.l02I8LEm025468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-02 13:08 EST ------- Well, I have not checked 0.9.8.1-2, however... * For iconv problem (only checked this for now) Actually I cannot catch what is happening on you because for me the result of your 0.9.8.1-2 by mockbuild on FC-devel is... ------------------------------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q prelude-lml prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.fc7 [root at localhost ~]# rpm -ql prelude-lml | grep doc | xargs file /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1: directory /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/AUTHORS: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/COPYING: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: UTF-8 Unicode English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/HACKING.README: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: UTF-8 Unicode English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/README: ASCII English text ------------------------------------------------- ... ChangeLog, NEWS are actually converted to UTF-8. Well, once rebuild this by mockbuild. Then what result do you gain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:22:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021822.l02IMFlf026374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 13:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > It is needed at least by LabPlot. I have managed to get rpmlint silent apart from one, harmless error. Package builds in mock (fc6/i386). On fc6/x86_64 it builds as well. I'll make a full review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:32:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219978] Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021832.l02IWqkF028138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-media-tags-plugin - Media Tags plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219978 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021837.l02IbFZV028783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-02 13:37 EST ------- [tasaka1 at localhost cowsay]$ cat 1.log | animalsay -W 100 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ / Thank you for adding my "animalsay" script!! \ | | | Well, = rpmlint issue | | | | W: cowsay non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/cowsay.bashcomp | | | | = This _must_ be ignored for this case. = Timestamps, man file description are now okay. = License, | | md5sum okay = Other things are also okay... accroding to | | | | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines | | | | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | | \ This package (cowsay) is APPROVED by me. / ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \ ____ \ / \ | ^__^ | | (oo) |______ | (__) | )\/\ \____/|----w | || || Moofasa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021849.l02Indx3030892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 13:49 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint is not quiet: E: qwtplot3d-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib but we can ignore that until a file in /usr/lib is symlink to a binary one * sources match upstream (7ef960d7874f78162d6c9d241de2843e) * BRs listed well (mock builds fine) * license is in fact zlib/libpng (checked) !* -devel subpackage present, but needs to be improved * name of package is good as well as spec file name * proper %post and %postun sections * package isn't designed to be relocatable * there's no duplicates in %files section * package owns files and directories well * proper %clean section * %defattr macros are present * macros are used good THING TO DO: - some header files include files like a qstringlist.h which are owned by qt-devel package. Thus you have to add qt-devel dependency to -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 18:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] New: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: libisofs the library to pack up hard disk files and directories into a ISO 9660 disk image. This may then be brought to CD via libburn. libisofs is to be the foundation of our upcoming mkisofs emulation. This software used to be a part of the libburn source package but has been split out into its own tarball, and thus its own srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 19:50:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021950.l02Jomhv006577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-01-02 14:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qwtplot3d.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/qwtplot3d-0.2.6-2.src.rpm New release: - Added qt-devel to -devel subpackage requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 19:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021956.l02JuNiP006902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-01-02 14:56 EST ------- I've already pointed out in various posts why this is not a good idea. Axel points out more. Additionally, the Firefox 2 package in rawhide currently regresses a lot with respect to i18n text rendering in the FC6 1.5 package. Many fixes have been going into the 1.5 branch from various distros, so making sure that 2.0.x has all those fixes is imperative. Honestly, I'm sorry that there are a few extension authors that couldn't be bothered supporting 1.5. I'm also sorry that XULrunner is still not released yet because this would be less of an issue then. But I'm mostly sorry that our desktop stack relies on gecko at all. Because Firefox 2.0 would be in FC6 already and everyone could find some other package to complain about. After my last public objections, some of you may have noticed that I got agreement from the Mozilla Corp. to better support Linux distributions. This changed the landscape some and may potentially help get 2.0.x into earlier Fedora releases or preferably get some 2.0.x features backported, but I can't guarantee either will happen just yet. I'm still working on things upstream as I can. So, once again, I will respectfully object to this package. If this is going to happen, it will be part of the core firefox package, not as a separate parallel-installed package. Should things change, news will be posted. In the meantime, http://xkcd.com/c198.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 19:56:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701021956.l02JuP5Q006928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-01-02 14:56 EST ------- I have noticed that you have enabled libundo. I will post a review request soonish. I also have a spec for liborigin, so lemme know if you get LabPlot to use system-wide one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:02:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221184] New: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/libundo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/libundo-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: Libundo is a simple, easy-to-use library which manages recording and playback of undo/redo information for application developers. It is designed to be simple to plug in to existing applications and require only a minimal amount of support code be written to support multi-level undo/redo. Libundo handles all the details of determining what has changed after an undoable action is performed, recording that information and saving it for use when an undo is performed. Libundo makes it easy for application writers to give end users what they want. Package builds fine in mock (fc6/i386) and rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022003.l02K373L007303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |221184 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:03:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022003.l02K39Sk007324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221027 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022021.l02KLJM6008636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-02 15:21 EST ------- This has been in review queue for over a year now. :) Can we please approve it or discard it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:31:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221188] New: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188 Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pdns-recursor.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pdns-recursor-3.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: PowerDNS Recursor is a non authoritative/recursing DNS server. Use this package if you need a dns cache for your network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022034.l02KYuEe009781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From jwhiter at redhat.com 2007-01-02 15:34 EST ------- Ok new SPEC file and SRPM uploaded to the same place its always been. -fixed the mixed spaces/tabs problem -added sed command to %install to fix the ScintillaLicense.txt eol encoding -fixed the docs so they are installed into doc/%{name}-%{version} -added an rm pixmaps/geany.ico, its only for windows installations the only rpmlint error thats left is a bogus one about filetypes.c not being in a devel package, and that doesn't apply as its just the syntax specifications for C for geany. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022041.l02Kfaev010197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 15:41 EST ------- Nothing to pick on. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:43:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022043.l02Khk1q010353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-02 15:43 EST ------- - All build dependencies are spurious - "-n libisofs-devel" could be replaced by just "devel" in devel's %package and %description, and libisofs by %{name} in -devel main pkg dependency - Summary: s/A library/Library/ - Unowned dir /usr/include/libisofs - Add CONTRIBUTORS to %doc - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs? - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package? - Bad grammar in %description: "libisofs the library to ...", dunno if the last sentence of it is needed, it's subject to bitrot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022045.l02Kjrpl010511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-02 15:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - All build dependencies are spurious Sorry, libburn-devel is not, but others apparently are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221059] Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022050.l02Ko8cI010662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowsay - configurable speaking/thinking cow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221059 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 15:49 EST ------- _____________________________________________________ / I had to slightly modify animalsay script ;-) \ | | | Thank you again for review! | | | | Package succesfully built for FC-5, FC-6 and devel. | | | \ Closing. / ----------------------------------------------------- \ \ .--. |o_o | |:_/ | // \ \ (| | ) /'\_ _/`\ \___)=(___/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 20:58:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022058.l02KwoWf011255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-02 15:58 EST ------- Thanks for review! Package built successfully for every branch I requested. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022119.l02LJ203012314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-02 16:18 EST ------- problem remains in when building the package in mock: [tscherf at tiffy result]$ rpm -qpd prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.fc6.i386.rpm|xargs file /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/AUTHORS: ASCII text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/COPYING: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/HACKING.README: ASCII English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/prelude-lml-0.9.8.1/README: ASCII English text strange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:20:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022120.l02LKUGK012459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-01-02 16:20 EST ------- I just noticed one more thing... Should app_mp3 even be built? It's pretty worthless since "real" mpg123 isn't even available in livna. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:22:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022122.l02LMXwm012652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-02 16:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - All build dependencies are spurious Ah, probably carryover from when the package was built in libburn. > - "-n libisofs-devel" could be replaced by just "devel" in devel's %package and > %description, and libisofs by %{name} in -devel main pkg dependency Whoops, more carry over from previous package. > - Summary: s/A library/Library/ Fixed. > - Unowned dir /usr/include/libisofs Hrm, I assumed that it would pick up ownership of that since it was creating the dir, my bad. > - Add CONTRIBUTORS to %doc Hurray for new files. > - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix. Is this really a problem that I should chmod the source? > - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs? Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release. > - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package? I was told yes, but I'll clarify. > - Bad grammar in %description: "libisofs the library to ...", dunno if the last > sentence of it is needed, it's subject to bitrot Yeah, this was their upstream content. http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.3-2.src.rpm Spec url is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022122.l02LMwBV012696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-02 16:22 EST ------- Hey, Chris: Finally some time to finish it up. :) All your points have been addressed: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:39:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022139.l02Ld90i014062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-02 16:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Well, some minor things and issues. > Fixed. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/libscigraphica-2.1.1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022151.l02LpUPM015020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-02 16:51 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent X license seems to be LGPL, license included but is GPL in specfile * follow guidelines * match upstream a164326a32a64063079405da11677f0a thunar-archive-plugin-0.2.2.tar.bz2 * sane provides, with the usual bogus dlopened module useless soname: Provides: thunar-archive-plugin.so * own directories, /usr/lib/thunarx-1/ should be owned by thunar * build and works correctly out of the box * BuildRequires and Requires seem to be right It is not obvious that the gtk cache update is needed, but I guess it is needed for the icons in the right-click thunar menu? The scriptlet snippet isn't the same than in the guidelines but the one proposed here should be right, too. The only real issue pending is the License issue. This is APPROVED if you fix it, no need to repost a srpm if it is the only difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 21:56:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022156.l02LuQZi015241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188 josef at toxicpanda.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pdns- |Review Request: pdns- |recursor - Modern, advanced |recursor - Modern, advanced |and high performance |and high performance |recursing/non authoritative |recursing/non authoritative |nameserver |nameserver ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-02 16:56 EST ------- Here is my review, everything looks good, it built and such. I haven't yet been sponsored and stuff, I'm doing reviews in order to get sponsored. Must: -rpmlint ran without errors [josef at dhcp59-136 ~]$ rpmlint pdns-recursor-3.1.4-1.src.rpm [josef at dhcp59-136 ~]$ -package conforms to package naming guidlines -spec file name matches basename -the package is licensed with an open source compatible license -package includes license in %doc -spec file is written in american english -spec file is legible -sources match upstream (sha1sum) d1fa344ec5f2feb12397361f92b011a0cb726d48 pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2 -package successfully built on my test box (x86_64) -no need for exclude arch -BR are present and make sense -no libraries, no need to run ldconfig -not relocatable -package owns everything it creates -package does not duplicate files it owns -file attributes are set appropriatly -%clean section present and removes buildroot -consistently uses macros -contains code -no large documentation -files in %doc does not affect runtime of application -does not contain a pkgconfig file -does not contain any libraries -does not have a devel package -does not contain any .la files -package does not have a gui -package does not own files/directories owned by other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022206.l02M6oQc015810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-02 17:06 EST ------- chris - since you haven't sponsored me yet, is this supposed to be assigned to me? If it is, am i supposed to move this into FE-ACCEPT? If not what do you need me to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:13:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022213.l02MDVtQ016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-02 17:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files > This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix. Is this > really a problem that I should chmod the source? Well, it took you many more keystrokes to ask that question than fixing it would have taken... :). Why not? Don't we want proper permissions for all installed files? > > - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs? > Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release. Unless I'm missing something, I think it should be patched in this package. Unless of course you prefer waiting for the next upstream release before continuing the review. > > - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package? > I was told yes, but I'll clarify. Looks spurious to me. Nothing is linked against libburn, nor it is dlopened, and I don't see anything else in libburn that would be a candidate for explaining the dependency. Caveat: I haven't tried actually using this package for anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:14:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022214.l02MEb71016348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-02 17:14 EST ------- What's the status on this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:29:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022229.l02MTjdM017248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-02 17:29 EST ------- The bug should still block FE-NEW and be assigned to nobody at fedoraproject.org (or whatever the default asignee is) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022230.l02MUEaq017294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-02 17:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > * rpmlint is silent > X license seems to be LGPL, license included but is GPL in specfile Sorry, my fault. COPYING and headers are LGPL, so the specfile is wrong. > It is not obvious that the gtk cache update is needed, but I guess it > is needed for the icons in the right-click thunar menu? I did not really test if it's necessary, I just strictly followed the guidelines. The guidelines tell you to run gtk-update-icon-cache, "If an application installs icons into one of the subdirectories in %{_datadir}/icons". > The scriptlet snippet isn't the same than in the guidelines but the > one proposed here should be right, too. Oops, I copied it over from another specfile, obviously the Scriptlet Snipplets in the Wiki have changed in the meantime. The page I used is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=recall&rev=1#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > The only real issue pending is the License issue. This is APPROVED if you > fix it, no need to repost a srpm if it is the only difference. OK, thanks a lot for reviewing this so carefully. I will fix the license issue after import into CVS. I will also update the icon cache scriptlet (if it is really needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:53:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022253.l02Mru2F018648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-02 17:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-5.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jan 02 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-5 - Move poker-interface to %%{python_sitearch}/pokerclient2d - Remove TODO comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 22:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022254.l02Msat5018687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From heiko.adams at gmx.de 2007-01-02 17:54 EST ------- Bug http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 has been resolved. So when will xarchiver land on Fedora Extras for FC5/6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022302.l02N2s8X018967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 josef at toxicpanda.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|josef at toxicpanda.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:13:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165533] Review Request: perl-Unix-Statgrab - Perl extension for collecting information about the machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022313.l02NDG6L019450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Unix-Statgrab - Perl extension for collecting information about the machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165533 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: Perl |Review Request: perl-Unix- |extension for collecting |Statgrab - Perl extension |information about the |for collecting information |machine |about the machine CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:13 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:15:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165398] Review Request: python-numarray - Python array manipulation and computational library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022315.l02NFR4G019550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-numarray - Python array manipulation and computational library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165398 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: Python array|Review Request: python- |manipulation and |numarray - Python array |computational library |manipulation and | |computational library CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:15 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:18:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: python-psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022318.l02NIdil019730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: psycopg2 - A|Review Request: python- |PostgreSQL database adapter |psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL |for Python |database adapter for Python ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:18 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198288] Review Request: python-paste-deploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022323.l02NNXLw019954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste-deploy - Load, configure, and compose WSGI applications and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198288 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: python- |pastedeploy - Load, |paste-deploy - Load, |configure, and compose WSGI |configure, and compose WSGI |applications and servers |applications and servers ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:23 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022325.l02NPHBO020045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-02 18:25 EST ------- Please give me another two days. I'll need some more time to investigate the solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:25:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198289] Review Request: python-paste-script - A pluggable command-line frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022325.l02NPT8x020100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paste-script - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: python- |pastescript - A pluggable |paste-script - A pluggable |command-line frontend |command-line frontend ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:25 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168923] Review Request: python-sqlobject - Python SQLObject ORM library -- needs sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022327.l02NRHC7020151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlobject - Python SQLObject ORM library -- needs sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168923 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: Python |Review Request: python- |SQLObject ORM library -- |sqlobject - Python SQLObject |needs sponsor |ORM library -- needs sponsor CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:27 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:29:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220775] Review Request: exaile - A music player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022329.l02NTbBa020260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exaile - A music player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220775 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Exaile! - A |Review Request: exaile - A |music player |music player ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:29 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:33:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220730] Review Request: gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022333.l02NXh9q020429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpodder - Podcast receiver/catcher written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220730 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:gpodder - |Review Request: gpodder - |Podcast receiver/catcher |Podcast receiver/catcher |written in Python |written in Python ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:33 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 2 23:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168922] Review Request: python-formencode - Python FormEncode Library -- needs sponsor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701022356.l02NuRmM021604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-formencode - Python FormEncode Library -- needs sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: Python |Review Request: python- |FormEncode Library -- needs |formencode - Python |sponsor |FormEncode Library -- needs | |sponsor CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 18:56 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199784] Review Request: python-psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030008.l0308u6Q022284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-psycopg2 - A PostgreSQL database adapter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199784 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|python-psycopg |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:08 EST ------- Please leave the component of review tickets to "Package Review". Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165329] Review Request: roundup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030015.l030FbxB022533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165329 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: roundup- |Review Request: roundup |0.8.4-3 | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:15 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:19:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030019.l030JICM022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-01-02 19:19 EST ------- Updated SPEC is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec?use_mirror=osdn Updated SRPM is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-8-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210464] Review Request: anjuta - A very capable IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030021.l030LJhP022824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A very capable IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210464 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: anjuta-2 - A|Review Request: anjuta - A |very capable IDE |very capable IDE ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:21 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182966] Review Request: argus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030022.l030MoLR022950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182966 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: argus- |Review Request: argus |2.0.6.fixes.1-1.src.rpm | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:22 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030025.l030PHAH023433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: filelight- |Review Request: filelight - |1.0 - cool diskspace use |cool diskspace use browser |browser for kde |for kde ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:25 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:27:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030027.l030RaiU023542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: | CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:27 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:28:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030028.l030SAVY023578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gdmap-0.7.5-|Review Request: gdmap |1 | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:28 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030029.l030TFuL023623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-01-02 19:29 EST ------- Setting this request to closed (inactivity). Some of the ideas in Russ' spec would be good to roll into a newer package (especially the SELinux stuff, on reflection - I'm more familiar with it now than I was when this was first lodged) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:29:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030029.l030TcxB023669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:29 EST ------- Reopen to assign to reviewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030031.l030V43p023800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197753] Review Request: gdmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030031.l030Vxv5023853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197753 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:31 EST ------- Assigned and close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:34:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030034.l030Y6wG023976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW Summary|Review Request: glipper-0.89|Review Request: glipper Keywords| |Reopened ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:34 EST ------- Re-open to properly assign review. Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030034.l030YmIW024031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197796] Review Request: glipper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030035.l030ZIXE024070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glipper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197796 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030037.l030bYZY024152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gstm-1.2 |Review Request: gstm ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:37 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166633] Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030040.l030e9BM024250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mmv - move multiple files program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166633 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: mmv-1.01b-1 |Review Request: mmv - move |(move multiple files |multiple files program |program) | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:39 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030041.l030f1Ot024316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-01-02 19:40 EST ------- I'll have another closer look later today. Sam pushed out a rash of releases over the new year break, including 0.59. It's functionally identical (at least from our POV) so I'm happy to keep reviewing the existing package as-is. It might be a courtesy to users to import it or a later version once approved of course. If you're concerned about ongoing maintenance - it's not too difficult (an evolving process, few specs are perfect on first import) and I'll put my hand up for co-maintainership if desired. (As to why I've not submitted mine - folks have beaten me to this and maildrop, and the courier-imap spec will eat your brain. It will take a herculean effort to get it to the point where it satisfies FE requirements while still working as Sam intended.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188205] Review Request: pessulus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030041.l030fx43024405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pessulus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188205 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pessulus-0.9|Review Request: pessulus ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:41 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170492] Review Request: qucs - Circuit simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030043.l030hlc8024578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qucs - Circuit simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170492 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: qucs-0.0.7 :|Review Request: qucs - |Circuit simulator |Circuit simulator CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:43 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030045.l030jgSB024665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: uncrustify- |Review Request: uncrustify - |0.30 - code beautifier |code beautifier ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:45 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166008] Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030048.l030mZRd024826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uw-imap - UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166008 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: uw-imap- |Review Request: uw-imap - UW |2004g-1: UW Server daemons |Server daemons for IMAP and |for IMAP and POP |POP CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-02 19:48 EST ------- Changed summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 00:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030048.l030mtUh024859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-02 19:48 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Issues: 1. Changed to use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT everywhere 2. It's actually dual licensed (Ruby + GPL); no license texts are included in the distribution tarball. I opened a bug upstream to include them. I changed the license field to be the same as the one for ruby - rpmlint doesn't like it, but it's at least consistent now. 3. Changed 4. Good catch - fixed, should now always be /usr/lib/ruby/gems 5. You do need the ruby BR - there's no ruby-devel BR New files uploaded: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygems.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygems-0.9.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 01:03:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030103.l0313IwK025330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-02 20:03 EST ------- Extracting debs now is safe, the file name no longer is predictable. CVS Sync is requested, archiver and thunar-archive-plugin should be in the repo soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 01:05:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030105.l0315LOT025403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 Bug 215792 depends on bug 215645, which changed state. Bug 215645 Summary: Package wgrib seperately? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215645 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 01:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030105.l0315adY025424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-02 20:05 EST ------- 24930 (thunar-archive-plugin): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/24930-thunar-archive-plugin-0.2.2-2.fc7/ Closing. P.S.: Just for the record: running gtk-update-icon-cache really is needed, otherwise you will see stock_broken_image in Thunar's right click menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 01:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030133.l031X9nO027095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-02 20:33 EST ------- Sebastian, have you heard something from Chung-Yen? If not, I'm going to review this package tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 03:02:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030302.l0332Gg1029710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From tmayberr at redhat.com 2007-01-02 22:02 EST ------- I built the alsa-tools package so it would generate the alsa-tools-firmware subpackage aswell as this package on an x86_64 FC6 system. I have a RME hammerfall DSP and with both packages installed the firmware is now loaded successfully when the udev magic happens early in the boot process. It is a little bit of a pity that at least for the RME cards that require firmware 3 separate packages are required to use the card rather than just one alsa-rme-tools package(or whatever) but I'm happy with a working solution, thank you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 03:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030310.l033AHgO030020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 03:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030323.l033NsJk030862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-02 22:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > - Quite a few executable permissions in -debuginfo source files > > This is a complaint with upstream that I've asked them to fix. Is this > > really a problem that I should chmod the source? > > Well, it took you many more keystrokes to ask that question than fixing it would > have taken... :). Why not? Don't we want proper permissions for all installed > files? I'd rather see it fixed upstream. I'll "fix" it if needbe, but this really doesn't hurt anything. > > > - Dubious Cflags in *.pc, should be -I${includedir}/libisofs? > > Upstream issue, I'll ask them to fix it for the next release. > > Unless I'm missing something, I think it should be patched in this package. > Unless of course you prefer waiting for the next upstream release before > continuing the review. As I prefer it to be fixed upstream, I'll either get them to do another release, or at least generate the patch based on an upstream source fix. > > > - Is the libburn dependency really needed in the main package? > > I was told yes, but I'll clarify. > > Looks spurious to me. Nothing is linked against libburn, nor it is dlopened, > and I don't see anything else in libburn that would be a candidate for > explaining the dependency. Caveat: I haven't tried actually using this package > for anything. I should have something more for you tomorrow after discussing with upstream. I'm just playing package monkey here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 04:30:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030430.l034ULR1003642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 seefeld at sympatico.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #144183|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2007-01-02 23:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144682) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144682&action=view) rpm spec file This new spec file addresses most of the points you have been making. I'm not sure about point E. Should I replace the whole %post block with a single line '%post -p /sbin/ldconfig' (And likewise for %postun) ? Where can I find proper documentation for that syntax / command ? Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 06:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 01:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030623.l036NgdD009374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-01-03 01:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > So, once again, I will respectfully object to this package. If this is going to > happen, it will be part of the core firefox package, not as a separate > parallel-installed package. Should things change, news will be posted. I still think we as a project should maintain a solution for our users that want ff2. Telling them to grab ff2 from devel is to risky IMHO. I was wondering if we could ship FF2 in updates-testing for a while, but with firefox beeing a dep of some other packages that is probably to complicated. Life sucks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 08:44:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030844.l038ifhi014572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-01-03 03:44 EST ------- Also add audiofile-devel to BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 08:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030852.l038qH8a015159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 03:52 EST ------- Well, * I cannot install -devel package. -------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# yum -y install prelude-lml-devel Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package prelude-lml-devel.i386 0:0.9.8.1-2.fc7 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.fc7 for package: prelude-lml-devel --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: prelude-lml-0.9.8.1-2.fc7 is needed by package prelude-lml-devel -------------------------------------------------------- For -devel package: -------------------------------------------------------- Requires: libprelude-devel, prelude-lml-%{version}-%{release} -------------------------------------------------------- should be: -------------------------------------------------------- Requires: libprelude-devel, prelude-lml = %{version}-%{release} -------------------------------------------------------- = For iconv issue: ?? I tested mockbuild on FC-devel/6/5, and all succeedes. I cannot figure out why you fail on iconv, however, I guess something wrong happened on your system (rpm -V glibc??) For now I judge that your spec works. = Debug issue is now corrected = I leave the content of -devel package as it is. = Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (prelude-lml) is now APPROVED by me. Now the rest one is prelude-manager (assigned to me), isn't it? I want to review it by tomorrow, however, I am also reviewing other 12 packages (plus also checking 2-3 packages) so it may get a bit late to check prelude-manager... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 08:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030859.l038xFhT015950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 03:59 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 08:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030859.l038xjIx016008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-03 03:59 EST ------- Some remarks: This package is causing me some gripes. 1. undo.h is being installed into /usr/include. 2. undo.h isn't C++-safe (it lacks the extern "C" guards 3. IMO, calling a library "undo", letting it contain symbols being prefixed "undo_*" and letting its headers provide defines such as "UNDO" isn't necessarily a clever design. None of these issues are blockers for inclusion into FE, but at least #1 and #2 are sufficient reason for me not to want "to dive into a formal review", sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 09:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 04:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701030921.l039L0JC018024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-03 04:20 EST ------- ok, -devel requirement is corrected and package is uploaded to the buildsystem. prelude-manager is still open, right, and I have 3 additional packages belonging to the prelude-suite: prewikka, samhain and snort. I will upload these packages the next couple of days. would be great if you could act as a sponsor here as well. If I could help you in any way, let me know. Thanks, Thorsten -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 10:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031055.l03AtO1A026708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 05:55 EST ------- Seemingly okay. I leave this package as the judgment by Paul. One question. What is the .c souce codes included in -devel package? -------------------------------------------------- /usr/include/scigraphica-2.0/scigraphica/algorithms/Axb_core.c /usr/include/scigraphica-2.0/scigraphica/algorithms/lm_core.c -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031120.l03BKtDX028264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-03 06:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Sebastian, have you heard something from Chung-Yen? If not, I'm going to review > this package tomorrow. Sadly, I've heard nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031121.l03BLvj1028319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-03 06:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > What's the status on this review? The thing that was holding it up originally was the license. This has been fixed by a new upstream release (0.67) which states that it's licensed under the same terms as perl itself (i.e. GPL or Artistic). In Comment #21, Robin was going to check whether Bug #73921 and Bug #129724 were still present before going ahead with owning the package in Extras, I have created an updated SRPM for 0.67 that brings the package much more into line with the way perl modules are normally written for Extras. This addresses the directory ownership issue of Bug #73921. I haven't checked the status of Bug #129724 but that looks to me more like an issue for upstream rather than a packaging issue, and I don't think that should block the package from being imported. Updated SRPM: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2-0.67-1.src.rpm Updated Spec: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2.spec Robin, what's the state of play for this package from your point of view? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:30:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031130.l03BUcA8028659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 06:30 EST ------- Well, a Happy new year to everyone. Jarod, it seems that you updated beryl related packages to 0.1.4, so how about this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:31:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031131.l03BVbhp028718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 06:31 EST ------- Seemingly okay (quickly checked), I leave this package as judgment by Paul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:40:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031140.l03Beu0R029024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 06:40 EST ------- ONE NOTE: On current FC-devel, scigraphica (actually libscigraphica) causes segv on exit. However, I suspect that this is due to ORBit2 or gtk2 or something else (strongly suspect ORBit2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 11:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221256] New: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/etswitch/etswitch.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/etswitch/etswitch-0.1.14-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: ETswitch is a *nix 'minimizer' for a few games. Supported games: Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory | Quake III: Arena | QuakeForge | Quake2(Quake2Forge) | DOOM3 | America's Army: Operations | Nexuiz | Scorched 3D | Alien Arena 2006 / GE / UE / 2007 | Cube | Tux Racer | jDoom / jHexen / jHeretic | S.C.O.U.R.G.E | OpenTTD | Trigger | Sauerbraten | GLtron | SuperTux | Pingus | Neverball / Neverputt | UFO2000 | Kobo Deluxe | chromium B.S.U. | Wormux | Warzone 2100 | Secret Maryo Chronicles | Descent 2 This is one of my first packages so I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 12:00:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 07:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031200.l03C0CRr030385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: etswitch - A|Review Request: etswitch - A |*nix 'minimizer' for a few |*nix 'minimizer' for a few |games |games OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 12:33:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 07:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195585] Review Request: tetex-fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031233.l03CXKes032155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195585 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|tetex-fontools |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-03 07:33 EST ------- The component field for package reviews must stay to "Package Review". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 12:54:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 07:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219915] Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031254.l03CsMJk000733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the "resources" protocol for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 13:05:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031305.l03D5j65001332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2007-01-03 08:05 EST ------- lxmusic needs xmms2 (but xmms2 is not included in FE), so I prefer not to include lxmusic lxsession seems not work in FC6 (I have tried it before) So, I think only lxpanel and pcmanfm in Extras is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 13:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031333.l03DX6DA002427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-03 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > lxmusic needs xmms2 (but xmms2 is not included in FE), so I prefer not to include lxmusic Yeah, I already tried to patch it for bmp/audacious, but it was too much work for only a tiny program. > lxsession seems not work in FC6 (I have tried it before) > So, I think only lxpanel and pcmanfm in Extras is enough. So is it ok for you if Sebastian takes over lxpanel? You could submit your pcmanfm package for review then, if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 14:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031435.l03EZ5S7007040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-03 09:34 EST ------- * rpmlint says: E: gocr explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg I posted a comment above asking for that Requires, I guess there is an executable from libjpeg used for conversion. * follow guidelines X License is GPL, not included. You should ask upstream to include the license file, otherwise he may not be able to defend his license. Some file with an author and no license. This should be investigated and certainly corrected upstream. Except from otsu it is the upstream author, so ther shouldn't be much trouble. Maybe the upstream author thinks that no license means public domain, but it is not the case, he should either remove the author notice or explicitly license it in the public domain. otsu.c has no license but an author (in fact 2, as shown by looking at the comments). the following code was send by Ryan Dibble pnm.c has no license but an author /* (c) Joerg Schulenburg 2000-2006 pcx.c and tga.c have no license but an author // Joerg Schulenburg Mai99 // Joerg Schulenburg Mai99 * build and run fine * right Requires and BuildRequires. Maybe a comment explaining the need for the requires could be in order. * %files section right * sane provides * match upstream f989fe8e24f82d19c8ce55df15784e15 gocr-0.43.tar.gz The only remaining blocker is the license issue. A statement from upstream and a promise to fix things for the next release would be enough for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 14:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031435.l03EZGLV007094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-01-03 09:35 EST ------- So you have the packager saying one thing and everyone in the Fedora "community" saying another thing instead of the "community" rallying behind a packager's decision on an issue. So, now people start looking for ways to get around the packager's decision. "Maybe we can have an extras package, or put something into updates-testing, etc." because nobody in the "community" thinks the packager's decision is good enough. Why on earth would anyone want to be a packager in this sort of "community"? Why would I want to continue contributing, after 3 years of Fedora package maintainer and 6 years of upstream mozilla.org work including work on the release team, want to continue contributing to a "community" project where I apparently haven't garnered enough respect to gain "community" backing on a technical, practical, and compatability decision, even if it is a little unpopular? The "we understand your points, but we want it anyway" mentality is getting a little old. Can't we simply tell people Fedora 6 has 1.5, Fedora 7 will have Firefox 2? If the success of FC6 is so dependent on a single package being upgraded, then something is completely off. Yes, I am aware that people want it. That doesn't mean we should bend over backwards to do it. If that were the case, we'd have shipped all sorts of media codecs by now. But we do what's right, not necessarily what's popular. So, how about a little support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 15:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031517.l03FHEAi011669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-03 10:17 EST ------- I have to agree with Christopher on this one... There's nothing so earth-shatteringly cool in FF2 that's worth the pain (and ill will) of shoehorning it into FC6. FF is just too deeply integrated into various bits of the desktop anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 15:29:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031529.l03FT5l9013290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-01-03 10:29 EST ------- I also agree with Christopher, the default FF in FC6 is 1.5 and that is fine with me, if people want to play with with FF 2.0 in FC6, they can get it from the Remi 3. part repository, so let Christopher do real some work on future version of firefox and close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 15:45:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031545.l03Fj7I8014428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-01-03 10:45 EST ------- Yeah, once I get all the 0.1.4 bits pushed for FC6, I plan to start working on this one again. Looks as if it may be a bit of work with seom broken out now (in the long run, it would appear seom needs to be packaged by itself and BR/R by beryl-vidcap). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 15:58:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031558.l03FwlDR015507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-03 10:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > X License is GPL, not included. You should ask upstream to include the > license file, otherwise he may not be able to defend his license. Ooops, sorry it is included. The only issue is with files with author and no license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 16:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031611.l03GBXKK016499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-03 11:11 EST ------- Christopher, I think you're taking this -way- too seriously. Life is too short to get upset about a few comments on bugzilla. You are the maintainer, and you get to say the last word. People may accept it, or cry about it, but it doesn't change the basic fact that, well, you get to say the final word. Either way, there's no reason for you to take it personally - no matter how high the shouting/crying/complaining get. As for me, I'm lurking here for a stable SRPMs. Once its out, I'll do what I did back when FF 1.5 was released and FC4 only had FF 1.0.x - take the -devel SRPM, adapt it, and build it myself. Being a KDE user, I don't risk blowing my DE stack, and if something breaks (and things do break...), I have one man to blame - me. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 16:32:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031632.l03GW9XT018990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-03 11:31 EST ------- I am not sponsored, it is prereview. * rpmlint output: NULL * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * Spec is written in English (probably American) * The spec file for the package is legible. * md5sums are matching (4f924bff0bb4fcded8cb73ff338b8563) * package successfully compiles on i386 * BuildRequires listed well (build succcesfully in mock) * no locales * there does not need to %post and %postun sections * package owns directories probably well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * package consistently use macros * the *.desktop is installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 16:39:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031639.l03Gdlfr019722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-03 11:39 EST ------- I've updated to lazarus-0.9.20. Please review. SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.20-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 16:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031641.l03GfZNU020052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 11:41 EST ------- Why is this bug even being considered when we already have: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2 Which should be good enough for anyone. Can we just close this bug as RIDICULOUS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:15:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031715.l03HF34r023201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Synopsis - |Review Request: synopsis - |Source-code Introspection |Source-code Introspection |Tool |Tool ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 12:15 EST ------- Well, still needs a lot of fixes. Please read the URLs I have already introduced. * Perhaps this package should use python_sitearch, not python_sitelib (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python) * Check Group. In my opinion: main package - Development/Tools devel package - Development/Libraries (rather mandatory) doc - Documentation (rather mandatory) * As I commented above, move all documentation files from /usr/share/doc/Synopsis to /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}. And.. 3 files "README COPYING NEWS" are included in both main package and -doc package (should be only in -main package) * Still Fedora specific compilation flags are not complitely passed. (Using CPPFLAGS as well as CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS seems to work). * Still mockbuild fails. For me, another requirement of "pkgconfig" for BuildRequires seems to work. * Still directory ownership issue is not treated completely. (%{py_sitedir}/Synopsis/Parsers is now owned by any package) Please check if all directories created during installation of synopsis related rpms are owned correctly by packages. * The usage of -p option of %post/%postun is on the section "Shared libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * Would you explain why you create another "-idl" package? "Requires" for main package and -idl package are currently same, so currently creating -idl subpackage creates no benefit. * Rpmlint complains: ------------------------------------------------------------ W: synopsis-devel summary-ended-with-dot The Synopsis development environment. ------------------------------------------------------------ Summary should not end with a dot. Note: when you modify spec file with no "Version" change, please increase "Release" number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031719.l03HJbGm023582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 12:19 EST ------- Christopher, please don't take this as the "community" trying to bypass you... I can't speak for the "community", but I really appreciate all the work you do on firefox, but with the fedora package and working with upstream. Lots of people want 2.0. It sounds like 2.0 has regressions vs 1.5 currently. :( I would have liked to see this as an option in fc6, but I understand that it would be a headache. I hope the regressions can be dealt with and you at some point are able to ship it in fc6 (either as a main firefox upgrade, or as a firefox2 parallel installabe package). So, currently I would be all for closing this request... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:21:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031721.l03HLONl023771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 12:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144720) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144720&action=view) Mock build log of (new) synopsis-0.9-1 Mockbuild log of (new) synopsis-0.9-1 on FC-devel i386. You can see: ----------------------------------------------- 675 checking for suffix of object files... o 676 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes 677 checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes 678 /builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/tests/configure: line 1844: pkg-config: command not found 679 /builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/tests/configure: line 1845: pkg-config: command not found 680 checking for ... /usr/bin/python 681 configure: creating ./config.status 682 config.status: creating QMTest/configuration ------------------------------------------------------- Also: ------------------------------------------------------- 728 make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/build/ctemp.linux-i686/src' 729 generating dependencies for tools/display-symbols.cc 730 /bin/sh -ec 'g++ -M -I . -I /builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src -I /builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src/Synopsis/gc/include /builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.9/src/tools/display-symbols.cc | sed "s,display-symbols\\.o[ :]*,tools/display-symbols\\.d tools/display-symbols\\.o : ,g" > tools/display-symbols.d' ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:24:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031724.l03HOwHZ024187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-01-03 12:24 EST ------- Paul, the new spec file looks great, and I agree that bug #129724 is a bug in the upstream package. My impression is that Chip won't be fixing it anytime soon, so if we're ok with living with it, the package is fine as far as I'm concerned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031731.l03HVSiD025027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-01-03 12:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > Christopher, please don't take this as the "community" trying to bypass you... > I can't speak for the "community", but I really appreciate all the work you do > on firefox, but with the fedora package and working with upstream. +1 > Lots of people want 2.0. Agreed. I even think most people will agree with the "There's nothing [...] earth-shatteringly cool in FF2" after they tried, but they will proably want to try it own their own > I would have liked to see this as an option in fc6, but I understand that it > would be a headache. I hope the regressions can be dealt with and you at some > point are able to ship it in fc6 (either as a main firefox upgrade, or as a > firefox2 parallel installabe package). > > So, currently I would be all for closing this request... +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031733.l03HXsdM025399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(denisl78 at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-03 12:33 EST ------- Now I regard this bug as stalled. Closing as NOTABUG, making this block bug FE-DEADREVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031738.l03HcEYG025726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-03 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Paul, the new spec file looks great, and I agree that bug #129724 is a bug in > the upstream package. My impression is that Chip won't be fixing it anytime > soon, so if we're ok with living with it, the package is fine as far as I'm > concerned. Great stuff. I already approved the package earlier so feel free to import and built it etc. (I assume you're still happy to own this package?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031740.l03He2Wr025827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-03 12:39 EST ------- Review: * rpmlint is quiet (and that's good ;-)) * I have no objection to names of package and spec file * sources match upstream (md5: ffc0b653e5e2985113262a5299ebe69b) * package is licensed under PHP open-source compatible license which is properly mentioned in License field and included in %doc * no problems with building on fc6/x86_64 * package isn't designed to be relocatable * %post and %postun are present (like in a template) * package meets every Guidelines it should * everything looks very similar to a php-pear spec template and everything is good :) There's even no need to set a FE-REVIEW blocker. Me and everything else can say that: ___________ < Approved! > ----------- \ ,__, \ (oo)____ (__) )\ ||--|| * -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221108] Review Request: openarena - first person shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031743.l03Hhow4026247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Alias: openarena https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221108 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |openarena -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 17:45:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031745.l03HjFHU026546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |171543 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 12:45 EST ------- Reblocking bug #171543 even though twisted-core and web are in FC6, it was agreed that we wait until all python-twisted packages are in FC6 before branching to provide the smothest upgrade path possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031804.l03I4VQJ028570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 13:04 EST ------- - Imported into CVS - Entry added to owners.list - Tagged and Built on devel - FC-5/6 branch request made Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031828.l03ISoCN031172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 13:28 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Canvas-0.3.0-3.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 03 2007 Christopher Stone 0.3.0-3 - No longer remove PDF.php file - Add README.Fedora file exlaining requirements for PDF.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:31:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031831.l03IVlw5031338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-01-03 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Suggest calling the binary 'kvm' instead of qemu-kvm, and adding a softlink to > the qemu manual page. Not calling the binary kvm due to potential confusion with the little kvm wrapper script in the tarball; although I'm somewhat interested in getting the script a little bit more suitable so that I can just include it. But I'll do that via kvm-devel > Alternatively, merge it to the qemu package. That's perhaps a little > premature at this moment. Yeah, seems a little early still. Once everything is upstream, I'll be more than glad to have qemu obsolete this (although if there are some useful tools around using qemu+kvm, then maybe this just becomes the tools package :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031833.l03IXPqD031474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-01-03 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Mock build failed. Apparently, I can't type/save files when I'm actually done with them... http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm-7-4.src.rpm and http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/kvm/kvm.spec updated. For real this time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031834.l03IYgIY031719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 13:34 EST ------- oops this bit got cut off from changelog paste above: - No longer own Image directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221307] New: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221307 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-lore-0.2.0-4.fc6/python-twisted-lore.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-lore-0.2.0-4.fc6/python-twisted-lore-0.2.0-4.fc6.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Lore is a complete documentation system based on XHTML and can generate documentation into other formats such as PDF, HTML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] New: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-mail-0.3.0-4.fc6/python-twisted-mail.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-mail-0.3.0-4.fc6/python-twisted-mail-0.3.0-4.fc6.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted Mail contains high-level, efficient protocol implementations for both clients and servers of SMTP, POP3, and IMAP4. Additionally, it contains an "out of the box" combination SMTP/POP3 virtual-hosting mail server. Also included is a read/write Maildir implementation and a basic Mail Exchange calculator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] New: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-news-0.2.0-3.fc6/python-twisted-news.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-news-0.2.0-3.fc6/python-twisted-news-0.2.0-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted News is an NNTP protocol (Usenet) programming library. The library contains server and client protocol implementations. A simple NNTP server is also provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:53:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] New: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event- based framework for internet applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-2.4.0-2.fc6/python-twisted.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-6-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-2.4.0-2.fc6/python-twisted-2.4.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. It includes a web server, a telnet server, a chat server, a news server, a generic client and server for remote object access, and APIs for creating new protocols and services. Twisted supports integration of the Tk, GTK+, Qt or wxPython event loop with its main event loop. The Win32 event loop is also supported, as is basic support for running servers on top of Jython. Installing this package brings all Twisted sub-packages into your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031856.l03IuGdO001668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org 2007-01-03 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > Why is this bug even being considered when we already have: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2 I can't access that page for some reason - anyway, just make sure the RPMs made by Gawain Lynch are mentioned on that page and then, yes, this bug report might become a little bit redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031859.l03IxjeB002488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031859.l03Ixv4w002522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 18:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031859.l03IxwXd002534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:00:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221307] Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031900.l03J0hWr002731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221307 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:00:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031900.l03J0cR1002702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:00:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031900.l03J0sM0002788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J11HN002826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J13uJ002848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1FCK002919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1Gvs002942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1IHv002994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1J3R003022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1J00003031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031901.l03J1IOc003002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031914.l03JEk51004521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-01-03 14:14 EST ------- Next problem... Without the core sounds, an attempt to use blind transfer disconnects the call. [Jan 3 12:02:06] WARNING[7091]: file.c:553 ast_openstream_full: File pbx-transfer does not exist in any format [Jan 3 12:02:06] WARNING[7091]: file.c:805 ast_streamfile: Unable to open pbx-transfer (format 0x8 (alaw)): No such file or directory == Spawn extension (remote, s, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' If we can't freely redistribute the core sounds, should the package maybe include an easy way to download them? (Or is the license on the sounds free enough that they can be distributed in a separate package?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031925.l03JPVTY005421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 19:34:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701031934.l03JYWeP006190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-03 14:34 EST ------- Hmmm yeah, I keep forgetting about the sounds... I don't think that the sounds free enough to be included in Fedora, because ISTR that they place restrictions on using the sounds with anything but Asterisk. I wasn't able to find the exact wording of the licensing though. They also don't include the "source" (the high-quality masters) but that may or may not be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 20:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032026.l03KQaar012196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-03 15:26 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.4-1.src.rpm New upstream tarball (emailed to me, they haven't posted it on their website yet, I"ll wait for that before importing/building). This should resolve the remaining issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 20:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032027.l03KRxcX012302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From dustinratliffe at gmail.com 2007-01-03 15:27 EST ------- Chris, I just noticed http://christopher.aillon.org/blog/dev/mozilla/20061204-linux-alliance.html and http://steelgryphon.com/blog/?p=96 linked off of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2 That's great news! Thank you for your efforts in getting better linux support upstream. Please keep us informed of progress on this front in your blog or on the wiki. Your documenting of firefox integration issues are important and will help spur collaboration in solving them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 20:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032052.l03KqRus013814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-03 15:52 EST ------- Upstream comments in http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtkusers/2007-January/088901.html > In VTK, the only code that is patented is the mpeg2 encoder. All the > other patented algorithms were either replaced or their patents > expired. The inclusion of mpeg2 in VTK is an oversight. We will make > it an external dependency in the next patch of VTK 5. I would suggest > waiting until then to include VTK in a distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 20:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032052.l03KqcaC013843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-03 15:52 EST ------- OpenPBX sounds are OK though -- can we use those? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 21:05:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032105.l03L5A8X014577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-03 16:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #80) > OpenPBX sounds are OK though -- can we use those? The majority of the OpenPBX and Asterisk sounds probably still use the same script (except for "OpenPBX" being substituted for "Asterisk" of course). How annoying those differences between the scripts would take some experimentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 21:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221108] Review Request: openarena - first person shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032111.l03LBefA015067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Alias: openarena https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221108 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-03 16:11 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: openarena-data no-documentation permissible although I usually suggest atleast placing the license file in the sub-package. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license field matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file legible although I would suggest a little extra whitespace in a couple places to make parsing the spec file easier. - sources match upstream 0c2c27456a11331d61448278a1e9aaad /home/chris/oa060.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries stored in ldconfig default path - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by default packages - no duplicates listed in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - package contains code - no large documentation files - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - add %doc doc/COPYING to data subpackage - remove LINUXNOTES from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 21:28:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032128.l03LSqYj016686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-03 16:28 EST ------- Trying to rebuild on devel the tests failed: t/GstRegistry...........ok 1/21undef is not of type GStreamer::PluginFeature at t/GstRegistry.t line 22. # Looks like you planned 21 tests but only ran 3. # Looks like your test died just after 3. t/GstRegistry...........dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 4-21 Failed 18/21 tests, 14.29% okay gstreamer-0.10.11-1.fc7 gstreamer-devel-0.10.11-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 23:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032327.l03NRveC025053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-03 18:27 EST ------- Sorry, I'll have some time to look at it on Friday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 23:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] New: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/doodle/doodle.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/doodle/doodle-0.6.6-1.src.rpm Description: Doodle is a tool to quickly search the documents on a computer. Doodle builds an index using meta-data contained in the documents and allows fast searches on the resulting database. Doodle uses libextractor to support obtaining meta-data from various file-formats. The database used by doodle is a suffix tree, resulting in fast lookups. Doodle supports approximate searches. Two things to reviewers: 1. I had to comment _smp_mflags, because when this flag is ON, the rpm does not build. I sent mail to author of this program. 2. To build doodle need libextractor-devel. This is not in fedora-extras, but the Review request is bug #214087 I am not sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 23:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032348.l03NmUIh026238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221349 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 23:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032348.l03NmRVj026202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214087 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 3 23:50:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701032350.l03NoW1G026280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 gawain.lynch at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2007-01-03 18:50 EST ------- Wow! In the world of open source things tend to happen because people have an itch they want to scratch. That is what happened here. I figured out a way to build this in parallel and posted some details to -devel for others who should know the risks and wanted to do it themselves. Period! I was asked by many people to put a package up and that is what I did. I never meant to cause anyone grief and the reaction to this bug says that obviously one should not have ever tried. Chris, I am truly sorry. Bug closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 00:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:13:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040013.l040DUft027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 19:13 EST ------- Yeah, that does seem suboptimal... Is it enough to keep the package from being published though? Perhaps you should push this version to devel and keep trying to get upstream to fix the issue? Did you ask about this on the upstream mailing list? Sourceforge seems broken here and I can't view the mailling list archives for this project. They do have an issue tracker, perhaps it would be good to file a bug/enhancement request there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 00:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040027.l040RJjT027739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-03 19:26 EST ------- I asked on the mailing list. In fact the maintainer isn't very interested in maintaining ivman anymore, so I think it is better to wait before building. Moreover I have modified locally what is in fedora cvs to mount synchronously, and also I have updated to 0.6.13 (2 patches are upstreamed), but I still would like to wait for things to settle down upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 01:19:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040119.l041J4s7029679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 20:19 EST ------- 1. ok. 2. ok. Yeah, it's really not possible to tell currently what the license is based on just looking at the package as shipped. ;( Do you know when they might address this? I hate to approve and ship the package without a known for sure license. I wish they would have at least said in the package that the license was ruby/GPL, but they didn't. 3. ok. 4. ok, looks good here. 5. ah, ok. Not sure why I was thinking that there was one. So the blocker I see left is including the license... do you think that will occur pretty soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 01:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040147.l041lDjH030640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-01-03 20:47 EST ------- As promised the latest version is now there: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-1.2.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Could I have a feedback on this one please ? I also have the mindi-busybox package to consider: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-1.fc5.src.rpm I tried to fix the problems reported in this report. Let me know what the staus could be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 01:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040154.l041sW1a030902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-01-03 20:54 EST ------- So a new version of mondo is available and I hope it will meet Fedora Extra requirements. ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/5/mondo-2.2.1-1.fc5.src.rpm TIA for your feedback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 03:06:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040306.l0436QXH000679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-01-03 22:06 EST ------- Hi Neal, I don't mean to be picky but packages that are successfully built and pushed: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=24978 should (please) be closed as NEXTRELEASE (not UPSTREAM). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 03:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040318.l043Indt001334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-01-03 22:18 EST ------- Hi Axel, thank you for your persistence and for the update! I'll be glad to review the next version (mentioned above) as soon as its ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 03:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040327.l043RumT001786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 22:27 EST ------- There is a policy to deal with this sort of thing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews Consider this to indicate that the review is stalled and that a response is needed soon. If there is no response in 1 week, we will move this back to NEW and someone else can review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 03:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040358.l043wuch003697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 22:58 EST ------- Hey Michael. First one general query: You are upstream for this package, do you intend to only maintain this one package in fedora, or are you planning on submitting more. If you are just seeking to make sure this is in fedora, perhaps someone who is already a maintainer might step up to do so. This would save you having to go through the sponsorship process and also take a task off your hands if you don't want to do it. ;) If you do have additional packages you want to maintain, you might submit them as well. Multiple submissions and/or adding review comments to other packages helps sponsors see that you know the guidelines and are ready to be sponsored. That said, here are some general comments/suggestions on this package: - You might use the %{?dist} tag. This is very handy when you push the same version of a package to multiple releases, so upgrades are still smooth. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - Build on x86_64 doesn't work. The build process ends with: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/ecryptfs-utils-8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ecryptfs It looks like the package is installing /usr/lib/ecryptfs on x86_64, when it should be installing in /usr/lib64/ecryptfs. If you need a x86_64 test machine, I have one handy and would be happy to provide you an account on it. - When going through a review, do add a changelog entry to your spec file and increment the version for each change. That helps reviewers see that items were addressed and when. There shouldn't be a need to increase the version upstream unless there were changes to the upstream package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040419.l044J9gP004971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-03 23:19 EST ------- More devel x86_64 build error fun: + cd lazarus + fpcmake Processing Makefile.fpc Error: Target "linux", package "rtl" not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040425.l044P3GC005372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 23:25 EST ------- In an effort to get these subpackages all reviewed and pushed in, I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:28:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040428.l044SN77005667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 23:28 EST ------- In an effort to get these subpackages all reviewed and pushed in, I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040445.l044jomj006878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-03 23:45 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream sha1sum/md5sum: 56f65ebb7c35a6efcaf4983af7e015dfb7ab9eac TwistedMail-0.3.0.tar.bz2 56f65ebb7c35a6efcaf4983af7e015dfb7ab9eac TwistedMail-0.3.0.tar.bz2.1 33667938b399ee5513c59b5d4087294b TwistedMail-0.3.0.tar.bz2 33667938b399ee5513c59b5d4087294b TwistedMail-0.3.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs (i386/x86_64) OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-mail no-binary (which can be ignored. This package has to be arch since the entire twisted stack must be due to python-twisted core being so). I don't see any blockers here... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] New: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: This is a C++ library that aims to be a good alternative to all the other BitTorrent implementations around. It is a library and not a full featured client, although it comes with a working example client. Its main goals are to be very efficient (in terms of CPU and memory usage) as well as being very easy to use both as a user and developer. A quick comment on the naming: There is already a separate libtorrent package in Extras, but this is a different project entirely, and I must use a separate name from the one already in Extras. I looked into it a bit more deeply, and other distributions such as Gentoo and Arch us "rb_libtorrent"; hence I chose the same name to follow suit and keep consistent with them. This is being packaged as an indirect dependency for the Deluge BitTorrent client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 04:50:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040450.l044opMp007251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-03 23:50 EST ------- [ Adding David to the CC list at his request. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040504.l0454LNb007814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-04 00:04 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 62a93645867bacad4a4ca4d45e9ce090 TwistedNews-0.2.0.tar.bz2 62a93645867bacad4a4ca4d45e9ce090 TwistedNews-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 b20aefb6002b6810361163b90f6d7a59ec9383ff TwistedNews-0.2.0.tar.bz2 b20aefb6002b6810361163b90f6d7a59ec9383ff TwistedNews-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK(i386/x86_64) - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-news no-binary Can be ignored in this case. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:21:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221307] Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040521.l045LoVa008207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221307 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-04 00:21 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 213569a86fc3d8558605e2847e6378b0 TwistedLore-0.2.0.tar.bz2 213569a86fc3d8558605e2847e6378b0 TwistedLore-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 e4a7eb4132388a211eaa5b559b60f00005916226 TwistedLore-0.2.0.tar.bz2 e4a7eb4132388a211eaa5b559b60f00005916226 TwistedLore-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: E: python-twisted-lore no-binary Can be ignored. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040534.l045Yj8m008615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-04 00:34 EST ------- Not sure this needs a formal review, but I can do so if need be. Questions/Issues: 1. What are these for? upstream/old packages? Obsoletes: %{origname} <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: %{origname} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: twisted <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: twisted = %{version}-%{release} 2. Should both of those Obsoletes be just "<" and not "<=" ? Surely you don't want to obsolete the very version you are providing? 3. Note that the old python-twisted package has: Obsoletes: python-Twisted < 1.3.0 Provides: python-Twisted = %{version}-%{release} Should that be carried forward? Can any Obsolete/Provides/Metapackage savvy folks look this over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] New: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains Python bindings for the rb_libtorrent library, allowing one to write full-featured applications in Python that use rb_libtorrent. This is being packaged as a dependency of the Deluge BitTorrent client, and requires rb_libtorrent (in review, bug #221372) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040548.l045mLER009037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net BugsThisDependsOn| |221372 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 00:48 EST ------- [ Adding David to the CC list at his request; and blocking the rb_libtorrent review requst bug (since that is required as a build dependency). ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 05:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 00:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040548.l045mW5E009051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221376 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 09:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040950.l049okYR023268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 09:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040950.l049on34023285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Bug 221310 depends on bug 216104, which changed state. Bug 216104 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 09:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040952.l049qZLj023441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 09:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 04:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701040952.l049qkME023469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Bug 221310 depends on bug 216106, which changed state. Bug 216106 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 10:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 05:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041047.l04Ala0R027232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frank-buettner at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-01-04 05:47 EST ------- Are any plains when it will be added to the repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 12:05:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041205.l04C5lfs031023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-01-04 07:05 EST ------- Yes, that was unintentional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 12:24:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041224.l04COtDf032000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-04 07:24 EST ------- oh well... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 15:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] New: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac-0.6.0-2.cvs20070104.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Dirac is an open source video codec Additional info: - rpmbuild -ba > log: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac.log - rpmlint is silent with both source and binaries. - never tried with mock... - libdirac-4.3.so has a SONAME Asking the developper (of dirac) for to support this review... Please also note that i need to be sponsored! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 15:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041515.l04FFsbU010109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libdirac - |Review Request: libdirac - |Dirac is an open source |Dirac is an open source |video codec |video codec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 16:53:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041653.l04Grh38021141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-01-04 11:53 EST ------- In response to comment 1: Re #1: That binary indeed needs to be statically linked because that is what is needed when transitioning from initramfs to the rootfs. It's no different than nash. Re #2: Please clarify; I'm not sure what "Parallel build" means Re #3: Will look up BuildRoot tag in FE guidelines and fix. In response to comment 2: Will probably be ExclusiveArch: i386 initially; am planning to add x86-64 support real soon. And at some point also ppc support. It's just not trivial to support other arches due to the very nature of Thanks a bunch for the comments so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041707.l04H7AhD022932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 ------- Additional Comments From ofeeley at yahoo.com 2007-01-04 12:07 EST ------- Apologies if this is the wrong place to report it but "yum localinstall mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm" seems not to be signed: # yum localinstall downloads/mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Local Package Process Examining downloads/mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm: mugshot - 1.1.30-1.fc5.i386 Marking downloads/mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm to be installed Setting up repositories livna [1/5] livna 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 core [2/5] core 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates [3/5] updates 100% |=========================| 1.2 kB 00:00 freshrpms [4/5] freshrpms 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 extras [5/5] extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package mugshot.i386 0:1.1.30-1.fc5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: loudmouth >= 1.0.3-3 for package: mugshot --> Processing Dependency: libloudmouth-1.so.0 for package: mugshot --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for loudmouth to pack into transaction set. loudmouth-1.0.3-3.fc5.i38 100% |=========================| 4.3 kB 00:00 ---> Package loudmouth.i386 0:1.0.3-3.fc5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: mugshot i386 1.1.30-1.fc5 downloads/mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm 1.1 M Installing for dependencies: loudmouth i386 1.0.3-3.fc5 extras 53 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 1.2 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/1): loudmouth-1.0.3-3. 100% |=========================| 53 kB 00:00 Package mugshot-1.1.30-1.fc5.i386.rpm is not signed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:08:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041708.l04H8iuO023157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-01-04 12:08 EST ------- The way this is going to work is that any package (for example a live CD installer or 3rd party live CD definition files) can drop configuration files in /etc/livecd. As such, there might not be a clear dep chain. Also, for Xen liveOS flavors one might instead install fedora-livecd-xen (that Provides: fedora-livecd) and fedora-livecd-desktop and then you don't have that dep chain. So I'd prefer each package to own the directory /etc/livecd. I *think* our guidelines allow for this so is it OK to import the SRPM as is? Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:10:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041710.l04HAnso023554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-01-04 12:10 EST ------- I'm not a sponsor, but I can do a non-binding review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:11:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041711.l04HBCjw023625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-01-04 12:11 EST ------- I'm not a sponsor, but I can do a non-binding review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041713.l04HDY6h023928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 otaylor at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ofeeley at yahoo.com ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2007-01-04 12:13 EST ------- Yes... getting a recognized signature on the Mugshot RPM is one of the main reasons we want to build the Mugshot Fedora packages in fedora-extras. Along with building for all architectures. We could sign the packages we build currently with a "Mugshot" GPG key, but there really wouldn't be a lot of point to that, since nobody would have that key on their system. So once this review request clears the situation will be better (it's currently blocking on some licensing details that we should have resolved soon.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041718.l04HIEFO024459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-04 12:18 EST ------- Well, for 0.9.7.1-1: * For Requires/BuildRequires - libpreludedb-devel requires libprelude-devel, so writing both "libpreludedb-devel libprelude-devel" is redundant. - gnutls-devel is required by libprelude-devel - Why does -devel package require libtool? * Scriptlets - For initscript treatment Please add the proper Requires(post), etc. according to "Services" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets . - And, if you don't want to do "condrestart" on %postun, please explain why (in some cases, condrestart treatment is unwilling) * Directory ownership issue - /usr/share/prelude-manager/ is not owned by any package. * Encoding -------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text -------------------------------------------------- * Debuginfo issue -------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/prelude-manager extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/fi lters/idmef-criteria.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/reports/db.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/reports/xmlmod.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/reports/textmod.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/reports/debug.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/reports/relaying.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/prelude-manager/decodes/normalize.so cpio: prelude-manager-0.9.7.1/src/.libs/prelude-managerS.c: No such file or directory 594 blocks ---------------------------------------------------- Perhaps modifying ltmain.sh as prelude-lml works? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 17:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041745.l04Hjr9V027893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-01-04 12:45 EST ------- fedora-livecd-desktop Requires: fedora-livecd-gnome fedora-livecd-gnome Requires: fedora-livecd Seems like a very clear dep chain to me. Only fedora-livecd should own the directory, no need for the subpackages to do it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:02:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041802.l04I2LdI029089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-04 13:02 EST ------- Well, actually I requested doodle. Then: Your package does not provide doodled (i.e. rebuilding your srpm does not create /usr/bin/doodled). The homepage (1) says that doodled requires fam, which is replaced by gamin. The spec file provided by dag.wieers.com (2) seems that doodled can be used with the help of gamin, so please modify your spec file to use gamin so that doodled can be used. Also, accroding to "Hints for system administrators" on the homepage doodled can be run as a daemon. In this case, providing initscript service scripts (usually under /etc/rc.d/init.d ) is recommended. Would you provide it? 1. http://gnunet.org/doodle/ 2. http://dag.wieers.com/packages/doodle/doodle.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041808.l04I86VR029343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-01-04 13:08 EST ------- Consider that an upcoming livecd-tools-installer package will also put files there and this package can be installed without having any fedora-livecd* packages installed. (actually this makes sense; you will be able to install the livecd-tools-installer package and use an existing system to install an .iso file to e.g. a USB hard disk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041812.l04ICNvK029833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-01-04 13:12 EST ------- To clarify comment 4, my question is should the livecd-tools-installer also own the /etc/livecd directory even though it *might* be installed at the same time as fedora-livecd (sometimes it might, sometimes not). I guess that would work I guess I'm fine with just having fedora-livecd owning /etc/livecd; we can always fix up things later if there are side effects. OK to import with this change? Or are there other issues? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:18:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041818.l04IIrEK030555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-04 13:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144826) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144826&action=view) Mock build log of doodle-0.6.6-1 Mockbuild log of doodle-0.6.6-1 on FC-devel i386. You can see that /usr/bin/doodled is not installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041822.l04IMoVT030967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-04 13:22 EST ------- It also happens on i386, I discovered. The problem is that I re-create the makefile so that it's installs in /ust/lib, but that fails. I'll investigate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041825.l04IPD1K031243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-04 13:25 EST ------- Some initial remarks: - Don't build the static libs (Append --disable-static to %configure). - Don't run the autotools as part of building. Autotool-generated files should be part of the source code. (Running the autotools as part of building exposes a package to subtile incompatiblities between different versions of the autotools. In fact, this package really suffers from some (however minor) issues). - The package doesn't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS correctly: It plays dirty games on CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS (E.g. it must not append -O3 and -mmx). - The *-devel subpackage ships a *.pc. Therefore it must Requires: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:31:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041831.l04IVKsT031636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-04 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > To clarify comment 4, my question is should the livecd-tools-installer also own > the /etc/livecd directory even though it *might* be installed at the same time > as fedora-livecd (sometimes it might, sometimes not). I guess that would work > > I guess I'm fine with just having fedora-livecd owning /etc/livecd; we can > always fix up things later if there are side effects. Standard soapbox answer to such kind of questions: - If several packages share a common directory, and if they depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, then letting the "root package" own this dir is sufficient. - If they don't depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, all of the packages must own this directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195292] Review Request: Openbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041850.l04IofG8001516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Openbox Alias: openbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195292 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |openbox -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041852.l04Iq6kN001617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |rb_libtorrent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041852.l04Iq8b2001660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes Alias: scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |scribes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041855.l04It4K7001881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-libtorrent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211256] Review Request: viaideinfo - Displays information on connected VIA IDE controllers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041859.l04IxO9i002297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viaideinfo - Displays information on connected VIA IDE controllers Alias: viaideinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211256 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |viaideinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041859.l04IxSSm002315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME Alias: labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |labyrinth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 18:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211242] Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the Scribes text editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041859.l04IxX9I002325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the Scribes text editor Alias: scribes-templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211242 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |scribes-templates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 19:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041903.l04J31Ub002784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |obconf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 19:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195871] Review Request: obmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041904.l04J4C8s002995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obmenu Alias: obmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195871 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |obmenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 19:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041920.l04JKKoV005305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 14:20 EST ------- A couple of comments (with full review coming later tonight when I get home from work): The gcc-c++ and /usr/bin/getopt (part of the util-linux package) BuildRequires are not nessary, as they are part of the standard build root (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions for more information). Your BuildRoot tag is incorrect. It should be "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" as specified in the guidelines. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 for more information.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 19:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-common-muse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701041946.l04JkIOK008616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: emacs-muse |Review Request: emacs- | |common-muse ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-04 14:46 EST ------- Change summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 20:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042002.l04K2ujD011038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-01-04 15:02 EST ------- So, in response to comment 6, and because of the fact that I'll have a new package soon that will drop files in /etc/livecd (that will not depend on other such packages) .... it seems like all packages dropping files in /etc/livecd should own the directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 20:06:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042006.l04K6G9A011764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-04 15:06 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing this! Please note that to build this package you need to build three other packages submitted (see the blocking bugs). If you would review them as well, that would be great! o buildroot: The wording in the guidelines is the `preferred' one, and it has been discussed that we should skip or change that. In any case that should not be a blocker. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00167.html o `redundant' BRs: They do not hurt and are also tagged as `not needed', not `forbidden'. Especially gcc-c++/libstdc++ could be removed from future minimal roots for an easy gain of space. It's already been removed in other buildsystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 20:18:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042018.l04KITrx014324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-04 15:18 EST ------- The release 3 will come soon... 1- OK for now (but if a program need to link with the static version?) (.la and .a removed from the package) 2- KO - Don't know how to do since ./configure will not be found. 3- OK 4- OK (5)- I've also add some BR (mock tries!) (6)- doxygen -u when required! I wonder these message: (install step) libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /usr/lib64' Should i do it do it myself ? (libtool is now in BR!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 20:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174268] Review Request: iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042046.l04KkB5v017647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174268 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: itcl- |Review Request: iwidgets - |iwidgets - object oriented |object oriented megawidgets |megawidgets for Tcl |for Tcl ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-04 15:45 EST ------- Changing summary for tracking purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042108.l04L8v3B019570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:10:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042110.l04LA2eY019660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 16:09 EST ------- I'll review this when I get home from work tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042110.l04LABD3019702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 16:10 EST ------- I'll review this when I get home from work tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:10:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042110.l04LARIe019739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:14:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042114.l04LEsoM020231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-04 16:14 EST ------- Could you retry with this version? SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.20-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 21:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042117.l04LHWtB020479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(konradr at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-01-04 16:17 EST ------- Hey Paul, Thanks for pinging me. Here are the updates. SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPMS URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-12.src.rpm I was not entirely sure what you meant by permissions. The header files are 644. Should they be 755? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 22:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042229.l04MTrWk026673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-04 17:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, actually I requested doodle. Then: > > Your package does not provide doodled (i.e. rebuilding your > srpm does not create /usr/bin/doodled). The homepage (1) says > that doodled requires fam, which is replaced by gamin. > The spec file provided by dag.wieers.com (2) seems that > doodled can be used with the help of gamin, so please > modify your spec file to use gamin so that doodled can be used. > Fixed > Also, accroding to "Hints for system administrators" on the homepage > doodled can be run as a daemon. In this case, providing > initscript service scripts (usually under /etc/rc.d/init.d ) > is recommended. Would you provide it? > > 1. http://gnunet.org/doodle/ > 2. http://dag.wieers.com/packages/doodle/doodle.spec The initscript is a problem. The doodled need argument which directory it monitors and the doodled can be run more then once in the same time. The doodled in initscript can be run with argument i.e. "/home", but the progam is limited to monitoring less than 1024 directories for changes, so the "/home" sometimes can be too big. I think it must be discussed. New files: Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/doodle/doodle.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/doodle/doodle-0.6.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 22:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042238.l04Mc2LJ027092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-04 17:37 EST ------- Release 3: Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac-0.6.0-3.cvs20070104.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Dirac is an open source video codec Build Log: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac.log 2 - OK understood, the bootstrap in included in the diract-snapshoot.sh (but should it use direct url to download the package with next snapshoot? for exemple on my website? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 22:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042258.l04MwgIa029191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From jwhiter at redhat.com 2007-01-04 17:58 EST ------- Ok i uploaded a new -2 package with the changelog updated and such. SPEC: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec SRPM: http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany-0.10-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 4 23:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177881] Review Request: lucidlife In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701042341.l04NfYR7001417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lucidlife Alias: lucidlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177881 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |lucidlife -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 00:58:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050058.l050w53q004193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-04 19:58 EST ------- issues are fixed now. updated packages: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 01:28:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050128.l051SMCM005377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-04 20:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Could you retry with this version? > > SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.20-2.src.rpm Same error as comment 19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 02:13:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050213.l052DDLg006716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 21:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Thanks for reviewing this! Please note that to build this package you need to > build three other packages submitted (see the blocking bugs). If you would > review them as well, that would be great! I'll take care of those ones as well. :] > o buildroot: The wording in the guidelines is the `preferred' one, and it has > been discussed that we should skip or change that. In any case that should not > be a blocker. > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-July/msg00167.html It was "discussed"; but no conclusion in that thread (or any similar that I can find via a brief Google search) has arisen. The consensus (with which I agree) is that using a terser BuildRoot breaks multi-user build environments and causes more trouble than it's worth. Until rpm-build (or whatever ends up carrying it) defaults to a sane buildroot (at which point we can stop putting them in our spec files entirely), we should keep what is in the Guidelines; and doing otherwise is therefore a blocker. Please fix that (in the other ones you're packaging too). Thank you. > o `redundant' BRs: They do not hurt and are also tagged as `not needed', not > `forbidden'. Especially gcc-c++/libstdc++ could be removed from future minimal > roots for an easy gain of space. It's already been removed in other > buildsystems. Understood. Thanks for the explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050312.l053CVsc008461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-04 22:12 EST ------- I disagree that there was a consensus in the way you interprete it. :) There was only one member that insisted on turning the current buildroot recommendation to a mandatory item, while the rest was convinced that the "preferred buildroot" isn't really a good one as it breaks multi-arch builds, which is a far more common case than multi-user builds (Note: We are always talking of the same package with the same nevr!!!). To quote: The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker." > we should keep what is in the Guidelines; and doing otherwise is therefore a > blocker This is not a MUST item, so this can't block the package. And if you still think strongly about it you can and should revive the discussion on fedora-packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:32:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050332.l053W1j8009752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-04 22:31 EST ------- Peter, BuildRoot is a should/recommended/preferred item (not MUST) in the Guidelines. If you're going to be inflexible here, please withdraw yourself as reviewer, and let someone else do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050346.l053keP4010727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|peter at thecodergeek.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > we should keep what is in the Guidelines; and doing otherwise is therefore a > > blocker > > This is not a MUST item, so this can't block the package. And if you still think > strongly about it you can and should revive the discussion on fedora-packaging. (In reply to comment #14) > Peter, BuildRoot is a should/recommended/preferred item (not MUST) in the > Guidelines. If you're going to be inflexible here, please withdraw yourself > as reviewer, and let someone else do it. Actually, it *is* a MUST item. The ReviewGuidelines explicitly state: "MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines." Part of the packaging guidelines is this BuildRoot determination. Though it is only a highly recommended value when the usage of "preferred" is literally taken; it is the spirit of the guidelines that makes this a requirement IMHO. The guidelines are there to ensure that packages going into Fedora all meet the same level of high quality assurance standards. While it is understandable that there are those packages which cannot meet specific guidelines for valid reasons, making the tag more terse than it already is is not one of them to me. (No disrespect intended, but how hard is it, really, to copy and paste the "BuildRoot: ..." line from the Guidelines wiki page? ^_^) If the Guidelines mean otherwise, why does it not mention any proper alternative? We seem to be in much disagreement about this, having reached somewhat of an impasse on these terms. I'm afraid I am therefore unable, in good conscience, review your submitted packages. Unfortunately, from a cursory glance at the .spec and rpmlint, this appears to be the only major issue that I can spot. Take care. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:49:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050349.l053nLLg010933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|peter at thecodergeek.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 22:49 EST ------- [ Withdrawing myself as reviewer of this package due to BuildRoot disagreements. See bug #220888 comment 15 for information. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050351.l053pv6H011105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|peter at thecodergeek.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 22:51 EST ------- [ Withdrawing myself as reviewer of this package due to BuildRoot disagreements. See bug #220888 comment 15 for information. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 03:53:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050353.l053rZhZ011275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|peter at thecodergeek.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 22:53 EST ------- [ Withdrawing myself as reviewer of this package due to BuildRoot disagreements. See bug #220888 comment 15 for information. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 04:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050420.l054KMe9013597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-04 23:20 EST ------- I'm sorry that you feel so strongly about that that you had to drop three (!!!) reviews. What you consider a blocker is far from being one, both technically from a specification POV (because a mandatory following of the guidelines that designate a "preferred" buildroot explicitely does not make that unique and leaves room for many other buildroots) as well from a semantically POV since the implied brokenness wrt to multi-users is smaller than the one wrt multi-arch as present in the "preferred" buildroot (while both are almost neglidgible corner-cases anyway). > No disrespect intended, but how hard is it, really, to copy and paste the > "BuildRoot: ..." line from the Guidelines wiki page? ^_^) Rephrasing the above: How hard is it, really, to simply let the current BuildRoot pass? Anyway I think fakeroot is a useful package and it will probably find another reviewer. Still thanks for trying to do the review in the first place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 04:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050450.l054oUXA016561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-04 23:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > What you consider a blocker is far from being one, both technically > from a specification POV (because a mandatory following of the guidelines that > designate a "preferred" buildroot explicitely does not make that unique and > leaves room for many other buildroots) [...] The whole purpose of guidelines and QA rules in this manner is to ensure that all potential packages conform to them for the benefit of all (or don't if there is good and valid reason not to do so). > [...] as well from a semantically POV since the > implied brokenness wrt to multi-users is smaller than the one wrt multi-arch as > present in the "preferred" buildroot (while both are almost neglidgible > corner-cases anyway). The way you have your BuildRoot setup, though, adds this multi-users brokenness to the already existent multi-arch breakage that could occur. If it in fact fixed it but still differed from what the Guidelines show, then I would definitely not consider it a blocker; and post an RFC for this to the relevant mailing list(s). > > No disrespect intended, but how hard is it, really, to copy and paste the > > "BuildRoot: ..." line from the Guidelines wiki page? ^_^) > > Rephrasing the above: How hard is it, really, to simply let the current > BuildRoot pass? It is very difficult for me, quite frankly. I am one of the main personnel who closely handle inventory control for my employer (a microelectronics R&D firm); and me approving of that incorrect BuildRoot would be akin in many ways to my signing a bill of materials, work order traveler, or other project document which contains information I know to be incorrect, incomplete, or otherwise improper. It's simply not the right thing to do. (As I said, though: if I felt that this reasoning for the deviation was good and valid, I'd let it through for certain.) > Anyway I think fakeroot is a useful package and it will probably find another > reviewer. Still thanks for trying to do the review in the first place. As do I. I hope your submission succeeds and wish you well. Hopefully this disagreement between us does not become unnecessary animosity. :] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 05:08:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050508.l0558xTP018224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 00:08 EST ------- Not a very official review because I am not in fedorabugs group yet (just requested that). MUST items - rpmlint on source returns only E: po4a unknown-key GPG#66534c2b which can safely be ignored - package meets naming guidelines - package meets almost all packaging guidelines; it does not respect the preferred buildroot, but this is not a blocker - license is GPL, text (COPYING) is included in %doc, matches upstream - spec file legible, in am. english - sha1sum 7319dcb1cbbfdff5fb5fb73cd2af92695732a36e matches upstream - locale included via %{perl_vendorlib}/Locale/Po4a - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc seems to affect runtime (could not test because package does not build in my mock) - no .la files - based on spec examination, does not seem to own files or directories already owned by other packages - no need for .desktop file Should - mock build for i386/fc6&devel fails with "Cannot find build req perl(Text::WrapI18N). Exiting." Maybe I should add something to the repo list in mock? I have tested both fc6 and devel, with core, extras and plague-results included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 05:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050516.l055GvdP018530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-05 00:16 EST ------- Peter, sorry it's taken so long to do this review: * source files match upstream 94bddbc6def599ed59c87fdd9edf5486 sipp-1.1rc8.src.tar.gz 94bddbc6def599ed59c87fdd9edf5486 sipp-1.1rc8.src.tar.gz.1 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines (except as noted below). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fc6 i386). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent: * %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution. * no shared libraries are present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers * no unversioned .so file * no pkconfig file * no libtool .la droppings. Suggestions: * Package README.txt, MEDIA.txt, and the contents of the pcap directory as %doc. Blockers: * The code is not built using the standard compiler flags. Modifying the build section to look like this will build the package with the proper flags: DEBUG_FLAGS="%{optflags}" %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} pcapplay_ossl The compile produces a lot of warning flags, but it completes and produces an executable. However, once I compiled sipp with the standard compiler flags the buffer overflow checking code is triggered when I run the following commands in separate windows (as a non-root user): sipp -sn uac -i 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 sipp -sn uas -i 127.0.0.1 That seems very bad to me... probably something to diecuss with the upstream authors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 05:17:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050517.l055HxN0018550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2007-01-05 00:17 EST ------- This is the second attempt to create a linuxwacom rpm wich updates linuxwacom ! Linuxwacom has updated to 0.7.6_4 the rpms can be found at http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386 spec url: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-0.7.6-4.spec srpm url: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-0.7.6_4-3.3.src.rpm debug url: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-debuginfo-0.7.6_4-3.3.i386.rpm rpm url: http://meverhagen.nl/fc6/i386/linuxwacom-0.7.6_4-3.3.i386.rpm The wacom rules has to be 49.wacom.rules since /dev/input/wacom has to be created in order to make the wacomcpl tool to work The xorg.conf file isn't updated throug the rpm I can use some help in how to archieve this. So until know the xorg.conf still has to be manipulated manually. For the graphire 4 there should be 4 'Section "inputdevice"' added, and the Section "ServerLayout" , Section "Module" get some new lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 05:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050529.l055TdVE018843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-05 00:29 EST ------- > - nothing in %doc seems to affect runtime (could not test because package > does not build in my mock) > - mock build for i386/fc6&devel fails with "Cannot find build > req perl(Text::WrapI18N). Exiting." That's because this package depends on two not-yet-includes perl packages that have been sumitted as well (follow the "blocked by" entries). > Maybe I should add something to the repo list in mock? I have tested both fc6 > and devel, with core, extras and plague-results included. You can build the two dependencies (note that they depend on each-other, so the order matters) and add them to the setup. If you're lazy you can use the pre-built packages for them I placed into ATrpms, but building yourself would be preferred (and even better would it be to get them reviewed, too :). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 05:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050546.l055kTTT019300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-05 00:46 EST ------- Please, let me restate that this no conflict with the packaging guidelines. The "preferred" can be at best interpreted as a SHOULD requirement, so by definition it is nothing to block on, and it is also nothing that "slips" QA in any way. I would even consider the demythifying of the needed `id -un` urban legend as an improvent in package quality even if it jeopardizes the use-case where several users build exactly the same package at the same time, which probably happened already twice since the passing of the millenium (and I mean the first one ;). > > > how hard is it, really, to copy and paste the > > > "BuildRoot: ..." line from the Guidelines wiki page? ^_^) > > Rephrasing the above: How hard is it, really, to simply let the current > > BuildRoot pass? > It is very difficult for me Well, that makes two stubborn packagers out of us, doesn't it? Anyway I need to stay hard on this as a long-time educational measure. id -un only landed in there due to early misunderstanding that "root" didn't mean a user but a build-"root" and the id -un obfusaction serves little to nothing. > > Anyway I think fakeroot is a useful package and it will probably find > > another reviewer. Still thanks for trying to do the review in the first > > place. > As do I. I hope your submission succeeds and wish you well. Hopefully > this disagreement between us does not become unnecessary animosity. :] Well, my Peter Voodo doll is rather pinned up right now, but no, there are no hard feelings for someone expressing his sincere opinion, even if it's diametrical opposite to mine. Now let me fire up that doll. ;) P.S. if you feel this discussion needs to be carried on, please let's leave bugzilla for the review and discuss this preferably on fedora-packaging or any other list, we abused bugzilla for discussing the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 06:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 01:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050605.l0565xpY019668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-05 01:05 EST ------- I overlooked that RPM does not find the rb_libtorrent dependency through the shared library's linkage dependencies, so I've added that as a hardcoded Requires in release 2. Spec: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.3.0-2.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 06:55:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 01:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050655.l056tBhj020842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 01:55 EST ------- One comment: I prefer using %(%{__id_u} -n) because it "may be" safer. However also I know that not a few Fedora contributors, including who frequently reviews other person's review requests or even who is a sponsor, disagree with "mandatory" use of %(%{__id_u} -n). Currently this is still under discussion, in my opinion. I suggest for rather new contibutors to use %(%{__id_u} -n), however I don't force people to use this currently who seems to have some reasons why they dislike this. So.. as Axel says, this is a issue of fedora-packaging mailing list (if someone thinks that discussion is needed... however it seems that this has been discussed already), not on _this_ bugzilla report, and should not be a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 07:33:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050733.l057XRvh022034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-01-05 02:33 EST ------- * owns the directories it creates * don't own directories it shouldn't. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 09:36:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 04:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050936.l059a17Q029038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 04:35 EST ------- OK, I will try to review them, although I am quite parallel with Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 09:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 04:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050949.l059na2t029937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 04:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Should > - mock build for i386/fc6&devel fails with "Cannot find build req > perl(Text::WrapI18N). Exiting." > > Maybe I should add something to the repo list in mock? I have tested both fc6 > and devel, with core, extras and plague-results included. > (In reply to comment #3) > > That's because this package depends on two not-yet-includes perl packages > that > have been sumitted as well (follow the "blocked by" entries). FYI: I attach here a comment which was sent to other person who asked me about a same situation. ====================================================== There may be many cases in which you have to use packages which are not imported into FE yet for mockbuild. This can be done by following (I write for my case) 1. yum install createrepo 2. Create some directory. For my case, mkdir -p /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/{i386,SRPMS} 3. put binary rpms into /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386, srpm into /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/SRPMS 4. cd /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386 createrepo $(pwd) Then repodata directory is created and some files are created under the directory 5. Change the permissions so that all files under /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS can be read by users who want to use mockbuild 6. Add the following to config file in /etc/mock -------------------------------------------------- [LOCAL] name=LOCAL baseurl=file:///var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386/ -------------------------------------------------- Then you can use rpms under /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386 for mockbuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 09:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 04:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050952.l059q4SQ030138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-05 04:52 EST ------- Thanks, Mamoru. If this happens often (and I guess it does) maybe the above is worth while to get into the wiki? Then we can just point people to this page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 09:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 04:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701050959.l059xPq5030840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 04:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Thanks, Mamoru. If this happens often (and I guess it does) maybe the above is > worth while to get into the wiki? Then we can just point people to this page. Well, then I will try to add about this first on my wiki pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:05:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051105.l05B52Ia003285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 06:04 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint on source rpm returns: E: perl-Text-CharWidth unknown-key GPG#66534c2b which can safely be ignored - no output from rpmlint on the generated binary - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines, except for the %buildroot which is not the preferred value (but non blocker) - the original tar does not include a license file but the (packaged) README explicitely states that the software is dual licensed as GPL and Artistic which are both approved for inclusion in Fedora - the License field corresponds to the above and therefore is OK - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum returns b369ce7a531539ebf5b9cf1c1b09d66846f56aa4 Text-CharWidth-0.04.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (i386) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for separate -docs package - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no .la files ... I would approve it if I were allowed to... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051115.l05BFmWY003773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-05 06:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > ... I would approve it if I were allowed to... You are allowed to... Why not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051121.l05BL9iG004033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 06:21 EST ------- fedorabugs membership ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051123.l05BNsYr004139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 06:23 EST ------- More specific, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-e1a114b23499786e13113ebf072d03a8f8d02094 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:33:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051133.l05BXbvR004571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-05 06:33 EST ------- Just follow what is said here... If I recall well once you are sponsored you can approve packages, being added to fedorabugs is just a technical issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:36:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051136.l05BalY2004685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-05 06:36 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.src.rpm Changelog - 1.5.1.5-2 - Added audiofile-devel, qwtplot3d-devel, ocaml and netcdf-devel as BR - using qwtplot3d and netcdf system wide #221022 - Fixed qt-qsa headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:40:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051140.l05Bee08004843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 11:57:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051157.l05BvtDl005840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 12:15:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051215.l05CFTan006927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051300.l05D0T4v008462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-05 08:00 EST ------- - *-3 still doesn't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS and still plays dirty games with CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS. /me thinks you misunderstood my earlier remark. The problem is not "make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"" (Which doen't make any sense), but the configure script mis-handling CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS and appending compiler flags to them it MUST not add to them, such as "-O3" and "-mmmx". - Why the dependency on valgrind? AFAIS, this package only uses valgrind in some part of its testsuite, but not as part of building. I.e. this dependency on valgrind only makes sense if your are running the testsuite as part of building. - Instead of directly using a cvs snapshot, you'd better base your package on a released version and apply a patch if you really think shipping a bleeding edge version is useful (I don't know, I am not familiar with libdirac's stability). - Finally, the "autotool" correct way to generate a cvs snapshot-tarball would be to run cvs co && autoreconf -fi && ./configure && make dist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051330.l05DUBFQ010000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-01-05 08:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor-0.9.27-1.src.rpm - updated to upstream version 0.9.27 I have requested the inclusion of the COPYING file, but have no reaction yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051337.l05DbG9S010337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051337.l05DbeG5010354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051338.l05DcCZ9010393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:48:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051348.l05DmmZq010866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 08:48 EST ------- unless someone more experienced then me has additional comments,this packaged is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051350.l05DoZB8011080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 08:50 EST ------- I'll review this one ASAP, probably Sunday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 13:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051351.l05DpXxw011180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-05 08:51 EST ------- I'll continue reviewing this one ASAP, probably Sunday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 14:06:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051406.l05E6L8u012472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-05 09:06 EST ------- Sigh, I made a type. Could you try again? (download the same file again)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 14:07:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051407.l05E7Lok012564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-05 09:07 EST ------- type=typo ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 15:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218230] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051504.l05F4PJB016493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Canvas - Common interface to image drawing Alias: pear-Image-Canvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218230 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-05 10:04 EST ------- - Imported into CVS - Added entry to owners.list - Build succeeded for devel - Requested FC-5/6 CVS sync Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 15:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051533.l05FXtMr018402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-05 10:33 EST ------- -1 (old 3) Don't know much about compile flag but since diract in a codec, compiling it with -mmx seems not too much!? (searching for aims of -03...) I expect it deals with i586/i686 ? Since it is an encoder and requires hight performances (to encode and certainly also to decode), i wonder if it is not better to stay with it? Tryed do do the changes but this seems not to work (searching...wip): %configure --enable-overlay --disable-static CXXFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" 2 OK (commented...) 3 The project is now involved in the hardware implementation. Encode/Decode Software "should" work! There is some enancement to wait http://dirac.sourceforge.net/todo.html! ... I have browsed the CVS and the last commit was 4 weeks ago. (the last release is 0.6.0 and was out 6 months ago) I cannot see a better time to make a snapshot ? what do you feel? 4 OK (added to diract-snapshot and updated to 20070105) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 15:35:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051535.l05FZmGC018513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 10:35 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 15:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051540.l05Fe7lG018951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-05 10:39 EST ------- Ping please import to cvs and request builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 16:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051601.l05G1DLL020393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 11:01 EST ------- For 0.9.7.1-2: * For Requires/BuildRequires: ------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: gnutls-devel, libpreludedb-devel, libxml2-devel ------------------------------------------- - "gnutls-devel" is not needed because libpreludedb-devel requires libprelude-devel and libprelude-devel requires gnutls-devel * Filesystem Layout - Please install initscript service file into %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d , not %{_sysconfdir}/init.d . For this file: ------------------------------------------- install -m 750 %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}.initd %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/%{name} ------------------------------------------- - %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/ is not needed because the working directory at this stage is there. - Why do you write "750"? Anyway the permission of this script is set as 0755 accroding to %file section and it should be 0755. * Directory/file ownership - Oops, %{_libdir}/prelude-manager/ is not owned by any packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 16:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051623.l05GNAqS021991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 riek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221596 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 16:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051638.l05GcFWN023304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 11:38 EST ------- I also found: * Conditional dependencies ------------------------------------------- *** Dumping configuration *** - TCP wrapper support : no - XML plugin support : yes - Database plugin support: yes ------------------------------------------- Is this okay? Mockbuild log says: ------------------------------------------- checking tcpd.h usability... no checking tcpd.h presence... no checking for tcpd.h... no ------------------------------------------- For FC-devel, tcpd.h is provided by tcp_wrappers-devel, For FC-6 and below, it is provided by tcp_wrappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 16:50:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051650.l05GoKgi024227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-05 11:50 EST ------- Anecdotal report of success using the SELinux policy as described in Comment #45: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2007-January/msg00021.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 16:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051653.l05GrjRV024757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-05 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > * Filesystem Layout > - Please install initscript service file into > %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d , not %{_sysconfdir}/init.d . %{_initrddir} can also be used for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:08:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051708.l05H8nrX026737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051717.l05HHGAE027492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-01-05 12:17 EST ------- - naming guidelines request naming the package vim-vimoutliner which seems a little bit weird but on Debian it is as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:17:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051717.l05HHUBp027523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-01-05 12:17 EST ------- Thanks for input, folks. I posted updated files to the same url. My comments follow. > libfl basically provides a single function The library provides the function 'main'. It's useful for linking with pure scanner, for testing purposes I suppose. I have never used it personally, but it has been part of flex' interface for ages. It technically can be shared, however strange does it look to have a shared library with 'main' inside. If this would be showstopper, I'll make it shared, no problem here. > However, what is an issue, is the name of this library I doubt any package links with -lfl at all. The library is useful for development of lexer. I think it will be more often fired from command line than from script, thus I chose rather less invasive variant "-lfl-compat", as opposed to "-lfl -L/usr/lib/flex-somesuffix". > The makeinstall macro should not be used unless there is no other choice. > Does the preferred "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" not work? No, the Makefile inside the flex-2.5.4a doesn't honor the DESTDIR variable. > installing the info files Got those fixed. There were more problems, such as file names and infodir entry name. > prefer to see the flex's headers [...] installed into a versioned directory Yes, using version number may be better idea. I'll give it a thought. Maybe it would make more sense to rename also the binaries and relevant files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:22:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051722.l05HMHni027824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-05 12:22 EST ------- To thet best of my knowledge, teh guidelines only require that the license is included in the rpm if it is distributed by upstream in the tarball - the lack of a license file should therefore not block this review. There's been nothing but crickets so far on my request to add the license to the tarball, so it might be a little bit before upstream fixes it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051724.l05HOPZk028078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-01-05 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Your comment about needing to set up an extras account makes me think that > you'll need to be sponsored; if so, this ticket should additionally block > FE-NEEDSPONSOR. (I can offer sponsorship, but I'm unsure about the static > library issue at this point.) Thanks, I gladly accept that. I added FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Let's sort out the remaining questions (comment #8) and we can move ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:24:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051724.l05HONLX028066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-05 12:24 EST ------- New files, reflecting new "ignore version info"feature" Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.2-1.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.2-1.src.rpm Will be posting to f-e-l for community brainstorm shortly. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 17:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051749.l05Hn0h1030541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-01-05 12:48 EST ------- This looks good. Guillaume, have you applied for access to the Extras CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 18:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051808.l05I8vKR032060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-05 13:08 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 18:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051818.l05IInDm000411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-05 13:18 EST ------- This now builds and looks good, I would approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 18:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051843.l05Ih5aI001909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-05 13:42 EST ------- Ok, approving, sorry Parag but we want this in soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 19:09:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051909.l05J9mdt003890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-01-05 14:09 EST ------- Thanks Parag and Jesse. Built for extras-development -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 19:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051954.l05JstHC009274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-05 14:54 EST ------- In reply to comment #4: >To thet best of my knowledge, teh guidelines only require that the license is >included in the rpm if it is distributed by upstream in the tarball - the lack >of a license file should therefore not block this review. Correct... my concern isn't that the license text isn't included, it's that there is nothing at all in the package referring to what the license _is_. Everything says 'see LICENSE.txt'. Not to say that it would happen, but they could ship a LICENSE.txt in the next release that was not acceptable for extras, and say 'Thats what we always meant". >There's been nothing but crickets so far on my request to add the license to >the tarball, so it might be a little bit before upstream fixes it. Anoying. :( I'll try and think of how we can address this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 19:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701051959.l05Jxl6K009664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-01-05 14:59 EST ------- Suggestion: Email the project asking them exactly what the license is (a URL to it is fine), copy that to a file named LICENSE.txt, and include it in the package as a Source1: LICENSE.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 20:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052009.l05K95qD011255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-01-05 15:09 EST ------- If that's done, please include the text of the reply from upstream in the package as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 20:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052022.l05KM9TY013364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-05 15:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-6.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jan 05 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-6 - Replace pkgconfig with poker-eval-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 20:36:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052036.l05Kajau016149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-05 15:36 EST ------- Dang. It needs a bunch of DHT loving which was fixed in SVN. I've therefore packaged the latest SVN with these fixes: Spec: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.3.0-3.20061128svn.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 20:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052055.l05KtaRS019300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-01-05 15:55 EST ------- I don't have access to bug #221596. Is anyone at liberty to disclose what it is? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 21:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052114.l05LElIG023114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 ------- Additional Comments From meyering at redhat.com 2007-01-05 16:14 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. FYI, I've fixed the undefined-non-weak-symbol problem with this patch: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-qpid-dev/200701.mbox/%3c87ps9tz3ko.fsf at rho.meyering.net%3e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 21:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052120.l05LKCH3024312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-01-05 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > -1 (old 3) Don't know much about compile flag but since diract in a codec, > compiling it with -mmx seems not too much!? Nicolas the problem lays in configure.ac file, which is used to generate configure and later Makefile. If you view this file and jump to "enable debug flags" and "enable MMX optimization flag" section, you will notice that the first one sets -O3 and the second -mmmx. Probably these sections needs to be clean up, then you have to do autoreconf to generate updated configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 21:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052155.l05LtgNH029423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 ------- Additional Comments From aconway at redhat.com 2007-01-05 16:55 EST ------- Applied to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/qpid/trunk/qpid/cpp at r493151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 21:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218678] Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052158.l05Lw4aG029645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 wwoods at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2007-01-05 16:58 EST ------- Huzzah! Built! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052215.l05MFmfX030895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-05 17:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Ping please import to cvs and request builds Done. Sources are in /cvs/extras, branches have been created for FC-5 and FC-6, and I was successfully able to build on FC-6. What's left to do? Just close this bug as NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:24:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052224.l05MOxDQ031418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore Alias: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-05 17:24 EST ------- Finished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052225.l05MPXQF031485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 Bug 196401 depends on bug 196393, which changed state. Bug 196393 Summary: Review Request: svrcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221665] New: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Numbers-Roman.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Numbers-Roman-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Numbers_Roman provides static methods for converting to and from Roman numerals. It supports Roman numerals in both uppercase and lowercase styles and conversion for and to numbers up to 5 999 999. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:31:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052231.l05MVlow031870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Numbers-Roman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221667] New: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Numbers-Words.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Numbers-Words-0.15.0-1.src.rpm Description: With Numbers_Words class you can convert numbers written in arabic digits to words in several languages. You can convert an integer between -infinity and infinity. If your system does not support such long numbers you can call Numbers_Words::toWords() with just a string. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052241.l05MfjOu032489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Numbers-Words -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] New: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: Deluge is a new BitTorrent client, created using Python and GTK+. It is intended to bring a native, full-featured client to Linux GTK+ desktop environments such as GNOME and Xfce. It supports features such as DHT (Distributed Hash Tables) and UPnP (Universal Plug-n-Play) that allow one to more easily share BitTorrent data even from behind a router with virtually no necessary configuration of the port-forwarding and whatnot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052248.l05MmEY7032736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |221376 Alias| |deluge ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-05 17:48 EST ------- [ Adding David to the CC list at his request and adding the python-libtorrent dependency. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052248.l05MmE6e032745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |221669 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:50:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect-2.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: The Net_UserAgent object does a number of tests on an HTTP user agent string. The results of these tests are available via methods of the object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 22:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052250.l05MoZ5g000448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Net-UserAgent-Detect -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:07:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-POP3.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-POP3-1.3.6-1.src.rpm Description: Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server. Support all POP3 commands including UIDL listings, APOP authentication, DIGEST-MD5 and CRAM-MD5 using optional Auth_SASL package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:09:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052309.l05N9mWj001388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Net-POP3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052317.l05NHv4c001663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-05 18:17 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit-3.0.1-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jan 05 2007 Christopher Stone 3.0.1-1 - Upstream Sync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221675] New: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/zd1211-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/zd1211-firmware-1.2-1_FC5.src.rpm Description: Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices Read from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureWirelessFirmware It need to be integrated on a livecd License issue: Do not have searched for legal issue about redistribution yet... I will do it (Zydas is now Atheros...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221677] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/at76_usb/at76_usb-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/at76_usb/at76_usb-firmware-0.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Firmware for Atmel AT76C503A based USB WLAN adapters This is needed at least to build a usable livecd... Saw here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureWirelessFirmware I have made no search about legal issues yet! I will do it Kernel external modules also exist but may be integrated in the kernel, soon or not... I will try to inform this tread... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 5 23:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701052358.l05NwYuU003238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-05 18:58 EST ------- This build error looks like an actual x86_64 one: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus Does fpcmake have some concept of autoconf $(libdir)? Even patched it has hardcoded /usr/lib/ which we don't want for arch dependent things on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 00:01:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060001.l0601oFJ003387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: zd1211- |Review Request: zd1211- |firmware - Firmware for |firmware - Firmware for |zd1211 802.11 wireless |zd1211 802.11 wireless |devices |devices ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-05 19:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/zd1211-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/zd1211-firmware-1.3-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Firmware for zd1211 802.11 wireless devices Recently updates to 1.3... Also noted that the license included in the README is GPL (and generated from sources with the driver...) from http://www.deine-taler.de/zd1211/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 01:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060110.l061AloF005339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-05 20:10 EST ------- I hope you don't mind if I finish this. + License (MIT) + BuildArch noarch + follows python template + macro usage + source matches + follows naming guidelines + sane BuildRoot + runs APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 01:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060134.l061Y8OY006014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-05 20:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Correct... my concern isn't that the license text isn't included, it's that > there is nothing at all in the package referring to what the license _is_. > Everything says 'see LICENSE.txt'. > > Not to say that it would happen, but they could ship a LICENSE.txt in the next > release that was not acceptable for extras, and say 'Thats what we always meant". Ok, now I understand the concern; the actual LICENSE.txt file is in their subversion repo [1] and starts by saying RubyGems is copyrighted free software by Chad Fowler, Rich Kilmer, Jim Weirich and others. You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL (see COPYING.txt file), or the conditions below: ... Does that address the concerns around the official license ? [1] http://rubyforge.org/viewvc/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=1060&root=rubygems&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 03:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060357.l063vGtM010259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-05 22:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) Ah, I didn't think to look in svn... that does indeed address my concerns. I was worried that they never had a LICENSE.txt file, so it could be anything. If they just neglected to ship it in their files thats not nearly as bad. ;) That solved, I see no further blockers, so this package can be APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 04:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060406.l06460GB010926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-01-05 23:05 EST ------- I've just released pybackpack 0.4.5 which fixes bugs #35, #36 and #37 mentioned above. There is still some performance to tweak out of the initial file analysis walk but this should be a very big improvement on the 10 hour duration Bernard was reporting. Spec: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec SRPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.5-1.src.rpm RPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.5-1.noarch.rpm Your feedback is much appreciated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 04:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060448.l064mRUO014883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-05 23:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for input, folks. I posted updated files to the same url. My comments > follow. > > > libfl basically provides a single function > The library provides the function 'main'. It's useful for linking with pure > scanner, for testing purposes I suppose. Yes and no. The real function that matters is yywrap() It's the fall-back/default yywrap lex-generated scanners use if the scanner doesn't provide one of its own. Most real-world scanner do and there do not link against libfl. > > > However, what is an issue, is the name of this library > I doubt any package links with -lfl at all. Sorry, you're in error. - All flex-based packages using the default yywrap do need to link against it. You so far don't see this, because they link against it statically. - All autoconf scripts using AC_PROG_LEX link against it. > I have never used it personally But I have and still am, for more than a decade. > The library is useful for > development of lexer. I think it will be more often fired from command line > than from script, thus I chose rather less invasive variant "-lfl-compat", as > opposed to "-lfl -L/usr/lib/flex-somesuffix". I have to disagree again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 05:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218839] Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060503.l0653DDh016295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-06 00:03 EST ------- Thanks for the review... imported, built for devel, branches requsted for FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 05:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060503.l0653ECQ016305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 Bug 218844 depends on bug 218839, which changed state. Bug 218839 Summary: Review Request: pyflakes - A Lint-like tool for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218839 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 05:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060506.l0656Fln016522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-06 00:06 EST ------- Jesse and Jeremy, Sorry i could not get time to approve this package. I don't mind Jesse that you approved this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 05:41:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060541.l065fKVd017102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-06 00:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I also found: > * Conditional dependencies > ------------------------------------------- > *** Dumping configuration *** > - TCP wrapper support : no > - XML plugin support : yes > - Database plugin support: yes > ------------------------------------------- > Is this okay? No. This means building the rpm is non-deterministic. Does the package have an --enable-tcp-wrapper configure option or similar? Then you might want to apply this. If not, you will probably want to add BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel or BuildConflicts: tcp_wrappers-devel for FC > 6, rsp. BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers or BuildConflicts: tcp_wrappers for FC <= 6 depending on if you want to use tcp_wrappers or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 07:19:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060719.l067Jttl019083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-06 02:19 EST ------- Fix: - Links broken in doc/apache-config.html, linked examples were moved to examples/apache Would be nice: - I see version 1.1.0 at http://www.openidenabled.com/yadis/libraries/python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 07:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060728.l067SXOt019235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 02:28 EST ------- Well, = now mockbuild for conditional dependency is okay = License is "actually" GPL = Other things are all okay. = Your other review requests seems good from a very quick check. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (doodle) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------------- Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . At a stage, I should receive a main which notices that you need a sponsor. Then I will SPONSOR YOU. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 08:03:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 03:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060803.l0683idA019781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-06 03:03 EST ------- Additionally, the -devel subpackage installs a .pc file, so it should require pkgconfig. I've added that in release 2. The .spec file is at the same URL; and the source RPM is at http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent-0.11-2.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 09:02:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 04:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701060902.l0692WxM022247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-01-06 04:02 EST ------- Compiles fine on both FC6 and Development however it doesn't actually work with any torrents: GTK Accessibility Module initialized ./deluge.py:62: GtkWarning: gtk_scrolled_window_add(): cannot add non scrollable widget use gtk_scrolled_window_add_with_viewport() instead self.wTree = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile) python-libtorrent, using libtorrent 0.11.0.0. Compiled with NDEBUG value: 1 Capping download to -1 bytes per second Capping upload to 40960 bytes per second Loading DHT state from /home/david/.config/deluge/dht.state No DHT file to resume opening torrent from URL ok clicked: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents/Zod-dvd-x86_64.torrent filename: /tmp/tmp9M8gRq.torrent file is a torrent Critical Error! No such uniqueID (46909632806912, 1) terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): vector::_M_range_check Afbrudt (SIGABRT) definitely and sadly so, not Extras ready - I bugged upstream: http://deluge-torrent.org/trac/ticket/95 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 10:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061041.l06Af1vg027967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 10:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] New: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile-1.6.7-3.src.rpm Description: GUILE (GNU's Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extension) is a library implementation of the Scheme programming language, written in C. GUILE provides a machine-independent execution platform that can be linked in as a library during the building of extensible programs. This is a compatibility package for the old guile version 1.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 10:45:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061045.l06Aj78W028471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 05:45 EST ------- *** Bug 218367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 10:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061044.l06AiuXK028438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 05:44 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221698 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 10:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 05:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061051.l06ApTK8029046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 05:51 EST ------- There is a bug on the geda suite due to the lack of compability with the guile 1.6 however I'm having troubles making it compatible with the actual fedora guile 1.8-devel package and at the same time I can't make libgeda compile properly with this compat-guile. http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/libgeda/ Why I posted here before solving the problem ? first I can't do myself, I need help. Secondly lots of geda users are complaining. Mamuro is your proposal still valid ? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367#c7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221307] Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061118.l06BIkVb030539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221307 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061119.l06BJ0sS030587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Bug 221310 depends on bug 221307, which changed state. Bug 221307 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-lore - Twisted documentation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221307 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221308] Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061119.l06BJAaq030615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:19:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061119.l06BJLJa030659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Bug 221310 depends on bug 221308, which changed state. Bug 221308 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 221310 depends on bug 221309, which changed state. Bug 221309 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:19:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221309] Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061119.l06BJ7fD030605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061119.l06BJT3G030686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 Bug 221310 depends on bug 221308, which changed state. Bug 221308 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-mail - A Twisted Mail library, server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221308 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 221310 depends on bug 221309, which changed state. Bug 221309 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-news - Twisted News is an NNTP server and programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 11:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 06:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061151.l06BpUcV031460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-06 06:51 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint on source rpm returns: E: perl-Text-WrapI18N unknown-key GPG#66534c2b which can safely be ignored - no output from rpmlint on the generated binary - package meets packaging guidelines, except for the %buildroot which is not the preferred value (but non blocker) - the original tar does not include a license file but the (packaged) README explicitely states that the software is dual licensed as GPL and Artistic (also used by Perl in which the source is written) which are both approved for inclusion in Fedora - the License field corresponds to the above and therefore is OK - spec file legible, in am. english - source is latest version, matches upstream, sha1sum returns f397756b8d0a090fdecbf9c854922c0d9825f284 Text-WrapI18N-0.06.tar.gz - compiles in mock for devel i386; it's a noarch so no potential need for exclusion on unsupported archs - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions are sane - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for separate -docs package - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no header, static, .pc files - no scriptlets SHOULD - builds in mock, creates a noarch - the generated package can successfully be used by other programs (po4a) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 12:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 07:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061256.l06CutLw000974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From david at readingroom.com 2007-01-06 07:56 EST ------- Hopefully you'll receive that e-mail to sponsor me - I've completed all the steps up to that one. (My username is "anderson"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 12:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 07:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061259.l06CxqKF001046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 07:59 EST ------- Oh.. I just noticed that you already requested for sponsorship. Now I am sponsoring you and you should receive a mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061300.l06D0du3001084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 08:00 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 221349) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061302.l06D23iR001152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 08:01 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 221349) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061303.l06D3D9W001217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-06 08:03 EST ------- Continuing review from where I have left it: MUST - successfully builds in mock for i386 (with two (identical) warnings: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Module/Build/Base.pm line 3450.) - locale handled by %find_lang %{name} [1] - seems to own all files it creates, does not own foreign files - no scriptlets included SHOULD - includes translations for supported Non-English languages - compiles and builds in mock/devel, results as no-arch package - runs on FC6 [1] in the build log I see plenty of lines similar to it: 276 translated messages, 78 fuzzy translations, 717 untranslated messages. ca: 826 translated messages, 85 fuzzy translations, 160 untranslated messages. Assuming the warnings issued at compile time are not dangerous [although I think upstream should be bugged for a fix] this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061318.l06DIH8D001596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 08:18 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you and you will receive a mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:19:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061319.l06DJf1j001654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 08:19 EST ------- Umm.. rather complicated spec file, however I will try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061322.l06DMKsb001792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 13:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061326.l06DQqme001977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 14:09:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061409.l06E9B2T003903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-06 09:09 EST ------- I decided to use ver. 2.0.2.01 because most apps use version 2.x. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL-2.0.2.01-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 14:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061423.l06ENoFY004708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-06 09:23 EST ------- Thanks - please can you add me (DavidAnderson) to the EditQueue on the wiki so that I can request rebuilds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 14:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061435.l06EZbbH005339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 14:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061442.l06EgRho005577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 09:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks - please can you add me (DavidAnderson) to the EditQueue on the wiki so > that I can request rebuilds? Well, what does it mean? I just remember that all I have to do is to sponsor a person who want to be a FE contributor. A rule (procedure) changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 14:44:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061444.l06EilpC005645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-06 09:44 EST ------- Someone has to add me to this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EditGroup And remove me from this one: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EditGroupQueue That then allows me to request a FC5 + 6 branch for my package by editing this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded Whether it's changed or not, I don't know! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 15:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 10:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061503.l06F36cn006193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 10:03 EST ------- Ah.. adding EditGroup is usually done by someone who are always checking the change of EditGroupQueue. Now Damien Durand edited them according to your request and you can go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 17:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] New: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/agg/agg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/agg/agg-2.5-1.src.rpm Description: Move agg a C++ rendering framework from the old core repo to the new shared one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 17:27:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061727.l06HRSEu013694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2007-01-06 12:27 EST ------- rpmlint output is... [root at soulcrusher SPECS]# rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/agg-2.5-1.i386.rpm [root at soulcrusher SPECS]# rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/agg-devel-2.5-1.i386.rpm W: agg-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 17:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061741.l06Hfa9S014304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-06 12:41 EST ------- REVIEW for 80f9ae6864029fd3b0635e71f486c538 lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm OK - rpmlint -i lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm W: lxpanel non-coherent-filename lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm The file which contains the package should be named --..rpm. This is odd, I don't see no error here. Something ether is wrong with rpmlint or with your build environment. I don't see this error when I rebuild the srpm locally or in mock, so I choose to ignore it in this review, but can you send me your .rpmmarcos file so we can investigate this further? Does the error go away, when you rebuild the package once again locally? OK - package and spec named according to the package naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license is open-source compatible, but COPYING looks dual licensed for me. First part is a BSD like license, second GPLv2. OK - Since GPL is more restrictive than BSD the whole package becomes GPL. So the license field in the spec is ok. OK - COPYING included in source and correctly installed in %doc OK - spec is in American English OK - spec is legible MINOR NOTE - line warps in long fields like %description are usually done after 79 characters. OK - source in srpm matches upstream by md5 37d0e9f2993fc63d9e7e1684552e10b4 OK - package compiles and build into binaries on core 6 i386 OK - no known ExcludeArchs OK - BuildRequires sane OK - locales handled correctly OK - no shared libs to worry about OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories it creates MINOR NOTE - Instead of %dir %{_datadir}/lxpanel/ %{_datadir}/lxpanel/* %dir %{_libdir}/lxpanel/ %{_libdir}/lxpanel/* you could simply use %{_datadir}/lxpanel/ %{_libdir}/lxpanel/ since you include everything in these directories anyway. The slashes at the end of the line is only for humans to indicate its a dir. OK - no duplicates in %files OK - file permissions and %defattr correct OK - valid clean section OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no large docs OK - docs don't affect runtime OK - no header files, static libs or *.pc files OK - no libtool archives OK - IMO no desktop file is needed since it's panel and not what I call a typical program/standalone application. OK - package doesn't own directories already owned by other files OK - package builds in mock (devel) OK - lxpanel works fine, but lxpanelctl is buggy. I can't add more starter because the "Select Application"-Dialog doesn't list the files in /usr/share/applications. Also hitting return in the location bar doesn't work. Looking at src/plugins/launchbar.c I think this is a known issue (see the FIXME in line 490) and isn't really meant to work atm. So from a reviewers point of view everything looks fine except rpmlint. If the rpmlint error on the srpm can be fixed with a simple rebuild build you can consider this package to be APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061837.l06Ibquc015855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 13:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144975) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144975&action=view) compat-guile-16.spec I created Well, I have not checked yet in detail if this package meets packaging guildlines. I justed looked into how this library are packaged and how rebuild of libgeda fails. Then: -------------------------------------------- %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libguile.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/compat-libguile.so -------------------------------------------- This line is actually wrong. When compilation of a source file needs linkage for a library by "-lXXX", this means that this compilation uses "libXXX.so". So the file named "compat-"libXXX.so cannot be used. Generally, a library for legacy compatibility should be named as "libguile16.so", as you can see a example in libpng10-devel (in FC5). And.. also the use of directory named "/.../.../compat-XXX" should be avoided because there is no guarantee that only one version of compatibility-providing libraries are needed. These types of directories should be named so that their names clearly show the version, like "/usr/include/guile16" or so. Also, the name of rpm should show version explicitly like libpng10 or compat-gcc-34. I tried to create compat-guile-16.spec with my suggestions applied. --------------------------------------------- Note: I only checked compatibility and not checked the accordance for packaging guidelines. I just noticed that owning automake .m4 file means that -devel package should need "Requires: automake". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:43:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061843.l06Ih6e9015995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 13:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144976&action=view) libgeda spec file using compat-guile-16 libgeda-20061020-2.1 spec file, which uses compat-guile-16. As I changed the names in compat-guile-16 to /usr/include/guile16 or so, I also changed libgeda spec file accroding to them. Also, I changed the use of sed so that sed should not "touch" the files which are actually not changed. Please check this spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:45:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061845.l06IjCI5016066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 13:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144977) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144977&action=view) Mock build log of compat-guile-16-1.6.7-3.1.fc7 Mockbuild log of compat-guile-16-1.6.7-3.1 on FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061846.l06IkN9u016102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 13:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144978) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144978&action=view) Mock build log of libgeda-20061020-2.1.fc7 Mockbuild log of libgeda-20061020-2.1 on FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061849.l06InPHv016157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 13:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=144979) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144979&action=view) Mock build log of libgeda-20061020-2.1.fc5 Mockbuild log of libgeda-20061020-2.1 on FC-5 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 18:59:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061859.l06IxV7m016353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-06 13:59 EST ------- * I have spotted a licensing issue: gpc is shipped with agg but seems to be covered by a GPL incompatible license: You may not use this software, in whole or in part, in support of any commercial product without the express consent of the author. * I think the summary could be ameliorated, for example with 'general purpose 2D graphical library' or 'graphical rendering engine' * in the patch, I guess the @FREETYPE_LIBS@ should be ion the libaggfontfreetype_la_LIBADD line. Not a big deal. Has the patch been submitted to upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 19:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061904.l06J4E5N016461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-06 14:04 EST ------- Also a dot should be at the end of the %descriptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 19:09:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061909.l06J9W3s016619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-06 14:09 EST ------- Well, actually * Requires for libgeda-devel should be changed to ------------------------------------------- %if 0%{fedora} >= 6 Requires: compat-guile-16-devel %else Requires: guile-devel %endif ------------------------------------------- And.. I may have not noticed other issues to be fixed. Note: When to modify configure, modifying configure.ac is not necessary. ===================================================== * Check: For installation of libgeda compat-guile-16-devel: (for now installing libgeda-devel is eliminated because of my typo written above) ------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# yum --disablerepo=\*debug\* --disablerepo=\*dries\* --disablerepo=\*freshrpms\* -y install libgeda compat-guile-16-devel Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for libgeda to pack into transaction set. libgeda-20061020-2.1.fc7. 100% |=========================| 7.4 kB 00:00 ---> Package libgeda.i386 0:20061020-2.1.fc7 set to be updated ---> Downloading header for compat-guile-16-devel to pack into transaction set. compat-guile-16-devel-1.6 100% |=========================| 23 kB 00:00 ---> Package compat-guile-16-devel.i386 0:1.6.7-3.1.fc7 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libqthreads.so.12 for package: libgeda --> Processing Dependency: libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: compat-guile-16 = 1.6.7-3.1.fc7 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: libguile.so.12 for package: libgeda --> Processing Dependency: libguile.so.12 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: libguilereadline-v-12.so.12 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.so.1 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/guile-1.6 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: libguile-ltdl.so.1 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Processing Dependency: libguile-ltdl.so.1 for package: libgeda --> Processing Dependency: libqthreads.so.12 for package: compat-guile-16-devel --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for compat-guile-16 to pack into transaction set. compat-guile-16-1.6.7-3.1 100% |=========================| 25 kB 00:00 ---> Package compat-guile-16.i386 0:1.6.7-3.1.fc7 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: compat-guile-16-devel i386 1.6.7-3.1.fc7 LOCAL 185 k libgeda i386 20061020-2.1.fc7 LOCAL 198 k Installing for dependencies: compat-guile-16 i386 1.6.7-3.1.fc7 LOCAL 715 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 3 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 1.1 M Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: compat-guile-16 ######################### [1/3] Installing: libgeda ######################### [2/3] Installing: compat-guile-16-devel ######################### [3/3] Installed: compat-guile-16-devel.i386 0:1.6.7-3.1.fc7 libgeda.i386 0:20061020-2.1.fc7 Dependency Installed: compat-guile-16.i386 0:1.6.7-3.1.fc7 Complete! [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q guile guile-devel guile-1.8.1-1.fc7 guile-devel-1.8.1-1.fc7 =================================================================== surely succeeds, without any conflict against guile(-devel)-1.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 19:22:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701061922.l06JMJUl017085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-01-06 14:22 EST ------- Forgive my intrusion, but mention of gpc perked my interest. Can I assume that the gpc referenced here has no relation to the GNU Pascal Compiler? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 21:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062113.l06LD6S1019907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-06 16:12 EST ------- It is the General Polygon Clipper, so has no relation with the GNU Pascal Compiler... The homepage is at http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/alan/software/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 21:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062120.l06LKtdw020219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-01-06 16:20 EST ------- Submitter unresponsive; Martin is going to submit his review request instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 22:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062226.l06MQXM4021929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 17:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - The %{name}.desktop file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install > in the %install section, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop In this case, the desktop file on the kmenu can be neglected since the desktop coming with the package is for kcontrol and not for kmenu. However kdmtheme will be following that direction for its next update. Fedora's default Kmenu is by far too huge and crowded, let's not dump anything onto it. My mom will be confused having her kmenu on her fedora that huge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 22:30:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062230.l06MUhIu022003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 22:30:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062230.l06MUiRE022015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 Bug 221027 depends on bug 221163, which changed state. Bug 221163 Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 22:59:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] New: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: cssed is a small developer editor and validator, that tries to ease the CSS editing. It features syntax highlighting, syntax validation, MDI notebook based interface, quick CSS properties and values insertion, auto-completion and dialog-based insertion of CSS complex values. Being a CSS editor, it's not limited to this language. cssed haved some support for HTML (with embbeded Javascript), XML, Javascript, Java, PHP, JSP, C, C++, Apache configuration files, .htaccess, Python, Perl, SQL, SH and other languages so it can serve quite well as multi-purpose editor. rpmlint returns only W: cssed-devel no-documentation. There is a review request already but it's inactive (bug 174063). This is one of my first packages so I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 23:00:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062300.l06N0l7A022694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cssed - CSS |Review Request: cssed - CSS |editor and validator |editor and validator OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 23:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062322.l06NMNXx023166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-06 18:22 EST ------- In this case, in agreement with Chitlesh, the items from comment #4 are inaccurate. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives for when it is appropriate (imo, not official, yet, mind you) to remove .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 6 23:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701062357.l06NvpHv023950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-06 18:57 EST ------- Some other issues I spotted: Not blockers (personal preferences, in fact ;-): * the news file could be shipped even though it only points to a web page * I would personally replace rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la by rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la * and in clean I would have used rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * I tend to add a trailing / to directories in %files to show that these are directories and not files, like %{_includedir}/agg2/ Serious issues: * there are dependencies missing for agg-devel: freetype-devel (for ft2build.h), pkgconfig * %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ and %{_datadir}/aclocal/ are not owned. pkgconfig owns %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/, automake owns %{_datadir}/aclocal/ (for the aclocal dir there are more than one way to fix the issue, but it must be fixed). * in libagg.pc there is -Wl,-rpath,${exec_prefix}/lib Is it really needed? Still in libagg.pc there is no reference to freetype2. Maybe there should be a Requires.private: freetype2 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 00:20:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070020.l070KZGL024254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 19:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In this case, in agreement with Chitlesh, the items from comment #4 are > inaccurate. See also > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives > for when it is appropriate (imo, not official, yet, mind you) to remove .la files. Well again that FE guideline as well may not apply here. withOUT the .la file, I have this: http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=348320132&size=o with the .la file, I have this: http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=348320133&size=o I guess the 2 items mentioned by Remi which are indeed FE guidelines, may not be applied here with this ksplash-engine-moodin package (if not they will break the package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 00:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070023.l070N6wK024302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-06 19:23 EST ------- In changelog: - removed kdelibs-devel from BR wich is already required by kdebase-devel There is a typo :) "which" with a "h" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 01:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070121.l071LHqt025209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-01-06 20:21 EST ------- OK, I've had a closer look at this. There's not much left to fix up, don't let the length of the review fool you :-). Fix these and I can check and approve this without a hassle. The following is all OK: * RPM name is OK * Source courier-authlib-0.58.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds in mock (i386 / x86_64, FC5 and FC6) * Runs OK. NEEDSWORK: * Lose the courier_release / distribution detection routines, they're not needed for Fedora purposes and (IMO) just clutter the specfile. Disttags alone should do the desired job. * BuildRequires: gcc-c++ should not be included (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) * Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} would be preferred to having an explicit "0" Epoch in the subpackage reqs. * Update to 0.59, which works quite well. RPMLINT: E: courier-authlib non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/courier-authlib 0555 * Hack this to 755/750 in %files to shut it up. E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauth.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauth.so.0.0.0 * These are dlopen()ed IIRC, so this can actually be ignored. E: courier-authlib non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/courier-authlib/authmigrate 0555 E: courier-authlib non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/courier-authlib/sysconftool 0555 * Change this to 755 in the spec (It's there in lines 5 and 6 after %install) and this goes away too (what's Sam thinking here??) E: courier-authlib non-readable /var/spool/authdaemon/pid.lock 0600 E: courier-authlib non-readable /etc/authlib/authmysqlrc.dist 0660 E: courier-authlib non-readable /etc/authlib/authldaprc.dist 0660 E: courier-authlib non-readable /etc/authlib/authdaemonrc.dist 0660 E: courier-authlib non-readable /etc/authlib/authpgsqlrc.dist 0660 * Ignore these (running RPMlint as non-privileged user) W: courier-authlib non-conffile-in-etc /etc/authlib/authmysqlrc.dist W: courier-authlib non-conffile-in-etc /etc/authlib/authldaprc.dist W: courier-authlib non-conffile-in-etc /etc/authlib/authdaemonrc.dist W: courier-authlib non-conffile-in-etc /etc/authlib/authpgsqlrc.dist 55 * I'd ignore these too (rpmlint doesn't seem to recognise these for some reason) E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthcommon.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthcommon.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthcustom.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthcustom.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthsasl.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthsasl.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthsaslclient.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauthsaslclient.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthpam.so.0.0.0 E: courier-authlib library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthpam.so.0.0.0 * dlopen()ed again I believe, don't worry too much. E: courier-authlib non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/authdaemon 0750 * I actually have this as 755 on my server, as I'm often running maildrop / imapd as the delivering user (not daemon/bin/root/mail etc.). YMMV, but my solution keeps rpmlint happy and allows any calling user to access the world-writable socket it contains. W: courier-authlib service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/courier-authlib E: courier-authlib no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/courier-authlib Patch the included init file for this one (Swap "2345" for "-" for the first issue and steal the stanza from rpmdevtools' template.init for the status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070205.l0725WHW026090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-06 21:05 EST ------- Thanks, package imported, built for devel and CVS branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070205.l0725iTs026111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-06 21:05 EST ------- Thanks, package imported, built for devel and CVS branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:05:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220945] Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070205.l0725lBU026123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-06 21:05 EST ------- Thanks, package imported, built for devel and CVS branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:05:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070205.l0725lg4026135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Bug 220944 depends on bug 220945, which changed state. Bug 220945 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CharWidth - Get number of occupied columns of a string on terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220945 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220944] Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070205.l0725rMs026153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-06 21:05 EST ------- Thanks, package imported, built for devel and CVS branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:06:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070206.l07263SW026180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 Bug 220888 depends on bug 220943, which changed state. Bug 220943 Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220943] Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070206.l07260Nl026174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: po4a - A tool maintaining translations anywhere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220943 Bug 220943 depends on bug 220944, which changed state. Bug 220944 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WrapI18N - Line wrapping with support for several locale setups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220944 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070233.l072X1mK026847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-06 21:32 EST ------- Doesn't build, missing gecko-sharp, gconf-sharp, and %find_lang doesn't find any langs. A spec that addresses these: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/mono-tools.spec The Summary doesn't seem to go with the %description, these are mono tools and not necessarily a documentation system. The description in the included README seems closer. URL is 404'd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 02:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070248.l072mnDU027144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-06 21:48 EST ------- Is this package still excluded on PPC? If so, the bug on the FE-ExcludeArch-ppc tracker shouldn't be closed. Please could you open a new bug if the package still isn't working -- and then fix the bug too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 04:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 23:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070454.l074sfWD031266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-01-06 23:54 EST ------- OK, so in looking at this: - dvdauthor can't encode mpeg - dvdauthor can't decode mpeg - dvdauthor can't play mpeg (duh, it can't encode/decode) - dvdauthor can mux/demux mpeg (this is how it gets into DVD format) - dvdauthor can't decode encrypted DVDs Since mux/demux is ok, this should be ok for Fedora. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 09:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070953.l079rEbC002905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-07 04:53 EST ------- The bug is down to something missing in the PPC version of glibc (it's not been ported across if memory serves me right). I did file a BZ report on it but was told that the missing bit wasn't going to be implemented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 09:56:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 04:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701070956.l079uU7R003174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2007-01-07 04:56 EST ------- I think you're right, in fact the obsoletes should obsolete a specified version, not "below current" for a name change. The old ones needn't be carried over, they were only my private packages. The others listed are from other repos that asked me to put them in there. New version at http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/python-twisted-2.4.0-2.fc5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 10:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 05:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071023.l07ANN9d004313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-07 05:23 EST ------- What bugzilla number? If the "something missing" is something that mono-debugger can't do without, then it would be strange for the glibc bug to be closed 'wontfix'. If it's something that mono-debugger _can_ do without, then mono-debugger should be fixed. Either way, there should be a bug filed against mono-debugger which a) Clearly explains the problem b) depends on the glibc bug you mention c) blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 10:35:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 05:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071035.l07AZ4DS004670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-01-07 05:35 EST ------- Thanks :) * Tue Jan 02 2007 Johan Cwiklinski 0.4.2-2 - using 'name' and 'version' macros for Source0 - corrected mispelling in changelog SRPM URL : http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/ksplash-engine-moodin-0.4.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 10:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 05:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071048.l07Amb0x005256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-07 05:48 EST ------- Aha, it seems to be bug 205017. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 10:58:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 05:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071058.l07AwpGq005613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-07 05:58 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071111.l07BBDtt006089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 06:11 EST ------- Again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071112.l07BCVmP006134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-07 06:12 EST ------- Thanks Mamuro, your modifications work perfectly. My geda bugs have been solved. How do you want to continue this review? should I only change the release version to 4 and file back ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071117.l07BHXTa006280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo |ra-cn/fe-review/glade3 |ra-cn/in-review/glade3.spec ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-01-07 06:17 EST ------- Hi, I made an update to the spec file, to use the latest 3.1.4 package. Besides that, the spec and srpm download URL has been changed a little. Please have a look and tell me what to do next, thank you all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071126.l07BQMxa006524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-07 06:26 EST ------- Upstream 0.2.4 tarball is available, but it's not quite the same as the copy included in 0.2.4-1 SRPM, lib micro version has changed. Upstream URLs changed: libburn -> libburnia, libburn-download -> libburnia-download I think the doxygen docs belong to -devel rather than the main package. The dependency on libburn is still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:38:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071138.l07Bc4HG006774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > How do you want to continue this review? > should I only change the release version to 4 and file back ? Well, (for compat-guile-16) at least -devel package needs "Requires: automake" because -devel package includes automake .m4 file so please fix so. Also, please check if I have overlooked something else and add some fixes you want to do. Then I will review your spec file again. By the way, do you agree with the name "compat-guile-16"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071147.l07BllB3007039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 ------- Additional Comments From G.Cohnen at t-online.de 2007-01-07 06:47 EST ------- deluge works great for me. AMD64 (x86_64) It's fundamental to compile python-libtorrent with -DAMD64 In python-libtorrent.cpp are this lines #ifdef AMD64 #define pythonLong int #else #define pythonLong long <- see -DAMD64 #endif I used this : python-libtorrent-0.3.0-3.20061128svn.src.rpm rb_libtorrent-0.11-2.src.rpm deluge-0.4.1-1.src.rpm the python-libtorrent.spec should changed for x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 11:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071155.l07BtC3f007550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-07 06:55 EST ------- The third subpatch for src/platform/X11/Makefile.am in agg-2.4-depends.patch is not applied, certainly because it lacks a line like @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ Another issue I found is that @x_libraries@ is empty, so there is a lone -L when linking. I think it should be fixed in the autotools build system. Maybe in configure there could be something along test -n "$x_libraries" && X_LDFLAGS="-L$x_libraries" AC_SUBST(X_LDFLAGS) and then in Makefile.am it could be libaggplatformX11_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info @AGG_LIB_VERSION@ @X_LDFLAGS@ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 12:14:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071214.l07CECTF008475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-07 07:14 EST ------- > * I would personally replace > rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la > by > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la The latter returns False if the target files don't exist. The former returns True in that case and doesn't break the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 12:39:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 07:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071239.l07CdUf1009425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-07 07:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > * I would personally replace > > rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la > > by > > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la > > The latter returns False if the target files don't exist. > The former returns True in that case and doesn't break the build. Breaking the build in case those files aren't there anymore is the point of my change. It helps to detect when something changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071304.l07D4mAt010249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-07 08:04 EST ------- %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la in the %files list would achieve the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:08:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071308.l07D8dar010401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-07 08:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Oh.. I just noticed that you already requested for > sponsorship. > > Now I am sponsoring you and you should receive a mail. Thank You for sponsorship. The package was built correctly on buildsys (all arch, devel), so I can close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:10:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071310.l07DAMMt010471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 08:10 EST ------- Closing that due to lack of interest. New request has been submitted in bug 221727. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221727 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071310.l07DAXeI010484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at iagorubio.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 08:10 EST ------- *** Bug 174063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071322.l07DM9Sp010691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 08:22 EST ------- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071333.l07DXTvN010994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 13:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 08:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071358.l07DwqaI012461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-01-07 08:58 EST ------- 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines. 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text included in package. 7. source files match upstream: d2c45879e4cfb95d410bf603af891e07 dvdauthor-0.6.11.tar.gz 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. 10. package builds in mock (x86_64 devel). 11. rpmlint is silent. 12. final provides and requires are sane: dvdauthor = 0.6.11-8.fc7 = /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libdvdread.so.3()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libfribidi.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) 13. no shared libraries are present. 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. no duplicates in %files. 18. file permissions are appropriate. 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is not present and no testsuite. 21. no scriptlets present. 22. code, not content. 23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 25. no headers. 26. no pkgconfig files. 27. no libtool .la droppings. 28. not a GUI app. 29. not a web app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071400.l07E0bsn012624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-01-07 09:00 EST ------- Oops forgot to set ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071403.l07E37iQ012862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 09:03 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint gives me following result: W: cssed-devel no-documentation can be ignored because of lack of any devel-related documentation * I have no objection to name of package and spec file * package is licensed under a GPL license and the license file is included into %doc * package builds fine in mock fc6/x86_64 * sources match upstream (md5: ff7c818d1f819b7d76b4f714be64e08e) * locales are handled well * all directories are properly owned !* %clean section presents but looks bad, you should change it to rm -rf %{buildroot} * %defattr macro presents in all %files sections * macros used well * -devel subpackage presents and looks good !* bad icon tag in desktop-file THINGS to do: * change %clean section * you have used cssed.png entry in desktop.file but that file doesn't exist. It seems to me that the best way would be changing it to /usr/share/cssed/pixmaps/cssed-about.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071417.l07EHrOA013780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-07 09:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > THINGS to do: > * change %clean section > * you have used cssed.png entry in desktop.file but that file doesn't exist. > It seems to me that the best way would be changing it to > /usr/share/cssed/pixmaps/cssed-about.png Fixed. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:22:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071422.l07EMhRN013925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-07 09:22 EST ------- Devel build done, owners.list and comps-fe7 updated, FC-6 branch requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:37:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071437.l07Ebnrx014246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2007-01-07 09:37 EST ------- I've updated the srpm and spec, how about that now... * Summary: Anti-Grain Geometry graphical rendering engine * patch fixed, and @FREETYPE_LIBS@ moved, and AC_SUBST(X_LDFLAGS) tweak added * . at end of descriptions * news added to docs * trailing / added to includedir %files * freetype-devel, pkgconfig and automake added to -devel requires * Requires.private added * rpath removed patches logged as: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1629532&group_id=42020&atid=431927 and http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1629915&group_id=42020&atid=431927 The substantive issue is gpc, and in that case we're building with --disable-gpc to disable building and including gpc in the final rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 14:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071445.l07Ejs4k014464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 15:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071509.l07F9LAk015265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-01-07 10:09 EST ------- We can certainly remove the jpp tags, but it's clear that I'm not making time to continue with this package, so I'd like to withdraw my review request. Perhaps somebody else would like to continue with this one. Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 16:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071620.l07GKT5V016980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-07 11:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Are any plains when it will be added to the repo? This package is currently under review. It will be added to the repository as soon as the review is complete. If you want it to reach the repository faster, help review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 16:30:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071630.l07GUcn3017296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-07 11:30 EST ------- I am not able to access any of these links above. Shouldnt this review reopened or a new review submitted as per comment #18? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 16:53:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071653.l07GrxmV017902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 11:53 EST ------- It's better to check rpmlint again before sending an each new release. If you made that, you would see following result: W: cssed macro-in-%changelog clean It means you have to double % character before clean, so write %%clean instead of %clean in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 17:10:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071710.l07HAvMx018282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 12:10 EST ------- Some question(s) and issue(s) * Is "po4a" really needed for rebuilding this? I can rebuild this without "po4a" by mockbuild on FC-devel i386. It seems that po4a is needed when you want to re-create some documents? * -------------------------------------- BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: /usr/bin/getopt (util-linux) -------------------------------------- These are not needed because these are included in minimal build environment. * I think adding debian/changelog is preferable because the upsteam of this package is debian people (correct?). * Does this package fail on parallel make? * rpmlint complains: ----------------------------------------------- E: fakeroot zero-length /usr/share/doc/fakeroot-1.5.10/README ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 17:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071743.l07HhJEl019276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-07 12:43 EST ------- Please post the link of the updated srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 17:59:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071759.l07HxxVJ019550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-07 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > It's better to check rpmlint again before sending an each new release. If you > made that, you would see following result: > W: cssed macro-in-%changelog clean > It means you have to double % character before clean, so write %%clean instead > of %clean in changelog. Fixed. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 18:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071829.l07ITd5L020085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-07 13:29 EST ------- Okay, now it does look fine. Package is approved. I'll sponsor you. Just request your cvsextras and fedorabugs account. After then you'll be able to import and build your package. Read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors carefully to know what you're to do. If package builds fine, don't forget to close that ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 18:32:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071832.l07IWTZ6020176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 13:32 EST ------- Well, I have to make some comments: * Please check the requirement for -devel package. cssed.pc includes the line: ----------------------------------------------- Requires: gtk+-2.0 glib-2.0 ----------------------------------------------- This means that -devel package needs "Requires: gtk2-devel" Also, ----------------------------------------------- Cflags: -I${prefix}/share/cssed/include ----------------------------------------------- points to a wrong directory. Also this file has a strange coding at the end (try "cat cssed.pc"). * Please avoid to use autotools when it is possible. It seems that from your patch against Makefile.am and the content of Makefile.in, you can make a patch against Makefile.in, not against Makefile.am with ease. * Please remove redundant BuildRequires. For example, glib2-devel is always required by gtk2-devel, so writting "glib2-devel" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 18:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: at76_usb-firmware - Firmware for Atmel AT76C503A based USB WLAN adapters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071833.l07IXcbK020201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: at76_usb-firmware - Firmware for Atmel AT76C503A based USB WLAN adapters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |Atmel AT76C503A based USB | |WLAN adapters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 18:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071840.l07IeSwM020341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 13:40 EST ------- Also: * some header files have CRLF (i.e. Windows-like) end-of-line encodings and these should be fixed. * fedora-cssed.desktop includes: ------------------------------------------- Categories=Application;Development;TextEditor;X-Fedora; ------------------------------------------- Two categories "Application" "X-Fedora" is now deprecated and so these should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 18:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071848.l07ImnW3020516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-07 13:48 EST ------- Also one issue. /usr/include/cssed/SciLexer.h includes: ---------------------------------------------- // Copyright 1998-2002 by Neil Hodgson // The License.txt file describes the conditions under which this software may be distributed. ---------------------------------------------- So please include scintilla/License.txt Note: this is MIT? If so, the license of this "whole" package is still GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 19:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071911.l07JB9xv021038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-07 14:11 EST ------- > * Is "po4a" really needed for rebuilding this? Indeed, you are right, the latest release says: "Drop po4a from build-deps." I'll comment BR: po4a away (but keep it in case the next release forgets again to process the language files). > zero-length [...]/README [...] debian/changelog Hm, a bit sloppy in upstream. I'll add debian/changelog, but I'd like to keep the zero-sized README in case it (hopefully) gets filled with content. I.e. better to carry an empty file, than to forget to check upon the next package update. What do you say? I wouldn't really object, if you insist on removing it. | o `redundant' BRs: They do not hurt and are also tagged as `not needed', not | `forbidden'. Especially gcc-c++/libstdc++ could be removed from future | minimal roots for an easy gain of space. It's already been removed in other | buildsystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 19:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701071948.l07Jm2gp022176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-07 14:48 EST ------- Also during review, each time you change the spec file, please bump the release and add a changelog entry (except maybe for very minor issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 20:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 15:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221769] New: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/libcgi-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: LibCGI is a library written from scratch to easily make CGI applications in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 21:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701072150.l07LoCOn024887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-07 16:50 EST ------- I fixed all these things. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/cssed/cssed-0.4.0-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 21:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701072159.l07LxSdA025102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-07 16:59 EST ------- fpcmake uses the settings in Makefile.fpc to generate the makefile. If you add a hardcoded 'lib/lazarus' in the Makefile.fpc, fpcmake places that literally in the makefile. I changed the patch, so that it doesn't use 'lib/lazarus', but '$(_lib)/lazarus' and added '_LIB={%_lib}' to the make-command. This should solve the build-problem on 64-bit systems. Can you try again? (same link?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 22:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221776] New: Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221776 Summary: Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/digitemp.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/digitemp-3.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: DigiTemp is a simple to use console application for reading values from Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire devices. Its main use is for reading temperature sensors, but it also reads counters and understands the 1-wire hubs with devices on different branches of the network. DigiTemp now supports the following 1-wire temperature sensors: DS18S20 (and DS1820), DS18B20, DS1822, the DS2438 Smart Battery Monitor, DS2422 and DS2423 Counters, DS2409 MicroLAN Coupler (used in 1-wire hubs) and the AAG TAI-8540 humidity sensor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 22:31:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 17:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701072231.l07MVlWH025852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-07 17:31 EST ------- * Sun Jan 07 2007 Thorsten Scherf 0.9.7.1-3 - added tcp-wrapper support - fixed dirowner and permissions problem updated packages are available: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager-0.9.7.1-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prelude-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 7 23:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701072317.l07NHZMl027010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-07 18:17 EST ------- greetings and happy new year, I want announce a new release of MyBashBurn 1.0.1 with major feature and enhancements, with some security bugfix important for this review, as a function against race conditions on temp files, now MyBashBurn look for root/user config in /etc/mybashburnrc, ~/.mybashburnrc in that order, fix permissions, updated man file and the option of change the 'root directory' (/usr/share/mybashburn/) have been deprecated for some time and will be removed. New files location: SPEC: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec SRPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.1-0.src.rpm HOMEPAGE: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 00:37:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080037.l080b8o0028765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library Alias: python-libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-07 19:37 EST ------- I've bumped it to a new release, which adds a -DAMD64 flag on 64-bit arches (as noticed by Gerd Classen on bug #221669). Updated files are on my webspace: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.3.0-4.20061128svn.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 00:38:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080038.l080cdil028813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-07 19:38 EST ------- Thanks for your help on getting this worked out, Gerd. I've posted an updated python-libtorrent spec/SRPM on its review request (bug #221376), and I've bumped the dependecy thereof in the spec/SRPM for Deluge as well. Update files are on my webspace: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge-0.4.1-2.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 00:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 19:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080052.l080qBOl029104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-07 19:52 EST ------- The http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded page is free for edit to anyone needing it. There is no need to be in a special group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 01:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217671] Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080118.l081IxZw029793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217671 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-01-07 20:18 EST ------- libhangul-0.0.4 was released btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 01:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217671] Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080124.l081O9ww030015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217671 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-01-07 20:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145019) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145019&action=view) libhangul.spec-1.patch Fix: - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} and for the include dir: - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. All the other MUST items are satisfied, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 07:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 02:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080730.l087Ugtm008844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-08 02:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile-16.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/compat-guile/compat-guile-16-1.6.7-4.src.rpm Yes, I'm ok with the name. Once I've asked on the mailing list about some particular guidelines to follow for compat packages, your way is more logic to me. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00375.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 09:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080940.l089edux016301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-08 04:40 EST ------- Manuel - maybe it was in the past, but now it requires you to be in "EditGroup" (which now I am). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 09:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080943.l089hIp6016492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-01-08 04:43 EST ------- Sorry about that Rahul, my university's network (which my website lies behind) has been inaccessible all weekend and it's still dropping packets. Hopefully it'll get fixed soon. Re: the review - let me know if I do need to open it or a new one. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 09:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 04:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701080956.l089uRub017681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-08 04:56 EST ------- As per the instructions at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-e2f7f3048aae892d69bba2b1d1563aed5c63a1ff I cd-ed into the "FC-5" directory and ran "make tag", but I got this error: [david at shed FC-5]$ make tag cvs tag -c curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 ERROR: The tag curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5:devel:anderson:1168092696 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 I know nothing about CVS... but it seems to be saying that the _fc5 tag is already applied to the devel branch? How could that have happened? (I hadn't run any previous tag commands). How do I undo it? I tried "cvs tag -d curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5" but I got an error saying this wasn't allowed: [david at shed devel]$ cvs tag -d curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 ERROR: Tag removal not allowed for tag curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 10:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 05:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081009.l08A93J1018392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-08 05:08 EST ------- WRT comment 12: Quoting the second paragraph of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded Add CVS administrative requests by editing this wiki page. You must register a wiki account to edit this page, but you do not need to be a member of the EditGroup. So either you are wrong, or policy has changed and this page has not been updated. The EditGroup contains the people which are allowed to change any page in the wiki, but this specific page has (had?) a special ACL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 13:25:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081325.l08DPmkM027946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-01-08 08:25 EST ------- Updated spec is available on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vim-vimoutliner.spec, SRPM on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vim-vimoutliner-0.3.4-8.src.rpm, and RPM on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vim-vimoutliner-0.3.4-8.noarch.rpm (small changes related to change of name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 13:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081327.l08DRsjO028111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-08 08:27 EST ------- Just some comments and hints: * Also run rpmlint on the built rpms: $ rpmlint ~/tmp/rpm/RPMS/aspell6-fa-0.10-0.i386.rpm W: aspell6-fa incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.10 0.10-0 E: aspell6-fa no-binary E: aspell6-fa only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: aspell6-fa no-documentation At least the two "W"arnings are helpful. The "E"errors can be ignored with this package. * Why is the package called "aspell6-fa" when all other aspell language packages are called "aspell-*"? * The defined %lang macro is not used in "Source0" everywhere. * Creating a macro for the Aspell "0.60" version is highly recommended. * Summary says "Farsi" only, description says "Persian" only. For consistency and better results when searching package summaries, I would use the name "Farsi" also in the description. * Licence file COPYING is not included as %doc. * Don't include the aspell home directory, because it belongs into the aspell mother package already, and you require that package. $ rpmls -p aspell6-fa-0.10-0.i386.rpm |grep ^d drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 Only include the files below that directory with this entry in the %files section: %{_libdir}/aspell-0.60/* * In your spec %changelog, specify the package version as full version-release, not just its version. Packages usually start with release 1, not 0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 13:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081344.l08Diuo1028965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-08 08:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > As per the instructions at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-e2f7f3048aae892d69bba2b1d1563aed5c63a1ff > I cd-ed into the "FC-5" directory and ran "make tag", but I got this error: > > [david at shed FC-5]$ make tag > cvs tag -c curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 > ERROR: The tag curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 is already applied on a different branch > ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches > curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5:devel:anderson:1168092696 > cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed > cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! > make: *** [tag] Error 1 > > I know nothing about CVS... but it seems to be saying that the _fc5 tag is > already applied to the devel branch? How could that have happened? (I hadn't > run any previous tag commands). How do I undo it? I tried "cvs tag -d > curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5" but I got an error saying this wasn't allowed: > > [david at shed devel]$ cvs tag -d curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 > ERROR: Tag removal not allowed for tag curlftpfs-0_9-1_fc5 > cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed > cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! Was the SRPM you imported using cvs-import.sh built using mock for an FC5 target? That would explain the tag being set as shown above. To fix the problem, increase the package's release number in CVS and try tagging again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 13:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081359.l08Dx1g7030217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-08 08:58 EST ------- Thanks Paul... I don't understand too well (I'm a CVS newbie), but it seems to work. Should I update the release numbers on the FC6 and devel versions too? (Otherwise FC5 will be newer than FC6+devel - is that a problem when the change is only trivial?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:06:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081406.l08E6aR4031059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 09:06 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuilding is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081406.l08E6stx031084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-08 09:06 EST ------- devel should never be "rpm-older" than FC-6, which should never be "rpm-older" than FC-5 etc. You'll get nagmails about it if they are, so it's worth fixing even for trivial changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081408.l08E8YJ5031202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 09:08 EST ------- Ping? I can see that this package (pyfribidi) is already imported into FE-5, so I think you can close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081414.l08EEoOf031771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-08 09:14 EST ------- Thanks for the tip Paul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081418.l08EI0NI032095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-08 09:17 EST ------- All done - closing NEXTRELEASE. Thanks to all those who commented (Mamoru, Manuel, Paul). I have one other package waiting review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873) - it's been reviewed once and a couple of minor tweaks made... kio_sword, a light-weight KDE front-end to SWORD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209222] Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081418.l08EICif032168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-lml - Prelude log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209222 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081418.l08EIZba032236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 09:18 EST ------- Okay, all I pointed out is now fixed and I can say that this package can be imported to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081421.l08ELHL7032526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-08 09:21 EST ------- * Package doesn't use our global RPM %optflags for compilation. It uses a custom -Wall only. Makefile needs a patch to accept $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} * Desktop menu category "Application;System;" is debatable. More appropriate would be "Application;Utility;" as it is an ordinary application that works on files, ISO 9660 image files. > %clean > rm -fr %{buildroot} %{_builddir}/%{name} Just "rm -fr %{buildroot}" is sufficient. The extracted tarball is removed automatically after a successful build. > #BuildRequires: gcc-c++ The code is written in C, not C++, anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 14:21:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081421.l08ELKlE032557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-08 09:21 EST ------- If you have a problem with hosting, you can get someone in #fedora-extras channel to temporarily provide you with a anonymous host. You can upload it to fedoraproject.org wiki too. Otherwise mail me the packages and spec files and I will host them till you get past the review. I dont want good packages struck in review just because of this. Yes, Please open a new review and mark this one as a duplicate of the new one. It helps in our tracking process since we are going through a major revamp of infrastructure and repository merges within Fedora. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:16:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081516.l08FG3tK005055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 10:16 EST ------- Well, then please check if %{_smp_mflags} is okay? If adding this bears no problem, please add this. (In reply to comment #21) > > zero-length [...]/README [...] debian/changelog > > What do you say? I wouldn't really object, if you insist on removing it. Well, then I don't force to remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081522.l08FMBP5005550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-01-08 10:21 EST ------- Does not work without filetype plugin on to /etc/vimrc (or ~/.vimrc). The way how to add this to vim needs to be discussed with vim maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081534.l08FYQjp006723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(thibaud.mouton at gma| |il.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 10:34 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG, blocking FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:37:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211740] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - CPAN module provides Perl interface to the libsyck data serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081537.l08FbvVb007098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - CPAN module provides Perl interface to the libsyck data serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211740 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-08 10:37 EST ------- What is the status of that review? Anyway I have spotted that this package uses an internal syck library. I think it is bad, the external one should be used instead - except if there is a good reason not to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:44:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081544.l08FiYZ6007715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 10:44 EST ------- Well, one issue. As I said in comment #11, activating TCP wrapper support needs * For FC-devel: tcp_wrappers-devel * For FC5/6: tcp_wrappers for BuildRequires. You can change the BuildRequies according to FC-devel <-> FC 5/6 by -------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: libpreludedb-devel, libxml2-devel %if 0%{?fedora} > 6 BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel %else BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers %endif -------------------------------------------- Other things are all okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (prelude-manager) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 15:52:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081552.l08Fq0cu008198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This is my first package - I am seeking a sponsor. (Just noticing that now I am sponsoring and currently this bug does not block FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 16:07:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081607.l08G7qdq009403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.6.0-3 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-01-08 11:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Ping? I can see that this package (pyfribidi) is already > imported into FE-5, so I think you can close this bug. Ah, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 16:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209224] Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081619.l08GJieP010332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prelude-manager - Prelude Management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209224 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-08 11:19 EST ------- fixed and closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 16:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081628.l08GSPKV011270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-01-08 11:28 EST ------- OK, so vim maintainer agrees to add it in future vim updates. For now it is added in %post script. Final rewiew: Package conforms to all MUST items, spec file is fine, rpmlint is silent. Package builds fine here and seems to work as intended. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081703.l08H32cj013899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compat-guile|Review Request: compat- |- Guile 1.6 compatibility |guile-16 - Guile 1.6 |package |compatibility package OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 12:02 EST ------- = Well, from my eye inspection, i.e. ------------------------------------------------- ( for f in `rpm -ql compat-guile-16-devel compat-guile-16 | sort` ; do if file $f | grep -q text ; then echo $f ; fi ; done ) | xargs grep guile16 ------------------------------------------------- all "guile16" words included in the texts in compat-guile-16(-devel) are correctly changed to guile16 (if needed). Then: ** ------------------------------------------------- - Added automake in BR ------------------------------------------------- Well, I didn't mean by that. What I meant is -devel package should have ------------------------------------------------- Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, automake ------------------------------------------------- because -devel package includes %{_datadir}/aclocal/guile16.m4. Actually automake is not needed for BuildRequires as you don't call automake in build process. ** Source0: must be: ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.6.7.tar.gz (md5sum coincides) ** %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Please choose one. Please fix the issues marked as **. Other things are okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (compat-guile-16) is APPROVED by me. -------------------------------------------------------- Note: It seems that the newest guile of 1.6 series is 1.6.8 . Please check 1.6.8 after you first import 1.6.7 into Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:23:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081723.l08HNVKc015900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-08 12:23 EST ------- (Just changing to NEXTRELEASE for tracability) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:24:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] New: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gilboad at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-1.src.rpm Description: CGDB is a curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB). The goal of CGDB is to be lightweight and responsive; not encumbered with unnecessary features. The interface is designed to deliver the familiar GDB text interface, with a split screen showing the source as it executes. The UI is modeled on the classic Unix text editor, vi. Those familiar with vi should feel right at home using CGDB. Many thanks to Mr. Peter Gordon for hosting the files. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081746.l08Hkas4017799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-08 12:46 EST ------- I had already fixed the above topics and I thought you'd probably prefer to remove the empty README, so it's gone now. Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.13-9.at.src.rpm * Sun Jan 7 2007 Axel Thimm - 1.5.10-13 - po4a currently not need as a BR. - remove empty README, add debian/changelog. The problem with parallel makes is that they are not really testable. Every invocation can have different ordering and results (it depends on the runtime needed per parallel target). In principle ony would haveto review the Makefile structure to be sure and this has to be done each time. So I rather play it safe than be sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081752.l08HqTnT018377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 17:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081758.l08Hw9Fx019117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-08 12:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The substantive issue is gpc, and in that case we're building with --disable-gpc > to disable building and including gpc in the final rpm It isn't enough, the srpm should not contain non free or legally problematic code. This should be reported upstream anyway, upstream is violating gpc license and/or the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:06:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081806.l08I643H020069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-08 13:06 EST ------- Last comment had a typo in the src.rpm's URL, it's SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fakeroot-1.5.10-13.at.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221884] New: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at andrewprice.me.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com I'm opening this second review request as per bug 168690. pyBackPack - A GTK+ application written in Python to back up and restore files onto CDR, USB stick or SSH host, aimed at less technical users. The project was started for Google Summer of Code 2005 but I took over development when the original maintainer no longer wanted it. I aim to improve it considerably from its current state. Current version: 0.4.5 Spec: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec SRPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.5-1.src.rpm RPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.5-1.noarch.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081838.l08IcDwk022544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-08 13:38 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: geany devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/geany/filetypes.c Okay, see comment #7 - package meets package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 2ffaae9b0fa807bdd4be0e6ec0f4a2e5 geany-0.10.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6 - all build dependencies listed in BR - locales handled properly - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by default packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** Since you are not yet sponsered, I want to see a couple package reviews from you before blocking FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081844.l08Ii8EL022931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-08 13:44 EST ------- Oh... forgot to add. First submission to -extras. Be gentle ;) rpmlint output: $ rpmlint -i cgdb-0.6.3-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm W: cgdb non-coherent-filename cgdb-0.6.3-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm The file which contains the package should be named --..rpm. 0.6.3 is the version. -1 is the release. fc6 is the... well, fc6. x86_64 is the arch. What am I missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081853.l08IrqWx023532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-08 13:53 EST ------- Oops rpmlint ran on the binary package. My bad. $ rpmlint -i cgdb-0.6.3-1.src.rpm W: cgdb mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Cleared the spaces. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-2.src.rpm After fix: $ rpmlint -i cgdb-0.6.3-2.src.rpm $ - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 18:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081858.l08IwLaR023830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-01-08 13:58 EST ------- I've opened a new review request at bug 221884. I can't see a way to mark this one as a duplicate though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081911.l08JBbs1024897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-08 14:11 EST ------- You need to apply for fedorabugs group access in the Fedora Account system to be able to change bug status. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem I have done it for you now. I was able to access the spec file and packages now in the new review you have submitted so I believe that your hosting problems are solved but if you need help, feel free to drop me a mail anytime. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221884 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081911.l08JBe8F024948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davea at sucs.org ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-08 14:11 EST ------- *** Bug 168690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081920.l08JKwBI026135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|davidz at redhat.com |rstrode at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:24:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081924.l08JOq8x026646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-08 14:24 EST ------- You should add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR block (177841) in all Your request (before You are sponsored), but in this request I added it. I can make a official review, but I can advise you: "strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/cgdb" probably is not needed, because (if I have good information) the rpmbuild does standard stripping. In %doc You must include: -AUTHORS -ChangeLog -COPYING -NEWS -README -TODO Now, You are including only REAME. I did not checked all "MUST/SHOULD", but it was not an official review. And the last: E: cgdb-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Empty debuginfo is useless -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:27:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081927.l08JRJWD026863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-08 14:27 EST ------- spec file looks clean and shiny. I always forget our policy of Epoch handling though. It might be a good idea to explicitly put an epoch of 0. should we version the buildrequires? What's --with-gdm-config=/etc/gdm/custom.conf do? Remember for most people custom.conf is just an empty stub file. Will that cause a problem for the applet? is rpmlint output clean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:40:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081940.l08Jelxm028109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-08 14:40 EST ------- SPEC : http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac.spec SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac-0.6.0-5.cvs20070108.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Dirac is an open source video codec Build Log: (2> .log) http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libdirac/libdirac-0.6.0-5.log It seems that using configure can disable theses unwanted FLAGs without autoreconf. I think it is a better solution. I wonder why the src.rpm has grown up. Since i was using make tag, the produced release dirac-0.6.0.tar.gz was bundled with the sources but no used. The only thing that wasn't bundled in this version was the qt4 gui encoder. But anyway it can be renabled later... I should have : (but since it is not release...) provides: dirac-qt4 obsolete: dirac-qt4 < %{version}-5.cvs20070108 The only rpmlint error i have is : E: libdirac configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. But the %configure script bundle it so i wonder if it is not a problem with the ./configure in the snapshot step -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081951.l08Jp4Rb029021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-08 14:50 EST ------- >From looking at the code, it uses gnome-vfs to monitor the config file, and reloads the gdm configuration if it changes. It does not read the file though, it gets the configuration from gdm. I guess it would be better to get notification on configuration changes from gdm, but thats just an upstream bug to file, not something we need to sort out prior to accepting the package. I don't think versioning the BRs would add a lot. I'd much rather rely on version checks in the configure script. The versioned BRs in the spec file get outdated to easily. rpmlint output was clean when I did the packages. The packaging guidelines don't say anything about requiring an explicit epoch, and that would be just silly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 19:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701081953.l08JrDQn029217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-08 14:53 EST ------- okie dokie, looks good then. build it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 20:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082008.l08K8MqH030732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-08 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > OK - rpmlint -i lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm > W: lxpanel non-coherent-filename lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm > The file which contains the package should be named > --..rpm. Mhh. Strange. I can't remember which .rpmmacros I have used for this package. So I've uploaded a new version which is the result of the mock build. Could you test it for this issue (just to play safe this time)? > First part is a BSD like license, second GPLv2. > OK - Since GPL is more restrictive than BSD the whole package becomes GPL. So > the license field in the spec is ok. The GPL is also the license at gnomefiles.org: http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/LXPanel > MINOR NOTE - line warps in long fields like %description are usually done after > 79 characters. Fixed. > MINOR NOTE - Instead of > %dir %{_datadir}/lxpanel/ > %{_datadir}/lxpanel/* > %dir %{_libdir}/lxpanel/ > %{_libdir}/lxpanel/* > you could simply use > %{_datadir}/lxpanel/ > %{_libdir}/lxpanel/ Ok. Fixed. > OK - IMO no desktop file is needed since it's panel and not what I call a > typical program/standalone application. Also think so. gnome-panel and kicker also have no desktop file. > OK - lxpanel works fine, but lxpanelctl is buggy. I can't add more starter > because the "Select Application"-Dialog doesn't list the files in > /usr/share/applications. Also hitting return in the location bar doesn't work. > Looking at src/plugins/launchbar.c I think this is a known issue (see the FIXME > in line 490) and isn't really meant to work atm. You're right. Seems to be already filed as a bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1623222&group_id=180858&atid=894869 SPEC Url: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel.spec SRPM Url: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-4.fc6.src.rpm Changelog: * Mon Jan 08 2007 Sebastian Vahl - 0.2.4-4 - Fixed some minor issues from the review process (#219930) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 20:12:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082012.l08KCtp0030997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-08 15:12 EST ------- Buildsystem knows about it, import and build away. Please close when built for dist-fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 20:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082036.l08KaHaQ032298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-08 15:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-3.src.rpm 0.6.3-3: - Fix %doc. - Do not strip debug info; let rpm do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 20:36:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221906] New: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karlikt at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver.spec SRPM URL: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver-0.12.0-1.src.rpm Description: GMediaServer is a UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system. It is part of the GNU project. GMediaServer serves audio and video files to certain network connected media players. Most hardware media players only play music and/or video - they don't provide the media themselves. Those media files have to come from a device on the network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 20:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082048.l08KmHI1000555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-08 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > So I've uploaded a new version which is the result of the mock build. Could you > test it for this issue (just to play safe this time)? Looks fine, ACCEPTED. Don't forget to change the default starters patch once we have a pcmanfm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 21:22:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082122.l08LMv5g002879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 212887, which changed state. Bug 212887 Summary: PHPUnit3 is going to Obsolete PHPUnit 1 and 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212887 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 21:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082125.l08LPe2V003083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-08 16:25 EST ------- built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 21:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082127.l08LRXkj003301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-08 16:27 EST ------- NOTE: This package is only meant to be built/used on devel/fc7+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 22:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082209.l08M9uLZ006124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-08 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > * Package doesn't use our global RPM %optflags for compilation. > It uses a custom -Wall only. Makefile needs a patch to accept > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} I've never used that flag in my builds. I made a patch (hopefully a good one) and I could also talk with the author about a backport changes to the upstream version, but I don't know if that has sense, because it seems to be used only in RPM builds and there should be something like that in a source Makefile: ifndef OPTFLAGS #common defined by the author GLOBALFLAGS = -O2 -Wall ... else GLOBALFLAGS = ${OPTFLAGS} endif GLOBALFLAGS += flags-speciied-for-program What do you suggest? > * Desktop menu category "Application;System;" is debatable. More > appropriate would be "Application;Utility;" as it is an ordinary > application that works on files, ISO 9660 image files. Ok, but it's in Accessories menu now. Grip is in Sound & Video and xcdroast in System Tools. There are all related with CD (in their own way). > > %clean > > rm -fr %{buildroot} %{_builddir}/%{name} > > Just "rm -fr %{buildroot}" is sufficient. The extracted tarball is > removed automatically after a successful build. Maybe in mock. In my local, custom build directory remains. If it's not a big problem I would prefer this option to stay (for other test builds). > > #BuildRequires: gcc-c++ > > The code is written in C, not C++, anyway. :) I took it from my SPEC file to other project. Btw, project compiled with OPTFLAGS is over 10% larger than the previous one. Is this normal? Thanks for your sugestions. SPEC: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec SRPC: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.6-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 22:30:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082230.l08MUkIC007979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-08 17:30 EST ------- Yeah, I noticed he changed a few things in the tarball, this srpm uses the now upstream one. Dep on libburn is because libisofs can actually make a call to libburn I'm told. Moving the docs to devel. http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/extras/libisofs-0.2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 23:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] New: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/xwnc.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/xwnc-0.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 23:38:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082338.l08NcVs7012066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Alias: xwnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |xwnc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 8 23:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701082343.l08NhNYN012463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-08 18:43 EST ------- I have placed and xwnc package up for review. xwnc ofcourse is a component of metisse. I'm going to go ahead and block this bug against FE-DEADREVIEW For the xwnc review see bug #221924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 02:59:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090259.l092xsQi020717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-08 21:59 EST ------- Builds this time, and seems to run. rpmlint to look at: E: lazarus statically-linked-binary /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc Why is this static? E: lazarus-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package debuginfo package empty, due in part to: W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild etc. Are the things in %(libdir)/lazarus/debian needed? Not a lawyer, but the modified LGPL does seem to give additional permission. Seems to be in Debian experimental, for what that's worth. Does this need futher license review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 04:06:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 23:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] New: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/libofx/libofx.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/libofx/libofx-0.8.2-2.src.rpm Description: libofx package for OFX support. Starting reviews of the gnucash stack in preparation for the grand merge. Can't actually move until everything is reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 05:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090518.l095I1Z6031595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-09 00:17 EST ------- Some remarks: - Consider disabling building the static libs (%configure --disable-static) - Consider using "make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install" instead of %makeinstall - Could you explain the "Requires: openjade". AFAIS, this package only needs a certain version of libopensp and doesn't actually apply/require openjade. - Consider using a standard FE BuildRoot and using %{?dist}. I am not going to formally reviewing the package because of the %buildroot being used, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 05:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090544.l095i6kE032318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-09 00:44 EST ------- You're going to comment but not review based on one item? And the point of that is....? --disable-static added, wee, get to save a few secs. DESTDIR added. The Requires is old historical stuff back when the libs were in openjade and it required that version to run right. Buildroot tweaked. Since upstream breaks abi even in minor point releases (0.8.0 -> 0.8.2), not sure what use pretending it can be built for multiple distros at once is, so no %{?dist}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 06:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] New: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/gwenhywfar.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/gwenhywfar-2.3.0-5.src.rpm Description: gwenhywfar utility library gwenhywfar is a utility library used by aqbanking. This is part of reviewing the gnucash stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 06:27:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090627.l096Rbs1001398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-09 01:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You're going to comment but not review based on one item? Yes, it's an item I have on my personal show stopper list. > And the point of that is....? Fighting guerillias? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 06:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090628.l096SlbV001443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-09 01:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > You're going to comment but not review based on one item? > Yes, it's an item I have on my personal show stopper list. Ok then. Mind you, the buildroot shouldn't even be *IN* the spec file, but that's an issue for a different day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 06:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090631.l096VThl001556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 01:31 EST ------- Okay. Now: ------------------------------------------------ This package (fakeroot) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------ INFO: I checked http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/fakeroot/ and it seems that 1.5.12 is released YESTERDAY. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 06:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090639.l096ddjt001913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2007-01-09 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > This looks good. Guillaume, have you applied for access to the Extras CVS? Excellent. I will apply for access to Extras CVS today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 07:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090711.l097B2Ux002789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-09 02:10 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag Issues: 1. The README.fedora is a bit on the terse side. You might have it list out the other packages that this one pulls in or at least repeat the summary, but thats not a big deal or a blocker. I think the obsoletes and provides are correct here. I tried to upgrade a fc6 python-twisted with this version and it correctly pulled in the packages and installed. I did notice one install on removal of any of the python-twisted-* packages that did the /usr/libexec/twisted-dropin-cache call in postun. If you remove them and python-twisted-core, rpm removes python-twisted-core first, resulting in a failed scriptlet on the other package, ie: rpm -e python-twisted-core python-twisted-words error: %postun(python-twisted-words-0.4.0-3.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 I think those packages need a Requires(postun): python-twisted-core I see no issues with this meta package, so I would be happy to APPROVE it. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, once it's been pushed to fc6, you should be able to rebuild flumotion there and hopefully fix the broken fc5->fc6 upgrade path in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 09:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090911.l099BsPN008782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Alias: xwnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 04:11 EST ------- - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines, including a comment specifying the fact that parallel make is broken - license ( GPL v2) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source is the last available version and matches upstream, f6df982eaebd4bf7f26661c126a1747a9cb0ecb1 xwnc-0.3.3.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - MINOR: duplicate BR autoconf (by automake), automake (by libtool) - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories/files that it creates, does not own foreign files/dirs - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - is an X server, so no need for .desktop file - no .la, no scriptlets, nothing related to devel (static, header files) - rpmlint is silent on both src.rpm and generated binary rpm - does not segfault on start :) I suggest the following - modify %{_bindir}/* into %{_bindir}/Xwnc so that you have better control and do not pull in unneeded stuff in case upstream changes something - add NEWS to %doc, it seems to contain more useful info then the included README - fix BR if you feel like it (according to packaging rules, duplicate BR are acceptable) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 09:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] New: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh- askpass with KWallet support Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/ksshaskpass.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/ksshaskpass-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 09:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090937.l099bYAI010691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 04:37 EST ------- I'll try to review this one. Preliminary comments - src.rpm should be updated when spec file is updated. You forgot to include the modified spec in the -2 src.rpm - upstream has released a new version yesterday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 09:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701090943.l099hhuA011270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 04:43 EST ------- Preliminary review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source libofx-0.8.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream but not last version, http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61170&package_id=57485&release_id=477013 shows that version 0.8.3 is available * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libofx-devel looks OK * File list of libofx looks OK * File list of libofx-devel looks OK rpmlint on libofx gives: E: libofx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ofx2qif ['/usr/lib64'] E: libofx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ofxdump ['/usr/lib64'] E: libofx binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libofx.so.3.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] Shouldn't this be fixed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 10:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091050.l09AojG0016211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-09 05:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I did notice one install on removal of any of the python-twisted-* > packages that did the /usr/libexec/twisted-dropin-cache call in > postun. If you remove them and python-twisted-core, rpm > removes python-twisted-core first, resulting in a failed scriptlet > on the other package, ie: > > rpm -e python-twisted-core python-twisted-words > error: %postun(python-twisted-words-0.4.0-3.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit > status 255 > > I think those packages need a > Requires(postun): python-twisted-core I think there are already implicit dependencies present for these, which come about through using the scriptlet form: %postun -p %{_libexecdir}/twisted-dropin-cache This results in scriptlet dependencies on %{_libexecdir}/twisted-dropin-cache, which implies python-twisted-core. So I don't know why rpm is removing the core package first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 11:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091107.l09B7wMk017874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-09 06:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > You're going to comment but not review based on one item? > > Yes, it's an item I have on my personal show stopper list. > > Ok then. Mind you, the buildroot shouldn't even be *IN* the spec file, Right, but until that day, I for one will insist on all rpm.specs using the same %buildroot for the sake of "reproducability/deterministic builts" and simplicity. (In reply to comment #5) > I'll try to review this one. OK, one of the Guerilla has took over ... I quit from this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 11:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220888] Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091149.l09Bn7u2019338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-09 06:49 EST ------- Thanks for the review of fakeroot and all three dependent packages! Since 1.5.10 was approved, I started by importing this version before testing the new one. I'll test 1.5.12 and issue an update before the freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 11:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 06:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091156.l09BuqEu019970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-09 06:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Got following errors while installing: > -- begin dump -- > [wahjava at chatteau SPECS]$ sudo rpm -ivh ../RPMS/i686/nss-mdns-0.8-2.i686.rpm > Password: > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:nss-mdns ########################################### [100%] > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.58781: line 3: fg: no job control > error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 > [wahjava at chatteau SPECS]$ sudo > rpm -ivh ../RPMS/x86_64/nss-mdns-0.8-2.x86_64.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > 1:nss-mdns ########################################### [100%] > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91686: line 3: fg: no job control > error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 > -- end dump -- Could you please try to re-run the rpm command with -vvv to see what exact command it's running, and try to run the command by hand? I believe it's because it's trying to update your nsswitch.conf, and can't parse it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 12:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 07:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091221.l09CLsdd021520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-09 07:21 EST ------- Is there still any open issue with the package? I think there was just the upstream request to package in accord to their subpackaging structure, which is up to you, both ways are fine. You can change the subpackaging also later, if you haven't made your mind 100% yet. I'd like to get this in, so it can be coevaluated with the other solutions. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 13:01:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091301.l09D1Mns023971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 08:01 EST ------- Well, * Licensing/Documentation Please add AUTHORS COPYING (adding these files are rather mandatory, if these files exist) * Source Specify URL. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is descriped on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ Well, I am a sponsor so I can sponsor you. Then I found another your review request (bug 221045), however the packaging of both two packages seems somewhat easy, so I want you to do a pre-review of other person's review request before I sponsor you (if you want me to sponsor you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 13:06:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091306.l09D637c024249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 08:05 EST ------- ( I can see this package imported into FE devel/6/5 and I think you can close this bug with CLOSED NEXTRELEASE ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 13:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091341.l09DfCpu026349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-09 08:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Builds this time, and seems to run. Good to hear. > rpmlint to look at: > E: lazarus statically-linked-binary /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc > Why is this static? All freepascal-programs are static. The (released) fpc-compilers don't support dynamic-linking. And for pascal-languages this isn't important in most cases. A pascal program for example is (almost) never linked to glibc. > E: lazarus-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package > debuginfo package empty, due in part to: > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild > etc. Yes, for some strange reason strip doesn't strip those binaries. And I have no idea why not. The rpm-script simply doesn't recognize them as binaries... I'll investigate further > Are the things in %(libdir)/lazarus/debian needed? No. ;) Shall I remove them from the package? > Not a lawyer, but the modified LGPL does seem to give additional permission. > Seems to be in Debian experimental, for what that's worth. Does this need futher > license review? This same license is used by the fpc-package itself. In principle it's LGPL, but since fpc can only link programs static, the LGPL license won't work. That's because the LGPL permits to use libraries, unmodified, in non-GPL applications, but only if they are linked in *dynamical*. The exception/change in this modified LGPL is that you can also link the binary static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 14:07:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091407.l09E73Nh028607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-09 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Is there still any open issue with the package? I think the only question still remaining is the license. http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/browser/trunk/bcfg2/COPYRIGHT I think that it's free enough to be included in Fedora, but I'm not sure that it's exactly the BSD licese. > I think there was just the upstream request to package in accord to their > subpackaging structure, which is up to you, both ways are fine. You can change > the subpackaging also later, if you haven't made your mind 100% yet. I'd like to > get this in, so it can be coevaluated with the other solutions. Thanks! Yeah, it doesn't matter to me much either way so I'll go along with upstream. Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 15:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091515.l09FFDHk001953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-01-09 10:15 EST ------- Well, I could reply with a quote: ?we don't create evil, we only package it?. I could add extern C guards if someone could tell me how to do so. As for installation dir, I think that putting a single header into its own subdir is a bit of an overkill. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 15:21:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091521.l09FLcQr002806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 15:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091545.l09Fj5rb006336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2007-01-09 10:44 EST ------- I had a better look: > rpmlint to look at: > E: lazarus statically-linked-binary /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc > Why is this static? This is explained above, but it's a little bit more complicated. For example lazarus itself is dyn. linked, but that's because it's linked to some C-libraries. svn2revisioninc doesn't depend on any c-libs, so it's static. > E: lazarus-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package > debuginfo package empty, due in part to: > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus > W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild If I run rpmlint I do not get these problems. I checked manually and the lazarus executable is stripped, and there's also a debug-package of 22 MB. But I use version 2.1.1 of the compiler. It could be a compiler-problem in version 2.0.4, or it could be a compiler problem on 64-bits systems. I'll try tonight with 2.0.4 on a 32-bit system. (the problem could be that the debuginfo isn't generated properly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:03:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] New: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phil at sanslogic.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.firestorm.cx/files/fswebcam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.firestorm.cx/fswebcam/files/fswebcam-20070108-1.src.rpm Description: A simple and tiny webcam application for capturing images from any V4L1/V4L2 compatable device. Includes basic image manipulation. This is my first package for Extras so needs sponsored. I'm also the upstream maintainer of this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091604.l09G4lXi008932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 phil at sanslogic.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:10:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091610.l09GA2WW009480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 11:09 EST ------- I can review this within the next day or 2 (if no one gets to it first in the meantime) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091610.l09GAHxL009528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 11:10 EST ------- I can review this within the next day or 2 (if no one gets to it first in the meantime) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:23:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091623.l09GNKNW011207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 11:23 EST ------- Looks interesting, I can review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:23:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091623.l09GNYCM011303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 11:23 EST ------- Well, time to review this again as a new year came. Assuming that the newest srpm is 3.2-7, I will check this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:23:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091623.l09GNW0f011283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-09 11:23 EST ------- In reply to comment #4: Yeah, the dependencies are there... I see whats happening now. It's the twisted-dropin-cache scriptlet returning 255 in that situation. python-twisted-core is still there when the other package is removed. So, it looks like it's a bug of some kind in that twisted-dropin-cache scriptlet. I'll file a bug against python-twisted-core, since this is off topic for this metapackage review. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:32:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091632.l09GWDvO012438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 11:32 EST ------- Offhand, you don't need: # work around an improper ${kdelibsuff} export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include anymore. qt was fixed wrt a long time ago. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091645.l09GjA6a013665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 11:44 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 221727) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091645.l09GjfI8013755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 11:45 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 221727) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091645.l09Gjg7n013767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 11:45 EST ------- I'm leary of this as well: cat > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/ksshaskpass.sh << EOF SSH_ASKPASS=%{_bindir}/ksshaskpass export SSH_ASKPASS (Besides, ksshaskpass-README.Fedora mentions also running ssh-add, so why is that not also present here?) I was going to say, perhaps /etc/kde/env would be a better place for this, but then it would be strictly limited to kde users... hey, some gnome user may be crazy enough to want to try this, right? (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091648.l09GmsI0014104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |faucamp at csir.co.za OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-09 11:48 EST ------- I'll take this one - am itching to play this game... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091650.l09Go9RK014195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-09 11:49 EST ------- Re: source rpm - there's a -3 there. Re: 0.8.3 - will handle once imported ; it shouldn't change much, aside from possibly the ABI. Will look at the rpath, although that's almost certainly libtool dainbramage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091654.l09GsTUZ014477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-09 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, I could reply with a quote: ?we don't create evil, we only package it?. ... and it's task of a review not to let pass through all kind of junk ;) > I could add extern C guards if someone could tell me how to do so. You should find this in all C-books having been released since 1989: #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif .... #ifdef __cplusplus } #endif > As for > installation dir, I think that putting a single header into its own subdir is a > bit of an overkill. The number of headers doesn't matter. One single header is as evil as is a dozen. /usr/include is in the compiler's default header search path, so any poorly designed package installing a header inside is likely to conflict with other headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 16:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091656.l09GusDQ014717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 11:56 EST ------- (just adding myself to cc list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 17:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091726.l09HQR2F017333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 12:26 EST ------- Just by glancing at your spec file: * BuildRequires: --------------------------------------- BuildRequires: autoconf BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: texinfo -------------------------------------- Why are these needed? Mockbuild succeeds without these. * Requires: --------------------------------------- Requires: ncurses --------------------------------------- is not needed because dependencies for libraries pulls this dependency automatically, long as cgdb is correctly linked against ncurses library. * Directories/files ownership issue %{_datadir}/cgdb/ is not owned by any package * Scriptlets Please add the needed Requires accroding to "Texinfo" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 17:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091733.l09HXp0Q018001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 12:33 EST ------- One another comment (just from spec file) * From rpmlint: --------------------------------------------- W: cgdb macro-in-%changelog doc --------------------------------------------- Please don't use %doc in %changelog. Use %%doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 17:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091743.l09HhSU6018915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-09 12:43 EST ------- 0.8.3-1 uploaded in the same place; it does not change ABI (just a crash bugfix.) rpath fixed with libtool override. Added conditional support for libxml++ for ofxconnect test utility - disabled while I get with upstream about whether he wants to support it with newer libxml++. (also, it adds a boatload of reqs to the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 18:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091803.l09I3Zvb020603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-09 13:03 EST ------- Ok, here's the review. MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: warzone2100-data no-documentation --- can be ignored, silent otherwise * package is named well * spec file is named well * package meets Packaging Guidelines !* package license is GPL, COPYING file included, however, see NOTES below * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * spec file is written in American English and legible * package source md5sum matches upstream source: 56e83a64d5b7aa60ced3d7ac7281bb42 warzone2100-2.0.5.tar.bz2 * package builds successfully on fc6/i386 (built in mock) * BuildRequires are good * package handles locales properly (no locales) * package has no need for %post and %postun sections * package is not relocatable * package owns directories it creates * no duplicate entries in %files * file permissions are good * proper %clean section * spec file macros are used consistently !* main package contains code, -data subpackage contains what seems to be permissable content - see NOTES, below * no -doc, -devel subpackages necessary * contents in %doc not required for runtime functionality of application * .desktop present and properly handled SHOULD items:: * package builds in mock (fc6/i386) * package functions as described :-) * subpackages require the base package using a fully versioned dependency NOTES: There is a potential problem with the game's data files; according to upstream they have contacted the developers to no avail, and released the data as GPL (as per the README.COPYING file, included in the package). Personally, I agree with the following from README.COPYING: "Since in the absence of a license the released data could not be distributed, we find that interpreting the license for the data as being under the same license as the source to be the best interpretation to fit the intention behind the release." Since the game has no significant game engine (significant==well known, successful), it is assumed that the GPL-release was done to "let the game live on", in good spirit; logically, it is therefore quite safe to assume a free license for the data as well. Further evidence supporting this is the fact that the game's movies AND the code for the movie player were never actually released along with the rest of the GPL'ed package (see upstream URL for details); obviously, these were not supposed to be distributed. STATUS: This package meets all the packaging guidelines, but suffers from a slight "grey-area" concerning the game data. I am very much inclined to approve this, but in all fairness it needs to be addressed by someone more schooled in these matters than me. Therefore, I am postponing approval, and will ask for assistance on fedora-extras. Mamoru, any thoughts on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 18:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091807.l09I75vg020795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-09 13:07 EST ------- 1. BuildRequires: In general, all 3 are installed by default - so they can be removed. Hopefully it won't break non-mock builds. Consider it done. 2. Requires: ncurses: Ouch. Forgot that ncurses-devel requires ncurses. Done. 3. Directories/files ownership issue. 4. Invalid %doc in changelog. Done. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-4.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] New: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: niles at rickniles.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.gnupooh.org/RPM/ogdi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnupooh.org/RPM/ogdi-3.1.5-mh1.src.rpm Description: Open Geographic Datastore Interface This is my first Fedora package and I need a reviewer. This package is a prereq for GDAL, the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. Source URL: http://ogdi.sourceforge.net/ Someone else was suppose to be working on this years ago, but I haven't seen any activity so I'm going to maintain it if no one else will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091908.l09J86oA026397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 14:07 EST ------- It's been over a month since the last action on this review, mine or otherwise. I recognize that we're just coming off the holidays, but this http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews would seem indicate that this review is stalled. I think I've fulfilled the stated requests, and welcome correction if I have not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:12:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091912.l09JC5kY027096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-09 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Dep on libburn is because libisofs can actually make a call to libburn I'm told. I've been told that a few times here too, but I'm still too thick to understand how does that happen. Anyway, I won't block the package on that, but suggest finding out the real details and fixing in future package revisions if applicable. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] New: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: niles at rickniles.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.gnupooh.org/RPM/gdal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnupooh.org/RPM/gdal-1.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: New packager, reviewer needed. I believe this SPEC file (or one very similar to it) was submitted a few years ago and rejected because it had some conflict with GRASS. However, this is a very important library for lots of GIS applications and I would like to try to resolve whatever issues are present. (GRASS 'borrowed' some of this library and thus there was two shared objects with the same name in two different packages.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091917.l09JHelx027702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-09 14:17 EST ------- I've added libldif to the public API of mozldap, and changed the version to 6.0.1. New files: SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap-6.0.1-1.src.rpm SRC URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap-6.0.1.tar.gz Axel, I have added back some of the macros to the spec file. The macros make our life easier as maintainers - we share the same spec file between RHEL-4 (which uses different nspr and nss) and Solaris. I hope that this is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] New: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gnomescan/gnomescan.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gnomescan/gnomescan-0.4.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Gnome Scan aim to provide a sane scan infrastructure. Flegita provide app and plugin on top of Gnome Scan for the desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:27:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091927.l09JRhBO028743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 14:27 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. On travel and then the holidays. - $ rpmlint -i limph-hostagent-1.9.4-1.fc6.noarch.rpm E: limph-hostagent executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/limph-hostagent Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. - You're still creating the tmp dir: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{limphdir}/tmp - Both limph and limph-hostagent own /usr/share/limph/host_agent.php. You need an %exclude in the limph files section. - Does limph-hostagent require limph to run? Looks like it does need config.php. Add the appropriate requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091938.l09JcD3e029550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-09 14:38 EST ------- FYI: bug 205955 comment 41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 19:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701091943.l09JhRxt029987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 14:43 EST ------- Thanks for the quick response. I've addressed the config and tmp issues, and the exclude. Limph-hostagent does not require Limph to run, it includes it's own config.php. Is this a problem? Do they need to be in two seperate places, like /etc/limph and /etc/limph-hostagent for example? Links to the current versions: Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-4.spec > > SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:05:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092005.l09K5QKC031711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 15:05 EST ------- MUST - rpmlint is silent on bioth src and binary packages - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL ) is OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source is latest version (0.8.3), matches upstream; sha1sum 0fa22f0535c1f50d4b9056f6f86d1429f1c8485f libofx-0.8.3.tar.gz - package builds on devel (x86 and i386) - missing BR: libtool - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories and files that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - docs and examples are included in the -devel package - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - post/postun ldconfig ok - no scriptlets but ldconfig - devel package ok - no .la files - devel correctly requires base package and also pkgconfig (due to presence of .pc) SHOULD Items: - no translations - builds/installs on devel (i386 and x86_64; no ppc to test on) - none of the bundled binaries segfaults on i386 Add the missing BR (libtool) and the package is APPROVED. Suggestion: since you do not build all the included binaries (ofxconnect) and the main purpose is just the library anyway, how about moving the bundled binaries (ofx2qif,ofxdump) to a separate ofx-tools or smtg similar ? They do not seem of much use -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:07:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092007.l09K7VM6031798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-09 15:07 EST ------- No, that's not the BSD license. But it is at least as free/open as the 3-term BSD license. It effectively looks like a BSD license with the non-endorsement term is missing. I think we can consider it free enough, or do you want to get backup from fedora-extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092011.l09KBewL032028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-01-09 15:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145190) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145190&action=view) warzone2100 failed build log for x86_64 This failes to build on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:15:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092015.l09KF0IK032304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-09 15:14 EST ------- Hm, maybe. Might want to see what others do. libtool added in CVS. Will import at some point once the whole stack gets through. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:19:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092019.l09KJLma032543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-09 15:19 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Successfully imported and built as plague job #25363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092022.l09KMSKp000429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 15:22 EST ------- MUST items - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPL v2) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source is the latest version, matches upstream, sha1sum 69df690a91dd5902b5fe3d6b5c6a140fe242f002 fswebcam-20070108.tar.gz - package builds in mock for devel/x86_64 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no scriptlets, static, headers or .pc files - Minor picknick: changelog misses the most current modifications, which triggers a warning from rpmlint when run against the binary package: fswebcam incoherent-version-in-changelog 20061210-1 20070108-1 There are no other complains from rpmlint, either on source or binary SHOULD: - builds in mock without problems - There is no obvious segfault at runtime, but I have no camera to fully test. Please fix the changelog and since your package is a GUI, consider adding a .desktop file (or explain why this would not be needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092023.l09KNiJs000544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 15:23 EST ------- But both limph and limph-hostagent use and own the same config file. This is not allowed. What you could do is create limph-common to own /etc/limph/config.php and have both limph and limph-hostagent require that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092028.l09KSxL4001031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092041.l09KfYVe001824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 15:41 EST ------- I see. I've done that. Now rpmlint -i is clean for all 3. Links to the current versions: Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-5.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 20:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092054.l09KsGDk002904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 15:54 EST ------- Requires should be: Requires: limph-common = %{version}-%{release} And one more problem, %limphdir needs to be owned by limph-common as well and not by limph. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092107.l09L7JjF003743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-09 16:07 EST ------- /usr/include/SDL/SDL_config.h:39:29: error: SDL_config-i386.h: No such file or directory It should probably include /usr/include/SDL/SDL_config-x86_64.h on x86_64 platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092108.l09L8Jbt003803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 16:08 EST ------- Ok. Does this do it for %limphdir? I think I specified the files and the directory properly. I also re-included the config.php symlink. Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-6.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092113.l09LDhdc004136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-09 16:13 EST ------- rpmlint complains about E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib/libssldap60.so libssldap60.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib/libldif60.so libldif60.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib/libldap60.so libldap60.so E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib/libprldap60.so libprldap60.so we should get rid of if [ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT != "/" ] ; then %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ; fi in the %build and %install section of the spec and add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to the start of %install and change %clean to rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT md5sums match 6f651d0e5c4b04352c64207623f8ef4f mozldap-6.0.1.tar.gz 6f651d0e5c4b04352c64207623f8ef4f ../SOURCES/mozldap-6.0.1.tar.gz builds in mock for FC-6 license is ok Owns its own directories Fix the %build %install and %clean lines and its APPROVED Feel free to fix when importing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092114.l09LE0Fi004159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 16:13 EST ------- In main %files section, should be: %{limphdir}/* so it doesn't own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092114.l09LEMpT004209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jwilson at redhat.com |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092115.l09LFAAp004365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-09 16:15 EST ------- Here is the problem from configure.ac: # add some required C flags here # -DYY_STATIC is required by flex # -m32 forces 32-bit compile, since code is not clean enough for 64-bit yet WZ_CFLAGS="${WZ_CFLAGS} -m32 -DYY_STATIC -DDEFAULT_DATADIR=\\\"${datadir}/warzone2100\\\"" I guess we will have to excludearch x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092115.l09LFnAN004554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-09 16:15 EST ------- I can not check it, because I have not x86_64. Probably the warzone2100 must have ExclusiveArch: i386. My friend will test it (build & play) on x86_64 and I will fix it or add an ExclusiveArch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092115.l09LFmh0004539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092119.l09LJ9To004933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 16:19 EST ------- So like this?: Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-7.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:21:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092121.l09LLdAZ005181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-09 16:21 EST ------- Otherwise, package is pretty simple (and easy to review). (: * SOURCE matches upstream: md5sum 3d0addbecfcb31aedb59f36f7a34b349 ksshaskpass-0.3.tar.gz The more I think about it (comment #3), the more I think /etc/kde/env should be used for the startup script. We definitely don't want SSH_ASKPASS defined for console/text sessions, so * MUSTFIX: put ksshaskpass.sh in /etc/kde/env * MUSTFIX: add ssh-add to ksshaskpass.sh per README (unless you had some good reason to omit that) fixup those items, and I think we have a winner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092135.l09LZAAs006295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-09 16:34 EST ------- a couple of notes this builds and works fine on sparc not sure why its ExclusiveArch i386 x86_64 the Requires on nss nspr and mozldap are unneccesary rpm has the smarts to know that source needs to be a full url in spec file please add disttag to the release rpmlint says E: perl-Mozilla-LDAP useless-explicit-provides perl(Mozilla::LDAP::Entry) E: perl-Mozilla-LDAP non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/sparc-linux-thread-multi/auto/Mozilla/LDAP/API/API.so 0555 E: perl-Mozilla-LDAP zero-length /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/sparc-linux-thread-multi/auto/Mozilla/LDAP/API/API.bs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092135.l09LZnrP006349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 16:35 EST ------- That's the ticket. Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092136.l09LaQjl006422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092139.l09Ldtln006553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-09 16:39 EST ------- * missing "Requires: opensp-devel" in libofx-devel This is because upstream's pkgconfig template is customised for static linking. * the INSTALL file in %doc is irrelevant to RPM package users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 21:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092158.l09LwAnR007869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-01-09 16:58 EST ------- When I remove the -m32 it builds (with a lot of "warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size") but it segfaults when trying to run. Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/x86-64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:00:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092200.l09M0jvF008025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-09 17:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145200) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145200&action=view) spec file diffs Thanks Dennis. Here are the final files: SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap-6.0.1-2.src.rpm SOURCE URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.1/src/mozldap-6.0.1.tar.gz The attachment is the diffs in the spec file proposed by Dennis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092212.l09MCpYn008585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 ------- Additional Comments From phil at sanslogic.co.uk 2007-01-09 17:12 EST ------- Thanks for looking, - I've updated the changelog to reflect the latest version - There is no GUI for this app so a .desktop file isn't needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092215.l09MFKOR008662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-09 17:15 EST ------- Successfully imported into /cvs/extras. Submitted branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:16:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092216.l09MG4ar008757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 Bug 219869 depends on bug 196401, which changed state. Bug 196401 Summary: Review Request: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092217.l09MHXnk008887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-09 17:17 EST ------- * %{_sysconfdir}/limph/ is not included -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092219.l09MJet8008985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-09 17:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > * %{_sysconfdir}/limph/ is not included Gah, thanks Michael! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092222.l09MMoGM009181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205955, 222042 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092222.l09MMpUP009194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222039 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:23:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092223.l09MNS8e009305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222039 nThis| | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:23:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092223.l09MNOin009295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222039 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092225.l09MPj50009559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|205955, 222042 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:25:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092225.l09MPlb5009586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|222039 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092225.l09MPxsU009614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | OtherBugsDependingO|222039 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092227.l09MRvjB009817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222042 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:28:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092228.l09MS001009847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-09 17:27 EST ------- Yes, you are right, it's not a GUI. Sorry for the confusion. >From my point of view, the package could be approved. However,since you need a sponsor, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-bb3314e7b80fd98f037edd46f6d1efafbb611752 should be followed and therefore you must convince a sponsor to review the package, too. Returing the package to FE-NEW status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092227.l09MRuhR009804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |222039 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092233.l09MX3rT010304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnomescan - |Review Request: gnomescan - |Gnome Scanner Utility |Gnome Scanner Utility CC| |maxx at krakoa.dk ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-09 17:33 EST ------- I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a pre-review. Builds in mock on i386 fedora core 6. Installs and runs - however I haven't got a scanner, so I cannot test functionality. rpmlint produces one error: W: gnomescan-devel no-documentation Which I suppose is fine, since the documentation belongs in the main package and not in the devel package. Package and spec file are correctly named Language and license are fine. find_lang is correctly used for locales. ldconfig is correctly called in %post and %postun Packages correctly own directories. Correctly handles pkgconfig files. Header files are in devel package. Includes a .desktop file that is correctly installed. What I am unsure about is this. It seems to me that this includes both gnomescan (flegita - the actual scanning application) and libgnomescan. Should the two be packaged separately? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:35:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092235.l09MZeFJ010555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-09 17:35 EST ------- It does not work on x86_64 and very probably on ppc. I have added the ExclusiveArch: i386 New URLs: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100-2.0.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092238.l09McEEb010803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |179259, 179260 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092242.l09MghmU011303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-09 17:42 EST ------- Further: > %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so The directory %{_libdir}/%{name} itself is not included. > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > export CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS > export CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS If during %install CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS are used to compile something, that would be wrong. The two exports can be deleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 22:44:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092244.l09MiTwF011549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-09 17:44 EST ------- > Offhand, you don't need: > # work around an improper ${kdelibsuff} > export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include > anymore. qt was fixed wrt a long time ago. (: Great ! That was abusive cut'n'paste... About the environement script, I just took the example from the one provided by the openssh-askpass package. I agree about moving it to /etc/kde/env (I didn't know of this dir, interesting :) ), but I don't think adding an ssh-add call to it is a good idea, for the following reasons : - scripts in env should not start programs, only define environment vars. Startup applications should be in ~/.kde/Autostart or /usr/share/autostart. - some people dislike ssh-agent, because it knows about their password. By calling ssh-add in the script, we would force it on every user on the system. that's why I added a README.Fedora with usage instructions. > We definitely don't want SSH_ASKPASS defined for console/text sessions Actually, if you call ssh-add from an interactive terminal, it will not use the SSH_ASKPASS application, it will just prompt for the password. That's why the openssh-askpass package defines it in /etc/profile.d Upstream provides an sha1sum on this page : http://hanz.nl/p/program , you can check it too if you want. * Tue Jan 09 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.3-2 - remove useless workaround - put the environment script in /etc/kde/env http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/ksshaskpass.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/ksshaskpass-0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 23:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701092323.l09NNAFw013772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-09 18:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a pre-review. Thanks for looking at it. > > What I am unsure about is this. It seems to me that this includes both gnomescan > (flegita - the actual scanning application) and libgnomescan. Should the two be > packaged separately? > I believe it's okay as is, seems like flegita is sort of a codename or nickname, and people who want to use the libs part can make use of the -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 9 23:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] New: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tscherf at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com %description Prewikka is a graphical front-end analysis console for the Prelude Hybrid IDS Framework. Providing numerous features, Prewikka facilitates the work of users and analysts. It provides alert aggregation and sensor and hearbeat views, and has user management and configurable filters. It has access to external tools such as whois and traceroute. http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.7.1-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec I need a sponsor for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 00:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] New: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/libdockapp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/libdockapp-0.6.1-1.src.rpm Description: LibDockApp is a library that provides a framework for developing dockapps. It provides functions and structures to define and display command-line options, create a dockable icon, handle events, etc. The goal of the library is to provide a simple, yet clean interface and standardize the ways in which dockapps are developed. A dockapp developed using libDockApp will automatically behave well under most window managers, and especially well under Window Maker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 00:27:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100027.l0A0RSJx017695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201851 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 01:48:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100148.l0A1maNL020108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-09 20:48 EST ------- If you want to volunteer as a maintainer for a package, it's best if you're willing and able to look into problems with it. The fact that it doesn't build on x86_64 or PowerPC is indicative that the code will have many quality issues and will need some real maintenance. If you send me a SSH public key, I can provide access to a PowerPC machine on which you can build and debug. I'm sure someone else can provide similar access for x86_64. As an absolute minimum, you'd need to file a bug describing precisely _what_ is wrong with the code when it's built for x86_64 and/or PowerPC. To say just "it doesn't work" is acceptable for a user to file in a bug report, but isn't something we expect to hear from a maintainer :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 03:03:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100303.l0A33tMq022360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-09 22:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-8.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-6.src.rpm Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 04:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100432.l0A4Wvim027511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-09 23:32 EST ------- Also check bug 178162 comment 14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 04:54:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100454.l0A4spf4029141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 05:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100533.l0A5X6AT030678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 00:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a pre-review. > > Thanks for looking at it. > > > > > What I am unsure about is this. It seems to me that this includes both gnomescan > > (flegita - the actual scanning application) and libgnomescan. Should the two be > > packaged separately? I don' think we need both packaged separately. > > > I believe it's okay as is, seems like flegita is sort of a codename or nickname, > and people who want to use the libs part can make use of the -devel subpackage. > However, I found that you don't need pkgconfig as BR for main package. Also, do we really need libtool as BR and all other make LIBTOOL? I removed them and did mock test and it went fine. Can you check that with testing application?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 05:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100545.l0A5jrGF030943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 00:45 EST ------- Also i found you have option to create a separate package for gimp-plugin that will contains single file in its installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 06:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100635.l0A6ZQeO032562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 01:35 EST ------- mock build is sucessfull and rpmlint reported error on libdockapp-fonts RPM E: libdockapp-fonts zero-length /usr/share/x11/fonts/dockapp/fonts.alias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 06:36:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] New: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdl.web at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-1.leof6.src.rpm Description: An easy-to-use telnet client mainly targets BBS users. PCMan X is a newly developed GPL'd version of PCMan, a full-featured famous BBS client formerly designed for MS Windows only. It aimed to be an easy-to-use yet full-featured telnet client facilitating BBS browsing with the ability to process double-byte characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 06:39:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100639.l0A6dsq0000325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-10 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > ping? I have submitted another package for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 BTW: gtk-murrine-engine 0.40.1 RPM for fc6 http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/zod/gtk-murrine-engine-0.40.1-1.leof6.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 06:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100652.l0A6qGPO000875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-01-10 01:52 EST ------- Nope, no word from upstream yet. I'll try to poke them tomorrow to see if we can get an ETA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 07:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100712.l0A7CQHG001482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 07:47:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100747.l0A7lB2m002535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 02:47 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent rpmlint on main RPM reported W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rpmlint on -devel rpm reported I: gwenhywfar-devel checking E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Otherwise mock build is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 07:48:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100748.l0A7m5EZ002568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 09:30:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100930.l0A9UisK010464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-10 04:30 EST ------- I removed the unusefull empty fonts.alias file here: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/libdockapp-0.6.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 09:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701100955.l0A9tXRq012436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 04:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. ec1219c355516d63b6e2ee1e4cb10c30 libdockapp-0.6.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code as well as content(fonts). + no static libraries present. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + fonts scriptlets used. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 10:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101015.l0AAFa6x014344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 05:15 EST ------- Remove .a files from installation from -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 10:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222072] Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101016.l0AAGBI9014429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdockapp - DockApp Development Standard Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222072 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-10 05:16 EST ------- imported, owners edited, built in devel, branches requested. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 12:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101239.l0ACdBAY022106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-10 07:39 EST ------- I see that Twisted 2.5.0 is out now, and claims to support python 2.5 (the release notes say that previous versions were broken with python 2.5). Given that Rawhide has python 2.5, I think that 2.5.0 should be pushed at least for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 12:57:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101257.l0ACvn6B023386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-10 07:57 EST ------- MUST - rpmlint checks return: on greylistd-0.8.3.2-7.at.src.rpm W: greylistd no-url-tag E: greylistd unknown-key GPG#66534c2b As explained in comment #2 the warning is due to lack of homepage for the project, second one can be safey ignored. However I suggest using ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/greylistd/ as URL. Second one can safely be ignored. on generated binary: W: greylistd no-url-tag E: greylistd non-standard-uid /var/run/greylistd/socket greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-gid /var/run/greylistd/socket greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-uid /var/run/greylistd greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-gid /var/run/greylistd greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-uid /var/lib/greylistd greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-gid /var/lib/greylistd greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/greylistd 0750 E: greylistd non-standard-uid /var/lib/greylistd/states greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-gid /var/lib/greylistd/states greylistd E: greylistd non-readable /var/lib/greylistd/states 0640 E: greylistd non-standard-uid /var/lib/greylistd/triplets greylistd E: greylistd non-standard-gid /var/lib/greylistd/triplets greylistd E: greylistd non-readable /var/lib/greylistd/triplets 0640 All these can be ignored since the package creates its own user to run as and makes some files available just to said user - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPL ) is OK and matches source (based on examining the man pages) - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum c634919b301f9d34c7609bf8fbf236362fc54295 greylistd_0.8.3.2.tar.gz - package compiles and builds on FC6 and devel (i386) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - duplicate file: %{_initdir}/greylistd - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no static, headers or libtool files SHOULD - compiles and builds in mock for FC6/i386; result is noarch (the whole lot consists of some python scripts) so no reason to not build on other archs - pre/post are sane - no sacrifice box to test the scripts on , I can only assume they work as intended :( This package is APPROVED but please do not forget to remove the duplicate entry for %{_initdir}/greylistd before importing. And you should also bug upstream to include the license in the tar file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 13:27:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101327.l0ADR6rt025077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-01-10 08:27 EST ------- You should have access now with me as your sponsor. Moving to FE-ACCEPT. Have fun and thanks for packaging for Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 13:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101334.l0ADYJMF025605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 13:45:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101345.l0ADjZGu026903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 13:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220891] Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101356.l0ADuN1h028043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-01-10 08:56 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I contacted upstream on including the license and removed the duplicate: * Wed Jan 10 2007 Axel Thimm - 0.8.3.2-8 - Remove double initfile in %%files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 14:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101408.l0AE8pku029656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-10 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > However, I found that you don't need pkgconfig as BR for main package. Maybe not explicitly (probably some other dependencies pulled it in inside mock for you), if you check the configure log you'll see that it checks for the presence of pkgconfig, so its needed for building. > Also, do we really need libtool as BR and all other make LIBTOOL? I removed them > and did mock test and it went fine. Did you run rpmlint on the resulting binary? If you did, you will have found out it has some rpath issues caused by using the libtool script bundled with the package. That's the reason for the libtool as BR and all other make LIBTOOL. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsys?highlight=%28rpath%29) As for your other comment on separate package for gimp-plugin, I don't think its necessary just for a single file. Or is there some technical reason(s) for it to be a separate package? > Can you check that with testing application?? > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 14:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101435.l0AEZDua032319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-10 09:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt It's not really a configuration file, it's a data file. It's a CA certificate bundle, much like /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt. However, that is also marked %config, so I'll change this. (Ideally it just uses the openssl CA bundle.) > E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. This is a mis-error from rpmlint. It's a architecture-specific include, so it can't be in /usr/include, and needs to be in an architecture specific directory. See glib2, dbus, gcc, qt for other examples of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 14:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101442.l0AEg3UZ000626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org |guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 15:14:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221727] Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101514.l0AFEb4R003289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - CSS editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221727 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 15:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101528.l0AFSDnQ004730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-10 10:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt > > It's not really a configuration file, it's a data file. It's a CA certificate > bundle, much like /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt. However, that is > also marked %config, so I'll change this. Perhaps it should live in /etc/pki/tls/certs too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 16:25:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101625.l0AGP5mD011327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From niles at rickniles.com 2007-01-10 11:25 EST ------- Well, I guess whom ever tried to get the EPSG license changed didn't try very hard. I sent an e-mail to the contact on the website and they responsed right away and explicitly said it was not there intention to limit derived works and would like to change the wording to reflect that. They are asking for suggested wording. I would like to get someone more familar with the legal issues to work with them. Is there a contact (maybe at Red Hat?) that I can forward their response to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 16:37:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101637.l0AGbnQe012868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-10 11:37 EST ------- Thanks, I will update the spec file and upload the src package this friday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 16:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101643.l0AGhBbE013725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-10 11:43 EST ------- Well, let's start again. Well, for 3.2-7: * Conditional dependencies: - Mockbuild log (on FC-devel i386) says: ---------------------------------------- checking security/pam_appl.h usability... no checking security/pam_appl.h presence... no ---------------------------------------- These are included in pam-devel. ******************************************************************* * * WARNING: One or more items required for the xmldump plugin are * missing: * * libxml2.so or libxml2.a...yes * gdome.h...yes * libgdome.so or libgdome.a...yes * glib.h...yes * libglib.so or libglib.a...no * glibconfig.h...yes * * (yes means it was found, no means it was not found) * * ntop will run just fine without this plugin. * *>>> If you want to use the xmldump plugin, * *??? 1. Install the necessary headers and libraries. *??? and rerun ./configure * ******************************************************************* libglib.so is included in glib-devel. * BuildRequires: -------------------------------------------------------- redundant package <= package which requires it tcp_wrappers net-snmp-devel autoconf automake automake libtool (However, I don't mind if you want to write "automake" explicitly) pkgconfig glib2-devel glib2-devel gdome2-devel -------------------------------------------------------- * Encoding: --------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/ntop-3.2/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text --------------------------------------------------------- - Please change the encoding to UTF-8. * For SEGV issue Patrice saw: Oh, I got SEGV, too! However, not completely reproducible, however, for me this happens at the same point at last. One example: ---------------------------------------------------------- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread -1273857136 (LWP 20547)] 0x00f58402 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt #0 0x00f58402 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x00bd8c70 in *__GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #2 0x00bda4c1 in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:88 #3 0x00c0e29b in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0xcd21c4 "*** glibc detected *** %s: %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:170 #4 0x00c15e29 in _int_free (av=0xcfc120, mem=0x82e67a0) at malloc.c:5774 #5 0x00c19650 in *__GI___libc_free (mem=0x82e67a0) at malloc.c:3552 #6 0x00f726cc in ntop_safefree (ptr=0x81d6154, file=0xfaa9fc "util.c", line=2601) at leaks.c:188 #7 0x00f964b9 in traceEvent (eventTraceLevel=3, file=0xfa73fd "ntop.c", line=136, format=0xfa7d40 "THREADMGMT[t%lu]: NPS(%d,%s): pcapDispatch thread terminated [p%d]") at util.c:2601 #8 0x00f75a62 in pcapDispatch (_i=0x0) at ntop.c:136 #9 0x00d382db in start_thread (arg=0xb4127b90) at pthread_create.c:296 #10 0x00c7d24e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 ---------------------------------------------------------- And.. in util.c: ---------------------------------------------------------- 2598 } 2599 2600 if (myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext] != NULL) 2601 free(myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext]); <- PROBLEM HAPPENED HERE!! 2602 2603 myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext] = strdup(buf); 2604 2605 myGlobals.logViewNext = (myGlobals.logViewNext + 1) % CONST_LOG_VIEW_BUFFER_SIZE; 2606 2607 if(myGlobals.logViewMutex.isInitialized) { ---------------------------------------------------------- It seems that myGlobals.logView is not initialized correctly by NULL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101701.l0AH1AC4016066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-10 12:01 EST ------- Well, as long as we discussed on bug 178162 , unless * EPSG declares explicitly that they changed their license written on http://www.epsg.org/CurrentDB.html to be "free" enough to meet Fedora guidelines * and explicitly declare that the new license can be applied to the old database already used we cannot accept libgeotiff (then gdal), as Tom "spot" Callaway says "this is not accepted". Well, would you attach here the content of mail which the EPSG upstream sent to you? Then we may be able to ask Tom to check it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101704.l0AH485a016604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-10 12:03 EST ------- It's not easily modifiable without patching, and if I'm going to do that, I'd rather just patch it to *use* the openssl one. Currently discussing that w/upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:12:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101712.l0AHCEmD017430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-10 12:12 EST ------- FWIW, curl uses the openssl one rather than the one shipped in the curl tarball... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:23:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101723.l0AHNEBb018309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-10 12:23 EST ------- So I'm sponsored in cvsextras (thank you!), I've got the various certs, CVS and plague set up. However: [limb at zanoni cvs]$ cvs co common Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Any thoughts? I'm using limb as the username in my cvsroot env entry in .bash_profile, and not limb at jcomserv.net. I've tried both, however. I'm guessing limb is correct due to syntax (I'm a Subversion user and emarrasingly new to CVS). Has my new permission status just not propagated yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:48:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101748.l0AHm0oG021053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-10 12:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145270) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145270&action=view) Log file for failed build on FC5/x86_64 after modifying BuildRequires I've managed to get access to a x86_64 box running FC5... The build fails *much* earlier for me on this machine, during configure, with the following output: checking for SDL - version >= 1.1.4... yes checking for presence of SDL_net... Found SDL_net in path checking SDL/SDL_opengl.h usability... no checking SDL/SDL_opengl.h presence... no checking for SDL/SDL_opengl.h... no checking for main in -lGL... yes checking for main in -lGLU... no checking for main in -lglu32... no checking OpenGL... no configure: error: OpenGL is currently mandatory error: Bad exit status from /home/francois/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.38734 (%build) --Adding "mesa-libGLU-devel" to the BuildRequires fixes this. However, the build still fails, but differently than in comment #6. I haven't got round to debugging this, but have attached the build log if anyone else wants to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101752.l0AHqHow021330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-10 12:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > gtk-murrine-engine 0.40.1 RPM for fc6 > http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/zod/gtk-murrine-engine-0.40.1-1.leof6.i386.rpm Please tell me the place for srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 17:56:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101756.l0AHucAe021572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-10 12:56 EST ------- My argument for maybe packaging libgnomescan separately is that if someone produces another scanning application, and depends on gnomescan-devel we suddenly have two different scanning applications installed, since gnomescan-devel depends on gnomescan. It is probably a minor detail at this, and is all depends on how you expect libgnomescan to be used by other applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101802.l0AI24Yh022185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-10 13:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > gtk-murrine-engine 0.40.1 RPM for fc6 > > > http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/zod/gtk-murrine-engine-0.40.1-1.leof6.i386.rpm > > Please tell me the place for srpm... http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.40.1-1.leof6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:03:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101803.l0AI3YZE022365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-10 13:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > --Adding "mesa-libGLU-devel" to the BuildRequires fixes this. > However, the build still fails, but differently than in comment #6. I haven't > got round to debugging this, but have attached the build log if anyone else > wants to take a look. I can not fix it, because author forces flag -m32 and in the same time there are set -m32 and -m64. I can remove it from makefile, but if author think that code is not prepared for x86_64 (yet?), so removing does not make any sense. When I get the access to ppc, I will describe build/work errors on architectures ppc and x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101817.l0AIHIIP023213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163779 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101817.l0AIHXui023301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|163779 | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:18:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101818.l0AIIMxV023438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From wahjava at gmail.com 2007-01-10 13:18 EST ------- -- begin dump -- [root at lap0 ~]# wget http://www.hadess.net/tmp/nss-mdns/nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm --23:42:08-- http://www.hadess.net/tmp/nss-mdns/nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm Resolving www.hadess.net... 216.243.209.211 Connecting to www.hadess.net|216.243.209.211|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 26115 (26K) [application/x-rpm] Saving to: `nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm' 100%[===================================================================================>] 26,115 13.1K/s in 1.9s 23:42:11 (13.1 KB/s) - `nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm' saved [26115/26115] [root at lap0 ~]# rpm -ivvv nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm D: ============== nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm D: Expected size: 26115 = lead(96)+sigs(180)+pad(4)+data(25835) D: Actual size: 26115 D: nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386.rpm: Header SHA1 digest: OK (2af72aea32fdac6af75793ad98824d0e916d8a17) D: added binary package [0] D: found 0 source and 1 binary packages D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages joinenv D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages rdonly mode=0x0 D: locked db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: ========== +++ nss-mdns-0.8-2 i386/linux 0x1 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Depends create mode=0x0 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rdonly mode=0x0 D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rdonly mode=0x0 D: read h# 35 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (db files) D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (cached) D: Requires: /bin/sh YES (cached) D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename rdonly mode=0x0 D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6 YES (db provides) D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) YES (db provides) D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) YES (db provides) D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) YES (db provides) D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) YES (db provides) D: read h# 18 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) YES (db provides) D: read h# 117 Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 D: Requires: perl YES (db provides) D: Requires: rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 YES (rpmlib provides) D: Requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 YES (rpmlib provides) D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rdonly mode=0x0 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Depends D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: ========== recording tsort relations D: ========== tsorting packages (order, #predecessors, #succesors, tree, depth, breadth) D: 0 0 0 0 1 0 +nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386 D: installing binary packages D: opening db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages joinenv D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages create mode=0x42 D: mounted filesystems: D: i dev bsize bavail iavail mount point D: 0 0x00000302 4096 4089983 5546087 / D: 1 0x00000003 4096 0 -1 /proc D: 2 0x00000000 4096 0 -1 /sys D: 3 0x0000000b 4096 0 -1 /dev/pts D: 4 0x00000301 1024 85863 26071 /boot D: 5 0x00000013 4096 31845 31844 /dev/shm D: 6 0x00000305 4096 1308736 -1 /media/fatty D: 7 0x00000014 4096 0 -1 /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc D: 8 0x00000015 4096 0 -1 /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs D: sanity checking 1 elements D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Name create mode=0x42 D: running pre-transaction scripts D: computing 9 file fingerprints Preparing packages for installation... D: computing file dispositions D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames create mode=0x42 D: ========== +++ nss-mdns-0.8-2 i386-linux 0x1 D: Expected size: 26115 = lead(96)+sigs(180)+pad(4)+data(25835) D: Actual size: 26115 D: nss-mdns-0.8-2: Header SHA1 digest: OK (2af72aea32fdac6af75793ad98824d0e916d8a17) D: install: nss-mdns-0.8-2 has 9 files, test = 0 nss-mdns-0.8-2 D: ========== Directories not explicitly included in package: D: 0 /lib/ D: 1 /usr/libexec/ D: 2 /usr/share/doc/ D: ========== D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 11028 /lib/libnss_mdns.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 10460 /lib/libnss_mdns4.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 10236 /lib/libnss_mdns4_minimal.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 10544 /lib/libnss_mdns6.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 10304 /lib/libnss_mdns6_minimal.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100755 1 ( 0, 0) 10864 /lib/libnss_mdns_minimal.so.2;45a52c9a D: fini 100644 1 ( 0, 0) 2024 /usr/libexec/nss-mdns-set.pl;45a52c9a D: fini 040755 2 ( 0, 0) 0 /usr/share/doc/nss-mdns-0.8 D: fini 100644 1 ( 0, 0) 10329 /usr/share/doc/nss-mdns-0.8/README;45a52c9a GZDIO: 10 reads, 77184 total bytes in 0.001503 secs D: +++ h# 815 Header SHA1 digest: OK (2af72aea32fdac6af75793ad98824d0e916d8a17) D: adding "nss-mdns" to Name index. D: adding 9 entries to Basenames index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Group create mode=0x42 D: adding "System Environment/Libraries" to Group index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Requirename create mode=0x42 D: adding 12 entries to Requirename index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename create mode=0x42 D: adding 7 entries to Providename index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames create mode=0x42 D: adding 4 entries to Dirnames index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion create mode=0x42 D: adding 12 entries to Requireversion index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion create mode=0x42 D: adding 7 entries to Provideversion index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Installtid create mode=0x42 D: adding 1 entries to Installtid index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 create mode=0x42 D: adding 1 entries to Sigmd5 index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header create mode=0x42 D: adding "2af72aea32fdac6af75793ad98824d0e916d8a17" to Sha1header index. D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Filemd5s create mode=0x42 D: adding 9 entries to Filemd5s index. D: install: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386) asynchronous scriptlet start D: install: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386) execv(/bin/sh) pid 19103 + /sbin/ldconfig + '%{_libexec}/nss-mdns-set.pl' add /etc/nsswitch.conf /etc/nsswitch.conf.new /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90274: line 4: fg: no job control D: install: waitpid(19103) rc 19103 status 100 secs 19.072 error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 D: running post-transaction scripts D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Filemd5s D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Installtid D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Providename D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Requirename D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Group D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: May free Score board((nil)) -- end dump -- Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 18:58:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101858.l0AIwlnv027722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Alias: xwnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-10 13:58 EST ------- - Removed glob from %files - Added NEWS to %doc - Not sure about your comment on BR, so I didnt fix anything in that regard - imported new srpm into cvs - added entry to owners.list - built successfully for devel - added cvs sync request for FC5/6 - THANKS FOR THE REVIEW! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 19:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] New: Review Request: six - Hex playing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six-0.5.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Six is a Hex playing program for Linux/Un*x systems running KDE. It has a strong AI, an easy to use GUI and can import emails from Richard's PBEM server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 19:12:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101912.l0AJCfa8029649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-10 14:12 EST ------- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 19:40:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101940.l0AJeNZv000793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-10 14:40 EST ------- I have not checked yet 0.6.3-4, however at least almost good. So: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is descriped on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 19:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101944.l0AJi5d9001491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-10 14:44 EST ------- It looks like there's some missing scriptlets. You ought to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets to know most of them. Firstly, your package installs icons into %{_datadir}/icons/{hicolor,locolor}. It means that you have to add following lines to your spec file: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --ignore-theme-index --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/ hicolor || : %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --ignore-theme-index --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/ hicolor || : Also, there's a "MimeType=" entry so you need to add: %post update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : %postun update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : And the normal review process: * sources match upstream (457028e8040f030b8f2cd6a65d04bab9) * rpmlint is silent * dist tag present * build root correct * license field matches the actual license and is included in %doc * BuildRequires looks good as package builds in mock (fc6/x86_64) * provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries * not relocatable * it owns all directories well Package contains check procedure, so you can create %check section with `make check` inside it. Thus, THINGS you need to do are: - add missing %post and %postun sections - add %check section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 19:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701101953.l0AJrnJM002786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-10 14:53 EST ------- Also, I can call ArcadeGame category into question. In my opinion it is rather only a BoardGame. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] New: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkonrath at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com I'd like to get the eclipse spec file reviewed in preparation for the core and extras merge. I won't be able to commit this to the extras repository because java-gcj-compat uses the eclipse-ecj sub-package but I would still like to go through the process. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/eclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/eclipse-3.2.1-28.fc7.src.rpm Note that this spec file is already in Fedora cvs and I will be committing changes as I go through this review process. Description: The Eclipse Platform is designed for building integrated development environments (IDEs) that can be used to create applications as diverse as web sites, embedded Java(tm) programs, C++ programs, and Enterprise JavaBeans(tm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:17:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102017.l0AKHS2x004923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-10 15:17 EST ------- I wonder if it would be a conflict of interest if I took this one? Probably not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102019.l0AKJCrD005217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-10 15:19 EST ------- only if you dont give it a fair review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102020.l0AKKepK005321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-10 15:20 EST ------- I'll give it a fair review. So I guess I can take this one. I'm intimately familiar with the spec so it'll probably be easier for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:20:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102020.l0AKKoGc005341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-10 15:20 EST ------- Could you please attach your nsswitch.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 20:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102037.l0AKbC08007076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-01-10 15:37 EST ------- Build fails for me in mock with: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotnetCDF.so.3* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotqwtplot3d.so.0* File not found: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotnetCDF.so File not found: /var/tmp/LabPlot-1.5.1.5-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/libLabPlotqwtplot3d.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 21:00:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102100.l0AL086t009620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-10 16:00 EST ------- Thanks Dennis. Here are the new files: SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5-7.src.rpm Sources: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-mozldap-1.5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/Makefile.PL.rpm I made a separate Makefile.PL.rpm so as not to conflict with the other Makefile.PL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 21:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102105.l0AL5Eub010373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-01-10 16:05 EST ------- I would like to ship the static library as I need to test to cgi apps for embedded systems using this library. Would it be ok if I create a -static subpackage that would require the devel subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 21:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102112.l0ALCIPj011259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-10 16:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-7.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 10 2007 Christohper Stone 1.0.32-7 - Keep permssions 600 for poker.server.xml file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 21:37:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102137.l0ALbi2H013366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Alias: xwnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-01-10 16:37 EST ------- libtool pulls in automake which in turn pulls in autoconf. Therefore it is enough to BR libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 21:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102155.l0ALtu0w014889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-10 16:55 EST ------- > Also, there's a "MimeType=" entry so you need to add: > %post > update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : No. update-desktop-database must be run. update-mime-database, on the contrary, is only for the new XML MIME type definition files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 22:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102203.l0AM33t2015278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-10 17:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > No. update-desktop-database must be run. Right. I have accidentally pasted a wrong script there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 22:07:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] New: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/polyester/polyester.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/polyester/polyester-1.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Widget style + kwin decoration both aimed to be a good balance between eyecandy and simplicity. Some notes: *.la-files cannot be removed without making this package unusuable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 22:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102231.l0AMVVJi018103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-10 17:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145292) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145292&action=view) updated spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 22:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102232.l0AMWKKo018289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-10 17:32 EST ------- Two small issues include MPL-1.1.txt RELEASE in %doc and change the license field to MPL as thats what it seems to be licensed under. package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license is open source-compatible. MPL License text included in package. source files match upstream: 136f74d7649ada77cdf7657bb01a165f perl-mozldap-1.5.tar.gz 136f74d7649ada77cdf7657bb01a165f ../SOURCES/perl-mozldap-1.5.tar.gz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( on FC-6 ). rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. not a web app. APPROVED using the attached spec file which fixes the issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 22:42:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102242.l0AMgKeA019056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-10 17:42 EST ------- i believe that you should avoid the 'find' command, just you should use 'install' command for change file access permissions in 'copy-time' with the parameters '-p -m755' on all *.py in %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 23:33:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102333.l0ANXm7g021849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-10 18:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.32-8.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jan 10 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.32-8 - Move poker-interface to %%{_libexecdir} - Package poker-interface with poker-client-lib - Remove no longer needed shared lib patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 23:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102343.l0ANhbn4022178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-10 18:43 EST ------- Ok, I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 10 23:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701102357.l0ANvpgJ023276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-01-10 18:57 EST ------- Thanks Dennis. Here are the final versions for inclusion into Fedora: SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5-8.src.rpm Sources: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/perl-mozldap-1.5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/perldap/releases/1.5/src/Makefile.PL.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 01:09:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110109.l0B19f37025970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol Alias: xwnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-10 20:09 EST ------- okay, I'll fix this in the -3 release. Seems also I did not have the latest debian patch applied, I will also update this in the -3 release. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 02:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110222.l0B2MK4T028570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-10 21:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I would like to ship the static library as I need to test to cgi apps for > embedded systems using this library. Are you running Fedora on this embedded system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 03:22:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110322.l0B3MaEj032510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-10 22:22 EST ------- Haha. I completely forgot about the install command for a moment. T_T I've updated the spec with your suggestion, Wilmer (which made it quite a bit cleaner, actually ^_^). SPEC: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/deluge-0.4.1-3.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 04:19:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110419.l0B4JnpI005098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-10 23:19 EST ------- I think according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage (Though its not a Final Draft), this document you need to get FESCO Approval to include .a files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 05:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:41:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] New: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at yahoo.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin-0.50-1.src.rpm Description: pastebin is here to help you collaborate on debugging code snippets. If you're not familiar with the idea, most people use it to submit a code fragment to pastebin, getting a url like http://pastebin.com/1234 and then link that URL in IRC or IM conversations. This allows others to see your code and optionally post changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 06:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110621.l0B6LkXF012989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-11 01:21 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPL License text included in package. source files match upstream: d7b8993f4baed7753fb7c912b06725fb pastebin.tar.gz d7b8993f4baed7753fb7c912b06725fb ../SOURCES/pastebin.tar.gz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( FC-6 ). rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. Needs fixing does not own %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} listed twice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 07:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110702.l0B7270J014112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-11 02:02 EST ------- Not building in mock on FC6 x86_64: gcc -shared -O -o /builddir/build/BUILD/ogdi-3.1.5/bin/Linux/libogdi31.so ecs_ dyna.o ecsregex.o ecssplit.o ecsassoc.o ecshash.o ecstile.o server.o ecsdist.o e cslist.o ecsinfo.o ecsgeo.o ecs_xdr.o ecs_xdrz.o gmath.o client.o ecs_capabiliti es.o -ldl -lz -lexpat -lproj -lm /usr/bin/ld: ecs_dyna.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ecs_dyna.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Don't use Packager field. You may put your contact information in your %changelog entries. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines for reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 07:25:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110725.l0B7PMQs014943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-11 02:25 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 7c481bb5ce112ebf5889bc4cd63f5836 gnomescan-0.4.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code Not contents. + no static libraries present. + no gnomescan.pc and gnomescanui.pc files present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + no scriptlets used. + Desktop files are handled correctly in spec. + file permissions are appropriate. + gui app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 07:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701110728.l0B7SjTp015087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From wahjava at gmail.com 2007-01-11 02:28 EST ------- -- begin dump -- [root at lap0 ~]# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf # # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning. # # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an # entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned # up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason # (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the # next entry. # # Legal entries are: # # nisplus or nis+ Use NIS+ (NIS version 3) # nis or yp Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP # dns Use DNS (Domain Name Service) # files Use the local files # db Use the local database (.db) files # compat Use NIS on compat mode # hesiod Use Hesiod for user lookups # [NOTFOUND=return] Stop searching if not found so far # # To use db, put the "db" in front of "files" for entries you want to be # looked up first in the databases # # Example: #passwd: db files nisplus nis #shadow: db files nisplus nis #group: db files nisplus nis passwd: files shadow: files group: files #hosts: db files nisplus nis dns hosts: files dns # Example - obey only what nisplus tells us... #services: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #networks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #protocols: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #rpc: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #netmasks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files ethers: files netmasks: files networks: files protocols: files rpc: files services: files netgroup: files publickey: nisplus automount: files aliases: files nisplus -- end dump -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 10:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111012.l0BACMLx026346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-11 05:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Ok, I'll do the review. Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 11:06:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111106.l0BB6HJN030700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-11 06:06 EST ------- Hi. Some time ago I've made(*) a splash screen with the fc6 artwork. Perhaps it would be worth to think about an inclusion in the package? Otherwise just ignore this comment. :) https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2006-November/msg00145.html * I'm not an artist. The screen works for me (tm) but surely needs some enhancement. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 13:06:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111306.l0BD65sd008054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-01-11 08:06 EST ------- Thanks, now that I'm sorta back online I've imported and build this, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 13:08:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 - FreeType 1.x compatibility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111308.l0BD87HE008422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 - FreeType 1.x compatibility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: freetype1 |Review Request: freetype1 - |compatibility FreeType 1.x |FreeType 1.x compatibility | |library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 13:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111335.l0BDZspf011699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 08:35 EST ------- A few comments: 1. Requires: kdelibs ImageMagick-c++ gsl fftw aren't required, rpm will(should!) pick these up automatically, you should remove these manual dependencies. 2. subpkgs, particularly -devel, should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{devel} 3. configure \ %ifarch x86_64 sparc64 ppc64 amd64 --enable-libsuffix=64 \ --with-qt-libraries=$QTDIR/lib \ %endif shouldn't be required. qt packaging properly sets QTLIB env variable for awhile now. 4. instead of sed -i -e \ s'|Categories=Qt;KDE;Education;Science;Physics;Math;|Categories=Science;|' \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop It's preferable to use desktop-file-install --remove-category="..." (and I'd argue you shouldn't be removing "Qt;KDE;Education" categories 5. items under %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/handbook imo, should be marked %doc 6. These are not required: %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig and -devel's Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 14:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111401.l0BE1KLZ013744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 09:01 EST ------- Excellent, thanks for the explanations and update. APPROVED. Now we need the author's also cool-looking ksshagent (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 15:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111531.l0BFVh1C022419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at yahoo.com 2007-01-11 10:31 EST ------- I have fixed he above issues. Spec URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin-0.50-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 15:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111541.l0BFfi6w023309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-11 10:41 EST ------- ok looks good and the package works. APPROVED and ill sponsor you also as it seems you are not sponsored already apply for cvsextras group access -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 15:43:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111543.l0BFhA4k023473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111608.l0BG8cOA026487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint is silent. rpmlint is not silent: W: pastebin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) Also, there are some documentation files in %{_datadir}/pastebin/lib/geshi/docs which should be moved to %doc. Creation of new directory there, like geshi sounds like a good solution. It seems to me that the content of {_datadir}/pastebin/lib/geshi may be moved there as well, obviously after some fixing in example.php. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111610.l0BGAxaU026716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 11:10 EST ------- Oops, I didn't want to set an FE-REVIEW blocker back. Changing to FE-ACCEPT again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111627.l0BGRKP3028296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at yahoo.com 2007-01-11 11:27 EST ------- Are you saying the geshi doc should be in /usr/share/doc/geshi or /usr/share/doc/pastebin-0.50/geshi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111632.l0BGWEhi028663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 11:32 EST ------- Well, some notes: Keep timestamps for text files as possible. ( Timestamps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * Use "cp -p" or "install -p" instead of just "cp" or "install" * for sed usage: ---------------------------------------------------- find . -type f| xargs sed -i 's/\r//' ---------------------------------------------------- Well, this usage of find -> sed change timestamps of all files under the directory ".", even some (many) files are actually not necessary to be fixed. Just use "sed" to the files which are _actually_ needed to be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111635.l0BGZgTm028912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Are you saying the geshi doc should be in /usr/share/doc/geshi or > /usr/share/doc/pastebin-0.50/geshi? > I meant the second one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111649.l0BGn7am029914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-11 11:49 EST ------- with the find and sed removed i get [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-2.noarch.rpm |grep wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding |wc -l 84 [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpm -qlp /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-2.noarch.rpm |wc -l 106 [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ so nearly every single file is dos line ended in this instance i think it is fine to mass change line endings. if it was a small handfull of files i would do them individually. but that is not the case. as far as the docs yeah I missed that they should go into %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111653.l0BGrPAM030238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-01-11 11:53 EST ------- as far as rpmlint goes [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-2.noarch.rpm [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-1.noarch.rpm [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ it is indeed silent for me if there is mixed spaces/tabs then thats should be fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 16:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111654.l0BGsHfo030330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 11:54 EST ------- Well, * Documentation - Consider to add doc/htdocs * File entry - From mockbuild log: ---------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/cgdb/cgdb.txt ---------------------------------------------- * Timestamp - This package includes a documentation ( /usr/share/cgdb/cgdb.txt ) and keeping timestamp on this file is preferable. Use: ---------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" ---------------------------------------------- * Some notes: - Please remove unnecessary comments like: ---------------------------------------------- #make %{?_smp_mflags} #Let RPM strip the debug info. #strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/cgdb ---------------------------------------------- * A question: - Why is the command prompt of cgdb is "tgdb"? ---------------------------------------------- Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (tgdb) ---------------------------------------------- And check my comment 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111712.l0BHCr0v032111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 12:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > it is indeed silent for me if there is mixed spaces/tabs then thats should be > fixed Apart from built rpm file, you ought to also check rpmlint against source rpm file. [ecik at ecik ~]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pastebin-0.50-2.src.rpm W: pastebin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:15:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111715.l0BHFHwK032312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > with the find and sed removed i get > [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ > rpmlint /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-2.noarch.rpm |grep > wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding |wc -l > 84 > [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ > rpm -qlp /home/dennis/fedora/RPMS/noarch/pastebin-0.50-2.noarch.rpm |wc -l > 106 > [dennis at daedalus SPECS]$ > > so nearly every single file is dos line ended in this instance i think it is > fine to mass change line endings. if it was a small handfull of files i would > do them individually. but that is not the case. Well, even this case, still checking if the file "sed" command is to be applied is really a text file. As far as I checked, there is one file which is not a text file (./public_html/favicon.ico), against this file "sed" command should not be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:21:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111721.l0BHL670032522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 12:20 EST ------- Well, for me accessing to http://cimi.netsons.org/ gets 404 so currently I cannot check if the source files is valid... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:40:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111740.l0BHec1q001664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 12:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, even this case, still checking if the file > "sed" command is to be applied is really a text file. > As far as I checked, there is one file which is not a text file > (./public_html/favicon.ico), > against this file "sed" command should not be used. It may be easily fixed by sedding only the files in lib/ subdirectory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:48:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111748.l0BHmaA1002092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-11 12:48 EST ------- Please don't close before owners/owners.list in CVS has been updated. Package is still listed as orphaned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] New: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at seznam.cz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SPECS/gxine.spec SRPM URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SRPMS/gxine-0.5.10-1.src.rpm Description: gxine is a fully-featured free audio/video player for unix-like systems which uses libxine for audio/video decoding and playback. For more informations on what formats are supported, please refer to the libxine documentation. gxine is a gtk based gui for this xine-library alternate to xine-ui. This is my first package so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 17:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111758.l0BHwx8m002790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-11 12:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-1.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jan 11 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-1 - Upstream sync - Add %%find_lang for new locales -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 18:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111815.l0BIFclk003986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 13:15 EST ------- I forgot to add that the files in public_html/ directory should be listed explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 18:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111858.l0BIwqEN007213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-01-11 13:58 EST ------- small notes - today?s entry in the changelog still refers to version 0.5.9 - rpmlint gives "W: gxine mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 25)" for the spec file, so convert the indentation to only one of them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111901.l0BJ1S1x007468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-11 14:01 EST ------- Imported, owners.list updated, branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:09:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111909.l0BJ9fFI008123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 14:09 EST ------- I have not rebuilt this package, however.. * Requires: ----------------------------------------- Requires: python-abi = ..... ----------------------------------------- - This is not needed any more because rpmbuild automatically adds python requirement as "Requires: python(abi) = ..." * Bytecompiled python objects .pyc and .pyo files should have 0644 permission. * At %install stage: ------------------------------------------ rm -rf %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/templates/__init__.py ------------------------------------------ Why is this needed? * Documentation: ----------------------------------------- mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/apache cp -p AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README \ %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -p doc/apache.conf %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/apache/ ----------------------------------------- These can be done by: ----------------------------------------- %install ...... mkdir apache cp -p doc/apache.conf apache/ ...... %files %doc AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README %doc apache/ ...... ----------------------------------------- By the way, is it really needed to move apache.conf documentation to apache directory (by creating apache directory)? * Other dependency This package requires either libpreludedb-mysql/pgsql/sqlite package. Also, it seems that prewikka-httpd will not work only by installing one of them. To use prewikka-httpd some setting seems still needed. One solution is that you write a document "README.fedora" which explains that prewikka user needs to install either a package according to what database he/she will use and some settings are needed according to what installed (at this stage, you can say "the details of settings are on http://..., however, you must write to the document at least what package user should install) By the way, if prewikka-httpd is used only by privileged user, it should be installed under %{_sbindir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111913.l0BJDbvW008523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 14:13 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 222326 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111913.l0BJDe8E008551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mola at c100c.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-11 14:13 EST ------- *** Bug 213511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111915.l0BJFsS4008786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at yahoo.com 2007-01-11 14:15 EST ------- Can you tell me why (source) I should list public_html files explicitly? I didn't see anything on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines about it. I am not saying I won't do it, I just want to know why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111923.l0BJNXsB009463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-11 14:23 EST ------- #8: I've got a couple of other packages that are waiting in the pipe-line - I'll add them ASAP. (and post the BZ# here.) More-ever, I'll start following the review requests and see if I can help. #9: I'll fix the errors and upload nice spec file. Thanks, Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111923.l0BJNd6K009476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-11 14:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > small notes > - today?s entry in the changelog still refers to version 0.5.9 > - rpmlint gives "W: gxine mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: > line 25)" for the spec file, so convert the indentation to only one of them Thanks, fixed. I replaced the old versions with the fixed ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:23:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222338] New: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338 Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dm at mensa.se QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://download.initng.org/initng-gui/initng-conf-gtk/initng-conf-gtk-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: This is a gtk gui for controlling and configuring InitNG that I'm the author of. There's also a short description and a screenshot at http://www.initng.org/wiki/initng-conf-gtk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:24:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111924.l0BJOukE009578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338 ------- Additional Comments From dm at mensa.se 2007-01-11 14:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145381&action=view) initng-conf-gtk 0.4-1 spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:25:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111925.l0BJPakn009620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-11 14:25 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output is clean - package meets package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream (tho as a side note the URL didn't work) 0df37a7a38ea0d63129d2590971caabb /home/josef/gxine-0.5.10.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6 - all build dependencies listed in BR - locales handled properly - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by default packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files * desktop file is not installed via the appropriate methods - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ====Things that need to be fixed==== * I found the upstream sources, but the URL that was in your spec file did not resolve, you may want to find a more permament URL. * You need to install the desktop file appropriatly, look here for an example http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 gxine seems to install it by itself, so you will want to do something like what I did for geany http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec * for gxine-mozplugin, it would not install because you have Requires: %{name}=%{version}-%{release} you need to put a space in between the '=', so it looks like this Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} and then it will work. I am not sponsored, this is just a review to help me get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111926.l0BJQmPq009770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-11 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Can you tell me why (source) I should list public_html files explicitly? > I meant that you ought to sed all files in lib/ and explicit list files to sed in public_html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111951.l0BJpvXj011825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-11 14:51 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== * rpmlint output [josef at dhcp59-136 SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/josef/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/polyester-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm E: polyester binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kstyle_polyester_config.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: polyester binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kwin_polyester_config.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: polyester binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kwin3_polyester.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: polyester binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/plugins/styles/polyester.so ['/usr/lib64'] - package meets package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 12e5f0fa6daeb083621635b410d7c813 polyester-1.0.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6 - all build dependencies listed in BR - locales handled properly - uses ldconfig properly - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by default packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files with suffix - no need for devel subpackage * contains .la files (should be OK http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives) * desktop file is not installed via the appropriate methods - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ====Things that need to be addressed==== * You need to fix the rpmlint errors. * You do not need the "Requires: kdebase", that should be pulled in automatically * You need to install the desktop file appropriatly, look here for an example http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 gxine seems to install it by itself, so you will want to do something like what I did for geany http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec I'm not sponsored, this is just a review to help me get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111953.l0BJr27s011904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-11 14:53 EST ------- reviewed two review requests with errors bz222220 bz222326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:58:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111958.l0BJwJEH012270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-11 14:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > ====Things that need to be fixed==== > * I found the upstream sources, but the URL that was in your spec file did not > resolve, you may want to find a more permament URL. > * You need to install the desktop file appropriatly, look here for an example > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 > gxine seems to install it by itself, so you will want to do something like > what I did for geany > http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec > * for gxine-mozplugin, it would not install because you have > > Requires: %{name}=%{version}-%{release} > > you need to put a space in between the '=', so it looks like this > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > and then it will work. Fixed. New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SPECS/gxine.spec New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SRPMS/gxine-0.5.10-2.src.rpm Thanks for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 19:58:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701111958.l0BJwlRJ012311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 14:58 EST ------- FYI, desktop-file-install is not mandatory. The guidelines only include suggested usage. (I mention this, mostly because I don't think it's use is warranted here). The rpath thing is annoying, especially having been built with ./configure --disable-rpath. ): -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:05:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112005.l0BK53VK012773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at yahoo.com 2007-01-11 15:05 EST ------- Would this be an acceptable way to sed only text files? for file in `find . -type f` do if (file $file | awk -F: '{print $2}' | grep -i text &> /dev/null) ; then sed -i 's/\r//g' $file fi done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112007.l0BK7wgC012964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josef at toxicpanda.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-11 15:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== > ... > * desktop file is not installed via the appropriate methods > ... > ====Things that need to be addressed==== > ... > * You need to install the desktop file appropriatly, look here for an example > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Josef, IMO you (and the guidelines) are wrong in this case. Please read the following thread on FE-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00494.html especially https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00495.html and https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-December/msg00496.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222347] New: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222347 Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/g-wrap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/g-wrap-1.9.6-8.src.rpm Description: scheme/C interface library used for GNUCash Part of reviewing the GNUCash stack for the grand merger. Only rpmlint complaints I know of is that g-wrap-devel has an include in /usr/{lib,lib64} - this is intentional as it's wordsize-specific and can't go in /usr/include. Latest upstream version is 1.9.7, but as that has caused issues with gnucash, and gnucash is the only consumer of g-wrap... not updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112013.l0BKDqfe013388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 15:13 EST ------- IMO, The Guidelines aren't wrong, they only say that .desktop files be installed appropriately (though arguably that is too vague for some folks). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] New: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jjohnstn at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-6.fc7.src.rpm Description: The eclipse-cdt package bundles the set of Eclipse CDT plugins which are used for C/C++ code development. In addition to the upstream CDT plugins, this project adds the new Autotools plugin from Red Hat which adds support for maintaining C/C++ projects using autotools (e.g. autoconf, automake). This project was formerly shipped in Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112023.l0BKNoOj014262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-11 15:23 EST ------- Mhh. Strange. The problem with rpath doesn't exist on x86 and I don't have a machine with x86_64 for testing. But I also don't know how to fix it. --disable-rpath is already set, there seems no local copy of libtool and I am not skilled in editing makefiles. Any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 20:46:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112046.l0BKk6oJ016635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-01-11 15:46 EST ------- There is a local libtool in the "admin" subdirectory. You can add the following lines (see http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-7cea8c7aa96400a4687e843156354476434ff883) to the spec file after running configure and before running make. # Don't use rpath! sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool Only check where libtool is created whether in the toplevel source dir or in the admin subdir and set the right path for libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:02:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] New: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: klee at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: The ChangeLog plug-in simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for your projects. It has parsers that work with Java, C/C++, and Python. It currently has one formatter, which formats ChangeLog entries in the "GNU Style". You can add your own parsers and formatters by contributing to the extension points defined in the plug-in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112104.l0BL4fdl018056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-11 16:04 EST ------- Pekka, are you still interested in getting this packaged? If not I can take it over... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:28:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112128.l0BLSqC5020132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 jjohnstn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: eclipse-cdt |Review Request: eclipse-cdt |- C/C++ Development plugins |- C/C++ Development plugins |for Eclipse |for Eclipse OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112141.l0BLfm3k021210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-11 16:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > IMO, The Guidelines aren't wrong, they only say that .desktop files be installed > appropriately (though arguably that is too vague for some folks). ATM the guidelines state: "Also remember that it is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, you need to run desktop-file-install in %install " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112146.l0BLkbHP021643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-11 16:46 EST ------- Oh, my fault. Didn't knowed that I must run %configure to get the libtool-file. Thanks Dan. Next try: SPEC Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/polyester/polyester.spec SRPM: Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/polyester/polyester-1.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Changelog: - Removed kdebase from "Require" - fix rpath Because I cannot reproduce the rpath error on x86 someone else must try it on x86_64. Josef? I also think so that desktop-file-install is not needed here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112147.l0BLlVc0021726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 16:47 EST ------- Sigh, ok, I guess we need to work to consolodate all the .desktop file references into one place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 21:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112151.l0BLp11r022095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-11 16:50 EST ------- More importantly, one should note that the example: desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/ \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications//foo.desktop Is (almost) a no-op, other than serving as a sanity-check/validator for the .desktop file (ie, dfi will barf if it finds something non-compliant). Now, how to (re)word this to make it clear fdi is not a MUST item, while at the same time maximizing confusion... (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222372] New: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josef at toxicpanda.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-1.src.rpm Description: Tilda is a Linux terminal taking after the likeness of many classic terminals from first person shooter games, Quake, Doom and Half-Life (to name a few), where the terminal has no border and is hidden from the desktop until a key is pressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:03:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112203.l0BM3VLX023242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-11 17:03 EST ------- btw I'm in the middle of being sponsored by somebody, but its not happened yet, just FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112207.l0BM7i80023489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-11 17:07 EST ------- added a BR for libconfuse-devel which is required for building Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:07:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222374] New: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric.moret at epita.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paprefs.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paprefs-0.9.5-1.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Preferences (paprefs) is a simple GTK based configuration dialog for the PulseAudio sound server. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112224.l0BMO48Y024887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-11 17:23 EST ------- > cp {AUTHORS,COPYING,README,ChangeLog,TODO,NEWS} > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} Instead of that, simply do this %doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog TODO NEWS in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:39:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221944] Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112239.l0BMdXAO026197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofx - A library for supporting Open Financial Exchange (OFX) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221944 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-11 17:39 EST ------- 0.8.3-3 uploaded - INSTALL, opensp-devel fixed. Tools split off into a 'ofx' package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112241.l0BMfYd6026282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112254.l0BMstHq027086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-11 17:54 EST ------- 2.3.0-6 uploaded; cert bundle marked as config, rpaths fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 22:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112255.l0BMtMXx027131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-11 17:55 EST ------- Just a note to the conversation about the *.desktop-files: I've tried to avoid packages which requires desktop-file-install in the past because I cannot say I've really understanded this (usage/guidelines/syntax/etc.). :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 23:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:03:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112303.l0BN3Cpv027681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-11 18:02 EST ------- Okay, I've (finally!) taken care of the two issues above. Here's the new spec and SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.2.a1.src.rpm Here's a diff from the most recently reviewed spec and the one above: http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec.patch Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 23:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] New: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/gnucash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/gnucash-2.0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: GnuCash is a personal finance manager. A check-book like register GUI allows you to enter and track bank accounts, stocks, income and even currency trades. The interface is designed to be simple and easy to use, but is backed with double-entry accounting principles to ensure balanced books. Known rpmlint complaints: - gnucash ships a couple of plugins in libdir - rpmlint thinks the schema files should be %config - I'm pretty sure they're not supposed to be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 11 23:45:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701112345.l0BNjngX029884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-11 18:45 EST ------- I look only some things, you should use the rpm directory macros %{_sbindir} and %{_initrddir}[1] and the command 'ln' must create with '-sf' parameter for a clean re-install output, you should delete of top the _docdir macro and the Packager tag should not be used[2]. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 00:06:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120006.l0C06a5o030630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-11 19:06 EST ------- * removed python-abi requirement * rm -rf %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/templates/__init__.py this is an empty file, thus is removed it. * moved apache.conf to %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} * created a README.fedora with setup instructions and put it in %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} * moved prewikka-httpd from /usr/bin => /usr/sbin new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.7.1-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 00:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120013.l0C0DSZn030864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at yahoo.com 2007-01-11 19:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/pastebin-0.50-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 00:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120017.l0C0H4TQ031121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-11 19:17 EST ------- Is there a reason why the gconf2 --makefile-uninstall-rule is missing? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 01:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120144.l0C1iPuN001808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2007-01-11 20:44 EST ------- One thine you may need to know: the lxde author says he will no more develop and maintain these programs So there is no NEXT version of lxde. That is one reason why I don't want to maintain any of lxde packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 01:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120145.l0C1jqLB001860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-11 20:45 EST ------- > GLOBALFLAGS += flags-speciied-for-program That's okay. The Makefile is very simple and hardcoded. Alternatively, it could use $(CFLAGS) in the same way that it's possible to override it from the outside. That works with most projects. > %clean > > Maybe in mock. In my local, custom build directory remains. rpmbuild --clean ... ;-) Then look at the end of the build output. Btw, I prefer rpmbuild over mock. > Btw, project compiled with OPTFLAGS is over 10% larger > than the previous one. Is this normal? Increase in size is normal and due to options like -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. Whether it's 10% or more or less, I don't know. :) $ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] New: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: ConsoleKit is a system daemon for tracking seats and sessions. It provides asynchronous notification via the system message bus. ConsoleKit is a central part of the effort to make fast user switching work well for FC7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120419.l0C4JROQ008392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:19 EST ------- I should have mentioned that still needs to go in core, since gdm will depend on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:20:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120420.l0C4KVst008482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120423.l0C4NgVD008723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:23 EST ------- the description is a little terse. the words "seats" and "sessions" have a specific undefined meaning for instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:25:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120425.l0C4P8wf008839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:25 EST ------- in the last package i reviewed you said you didn't think having specific version for the build requires was a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120426.l0C4QWB2008953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:26 EST ------- If the tarball name is console-kit, why are we calling the package ConsoleKit ? why are we specifically passing -n to %setup? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:29:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120429.l0C4TOPI009210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:29 EST ------- you need a Requires(preun): service i think -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120437.l0C4beiX010055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:37 EST ------- do we really want to be shipping a binary that upstream explicitly made noinst? and giving it our own name nontheless? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120439.l0C4doVI010256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:39 EST ------- The init scripts have bogus priority numbers. why is it getting started so late? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:42:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120442.l0C4g91v010437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:41 EST ------- Re comment 2, from the README: What is a seat? 8 =============== 9 10 A seat is a collection of sessions and a set of hardware (usually at 11 least a keyboard and mouse). Only one session may be active on a 12 seat at a time. 13 14 What is a session? 15 ================== 16 17 A session is a collection of all processes that originate from a single 18 common ancestor and retain knowledge of a secret. As an implementation 19 detail, this secret may be stored in the process environment by the 20 login manager under the name XDG_SESSION_COOKIE. That reminds me that I should include the README ChangeLog, etc in the rpm Re comment 3: True. This spec was stolen from davidz... Re comment 4: I don't know. This is the way William Jon McCann shipped it. The project itself is clearly called ConsoleKit (see e.g. the README), but the tarball is named console-kit. David decided to go with the project name for the rpm, which is explicitly allowed by the package naming guidelines. Re comment 5: /sbin/service is part of initscripts, which is on the exceptions list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:48:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120448.l0C4m7Sm010792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:47 EST ------- can you put a complete url in the source line? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120449.l0C4nVjb010909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:49 EST ------- Re comment 6: good point, and I guess the answer is no. It is certainly not essential functionality, since it is just a wrapper of sorts around the dbus interface. Re comment 7: I don't know. Why would you start it earlier ? Re comment 9: sure, let me produce an updated spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 04:51:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120451.l0C4pOgU011054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-11 23:51 EST ------- ConsoleKit seems sort of low level. If we start it at the end, it means no other services will be able to use it... We made this same mistake with hal and networkmanager for what its worth. We shouldn't repeat it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 05:13:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120513.l0C5Dox1012732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-12 00:13 EST ------- Well, its currently started at the same time as hal and NetworkManager... Do we really want to deviate from upstream for that, without a concrete problem that would be solved by starting it earlier ? Updated: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit-0.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 05:15:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120515.l0C5FQ5s012864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-12 00:15 EST ------- it guess is shouldn't hold up the review, but it's something we need to fix for all three services. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 05:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120518.l0C5Io8E013044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-12 00:18 EST ------- We should fix the description to say what consolekit does in primitive terms. But with that change and assuming this passes rpmlint and succeeds in mock, it seems like it's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 05:58:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120558.l0C5wlx4014354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-12 00:58 EST ------- Obviously, because once you install it, you will never ever want to uninstall it, evar. Or, I screwed up. Fixed & uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 06:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120600.l0C60fm8014417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 01:00 EST ------- * Commands under paths only used by previledged users (like /sbin/service) must be written with full path in scriptlets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 06:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120611.l0C6Ba4S014732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-12 01:11 EST ------- We should probably require dbus explicitly, for the /etc/dbus-1/system.d directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 06:42:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120642.l0C6g2M6015915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2007-01-12 01:42 EST ------- Yes I have access, thanks Josh. Thank you very much everybody for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 06:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120652.l0C6qZUP016339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-12 01:52 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPMS. E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. But its ok as it looks mis-error by rpmlint. + source files match upstream. 0f7cf7d0efa6719f85c00d6d8ccec2b3 gwenhywfar-2.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code Not contents. + no static libraries present. + no gwenhywfar.pc files present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + no scriptlets used. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 07:48:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120748.l0C7mioj018340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 02:48 EST ------- Umm.. still I cannot connect to http://cimi.netsons.org/, however, when I logged in to other host and tried to connect there from the host, it suceeded.... Then, 0.41 seems released, so would you update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 07:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120759.l0C7xoc5018647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-12 02:59 EST ------- Done. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.41-1.leof6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 08:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120803.l0C83l2g018799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 08:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120804.l0C84hxI018828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 09:45:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701120945.l0C9jbBi025736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 |Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 |- Telnet client designed for|- Telnet client designed for |BBS browsing |BBS browsing ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-12 04:45 EST ------- I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a prereview. At a first glance the spec file looks fine, however it doesn't build in mock. The error is: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55138: line 31: desktop-file-install: command not found so I think you need to add desktop-file-utils to your BuildRequires line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 12:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121241.l0CCfOFK004235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-12 07:41 EST ------- Build in devel. Will build in FC-6/5 when branches are complete. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 13:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121331.l0CDVXa4006732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-12 08:31 EST ------- New versions including the last 3 comments: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit-0.1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:04:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121504.l0CF4AsS013672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:04 EST ------- Just looking over: (In reply to comment #7) > + no gwenhywfar.pc files present. It certainly has them in my builds... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:07:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121507.l0CF7FeM014119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-12 10:07 EST ------- tgdb is cgdb's trivial GDB interface library which is being used to communicate with the gdb back-end. I have no idea why the up-stream maintainer doesn't change the prompt to cgdb. Single question: I'm pushing the htdocs under /usr/share/cgdb. Should I push it under /usr/share/docs/cgdb instead? As far as I could see, some html files go into /usr/share/ while others go into /usr/doc/ Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-5.src.rpm * Tue Jan 08 2007 - 0.6.3-5 - Keep timestamps on install - Remove unnecessary comments. - Add missing HTML docs. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121509.l0CF939m014417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:08 EST ------- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121513.l0CFDPBR014705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:13 EST ------- Okay, first things first: rpmlint output (on FC6): W: eclipse-cdt non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) This one I'm not sure about so let's leave it for now. I'll look into it. W: eclipse-cdt invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) Just put EPL and not the version or the full name or the URL. W: eclipse-cdt macro-in-%changelog eclipse_arch Macros in %changelogs need to be double-%'d. Change %{eclipse_arch} to %%{eclipse_arch}. W: eclipse-cdt mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) Open the specfile in emacs and M-x untabify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121515.l0CFFmvw014852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I'm pushing the htdocs under /usr/share/cgdb. Should I push it under > /usr/share/docs/cgdb instead? Ah, no. Just add %doc doc/htdocs . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:16:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121516.l0CFGQIW014912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com CC|overholt at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:16 EST ------- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121518.l0CFIHq7015046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:17 EST ------- rpmlint output: W: eclipse-changelog non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) Let's leave this one for now. I'll investigate and get back to you. W: eclipse-changelog invalid-license Eclipse Public License v1.0 Just put EPL and not the full name or version. W: eclipse-changelog mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 11) You've got mixed tabs and spaces. One way to fix this is to open the specfile in emacs and type Alt-x and then type untabify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121522.l0CFME2N015461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-12 10:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Just looking over: > > (In reply to comment #7) > > + no gwenhywfar.pc files present. > > It certainly has them in my builds... oops Sorry. I actually used to copy my Review Template and modify them according to package. I forgot to remove no word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121549.l0CFnvve017952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-12 10:49 EST ------- Hi David, A couple of needswork and nitpicks, NEEDSWORK: * Packages doesn't build in x86_64 mock * Needs to call ldconfig in post and postun * Ought to use the %find_lang for locales/translations * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NITS: * You should really require sword >=1.5.8 * Setting the CFLAGS in the spec is not necessary, it's already set by rpmbuild * Also setting the $PATH for QT is not necesaary, already done /etc/profile.d/qt.sh (I notice you only set this variables, you didn't export them) * I'm not sure what '--preserve-root' option does when you clean the buildroot, but I think its unnecesary. * I'm not -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121550.l0CFo8G7017991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-01-12 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > W: eclipse-changelog invalid-license Eclipse Public License v1.0 > > Just put EPL and not the full name or version. I used "Eclipse Public License" in the eclipse spec file and didn't get a warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 15:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121556.l0CFuSCv018714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 10:56 EST ------- Okay. = All seven sources coincise with upstream as of md5sum value. = Packaging are okay. = Well, your another review request (bug 222087) seems to have several issues, however, I believe someone points out them and you will fix up soon (I am also reviewing several review requests and reviewing your another requests may take long....) ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gtk-murrine-engine) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . When you follow some procedure, I should receive a mail that you need a sponsor. Then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121601.l0CG1eUt019318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 11:01 EST ------- Well, would you once create srpm for 0.1.4? Maybe someone (including me) can point out how beryl-vidcap should be fixed if there is any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121616.l0CGGdSm020587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > W: eclipse-changelog invalid-license Eclipse Public License v1.0 > > > > Just put EPL and not the full name or version. > > I used "Eclipse Public License" in the eclipse spec file and didn't get a warning. Yeah, that's fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121622.l0CGM5Sm020906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|overholt at redhat.com |bkonrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 11:22 EST ------- And now some comments about the specfile: . don't use pkg_summary. just put the summary in Summary: . I don't think we need eclipse_name. just replace that with eclipse in its 3 uses. . get rid of the section macro . I hate that there's an epoch but there's nothing we can do about that now . arch-specific plugins such as org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux should be moved to %{_libdir}/eclipse . does the CDT still use ctags? . do any of the jars contain arch-specific bits (.sos, etc.) that may make it multilib-incompatible? . eclipse_lib_base isn't currently used but it will be when you move the arch-specific plugins there . I think the instructions for generating the tarball no longer hold. Specifically, I think it should now be: eclipse -Duser.home=../../home -application . is the autotools stuff all licensed properly? ie. it's all EPL and it all has the correct copyright notices in the files? . could we add comments for all of the patches? It would greatly help figuring out why we're patching and what each patch is doing. . is CPPUnit support EPL? . should we require gcc? what about gcc-c++? Perhaps gdb and/or make already require those ... . can we look at adding all of the arches? or at least can we add a comment specifying why we're only building on the 4 we are? . the sdk's %description is weak. look at the sdk %descriptions in eclipse.spec . we shouldn't have links between /usr/share/eclipse and /usr/lib/eclipse for the .sos. Ben, what do you think about this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121624.l0CGOQIQ021054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-12 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a prereview. > > At a first glance the spec file looks fine, however it doesn't build in mock. > > The error is: > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55138: line 31: desktop-file-install: command not found > > so I think you need to add desktop-file-utils to your BuildRequires line. Thanks. Done. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.leof6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:34:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121634.l0CGYVvG021681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-12 11:34 EST ------- rpmlint has some interesting things to say: W: ConsoleKit conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Are these really config files? W: ConsoleKit non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/console-kit.conf This WOULD be a config, and should get (noreplace) maybe? E: ConsoleKit executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Another dupe of above. W: ConsoleKit service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit I think this is fine yes? We _always_ want ConsoleKit running? W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename This is because "ConsoleKit" != the binary name. I think thats OK in this case right? W: ConsoleKit no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Does 'reload' vs restart make any sense in this daemon? W: ConsoleKit incoherent-init-script-name ConsoleKit Dupe from above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121645.l0CGjVlR022975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-01-12 11:45 EST ------- Note, despite its location /etc/dbus-1/system.d doesn't really house config files so much as policy files. i.e., it would be very rare for a sysadmin to want to change anything in that directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121646.l0CGkkFL023114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-12 11:46 EST ------- Thanks, Deji. New files: Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword-0.3-2.src.rpm > NEEDSWORK: > * Packages doesn't build in x86_64 mock Fixed using patch (thanks again!). > * Needs to call ldconfig in post and postun > * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives I don't believe these two are true. All kioslaves need the libtool archive and won't work without them. Fedora ships these in kdebase for the standard kioslaves. (I believe that in KDE4 they'll go away). > * Ought to use the %find_lang for locales/translations There's no localisation upstream, so this is a no-op, but I've implemented it anyway (as I believe upstream is introducing it in future). > NITS: > * You should really require sword >=1.5.8 Done. > * Setting the CFLAGS in the spec is not necessary, it's already set by rpmbuild Removed. > * Also setting the $PATH for QT is not necesaary, already done /etc/profile.d/qt.sh Removed. > * I'm not sure what '--preserve-root' option does when you clean the buildroot, but I think its unnecesary. Paranoia - it tells "rm" to cancel the command if told to "rm -rf /" ! Anyway, gone now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] New: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/bibletime.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/bibletime-1.6.2-1.src.rpm Description: BibleTime is a free and easy to use bible study tool for UNIX systems. BibleTime provides easy handling of digitalized texts (Bibles, commentaries and lexicons) and powerful features to work with these texts (search in texts, write own notes, save, print etc.). BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 16:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121654.l0CGsHkh023734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-12 11:53 EST ------- The 'incoherent' messages are real errors. The lock file name in subsys *must* match the script file name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 17:11:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121711.l0CHBK2N024835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 12:11 EST ------- Well, * For file entry - Please clean up file entry. For example, why don't you just write ---------------------------------------------------- %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ ---------------------------------------------------- instead of the directory + all files/directories under there? Just writing the directory without %dir prefix is interpretted as the directory and all files/directories under there. * Documentation install As said in comment 1, please don't use: ---------------------------------------------------- cp -p AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README \ %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -p doc/apache.conf %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ cp README.fedora %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} ---------------------------------------------------- Just write like: ---------------------------------------------------- %doc AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README doc/apache.conf ---------------------------------------------------- Using %doc without absolute path is interpretted as 1. to create the default documentation directory (%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}) 2. Install the files/diretories listed into the directory. * README.fedora Don't create a patch. Just write README.fedora and include in srpm as a source. i.e. ---------------------------------------------------- ....... %Source0: %Source1: README.fedora ........ %prep %setup -q cp -p %{SOURCE1} . ......... ......... %files ......... %doc AUTHORS ... %doc README.fedora ........... ---------------------------------------------------- * empty __init__.py This file is imported first when to call python modules in the directory, so this file is needed even this is empty. You can other empty __init__.py scripts in prewikka. And.. the existence of __init__.py means that the module scripts under this directory are imported from other binaries/scripts and not called directly by user. For this case the scripts should not have shebang and should not have executable permission flags. So: 1. Don't remove __init__.py under prewikka/templates/ 2. Set permission of all .py/.pyo/.pyc files under this directory as 0644 3. Remove shebang from all .py scripts under this directory. 4. And... check if prewikka works without problems if you do 1-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 17:23:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121723.l0CHND4N025522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-12 12:23 EST ------- New versions including the last 3 comments: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/ConsoleKit/ConsoleKit-0.1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 17:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121723.l0CHNf0t025554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Would this be an acceptable way to sed only text files? This script should work well. I can accept 0.50-3 for sed issue (not checked if other issues exist, however I assume it is okay for now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121807.l0CI7nbT028268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 13:07 EST ------- Well, several issues from very quick check. (0.3.5-2) * Your own desktop misses Icon item. Why not use original desktop file included in tarball? Note: for original desktop, the Icon description is enough with ----------------------------------------- Icon=pcmanx.png ----------------------------------------- * Still fails on mockbuild ------------------------------------------ + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild pcmanx No translations found for pcmanx in /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40758 (%install) ------------------------------------------ * Debuginfo rpm issue ---------------------------------------------- make install-strip DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ----------------------------------------------- Well, don't strip binaries. Debuginfo rpm becomes useless. * Timestamps Please keep timestamps for installed text files. Usually -------------------------------------------------- make install INSTALL="install -c -p" --------------------------------------------------- works. * Desktop category Original desktop file includes --------------------------------------------------- Application ---------------------------------------------------- category. This is deprecated and this should be removed. ---------------------------------------------------- --add-category X-Fedora --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra --add-category Applications ---------------------------------------------------- All these are not deprecated and should be removed ---------------------------------------------------- --add-category Internet ---------------------------------------------------- This is forbidden. Perhaps you meant "Network"? * scriptlets ---------------------------------------------------- update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : ---------------------------------------------------- This is not needed because pcmanx desktop does not contain mime types description. * file entry ------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/* -------------------------------------- This is wrong because this includes %{_libdir}/debug, which should appear only in debuginfo rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121808.l0CI80pA028295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 13:07 EST ------- . Since this is Fedora, we can do away with the fedora and redhat defines. That can be simplified to just %define gcj_support 1 . replace %{eclipse_name} in the definition of eclipse_base to just be eclipse and remove eclipse_name entirely . please add a little explanation (or a script a la eclipse-emf and eclipse-gef ... in Extras) as to how the src zip is generated . "this plugins is really noarch but it" -> "These plugins are really noarch but they" . you've got an extra line between %prep and %build . it's also unfortunate that we have an epoch but we can't do anything about that now . do we require a specific version of the CDT? . how do we get around the optional python parser and a PyDev dependency? Otherwise, things look good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:11:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121811.l0CIBnCO028586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-01-12 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > . please add a little explanation (or a script a la eclipse-emf and eclipse-gef ... in Extras) as to how the src zip is generated Since Kyu is a developer on this plugin, he should make a propper source zip available for all to use instead of creating it each with a script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:17:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vim-vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121817.l0CIHDsW029026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vim-vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: vimoutliner |Review Request: vim- |- set of vim macros for |vimoutliner - set of vim |editing outlines |macros for editing outlines ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-12 13:17 EST ------- (Changing summary for traceability) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:45:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121845.l0CIjmo7030994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-12 13:45 EST ------- It would be nice if it could happen before the split so that we can start testing the libgcj bits sooner rather than later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121852.l0CIqddV031641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-01-12 13:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > * For SEGV issue Patrice saw: > Oh, I got SEGV, too! However, not completely reproducible, > however, for me this happens at the same point at last. > On Dec 4, the author stated that he would soon be working towards a 3.3 release. Perhaps we should pull the CVS-current and start working with that as some of these problems may be resolved. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121853.l0CIrEju031682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-01-12 13:53 EST ------- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ntop.general/12438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 18:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121855.l0CItKCg032030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-12 13:55 EST ------- > kioslaves need the libtool archive yup, for now anyway, until kde(kdelibs) is fixed/patched to do otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121904.l0CJ4qcG032518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-01-12 14:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail-2.2.1-6.fc6.src.rpm * Fri Jan 12 2007 Bernard Johnson 2.2.1-6 - add patch to fix errno race condition - don't delete libsort_sieve.so, it's a module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] New: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofia-sip-1.12.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Sofia SIP is a RFC-3261-compliant library for SIP user agents and other network elements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:13:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218744] Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121913.l0CJDRjf000587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - SIP user agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218744 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-12 14:13 EST ------- In a private email Pekka indicated that he was fine with me taking this review over. Closing this review and opening a new one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 222475 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121913.l0CJDcDc000612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppessi at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-12 14:13 EST ------- *** Bug 218744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121913.l0CJDxw7000660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-12 14:13 EST ------- Hello Sebastin, I don't think It should be integrated within this package "ksplash-engine-moodin". but however you can create another package "ksplash-moodin-theme-MYTHEME.spec for the themes on: Johan Cwiklinski has been working on some themes for moodin as a seperate package which depends on this "ksplash-engine-moodin". see http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/moodin/themes/ksplash-moodin-theme-curcuit.spec as example. Try to work on yours and ask for another review and add me in Cc: for that bug:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121922.l0CJMS0K001245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-12 14:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #0) > > This is my first package - I am seeking a sponsor. > > (Just noticing that now I am sponsoring and currently > this bug does not block FE-NEEDSPONSOR) I've blocked this bug as FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Deji Akingunola, are you sponsoring? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:26:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121926.l0CJQNex001579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-12 14:26 EST ------- Hi Chitlesh, I think Mamoru fixed that in comment #4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121928.l0CJStEN001712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-12 14:28 EST ------- Confirmed - Mamoru Tasaka is my sponsor (curlftpfs, my first package, is already in Extras). I don't need a sponsor any more for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121929.l0CJTPHc001775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-12 14:29 EST ------- Added to brew. Close when built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121935.l0CJZbxc002247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-12 14:35 EST ------- Thanks for such info :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121945.l0CJjLTQ003101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-12 14:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, several issues from very quick check. > (0.3.5-2) > > * Your own desktop misses Icon item. Why not use original > desktop file included in tarball? > Note: for original desktop, the Icon description is enough > with > ----------------------------------------- > Icon=pcmanx.png > ----------------------------------------- The original .desktop contains two Icon entries. No it's not missing. See line: Icon=pcmanx Should I change it to pcmanx.png? > > * Still fails on mockbuild Where can I use this? or do I have to setup my own? > ------------------------------------------ > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh > /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild pcmanx > No translations found for pcmanx in /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40758 (%install) > ------------------------------------------ Any ideas why it failed? AFAIK, there are thse files: /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo > > * Debuginfo rpm issue > ---------------------------------------------- > make install-strip DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > ----------------------------------------------- > Well, don't strip binaries. Debuginfo rpm becomes useless. > > * Timestamps > Please keep timestamps for installed text files. Usually > -------------------------------------------------- > make install INSTALL="install -c -p" > --------------------------------------------------- > works. > > * Desktop category > Original desktop file includes > --------------------------------------------------- > Application > ---------------------------------------------------- > category. This is deprecated and this should be removed. Removed from desktop file. > ---------------------------------------------------- > --add-category X-Fedora > --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra > --add-category Applications > ---------------------------------------------------- > All these are not deprecated and should be removed I can't understand this. Should be removed or not? I keep them for now. > ---------------------------------------------------- > --add-category Internet > ---------------------------------------------------- > This is forbidden. Perhaps you meant "Network"? fixed. > * scriptlets > ---------------------------------------------------- > update-desktop-database > /dev/null 2>&1 || : > ---------------------------------------------------- > This is not needed because pcmanx desktop does not contain > mime types description. fixed. > > * file entry > ------------------------------------- > %{_libdir}/* > -------------------------------------- > This is wrong because this includes %{_libdir}/debug, > which should appear only in debuginfo rpm. fixed. The new src.rpm is here: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-3.leof6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:55:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701121955.l0CJt7lF004027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-12 14:55 EST ------- ok, fixed the issues. one question remains: when I use this: %files %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %doc AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README README.fedora doc/apache.conf why is prewikka the owner of both dirs, although I did not use the %dir macro? new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.7.1-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 19:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222478] New: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofsip-cli-0.12-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofsip-cli-0.12-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This is a simple SIP VoIP/IM example client demonstrating how to use the Sofia-SIP libsofia-sip-ua library interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122000.l0CK0N5g004315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |222475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122000.l0CK0NZa004319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent librar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222478 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122002.l0CK24pm004471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sofia-sip - |Review Request: sofia-sip - |Sofia SIP User-Agent librar |Sofia SIP User-Agent library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:38:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:38:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222404] Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122038.l0CKcPQR007014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-12 15:38 EST ------- built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122050.l0CKo368007921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-12 15:49 EST ------- New SRPM and spec. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six-0.5.3-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 20:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122057.l0CKv6AO008236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-12 15:57 EST ------- I forgot about the locolor icons. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six-0.5.3-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 21:08:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122108.l0CL8iUQ009349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-12 16:08 EST ------- You forgot to add --ignore-theme-index option argument to gtk-update-icon-cache run against locolor dir. There's no index.theme file so it causes an error: No theme index file in '/usr/share/icons/locolor/'. If you really want to create an icon cache here, use --ignore-theme-index. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 21:21:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122121.l0CLL7pp010516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-12 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You forgot to add --ignore-theme-index option argument to gtk-update-icon-cache > run against locolor dir. There's no index.theme file so it causes an error: > > No theme index file in '/usr/share/icons/locolor/'. > If you really want to create an icon cache here, use --ignore-theme-index. > Fixed. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/six/six-0.5.3-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 21:29:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222257] Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122129.l0CLT9Yc011472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 mastahnke at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 21:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221108] Review Request: openarena - first person shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122154.l0CLsPhe013446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openarena - first person shooter Alias: openarena https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221108 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-12 16:54 EST ------- After fixing some ppc problems, I finally managed to build that. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 21:56:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122156.l0CLucil013616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-01-12 16:56 EST ------- Sorry for the delay SPEC file : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm.spec SRPMS : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/libgtksourceviewmm/libgtksourceviewmm-0.2.0-3.src.rpm - add automake and pkgconfig in devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 22:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122200.l0CM0rgB014011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-12 17:00 EST ------- Package looks fine now. Pity that I wasn't able to win ;) but it, obviously, doesn't stand in the way to make this package approved. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 22:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122219.l0CMJUwV015115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-01-12 17:19 EST ------- Updated files are located here: http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse.spec http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse-3.2.1-30.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 22:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122231.l0CMVUbk015862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372 ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-12 17:31 EST ------- ahh im braindead. fixed it Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 12 22:54:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701122254.l0CMsUsh016707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-01-12 17:54 EST ------- Sorry, sick wife and kids, plus my day job kept getting in the way... Finally got around to it, SRPM available here: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/beryl-vidcap/beryl-vidcap-0.1.4-1.fc6.src.rpm At the moment, I'm just including a seom svn checkout in the package, will look into packaging seom on its own in the future... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 01:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222515] New: Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222515 Summary: Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofiasip-gaim-prpl-1.1.1-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/sofsip-cli-0.12-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim and is compliant with the IETF RFC3261 specification. Aims to leverage features of the cool Gaim UI for Sofia-SIP library usage, and it can be used as a SIP client for uses such as VoIP, IM and presence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 01:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130153.l0D1rWIS022993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222515 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 01:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222515] Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130153.l0D1rTX4022989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222515 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |222475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 04:30:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130430.l0D4UUpm028481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-12 23:30 EST ------- Hi David, A couple of needswork, NEEDSWORK: * Buildrequire is needed for gettext (though it builds without it) * rpmlint complaints (on the binary) W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/handbook/common ../../common W: bibletime devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/bibletimeinterface.h W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/howto/common ../../common The 1st and the 3rd warnings are being fixed upstream, we can wait on them for those, the second one I believe can be ignored There is also a load of warnings on the desktop file installation, the attached patch fixes it. However to use the patch, you need to remove the add-category and remove-key options from desktop-file-install call in the spec file. The add-category X-Fedora had been judged to be unnecesary and the rest are taking care of in the patch. Other issues (in the spec): * make bibletime.desktop is not necessary (doesn't do anything)in the build section, the desktop file was created by configure already; that line can be removed * I think you can also remove those preserve-root options ;) * Calling /sbin/ldconfig in post and postun is not necessary, since bibletime doesn't ship any library * There is no need for the 2 lines after make install, the --dir option in the desktop-file-install takes care of that. (By the way, i don't think it ought to be hidden under kde subdir in %{_datadir}/applications/, bibletime can be useful for folks who generally prefer other DE too). * You listed %{_datadir}/apps/bibletime/bibletimeui.rc and %{_datadir}/apps/bibletime/tips twice, you can chmod them to 0644 in the install section, and remove their explicit listing from the files section. * I think its also a nice idea to use the %find_lang macro for the documentation files as done for kio_sword. I'm attaching a patch (to the spec) that implement fix these issues, use it as you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 04:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130431.l0D4VUh1028596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-12 23:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145518&action=view) Desktop patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 04:35:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130435.l0D4Z8JO028853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-12 23:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145519) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145519&action=view) Patch to the bibletime.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 04:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130444.l0D4i8xw029566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-12 23:43 EST ------- Your Spec link seems to be 404, but I can get the spec from your src.rpm. I'd be happy to review this. Expect a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:01:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130501.l0D51cf6030813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 00:01 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below- License field in spec matches See below- License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK (i386/x86_64) - Should build on all supported archs See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. See below - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Not a blocker, but you should consider very strongly using the %{?dist} tag. 2. You have the license as GPL in the spec, but the pgfoundry page says "BSD". The included copyright.txt file appears to be the orig BSD license with advertising clause. 3. Suggest you provide a full download url for the Source0 line. In fact, now I can't find a download link for the 1.0.0 release. Only the new 2.0beta1 seems to be available. Perhaps thats the prefered version to package now? 4. This package should own: %{_datadir}/pgsql/%{name} directory. 5. rpmlint says: W: dbi-link no-%build-section You could add a empty %build to fix this. I seem to remember some other problems with specs with no %build section, so you should probibly add it anyhow. Shouldn't hurt. 6. Should change the Requires for the dbi-link-test subpackage from: Requires: %{name} to Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] New: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gilboad at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-1.src.rpm Description: IceWM is a window manager for the X Window System (freedesktop, XFree86). The goal of IceWM is speed, simplicity, and not getting in the user's way. $ rpmlint -i -v SRPMS/icewm-1.2.30-1.src.rpm I: icewm checking - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:30:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130530.l0D5Uat4032241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 00:30 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-6.src.rpm FYI, another package up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130531.l0D5VtGt032319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 00:31 EST ------- Added NEED-REVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:32:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130532.l0D5WT8N032368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 00:32 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: dad6200744d2c8f326fbec1f5e0c8249 Net_POP3-1.3.6.tgz dad6200744d2c8f326fbec1f5e0c8249 Net_POP3-1.3.6.tgz.1 f2c485f9e2b306f5f75c7c71d373a26cad09667b Net_POP3-1.3.6.tgz f2c485f9e2b306f5f75c7c71d373a26cad09667b Net_POP3-1.3.6.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. I don't think that: Requires(hint): php-pear(Net_Auth_SASL) >= 1.0 is usable with any rpm shipped by Fedora. I suppose it just makes it a hard Requires. Perhaps just change that to a Requires? Also, I can't seem to find that requirement in yet, should that package be added? 2. rpmlint says: W: php-pear-Net-POP3 no-documentation Which I guess can be ignored, since upstream has had no docs. 3. The /usr/share/pear/Net directory doesn't seem to be owned by this package, it seems owned by php-pear-Net-FTP. Should that package be required? or should this package also own that directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:48:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130548.l0D5mlXp000718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 00:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-2.src.rpm * Tue Jan 11 2007 - 1.2.30-2 - Manually add missing man page. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] New: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/aqbanking.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/aqbanking-2.1.0-11.src.rpm Description: aqbanking, assorted frontends, backend, bindings, etc. aqbanking is the online banking library used by gnucash (and, potentially, kmymoney and grisbi). A change from the Fedora Core package is that we build all the backends and frontends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 05:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130555.l0D5tfPI001128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 00:55 EST ------- OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (PHP) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 87217ac170577bc02cbb99094d1a9a80 Net_UserAgent_Detect-2.2.0.tgz 87217ac170577bc02cbb99094d1a9a80 Net_UserAgent_Detect-2.2.0.tgz.1 c949c65eebc8d2444abe64dd6c6be438f6e218a8 Net_UserAgent_Detect-2.2.0.tgz c949c65eebc8d2444abe64dd6c6be438f6e218a8 Net_UserAgent_Detect-2.2.0.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK(i386/x86_64) - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. According to the comments in the source file the license of this package is the php 2.0 license, available as: http://www.php.net/license/2_02.txt The PHP-LICENSE-3.01 included seems to be a newer, diffrent version. 2. This package owns the /usr/share/pear/Net directory. Should it? Or should it require some other package that does? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130604.l0D64j42001615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 01:04 EST ------- Sigh. Don't know how did I miss it... * Sat Jan 13 2007 - 0.6.3-7 - Fix wrong license. (Was LGPL, should be GPL.) Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130604.l0D64o0h001624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 01:04 EST ------- * Sat Jan 13 2007 - 1.2.30-3 - Fix wrong license. (Was LGPL, should be GPL.) Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-3.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:15:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130615.l0D6FwaV002191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 01:15 EST ------- Almost done, rpmlint is not satisfactorily silent on the binary rpm [deji at agape deji]$ rpmlint kio_sword-0.3-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: kio_sword dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kio_sword symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common The first can be ignored (knowing the target is there), the following patch fix the second warning; >> --- kio_sword.spec 2007-01-13 01:13:05.000000000 -0500 +++ kio_sword.spec.new 2007-01-13 01:16:41.000000000 -0500 @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install +#Fix symlink relative +pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/ +ln -sf ../common common +popd + %find_lang kio_sword || touch kio_sword.lang HTML_DIR=$(kde-config --expandvars --install html) if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$HTML_DIR ]; then << -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130625.l0D6PNLu002593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 01:25 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ecc4bb28c44a3bcef9e423125a06bd09 fam-ruby-0.2.0.tar.gz ecc4bb28c44a3bcef9e423125a06bd09 fam-ruby-0.2.0.tar.gz.1 4ebdf619370f663d06015d680f0ae26f279676e3 fam-ruby-0.2.0.tar.gz 4ebdf619370f663d06015d680f0ae26f279676e3 fam-ruby-0.2.0.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Should there really be a devel subpackage just for docs? If there does need to be one for some reason it should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but I don't see a reason to have one, unless I am missing something... 2. Should the 'Requires: gamin' be needed? rpm already puts in a requires on libfam.so.0 which is provided by the gamin package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:38:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130638.l0D6cbt1002889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-13 01:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Added NEED-REVIEW The FE-REVIEW blocker should only be added to a bug that is currently in progress of being reviewed, not to a bug which needs a review. Also, it appears that you are not yet sponsored (which I am unable to do). I will therefor add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. When you are sponsored either from this package or another of your submissions, the blocker should be manually removed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:41:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130641.l0D6fPxA002981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 01:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > No it's not missing. See line: Icon=pcmanx > Should I change it to pcmanx.png? Ah, okay. You may leave this as "Icon=pcmanx" > > > > > * Still fails on mockbuild > Where can I use this? or do I have to setup my own? Well, first install "mock" rpm (from Fedora Extras) and please check the manual of mock (if you use the default configuration, you can do the mockbuild by "mock ?????.src.rpm") > > > ------------------------------------------ > > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh > > /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild pcmanx > > No translations found for pcmanx in > /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40758 (%install) > > ------------------------------------------ > > Any ideas why it failed? AFAIK, there are thse files: > > /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo > /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo For this package, creating these gettext .mo files needs gettext rpm. Please add "gettext" to BuildRequires. > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > --add-category X-Fedora > > --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra > > --add-category Applications > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > All these are not deprecated and should be removed > > I can't understand this. Should be removed or not? Oops.. What I meant was "All these are now deprecated".... Please remove these.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 06:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130648.l0D6mdd3003308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 01:48 EST ------- I'm sorry that patch should really look like below; >> --- /home/deji/Desktop/kio_sword-0.3-2.src.rpm_FILES/kio_sword.spec 2007-01-13 01:48:38.000000000 -0500 +++ kio_sword.spec 2007-01-13 01:32:54.000000000 -0500 @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install +#Fix symlink to be relative +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/common +pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/ +ln -s ../common common +popd + %find_lang kio_sword || touch kio_sword.lang HTML_DIR=$(kde-config --expandvars --install html) if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$HTML_DIR ]; then << I guess its time to go to bed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 07:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] New: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gilboad at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun-0.9.2-1.src.rpm Description: A simple program which provides a "run program" window, featuring a bash-like TAB completion. It uses GTK+ interface. Also, supports CTRL-R / CTRL-S / "!" for searching through history. $ rpmlint -i -v gmrun-0.9.2-1.src.rpm I: gmrun checking - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 07:09:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130709.l0D79gEs003656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 07:10:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130710.l0D7A98n003668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 02:10 EST ------- Added NEED-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 07:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130737.l0D7bOYk003972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 07:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130743.l0D7hRYG004073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 02:43 EST ------- Well, * "INSTALL" document is not needed. This is needed for people who want to rebuild this by themselves and not needed for pre-built binary rpm. * htdocs/cgdb.png is broken. So please remove this file for now and report to upstream Other things are all okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (cgdb) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------------- Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . When you follow some procedure, I should receive a mail that you need a sponsor. Then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 08:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130840.l0D8ewiu005530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 03:40 EST ------- OK. Thanks. I misunderstood the how-to-join HOWTO. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 08:41:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130841.l0D8fA1Y005569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-13 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > No it's not missing. See line: Icon=pcmanx > > Should I change it to pcmanx.png? > Ah, okay. You may leave this as "Icon=pcmanx" > > > > > > > > * Still fails on mockbuild > > Where can I use this? or do I have to setup my own? > > Well, first install "mock" rpm (from Fedora Extras) and > please check the manual of mock > (if you use the default configuration, you can do the > mockbuild by "mock ?????.src.rpm") > > > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh > > > /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild pcmanx > > > No translations found for pcmanx in > > /var/tmp/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-2.fc7-root-mockbuild > > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40758 (%install) > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Any ideas why it failed? AFAIK, there are thse files: > > > > /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo > > /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/pcmanx.mo > > For this package, creating these gettext .mo files needs > gettext rpm. Please add "gettext" to BuildRequires. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > --add-category X-Fedora > > > --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra > > > --add-category Applications > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > All these are not deprecated and should be removed > > > > I can't understand this. Should be removed or not? > Oops.. What I meant was "All these are now deprecated".... > Please remove these.. Seems all fixed. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.5-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 08:41:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130841.l0D8fSrY005603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 08:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130842.l0D8gBCB005652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-13 03:42 EST ------- Changed NEEDREVIEW to NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 08:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701130850.l0D8oGsQ005852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-13 03:50 EST ------- Tried to 'make build' gtk-murrine-engine but failed. ---------------------- /usr/bin/plague-client build gtk-murrine-engine gtk-murrine-engine-0_41-1_fc7 devel Server returned an error: Insufficient privileges. ---------------------- Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 11:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131156.l0DBuxSC012826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-13 06:56 EST ------- Version 0.7 is out. Locale was added and few other changes in a build process occured. * Fri Jan 12 2007 Marcin Zajaczkowski - 0.7-1 - updated to 0.7 - added locale files - added manual page - adjusted %%{optflags} patch to a new Makefile - added patch to correct wrong dependencies which broke parallel build - removed redundant deletion of builddir (--clean option in rpmbuild does the same) Spec: timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec SRPM: timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 11:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 06:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131158.l0DBwFRI012929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-13 06:58 EST ------- Ehh, again with clickable links... Spec: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec SRPM: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 12:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 07:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131230.l0DCUn6a014103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-01-13 07:30 EST ------- the current SRPM builds successfully in mock for Fedora Development/i386 and rpmlint is silent on all rpms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 13:05:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131305.l0DD5XuG015016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-13 08:05 EST ------- Hello, sorry about the dealy, I have some material problem at my place. I'm trying to mock right now. (In reply to comment #13) > Just a note to the conversation about the *.desktop-files: I've tried to avoid > packages which requires desktop-file-install in the past because I cannot say > I've really understanded this (usage/guidelines/syntax/etc.). :) > In this case, desktop-install-file isn't required since this is for kwin. But (for another package) however they should be used for GUI. The package looks good. Josef Whiter can you try rebuilding the package on x86_64 arch please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 13:22:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131322.l0DDMHK8015384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-13 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > 2. subpkgs, particularly -devel, should > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{devel} Hmm how can a %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} be "autodependent" ? %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} depends on %{name}-%{version}-%{devel} doesn't make sense. > 4. instead of > sed -i -e \ > s'|Categories=Qt;KDE;Education;Science;Physics;Math;|Categories=Science;|' \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/%{name}.desktop > It's preferable to use > desktop-file-install --remove-category="..." > (and I'd argue you shouldn't be removing "Qt;KDE;Education" categories Labplot will be part of the Scientific Tools at Fedora at the same time a KDE package. Since Labplot will be installed at kmenu>Edutainement>Mathematics and other scientific tools such as Qalculate, the next release of the geda packages, kicad and xcircuit are being installed at kmenu>Science&Math, that is why I prefer that important tool, Labplot, to be installed at Science&Math instead of having multiple copies/items of Labplot in the kmenu (which makes the kde menu huge) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131402.l0DE2u6I017145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-13 09:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145526) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145526&action=view) build failure log Not a full review, just an early bird's picks: * %defattr missing in several sub-packages * Obsoletes ought to specify max.versions (using "LT", or "LE" inequations) * main package must not own %{_libdir}/gwenhywfar since that belongs into the "gwenhywfar" pkg already * Excludes are not symmetric. That's dangerous since you can lose files: main package: %exclude %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/debugger %exclude %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/* %exclude %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/wizards qbanking package: %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/debugger %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/qbanking %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/wizards You exclude everything in %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/* but only %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/qbanking is included explicitly. Other content below %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/ would be skipped/excluded silently. * the -devel packages ought to "Requires: automake", so the %{_datadir}/aclocal/ directory is not orphaned - and because smart applications use automake anyway - it's kinda difficult to determine the config values without using the foo-config scripts/pkgconfig/automake * [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Useless check. Nowadays buildroot cannot be "/" anymore. * "Requires: pkgconfig" in the frontends' -devel packages is redundant, since they all need aqbanking-devel which in turn requires pkgconfig for all its *-config queries (due to the applied Patch2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222533] New: Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222533 Summary: Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/grig.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/grig-0.7.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Grig is a graphical user interface for the Ham Radio Control Libraries. It is intended to be simple and generic, presenting the user to the same interface regardless of which radio he or she uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131416.l0DEG7h8017606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 09:16 EST ------- Doesn't build in mock (rawhide x86_64), build.log ends with; << DIE_RPATH_DIE="/usr/lib64:$DIE_RPATH_DIE" gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -g -Wall -g -o .libs/testlib testlib.o ./.libs/libcbanking.so /usr/bin/ld: warning: libaqbanking.so.16, needed by ./.libs/libcbanking.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) testlib.o: In function `main': /builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0/src/frontends/cbanking/testlib.c:6: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_free' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetProgressEndFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetHideBoxFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_new' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetProgressLogFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_InputBox' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetShowBoxFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetMessageBoxFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetGetPinFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_BANKING__INHERIT_GETLIST' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_BANKING__INHERIT_SETDATA' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetProgressAdvanceFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetInputBoxFn' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_MessageBox' ./.libs/libcbanking.so: undefined reference to `AB_Banking_SetProgressStartFn' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [testlib] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0/src/frontends/cbanking' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0/src/frontends' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37465 (%build) >> Other minor issues; Shouldn't Buildrequires on python be python-devel instead? Also the python packaging guildeline mandates defining python_sitelib at the top of your specfile, so the files under -python-%{name} subpackages would just go into %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:16:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] New: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sander at hoentjen.eu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/libsnack/libsnack.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/libsnack/libsnack-2.2.10-1.src.rpm Description: The Snack Sound Toolkit is designed to be used with a scripting language such as Tcl/Tk or Python. Using Snack you can create powerful multi-platform audio applications with just a few lines of code. Snack has commands for basic sound handling, e.g. sound card and disk I/O. Snack also has primitives for sound visualization, e.g. waveforms and spectrograms. It was developed mainly to handle digital recordings of speech, but is just as useful for general audio. Snack has also successfully been applied to other one-dimensional signals. This packages includes Ogg library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:42:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131442.l0DEg9Qo018609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-01-13 09:42 EST ------- Chris, are you still up to do the review ? A quick note first: in the devel package section: those should be Requires:, not BuildRequires:, and i don't think automake should be in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 14:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131448.l0DEmBPC018822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libsnack - |Review Request: libsnack - |Snack Sound Toolkit provides|Snack Sound Toolkit provides |audio handling to tlc/tk or |audio handling to tlc/tk or |python |python AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dakingun at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 09:48 EST ------- Package builds fine, but have minor issue; - The Release field should have .%{?dist} tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 15:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131544.l0DFiBbu020679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-13 10:44 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/LabPlot/LabPlot-1.5.1.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 15:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222175] Review Request: six - Hex playing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131545.l0DFjr1j020752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: six - Hex playing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222175 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 15:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131557.l0DFvjra021074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-01-13 10:57 EST ------- added dist tag Spec URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/libsnack/libsnack.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/libsnack/libsnack-2.2.10-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:19:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131619.l0DGJsq2021851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-13 11:19 EST ------- New versions: Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/bibletime.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/bibletime-1.6.2-2.src.rpm Thanks for the review. I adopted all your suggestions. With the find_lang... I think again this is probably a no-op, as I believe that the i18n stuff is in a separate tarball and not in the main BT distribution. I was thinking of adding this at a later stage once I've got it into Extras. Almost there - I hope! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:20:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131620.l0DGK1sO021864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-13 11:19 EST ------- Thanks again, Deji. Patch added. New files: Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/kio_sword-0.3-3.src.rpm Personally I'm not sure of whether silencing trivial rpmlint warnings is any better than cluttering up the specfile, but seeing as you've helped me so much I'll go with you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131636.l0DGaLo6022408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 11:36 EST ------- Okay. All issues are now fixed correctly. One issue. * Timestamps - -devel package contains many header files and keeping timestamps on these files are recommended. Please use --------------------------------------- make INSTALL="install -c -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install ---------------------------------------- Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------- This package (libgtksoureviewmm) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221698] Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131638.l0DGcSne022503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile-16 - Guile 1.6 compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221698 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131654.l0DGsZ6A023012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-13 11:54 EST ------- * doesn't build with RPM %optflags * Python docs are included, python module is NOT. Package description also mentions Python support. * snacksphere docs are included, snacksphere is NOT. Trying to load it fails. pkgIndex also lists snacksphere, although it's missing. * licence is not included * the "make test" suite fails here * Tcl SIG - What are the usual naming guidelines for this? The "snack" -> "libsnack" name is questionable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:54:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131654.l0DGsmoU023027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Personally I'm not sure of whether silencing trivial rpmlint warnings is any > better than cluttering up the specfile, I agree with you, but the packaging guildeline says the rpmlint must be satisfied as much as possible, "for thus it becometh us to fulfill all righteousness" ;). GOOD: * rmplint silent mock built binary * rpmlint warning on srpm can be ignored; (W: kio_sword dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kio_sword/common ../common) * source tarball matches upstream's md5sum: 957c563737d47900f67661086732ee12 kio_sword-0.3.tar.gz * package name meets the Package Naming Guidelines. * Satifies the Packaging Guidelines. * Builds in mock (x86_64 development) * Installs OK * License: GPL * Spec file generally OK. It includes a .la, but that's OK for kde packages for now (coments #6 & #7) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 16:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131658.l0DGw0PP023171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-13 11:57 EST ------- I 've just rebuilt the release 2 on a x86_64 rpmlint is clean... There is no rpath issues I should have used theses solutions: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsys But anyway this one needs also to be documented: # Don't use rpath! sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131701.l0DH1WNZ023311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-13 12:01 EST ------- http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/polyester/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131725.l0DHPgoS024163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-13 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > With the find_lang... I think again this is probably a no-op, as I believe > that the i18n stuff is in a separate tarball and not in the main BT > distribution. Now thinking about it again, I believe you're right. Considering that the review guildelines says locale files must not be explicitly listed, and since it doesn't hurt, I think it can stay. > Almost there - I hope! Yes. GOOD: * rmplint silent on mock srpm * rpmlint warning on mock built binary can be ignored (targets really exist); (W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/handbook/common ../../common W: bibletime devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/bibletimeinterface.h - A separate -devel subpackage is not needed for this, I believe. Moreso BT doesn't ship any library W: bibletime dangling-relative-symlink) /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/bibletime/howto/common ../../common * source tarball matches upstream's md5sum: b2b8b624d21d397201aec742d43501e5 bibletime-1.6.2.tar.bz2 * package name meets the Package Naming Guidelines. * Satifies the Packaging Guidelines. * Builds in mock (x86_64 development) * Installs and works OK (for me at least) * License: GPL * Spec file generally OK. APPROVED. It'll be nice to include the 'Changelog' with the README and License in the %doc section before/after you eventually import it into CVS. Also please don't forget the bibletime-i18n you promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:40:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131740.l0DHerht024980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-13 12:40 EST ------- Thanks! Imported into CVS. I dislike changelogs in packages - useless bloat, IMO. People who want them know where to get them. I have 31Mb on my Fedora installation and never wanted any of them! (I once filed a bug against wine-core to get 8Mb of them removed from the package). The gcc rpm ships with 10 years of changelogs - I have no idea why! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:45:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131745.l0DHjc1n025190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-13 12:45 EST ------- Thanks Nicolas Chauvet, MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131746.l0DHkaw8025249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:47:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131747.l0DHlS8J025314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 12:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145531) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145531&action=view) gdb log of pcmanx Well, one issue and one _critical_ problem * Catetogory "X-Fedora" is not used now and please remove it. * On FC7 (rawhide 20070113), pcmanx always cause SEGV on startup. I attached a gdb log at the situation. I looked at the log, however, currently I cannot find out the cause. Would you contact with upstream? Note: On FC5, there is no segv. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 17:58:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:58:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131758.l0DHwiEh025862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 12:58 EST ------- ok, I would be happy to review this package... Look for a full review in a bit (after I can figure out why doing a mockbuild of this on my test box causes it to lockup). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131806.l0DI6kj3026279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131814.l0DIElqC026473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 13:14 EST ------- Well, I want to check CVS accroding to your comment 32 and as I can see many changes between 3.2 -> cvs 071111. Would you package cvs version? However, I am afraid that as long as I check the diff of util.c, the bug I pointed out on comment 30 doesn't seem to be fixed...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131815.l0DIFeN0026529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-01-13 13:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * Tcl SIG - What are the usual naming guidelines for this? > The "snack" -> "libsnack" name is questionable. I don't think there is a Tcl SIG, but it might be nice to have one. 'snack' would be a more appropriate name, since that's what upstream uses, and that's what Tcl developers would likely expect it to be called. I had considered packaging snack a few months ago, but noticed that it comes with a mp3 decoder (generic/mkFormatMP3.c), which is unacceptible for Fedora. You'll have to regenerate the tarball to omit the mp3 decoding bits before it can be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:20:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131820.l0DIK7v8026631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2007-01-13 13:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=145531) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145531&action=view) [edit] > gdb log of pcmanx > > Well, one issue and one _critical_ problem > * Catetogory "X-Fedora" is not used now and please > remove it. > > * On FC7 (rawhide 20070113), pcmanx always cause > SEGV on startup. > I attached a gdb log at the situation. > I looked at the log, however, currently I cannot find > out the cause. > Would you contact with upstream? > > Note: On FC5, there is no segv. Email sent out. I will put out a new src rpm once the seq fault fixed along with fixing the category problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:28:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131828.l0DISJbC026858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-13 13:28 EST ------- Yes, browsing the rather large tarball is another thing to do. I only had a first brief look because the package description as quoted at the top of the ticket says This packages includes Ogg library. which is confusing enough to suggest that possibly it ships an included libogg or something like that. That made it worth taking a look. The description (s/packages/package/) refers to libsnackogg.so which wasn't obvious. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131836.l0DIahAF027100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-13 13:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-yadis-1.1.0-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-yadis-1.1.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Updated to 1.1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131836.l0DIaZLj027087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-01-13 13:36 EST ------- This also doesn't build on x86_64. The included patch to configure fixes the search path for tclConfig.sh on 64-bit systems, but doesn't do the for tkConfig.sh. (In reply to comment #5) > which is confusing enough to suggest that possibly it ships an > included libogg or something like that. That made it worth taking > a look. The description (s/packages/package/) refers to libsnackogg.so > which wasn't obvious. ;) It does include 'SnackOgg.c', which has a suspicious header that reads: * THIS FILE IS PART OF THE OggVorbis SOFTWARE CODEC SOURCE CODE. * ...and 2000 lines of Ogg manipulation code. You might want to see if you can omit this source file (rm it during %prep) and build against libogg/libvorbis instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:39:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131839.l0DIdTPS027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 13:39 EST ------- And.. where is -5 srpm? -4 srpm does not have README.fedora and I cannot create -5 srpm by "rpmbuild -bs prewikka.spec" (In reply to comment #4) > when I use this: > > %files > %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ As commented in comment 3, Writing just ---------------------------------------- %files ---------------------------------------- without marking as %dir is interpreted as the directory and all files/directories under the directory. > %doc AUTHORS README NEWS HACKING.README README.fedora doc/apache.conf when written as this, * rpmbuild makes the directory %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} * rpmbuild just copies all the listed files/directories into the directory * rpmbuild automatically adds automatically the directory /%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} and all files/directories under there into file list and mark all files as %doc. -------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e '/^#!\/usr\/bin\/env python$/d' %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/templates/* --------------------------------------------------------------- * After these, please make sure that all files under %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/templates/ do _not_ have executable permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:42:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131842.l0DIgfW5027320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-01-13 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This also doesn't build on x86_64. The included patch to configure fixes the > search path for tclConfig.sh on 64-bit systems, but doesn't do the for tkConfig.sh. ...it also needs 'BuildRequires: tk-devel'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131848.l0DIm2AB027487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-01-13 13:47 EST ------- Here is the new version, with "Provides: stklos-devel": http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/stklos-0.82-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131855.l0DItMun027693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-01-13 13:55 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131858.l0DIwZAN027771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 13:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145532&action=view) objdump log of libseom.so.0.0.0 Well, I tried 0.1.4-1.fc7 (on FC-devel i386), however, libseom.so.0.0.0 still contains non-pic code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 18:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131859.l0DIx3pO027806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-01-13 13:59 EST ------- hmm, sorry for the bad shape.. i actually took this from somewhere else some time ago, built it for my own use and *thought* i had checked it back then for fedora like quality. Let me work on it a bit and you will hear from me again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 19:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131900.l0DJ034b027839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-13 14:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145533) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145533&action=view) Mock build log of beryl-vidcap-0.1.4-1.fc7 I attach a mockbuild log of 0.1.4-1 on FC-devel i386. Any ideas, anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 19:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131949.l0DJn7Om029646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-13 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > One thine you may need to know: > the lxde author says he will no more develop and maintain these programs > > So there is no NEXT version of lxde. > That is one reason why I don't want to maintain any of lxde packages. Mhh. Not good. Didn't know that. I've written to the maintainer of lxpanel and asked him about that. After I get an answer I will decide what to do with lxpanel in extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 19:54:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701131954.l0DJsu9j030152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-13 14:54 EST ------- Comments: * for me, tabs result in bad formatting * For man pages, I prefer something along %{_mandir}/man1/icewm.1* to catch different compression or no compression at all. * the themes are not packaged. Is it on purpose? * CXXFLAGS add -fpermissive -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wconversion -Wwrite-strings -W inline -Woverloaded-virtual -W -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti is it right? * compilation warnings don't seem to be that harmfull to me, but may be worth reporting upstream (some system return flag may not be checked) * ldd -u -r on executables leads to many Unused direct dependencies. It is not very problematic, but it leads to unusefull dependencies on other libs sonames, which will lead you to unusefull rebuild when the soname change. Most of the time this is caused by pkgfonfig files not using corrrectly .private, or project not using pkgconfig it is this case for unusefull link on X libs in icewm, since icewm don't use pkgconfig for X libs. Needswork: * patch should be applied to lib/menu.in, not lib/menu * To have the prefix set correctly, configure and configure.in should be patched to set CONFIG_GNOME2_MENU_DIR instead of lib/menu(.in) CONFIG_GNOME2_MENU_DIR="${GNOME2_PREFIX}/share/gnome/vfolders/" should be CONFIG_GNOME2_MENU_DIR="${GNOME2_PREFIX}/share/gnome/desktop-directories/ " Then lib/menu.in could be patched to remove menuprog Gnome folder icewm-menu-gnome1 --list and use icewm-menu-gnome2 for kde folder too. * BR (BuildRequires) for kde-config is needed for CONFIG_KDE_MENU_DIR * things in the default menu should be removed or be Requires. In my opinion xterm could stay, but the remaining should go (especially mozilla which isn't in fedora). Mozilla could be replaced by htmlview, alternatively. * files in %{datadir}/icewm are not %config files, these are defaults. What is in --with-cfgdir are config file and there are none. My opinion is that %configure should have --with-cfgdir=%{_sysconfdir}/icewm otherwise /etc is hardcoded. * %{_sysconfdir}/icewm should be created and owned by the package * locales aren't handled right, it is covered in the guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee * KDEDIR is taken from the environment, so /etc/profile.d/kde.sh should be sourced * gettext BuildRequires is missing * VERSION PLATFORMS in %doc seem unuseful to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 20:36:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132036.l0DKa0Rk031740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-13 15:35 EST ------- Packaging note from the README: This is the last release of python-yadis as an independently distributed package. Future versions will come bundled with the python-openid library. Review: + License (LGPL) + noarch package, installs to %{python_sitelib} + follows python template + source matches upstream + %check passed + use of macros + follows naming guidelines + rpmlint clean + builds on x86_64 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132109.l0DL9765032559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 16:08 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL/GFDL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 5755b05a3eaebab392fe9ad49073beb2 gnucash-2.0.4.tar.bz2 5755b05a3eaebab392fe9ad49073beb2 gnucash-2.0.4.tar.bz2.1 ffc058efd0283a4b43ca31980c40db49 gnucash-docs-2.0.1.tar.bz2 ffc058efd0283a4b43ca31980c40db49 gnucash-docs-2.0.1.tar.bz2.1 afa10712d00b6a90aef0dc7fbb116ff30ded91cb gnucash-2.0.4.tar.bz2 afa10712d00b6a90aef0dc7fbb116ff30ded91cb gnucash-2.0.4.tar.bz2.1 ce04f51e8eeb8324b7abca6bf84ddb18562cf6b4 gnucash-docs-2.0.1.tar.bz2 ce04f51e8eeb8324b7abca6bf84ddb18562cf6b4 gnucash-docs-2.0.1.tar.bz2.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: See below - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Is this package built often from svn snapshots? ie, are the %if's for svn building needed anymore? 2. Is the %defattr(-,root,root,755) needed? Or will %defattr(-,root,root,-) work? 3. Does rpm fail at finding the perl requires? Is the '%define __perl_requires %{nil}' still needed? 4. Doesn't seem to build here in mock/devel. The build.log has at the end: checking for libgsf-1 >= 1.12.2 libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.12.2... Package libgsf- gnome-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgsf-gnome-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libgsf-gnome-1' found configure: error: Library requirements (libgsf-1 >= 1.12.2 libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.12.2) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55382 (%build) Looks like missing 'Buildrequires: libgsf-gnome-devel' Adding that gets it building on devel here. 5. The "--disable-sql" seems to have been added back in fc4. Is it worth re-enabling now? 6. Should the --with-cairo be commented in or out? 7. Our friend rpmlint says: E: gnucash obsolete-not-provided gnucash-backend-postgres I don't know how long ago the gnucash-backend-postgres was removed, but it might be good to provide gnucash-backend-postgres as long as the obsolete is still there. E: gnucash invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgncqof-backend-qsf.so libgncqof-backend- qsf.so E: gnucash invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgnc-backend-file.so libgnc-backend-file.so Can be ignored. I think rpmlint can't handle things with - in the filename when it's not a major version number. W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnucash_warnings.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnucash_history.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_prices.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_window_pages_register.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_reconcile.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_hbci.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_common.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnucash_general.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_business_common.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_print_checks.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_import_generic_matcher.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_totd.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_window_pages_account_tree.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_scheduled_transctions.schemas W: gnucash non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ apps_gnucash_dialog_commodities.schemas I think as you say that all these can be ignored. E: gnucash non-executable-script /usr/share/xml/gnucash/xsl/vcard- gnccustomer.pl 0644 Might nuke the #!/usr/bin/perl from this script or make it executable? E: gnucash shell-syntax-error-in-%post There seems to be a unattached done in the %post. W: gnucash unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnucash-backend-postgres typically it's good to add a version thats being obsoleted. E: gnucash hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug Is the '%exclude /usr/lib/debug' needed? E: gnucash-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/gnucash-2.0.4/src/ import-export/import-commodity-matcher.c Should be mode 644? 8. .la files should be nuked unless there is a good reason to keep them. 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release. Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package? That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated. 10. Does %{?_smp_mflags} not work with this package? Unless it breaks something, that should be added to both the main make and the docs make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:11:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132111.l0DLBvMQ000301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-13 16:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > 1. I don't think that: > Requires(hint): php-pear(Net_Auth_SASL) >= 1.0 > is usable with any rpm shipped by Fedora. I suppose it just makes it a hard > Requires. Perhaps just change that to a Requires? Also, I can't seem to find > that requirement in yet, should that package be added? Even though (hint) does not do anything right now, I use this for optional packages. I added it because the Summary on the web page: "...using optional Auth_SASL package" > 3. The > /usr/share/pear/Net > directory doesn't seem to be owned by this package, > it seems owned by php-pear-Net-FTP. > Should that package be required? or should this package also > own that directory? This package Requires php-pear(Net_Socket) >= 1.0 which should own the Net directory. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132113.l0DLDnhH000350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-13 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Issues: > > > > 1. I don't think that: > > Requires(hint): php-pear(Net_Auth_SASL) >= 1.0 > > is usable with any rpm shipped by Fedora. I suppose it just makes it a hard > > Requires. Perhaps just change that to a Requires? Also, I can't seem to find > > that requirement in yet, should that package be added? > > Even though (hint) does not do anything right now, I use this for optional > packages. I added it because the Summary on the web page: > "...using optional Auth_SASL package" Although this should read "Auth_SASL" not "Net_Auth_SASL". I will fix this. Nice catch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:16:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132116.l0DLGJO6000413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-13 16:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-POP3.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-POP3-1.3.6-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Jan 13 2007 Christopher Stone 1.3.6-2 - Fix Requires for Auth_SASL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:25:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222534] Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132125.l0DLPOwf000705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsnack - Snack Sound Toolkit provides audio handling to tlc/tk or python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222534 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-13 16:25 EST ------- > SnackOgg.c *urks* Additionally, it links against libogg.so.0, libvorbis.so.0, and libvorbisenc.so.2,... > generic/ Included are several files licenced by Microsoft with the terms in the "BSD.txt" file. It requires that the file is included and that a licence change (e.g. to the GPL) is indicated at the top of each file to which the new licence applies. That is not the case, hence the BSD.txt licence applies to the whole product. In the README they write that the GPL is only for the included mp3 decoder, however that one may not be sold without prior written consent by its author. Plus, other files, such as jkSynthesis.c and sound.c, have a GPL header, so the entire release must be GPL. Licence mess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:30:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132130.l0DLUVkx000822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 16:30 EST ------- ok, that appears to fix up all the blockers I see. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132133.l0DLXTR8000889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-13 16:33 EST ------- sorry, it agree it would be helpful to upload the package I talk about. :) find it here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.7.1-5.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 21:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] New: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby-0.6-0.1.a.src.rpm Description: Blobby Volley is one of the most popular freeware games. Blobby Volley 2 is the continuation of this lovely game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 22:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132228.l0DMS5ks002244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-13 17:27 EST ------- - Imported into CVS - Entry added to owners.list - built successfully for devel - cvs sync request added for FC5/6 THANKS FOR THE REVIEW! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 22:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132239.l0DMdq8B002476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-13 17:39 EST ------- I have uploaded a new version which adds COPYING and AUTHORS files, and adds URL to Source0 (as per review request). New SRPM: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube-0.0.2-3.src.rpm The new spec file has the same url as the old one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 22:40:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132240.l0DMeUA2002511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-13 17:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect-2.2.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Jan 13 2007 Christopher Stone 2.2.0-2 - Use PHP License version 2.02 > 2. This package owns the > /usr/share/pear/Net directory. Should it? Or should it require some > other package that does? There are many pear packages that share ownership of the same directories. The general rule of thumb in this case is that if the owner of a directory is unclear then the package should own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 22:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132241.l0DMfL0c002543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-13 17:41 EST ------- I have uploaded a new version which adds COPYING file. New SRPM: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6-3.src.rpm The new spec file has the same url as the old one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 22:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132245.l0DMjLw7002677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-13 17:45 EST ------- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 23:24:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132324.l0DNONTI003515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-13 18:24 EST ------- REVIEW: * sources match upstream (md5: fdef3e59f0870d890be8dffaccd773ca) * package meets all guidelines it should * correct build root: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}- root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * package is licensed under a GPL license and license text is included in package * the latest version is being packaged * no shared libraries * no duplicates in %files * %clean is present * proper scriptlets * no need to any subpackages * rpmlint is silent * final provides and requires are sane !* desktop file: Category Application is deprecated and should be removed. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html * BRs listed good * mock builds fine (fc6/x86_64) * all directories are owned well !* a lack of Requires: you should add hicolor-icon-theme dependency: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00282.html THINGS to do: - get rid of an Application category - add hicolor-icon-theme dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 23:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132329.l0DNT022003637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2007-01-13 18:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Well, I tried 0.1.4-1.fc7 (on FC-devel i386), however, > libseom.so.0.0.0 still contains non-pic code. How do I find out which code (symbols?) is non-PIC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 23:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132347.l0DNltsX004140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-13 18:47 EST ------- Hi, Thanks for the review. I have a newer spec file already, for 2.0beta1. I applied some fixes to it per this review. Per author, it will go stable next week. Until then we can push this. Here are the spec file and SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link-2.0beta1-1.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 13 23:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701132355.l0DNtDFN004279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 18:55 EST ------- FYI, I just did a test build here... the smp_flags is a no go. It blows up... scratch item 10 off. On item 2: The %defattr(-,root,root,-) seems to generate ok permissions from a quick look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 00:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140015.l0E0FMWj004587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 19:15 EST ------- 1. Ok, looks good now. 2. Fair enough, just wanted to make sure you were aware of the issue. I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 01:00:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140100.l0E106WO005200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dbi-link - |Review Request: postgresql- |Partial implementation of |dbi-link - Partial |the SQL/MED portion of the |implementation of the |SQL:2003 specification |SQL/MED portion of the | |SQL:2003 specification ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-13 19:59 EST ------- ok, I see you changed the package name, and postgresql-dbi-link might make more sense... I am changing the summary of this review to match for tracking purposes. 1. ok. dist tag now present. 2. ok. license is correctly BSD. 3. ok. The source link looks good now. 4. ok. No longer an issue with this version. 5. ok. empty build section added. 6. ok. subpackage now requires the version-release of the main package. New issue: The naming doesn't seem to match what it should be for pre-release packages. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head- d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a I think it should be: postgresql-dbi-link-2.0-0.1.beta1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 01:08:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222552] New: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552 Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph-1.12-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Mailgraph is a very simple mail statistics RRDtool frontend for Postfix and Sendmail that produces daily, weekly, monthly and yearly graphs of received/sent and bounced/rejected mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 01:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140145.l0E1jfJj006001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 04:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222555] New: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555 Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/tango-icon-theme-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Contains extra icons for from the Tango Project. Currently this includes Tango icons for iPod Digital Audio Player (DAP) devices and the Dell Pocket DJ DAP. rpmlint is silent except for one warning: W: tango-icon-theme-extras invalid-license Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike This is a a false positive, as it is simply not in the list in rpmlint's TagsCheck.py file; and the tango-icon-theme in Extras uses this exact License tag. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 04:14:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140414.l0E4Ej3I008487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at theholbrooks.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 04:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140455.l0E4tSSJ010366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-01-13 23:55 EST ------- REVIEW: ======= OK - package meets naming and packaging guidelines. OK - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK - dist tag is present. OK - build root is correct. OK - license field matches the actual license. OK - license is open source-compatible. ok - source files match upstream: 5103711a2e29d48a5ccda8ba1a11c893 Numbers_Roman-1.0.1.tgz 5103711a2e29d48a5ccda8ba1a11c893 Numbers_Roman-1.0.1.tgz OK - latest version is being packaged. OK - BuildRequires are proper. OK - package builds in mock OK - rpmlint is silent. OK - final provides and requires are sane: OK - no shared libraries are present. OK - package is not relocatable. OK - owns the directories it creates. OK - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK - no duplicates in %files. OK - file permissions are appropriate. OK - %clean is present. OK - %check is not present, no tests included by upstream OK - pear scriptlets are standard OK - code, not content. OK - documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK - no headers. OK - no pkgconfig files. OK - no libtool .la droppings. OK - not a GUI app. Cut-and-dry pear package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 04:57:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140457.l0E4vAUl010490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at theholbrooks.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 05:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140502.l0E52D8N010766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-01-14 00:02 EST ------- OK - package meets naming and packaging guidelines. OK - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK - dist tag is present. OK - build root is correct. OK - license field matches the actual license. OK - license is open source-compatible. OK - source files match upstream: cd65db3d32d781b1a28a1d83b0ff1530 Numbers_Words-0.15.0.tgz cd65db3d32d781b1a28a1d83b0ff1530 Numbers_Words-0.15.0.tgz OK - latest version is being packaged. OK - BuildRequires are proper. OK - package builds in mock OK - rpmlint is silent. OK - final provides and requires are sane OK - no shared libraries are present. OK - package is not relocatable. OK - owns the directories it creates. OK - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK - no duplicates in %files. OK - file permissions are appropriate. OK - %clean is present. OK - %check is not present, no tests included by upstream OK - pear scriptlets are standard OK - code, not content. OK - documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK - no headers. OK - no pkgconfig files. OK - no libtool .la droppings. OK - not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 07:36:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:36:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140736.l0E7aqJh014233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-14 02:36 EST ------- - imported into cvs - updated owners.list - tagged and built for devel - cvs sync requested for fc5/6 THANKS FOR THE REVIEW! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 07:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140738.l0E7cHg3014262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-01-14 02:38 EST ------- Another pre-review (I do not have sponsoring privileges) - Source tarball downloadable and matches upstream - Builds fine under mock for fedora-6-x86_64 - Works fine (note: logo won't appear unless xine-lib-extras is installed. Would be nice to have this once Fedora's RPM supports the 'Suggest' tag) Note to intended sponsor: this is the continuation of the packaging process Martin and I did in bz #213511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 07:53:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 02:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221667] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140753.l0E7rh1g014445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Words - Methods for spelling numerals in words Alias: pear-Numbers-Words https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221667 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-14 02:53 EST ------- - imported into cvs - updated owners.list - tagged and built for devel - branch requested for FC5/6 THANKS FOR THE REVIEW! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 08:08:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221665] Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701140808.l0E88ajZ014741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Numbers-Roman - Provides methods for converting to and from Roman Numerals Alias: pear-Numbers-Roman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221665 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-14 03:08 EST ------- - imported in cvs - added entry to owners.list - tagged and built for devel - requested cvs sync for FC5/6 THANKS FOR THE REVIEW! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 10:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141018.l0EAIxrw016021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-14 05:18 EST ------- APPROVED You seem to have no other package submitted, but I can sponsor you nevertheless. You would continue at this step: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 Packaging subtleties: * .desktop category "Application" is deprecated, might be rejected by a newer desktop-file-install and desktop-file-validate * %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1.gz => %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1* would make the spec not fail if automatic compression of manual pages is disabled or changed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 11:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141114.l0EBEq9D017322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 06:14 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I've added the hicolor-icon-theme dependency, but I'm not sure about the Application category, since the example on the Packaging Guidelines page still has it : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop I've posted on the packaging list for advice, I'll let you know the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 11:19:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141119.l0EBJwTV017430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-14 06:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the review. I've added the hicolor-icon-theme dependency, but I'm not > sure about the Application category, since the example on the Packaging > Guidelines page still has it : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop So that should be fixed. There's desktop-file-utils-0.12 in fc7 and its desktop-file-validate shows the following error: [ecik at ecik /download]$ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/fedora- blobby.desktop /usr/share/applications/fedora-blobby.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 11:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141123.l0EBNjRs017510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-14 06:23 EST ------- Another comment, a convention I find useful for patch is to name them with the package name, package version they were introduced in first, and add a -b when patching. In your case, this would lead to Patch0: icewm-1.2.30-gnome_menu.patch %patch0 -p 0 -b .gnome_menu Adding the -b helps in case one want to reuse gendiff after modifying the initial patch. This is not mandatory at all, things are fine as they are too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 12:44:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 07:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141244.l0ECi9Na019599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 07:43 EST ------- OK then, thanks. * Sun Jan 14 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.6-0.2.a - add dependency on hicolor-icon-theme (#222547) - removed the "Application" category from the desktop file http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby-0.6-0.2.a.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 13:19:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141319.l0EDJWIA020375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-14 08:19 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #4) > New issue: > > The naming doesn't seem to match what it should be for pre-release packages. > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head- > d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a > > I think it should be: > postgresql-dbi-link-2.0-0.1.beta1 Ok, but that would not match tarball name. My proposal: Let's leave it as it is now. dbi-link will go stable in next week or so, and we will remove beta tag then. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 15:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141546.l0EFksai025840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 10:46 EST ------- NOTIFICATION: Currently gdome2 is orphaned, which means that no one maintains gdome2, and if ntop requires gdome2 a new maintainer is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 16:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220736] Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141647.l0EGlmA8027220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736 ------- Additional Comments From esr at thyrsus.com 2007-01-14 11:47 EST ------- Working on it. The manual-page mangling turns out to be due to an upstream bug in the stylesheets, apparently introduced since the last time I looked at that output. I'm trying to get that resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:21:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141721.l0EHLtCs028332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-14 12:21 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141722.l0EHMKWg028373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 12:22 EST ------- Well, * Now README.fedora seems good (although I don't know at all about mysql...) So, please add to %description the sentence like: ----------------------------------------------------- Please read README.fedora for fedora specific issues. ----------------------------------------------------- * Please check if the directory to be installed is whether python_sitelib or python_sitearch. On 64bit arch, these directories differ. If this package is arch-independent, the directory must be python_sitelib. Otherwise, this srpm must not be marked as noarch rpm. * It seems that the current prewikka is 0.9.8 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141726.l0EHQEHg028570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #28) > > Well, I tried 0.1.4-1.fc7 (on FC-devel i386), however, > > libseom.so.0.0.0 still contains non-pic code. > > How do I find out which code (symbols?) is non-PIC? Actually I don't know _which_ code is non-PIC, however, the existence of the line of "TEXTREL" in objump result (in comment 28) means that some codes are non-PIC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141745.l0EHjNaF029621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-14 12:45 EST ------- To give you some idea of what needs to be done here is a probably incomplete list: - Can't parse the spec when postgresql-devel is not installed, because "2_PGpackage postgresql-devel is not installed" is not a valid Release. This makes it fail to build in mock. - Do not redefine prefix - Some paths are not macros, /etc /usr/share/doc - Do not define Packager. You may keep the contact information in the %changelog - Make Source0 a download URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141745.l0EHjqCB029680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 12:45 EST ------- Just something I caught at the last minute: * Sun Jan 14 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.6-0.3.a - patch it to obey RPM_OPT_FLAGS http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby-0.6-0.3.a.src.rpm Please tell if you still approve it with this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 17:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141753.l0EHrWm8029875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 12:53 EST ------- Well, for pdfcube 0.0.2-3, there is no problem as this is rather easy to package. So, as said in comment 7, would you do a pre-review of other person's review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:06:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141806.l0EI6xeG030328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 13:06 EST ------- Please don't use autotool when possible. It seems that the flag "-Os" is used only at one point in configure, so making a patch for configure, not for configure.in should be easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] New: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/pychess.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/pychess-0.6.0-0.1.beta5.src.rpm Description: PyChess is a gtk chessgame for Linux. It is designed to a the same time be easy to use, beautyful to look at and provide advanced functions for advanced players rpmlint output that I'm not sure how to solve: SRPM: W: pychess setup-not-quiet RPM: E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/Move.py 0644 E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Players/PyChess.py 0644 E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/History.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:34:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141834.l0EIYvnZ031039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-14 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > rpmlint output that I'm not sure how to solve: > > SRPM: > W: pychess setup-not-quiet This one means that you're not passing "-q" to the %setup call in your %prep section. This parameter tells rpmbuild not to output the list of files it is extracting and whatnot. > RPM: > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/Move.py 0644 > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Players/PyChess.py 0644 > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/History.py 0644 These three mean that the scripts are not executable. A simple `chmod +x` at the end of your %build section on each of these should resolve those qualms. (Full review to come later today.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141837.l0EIbCNZ031110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-14 13:37 EST ------- In reply to comment #5: But your current 2.0beta1-1 package is rpm newer than 2.0-1 will be. Upgrades will not work. % rpmdev-vercmp Epoch1 :0 Version1 :2.0beta1 Release1 :1 Epoch2 :0 Version2 :2.0 Release2 :1 0:2.0beta1-1 is newer This is why the nameing guidelines require the nameing they do for pre release packages. The current name doesn't meet the guidelines and won't work right for upgrades. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141848.l0EImBGI031432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 13:47 EST ------- Sure, I don't mind, but why ? What's the problem with it ? Anyway, I've patched configure instead : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/blobby-0.6-0.4.a.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:51:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141851.l0EIpagj031533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-14 13:51 EST ------- * added a note to README.fedora * this package is arch-independent, so I switch to python_sitelib * used new upstream version 0.9.8 find it here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.8.1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141852.l0EIqAGR031585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2007-01-14 13:52 EST ------- * added a note to README.fedora * this package is arch-independent, so I switch to python_sitelib * used new upstream version 0.9.8 find it here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka-0.9.8-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/prewikka.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:53:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222571] New: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571 Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/kalgebra.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/kalgebra-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: KAlgebra is a MathML-based graph calculator. Besides it was initially mathml oriented now it can be used by everyone with little mathematic knowledge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 18:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141855.l0EIt4S6031719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 13:55 EST ------- Just one comment (In reply to comment #0) > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/Move.py 0644 > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Players/PyChess.py 0644 > E: pychess non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pychess/Utils/History.py 0644 (In reply to comment #1) > These three mean that the scripts are not executable. A simple `chmod +x` at the > end of your %build section on each of these should resolve those qualms. Please check if * these files should have executable flags (i.e. really should executable) * or shebangs on these files should be removed (i.e. 0644 is correct) The scripts only called by other applications/scripts and not directly called by user should not have shebangs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 19:11:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141911.l0EJBLhP032284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Sure, I don't mind, but why ? What's the problem with it ? Well, * A weak reason is just "please don't use which is not needed actually". * Another reason is that using autotool easily may generate files which upstream (or someone else) may not desire, especially when the version of autotool differ between which upstream used and which you used. This is once discussed when autotools are removed from minimum buildroot, starting from http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-September/msg00146.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 19:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141920.l0EJKM7m032588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-01-14 14:20 EST ------- Fixed the issues mentioned, rpmlint is now silent. Updated: Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/pychess.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/pychess-0.6.0-0.2.beta5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 19:22:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141922.l0EJMkZ6032723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-14 14:22 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #6) > The current name doesn't meet the guidelines and won't work right > for upgrades. Ok then. I updated the spec file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link.spec ...and the SRPM is here: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link-2.0-0.1.beta1.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 19:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141925.l0EJPkqd000397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-14 14:25 EST ------- Well, adding executable permission means that these scripts are sometimes called directly by user? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 19:41:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701141941.l0EJfBSL000826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 14:41 EST ------- Fine, thanks for this clear reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 20:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222575] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: An HTML_QuickForm meta-element which holds multiple HTML_QuickForm elements in an HTML_Table. The elements in the table should behave exactly like normal elements in a form, such as freezing and getting defaults and submitted values correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 20:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142001.l0EK1S4J001692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-ElementGrid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 20:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142018.l0EKI4Yn002165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-01-14 15:18 EST ------- I don't know. Wouldn't think so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 20:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142026.l0EKQF0P002562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-14 15:26 EST ------- Package is still approved, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 21:10:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221957] Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142110.l0ELANdg004473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksshaskpass - A KDE version of ssh-askpass with KWallet support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221957 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-14 16:10 EST ------- Imported, branched, tagged and published. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 21:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142131.l0ELVWC5004847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 21:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142137.l0ELbf2K004989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-14 16:37 EST ------- Thanks for the catch, Mamoru. However, this is behavior similar to my packaging of Scribes; and it was APPROVED with such changes. Seeing as how such permissions cause no apparent security issues or bugs with the software, I don't consider this a blocker. == Formal Review of pychess 0.6.0-0.2.beta5 == GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both the source and binary (noarch) RPMs. GOOD: The package follows the naming guidelines, and the spec file is named accordingly ("%{name}.spec"). GOOD: BuildRoot is "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)", following the packaging guidelines. GOOD: No duplicate BuildRequires are included; and all necessary BuildRequires are listed. GOOD: Included documentation (%doc) is OK. GOOD: Package builds and runs against system copies of installed tools and libraries; and does not include its own local copies thereof. GOOD: Package includes an appropriate .desktop file since it is a graphical application; and desktop-file-install is properly used to install it. A BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is also present. GOOD: Macros are used instead of harcoded file names, and usage of these macros (including $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) is consistent throughout the spec file. GOOD: Locale files are handled correctly, using %find_lang appropriately. GOOD: Package is not relocatable. GOOD: Package includes appropriate code and content; and final directory and file ownership is OK. GOOD: Package does not own any system files/directories or any files/directories that conflict with another package. GOOD: Package license (GPL) is OK; and a copy of it is included in the package as documentation (%doc LICENSE). The License field in the spec file properly reflects this. GOOD: Spec file is nicely legible. GOOD: The source tarball matches that of upstream: $ md5sum SOURCES/pychess-0.6.0-beta5* ed2cdca72465c4b529a1caf6960745be SOURCES/pychess-0.6.0_beta5-srpm.tar.gz ed2cdca72465c4b529a1caf6960745be SOURCES/pychess-0.6.0_beta5-upstream.tar.gz GOOD: The package successfully builds in mock into noarch binary RPMs on both FC6 and devel/FC7. GOOD: No duplicates are listed in the %files section; and its %defattr line is good. GOOD: Package has an appropriate %clean section, which contains simply "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" GOOD: When installed, the application runs well with no apparent segfaults or major bugs. N/A: No non-ASCII characters are needed, so encoding is OK. N/A: This is a noarch package, so compiler flags are not needed. N/A: No static libraries or rPath exclusions are needed. N/A: Package includes no configuration files or data, so %config markings are not needed. N/A: Package uses Python distutils for building; so using `make %{?_smp_flags}` is not needed. N/A: Package is not a web application. N/A: Package is noarch; thus no ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch tweaking is required. N/A: Package installs no shared libraries; thus %post/%postun scriplets of /sbin/ldconfig are not needed. N/A: No large (neither in size nor in quantity) documentation is included, thus no -doc subpackage is needed. N/A: No headers, no pkgconfig files, and no static or unsuffixed shared libraries are included. Thus, no -devel subpackage is needed. N/A: Package contains no libtool archives (*.la files) N/A: Package contains no %description or Summary translations. N/A: Scriplets are not required for this package. I see only one thing that needs fixing with this package and that is that the %description contains what appear to be a lot of simple typos. The following would be more appropriate: "PyChess is a GTK+ chess game for Linux. It is designed to at the same time be easy to use, beautiful to look at, and provide advanced functions for advanced players." However, that is something you can fix after importing it into CVS. Therefore (under the condition that this is done), this package is APPROVED. Remember to also close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when it is imported and pushed through the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 22:28:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142228.l0EMSwKT005978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-14 17:28 EST ------- Hi, Thanks for all the comments. I have already worked on this spec, and here is the current spec file and SRPM of the latest version: SPEC file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.6-1.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 22:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142241.l0EMf8gg006191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2007-01-14 17:41 EST ------- Sure. I have already done two (well more like one and a "doesn't build in mock"-comment). #222043 and #222087. But I'm still watching the fedora-package-review list for new request, and then I try to jump in when I have the time (and when someone else hasn't scooped me :-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 22:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222589] New: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/dolphin.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/dolphin-0.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: Dolphin focuses on being only a file manager. This approach allows to optimize the user interface for the task of file management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 22:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222569] Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142243.l0EMhpcA006295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pychess - Chess game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222569 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 23:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142320.l0ENKuxI007053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-14 18:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Chitlesh said: > > By the way, I'm the geda suite packager for fedora:) > > Sorry, didn't mean to step on anyone's feet! It's not the case:) I'm glad someone is pushing scientific/electronic tools inside. :) keep it up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 23:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142359.l0ENx5G7007694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-14 18:59 EST ------- Imported and built on development after I fixed some issues with python 2.5 and elementtree. Branches requested for FC-5 and FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 23:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218844] Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142359.l0ENxYJA007709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 14 23:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701142359.l0ENxjnw007718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 Bug 218852 depends on bug 218844, which changed state. Bug 218844 Summary: Review Request: python-yadis - Relying party support for the Yadis service discovery protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218844 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150001.l0F01nsC007796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-14 19:01 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit-3.0.2-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jan 14 2007 Christopher Stone 3.0.2-1 - Upstream sync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150011.l0F0BFiN007920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression |PHPUnit - Regression testing |testing framework for unit |framework for unit tests |tests | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222593] New: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222593 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Graph.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Image-Graph-0.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: Image_Graph provides a set of classes that creates graphs/plots/charts based on (numerical) data. Many different plot types are supported: Bar, line, area, step, impulse, scatter, radar, pie, map, candlestick, band, box & whisker and smoothed line, area and radar plots. The graph is highly customizable, making it possible to get the exact look and feel that is required. The output is controlled by a Image_Canvas, which facilitates easy output to many different output formats, amongst others, GD (PNG, JPEG, GIF, WBMP), PDF (using PDFLib), Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222593] Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150049.l0F0nqhX008722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-Graph - Displays numerical data as a graph/chart/plot Alias: pear-Image-Graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222593 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Image-Graph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] New: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ynakam at hitachisoft.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com * Spec URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec * SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.7.beta6.fc6.src.rpm * Description: SELinux Policy Editor(SEEdit) is a tool to make SELinux easy. It is composed of Simplified Policy, command line utils and GUI. The main feature is Simplified Policy. Simplified Policy is written in Simplified Policy Description Language(SPDL). SPDL hides detail of SELinux. For detail, visit http://seedit.sourceforge.net/. rpmlint is silent in my environment. It is my first package. I need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 00:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150057.l0F0v6tq008903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ynakam at hitachisoft.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 01:58:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150158.l0F1wEbK010455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-01-14 20:58 EST ------- Sorry, please review following. * SPEC http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec * SRPM http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.7.beta6.src.rpm Modified to use disttag to describe version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 02:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222597] New: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Crypt-CHAP.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Crypt-CHAP-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides Classes for generating CHAP packets. Currently these types of CHAP are supported: CHAP-MD5, MS-CHAPv1, MS-CHAPv2. For MS-CHAP the mhash and mcrypt extensions must be loaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 02:02:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222597] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150202.l0F22mtQ010676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets Alias: pear-Crypt-CHAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-Crypt-CHAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 02:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222598] New: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222598 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-radius.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-radius-1.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: This package is based on the libradius of FreeBSD, with some modifications and extensions. This PECL provides full support for RADIUS authentication (RFC 2865) and RADIUS accounting (RFC 2866), works on Unix and on Windows. Its an easy way to authenticate your users against the user-database of your OS (for example against Windows Active-Directory via IAS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 02:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222598] Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150213.l0F2D8FK010861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Alias: php-pecl-radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222598 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |php-pecl-radius -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 04:59:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150459.l0F4xnbs015452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-14 23:59 EST ------- The package from comment #7 looks good. I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request as NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 07:45:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150745.l0F7jxgm022202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-15 02:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jan 14 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-2 - Split out poker-client-lib/poker2d files into another spec file - Add Requires apg and poker-web to poker-bot - No longer remove symlinks for constants.php and htaccess - Create a README.Fedora for poker-web package - Reduce initial number of bots to four due to a bug rpmlint errors: E: poker-network no-binary E: poker-network-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package These are because poker2d is packaged with this upstream. This will be fixed when poker2d is out of alpha mode. E: poker-server non-readable /etc/poker-network/poker.server.xml 0600 This is because the mysql root password is in this file. E: poker-web htaccess-file /usr/share/poker-web/.htaccess I don't understand this error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 07:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222612] New: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612 Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d-1.0.33-2.src.rpm Description: Play poker with other players connected on a poker-network server (holdem, omaha, omaha high/low, stud 7 ...) in ring games, sit and go or multitables tournaments. poker2d will automaticaly reconnect to the table if the connection is lost and allows playing on multiple tables simultaneously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 07:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150749.l0F7nf7B022309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server Alias: poker2d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |219972 Alias| |poker2d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 07:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150749.l0F7npXI022326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |222612 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 08:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 03:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701150836.l0F8a2bS023871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-15 03:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > E: poker-web htaccess-file /usr/share/poker-web/.htaccess > > I don't understand this error. .htaccess files are frowned upon because the same effect can usually be achieved by adding an appropriate clause in a .conf file dropped into /etc/httpd/conf.d. This then allows the use of "AllowOverride None" for that directory, meaning that httpd doesn't need to check for .htaccess files for every access, and is hence a performance benefit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kingyipan at linpus.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://fedora:arodef at 218.210.26.83/llk.spec SRPM URL: ftp://fedora:arodef at 218.210.26.83/llk_linux-2.2-1lp.src.rpm Description: A popular game. To get a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151018.l0FAI0x9032710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- Alias: king https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 kingyipan at linpus.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> Alias| |king ------- Additional Comments From kingyipan at linpus.com 2007-01-15 05:17 EST ------- I'm working with rpm.I want to becom a fedora extras contributor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151020.l0FAKHWE000476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 kingyipan at linpus.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|king |llk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:33:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151033.l0FAX2VH001723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151035.l0FAZSUf001871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-01-15 05:35 EST ------- hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Read them and do the appropriate corrections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151036.l0FAaWXt001932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: llk - A very|Review Request: llk_linux - |popular game from inernet |A very popular game from | |inernet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 10:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151059.l0FAxIpB003168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-15 05:59 EST ------- Imported. Thanks all for helping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 12:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151249.l0FCnaIV009120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-15 07:49 EST ------- * Mon Jan 15 2007 - 0.6.3-8 - Remove INSTALL - Move cgdb.txt to %%docs. (Where index.html can see it.) - Move htdocs to %%docs. - Fix broken cgdb.png file. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-8.src.rpm I'll follow the instructions in "Contributors" ASAP. FYI, another package up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 14:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222648] New: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/audacious-plugin-fc.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/audacious-plugin-fc-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is an input plugin for Audacious which can play back Future Composer music files from AMIGA. Song-length detection and seek are implemented, too. Note: May take a while till source tarball is available at SF.net everywhere. As I'm upstream for the old source code, here's a detached sig: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/audacious-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2.asc Input files for testing: http://xmms-fc.sourceforge.net/favfcmods2.tgz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 15:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221175] Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151544.l0FFig3V022350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libisofs - A library to create ISO 9660 disk images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221175 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-01-15 10:44 EST ------- Built, asking for FC-6 branch. Added to owners.list too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 16:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151629.l0FGTNVM026858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 11:29 EST ------- Well, for -8, * Please keep the name of "htdocs", i.e. the entry of %doc should be "htdocs", not "htmldocs". * Use "cp -p" to keep timestamps. * For Source1: If this file is available from some URL, please specify the URL like Source0. If this file is something you created by ImageMagick, for example, please note how you created the file briefly as comments in spec file. * For cgdb.txt: Well, I confirmed that this file is needed by ./doc/htdocs/documentation.shtml, so actually --------------------------- cp -p doc/cgdb.txt htdocs (please copy to this directory) --------------------------- is needed. And as you can see in ./cgdb/src/interface.c: --------------------------- 1525 void 1526 if_display_help (void) 1527 { 1528 char cgdb_help_file[MAXLINE]; 1529 int ret_val = 0; 1530 1531 fs_util_get_path (PKGDATADIR, "cgdb.txt", cgdb_help_file); 1532 ret_val = source_set_exec_line (src_win, cgdb_help_file, 1); 1533 if (ret_val == 0) 1534 if_draw (); 1535 else if (ret_val == 5) /* File does not exist */ 1536 if_display_message ("No such file: %s", 0, cgdb_help_file); 1537 } 1538 --------------------------- This file is also needed by cgdb binary, so please don't remove this from %{_datadir}/cgdb. After you fix these, you can import this to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 16:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151635.l0FGZsJp027313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Issues: > > 1. Is this package built often from svn snapshots? > ie, are the %if's for svn building needed anymore? It was in the run-up to 2.0. I haven't really built it much from SVN since then. It could be removed as it does dirty up the spec file a lot. > 2. Is the > %defattr(-,root,root,755) > needed? Or will > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > work? 755 is the default, so just (-,root,root) should work. Fixed. > 3. Does rpm fail at finding the perl requires? > Is the '%define __perl_requires %{nil}' still needed? Ooh, good catch. This was done to avoid generating perl requires on something that we didn't ship that was satisfied by installing an Extras package. I'll try without it to see if it can be removed. > 4. Doesn't seem to build here in mock/devel. > The build.log has at the end: > > checking for libgsf-1 >= 1.12.2 libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.12.2... Package libgsf- > gnome-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the > directory containing `libgsf-gnome-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment > variable No package 'libgsf-gnome-1' found > configure: error: Library requirements (libgsf-1 >= 1.12.2 libgsf-gnome-1 >= > 1.12.2) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if > your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55382 (%build) > > Looks like missing 'Buildrequires: libgsf-gnome-devel' > Adding that gets it building on devel here. Hm, wonder if that was split. Will check. > 5. The "--disable-sql" seems to have been added back in fc4. > Is it worth re-enabling now? The SQL support is deprecated, lacking a maintainer, and not supported upstream. > 6. Should the --with-cairo be commented in or out? It's an option that the builtin libgoffice/libgsf snapshots took, that ended up not working. (In Core, we built this with the builtin goffice support.) As we're using separate goffice/gsf, the comment can be removed. > 7. Our friend rpmlint says: > > E: gnucash obsolete-not-provided gnucash-backend-postgres > > I don't know how long ago the gnucash-backend-postgres was removed, > but it might be good to provide gnucash-backend-postgres as long > as the obsolete is still there. Well, we don't provide the functionality, and it was always built from the gnucash SRPM. I'm not seeing how you could get into a situation where you'd need the provide. > E: gnucash non-executable-script /usr/share/xml/gnucash/xsl/vcard- > gnccustomer.pl 0644 > > Might nuke the #!/usr/bin/perl from this script or make it executable? It's an example script, so having it non-executable makes sense to me. (Not sure why they install it in datadir instead of doc) > E: gnucash shell-syntax-error-in-%post > > There seems to be a unattached > done > in the %post. Good catch, fixed. > W: gnucash unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnucash-backend-postgres > > typically it's good to add a version thats being obsoleted. See above - not sure how you'd get to where it's needed. > E: gnucash hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug > > Is the '%exclude /usr/lib/debug' needed? Otherwise %{_libdir}/* will pick it up. > E: gnucash-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/gnucash-2.0.4/src/ > import-export/import-commodity-matcher.c > > Should be mode 644? Possibly. Not sure it matters in debuginfo, but fixed. > 8. .la files should be nuked unless there is a good reason to keep them. gnucash uses g-wrap, which uses libltdl to load shared objects. Unfortunate, but required. > 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release. > Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package? > That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated. Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash-docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 16:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] New: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ksudoku/ksudoku.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ksudoku/ksudoku-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Ksudoku is a fully-featured Sudoku puzzle generator and solver for KDE. With it you can generate and play 3D and 2D puzzles of different sizes and levels. The main algorithm is fast and extendable to any general graph coloring problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 16:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151654.l0FGsC9G028871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * %defattr missing in several sub-packages Gack, fixed. > * Obsoletes ought to specify max.versions (using "LT", or "LE" > inequations) They're obsolete upstream projects that this replaced - is there really a need to specify a version for such things? > * main package must not own %{_libdir}/gwenhywfar since that belongs > into the "gwenhywfar" pkg already Fixed. > You exclude everything in > %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/* > but only > %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/qbanking > is included explicitly. Other content below > %{_libdir}/aqbanking/plugins/*/frontends/ > would be skipped/excluded silently. So, other frontends could eventually add code. If I only exclude the specific frontend, the code will end up wrongly in the main package. If exclude all, as it's currently done, it will end up silently dropped. Fun. I suppose in the wrong package is better than silently missed. > * the -devel packages ought to "Requires: automake", so the > %{_datadir}/aclocal/ directory is not orphaned - and because smart > applications use automake anyway - it's kinda difficult to determine > the config values without using the foo-config scripts/pkgconfig/automake ??? Why bring automake into the buildroot if the package never calls it? Seems better to have something else own the dir. > * [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Useless check. Nowadays buildroot cannot be "/" anymore. Fixed. > * "Requires: pkgconfig" in the frontends' -devel packages is redundant, > since they all need aqbanking-devel which in turn requires pkgconfig > for all its *-config queries (due to the applied Patch2) True, but since all the -config scripts *explicitly* call it, I'm more comfortable leaving the Requires: in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 16:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151657.l0FGv0Hk029047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-15 11:56 EST ------- Done. * Mon Jan 15 2007 - 0.6.3-9 - Do -not- delete cgdb.txt - needed by binary. - Use the original htdocs instead of htmldocs. - Preserve timestamps. - Fix missing URL in imported cgdb.png. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/cgdb-0.6.3-9.src.rpm I'll upload the files later today. Thanks for the help, - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 17:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151700.l0FH093I029253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Doesn't build in mock (rawhide x86_64), build.log ends with; Will poke at it. Yay libtool. > Other minor issues; > Shouldn't Buildrequires on python be python-devel instead? It doesn't link against libpython, so, no. > Also the python packaging guildeline mandates defining python_sitelib at the top > of your specfile, so the files under -python-%{name} subpackages would just go > into %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ Is this on the wiki somewhere? I'm not finding it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 17:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151702.l0FH24IG029516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 12:02 EST ------- New stuff uploaded to http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/ with said fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 17:12:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151712.l0FHCse8030261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |ksudoku -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 17:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151727.l0FHRH51031585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 12:27 EST ------- Okay, -9 is good. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151801.l0FI1Wf2001477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-01-15 13:01 EST ------- Interpretation on content being under the GPL works for me. I'll sign off on it as ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151824.l0FIOcWD003722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 13:24 EST ------- Well, now: -------------------------------------------------- This package (prewikka) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------- Two notes: * It seems that this is licensed under GPL, so please ask upstream to include the copy of GPL license in tarball. * I don't think the Group "Development/Languages" is good. This group is usually used by gcc, python, perl, etc. rpmlint requires to choose Group from ------------------------------------------------------ "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". ------------------------------------------------------ Maybe "Applications/System"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151833.l0FIXPcF004598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-15 13:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145596) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145596&action=view) Edited .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:34:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151834.l0FIY0bp004679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 13:33 EST ------- Please close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE when rebuilding is done (I can see this package imported into all repos so I think you can close this bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151835.l0FIZ9WB004817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-15 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > . Since this is Fedora, we can do away with the fedora and redhat defines. That > can be simplified to just %define gcj_support 1 Done > . replace %{eclipse_name} in the definition of eclipse_base to just be eclipse > and remove eclipse_name entirely Done > . "this plugins is really noarch but it" -> "These plugins are really noarch but > they" Done > . you've got an extra line between %prep and %build Done > . it's also unfortunate that we have an epoch but we can't do anything about > that now Nothing to be done. > . do we require a specific version of the CDT? eclipse-cdt >= 3.1.1 Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151840.l0FIeAdl005279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-15 13:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > . please add a little explanation (or a script a la eclipse-emf and eclipse-gef > ... in Extras) as to how the src zip is generated Add a comment in .spec file you mean? If so, is there a common place to write comment in .spec file about how the src zip is generated? > . how do we get around the optional python parser and a PyDev dependency? Right now python parser is disabled so it does not require PyDev dependency. I'll have to do some more work to make python parser as an optional feature. So in next release, I'll include it and make PyDev as build dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151841.l0FIfiQ5005387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 klee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145596|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151843.l0FIhX5Z005684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 sdl.web at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:49:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151849.l0FInEvp006391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 13:49 EST ------- Well, * This package is okay * Your another package seems okay, at least to some degree (I have not checked fully. Maybe other person will review it) * And.. now I trust that you can review other person's review request. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (pdfcube) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . At a stage, I will receive a mail which notices that you need a sponsor. Then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151851.l0FIpMGj006662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151857.l0FIvT1Z007010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 13:57 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 221873) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 18:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151858.l0FIwMtE007062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-15 13:58 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 221873) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 19:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151906.l0FJ6m8p007768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-15 14:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #5) > > . please add a little explanation (or a script a la eclipse-emf and eclipse-gef > > ... in Extras) as to how the src zip is generated > > Add a comment in .spec file you mean? If so, is there a common place to write > comment in .spec file about how the src zip is generated? We usually try to put it right before the SourceN line. If it's not complicated, put the steps directly there. If it's a bit more complicated, it might be nice to have a shell script like the one for EMF (fetch-eclipse-emf.sh). I'll leave that up to you. Ben's comment is interesting, though. Can you make a src zip that can be imported directly? Then the Debian guys and others can use it directly. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 19:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151944.l0FJiWoh010572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-15 14:44 EST ------- Much better. But doesn't build on FC6 x86_64; configure: error: /usr/lib64/pgsql//plpgsql.so|sl|dll is not found in the pkglib dir. Please specify the pkglibdir with --with-pgpkglibdir= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 19:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151955.l0FJtsaH011575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 19:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701151959.l0FJxlqH011773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-15 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > We usually try to put it right before the SourceN line. If it's not > complicated, put the steps directly there. If it's a bit more complicated, it > might be nice to have a shell script like the one for EMF > (fetch-eclipse-emf.sh). I'll leave that up to you. > Generating src zip is really simple. I click on changelog-core,feature,doc folder from Package Explorer and do Export as Archive. Just have to exclude bin directories from each folders. I'll just write this down in spec file. > Ben's comment is interesting, though. Can you make a src zip that can be > imported directly? Then the Debian guys and others can use it directly. What > do you think? Yes, the src zip I use can be imported directly from eclipse. We just have to extract it in a workspace and do Create new project from existing location. It will set up all the environment needed to start hacking on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 20:03:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152003.l0FK3oqf012077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-15 15:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > > Also the python packaging guildeline mandates defining python_sitelib at the top > > of your specfile, so the files under -python-%{name} subpackages would just go > > into %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ > > Is this on the wiki somewhere? I'm not finding it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python?highlight=%28python%29%7C%28packaging%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 20:10:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152010.l0FKAc9r012670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-15 15:10 EST ------- Works for me in my FC6 box: Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.6-2.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.6-2.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/postgresql-slony1-engine-debuginfo-1.2.6-2.x86_64.rpm But today I worked a bit more on this package (See -2 on the packages above). Here is the new spec and new SRPM: SPEC file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 20:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152018.l0FKI8Ww013389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 15:17 EST ------- Ah. That's not actually linked anywhere from the main guidelines page. Perhaps it should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 20:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152043.l0FKhawx015131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-15 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Generating src zip is really simple. I click on changelog-core,feature,doc > folder from Package Explorer and do Export as Archive. Just have to exclude bin > directories from each folders. I'll just write this down in spec file. No, it needs to be programmatic -- ie. scriptable on the command line. Better yet, you'll just do it and put it somewhere like below. > Ben's comment is interesting, though. Can you make a src zip that can be > > imported directly? Then the Debian guys and others can use it directly. What > > do you think? > > Yes, the src zip I use can be imported directly from eclipse. We just have to > extract it in a workspace and do Create new project from existing location. It > will set up all the environment needed to start hacking on it. What Ben's asking is for you to roll src zips when you cut releases. So if you were to create release 2.5 or something, you'd do whatever you do now (tag CVS, etc.) *plus* you'd run some ant task to plop a src zip somewhere that can be used directly by this RPM and by the Debian guys. If this is possible -- and I think it is -- I'd prefer it to the "here's how we generated this source tarball" current situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 20:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152053.l0FKrAUr015715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-01-15 15:52 EST ------- Here's a doc that explains how to make a src drop with eclipse: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/exporting-buildable-source-archives.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152218.l0FMIQfw022784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-15 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Okay, first things first: rpmlint output (on FC6): > > W: eclipse-cdt non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > > This one I'm not sure about so let's leave it for now. I'll look into it. > > W: eclipse-cdt invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > Just put EPL and not the version or the full name or the URL. > > W: eclipse-cdt macro-in-%changelog eclipse_arch > > Macros in %changelogs need to be double-%'d. Change %{eclipse_arch} to > %%{eclipse_arch}. > > W: eclipse-cdt mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) > > Open the specfile in emacs and M-x untabify. New SRPM URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-6.1.fc7.src.rpm All comments above handled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:23:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152223.l0FMNuoq023121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-15 17:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > And now some comments about the specfile: > > . don't use pkg_summary. just put the summary in Summary: Done. > . I don't think we need eclipse_name. just replace that with eclipse in its 3 uses. Done. > . get rid of the section macro Done. > . I hate that there's an epoch but there's nothing we can do about that now > . arch-specific plugins such as org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux should be moved to > %{_libdir}/eclipse Done. > . does the CDT still use ctags? There is a comment it has been removed so ctags requirement removed. > . do any of the jars contain arch-specific bits (.sos, etc.) that may make it > multilib-incompatible? Not sure what you mean other than the arch plug-ins. > . eclipse_lib_base isn't currently used but it will be when you move the > arch-specific plugins there Yes, it used now. > . I think the instructions for generating the tarball no longer hold. > Specifically, I think it should now be: > > eclipse -Duser.home=../../home -application Yes. Comments added and checked for all tarballs used. > . is the autotools stuff all licensed properly? ie. it's all EPL and it all has > the correct copyright notices in the files? It does now. Comments added and licenses added. Source tarball updated. > . could we add comments for all of the patches? It would greatly help figuring > out why we're patching and what each patch is doing. Done. > . is CPPUnit support EPL? No. It is CPL. > . should we require gcc? what about gcc-c++? Perhaps gdb and/or make already > require those ... Yes, I believe we should. We use parts of gcc. > . can we look at adding all of the arches? or at least can we add a comment > specifying why we're only building on the 4 we are? I have added a comment. > . the sdk's %description is weak. look at the sdk %descriptions in eclipse.spec Done. > . we shouldn't have links between /usr/share/eclipse and /usr/lib/eclipse for > the .sos. Ben, what do you think about this one? Nothing done on this. Let me know what is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] New: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/fuse-smb.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/fuse-smb-0.8.5-2.src.rpm Description: With SMB for Fuse you can seamlessly browse your network neighbourhood as were it on your own filesystem. It's basically smbmount with a twist. Instead of mounting one Samba share at a time, you mount all workgroups, hosts and shares at once. Only when you're accessing a share a connection is made to the remote computer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152244.l0FMi55F023960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-01-15 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > . we shouldn't have links between /usr/share/eclipse and /usr/lib/eclipse for > > the .sos. Ben, what do you think about this one? > > Nothing done on this. Let me know what is needed. For FHS compliance you need to put fragments with shared libraries in %{libdir}/eclipse/plugins to avoid symlinking from /usr/share to /usr/lib. See this document for more information: http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/FHS_Compliant_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:50:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152250.l0FMooHu024366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-15 17:50 EST ------- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 22:51:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152251.l0FMphSo024525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-15 17:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > APPROVED > > You seem to have no other package submitted, I created packages for a few applications (see my webpage: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms.html) which I recognized as useful and which hadn't had RPMs already. Some of them (like p7zip) were already added to FE by other people (based on my SPEC files). I made a proposal with isomaster to gain experience with passing FE requirements and I plan to add some other packages too. I've already submited review request of fuse-smb (bug 222742). > but I can sponsor you nevertheless. You would continue at this step: Thanks Michael. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 It doesn't look to be user friendly :) > Packaging subtleties: > > * .desktop category "Application" is deprecated, might be rejected > by a newer desktop-file-install and desktop-file-validate > > * %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1.gz => %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1* > would make the spec not fail if automatic compression of manual > pages is disabled or changed One question. Should I: - respect those suggestions in the "final" version uploaded to CVS, - wait with fixes until next "big" sotware version, - fix those things and ask once again for aproval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 23:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152303.l0FN3B9b025201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-15 18:02 EST ------- > One question The newer desktop-file-utils in Rawhide rejects .desktop files which set Category=Application already, so you won't be able to build the package for that target unless you fix the .desktop file. ;-) And the thing about manual pages is fully up to you and your personal preferences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 15 23:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701152346.l0FNkCt2026931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-15 18:46 EST ------- REVIEW contains only a checklist, have a look at THINGS to do to find out what you need to do. REVIEW: * dist tag present, * package is licensed under GPL license, * license text included in %doc, * rpmlint is quiet, * sources match upstream (8b9268826b544ad124e016ced17d5310), * latest version is being packaged, !* BRs aren't proper, package fails to build in mock! !* provides and requires (some things needs to be fixed): fuse-smb-0.8.5-2.fc7.src.rpm =PROVIDES:= (none)=REQUIRES:= fuse-devel >= 2.3 samba-client fuse-smb-0.8.5-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm =PROVIDES:= fuse-smb = 0.8.5-2.fc7 =REQUIRES:= fuse >= 2.3 fuse-libs >= 2.3 libfuse.so.2()(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) samba-common >= 3.0 * package isn't designed to be relocatable, * package doesn't create any directories and it doesn't own any directory it shouldn't, * %clean section is present and looks good * build root good * no duplicates in %files * all files have appropriate permissions * no scriptlets required * no need to any subpackages * no .la files * not a gui application THINGS to do: * add samba-client BR to get rid of mock errors. * you're using versioned dependecies unnecesarily. Also, some of them have to be removed completely. Have a look at fuse-smb-0.8.5-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm requires list. It requires libfuse.so.2 which is owned by fuse-libs and libsmbclient.so.0 owned by samba- common. It means you don't need samba-common and fuse-libs dependencies. Also, you can smoothly get rid of fuse dependency. You don't need versioned dependency for fuse-devel as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 00:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219873] Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160003.l0G035BM027558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_sword - lightweight Sword front-end for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219873 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-15 19:03 EST ------- Thanks to all who have helped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 00:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160004.l0G04UQr027608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-15 19:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145640) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145640&action=view) i18n patch This is a patch for i18n. Any comments welcomed! (I plan to add it to CVS this week). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 00:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160027.l0G0RBJR028394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-15 19:26 EST ------- > ??? Why bring automake into the buildroot if the > package never calls it? Seems better to have something > else own the dir. Wink, wink, Core dudes! ;-) The reviewing guidelines are quite explicit in this case nowadays: MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. But as I wrote, aqbanking-devel API users likely use automake anyway. *g* > versioned Obsoletes ... make it less of a hassle in case you (or your fellow packagers) ever want to bring back packages with the obsolete names (and that has been a real-world scenario before, not a purely theoretical one). Admittely, it's far from a serious issue for the "aqhbci" namespace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 00:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160034.l0G0Yjxo028541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-15 19:34 EST ------- > %build > CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %configure Setting CFLAGS here is superfluous. The %configure macro sets CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/FFLAGS already. Check out: rpm --eval %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 03:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160301.l0G31Dr8032594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-15 22:01 EST ------- Okay, so you should be sponsered now (if I did it right). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 03:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160341.l0G3f1Kf002077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-15 22:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it > does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require > a package which does create that directory. The exception to this > are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy > Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), > as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Messy; essentially means any automake-ed devel package will require automake even if no one uses it. Ah well. Fixed. > > versioned Obsoletes > > ... make it less of a hassle in case you (or your fellow packagers) > ever want to bring back packages with the obsolete names (and that > has been a real-world scenario before, not a purely theoretical one). Oh, I know the theory and that it happens; just not sure it will happen in this case. (Of course, if it happens with a new package, in the same namespace, with a lower version, then you get to play with epochs. Yay!) Tweaked for the last version I could find anywhere (1.0.3). New stuff uploaded as -12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 06:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701160643.l0G6hTWg009639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2007-01-16 01:43 EST ------- Kevin, do you know how I can reproduce the problem you are seeing ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 10:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161011.l0GABEQ4022263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-01-16 05:11 EST ------- http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-2.src.rpm this did not rebuild cleanly in mock either against fc6 nor development. snippet of build.log from fc6 build attempt: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/p ython2.4/site-packages/pokernetwork File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokernetwork/__init__* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokernetwork/dispatch* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokernetwork/packets* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokernetwork/pokernetworkconfig* snippet of build.log from development build: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/p ython2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/__init__* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/dispatch* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/packets* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/pokernetworkconfig* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/poker-network-1.0.33-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/u sr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/pokerpackets* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 10:26:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161026.l0GAQ8VG023181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-16 05:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I did notice one install on removal of any of the python-twisted-* > packages that did the /usr/libexec/twisted-dropin-cache call in > postun. If you remove them and python-twisted-core, rpm > removes python-twisted-core first, resulting in a failed scriptlet > on the other package, ie: > > rpm -e python-twisted-core python-twisted-words > error: %postun(python-twisted-words-0.4.0-3.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit > status 255 Interesting. This occurs on FC6, but not on FC-devel. Maybe rpm has some issues. * Tue Nov 21 2006 Paul Nasrat - 4.4.2-36 - Fix ordering issues (#196590) * Wed Nov 01 2006 Paul Nasrat - 4.4.2-35 - Flush query buffer patch from jbj (#212833) * Wed Nov 01 2006 Paul Nasrat - 4.4.2-34 - Debuginfo extraction with O0 * Thu Oct 26 2006 Paul Nasrat - 4.4.2-33 - Fix for ordering (#202540, #202542, #202543, #202544) Maybe some change occured in -33 and -36 fixed this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 10:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:31:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161031.l0GAVe9q023509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-16 05:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145667) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145667&action=view) remove test log on FC-devel The log of ------------------------------------ rpm -evv --test python-twisted-core python-twisted-words ------------------------------------ on FC-devel. This log says that removing will be done by the order of "words->core" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 10:32:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161032.l0GAWmnX023630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-16 05:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145668) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145668&action=view) remove test log on FC-6 Same on FC-6. The log says "core->words" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 12:06:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161206.l0GC6VeG029199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 12:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161207.l0GC7Ugr029335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 12:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161211.l0GCB8Ed029844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 15:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161526.l0GFQIdi015287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|179260 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-16 10:26 EST ------- I remove ExcludeArch-ppc, the building is correct. I do not know if it run (I can not check it), but build is normal . About x86_64: I do not want to change a code (to build), because I am not author. I analized logs in attachment and I think it will be better if authors prepare code to work under x86_64 architecture than if I modified source-files. There must be important reason to force flag -m32. New URLs (delete ExclusiveArch and add ExcludeArch): http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/warzone/warzone2100-2.0.5-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 15:57:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161557.l0GFvgGT019297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-16 10:57 EST ------- - Tab size: I'm using ts=4 - which may cause a problem if/when ts=8. (I know that there's a world war going on about tab size/stop). Is there a unified SPEC format that dictates the tab size and/or tabs vs. spaces? - CXXFLAGS: AFAICS these are the CXXFLAGS generated by automake. - Themes: Due to bandwidth constraints, I don't use mock. At least on my dev machine, themes are packed into the RPM. - KDE: Fedora is GNOME centric. While I'm a KDE user myself, I see little reason to force users to install the KDE dep-chain when they are looking for a lightweight WM. In short, KDE is removed from menu.in. - Default menu: * Browser: AFAIK Firefox is the default browser in Fedora. Added as the default browser in the main menu. (htmlview is less useful) Should we consider elinks instead? * Misc: I'm also getting idesk and gmrun reviewed - once they are in, I'll add them as BR/R in an attempt to create a fuller DE environment. * Tue Jan 16 2007 - 1.2.30-4 - Fix man page name. - Remove missing menu items. - Convert GNOME-menu patch to configure.in patch. - Push default configuration into /etc/icewm - Remove default KDE support. (GNOME centric distribution - no need to drag the KDE dep-chain in a lightweight WM) - Require firefox (default browser in Fedora). - Add missing firefox icon. (No source - manual convert) - Add missing gnome-menus. (required for GNOME2 menus) - Fix missing gettext BR. - Fix missing lang support. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-4.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:01:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161601.l0GG1Raa019717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-16 11:01 EST ------- A couple of issues. 1. I'm using ImageMagick's convert to create the firefox icon. There's no outside source for 16x16 firefox xpm image. Is it allowed? 2. GNOME-menu seem like it's semi-broken. I'll report upstream. 3. I need to integrate icewm into gdm. I'll do it ASAP. Thanks for the review. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161603.l0GG31Wc019918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-16 11:02 EST ------- Note to myself: I will add init scripts for this package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161613.l0GGDciP021209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-16 11:13 EST ------- Well, as this package came up for discussion, I checked this package. * As commented in fedora-extras-list, please remove test/oracle (I confirmed that you did it). * Why does this package have "perl => 5.8.5, postgresql-devel >= 8.0" for BuildRequires? From your spec file, all rpmbuild has to do is just "install" or "cp", so no other packages than mimimal buildroot environment are needed * Files/directories entry --------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc copyright.txt IMPLEMENTATION.txt README.txt TODO.txt ROADMAP.txt %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %files test %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README.txt %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/csv %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/mysql %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/postgresql ------------------------------------------------ Well, this is wrong...... Writing as ------------------------------------------------ %{_datadir}/%{name}/ ------------------------------------------------ is interpretted as the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/ and all files/directories under %{_datadir}/%{name}/. So, for example, all test files are also included in main package, too. Please fix the file/directory entry so that there are no duplicate entries. And... why is README.txt installed in both packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161613.l0GGDqca021252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-16 11:13 EST ------- The changes you made in the spec here, mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/{aqbanking,aqhbci} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} are thrown out by the %doc macro in the files section. The docs you move there are lost; I suggest you remove the %doc macro from aqbanking file section and manually move {AUTHORS README COPYING ChangeLog} to that directory you created. Also (not sure if this matters),somewhere in the build log there is make[4]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqbanking-2.1.0/bindings/python' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. ./aqcodegen types.xml ../../src/libs/aqbanking/types > _aqtypes.py.tmp && \ mv _aqtypes.py.tmp _aqtypes.py || \ rm -f _aqtypes.py.tmp Traceback (most recent call last): File "./aqcodegen", line 5, in import xml.dom.ext.reader.Sax2 ImportError: No module named ext.reader.Sax2 test -z "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aqbanking" || mkdir -p -- "/var/tmp/aqbanking-2.1.0-12-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aqbanking" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161614.l0GGEiUs021357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-16 11:14 EST ------- Sorry, however I must reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161615.l0GGFctD021463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161625.l0GGP7Cc022389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-16 11:24 EST ------- Ugh. Sorry about missing those things. ;( It seems I didn't re-run my full checklist on the new 2.0beta1 package... oracle and excel and such were not in the 1.0 package that was orig submitted. I'll make another run just to doublecheck... Can you fix all the issues in comment #9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:42:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161642.l0GGgkMY024173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-16 11:42 EST ------- The only additional item I can see from re-running my full checklist on the version in CVS is that the 'perl-YAML' Requires is not needed. rpm picks up that dependency just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 16:59:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161659.l0GGx8Fm026123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-01-16 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > - KDE: > Fedora is GNOME centric. While I'm a KDE user myself, I see little reason to > force users to install the KDE dep-chain when they are looking for a > lightweight WM. > In short, KDE is removed from menu.in. Seems to be the wrong decision to me. It would be better to split off both GNOME and KDE support into sub packages so that they might be included in the different spins for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 17:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161713.l0GHDwIn028160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-16 12:13 EST ------- #11. I'm a new member in the extras' world. If I add kde-config to BR (or actually kdelibs), whouldn't it add REQ in install time? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 17:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161740.l0GHenFZ030935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-16 12:40 EST ------- Ah, this is because your %{python_sitearch} is the same as your %{python_sitelib}. This should be fixed now. Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-3.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jan 16 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-3 - Do not glob removal of files under %%{python_sitearch} - Change Requires from php to php-bcmath for poker-web -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 17:54:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161754.l0GHsnTQ032162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 18:56:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161856.l0GIu28a004187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-16 13:55 EST ------- Fixing - the latter seems like a missing buildreq (PyXML)... are you still getting a valid python package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222888] New: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit-2.4-1.src.rpm Description: Tiquit offers email notification, parent/child tickets, and comprehensive search and reporting functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:14:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161914.l0GJEc6q005388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-16 14:14 EST ------- Fixes uploaded as -13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:14:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161914.l0GJEm8r005407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-01-16 14:14 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, sponsored through limph review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:31:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161931.l0GJVMHi006825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-16 14:31 EST ------- Got some more clarification on requirements for poker-web package from upstream: Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-4.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jan 16 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-4 - Add php-mysql and php-gd to Requires for poker-web -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:58:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161958.l0GJwJtt009398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-16 14:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145724) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145724&action=view) Edited spec file source is now on sourceware.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 19:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701161959.l0GJx0mV009447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 klee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145724|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 20:33:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162033.l0GKXaO5011934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 15:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > - Tab size: > I'm using ts=4 - which may cause a problem if/when ts=8. > (I know that there's a world war going on about tab size/stop). > Is there a unified SPEC format that dictates the tab size and/or tabs vs. spaces? No, it is your personal preference. I prefer using spaces, but there is nothing that dictates the appearance of the spec file, except that it should remain legible, which is the case here. > - CXXFLAGS: > AFAICS these are the CXXFLAGS generated by automake. No, there is no use of automake in icewm. These seems to be set in ICE_CXX_FLAG_ACCEPT in configure.in. > - Themes: > Due to bandwidth constraints, I don't use mock. At least on my dev > machine, themes are packed into the RPM. Oops, indeed they are, I missed them. > - KDE: > Fedora is GNOME centric. No. It is admittedly freedesktop centric, but nothing more. > While I'm a KDE user myself, I see little reason to > force users to install the KDE dep-chain when they are looking for a > lightweight WM. Nothing from gnome should be installed either. Only used if present. > In short, KDE is removed from menu.in. Please try to arrange things such that gnome and kde stuff is used if they are installed, and that things go smoothly if they aren't. If I am not wrong this is what is currently done by using /usr/share/desktop-directories/ > - Default menu: > * Browser: > AFAIK Firefox is the default browser in Fedora. Added as the default browser > in the main menu. (htmlview is less useful) htmlview is much smarter than firefox to chose the right browser. The fact that firefox is the default browser doesn't means that it should be used. > Should we consider elinks instead? No, let's let htmlview do the work. I guess you can setup things to use elinks through htmlview... Have a look at the htmlview script, and try to run it if you are not convinced. > * Misc: > I'm also getting idesk and gmrun reviewed - once they are in, I'll add them as > BR/R in an attempt to create a fuller DE environment. The window manager is not the place where the desktop should be set up. What you need is a group in the comps file, but please try to minimize the window manager dependencies. The other way around is also true, apps should not depend on a particular window manager and most of the time not on a window manager at all. > * Tue Jan 16 2007 - 1.2.30-4 > - Fix man page name. Please don't do the gziping of man pages yourself, just install them and let rpm handle them. > - Push default configuration into /etc/icewm That's not right. Please leave the default config files in %_datadir, just create and own the %{_sysconfdir}/icewm directory. You can use complicated things with noverify, if you like, for files that are meant to be in that directory, but I don't think it is worth it. > - Remove default KDE support. (GNOME centric distribution - > no need to drag the KDE dep-chain in a lightweight WM) Please no. I believe kde is used currently, although I haven't tested. If you feel brave, you could have a look at how pyxdg is used to create menus in fluxbox-xdg-menu and try to hack something similar... > - Add missing firefox icon. (No source - manual convert) Beware of the trademark issues surrounding firefox. > - Add missing gnome-menus. (required for GNOME2 menus) Not sure that it is needed. It would be certainly better if it wasn't needed, and only desktop neutral freedesktop stuff was needed. In fact it seems that it is what is done. You should in my opinion depend on redhat-menus instead (there is a directory ownership issue, I just filled Bug 222905). > - Fix missing lang support. It is not completly fixed. There should be %files -f %{name}.lang and no %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 20:35:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162035.l0GKZuWA012040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-16 15:35 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream: (had to fix Source0 URL) d5fe20e9deda671dd15340f43ab4c4a3 ksudoku-0.3.tar.gz - successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - package requires other packages for directories it does not create - no duplicates listed in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no .so files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Change Source0 to: http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - /usr/share/doc/HTML needs to be in %doc ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - Add comments above sed commands explaining what you are doing - Add comments above the rm command for HTML/common explaining what you are doing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 20:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162048.l0GKmprs012776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-16 15:48 EST ------- Plugins with shared libraries are also plugins that get moved to /usr/lib/eclipse already because of arch. Thus, section in install that moves .so and links them to /usr/share has been removed. Specfile and srpm have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162109.l0GL9eUZ014955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-01-16 16:09 EST ------- It is the job of a package maintainer to modify sources as appropriate and to feed the changes upstream. The "important reason to flag -m32" is just that the code is broken and the authors do not consider fixing it a priority. Fedora has different standards, and you should take the lead on fixing it for 64-bit operation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162116.l0GLGd8x015574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 16:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > A couple of issues. > 1. I'm using ImageMagick's convert to create the firefox icon. There's no > outside source for 16x16 firefox xpm image. Is it allowed? As I said above beware with the firefox trademark issues. Would be better if you used a more neutral one, like /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat-web-browser.png There are certainly also trademark issues, though. I also found: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/stock/navigation/stock_terminal-webbrowser.png > 2. GNOME-menu seem like it's semi-broken. I'll report upstream. It's not semi broken, it is completely broken ;-). At least the empty submenus shouldn't be shown, there shouldn't be double submenus and all the gnome apps should be shown. I think that you should use, instead: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/scripts/icewm-xdg-menu In my tests it is much better. Moreover it has less dependencies. In my opinion something like the following would be nice: prog xterm xterm xterm prog Web htmlview htmlview separator menuprog Applications - icewm-xdg-menu menufile Programs folder programs menufile Tool_bar folder toolbar And maybe without menufile Programs folder programs it seems to be useless. > 3. I need to integrate icewm into gdm. I'll do it ASAP. Indeed, it is a must. I'll attach an icewm.desktop file you could drop in %_datadir/xsessions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:17:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162117.l0GLHtGA015656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 16:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145738) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145738&action=view) desktop file for icewm for *dm sessions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:29:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162129.l0GLTf98016696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 16:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I think that you should use, instead: > http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/scripts/icewm-xdg-menu Trouble with that is that it is a bit slow so it would be better if the menu could be generated once and not everytime the user clicks. Don't know if it is feasible in icewm, though. In any case it seems to me to be way better that icewm-menu-gnome2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:35:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162135.l0GLZoRw017303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-16 16:35 EST ------- Thanks. You've still got mixed tabs and spaces. Also, don't use %{name} in the source URL ... it's just another thing to fix when trying to wget :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:43:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162143.l0GLh8vu018228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145738|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 16:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145744) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145744&action=view) icewm.desktop using icewm-session -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162148.l0GLmUr3018660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-16 16:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > #11. > > I'm a new member in the extras' world. > If I add kde-config to BR (or actually kdelibs), whouldn't it add REQ in install > time? not necessarily, it depends whether it is used and needed or not. In our case I think it is unuseful at build and install time, instead icewm-xdg-menu should be used. In my opinion icewm-menu-gnome2 shouldn't be shipped in the icewm main package but in a icewm-gnome subpackage or not shipped at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 21:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162159.l0GLxvKC019885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-16 16:59 EST ------- We can continue discussion of this bug over in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222013 I just posted at least what could be a workaround for rpm in fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 22:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162219.l0GMJ5cF021461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-16 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) (...) > * you're using versioned dependecies unnecesarily. Also, some of them have to > be removed completely. > Have a look at fuse-smb-0.8.5-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm requires list. It requires > libfuse.so.2 which is owned by fuse-libs and libsmbclient.so.0 owned by samba- > common. It means you don't need samba-common and fuse-libs dependencies. Also, > you can smoothly get rid of fuse dependency. You don't need versioned > dependency for fuse-devel as well. At first I agree with you that few of them can smoothly removed, but let me explain one thing. The main reason why I use (sometimes redundant) full packages name is the fact that those packages are also (till now only) avilable as a separate packages from my website. When I download some stand-alone package and try to install it it's much more readable to see "fuse-lib > 2.3 is required by ..." than "libfuse.so.2()(64bit) is required by ...". In the first option I know what should I install, in the second I have to find it out first [1]. [1] - I know that novadays (in FC4+ out-of-box?) it's possible to use yum to resolve dependencies and install required packages. The only problem I see is the situation when package was renamed in a newer version, but SPEC file should be then updated. Do you really think that using full package names in the Requirement section instead of letting RPM do it, can cause some problems or is an out-of-date habit? (In reply to comment #3) > Setting CFLAGS here is superfluous True. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 22:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162239.l0GMdZW0023367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-01-16 17:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Do you really think that using full package names in the Requirement section > instead of letting RPM do it, can cause some problems or is an out-of-date habit? > Packaging Guidelines says about it as a "reinventhing the wheel". In fact it does look like that. If RPM can find all dependencies well, we don't need to help it. Especially, if package's dependencies aim to be automatically resolved by yum. According to guidelines I shouldn't approve package until you get rid of that superfluous dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 22:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162255.l0GMtu7J024313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-16 17:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Change Source0 to: > http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > - /usr/share/doc/HTML needs to be in %doc > > ==== SHOULD FIX ==== > - Add comments above sed commands explaining what you are doing > - Add comments above the rm command for HTML/common explaining what you are doing > Fixed. rpmlint returns W: ksudoku dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksudoku/common ../common because ksudoku doesn't contain this directory (kdelibs does). Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ksudoku/ksudoku.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/ksudoku/ksudoku-0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 22:58:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162258.l0GMw2q9024405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-01-16 17:58 EST ------- Updated SPEC is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec Updated SRPM is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-9-0.src.rpm Kevin Fenzi (kevin at tummy.com) wrote: > First one general query: You are upstream for this package, do you > intend to only maintain this one package in fedora, or are you > planning on submitting more. This is the only package I intend on maintaining in Fedora at the moment. > If you are just seeking to make sure this is in fedora, perhaps > someone who is already a maintainer might step up to do so. Perhaps. > This would save you having to go through the sponsorship process and > also take a task off your hands if you don't want to do it. ;) I would like to take the path of least resistance to get eCryptfs support into Fedora, but I would also like the ability to push changes into the package without having to bother a middleman. The userspace utilities change about as rapidly as the kernel module, which is probably going to be changing on every 2.6.x kernel release for at least the next year. > - You might use the %{?dist} tag. This is very handy when you push > the same version of a package to multiple releases, so upgrades are > still smooth. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag >From what I understand, I can just do this? --- diff --git a/rpm/ecryptfs-utils.spec b/rpm/ecryptfs-utils.spec index f6e42ea..6d717f7 100644 --- a/rpm/ecryptfs-utils.spec +++ b/rpm/ecryptfs-utils.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: ecryptfs-utils Version: 9 -Release: 0 +Release: 0%{?dist} Summary: The eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries Group: System Environment/Base License: GPL --- > - Build on x86_64 doesn't work. The build process ends with: > RPM build errors: > File not found: > /var/tmp/ecryptfs-utils-8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ecryptfs > > It looks like the package is installing /usr/lib/ecryptfs on x86_64, > when it should be installing in /usr/lib64/ecryptfs. This required some changes to the build, but I believe I have this remedied in the most recent version of the package. Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 23:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162307.l0GN7AiC024879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-16 18:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Specfile and srpm have been updated. What are the new URLs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 23:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162311.l0GNBc2u025083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-16 18:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-6.1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 23:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162314.l0GNEXYg025253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-16 18:14 EST ------- Oops I am sorry, I forgot to also mention that /usr/share/doc/HTML needs to be moved to /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/HTML -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 16 23:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701162347.l0GNlXVw026507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-01-16 18:47 EST ------- Martin, you might want to announce this review in fedora-extras-list, and mention that it's been pre-reviewed? Developers might not notice that you need sponsoring otherwise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 00:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170028.l0H0SoT3027723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-01-16 19:28 EST ------- Here is the latest update. according to rpmlint the RPM's are fine now. I hope you agree with me on this. http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.spec http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.5.alpha2.i386.rpm http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.5.alpha2.src.rpm http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-data-1.2.0-0.5.alpha2.i386.rpm http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-devel-1.2.0-0.5.alpha2.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 01:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170122.l0H1MMZq029235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-16 20:22 EST ------- It will not build on x86_64! You should add: ExclusiveArch: i386 Or Only patch it on x86_64 with an experimental support %ifarch x86_64 %patch0 -p1 %endif I also wonder why the plugin dir is in /usr/lib in x86_64 if your spec file libdir=%{_libdir} it will work fine depending on the choice above... Some build quotes: -------------------------- ... tall_prefix=/usr sysconfdir=/etc no_rpath=true build scons: Reading SConscript files ... Looking for build directory for platform 'linux2' Exact match not found, finding closest guess No match found, looking for 'default' directory Found configuration directory platform/default, will use that ... build/shadercompiler/shadervm/shadervm.cpp: In member function 'void Aqsis::CqShaderVM::LoadProgram(std::istream*)': build/shadercompiler/shadervm/shadervm.cpp:1108: error: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision scons: *** [build/shadercompiler/shadervm/shadervm.os] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 03:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:33:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] New: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt.spec SRPM URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: The Fedora hardware profiler is a server-client system that does a hardware scan against a machine and sends the results to a server to a Fedora Project turbogears server. The sends are anonymous and should not contain any private information other than the physical hardware information and basic OS info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 03:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222960] New: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/SPECS/xenman.spec SRPM URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/RPMs/xenman-0.6-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: XenMan is an intuitive, graphical management tool aimed at operational lifecycle management for the Xen virtualization platform. With XenMan's secure, multi-node administration, performance management and provisioning capabilities, administrators can safely manage their entire environment from a single, centralized console. Most common administrative tasks like starting, stopping, monitoring and provisioning virtual machines (Guest OS's) typically involve just a few mouse clicks with XenMan; as do server management operations like scanning OS configurations or acquiescing individual servers for maintainance. Hi, I packaged this program and i would appreciate a review so that i can get it into fedora extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 03:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170345.l0H3jlkE002624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: XenMan - |Review Request: XenMan - |Graphical management tool |Graphical management tool |for Xen |for Xen Version|devel |fc6 Platform|All |noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 04:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170417.l0H4HZZe004798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-01-16 23:17 EST ------- What's the status on this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 04:29:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170429.l0H4TstO006014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-16 23:29 EST ------- About debuginfo rpmlint errors, you can take a look on this spec: SPEC http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/aqsis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 04:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170459.l0H4xDtN008952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-01-16 23:59 EST ------- Looks like you need to correct Changelog entry rpmlint on rpm gave me W: mybashburn incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1 1.0.1-0 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 05:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222964] New: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnny.d at freesurf.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mercucio.homelinux.net/dayplanner.spec SRPM URL: http://mercucio.homelinux.net/dayplanner-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: Day planner is a simple time management program. Day planner is designed to help you easily manage your time. It can manage appointments, birthdays and more. It makes sure you remember your appointments by popping up a dialog box reminding you about it. This is my first Package and as far as I understand the whole concept I am in the need of a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 05:17:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170517.l0H5HuQF010626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 johnny.d at freesurf.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 05:51:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170551.l0H5pRAf011435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 00:51 EST ------- %changelog * Sat Jan 13 2007 - 0.9.2-2 - Fix Source0 URL. - Remove redundant %%doc files. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun-0.9.2-2.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 06:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170657.l0H6vakj013318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-17 01:57 EST ------- + builds on x86_64 devel + rpmlint clean + follows python spec template + License: LGPL + macro use + %check passes + source matches upstream APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 07:17:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170717.l0H7Howl013837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 02:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I see no issues with this meta package, so I would be > happy to APPROVE it. Well, I also think that there is nothing which this metapackage should fix for scriptlet ordering issue and this package may go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 07:20:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170720.l0H7KnLW013908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 02:20 EST ------- (Please block both FE-NEW and FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 07:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170724.l0H7OFgM013985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-17 02:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Interpretation on content being under the GPL works for me. I'll sign off on it > as ok. Thanks, noted. :-) (In reply to comment #16) > I remove ExcludeArch-ppc, the building is correct. I do not know if it run (I can not check it), but build is normal . Have you tried starting it up via SSH with X11 forwarding? ("ssh -X") It would be *dead* slow, but at least it should boot up. (In reply to comment #17) > It is the job of a package maintainer to modify sources as appropriate and to > feed the changes upstream. The "important reason to flag -m32" is just that the > code is broken and the authors do not consider fixing it a priority. Fedora has > different standards, and you should take the lead on fixing it for 64-bit operation. I agree with this. However, having played around with the code a bit, it is clear that a 64-bit port of this application will take some serious maintenance, mostly due to its (legacy) Windows-centric memory handling (lots of ugly DWORDs etc). Currently it compiles and starts up, but segfaults after the initial loading screen. Fixing this is a slightly big(ish) and time-consuming endeavour, one which would benefit greatly from the assistance of a bigger Fedora audience; therefore my current recommendation is to exclude x86_64 for now, add it to "devel", and file a bug report against warzone2100 detailing the 32-bit-windows-to-64-bit-linux pointer issues (see Bug #158646 for an example). The point is, in the long run, the 64-bit issue will *have* to be fixed, but it might be solved quicker if the package is accepted for devel/i386 and ppc, and a specific bug report is filed against it. I will let this suggestion simmer for a day or so before taking action, so if someone does not agree with this idea, please speak up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 07:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170746.l0H7kIl0014707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 02:46 EST ------- * Lang. Changed to %find_lang %{name} -f %{name}.lang. Done. * ICE_CXX_FLAG_ACCEPT: OK. I understand. (Admittedly I'm not that experienced with automake/autoconf - so bear with me.) Does the default flag set poses any problem? I'm reluctant to mock around with the default flags - I've been bitten by GCC too many times to take this matter lightly. * htmlview: Done. Switched to bluecurve icons instead. * BZ #222905 (gnome-menu): Ay... I CC'ed myself. Once it changes I'll replace the gnome-menu with redhat-menus. * Default configuration. (/etc/icewm): OK, I'll return them to their original position. Never the less, I'll be wise to sym-link /etc/icewm/xxx to /usr/share/icewm/xxx as it's the logical place for system-wide configuration files. * GNOME/KDE: As I'm using the freedesktop files (/share/desktop-directories/), both menus should be identical, no? * icewm-xdg-menu, wm-session: Thanks. Integrated. It's a bit (?) slow. I'm thinking about using gnome-menu with a static list of directories (E.g. Utilities, Office, Development, Games, Internet, Multimedia) - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 07:47:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170747.l0H7lGoQ014749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 02:47 EST ------- * Wed Jan 17 2007 - 1.2.30-5 - Fix Source0 URL. - Replace cp with install. - Do not gzip the man page, just copy it. - Use htmlview instead of firefox. - Use BlueCurve icons instead of the mozilla ones. - Re-fix lang support. - Return the default configuration files to %%_datadir - Add gdm session support. - Remove gnome-menus from default menu - replace it with pyxdg/icewm-xdg-menu. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-5.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 08:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701170818.l0H8IloX015591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-17 03:18 EST ------- New build: Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido.spec SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-4.src.rpm Changes: - Added proper handling of .desktop file - Added BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 10:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171020.l0HAK4md023505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-01-17 05:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Thanks. You've still got mixed tabs and spaces. > > Also, don't use %{name} in the source URL ... it's just another thing to fix > when trying to wget :) So why not use: $ spectool --gf blah.spec instead? spectool handles the macro expansion and then calls wget on the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 10:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171037.l0HAbTXg024458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 ------- Additional Comments From johnny.d at freesurf.ch 2007-01-17 05:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (Please block both FE-NEW and FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Thanks for your help :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 10:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171038.l0HAcx3Y024573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-17 05:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Try to work on yours and ask for another review and add me in Cc: for that bug:) ok, you're right. :) I will wait until this package is approved and then create a single addon for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 12:10:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171210.l0HCA7Q6030513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-01-17 07:10 EST ------- I'm closing this one for now as I've been unable to get any response at all from Red Hat regarding my CLA worries. I do this with great regret but in the hope that someone else will submit evolution-brutus to Fedora. I will certainly support any would-be maintainer(s) as much as humanly possible. Many thanks to Mamoru for his great help getting evolution-brutus into a state technically suitable for inclusion into Fedora! Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 12:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171218.l0HCIR4E030995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-17 07:18 EST ------- You forgot to add the fixed doc directory to the file list. Adding it, and running rpmlint on the resulting packages produce; [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.src.rpm W: aqbanking unversioned-explicit-obsoletes aqhbci-devel - You forgot to version to this one. [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm E: aqbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci - aqbanking needs to also 'Provides: aqhbci' E: aqbanking zero-length /usr/share/aqbanking/bankinfo/us/bic.idx [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-devel-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm E: aqbanking-devel obsolete-not-provided aqhbci-devel - Also needs to provided for. E: aqbanking-devel zero-length usr/share/doc/aqbanking-devel-2.1.0/01-OVERVIEW - Can be left out of the doc list [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint qbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm E: qbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci-qt-tools - I'm not sure you ever ship this, you can drop the obsolete or also provide it. W: qbanking no-documentation - I believe this and the rest like it can be ignored. [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint qbanking-devel-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: qbanking-devel no-documentation [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint kbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: kbanking no-documentation [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint kbanking-devel-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: kbanking-devel no-documentation [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint python-aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: python-aqbanking no-documentation [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint g2banking-devel-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: g2banking-devel no-documentation [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint g2banking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm W: g2banking no-documentation And you really haven't fixed > * [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > Useless check. Nowadays buildroot cannot be "/" anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171304.l0HD4rSL001945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-17 08:04 EST ------- > /usr/share/doc/HTML needs to be in %doc FYI, everything under %{_docdir} is *automatically* marked %doc by rpm. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] New: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist-0.5-3.fc6.src.rpm Description: KoverArtist is a program for the fast creation of covers for cd/dvd cases and boxes. The main idea behind it is to be able to create decent looking covers with some mouseclic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171338.l0HDcOEo003457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-17 08:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and built for development. Branched requested for FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171340.l0HDe2ue003550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 08:39 EST ------- Well, I think this package is useful, so I wish someone would take this package. Closing for now, marking this as FE-DEADREVIEW, adding this to WishList. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171353.l0HDrqWL004569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 08:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > SPEC > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/aqsis.spec I will check this spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 13:54:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171354.l0HDsOGh004677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-17 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Oops I am sorry, I forgot to also mention that /usr/share/doc/HTML needs to be > moved to /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/HTML > This is a part of KDE help system and AFAIK it doesn't work in different path (I mean opening it with Help menu ? ksudoku Handbook not manually). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171402.l0HE2s2k005861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 09:02 EST ------- (Just changing to NEXTRELEASE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:29:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171429.l0HETJk7009347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 09:29 EST ------- Thanks. (Though, technically, my FC6 branch request has yet to be processed, so for now, this is strictly -devel release...) - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:33:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222998] New: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gilboad at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk-0.7.5-1.src.rpm Description: iDesk gives users of minimal WM's icons on their desktop. The icon graphics are either from a PNG or SVG (vector) file and support some eye-candy effects like transparency. Each icon can be configured to run one or more shell commands and the actions which run those commands are completely configurable. In a nutshell if you want icons on your desktop and you don't have or don't want KDE or gnome doing it, you can use iDesk. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171438.l0HEcXKh009962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 09:38 EST ------- ... The description is taken from the upstream owner. I'll re-phrase it in -2. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171444.l0HEisrY010398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-17 09:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > Also, don't use %{name} in the source URL ... it's just another thing to fix > > when trying to wget :) > > So why not use: > > $ spectool --gf blah.spec > > instead? spectool handles the macro expansion and then calls wget on the result. 'cause I didn't know about spectool :) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218852] Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171448.l0HEmSB2010953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openid - Python OpenID libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218852 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 14:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171458.l0HEwDq5011877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-17 09:58 EST ------- One item I see immediately: use the %find_lang macro instead of manually including the locale file(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:12:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171512.l0HFCw7w013368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 10:12 EST ------- Well, Paul, are you reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171516.l0HFG0jC013822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-17 10:15 EST ------- Ups. Must have missed this on my checklist (spec is quite old). Sry. Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist-0.5-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:20:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171520.l0HFKjDF014395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-17 10:20 EST ------- 3 more comments: - "mouseclic" in description should be "mouseclick" I think. Shouldn't it be the plural "mouseclicks" anyway? - desktop-file-install doesn't look ok: Category "X-Fedora" is obsolete. Main category is "AudioVideo", while the changelog says "changed group to Applications/Publishing". - Not sure if %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-koverartist.desktop should be %{_datadir}/applications/kde/fedora-koverartist.desktop instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171523.l0HFNw8Z014755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 10:23 EST ------- Hello. As David Nielsen pointed out, please check: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 There are ..actually... many requests which are in need of reviewers. Well, everyone including me was a newbie at first. Please try reviewing (though some package needs some knowledge other than only packaging issue....). If you have some questions, I _must_ help you as sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:24:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223008] New: Review Request: perl-File-Copy-Recursive - Perl extension for recursively copying files and directories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223008 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Copy-Recursive - Perl extension for recursively copying files and directories Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/packman/fedora/SRPMS/perl-File-Copy-Recursive.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/packman/fedora/SRPMS/perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A Perl module to copy and move directories recursively to an optional depth and attempts to preserve each file or directory's mode. This package is a dependency of perl-File-Flat and is required to enable me to upgrade perl-File-Flat to 1.00 in FE (ATM, at 0.95) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171531.l0HFVkRN015437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-17 10:31 EST ------- I am still seeing a couple of spots I don't feel comfortable about: 1. The BR: gettext-devel seems superfluous to me. AFAIS, "BR: gettext" should suffice. 2. The mozplugin has depencency problems wrt. the %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins directory It must either * own %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins * Require a package providing %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins * "Requires: %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins" AFAICT, their is no policy on handling mozilla-plugins, yet, so the most simple work-around would be to "Requires: firefox". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 15:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171558.l0HFwaRr017896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-17 10:58 EST ------- I can't build that SRPM: + mkdir -p /var/tmp/eclipse-cdt-buildroot/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins ++ find ./usr/share/eclipse/plugins -name '*x86_3.1.1*' find: ./usr/share/eclipse: No such file or directory + popd /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90082: line 40: popd: directory stack empty error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90082 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171601.l0HG1ANW018111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-17 11:01 EST ------- I see, I did not realize this was a KDE directory. Package looks fine. My mistake. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171608.l0HG8WSK018832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-17 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 3 more comments: > - "mouseclic" in description should be "mouseclick" I think. Shouldn't it be the > plural "mouseclicks" anyway? Mhh. Think so. (Note to myself: no more c&p in the descriptions) > - desktop-file-install doesn't look ok: Category "X-Fedora" is obsolete. Main > category is "AudioVideo", while the changelog says "changed group to > Applications/Publishing". Because I cannot say I've understood the desktop-file-usage completly I've used a modified entry from the package "kover" (also available in extras - and with X-Fedora). And also the entry "Group: Applications/Publishing". I'm not really sure where to put it. The rpm-group "Applications/Multimedia" doesn't seem the best for me. "Applications/Publishing" could be better (because it is a printing program) but the corresponding desktop category* "Office" would not describe it clearly. * http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html > - Not sure if > %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-koverartist.desktop should be > %{_datadir}/applications/kde/fedora-koverartist.desktop instead Good question. On my installation only amarok and kaffeine (as single packages) are in %{_datadir}/applications/kde/ but digikam, kompose, konversation, kshutdown, and some more use /usr/share/applications/fedora-${name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:08:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221873] Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171608.l0HG8tJc018868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgdb - A curses-based interface to the GNU Debugger (GDB) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221873 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 11:08 EST ------- I'll contact you if I have any questions. I'll try not to bug you too much ;) Thanks, - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] New: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/nxml-mode/nxml-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/nxml-mode/nxml-mode-0.20041004.1-0.1.src.rpm Description: This is an Emacs mode for editing XML with interactive validity and well-formedness checks. Given a DTD it will also complete tags and attributes, and ' Message-ID: <200701171617.l0HGHdgN019873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 11:17 EST ------- Well, much improvement for this package!! A. Packaging issue (mainly in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) So, first full review. (Again note: please increase the release number when you change the spec file, and reset the release number when you use new source). * Requires: ------------------------------------------------------- Requires: fltk >= 1.1.0, libjpeg >= 6b, libtiff >= 3.7.1, OpenEXR ------------------------------------------------------- These should not be needed. Libraries' dependencies automatically checked by rpmbuild correctly pull these dependencies. * Documentation - "INSTALL" should not be necessary. This is needed for people who want to rebuild this package by themselves. * ChangeLog - 1.2.0-0.6alpha2 should be 1.2.0-0.6.alpha2 * Compilation flags - Well, please look at the build log. This spec file: 1. Once compile at %build stage using scons. At this time compiler uses Fedora specific compilation flags. 2. Next at %install stage, scons tries to compile all targets once more!! At this stage, compiler does not use Fedora specific compilation flags, so this is wrong. ? Doesn't scons accept the argument like --skip-build at install stage like usual "setup.py" written in python? ? Or are there any way to avoid twice compilation? - If not, move all compilation using scons to %install stage, compiling twice is redundant. * Encodings: - Please change the encoding of the following file(s) to UTF-8. ----------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/aqsis-1.2.0/AUTHORS: ISO-8859 English text ----------------------------------------------------- = (not a blocker) If you are upstream, please change all text files to UTF-8 for next tarball. = License (okay) = Some files are licensed not under LGPL or GPL. ./displays/d_sdcBMP/d_sdcBMP.cpp ./displays/d_sdcWin32/d_sdcWin32.cpp ./shadercompiler/slpp/pp* ./displays/d_exr/dspyhlpr.c ./displays/d_sdcWin32/interface.c ./displays/d_sdcWin32/d_sdcWin32.h = None of them conflicts with GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:35:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171635.l0HGZeIq021966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-17 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm > E: aqbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci > - aqbanking needs to also 'Provides: aqhbci' How does this help? Anything that actually used the old aqhbci will not work even if this did provide it - different ABI, different interface, different paths to the binaries used. I believe this falls under the '[not] a compatible enough replacement' category of the provides/obsoletes draft. > [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint qbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm > E: qbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci-qt-tools > - I'm not sure you ever ship this, you can drop the obsolete or also provide it. It's in FE-4. But see above. > And you really haven't fixed > > * [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > Useless check. Nowadays buildroot cannot be "/" anymore. Fixed %install before, fixed %clean now. Uploaded as -14. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:39:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171639.l0HGdhhA022355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 11:39 EST ------- By the way ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171643.l0HGhaSL022860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-17 11:43 EST ------- Re-check "License:" as it is _not_ GPL. > ## Uses the same naming schema for libraries/directories :( > Conflicts: libtorrent IMO this conflict is unacceptable. Actually, "libtorrent" is libtorrent.so.9, this one is libtorrent.so.0, and "libtorrent-devel" uses /usr/include/torrent/ while this one uses /usr/include/libtorrent/. So, theoretically they could even co-exist at this point of time, provided that they got some love from upstream. But so far, the rename is half-hearted. > %files > %{_bindir}/client_test > %{_bindir}/simple_client For a library package and the limited /usr/bin namespace, these two file names are far too generic. They ought to be moved or renamed. The filenames /usr/bin/dump_torrent and /usr/bin/make_torrent are quite generic, too. Upstream is highly encouraged to choose an own namespace. > %files devel > %doc COPYING docs/* The file COPYING is included in the main package already. > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc This file is tuned for static linking, unfortunately, in that it links libraries which libtorrent.so.0 is linked against already. > Requires: openssl-devel Where do you see this requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 16:45:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222456] Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171645.l0HGjS1N023069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibletime - BibleTime is a frontend for the SWORD Bible Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222456 fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging at dw-perspective.org.uk 2007-01-17 11:45 EST ------- Thanks to everyone who helped with this. Now in Extras. (i18n being put in the devel branch as we speak - if nobody complains, I'll add it to FC5 + 6 in the next week). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171700.l0HH0GpM024777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-17 12:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > The only additional item I can see from re-running my full checklist on the > version in CVS is that the 'perl-YAML' Requires is not needed. rpm picks up > that dependency just fine. Done. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:05:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171705.l0HH51GK025631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-17 12:04 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #9) > Well, as this package came up for discussion, I checked > this package. > > * As commented in fedora-extras-list, please remove > test/oracle (I confirmed that you did it). Yes, done in 0.2. > * Why does this package have "perl => 5.8.5, postgresql-devel >= 8.0" > for BuildRequires? > From your spec file, all rpmbuild has to do is just "install" > or "cp", so no other packages than mimimal buildroot environment > are needed That's my bad -- Removed that in 0.3. > * Files/directories entry > --------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc copyright.txt IMPLEMENTATION.txt README.txt TODO.txt ROADMAP.txt > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > > %files test > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc README.txt > %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/csv > %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/mysql > %{_datadir}/%{name}/test/postgresql > ------------------------------------------------ > Well, this is wrong...... > > Writing as > ------------------------------------------------ > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > ------------------------------------------------ > is interpretted as the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/ and > all files/directories under %{_datadir}/%{name}/. > So, for example, all test files are also included in > main package, too. > > Please fix the file/directory entry so that there are > no duplicate entries. Fixed in new version. > And... why is README.txt installed in both packages? Yeah, ok. Removed. Thanks for the review. I'll submit the new spec and SRPM shortly. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:05:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171705.l0HH5ZAm025801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-17 12:05 EST ------- > It will not build on x86_64! > You should add: > ExclusiveArch: i386 Usually, this is wrong. If you know it doesn't build on x86_64, you do ExcludeArch: x86_64 and add a comment which contains the link to a ticket in bugzilla.redhat.com where the build problem is explained. If, on the contrary, you use ExclusiveArch, you lock out all other architectures, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:06:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171706.l0HH6LF8025969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-17 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > Because I cannot say I've understood the desktop-file-usage completly I've used > a modified entry from the package "kover" (also available in extras - and with > X-Fedora). Most of our packages still have X-Fedora, because it used to be in the wiki. AFAIK in October packaging committee voted to stop using this category, although this never has been announced officially. Maybe Rex can give us some more details on this? > I'm not really sure where to put it. The rpm-group "Applications/Multimedia" > doesn't seem the best for me. "Applications/Publishing" could be better (because > it is a printing program) but the corresponding desktop category* "Office" > would not describe it clearly. I don't care where you put it but changelog and desktop file should match. IMHO Applications/Publishing is ok. > On my installation only amarok and kaffeine (as single packages) > are in %{_datadir}/applications/kde/ but digikam, kompose, konversation, > kshutdown, and some more use /usr/share/applications/fedora-${name}.desktop If the program runs fine in Gnome/XFCE too, I suggest %{_datadir}/applications, but Gnome/XFCE will also find it inside of %{_datadir}/applications/kde. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:08:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171708.l0HH8ORb026331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-01-17 12:08 EST ------- New spec file: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link-2.0-0.3.beta1.src.rpm Could you please take a look at them? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171712.l0HHCA9q027259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-17 12:12 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i -v idesk-0.7.5-1.src.rpm I: idesk checking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171714.l0HHEr5L027709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-17 12:14 EST ------- > this never has been announced officially. It was announced to fedora-maintainers. Regardless, you should do you best to follow the guidelines as it is *now*. (: Re: %{_datadir}/applications vs. %{_datadir}/applications/kde You shouldn't mix-n-match --vendor and %{_datadir}/applications/kde. Either use: --vendor=fedora --dir=%{_datadir}/applications or --vendor="" --dir=%{_datadir}/applications/kde in this case, probably the former. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:16:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] New: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libgimme-codec/libgimme-codec.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libgimme-codec/libgimme-codec-0.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: libgimme-codec allows programs that use it to call a helper script when a video or audio codec is unhandled by the media framework in use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171717.l0HHHj0O028240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-17 12:17 EST ------- libgimme-codec is an optional dependency of Totem, which is in Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:21:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171721.l0HHLb2M028824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-17 12:21 EST ------- buildroot does not match preferred tag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171730.l0HHUXno030313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-17 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > buildroot does not match preferred tag: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 Thanks, fixed in http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libgimme-codec/libgimme-codec-0.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171741.l0HHftUo031597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-17 12:41 EST ------- Currently libgimme-codec requires cvs gstreamer (0.10.11.1). Bastian says that a new gstreamer release is expected soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171742.l0HHglbO031726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-17 12:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I don't care where you put it but changelog and desktop file should match. IMHO > Applications/Publishing is ok. > The changelog entry belongs to a change in the rpm-group. First I'd put this into "Groups: User Interface/Desktops" and forgotten to change it. It was not meant to be a change in the desktop-file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171748.l0HHmvMv032558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-17 12:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Currently libgimme-codec requires cvs gstreamer (0.10.11.1). Bastian says that a > new gstreamer release is expected soon. Bit of a confusion there I guess. libgimme-codec support in Totem requires gstreamer core 0.10.11.1, libgimme-codec needs nothing but a libc to compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 17:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171749.l0HHnVFW032641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-17 12:49 EST ------- Looking at the package in comment #15: - You probibly shouldn't have the versions in the Requires for postgresql- server and perl. Since this package will be for fc5/fc6/devel, all of those releases have newer versions than listed in the requires. - You now need to own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ in the main package, you can add a: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} in the files section of the main package to do this. - The test subpackage needs to own: %{_datadir}/%{name}/test directory as well. %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/test in files there should do that. I don't see anything else aside from those 3 items... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 18:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171817.l0HIH9r0003257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-01-17 13:17 EST ------- Oh I see. What happened here is that I misread the output of objdump, only noticing the first object with `main' function inside. My bad. I updated the spec to place compat libfl into /usr/lib/flex-2.5.4a/libfl.a, and the include file into /usr/include/flex-2.5.4a/FlexLexer.h If one wants to use these files, she has to set up LDFLAGS's -L and CPPFLAGS' -I, but the commands themselved remain intact. (Sorry it took me so long to reply, I was ill last week.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 18:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171821.l0HIL5FF003835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-17 13:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=145844) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=145844&action=view) fixed tab/space mix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 18:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171843.l0HIhLGm006037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-17 13:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I am still seeing a couple of spots I don't feel comfortable about: > > 1. The BR: gettext-devel seems superfluous to me. > AFAIS, "BR: gettext" should suffice. Oh, I think you are right. I don't remember, why I put there the gettext-devel BR... Fixed. > 2. The mozplugin has depencency problems wrt. the %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins > directory > > It must either > * own %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins > * Require a package providing %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins > * "Requires: %{libdir}/mozilla/plugins" > > AFAICT, their is no policy on handling mozilla-plugins, yet, so the most simple > work-around would be to "Requires: firefox". > Well, I didn't realize that. I looked at the totem package (which has also mozplugin subpackage) and noticed that it is also not handled there, so I did not think it necessary. However, I followed your advice and added Requires: firefox. Thanks for the tip. :-) New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SPECS/gxine.spec New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SRPMS/gxine-0.5.10-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171907.l0HJ7eLu008763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com 2007-01-17 14:07 EST ------- Updated specfile/srpm uploaded to same location. Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171909.l0HJ9XLG008880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 14:09 EST ------- Well, as a result of rawhide update: ----------------------------------- gtk2-2.10.8-1.fc7 glib2-2.12.9-1.fc7 ----------------------------------- segv on startup disappeared. Now I suspect that segv on startup I saw was due to gtk2 or glib2, not pcmanx-gtk2. Still, I found one more issue. When I: * remove wget (in fact, do "mv /usr/bin/wget /usr/bin/.wget") * launch pcmanx * try to update BBS list -- then at the probability of around 50%, pcmanx freezes. This is reproducible also on FC-5. This is (perhaps) due to around line 729-763 in src/mainframe.cpp. When "system(wget...)" exits immediately with failure, some race condition seems to happen. This may be avoided by adding "Requires: wget", however I think this is apparently a bug and I don't think leaving this as it is is good. Well, again would you report to upstream about this (and also report that startup segv was perhaps due to gtk2 or glib2)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171916.l0HJG17N009576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 14:15 EST ------- One more issue. * Timestamps ------------------------------ install -m 644 *.sql %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/ ------------------------------ Please use "install -p -m 644" to keep timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223068] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Object-Pluggable/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0002-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable.spec Description: This module aids in the development and deploment of plugin-enabled Moose-based classes. It extends the Moose framework via a roles to enable this behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171918.l0HJIW2D009940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171927.l0HJR7V7010881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-01-17 14:27 EST ------- pygame already requires py-numeric, tk-devel requires tcl-devel and freeglut requires mesa-libGLU-devel So you can remove py-numeric, tcl-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel from (Build)Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171940.l0HJeINR012360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-17 14:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > Issues: > > 1. Should there really be a devel subpackage just for docs? > If there does need to be one for some reason it should > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but I don't see a > reason to have one, unless I am missing something... The main reason why I did that is because the docs wind up being several times the size of the actual library; and they are only of interest to developers. But if you think saving space/bandwidth this way is a bad idea, I'll put them into the main package. > 2. Should the 'Requires: gamin' be needed? > rpm already puts in a requires on libfam.so.0 which is provided by > the gamin package. You are right - I removed that explicit dependency. New stuff: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:52:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171952.l0HJq02t013429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico. | |ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 14:51 EST ------- ping? Also, assuming that this is your first package (according to bugzilla entry), I mark this as FE-NEEDSPNSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 19:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701171959.l0HJxXOB014002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-17 14:59 EST ------- Issues ====== * You should remove %config from default config files. Indeed %config is for files to be modified by the user. It is not the case for the files in %_datadir/icewm which hold the defaults and therefore should not be modified. You, as a packager are the one who can modify the files. Users can make system-wide changes in %{_sysconfdir}/icewm/ files, and each user makes his changes in ~/.icewm/ * with icewm-xdg-menu.py in /usr/bin, rpm creates files used for optimization of python. I don't know if it is problematic or right. rpmlint complains, but it may be ignorable. W: icewm non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/icewm-xdg-menu.pyo 0644 W: icewm non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/icewm-xdg-menu.pyc 0644 * /usr/bin/icewm-menu-gnome2 should in my opinion be in a subpackage, to avoid bringing in gnome dependencies to the main icewm package. * icewm.desktop should be 0644, so the install line should be install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/xsessions/ * missing Requires: xterm * did you check the trademark issues with redhat-web-browser artwork? * License seems to be LGPL, from what I can see in COPYING, and on the sourceforge site. Many files lack a license notice, they only have a copyright. No license means a restrictive license (no right to modify or redistribute). Given that all the files which have a notice mention the LGPL, I guess there is no real issue. According to the FSF, the authors may not be completely sure that they can defend their license in a court unless they have the notice that appears at the end of the LGPL. Maybe you could report that upstream. Some files don't have a copyright notice. Usually it means that they are in the public domain (which is not an issue). Comments ======== * in my opinion the glob for the man page is better like %{_mandir}/man1/icewm.1* to get man pages even without compression * %find_lang %{name} seems to be enough, I guess the default is %{name}.lang for the file name. * you should consistently use %{__install} or install * you can use -b for patches to help those who like gendiff, so for example one would have %patch0 -p1 -b .configure and so on * in general it is not useful to repeat the package name in the summary, all the tools get the package name from the package name. Not a big deal. * I don't think that ' for the X Windows System' is really useful since it doesn't add any useful information. I would have choosed something like Summary: Light Window Manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:27:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172027.l0HKRDPt016232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-17 15:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Packaging Guidelines says about it as a "reinventhing the wheel". In fact > it does look like that. If RPM can find all dependencies well, we don't need > to help it. Especially, if package's dependencies aim to be automatically > resolved by yum. OK, I fixed that and OPTFLAGS too. I kept version of fuse-devel because it's a minimal required version and it's the only place when can I point it (for build). http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/fuse-smb.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/fuse-smb-0.8.5-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172032.l0HKWZ5H016645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-17 15:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * ICE_CXX_FLAG_ACCEPT: > OK. I understand. (Admittedly I'm not that experienced with automake/autoconf - > so bear with me.) > Does the default flag set poses any problem? > I'm reluctant to mock around with the default flags - I've been bitten by GCC > too many times to take this matter lightly. I think that it would be right if you added a comment in the specfile to state something along that # the following compile flags are set in configure: # -fpermissive -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wconversion -Wwrite-strings # -Winline -Woverloaded-virtual -W -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti Then you could have a look at gcc man page to verify that nothing potentially wrong is done. > Ay... I CC'ed myself. Once it changes I'll replace the gnome-menu with redhat-menus. In fact I am not sure that any of these dependency is usefull. They will certainly be used if present. It is right in the current spec file as these deps are not there. > * Default configuration. (/etc/icewm): > OK, I'll return them to their original position. Never the less, I'll be wise to > sym-link /etc/icewm/xxx to /usr/share/icewm/xxx as it's the logical place for > system-wide configuration files. Certainly not. /usr/share/icewm/xxx is for defaults from the vendor (ie you) while /etc/icewm/xxx is for system-wide configuration files. > * GNOME/KDE: > As I'm using the freedesktop files (/share/desktop-directories/), both menus > should be identical, no? I guess so. > * icewm-xdg-menu, wm-session: > Thanks. Integrated. > It's a bit (?) slow. I'm thinking about using gnome-menu with a static list of > directories (E.g. Utilities, Office, Development, Games, Internet, Multimedia) That could be right. But gnome-menu2 isn't only broken because it adds empty submenus, it also miss some apps. For example I couldn't find gnochm nor kchmviewer (I maintain them, that's why I 'test' menus and mime opening apps on them). What about asking upstream for a possibility to have something like menuprog, but which is called only when starting icewm? > - Gilboa It is not wrong to add your name in bugzilla tickets, but it is not strictly necessary, since it is already at the top of the tickets (with your mail address for logged in people). Sorry if you already know it and do it on purpose... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:37:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172037.l0HKbibn017098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-17 15:37 EST ------- > Re-check "License:" as it is _not_ GPL. Gaah. I just copied that from the Gentoo ebuild without verifying it. Thanks for the catch. > IMO this conflict is unacceptable. Actually, "libtorrent" is > libtorrent.so.9, this one is libtorrent.so.0, and "libtorrent-devel" > uses /usr/include/torrent/ while this one uses /usr/include/libtorrent/. > So, theoretically they could even co-exist at this point of time, > provided that they got some love from upstream. But so far, the > rename is half-hearted. On further investigation, only some of the -devel files conflict (libtorrent.pc and the unsuffixed libtorrent.so symlink). I'll make only the -devel subpackage conflict with that of libtorrent, then. > For a library package and the limited /usr/bin namespace, these two > file names are far too generic. They ought to be moved or renamed. Well, these binaries are actually just examples of what can be done with this libtorrent. Would they be better suited as %doc perhaps? > The file COPYING is included in the main package already. Perhaps; but as a matter of personal preference and to keep things explicitly clear, I prefer to package such files as %doc for every subpackage in a build. > This file is tuned for static linking, unfortunately, in that > it links libraries which libtorrent.so.0 is linked against > already. Hmm. I was under the [apparently mistaken] impression that forcing the use of the system zlib would offset that from the ./configure script. A patch is underway. >> Requires: openssl-devel > Where do you see this requirement? Several OpenSSL headers are used via #include directives from files in the /include/libtorrent/asio/ssl directory (used for asynchronous SSL handshaking and whatnot). Thus, I have it pull in openssl-devel so that any potential build finds those headers as well. When I home this evening, I'll bug upstream about the dump_torrent/make_torrent naming, as well as fix the issues presented in your comment. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223008] Review Request: perl-File-Copy-Recursive - Perl extension for recursively copying files and directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172043.l0HKhar4018048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Copy-Recursive - Perl extension for recursively copying files and directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223008 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-17 15:43 EST ------- * rpmlint warning is ignorable: W: perl-File-Copy-Recursive mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 1) * follow guidelines * free software license, not included * BuildRequires right * sane provides: Provides: perl(File::Copy::Recursive) = 0.30 * match upstream d764baa2507d4ab4471174d80589de1f File-Copy-Recursive-0.30.tar.gz * %files section right. APPROVED I personally prefer to add a trailing slash to directories in %files section, to show visually that it is a directory and not a file, like in %{perl_vendorlib}/File/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172043.l0HKhgi5018072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-17 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > The main reason why I did that is because the docs wind up being several times > the size of the actual library; and they are only of interest to developers. But > if you think saving space/bandwidth this way is a bad idea, I'll put them into > the main package. Create a -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 20:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222670] Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172057.l0HKvlDm019265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksudoku - Sudoku game Alias: ksudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222670 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:02:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172102.l0HL2nHn019663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-01-17 16:02 EST ------- My question was rather about formal procedures, but I made suggested fixes anyway. Current version (proper category and man page mapping): http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster.spec http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/zrzut/isomaster-0.7-2.src.rpm I will try to manage a Fedora Account at the weekend (maybe I will recall a password to my GPG key earlier :) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172131.l0HLVTeV021873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-17 16:30 EST ------- My bad. I removed the .so move stuff but clipped two lines that created and pushed a directory. The files have been updated (same URL). In this round, I also removed gcj .so files from the SDK package as they are already in the base rpm. Spec URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.vermillionskye.com/eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172133.l0HLXpqg022060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-17 16:33 EST ------- Yeah, you could create a -doc subpackage. I personally don't think it's really worth it. The docs amount to about 25k when they are compressed in the rpm, and about 120k on disk. Thats not really worth the overhead of another package IMHO. If you do want to keep them in another subpackage, I think -doc makes more sense than devel. If they are in a devel package people might think they need that devel package to do any development, rather than just being full of docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:36:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172136.l0HLamdp022485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-17 16:36 EST ------- * A quick look at the spec file shows that Group: and URL: are remnants from cgdb. * it doesn't seems to use directly glib2, so maybe the BR for gtk2-devel is sufficient * in my opinion, you could remove the leading 'A' from summary, and 'for minimal WMs'. * Once again %{_datadir}/gmrun/gmrunrc is not to be marked with %config. * the %{_datadir}/gmrun/ directory is unowned. * the default config file should be tuned a bit for fedora and apropriate dependencies should be added. In fact I think that it could be easier to rewrite the config file from scratch and add the upstream one in %doc In my opinion, the best integration would be achieved by calling xdg-open on every URL and on any file, whatever its extension is. Currently it is not possible to specify a default handler for url or files. Maybe upstream could be convinced to add that possibility to the config? In the mean time, I think that every entry in the config file should be handled with xdg-open. For URL_*, could be like: URL_http = xdg-open %u URL_mailto = xdg-open %u URL_man = xdg-open %u URL_info = xdg-open %u URL_pd = xdg-open %u URL_file = xdg-open %u URL_readme = xdg-open %u I removed URL_sh, I don't think it is that clever to handle such URI. Maybe some %u should in fact be %s, please adjust. And for EXT:*: EXT:txt,cc,cpp,h,java,html,htm,epl,tex,latex,js,css,xml,xsl,am,doc,rtf,ps,pdf = xdg-open %s The terminal should better be xterm in my opinion given the target of gmrun. * There is a missing BuildRequires on popt. (Hopefully on popt-devel once it is split). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172156.l0HLuqlR024253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-01-17 16:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > So you can remove py-numeric, tcl-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel from (Build)Requires Done. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL-2.0.2.01-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:57:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172157.l0HLvFa7024310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-17 16:57 EST ------- ====REVIEW CHECKLIST==== * rpmlint not silent: E: audacious-plugin-fc no-changelogname-tag E: audacious-plugin-fc unknown-key GPG#b8af1c54 - package naming guidelines met - spec file name matches %%{name} * packaging guidelines not met: - missing %%changelog entries in spec file - (slightly different build root from the preferred one) - Package licensed with GPL compatible license - %%doc section OK - spec written in American English - spec file legible (only you should remove in the %%install section "mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" - it's not necessary; and as mentioned above, %%changelog missing) - source match upstream (613c456b525d0f5ebce912a981e57264 audacious-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2) - builds successfully on at least i386 FC6 - all build dependences listed - locales handled properly (none present) - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all its directories - dirs not owned is owned by required package(s) - no duplicates - file permissions set properly - contains proper %%clean section - macros used consistently - package contains code - no large docs - no -devel subpackage - no pkgconfig files - no libraries with suffix, no static libraries - not a GUI app - package does not own dirs or files owned by other packages - builds in mock ====Things need to be done==== Add %%changelog section to your specfile: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 You should change build root to the prefered one: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 As mentioned above, you should remove from the %%install section "mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". It is not necessary. I am not sponsored. This pre-review is to help me get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 21:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172159.l0HLxlag024624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-01-17 16:59 EST ------- I mailed to devels of warzone and I have got a answer that the run version 2.0.5 on x86_64 is impossible and they are working to fix it in v2.1. I can see some solutions: 1. The package is accepted with ExcludeArch (and it will be removed when it will run on 64-bits). 2. The package is "waiting" for next release. 3. I can try to patch it, but I have not x86_64 and it is very hard, because the devels wrote me that running is imposs., so there is a lot of code to changing (my programming skills might be insufficient). If anyone can see other way, please write it. (In reply to comment #18) > Have you tried starting it up via SSH with X11 forwarding? ("ssh -X") It would > be *dead* slow, but at least it should boot up. I have not any access to ppc machine, the "build test" was did by one person on IRC (thanks to him) >therefore my > current recommendation is to exclude x86_64 for now, add it to "devel", and file > a bug report against warzone2100 detailing the 32-bit-windows-to-64-bit-linux > pointer issues (see Bug #158646 for an example). I can not a publish the package in FE without block "FE-ACCEPT". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 22:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172238.l0HMcUJt030052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-17 17:38 EST ------- Almost there. Just fix the lines beginning with an X: MUST: X rpmlint on eclipse-changelog srpm gives this as output W: eclipse-changelog non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) Let's change this to Development/Tools as per: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525#c5 * package is named appropriately * specfile name matches %{name} * package meets packaging guidelines. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in package and marked with %doc you'll need to include a copy of epl-v10.html and mark it with %doc in the %files section * specfile written in American English * specfile is legible * source files match upstream * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 (it's building on the other arches in Fedora Core presently) > please wait for the CDT bug to be filed regarding investigating building on > all arches and then add its URL to the comment * BuildRequires are proper * no locale data so no find_lang necessary * package is not relocatable * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions are fine; %defattrs present * %clean present * macro usage is consistent * package contains code * no large docs so no -doc subpackage the doc plugins aren't usable outside of Eclipse so there's no point marking them as %doc * %doc files don't affect runtime * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * no pkgconfig or header files * no -devel package * no .la files * no desktop file * not a web app. * file ownership fine * final provides and requires are sane $ rpm -qp --requires eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.i386.rpm /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2.0 java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcj_bc.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libz.so.1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) $ rpm -qp --provides eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.i386.rpm changelog.jar.so eclipse-changelog = 1:2.3.3-3 SHOULD: X package does not include license text * package builds on i386 (and others in brew ATM ... I don't envision a problem here) * package functions in Eclipse (on FC6 ... not much has changed in rawhide in the Eclipse stack so I don't anticipate anything rawhide-specific) X package builds in mock my mock setup doesn't seem to be working but I don't anticipate any problems here as the package currently builds fine in brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 22:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221031] Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172245.l0HMjQ3o030702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyOpenGL - Cross platform Python binding to OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221031 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-01-17 17:45 EST ------- In the description you write " The binding is created using the SWIG wrapper generator" but in build.log in the mock build the following error appears: swig -version unable to execute swig: No such file or directory swig1.3 -version unable to execute swig1.3: No such file or directory sh: swig: command not found sh: swig1.3: command not found warning: build_w: Can't find SWIG, will just have to do with the existing wrapper source. So maybe you need to add swig to your BuildRequires. But I don't know whether this would be better or not, do you know? Also there are a lot of gcc warnings in the compile log, some seem to be swig related but there are also some others. Please report them upstream if not already done. I can attach the build.log if you did not compile it in mock youreself. There are also a lot of lines like "package init file 'OpenGL/scripts/__init__.py' not found (or not a regular file)" - Does this need to be fixed? You did not update So maybe you need to add swig to your BuildRequires. But I don't know whether this would be better or not, do you know? Also there are a lot of gcc warnings in the compile log, some seem to be swig related but there are also some others. Please report them upstream if not already done. I can attach the build.log if you did not compile it in mock youreself. There are also a lot of lines like "package init file 'OpenGL/scripts/__init__.py' not found (or not a regular file)" - Does this need to be fixed? You did not update http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/PyOpenGL/PyOpenGL.spec (it is still release 1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 22:46:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172246.l0HMkHdQ030779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-17 17:46 EST ------- While it has its drawbacks in the form of yum having to download filelists XML, the least intrusive way I'm aware of to currently require "a browser which uses Mozilla plugins and loads them from %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" (I'm not sure if that's the goal here) is to use "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins". See eg. bug 131247, bug 207613, and gnash, HelixPlayer, and opensc packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 22:48:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222347] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172248.l0HMm3XS030968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222347 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-17 17:47 EST ------- http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-January/msg00017.html http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/install-infos/g-wrap.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 22:56:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172256.l0HMubOK031842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc3 |devel ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-01-17 17:56 EST ------- New packages will land in devel, not FC3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:04:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172304.l0HN47vC032460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-01-17 18:03 EST ------- Change Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/xmms-fc/audacious-plugin-fc-0.1.tar.bz2 to Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/xmms-fc/audacious-plugin-fc-%{version}.tar.bz2 So you do not need to change the Source with every new version. Consider changing the release-tag to: Release: 1%{?dist} See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag And I noticed, that the other audacious plugins in extras have audacious-plugins (plural) as prefix not only audacious-plugin (singular), e.g. audacious-plugins-arts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:06:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172306.l0HN65rw032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory at aqsis.org 2007-01-17 18:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > * Compilation flags > - Well, please look at the build log. > This spec file: > 1. Once compile at %build stage using scons. At this time > compiler uses Fedora specific compilation flags. > 2. Next at %install stage, scons tries to compile all targets > once more!! At this stage, compiler does not use Fedora > specific compilation flags, so this is wrong. > > ? Doesn't scons accept the argument like --skip-build at > install stage like usual "setup.py" written in python? > ? Or are there any way to avoid twice compilation? > - If not, move all compilation using scons to %install stage, > compiling twice is redundant. This is a regression of a problem we had before. The problem is reintroduced by the 'fix' to a comment a couple of posts above, about removing the specification of CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for the 'install' pass. By removing those, the command line to the compiler changes, which SCons sees as a dependency change, so rebuilds all files with the new command line. The only way round this is to leave the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS declarations in the 'install' pass so that the settings seen by SCons are identical to those used during the 'build' pass. Paul Gregory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221310] Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172306.l0HN6dIV032624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2007-01-17 18:06 EST ------- pushed for devel and fc6, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:08:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172308.l0HN8HxD000327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-01-17 18:08 EST ------- Consider renaming it to audacious-plugins-itouch because this fits to the naming scheme of the other audacious plugins in extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172309.l0HN9dnt000368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-17 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > While it has its drawbacks in the form of yum having to download filelists XML, > the least intrusive way I'm aware of to currently require "a browser which uses > Mozilla plugins and loads them from %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" (I'm not sure if > that's the goal here) is to use "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins". > > See eg. bug 131247, bug 207613, and gnash, HelixPlayer, and opensc packages. Well, I have not made up my mind fully about that. Temporarily I added "Requires: firefox", as Ralf suggested, but neither his nor yours solution I see as ideal. Now I prefer the first one, assuming, that most fedora users have firefox installed and thus it will work for most people as intended. If I used "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" it would solve one problem, while other would arise. If a user has not got installed a package which owns this directory, which one yum picks up? I don't suppose it'll ask you which one do you want. I think the best solution would be, as suggested in bz #131247, a standalone package which would own these directories and would be required by all packages that write to or read from these directories (e.g. firefox and totem-mozplugin). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:32:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172332.l0HNWoQS003530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-17 18:32 EST ------- All valid points. * changed "Buildroot" * changed "Source" * added %changelog for this revision * changed %install Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/audacious-plugin-fc.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/audacious-plugin-fc-0.1-2.src.rpm * "audacious-plugins" is a collection of multiple plug-ins, where the sub-package names are inherited from the main package. Instead, the packager could have named the sub-packages "audacious-plugin-foo" explicitly. This package contains a single plugin, and its upstream name is audacious-plugin-fc, too. * %{?dist} can be added in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172340.l0HNemJS004078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-01-17 18:40 EST ------- If this package should be renamed, then audacious-docklet also needs to be renamed. If this package is going to be renamed, we still should add Provides: and Obsoletes: for audacious-itouch to allow easy upgrading of 3rd party packages. I don't think renaming this package is really necessary. According to the naming guidlines an addon package "should prepend the "parent" package in its name, in the format: %{parent}-%{child}." IMHO Using audaciuos as parent is perfectly ok. Using audaciuos-plugins would indicate that this package stricktly depends on audacious-plugins instead of audacious itself. The only reason for this package to depend on audacious-plugins is that the plugins package owns the dir this plugin is installed to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 17 23:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701172356.l0HNu56D005275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ynakam at hitachisoft.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 00:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180007.l0I07Jkf005803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 josef at toxicpanda.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com 2007-01-17 19:07 EST ------- Commited to CVS and built properly, closing with NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 00:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180009.l0I09GvS005905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 00:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180010.l0I0A5vr005967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 00:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180034.l0I0YAKH007493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ynakam at hitachisoft.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 00:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223154] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223154 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Net-Domain-TLD.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Net-Domain-TLD-1.65-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this module is to provide user with current list of available top level domain names including new ICANN additions and ccTLDs. This module is an optional dependency for perl-Email-Valid's tests, and since its a tiny little thing with no deps outside of perl, here it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 01:45:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180145.l0I1j4od010762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-01-17 20:45 EST ------- Ok, you guys convinced me; now there's only one package for everything, no subpackages. (Though I still somehwat cringe at the idea of wasting people's disk space, even if it's only 100k) New stuff: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 01:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180148.l0I1mGfZ010896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-17 20:48 EST ------- Oh, my bad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 01:56:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180156.l0I1u20x011169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-17 20:55 EST ------- ok. Keep in mind that if someone is really tight on disk space they can always install with '--excludedocs' and not have to worry about them. :) I see no further issues, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 02:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180214.l0I2Exhl011869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 03:01:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180301.l0I31c7b013210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-01-17 22:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) 1. ok. 2. ok. 3. ok. 4. ok. Yeah, libgsf-gnome-devel was split off recently in devel. 5. ok. 6. ok. 7. ok. All makes sense. 8. ok. 9. >> 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release. >> Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package? >> That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated. > >Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash- docs. Well, for instance if you have Requires: gnucash-docs = 2.0.1 now, you can upgrade the main package without needing docs updates until the next time they update the docs. I don't know how often upstream updates the main package without the docs also being updated however, so this might not be worth the trouble. A few additional items: - There is a 'Requires: qbanking'. Nothing currently provides that... Should that be 'aqbanking'? Any particular version? - Oddly the changes you made in the rpath disabling seem to have fixed whatever I was seeing with the smp_mflags not working. This cuts buildtime here from about 70min to about 23min. Can you confirm adding smp_mflags works now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 03:13:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180313.l0I3Du4e013860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-17 22:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #37) > > * Compilation flags > > - Well, please look at the build log. > > This spec file: > > 1. Once compile at %build stage using scons. At this time > > compiler uses Fedora specific compilation flags. > > 2. Next at %install stage, scons tries to compile all targets > > once more!! At this stage, compiler does not use Fedora > > specific compilation flags, so this is wrong. > > > This is a regression of a problem we had before. The problem is reintroduced by > the 'fix' to a comment a couple of posts above, about removing the specification > of CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for the 'install' pass. For this package, avoiding double compiling is more important. So if there is no other easy way to avoid this, please readd CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS on %install stage (and leave a comment about this on spec file) By the way, again, doesn't scons have the option like "--skip-build", which most "setup.py" scripts written in python have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 04:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180425.l0I4P1dk019388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-01-17 23:24 EST ------- hi, - for fisrt: i checked out your spec file and...it doesn't meets with extras Packaging Guidelines. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Theres are a lot of things to review in your SPEC file, a lot of things must be fix. %{distro} can be remove, %{?dist} do the same thing. #policy,gui subpackages are build only when arch is "noarch" --> why don't you set them to noarch in spec file ? your source0 must be point to the full path to verify the tarball. you use cd and cd .. to enter and exit from an subfolder, you can use pushd to enter and popd to exit. your desktop-file-install command miss some option such as mode and -add-categories. there is a lot of macros which's not in the right place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 05:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:28:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180528.l0I5S8qd025694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-01-18 00:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > This file is tuned for static linking, unfortunately, in that > > it links libraries which libtorrent.so.0 is linked against > > already. > > Hmm. I was under the [apparently mistaken] impression that forcing the use of > the system zlib would offset that from the ./configure script. A patch is underway. Actually, it properly uses "-lz" in the libtorrent.pc file when built and installed in the buildroot; so such a patch is unneeded. It's just the as-shipped libtorrent.pc that contains the zlib.la usage. $ grep Libs /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc Libs: -L${libdir} -lz -lboost_date_time -lboost_filesystem -lboost_thread -lz -ltorrent $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc rb_libtorrent-devel-0.11-3.i386 For the file naming stuff, I renamed everything to include "torrent"; and have sent a message to the upstream development list with regards to this. Other stated issues are fixed in release 3. Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent-0.11-3.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 05:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223154] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180549.l0I5n2Do027997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223154 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-18 00:48 EST ------- Clean, nothing much to say about it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 07:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:13:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180713.l0I7DUbB002201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-18 02:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I mailed to devels of warzone and I have got a answer that the run version 2.0.5 > on x86_64 is impossible and they are working to fix it in v2.1. I'm glad to see you've contacted upstream about this. :-) Do they have any estimated release dates or progress indicators? Perhaps some of the fixes already exist in CVS/SVN somewhere? I can see some > solutions: > 1. The package is accepted with ExcludeArch (and it will be removed when it will > run on 64-bits). This is basically much what I meant in comment #18, only with a specific "64-bit issue" bug report against the package after it has been accepted. So this is the course of action we'll take if no-one opposes the idea. > 2. The package is "waiting" for next release. IMHO this wouldn't solve anything really. > 3. I can try to patch it, but I have not x86_64 and it is very hard, because the > devels wrote me that running is imposs., so there is a lot of code to changing > (my programming skills might be insufficient). It's not impossible, but it's certainly time-consuming and non-trivial. Not having access to an x86_64 box to play around with doesn't help, either. > I have not any access to ppc machine, the "build test" was did by one person on > IRC (thanks to him) Indeed, thanks. Could you possibly ask him to just quickly test whether the program actually runs on PPC (considering it *does* actually compile on x86_64 also, with a few tweaks). > > >therefore my > > current recommendation is to exclude x86_64 for now, add it to "devel", and file > > a bug report against warzone2100 detailing the 32-bit-windows-to-64-bit-linux > > pointer issues (see Bug #158646 for an example). > I can not a publish the package in FE without block "FE-ACCEPT". > See the next sentence in that comment: "...it might be solved quicker if the package is accepted for devel/i386 and ppc". This would be the "FE-ACCEPT". ;-) The only real blocker for me at this stage (scanning through this quickly) is whether the program actually runs correctly on PPC. Please ask your ppc contact to verify this, or ask fedora-extras-list for assistance. After we have confirmation, I'll do a 2nd review and approve the package for i386 and PPC if it is fit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 07:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180718.l0I7IC9b002508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-01-18 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Thank you for comment. > %{distro} can be remove, %{?dist} do the same thing. Removed %{distro}. >#policy,gui subpackages are build only when arch is "noarch" >--> why don't you set them to noarch in spec file ? I wanted to make noarch.rpm not i386.rpm for doc and gui subpackage, but it seems that such sub packages are usually build as i386.rpm in fedora. So I removed %if s related to noarch, it is more simple. >your source0 must be point to the full path to verify the tarball. Fixed. >you use cd and cd .. to enter and exit from an subfolder, you can use pushd to enter and popd to exit. Fixed. > your desktop-file-install command miss some option such as mode and -add-categories. Fixed, add "-add-categories". > there is a lot of macros which's not in the right place. I looked at macros section of package guide line, but I am not sure what you mean. Can you tell me one example? Other fixes: - Added forgotten BuildRequires for libselinux,libsepol. - Added %{?_smp_mflags} to make New SPEC and SRPM: * SPEC http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec * SRPM http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.8.beta6.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 08:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180813.l0I8DhUN005309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-18 03:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > >#policy,gui subpackages are build only when arch is "noarch" >--> why don't you > set them to noarch in spec file ? > > I wanted to make noarch.rpm not i386.rpm for doc and gui subpackage, > but it seems that such sub packages are usually build as i386.rpm in fedora. Right, this is impossible. All packages being built from a common src.rpm share the same arch. More comments: - MUSTFIX: Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS: ... gcc -c -Wall -O2 -g -DDEBUG=1 -I../include -I/usr/include/selinux lex.yy.c .. - SHOULDFIX: Incorrect include directory -I/usr/include ... cc -Werror -Wall -W -I/usr/include -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../include -I/usr/include/selinux -Dfc6 -c -o seedit-restorecon.o ... Passing -I/usr/include is a mistake. You should never pass -I/usr/include. - MUSTFIX: Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit is unowned. The seedit package must known this directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 08:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180814.l0I8EV17005344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-18 03:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - MUSTFIX: Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit is unowned. > The seedit package must known this directory. s/known/own/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 08:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180850.l0I8oP9C006962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-01-18 03:50 EST ------- /me votes for "%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" as that scheme is used by other packages already and makes it possible to create a spin with gxine, but without firefox -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 09:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180918.l0I9I89g009393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-18 04:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > /me votes for "%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" as that scheme is used by other > packages already and makes it possible to create a spin with gxine, but without > firefox Well, I will think about it. But about the spin you talk about - you can have gxine without firefox installed. The "Require: firefox" is in the -mozplugin subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 09:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701180938.l0I9c1Nu013701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-01-18 04:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > /me votes for "%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" as that scheme is used by other > > packages already This doesn't work do to bugs in rpm (Ville: Does this still apply, or this rpm finally been fixed). > Well, I will think about it. But about the spin you talk about - you can have > gxine without firefox installed. The "Require: firefox" is in the -mozplugin > subpackage. The problem is not firefox, the problem is removing "%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" the directory, when it's not needed anymore. That is what I wrote a couple of days ago in another package's review: - If several packages share a common directory, and if they depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, then letting the "root package" own this dir is sufficient. - If they don't depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, all of the packages must own this directory. The former doesn't apply to gxine-mozplug => Only the latter is applicable. "Requires: firefox" would be a hack to force the former approach, though this, strictly speaking is incorrect and too strict (It's the same "hack" why packages providing *.pc must "Require: pkgconfig" and packages providing aclocal/*.m4 must "Require: automake". Both these "Require"-ments are hacks/band-aids and actually wrong, but provided rpm persists to be unfixed/unmaintained, these are "easy hacks"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 10:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181011.l0IABfvo015507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-18 05:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > The problem is not firefox, the problem is removing "%{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" > the directory, when it's not needed anymore. > > That is what I wrote a couple of days ago in another package's review: > > - If several packages share a common directory, and if they depend on each other > in a strict hierarchy, then letting the "root package" own this dir is sufficient. > - If they don't depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, all of the packages > must own this directory. > > The former doesn't apply to gxine-mozplug => Only the latter is applicable. > > "Requires: firefox" would be a hack to force the former approach, though this, > strictly speaking is incorrect and too strict (It's the same "hack" why packages > providing *.pc must "Require: pkgconfig" and packages providing aclocal/*.m4 > must "Require: automake". Both these "Require"-ments are hacks/band-aids and > actually wrong, but provided rpm persists to be unfixed/unmaintained, these are > "easy hacks"). > So what do you suggest then? If the "Requires: firefox" is incorrect hack and "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" won't work due to some bug in rpm? Or did I misunderstand your post? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 10:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181040.l0IAeKlf017739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory at aqsis.org 2007-01-18 05:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > For this package, avoiding double compiling is more important. > So if there is no other easy way to avoid this, please readd > CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS on %install stage (and leave a comment > about this on spec file) > > By the way, again, doesn't scons have the option like > "--skip-build", which most "setup.py" scripts > written in python have? No, SCons is a very different tool to the Python packaging tools. Basically it builds a complete dependency tree. The install depends on the build, and if the build options change, the build has to be redone. There are actually two options. 1) As mentioned, replace the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS settings for the install phase to ensure that the build options are identical. 2) Skip the 'build' phase altogether, the dependency setup for the 'install' phase will ensure it builds before installing. Whichever is most appropriate, the result will be the same. Paul Gregory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 10:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181044.l0IAiPia018334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-01-18 05:44 EST ------- Ok, so I looked into all packages I am aware of that need %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins and except for totem-mozplugin all has "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins". So I decided to follow the common way of requiring it and changed my package accordingly. New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SPECS/gxine.spec New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SRPMS/gxine-0.5.10-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 11:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 06:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181124.l0IBOTPX022110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 06:24 EST ------- Well, anyway please upload a new spec and srpm so that I can check it again. Also, please read my comment 38. This is required for getting sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 11:59:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 06:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181159.l0IBxts5023485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 06:59 EST ------- A bit clean up. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kazehakase.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kazehakase-0.4.3-4.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------- * Thu Jan 18 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.3-4 - Do not call autoconf, just fix configure. * Sat Dec 23 2006 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.3-3 - Add firefox version dependency for gecko engine -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 12:26:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181226.l0ICQoqZ024779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-01-18 07:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - MUSTFIX: Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit is unowned. > The seedit package must known this directory. s/known/own/ more info: your directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit should look like this --> %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ where your defined python_sitelib must set above with something like this: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c 'from distutils import sysconfig; print sysconfig.get_python_lib()') > >#policy,gui subpackages are build only when arch is "noarch" >--> why don't you > set them to noarch in spec file ? > > I wanted to make noarch.rpm not i386.rpm for doc and gui subpackage, > but it seems that such sub packages are usually build as i386.rpm in fedora. >Right, this is impossible. All packages being built from a common src.rpm share >the same arch. i meant to set subpakage section to "buildarch: noarch" more comment: vendor option in desktop-file-install should set to vendor "" set it to fedora is not required any more. in %post policy: touch %{_datadir}/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-init --> %{_datadir}/%{name}/sepolicy/need-init same thing for the other below. %doc should be place just after %defattr macros and on the same line. missing argument: %files -f %{name}.lang see Handling Locale Files section in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 12:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181251.l0ICpVCc027500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 13:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181303.l0ID3mS2028671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-18 08:03 EST ------- > /include/libtorrent/asio/ssl Ah, yes. > $ grep Libs /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc > Libs: -L${libdir} -lz -lboost_date_time -lboost_filesystem > -lboost_thread -lz -ltorrent should read: $ grep Libs /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc Libs: -L${libdir} -ltorrent Because libtorrent is linked against zlib and boost already, see: ldd /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.0 Not a big issue, though. The pkgconfig file should tell what is necessary to compile with and link with libtorrent, not tell what libtorrent was built with. This is a mistake done by several upstream projects. They squeeze everything, which was used for building libtorrent, into the "Libs" line. The full set of -lfoo options is only needed for static linking (or special forms of linking). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 13:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181321.l0IDL9LI030007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 13:24:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181324.l0IDOYOQ030394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 214193, which changed state. Bug 214193 Summary: sip: upgrade to 4.5.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214193 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 13:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181334.l0IDYNkn031225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-01-18 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > [deji at agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm > > E: aqbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci > > - aqbanking needs to also 'Provides: aqhbci' > > How does this help? Anything that actually used the old aqhbci will > not work even if this did provide it - different ABI, different interface, > different paths to the binaries used. I believe this falls under the '[not] a > compatible enough replacement' category of the provides/obsoletes draft. > The way I always read Obsolete/Provides is that its meant for people installing the software, not programs using it. Thus if someone doesn't know aqhbci had been obsoleted type 'yum install aqhbci', he'll get aqbanking because of Provides. > > Uploaded as -14. Look like you inadvertently use the %doc macro under aqbanking files section again, that will clean out the directory before packaging it ;). Just listing the directory without the %doc will do. I believe the package is OK after doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 13:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181336.l0IDaZ7T031392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2007-01-18 08:36 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 15:12:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181512.l0IFC7lX006948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-18 10:12 EST ------- "* A quick look at the spec file shows that Group: and URL: are remnants from cgdb." Sigh. /Bangs head against the wall. "* it doesn't seems to use directly glib2, so maybe the BR for gtk2-devel is sufficient" Indeed. gtk2-devel REQ glib2-devel. Done. * xdg-open Seems too heavy for me. Correct if I'm wrong, but doesn't xdg-open requires an active browser to handle the different URLs? As I'm targeting, well, my Laptop (P2/366, 256MB) I'm doing my best (in IceWM/gmrun/idesk) to remove unnecessary dep-chains and keep things as-lean-as-possible. * BuildRequires on popt. Missed it in the configure output. Done. * Thu Jan 18 2007 - 0.9.2-3 - Fix wrong group and project URLs. - Fix summery, description. - Remove BR: glib2-devel. (REQ by gtk2-devel). - Add BR: popt - Remove gmrunrc from %%config section. - Set gmrunrc to 0644 (by default it's 0600) - Configure gmrunrc to better handle Fedora URI's. - Add REQ: htmlview. (gmrunrc) - Add REQ: xterm. (gmrunrc) Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun-0.9.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 15:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181541.l0IFfZiU009257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-01-18 10:41 EST ------- I suggested to rename the package not because of the guidelines but because it is confusing for me as a user that the plugins for audacious do not have a consistent naming scheme. I did not know that audacious-plugins-* are all from the same package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 15:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181557.l0IFvGPl010725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2007-01-18 10:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt.spec SRPM URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt-0.3-1.src.rpm Upstream (me) released new version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 16:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181650.l0IGoUqm015602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-01-18 11:50 EST ------- Here is the most recent spec and srpm. http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.spec http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.2.alpha2.src.rpm I will send in another review request soon and let you know about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181704.l0IH4x5C016525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-18 12:04 EST ------- Almost there. Just fix the lines beginning with an X: MUST: * rpmlint on eclipse-cdt srpm gives no output * package is named appropriately * specfile name matches %{name} X package meets packaging guidelines. BuildRoot incorrect. As per this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot it should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Also, you have %{dist} where that should be %{?dist}. X license field matches the actual license. because CPPUnit is still CPL, it has to be: License: EPL/CPL You need to speak to upstream to get them to re-license the cppunit plugin(s) * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in package and marked with %doc you'll need to include a copy of epl-v10.html and cpl.html and mark them with %doc in the files section. Just put them in the cdt core and/or the cdt sdk feature directories. * specfile written in American English * specfile is legible * source files match upstream upstream doesn't provide a source tarball but instructions on how to generate are provided; I can't reproduce the tarballs exactly using these intructions (size differences), but a diff of the exploded contents gives nothing. * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 (it's building on the other arches in Fedora Core presently) > please file a bug in Red Hat bugzilla to investigate building on all arches > also, please file a bug with upstream regarding this; we don't care if they > _provide_ builds on other platforms than they do now, but it should at least > be buildable on all arches. * BuildRequires are proper * no locale data so no find_lang necessary * package is not relocatable * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions are fine; %defattrs present * %clean present * macro usage is consistent * package contains code * no large docs so no -doc subpackage the doc plugins aren't usable outside of Eclipse so there's no point marking them as %doc * %doc files don't affect runtime (N/A) * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * no pkgconfig or header files * no -devel package * no .la files * no desktop file * not a web app. * file ownership fine X final provides and requires are sane $ rpm -qp --provides eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm cdt_linux.jar.so com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools_0.0.6.jar.so cppunit.jar.so libpty.so libspawner.so org.eclipse.cdt.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.launch_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.make.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.make.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.gnu.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so org.eclipse.cdt.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so eclipse-cdt = 1:3.1.1-7 $ rpm -qp --provides eclipse-cdt-sdk-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm eclipse-cdt-sdk = 1:3.1.1-7 $ rpm -qp --requires eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh eclipse-platform eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2.0 gdb java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.64 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.64 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libgcj_bc.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libz.so.1 make rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) X do we need a Requirement on gcc? $ rpm -qp --requires eclipse-cdt-sdk-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm eclipse-cdt = 1:3.1.1-7 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 SHOULD: X package includes license text see my comments above about including the EPL and CPL texts as html in the feature directories * package builds on i386 ... and others in brew ATM; I don't envision a problem here) * package functions in Eclipse X package builds in mock my mock setup doesn't seem to be working but I don't anticipate any problems here as the package currently builds fine in brew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181706.l0IH6sAi016800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 12:06 EST ------- Umm.. > ExcludeArch: x86_64 So the suggestion by Nicolas on comment 34 and comment 35 are gone? Nicolas says that with a patch this package can be build on x86_64. And.. please increase the release, keep the order for Changelog!! Decreasing release number during review make it hard for reviewers to check what is actually changed. Please check the suggestion by Nicolas and resubmit a new spec/srpm, with keeping release order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222347] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181724.l0IHO3Ja017919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222347 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-18 12:23 EST ------- Thanks, fixed. -9 uploaded. Note: the currently-in-development version of gnucash moves from g-wrap to swig for its guile bindings; when that version is added to the development tree, g-wrap will be orphaned, as nothing else uses it. I'll still maintain it for older trees that need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181726.l0IHQO6N018091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-01-18 12:26 EST ------- * CXXFLAGS: I checked it back when you first pointed it out. Nothing too major. Mostly added warning and reduced C/Cxx bloat. The permissive and no-exceptions are... a bit odd, but neither seem to pose any danger. * "What about asking upstream for a possibility to have something like menuprog, but which is called only when starting icewm?" I think I have a better solution (at least short-term one): By default icewm-session tries to execute the "startup" script (if it exists) within the user's .icewm directory. While not perfect, I should be able to create a default script that will use the icewm-xdg-menu.py to generate static menu items. However, such a solution may require recursive bash scripting and I rather take the time to think about it. (Plus, an ideal script should also generate the icon-line for each and every menu item). * "did you check the trademark issues with redhat-web-browser artwork?" OK. I vented it with my sponsor and the icon is GPL. No problems there. However, I decided it's useless the pack the icon twice. I just added redhat-artwork to REQ and pointed the toolbar/menu to the original icon(s). * GPL/LGPL: Somehow I got the idea that the xdg menu script was GPL, and therefore I decided to switched everything to GPL to keep everything kosher. Can't seem to find it now. My mistake, I guess. Switching back to LGPL. * Signature: Bad habit of mine. It helps me locate my own posts in long threads. * Tue Jan 18 2007 - 1.2.30-6 - Change license back to LGPL. - Change summery. - New sub-package: -gnome. (GNOME menu support.) - Missing REQ: xterm. - Missing REQ: htmlview. - Remove redundant %%_sysconf section. - Remove redundant redhat-xxx icons. - New REQ: redhat-artwork. (icons) - Better man pages handling. - Customize keys to better match fedora. - New REQ: eject. (keys) - New REQ: alsautils. (keys) Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:26:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222388] Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181726.l0IHQd2N018131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucash - personal finance management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222388 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-18 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > >> 9. It looks like the docs aren't released for each main gnucash release. > >> Perhaps it would make sense to split them into a gnucash-docs package? > >> That would save people 10MB of update when just gnucash was updated. > > > >Not sure how it helps when you have the main package always requiring gnucash- > docs. > > Well, for instance if you have Requires: gnucash-docs = 2.0.1 now, you > can upgrade the main package without needing docs updates until the next > time they update the docs. I don't know how often upstream updates the > main package without the docs also being updated however, so this might > not be worth the trouble. Hm, possibly. Let me see how much pain it is to split, shouldn't be too much. > A few additional items: > > - There is a 'Requires: qbanking'. Nothing currently provides that... > Should that be 'aqbanking'? Any particular version? See currently-under-review aqbanking package - it's split off. > - Oddly the changes you made in the rpath disabling seem to have fixed > whatever I was seeing with the smp_mflags not working. This cuts buildtime > here from about 70min to about 23min. Can you confirm adding smp_mflags > works now? I'll need to test - I've still seen errors where the guile bindings/C libraries get out of sync and fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222522] Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181742.l0IHgxs8019420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-01-18 12:42 EST ------- Re: %doc - I've tested it, the doc build as it's there now seems to work fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 17:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181755.l0IHts3p020602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Aqsis - 3D |Review Request: aqsis - 3D |Rendering system |Rendering system ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 12:55 EST ------- (Just renaming...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 18:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181800.l0II0uSU020939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 13:00 EST ------- Please close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE when importing is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 18:02:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181802.l0II2or3021037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 13:02 EST ------- Well, actually more than one month is passed since I received a comment from you. I will close this bug if I cannot receive a comment from you within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 18:04:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181804.l0II4Id0021121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 13:04 EST ------- ping again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 18:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181808.l0II8Ll6021290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-01-18 13:08 EST ------- As requested, I included Nicolas suggestions. Thanks Nicolas btw. http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.spec http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.7.alpha2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 18:24:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181824.l0IIOlnC022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 19:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181911.l0IJBMGi025916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-18 14:11 EST ------- Well, for -0.7: * Please mark %config as %config(noreplace) unless you have a reason you don't want to. * I checked the tarball insize your srpm (-0.7), however, it differs from the one I can get from the URL written as Source0?? tarball in srpm: size 1012133 md5sum 7d0add63c9cd52ab2c6dbb79a8490d37 tarball from URL: size 1012006 md5sum ed944a63d74a528dc8df91068e63456f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 19:19:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222070] Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181919.l0IJJjJx026791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prewikka - Prelude IDS Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222070 tscherf at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 19:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181941.l0IJfx22028691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-18 14:41 EST ------- * source files match upstream (but see below) $ md5sum smolt-0.3.tar.gz\?format\=raw sources/smolt-0.3.tar.gz ec06dc7c2f680bb8b433153e9ce33a25 smolt-0.3.tar.gz?format=raw ec06dc7c2f680bb8b433153e9ce33a25 sources/smolt-0.3.tar.gz $ sha1sum smolt-0.3.tar.gz\?format\=raw sources/smolt-0.3.tar.gz b8c3162714ca5631bc5104635e86e8d7c7cebb62 smolt-0.3.tar.gz?format=raw b8c3162714ca5631bc5104635e86e8d7c7cebb62 sources/smolt-0.3.tar.gz * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fc6 i386). * package installs properly. * rpmlint says: E: smolt no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install %install needs to start with "rm -rf %{buildroot}" W: smolt no-%build-section Please add, even if it's empty. E: smolt non-executable-script /usr/share/smolt/client/reboot.py 0644 E: smolt non-executable-script /usr/share/smolt/client/systemid.py 0644 E: smolt non-executable-script /usr/share/smolt/client/errata.py 0644 This is because there's "#!/usr/bin/python" lines in the files. They can either be dealt with in the .spec file with something like this: %{__sed} -i -e '/^#!/,1d' or since you are the upstream it's probably better to make the change there and release a new version. E: smolt zero-length /etc/sysconfig/hw-uuid It would probably be better to mark this as %ghost W: smolt-server no-documentation When you write some documentation you can add it ;). Until then we can ignore... * %check is not present; There is no test code in the distribution. * no shared libraries are present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers * no unversioned .so file * no pkconfig file * no libtool .la droppings. Needs fixing: * I'd recommend for the URL rather than a pointer to the main project page. * The URL specified for the source doesn't work directly, instead this is the URL that gets you the actual package. Unfortunately that won't work for the source line. https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/smolt/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/smolt-0.3.tar.gz?format=raw * smolt package needs to Require wget * I would recommend a slight modification to the %post script: if ! -s %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/hw-uuid then /bin/cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/hw-uuid /bin/chmod 0644 %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/hw-uuid /bin/chown root:root %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/hw-uuid fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 19:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701181943.l0IJh1iU028833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 20:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182013.l0IKDOje032367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From jjohnstn at redhat.com 2007-01-18 15:13 EST ------- Packages updated at same URLs. (In reply to comment #12) > Almost there. Just fix the lines beginning with an X: > > MUST: > * rpmlint on eclipse-cdt srpm gives no output > * package is named appropriately > * specfile name matches %{name} > X package meets packaging guidelines. > > BuildRoot incorrect. As per this: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot > > it should be: > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > Done. > Also, you have %{dist} where that should be %{?dist}. > Done. > X license field matches the actual license. > > because CPPUnit is still CPL, it has to be: > > License: EPL/CPL > Have changed to: Eclipse Public License / CPL rpmlint doesn't like the combination, but individually, each license above is valid to rpmlint. > You need to speak to upstream to get them to re-license the cppunit plugin(s) > > * license is open source-compatible. > X license text included in package and marked with %doc > > you'll need to include a copy of epl-v10.html and cpl.html and mark them with > %doc in the files section. Just put them in the cdt core and/or the cdt sdk > feature directories. > Done. > * specfile written in American English > * specfile is legible > * source files match upstream > upstream doesn't provide a source tarball but instructions on how to > generate are provided; I can't reproduce the tarballs exactly using these > intructions (size differences), but a diff of the exploded contents gives > nothing. > * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 (it's building on > the other arches in Fedora Core presently) > > > please file a bug in Red Hat bugzilla to investigate building on all arches > > also, please file a bug with upstream regarding this; we don't care if they > > _provide_ builds on other platforms than they do now, but it should at least > > be buildable on all arches. > > * BuildRequires are proper > * no locale data so no find_lang necessary > * package is not relocatable > * package owns all directories and files > * no %files duplicates > * file permissions are fine; %defattrs present > * %clean present > * macro usage is consistent > * package contains code > * no large docs so no -doc subpackage > the doc plugins aren't usable outside of Eclipse so there's no point marking > them as %doc > * %doc files don't affect runtime (N/A) > * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. > * no pkgconfig or header files > * no -devel package > * no .la files > * no desktop file > * not a web app. > * file ownership fine > X final provides and requires are sane > > $ rpm -qp --provides eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm > cdt_linux.jar.so > com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools_0.0.6.jar.so > cppunit.jar.so > libpty.so > libspawner.so > org.eclipse.cdt.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.launch_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.make.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.make.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.gnu.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > org.eclipse.cdt.ui_3.1.1.200701181121.jar.so > eclipse-cdt = 1:3.1.1-7 > > $ rpm -qp --provides eclipse-cdt-sdk-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm > eclipse-cdt-sdk = 1:3.1.1-7 > > $ rpm -qp --requires eclipse-cdt-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm > /bin/sh > /bin/sh > eclipse-platform > eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2.0 > gdb > java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.64 > java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.64 > libc.so.6 > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) > libdl.so.2 > libgcc_s.so.1 > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) > libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) > libgcj_bc.so.1 > libm.so.6 > libpthread.so.0 > librt.so.1 > libz.so.1 > make > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > X do we need a Requirement on gcc? > Per offline conversation, I have required gcc-c++, automake, and autoconf. > $ rpm -qp --requires eclipse-cdt-sdk-3.1.1-7.i386.rpm > eclipse-cdt = 1:3.1.1-7 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > SHOULD: > X package includes license text > see my comments above about including the EPL and CPL texts as html in the > feature directories Ok. > * package builds on i386 > ... and others in brew ATM; I don't envision a problem here) > * package functions in Eclipse > X package builds in mock > my mock setup doesn't seem to be working but I don't anticipate any problems > here as the package currently builds fine in brew > Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 20:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182022.l0IKM9KZ000962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2007-01-18 15:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt.spec SRPM URL: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/smolt/smolt-0.4-1.src.rpm - New upstream version - Altered post install section - Added wget requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 20:33:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182033.l0IKXmR6002587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-18 15:33 EST ------- >From comment#39 Michael Schwendt seems to say it is better not to build x86_64 (that what i've understood - i noted i need to submit a bug about this somewhere). It was also discussed in the aqsis forum... I'm not sure a bugzilla.redhat.com bug entry can be done when the package is in review. I've just submitted it on the aqsis bugtracker @cgtobi : pleased to help! May i ask if neqsus if supposed to be submitted reviewes ? (Blender exporter for aqsis). http://download.aqsis.org/testing/MISC/neqsus/neqsus-2006-10-28.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 20:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222547] Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182038.l0IKcaYj003295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobby - Blobby Volley 2, a volley-ball game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222547 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-01-18 15:38 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 20:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182055.l0IKt4v9005888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From rds204 at zepler.net 2007-01-18 15:55 EST ------- Just a note: I haven't died. Laptop death and exams are getting in the way! I'll be back soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 21:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182105.l0IL5wlL008028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-01-18 16:05 EST ------- APPROVED Thanks, Jeff! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 21:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208898] Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and control applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182106.l0IL6XEL008185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and control applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208898 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-18 16:06 EST ------- I wonder if this should be closed, based on what I see on my rawhide system: [mclasen at localhost ~]$ rpm -q bluez-gnome bluez-gnome-0.6-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 21:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182125.l0ILPJnL010408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-18 16:25 EST ------- OK, rpmlint says this: W: smolt dangerous-command-in-%post chmod W: smolt-server no-documentation I think that both of those can be ignored. The only remaining issue is the URL of the tarball. The URL in the source tag didn't change but I don't see the tarball up on the smolt trac wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 21:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182133.l0ILX14n011254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2007-01-18 16:32 EST ------- I've uploaded the URL to hosted. Do I need to find raw-hosting space to get it into extras or will this do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 21:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222994] Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182152.l0ILqbvJ012724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koverartist - Create CD/DVD covers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-18 16:52 EST ------- Next round (vendor is still "fedora" in /usr/share/applications/fedora-koverartist.desktop): Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/koverartist/koverartist-0.5-5.fc6.src.rpm Changelog: - some cleanup in description - dropped X-Fedora in desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 22:06:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182206.l0IM6i9U014165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-01-18 17:06 EST ------- Put some documentation in the .spec file about the problem until the Fedora hosted project gets it's raw webspace figured out. You can do that after/before import. Now that the tarball is available somewhere I'll mark this as APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 22:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223154] Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182211.l0IMBGvI014549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Domain-TLD - Work with TLD names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223154 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-01-18 17:11 EST ------- Committed and built for all active dists, thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 22:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182227.l0IMR4Nc016354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-01-18 17:27 EST ------- idesk would only work if the user puts an .idesktoprc in his home. But I don't know how to put this in the spec. Strange group for this package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 22:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182230.l0IMUF7k016930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-18 17:30 EST ------- Looks like there are problems with this package ... http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-bindings&m=109368643306526&w=2 qtc has long since gone and the only version I can find won't even come close to compiling. I'm going to abandon this package and close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 22:58:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182258.l0IMwI1r020120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2007-01-18 17:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-3.src.rpm Fixes the above, but I must disagree, find lang does find languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 23:30:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182330.l0INUxFs022029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-01-18 18:30 EST ------- Don't forget to add: in build step... libdir=%{_libdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 23:34:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182334.l0INY6vO022330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 18 23:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701182347.l0INliK2023623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-01-18 18:47 EST ------- Not building in mock: checking for flex... no checking for lex... no checking for bison... no checking for byacc... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-ranlib... ranlib checking for perl... perl checking for perl version greater than or equal to 5.6.0... yes checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... no checking upnp/upnp.h usability... yes checking upnp/upnp.h presence... yes checking for upnp/upnp.h... yes checking for UpnpInit in -lupnp... yes checking magic.h usability... no checking magic.h presence... no checking for magic.h... no configure: error: libmagic magic.h header file not found Looks like you need BuildRequires for file, gettext, flex, and byacc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 00:54:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190054.l0J0s68F026421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc5 |devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:17:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190117.l0J1Huk9027193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-18 20:17 EST ------- There is a missing requires for: /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-terminal.png but maybe there could be a more neutral default? Also from reading the docs it seems that a png in /usr/share/pixmaps/ is used automatically, it would be better to omit the path, then. Regarding the -gnome subpackage, the BuildRequires should be in the main package. The main package is the only source package, subpackages are binary packages. Source1 should be with full url. Your %attr line for icewm-xdg-menu.* isn't completly right, since the files end up being owned by the user doing the rpm build. I think it should be %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/icewm-xdg-menu.* regarding man pages and globs, you misunderstood my comment (which wasn't clear...). A line of code is better than a long explanation, so I think the best would be, in %install: install -p -m 644 doc/icewm.1.man $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1/icewm.1 And in %files: %{_mandir}/man1/icewm.1* Please remove the dot at the end of the -gnome subpackage summary. The /etc is hardcoded for the System configuration directory. To have instead %{_sysconfdir} used, you should add to %configure: --with-cfgdir=%{_sysconfdir}/icewm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:23:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190123.l0J1N4T6027333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-18 20:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > * CXXFLAGS: Right > * "What about asking upstream for a possibility to have something like > menuprog, but which is called only when starting icewm?" > > I think I have a better solution (at least short-term one): By default > icewm-session tries to execute the "startup" script (if it exists) within the > user's .icewm directory. > While not perfect, I should be able to create a default script that will use the > icewm-xdg-menu.py to generate static menu items. > However, such a solution may require recursive bash scripting and I rather take > the time to think about it. > (Plus, an ideal script should also generate the icon-line for each and every > menu item). Also it implies messing with users config file which is not very clean. > * "did you check the trademark issues with redhat-web-browser artwork?" > > OK. I vented it with my sponsor and the icon is GPL. No problems there. The copyright of the artwork is a different issue than the trademark associated with the same artwork. Anyway the issue is moot now. > However, I decided it's useless the pack the icon twice. > I just added redhat-artwork to REQ and pointed the toolbar/menu to the original > icon(s). Right (but see my comment about the path no required). > * Signature: > > Bad habit of mine. > It helps me locate my own posts in long threads. You can continue, if you find it useful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:33:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190133.l0J1XbOl027780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-18 20:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > * xdg-open > > Seems too heavy for me. xdg-open is very light, it is only a shell script. Its package (xdg-utils) only brings in indirectly libglib-2.0 which is already a dep. > Correct if I'm wrong, but doesn't xdg-open requires an active browser to handle > the different URLs? xdg-open doesn't do anything itself. It calls the right command in kde, gnome and xfce. Otherwise it tries mimeopen (a perl script from perl-File-MimeInfo) and last it tries a browser (firefox being the default browser). So I think using that script is in my opinion the most generic way of handling mimetypes (it is similar with htmlview, but more generic). Now the real question, in my opinion, is: do you want to have a Requires on perl-File-MimeInfo (or %{_bindir}/mimeopen), given that it brings in perl, in order to be sure that every file will be handled right, or do you accept poor handling of URI and files in case the user don't have a way to use the freedesktop stuff? > As I'm targeting, well, my Laptop (P2/366, 256MB) I'm doing my best (in > IceWM/gmrun/idesk) to remove unnecessary dep-chains and keep things > as-lean-as-possible. I also think this is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190154.l0J1sjbk028668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-18 20:54 EST ------- NEWS should certainly be in %doc It is a personal preference, not something mandatory at all, but I personally like to a a training / in %files for directories to show visually that it is a directory and not a file. Here it leads to %{_datadir}/gmrun/ The %attr line is wrong, root,root is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190156.l0J1u8a3028745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from inernet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 ------- Additional Comments From kingyipan at linpus.com 2007-01-18 20:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > > Read them and do the appropriate corrections Thanks for your comment, I'm sorry for my abruptness review request; I would read the fedora packageing guideline more seriousely,although i had read them one time befor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 01:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190156.l0J1um40028782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-01-18 20:56 EST ------- You still use %{__install} and install inconsistently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 02:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190238.l0J2cCCW029912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-01-18 21:37 EST ------- Some more comments before starting a real review: I have to wonder if this single 200 line source file + header is really worth packaging as a shared library. Wouldn't it be much easier to just copy these two files into the applications where it is needed ? Anyway, if we want to go ahead with this micro-package, rpmlint has some complaints: rpmlint libgimme-codec-0.0.0-1.i386.rpm E: libgimme-codec no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libgimme-codec.so.0.0.0 W: libgimme-codec no-documentation rpmlint libgimme-codec-devel-0.0.0-1.i386.rpm W: libgimme-codec-devel no-documentation E: libgimme-codec-devel script-without-shebang /usr/include/gimme-codec.h Also, Requires: %name = %{version} should be %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190336.l0J3a8Sa032162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-01-18 22:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) >- MUSTFIX: Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS: >... >gcc -c -Wall -O2 -g -DDEBUG=1 -I../include -I/usr/include/selinux lex.yy.c >.. Fixed. Modified spec file and Makefiles. >- SHOULDFIX: Incorrect include directory -I/usr/include >... >cc -Werror -Wall -W -I/usr/include -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE >-I../include -I/usr/include/selinux -Dfc6 -c -o seedit-restorecon.o >... >Passing -I/usr/include is a mistake. You should never pass -I/usr/include. Fixed. >- MUSTFIX: Directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit is unowned. >The seedit package must own this directory. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190337.l0J3b0iq032208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-01-18 22:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) >more info: >your directory /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/seedit >should look like this --> %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ >where your defined python_sitelib must set above with something like this: >%define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c 'from distutils import sysconfig; print >sysconfig.get_python_lib()') It is very useful, thanks! Fixed. >vendor option in desktop-file-install should set to vendor "" >set it to fedora is not required any more. Fixed. >in %post policy: >touch %{_datadir}/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-init >--> %{_datadir}/%{name}/sepolicy/need-init >same thing for the other below. Fixed. >%doc should be place just after %defattr macros and on the same line. Fixed. >missing argument: >%files -f %{name}.lang >see Handling Locale Files section in >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Fixed, but there is no locale file in seedit package. locale file exists only in gui subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:38:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190338.l0J3cm4N032312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-01-18 22:38 EST ------- Current spec file and src.rpm file is following: * SPEC http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec * SRPM http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.9.beta6.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223421] New: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223421 Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnome at dux-linux.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/RPMS/mrxvt.spec SRPM URL: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/RPMS/mrxvt-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: Mrxvt (previously named materm) is a lightweight, powerful multi-tabbed terminal emulator for the X window system. mrxvt is based on rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. It implements many useful features seen in some modern X terminal emulators (like gnome-terminal and konsole) but aims to be fast, lightweight and independent of standard toolkits or desktop environments (e.g. Gnome / KDE). NOTE: I have the permission from the maintainer of mrxvt to submit this package for review. It has been tested on FC6, but not on Fedora Core versions < FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223422] New: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnome at dux-linux.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/RPMS/mrxvt.spec SRPM URL: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/RPMS/mrxvt-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: Mrxvt (previously named materm) is a lightweight, powerful multi-tabbed terminal emulator for the X window system. mrxvt is based on rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. It implements many useful features seen in some modern X terminal emulators (like gnome-terminal and konsole) but aims to be fast, lightweight and independent of standard toolkits or desktop environments (e.g. Gnome / KDE). NOTE: I have the permission from the maintainer of mrxvt to submit this package for review. It has been tested on FC6, but not on Fedora Core versions < FC6. This is my first package and I need a sponsor: PLEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 03:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190357.l0J3vDUQ000964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mrxvt - |Review Request: mrxvt - |Multi-tabbed terminal |Multi-tabbed terminal |emulator. |emulator. BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 04:01:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223421] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190401.l0J41cnI001247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223421 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mrxvt - |Review Request: mrxvt - |Multi-tabbed terminal |Multi-tabbed terminal |emulator. |emulator. Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-01-18 23:01 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 223422 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 04:01:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190401.l0J41dHV001256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-01-18 23:01 EST ------- *** Bug 223421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 04:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190416.l0J4Gt4X002052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-01-18 23:16 EST ------- poker-bot has 'Requires: poker-client-lib %{version}-%{release}'. poker-client-lib is provided by the poker2d package. This means that you will have to make sure to update both poker-network and poker2d and keep the release numbers consistent. It might be better to drop the %{release} from the Requires, if that's permissible. I also get a 404 error when I try to access the poker-web web interface. This was after moving the apache.conf from poker-web into the conf.d directory of apache and restarting apache. "The requested URL /cgi-bin/php/poker-web/index.php was not found on this server." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 06:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223421] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190619.l0J6JrBa010101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223421 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 09:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701190948.l0J9mENK019882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(luya_tfz at thefinalz| |one.com) | ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2007-01-19 04:48 EST ------- Already a month. I haven;t had access to the system to resume the work being busy at the job. I will resume the package development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 10:20:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 05:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191020.l0JAKZTe021600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-01-19 05:20 EST ------- Totem wouldn't be the only application using this library, Rhythmbox, and other GStreamer-based applications would be using this library as well. It would also probably be the place where the Fedora/RHEL specific download-scripts would be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 11:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191100.l0JB0gPS025533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 11:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191106.l0JB6KqD026289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 11:06:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191106.l0JB6vvj026364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 06:06 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 220759) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 11:09:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191109.l0JB9Z3G026790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(niles at rickniles.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 06:09 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 11:17:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191117.l0JBH2ie027394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 06:17 EST ------- Hello, Yaacov: Well, long day seems to have passed without anyone looked into tihs package, so... Do you want to import to this package into Fedora Extras now? If so, please * update this package. It seems that the newese source is 1.4.8 . * and rewrite the spec file according to Fedora packaging guideline. For this package, firstly please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:22:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191322.l0JDMAhW002521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-19 08:22 EST ------- If by 2, I meant 10, then yes (darn kde-3.5.6 release!), review forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:22:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191322.l0JDMrwA002576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:23:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191323.l0JDNEPa002649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:44:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:44:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191344.l0JDiGik003883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 08:44 EST ------- (Please close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE when rebuilding is done) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191347.l0JDlhb8004789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 08:47 EST ------- ( ping? Again I think this bug can be closed... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 13:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191348.l0JDmdAu004898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-19 08:48 EST ------- Packaging-wise, pretty simple, offhand: SHOULD: +BuildArch: noarch SHOULD: the Autoreq: 0 here is dubious at best, problematic at worst, for (very) little gain. I'd recommend omitting it. MUST: make /etc/livecd owned only by (main) fedora-livecd pkg. MUST: all subpackages +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} MUST: (sub)packages installing items into /usr/share/backgrounds need Requires: desktop-backgrounds-basic (-gnome subpkg in particular) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 14:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191406.l0JE6EuO006635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-19 09:06 EST ------- First pass: MUST: package creates a useless -debuginfo package. I'd recommend adding to specfile something like: # note: includes a single statically-linked, stripped binary, # -debuginfo is pointless here %define debug_package %{nil} I'm doing a test run of livecd ... --package=fedora-livecd-desktop If all goes well, we'll be close to package approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 14:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191408.l0JE8AXs006892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-01-19 09:08 EST ------- > MUST: all subpackages +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ammendment: -gnome MUST: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -desktop MUST: either Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-gnome or Requires: %{name}-gnome = %{version}-%{release} whichever is more esthetically pleasing to you. Make these changes, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 14:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191431.l0JEVQLQ008700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From radford at robotics.caltech.edu 2007-01-19 09:31 EST ------- For consistency, I think /etc/livecd/ should be named /etc/livecd.d/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 15:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191505.l0JF5hgZ010632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-01-19 10:05 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-f6f080b4c48fe519c98a29364a740953f90179e7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 15:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201808] request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191552.l0JFqbUe014009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: request for package in extras: aria2 (command line BitTorrent client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201808 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 10:52 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221039 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 15:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191552.l0JFqcjd014024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anthonybryan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-19 10:52 EST ------- *** Bug 201808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 17:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191703.l0JH3Uuj020858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-01-19 12:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=146011) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146011&action=view) Mock build log Package fails to build in Mock. Refer to attached build log. BTW: Can you fix the white-space usage in the file section to make it more readable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 17:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223486] New: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/happy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/happy-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: [This is my first Extras contribution, and I need a package sponsor.] Happy is a parser generator system for Haskell, similar to the tool `yacc' for C. Like `yacc', it takes a file containing an annotated BNF specification of a grammar and produces a Haskell module containing a parser for the grammar. Happy is flexible: you can have several Happy parsers in the same program, and several entry points to a single grammar. Happy can work in conjunction with a lexical analyser supplied by the user (either hand-written or generated by another program), or it can parse a stream of characters directly (but this isn't practical in most cases). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 17:40:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:40:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191740.l0JHeQ2a023061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191805.l0JI5Wvb024459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-19 13:05 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-5.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jan 19 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-5 - Remove webclient from poker-web Requires - Remove %%{release} from poker-client-lib Requires for poker-bot - Fix init scripts to work for different python releases - Remove redundant python-twisted-core from BuildRequires The poker-web interface should be accessable at: http://localhost/poker-web/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191806.l0JI6uD8024552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server Alias: poker2d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-01-19 13:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d-1.0.33-3.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jan 19 2007 Christopher Stone 1.0.33-3 - Remove %%{release} from poker-network in poker-client-lib Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223490] New: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex.spec SRPM URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex-2.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Alex is a tool for generating lexical analysers in Haskell, given a description of the tokens to be recognised in the form of regular expressions. It is similar to the tool lex or flex for C/C++. [I am a new contributor, and need a sponsor.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191809.l0JI9uSP024727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |223486 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:10:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191810.l0JIA6k8024739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |223490 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 18:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191859.l0JIxA63028579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-01-19 13:59 EST ------- The package should probably be called emacs-nxml-mode according to the package naming guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-f3625ee8ad50323dbc0a2efff9344b1080f31113 The naming guidelines say emacs-common- but I suppose emacs- would be enough for this package because it doesn't work with XEmacs, and I'm not aware of anything that would change that in the foreseeable future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 19:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222959] Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191937.l0JJb49d000602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smolt - Fedora Hardware Profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222959 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2007-01-19 14:37 EST ------- Thanks for the quick response. This is imported and build. Should be on the mirrors soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 19:37:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701191937.l0JJbr2D000867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From nigde at mitechki.net 2007-01-19 14:37 EST ------- > Why is this bug even being considered when we already have: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox2 Because the wiki page actually refers to this bug as a possible solution to "How do I get firefox 2 on my FC6 system?" problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 19 20:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200701192001.l0JK1Vvv003585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-01-19 15:01 EST ------- Another update. RE %config(noreplace) As we agreed in 
From comment#28 I leave it as it is.

RE tarball sice
I used a locale SVN tarball. I marked the new RPM's to show that its a SVN
checkout. New tarball will be released soon. (I am upstream)

RE libdir
Its included now.
I also excluded x86_64 since we agreed internally to leave that for the next
release.

http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis.spec
http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-0.8.svn738.src.rpm

@kwizart: The problem with packaging Neqsus AKA BtoR si that it relays on cgkit
which isn't available as RPM, so this may become tricky.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 21:31:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:31:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and
	Visualization
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192131.l0JLVdKB010858@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-19 16:31 EST -------
Build for me for FC6 in mock.  Looks like it can't find the following:

checking for main in -lkexidb... no

  -> this is in koffice-devel

Don't know what functionality this would provide...

Also can't find:

checking for texvc... no

 -> This is part of mediawiki.  LabPlot uses it's own included version.  Not
sure if this is a big deal or not.

checking cdfrev.h usability... no
checking cdfrev.h presence... no
checking for cdfrev.h... no
checking for main in -lcdf... no

But this doesn't seem to be in Extras.  Again, no idea what this affects, just
pointing it out.

Finally:

cephes :                using included cephes library.

but this isn't packaged seperately in FE.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 22:12:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:12:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction
	Library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192212.l0JMCFBs012987@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042





------- Additional Comments From niles at rickniles.com  2007-01-19 17:12 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146041)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146041&action=view)
EMail from EPSG group

I've got both the FSF (including RMS) and the current GeoTiff maintainer Frank
Warmerdam all exchanging e-mail.  The EPSG is planning on issuing an official
statement after their next meeting ("in a few weeks").	They are working with
Frank and Stallman about the exact wording that would be acceptable.

Perhaps we can move on assuming this will all work it's way out???


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 22:12:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:12:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction
	Library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192212.l0JMCS8D013011@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042





------- Additional Comments From niles at rickniles.com  2007-01-19 17:12 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146042)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146042&action=view)
EMail from EPSG group

I've got both the FSF (including RMS) and the current GeoTiff maintainer Frank
Warmerdam all exchanging e-mail.  The EPSG is planning on issuing an official
statement after their next meeting ("in a few weeks").	They are working with
Frank and Stallman about the exact wording that would be acceptable.

Perhaps we can move on assuming this will all work it's way out???


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 22:53:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:53:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction
	Library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192253.l0JMrUMj014946@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-19 17:53 EST -------
Interesting. I hope that EPSG and FSF would make some
pleasant decision.

Then....
Well, I almost forgot my previous review, however,
* The default is "all make the option active which can
  be available".
  I forgot what option GDAL has, however, at least
------------------------------------------
	--without-netcdf \
------------------------------------------
  if you _really_ want to do for some reason,
  please explain why because netcdf is available from
  Fedora Extras.

  Well, a spec file written by me is left on
  bug 205955 comment 32.
  (For this spec file, I don't think that we should make
   "-bin" subpackage).

* Related to this, the use of internal copy of other
  libraries are forbidden on Fedora when they (the libraies)
  are available seperately.
  For example you have to submit another "libgeotiff" review
  request and make this package use libgeotiff  package
  you created.

* I forgot why -python subpackage is created, however,
  consider to make -python subpackage if it is of any
  sense.


For packaging issue :
* Well, there are several issues which must be fixed...
  please read 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 22:55:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:55:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction
	Library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192255.l0JMtGLw015001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
               Flag|needinfo?(niles at rickniles.co|
                   |m)                          |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-19 17:55 EST -------
(Well, in order to remove "NEEDINFO", once I close this bug and
 reopen. Please don't be upset....)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 22:55:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:55:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction
	Library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192255.l0JMttUZ015069@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
         Resolution|NOTABUG                     |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 23:02:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:02:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore
	Interface
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192302.l0JN2pT9015519@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-19 18:02 EST -------
(Add myself to Cc list as I want to review bug 222042.
 Please update your spec/srpm according to John)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 23:35:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:35:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] New: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting
	things from Access databases
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557

           Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
                    from Access databases
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools.spec
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools-0.5-1.src.rpm
Description: 

The MDB Tools project is a effort to document the MDB file format used in Microsoft's Access database package, and to provide a set of tools and applications to make that data available on other platforms.

Specifically, MDB Tools includes programs to export schema and data to other databases such as MySQL, Oracle, Sybase, PostgreSQL, and others.

Also included is a SQL engine for performing simple SQL queries. The 0.5 release includes an updated GUI interface (screenshot is available here). A sparse but functional ODBC driver is included as well.

MDB Tools currently has read-only support for Access 97 (Jet 3) and Access 2000/2002 (Jet 4) formats.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 23:40:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:40:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192340.l0JNeDWk017289@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-19 18:40 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-6.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri Jan 19 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-6
- Add php to poker-web Requires (php-mysql does not pull it in)
- Add patch to fix --disable-poker2d config option
- Use --disable-poker2d option to reduce manually removing some files


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 19 23:44:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:44:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701192344.l0JNil1d017504@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-19 18:44 EST -------
Ooops and one last minute reupload fix:
- Remove no longer needed BuildRequires for poker2d package


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 01:39:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:39:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200139.l0K1deHu026396@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-19 20:39 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-7.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sat Jan 20 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-7
- Create a httpd poker-web.conf file from the .htaccess file
- Remove existing htaccess and apache.conf files
- Add new apache conf to %%files in poker-web
- Make symlink to constants.php relative


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 02:08:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:08:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 208898] Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and
	control applet
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200208.l0K28E5t027127@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and control applet


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208898


mclasen at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 02:17:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:17:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for
	automated codecs installation
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200217.l0K2HOKA027534@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039





------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com  2007-01-19 21:17 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146050)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146050&action=view)
updated spec

Here is a slightly updated spec that addresses the rpmlint errors. it installs 

a .0 symlink for the library and installs the headers with proper permissions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 02:34:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:34:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for
	automated codecs installation
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200234.l0K2YmK5028038@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039


mclasen at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mclasen at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |188267
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 02:57:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:57:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for
	automated codecs installation
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200257.l0K2vQen028457@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039


mclasen at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|188267                      |188268
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com  2007-01-19 21:57 EST -------
Starting a formal review based on the modified spec:

+ rpmlint only warns about missing docs, which is fine
+ package is named according to the naming guidelines
+ spec name equal package name
+ spec follows packaging guidelines
+ license is LGPL
+ license tag matches actual license
+ tarball doesn't include license file
+ spec file is in English
+ spec file is legible
+ md5sums of upstream source matches
+ package built fine in mock
+ BuildRequires are complete
+ no locale data
+ ldconfig called in %post and %postun
+ package not relocatable
+ package owns all created directories
+ file lists contain no dupes
+ files have proper permissions, all file lists have %defattr
+ %clean is there
+ macros are used consistently
+ package contains code
+ headers are in -devel
+ -devel requires base
+ no .pc files 
+ no .la files
+ no desktop files
+ package does not own standard directories

Accepted

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 03:04:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:04:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200304.l0K34svU028611@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |fedora at christoph-wickert.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-19 22:04 EST -------
Looks good on a first glance. Stay tuned for a detailed review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 06:38:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:38:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223586] New: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program
	for KDE 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586

           Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for
                    KDE
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.3.11-1.src.rpm
Description: 
Strigi is a fast and light desktop search engine. It can handle a large range
of file formats such as emails, office documents, media files, and file
archives. It can index files that are embedded in other files. This means email
attachments and files in zip files are searchable as if they were normal files
on your harddisk.

Strigi is normally run as a background daemon that can be accessesed by many
other programs at once. In addition to the daemon, Strigi comes with powerful
replacements for the popular unix commands 'find' and 'grep'. These are called
'deepfind' and 'deepgrep' and can search inside files just like the strigi
daemon can

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 07:13:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:13:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200713.l0K7DUAV007363@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 02:13 EST -------
* xdg-open:

I stand corrected, but I tried it a couple of months ago (on my laptop) it
always seemed to start firefox when it needed to resolve a certain MIME type.
Getting a P2/366 laptop start firefox everytime you type man:pthread_create is a
-very- frustrating experience...
Now, if I could use say, elinks instead, it would have been nice.

NEWS, %{_datadir}:

Fixed.

* A couple of simple question: (More of a user-opinion)
- I'm thinking about adding xscreensaver to the dep chain.
Autostart it using startup and add Ctrl+Alt+L to activate it. (xscreensaver-command)
Do you see any problem with auto-starting xscreensaver by default?
- Second, I'm thinking about doing adding menu support to a couple of key
system-config-xxx applets. (desktop, screensaver, mouse, sound, etc)
- Third. How about adding xrdb -load ~/.Xdefaults by default?

* Sat Jan 20 2007  - 0.9.2-4
- Add missing NEWS to %%doc.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun-0.9.2-4.src.rpm

- Gilboa


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 07:14:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:14:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200714.l0K7EWfe007425@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 02:14 EST -------
... Sigh. I suck at multi-threading :(

Ignore the "couple of questions", they belong to icewm.

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 07:15:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:15:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200715.l0K7FRKA007484@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 02:15 EST -------
* Icons:

There seem to be an upstream bug about it.
While it -should- use the icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, it doesn't - a full URL
is needed to get it working.
I'll investigate it further once I finish getting the initial review out.
Either way, I'm pointing the menu and toolbar files to BlueCurve to reduce the
dep-chain to redhat-artwork. (Which, AFAIK is installed by default)

* %{__install}:

Fixed.

* Auto-generate menu:

A simple solution will be to add an entry within menu that points to another
file say, "auto-generated-menu-entry-do-not-edit".
If the user wants to disable this script he can either:
A. Delete the entry from his menu file.
B. Create his own startup script that will over-ride the "default" one.

* A couple of simple question: (More of a user-opinion)
- I'm thinking about adding xscreensaver to the dep chain.
Autostart it using startup and add Ctrl+Alt+L to activate it. (xscreensaver-command)
Do you see any problem with auto-starting xscreensaver by default?
- Second, I'm thinking about doing adding menu support to a couple of key
system-config-xxx applets. (desktop, screensaver, mouse, sound, etc)
- Third. How about adding xrdb -load ~/.Xdefaults by default?


* Sat Jan 20 2007  - 1.2.30-7
- Fix source1 URL.
- Fix xdg-menu* owner.
- Replace default terminal icon to reduce dep-chain.
- Fix icewm-gnome description.
- Replace install with %%{_install}
- Push -gnome's BR to main package.
- Change hard-coded sysconf path.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-7.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 07:18:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:18:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200718.l0K7I1Jb007620@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 02:17 EST -------
Ohm...

I'm not I understand what you mean.
Group? You are aware that this "thread" (If I understand what you mean) is
actually the iDesk package review, right?

- Gilboa


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 07:23:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:23:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200723.l0K7NaAO007967@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 02:23 EST -------
s/I'm not understand/I'm not sure I understand/g

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 08:17:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:17:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223588] New: Review Request: rudeconfig - library for
	manipulating config files 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223588

           Summary: Review Request: rudeconfig - library for manipulating
                    config files
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: matt at rudeserver.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.rudeserver.com/config/download/rudeconfig.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.rudeserver.com/config/download/rudeconfig-5.0.4-1.src.rpm
Description: 

rudeconfig is a C++ library for reading, writing and 
manipulating configuration/.ini files.

Thanks in advance for the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 08:24:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:24:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223588] Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for
	manipulating config files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200824.l0K8OLnt009497@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for manipulating config files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223588


matt at rudeserver.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: rudeconfig -|Review Request: rudeconfig -
                   |library for manipulating    |C++ library for manipulating
                   |config files                |config files




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 09:32:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 04:32:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223588] Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for
	manipulating config files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701200932.l0K9W7hM012927@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for manipulating config files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223588





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-20 04:32 EST -------
Congrats, a pretty clean package!

Disable building the static library and I'll approve it.



Minor issue: The website doesn't mention version 5.0.4 yet. ATM, the tarball
only seems to be accessible when directly accessing it (I could access and
verifiy it)

A note to upstream (seemingly you): Your configure scripts supports building
bz2-compressed tarballs - It might we worth considering to using the bz2'ed
tarball instead of the gziped versions. Spares a couple of bytes on disks/CDs etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 12:27:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:27:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223588] Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for
	manipulating config files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201227.l0KCRXrq021190@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rudeconfig - C++ library for manipulating config files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223588


rc040203 at freenet.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |rc040203 at freenet.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-20 07:27 EST -------
MUSTFIX:

- Disable building the static lib (%configure --disable-static)
  and reflect this change where needed.

- Remove commented out duplicate %configure.
  rpm expands comments which causes %configure to be invoked twice.
  If you want to use % in comments you must use %% instead of %.

COSMETICS:

- Minor typo in changelog:
  ...
  Fri Sep 2 2005 .. server.com?
  ...

  This should read ...server.com>



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 12:29:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:29:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223591] New: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI
	layout tool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223591

           Summary: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/magic.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/magic-7.4.33-1.src.rpm
Description:
Magic is a venerable VLSI layout tool, written in the 1980's at
Berkeley by John Ousterhout, now famous primarily for writing
the scripting interpreter language Tcl. Due largely in part to
its liberal Berkeley open-source license, magic has remained
popular with universities and small companies.

Magic is widely cited as being the easiest tool to use for
circuit layout, even for people who ultimately rely on commercial
tools for their product design flow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 12:49:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:49:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201249.l0KCnnOG022249@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223591





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-20 07:49 EST -------
The following rpmlints can be ignored:
E: magic script-without-shebang /usr/lib/magic/tcl/console.tcl
=> Useful for launching magic /usr/lib/magic/tcl/magicexec

W: magic hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/magic/sys/.magicrc
=> On launching magic, you can see on the tkcon main:
[..]
MOSIS Scalable CMOS Technology for Standard Rules
Processing system .magicrc file
New windows will not have a title caption.
[..]

E: magic-doc only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
W: magic-doc no-documentation
Documentation are at:
/usr/lib/magic/doc

The copyright file is /usr/lib/magic/doc/copyright.ps



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 13:25:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:25:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and
	Visualization
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201325.l0KDPnLn023351@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-20 08:25 EST -------
The original cephes-math library, http://www.moshier.net/cephes-math-38.tar.gz/
>From readme file:

   "Some software in this archive may be from the book _Methods and
Programs for Mathematical Functions_ (Prentice-Hall, 1989) or
from the Cephes Mathematical Library, a commercial product. In
either event, it is copyrighted by the author.  What you see here
may be used freely but it comes with no support or guarantee."

>From the INSTALL file:
"Precompiled libraries and programs are supplied here for ix86-linux."

I don't think that the original cephes-math library is compatible with Fedora
policies

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 13:33:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:33:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201333.l0KDXvh1023552@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 08:33 EST -------
Review for
dd8afaafb2657d6cabc43b93a7d408c8  tilda-0.9.4-3.src.rpm

FIX - rpmlint not silent on the SRPM:
W: tilda macro-in-%changelog doc
fix this by adding a second '%' to %doc: %%doc
OK - package and spec named according to the package naming guidelines
OK - package meets packaging guidelines
OK - license is open-source compatible (GPLv2)
OK - license field in spec matches actual license
OK - COPYING included in source and correctly installed in %doc
OK - spec is in American English
OK - spec is legible
OK - source in srpm matches upstream by md5
773d47e3985f7e778b662a38b053c1df
OK - package compiles and build into binaries on Core 6 i386
OK - no known ExcludeArchs
FIX - BuildRequires not correct: gettext is not required. 
FIX - ./configure checks for libXt (see config.log ~182), so you should
BuildRequire libXT-devel
Note - two redundant BRs that could be removed: glib2-devel is required by
pango-devel, gtk2-devel is pulled in by vte-devel
OK - no locales to worry about
OK - no shared libs to worry about
OK - package is not relocatable
OK - package owns all directories it creates (it doesn't create any)
OK - no duplicates in %files
NOTE - I guess tilda.png should also be installed to
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ for it is size specific
OK - file permissions and %defattr correct
OK - valid clean section
OK - macro usage consistent
OK - code, not content
OK - no large docs
OK - docs don't affect runtime
NOTE - You can remove the NEWS from %doc as long as it only tells you to look at
the README
OK - no header files, static libs or *.pc files
OK - no libtool archives
OK - desktop file included and correctly installed with desktop-file-install
FIX - add '--remove-category="Application"' to desktop-file-install as
"Application" no longer is a valid category according to 
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
NOTE - you could also add '--copy-name-to-generic-name' so we get a generic name
NOTE - consider adding a comment to the desktop file. As a quick fix use
something like 'echo "Comment=A quake like terminal for GNOME" >> tilda.desktop'
during %prep
OK - package doesn't own directories already owned by other files
OK - package builds in mock (devel)
OK - basically package works as described but there is no drop down or roll up.
Also I see a critical gtk error (" Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_resize: assertion
`height > 0' failed ").

NEEDSWORK

Please fix at least the "FIX"-issues, before I can approve the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 13:36:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:36:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201336.l0KDaKh9023601@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 08:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> BuildRequire libXT-devel

Should be libXt-devel, sorry for the typo.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 13:58:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:58:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201358.l0KDwK1G024481@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-20 08:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #27)

> Either way, I'm pointing the menu and toolbar files to BlueCurve to reduce the
> dep-chain to redhat-artwork. (Which, AFAIK is installed by default)

That seems right to me.

> * Auto-generate menu:
> 
> A simple solution will be to add an entry within menu that points to another
> file say, "auto-generated-menu-entry-do-not-edit".
> If the user wants to disable this script he can either:
> A. Delete the entry from his menu file.
> B. Create his own startup script that will over-ride the "default" one.

That's more or less how it is done for fluxbox. It seems to be right
to me. (in fluxbox the conf is directly copied into the user home
directory, I think that it is preferable to have the default shipped by
fedora in %_datadir/icewm. Also the whole menu is generated, not 
only an entry, but I modified it to have only an entry generated...).

> * A couple of simple question: (More of a user-opinion)
> - I'm thinking about adding xscreensaver to the dep chain.
> Autostart it using startup and add Ctrl+Alt+L to activate it.
(xscreensaver-command)
> Do you see any problem with auto-starting xscreensaver by default?

I don't think this should be done unless it is done upstream.
There could be a comment in startup file, however to indicate 
something along

# to have a screensaver started automatically, install the
# xscreensaver package and uncomment the following line
# xscreensaver &


> - Second, I'm thinking about doing adding menu support to a couple of key
> system-config-xxx applets. (desktop, screensaver, mouse, sound, etc)

No, they should be brought in by pyxdg or similar, if it is not the
case it should be handled at that level, such that it is also right
in fluxbox, pekwm...

> - Third. How about adding xrdb -load ~/.Xdefaults by default?

Isn't that done by session startup scripts?
I have checked, it is done in 
/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc-common

> * Sat Jan 20 2007  - 1.2.30-7
> - Fix source1 URL.

It is not completely right, since the file isn't there, if I recall well
there is no .py in the original url



Please remove the dot at the end of the -gnome Summary.

Seems like we're not far from being done. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 14:05:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:05:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201405.l0KE5X4i024920@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |fedora at christoph-wickert.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 14:33:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:33:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] New: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592

           Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
                    integration with Google calendar
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja.spec
SRPM URL: http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/wuja-0.0.5-1.src.rpm
Description: Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 14:34:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:34:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201434.l0KEYmVU026353@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592





------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com  2007-01-20 09:34 EST -------
Also, this is my first contribution for Fedora extras and as such I am in need
of a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 15:32:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:32:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201532.l0KFWUTk028030@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112





------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl  2007-01-20 10:32 EST -------
According to comment #3 MMS support is not acceptable. MMSRip without MMS support looks very 
useless to me, so should we close this review with WONTFIX?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 15:34:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:34:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201534.l0KFYB1M028057@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112


foolish at guezz.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:21:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:21:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] New: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598

           Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
                    OriginLab OPJ project files
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin-20070115-1.src.rpm
Description:
A library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:23:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:23:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and
	Visualization
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201623.l0KGNxCc029744@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027


cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|221163                      |223598




------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-20 11:23 EST -------
Looking forward to use liborigin system wide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:24:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:24:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221163] Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++
	library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201624.l0KGONUl029791@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qwtplot3d - Qt/OpenGL-based C++ library providing a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163


cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|221027                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:24:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:24:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201624.l0KGOYLE029803@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598


cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |221027
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:54:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:54:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201654.l0KGsc6o030479@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP
Alias: perldap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869


johan-fedora at deds.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 16:56:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:56:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223601] New: Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of
	reserved barewords and symbol names
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223601

           Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved
                    barewords and symbol names
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-B-Keywords.spec

SRPM URL:
ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-B-Keywords-1.05-1.src.rpm

Description:
Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names.

Note:
New requirement of Perl::Critic 0.23.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:09:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:09:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201709.l0KH9AkI030857@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP
Alias: perldap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219869


dennis at ausil.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |163779




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:23:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:23:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201723.l0KHN6Tp031437@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144


johan-fedora at deds.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:24:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:24:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for
	keyword extraction
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201724.l0KHOCV9031490@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087


johan-fedora at deds.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl  2007-01-20 12:24 EST -------
Closing this bug as NEXTRELEASE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:24:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:24:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221349] Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the
	documents on a computer
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201724.l0KHOOlq031518@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: doodle - tool to quickly search the documents on a computer


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221349


Bug 221349 depends on bug 214087, which changed state.

Bug 214087 Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:32:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:32:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201732.l0KHWuPR031694@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 12:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> idesk would only work if the user puts an .idesktoprc in his home. But I don't 
> know how to put this in the spec.

This is something we can not do with rpm. Look at your devilspie package:
Without a custom config the program is pretty much useless, too. 

All we can do is include as much information in %doc as possible. Sample files,
possibly a README.Fedora, but I don't think it's really necessary in this case,
the message  "Error: you have to create the .idesktop dir on your HOME!!" is
clear enough.


(In reply to comment #1)
> ... The description is taken from the upstream owner. 
> I'll re-phrase it in -2.

Yeah. I suggest removing the note regarding svg support, since it was removed in
0.6.

Review for
e958b9f882c088c15ad7ce5390f54664  idesk-0.7.5-1.src.rpm

OK - rpmlint silent
OK - package and spec named according to the package naming guidelines
FIX - package meets packaging guidelines, but specfile needs some tweaking:
- Group: tag "Development/Debuggers" is definitely wrong (this is what Sebastian
meant in with "strange group" in comment #3). I suggest "User
Interface/Desktops" or "User Interface/X". BTW: For comps.xml I suggest "X
Window System" or "Window Managers".
- Change URL: to http://idesk.sourceforge.net, this is more save if upstream
will change their website.
- Change Source0 to
http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
instead of heanet mirror.
- insert line wraps after max 79 characters when you rewrite %description
OK - license is open-source compatible (BSD)
FIX - license field in spec file doesn't match actual license: the included
COPYING is a BSD license, but spec file says it's GPL.
OK - COPYING included in source and correctly installed in %doc
OK - spec is in American English
OK - spec is legible
OK - source in srpm matches upstream by md5
beb48c97815c7b085e3b3d601297fbb8
OK - package compiles and build into binaries on Core 6 i386
OK - no known ExcludeArchs
FIX - BuildRequires: should have libSM-devel (./configure checks libICE and libSM)
OK - no locales to worry about
OK - no shared libs to worry about
OK - package is not relocatable
OK - package owns all directories it creates
OK - no duplicates in %files
OK - file permissions and %defattr correct
OK - valid clean section
OK - macro usage consistent
OK - code, not content
OK - no large docs
OK - docs don't affect runtime
OK - no header files, static libs or *.pc files
OK - no libtool archives
OK - no desktop file needed
OK - package doesn't own directories already owned by other files
OK - builds in mock (devel)
OK - works as described

NEEDSWORK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:39:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:39:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201739.l0KHdN8S031861@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 12:39 EST -------
OK.
All the bugs fixed.

Time to introduce new ones.
I broke the icewm-xdg-menu into a new sub-package and created a bash script that
uses its output to generate static menu files. (And locate the best matching icons)
The script itself seems to work just fine on two of my machines (Minus some wine
problems) - it should be stable enough for wide-testing.
For now, it requires manual activation. (icewm-generate-menu
_default_icon_theme_name_)

* Sat Jan 20 2007  - 1.2.30-8
- Fix source0 URL. (2nd is a winner)
- Fix -gnome summery.
- New sub-package: icewm-xdg-menu
- ALPHA: icewm-generate-menu script added to use icewm-xdg-menu to generate
static menus.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-8.src.rpm
Script URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-generate-menu


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:42:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:42:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201742.l0KHgPGw031982@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 12:42 EST -------
Oh... I didn't test it with xinit, but when I start icewm from gdm, .Xdefaults
doesn't get loaded automatically.

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 17:58:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:58:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard
	control plugin for the Audacious media player
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201758.l0KHw6fH032373@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 12:58 EST -------
I still think that audacious-itouch is a valid name for this package, since this
is the upstream name. Nevertheless - after reading the review request for
audacious-plugin-fc (bug #222648) and thinking about this more deeply, I like
the idea of getting this straight. This would also include renaming
audacious-docklet.

Yu, what you think?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 18:09:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:09:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201809.l0KI9ff1032591@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 13:09 EST -------
- Group:
My bad. I used an old spec file and forgot to clean it up.

- License:
Weird! Owner [1] claims that iDesk is GPL.
He must have switched license and forgot to update the COPYING file.
Any ideas what to do?

[1] http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Idesk-License

Either way:

* Sat Jan 20 2007  - 0.7.5-2
- Fix description.
- Fix group.
- Missing BR: libSM-devel.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk-0.7.5-2.src.rpm

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 18:11:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:11:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201811.l0KIBWE2032639@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 13:11 EST -------
Oh, Sebastian (#3)

Sorry for the mis-understanding.

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 18:25:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:25:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201825.l0KIPmhi000725@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 13:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> - License:
> Weird! Owner [1] claims that iDesk is GPL.
> He must have switched license and forgot to update the COPYING file.
> Any ideas what to do?
> 
> [1] http://idesk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Idesk-License

COPYING is definitely BSD, so are the headers. Take a look at Main.cpp for example.

If this is really GPL, you should include a copy of it as Source1 and install it
instead of COPYING. Please ask upstream first.

> Either way:
> 
> * Sat Jan 20 2007  - 0.7.5-2
> - Fix description.
> - Fix group.
> - Missing BR: libSM-devel.

Looks good so far, if the license issue is clear, I  will approve the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 18:33:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:33:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201833.l0KIXOo6000911@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592





------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com  2007-01-20 13:33 EST -------
% rpmlint wuja-0.0.5-1.src.rpm 
% rpmlint wuja-0.0.5-1.noarch.rpm 
W: wuja non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/wuja.schema
% 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 18:51:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:51:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201851.l0KIpq3j001337@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora at christoph-wickert.de
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-20 13:51 EST -------
adding bug #177841 tracker


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 19:12:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:12:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201912.l0KJC1Q7001882@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 14:11 EST -------
OK. Thanks. I'll contact the author and report back.
Other then that, iDesk/x86_64 dies a horrible death during startup - making it
i386 only for now.

- Gilboa


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 19:17:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:17:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701201917.l0KJHIXG002087@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-20 14:17 EST -------
Forgot to add:

Source0:
At least in my case
http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 doesn't
work but the heatnet mirror (or any other mirror for that mater) does work.
I can change it back to dl.sourceforge, but IMHO, it is less useful.

- Gilboa


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 20:02:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:02:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media
	server for the GNU system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202002.l0KK2ju8003472@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906





------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-20 15:02 EST -------
I fixed it, but I must fix problems with info (%post and %preun sections) before
I publish second release. I think tommorow I will upload new release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 20:08:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:08:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202008.l0KK8ufo003723@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495


squentin at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |squentin at free.fr




------- Additional Comments From squentin at free.fr  2007-01-20 15:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Trying to rebuild on devel the tests failed:
> 
> t/GstRegistry...........ok 1/21undef is not of type GStreamer::PluginFeature at
> t/GstRegistry.t line 22.

This test the presence of the alsasink from the alsa plugin

> gstreamer-0.10.11-1.fc7
> gstreamer-devel-0.10.11-1.fc7

and the alsa plugin is in gstreamer-plugins-base...

Maybe the tests shouldn't test specific plugins, or maybe GStreamer should
depend on gstreamer-plugins-base, as I'm not sure the gstreamer package by
itself is very useful.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 20:52:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:52:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202052.l0KKqkjt005068@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-20 15:52 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-8.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sat Jan 20 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-8
- Readd poker-client-lib package to this spec file
- Readd %%{release} to packages that require poker-client-lib
- Remove manual removal of files since they are all in poker-client-lib
- Update comments on rpmlint errors

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 20:53:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:53:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on
	a poker-network server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202053.l0KKrWud005102@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server
Alias: poker2d

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-20 15:53 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d-1.0.33-4.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sat Jan 20 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-4
- Move %%{_libexecdir}/poker-interface into a common subpackage
- Move locales to poker2d-common
- Move poker-client-lib back into poker-network package
- Remove Version from desktop file
- Fix up Requires and BuildRequires
- Fix descriptions for sub packages


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 21:05:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:05:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] New: Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices
	via the OBEX protocol
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618

           Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via
                    the OBEX protocol
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/obexftp.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/obexftp-0.20-1.src.rpm
Description:
The overall goal of this project is to make mobile devices featuring the OBEX
protocol and adhering to the OBEX FTP standard accessible by an open source
implementation. The common usage for ObexFTP is to access your mobile phones
memory to store and retrieve e.g. your phonebook, logos, ringtones, music,
pictures and alike.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 21:33:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:33:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard
	control plugin for the Audacious media player
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202133.l0KLXwxH005969@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256





------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name  2007-01-20 16:33 EST -------
To me it seems best to ask the packaging committee for a recomandation. Right
now it seems that "-", "-plugin-",
"-plugins-" and "--plugin" for
different packages. I would prefer "-plugins-" or
"-plugin-", this would make it easier to install all
plugins, e.g. with yum install audacious-plugins-\* while audacious-\* also
matches the devel package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 21:42:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:42:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202142.l0KLgE3W006180@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2007-01-20 16:42 EST -------
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
W: obexftp-python no-documentation
W: obexftp-perl no-documentation
W: obexftp-devel no-documentation

All safe to ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

Looks good, APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 21:42:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:42:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202142.l0KLgxJQ006238@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 22:06:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:06:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202206.l0KM6mUv006678@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-20 17:06 EST -------
%defattr missing in -perl package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 22:23:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:23:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source
	video codec
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202223.l0KMNMHA006982@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405


rpm at greysector.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-20 17:23 EST -------
Per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837
the release field should be:
Release:        5.%{cvs}cvs%{?dist}

Why is the testsuite disabled?

I don't like /usr/bin/ binaries in a package called libwhatever. Moreover, if
the source tarball is called dirac, why is the main package called libdirac?
Please put the binaries in a package named dirac

There are two redundant BuildRequires: libtool requires automake and automake
requires autoconf.

Builds fine in mock/x86_64/devel.

Shouldn't package docs be in %{_datadir}/doc/dirac-docs-%{version} ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 22:41:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:41:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202241.l0KMfUQP007375@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-20 17:41 EST -------
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...) missing as well.

Subpackages should probably be called python-obexftp and perl-obexftp instead of
obexftp-* according to package naming guidelines.

_obexftp.so.X and _obexftp.so.X.X for a Python extension are probably just
cruft, and could be replaced with a plain _obexftp.so.

%configure --disable-dependency-tracking would result in cleaner build output
and possibly speed up the build.

The minimum openobex version this works with is 1.2, making the build dep on
openobex-devel versioned (>= 1.2) would save some trouble from people using
older distros.

Requires: openobex-devel >= 1.2 missing from -devel, see #includes in installed
header files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 22:54:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:54:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] New: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627

           Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
                    switcher
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/system-switch-java.spec
SRPM URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/system-switch-java-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
Description: system-switch-java provides an easy way to select the default Java
toolset for the system.  It shells out to /usr/sbin/alternatives to
set the "java", "javac" and related alternatives.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 23:15:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:15:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and
	easy access remote resources via SMB
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202315.l0KNFv5g008416@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742





------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-20 18:15 EST -------
Sorry that you had to wait.
Rpmlint now shows:
W: fuse-smb mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 1)
but it's not a blocker.
However, I'll make it FE-ACCEPTed once you put isomaster into repo.

But it's now APPORVED in any case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 23:22:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:22:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202322.l0KNMC74008563@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557


rpm at greysector.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |rpm at greysector.net
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 23:25:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:25:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202325.l0KNPF4H008715@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-20 18:25 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-9.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sat Jan 20 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-9
- Fix init scripts, PYTHON_SITELIB substituion macro got lost
- Re-word poker-web README.Fedora file reflecting new changes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 20 23:53:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:53:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701202353.l0KNrtLV009144@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598


dakingun at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |dakingun at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2007-01-20 18:53 EST -------
Hi,

This package (its Makefile actually) needs to be patched up for rpmbuild to work
properly on x86_64. It currently hard-codes the library path to /usr/lib.
Also, can you make it use the rpm's %optflags for the CFLAGS?

An Aside: What a version number ;), can't upstream use sth simple as 1.0  

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 00:12:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:12:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for
	libtidy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210012.l0L0CqEf009559@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-20 19:12 EST -------
It has been more than two months with no comments or updates on this bug. 

Konstantin: Are you still interested in submitting this package? Please let us
know. One more week of silence on the bug and we'll have to mark it as a dead
review.

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 00:37:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:37:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] New: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster
	synchronization tool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633

           Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2.spec
SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2-1.33-1.src.rpm
Description:
Csync2 is a cluster synchronization tool. It can be used to keep files on 
multiple hosts in a cluster in sync. Csync2 can handle complex setups with 
much more than just 2 hosts, handle file deletions and can detect conflicts.
It is expedient for HA-clusters, HPC-clusters, COWs and server farms.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 01:35:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:35:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C,
	C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays,
	and reading sequence.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210135.l0L1ZQJH011070@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(kobi.zamir at gmail.c
                   |                            |om)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 01:38:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:38:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210138.l0L1cqds011140@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-20 20:38 EST -------
Umm...
Any need of using svn version tarball? If there is any strong
reason to use svn version, please tell me the reason and
write where I can get svn source.
Otherwise please use the tarball which are available from
some URL until this review is completed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 01:46:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:46:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210146.l0L1k6RD011314@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147





------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com  2007-01-20 20:46 EST -------
A seriouse bug was fixed, so I choose to use a SVN checkout instead of the tarball. As I said a new tarball 
will soon be released. Of course you can get the SVN from sourceforge.net/projects/aqsis .

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 02:19:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:19:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210219.l0L2JcQu012067@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-20 21:19 EST -------
I'm having trouble running the poker-server due to a bad mysql password.  Here's
what I've done:

 1. On a fresh box, install Rawhide with the latest updates
 2. Install mysql-server, as well as the poker-server dependencies
 3. Leave the settings in /etc/poker-network/poker.server.xml as the defaults
 3. 'service mysqld start'
 5. 'service poker-server start'
 6. Look in /var/log/poker-server.log

Expected results:

Some sort of 'poker server started' success message

Observed results:

The attached stack trace

I tried using a shorter pokernetwork password in the mysql server, as well as an
empty password, but I get the same results.  I've also tried connecting to the
mysql server as the pokernetwork user, using the password in poker.server.xml,
but that fails as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 02:20:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:20:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210220.l0L2KZPJ012117@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-20 21:20 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146068)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146068&action=view)
service startup failure log


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 02:36:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:36:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source
	video codec
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210236.l0L2a0OD012588@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-20 21:35 EST -------
SRPM:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/dirac/dirac-0.6.0-6.20070108cvs.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
SPEC:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/dirac/dirac.spec
Description: Dirac is an open source video codec 

Test-suite is not provided with this snapshoot scheme (done from remark in #6 )
same problem with qt4-encodeur gui (anyway i'm not sure we need an encoder gui
for each codec !?). if encoder_gui and test-suite are really needed the best way
to do this would be to make another snaphoot and a tarball with only theses two
wanted parts!

Encoding seems to work fine but isn't useable since playbak need to be tested...



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 04:54:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:54:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210454.l0L4sGwA015769@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-20 23:54 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146073)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146073&action=view)
updated init file

New init file that properly detects if poker-server is already running based on
the pid in the pidfile.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 06:24:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:24:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210624.l0L6OJMm018500@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 01:24 EST -------
Two other issues that I've discovered while trying to run the server:

- Attempting to create a new user account through the poker-web interface fails.
 The web interface returns a cryptic string "type = 121, code = 1, message =",
and attempts to log in using the new account fail.

- If selinux is enabled, then the web interface can't communicate with the
poker-server backend.  From the avc denial message, this appears to be because
the web interface wants to establish a TCP connection to the poker server (port
19382), which is disallowed by the standard httpd policy.

Jan 20 22:20:52 localhost kernel: audit(1169360452.415:4): avc:  denied  {
name_connect } for  pid=2460 comm="httpd" dest=19382
scontext=user_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:port_t:s0
tclass=tcp_socket


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 06:52:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:52:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701210652.l0L6qCRr018899@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Alias: phpDocumentor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502





------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com  2007-01-21 01:52 EST -------
Is there a reason that one package is called phpdoc and not
php-pear-PhpDocumentor?  The source looks to all be from PhpDocumentor.tgz.  I
realize phpdoc is the name of the binary, and can be run from the command line,
but it seems odd to me to have one source rpm produce packages of completely
different names.  

Also, is the web interface enabled by default?  I didn't see anyting in
/etc/httpd/conf.d.  I guess I thought something like

#Created for PhpDocumentor package
Alias /phpdoc '/usr/share/pear/data/PhpDocumentor'

  Options -Indexes


I am not sure if enabling this on the web by default is allowed (encouraged)
though.  




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 10:20:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:20:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211020.l0LAKpwr020277@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glade3


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 05:20 EST -------
URL?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 10:38:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:38:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler
	System
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211038.l0LAcrHH021209@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 05:38 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146082)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146082&action=view)
Amended spec file


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 10:40:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:40:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler
	System
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211040.l0LAeP0h021343@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 05:40 EST -------
You MUST have the devel file for this package. Using the spec from #21, rpmlint
is clean and it builds fine inside of mock

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 10:58:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:58:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211058.l0LAwa2Y022344@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 05:58 EST -------
Fails to build in mock. You need to add BR gtk2-devel to the spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 11:01:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:01:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221027] Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and
	Visualization
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211101.l0LB1g1W022492@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LabPlot - Data Analysis and Visualization


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221027





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 06:01 EST -------
The URL in #11 gives a 404

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 11:11:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:11:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] New: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image
	comparison utility
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657

           Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
                    utility
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: cgtobi at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/PerceptualDiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/PerceptualDiff-1.0-1.src.rpm
Description: PerceptualDiff is an image comparison utility that makes use of a computational model of the human visual system to compare two images.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 11:15:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 06:15:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211115.l0LBF6uB023105@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147





------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com  2007-01-21 06:15 EST -------
@Mamoru: Here is my other review request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 12:59:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 07:59:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211259.l0LCxQ0x026200@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mr.ecik at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-21 07:59 EST -------
It fails to build on x86_64:
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/PerceptualDiff-1.0/Metric.cpp:20:
/builddir/build/BUILD/PerceptualDiff-1.0/LPyramid.h:38:22: warning: no newline 
at end of file
/builddir/build/BUILD/PerceptualDiff-1.0/Metric.cpp:316:2: warning: no newline 
at end of file
Linking CXX executable perceptualdiff
CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/RGBAImage.o: In function 
`RGBAImage::ReadPNG(char*)':
RGBAImage.cpp:(.text+0x4e8): undefined reference to `png_read_destroy'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [perceptualdiff] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/all] Error 2


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:07:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:07:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211307.l0LD7cKo026405@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-21 08:07 EST -------
Tobi, please make yourself familiar with the Fedora Packaging GuideLines.


MUSTFIX:

- Check your BuildRequires.
  ATM, building fails right from the beginning:
...
+ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr .
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.39497: line 27: cmake: command not found
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.39497 (%build)

=> BuildRequires: cmake

- Don't use strip in %install
Remove the "strip"-line

- Broken source code, triggering warning during the build
  ... warning: no newline at end of file

- Build also fails on i386:
  ...
Linking CXX executable perceptualdiff
CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/RGBAImage.o: In function `RGBAImage::ReadPNG(char*)':
RGBAImage.cpp:(.text+0x527): undefined reference to `png_read_destroy'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [perceptualdiff] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/all] Error 2


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:21:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:21:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211321.l0LDLjEQ026695@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 08:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Fails to build in mock. You need to add BR gtk2-devel to the spec

Really?
Rebuilding scigraphica requires libscigraphica-devel (bug 220967),
libscigraphica-devel requires gtk+extras-devel, and
gtk+extra-devel requires gtk2-devel...

For me mockbuild succeeds (with libscigraphica(-devel) correctly
installed for scigraphica mockbuild).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:22:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:22:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211322.l0LDMGNY026741@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-21 08:22 EST -------
(In reply to comment #30)
> Oh... I didn't test it with xinit, but when I start icewm from gdm, .Xdefaults
> doesn't get loaded automatically.

That's strange. In /usr/share/gdm/defaults.conf:

BaseXsession=/etc/X11/xinit/Xsession

In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
. /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc-common


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:24:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:24:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211324.l0LDOiDj026857@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 08:24 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146085)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146085&action=view)
Mock build log of scigraphica-2.1.0-4.fc7

Mockbuild log of scigraphica-2.1.0-4 on FC7 i386
(for me).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:27:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:27:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211327.l0LDRMlr026983@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 08:27 EST -------
Buildsys here was updated at 7am (GMT) today which would have sucked in any
libscigraphica updates. Mock fails to build here full stop.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:35:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:35:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211335.l0LDZDWZ027095@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-21 08:35 EST -------
* In %files the second line is redundant:
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/icewm-xdg-menu*
%{_bindir}/icewm-xdg-menu*

* Instead of using your script, I think it would be better to 
  modify icewm-xdg-menu. There is already the option --entire-menu.
  I have taken a function findIcon from fluxbox-xdg-menu and added 
  --with-icons and --theme options. I think that with that patch

icewm-xdg-menu --with-icons --entire-menu 

  does the same than your script, but is faster...

* The license for icewm-xdg-menu is missing. I will contact upstream
  to submit my patch and ask him.

* there is no need to split an automenu subpackage for an additional 
  script. The changelog entry is a bit strange since it states
  sub-package: icewm-xdg-menu although the subpackage name is 
  icewm-automenu. 

* there is a missing dot at the end of the -gnome subpackage %description

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:37:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:37:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211337.l0LDb1Fb027143@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-21 08:37 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146086)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146086&action=view)
add --with-icon and --theme options to icewm-xdg-menu


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 13:54:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:54:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211354.l0LDsiUX027802@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com  2007-01-21 08:54 EST -------
Fixed build requirements and excluded x86_64

Spec URL: http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/PerceptualDiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cgtobi.de/aqsis/PerceptualDiff-1.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 14:17:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:17:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211417.l0LEHOuv029099@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-21 09:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #39)
> I'm having trouble running the poker-server due to a bad mysql password.  Here's
> what I've done:
> 
>  1. On a fresh box, install Rawhide with the latest updates
>  2. Install mysql-server, as well as the poker-server dependencies
>  3. Leave the settings in /etc/poker-network/poker.server.xml as the defaults
>  3. 'service mysqld start'
>  5. 'service poker-server start'
>  6. Look in /var/log/poker-server.log
> 
> Expected results:
> 
> Some sort of 'poker server started' success message
> 
> Observed results:
> 
> The attached stack trace
> 
> I tried using a shorter pokernetwork password in the mysql server, as well as an
> empty password, but I get the same results.  I've also tried connecting to the
> mysql server as the pokernetwork user, using the password in poker.server.xml,
> but that fails as well.

Okay, after some digging the in mysql manual I found this:
If you cannot figure out why you get Access denied, remove from the user  table
all entries that have Host values containing wildcards (entries that contain ?%?
or ?_?). A very common error is to insert a new entry with Host='%' and
User='some_user', thinking that this allows you to specify localhost to connect
from the same machine. The reason that this does not work is that the default
privileges include an entry with Host='localhost' and User=''. Because that
entry has a Host value 'localhost' that is more specific than '%', it is used in
preference to the new entry when connecting from localhost! The correct
procedure is to insert a second entry with Host='localhost' and
User='some_user', or to delete the entry with Host='localhost' and User=''.
After deleting the entry, remember to issue a FLUSH PRIVILEGES statement to
reload the grant tables.

So to fix this you have drop all anonymous users in the user table.  I will talk
to upstream about this and see what they suggest.  Might be best to change the
user creation code to use a Host of 'localhost' instead of '%'.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 14:19:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:19:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211419.l0LEJJMj029240@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 09:19 EST -------
Then, still fails on mockbuild? If so, would you
attach a mockbuild log with --debug option?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 14:43:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:43:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211443.l0LEhqtq030415@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-21 09:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Other then that, iDesk/x86_64 dies a horrible death during startup - making it
> i386 only for now.

You should not make it ExclusiveArch i386 but ExcludeArch x86_64.

Once this review is finished, open a bug with a some more info about the crash
and a blocker on bug #179259 as described in 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -> Must Items ->
ExcludeArch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 14:43:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:43:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211443.l0LEhpTD030405@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-21 09:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> * xdg-open:
> 
> I stand corrected, but I tried it a couple of months ago (on my laptop) it
> always seemed to start firefox when it needed to resolve a certain MIME type.
> Getting a P2/366 laptop start firefox everytime you type man:pthread_create is a
> -very- frustrating experience...
> Now, if I could use say, elinks instead, it would have been nice.

As I said above, with perl-File-MimeInfo installed additionally things are
better. Although 
mimeopen -n 'man:pthread_create'
leads to 
Could not determine mimetype for file: man:pthread_create. Same with
urls. Ok, so I revert what I said above. xdg-open together with 
mimeopen may be good for files, not for urls.

It works for file:, and file extensions. So maybe the patch to 
gmrunrc could have

URL_file = xdg-open %s

EXT:doc,rtf,txt,cc,cpp,h,java,html,htm,epl,tex,latex,js,css,xml,xsl,am,ps,pdf =
xdg-open %s

And some requires missing are

Requires: man, info

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 14:44:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:44:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211444.l0LEicYU030452@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-21 09:44 EST -------
- Building still fails:

CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/RGBAImage.o: In function 
`RGBAImage::ReadPNG(char*)':
RGBAImage.cpp:(.text+0x527): undefined reference to `png_read_destroy'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [perceptualdiff] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/all] Error 2

- Sources are still broken

- The build error reported for the x86_64 is identical to the one I am seeing on
i386, I am having strong doubts on whether excluding the x86_64 is the right
measure to address the building issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 15:05:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:05:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211505.l0LF5EDs030986@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-21 10:05 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.33-10.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sun Jan 21 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-10
- Add better pid file checking in init scripts
- Add FLUSH PRIVILEDGES to poker-web README.Fedora
- Add another CREATE USER statement to README.Fedora for localhost
- Add patch to properly create users in pokerdatabase.py


@wart: This version has a patch to create two user entries, one with a Host of
'%' and a second with a host of 'localhost'.  This should fix the localhost
issues, please test.  I've also updated the init scripts with your attached patch.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 15:11:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:11:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211511.l0LFBHuZ031239@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-21 10:11 EST -------
And here's the review:

 1. package doesn't meet naming and packaging guidelines, see below.

    %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} is redundant, %setup -q is enough.

    Make that line
    %{_includedir}/mdb*
    read
    %{_includedir}/mdb*.h

    Please split the GUI app into a separate package, it adds a lot of
    dependencies.
    Please split the libraries into %package -n libmdb and put LGPL in its
    License: field (see 6. below).
    Consider splitting the ODBC driver, too.

 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
 3. dist tag is present.
 4. build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 5. license field matches the actual license, but see 1.

   "Files in libmdb are licensed under LGPL and the utilities under the GPL,
    see COPYING.LIB and COPYING files respectively."

 6. license is open source-compatible (GPL/LGPL). License text included in package.
    Add COPYING.LIB to %docs.
 7. source files match upstream:
    4a18bf96e67161101cade64526756d22  mdbtools-0.5.tar.gz
 8. latest version is being packaged.
    Is 0.6pre1 not stable enough?
 9. BuildRequires are probably incomplete, you are not building the ODBC driver.
    I suggest adding BR: unixODBC-devel and --with-unixodbc=/proper/path
10. package builds in mock (x86_64/devel,fc6).
11. rpmlint warning can be fixed by adding HACKING to -devel %doc.
    W: mdbtools-devel no-documentation
12. final provides and requires are sane, but see 1.

    mdbtools-0.5-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm
     libmdb.so.0()(64bit)  
     libmdbsql.so.0()(64bit)  
     mdbtools = 0.5-1.fc7
    =
     /sbin/ldconfig  
     libICE.so.6()(64bit)  
     libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libSM.so.6()(64bit)  
     libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit)  
     libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit)  
     libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libc.so.6()(64bit)  
     libcairo.so.2()(64bit)  
     libdl.so.2()(64bit)  
     libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit)  
     libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libm.so.6()(64bit)  
     libmdb.so.0()(64bit)  
     libmdbsql.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpng12.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpopt.so.0()(64bit)  
     libpthread.so.0()(64bit)  
     librt.so.1()(64bit)  
     libxml2.so.2()(64bit)

13. shared libraries are present and handled properly with ldconfig.
14. package is not relocatable.
15. owns the directories it creates.
16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
17. no duplicates in %files.
18. file permissions are appropriate.
19. %clean is present.
20. %check is not present and no testsuite.
21. no scriptlets present.
22. code, not content.
23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
25. headers present only in -devel.
26. no pkgconfig files.
27. no libtool .la droppings.
28. GUI app, but no .desktop file.
29. not a web app.

NEEDSWORK: 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, 28.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 15:11:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:11:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211511.l0LFBd0a031265@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-21 10:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #42)
> Two other issues that I've discovered while trying to run the server:
> 
> - Attempting to create a new user account through the poker-web interface fails.
>  The web interface returns a cryptic string "type = 121, code = 1, message =",
> and attempts to log in using the new account fail.

I cannot reproduce this error here.  Can you try again with the new -10 release
package? And with selinux disabled?  I'll show it to upstream and see if they
have any ideas.


> 
> - If selinux is enabled, then the web interface can't communicate with the
> poker-server backend.  From the avc denial message, this appears to be because
> the web interface wants to establish a TCP connection to the poker server (port
> 19382), which is disallowed by the standard httpd policy.
> 
> Jan 20 22:20:52 localhost kernel: audit(1169360452.415:4): avc:  denied  {
> name_connect } for  pid=2460 comm="httpd" dest=19382
> scontext=user_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:port_t:s0
> tclass=tcp_socket
> 

>From the poker-server README.Fedora file:

poker-server uses the following IP ports:
19380 default
19381 is for SSL
19382 is for XMLRPC
18383 is for XMLRPC over SSL

So, do we need to add selinux policy rules for these ports?  In my initial
release I had something in the init scripts which I copied from one of your
packages, but it was insufficient because you need to make a policy file too
which I do not know how to do.  Should I try to contact so selinux guys to try
and fix this for me?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 15:48:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:48:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211548.l0LFm5Uh032550@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-21 10:48 EST -------
Some initial comments:

1. You should consider renaming this package to something like gnome-wuja,
gnome-applet-wuja or gnome-wuja-applet. See the 'Addon Packages' section of the
Naming guidelines for more info.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-e865dfbf5ffb4156a1bdf299ace96f48af903a7a
If you rename this pacakge you should also a a Poovides: with the original name
to make 'yum install wuja' work. This would be similar to 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes

2. change 
    /etc/gconf/schemas/wuja.schema to 
    %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/wuja.schema and
    /usr/bin/wuja to 
    %{_bindir}/wuja

absolute paths are a No-Go. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros
for a list of valid macros.

3. wuja.schema is not installed properly in gconf. You need to disable/skip
schemas install in setup.py and do this in %post, %pre and %preun. See 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-6c2101d8f810cc95c677c8c27f43573b0bc23cb1

4. You should think about stripping down the files section with wildcards, e. g.
    %{python_sitelib}/wuja/calendar.py*
    %{python_sitelib}/wuja/data/*.png
    %{python_sitelib}/wuja/data/*.glade

You could even use a minimal definition like
    %doc AUTHORS LICENSE README
    %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/wuja.schema
    %{_bindir}/wuja
    %{python_sitelib}/wuja/

Makes sense as long as you are not planning to separate parts of the package or
exclude certain files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 16:37:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:37:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211637.l0LGbpe1002202@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 11:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> RGBAImage.cpp:(.text+0x4e8): undefined reference to `png_read_destroy'

(In reply to comment #2)
> RGBAImage.cpp:(.text+0x527): undefined reference to `png_read_destroy'

This is because...
from 1.2.10 the function png_read_destroy() is moved to "internal"
function and cannot be used for dinamical linking.

You have to use libpng10 instead (in FC5/FE6/FE-devel)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 16:45:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:45:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211645.l0LGjiFX002480@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 11:45 EST -------
(Well, in comment 5 I commented that the build failure is
 due to libpng 1.2.8 -> 1.2.10, however, I met with server internal
 error and the mail may not be delivered. Please
 check my comment #4.

 And.. adding a note. As this is due to libpng 1.2.8->1.2.10 change,
 mockbuild succeeds on FC5 as FC5 libpng is 1.2.8)

 However, adding another issue.
 Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. Please check
 it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 16:46:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:46:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211646.l0LGkf9V002508@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 11:46 EST -------
Oops.. s|comment 4|comment 5|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 17:06:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:06:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211706.l0LH6WjA002998@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 12:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
>  However, adding another issue.
>  Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. Please check
>  it.

More concrete...
In CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir (created after cmake),
build.make says:
--------------------------------------
    46  include CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/flags.make
---------------------------------------
and flags.make says:
---------------------------------------
     3  
     4  CXX_FLAGS =    
     5  
---------------------------------------
  Perhaps you have to set CXX_FLAGS at some point.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 17:13:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:13:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211713.l0LHDpQt003216@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-21 12:13 EST -------
Is there any way to make this cmake stuff more verbose?

The default log messages this package prints out during compilation/linkage are
more or less useless.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 17:41:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:41:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211741.l0LHf2rv003888@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 12:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is there any way to make this cmake stuff more verbose?
> 
> The default log messages this package prints out during compilation/linkage are
> more or less useless.

Usually, removing "@" (atmark) from the top of the line in Makefile
do this. However, even I tried this, still useful verbose message 
cannot be print out.
I strongly suspect that cmake is suppressing me. "make -n" seems to
print what is to be actually done anyway. So a workaround maybe:

----------------------------------------------------------
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr .
# just to make message more verbose
sed -e 's|\(^[ \t]\)*@|\1|' ./Makefile ./CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/build.make
make -n
make %{?_smp_mflags}
----------------------------------------------------------


Another note:
By the way, please don't strip binaries as debugging info is
needed for creating debuginfo rpm (at the time rpmbuild
creates debuginfo rpm, binaries with
executable permission are stripped automatically)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 17:51:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:51:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223670] New: Review Request: granule - new release 1.2.4 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223670

           Summary: Review Request: granule - new release 1.2.4
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: 3rdshift at comcast.net
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=111131
SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=111131
Description: A release of new version. I need the bug # fillup a request for additional branch (FC-6).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 17:59:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:59:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223670] Review Request: granule - new release 1.2.4
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211759.l0LHxa1G004411@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: granule - new release 1.2.4


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223670


bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: granule -   |Review Request: granule -
                   |new release 1.2.4           |new release 1.2.4
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-21 12:59 EST -------
The original review is bug 210189.

For new CVS branches, you need only the review ticket number.
A branch for granule FC-6 exists already. If you have any
questions about processes, just ask.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 18:01:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:01:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211801.l0LI1RUO004502@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 13:01 EST -------
Oops...
the sed line should be:
---------------------------------------------
sed -i -e 's|^\([ \t]*\)@|\1|' ./Makefile ./CMakeFiles/perceptualdiff.dir/build.make
---------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 18:12:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:12:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211812.l0LICBaJ004756@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-21 13:12 EST -------
Well, I tried to svn source (rev. 738) and the source
coincides. Now for aqsis it is okay.

So as noted sponsorship is needed. I would sponsor you
when bug 223657 proceeds to some extent enough for me to
accept.
If you don't want to wait, you can still do a pre-review of
other person's review request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 18:16:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:16:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211816.l0LIGkwk004927@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-21 13:16 EST -------
> Usually, removing "@" (atmark) from the top of the line in Makefile

Thanks, but I am familiar with make ;)

I had hoped cmake to have a command line option or similar to switch its output
into something useful and was not just printing out silly "Building ... k.o"
messages - Apparently, I was wrong.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 19:06:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:06:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on
	a poker-network server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211906.l0LJ6KUt006390@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server
Alias: poker2d

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 14:06 EST -------
I've just started looking at this in order to test poker-network, and have come
across a few quirks:

 - poker2d throws an error if sound is not enabled on the host machine.  It
would be nice if it could print a warning a continue on:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerclient2d/poker2d.py", line 145, in run
    config = config)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerclient2d/poker2d.py", line 197, in
__init__
    self.initDisplay()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerclient2d/poker2d.py", line 280, in
initDisplay
    factory = self)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerclient2d/pokerdisplay2d.py", line
324, in __init__
    pygame.mixer.init()
error: No available audio device


 - I haven't been able to find a way to specify which poker server to use
outside of editting the poker2d.xml file.  This means that in order to use my
own poker server, I have to start up poker2d, exit, edit poker2d.xml, then start
poker2d again.  A command line option or in-game menu option to set the poker
server would be useful.

 - Attempting to select the 'High Quality Graphics' option from the in-game menu
throws an error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerclient2d/poker2d.py", line 65, in
simulate
    Gtk2Reactor.simulate(self)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/internet/gtk2reactor.py", line
216, in simulate
    self.runUntilCurrent()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 539, in
runUntilCurrent
    self._insertNewDelayedCalls()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 505, in
_insertNewDelayedCalls
    for call in self._newTimedCalls:
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerui/pokerinterface.py", line 107,
in event
    data = self.handleMenu(data[1:])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerui/pokerinterface.py", line 580,
in handleMenu
    self.publishEvent(INTERFACE_MENU, data[0], data[1])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/dispatch.py", line 61, in
publishEvent
    cb(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerui/pokerrenderer.py", line 1615,
in handleMenu
    settings.headerSet("/settings/glow", value)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/pokernetworkconfig.py",
line 64, in headerSet
    result = pokerengineconfig.Config.headerSet(self, name, value)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokerengine/pokerengineconfig.py", line
147, in headerSet
    results[0].setContent(value)
IndexError: list index out of range


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 19:28:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:28:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211928.l0LJSjHM007232@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 14:28 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146095)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146095&action=view)
error log from poker-bot

/var/log/poker-bot.log containing error messages after starting poker-bot.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 19:31:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:31:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211931.l0LJVG37007319@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 14:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #45)
> (In reply to comment #42)
> > Two other issues that I've discovered while trying to run the server:
> > 
> > - Attempting to create a new user account through the poker-web interface fails.
> >  The web interface returns a cryptic string "type = 121, code = 1, message =",
> > and attempts to log in using the new account fail.
> 
> I cannot reproduce this error here.  Can you try again with the new -10 release
> package? And with selinux disabled?  I'll show it to upstream and see if they
> have any ideas.

Problem found:  There is a minimum limit of 5 characters for usernames.  This
error should be reported more clearly in the web interface.

> > - If selinux is enabled, then the web interface can't communicate with the
> > poker-server backend.  From the avc denial message, this appears to be because
> > the web interface wants to establish a TCP connection to the poker server (port
> > 19382), which is disallowed by the standard httpd policy.
> > 
> > Jan 20 22:20:52 localhost kernel: audit(1169360452.415:4): avc:  denied  {
> > name_connect } for  pid=2460 comm="httpd" dest=19382
> > scontext=user_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:port_t:s0
> > tclass=tcp_socket
> > 
> 
> From the poker-server README.Fedora file:
> 
> poker-server uses the following IP ports:
> 19380 default
> 19381 is for SSL
> 19382 is for XMLRPC
> 18383 is for XMLRPC over SSL
> 
> So, do we need to add selinux policy rules for these ports?  In my initial
> release I had something in the init scripts which I copied from one of your
> packages, but it was insufficient because you need to make a policy file too
> which I do not know how to do.  Should I try to contact so selinux guys to try
> and fix this for me?

I've passed this along to the fedora-selinux-list to ask for suggestions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 19:43:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:43:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time
	strategy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701211943.l0LJhM9E007549@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065





------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-21 14:43 EST -------
One test is done. In mail from mailing list (fedora-extras-list) we can read:
"Seems to start up and looks OK.[...]" (dwmw2), so it work (I do not know how
fast/slow, but it runs).
I think it can be approved for i386 and ppc.
Probably in a few days I will receive results of a second test.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 20:27:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:27:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221906] Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media
	server for the GNU system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212027.l0LKRRnx008634@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gmediaserver - UPnP compatible media server for the GNU system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221906





------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-21 15:27 EST -------
New URLs:
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver.spec
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/gmediaserv/gmediaserver-0.12.0-2.src.rpm

I read configure.ac and added more BRs.
I had to fix info, because it did not install correctly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 20:31:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:31:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time
	strategy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212031.l0LKVVGG008778@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065





------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-21 15:31 EST -------
I receive result of second test:
"I've got PowerPC box, and I tried to play with your SRPM today -
everything looks OK. [...] In any case i found no troubles."

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 20:41:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:41:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212041.l0LKfhKd009334@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Alias|                            |tango-icons-extras




------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-21 15:41 EST -------
[ Adding alias; though "tango-icon-theme-extras" exceeds the 20-character limit. ]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 21:11:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:11:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212111.l0LLBlOK010335@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592





------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com  2007-01-21 16:11 EST -------
Thanks for the feedback. Package updated incorporating the suggestions,
wuja.spec remains at the same location.

SRPM's new URL is:
http://dangerouslyinc.com/files/wuja/gnome-applet-wuja-0.0.5-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 21:24:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:24:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212124.l0LLOmke010636@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841              |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-21 16:24 EST -------
Hi Chris,

Since you have been sponsored by jkatz before, I'll remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker.

* RPM name is OK
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint looks OK
* File list looks OK
* debuginfo rpm looks OK

Needs work:
* Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)

Please also fix the points Bernard noted in comment #1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 21:49:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:49:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212149.l0LLnwlN011146@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 16:49 EST -------
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools.spec
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools-0.5-2.src.rpm

All except the desktop file has been address. I know 0.6pre1 is available, but
it has quite a bit of code problems and I'd rather get 0.5 into FE before
starting to hack around with 0.6pre1

odbc was a swine!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 22:17:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:17:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212217.l0LMH2tT011590@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 17:17 EST -------
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools.spec
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools-0.5-3.src.rpm

desktop file issue fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 23:41:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:41:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212341.l0LNfHW9013387@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-21 18:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...) missing as well.

Any... pointers to some docs on that? I've searched through packaging guidelines
and there's nothing about that. I only found some old IRC logs mentioning this,
but nothing tangible.

> Subpackages should probably be called python-obexftp and perl-obexftp instead
> of obexftp-* according to package naming guidelines.

Perl naming guidelines say that only about CPAN-originated modules. Plus we have
lots of other packages named something-perl, for example openbabel (also mine).

> _obexftp.so.X and _obexftp.so.X.X for a Python extension are probably just
> cruft, and could be replaced with a plain _obexftp.so.

I don't know much about python. Are you sure I can do that?

> %configure --disable-dependency-tracking would result in cleaner build output
> and possibly speed up the build.

OK.

> The minimum openobex version this works with is 1.2, making the build dep on
> openobex-devel versioned (>= 1.2) would save some trouble from people using
> older distros.
> 
> Requires: openobex-devel >= 1.2 missing from -devel, see #includes in
> installed header files.

OK.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 23:42:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:42:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223724] New: Review Request: fvwm - window manager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724

           Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/fvwm.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/fvwm-2.5.21-1.src.rpm
Description: ICCCM-compliant multiple virtual desktop window manager

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 21 23:51:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:51:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701212351.l0LNpNPT013670@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-21 18:51 EST -------
%package libmdb
This was supposed to be
%package -n libmdb
You can call the subpackage -libs, too. IOW: either libmdb or mdbtools-libs.
Looks like the latter might be a better idea.

ldconfig is not called for every subpackage with libs in %{_libdir} now. Instead
you're calling it in the main package which no longer has any libs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 00:55:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:55:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220055.l0M0tNxc015259@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-21 19:55 EST -------
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools.spec
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mdbtools-0.5-4.src.rpm

Fixes the ldconfig problem

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 02:08:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:08:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython -  Java source interpreter
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220208.l0M28brA017614@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Jython -  Java source interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898


green at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2007-01-21 21:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Okay, I've (finally!) taken care of the two issues above.  Here's the new spec
> and SRPM:

rpmlint now complains about the explicit libreadline-java dependency, but I
think this must be a bug in rpmlint.  So... APPROVED!  

Be sure to close this bug once you've pushed the package out.  Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 02:35:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:35:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220235.l0M2Ze2p018429@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 21:35 EST -------
GOOD
====
* rpmlint output:
E: poker-network no-binary
  - poker-network is a library used by poker-server and others.  The
    lack of a binary is not an error.
E: poker-server non-readable /etc/poker-network/poker.server.xml 0600
  - This file contains passwords for the server.  It must have these
    permissions.
E: poker-network-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package
  - This should go away once the package becomes noarch (see MUSTFIX)

* Source matches upstream
  18538c17d8ab9796bd6cda846076a398c5f152a0  poker-network-1.0.33.tar.gz
* package and spec file named appropriately
* GPL license ok, license file included
* spec file legible and in Am. English
* Compiles and builds on FC6-i386, FC6-x86_64, FC7-i386, FC7-x86_64.
  Fails to build on FC-5 due to missing python-twisted-web
* BR: look sane
* File contents look ok
* No locales (removed during install)
* No static or shared libs
* Not relocatable
* Directory ownership ok
* Duplicate license file in %files lists for subpackages, but I don't consider
  this a problem. 
* No need for -doc subpackage
* %doc doesn't appear to be needed at runtime.
* No .desktop file needed
* Packages run on FC7-i386 (other platforms/arch not tested)

MUSTFIX
=======
* Upstream bug #1454 that will allow this to be a noarch package.
* Create a 'poker' user for running the server for better security
* /usr/share/doc/poker-network-1.0.33/NIHPHOBIA is cute, but not really
  necessary, is it?
* Don't use %{version} in the patch filenames.  The version in a patch
  filename is supposed to reflect the package version when the patch
  was first introduced, not the current package version.

SHOULD
======
* Add selinux policies to poker-server for better security
* Patch tests/Makefile.in and configure in poker-network-1.0.33-config.patch
  so that you don't have to call 'autoreconf' during %build.  Hopefully
  upstream will adopt this patch in a new release so that it becomes a
  moot point.
* Use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir}/init.d
* Use double quotes around the sed regsub pattern to avoid potential
  problems if %{python_sitelib} were to ever contain a space.

NOTES and Questions
===================
* poker-network and poker2d (BZ #222612) use the same upstream source
  tarball, but different spec files.  My understanding is that this is
  so that poker-network can be marked as 'noarch', while poker2d will contain
  arch-specific bits.  As far as I am aware, there are no problems
  using the same source file for two different spec files, aside from
  duplication in the resulting srpm.
* Why does the package contain a x509 certificate for 'webmaster at localhost'?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 02:38:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:38:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220238.l0M2c00S018522@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972


wart at kobold.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 02:41:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:41:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220241.l0M2fOL3018655@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-21 21:41 EST -------
One more SHOULD item:
* Document the dependency of the currency type on the server url in
  poker.bot.xml.  This seems to be a common source of confusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 04:09:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:09:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223746] New: Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223746

           Summary: Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious.spec
SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious-0.10.2-1.fc6.src.rpm

Description: 

Epilicious is an extension for the Epiphany web browser that lets you 
synchronise Epiphany and Delicious bookmarks.

Package builds in mock. 

rpmlint output: 
E: epiphany-extensions-epilicious only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

This package places files, including files that really should be in /usr/share, into the epiphany extention dir, which is in /usr/lib/epiphany/extensions/. The epiphany-extensions package itself does put data files in /usr/share, but I haven't been able to make this extension work doing that. Ignoring this rpmlint message is therefor the only solution I've been able to find. Suggestions are very welcome.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 04:11:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:11:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223746] Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220411.l0M4BeAb021725@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223746





------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net  2007-01-21 23:11 EST -------
Upstream tarball is not including a copy of the GPL, don't know if this is a
blocker or not. I have contacted upstream trying to change this. README refers
to an online copy of the GPL.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 04:41:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:41:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220441.l0M4f1SS022532@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2007-01-21 23:40 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Buildsys here was updated at 7am (GMT) today which would have sucked in any
> libscigraphica updates. Mock fails to build here full stop.
It seems to me (from the tone of the message) that you think libscigraphica is
in Extras tree already; but the review (bug #220967) is still waiting on you.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 04:53:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:53:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223601] Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved
	barewords and symbol names
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220453.l0M4rPTN023276@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223601


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 04:53:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:53:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220453.l0M4re2n023316@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 05:44:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:44:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220544.l0M5iGvU025609@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-22 00:44 EST -------
I got mock build problem
*** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
*** KDE requires autoconf 2.52,2.53 or 2.54

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 05:57:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:57:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223601] Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved
	barewords and symbol names
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220557.l0M5vbZZ026047@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223601


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-22 00:57 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
f8b40e7dc864fc27fc69638e58cc651c  B-Keywords-1.05.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/01pod.............ok
t/02pod-coverage....ok
t/03yaml............ok
t/04boilerplate.....ok
t/10basic...........ok
t/11keywords........ok
All tests successful.
Files=6, Tests=14,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.30 cusr +  0.05 csys =  0.35 CPU)

-APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 06:16:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:16:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220616.l0M6GETt026919@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682





------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com  2007-01-22 01:15 EST -------
Hi,

New spec file:

http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link.spec

New SRPM:

http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/dbi-link/postgresql-dbi-link-2.0-0.4.beta1.src.rpm

Regards, Devrim

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 06:43:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:43:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time
	strategy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220643.l0M6hRJk027735@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065


faucamp at csir.co.za changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za  2007-01-22 01:43 EST -------
Thanks for requesting the tests. Now at least we are sure. :-)

MUST items:
 * rpmlint output:

W: warzone2100-data no-documentation --- can be ignored, silent otherwise

 * package is named well
 * spec file is named well
 * package meets Packaging Guidelines
 * package license is GPL, COPYING file included
 * License field in spec file matches actual license
 * license file is included in %doc
 * spec file is written in American English and legible
 * package source md5sum matches upstream source:

56e83a64d5b7aa60ced3d7ac7281bb42  warzone2100-2.0.5.tar.bz2

 * package builds successfully on fc6/i386, PPC
   (PPC builds not done by me, but tested throughout review)
 * BuildRequires are good
 * package handles locales properly (no locales)
 * package has no need for %post and %postun sections
 * package is not relocatable
 * package owns directories it creates
 * no duplicate entries in %files
 * file permissions are good
 * proper %clean section
 * spec file macros are used consistently
 * main package contains code, -data subpackage contains permissable content
 * no -doc, -devel subpackages necessary
 * contents in %doc not required for runtime functionality of application
 * .desktop file present and properly handled

SHOULD items:
 * package builds in mock (fc6/i386)
 * package functions properly on i386 and PPC
   - ExludeArch x86_64 is present until this issue is can be resolved
     (see comments #16 and #20 for resolution)
 * subpackages require the base package using a fully versioned dependency

Everything has been met. 

-------------------------
This package is APPROVED.
-------------------------

After importing this package, please file a bug against it detailing the 64-bit
pointer issues as discussed in comment #18. The bug number should then also be
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line in the spec file.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 06:59:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:59:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220659.l0M6xEsj028392@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-22 01:59 EST -------
Ooops where can i get dependency rpm perl(Moose)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 07:12:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:12:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220712.l0M7CVoZ028857@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: slab


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681


traxtopel at fastmail.fm changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |traxtopel at fastmail.fm




------- Additional Comments From traxtopel at fastmail.fm  2007-01-22 02:12 EST -------
I am using the 0.6.3 & 0.6.4 code, there are issues with Recent documents. i.e.
from nautilus open a file, initially it does not appear on the slab recent
documents panel, until you open another document i.e. something not getting
refreshed correctly

I am currently using the patches from gentoo(issues appear with either),
slightly modified
http://gentoo-fldc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gnome-extra/gnome-main-menu/files/

Has anyone else seen this issue with "Recent Documents"?

If anyone wants I can post these patches.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 07:32:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:32:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220732.l0M7WaeT029585@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682


devrim at commandprompt.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com  2007-01-22 02:32 EST -------
Removing this package from Extras, because the author did not want Oracle
portions to be removed.

So I'm closing this bug.

Regards, Devrim

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 07:39:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:39:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220739.l0M7dbOg029845@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-22 02:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Ooops where can i get dependency rpm perl(Moose)?

It's in extras.

yum install 'perl(Moose)'

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 07:49:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:49:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220749.l0M7nfMG030237@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-22 02:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_...) missing as well.
> 
> Any... pointers to some docs on that?

Not that I'm aware of.  Just copy/paste the line from
/etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-perl.spec

> > Subpackages should probably be called python-obexftp and perl-obexftp 
> > instead of obexftp-* according to package naming guidelines.
> 
> Perl naming guidelines say that only about CPAN-originated modules.

None of the other cases talk anything about where the software originates from,
and I don't see why it would make a difference, nor why the general rule
wouldn't apply, see Addon packages (general) in naming guidelines.

> > _obexftp.so.X and _obexftp.so.X.X for a Python extension are probably just
> > cruft, and could be replaced with a plain _obexftp.so.
> 
> I don't know much about python. Are you sure I can do that?

Pretty sure.  Will need to verify this though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 08:01:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:01:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background
	for minimal WMs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701220801.l0M81T4u030609@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de  2007-01-22 03:01 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Oh, Sebastian (#3)
> 
> Sorry for the mis-understanding.
> 
> - Gilboa

No Problem. I should have explained this a little bit better. :)


(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > idesk would only work if the user puts an .idesktoprc in his home. But I don't 
> > know how to put this in the spec.
> 
> This is something we can not do with rpm. Look at your devilspie package:
> Without a custom config the program is pretty much useless, too. 

Ok, good point. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 11:05:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:05:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221105.l0MB5dto016670@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-22 06:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Ooops where can i get dependency rpm perl(Moose)?
> 
> It's in extras.
> 
> yum install 'perl(Moose)'

thanks. I was using old local extras repo. Thats why i faced that problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 11:08:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:08:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221108.l0MB8GnG017061@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-22 06:08 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
b02e2baf09176b453e1b5abcde830144  MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0002.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/00-load.t t/01-basic.t t/boilerplate.t
t/pod-coverage.t t/pod.t
t/00-load.........ok 1/1# Testing MooseX::Object::Pluggable 0.0002, Perl
5.008008, /usr/bin/perl
t/00-load.........ok
t/01-basic........ok
t/boilerplate.....ok
t/pod-coverage....t/pod-coverage.t does not exist
t/pod.............ok
All tests successful.
Files=5, Tests=21,  1 wallclock secs ( 1.03 cusr +  0.05 csys =  1.08 CPU)

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 11:09:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:09:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221109.l0MB94Lv017198@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 12:31:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:31:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221231.l0MCVwvU028539@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-22 07:31 EST -------
      The fact that you install csync2.xinetd makes me think that you must
Require xinetd.
      Also, since the policy in Fedora is to NOT install services in a
configuration which leaves them activated by default, I think that you should
patch csync2.xinetd and replace "disable=no" with "disable=yes", so that it
would not automatically start when the next service xinetd start/restart occurs.
The admin should specifically activate the new service.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 13:46:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:46:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing
	XML
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221346.l0MDkTHr002890@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223023





------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com  2007-01-22 08:46 EST -------
http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/nxml-mode/emacs-nxml-mode.spec
http://cyberelk.net/tim/data/nxml-mode/emacs-nxml-mode-0.20041004.1-1.src.rpm

I also adjusted the BuildRoot tag and the Release tag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 16:19:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:19:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221619.l0MGJ6DN016962@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365





------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com  2007-01-22 11:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> Almost there.  Just fix the lines beginning with an X:
> 
> MUST:
> X rpmlint on eclipse-changelog srpm gives this as output
> 
> W: eclipse-changelog non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development
> Environments (IDE)
> 
> Let's change this to Development/Tools as per:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525#c5

Done.



> X license text included in package and marked with %doc
> 
> you'll need to include a copy of epl-v10.html and mark it with %doc in the
> %files section
> 

Done.


> X package does not include license text

Done.

> X package builds in mock
>   my mock setup doesn't seem to be working but I don't anticipate any problems
>   here as the package currently builds fine in brew

Nothing to do.


New versions uploaded to 

Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 16:43:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:43:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221643.l0MGhN17019702@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 11:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > MUST:
> > X rpmlint on eclipse-changelog srpm gives this as output
> > 
> > W: eclipse-changelog non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development
> > Environments (IDE)
> > 
> > Let's change this to Development/Tools as per:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525#c5
> 
> Done.

You've got "Development/Toos" :)

> > X license text included in package and marked with %doc
> > 
> > you'll need to include a copy of epl-v10.html and mark it with %doc in the
> > %files section
> 
> Done.

Almost:

RPM build errors:
    File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3-root-overholt/usr/share/eclipse/features/com.redhat.eclipse.changelog_*/epl-v10.html

You need to actually include the file.  I'd say put it in ChangeLog CVS (in
features/com.redhat.eclipse.changelog) and roll a new tarball.  Call it 2.3.3.1
or something.

> > X package does not include license text
> 
> Done.
> 
> > X package builds in mock
> >   my mock setup doesn't seem to be working but I don't anticipate any problems
> >   here as the package currently builds fine in brew
> 
> Nothing to do.
> 
> 
> New versions uploaded to 
> 
> Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog-2.3.3-3.fc7.src.rpm
> 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 17:48:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:48:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221748.l0MHme0F026875@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-22 12:48 EST -------
Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-4.src.rpm

fixed all the FIX issues and most of the notes.  Do you have a good suggestion
on how to copy the icon into %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/, should I
just do a %{_cp} in the %build section?  Also, what do you mean by

basically package works as described but there is no drop down or roll up.
Also I see a critical gtk error (" Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_resize: assertion
`height > 0' failed ").

I'm not getting the error, and it drop's down/rolls up for me.  You have to make
sure to setup the keybindings for it to drop down/roll up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 18:21:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:21:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221821.l0MILOaq029453@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365





------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com  2007-01-22 13:21 EST -------
All done again.. Sorry I should've double checked.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:10:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:10:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221910.l0MJAIiK000800@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |overholt at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 14:10 EST -------
I'll take this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:11:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:11:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222350] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development
	plugins for Eclipse
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221911.l0MJBt5i000939@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - C/C++ Development plugins for Eclipse


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222350


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |222365
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 14:11 EST -------
This package can't move to Extras until eclipse-changelog (bug #222365) does.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:12:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:12:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221912.l0MJC8us001000@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |222350
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:27:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:27:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220736] Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other
	troff-based markups to XML-DocBook
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221927.l0MJRCpF002534@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: doclifter - lifts man pages and other troff-based markups to XML-DocBook


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220736





------- Additional Comments From esr at thyrsus.com  2007-01-22 14:27 EST -------
The upstream bug in the stylesheets has been acknowledged and fixed.  The
maintainer (Mike Smith at w3.org) tells me he will push a release to the Fedora
package maintainer ASAP.

I have addressed all other issues raised here, and the fixes will be in the next
doclifter release.  Stay tuned...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:48:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:48:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221948.l0MJm1f1004171@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627


fitzsim at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |195649
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:53:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:53:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222742] Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and
	easy access remote resources via SMB
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221953.l0MJr6dN004640@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fuse-smb - FUSE-Filesystem to fast and easy access remote resources via SMB


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222742


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-22 14:52 EST -------
Since you are now sponsored, I can approve this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 19:57:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:57:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701221957.l0MJvOU7005072@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-22 14:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> 
> Do you have a good suggestion
> on how to copy the icon into %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/, should I
> just do a %{_cp} in the %build section? 

You could use something like:

    install -p -m 644 %{name}.png \
        $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png

> Also, what do you mean by
> 
> basically package works as described but there is no drop down or roll up.
> Also I see a critical gtk error (" Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_resize: assertion
> `height > 0' failed ").
> 
> I'm not getting the error, 

no errors when you start tilda from the commandline? Not even when you open the
prefs window?

> and it drop's down/rolls up for me.  You have to make
> sure to setup the keybindings for it to drop down/roll up.

I know, but I wasn't able to set up working keys in Gnome. I tried CTRL+F1,
STRG+F1, ALT+12 and some more, doesn't matter. And yes, I did restart tilda
every time after the changes. Nothing happens when I'm on the desktop or in
another window, when tilda is focussed, ALT+12 is interpreted as the keystrokes
";3~".

What keys are you using?

Also after setting the binding to F12 I stumbled over

$ LANG=C tilda
Key Incorrect -- Read the README or tilda.sf.net for info, rerun as 'tilda -C'
to set keybinding
: Success
Speicherzugriffsfehler

The message to run tilda -C is ok, but of course the program should not segfault.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:05:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:05:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222005.l0MK5KlY005760@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219112


johan-fedora at deds.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:16:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD
	image editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222016.l0MKGUSK006710@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969





------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl  2007-01-22 15:16 EST -------
I've successfully built isomaster in a devel branch. Additional branches (FC-5
and FC-6) were requested. If they are approved and built I'll mark this bug as
resolved.

Btw, can I remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:31:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:31:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222031.l0MKVAB9007846@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-22 15:31 EST -------
Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-5.src.rpm

for the icon change.

I'm running tilda on fluxbox, but when I use gnome and run tilda from the
command line I do see the gtk errors you are talking about.  I will look into
fixing those.  I am using Alt+5 for my keybindings, but I also tried Control+F1
and that worked as well.  The keybindings are a little finicky, set it to
"Alt+5" and see if it works.  If you don't have the exact format that it likes,
i.e. you set it to "Ctrl+F1" instead of "Control+F1" it wont work.  I will also
look into the segfault.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:32:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:32:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222032.l0MKWqEv007981@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 15:32 EST -------
Review:

MUST:
? is this appropriate for Fedora?  I guess with the pending release of
  OpenJDK it's fine.  I'm just wondering whether people will be
  concerned that we're "making it too easy for people to use non-free
  software".  I guess it's not really helping them to install it, but
  just to use it once they've got it installed, kinda like ex. rhythmbox
  working with the gstreamer MP3 plugin.
* rpmlint on system-switch-java srpm gives no output
? package is named appropriately
  should the gui subpackage be 'gtk' instead of 'gnome'?
  are you calling it the "Duke Toolset Switcher" to get around the legal issues
    surrounding use of "Java"?
* specfile name matches %{name}
* package meets packaging guidelines.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
* specfile written in American English
X specfile is legible
  your changelog entry has a weird date format and it seems too early :)
X source files match upstream
  can you host the tarball somewhere?  can we do an md5sum somehow?
* package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
X BuildRequires are proper
  see below about desktop-file-utils
* find_lang usage correct
* package is not relocatable
X package owns all directories and files
  is the ownership of %{_datadir}/pixmaps/*, etc. correct?
X no %files duplicates
  why are the %doc files listed twice
* file permissions are fine; %defattrs present
* %clean present
* macro usage is consistent
* package contains code
* no large docs so no -doc subpackage
* %doc files don't affect runtime (N/A)
* no shared libraries are present
* no pkgconfig or header files
* no -devel package
* no .la files
X desktop file
  you need to run desktop-file-install in %install and BuildRequires:
desktop-file-utils
* not a web app.
* file ownership fine
* binary RPMs function on x86 (well, I don't have any other JVMs to test
  against by both the GUI and the TUI seem to interact properly with
  consolehelper/pam and don't crash)
* final provides and requires are sane

$ rpm -q --provides -p system-switch-java-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
config(system-switch-java) = 1.0.0-1
system-switch-java = 1.0.0-1

$ rpm -q --provides -p system-switch-java-gnome-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
system-switch-java-gnome = 1.0.0-1

$ rpm -q --requires -p system-switch-java-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
/usr/bin/env  
chkconfig  
config(system-switch-java) = 1.0.0-1
libuser  
newt  
python  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
usermode 

$ rpm -q --requires -p system-switch-java-gnome-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
libglade2  
pygtk2  
pygtk2-libglade  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
system-switch-java = 1.0.0-1
usermode-gtk

SHOULD:
* package includes license text
* package builds on i386
* package builds in mock
X consider using make %{?_smp_mflags}

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:34:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:34:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222034.l0MKYTJj008060@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365





------- Additional Comments From klee at redhat.com  2007-01-22 15:34 EST -------
New versions uploaded to 
 
Spec URL: http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sourceware.org/eclipse/changelog/eclipse-changelog-2.3.4-1.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 20:48:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:48:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223873] New: Review Request: ecj - Eclipse Compiler for the
	Java programming language
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223873

           Summary: Review Request: ecj - Eclipse Compiler for the Java
                    programming language
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://overholt.ca/eclipse/ecj.spec
SRPM URL: http://overholt.ca/eclipse/ecj-3.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description: ECJ is the Java bytecode compiler of the Eclipse Platform.  It is also known as the JDT Core batch compiler.

This package is somewhat a duplicate of the existing eclipse-ecj package (a sub-package of the eclipse SRPM).  Due to developments in gcc, the gcc SRPM will soon need to BuildRequires:  eclipse-ecj.  This large dependency (and build loop) is undesirable so this separate ecj package was created.  eclipse-ecj will cease to exist when this package is included.

This package cannot go into Extras due to the gcc requirement on it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:04:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:04:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD
	image editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222104.l0ML4uV8010356@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969


bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:24:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:24:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222124.l0MLOFGQ011945@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jkeating at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 16:23 EST -------
APPROVED

Thanks, Kyu!

Now for the question of how we go about moving something from Core to Extras ...

Jesse:  eclipse-changelog is currently in Core but in anticipation of the merge,
it's been reviewed and is ready to be moved to Extras.  It's a leaf package. 
How should we proceed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:26:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:26:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222126.l0MLQ8UH012164@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-22 16:26 EST -------
Spec URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.toxicpanda.com/tilda-0.9.4-6.src.rpm

fixed the segfault.  The gtk warnings seem to be coming from VTE, nothing tilda
is doing itself so I cannot do much about those.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:33:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:33:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222133.l0MLXVjd013132@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-22 16:33 EST -------
hmm, when i was building and testing the segfault went away, but when i install
the package it still segfaults... /me goes to see wtf went wrong.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:39:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:39:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222139.l0MLdUVC013719@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-22 16:39 EST -------
nevermind I'm an idiot, i had tilda installed in /usr/local/bin from when i was
building/testing and such, carry on :).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:44:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:44:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222144.l0MLinfT014051@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365


notting at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |notting at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com  2007-01-22 16:44 EST -------
We're working on a mechanism to allow to move with SCM history. That mechanism
is not finished yet. Give us a day or three?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 21:47:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:47:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the
	task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222147.l0MLlKfD014292@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-22 16:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> We're working on a mechanism to allow to move with SCM history. That mechanism
> is not finished yet. Give us a day or three?

Cool, thanks for the info, Bill.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 22:01:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:01:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222201.l0MM1iqD015562@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492





------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com  2007-01-22 17:01 EST -------
actually not, it was approved in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 22:41:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:41:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222241.l0MMfmZc018569@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-22 17:41 EST -------
Hi Manuel,

>>The fact that you install csync2.xinetd makes me think that you must require xinetd.

Fixed

>> Also, since the policy in Fedora is to NOT install services in a
>> configuration which leaves them activated by default, I think that you should
>> patch csync2.xinetd and replace "disable=no" with "disable=yes", so that it
>> would not automatically start when the next service xinetd start/restart occurs.
>> The admin should specifically activate the new service.

Fixed as well.

New versions:
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2.spec
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2-1.33-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 22:50:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:50:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222250.l0MMocro019120@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mr.ecik at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-22 17:50 EST -------
I'll have a look at it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 22 23:11:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:11:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system
	userland utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701222311.l0MNBxnm020252@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841              |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-22 18:11 EST -------
Hi Chris,

Since you've been sponsored by jkatz, I'll remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker.

I've found a few things though:

rpmlint of gfs-utils is not silent:
W: gfs-utils incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.fc6.0 0.1.0-0.fc6.2
W: gfs-utils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gfs
E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Description
E: gfs-utils missing-mandatory-lsb-tag Short-Description
W: gfs-utils incoherent-init-script-name gfs

The package should contain the text of the license
  (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)

Scriptlets: missing "service" in %preun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)
Scriptlets: missing "service" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets)

* Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)
* No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag.

Please don't hardcode the distro in Release, use %dist

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 00:13:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:13:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230013.l0N0DVEQ022830@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-22 19:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> The keybindings are a little finicky, set it to
> "Alt+5" and see if it works. 

Argh, works. Must be lowercase, Alt instead of ALT


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 01:09:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:09:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for
	PulseAudio
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230109.l0N19lQw024714@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374





------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net  2007-01-22 20:09 EST -------
This is not a review 

I think calling the package pulseaudio-preferences would be more intuitive. I
wouldn't know to install paprefs to get the pulseaudio preferences. PulseAudio
website even refers to paprefs as pulseaudio volume control on the front page.
According to PackageNamingGuidelines: "If a new package is considered an "addon"
package that enhances or adds a new functionality to an existing Fedora Core or
Fedora Extras package without being useful on its own, its name should reflect
this fact." 

Some other issues to adress: 
* BuildRequires for lynx is commented out, lynx is needed to build
* BuildRequires for desktop-file-utils commented out for some reason

* "--add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="  is depriciated, you should also add
"--remove-category Application"

* %dir is for owning a dir, but not the contents of that dir. since this package
owns all files in %{_datadir}/paprefs, %dir %{_datadir}/paprefs is not needed.

* Doesn't Require: any of the pulseaudio stack, while paprefs runs without it, I
would imagine it to be pretty useless without pulseaudio actually installed

Good: rpmlint silent, source matches upstream, spec looks good, runs, includes
licencing information, 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 07:02:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:02:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230702.l0N72kKt006146@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-23 02:02 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146272)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146272&action=view)
Mock build log of  on FC-devel i386

Well,
* BuildRequires, etc
  - Firstly, I cannot check this package because mockbuild
  fails on FC-devel i386. Please check the attached
  log.

* File/Directory entries
  - For main package, file entries include:
---------------------------------------------
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/%{name}
---------------------------------------------
    And, for example -policy subpackage include:
---------------------------------------------
%{_datadir}/%{name}/scripts/seedit-installhelper.sh
----------------------------------------------
    ... Then seedit-installhelper.sh is installed in
    both main and -policy subpackage, because
----------------------------------------------
%{_datadir}/%{name}
----------------------------------------------
    is interpretted as the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}
    itself _and_ all the files/directories etc under
    %{_datadir}/%{name}.
    If you want to indicate only the directory, you have
    to write:
----------------------------------------------
%dir %{_datadir}/%{name}
----------------------------------------------
    Please remove duplicate entries, then ensure that
    every directories created during the install of
    seedit related packages are owned by one package.

* Requires
-----------------------------------------------
Requires: python >= 2.3
----------------------------------------------- 
    This is not needed. Python version dependency is
    automatically added by rpmbuild process.

* %build process, etc...
-----------------------------------------------
--add-category X-Fedora
-----------------------------------------------
    The category "X-???" is deprecated and should be
    removed.
------------------------------------------------
install -m 664 %{SOURCE2}
------------------------------------------------
     Why should this be 0664, not 0644?

* scriptlets:
  ... By the way, what if user sets selinux policy as
  "DISABLED"? There may be the case in which sysadmin
  has to disable selinux for some reason. In the case,
  selinux degree is "upgraded" to TARGETED?

* For header description:
------------------------------------------------------
Source0:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/%{name}-%{version}-%{betatag}.tar.gz

------------------------------------------------------
  Please change the URL of Source0 so that I can directly
  gain the source by "wget -N .........".
  Executing "wget -N" against this URL only pulls a HTML
  file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 07:03:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:03:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] New: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for
	GNOME - point, click, debug! 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943

           Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
                    point, click, debug!
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-1.src.rpm

Description:
Nemiver is an ongoing effort to write a standalone graphical debugger that
integrates well in the GNOME desktop environment. It currently features a
backend which uses the well known GNU Debugger (gdb) to debug C/C++ programs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 07:04:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:04:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230704.l0N74coU006239@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223591


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 07:06:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:06:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230706.l0N76bHG006311@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: Nemiver - A |Review Request: Nemiver - A
                   |C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -  |C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
                   |point, click, debug!        |point, click, debug!
              Alias|                            |nemiver




------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-23 02:06 EST -------
[ Adding alias. ]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 07:19:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:19:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230719.l0N7JWoC006642@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-23 02:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> * scriptlets:
>   ... By the way, what if user sets selinux policy as
>   "DISABLED"? There may be the case in which sysadmin
>   has to disable selinux for some reason. In the case,
>   selinux degree is "upgraded" to TARGETED?

Oops, s|TARGETED|permissive|...
Then: anyway should selinux degree be set as permissive when
removing this anyway? If selinux policy is set correctly by
this application (seedit), the selinux policy should work
even after this application is removed, shouldn't it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 08:12:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:12:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230812.l0N8CBhc008016@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-23 03:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)

Mamoru, thanks for comments.

>Well,
* BuildRequires, etc
>  - Firstly, I cannot check this package because mockbuild
>  fails on FC-devel i386. Please check the attached
>  log.
Fixed.
Added flex and byacc in buildrequires.

> * File/Directory entries
>  - For main package, file entries include:
>    Please remove duplicate entries, then ensure that
>    every directories created during the install of
>    seedit related packages are owned by one package.
Fixed.


>* Requires
>-----------------------------------------------
>Requires: python >= 2.3
>----------------------------------------------- 
>    This is not needed. Python version dependency is
>    automatically added by rpmbuild process.
Fixed.

>* %build process, etc...
>-----------------------------------------------
>--add-category X-Fedora
>-----------------------------------------------
>    The category "X-???" is deprecated and should be
>    removed.
Fixed.

>------------------------------------------------
>install -m 664 %{SOURCE2}
>------------------------------------------------
>     Why should this be 0664, not 0644?
It was only a mis-spell.
Fixed.

>* For header description:
>  Please change the URL of Source0 so that I can directly
>  gain the source by "wget -N .........".
>  Executing "wget -N" against this URL only pulls a HTML
>  file.
Fixed.


>* scriptlets:
>  ... By the way, what if user sets selinux policy as
>  "DISABLED"? There may be the case in which sysadmin
>  has to disable selinux for some reason. In the case,
>  selinux degree is "upgraded" to TARGETED?
Hmm, I will reply in next comment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 08:14:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:14:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230814.l0N8EOKm008083@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-23 03:14 EST -------
SELinux Policy Editor generates its own policy under /etc/selinux/seedit.
It can not be editted without seedit, seedit-policy packages.
And when user uses seedit for the first time, 
/etc/selinux/seedit is overwritten.
SELINUXTYPE=targeted
->
SELINUXTYPE=seedit

So, when seedit is uninstalled, 
/etc/selinux/seedit becomes unuseful, because it can not be editted.
So /etc/selinux/config should be editted.
SELINUXTYPE=seedit
->
SELINUXTYPE=targeted

>* scriptlets:
>  ... By the way, what if user sets selinux policy as
>  "DISABLED"? There may be the case in which sysadmin
>  has to disable selinux for some reason. In the case,
>  selinux degree is "upgraded" to TARGETED?
I've understood what you say, and I agree.
In the latest seedit.spec,
it will not touch "SELINUX=" line.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 08:15:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:15:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230815.l0N8FReL008123@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-23 03:15 EST -------
Current spec file and src.rpm file is following:

* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.10.beta6.2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 09:13:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:13:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex,
	a tool for creating scanners
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230913.l0N9DEHt012185@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-23 04:13 EST -------
FYI: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-01/msg00870.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 09:33:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:33:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230933.l0N9X1w4013748@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223591





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-23 04:32 EST -------
Can't see LICENSE text in %doc package.
rpmlint is OK then.
mock build is fine.
But can't see Desktop file so used this application from console
Maybe you like to move Categories from Science to Engineering in .desktop file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 09:33:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:33:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230933.l0N9Xpeo013789@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 09:56:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:56:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE
	focusing on usability
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701230956.l0N9u9i3015407@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-23 04:56 EST -------
Got rpmlint warnings 
I: dolphin checking
W: dolphin dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/dolphin/common ../common
The relative symbolic link points nowhere.

/tmp/dolphin-0.8.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm.26367/usr/share/applications/dolphin.desktop:
warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use
within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-"

Both warnings can be ignored for KDE package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 10:04:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:04:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE
	focusing on usability
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231004.l0NA43LF016045@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-23 05:04 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM.
- rpmlint is NOT silent for RPMS.
+ source match upstream.
62f526d93df2fe255d04625cbc670000  dolphin-0.8.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code Not contents.
+ no static libraries present.
+ no .pc files present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available for installation.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ icon cache scriptlets used.
+ Desktop file handled correctly.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ GUI app
APPROVED.

Any reason behind not installing translation files?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 10:12:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:12:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231012.l0NACAop016453@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-23 05:12 EST -------
(Just adding myself to Cc list, as this package
 seems interesting)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 12:53:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:53:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231253.l0NCr2pQ028588@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-23 07:53 EST -------
Well, I
* install 0.10 -gui package
* changed selinux : "disabled" -> "permissive"
* reboot
* try "seedit-gui"
Then...
-------------------------------------------------
[tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ seedit-gui 
sh: /usr/share/seedit/scripts/seedit-installhelper.sh: ????????????
??????????
-------------------------------------------------
(for non-Japanese users: "?????????..." means
 "no such file or directory")

What is happening?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 14:21:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:21:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231421.l0NELUeO002873@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-23 09:21 EST -------
OOps!
It is due to resent changes about paths.
I have forgotten test seedit itself..

I will fix it tomorrow,


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 14:42:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:42:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without
	using monodevelop
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231442.l0NEgSCA004886@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776





------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2007-01-23 09:42 EST -------
I did build it in mock, development x86_64

Adding  BuildRequires: gettext   seems to fix the languages thing.

I also get a warning from the desktop file:
/var/tmp/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-monodoc.desktop:
warning: The 'Application' cate
gory is not defined by the desktop entry specification.  Please use one of
"AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Ed
ucation", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System",
"Utility" instead

Possibly Development would be appropriate.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 15:00:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:00:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time
	strategy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231500.l0NF0Zoa006510@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
OtherBugsDependingO|179259                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-23 10:00 EST -------
I can close this bug (correctly build on i386 and ppc). The bug report is #223992

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 15:40:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:40:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231540.l0NFesZe010490@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-23 10:40 EST -------
* missing "BuildRequires: gettext"

* in -devel package, missing "Requires: gnome-vfs2-devel glib2-devel"
These are "Requires" in the pkgconfig file. glib2-devel is redundant
(due to glibmm24-devel), but a direct requirement.

* Avoid duplicating the licence file "COPYING" in sub-packages.
Here the -devel package requires the main package. 

* GConf schema files are no %config files and should not be
marked as such.

* In the scriptlets, you list the two schema files without wildcards.
You ought to do the same in the %files section, so you will notice
when the set of schema files changes.

* %defattr missing in -devel package


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 17:02:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:02:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231702.l0NH2C24018158@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: icu4j


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592





------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com  2007-01-23 12:02 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146318)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146318&action=view)
spec file for review

Release tag to be adjusted as per new guidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 17:05:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:05:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231705.l0NH5PDD018579@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: icu4j


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592





------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com  2007-01-23 12:04 EST -------
SRPM can be obtained with 'make srpm' in the 'devel' branch of dist CVS.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 17:30:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:30:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231730.l0NHUHH3020172@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: icu4j


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592





------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com  2007-01-23 12:29 EST -------
URL: http://people.redhat.com/fnasser/icu4j-3.4.5-2jpp.1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 18:41:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:41:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231841.l0NIfcAa025444@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-23 13:41 EST -------
To clarify, I don't consider foo-obexftp vs obexftp-foo for foo={perl,python} a
blocker as there are some interpretation differences about the naming guidelines
and quite a few packages going either way in the repo.  This is something that
the packaging committee should work on, and can be fixed later if need be.

Regarding _obexftp.so.*.*, a simple "python -c 'import obexftp'" will work with
only the *.so present, it doesn't need the *.so.*.  And 'find /usr/lib/python2.4
-name "*.so.*"' finds nothing here.  So I *guess* it's safe to install the
extension just as *.so and drop the links.  This is neither a blocker though,
but is something upstream could perhaps clarify.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 19:14:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:14:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for
	PulseAudio
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231914.l0NJE39r028191@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374





------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr  2007-01-23 14:13 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146339)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146339&action=view)
New spec

I agree that a name such as pulseaudio-preferences would make more sense. The
reason I named it paprefs was for the sake of consistency. All current gtk
based packages for pulseaudio have the name of their executable: pavumeter,
padevchooser, pavucontrol, paman while all pulseaudio backend package names
start with pulseaudio. Maybe should we rename the gtk based packages to the
more meaningful pulseaudio-whatever.

I am not utterly familiar with desktop-file-install, could you point me to the
page that describe the deprecation of some of those parameters. ie: removing
the "--vendor=" statement resulted in an rpmbuild failure with the below error:


+ desktop-file-install --dir
/var/tmp/paprefs-0.9.5-1-root-emoret/usr/share/applications --remove-category
Application
/var/tmp/paprefs-0.9.5-1-root-emoret/usr/share/applications/paprefs.desktop
Must specify the vendor namespace for these files with --vendor

Re: BuildRequires I took the paman spec file as a template to derive the spec
for paprefs. I have addressed all concerns regarding the issues you kindly
outlined in Comment #1 and I think most would also apply to all gtk based
pulseaudio packages (pavumeter, padevchooser, pavucontrol, paman), so you may
want to provide feedback for those other packages as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 19:32:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:32:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223873] Review Request: ecj - Eclipse Compiler for the Java
	programming language
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701231932.l0NJWLqE030261@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecj - Eclipse Compiler for the Java programming language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223873


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-23 14:32 EST -------
After thinking about this some more and discussing with Ben Konrath and Tom
Fitzsimmons, I've decided to close this request.  We couldn't come up with any
actual benefits to having the separate ecj package.  This SRPM can be used by
those wanting quick turnaround on ecj changes, although these are not very likely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 20:04:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:04:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701232004.l0NK4ltq000638@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732


dlutter at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 21:48:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:48:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701232148.l0NLmss8010579@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-01-23 16:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Review:
> 
> MUST:
> ? is this appropriate for Fedora?  I guess with the pending release of
>   OpenJDK it's fine.  I'm just wondering whether people will be
>   concerned that we're "making it too easy for people to use non-free
>   software".  I guess it's not really helping them to install it, but
>   just to use it once they've got it installed, kinda like ex. rhythmbox
>   working with the gstreamer MP3 plugin.

Yes, I'm readying Fedora Extras for smooth integration of OpenJDK alongside
java-gcj-compat.

> * rpmlint on system-switch-java srpm gives no output
> ? package is named appropriately
>   should the gui subpackage be 'gtk' instead of 'gnome'?

I renamed it 'system-switch-java-gui'.

>   are you calling it the "Duke Toolset Switcher" to get around the legal issues
>     surrounding use of "Java"?

Yes, I didn't want to misrepresent the switcher as a Java-trademarked tool.  But
when re-examining this, I realized that System->Administration entries should be
simple, descriptive names rather than tool titles anyway.  So I've settled on
just "Java Toolset" for the menu entry, and "Java Toolset Configuration" for the
window title.  This implies "configuring the Java or Java-like toolset" rather
than "running the Java(TM) Toolset Switcher".

> * specfile name matches %{name}
> * package meets packaging guidelines.
> * license field matches the actual license.
> * license is open source-compatible.
> * license text included in package and marked with %doc
> * specfile written in American English
> X specfile is legible
>   your changelog entry has a weird date format and it seems too early :)

The date format is standard, but I updated the entry to be more current.

> X source files match upstream
>   can you host the tarball somewhere?

I'd like to maintain this as an SRPM-only package for now.

>   can we do an md5sum somehow?

9403b60da2e2bd3117f170d75a507ad3  SOURCES/system-switch-java-1.0.0.tar.bz2

> * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
> X BuildRequires are proper
>   see below about desktop-file-utils

Fixed.

> * find_lang usage correct
> * package is not relocatable
> X package owns all directories and files
>   is the ownership of %{_datadir}/pixmaps/*, etc. correct?

It turns out I didn't need the application-specific pixmaps sub-directory.  Fixed.

> X no %files duplicates
>   why are the %doc files listed twice

Fixed.

> * file permissions are fine; %defattrs present
> * %clean present
> * macro usage is consistent
> * package contains code
> * no large docs so no -doc subpackage
> * %doc files don't affect runtime (N/A)
> * no shared libraries are present
> * no pkgconfig or header files
> * no -devel package
> * no .la files
> X desktop file
>   you need to run desktop-file-install in %install and BuildRequires:
> desktop-file-utils

Fixed.

> * not a web app.
> * file ownership fine
> * binary RPMs function on x86 (well, I don't have any other JVMs to test
>   against by both the GUI and the TUI seem to interact properly with
>   consolehelper/pam and don't crash)
> * final provides and requires are sane
> 
> $ rpm -q --provides -p system-switch-java-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
> config(system-switch-java) = 1.0.0-1
> system-switch-java = 1.0.0-1
> 
> $ rpm -q --provides -p system-switch-java-gnome-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
> system-switch-java-gnome = 1.0.0-1
> 
> $ rpm -q --requires -p system-switch-java-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
> /usr/bin/env  
> chkconfig  
> config(system-switch-java) = 1.0.0-1
> libuser  
> newt  
> python  
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> usermode 
> 
> $ rpm -q --requires -p system-switch-java-gnome-1.0.0-1.noarch.rpm 
> libglade2  
> pygtk2  
> pygtk2-libglade  
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> system-switch-java = 1.0.0-1
> usermode-gtk
> 
> SHOULD:
> * package includes license text
> * package builds on i386
> * package builds in mock
> X consider using make %{?_smp_mflags}

Fixed.

I uploaded the updated spec and SRPM files.  The URLs are the same as above.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 21:58:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:58:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP
	messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701232158.l0NLwI1L011488@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630





------- Additional Comments From aconway at redhat.com  2007-01-23 16:58 EST -------
Updaed the SRPM & spec URLs with Jim's fixes for review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 23 22:59:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:59:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701232259.l0NMxAql015418@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-23 17:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> >   can we do an md5sum somehow?
> 
> 9403b60da2e2bd3117f170d75a507ad3  SOURCES/system-switch-java-1.0.0.tar.bz2

Okay, I've verified that I've got the same one.

My only remaining questions surround the use of consolehelper and pam.  But I
assume you know what you're doing here :)  Thus ...

APPROVED.  Thanks, Tom.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 00:01:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:01:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240001.l0O01Hki019873@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-23 19:00 EST -------
I do not want to sound picky, but
- the URL included in the spec is not very useful.
- The purpose of the md5sum check is to guarantee that the file included in the
src.rpm coincides with the one from the upstream source. Computing the md5sum by
the packager and by the reviewer based on the SAME file extracted from the same
src.rpm guarantees nothing.
- each modification to the spec should be reflected in the release tag and in
the changelog

In this special case, I suggest including a comment in the spec, specifying that
there is no other upstream but the src.rpm and, also, defining a real path for
the said src.rpm (hosting it for instance on http://fitzsim.org or on
people.redhat.com)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 01:26:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:26:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240126.l0O1QQJu023699@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pertusus at free.fr




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-23 20:26 EST -------
* regarding the license, I have spotted some files without license
  but with a mention to an author or even a copyright notice. 
  When there is a copyright and no license, the default license
  is a restrictive license (no modification nor redistribution)
  which is non free and GPL incompatible.
  
it is the case for
bin/fvwm-config
bin/fvwm-convert-2.2 (although the comments seem to indicate that
                      it is public domain)
bin/fvwm-convert-2.4

utils/fvwm_make_*.sh  (although these are examples and so are likely
                       in the public domain)

modules/FvwmWharf/ASSound/ASSound.c

* I think that the summary could be shortened, ICCM compliance and
  for the X Window system are not very informative. Maybe something along

Summary:        Highly configurable multiple virtual desktop window manager

* fvwm-menu-headlines should use htmlview instead of netscape

* fvwm-bug requires %{_sbindir}/sendmail

* fvwm-menu-xlock requires xlock

* fvwm-menu-directory could use mimeopen -n instead of EDITOR to 
  open files.

* in fvwm/ConfigFvwmSetup the default menu is badly suited for 
  fedora. I propose removing rxvt, replacing the utility submenu 
  a dynamically generated menu using the freedesktop standard.
  For that, I found a python script using pyxdg which could 
  be suitable:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pz215/fvwm-scripts/scripts/xdg-menu.py
  However, I found 2 issues with that script, when calling it with
  xdg-menu.py /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu > somefile
1. the accented characters make it break
2. the top level menu hasn't a reproducible name which could be handy
   to reference it in a Popup entry. 
  I reported those issues upstream, with a patch to add a -m option
  to specify the toplevel menu name

Then AddToMenu MenuFvwmUtilities  could become something along:

PipeRead "fvwm-xdg-menu-top -m MenuFvwmUtilities /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu"


* there is a missing
Requires: xterm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 02:13:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:13:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240213.l0O2Da4c025218@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-23 21:13 EST -------
Good:

- rpmlint checks do not return anything either on the source or on the binary rpm
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- buildroot has the recommended value
- license ( GPL ) is OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source is last version and matches upstream, sha1sum
8d94eb0c7ff997598be7b1cfc444bb74eae6712d  csync2-1.33.tar.gz
- package builds in mock for devel (i386) and FC6 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates, does not own foreign files or directories
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- available documentation is included, but small so no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- no static, headers, libtool or .pc files

SHOULD
- builds fine in mock (FC6/x86_64, devel/i386)
- runs OK on FC6/x86_64 (once the proper instructions -- included in the rpm --
are followed, that is csync2 is added to /etc/services)

Suggestion: the changelog entry should describe the actual modifications
(especially since they are small - a one liner should suffice) rather then point
to a bugzilla entry (it makes life simpler for someone examining the rpms,
avoiding the need for an extra web query; not to mention that bugzilla might be
down or simply not accessible)
As a sidenote, you could have used a 1 line sed command in %install in order to
modify the offending line in xinetd.conf, rather then creating a separate patch,
but your method is perfectly fine.

  In this moment I see no blockers, but before approving this package I would
like for someone more experienced to comment on the following:
  In order to start the program (via xinetd), /etc/services must be modified,
adding a line specifying the port and protocol used by csync2 and SSL
certificates must be generated for each box where the program will run
  Editing /etc/services could be handled either in a %post entry (in the sources
there is a spec file which does the addition, but does not verify if the entry
already exists and neither removes it at uninstall time), or (as the packager
has chosen) manually by the admin.
   My question is: which one of this two methods is the proper procedure for
Fedora ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 02:46:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:46:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240246.l0O2k04T026371@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-23 21:45 EST -------
Hey Thomas. 

Anything holding up importing and building this package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 03:21:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:21:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240321.l0O3LFwb027782@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-23 22:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I do not want to sound picky,

I don't think any of it sounds picky :)  The only thing I disagree with is this:

> - each modification to the spec should be reflected in the release tag and in
> the changelog

Does it really matter if the release tag is bumped for pre-first build fixes?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 03:36:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:36:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240336.l0O3a3HP028893@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-23 22:35 EST -------
I'd be happy to review this package. 

Look for a full review here in a bit...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 03:54:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:54:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240354.l0O3s7HM030026@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-23 22:54 EST -------

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
439a10639f53def0ba47c0851e4a2671  pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2
439a10639f53def0ba47c0851e4a2671  pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2.1
d1fa344ec5f2feb12397361f92b011a0cb726d48  pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2
d1fa344ec5f2feb12397361f92b011a0cb726d48  pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
See below - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. The Source URL doesn't seem to work for me.

Should be:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2

(note: releases, not release)

2. Your debuginfo files are all empty. Not sure why that is, but
I think it deserves some investigation.

3. I assume the
Provides:               powerdns-recursor = %{version}-%{release}
is for upstream or other project released rpms?

4. Is it ok for this package to run as user 'pdns', which is
the same as the 'pdns' package. If they are both on the same
machine could there be security implications? Perhaps this
package should use a 'pdns-recursor' user instead?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 03:59:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:59:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240359.l0O3x2bQ030344@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-23 22:58 EST -------
Hey Andrew... if you are reviewing this I assume it should be blocking FE-
REVIEW instead of FE-NEW. I am going to change it to do so. If I am in error, 
feel free to change it back. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 04:00:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:00:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240400.l0O40xoh030501@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972


wart at kobold.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 04:07:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:07:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP
	messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240407.l0O47C4H030961@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630





------- Additional Comments From aconway at redhat.com  2007-01-23 23:07 EST -------
Increased the release number and published the new SRPM at:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/cpp/qpidc-0.1-2.src.rpm

No changes since comment #4 except to increase the relase number and add a
changelog note.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 04:12:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:12:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240412.l0O4CiMR031258@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-23 23:12 EST -------
I finally got selinux policies building in Rawhide again, and started looking at
a policy for poker-server.  In the init script, you invoke the service by
invoking python with the script as an argument.  In order to make selinux work
with this, you should include a small wrapper script that does the same thing,
and invoke this wrapper script from the init script.  Something like:

$ cat /usr/bin/poker-server
#!/bin/sh

/usr/bin/python /usr/bin/twistd --python
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pokernetwork/pokerserver.py ${0+$@}

And then in the init script, invoke the script as:

/usr/bin/poker-server \
        --pidfile=${pidfile} \
        --logfile=${logfile} --quiet ${opt_args} \
        --reactor=${reactor}

This will allow the wrapper script to be labelled as pokerd_exec_t, whereas in
the current setup, python itself must be labelled as pokerd_exec_t in order to
execute in the proper domain.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 04:24:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:24:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240424.l0O4OLHD031941@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-23 23:24 EST -------
In reply to comment #16:

>This is the only package I intend on maintaining in Fedora at the
>moment.

ok.

>> This would save you having to go through the sponsorship process and
>> also take a task off your hands if you don't want to do it. ;)

> I would like to take the path of least resistance to get eCryptfs
> support into Fedora, but I would also like the ability to push changes
> into the package without having to bother a middleman. The userspace
> utilities change about as rapidly as the kernel module, which is
> probably going to be changing on every 2.6.x kernel release for at
> least the next year.

Indeed. Understandable.

I would really like to see this package in as well.
So, I can review this package and sponsor you once it's
in an acceptable state.

> From what I understand, I can just do this?
...snipp dist tag patch...

Yes, that should do it.

Some other notes/observations before a formal review:

1. Your version scheme seems a bit odd. Is there any reason why
you do major integer releases every time? Now that 9 is out
it's hard to go to a more traditional 'work toward a stable 1.0',
but it might be worth considering just minor bumps for minor
changes?

2. x86_64 now builds here. :) As does ppc32. 

3. The 2.6.19 kernel in fc6 updates has the ecryptfs module,
so there should be support for this in fc6 with the updated
kernel at least. Not sure how we are going to require that
however. Wonder if we can do a 'Requires: ecryptfs.ko'.

Look for a formal review here soon... 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 04:57:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:57:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240457.l0O4vTbK001898@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222191


overholt at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|overholt at redhat.com         |fitzsim at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com  2007-01-23 23:57 EST -------
You are correct about the blocker but Tom's actually going to review it.  I've
re-assigned to him.  Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 05:25:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:25:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240525.l0O5P3Ch003556@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-24 00:24 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
e6afeeb371c5d7d8c8d3c6dc379dd11a  ecryptfs-utils-9.tar.bz2
e6afeeb371c5d7d8c8d3c6dc379dd11a  ecryptfs-utils-9.tar.bz2.1
bbd72d4036e2b0faf7a8a4ca204fed274c6849cd  ecryptfs-utils-9.tar.bz2
bbd72d4036e2b0faf7a8a4ca204fed274c6849cd  ecryptfs-utils-9.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
See below - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
See below - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
See below - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned 
depend.
See below - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. Might include the following as %doc files:
AUTHORS NEWS THANKS

2. The devel subpackage should have:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
You have currently => and just version.

3. rpmlint says:

E: ecryptfs-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ecryptfsd ['/usr/
lib64']
E: ecryptfs-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ecryptfs-manager ['/
usr/lib64']
E: ecryptfs-utils binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /sbin/mount.ecryptfs ['/usr/
lib64']

See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-
a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544

4. The keyutils-libs Requires doesn't seem needed.
keyutils pulls it in, and thats already required.

5. Should add the dist tag, as discussed in previous comments.

A few other notes, not related to packaging:

- http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net/README seems to be out of date?

- I tried the example in the README, doing:
mkdir /root/crypt /mnt/crypt; mount -t ecryptfs /root/crypt /mnt/crypt
It prompts me for a passphrase, etc, but then I don't see the dir mounted
and writing files just appears to write to the dirs, am I missing a step?
I see reports of someone perhaps having the same issue on a x86_64 box,
which I am also using... Installing the i386 version gets me:
Error mounting ecryptfs

- I'm not sure what the README means by a 'layover mount', can you expand?

- If it would help you are welcome to use my x86_64 test box
to track down x86_64 issues.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 05:25:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:25:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP
	messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240525.l0O5PeYD003600@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-24 00:25 EST -------
- spec still contains redundant "BuildRequires: cppunit"

- Unnecessarily wasting time on building static libs
=> %configure --disable-static

- rpmlint:
W: qpidc incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1 0.1-2
=> Probably an oversight.

E: qpidc script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/qpidc-0.1/LICENSE.txt
=> chmod -x LICENSE.txt in %prep.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 05:41:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:41:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240541.l0O5fsvl004093@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-24 00:41 EST -------
FYI, on my x86_64 box with either the x86_64 or i386 package installed, and my 
ppc box, I get the "Error mounting ecryptfs" and in dmesg I see: 

ecryptfs_parse_options: Could not find key with description: [15194abfa1fef279]
process_request_key_err: Unknown error code: [0x00000000ffffff82]
Error parsing options; rc = [-22]


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 06:10:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:10:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240610.l0O6AW8b005137@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-24 01:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> * missing "BuildRequires: gettext"
> * %defattr missing in -devel package
> * in -devel package, missing "Requires: gnome-vfs2-devel glib2-devel"
> These are "Requires" in the pkgconfig file. glib2-devel is redundant
> (due to glibmm24-devel), but a direct requirement.
 
Oopsie. Fixed in release 2.
 

> * Avoid duplicating the licence file "COPYING" in sub-packages.
> Here the -devel package requires the main package. 

I'm of the opinion that such license files should always be included in any
subpackage ot make the licensing explicitly clear. However, since there is not
officially any such guideline, I don't think this a blocker at all.
 

> * GConf schema files are no %config files and should not be
> marked as such.

My understanding is that schemas should be marked %config, as they are the base
configurations for the package which the system administrator can change as he
or she sees fit, etc. Several other of my packages which use gconf schemas have
them marked as %config(noreplace). Why is it invalid? Thanks.

> * In the scriptlets, you list the two schema files without wildcards.
> You ought to do the same in the %files section, so you will notice
> when the set of schema files changes.

Oooooooh. Good catch; thanks. Fixed in release 2.

URLs for release 2:
Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver.spec
SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 06:41:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:41:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240641.l0O6fN7X006147@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2007-01-24 01:40 EST -------
I know 'the more the merrier', but as this package is a frontend to alternatives
(specific to java); I want to draw your attention to another pygtk frontend call
galternatives (already in Extras). It works for all packages using
/usr/sbin/alternatives and its more fine-grained. When i tried this package, it
only shows one radio button with 'GCJ'  selected, so I figure it does all the
other work in the background given multiple java implementations. However, with
galternatives, there are many pieces (related to java) that can be selected
alternatively, 'java', 'javac' 'jre_1.4.2', etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 06:54:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:54:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240654.l0O6sAXR006514@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-24 01:54 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
Following is latest version:
I installed rpms and they worked..

* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.11.beta6.3.src.rpm



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 07:52:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:52:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240752.l0O7qpi5008316@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-24 02:52 EST -------
You would not edit installed schema files if you wanted to change
the system-wide GConf defaults. You would edit the key/value
pairs in the database, e.g. with gconf-editor or gconftool-2.
Modifying schema files leads to non-trivial upgrade scenarios,
especially when they are marked as %config(noreplace).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 09:32:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:32:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701240932.l0O9WLKW014661@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-24 04:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
As far as I know, yes, as subsequent versions can be used to follow the track
and examine what modifications have been performed.
See also
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines?highlight=%28release%29%7C%28bump%29#head-5ea39bbc33cf351b41b51325ac3527eff4c58dac


I bet this requirement is in the wiki, too... but I can't locate it now :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 11:27:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:27:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241127.l0OBRJQn022632@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 11:32:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:32:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241132.l0OBWPPD022849@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 06:32 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146400)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146400&action=view)
The output log on the execution of seedit-gui

Well, now:
* On the first time I executed seedit-gui, I was
  asked to reboot the system, so did I.
* Then on the second time I executed, I got the
  error attached.
* On the third time, it seems that seedit-gui works
  well.
Is this the expected behavior?

For packaging issue, I will check later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 11:46:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:46:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP
	messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241146.l0OBkltR023422@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630





------- Additional Comments From meyering at redhat.com  2007-01-24 06:46 EST -------
Hi Ralf,

Thanks again for the quick feedback.  I've posted a patch here:
http://www.nabble.com/qpidc-RPM-feedback-t3080445.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 12:03:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:03:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241203.l0OC3mTF024048@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 07:03 EST -------
Thanks for the review Manuel.
My comments inline:

>> As a sidenote, you could have used a 1 line sed command in %install in
>> order to modify the offending line in xinetd.conf, rather then creating a
>> separate patch, but your method is perfectly fine.

I actually changed 2 lines in csync2.xinetd ;-) I prefer clean patches to 
regular expressions in spec files. That way, if something changes in the 
source, the patch fails to apply and I can fix it.

>> In order to start the program (via xinetd), /etc/services must be modified,
>> adding a line specifying the port and protocol used by csync2 and SSL
>> certificates must be generated for each box where the program will run

There's no need to edit /etc/services, since xinetd doesn't require it.
I tried creating the ssl certificates in %install (make cert does this), but 
in mock, openssl seems to have problems opening a random device. I'm not sure 
what's the best way to handle this. Maybe just ship a self-signed cert with 
the rpm?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 12:20:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:20:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241220.l0OCKoTX024947@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-24 07:20 EST -------
     I fully agree with clean patches, but for very small modifications I prefer
 one liners to separate patches. And since you could have done "s/default
on/default off; s/disable=no/disable=yes" one line would have been enough :)

     Serious stuff now:
In my case, the first attempt to run csync2 on FC6 (without editing
/etc/services) triggered this error:

Jan 24 03:27:18 wolfy Installed: xinetd.x86_64 2:2.3.14-8
Jan 24 03:27:19 wolfy Installed: csync2.x86_64 1.33-2.fc6
Jan 24 03:27:58 wolfy xinetd[19733]: Port not specified and can't find service:
csync2 with getservbyname
Jan 24 03:27:58 wolfy xinetd[19733]: xinetd Version 2.3.14 started with libwrap
loadavg labeled-networking options compiled in.
Jan 24 03:27:58 wolfy xinetd[19733]: Started working: 0 available services



     As of creating the certs, I'd include the relevant part of the Makefile 
rather then creating the certificates by default. Maybe because I generate ALL
certificates in only one place and transfer them wherever they are needed...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 12:22:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:22:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241222.l0OCMn7H025092@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 07:22 EST -------
Hi Kevin, thanks for reviewing this.

>> 1. The Source URL doesn't seem to work for me.

Ah, typo

>> 2. Your debuginfo files are all empty. Not sure why that is, but
>> I think it deserves some investigation.

Huh, I'm pretty sure I checked that. I'll have another look.

>> 3. I assume the Provides: powerdns-recursor = %{version}-%{release}
>> is for upstream or other project released rpms?

That's right. The product is commonly known as powerdns, but upstream names 
it's tarballs pdns.{something}.tgz.
Users will probably try to `yum install powerdns-recursor`.

>> 4. Is it ok for this package to run as user 'pdns', which is the same as
>> the 'pdns' package. If they are both on the same machine could there be
>> security implications? Perhaps this package should use a 'pdns-recursor'
>> user instead?

The packages don't depend on each other, and they don't share any data, so a 
user 'pdns-recursor' makes sense.

I'm at work now, but will create a new version tonight.

Cheers,

Ruben

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 12:42:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:42:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241242.l0OCgrS9025756@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 07:42 EST -------
man xinetd(8): xinetd is not limited to services listed in /etc/services. 
Therefore, anybody can use xinetd to start special-purpose servers.

But for that to work, you probably have to set "type" to UNLISTED.

I'm at work now, but I'll see what I can come up with tonight.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 13:32:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241332.l0ODWFMd028435@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-24 08:32 EST -------
Just tested. One can either edit /etc/services or add the following two lines to
/etc/xinetd.d/csync2:
        type            = UNLISTED
        port            = 

Which makes me suggest the following
- modify a bit your patch as to include these two lines, using the default port
value assumed by csync2 ( 30865 )
- add a README.FEDORA pointing this difference towards the included docs
- bug upstream to modify the docs (the paper.pdf)

What do you think ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 14:11:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:11:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241411.l0OEBwcr031292@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 09:11 EST -------
Sounds good to me. Will do that tonight.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 14:28:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:28:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 210423] Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241428.l0OESZTF000669@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping utility
Alias: volp

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210423





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 09:28 EST -------
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if any response is received
from reporter within a week.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 14:45:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:45:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine
	multimedia library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241445.l0OEjaMR001779@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326





------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com  2007-01-24 09:45 EST -------
Could the following patch from gxine's Mercurial tree be applied? It concerns
the application crashing if a modal dialog is open when the current stream ends.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109655&aid=1643093&group_id=9655
http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/hg/gxine/?cmd=changeset;node=1827

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 15:45:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:45:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241545.l0OFjGkR007880@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-01-24 10:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I do not want to sound picky, but
> - the URL included in the spec is not very useful.

I'll change it to:

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/7/SRPMS/system-switch-java-%{version}-%{release}.src.rpm

once the '7' directory has been created.

> - The purpose of the md5sum check is to guarantee that the file included in the
> src.rpm coincides with the one from the upstream source. Computing the md5sum by
> the packager and by the reviewer based on the SAME file extracted from the same
> src.rpm guarantees nothing.

It guarantees that the reviewer is reviewing the same tarball that I think he's
reviewing (i.e., that I didn't build the wrong tarball into the to-be-reviewed
src.rpm).  But I agree that in the case of no-upstream packages like this, the
md5sum step of the review process is less meaningful.

> - each modification to the spec should be reflected in the release tag and in
> the changelog

Not for review packages that have not yet entered the revision control system.

> 
> In this special case, I suggest including a comment in the spec, specifying that
> there is no other upstream but the src.rpm

OK, will do.

> and, also, defining a real path for
> the said src.rpm (hosting it for instance on http://fitzsim.org or on
> people.redhat.com)

I'm not going to do that because I don't intend to keep the fitzsim.org src.rpm
up-to-date.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 15:51:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:51:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241551.l0OFpN2M008390@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-01-24 10:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> I know 'the more the merrier', but as this package is a frontend to alternatives
> (specific to java); I want to draw your attention to another pygtk frontend call
> galternatives (already in Extras). It works for all packages using
> /usr/sbin/alternatives and its more fine-grained. When i tried this package, it
> only shows one radio button with 'GCJ'  selected, so I figure it does all the
> other work in the background given multiple java implementations. However, with
> galternatives, there are many pieces (related to java) that can be selected
> alternatively, 'java', 'javac' 'jre_1.4.2', etc.

Yes, system-switch-java is intended to allow an administrator to easily select
the default Java toolset, which includes all relevant alternatives for the
selected Java vendor/version combination.  I'll recommend that administrators
wanting finer-grained control over these alternatives should use galternatives.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 15:55:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:55:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241555.l0OFtEEZ008783@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-24 10:54 EST -------
the url is supposed to point at the upstream project.  if there is not one 
then you need to create one. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 16:05:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++
	compiler system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241605.l0OG567x009836@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 11:05 EST -------
Umm... this review ticket has currently no activity.

Enrico, would you update your spec/srpm if you have some
points you want to change or fix? After that, I will
take a look at your spec/srpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 17:23:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:23:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223068] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make
	your Moose classes pluggable
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241723.l0OHNMZS017174@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable - Make your Moose classes pluggable


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223068


cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu  2007-01-24 12:23 EST -------
Updated to 0.0004, imported and built on devel; branches requested for fc5,6.

Thanks for the review! :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 17:53:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:53:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex,
	a tool for creating scanners
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241753.l0OHrEfR020352@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381





------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com  2007-01-24 12:53 EST -------
Btw, I just commited flex 2.5.33 into raw hide.
Are there are any other comments regarding the compat-flex package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 18:06:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:06:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2
	engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241806.l0OI6iuo021800@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 13:06 EST -------
Well,
* Firstly, Fedora's packaging policy by default is "all or
  nothing" unless there is a certain reason for conditional
  dependency (check: "Conditional dependencies" in
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines )

  What I mean by here is: I browsed under
  http://people.os-zen.net/rezza/themes/ , there are 6 themes
  named "Rezlooks-XXX.tar.gz", while you seem to have chosen
  4 of them and 2 erased by the some reason.

  If you have a reason why you didn't include 2 themes, please
  comment in the spec file why (sorry if it was only because there
  was only 4 themes when you packaged this srpm). Otherwise, 
  you must include "all" themes or include "nothing".

  Then..
  * rpmlint for srpm:
------------------------------------------------------
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission Rezlooks-Snow.tar.gz 0600
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission Rezlooks-Gilouche.tar.gz 0600
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission gtk-rezlooks-engine.spec 0600
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission Rezlooks-graphite.tar.gz 0600
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission Rezlooks-candy.tar.gz 0600
W: gtk-rezlooks-engine strange-permission 39179-rezlooks-0.6.tar.gz 0600
------------------------------------------------------
   Please change the permission of files included in srpm
   to 0644.

   * Documentation
     /usr/share/doc/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6/NEWS says:
------------------------------------------------------
See Changelog for news.
-------------------------------------------------------
     This file is useless and please include Changelog instead.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 18:29:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:29:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] New: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt
	applications to use KDE's file dialogs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228

           Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to
                    use KDE's file dialogs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: faucamp at csir.co.za
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/kgtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/kgtk-0.8-1.src.rpm
Description:
This is an LD_PRELOAD library that allows Gtk and Qt applications (such as
Firefox, Evolution, Eclipse, etc) to use KDE's file dialogs.

When a Gtk/Qt app is executed, it starts the kdialogd app (if not already
started), and communicates with this via a UNIX domain socket. There will only
ever be one instance of kdialogd, and all apps communicate with the same
instance - and it terminates itself 30 seconds after the last Gtk/Qt app has
disconnected.


This package builds in mock (fc6/i386) and has been built and tested on fc6/i386 and fc5/x86_64. rpmlint is silent.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 18:40:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:40:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241840.l0OIeGnb024894@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 13:40 EST -------
Well,

* Current URL seems to be http://deluge-torrent.org/
* The newest version seems to be 0.4.0
  ( http://deluge-torrent.org/wiki/Downloads )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 19:00:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:00:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241900.l0OJ0oPX026330@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-24 14:00 EST -------
By the way, does this need rb_libtorrent (bug 221372)?

* Doesn't this package compile without rb_libtorrent?
* Is this python module linked against libtorrent.so?
  For me, 0.4.0 compile without rb_libtorrent.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 19:31:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:31:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241931.l0OJVYhW029288@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com  2007-01-24 14:31 EST -------
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ecryptfs_parse_options: Could not find key with description: [15194abfa1fef279]

It sounds like there is a problem getting the key into your user session
keyring. This seems to be becoming a more common problem recently. We are in the
process of updating the userspace tools to do some preliminary sanity checks of
the keyring before attempting to move forward with the mount. The failure
conditions could be more gracefully handled in the userspace mount helper too.

After you attempt a mount, what is the output of ``keyctl show''?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 19:45:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:45:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine
	multimedia library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241945.l0OJj31j030595@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326





------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz  2007-01-24 14:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> Could the following patch from gxine's Mercurial tree be applied? It concerns
> the application crashing if a modal dialog is open when the current stream ends.
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109655&aid=1643093&group_id=9655
> http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/hg/gxine/?cmd=changeset;node=1827

Done.

New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SPECS/gxine.spec
New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/FC6/SRPMS/gxine-0.5.10-5.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 19:48:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:48:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine
	multimedia library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701241948.l0OJmV6c030852@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326





------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz  2007-01-24 14:48 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146444)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146444&action=view)
stream end crash patch

Upstream patch.
Fixes a crash which occurs when some dialog is opened and stream ends. Upstream
bz #1643093

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:14:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:14:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242014.l0OKEftP000955@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 15:14 EST -------
Ok, fixed all the things above, and more.
I added a nicer initscript as well.

New files:
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pdns-recursor.spec
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pdns-recursor-3.1.4-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:19:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:19:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224244] New: Review Request: gaim
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224244

           Summary: Review Request: gaim
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Requesting review in preparation for the Fedora merge.  I would really like to maintain single spec support all Fedora plus RHEL3+.  It has been easier to maintain in this fashion, and most importantly, the spec hasn't got out of hand with crazy stuff.  Cleanup recommendations are welcome.

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gaim/

Description: 
Gaim allows you to talk to anyone using a variety of messaging 
protocols, including AIM (Oscar and TOC), ICQ, IRC, Yahoo!, 
MSN Messenger, Jabber, Gadu-Gadu, Napster, and Zephyr.  These 
protocols are implemented using a modular, easy to use design.  
To use a protocol, just add an account using the account editor.

Gaim supports many common features of other clients, as well as many 
unique features, such as perl scripting and C plugins.

Gaim is NOT affiliated with or endorsed by America Online, Inc., 
Microsoft Corporation, or Yahoo! Inc. or other messaging service 
providers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:25:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:25:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] New: Review Request: squirrelmail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245

           Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Requesting review in preparation for the Fedora merge.  This package is in a horrible, horrible mess, with language specific patches (more yet coming...) and a mass encoding change.  Fedora needs some serious help in merging these things upstream, and convincing upstream to handle the l10n encodings in a non-braindead way so we don't have to ship with these horrible ugly hacks.

Anybody want to be co-maintainer of this in F7?

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/squirrelmail/

Description: 
Squirrelmail is a terrible IMAP webmail client that hasn't improved much at all in the past several years, yet we continue to ship it because we were unable to find anything better to repace it that is also simple and self contained. =(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:50:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:50:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242050.l0OKodSq005224@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-24 15:50 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> By the way, does this need rb_libtorrent (bug 221372)?


This is the python interface to the functionality provided by the rb_libtorrent
library. Without rb_libtorrent installed, this package is essentially useless. :]

I'm going to be pretty busy the rest of today, so I'll get to updating this
tomorrow (probably sometime in the early evening-ish).

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:52:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:52:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242052.l0OKqqgr005474@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-24 15:52 EST -------
I will review it later. I can see that the *.so is not in devel subpackage. You
must fix it. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 20:54:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:54:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242054.l0OKsSgJ005672@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |karlikt at gmail.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 21:04:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:04:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224254] New: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game
	using the Stratagus game engine
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254

           Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the
                    Stratagus game engine
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos.spec

Description: Invasion - Battle of Survival is a real-time strategy game using the 
Stratagus game engine

Unfortunately I haven't enough space to host whole SRPM, so I give only direct links to the spec-file, shell script for starting game and path to the main source archive:

http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos.spec
http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos.sh
http://bos.seul.org/files/bos_2_0_1.tar.gz

The main doubt for me is the name of package. Should it be bos or battle-of-survival or stratagus-bos?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 21:25:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:25:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using
	the Stratagus game engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242125.l0OLPB7Y008822@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254





------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com  2007-01-24 16:25 EST -------
Oops!
Accidentally forotten patch:

http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos-2.0.1-fixes.patch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 21:33:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:33:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242133.l0OLXIX4009389@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-24 16:33 EST -------
New version:
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2-1.33-3.src.rpm
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2.spec

One rpmlint error though because I changed permissions to 640 on the ssl key, but that's a lot safer than 
world readable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 21:40:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:40:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242140.l0OLe5Vp010065@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-01-24 16:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> the url is supposed to point at the upstream project.  if there is not one 
> then you need to create one.

I think this package is specific enough to Fedora that it doesn't warrant a
separate upstream project.  But since two people have mentioned this, what I'll
do is upload the release tarballs someplace convenient, like:

ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/rhug/


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:09:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:09:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242209.l0OM9Zqi012905@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-24 17:09 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.34-1.src.rpm

%changelog
* Wed Jan 24 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.34-1
- Upstream sync
- Add a wrapper script for init files to help SElinux
- invoke wrapper script using daemon --user=POKER_USER
- add sed command to fill in POKER_USER in init files
- remove old config patch which is fixed in this release
- add new config patch to configure as noarch package
- comment out make check in spec
- Remove adduser call in %%pre and use userid of games instead

* Mon Jan 22 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.33-11
- Remove poker-server and poker-web Requires from poker-bot
- Remove NIHPHOBIA from %%doc
- Remove %%{version} from patch names
- Replace %%{_sysconfdir}/init.d with %%{_initrddir}
- Document relation between currency and URL in poker-web/README.Fedora
- Add a poker-bot/README.Fedora file for explaining cash-in URLs
- Change permissions on poker.server.xml to readable
- Add permission changing to instructions in poker-server/README.Fedora
- Add creation of %%{poker_user} user id to run poker-server
- Create a directory for poker-server log files
- Add poker-server run and log directories to poker-server %%files
- Change ownership of poker-server run/log directories to %%{poker_user}

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:10:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:10:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on
	a poker-network server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242210.l0OMAwOI013049@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server
Alias: poker2d

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-24 17:10 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker2d-1.0.34-1.src.rpm

%changelog
* Wed Jan 24 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.34-1
- Upstream sync
- Comment out make check


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:15:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:15:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2
	engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242215.l0OMFGD6013500@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045





------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk  2007-01-24 17:15 EST -------
I have uploaded a new version which removes NEWS file and adds Changelog file.

I have also fixed the permissions, and included the Rezlooks-dark theme.

I have not included Rezlooks-Arials since it requires the nuoveXT-1.6 icon
theme, and contains a theme file which specifies the wrong controls and window
border themes. This is now also noted in the spec file.

New SRPM: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/gtk-rezlooks-engine-0.6-4.src.rpm

The new spec file has the same url as the old one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:16:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:16:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242216.l0OMGBXr013561@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-24 17:16 EST -------
NOTE: service poker-server status does not work.  No matter what I try.  I think
we have to write our own status function for this, what do you think?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:22:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:22:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242222.l0OMM1wh014013@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-24 17:21 EST -------
> MUSTFIX
> =======
> * Upstream bug #1454 that will allow this to be a noarch package.

Should be fixed.

> * Create a 'poker' user for running the server for better security

I used user "games" instead.

> * /usr/share/doc/poker-network-1.0.33/NIHPHOBIA is cute, but not really
>   necessary, is it?

Removed.

> * Don't use %{version} in the patch filenames.  The version in a patch
>   filename is supposed to reflect the package version when the patch
>   was first introduced, not the current package version.

Fixed.

> 
> SHOULD
> ======
> * Add selinux policies to poker-server for better security

Need help from you on this.

> * Patch tests/Makefile.in and configure in poker-network-1.0.33-config.patch
>   so that you don't have to call 'autoreconf' during %build.  Hopefully
>   upstream will adopt this patch in a new release so that it becomes a
>   moot point.

They will, not sure it's worth the effort since the patch will be in the next
release.

> * Use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir}/init.d

Done.

> * Use double quotes around the sed regsub pattern to avoid potential
>   problems if %{python_sitelib} were to ever contain a space.

There already are double quotes around this path in the init file.

> 
> NOTES and Questions
> ===================
> * poker-network and poker2d (BZ #222612) use the same upstream source
>   tarball, but different spec files.  My understanding is that this is
>   so that poker-network can be marked as 'noarch', while poker2d will contain
>   arch-specific bits.  As far as I am aware, there are no problems
>   using the same source file for two different spec files, aside from
>   duplication in the resulting srpm.

No, the packages are seperated because they need to use different %configure
options.  The fact that it allows us to make one package noarch is a beneficial
side-effect.

> * Why does the package contain a x509 certificate for 'webmaster at localhost'?
> 

09:38:57       XulChris | dachary: reviewer wants to know: "Why does the package
contain a x509 certificate for 'webmaster at localhost'?"
09:38:57        dachary |  :-)
09:39:12        dachary |  for the SSL conx to the poker server
09:39:46       XulChris | dachary: i dont know anything about x509 certificates,
but what if you dont have a webmaster user name or use "localhost"?
09:40:12        dachary |  it's a self signed certificate
09:40:21        dachary |  the email does not matter much
09:40:33       XulChris | so its nothing i have to generate at build time then?
09:40:41        dachary |  it's a place holder that must be replaced if you're
serious about security
09:40:47        dachary |  no


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:24:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:24:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223627] Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset
	switcher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242224.l0OMOEje014193@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: system-switch-java - Java toolset switcher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223627


fitzsim at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-01-24 17:23 EST -------
Package built in devel.  Closing.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:38:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:38:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242238.l0OMcn19014977@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-24 17:38 EST -------
- MUST: rpmlint is silent - OK
- MUST: The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK
- MUST: The spec file name in the format %{name}.spec - OK
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- MUST: licensed with an open-source compatible license (GPL) - OK
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - OK
- MUST: Text of license is included in %doc - OK
- MUST: The spec file is written in American English. - OK
- MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. - OK
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. (2cde8a09508773cf2f9028912be4fbbe)
- MUST: successfully compile and build on i386/fc6 (in mock) - OK
- MUST: Not ExcludeArch - OK
- MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires (mock-build correct) - OK
- MUST: There are not any locales - OK
- MUST: ldconfig non required - OK
- MUST: the package not designed to be relocatable - OK
- MUST: A package owns all directories that it creates - OK
- MUST: There are not any duplicates in %files. - OK
- MUST: Permissions on files set properly - OK
- MUST: %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK
- MUST: macros use consistently - OK
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. - OK
- MUST: -doc subpackage not required - OK
- MUST: Files in %doc not affects the runtime of the application - OK
- MUST: Not any static libraries ot headers - OK
- MUST: Non *.pc files - OK
- MUST: library files end in .so (without suffix) are not in -devel - TO BE FIXED
- MUST: not any subpackages (but requires)
- MUST: not contain any .la libtool archives - OK
- MUST: Packages is not containing GUI applications - OK
- MUST: Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. - OK

SHOULD Items:
- SHOULD: text of license included in package
- SHOULD: any translations
- SHOULD: Package tested in mock
- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures. (At now I cannot check it)
- SHOULD: Package runs correctly (not any errors)
- SHOULD: scriptlets are not used
- SHOULD: Not any subpackages (without devel which must be created)
- SHOULD: Not any *.pc files



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 22:47:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:47:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224244] Review Request: gaim
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242247.l0OMlvfV015591@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gaim


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224244





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-24 17:47 EST -------
> %post 
> /sbin/ldconfig -n %{_libdir}/gaim
>
> %postun
> /sbin/ldconfig -n %{_libdir}/gaim

These two don't do anything useful.


> %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gaim.schemas

Why are these not installed/uninstalled with gconftool-2?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 23:08:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:08:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] New: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271

           Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated
                    tests
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/rhts-candidates/rhts-2.6.0.svn332-1/rhts.spec

SRPM URL: 
http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/rhts-candidates/rhts-2.6.0.svn332-1/rhts-2.6.0.svn332-1.src.rpm

Description: 
RHTS is a system for developing automated tests.

This package contains tools for developing tests, running them, handling test metadata, and packaging tests for easy deployment to testing hosts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 23:09:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:09:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242309.l0ON9qIK017054@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-24 18:09 EST -------
     I am sorry, but I definitely MUST veto the inclusion of certificates in the
binary rpm. The reason is that this would lead to each and every computer where
the rpm is installed to have the very same certificates. Which kind of defeats
the whole purpose of certificates.
     If you want to help the users, you could use for instance one of the
following approaches:
a)
- extract the certificate generation part from the Makefile included in sources
and save it as a separate mkcert.sh
- install this file as a %doc
- document it in the README.FEDORA file I have suggested in comment #7
b)
- generate the certificates in %post

     Personally I believe that the first approach is better, allowing for the
admins to have the certificates generated only if they feel like needing them.
     You could take a look at mod_ssl and dovecot. The first one includes the
directories where Apache SSL certificates are to be stored, as well as the
scripts needed to generate the certificates, but does not include the
certificates themselves. In addition a set of sample certificates are generated
at install time. A cleaner approach (in my opinion...) is used by dovecot which
includes a dovecot-openssl.cnf file (in /etc/pki) and a mkcert.sh script
(included as doc/sample).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 23:29:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:29:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242329.l0ONTM77018271@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-24 18:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #53)
> > MUSTFIX
> > * Create a 'poker' user for running the server for better security
> 
> I used user "games" instead.

Better to use a custom user account and not the overloaded 'games' account. 
This helps prevent a security breach from one game using the 'games' account
from compromising other games using the 'games' account.  This will require
using 'useradd' in the %pre scriptlet.

> > * Add selinux policies to poker-server for better security
> 
> Need help from you on this.

I'm working on it...

> > * Use double quotes around the sed regsub pattern to avoid potential
> >   problems if %{python_sitelib} were to ever contain a space.
> 
> There already are double quotes around this path in the init file.

But the sed command itself would fail if %{python_sitelib} contained a space,
unless you surround the regsub pattern with double-quotes.

> > NOTES and Questions
> > ===================
> > * Why does the package contain a x509 certificate for 'webmaster at localhost'?
> > 
> 
> 09:38:57       XulChris | dachary: reviewer wants to know: "Why does the package
> contain a x509 certificate for 'webmaster at localhost'?"
> 09:38:57        dachary |  :-)
> 09:39:12        dachary |  for the SSL conx to the poker server
> 09:39:46       XulChris | dachary: i dont know anything about x509 certificates,
> but what if you dont have a webmaster user name or use "localhost"?
> 09:40:12        dachary |  it's a self signed certificate
> 09:40:21        dachary |  the email does not matter much
> 09:40:33       XulChris | so its nothing i have to generate at build time then?
> 09:40:41        dachary |  it's a place holder that must be replaced if you're
> serious about security
> 09:40:47        dachary |  no

I suspected it was something like this.  poker-server admins should be aware
that using the default x509 cert provides no security at all, since everyone has
access to the certificate's private key.  Please document this in README.Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 24 23:40:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:40:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701242340.l0ONeSqL018647@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-24 18:40 EST -------
Some watch-the-spec findings:

> %if %{hardcore_python_packaging}
> Requires:   python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")
> %endif

Since FC4, "Requires: python(abi) =" is added by rpmbuild for
Python modules below the versioned %_libdir/python* directory.


> %build
> [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT;

> %clean
> [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT;

Superfluous. Nowadays BuildRoot cannot be '/' anymore. Apart from
that, you would have a hard time finding anyone who has ever built
an rpm with "--buildroot=/".


> %install
> DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install-noarch

Here "rm -rf $RPM_BUILDROOT" at the beginning of %install
is missing. You want to install into a clean buildroot always,
not just with --short-circuit installs.


> /usr/share/rhts/lib/rhts-make.include

Directories /usr/share/rhts/ and /usr/share/rhts/lib/ are not
included.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 00:11:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:11:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250011.l0P0Bh5k019938@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-24 19:11 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.34-2.src.rpm

%changelog
* Wed Jan 24 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.34-2
- Write own status function using isrunning to poker-server/bot init
- Fix some errors in init files
- Change %%{poker_user} from games to poker
- Add useradd call in %%pre for poker-server
- Add note in poker-server README about x509 certificate
- Add quotes around sed expression


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 00:27:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:27:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250027.l0P0Rhm8020696@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972


Bug 219972 depends on bug 171543, which changed state.

Bug 171543 Summary: update twisted-python from 1.3 to 2.4 stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171543

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 01:21:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:21:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250121.l0P1LvkW022805@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-24 20:21 EST -------
=== MUST Fix ===

* You don't need to define version and release above, just past them in the      
  right way "version:   and  release:    "
* "Group:   QA" not valide.
* fields "url:" is missing.
* fields Source0 must be point to the full location of the tarball for check up.
* "# snapshot" can be remove.
* fields BuildRoot: not complete and not be point to your login (error while
build)= "make: *** No rule to make target `install-noarch'.  Stop."

* Things which has already mentioned by Michael Schwendt.
* make install-noarch not really need it, just an make install.
----
rpmlint output from srpm:
----
W: rhts non-standard-group QA
W: rhts no-url-tag
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhts-testhelpers
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-provides rhts-testhelpers
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhts-testhelpers-developer
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-provides rhts-testhelpers-developer
W: rhts rpm-buildroot-usage %build [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && [ -d
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT;
W: rhts rpm-buildroot-usage %build DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT make
E: rhts no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
W: rhts mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 31)
-----
rpmlint output from rhts-test package:
-----
W: rhts-test-env no-url-tag
W: rhts-test-env no-documentation
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests
E: rhts-test-env script-without-shebang /usr/share/rhts/lib/rhts-make.include
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea
E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777
-----
rpmlint output from rhts-python package:
-----
W: rhts-python no-url-tag
W: rhts-python no-documentation
E: rhts-python non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rhts/testinfo.py 0644
-----
* all warning and error must be fix.
* in field %files, you don't need to past each files, main location it enough.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 02:05:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:05:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250205.l0P25Jwh024298@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-24 21:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
It is unexpected behavior, thanks for report.
It is a bug when upgrading package, and I have fixed now.

And please input 
/usr/sbin/seedit-rbac off -n
before upgrade.(it is needed only this time, will not needed next time.)

Fixed version..
* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.12.beta6.4.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 02:16:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:16:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250216.l0P2GeF8024737@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-24 21:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> You would not edit installed schema files if you wanted to change
> the system-wide GConf defaults. You would edit the key/value
> pairs in the database, e.g. with gconf-editor or gconftool-2.
> Modifying schema files leads to non-trivial upgrade scenarios,
> especially when they are marked as %config(noreplace).

Aaahh that makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the explanation. I fixed the schemas
stuff in release 3:

Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/download/fedora/nemiver.spec
Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/download/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-3.src.rpm

However, now rpmlint gives me two messages about that:
  W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-workbench.schemas
  W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-dbgperspective.schemas
I take it there are safe to ignore for GConf schemas then?

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 02:56:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:56:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250256.l0P2uSQo026105@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-24 21:56 EST -------
>And please input 
>/usr/sbin/seedit-rbac off -n
>before upgrade.(it is needed only this time, will not needed next time.)

I think you should past this in your updated spec file for updated release.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 03:00:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:00:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250300.l0P30hm5026235@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-24 22:00 EST -------
oops,

"make: *** No rule to make target `install-noarch'.  Stop." is pasted in the
wrong way.

>make install-noarch not really need it, just an make install.
make: *** No rule to make target `install-noarch'.  Stop.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 03:12:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:12:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using
	the Stratagus game engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250312.l0P3CKDW026661@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-24 22:12 EST -------
>Unfortunately I haven't enough space to host whole SRPM, so I give only direct
>links to the spec-file, shell script for starting game and path to the main
>source archive:


I don't really know if it's approved on bugzilla...

However,

> The main doubt for me is the name of package. Should it be bos or
>battle-of-survival or stratagus-bos?

Your package must have the same name than your tarball name as well as your spec
file.

A lot of thing must be fix in your spec file.
I'll make a full review of your package within a few days.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 04:12:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:12:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224292] New: Software updater caused and unhandled exception
	error when selecting view updates.
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224292

           Summary: Software updater caused and unhandled exception error
                    when selecting view updates.
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: fc6
          Platform: i386
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dunkle_tx at msn.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Description of problem:
Prior to this this I have updated 4 times with no problem. Software updater
caused and unhandled exception error when selecting view updates. See log data
in Acutual result section below.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always when selecting view updates.  25 updates were available for installation.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select update
2.Select view update
3.Exception Occurred Box appears
  
Actual results:
Component: Software Updater
Summary: TB8a9160cb comps.py:143:parse_package_list:CompsException

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 659, in ?
    main()
  File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 655, in main
    pup.run()
  File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 494, in run
    self.doRefresh()
  File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 269, in doRefresh
    self.reposSetup(pbar)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 153, in reposSetup
    self.doGroupSetup()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 408, in doGroupSetup
    self.comps.add(groupfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/comps.py", line 339, in add
    group = Group(elem)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/comps.py", line 57, in __init__
    self.parse(elem)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/comps.py", line 133, in parse
    self.parse_package_list(child)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/comps.py", line 143, in
parse_package_list
    raise CompsException
CompsException

Local variables in innermost frame:
genre: optinoal
self: Graphics
package: digikam
packagelist_elem: 
child: 


Expected results:


Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 04:32:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:32:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224292] Software updater caused and unhandled exception error
	when selecting view updates.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250432.l0P4WmPl000369@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Software updater caused and unhandled exception error when selecting view updates.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224292


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
                 CC|fedora-package-             |peter at thecodergeek.com
                   |review at redhat.com           |
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(dunkle_tx at msn.com)




------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-24 23:32 EST -------
This looks like it was caused by a mistyped entry in the comps XML file (which
stores the packages and grouping information). I've fixed this in CVS and it
should go out with the next Extras push (likely tomorrow). Please let us know if
that resolves your issue when the next Extras release is pushed. 

Thanks for your bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 04:36:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:36:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250436.l0P4aC9l000453@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-24 23:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> >And please input 
> >/usr/sbin/seedit-rbac off -n
> >before upgrade.(it is needed only this time, will not needed next time.)
> I think you should past this in your updated spec file for updated release.
I see, it is more kind. 
I fixed seedit itself.
"/usr/sbin/seedit-rbac off -n" is no longer necessary.

Latest version..
* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.13.beta6.5.src.rpm




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 04:46:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:46:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250446.l0P4k1c7001531@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |peter at thecodergeek.com




------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-24 23:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
[..]
> * fields Source0 must be point to the full location of the tarball for check up.
While this is generally true, it is not the case for source snapshots (unless
there is a valid URL for it, such as some projects' nightly or weekly CVS tarballs).

(In reply to comment #0)
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea
> E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777

Why are these /mnt directories needed? If they are valid, would they be better
as locations in /srv or similar?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 06:22:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:22:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250622.l0P6M9fn009213@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-25 01:22 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146500)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146500&action=view)
Modified icemw-xdg-menu patch

Patrice,

Did you get the author's permission to mark the icemw-xdg-menu script as GPL?
I've modified your patch (Small bug: broken theme name parsing; added icon_size
support - instead of the default 48x48)
Please review my modification (this is the first time I touch python code...).

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 06:37:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:37:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250637.l0P6b8I0009782@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-25 01:37 EST -------
As for the package, the automenu subpackage was designed to reduce the dep-chain
in the main icewm package. (xdg-menu)
Changed the sub-package name to xdgmenu

* Thu Jan 25 2007  - 1.2.30-9
- Remove redundant icewm-xdg-menu* %%file entry.
- Change sub-package name to xdgmenu.
- Move icewm-xdg-menu to xdgmenu sub-package.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-9.src.rpm

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 06:39:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:39:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250639.l0P6dWLI009853@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-25 01:39 EST -------
Changelog should include:
- Removed the icewm-generate-menu script.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 07:46:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:46:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250746.l0P7k3vg013463@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 02:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > By the way, does this need rb_libtorrent (bug 221372)?
> 
> 
> This is the python interface to the functionality provided by the
> rb_libtorrent
> library. 

Yes. As you and the description on http://deluge-torrent.org/wiki
says, this (python-libtorrent) is the python interface, which
provides the function provided the rb_libtorrent, i.e. the _rewrite_
of rb_libtorrent so that rb_libtorrent can be used from python
_directly_.

As you can see, the source of python-libtorrent includes the
"copy" of rb_libtorrent source, modified so that it can be
called by python. I still doubt that this package should need
C++ version of libtorrent (rb_libtorrent).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 07:53:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:53:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224314] New: Package Updater Bug
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224314

           Summary: Package Updater Bug
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: fc6
          Platform: i686
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: sidorenko.andrey at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


I try to update using Package Updater but always receive the error message
"Exception Occurred". The crash dump in an attached file.

------- Additional Comments From sidorenko.andrey at gmail.com  2007-01-25 02:53 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146503)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146503&action=view)
crash dump


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 07:57:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:57:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224314] Package Updater Bug
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250757.l0P7vZKR014194@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package Updater Bug


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224314





------- Additional Comments From sidorenko.andrey at gmail.com  2007-01-25 02:57 EST -------
Note, there is very the same problem with Package Manager

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 08:06:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:06:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250806.l0P867WX014626@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228





------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za  2007-01-25 03:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I will review it later. I can see that the *.so is not in devel subpackage. You
> must fix it. 

No. The .so files are not development libraries; they are merely LD_PRELOAD
modules that get loaded when another program is executed (if needed). If you
look at the wrapper scripts /usr/bin/kgtk-wrapper and /usr/bin/kqt-wrapper
you'll see what I mean.

I have, however, patched an error in the libkgtk module's Makefile.in that
caused it to create (useless) library version information.

New build:
Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/kgtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/kgtk-0.8-2.src.rpm

Changes:
- Created patch to prevent useless libkgtk.so.* symlinks during %%build
- Added package name/version prefix to patch filenames


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 08:14:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:14:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250814.l0P8E20p015174@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-25 03:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> However, now rpmlint gives me two messages about that:
>   W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-workbench.schemas
>   W: nemiver non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/nemiver-dbgperspective.schemas
> I take it there are safe to ignore for GConf schemas then?
>
Yap, that's the usual warnings on about schema files.
If everyone agrees on that, rpmlint could be modified to check the reverse
condition, i.e.: everything under /etc/gconf/schema triggers a warning if it is
actually marked as %config

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 08:17:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:17:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250817.l0P8HF7f015371@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-25 03:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/download/fedora/nemiver.spec
> Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/download/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-3.src.rpm
> 

Correct links seems to be:
Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver.spec
SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-3.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 08:43:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:43:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224314] Package Updater Bug
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250843.l0P8hYUs016839@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package Updater Bug


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224314


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|Package Review              |pirut
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |katzj at redhat.com
          QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |
                 CC|fedora-package-             |
                   |review at redhat.com           |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 09:45:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:45:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250945.l0P9jrvV024935@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-25 04:45 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146512)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146512&action=view)
mock log


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 09:48:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:48:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701250948.l0P9mgoP025146@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-25 04:48 EST -------
I've just mock the 0.5-1 version successfully with mock.

The included patch should have fixed it.

I should remove duplicate files in the next release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 10:34:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:34:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251034.l0PAY68c028623@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-25 05:33 EST -------
OK, included all suggestions except _obexftp.so.*.* renaming in python
subpackage. I'll import the package sometime tonight. Thanks for comments, everyone.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 10:48:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:48:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251048.l0PAm0XF029539@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #146086|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #146500|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-25 05:47 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146523)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146523&action=view)
patch with upstream revisions and icon size command line switch


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 11:07:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:07:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251107.l0PB7dHY031536@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-25 06:07 EST -------
I have checked that the result is nice with unnoticeable delays
with .icewm/startup:

#! /bin/sh

icewm-xdg-menu --entire-menu --with-theme-paths > ~/.icewm/programs

And .icewm/menu:
# This is an example for IceWM's menu definition file.
#
# Place your variants in /etc/icewm or in $HOME/.icewm
# since modifications to this file will be discarded when you
# (re)install icewm.
#
prog xterm /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/gnome-terminal.png xterm
prog "Web browser" /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/apps/mozilla-icon.png htmlview
separator
menufile Programs folder programs


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 11:22:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:22:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251122.l0PBM76G000522@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-25 06:22 EST -------
Upstream for the xdg-menu.py fixed the issues I reported, and
changed the name of the script:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pz215/fvwm-scripts/scripts/fvwm-xdg-menu.py

I submitted a minor patch for -f such that directory is created for 
icons if it doesn't exists.

fvwm-xdg-menu.py
Requires:    ImageMagick

I attach a patch for fvwm/ConfigFvwmSetup

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 11:23:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:23:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251123.l0PBNaOC000675@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-25 06:23 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146525)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146525&action=view)
use fvwm-xdg-menu.py to generate the Utilities menu


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:20:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:20:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251320.l0PDK2VQ010214@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245


rdieter at math.unl.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rdieter at math.unl.edu




------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2007-01-25 08:19 EST -------
> Squirrelmail is a terrible IMAP webmail client...

that's funny... I've heard very good things about http://www.roundcube.net/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:35:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:35:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224364] New: Review Request: 
 -  
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224364

           Summary: Review Request: 
 - 
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: harald at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.2-1/cdrkit.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.2-1/cdrkit-1.1.2-1.src.rpm
Description: Command line compatible replacement of cdrtools/cdrecord/mkisofs/cdda2wav which obsoletes the latter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:36:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:36:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] New: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365

           Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: harald at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.2-1/cdrkit.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.2-1/cdrkit-1.1.2-1.src.rpm
Description: Command line compatible replacement of cdrtools/cdrecord/mkisofs/cdda2wav which obsoletes the latter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:37:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:37:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224364] Review Request: 
 - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251337.l0PDbfGg011654@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 
 - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224364


harald at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: 
 -  -                |summary here>
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-25 08:37 EST -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 224365 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:37:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:37:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251337.l0PDbjje011676@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-25 08:37 EST -------
*** Bug 224364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 13:40:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:40:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251340.l0PDeIvg011956@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-25 08:40 EST -------
problem: requires cmake from extras, which itsself requires xmlrpc-c (extras)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 14:33:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:33:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224382] New: Review Request: 
 -  
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224382

           Summary: Review Request: 
 - 
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: geboyd53 at comcast.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: 
SRPM URL: 
Description: 

Yumextender and pup crash with an unhanled exception errot after the last kernel upgrad.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 14:36:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:36:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224382] Review Request: 
 - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251436.l0PEagf9018106@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 
 - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224382


geboyd53 at comcast.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: 
 -  -                |summary here>
           Severity|normal                      |high




------- Additional Comments From geboyd53 at comcast.net  2007-01-25 09:36 EST -------
I've had no problems with either PUP or yumexteder untill the last kernel update
and the u=nre updates for yumextender. Now whem=n I try ti run the, I get an
unhadled exception error on both of the.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 14:39:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:39:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224382] Review Request: 
 - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251439.l0PEdMxQ018419@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 
 - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224382


geboyd53 at comcast.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|devel                       |fc6
          Component|Package Review              |yum




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 14:40:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:40:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224382] Review Request: 
 - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251440.l0PEeTlR018600@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 
 - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224382


notting at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |katzj at redhat.com
          QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |
                 CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- |skvidal at linux.duke.edu
                   |package-review at redhat.com   |




------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com  2007-01-25 09:40 EST -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 224292 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 14:59:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:59:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251459.l0PExSrC020859@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com  2007-01-25 09:59 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146549)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146549&action=view)
dmesg

I got this error during unmount. Tested on 
Linux dhcp-lab-160.brq.redhat.com 2.6.19-1.2912.fc7 #1 SMP Sun Jan 14 20:08:35
EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 15:28:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:28:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request:  - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251528.l0PFSb3c023922@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007





------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net  2007-01-25 10:28 EST -------
Konrad,

Looking at packages such as iproute or kernel-devel, I saw that they hardcode
the kernel release number into the spec file.

So the solution I implemented is a mix between these packages and something more
"automatic":
I %define'd a variable in the specfile (base_kernel). This variable is presently
set by extracting the installed kernel release. 
But using base_kernel makes it possible to hard-code its value as needed, and
build against that hard-coded kernel release.

BTW, added support for FC7 / 2.6.19 in the upstream library.

New links:

SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-12-1/libtune.spec
SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.12-1.src.rpm

Regards,
Nadia

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 15:51:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:51:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251551.l0PFp5QY026548@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client
Alias: sear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839





------- Additional Comments From sg02r at ecs.soton.ac.uk  2007-01-25 10:51 EST -------
We're close to being ready for a new release. This is currently pending an
update to the eris library.

However I am told that guichan 0.6 will be packaged soon and that again breaks
backwards compat with guichan 0.5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:02:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:02:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning
	cube
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251602.l0PG2XYW027689@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 11:02 EST -------
What is the status of this bug?
Any problem on importing this package to buildsys?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:04:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:04:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] New: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin
	for the PulseAudio sound server
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402

           Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
                    the PulseAudio sound server
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gst-pulse.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gst-pulse-0.9.4-0.mc.1.src.rpm
Description: 
gst-pulse is a GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:04:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:04:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 204513] Review Request: xcalc - X.org XCalc
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251604.l0PG4kOx028122@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xcalc - X.org XCalc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204513


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11-   |Review Request: xcalc -
                   |xcalc - X.org XCalc         |X.org XCalc




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:10:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:10:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251610.l0PGA765028812@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841              |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:10 EST -------
Closing due to Comment #10.  Please consider packaging the new software instead
of this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:10:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:10:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251610.l0PGAKXH028867@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498


Bug 200498 depends on bug 200499, which changed state.

Bug 200499 Summary: Review Request: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:10:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:10:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251610.l0PGAvjL028952@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs at math.uh.edu




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-25 11:10 EST -------
Why is the a problem?  Recall that "Core" and "Extras" have no meaning past FC6,
so if you're only targeting F7 then there shouldn't be any trouble.

Even then the issue seems to be one of build-time dependencies, and I wouldn't
expect that these packages have additional runtime dependencies.

So really the fundamental question is whether we actually want to replace
cdrecord and friends in F7 with cdrkit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:11:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:11:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251611.l0PGB09H028975@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841              |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:10 EST -------
Closing due to comment #3.  Please consider packaging the new sofware.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:12:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:12:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 187196] Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251612.l0PGCBRB029137@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187196


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 208686              |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:12 EST -------
Closing due to lack of response in a reasonable length of time.  If you have an
updated package for submission, please open a new ticket.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:13:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:13:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251613.l0PGDnXL029414@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |wtogami at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(redhat at flyn.org)




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:13 EST -------
Does linux-wlan-ng plan on ever including itself within the upstream kernel?

If not, then this does not satisy our requirements for kernel module inclusion.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:15:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:15:44 -0500
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?=
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251615.l0PGFi2v029572@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350





------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:15 EST -------
This was discussed at some length yesterday.

The firmware FAQ as posted is not enough, as it does not (at minimum) have any
attribution that actually states it comes from the copyright holder/licensor;
this would need fixed before it could be considered freely redistributable.
(i.e., the statement needs to clearly come *from Intel*, not just a page @ SF
that Intel presumably edits.)

Aside from that, we noted that the EULA for Fedora Core states:

1.  THE SOFTWARE.  Fedora Core (the "Software") is a modular Linux
    operating system consisting of hundreds of software components.
    The end user license agreement for each component is located in
    the component's source code.  With the exception of certain image
    files containing the Fedora trademark identified in Section 2
    below, the license terms for the components permit User to copy,
    modify, and redistribute the component, in both source code and
    binary code forms.
...

Note the 'modify' and 'source code and binary code' sections above. Obviously,
we don't want to break our own EULA. The Fedora board is planning to look into
how to address this issue at the upcoming FUDCon in Boston; the outcome of this
will probably be alterations of the firmware guidelines and something more clear
as to whether or not this is acceptable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:22:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:22:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251622.l0PGMjZ7030103@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From riel at redhat.com  2007-01-25 11:22 EST -------
According to http://xenman.sourceforge.net/ XenMan was renamed to ConVirt.  Is
Xenman really the right name for the RPM?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:27:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:27:21 -0500
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?=
	=?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?=
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251627.l0PGRLOX030530@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350





------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net  2007-01-25 11:27 EST -------
Thanks for sharing all this with us Bill. I'll wait to know the outcome of the
FUDCon discussions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:29:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:29:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] New: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily
	use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413

           Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI
                    console colors from PHP applications
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-Console-Color.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-Console-Color-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
Description: 
The Console_Color class makes it easy to use ANSI color codes when writing CLI-based applications in PHP.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:33:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:33:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251633.l0PGXkp9031186@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402


jeff at ocjtech.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |jeff at ocjtech.us




------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us  2007-01-25 11:33 EST -------
I'll have a review in a bit, but perhaps this package would be better named
gstreamer-plugins-pulse?  That would match better with other gstreamer plugins
(except gnonlin AFAIK).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:41:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:41:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2
	engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251641.l0PGfQf3031942@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 11:41 EST -------
Okay.

* All sources coincides with what I downloaded on md5sum.
* Packaging issues are all okay.

---------------------------------------------------------
   This package (gtk-rezlooks-engine) is APPROVED by me

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 16:53:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:53:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use
	ANSI console colors from PHP applications
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251653.l0PGrkXN000832@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Alias: pear-Console-Color

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |chris.stone at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |
              Alias|                            |pear-Console-Color




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:09:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:09:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use
	ANSI console colors from PHP applications
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251709.l0PH964j002205@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Alias: pear-Console-Color

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-25 12:08 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license field matches actual license
- source package does not include license text
- spec written in American english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
0ed565fb5b3f3ed2d604053d9e1adce6  Console_Color-1.0.1.tgz
- package successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
X package does not own all directories it creates
- directories it does not create are pulled in from other packages
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean section
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files with suffixes
- no need for devel subpackage
- no libtool archives
- not a GUI app
- package does not own files or directories owned by other non-pear packages


==== MUST FIX ====
- This package must own the Console directory

==== SHOULD FIX ====
- Consider adding a PHP License text file to %doc


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:10:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:10:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python
	scriptable data analysis application
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251710.l0PHALAf002282@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 12:10 EST -------
Well, just I looked at your spec file:
* Currently several directories under %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}
  (and this directory itself) is not owned by any package

* By the way, why LICENSE, DISCLAIMER.rtf are installed in
  both main and -devel package?

* qt file sourcing
--------------------------------------------------
 export QTDIR="" && source /etc/profile.d/qt.sh
--------------------------------------------------
  This should not be needed as qt package is correctly
  fixed. Please remove this

* --add-category X-Fedora \
  This category is deprecated and should be removed.

* %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/hippoApp.png
  Installing image files under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor needs
  icon cache updating (check:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets )

* %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/
  Please don't write so. Currently rawhide python is 2.5 and
  this description should cause failure. Please check:
      http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python

NOTE: I only looked at your spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:10:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:10:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use
	ANSI console colors from PHP applications
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251710.l0PHAptx002325@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Alias: pear-Console-Color

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-25 12:10 EST -------
oops, I just realized the Console directory is owned by php-pear, so this
package is correct and should *not* own this directory.  Ignore the MUST FIX
item above.

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:16:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:16:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251716.l0PHGadO003025@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client
Alias: sear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-25 12:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> We're close to being ready for a new release. This is currently pending an
> update to the eris library.
> 
> However I am told that guichan 0.6 will be packaged soon and that again breaks
> backwards compat with guichan 0.5.

Yep, it sucks.  The other package in Fedora that depends on guichan is
'manaworld'.  Their latest release requires guichan 0.6, but is only considered
a bugfix release, so I've been postponing upgrading both manaworld and guichan
to give sear a chance to catch up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:33:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:33:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251733.l0PHXS5s006008@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com  2007-01-25 12:33 EST -------
Although I don't believe this is part of the formal packaging guidelines, the
PAM config file that is included for the console-helper magic does not follow
the standard used by other console-helper enabled apps.

eg, xenman RPM installs a file containing

# cat /etc/pam.d/xenman
#%PAM-1.0                                            
auth       sufficient   pam_rootok.so                      
auth       sufficient   pam_timestamp.so                     
auth       include      system-auth   
session    required     pam_permit.so                         
session    optional     pam_xauth.so                            
session    optional     pam_timestamp.so                   
account    required     pam_permit.so

While other apps typically delegate the config:

# cat /etc/pam.d/system-config-network
#%PAM-1.0
auth            include         config-util
account         include         config-util
session         include         config-util

The latter config makes it easy to manage all the apps' PAM configs in one place.

The app appears configured in /etc/xenman.conf to write to /var/log/xenman, but
the RPM does not create this directory. I don't know if the application takes
care of rotatings log files itself, but if not it installing a config into
/etc/logrotate.d would be desirable.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:34:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:34:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP
	messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251734.l0PHYnfd006171@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630





------- Additional Comments From aconway at redhat.com  2007-01-25 12:34 EST -------
Applied Jims patch and fixed other issues mentioned in the mail
http://www.nabble.com/qpidc-RPM-feedback-t3080445.html
removed .txt extensions, fixed svn ignores etc.

Updated spec, tarballs and SRPM at: 
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/cpp/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:39:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:39:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251739.l0PHdCKL007193@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com  2007-01-25 12:39 EST -------
I agree that gstreamer-plugins-pulse would be a better package name.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:49:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:49:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251749.l0PHnVBe012700@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-25 12:49 EST -------
Jochen - do you still want to review?  perl(NetCDF) is now available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 17:57:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:57:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251757.l0PHvLIo014194@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-25 12:57 EST -------
yes, I want :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:06:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:06:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use
	ANSI console colors from PHP applications
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251806.l0PI6BmD015149@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Alias: pear-Console-Color

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413





------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk  2007-01-25 13:06 EST -------
Yes, I specifically avoided owning the Console directory for the reason you cite.
Upstream doesn't have a License file but
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9948 is an upstream bug about this.

Thanks for your time in doing this review. It will be imported ASAP.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:11:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:11:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning
	cube
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251811.l0PIB5OT015641@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759





------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk  2007-01-25 13:11 EST -------
I imported it into CVS, and I am now waiting for an FC6 branch to be created
before requesting a build (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded).

Isn't that the correct way to proceed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:15:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:15:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251815.l0PIFxZ0016206@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com  2007-01-25 13:15 EST -------
Well, it is ONE plugin, but I have changed the name anyway, new URLs are
SPEC: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gstreamer-plugins-pulse.spec
SRPM:
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gstreamer-plugins-pulse-0.9.4-0.mc.2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:17:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:17:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251817.l0PIHWxU016394@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 13:17 EST -------
Well, for packaing issue:

* Requires:
  - gnome-python2 (required by -gui)
    Please check if this is really required. By checking with
    "grep import" no module seems to be installed from
    gnome-python2.

* File ownership issue/scriptlet
  - - policy package:
-------------------------------------------------------
if [ $1 = 2 ]; then
        #Mark to initialize RBAC config when upgrade
        touch /usr/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-rbac-init
fi
-------------------------------------------------------
    However:
-------------------------------------------------------
[root at localhost ~]# touch /usr/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-rbac-init
[root at localhost ~]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-rbac-init
file /usr/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-rbac-init is not owned by any package
-------------------------------------------------------
    This file (and perhaps also /usr/share/seedit/sepolicy/need-init)
    should be marked as %ghost file

    And please check if any other file which should be marked
    as such exists so that all _unnessary_ files are correctly
    removed on the complete removal of seedit.

* Version dependency requirement
-------------------------------------------------------
Requires: seedit >= 2.1.0
-------------------------------------------------------
  - Usually these types of requirement should be version-release
    dependent, i.e.
-------------------------------------------------------
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
-------------------------------------------------------

* Desktop file:
-------------------------------------------------------
Categories=Application;SystemSetup;X-Red-Hat-Base;
-------------------------------------------------------
  Both categories: "Application" "X-Red-Hat-Base" "SystemSetup"
  are now deprecated and these should be removed.

  From desktop-file-validate:
-------------------------------------------------------
Categories values must be one of 
"AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", 
"Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", 
"System", "Utility", "Building", "Debugger", "IDE", 
"GUIDesigner", "Profiling", "RevisionControl", "Translation", 
"Calendar", "ContactManagement", "Database", "Dictionary",
"Chart", "Email", "Finance", "FlowChart", "PDA", 
"ProjectManagement", "Presentation", "Spreadsheet", "WordProcessor",
"2DGraphics", "VectorGraphics", "RasterGraphics", "3DGraphics", 
"Scanning", "OCR", "Photography", "Viewer", "DesktopSettings", 
"HardwareSettings", "PackageManager", "Dialup", "InstantMessaging", 
"IRCClient", "FileTransfer", "HamRadio", "News", "P2P", 
"RemoteAccess", "Telephony", "WebBrowser", "WebDevelopment", 
"Midi", "Mixer", "Sequencer", "Tuner", "TV", "AudioVideoEditing", 
"Player", "Recorder", "DiscBurning", "ActionGame", "AdventureGame", 
"ArcadeGame", "BoardGame", "BlocksGame", "CardGame", "KidsGame", 
"LogicGame", "RolePlaying", "Simulation", "SportsGame", 
"StrategyGame", "Art", "Construction", "Music", "Languages", 
"Science", "Astronomy", "Biology", "Chemistry", "Geology", "Math", 
"MedicalSoftware", "Physics", "Amusement", "Archiving", 
"Electronics", "Emulator", "Engineering", "FileManager", 
"TerminalEmulator", "Filesystem", "Monitor", "Security", 
"Accessibility", "Calculator", "Clock", "TextEditor", "Core", 
"KDE", "GNOME", "GTK", "Qt", "Motif", "Java", "ConsoleOnly", 
"Screensaver", "TrayIcon", "Applet", "Shell"
-------------------------------------------------------

* Timestamps
  - These packages include many text files, image files
    and keeping timestamps on these files are generally 
    preferred. Please fix so that the timestamps on these
    files are kept.

-------------------------------------------------------
install -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/seedit-gui.png
-------------------------------------------------------
    Also, please use "install -p".

* Macros
-------------------------------------------------------
%define selinuxconf /etc/selinux/config
%define auditrules /etc/audit/audit.rules
-------------------------------------------------------
  Please check if the directory /etc should be written
  as hardcoded or as %{_sysconfdir}.

* Pam requirement
  %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/seedit-gui includes:
-------------------------------------------------------
auth            include         config-util
-------------------------------------------------------
  This sentence requires pam >= 0.80 so I think
  adding "Requires: pam >= 0.80" is preferable.

* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot}
  Please use one, not both.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:20:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:20:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning
	cube
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251820.l0PIKKCM017024@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 13:20 EST -------
Well, please first try if this package can be rebuilt
on FE-devel.

When it succeeds, I usually close my review request as "CLOSED
NEXTRELEASE" after I request for SyncNeeded.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:48:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:48:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251848.l0PIm18W021085@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us  2007-01-25 13:47 EST -------
Here are a few things to fix, and then I'll do the full review:

* Remove the .la files in %install
* Add --disable-static to the %configure command to not build and
  package static library
* Need to add "gstreamer-plugins-base-devel" as a build requirement.
* Release field should be "2{%?dist}".


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 18:59:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:59:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251859.l0PIx67V022964@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-25 13:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> According to http://xenman.sourceforge.net/ XenMan was renamed to ConVirt.  Is
> Xenman really the right name for the RPM?

Convirt is the project name.

(In reply to comment #3)
>While other apps typically delegate the config:

it'll be change to follow the same way of all PAM config.

>The app appears configured in /etc/xenman.conf to write to /var/log/xenman, but
>the RPM does not create this directory. I don't know if the application takes
>care of rotatings log files itself, but if not it installing a config into
>/etc/logrotate.d would be desirable.

Don't really need it in spec file, the apps is in charge for log file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:09:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:09:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251909.l0PJ96NG023930@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-01-25 14:09 EST -------
Good:
+ Tarball in source RPM match with upstream.
+ rpmlint is quite on source rpm.
+ Local build works fine.
+ rpmlint is quite on binary rpm.
+ Local install and uninstalling works fine.

Bad:
- The %makeinstall macro should not be used
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#MakeInstall)

Sorry, I have to interupt, becouse I have a install problem with mock on my new
machine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:16:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:16:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251916.l0PJG76w025395@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-25 14:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Bad:
> - The %makeinstall macro should not be used
>   (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#MakeInstall)

The makefiles do not support DESTDIR, and I really don't want to patch them to
do so.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:28:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:28:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251928.l0PJS1wH029302@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-01-25 14:28 EST -------
I will cite:

Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used

Fedora's RPM includes a %makeinstall macro but it must NOT be used when make
install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} will work. %makeinstall is a kludge that can work
with Makefiles that don't make use of the DESTDIR variable but it has the
following potential issues:

    *

      %makeinstall overrides a set of environment variables during "make
install". I.e. it performs make prefix="..." includedir="..." ...
    *

      It is error prone, and can have unexpected effects when run against less
than perfect Makefiles.
    *

      It can trigger unnecessary rebuilds when executing "make install"
    *

      If a package contains libtool archives, it can cause broken *.la files to
be installed.

Instead, Fedora packages should use: make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install or make
DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install

Thsi is a list of reasons why %Makeinstall should not used.

Sory for any inconviniences.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:30:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:30:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251930.l0PJUAdK029787@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-01-25 14:30 EST -------
At last I have a positiv message for you.

I have solve my moch issue and can report a positve build of your package on mock.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:52:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:52:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251952.l0PJqRfd000551@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com  2007-01-25 14:52 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146611)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146611&action=view)
Some printk() and a BUG_ON() to help track down unmount oops

Add some printk() and a BUG_ON() statements to help track down unmount oops.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:54:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:54:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224458] New: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224458

           Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Requesting review in preparation for the Fedora merge.  libsilc is used primary by gaim as a secure encrypted IRC-like protocol.

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsilc/

Description:
SILC Client Library libraries for SILC clients.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 19:55:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:55:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701251955.l0PJtQtR001146@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com  2007-01-25 14:55 EST -------
Peter Vrabec wrote:
> Created an attachment (id=146549)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146549&action=view) [edit]
> dmesg
>
> I got this error during unmount.

I think this is something I've seen before, but I don't know how to reproduce
it. Could you provide a sequence of operations that will invoke this stack trace?

In the meantime, I added a patch that might help debug this issue. The stack
trace suggests to me that an inode mutex in the lower filesystem is being locked
and is not being properly unlocked somewhere along the way. Right now I suspect
a missing unlock in ecryptfs_d_release(), but until I can find a way to
reproduce this on my end, I'm sort of in the dark.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 20:14:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:14:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252014.l0PKEvL0003292@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-25 15:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I will cite:
> 
> Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used
> 
> Fedora's RPM includes a %makeinstall macro but it must NOT be used when make
> install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} will work.
                               ^^^^^^^^^

And I say again, DESTDIR does NOT work with this package, and %makeinstall does.
  If someone can show me a clean way to add DESTDIR support, that would be nice.
 But the configure system used in this package is very outdated and I don't
think it's work spending time on it when a reasonable work around is available.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 20:20:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:20:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252020.l0PKKJnH003567@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-25 15:20 EST -------
My mistake, I did not read files :)
With new patch the files are more clear.

   This package (kgtk) is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 20:25:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:25:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252025.l0PKPUPu003864@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-25 15:25 EST -------
Hello Manuel,

I had a look at how dovecot did it, and that's definitely a better approach
Added a mkcert.sh script and a README.fedora file with a short Getting Started text.

New release:
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2.spec
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/csync2-1.33-4.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 20:59:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:59:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224477] New: Review Request: spamassassin
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224477

           Summary: Review Request: spamassassin
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Please review in preparation for the Fedora Merge.

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/spamassassin/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 21:22:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:22:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252122.l0PLMFP9012183@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-25 16:22 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> 
> Correct links seems to be:
> Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver.spec
> SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/nemiver-0.3.0-3.src.rpm
> 

Err...dang typos. Thanks, Gianluca.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 21:29:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:29:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252129.l0PLTHGT012895@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-25 16:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> As you can see, the source of python-libtorrent includes the
> "copy" of rb_libtorrent source, modified so that it can be
> called by python. I still doubt that this package should need
> C++ version of libtorrent (rb_libtorrent).

OOOOHHHH....That's icky! Good catch. I wonder if simply removing the internal
libtorrent files would make it use the installed system copy...I'll play with it
when I get home tonight. I'll need to bug the upstream Deluge people too.

Thanks for the catch!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 21:32:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:32:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252132.l0PLWnqq013312@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224458


dan at danny.cz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dan at danny.cz




------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz  2007-01-25 16:32 EST -------
two minors in the spec file:
- use %{?dist} instead of hardcoded .fc6 in the Release tag
- use
http://www.silcnet.org/download/toolkit/sources/silc-toolkit-%{version}.tar.bz2
as Source0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 22:44:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:44:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252244.l0PMivfJ021317@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271





------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com  2007-01-25 17:44 EST -------
Thanks everyone.

I've gone through and attempted to fix as much of this as possible.

New specfile:
http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/rhts-candidates/rhts-2.6.0.svn336-2/rhts.spec

New SRPM:
http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/rhts-candidates/rhts-2.6.0.svn336-2/rhts-2.6.0.svn336-2.src.rpm

rpmlint output from srpm:
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhts-testhelpers
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-provides rhts-testhelpers
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rhts-testhelpers-developer
W: rhts unversioned-explicit-provides rhts-testhelpers-developer
All of the above refer to earlier versions of this package that were purely
internal to Red Hat (we changed the names) - is this waivable?

rpmlint output from rhts-python:
W: rhts-python no-documentation
There isn't any - is this waivable?

rpmlint output from rhts-test-env:
W: rhts-test-env no-documentation
There isn't any - is this waivable?

E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace
E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea
E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777
RHTS provides a way to build tests as RPMs, and these have to live 
somewhere in the filesystem hierarchy.  We've been using these locations as a
place for the built tests to live.  Suggestions for better places welcome.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 23:42:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:42:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252342.l0PNgHlt026772@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-25 18:42 EST -------
Excelent job. All tests pass as per the original review (comment #3), the
package builds OK (as before) in mock for FC6/x86_64, the new sources are
installed cleanly, all permissions are sane, changelog correctly reflects all
changes.

This package is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Jan 25 23:48:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:48:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701252348.l0PNmcHk027141@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com  2007-01-25 18:48 EST -------
I independently made exactly the same changes to the spec file, and after adding
--disable-static, rpmlint is happy.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 01:15:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:15:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260115.l0Q1FH5O030704@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us  2007-01-25 20:15 EST -------
Please post the updated spec/srpm so that I can finish the review...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 02:33:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:33:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260233.l0Q2Xm93001230@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618


rpm at greysector.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-25 21:33 EST -------
imported 0.20-2 with the following changelog:
- added missing defattr
- require openobex-devel > 1.2
- added missing MODULE_COMPAT Requires: to perl subpackage
- renamed subpackages to perl/python-obexftp
- fixed rpaths

Thanks to Toshio for some help with rpaths.

Built for devel, FC-6 branch requested. Thanks for the review, Tom.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 03:18:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:18:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260318.l0Q3IplG003292@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-25 22:18 EST -------
And.. config-util (/etc/pam.d/config-util) is perhaps
Fedora/Redhat specific and requires pam >= 0.80-9.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 04:34:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:34:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260434.l0Q4YAMj008390@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-25 23:34 EST -------
Wow, have I really forgotten about this for four weeks? 

In any case, I'm now using this package everything seems just fine.  The issues
I found earlier have been fixed.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 04:36:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:36:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260436.l0Q4abv9008612@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-25 23:36 EST -------
Thank you for review!

>* Requires:
>  - gnome-python2 (required by -gui)
>    Please check if this is really required. By checking with
>    "grep import" no module seems to be installed from
>    gnome-python2.
Fixed, I am not using it now.

>* File ownership issue/scriptlet
>    And please check if any other file which should be marked
>    as such exists so that all _unnessary_ files are correctly
>    removed on the complete removal of seedit.
Fixed, I listed rbac-init, need-init in %ghost.

>* Version dependency requirement
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Requires: seedit >= 2.1.0
>-------------------------------------------------------
>  - Usually these types of requirement should be version->release
>    dependent, i.e.
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
>-------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
>Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
did not work("=" does not work), 
so I used 
Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release}


>* Desktop file:
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Categories=Application;SystemSetup;X-Red-Hat-Base;
>-------------------------------------------------------
>  Both categories: "Application" "X-Red-Hat-Base" "SystemSetup"
>  are now deprecated and these should be removed.
Fixed.

>* Timestamps
>  - These packages include many text files, image files
>    and keeping timestamps on these files are generally 
>    preferred. Please fix so that the timestamps on these
>    files are kept.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>install -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/seedit-gui.png
>-------------------------------------------------------
>    Also, please use "install -p".
Fixed both spec file and Makefiles.

>* Macros
>-------------------------------------------------------
>%define selinuxconf /etc/selinux/config
>%define auditrules /etc/audit/audit.rules
>-------------------------------------------------------
>  Please check if the directory /etc should be written
>  as hardcoded or as %{_sysconfdir}.
Fixed.

>* Pam requirement
>  %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/seedit-gui includes:
>-------------------------------------------------------
>auth            include         config-util
>-------------------------------------------------------
>  This sentence requires pam >= 0.80 so I think
>  adding "Requires: pam >= 0.80" is preferable.
Yes, in old pam, it does not work.
Fixed.

>* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot}
>  Please use one, not both.
Fixed. Using only %{buildroot}

Updated version:
* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.14.beta6.6.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 06:53:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:53:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260653.l0Q6rLY1015372@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228





------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za  2007-01-26 01:53 EST -------
Thanks for the review! Will import, build and close the the bug as soon as it's
successful.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 07:08:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:08:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260708.l0Q78o0B015681@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-26 02:08 EST -------
I wrote a fixed setup.py (sent upstream) build script which configures the build
against and links to the system copy of rb_libtorrent, rather than its own
internal copy. I also updated to the latest version (0.4.0).

Spec: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec
SRPM: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.4.0-1.src.rpm

Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 07:12:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:12:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260712.l0Q7CJMN015781@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 02:12 EST -------
Then first try this...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 08:03:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:03:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224228] Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications
	to use KDE's file dialogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260803.l0Q83Q25016819@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kgtk - Allows Gtk and Qt applications to use KDE's file dialogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224228


faucamp at csir.co.za changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za  2007-01-26 03:03 EST -------
Successfully built for devel, branches requested. Closing review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 09:20:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:20:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260920.l0Q9Kkwc021430@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 04:20 EST -------
For -0.14:

(In reply to comment #24)
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >  - Usually these types of requirement should be version->release
> >    dependent, i.e.
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> Fixed.
> >Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> did not work("=" does not work), 
> so I used 
> Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release}
What do you mean? Why equality is not valid for this package?
Theoretically, inequality admits the different version between
main package and its subpackages.

> Fixed.
Okay. Now I can correctly see seedit-gui entry.
> 
> >* Timestamps
> >  - These packages include many text files, image files
> >    and keeping timestamps on these files are generally 
> >    preferred. Please fix so that the timestamps on these
> >    files are kept.
> Fixed both spec file and Makefiles.
Still some files are installed by "install -m 755" or "cp -r",
not "install -p -m 755" or "cp -pr"

> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >auth            include         config-util
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >  This sentence requires pam >= 0.80 so I think
> >  adding "Requires: pam >= 0.80" is preferable.
> Yes, in old pam, it does not work.
> Fixed.
For this, I think "pam >= 0.80-9" is preferable as said
in comment 23, because config-util is introduced on 0.80-9.

Nevertheless, the left issues are rather small. So:

-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review request and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored


Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review
can be checked on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1

Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 09:34:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260934.l0Q9YEje022249@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-26 04:34 EST -------
Build successfully in mock for FC5.

rpmlint on src.rpm has only one small complaint

/var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/result/nemiver-0.3.0-3.fc5.src.rpm
W: nemiver mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 150, tab: line 1)

I'd like to try it out, but there are some issues related to SELinux; this is
what I have in audit.log when running nemiver:

type=AVC msg=audit(1169803885.025:2173): avc:  denied  { execmod } for 
pid=32735 comm="nemiver" name="libdbgperspectiveplugin.so" dev=dm-0 ino=12452120
scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0
tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1169803885.025:2173): arch=40000003 syscall=125
success=no exit=-13 a0=d0c000 a1=20d000 a2=5 a3=bfc34b00 items=0 ppid=1
pid=32735 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500 fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=500
fsgid=500 tty=(none) comm="nemiver" exe="/usr/bin/nemiver"
subj=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC_PATH msg=audit(1169803885.025:2173): 
path="/usr/lib/nemiver/plugins/dbgperspective/libdbgperspectiveplugin.so"


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 09:49:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:49:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701260949.l0Q9n3UE022962@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 04:48 EST -------
Before checking this..

Can't the conflict between libtorrent <-> this package be
avoided simply by moving
* /usr/lib/libtorrent.so -> /usr/lib/librb_torrent.so
* /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc -> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/librb_torrent.pc
?

I don't want to make use of "conflict" simply because the
file entry duplicates when some seemingly-easy solution exists,
because this type of file conflicts always occur on making
compat version rpm.

Would you consider to aviod using conflict by renaming?
I also suggest when you agree, the "real" dynamic library
"/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.0.1.0" and the header directory
"/usr/include/libtorrent" should be renamed as such.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 10:09:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:09:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261009.l0QA9oDc023790@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com  2007-01-26 05:09 EST -------
#mkdir crypt
#mkdir foo
#mount -t ecryptfs crypt foo
Passphrase:
Verify Passphrase:
Cipher
1) AES-128
2) AES-192
3) AES-256
4) CAST5
5) Twofish
6) Triple-DES
7) Blowfish
8) CAST6
Selection [AES-128]:
Attempting to mount with the following options:[enter]
  ecryptfs_cipher=aes
  ecryptfs_key_bytes=16
  ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0
Mounted ecryptfs
#cd foo
#vim xxx
#cd ..
#umount foo
Neopr?vn?n? p??stup do pam?ti (SIGSEGV)

Message from syslogd at dhcp-lab-160 at Fri Jan 26 09:56:52 2007 ...
dhcp-lab-160 kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 10:44:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:44:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261044.l0QAi7wa026284@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com  2007-01-26 05:43 EST -------
this is suspicious, isn't it:

in /etc/mtab is
/rootcrypt /rootfoo ecryptfs 
rw,ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_cipher=aes, 0 
0

in /proc/mounts is
crypt/ /root/foo ecryptfs rw,dir=/root/crypt 0 0


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 10:52:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:52:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261052.l0QAqQM2026960@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-26 05:52 EST -------
Try getting the plugins to compile with -fPIC and see if that helps with the
SELinux issue. The main code uses -fPIC but it isn't propagated down to the plugins.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 11:05:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:05:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261105.l0QB5R4c028257@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com  2007-01-26 06:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > According to http://xenman.sourceforge.net/ XenMan was renamed to ConVirt.  Is
> > Xenman really the right name for the RPM?
> 
> Convirt is the project name.
> 
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >While other apps typically delegate the config:
> 
> it'll be change to follow the same way of all PAM config.
> 
> >The app appears configured in /etc/xenman.conf to write to /var/log/xenman, but
> >the RPM does not create this directory. I don't know if the application takes
> >care of rotatings log files itself, but if not it installing a config into
> >/etc/logrotate.d would be desirable.
> 
> Don't really need it in spec file, the apps is in charge for log file.

and rpm is in charge to own the dirs and be able to remove it aswell. maybe it
would make sense to also touch an empty logfile and get it owned by the package?  ;)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 11:40:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:40:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261140.l0QBe3gc031663@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365


harald at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |214825
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 11:52:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:52:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222087] Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed
	for BBS browsing
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261152.l0QBqpht032024@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pcmanx-gtk2 - Telnet client designed for BBS browsing


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222087





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 06:52 EST -------
Still no response from upstream?
If so, would you try svn version?

>From that I searched for net information:
* startup segv occuring on gtk2-2.10.7 seems to be fixed
  in svn version
* I just checked svn version and ChangeLog says:
----------------------------------------------------------
+2007-01-21  Shih-yuan Lee (FourDollars)  
+
+       * configure.ac,
+       src/appconfig.cpp,
+       src/appconfig.h,
+       src/generalprefpage.cpp,
+       src/mainframe.cpp,
+       src/mainframe.h,
+       src/view/telnetview.cpp,
+       src/view/telnetview.h: disable the buggy "BBS List Update" and wget
download by default.
-------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 13:43:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:43:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261343.l0QDhxKA005566@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-26 08:43 EST -------
build fails on x86_64 FC-6  tryng to use i386 bits

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../kdebluetooth -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I.  -I/usr/include/xmms -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib64/glib/include    -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT  -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -O2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION  -c -o 
maindialogbase.o maindialogbase.cpp
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link 
g++  -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -O2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION    -o 
kbemusedsrv  -lkio -lkdeui -lxmms -lgtk -lgdk -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lglib   -L/usr/lib -lbluetooth -L/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib -L/usr/lib64     
main.o kbemusedsrv.o controller.o xmmscontroller.o noatuncontroller.o 
amarokcontroller.o scriptscontroller.o dcopcall.o kurltableitem.o 
dcopinterface_skel.o maindialogbase.o 
logdialogbase.o ../libkbluetooth/libkbluetooth.la
/usr/lib/libkio.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 13:48:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:48:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261348.l0QDmCnT005863@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2007-01-26 08:48 EST -------
It has always built fine for me mock/x86_64, but I don't ever remember seeing
any references to xmms either.  Are you building by hand or in mock?  If by
hand, you need to be careful to clean your x86_64 system of any i386 bits.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 13:55:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:55:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261355.l0QDtdha006726@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-26 08:55 EST -------
That's right...

i'll add it ;-) and post the updated spec file and srpm.

thanks 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 14:32:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:32:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223601] Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved
	barewords and symbol names
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261432.l0QEWerE009750@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Keywords - Lists of reserved barewords and symbol names


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223601


jpo at di.uminho.pt changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt  2007-01-26 09:32 EST -------
Thanks for the review.

Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 14:53:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:53:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261453.l0QErBoR011405@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-26 09:53 EST -------
i built by hand.  ill see if i can reproduce in mock


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:17:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:17:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261617.l0QGHwPK019439@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-26 11:17 EST -------
>maybe it would make sense to also touch an empty logfile and get it owned by
the >package? 

Add it in %post ands as %ghost file, what do you think about it ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:19:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:19:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261619.l0QGJDNA019713@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-26 11:19 EST -------
> >  This sentence requires pam >= 0.80 so I think
> >  adding "Requires: pam >= 0.80" is preferable.
> Yes, in old pam, it does not work.
> Fixed.
>For this, I think "pam >= 0.80-9" is preferable as said
>in comment 23, because config-util is introduced on 0.80-9.

I think that PAM is not really obligatory as requires, considering it is the
default authentication of fedora system, it's already installed from first
installation of fedora Core.
On the other hand, it would surely be necessary to add "usermode" in fields
requires.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:18:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:18:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for
	the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261618.l0QGIwP4019637@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gst-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402





------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com  2007-01-26 11:18 EST -------
New packages uploaded.
SRPMS:
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gstreamer-plugins-pulse-0.9.4-3.src.rpm
SPEC is on the same URL
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/gstreamer-plugins-pulse.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:26:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:26:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261626.l0QGQ3BA020391@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 11:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #26)

> I think that PAM is not really obligatory as requires, 
What I mention is this requires pam ">= 0.80-9", not only pam,
because "include config-util" sentence cannot be interpretted
under pam 0.80-8.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:52:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:52:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261652.l0QGqx1T022522@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-26 11:52 EST -------
builds fine in mock, will test today.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:58:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:58:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier
	authentication library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261658.l0QGwuTv023274@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(lists at forevermore.
                   |                            |net)




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 11:58 EST -------
Please note the current status of this bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 16:59:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:59:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261659.l0QGxqpw023396@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: maildrop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 11:59 EST -------
Then.. what is the status of this bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:03:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:03:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261703.l0QH3xKc023793@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gotmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(james at lovedthanlos
                   |                            |t.net)




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-26 12:03 EST -------
What is the status of this bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:10:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:10:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for
	mugshot.org
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261710.l0QHAkEA024370@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003





------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2007-01-26 12:10 EST -------
Any update on the licensing issue?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:14:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:14:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224364] Review Request: 
 - 
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261714.l0QHETB9024712@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: 
 - 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224364


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:16:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:16:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223039] Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for
	automated codecs installation
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261716.l0QHG3d8024877@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgimme-codec - Helper library for automated codecs installation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223039





------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com  2007-01-26 12:16 EST -------
Putting this on hold, as it's pretty much agreed that GStreamer should provide
this functionality directly:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401072
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401074

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:17:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:17:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 208898] Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and
	control applet
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261717.l0QHH3T1024969@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bluez-gnome -- Bluetooth pairing and control applet


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208898





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-26 12:16 EST -------
So was this package formally approved?  Currently it's still blocking FC-NEW,
and there's no indication of approval in any of the comments.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:17:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:17:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261717.l0QHHvuj025034@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jokosher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029





------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org  2007-01-26 12:17 EST -------
can the 0.2 jokosher package at least be put up here for people to test ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:34:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:34:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261734.l0QHYDmn026190@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645





------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org  2007-01-26 12:34 EST -------
nothing but xmas and lca :)

imported, requested branches, will push build

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 17:50:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:50:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261750.l0QHohlg027551@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|188265                      |188267
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-26 12:50 EST -------
It does seem that moving to cdrkit is in the plan for F7.  I'll review this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 18:32:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261832.l0QIWFI8031457@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-26 13:32 EST -------
This fails to build for me:

CMake Error: Error: found a Linux system but no libcap header. Install libcap-dev.

Adding BuildRequires: libcap-devel gets me past that, but then the build fails
later:

[ 70%] Building C object genisoimage/CMakeFiles/genisoimage.dir/jte.o
/builddir/build/BUILD/cdrkit-1.1.2/genisoimage/jte.c:18:18: error: zlib.h: No
such file or directory
/builddir/build/BUILD/cdrkit-1.1.2/genisoimage/jte.c: In function
'flush_gzip_chunk':
/builddir/build/BUILD/cdrkit-1.1.2/genisoimage/jte.c:581: error: 'z_stream'
undeclared (first use in this function)
[etc.]

Adding BR: zlib-devel gets through that and allows the build to complete.

The resulting packages don't install properly:

Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/local/bin/perl is needed by package icedax
Error: Missing Dependency: perl(v5.8.1) is needed by package genisoimage

Some rpmlint complaints:

W: cdrkit summary-ended-with-dot A collection of CD/DVD utilities.
W: genisoimage summary-ended-with-dot Creates an image of an ISO9660 filesystem.
W: wodim summary-ended-with-dot A command line CD/DVD recording program.
W: icedax summary-ended-with-dot A utility for sampling/copying .wav files from
digital audio CDs.
   Best for summaries to not end with dots.

E: icedax invalid-dependency /usr/local/bin/perl
E: icedax wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl"
W: icedax doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl
/usr/local/bin/perl
W: icedax doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl
perl(strict)
W: icedax doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl
perl(IO::Handle)
W: icedax doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl
perl(Env)
W: icedax doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/icedax-1.1.2/icedax/tracknames.pl
perl(Socket)
   These are all related.  Basically, documentation should not be executable,
and examples in documentation shouldn't pull in dependencies (which they won't
if they're not executable).  If you want to be nice, you can fix up the
/usr/local/bin/perl bits.

W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides dvdrecord
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdrecord
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdrecord
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdrecord-mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdrecord-mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdrecord-cdda2wav
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdrecord-cdda2wav
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdda2wav
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdda2wav
   These really shouldn't be unversioned; we can't predict what will happen in
the future with these package.  So it's best to obsolete cdrecord <= current
version and provide cdrecord = current version + epsilon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 19:02:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:02:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261902.l0QJ2n7P001087@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-26 14:02 EST -------
Just in case it wasn't intentional: the package doesn't have a disttag so some
manual release tag adjustments will be needed so that the FC-6 and devel builds
don't end up with identical NEVR's.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 19:20:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:20:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223633] Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261920.l0QJKsOf003144@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-26 14:20 EST -------
Thanks for the review Manuel.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 19:42:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:42:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2
	engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701261942.l0QJgYta005642@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224


opensource at till.name changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |opensource at till.name
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name  2007-01-26 14:42 EST -------
Does not need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR anymore

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 20:13:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:13:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224271] Review Request: rhts - A system for developing
	automated tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262013.l0QKDfeJ008617@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271


green at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |green at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2007-01-26 15:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace
> E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea
> E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777
> RHTS provides a way to build tests as RPMs, and these have to live 
> somewhere in the filesystem hierarchy.  We've been using these locations as a
> place for the built tests to live.  Suggestions for better places welcome.

How about /var/lib/rhts/{tests,scratchspace,testarea}?

See http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.8.html




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 20:24:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:24:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262024.l0QKOjtG009822@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979


opensource at till.name changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |opensource at till.name




------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name  2007-01-26 15:24 EST -------
from README:

"Tesseract can also make use of the libtiff library. (www.libtiff.org)
Without libtiff, Tesseract can only read uncompressed and G3 compressed
TIFF files."

You seem not to use libtiff, is this intentional?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 20:47:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:47:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a
	few games
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262047.l0QKlTgC013191@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-26 15:47 EST -------
I note that the summary doesn't seem to tell me much at all about what this
package is actually supposed to do.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 20:57:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:57:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using
	the Stratagus game engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262057.l0QKvFm9014166@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254





------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com  2007-01-26 15:57 EST -------
Ver. 2.0.1-2

- fixed some rpmlint errors and warnings
- added %doc section

http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos.spec
http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos.sh
http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/bos-2.0.1-fixes.patch

http://bos.seul.org/files/bos_2_0_1.tar.gz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 20:59:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:59:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223618] Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via
	the OBEX protocol
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262059.l0QKxAV9014290@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obexftp -  Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-26 15:58 EST -------
I noticed that while trying to build for FC-6 and fixed it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 21:03:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:03:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224413] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use
	ANSI console colors from PHP applications
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262103.l0QL3Pa3014463@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Color - Easily use ANSI console colors from PHP applications
Alias: pear-Console-Color

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224413


rpm at timj.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk  2007-01-26 16:03 EST -------
Built in devel (job #26375) and FC-6 (#26443).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 21:26:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:26:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262126.l0QLQRkK015753@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-26 16:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Can't the conflict between libtorrent <-> this package be
> avoided simply by moving
> * /usr/lib/libtorrent.so -> /usr/lib/librb_torrent.so
> * /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc -> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/librb_torrent.pc
> [...]
> ?

Unfortunately, it is not necessarily that simple, as this would require all
packages building against it to be reconfigured to use the 'rb_libtorrent'
naming (patching the necessary build scripts), whereas other distributions
maintain the simple conflict and note that it is different from the Rakshasa
library of the same name. One of my ideals is to, within reason, keep the
packaging of a piece of software very similar between distributions; and having
to maintain a Fedora-specific patching to it (as well as anything that would
potentially build/link against it, such as python-libtorrent) would give us
harm us in terms of this packaging difference more than the no-Conflicts help
it would bring us.

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 21:28:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:28:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar
	to the UNIX top command
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262128.l0QLSXnJ015886@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-26 16:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #33)
> Well, I want to check CVS accroding to your comment 32
> and as I can see many changes between 3.2 -> cvs 071111.
> Would you package cvs version?
> 
> However, I am afraid that as long as I check the diff
> of util.c, the bug I pointed out on comment 30 doesn't seem
> to be fixed......

It took awhile to figure out that gmane is just broken and can't post to the
ntop mailing list - so I subscribed and sent a message to follow up with this bug.

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ntop.devel/6445

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 21:29:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:29:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar
	to the UNIX top command
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262129.l0QLTsal015998@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-26 16:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> NOTIFICATION:
> 
> Currently gdome2 is orphaned, which means that no one
> maintains gdome2, and if ntop requires gdome2 a new 
> maintainer is needed.

If ntop is worked into acceptable shape, I can pick up ownership of gdome2 as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 21:43:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:43:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning
	cube
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262143.l0QLhBes017129@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759


maxx at krakoa.dk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 22:19:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:19:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221045] Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2
	engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262219.l0QMJeq4019742@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtk-rezlooks-engine - Rezlooks GTK2 engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221045


maxx at krakoa.dk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 23:09:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:09:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262309.l0QN9aX3022302@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com  2007-01-26 18:09 EST -------
Peter Vrabec wrote:
> #umount foo
> Neopr?vn?n? p??stup do pam?ti (SIGSEGV)

With this sequence of operations, everything on my end is sane. It looks like I
am going to have to set up a test machine with your exact kernel to reproduce this.

If you have the time, you might try this with the most recent -mm kernel to see
if the issue is already resolved there.

> this is suspicious, isn't it:
> in /etc/mtab is
> /rootcrypt /rootfoo ecryptfs 
> rw,ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_cipher=aes, 0 
> 0
>
> in /proc/mounts is
> crypt/ /root/foo ecryptfs rw,dir=/root/crypt 0 0

I'm not sure what the consequences are of these not being in sync, but I suppose
it would be a good thing to put on the work queue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 23:20:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:20:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date
	(calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0
	graphics library.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262320.l0QNKD7v022794@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290


kaplanlior at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kaplanlior at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com  2007-01-26 18:20 EST -------
Hi,

I've talked with Yaacov, and I'll be the "maintainer" of this package. I'll try
to send updated files soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 23:20:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:20:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262320.l0QNKGjr022811@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286


kaplanlior at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kaplanlior at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com  2007-01-26 18:20 EST -------
Hi,

I've talked with Yaacov, and I'll be the "maintainer" of this package. I'll try
to send updated files soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Jan 26 23:20:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:20:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C,
	C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays,
	and reading sequence.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701262320.l0QNKKhL022826@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289


kaplanlior at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kaplanlior at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From kaplanlior at gmail.com  2007-01-26 18:20 EST -------
Hi,

I've talked with Yaacov, and I'll be the "maintainer" of this package. I'll try
to send updated files soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 00:04:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:04:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing
	XML
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270004.l0R04B4c024871@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223023


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ville.skytta at iki.fi
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-26 19:04 EST -------
- rpmlint: E: emacs-nxml-mode invalid-spec-name emacs-xml-mode.spec
Should be renamed to emacs-nxml-mode.spec

- rpmlint: W: emacs-nxml-mode prereq-use info
PreReq: info should be replaced by "Requires(post): info" and 
"Requires(postun): info", or /sbin/install-info, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#info

- Dependency on emacs missing.  Or should that be emacs-common?  Possibly
versioned so that a newer or equal version of Emacs which was used to build the
package is needed?

- Better URL: http://www.thaiopensource.com/nxml-mode/

- Origin of slides.rnc and slidesdb.rnc?  I guess 
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/slides/ , there seems to be newer
version(s) available in the 3.4.0/schema/relaxng/ dir -> maybe upgrade and use
full URLs to sources?

- Package rename needs to be reflected in install-info invocations, now fails on
install:
install-info: No such file or directory for /usr/share/info/emacs-nxml-mode.info
...and on removal:
install-info: warning: no entries found for
`/usr/share/info/emacs-nxml-mode.info'; nothing deleted

- auto-mode-alist association in nxml-init.el fails to do its job, XML and XHTML
files still open in xml-mode and html-mode here.  My (unverified) guess is that
it's because of magic-mode-alist.  So perhaps either add the appropriate
magic-mode-list associations to the init file too or remove the nonfunctional
auto-mode-alist one?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 00:10:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:10:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224684] New: Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation
	program for Apache
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684

           Summary: Review Request: cronolog -  Web log rotation program for
                    Apache
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: jafo-redhat at tummy.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/cronolog.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/cronolog-1.6.2-3.src.rpm
Description: 
cronolog is a simple filter program that reads log file entries from
standard input and writes each entry to the output file specified
by a filename template and the current date and time. When the
expanded filename changes, the current file is closed and a new one
opened. cronolog is intended to be used in conjunction with a Web server,
such as Apache, to split the access log into daily or monthly logs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 00:11:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:11:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270011.l0R0B4lq025056@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-26 19:10 EST -------
At the first glance:
- usage of service and chkconfig in %pre/%post impose Require chkconfig,service
- I am not sure that the location of the script
/usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi is correct.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Hierarchy%29%7C%28Filesystem%29%7C%28Standard%29#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d375c524ab2ea0188557e
states that Fedora "follows the [WWW] Filesystem Hierarchy Standard" which in
turn says that /usr/share should be used for "Architecture-independent data".
Since mailgraoh is a script (hence a program) rather than data, I'd say that
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Hierarchy%29%7C%28Filesystem%29%7C%28Standard%29#head-69ef16dbc0ecb520d4cc7bbd381038f23963e1fd
 a better place could be %{_libexecdir}\%{name}. As an addition, rrd itself sits
in /usr/bin.
OTOH
- awstats sits happily in /usr/share/awstats, so /usr/sahre has already been
blessed in FE
- mailman (from core) serves the scripts from /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin
 
Someone with more experience, could you please step in ?

Once we settle the above mentioned items, I'll be glad to do a pre-review (I
cannot formaly review the package because you need a sponsor).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 00:12:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:12:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270012.l0R0CZlJ025101@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro    |nobody at fedoraproject.org




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-26 19:12 EST -------
Sorry for the noise, I may not formally assign the package to myself.
Reassigning back to nobody at fedoraproject.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 01:24:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:24:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270124.l0R1OdKp026643@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-26 20:24 EST -------
(In reply to comment #25)
> > >Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> > did not work("=" does not work), 
> > so I used 
> > Requires: %{name} >= %{version}-%{release}
> What do you mean? Why equality is not valid for this package?
> Theoretically, inequality admits the different version between
> main package and its subpackages.
Fixed. It works now.
It seems that I misspelled something :-)


> Still some files are installed by "install -m 755" or "cp -r",
> not "install -p -m 755" or "cp -pr"
OOps, I've greped build log, and removed cp -r, install -m.

> For this, I think "pam >= 0.80-9" is preferable as said
> in comment 23, because config-util is introduced on 0.80-9.
Fixed, 
About usermode, I've already have it in Requres field.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 01:29:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:29:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270129.l0R1TPkr026865@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-26 20:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #25)

Updated version:
* SPEC
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit.spec
* SRPM
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.jp/selpe/23577/seedit-2.1.0-0.15.beta6.7.src.rpm

> -------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: Before being sponsored:

> Usually there are two ways to show this.
> A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
> B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
>    (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
>    a formal review)
I see.
I have no more package to submit, so I will take "B".
It might take time, but I will do some pre-review.
Please wait and see my pre-review.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 03:26:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:26:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270326.l0R3QR4d001513@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-26 22:26 EST -------
Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network.spec
SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-network-1.0.34-3.src.rpm

%changelog
* Fri Jan 26 2007 Christopher Stone  1.0.34-3
- Use %%{name} where poker-network is found in spec
- Keep poker.server.xml 0600 and update Fedora.README accordingly
- Remove poker-network-init selinux wrapper script
- Create poker-server-selinux and poker-bot-selinux wrapper scripts
- Create poker-server-selinux and poker-bot-selinux sub-packages
- Add sed substitutions to selinux wrapper scripts
- Modify init scripts to check for selinux wrapper script
- Change "mkdir -p" instances to "install -d"


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 04:54:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:54:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date
	(calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0
	graphics library.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270454.l0R4s5fJ008679@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com         |nobody at fedoraproject.org
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |163776, 177841
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 04:54:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:54:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270454.l0R4sLr4008747@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com         |nobody at fedoraproject.org
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |163776, 177841
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 04:58:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:58:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date
	(calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0
	graphics library.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270458.l0R4wuQj009386@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |174289




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 04:59:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:59:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C,
	C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays,
	and reading sequence.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270459.l0R4x7me009417@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |174290
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 05:47:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:47:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software
	synthesizer plugin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270547.l0R5lk7l014757@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029


florin at andrei.myip.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |florin at andrei.myip.org




------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org  2007-01-27 00:47 EST -------
FWIW, the src.rpm rebuilds just fine on FC6 and the binary works pretty well (if
/etc/hosts is correct)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 05:53:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:53:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for
	LADSPA
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270553.l0R5rLka015254@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045


florin at andrei.myip.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |florin at andrei.myip.org




------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org  2007-01-27 00:53 EST -------
Would be nice to rename this to ladspa-caps-plugins
Thanks,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 06:14:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:14:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer
	0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270614.l0R6E1SW017121@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402


jeff at ocjtech.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: gst-pulse - |Review Request: gstreamer-
                   |GStreamer 0.10 plugin for   |plugins-pulse - GStreamer
                   |the PulseAudio sound server |0.10 plugin for the
                   |                            |PulseAudio sound server
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us  2007-01-27 01:13 EST -------
* source files match upstream

$ md5sum gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz*
7c60018e8b9ce7f62c7078bee5851f07  gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz
7c60018e8b9ce7f62c7078bee5851f07  gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz.1

$ sha1sum gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz*
6f8fd58d3f3a17e4c5e2c8b59d4ab06453082240  gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz
6f8fd58d3f3a17e4c5e2c8b59d4ab06453082240  gst-pulse-0.9.4.tar.gz.1

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (fc6, i386)
* package installs properly. 
! rpmlint says:

E: gstreamer-plugins-pulse script-without-shebang
/usr/share/doc/gstreamer-plugins-pulse-0.9.4/README.Fedora

Either specify a mode ("install -m 644 -p") or use "cp" to get the
file into the build directory.

E: gstreamer-plugins-pulse description-line-too-long gstreamer-plugins-pulse is
a GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
E: gstreamer-plugins-pulse description-line-too-long gstreamer-plugins-pulse is
a GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.

I don't think that it's necessary to have the name of the package in
the description, I'd get rid of it.

* %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution.
* no shared libraries are present
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers
* no unversioned .so file
* no pkconfig file
* no libtool .la droppings.
* Final requirements are:

libc.so.6  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)  
libdl.so.2  
libglib-2.0.so.0  
libgmodule-2.0.so.0  
libgobject-2.0.so.0  
libgstaudio-0.10.so.0  
libgstpulse.so.0  
libgstreamer-0.10.so.0  
libgthread-2.0.so.0  
libm.so.6  
libpthread.so.0  
libpulse.so.0  
libxml2.so.2  
libz.so.1  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)  

* The final provides are:

libgstpulse.so.0  
gstreamer-plugins-pulse = 0.9.4-3.fc6

The rpmlint errors are minor, you can fix them up after importing (but
before issuing a build please).  This package is APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 06:52:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:52:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270652.l0R6qtPZ020372@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 01:52 EST -------
I will review this after rb-libtorrent (bug 221372) is
completed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 06:53:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:53:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection
	Tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270653.l0R6rJno020440@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 01:53 EST -------
ping again?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 07:13:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:13:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270713.l0R7DAld022085@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 02:13 EST -------
Umm..
on FC-devel, this program completely hangs up after printing
the following messages...

----------------------------------------------------------
[tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ deluge
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
./deluge.py:62: GtkWarning: gtk_scrolled_window_add(): cannot add non scrollable
widget use gtk_scrolled_window_add_with_viewport() instead
  self.wTree = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile)
python-libtorrent, using libtorrent 0.11.0.0. Compiled with NDEBUG value: 1
Capping download to -1 bytes per second
Capping upload to -1 bytes per second
Loading DHT state from /home/tasaka1/.config/deluge/dht.state
No DHT file to resume
--------------------------------------------------------

On FC-5, it does not hang up. Would you know why?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 07:32:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:32:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service
	evasion module for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270732.l0R7WCuv022510@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mpeters at mac.com             |nobody at fedoraproject.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163776
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 02:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> If there is no response in 1 week, we will move this back to NEW and someone 
> else can review it. 
> 

Switching to FE-NEW

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 07:36:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:36:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270736.l0R7ae5n022691@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com         |nobody at fedoraproject.org
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |163776, 177841
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 07:56:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:56:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224684] Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program
	for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270756.l0R7uhv9023140@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cronolog -  Web log rotation program for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ville.skytta at iki.fi
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-27 02:56 EST -------
- "strip src/cronolog" needs to go, let rpmbuild take care of it and produce a
usable debuginfo package.

- Use "make install DESTDIR=..." instead of %makeinstall
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002

- Why is the info file removed instead of being included and properly installed?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#info

- The man page refers to /www/sbin/cronolog which could be replaced by the
actual installation path, /usr/sbin/cronolog

- Would /usr/bin be a more appropriate install path for cronosplit than /usr/sbin?

- INSTALL is useless in %doc, and should be dropped.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 09:09:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:09:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701270909.l0R99I8Q026524@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-27 04:09 EST -------
Is it really worth having separate selinux subpackages for poker-server and
poker-bot? What's the advantage of this approach rather than a combined package
that handles both?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 11:04:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:04:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271104.l0RB4AR6001153@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645


thomas at apestaart.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org  2007-01-27 06:03 EST -------
pushed, closing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 11:04:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:04:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271104.l0RB4HRs001194@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redland


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647


Bug 195647 depends on bug 195645, which changed state.

Bug 195645 Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 12:21:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:21:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271221.l0RCLRi2003391@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245


tokul at users.sourceforge.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tokul at users.sourceforge.net




------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net  2007-01-27 07:21 EST -------
> that's funny... I've heard very good things about http://www.roundcube.net/

1. Licensed under GPL and bundles code incompatible with GPL.

2. implements features that are not implemented in SquirrelMail because they are
unstable and require too many safety checks. Roundcube implementation of output
character set does not include required safety checks.

3. Less stable than SquirrelMail.

4. Spell check depends on external third party API.

5. PHP array based translations. See horror stories of translation maintainers.

6. Heavy dependency on JavaScript.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 12:41:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:41:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for
	Xen
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271241.l0RCf2Xn003910@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960





------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-27 07:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> >maybe it would make sense to also touch an empty logfile and get it owned by
> the >package? 
> 
> Add it in %post ands as %ghost file, what do you think about it ?

Doesn't sound good. Just create it in %install and simply add
%{_sysconfdir}/log/%{name} to %files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 13:05:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:05:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] New: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010

           Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2.spec
SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2-0.8.21-1.src.rpm
Description: Globulation 2 brings a new type of gameplay to RTS games. The player chooses
the number of units to assign to various tasks, and the units do their best to
satisfy the requests. This allows players to manage more units and focus on
strategy rather than individual unit's jobs. Globulation 2 also features AI
allowing single-player games or any possible combination of human-computer
teams. Also included is a scripting language for versatile gameplay or
tutorials and an integrated map editor. Globulation2 can be played in single
player mode, through your local network, or over the Internet with Ysagoon
Online Gaming (or YOG for short).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 13:07:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:07:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271307.l0RD74pi005525@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005


rafalzaq at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com  2007-01-27 08:07 EST -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 225010 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 13:07:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:07:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271307.l0RD79pF005536@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010


rafalzaq at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |brkamikaze at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com  2007-01-27 08:07 EST -------
*** Bug 191005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 14:52:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:52:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220979] Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271452.l0REqpKt010712@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tesseract - Raw OCR Engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220979


karlikt at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|179259                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com  2007-01-27 09:52 EST -------
No, it was not intentional.
New release:
ChangeLog:
- Update BRs
- Fix x86_64 compile

The patch x86_64-fix is not written by me. I found it in debian package.

New URLs:
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract.spec
http://karlik.nonlogic.org/tesseract/tesseract-1.02-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 14:53:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:53:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271453.l0RErLSj010767@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841              |201449
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 15:11:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:11:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE
	focusing on usability
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271511.l0RFBlan011483@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-27 10:11 EST -------
Thanks for the review. I'll be uploading it once I'm back from holidays.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation

(In reply to comment #2)
> APPROVED.
> 
> Any reason behind not installing translation files?
> 

What do you mean?

In the spec file, I have already stated:
## File lists
# locale's
%find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang
# HTML (1.0)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 15:31:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:31:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+
	widgets for SciGraphica
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271531.l0RFVw8c012078@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 10:31 EST -------
Umm, again ping, Paul?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 15:32:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:32:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222571] Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph
	calculator for KDE
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271532.l0RFWpgj012111@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kalgebra - MathML-based graph calculator for KDE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222571





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-27 10:32 EST -------
Updated:
Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/kalgebra.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/kalgebra-0.5-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 15:59:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:59:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271559.l0RFxOaD012857@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-27 10:59 EST -------
With the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS I'm having these:
g++ -c -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -W -O2 -fPIC OPJFile.cpp -o OPJFile.o
OPJFile.cpp: In member function 'int OPJFile::Parse()':
OPJFile.cpp:76: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:109: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:116: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:123: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:126: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:129: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:139: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:147: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:156: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:165: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:201: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:207: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:215: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:216: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:254: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:269: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:272: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:286: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:288: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:289: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:298: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:305: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:321: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:323: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:324: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:326: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:328: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:382: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:392: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:408: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:430: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:439: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:475: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
OPJFile.cpp:478: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t,
size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
g++ -shared -Wl,-soname,liborigin.so.0 -o liborigin.so.0.0.1 OPJFile.o

Added fix for hardcoded path of %{_libdir}

Updated
Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin-20070115-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 16:08:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:08:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220926] Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271608.l0RG88ne013169@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ingo - The Horde email filter manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220926


fedora at theholbrooks.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org  2007-01-27 11:08 EST -------
Module imported, added to owners.list, devel built, and FC[56] branches
requested.  Thanks again for the review!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 16:31:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:31:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271631.l0RGVo86013938@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-27 11:31 EST -------
i could get a pin dialog using bluetooth-applet  and indeed pin helpers have 
gone away.  from what i can tell whats needed is to add dbus support to 
register and listen for pin requests. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 16:43:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:43:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271643.l0RGh9qx014267@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-27 11:43 EST -------
The selinux stuff is in a state of flux right now as wart and I implement it.  I
added both a poker-network and poker-bot selinux subpackage for consistency.  I
planned to ask wart if this was necessary, but I have not had the chance to ask
him yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 17:05:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:05:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271705.l0RH5bs4014876@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-27 12:05 EST -------
Just to clarify, did you test the package from comment 29?

Here's how Debian has apparently solved the pin dialog issue; doesn't look too
clean to me but anyway:
http://bugs.debian.org/383877
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta2-2.diff.gz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 17:26:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:26:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271726.l0RHQksJ015579@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 12:26 EST -------
Well, for 0.11-3:

* License:
  - Well, some sources are not licensed under BSD.

  A. Some files are under the Boost Software License
     (perhaps okay)
     [under include/libtorrent/]:
     asio.hpp asio/*.hpp asio/*/*.hpp
     invariant_check.cpp

  B. Need some verification
     [under include/libtorrent/]
     utf8.hpp
------------------------------------------------------
1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not
   claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software
   in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be
   appreciated but is not required.
2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
   misrepresented as being the original software.
3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.
-------------------------------------------------------

* Fedora specific documentation
  - Please include your name.

* Timestamps
  - This package try to install many text files/image files
    and in that case keeping on those files are preferable.
    For this package please:
--------------------------------------------------------
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
export CPPROG="%{__cp} -p"
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p"
--------------------------------------------------------

* Requires, etc
  /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc includes:
--------------------------------------------------------
Libs: -L${libdir} -lz  -lboost_date_time -lboost_filesystem -lboost_thread -lz
-ltorrent
--------------------------------------------------------
  * I doubt that addtional linkage is needed as 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 17:49:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:49:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271749.l0RHn0kL016120@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 12:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
>   B. Need some verification
>      [under include/libtorrent/]
>      utf8.hpp
Okay, this is zlib, free and GPL-compatible.
So, this is licensed under 3 kinds of license,
BSD, Boost and zlib.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 17:58:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:58:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271758.l0RHwZx9016470@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 12:58 EST -------
( As python-libtorrent (bug 221376) seems to be accepted soon after
 rb_libtorrent (bug 221372) is completed, I assign this bug to
 myself. )


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 18:04:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:04:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225038] New: Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+
	text editor 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225038

           Summary: Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text
                    editor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit.spec
SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/medit/medit-0.8.1-1.src.rpm
Description: medit is a multiplatform GTK text editor. Started originally as a simple 
built-in editor component in GGAP, it grew up to a real text editor

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 18:22:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:22:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271822.l0RIMQGr017481@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-27 13:22 EST -------
We've discussed this a bit on IRC, and I think I've found a reasonable solution.
 One selinux subpackage will be needed (poker-selinux), and it will contain only
the selinux policy files, not the wrapper scripts.  poker-selinux will not need
'Requires: poker-server'.

Since the wrapper scripts are generic enough to be used when selinux is enabled
or disabled, there doesn't need to be a conditional in the init script to call
them if they are present.  The wrapper scripts can safely move to the
corresponding poker-bot and poker-server subpackages.

poker-web requires the selinux policies in order to function, since it requires
giving permission to httpd to connect to the pokerd_port_t ports.  So poker-web
will need "Requires: poker-selinux".  If poker-web is installed with
poker-server and/or poker-bot, this will enforce selinux protection on those two
packages as well.  The protection for poker-bot/poker-server can be disabled,
however, by using 'setsebool pokerd_disable_trans on' without affecting the
selinux rules needed for poker-web.  But if poker-server/poker-bot are installed
without poker-web, then the selinux protection is only available if the admin
installs poker-selinux manually.

I'm testing out these changes now and will attach updates for the spec file and
init scripts when ready.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 18:43:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:43:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224684] Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program
	for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271843.l0RIhEF8017977@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cronolog -  Web log rotation program for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684





------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com  2007-01-27 13:43 EST -------
All these items addressed, thanks.

ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/cronolog-1.6.2-4.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/cronolog.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 18:59:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:59:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth
	Framework
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271859.l0RIxI9s018504@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-27 13:59 EST -------
yes i used the package from comment 29   ill try with debian's patch 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 19:01:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:01:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225038] Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text
	editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271901.l0RJ13xp018586@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225038


lxtnow at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: medit -     |Review Request: medit -
                   |Another very nice Gtk+ text |Another very nice Gtk+ text
                   |editor                      |editor




------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-27 14:01 EST -------
In fields %install,
in your "desktop-file-install" line commande, "--delete-original" was pasted
twice...?

"--vendor=Fedora" is not required anymore, juste set --vendor="".

you shoudn't past all BuildRequires on the same line.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 19:34:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:34:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271934.l0RJYGfw019436@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 14:34 EST -------
Sorry it took me so long to get back to looking at this. 

1-4 all look solved. 

One new issue... the init file's Description doesn't look right: 

# description:  This is a daemon which periodically checks for updates \
#               and can send notifications via mail, dbus or syslog.

Thats a pretty minor issue, and you should be able to change it before you import.

I don't see any further issues, so this package is APPROVED. 
Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported
and built. 

Also, consider reviewing some other waiting packages to help spread out the
reviewing load. :) 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 19:52:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:52:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701271952.l0RJqYlQ019916@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-27 14:52 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> - usage of service and chkconfig in %pre/%post impose Require chkconfig,service

It doesn't use /sbin/service, but it does use /sbin/chkconfig so I added the
proper requires.


Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph-1.12-2.fc6.src.rpm


* Sat Jan 27 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 1.12-2
- add Requires(preun), Requires(post) for chkconfig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 20:21:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:21:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224684] Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program
	for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272021.l0RKLb0r020454@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cronolog -  Web log rotation program for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-27 15:21 EST -------
Looks good, approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 20:56:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:56:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272056.l0RKu5eK021502@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Alias: phpDocumentor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502





------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-27 15:56 EST -------
1. Because php-pear-PhpDocumentor is a library that phpdoc uses. Think of them
as "curl" and "libcurl".
2. I don't think enabling web access by default is a good idea -- it's not a
common usage, and that would make it depend on httpd, which is not necessary for
most uses of phpdoc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 20:59:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:59:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225038] Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text
	editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272059.l0RKxpas021584@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: medit - Another very nice Gtk+ text editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225038





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-27 15:59 EST -------
* must not include /usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache

* missing scriptlets for gtk-update-icon-cache (hicolor icons)
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets

* must not include /usr/share/mime/mime.cache

* contents of /usr/share/mime/ and subdirs are highly questionable
and need a very close look


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 21:10:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:10:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272110.l0RLADMr021841@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542





------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com  2007-01-27 16:10 EST -------
I've updated the SPEC and the SRPM:

http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.0.4-1.src.rpm

rpmlint gives me these warnings/errors:

E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.5.0.4 libfaxutil.so
E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4 libfaxserver.so
W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so
E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600
E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax
E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail/image
E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux
E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax
E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail/application/octet-stream
E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail/image/tiff
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700
E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail/application/pdf
W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700
E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail/application
W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps
E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700
E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax

Please let me know what you would like me to do from here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 21:21:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:21:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272121.l0RLL4YO022067@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-27 16:21 EST -------
Thanks Howard, I will look at the files later this weekend, I promise.

There was something seriously wrong with you latest package (the ones I built
and the binary you gave me), the permissions were messed up and files were not
executable, the %attr statements don't work as expected. I'll need to
investigate this further. Please stay tuned.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 21:27:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:27:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272127.l0RLRplp022276@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682


david at fetter.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |david at fetter.org




------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org  2007-01-27 16:27 EST -------
I believe this fixes the earlier issues.

http://fetter.org/~shackle/postgresql-dbi-link.spec

http://fetter.org/~shackle/postgresql-dbi-link-2.0.0-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 21:42:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:42:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272142.l0RLgUb3022678@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-27 16:42 EST -------
What do you mean by hanging up? Does it draw the window; but have it
unresponsive to input? Does it simply not function right? I'm using FC-6 (with a
lot of X-related stuff from Rawhide) and have seen no such problem. :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:01:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:01:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] New: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045

           Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/incron.spec
SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/incron-0.4.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
This program is an "inotify cron" system.
It consists of a daemon and a table manipulator.
You can use it a similar way as the regular cron.
The difference is that the inotify cron handles
filesystem events rather than time periods.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:04:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:04:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272204.l0RM4Sgo023205@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: incron -    |Review Request: incron -
                   |Inotify cron system         |Inotify cron system
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 17:04 EST -------
Per my comment on IRC, I would be happy to review this package... 

Look for a formal review later tonight. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:10:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:10:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD
	image editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272210.l0RMABwD023413@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969


mszpak at wp.pl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl  2007-01-27 17:09 EST -------
With minor problems, but a package is already available also in FC-5 and FC-6.


Thanks for your help.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:30:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:30:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272230.l0RMUUgK023878@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841              |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-27 17:30 EST -------
I'd be happy to review this package. 

Look for a full review here in a bit...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:35:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:35:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system
	userland utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272235.l0RMZsqo024010@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:37:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:37:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 209511] Review Request: gnbd - global network block device
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272237.l0RMbHoV024044@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 22:58:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:58:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272258.l0RMwksF024482@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-27 17:58 EST -------
I've noted the separate licenses; but AFAICT they all are very similar to the
BSD license (mostly "do what you want with the code, so long as the original
authors' copyrights are left intact and the license text is not altered")
 
> * Fedora specific documentation
>   - Please include your name.
Fixed in release 4.

> * Timestamps
>   - This package try to install many text files/image files
>     and in that case keeping on those files are preferable.
>     For this package please:
> --------------------------------------------------------
Fixed in release 4.

> * Requires, etc
>   /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc includes:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lz  -lboost_date_time -lboost_filesystem -lboost_thread -lz
> -ltorrent
> --------------------------------------------------------
>   * I doubt that addtional linkage is needed as 
Ah I see. Since we're linking against the system zlib, both the the @ZLIB@ and
@LIBS@ macros in the input file are expanded to contain '-lz' in the final
libtorrent.pc file. I've fixed this in release 4.

Spec: http:/thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent.spec
SRPM: http:/thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent-0.11-4.src.rpm

Thanks for your time and comments!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 23:04:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:04:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern,
	advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272304.l0RN41vo024596@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-27 18:03 EST -------
Hi Kevin,

Fixed, and build successfully on -devel.

>>Also, consider reviewing some other waiting packages to help spread out the reviewing load. :)

Working on that :-)

Thanks for your review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 23:10:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:10:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272310.l0RNA39A024714@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|ruben at rubenkerkhof.com      |nobody at fedoraproject.org
                 CC|                            |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163776, 177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-27 18:09 EST -------
Must:

- package conforms to package naming guidlines
- spec file name matches basename
- the package is licensed with an open source compatible license
- package includes license in %doc
- spec file is written in american english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream (sha1sum):
   08bbe7f6e66f1b14b40ce7da8caa716b6ee122e3  mailgraph-1.12.tar.gz
- package successfully built on my test box (i386)
- no need for exclude arch (noarch package)
- files in %doc does not affect runtime of application
- does not contain a pkgconfig file
- does not contain any libraries
- does not have a devel package
- does not contain any .la files
- package does not have a gui
- package does not own files/directories owned by other packages.
- no libraries, no need to run ldconfig
- not relocatable
- package owns everything it creates
- package does not duplicate files it owns
- consistently uses macros
- code, not content

Needs work:

- rpmlint errors:
   E: mailgraph non-standard-gid /var/cache/mailgraph apache.
   This can be ignored, but you should Require httpd, otherwise you can't be sure
   this user exists.
   E: mailgraph non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/mailgraph 0775.
   Can't you make apache the owner of the directory?

- Do you need the repotag in Release?
- Please preserve timestamps when installing files (Packaging/Guidelines/Timestamps)

I see you have not been sponsored yet, and I'm not a sponsor, so I'll have to put the FE-NEEDSPONSOR 
blocker back.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 23:41:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:41:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272341.l0RNfh6c025324@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 18:41 EST -------
Well, "hang up" means...

When I launch "deluge"
* the window is drawn, with characters on the window
* the message (in comment 7) is printed out
* but the window does not response to any mouse click anymore...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 23:44:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:44:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272344.l0RNibZm025391@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-27 18:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
>    E: mailgraph non-standard-gid /var/cache/mailgraph apache.
>    This can be ignored, but you should Require httpd, otherwise you can't be sure
>    this user exists.

Ah, excellent point.  I remember thinking that it could be installed without
httpd required, but didn't consider the data directory ownership.

>    E: mailgraph non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/mailgraph 0775.
>    Can't you make apache the owner of the directory?

I could.  but if I change it apache.apache 0755, then I'm pretty sure rpmlint
will complain about "non-standard ownership".  Is there a flaw to the way that
I've done it, or are you expressing a preference, or pointing me to a guideline?

> - Do you need the repotag in Release?

No, but until it's accepted, it help me build with my own repotag and not have
to keep two spec files.  Since the repotag is unset in FE it should not have any
impact.

> - Please preserve timestamps when installing files
(Packaging/Guidelines/Timestamps)

I will update with this change next release.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Jan 27 23:45:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:45:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701272345.l0RNjpQc025421@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-27 18:45 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146755)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146755&action=view)
selinux file updates

The attached tarball contains the selinux policy files and the corresponding
changes to the init scripts and spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 00:12:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:12:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280012.l0S0CC3j025925@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-27 19:12 EST -------
Well,
* Why do you call autoconf while there is a original
 "configure" script?
* Remove static archive (*.a)
* Usually the dependency for the main package should be given
  with full version-release dependency.
* Please specify the URL of SOURCE0
* Is %repotag needed? As least this is not needed for
  Fedora.
* And.. I don't know, however are many files under www/ or
  rfc/ can be ignored?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 00:41:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:41:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280041.l0S0fZiX027240@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-27 19:41 EST -------
> I could.  but if I change it apache.apache 0755, then I'm pretty sure rpmlint
> will complain about "non-standard ownership".  Is there a flaw to the way that
> I've done it, or are you expressing a preference, or pointing me to a guideline?

I think rpmlint is complaining about the 0775, which probably should be a 0755 :-)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 00:59:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:59:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service
	evasion module for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280059.l0S0x8q3027452@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-27 19:59 EST -------
Hi Konstant,

Review for release 1.10.1-1
* RPM name is OK
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint looks OK
* File list looks OK
* Config files of mod_evasive look OK

Needs work:
* Source 0 is not available (http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/mod_evasive/
mod_evasive_1.10.1.tar.gz). The project is now at http://www.zdziarski.com/projects/mod_evasive/
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
  Please replace /usr/sbin/apxs with %{_sbindir}/apxs



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 01:11:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:11:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280111.l0S1B7HJ027768@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-27 20:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Well,
> * Why do you call autoconf while there is a original
>  "configure" script?

At one point I was using a newer release that did not have a configure script. 
I forgot to change it back.  Fixed.

> * Remove static archive (*.a)

Fixed.

> * Usually the dependency for the main package should be given
>   with full version-release dependency.

Fixed.

> * Please specify the URL of SOURCE0

Fixed.

> * Is %repotag needed? As least this is not needed for
>   Fedora.

No, at the moment it's for my convenience so I don't need two spec files for
non-FE builds.

> * And.. I don't know, however are many files under www/ or
>   rfc/ can be ignored?

www files are the smarty templated files that are for the web pages hosted at
sf.net.

In my opinion the RFCs should not be included.
rfc/README:
These RFC's are copied here for convenience only!
In no way does the libSieve project make any claims
as to ownership, authorship or stewardship over
these documents. Please do not make reference to
this "mini-repository" in any way; rather,
point to the home repository hosted by the IETF:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/



Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.1.13-4.fc6.src.rpm

* Sat Jan 27 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 2.1.13-4
- add fully versioned dependency on main package for -devel
- remove .a library from -devel
- do not call autoconf, use configure file
- direct download url for source0
- remove buildrequires for autoconf and m4


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 01:19:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:19:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280119.l0S1JfrC027964@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 01:32:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:32:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280132.l0S1WM6a028234@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-27 20:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > I could.  but if I change it apache.apache 0755, then I'm pretty sure rpmlint
> > will complain about "non-standard ownership".  Is there a flaw to the way that
> > I've done it, or are you expressing a preference, or pointing me to a guideline?
> 
> I think rpmlint is complaining about the 0775, which probably should be a 0755 :-)
> 

You are correct, but I think you missed my point.  If you change the ownership
from root.apache to apache.apache and the mode from 0775 to 0755, you trade this
"error" message:

E: mailgraph non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/mailgraph 0775

for this "error" message:

E: mailgraph non-standard-uid /var/cache/mailgraph apache

I just checked it on my system and indeed that is what rpmlint says.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 02:00:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:00:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for
	integration with Google calendar
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280200.l0S20NIA028682@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-27 21:00 EST -------
According to the naming guidelines the name of the spec should be
gnome-applet-wuja.spec now.

I think you should replace wuja with gnome-applet-wuja now in %description, too.

You can remove the 'killall -HUP gconfd-2 ...'-lines from the scriptlets, since
bug #173869 is fixed.

The 'Obsoletes:'-tag is only needed
- if a package named wuja had already been published or
- if there are 3rd party packages named wuja and we want to replace them.
So for this special package you can remove it I think.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 02:30:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:30:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280230.l0S2UBux029053@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net  2007-01-27 21:30 EST -------
Same thing happens on Development (x86_64)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 02:34:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:34:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280234.l0S2YV0R029124@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 21:34 EST -------
Just to fill in some additional information here: 

- David is the upstream author of this package. (from comment #20). 
- The Oracle (and excel) dependencies were due to examples of how to use this
package, there is no real dependency on them in the package itself. 
- David is fine with Devrim maintaining the Fedora version of this package now. 
- The 2.0.0 version was released upstream, including moving those test scripts
to a 'examples' directory, and having them be shipped as doc files. 

That said, looking at the package in comment #20: 

1. You should use the %{?dist} tag: 
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag

2. You might change the 
%doc %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples
to just
%doc examples
Although I guess it's just a matter of taste where the example files are... 

I don't see anything else thats a blocker with the package in comment #20.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 03:25:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:25:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280325.l0S3PW4J029800@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 22:25 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
61bfebf6814ee893d4ff42628a823404  incron-0.4.0.tar.bz2
61bfebf6814ee893d4ff42628a823404  incron-0.4.0.tar.bz2.1
6fbef5fdda790abbf187d3c43d79d9e85ff9a59e  incron-0.4.0.tar.bz2
6fbef5fdda790abbf187d3c43d79d9e85ff9a59e  incron-0.4.0.tar.bz2.1
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
See below - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. rpmlint says:

E: incron setuid-binary /usr/bin/incrontab root 04755
E: incron non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/incrontab 04755

I think this is required for handling user incron's.

2. The post/preun/postun scriptlets aren't right. Installing gives you:
error reading information on service incron: No such file or directory
error: %post(incron-0.4.0-1.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
The name of the service is 'incrond'

3. Testing on my fc6 laptop with selinux enabled shows that it works.
It didn't seem to pick up my user incrontab at first, and I had to restart
the daemon, but then it started working ok. Using the IN_NO_LOOP
is very important ( set a monitor for create in /tmp to mail me, and
it looped and sent me about 1000 emails before I stopped it. ;)

The only blocker I see is fixing up the scriptlets.
Fix that and I will approve the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 03:37:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:37:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280337.l0S3biQV029966@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redland


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 22:37 EST -------
Hey Thomas. Now that rasqal is in, we can move forward on this review. 

1.0.5 appears to be out, could you upgrade to that and make any other changes
you would like and I will do a review... :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 03:52:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:52:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280352.l0S3qTS6030167@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724





------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org  2007-01-27 22:52 EST -------
Thanks for the excellent comments! Working...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 04:15:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:15:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280415.l0S4F8T7030772@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 23:15 EST -------
In reply to comment #24:

Are you using a x86_64 machine? I see the same thing on my x86_64 machine here. 
I'll attach the dmesg from the machine. It does sound like a locking issue. 

Michael: Could you post an updated package addressing the issues in comments #17
and #18?





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 04:17:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:17:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs
	utilities
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280417.l0S4HY0T030898@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-27 23:17 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146760)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146760&action=view)
backtrace from dmesg on x86_64 machine


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 05:13:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:13:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280513.l0S5Dddi001093@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 00:13 EST -------
Well,

* License
  - Some sources are not licensed under LGPL.
    + GPL
      sv_util/*print*.[hc]
      sv_util/xsize.h

    As GPL is more strict than LGPL, please modify
    the whole license of this package to GPL
    (not a blocker, however, would you tell upstream
     about this? License text is LGPL, however this
     package is surely GPL)

* Timestamps
  - This package installs several header files, and
    in that case keeping timestamps on these files
    are preferred. For this package,
--------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p"
--------------------------------------------------
    will keep timestamps.

* Source:
  - It seems that the newest is 2.2.4.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 07:14:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:14:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280714.l0S7EYbh004181@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-28 02:14 EST -------
I promise not to take so long with this one.

First off, the release should be "0.1.rc2%{?dist}"; you can append ".1" once the
package is in the repo and you need to tweak a non-development branch without
rebuilding any of the newer branches.

About registry.php, what stops us from just shipping the horde package with jeta
enabled in registry.php?  I don't think it's worth it to try and change it; that
can get rather complicated and it's best to avoid that kind of thing unless it's
really trivial to do, and even then it's still usually better to just leave it
up to the admin.

I guess the fundamental question is why upstream doesn't enable jeta by default.
 I suppose it's because it hasn't been released yet.  Or do things break if
"status" is set to "active" when the application isn't installed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 08:41:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:41:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280841.l0S8fD58005832@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 03:41 EST -------
It seems that current version is 0.5.0 .

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 09:33:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:33:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280933.l0S9XB3W003547@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-28 04:33 EST -------
Agreed. There's no way to do this without those 2 error messages, so I think it's safe to ignore them.
Have you created a new version yet?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 09:58:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:58:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701280958.l0S9wF9L004435@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-28 04:58 EST -------
The icewm-xdg-menu patch has been incorporated upstream.

Another comment is that I don't think that icewm-xdg-menu
deserves to be in a separate subpackage, since python is
likely to be installed on every desktop and most servers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 10:25:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 05:25:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281025.l0SAPvYo005728@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-28 05:25 EST -------
> 2. The post/preun/postun scriptlets aren't right. Installing gives you:
> error reading information on service incron: No such file or directory
> error: %post(incron-0.4.0-1.fc6.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> The name of the service is 'incrond'

Fixed

> 3. Testing on my fc6 laptop with selinux enabled shows that it works.
> It didn't seem to pick up my user incrontab at first, and I had to restart
> the daemon, but then it started working ok. Using the IN_NO_LOOP
> is very important ( set a monitor for create in /tmp to mail me, and
> it looped and sent me about 1000 emails before I stopped it. ;)

Strange, I had the same thing without selinux. It didn't pickup my incrontab the first time either.

On Comment #3: They must have released that a few hours ago. Good catch.

I have a question about the licensing though:

 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of one of the following licenses:
 *
 * \li 1. X11-style license (see LICENSE-X11)
 * \li 2. GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 (see LICENSE-LGPL)
 * \li 3. GNU General Public License, version 2  (see LICENSE-GPL)

Should I just pick GPL and include LICENSE-GPL?

New version:
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/incron.spec
http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/incron-0.5.0-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 12:31:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:31:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220967] Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+
	widgets for SciGraphica
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281231.l0SCVw4r010353@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libscigraphica - A library of gtk+ widgets for SciGraphica


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220967


paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the-     |
                   |johnsons.co.uk)             |




------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-28 07:31 EST -------
Builds fine in mock, rpmlint is clean (devel gives a warning about no-docs which
can be ignored)

Review

Good

Consistent use of macros
No permission conflicts / incorrect ownership
Docs included
No static libs included
devel file uses pkgconfig correctly
library - doesn't need desktop icon
rpm requirements sane

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:07:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:07:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220968] Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application
	for data analysis and technical graphics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281307.l0SD7Nvi011731@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968


paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-28 08:07 EST -------
Okay, it's happy again!

rpmlint is not quiet - it's complaining about the two .h files in pixmaps. I've
looked at them and will allow it on this occassion. I'm not happy though.

mock is happy (x86)

Review

Good

Consistent use of macros
No permission or ownership issues
No static libs
docs included
devel not built, no pkgconfig required
rpm not missing any required
software actually works
Includes desktop icon

Unhappy but will allow
.h files in non-devel package

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:10:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:10:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281310.l0SDASEL011844@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glade3


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747


paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(bbbush.yuan at gmail.
                   |                            |com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:12:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:12:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler
	System
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281312.l0SDC9hA011903@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728


paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEEDINFO
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(gemi at bluewin.ch)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:23:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:23:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281323.l0SDNUpc012187@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glade3


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747





------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz  2007-01-28 08:23 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> URL?

I think he means the URL in additional bug info:
ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3.spec

and for the srpm:
ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/glade3-3.1.4-0.8.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:42:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:42:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without
	using monodevelop
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281342.l0SDg5Ra012573@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-28 08:42 EST -------
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools.spec
SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/mono-tools-1.2.1-4.src.rpm

Address the above

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:54:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:54:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281354.l0SDsp2u013226@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-28 08:54 EST -------
While the pyxdg and the gnome-menus packages may not be big enough to warrant a
sub-package, adding 20-30 second to each login is.
Breaking icewm-xdg-menu into a separate sub-package creates a better out of the
box experience to those who need auto-generated menus (by auto-enabling it),
while keeping it KISS, to those who don't. (Low-end machines, servers, etc)

* Sun Jan 28 2007  - 1.2.30-10
- Missing REQ: icewm (both -gnome and -xdgmenu)
- Updated menu.in patch.
- Updated startup script. (-xdgmenu)
- Updated icewm-xdg-menu script. (-xdgmenu)
	
Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-10.src.rpm

- Gilboa


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 13:59:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:59:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler
	System
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281359.l0SDxu2F013613@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728


gemi at bluewin.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(gemi at bluewin.ch)  |




------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2007-01-28 08:59 EST -------
Your spec file doesn't work since some executables in the main package depend on
stklos-config. That is one reason why I am opposed to the split.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 14:02:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:02:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281402.l0SE2jni013850@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com  2007-01-28 09:02 EST -------
Done.

* Sun Jan 28 2007  - 0.9.2-5
- Missing REQ: man.
- Missing REQ: info.
- Missing REQ: xdg-open.
- Use xdg-open to handle files.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/gmrun-0.9.2-5.src.rpm

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 14:26:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:26:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler
	System
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281426.l0SEQmP2015207@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728





------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk  2007-01-28 09:26 EST -------
You still need to split the package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 15:04:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:04:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection
	Tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281504.l0SF4naU016556@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393


seefeld at sympatico.ca changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico.|
                   |ca)                         |




------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca  2007-01-28 10:04 EST -------
Sorry for the lack of feedback. I'v got bug-reports concerning Python 2.5
on some 64-bit architectures, and so I'm considering to work on a minor
release (0.9.1), where I then can address the other changes you requested,
too.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 15:18:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:18:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281518.l0SFI6Gl017043@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 10:18 EST -------
Okay.
-----------------------------------------------------
  This package (rb_libtorrent) is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 15:20:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:20:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225066] New: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of
	plugins for gedit 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066

           Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins
                    for gedit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: trond.danielsen at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/gedit-plugins.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/gedit-plugins-2.15.5-1.src.rpm
Description: gedit-plugins is a collections of plugins for gedit - the default GNOME text editor.

More information about the plugins can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GeditPlugins

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 15:23:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:23:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins
	for gedit
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281523.l0SFN6HU017306@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066


trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: gedit-      |Review Request: gedit-
                   |plugins - Collections of    |plugins - Collections of
                   |plugins for gedit           |plugins for gedit




------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com  2007-01-28 10:23 EST -------
Output from rpmlint below:

[trondd at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gedit-plugins-2.15.5-1.i386.rpm 
W: gedit-plugins non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/gedit-show-tabbar-plugin.schemas
[trondd at localhost SPECS]$ 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 15:40:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:40:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281540.l0SFeE8h017849@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 10:40 EST -------
Well, actually the files needed for this package is
python-libtorrent.cpp and your setup.py makes sense.

* URL, Source0 should be
  http://deluge-torrent.org/
  http://deluge-torrent.org/downloads/python-libtorrent_0.4.0.tar.gz
  (md5sum coincides)
  respectively (use %{name}, %{version}).

* Please fix the permission included in -debuginfo rpm.

Other things are okay.
-------------------------------------------------------
   This package (python-libtorrent) is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:03:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:03:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins
	for gedit
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281603.l0SG3XMR018503@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-28 11:03 EST -------
Skimming over the spec...

> %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gedit-show-tabbar-plugin.schemas

Scriptlets for gconftool install/uninstall of these schemas
is missing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets

> %{_datadir}/locale/*

Use the %find_lang macro appropriately instead of including the
files like this. This is a MUST item according to the guidelines.

> %doc README INSTALL NEWS AUTHORS COPYING

The 'INSTALL' file most likely is the standard "Basic Installation"
document which is irrelevant to RPM package users.

> Summary:        Gedit-plugins is a collection of plugins for gedit

Repeating the package name in the summary is commonly considered
bad taste. Better and short to the point:

Summary: Plug-ins for gEdit

Or:

Summary: plug-in collection for gEdit

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:05:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:05:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins
	for gedit
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281605.l0SG5jeF018588@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-28 11:05 EST -------
Or like the summary of this ticket. :)

Summary: Collection of plugins for gedit


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:12:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:12:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281612.l0SGCaDX018841@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-28 11:12 EST -------
> %{_includedir}/%{name}/OPJFile.h

The directory itself is not included.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:18:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:18:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281618.l0SGIpeN018980@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 11:18 EST -------
(By the way, I would appreciate if you would review my
 review request bug 219327)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:46:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:46:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins
	for gedit
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281646.l0SGkBZk019649@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066





------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com  2007-01-28 11:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Skimming over the spec...
> 
> > %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gedit-show-tabbar-plugin.schemas
> 
> Scriptlets for gconftool install/uninstall of these schemas
> is missing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
> 

Fixed.

> > %{_datadir}/locale/*
> 
> Use the %find_lang macro appropriately instead of including the
> files like this. This is a MUST item according to the guidelines.
> 

Fixed.

> > %doc README INSTALL NEWS AUTHORS COPYING
> 
> The 'INSTALL' file most likely is the standard "Basic Installation"
> document which is irrelevant to RPM package users.
> 

INSTALL file removed.

> > Summary:        Gedit-plugins is a collection of plugins for gedit
> 
> Repeating the package name in the summary is commonly considered
> bad taste. Better and short to the point:
> 
> Summary: Plug-ins for gEdit
> 
> Or:
> 
> Summary: plug-in collection for gEdit

Fixed.

Thanks for the quick reply. I have uploaded the new and improved versions to the
same location as previously (ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:47:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:47:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225075] New: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to
	Enable/Disable writable support 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075

           Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to
                    Enable/Disable writable support
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/SPECS/ntfs-config.spec
SRPM URL: http://blog.fedora-fr.org/public/smootherfrogz/RPMs/ntfs-config-0.5.2-1.fc6.src.rpm
Description: 

ntfs-config will allow you to enable/disable write support
for external and/or internal device with only two click.
This will configure your system to use the new ntfs-3g driver
instead of the current read-only kernel one.

-----------------

Hi, 
here is another package from me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:48:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:48:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to
	Enable/Disable writable support
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281648.l0SGmwNQ019729@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable writable support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075


lxtnow at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: ntfs-config |Review Request: ntfs-config
                   |- A front-end to            |- A front-end to
                   |Enable/Disable writable     |Enable/Disable writable
                   |support                     |support
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |177841
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:58:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:58:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to
	Enable/Disable writable support
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281658.l0SGwDbl019936@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable writable support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075


lxtnow at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|devel                       |fc6




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 16:58:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:58:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281658.l0SGwqHJ019971@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-28 11:58 EST -------
Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm

* Sun Jan 28 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 2.2.4-1
- 2.2.4
- change license to GPL based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723#c11
- install files preserving timestamps

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:02:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281702.l0SH2Abl020100@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-28 12:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> * License
>   - Some sources are not licensed under LGPL.
>     + GPL
>       sv_util/*print*.[hc]
>       sv_util/xsize.h
> 
>     As GPL is more strict than LGPL, please modify
>     the whole license of this package to GPL
>     (not a blocker, however, would you tell upstream
>      about this? License text is LGPL, however this
>      package is surely GPL)

I sent a message to the author.  He's usually pretty responsive, so we'll see
what he has to say.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:06:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:06:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to
	Enable/Disable write support
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281706.l0SH6Iw7020203@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075


lxtnow at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: ntfs-config |Review Request: ntfs-config
                   |- A front-end to            |- A front-end to
                   |Enable/Disable writable     |Enable/Disable write support
                   |support                     |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:25:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:25:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281725.l0SHPdcX020998@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-28 12:25 EST -------
Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph-1.12-3.fc6.src.rpm

* Sun Jan 28 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 1.12-3
- consistent use of mode in creating directories
- add Requires for httpd
- preserve timestamps on install

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:31:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:31:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281731.l0SHVAEB021198@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-28 12:31 EST -------
Bottom of comment 6 still holds true, doesn't it?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:45:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:45:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281745.l0SHj133021508@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 12:45 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146773)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146773&action=view)
Mock build log of libsieve-2.2.4-1.fc7

Mockbuild log of libsieve-2.2.4-1 on FC-devel
i386.

Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed.
Please check how CFLAGS, etc are treated.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:48:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:48:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281748.l0SHmbO6021594@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 12:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Bottom of comment 6 still holds true, doesn't it?

I allowed it because Peter seemed to have some reasons,
however generally the extra linkage you pointed out
should be removed.

However, I will not get FE-ACCEPT flag back for this
reason now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 17:55:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:55:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281755.l0SHtX9O021840@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-28 12:55 EST -------
> because Peter seemed to have some reasons,

Not documented in this ticket. What are those reasons?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 18:00:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:00:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281800.l0SI0sxw022047@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-28 13:00 EST -------
Ack. I already imported it and submitted it to the build system for devel (job
26582). >_>

I will fix this in CVS and submit a new build. Thanks; and sorry for the slight
misunderstanding!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 18:04:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:04:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281804.l0SI42wW022145@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 13:04 EST -------
Then reopen.

By the way, usually the dependency for perl module
should be written like "perl(DBI)" or so.
However, if it needs version-specific dependency,
I don't know how to write it.

(So if there is no way to write version dependency
 in perl(XXX) format, I leave the format as current
 spec file has)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 18:05:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:05:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281805.l0SI5ECh022202@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163779                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 13:05 EST -------
And again once back to FE-REVIEW

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:04:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:04:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281904.l0SJ4owP023770@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-28 14:04 EST -------
ok on issue2. 

I think the issue with it not noticing a changed incrontab for a user is fixed 
now in 0.5.0. At least it seems to be here... 

That license snippet is from strtok.h/strtok.cpp files, right? 
Everything else looks to be GPL-2, so the entire package should be distributed
under the GPL. I think including the LICENSE-GPL is the right thing to do. 

I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED.
Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported 
and built. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:07:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:07:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial
	implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281907.l0SJ721H023854@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgresql-dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-28 14:07 EST -------
Thanks Mamoru. I meant to move it back to review, but forgot to do so. 

Devrim: Can you address the issues in comments #21 and #22?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:15:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:15:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281915.l0SJFDPo024108@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-01-28 14:15 EST -------
Sorry, You are right. I wil APPROVE you package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:23:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:23:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281923.l0SJNPKO024428@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-28 14:23 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> Ack. I already imported it and submitted it to the build system for devel (job
> 26582). >_>
> 
> I will fix this in CVS and submit a new build. Thanks; and sorry for the slight
> misunderstanding!

Fixed in 0.11-5 (job 26587). Thanks!!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:40:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:40:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281940.l0SJelAG024893@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-28 14:40 EST -------
I've fixed those in 0.4.0-2, which is what I will import into CVS.

Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent.spec
SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/python-libtorrent-0.4.0-2.src.rpm

Thanks for your review!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:43:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:43:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent
	library aiming to be the best alternative
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281943.l0SJhVhp024990@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 19:43:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:43:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701281943.l0SJhsr7025026@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376


Bug 221376 depends on bug 221372, which changed state.

Bug 221372 Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 20:04:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:04:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282004.l0SK40oB025517@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jokosher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029





------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com  2007-01-28 15:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #50)
> can the 0.2 jokosher package at least be put up here for people to test ?

There is no package for 0.2 to test. 0.9 is just around the corner. Personally,
I intend to run Rawhide from F7 Test 1 and I may create a package when this
happens in a week or so. You are of course more than welcome to compile your own
however whilst upstream continues to use bleeding edge tools for which there are
no packages themselves built, dependencies cannot be resolved so there is little
point building them. Fedora 7 will, for the first time, contain all the packages
required to run Jokosher in its present form.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 20:56:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:56:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282056.l0SKuj20026849@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-28 15:56 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146783)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146783&action=view)
possible patch for cflags

Would this patch be considered acceptable or do I need to fix autotools and
regenerate everything?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 20:56:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:56:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225045] Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282056.l0SKulSS026859@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: incron - Inotify cron system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225045


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-28 15:56 EST -------
> That license snippet is from strtok.h/strtok.cpp files, right? 
> Everything else looks to be GPL-2, so the entire package should be distributed
> under the GPL. I think including the LICENSE-GPL is the right thing to do.

That's right.

> I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED.
> Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported 
> and built.

Thanks for the quick review Kevin.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 21:08:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:08:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282108.l0SL8aNo027134@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-28 16:08 EST -------
One last thing, please replace %{_var} with %{_localstatedir}.
I don't see any blockers, but can't accept your package, since you still need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 21:54:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:54:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282154.l0SLseVs028188@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-28 16:54 EST -------
ldconfig calls for -devel are unnecessary. You seem to have ignored first part
of comment #4, please rename libmdb to libs.
Requires: mdbtools-libmdb for main package is redundant.

Doesn't build in mock/fc6:

Making all in odbc
make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mdbtools-0.5/src/odbc'
source='odbc.c' object='odbc.lo' libtool=yes \
        depfile='.deps/odbc.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/odbc.TPlo' \
        depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../depcomp \
        /usr/bin/libtool --mode=compile gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_
STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"mdbtools\" -DVERSION=\"0.5\"
-DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHA
VE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1
-DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDI
NT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DYYTEXT_POINTER=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1
-DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_
UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_WORDEXP_H=1  -I. -I. -I ../../include `glib-config --cflags` 
  -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOUR
CE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64
-mtune=generic -DSQL -DUNIXODBC -c -o odbc.lo `test -
f 'odbc.c' || echo './'`odbc.c
/bin/sh: glib-config: command not found
mkdir .libs
 gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -D
PACKAGE=\"mdbtools\" -DVERSION=\"0.5\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1
-DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAV
E_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1
-DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
=1 -DYYTEXT_POINTER=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1
-DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_WORDEXP_H=1 -I. -I. -
I ../../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64
 -mtune=generic -DSQL -DUNIXODBC -c odbc.c -MT odbc.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/odbc.TPlo  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/odbc.o
In file included from ../../include/mdbodbc.h:22,
                 from odbc.c:28:
../../include/mdbtools.h:31:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory

Attached patch makes it look for glib2 instead of glib and fixes some minor
issues in the code as well, but the rest of the code triggers a lot of gcc
warnings. You might want to look through the build log and fix them.

With that fix, it builds fine in mock, just some small rpmlint issues:
$ rpmlint *.rpm
E: mdbtools script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/mdbtools-0.5/COPYING.LIB
-> chmod 644 COPYING.LIB in %prep
W: mdbtools-libs summary-not-capitalized libraries for mdbtools
-> Capitalize

Does the frontend really requires the command line tools or only the libraries?
In the latter case, Requires: mdbtools in %package frontend is unnecessary.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 21:55:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:55:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things
	from Access databases
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282155.l0SLtoU8028217@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-28 16:55 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146785)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146785&action=view)
Patch to fix build of odbc lib.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 22:05:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:05:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source
	video codec
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282205.l0SM5RUG028412@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-28 17:05 EST -------
Looking good now.

Small issue: it is preferable to ship the desktop file separately instead of
creating it in %install.

These files have names that are IMHO too generic. Maybe rename them to dirac_*?
%{_bindir}/BMPtoRGB                                                            
                                        
%{_bindir}/RGBtoBMP                                                            
                                        
%{_bindir}/RGBtoUYVY                                                           
                                        
%{_bindir}/RGBtoYUV*                                                           
                                        
%{_bindir}/UYVYtoRGB                                                           
                                        
%{_bindir}/YUV*toRGB


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 23:11:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:11:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221376] Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to
	the rb_libtorrent library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282311.l0SNBVRt030011@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
Alias: python-libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 23:11:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:11:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282311.l0SNBssh030059@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669


Bug 221669 depends on bug 221376, which changed state.

Bug 221376 Summary: Review Request: python-libtorrent - Python bindings to the rb_libtorrent library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221376

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Jan 28 23:13:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:13:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701282313.l0SNDc2X030130@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-28 18:13 EST -------
Hi Peter,

I'm happy to review your package. Look for a full review here in a bit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 00:18:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:18:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290018.l0T0ISQe031754@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2007-01-28 19:17 EST -------

GOOD:
* Rpmlint silent on both srpm and binaries (No documentation warning on the
-devel subpackages, which can be ignored.
* Naming meets the guildlines
* License - GPL
* Source file matches upstream 
(md5sum: 5ed1c7c0955f935d3b4e45fb25e1d7fc  liborigin-20070115.tgz)
* Built OK (in rawhide x86_64 mock)
* Installs OK and worksforme

Please fix the directory listing as Michael pointed out above, and then I can
approve the package. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 00:28:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:28:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223486] Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290028.l0T0SZN1032120@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: happy - Haskell parser generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223486


petersen at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |petersen at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 01:39:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:39:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225114] New: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering
	interface
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114

           Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: florin at andrei.myip.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://florin.myip.org/extras/jamin/jamin.spec
SRPM URL: http://florin.myip.org/extras/jamin/jamin-0.95.0-4.src.rpm
Description: Open source audio mastering application. Essential in finishing an audio / music project.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 02:33:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:33:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290233.l0T2XKCt002656@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004





------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org  2007-01-28 21:33 EST -------
Before you get too far... I just got an email from horde's announce list that
jeta 1.0 final was just released today.  Stand by until I get new RPMs up!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 02:35:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:35:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290235.l0T2Z2hg002698@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |peter at thecodergeek.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:00:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:00:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290300.l0T30SRV003324@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004





------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org  2007-01-28 22:00 EST -------
Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/jeta.spec
SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/jeta-1.0-1.src.rpm

New 1.0 final RPMs.  As I'm sure future versions of horde will start shipping
jeta pre-enabled, I will do the same in horde's registry.php

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:21:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:21:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with
	OpenGL
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290321.l0T3LY9L003733@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027


kwizart at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kwizart at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-28 22:21 EST -------
I have tryed to made new packages!
 (I didn't know if anyone have made it already...) 
But i thought nucleo has a BR to ffmpeg-devel which isn't avaible in extras? 
(so you don't enabled it i suppose...)

Please do not consider this as a review since it will need packages not provided
in extras reposository... (it is just a handshake!)

SPECS:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/metisse.spec
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/nucleo.spec
SRPMS:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/metisse-0.4.0-0.1.rc4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/nucleo-0.6-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm

Since nucleo do not build on x86_64 i've thought it was never used to build.
Which is untrue, older version seems to build fine on x86_64...
I don't understood metisse was post 0.4.0 release... (this file is a rc4
released in 01/2007!)
Theses packages are marked as orphaned on you fedoraproject wiki pages, i'm
interested in them... Can we work together ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:37:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:37:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225118] New: Review Request: 
 -  
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225118

           Summary: Review Request: 
 - 
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/pyopengl.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/PyOpenGL-3.0.0a5-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: Standard OpenGL bindings for Python

rpmlint output on binary (source is silent - only one kind of error)
W: PyOpenGL incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.0.0a5-1 3.0.0a5-1.kwizart.fc6
E: PyOpenGL zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/readme.txt
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/tests/test_tess1.py 0644
E: PyOpenGL wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/NeHe/lesson4.py ""
E: PyOpenGL script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/OpenGL/Demo/GLUT/tom/conechecker.py

Should I add the shebang to /usr/bin/python ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:39:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:39:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225119] New: Review Request: 
 -  
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119

           Summary: Review Request: 
 - 
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/pythoncad.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/PythonCAD-0.1.35-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: PythonCAD scriptable CAD package

rpmlint on binary (source silent)
W: PythonCAD non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gtkpycad.pyo 0644
W: PythonCAD non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gtkpycad.pyc 0644
E: PythonCAD non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/PythonCAD/Generic/bindump.py 0644

Should I changes these perm to 755 ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:42:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:42:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD
	package
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290342.l0T3gK6H004284@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119


kwizart at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: 
 -                |package




------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-28 22:42 EST -------
I Also need to be sponsored...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:43:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:43:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225118] Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings
	for Python
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290343.l0T3hECO004350@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings for Python


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225118


kwizart at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: 
 -                |Python




------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-28 22:43 EST -------
I Also need to be sponsored...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:54:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:54:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225118] Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings
	for Python
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290354.l0T3sNJV004738@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyopengl - Standard OpenGL bindings for Python


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225118





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-28 22:54 EST -------
Please contact with bug 221031

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 03:57:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:57:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290357.l0T3vEe4004800@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-28 22:57 EST -------
Since users still report failing (most of the time with association with ap) I
think this is too much early to split the package...
Recent involvement of the module can enable the debugfs inside a recent kernel
(2.6.18 but only work with fedora and this module since 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6)

So it would be interesting in trying to help and report feedback, See:
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2695

A more recent version:
SRPMS
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/rt2x00-kmod-0.0.0cvs20070113-1.2.6.19_1.2895.fc6.src.rpm
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/rt2x00-0.0.0cvs20070113-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm

SPECS:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/rt2x00.spec
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/rt2x00-kmod.spec



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 04:17:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:17:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290417.l0T4H4IJ005184@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-28 23:17 EST -------
Also notes that hostapd and wpa-supplicant need to be patched in order to work
with rt2x00 version (d80211 from rt2x00 repository - i don't know yet about
wireless-dev version!)
See also on the :
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2434




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 04:31:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:31:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222589] Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE
	focusing on usability
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290431.l0T4VVkj005434@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dolphin - A file manager for KDE focusing on usability


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-28 23:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the review. I'll be uploading it once I'm back from holidays.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation
> 
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > APPROVED.
> > 
> > Any reason behind not installing translation files?
> > 
> 
> What do you mean?
> 
> In the spec file, I have already stated:
> ## File lists
> # locale's
> %find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang
> # HTML (1.0)
> 

I mean i saw following line in SPEC
%{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/%{name}/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 04:42:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:42:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with
	OpenGL
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290442.l0T4g9St005956@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-28 23:42 EST -------
The nucleo spec file in cvs has patches to make it work on x86_64.

Michel Salim  contacted me a couple days ago also
expressing interest in unorphaning this package.  You should also contact him.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 04:44:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:44:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222612] Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on
	a poker-network server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290444.l0T4in5Z006128@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker2d - GTK poker client to play on a poker-network server
Alias: poker2d

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222612





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-28 23:44 EST -------
Is 'Requires: MySQL-python' really necessary?  I don't have mysql-server
installed on my client machine, or even remote access to the mysql server on the
poker server machine, yet the poker2d client still runs fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 05:00:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] New: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126

           Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
                    Compressor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: guthrie+fedorabugs at counterexample.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/fc6/dxpc.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/fc6/dxpc-3.9.0-3.fc6.src.rpm
Description:

Hello, I just finished repackaging the dxpc package from fc5 with the latest version of dxpc.  This is the first time that I have submitted a package for review.  I am hoping to get it reviewed so that I can get it into fc6.

Dxpc is a differential X protocol compressor.

dxpc is an X protocol compressor designed to improve the speed of X11 applications run over low-bandwidth links (such as dialup PPP connections or ADSL).  This RPM has been updated to the most recent version of the code.  (3.9.0)

Please note that I have signed the SRPM file with a gpg key.  You can verify it with the key here: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/GUTHRIE-GPG-KEY.  (I didn't know if this was the right thing to do, but I figured it wouldn't hurt.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 05:03:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:03:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290503.l0T53qS5007059@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-29 00:03 EST -------
One remark:

- MUSTFIX: package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 05:05:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:05:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290505.l0T55uZ4007183@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-29 00:05 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146809)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146809&action=view)
Patch to prevent configure from overriding CXXFLAGS

This patch hacks configure/configure.in to not override CXXFLAGS.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 05:07:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:07:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290507.l0T57TuP007255@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-29 00:07 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146810)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146810&action=view)
Patch glob2.spec to use *-configure.diff


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 05:09:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:09:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290509.l0T59ew8007331@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From guthrie+fedorabugs at counterexample.org  2007-01-29 00:09 EST -------
I should note that the release tag for this RPM is not 1.fc6 because I took a
patch for Makefile.in that was part of the previous RPM for fc5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 07:33:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:33:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290733.l0T7XnGL011979@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 02:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created an attachment (id=146783)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146783&action=view) [edit]
> possible patch for cflags
> 
> Would this patch be considered acceptable or do I need to fix autotools and
> regenerate everything?

Well, we recommend _not_ to use autotool. Your patch is
good, however, when I checked your patch, the following may
be simpler.
----------------------------------------------------------
%prep 
%setup -q

%{__sed} -i.cflags \
	 -e 's|^\(CFLAGS = -Wall\)|\1 @CFLAGS@|' \
	 `find . -name Makefile -or -name Makefile.in`
----------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 07:44:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:44:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290744.l0T7i2NG012374@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-29 02:43 EST -------
Ok, here we go.



- package conforms to package naming guidlines
- spec file name matches basename
- the package is licensed with an open source compatible license
- package includes license in %doc
- spec file is written in american english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream (sha1sum)
   1bed3023139187c36e851df19506f4942bf2d1c1  tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0.tar.gz
   1bed3023139187c36e851df19506f4942bf2d1c1  tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0.tar.gz.1
- package successfully built on my test box (i386)
- no need for exclude arch
- BR are present and make sense
- no libraries, no need to run ldconfig
- not relocatable
- package owns everything it creates
- package does not duplicate files it owns
- file attributes are set appropriatly
- %clean section present and removes buildroot
- consistently uses macros
- no large documentation
- files in %doc does not affect runtime of application
- does not contain a pkgconfig file
- does not contain any libraries
- does not have a devel package
- does not contain any .la files
- package does not have a gui
- package does not own files/directories owned by other packages.

Peter, have you considered reporting the missing CC lincense to the rpmlint maintainer?

I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED.





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 07:47:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:47:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290747.l0T7lK1M012532@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-29 02:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> One last thing, please replace %{_var} with %{_localstatedir}.
> I don't see any blockers, but can't accept your package, since you still need
a sponsor.

Thanks.

Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/mailgraph-1.12-4.fc6.src.rpm

* Sun Jan 28 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 1.12-4
- replace %%{_var} with %%{_localstatedir}



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 07:55:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:55:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290755.l0T7tnY7012849@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 02:55 EST -------
Just a comment:

* BuildRequires
-------------------------------------------
BuildRequires:	ImageMagick-devel >= 5.5.7
BuildRequires:	librsvg2-devel >= 2.12.3
-------------------------------------------
Check if "-devel" (not main) package is really required.
>From buildlog, rebuilding this needs "/usr/bin/convert"
(in ImageMagick), /usr/bin/rsvg (librsvg2) are needed,
however, -devel packages do not seem to be needed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 07:58:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:58:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290758.l0T7wplX013000@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-29 02:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> %{__sed} -i.cflags \
> 	 -e 's|^\(CFLAGS = -Wall\)|\1 @CFLAGS@|' \
> 	 `find . -name Makefile -or -name Makefile.in`

That works for me.

Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.2.4-2.fc6.src.rpm

* Mon Jan 29 2007 Bernard Johnson  - 2.2.4-2
- add note regarding why license tag is GPL
- sed surgery on Makefile.in files so that CFLAGS is passed properly


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 08:39:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:39:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290839.l0T8d2tI014451@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 03:38 EST -------
Okay.

* The issues for this package are all now fixed.
* Your other package review requests or your pre-reviews seem
  to be of quality to a certain extent.

-------------------------------------------------------
  This package (libsieve) is APPROVED by me.
-------------------------------------------------------

Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors .
I will sponsor you when you do a procedure and I receive
a mail which tells that you need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 08:46:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:46:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290846.l0T8kPHs014844@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 03:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> One last thing, please replace %{_var} with %{_localstatedir}.
> I don't see any blockers, but can't accept your package, since you still need
a sponsor.

(Perhaps this will be solved within a day. Please check
 bug 216723)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 08:53:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:53:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290853.l0T8rukL015321@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-29 03:53 EST -------
I suggest removing the [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] part from %install and %clean.
No one is using / for buildroot any more.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 08:59:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:59:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] New: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130

           Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/smashteroid.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/smashteroid-1.11-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description:
Smashteroid is a remake of the old Intellivision game Astrosmash. Your job is
to defend Earth from the onslaught of asteroids.  Features three game modes
with exciting new twists.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 09:58:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:58:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701290958.l0T9wT2H020054@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365


harald at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-29 04:58 EST -------
ok, new spec file and src.rpm uploaded..

rpmlint only complains about:
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdrecord-mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdrecord-mkisofs
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-obsoletes cdrecord-cdda2wav
W: cdrkit unversioned-explicit-provides cdrecord-cdda2wav

But cdrtools had this for last releases also.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 10:11:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:11:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer
	0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291011.l0TABl8L021054@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224402


mcepl at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 10:24:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:24:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291024.l0TAOJt2021882@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-29 05:24 EST -------
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
on dxpc-3.9.0-3.fc6.src.rpm
  E: dxpc unknown-key GPG#be3aac96
  W: dxpc macro-in-%changelog buildroot
  W: dxpc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 7)
first one can be ignored. second one is caused by not prefixing %{buildroot}
with a % in 3.9.0-2. Third one is obvious...
- no output from rpmlint for the binary rpm
- package meets naming guidelines, except that release tag could have started
from 0 or 1; the presence of a patch taken from a previous version does not
really justify starting from 3. This is not a blocker.
- package meets packaging guidelines, except for the presence of [
"%{buildroot}" != "/" ]
- license is BSD, corresponding to the one provided in the sources as README
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source is last version, matches upstream, sha1sum
48acc713a8d3386d8f554fdba8b93dd8cc0e28c4  dxpc-3.9.0.tgz
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates, does not own foreign files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- MUSTFIX: removing the [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] from %install and %clean
- macro use consistent; "make install" from sources does not work correctly
(build fails, so usage of %makeinstall is justified (unless a patch is written
for Makefile.in))
- code, not content
- no need for -docs; README.mingw could be ditched, it is not relevant for
Fedora; TODO also does not contain anything useful
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file, no .la, static files, or .pc

SHOULD
- builds succesfully in mock,FC6/x86_64
- installs cleanly, runs OK

MUSTFIX: 
- removing [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ]

Suggested fix:
- not packaging README.mingw


Since you need a sponsor, I cannot formaly approve your package, but once you
find a sponsor, please point him to this review. Please follow the instructions
from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors in order to get sponsored.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 10:25:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:25:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291025.l0TAPfW4022056@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-29 05:25 EST -------
Ups.. sorry Michael, I have not noticed you have already taken this request :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 10:28:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:28:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard
	control plugin for the Audacious media player
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291028.l0TASdrx022415@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256





------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com  2007-01-29 05:28 EST -------
I agree the plugin should be named audacious-plugin-itouch.
But to do this, I must modify the source tarbal, and repackage it. Do I have the
right to do that? 
Besides of that, I have made the package available for a while. When will it get
pass the review process? 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 11:23:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:23:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291123.l0TBNPi8026465@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-29 06:23 EST -------
> No one is using / for buildroot any more.

Because it is impossible. :)  Apart from that you would find it
very difficult to find somebody who has ever before killed a machine
with rpmbuild and "--buildroot /".


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 11:52:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:52:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291152.l0TBqLmG027537@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-29 06:52 EST -------
The dependency of poker-web on poker-selinux is debatable. Many people, for
reasons best known to themselves, run web servers with SELinux disabled or in
permissive mode. For these people, it's not necessary to have poker-selinux in
order for poker-web to work.

So the alternatives are either:
1. Include the depenency (the status quo) and possibly pull in lots of
additional packages (potentially the whole SELinux ecosystem on a system not
currently using SELinux).
2. Omit the dependency and possibly confuse users that don't know about the
-selinux subpackage. I know that this can happen despite the inclusion of a
README.SELinux file in a main package that explains about installing the
-selinux subpackage, even from experienced people that really should know better
(I maintain the mod_fcgid package in Extras, which has a -selinux subpackage
that is not a hard dependency).

A decision for the maintainer I think; just be aware of the pros and cons each way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 13:32:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:32:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222521] Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291332.l0TDWMEJ032410@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: IceWM -  Lightweight Window Manager.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-29 08:32 EST -------
Your argument about having separate xdgmenu subpackage seems
relevant to me.

[ -f ~/.Xdefaults ] && xrdb -load ~/.Xdefaults
should be handled by the session opening. This doesn't belong
here. I showed above that this should be handled in xinit and
gdm, if it isn't then you should fill a bug against the relevant
package, not try to workaround it.

Also I think it would be better to have the startup file in 
the main package, but it wouldn't do anything interesting 
if icewm-xdg-menu isn't installed. It could be generated at
%install time, like

cat > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icewm/startup < ~/.icewm/programs.autogen
fi
EOF

chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icewm/startup


Also you should use consistently %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 13:52:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:52:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291352.l0TDqQ2r001044@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-29 08:52 EST -------
The %files line:
%attr(0644,-,-) %{_datadir}/gmrun/gmrunrc

is unuseful (and harmful)...  

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 13:54:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:54:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222523] Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program"
	window with TAB completion
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291354.l0TDsWtr001192@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:gmrun - A lightweight "Run program" window with TAB completion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222523





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-01-29 08:54 EST -------
I still think that 'for minimal WMs' shouldn't be in the summary. 
In my opinion it is wrong. gmrun may be used with any wm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 15:19:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:19:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291519.l0TFJWuE007461@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-29 10:19 EST -------
Thanks for the review, Ruben!

(In reply to comment #4)
> BuildRequires:	ImageMagick-devel >= 5.5.7
> BuildRequires:	librsvg2-devel >= 2.12.3
> -------------------------------------------
> Check if "-devel" (not main) package is really required.
> From buildlog, rebuilding this needs "/usr/bin/convert"
> (in ImageMagick), /usr/bin/rsvg (librsvg2) are needed,
> however, -devel packages do not seem to be needed.

Much of this spec file is copied directly from the tango-icon-theme spec that is
already in Extras. I will check on these BuildRequires when I return home
tonight.  :]


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 15:26:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:26:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291526.l0TFQQik007861@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-29 10:26 EST -------
Sorry, where were they uploaded?  All I see is the 1.1.2-1 package and spec.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 15:50:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:50:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291550.l0TFoN5m009454@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114


green at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |green at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2007-01-29 10:50 EST -------
Hi Florin - thanks for submitting this.  Here are some initial comments.

* desktop_vendor is no longer planetccrma.  
* For Source0, can you please put the full URL to the tarball?
* See the section "Handling Locale Files" in 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
  We'll need to replace the "%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/jamin.mo"
  in %files with the find_lang stuff described in the wiki.

Also...

# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/jamin-0.95.0-4.src.rpm 
W: jamin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 60, tab: line 1)

I don't know where this is coming from.  The spec file maybe?

AG



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 16:20:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:20:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 192441] Review Request: gset-compiz
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291620.l0TGK17n011779@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gset-compiz


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192441


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CANTFIX
                 CC|                            |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-29 11:20 EST -------
Upstream for gset-compiz seems inactive . I couldn't find an official website 
for it either. I'll close this ticket. Please re-open it if you think this is 
incorrect. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 16:46:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:46:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291646.l0TGk6kD014237@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-29 11:45 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Squirrelmail is a terrible IMAP webmail client...
> 
> that's funny... I've heard very good things about http://www.roundcube.net/

or ilohamail.org ?

Sticking to the review, since the default config gets login/passwords from the
regular accounts on the machine, whay don't you force SSL on the apache.conf file? 

I am regularly doing that on every new install by adding:


  SSLRequireSSL


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 16:50:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:50:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291650.l0TGolWa014675@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245





------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net  2007-01-29 11:50 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> why don't you force SSL on the apache.conf file? 

Bug 183189 - RFE: Ship secure_login plugin by default.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 16:56:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:56:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291656.l0TGueGF015554@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245





------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-29 11:56 EST -------
> 
>  SSLRequireSSL
> 

We can't add this because it would break existing users who upgrade their RPM. 
Is this acceptable?

Adding documentation with an example redirect to SSL syntax, and other HOWTO to
enable SSL, would be doable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 16:58:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:58:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291658.l0TGwfiO015764@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |chris.stone at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |
              Alias|                            |smashteroid




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 17:15:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:15:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for
	the gtksourceview widget library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291715.l0THFCS7017739@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 12:15 EST -------
(Closing as NEXTRELEASE as this is already imported into
 FE-devel/6.
 If there is any problem, please let me know it.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 17:15:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:15:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291715.l0THFBHh017721@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com  2007-01-29 12:15 EST -------
Thanks for these patches.

Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2.spec
SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2-0.8.21-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 17:22:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:22:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291722.l0THM5lI018263@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|chris.stone at gmail.com       |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de
              Alias|smashteroid                 |




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-01-29 12:21 EST -------
Good:
+ License look fine.
+ Tarball matchs with upstream.
+ Nameing seams ok.
+ Local build works fine
+ Gaming is running on my machine.
+ Installing and uninstalling works fine.
+ Build on mock works fine.
+ rpmlint is quite on source and binary package.
+ rpmlint is quite on install package.

Bad:
- Please include license material to the docs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 17:36:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:36:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291736.l0THatB4019291@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018


matthias at rpmforge.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge.|
                   |net)                        |




------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net  2007-01-29 12:36 EST -------
Isn't anyone interested in making a formal review of this package? :-(
Why was it put as NEEDINFO? I don't see any needed info... silencing %setup is
trivial an non-mandatory, and the BuildRoot is the one I use. For anything else,
please comment...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 17:59:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:59:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291759.l0THxBHV020730@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-29 12:59 EST -------
Thanks.  Checked it and built.  Added to owners.list.  Requesting branches...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:01:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:01:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB
	products into NetCDF files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291801.l0TI1Lho020874@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445


orion at cora.nwra.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:12:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:12:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291812.l0TICm9F021621@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 13:12 EST -------
Removing NEEDSPONSOR as I am sponsoring now

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:13:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:13:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar
	to the UNIX top command
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291813.l0TIDLoT021657@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 13:13 EST -------
(removing NEEDSPONSOR as bug 216723)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:14:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:14:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar
	to the UNIX top command
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291814.l0TIEOVa021775@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:14:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:14:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291814.l0TIEdeg021820@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 13:14 EST -------
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR as bug 216723)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:15:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:15:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291815.l0TIFI1o021937@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 13:15 EST -------
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR as bug 216723)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:16:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:16:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 217654] Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291816.l0TIG2fB022007@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217654


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-29 13:16 EST -------
(Removing NEEDSPONSOR as bug 216723)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:15:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:15:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291815.l0TIFlcv021983@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018





------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz  2007-01-29 13:15 EST -------
It looked to me as a forgotten package, because there was no reaction, so I have
put the status to NEEDINFO. And I will do the formal review.

There is a small typo in the "pre" script - /dev/nulll vs. /dev/null

In all other points I agree with Manuel, so with the typo fixed there are no
blockers and the package is APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:18:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:18:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291818.l0TII2Im022280@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018


dan at danny.cz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:19:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:19:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291819.l0TIJClZ022442@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018


dan at danny.cz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |dan at danny.cz




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:28:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:28:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291828.l0TISuMH023263@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-29 13:28 EST -------
I'd love to have this on my mail server...

The pacakge looks good, but I think you should fix line 55 ( s/nulll/null/ ) and
add 
Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig
Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig
Requires(preun): /sbin/service

as suggested in:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:36:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:36:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 218018] Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy
	filter using spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291836.l0TIadYf024068@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spampd - Transparent SMTP/LMTP proxy filter using spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218018





------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net  2007-01-29 13:36 EST -------
Thanks! You can quickly check the latest package if you want, just in case :
http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/spampd-2.30-3.fc6.src.rpm
http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/spampd-2.30-3.fc6.noarch.rpm
http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/spampd.spec

Changes :
- Fixed spampd.init mode to 755
- Fixed type in %pre (/dev/nulll)
- Silenced the %setup step
- Add scriplet chkconfig and service requirements

Note that I've been running this in production since November... works great for me!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:53:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:53:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291853.l0TIrKfv025783@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-29 13:53 EST -------
In addition to the findings from comment 3, a bit of clean-up could
be applied to the spec file. All non-blockers, though:

> BuildRequires: lzo-devel >= 1.08

lzo is >= 1.08 in Fedora, at least in Fedora Extras >= 3.

> %if "%{?fedora}" > "4"

Fedora <= 4 has reached end-of-life.

> %install
> [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && rm -rf %{buildroot}
> %makeinstall

Instead of %makeinstall, prefer the standard

  make DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" install

whenever it works.

These can all be fixed in CVS, however, so feel free to continue with
the process at step 10: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 18:54:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:54:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291854.l0TIsQo5025893@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126


bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:28:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:28:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291928.l0TJS5ap030281@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From guthrie+fedorabugs at counterexample.org  2007-01-29 14:27 EST -------
Well, at least you wouldn't catch me doing that anyway.  ;-)  I've seen that
test in several other RPMs, and I figured it wouldn't hurt to protect against
someone doing something silly.  But I can also understand we're trying make the
spec files as clean as possible.  I have reposted the spec file and the source
rpm at the URLs above.  I have removed the test for %{buildroot} as requested. 
I have cleaned up the warnings from rpmlint for the source rpm.  (So now you
should only get the warning about the unknown key.)  I have also removed
README.mingw from the documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:30:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:30:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225207] New: Review Request: libsmbios - library for userspace
	smbios table parsing
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225207

           Summary: Review Request: libsmbios - library for userspace smbios
                    table parsing
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: michael_e_brown at dell.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/libsmbios/download/libsmbios/libsmbios-0.13.0/libsmbios.spec  

SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/libsmbios/download/libsmbios/libsmbios-0.13.0/libsmbios-0.13.0-1.fc6.src.rpm

Description: 
This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor.

Libsmbios is a library and utilites that can be used by client programs to get information from standard BIOS tables, such as the SMBIOS table.

Currently, libsmbios is required by the HAL module for backlight control on Dell Laptops.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:33:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:33:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291933.l0TJX5KS031018@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From guthrie+fedorabugs at counterexample.org  2007-01-29 14:33 EST -------
(The first sentence of the last comment applied to comment #5, BTW.)

I should note that the Makefile.in makes absolutely no use of the variable
DESTDIR at this moment.  Looking at the Makefile, that shouldn't be too
difficult to fix.

I'll leave those fixes for CVS, like you said.  Thanks again for your help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:48:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:48:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291948.l0TJmSRW000328@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 14:48 EST -------
What the hell?  I was reviewing this package?  Why did you remove my name from
the assigned field?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:48:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:48:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291948.l0TJmtJC000354@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 14:48 EST -------
Here is my review:
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license field matches actual license
- license text included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec legible
- sources match upstream
fbdd2aed12da3f2e4802c629fcdd7979  astro111src.zip
- successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
X package does not pull in all directories it uses
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files with suffix
- no devel subpackage required
- no libtool archives
- contains proper .desktop file
- does not own files or directories owned by other packages

==== MUST FIX ====
- Shouldnt this require hicolor-icon-theme?

==== SHOULD FIX ====
- Use http://www.t3-i.com/smashteroid.htm as URL
- inform upstream of 64bit compiler warnings

==== QUESTIONS ====
- patch seems to include license-change.txt but its not included in %doc?
- patch seems littered with ^Ms, not an issue, but difficult to read

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:49:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:49:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291949.l0TJnsLS000404@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de      |chris.stone at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 14:49 EST -------
Re-assigning bug to me because I was reviewing it before Jochen so rudely
removed my name from asigned feild.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:51:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:51:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291951.l0TJpalM000626@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Alias|                            |smashteroid




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 14:51 EST -------
Readding alias ... Jochen why did you remove the alias too?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:57:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:57:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291957.l0TJvcjR001283@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-29 14:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I don't see any blockers, but can't accept your package, since you still need
a sponsor.

If you want to finish a review now, go ahead... mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
provided sponsorship for me.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 19:59:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:59:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701291959.l0TJx4KW001455@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 14:59 EST -------
I'm guessing that what happened was that Jochen got a mid-air collision and
decided to completely ignore it and overwrite my changes to this bug....

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:26:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:26:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225220] New: TEST Merge Review: test-package
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225220

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: test-package
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,wtogami at redhat.com


TEST Fedora Merge Review: test-package

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/test-package/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:29:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:29:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225220] TEST Merge Review: test-package
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292029.l0TKT4Fx004624@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: test-package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225220


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:43:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:43:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225223] New: TEST Merge Review: a2ps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225223

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: a2ps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


TEST Fedora Merge Review: a2ps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/a2ps/

THIS IS ONLY A TEST!
GROWL!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:43:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:43:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225224] New: TEST Merge Review: acl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225224

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: acl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


TEST Fedora Merge Review: acl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acl/

THIS IS ONLY A TEST!
GROWL!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:43:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:43:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225225] New: TEST Merge Review: acpid
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225225

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: acpid
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


TEST Fedora Merge Review: acpid

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acpid/

THIS IS ONLY A TEST!
GROWL!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:46:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:46:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225225] TEST Merge Review: acpid
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292046.l0TKkaQH006096@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: acpid


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225225


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:46:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:46:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225224] TEST Merge Review: acl
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292046.l0TKkgSq006112@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: acl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225224


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:46:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:46:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225223] TEST Merge Review: a2ps
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292046.l0TKklsE006152@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: a2ps


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225223


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:50:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:50:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225227] New: TEST Merge Review: foomatic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225227

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: foomatic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: foomatic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/foomatic/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:52:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:52:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225228] New: TEST Merge Review: foomatic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225228

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: foomatic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: foomatic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/foomatic/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:52:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:52:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292052.l0TKqgk9006697@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
              Alias|                            |mailgraph




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-29 15:52 EST -------
I don't see any further issues, so this package is APPROVED. 
Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported
and built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:53:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:53:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225228] TEST Merge Review: foomatic
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292053.l0TKrTie006807@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: foomatic


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225228


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:54:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:54:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225231] New: TEST Merge Review: a2ps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225231

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: a2ps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: a2ps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/a2ps/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:54:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:54:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225232] New: TEST Merge Review: acl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225232

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: acl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: acl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:54:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:54:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225233] New: TEST Merge Review: acpid
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225233

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: acpid
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: acpid

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acpid/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:54:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:54:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225234] New: TEST Merge Review: adaptx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225234

           Summary: TEST Merge Review: adaptx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: adaptx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/adaptx/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:55:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:55:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225234] TEST Merge Review: adaptx
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292055.l0TKtshQ007025@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: adaptx


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225234


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:56:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:56:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225233] TEST Merge Review: acpid
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292056.l0TKu3uD007038@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: acpid


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225233


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:56:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:56:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225232] TEST Merge Review: acl
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292056.l0TKu7uh007055@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: acl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225232


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:56:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:56:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225231] TEST Merge Review: a2ps
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292056.l0TKuJjB007073@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: TEST Merge Review: a2ps


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225231


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:58:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:58:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225235] New: Merge Review: a2ps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235

           Summary: Merge Review: a2ps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: a2ps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/a2ps/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225236] New: Merge Review: acl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225236

           Summary: Merge Review: acl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: acl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225237] New: Merge Review: acpid
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225237

           Summary: Merge Review: acpid
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: acpid

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/acpid/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225238] New: Merge Review: adaptx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225238

           Summary: Merge Review: adaptx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: adaptx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/adaptx/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225239] New: Merge Review: adjtimex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225239

           Summary: Merge Review: adjtimex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: adjtimex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/adjtimex/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225240] New: Merge Review: alchemist
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225240

           Summary: Merge Review: alchemist
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: alchemist

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/alchemist/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225242] New: Merge Review: alsa-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225242

           Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: alsa-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/alsa-utils/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 20:59:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:59:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225241] New: Merge Review: alsa-lib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225241

           Summary: Merge Review: alsa-lib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: alsa-lib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/alsa-lib/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:00:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:00:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225243] New: Merge Review: amanda
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225243

           Summary: Merge Review: amanda
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: amanda

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/amanda/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:00:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:00:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225244] New: Merge Review: amtu
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225244

           Summary: Merge Review: amtu
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sgrubb at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: amtu

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/amtu/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:00:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:00:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225245] New: Merge Review: am-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225245

           Summary: Merge Review: am-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: am-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/am-utils/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:00:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:00:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225246] New: Merge Review: anaconda
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225246

           Summary: Merge Review: anaconda
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: anaconda

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/anaconda/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225247] New: Merge Review: anacron
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225247

           Summary: Merge Review: anacron
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: anacron

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/anacron/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225248] New: Merge Review: ant
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248

           Summary: Merge Review: ant
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ant

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ant/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225250] New: Merge Review: antlr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225250

           Summary: Merge Review: antlr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: antlr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/antlr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225252] New: Merge Review: apmd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225252

           Summary: Merge Review: apmd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: apmd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/apmd/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225253] New: Merge Review: apr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253

           Summary: Merge Review: apr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: apr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/apr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:01:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225254] New: Merge Review: apr-util
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254

           Summary: Merge Review: apr-util
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: apr-util

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/apr-util/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225255] New: Merge Review: arptables_jf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225255

           Summary: Merge Review: arptables_jf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: arptables_jf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/arptables_jf/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225256] New: Merge Review: arts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225256

           Summary: Merge Review: arts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: arts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/arts/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225257] New: Merge Review: aspell-af
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225257

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-af
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-af

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-af/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225258] New: Merge Review: aspell-bg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225258

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-bg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-bg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-bg/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225259] New: Merge Review: aspell-br
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225259

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-br
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-br

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-br/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:02:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:02:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225260] New: Merge Review: aspell-ca
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225260

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ca
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-ca

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-ca/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:03:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:03:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225262] New: Merge Review: aspell-cy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225262

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-cy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-cy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-cy/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:03:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:03:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225261] New: Merge Review: aspell-cs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225261

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-cs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-cs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-cs/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:03:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:03:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225263] New: Merge Review: aspell-da
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225263

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-da
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-da

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-da/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:03:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:03:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225264] New: Merge Review: aspell-de
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225264

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-de
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-de

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-de/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:03:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:03:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225265] New: Merge Review: aspell-el
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225265

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-el
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-el

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-el/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:04:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:04:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225267] New: Merge Review: aspell-es
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225267

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-es
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-es

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-es/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:04:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:04:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225266] New: Merge Review: aspell-en
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-en

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-en/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:04:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:04:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225269] New: Merge Review: aspell-fo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225269

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-fo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-fo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-fo/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:04:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:04:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225270] New: Merge Review: aspell-fr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225270

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-fr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-fr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-fr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:04:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:04:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225271] New: Merge Review: aspell-ga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225271

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-ga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-ga/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225272] New: Merge Review: aspell-gd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225272

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-gd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-gd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-gd/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225273] New: Merge Review: aspell-gl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225273

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-gl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-gl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-gl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225274] New: Merge Review: aspell-hr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225274

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-hr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-hr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-hr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225275] New: Merge Review: aspell-id
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225275

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-id
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-id

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-id/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225276] New: Merge Review: aspell-is
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225276

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-is
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-is

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-is/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225277] New: Merge Review: aspell-it
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225277

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-it
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-it

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-it/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225278] New: Merge Review: aspell-nl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225278

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-nl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-nl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-nl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225279] New: Merge Review: aspell-no
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225279

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-no
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-no

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-no/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225280] New: Merge Review: aspell-pl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225280

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-pl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-pl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:05:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225281] New: Merge Review: aspell-pt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225281

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-pt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-pt/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225282] New: Merge Review: aspell-ru
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225282

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-ru
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-ru

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-ru/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225283] New: Merge Review: aspell-sl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225283

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-sl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-sl/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225284] New: Merge Review: aspell-sr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-sr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-sr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225285] New: Merge Review: aspell-sv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225285

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell-sv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-sv/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225286] New: Merge Review: aspell
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225286

           Summary: Merge Review: aspell
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: aspell

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225287] New: Merge Review: atk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225287

           Summary: Merge Review: atk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: atk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/atk/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225288] New: Merge Review: at
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288

           Summary: Merge Review: at
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: at

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/at/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:06:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:06:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225289] New: Merge Review: at-spi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225289

           Summary: Merge Review: at-spi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: at-spi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/at-spi/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225290] New: Merge Review: attr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225290

           Summary: Merge Review: attr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: attr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/attr/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225291] New: Merge Review: audiofile
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225291

           Summary: Merge Review: audiofile
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: audiofile

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/audiofile/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225292] New: Merge Review: audit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225292

           Summary: Merge Review: audit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sgrubb at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: audit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/audit/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225293] New: Merge Review: authconfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225293

           Summary: Merge Review: authconfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: authconfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/authconfig/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225294] New: Merge Review: authd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225294

           Summary: Merge Review: authd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: authd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/authd/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:07:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:07:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225295] New: Merge Review: autoconf213
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295

           Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: autoconf213

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/autoconf213/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:08:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225296] New: Merge Review: autoconf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225296

           Summary: Merge Review: autoconf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: autoconf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/autoconf/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:08:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225297] New: Merge Review: autofs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225297

           Summary: Merge Review: autofs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jmoyer at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: autofs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/autofs/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:08:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225298] New: Merge Review: automake14
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225298

           Summary: Merge Review: automake14
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: automake14

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/automake14/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:08:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225300] New: Merge Review: automake16
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225300

           Summary: Merge Review: automake16
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: automake16

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/automake16/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:08:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225299] New: Merge Review: automake15
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225299

           Summary: Merge Review: automake15
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: automake15

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/automake15/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225301] New: Merge Review: automake17
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225301

           Summary: Merge Review: automake17
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: automake17

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/automake17/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225302] New: Merge Review: automake
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225302

           Summary: Merge Review: automake
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: automake

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/automake/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225303] New: Merge Review: autorun
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225303

           Summary: Merge Review: autorun
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: autorun

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/autorun/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225304] New: Merge Review: avahi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225304

           Summary: Merge Review: avahi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: avahi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/avahi/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225305] New: Merge Review: avalon-framework
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225305

           Summary: Merge Review: avalon-framework
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: avalon-framework

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/avalon-framework/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225306] New: Merge Review: avalon-logkit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225306

           Summary: Merge Review: avalon-logkit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: avalon-logkit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/avalon-logkit/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 21:09:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:09:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225307] New: Merge Review: awesfx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225307

           Summary: Merge Review: awesfx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: awesfx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/awesfx/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 22:25:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:25:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292225.l0TMPuVb014949@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-29 17:25 EST -------
WRT comment #6:
    I see no point in dropping support for FC<=4 as long as it comes with no
extra cost. We do not build any more in FE for those distros, but someone using
them -- or a derivative -- might just grab the src.rpm and recompile it. I for
one am forced from time to time to build for Centos 3 & 4 (take for instance
nedit.. the one in Centos 3 does not have multitab editing, an extremely useful
feature for my colleagues). I find easier to just start from a validated src.rpm
which already includes the needed bits than do the all the backporting myself...
even if we are speaking of just replacing the names of the xorg libs. 

    And yes, I do know the risks involved by using older distros as well as
those coming from backporting.

wrt comment #7
    Whenever modifying the spec file, please increase the release tag and add a
relevant entry in %changelog.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 22:48:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:48:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service
	evasion module for Apache
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292248.l0TMmiCM017050@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388





------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-29 17:48 EST -------
Updated spec/srpm:

http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/mod_evasive.spec
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/mod_evasive-1.10.1-2.fc7.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 22:58:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:58:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292258.l0TMwUOL017553@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor
Alias: phpDocumentor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502





------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-29 17:58 EST -------
Version 1.3.1:
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor.spec
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.1-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 23:16:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:16:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] New: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP
	coding standards enforcement tool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341

           Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding
                    standards enforcement tool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer.spec
SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer-0.3.0-1.fc6.src.rpm
Description:
PHP_CodeSniffer provides functionality to verify that code conforms to
certain standards, such as PEAR, or user-defined.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 23:32:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:32:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding
	standards enforcement tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292332.l0TNWe2F019717@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
Alias: pear-CodeSniffer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |chris.stone at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |
              Alias|                            |pear-CodeSniffer




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 23:48:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:48:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292348.l0TNmgbp020590@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs.
Alias: MyBashBurn

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197





------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-29 18:48 EST -------
After of a short vacations here are some corrections:

SPEC: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec
SRPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.1-2.src.rpm

Everybody remember, i need a sponsor, Thanks.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 23:51:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:51:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225345] New: Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression
	editor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225345

           Summary: Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression editor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/kodos.spec
SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/kodos-2.4.9-1.src.rpm
Description:
Kodos is a visual regular expression editor and debugger written in Python.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Jan 29 23:56:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:56:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for
	libtidy
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701292356.l0TNu84F021100@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828


icon at fedoraproject.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-29 18:56 EST -------
Well, the project hasn't been updated since 2004, so I'm going to pronounce it
dead. Thanks to all involved!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 00:05:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:05:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225346] New: Review Request: python-pgsql - Enhanced python
	interface to PostgreSQL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225346

           Summary: Review Request: python-pgsql - Enhanced python interface
                    to PostgreSQL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-pgsql.spec
SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-pgsql-0.9.3-2.src.rpm
Description:
This is a simple PostgreSQL interface for Python which is derived
from the PyGreSQL 3.8.1 sources module. The main changes from the
PyGreSQL module are:

- support for bind parameters, alleviating the need for
  extensive, expensive and vulnerable quoting of user-supplied
  data
- support for server side cursors for looping through large query
  results without loading up the entire result set in the client's
  memory
- returned values are translated to Python objects in the C layer,
  resulting in some speed improvement
- better DB API 2.0 compliance

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 00:56:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:56:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding
	standards enforcement tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300056.l0U0ud2p023030@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
Alias: pear-CodeSniffer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 19:56 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output clean
X package is not named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guideliens
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license in spec matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec file legible
- sources match upstream
9b13c0cad263a1e7044b8135b37a1c93  PHP_CodeSniffer-0.3.0.tgz
- successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- no shared libraries
- not relocatable
X package does not own all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean
- macro usage is consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files with suffix
- no need for devel subpackage
- no libtool archives
- not a GUI application
- does not own files or directories owned by other packages


==== MUST FIX ====
- Package must meet packaging naming guidelines, rename package to:
  php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer
- Rename %{name} accordingly
- Package must own all directories it creates:
  change %{pear_phpdir}/PHP/* to %{pear_phpdir}/PHP in %files

==== SHOULD FIX ====
- URL should not contain a macro as it is copy&pasted from spec file by
maintainers on a regular basis
- Add versioned Requires: php > 5.1.0


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 01:14:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:14:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding
	standards enforcement tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300114.l0U1ElJx023627@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
Alias: pear-CodeSniffer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341





------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-29 20:14 EST -------
Updated:
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer.spec
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer-0.3.0-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 01:17:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:17:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding
	standards enforcement tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300117.l0U1Hs6B023710@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
Alias: pear-CodeSniffer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 20:17 EST -------
All MUST FIX items fixed.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 01:18:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:18:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer - PHP coding
	standards enforcement tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300118.l0U1Ixmx023776@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
Alias: pear-CodeSniffer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225341


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: php-pear-   |Review Request: php-pear-
                   |PHP_CodeSniffer - PHP coding|PHP-CodeSniffer - PHP coding
                   |standards enforcement tool  |standards enforcement tool




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 01:50:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:50:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing
	framework for unit tests
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300150.l0U1om09024979@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests
Alias: pear-PHPUnit3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-29 20:50 EST -------
SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit.spec
SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit-3.0.3-1.src.rpm

%changelog
* Mon Jan 29 2007 Christopher Stone  3.0.3-1
- Upstream sync


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 02:21:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:21:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300221.l0U2Loq8026334@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-29 21:21 EST -------
Yup. I tried rebuilding it in mock with these BuildRequires changed to their
base packages (ImageMagick and librsvg2 intead of the -devel subpackages); and
the configure script fails because it uses pkg-config to ensure that the
necessary versions of these two are installed. The relevent pkgconfig files are
in the -devel packages, so these are needed. :)

Thanks for the review; imported and closing as NEXTRELEASE.

(And I've created bug #225354 to ask about adding that to the list of valid
licenses.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 02:22:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:22:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons
	from the Tango Project
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300222.l0U2MEdc026362@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555


peter at thecodergeek.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 02:57:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:57:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225356] New: fonts-thai
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356

           Summary: fonts-thai
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: besfahbo at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


I've created an initial fonts-thai package based on the one from olpc:

  http://www.gnome.org/~behdad/fedora/fonts-thai/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 04:15:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:15:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300415.l0U4FiM3032244@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114





------- Additional Comments From florin at andrei.myip.org  2007-01-29 23:15 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> * desktop_vendor is no longer planetccrma.  

fixed

> * For Source0, can you please put the full URL to the tarball?

fixed

> * See the section "Handling Locale Files" in 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>   We'll need to replace the "%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/jamin.mo"
>   in %files with the find_lang stuff described in the wiki.

fixed

> # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/jamin-0.95.0-4.src.rpm 
> W: jamin mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 60, tab: line 1)

fixed

I don't know if I have to bump the Release number after every rebuild like this,
so I'm just using the same number. Just re-download the same files from the URLs
above.
In the future, I will update the Release number if that's what's needed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 04:17:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:17:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300417.l0U4HlmW032352@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-29 23:17 EST -------
I am not sponsor, so it is pre-review.
I am seeking for sponsor, at Bug 222594 .
I have looked at your spec file, and have some comments.

1) %makeinstall
You can not use %makeinstall. 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002

2) More macros
You can replace initng-conf-gtk with %{name}.

3) desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \
  --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \
  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/initng-conf-gtk.desktop

--vendor fedora ->  --vendor "" 
You do not have to set vendor as fedora.

4) make
You have to use %{optflags} :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448

and also %{?_smp_mflags} :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e

5) Timestamp
I built SRPM, and found -p is not used for cp and install.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 05:41:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:41:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD
	package
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300541.l0U5fAhI004504@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-30 00:41 EST -------
I am not sponsor, so it is pre-review.
I am also seeking for sponsor, at Bug 222594 .
I have looked at your spec file, and have some comments.

1) Block FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Please input "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" at Bug 225119 blocks ...
By this, possible sponsor might find you :-)

2) cp pythoncad.desktop $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/

You have to use desktop-file-install command.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755

3) File copy
You are using cp and chmod command to install files,
but you can do it by "install -m ".
And, please do not forget to use "-p" option:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab

4) BuildRequires
You are using "setup.py", but it requires "python-tools" package.

And you can omit "python":
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList

5) [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"
It is not commonly used.
rm -rf "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" will work.

6) Spec file name
%{name} in your package is "PythonCAD", however, spec name is "pythoncad.spec".
I think you have to use either "PythonCAD" or "pythoncad".
please look at below:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-625ebbc8678382beca8d0b02504d30e7b6f23791

7) *.pyo *.pyc in /usr/bin/
>From rpmlint:
W: PythonCAD non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gtkpycad.pyo 0644
W: PythonCAD non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gtkpycad.pyc 0644
If you change executable name from "gtkpycad.py" to "gtkpycad", it will not
appear, and I think it is better.

8)
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/pythoncad.spec
and spec file included in SRPM is different one.

9) python setup.py install --prefix=/usr --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
You can use %{__python} .

10) Should I changes these perm to 755 ?
I think so..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 05:48:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:48:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300548.l0U5mTIS005002@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-30 00:48 EST -------
I have read guidelines again and did two pre-review today..
Bug 225119 and Bug 222338 .


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 05:51:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:51:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225364] New: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module
	for command line interface programs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225364

           Summary: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for
                    command line interface programs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-App-CLI.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-App-CLI-0.07-1.src.rpm
Description: App::CLI dispatches CLI (command line interface) based commands into
command classes. It also supports subcommand and per-command options.

It is a requirement for SVK 2.0.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 05:54:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:54:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225365] New: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding
	iterator 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225365

           Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-File-Next.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-File-Next-0.38-1.src.rpm
Description: File::Next is an iterator-based module for finding files.  It's
lightweight, has no dependencies, runs under taint mode, and puts your
program more directly in control of file selection.

It is required by ack.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:02:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:02:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225366] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify
	the dependencies of a distribution
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225366

           Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Depends - Identify the
                    dependencies of a distribution
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Module-Depends.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Module-Depends-0.10-2.src.rpm
Description: Module::Depends extracts module dependencies from an unpacked
distribution tree.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:05:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:05:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225367] New: Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform
	path specification manipulation
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225367

           Summary: Review Request: perl-Path-Class - Cross-platform path
                    specification manipulation
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Path-Class.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Path-Class-0.16-1.src.rpm
Description: Path::Class is a module for manipulation of file and directory
specifications (strings describing their locations, like
'/home/ken/foo.txt' or 'C:\Windows\Foo.txt') in a cross-platform manner. It
supports pretty much every platform Perl runs on, including Unix, Windows,
Mac, VMS, Epoc, Cygwin, OS/2, and NetWare.

It is required for SVK 2.0.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:06:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225368] New: Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225368

           Summary: Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/ack.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/ack-1.56-2.src.rpm
Description: Ack is designed as a replacement for grep.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:07:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:07:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225368] Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300607.l0U67X7S005933@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ack - Grep-like text finder


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225368


ianburrell at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |225365




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:07:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:07:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225365] Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300607.l0U67Y4u005938@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator 


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225365


ianburrell at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |225368
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:08:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:08:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without
	using monodevelop
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300608.l0U687Xj005965@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776





------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2007-01-30 01:08 EST -------
- devel package missing %defattr
- missing SMP flags or note why not

- does not run on x86_64.
$ monodoc
/usr/bin/monodoc: line 7: libdir: command not found
cannot open assembly /monodoc/browser.exe

It appears the build did not automatically substitute the libdir variable. 

create-native-map also has problems:
$ create-native-map 
cannot open assembly /usr/bin/../lib/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe

which is in the right spot under /usr/lib64

gnunit and gnunit2 aren't working either:
$ gnunit2 
Unhandled Exception: Glade.HandlerNotFoundException: The handler for the event
DeleteEvent should take '(System.Object,Gtk.DeleteEventArgs)', but the signature
of the provided handler ('OnWindowDelete') is '(System.Object,System.EventArgs)'


rpmlint sez:
E: mono-tools hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
Conditional for pre mono libdir Fedora. OK.

E: mono-tools no-binary
E: mono-tools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Ignore, we don't consider mono noarch

E: mono-tools zero-length /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/NEWS
Content free. May rm.

E: mono-tools script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/mono-tools-1.2.1/COPYING
Weird. Recommend removing the exec bit.

W: mono-tools-devel summary-not-capitalized .pc file for mono-tools
Ignore

W: mono-tools-devel no-documentation
Ignore

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:17:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:17:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225365] Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300617.l0U6HPTg006267@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225365


rc040203 at freenet.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: perl-File-  |Review Request: perl-File-
                   |Next - File-finding iterator|Next - File-finding iterator




------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-30 01:17 EST -------
For better test coverage, please add:

BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) >= 1.04
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.14

Without them, "make check" issues warnings in mock.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:18:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:18:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300618.l0U6IEna006312@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-30 01:18 EST -------
Hello.

I'll be happy to review this for you. Full review to come tomorrow...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 06:47:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:47:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300647.l0U6l5Ie007048@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-30 01:46 EST -------
According to its website, 0.4.4 is released. Would you please update your
spec/SRPM accordingly? Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 07:22:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:22:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225364] Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for
	command line interface programs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300722.l0U7MQ5p008098@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225364





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-30 02:22 EST -------
Please remove this from your spec:
Requires:       perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple)

It is redundant to rpm's automatic requires resultion and causes the rpm to
contain a duplicate "Requires: perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple)"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 07:40:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:40:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++
	compiler system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300740.l0U7e3cs008803@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883





------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de  2007-01-30 02:40 EST -------
Mon Jan 29 2007 Enrico Scholz  - 2.18.3-2
- cleanups
- updated icon-cache scriptlets
- removed empty (ssh), unavailable (minit) and conflicting (initng)
  initscripts


http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 07:47:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 02:47:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300747.l0U7lAZM009179@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338





------- Additional Comments From dm at mensa.se  2007-01-30 02:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1) %makeinstall
> You can not use %makeinstall. 

Ok.

> 2) More macros
> You can replace initng-conf-gtk with %{name}.

Yep.

> 3) desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \
>   --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \
>   $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/initng-conf-gtk.desktop
> 
> --vendor fedora ->  --vendor "" 
> You do not have to set vendor as fedora.

Ah. Looks like I mixed up vendor_id and vendor...

> 4) make
> You have to use %{optflags} :
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448

This fails with the following:

+ make -j2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic
make: invalid option -- O
make: invalid option -- 2
make: invalid option -- g
make: unrecognized option `--param=ssp-buffer-size=4'
make: invalid option -- 6
make: invalid option -- 4
make: invalid option -- u
make: invalid option -- =
make: invalid option -- g
make: invalid option -- c

Anyone knows what I'm doing wrong?

> and also %{?_smp_mflags} :
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e

Yep.

> 5) Timestamp
> I built SRPM, and found -p is not used for cp and install.
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab

Now you lost me. I can't seem to find any cp or install commands in my spec file?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 08:04:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:04:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300804.l0U84J5G009735@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 03:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> According to its website, 0.4.4 is released.

Oh.. 0.4.4 seems to be released yesterday. Thanks.

http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kazehakase.spec
http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kazehakase-0.4.4-1.src.rpm

-------------------------------------------------
* Tue Jan 30 2007 Mamoru Tasaka  - 0.4.4-1
- 0.4.4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 08:10:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:10:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300810.l0U8A3cw009961@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-30 03:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > 4) make
> > You have to use %{optflags} :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448
> This fails with the following:

> Anyone knows what I'm doing wrong?
I checked build log, and it seems that %{optflag} is automatically set in your
case. %{optflag} is set in %configure..
I think you do not have to set %{optflags} here.
 
> > 5) Timestamp
> > I built SRPM, and found -p is not used for cp and install.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab
> Now you lost me. I can't seem to find any cp or install commands in my spec file?
Yes, I lost. It was my mistake :-) 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 08:15:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:15:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300815.l0U8Fxwu010196@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-01-30 03:15 EST -------
In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)

> > 4) make
> > You have to use %{optflags} :
> >
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448
> 
> This fails with the following:
> 
> + make -j2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
> -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic
> make: invalid option -- O
> make: invalid option -- 2
> make: invalid option -- g
> make: unrecognized option `--param=ssp-buffer-size=4'
> make: invalid option -- 6
> make: invalid option -- 4
> make: invalid option -- u
> make: invalid option -- =
> make: invalid option -- g
> make: invalid option -- c
> 
> Anyone knows what I'm doing wrong?
You probably are facing a quoting bug somewhere when passing down $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
(In other words, some "" are missing somewhere).




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 08:18:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:18:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300818.l0U8IBMq010259@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-30 03:18 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> This fails with the following:
> 
> + make -j2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
> -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic
> make: invalid option -- O
> make: invalid option -- 2
> make: invalid option -- g
> make: unrecognized option `--param=ssp-buffer-size=4'
> make: invalid option -- 6
> make: invalid option -- 4
> make: invalid option -- u
> make: invalid option -- =
> make: invalid option -- g
> make: invalid option -- c
> Anyone knows what I'm doing wrong?
BTW, make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" 
will work.
In your case, you do not have to do so, because %configure does this.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 08:51:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:51:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300851.l0U8pvGI012100@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-30 03:51 EST -------
yes, I have overwritten the old version... no need yet to increase the release :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 09:13:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:13:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225303] Merge Review: autorun
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300913.l0U9DGjj014300@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: autorun


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225303





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-30 04:13 EST -------
autorun is obsolete.... drop/remove/delete

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 09:32:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:32:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300932.l0U9WsNa015885@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info  2007-01-30 04:32 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> yes, I have overwritten the old version... no need yet to increase the release 

Quoting:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes

'Increase the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid
confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older
versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and
new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change.'

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 09:47:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:47:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300947.l0U9l6ti016886@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552


bjohnson at symetrix.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 09:49:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:49:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing,
	sorting and filtering your mail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300949.l0U9nskG017030@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723


bjohnson at symetrix.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 09:50:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:50:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701300950.l0U9o683017057@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497


Bug 217497 depends on bug 216723, which changed state.

Bug 216723 Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 10:44:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:44:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301044.l0UAiZTM020651@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365





------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com  2007-01-30 05:44 EST -------
kk, sry

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 11:12:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:12:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301112.l0UBCdQd023892@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-30 06:12 EST -------
Just for the records: it does not seems to play nice with SELinux (at least in
my CentOS 4 mail server)

type=AVC msg=audit(1170155275.211:591976): avc:  denied  { execute } for 
pid=32749 comm="httpd" name="mailgraph.cgi" dev=dm-0 ino=571556
scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:usr_t tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1170155275.211:591976): arch=40000003 syscall=11
success=no exit=-13 a0=8baf6b8 a1=8bb1108 a2=8bb1118 a3=8bb1968 items=1
pid=32749 auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48
comm="httpd" exe="/usr/sbin/httpd"
type=CWD msg=audit(1170155275.211:591976):  cwd="/usr/share/mailgraph"
type=PATH msg=audit(1170155275.211:591976):
name="/usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi" flags=101  inode=571556 dev=fd:00
mode=0100755 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00

any hint?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 11:30:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:30:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301130.l0UBUrlZ025007@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-30 06:30 EST -------
By default SELinux allows apache scripts to be placed only in certain defined
places. Coud you please copy /usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi to
/var/www/cgi-bin, modify httpd.conf accordingly and retry ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 11:33:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:33:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301133.l0UBXbdm025144@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-30 06:33 EST -------
Try this:

# chcon -t httpd_script_exec_t /usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi

No need to modify httpd.conf if this works.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 11:34:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:34:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301134.l0UBYeSn025186@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-30 06:34 EST -------
Sorry, that should have been httpd_sys_script_exec_t in Comment #19.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 11:57:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:57:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++
	compiler system
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301157.l0UBvGhq026152@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 06:57 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146910)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146910&action=view)
Mock build log of distcc-2.18.3-2.fc7

Mockbuild pf 2.18.3-2 fails on FC-devel i386.
Please check the mockbuild log.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 12:03:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:03:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301203.l0UC3K3f026401@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-30 07:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> By default SELinux allows apache scripts to be placed only in certain defined
> places. Coud you please copy /usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi to
> /var/www/cgi-bin, modify httpd.conf accordingly and retry ?

I copied the cgi and tried to access http://localhost/cgi-bin/mailgraph.cgi (so,
no need for httpd.conf modifications), but then it complains about denied
read/write ops:

type=AVC msg=audit(1170158491.308:592646): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=1293
comm="mailgraph.cgi" name="mailgraph.rrd" dev=dm-0 ino=279712
scontext=root:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t tcontext=root:object_r:var_lib_t
tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1170158491.308:592646): arch=40000003 syscall=5
success=no exit=-13 a0=8ea0b28 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=1 pid=1293 auid=0 uid=48
gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48 comm="mailgraph.cgi"
exe="/usr/bin/perl"
type=CWD msg=audit(1170158491.308:592646):  cwd="/var/www/cgi-bin"
type=PATH msg=audit(1170158491.308:592646):
name="/var/lib/mailgraph/mailgraph.rrd" flags=101  inode=279712 dev=fd:00
mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00
type=AVC msg=audit(1170158491.527:592647): avc:  denied  { getattr } for 
pid=1296 comm="mailgraph.cgi" name="mailgraph" dev=dm-0 ino=279710
scontext=root:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_t
tclass=dir
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1170158491.527:592647): arch=40000003 syscall=195
success=no exit=-13 a0=9dd6ac0 a1=9dac0c8 a2=335ff4 a3=9dd6ac0 items=1 pid=1296
auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48
comm="mailgraph.cgi" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
type=AVC_PATH msg=audit(1170158491.527:592647):  path="/var/cache/mailgraph"
type=CWD msg=audit(1170158491.527:592647):  cwd="/var/www/cgi-bin"
type=PATH msg=audit(1170158491.527:592647): name="/var/cache/mailgraph" flags=1
 inode=279710 dev=fd:00 mode=040775 ouid=0 ogid=48 rdev=00:00
type=AVC msg=audit(1170158491.529:592648): avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=1296
comm="mailgraph.cgi" name="mailgraph" dev=dm-0 ino=279710
scontext=root:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_t
tclass=dir
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1170158491.529:592648): arch=40000003 syscall=39
success=no exit=-13 a0=9dbc540 a1=1ff a2=538c94 a3=9dbc540 items=1 pid=1296
auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48
comm="mailgraph.cgi" exe="/usr/bin/perl"
type=CWD msg=audit(1170158491.529:592648):  cwd="/var/www/cgi-bin"
type=PATH msg=audit(1170158491.529:592648): name="/var/cache/mailgraph/,cgi-bin"
flags=10  inode=279710 dev=fd:00 mode=040775 ouid=0 ogid=48 rdev=00:00



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 12:06:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:06:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301206.l0UC6ODr026486@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-30 07:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Try this:
> 
> # chcon -t httpd_script_exec_t /usr/share/mailgraph/mailgraph.cgi
> 
> No need to modify httpd.conf if this works.
> 

Nope. still denied read/write ops on the rrd files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 12:11:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:11:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301211.l0UCB8Go026730@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 07:11 EST -------
Well,

* This package (seedit) is good.
* md5sum of source coincides.
* Your pre-review looks good to a certain content.
- Note:
  My recognition is that setting the id of vendor as 
  "fedora" is still recommended if upstream does not
  set vendor id.
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

Okay!!
------------------------------------------------------------
  This package (seedit) is APPROVED by me.
------------------------------------------------------------

  Please go forward according to 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
  I will sponsor you when you do a procedure and I receive
  a mail which tells that you need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 12:12:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:12:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301212.l0UCCQDG026873@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-30 07:12 EST -------
Try:

# chcon -Rh -t httpd_var_lib_t /var/lib/mailgraph
# chcon -Rh -t httpd_cache_t /var/cache/mailgraph


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 13:06:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:06:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225400] New: Review Request: tetrinetx - The GNU TetriNET
	server
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225400

           Summary: Review Request: tetrinetx - The GNU TetriNET server
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: faucamp at csir.co.za
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/tetrinetx.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.snoekie.com/rpm/tetrinetx-1.13.16-1.src.rpm
Description:
Tetrinetx is the GNU TetriNET server written in C. It includes IRC and
Spectator supports. As many other tetrinet servers, it uses IP independent
decryption which allows the server to run behind a router.

TetriNET is a network-based, multiplayer tetris game. This package contains
a server for hosting TetriNET games over a public or private network.


Package builds in mock (fc6/i386) and on x86_64.

rpmlint output:
===============
E: tetrinetx non-standard-uid xxxx 
-- quite a few times; this is due to the use of a "tetrinetx" user for the server (and its run-time files); maybe this should be changed to using the generic "games" account?

E: tetrinetx non-readable /etc/tetrinetx/game.secure 0600
-- this file contains security configuration for TetriNET, and should not be readable by anyone other than the tetrinet server

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 15:31:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:31:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client
	with support for UPnP and DHT
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301531.l0UFV9eY010242@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT
Alias: deluge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221669





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 10:31 EST -------
Umm..

Actually this works well with FC-5 i386, however, still
hangs up on FC-devel i386...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 15:47:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:47:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301547.l0UFl6TH012521@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114


green at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com  2007-01-30 10:47 EST -------
Here's my review.  Note the single line with an X.  I would approve this package
once the Source0 line is tweaked, however I believe that we need to find a
sponsor for you since, from what I can tell, this appears to be your first
contribution.  
I've added a bugzilla dependency on FE-NEEDSPONSOR for now.

Also, my personal preference is to boost the release number on every update
during the review, but I don't think that's a requirement.

* package meets and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
  (This is a total nit-pick, but my personal preference is to align
   spec file field values like so...
http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/zynaddsubfx.spec )
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* License text included in package.
X source files match upstream (extracted from upstream cvs so no md5sum available.)
$ md5sum jamin-0.95.0.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/jamin-0.95.0.tar.gz 
032f2a4a578a8938f76282112d56c8d6  jamin-0.95.0.tar.gz
032f2a4a578a8938f76282112d56c8d6  /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/jamin-0.95.0.tar.gz

However, the source URL didn't work for me.  But this one does...
http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/jamin/jamin-0.95.0.tar.gz

* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires and requires look sane:
jamin-0.95.0-4.fc6.i386.rpm
  jamincont_1912.so  
  jamin = 0.95.0-4
====
  hicolor-icon-theme
  ladspa-swh-plugins >= 0.4.7
  libatk-1.0.so.0
  libcairo.so.2
  libfftw3f.so.3
  libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  libglib-2.0.so.0
  libgmodule-2.0.so.0
  libgobject-2.0.so.0
  libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  libjack.so.0
  liblo >= 0.15
  liblo.so.0
  libpango-1.0.so.0
  libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
  libpthread.so.0
  libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0)
  libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1)
  libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)
  libxml2.so.2
* shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required (it's a ladspa plugin).
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present
* scriptlets OK
* code, not content.
* docs look fine (there's no JAMin manual, right?)
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* .desktop file required, and it looks ifne.
* not a web app.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:13:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:13:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301613.l0UGDau3016197@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-30 11:13 EST -------
Updated
Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/liborigin-20070115-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:22:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:22:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223598] Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading
	OriginLab OPJ project files
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301622.l0UGMXEq017356@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: liborigin - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223598


dakingun at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2007-01-30 11:22 EST -------
APPROVED, with review highlights in comment #4 and update in comment #5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:25:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:25:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301625.l0UGPPqZ017774@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 11:25 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146929)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146929&action=view)
PerceptualDiff.spec I used

PerceptualDiff.spec I used.
Please check this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:26:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:26:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223657] Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison
	utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301626.l0UGQvvc018054@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PerceptualDiff - An image comparison utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 11:26 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146930)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146930&action=view)
Mock build log of  PerceptualDiff-1.0-2.1.fc7

Mock build log of  PerceptualDiff-1.0-2.1 (my spec file)
on FC-devel i386

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:34:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD
	package
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301634.l0UGYE4s019038@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119


kwizart at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-01-30 11:34 EST -------
Thx for your help Yuichi!

SRPM:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PythonCAD/PythonCAD-0.1.35-2.kwizart.fc6.noarch.rpm
SPEC:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PythonCAD/PythonCAD.spec
Description: PythonCAD scriptable CAD package

I'm using mock for a few time...So it now build fine in mock!
(rpmlint is now silent...)



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 16:44:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:44:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301644.l0UGiVKn020200@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223591





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2007-01-30 11:44 EST -------
Updated:
Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/magic.spec
SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/magic-7.4.33-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 17:35:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:35:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225364] Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for
	command line interface programs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301735.l0UHZH9K024361@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-App-CLI - Dispatcher module for command line interface programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225364





------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com  2007-01-30 12:35 EST -------
Remove explicit requires.

Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-App-CLI.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-App-CLI-0.07-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 17:35:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:35:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225365] Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301735.l0UHZdAs024400@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Next - File-finding iterator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225365





------- Additional Comments From ianburrell at gmail.com  2007-01-30 12:35 EST -------
Add BuildRequires Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage.

Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-File-Next.spec
SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-File-Next-0.38-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 17:45:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:45:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225447] New: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an
	RSS parser written in PHP
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447

           Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss -  MagpieRSS is an RSS
                    parser written in PHP
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/php-magpierss.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/php-magpierss-0.72-1.src.rpm
Description: MagpieRSS is a set of php files designed to parse RSS XML for usage in PHP code.
MagpieRSS is compatible with RSS 0.9 through RSS 1.0.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 18:30:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:30:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222338] Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration
	and control utility
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301830.l0UIUA87029416@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222338


dm at mensa.se changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #145381|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From dm at mensa.se  2007-01-30 13:30 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=146942)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146942&action=view)
initng-conf-gtk 0.5-1 spec file

New upstreams release. Rolled new rpms according to the comments above.

New srpm at
http://download.initng.org/initng-gui/initng-conf-gtk/initng-conf-gtk-0.5-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 18:45:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:45:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225345] Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression
	editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301845.l0UIjVhu030967@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225345


orion at cora.nwra.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |orion at cora.nwra.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-30 13:45 EST -------
Mostly looks good, full review to follow but thought I'd note this first:

# rpmlint -i kodos
E: kodos non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kodos/kodos.py 0644
This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed.  If
the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits,
otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere.


I think you want to pull the shebang.  Or, perhaps not even package it as it is
basically the same as /usr/bin/kodos?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 18:52:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:52:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS
	parser written in PHP
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301852.l0UIq775031445@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss -  MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447


mastahnke at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |225434




------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com  2007-01-30 13:52 EST -------
I think I am going to change the install path for this and make the review
dependent on bug #225434.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 18:57:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:57:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS
	parser written in PHP
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301857.l0UIvRL8031899@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss -  MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447





------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com  2007-01-30 13:57 EST -------
Update:

SPEC URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/php-magpierss.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/php-magpierss-0.72-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 19:01:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:01:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225345] Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression
	editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301901.l0UJ1aKj032098@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kodos - Visual regular expression editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225345





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2007-01-30 14:01 EST -------
mock build fails:

+ desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir
/var/tmp/kodos-2.4.9-1.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications --add-category
X-Fedora /builddir/build/SOURCES/kodos.desktop
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.24776: line 36: desktop-file-install: command not found

Looks like you need:

BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 19:19:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:19:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for
	Mail statistics
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701301919.l0UJJYYq001048@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics
Alias: mailgraph

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222552





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-01-30 14:19 EST -------
Hi, this is the closed review bug.  Please open another bug regarding this issue
and I'll get it working with SELinux.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 22:12:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:12:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701302212.l0UMCUPX014362@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-30 17:12 EST -------
Why do you split this into two packages?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 22:15:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:15:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using
	the Stratagus game engine
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701302215.l0UMFnQa014712@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-30 17:15 EST -------
I would suggest using battle-of-survival.  bos is too generic.  See for example,
the flight-of-the-amazon-queen and beneath-a-steel-sky review requests for
naming guidelines.  These packages use the long names instead of the shortened
fotaq/bass names.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 22:28:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:28:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] New: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500

           Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/cycle.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/cycle-0.3.1-1.src.rpm
Description: 
Cycle is a calendar for women. Given a cycle length or statistics for
several periods, it can calculate the days until menstruation, the days
of "safe" sex, the fertile period, and the days to ovulations, and 
define the d.o.b. of a child. It allows the user to write notes and 
helps to supervise the administration of hormonal contraceptive tablets.

Possibilities of the program:
  - Calculate days of menstruation, based on the length of the cycle or 
    on statistics of previous periods.
  - Calculate days of "safe" sex, fertile period and day to ovulations.
  - Definition of D.O.B. (Date Of Birth) of a child
  - Allows to write notes.
  - Helps to supervise reception of hormonal contraceptive tablets.
  - Multiple users allowed. Data is protected by a password for every 
    user.

NOTE: This program is not a reliable contraceptive method. It does 
neither help to prevent sexual transmision diseases like AIDS. It is 
just an electronic means of keeping track of some of your medical data 
and extract some statistical conclusions from them. You cannot consider 
this program as a substitute for your gynecologist in any way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 22:37:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:37:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701302237.l0UMb0g4016567@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com  2007-01-30 17:36 EST -------
It's recommended by the games Packaging Guidelines:

"Package game files and data files separately, if possible, to reduce size of
bugfix updates. This must be done if upstream packages game data in separate
tarballs, and should be done even if upstream uses one tarball for game source
and data. See Nazghul and tong for examples."
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 23:29:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:29:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701302329.l0UNToTw019156@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-30 18:29 EST -------
I think they meant in seperate spec files.  If you bug fix the glob2 source and
update your release number, then the data package also gets the updated releace
number because they are in the same spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Jan 30 23:34:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:34:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701302334.l0UNYQb0019410@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-30 18:34 EST -------
Although looking at nazghul and tong, they both do the same thing you are doing,
so I am confused by this guideline.  I'm going to try and clarify this on the
fedora-games mailing list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 01:01:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:01:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310101.l0V118ID023807@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com  2007-01-30 20:01 EST -------
I think there's a problem on 64 bit.  Here's what happens when I just tested 
this on x86_64:
(this is a runtime error)
dxpc proxy running in CLIENT mode
using image compression level 9
connected to server proxy
ready
[now connect...]
dxpc: EncodeBuffer.C:95: void EncodeBuffer::encodeValue(unsigned int, unsigned 
int, unsigned int): Assertion `numBits <= (sizeof(unsigned) * 8)' failed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 01:44:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:44:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310144.l0V1iPe3025435@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com  2007-01-30 20:44 EST -------
Paul, how do I go about this? I've tried adding '--with-pic' to the %configure
call, but there is nothing different in the build log about PIC/non-PIC code
generation from not having that. 

Poking through the configure.ac reveals nothing obvious either. :S

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 02:25:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:25:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225522] New: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool
	for manipulating images
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522

           Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for
                    manipulating images
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/cinepaint.spec
SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/cinepaint-0.21.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: 
CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images

Build fine in mock - rpmlint is silent
It can be improved with oyranos (working on it but oyranos will also need elektra. Working on it but will also need more time working on it...etc) Anyway it works fine...Oyranos Can be enabled later...

Quote of COPYING:
---
CinePaint Licenses
12/21/04 Robin.Rowe at MovieEditor.com

CinePaint contains code that is a mix of open source licenses.
 - GPL
 - LGPL
 - MIT OSI (a BSD-like license)
---
Do MIT OSI is this one http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#3 ?
also called "X11 License" from GPL approved licence ?
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses

This code do not seems to have 3 licences but only some part of the code has a different license...(didn't checked all the code about this question...)

Also i'm searching for a sponsort

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 02:49:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:49:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310249.l0V2nUAT027667@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-30 21:49 EST -------
Is it easy to patch this so that high scores go in /var/games/smashteroid?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 04:32:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:32:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310432.l0V4W8Vo001032@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2007-01-30 23:32 EST -------
I think the best solution would be to move the selinux policy into the reference
policy, and use a boolean to enable/disable the http-can-talk-to-pokerd bits. 
Until then, I guess the maintainer can choose to add the Requires or not.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 04:32:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:32:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310432.l0V4WquI001124@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-30 23:32 EST -------
I am now sponsored, thank you very much!
I will import seedit this midnight.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 07:37:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:37:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310737.l0V7b4tS011466@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From guthrie at counterexample.org  2007-01-31 02:37 EST -------
I will probably have to pass this bug upstream for the time being and add an
excludearch tag to the spec file.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 08:04:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310804.l0V84i0j012297@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-31 03:04 EST -------
Add -fPIC to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS maybe?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 08:14:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:14:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219972] Review Request: poker-network - A poker server,
	client and abstract user interface library
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310814.l0V8Eoxp012656@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library
Alias: poker-network

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-31 03:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #62)
> I think the best solution would be to move the selinux policy into the reference
> policy, and use a boolean to enable/disable the http-can-talk-to-pokerd bits. 
> Until then, I guess the maintainer can choose to add the Requires or not.

Agree 100%

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 08:50:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:50:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701310850.l0V8o6pX014342@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2007-01-31 03:50 EST -------
Jochen, Christopher, both thanks for your review.

(In reply to comment #3)
> Here is my review:
> ==== MUST FIX ====
> - Shouldnt this require hicolor-icon-theme?
> 
Fixed

> ==== SHOULD FIX ====
> - Use http://www.t3-i.com/smashteroid.htm as URL
Fixed

> - inform upstream of 64bit compiler warnings
I need to send all my changes upstream, if I get around to it I'll fix all the
warnings (also the non 64 bit ones) before doing so.
> 

> ==== QUESTIONS ====
> - patch seems to include license-change.txt but its not included in %doc?
Yes, a must-fix actually as Jochen has correctly identified.

> - patch seems littered with ^Ms, not an issue, but difficult to read
Thats what you get when you take dos source code and port it to Linux with a
patch :)


(In reply to comment #7)
> Is it easy to patch this so that high scores go in /var/games/smashteroid?

Doable yes, easy unfortunately not. Not worth the work IMHO. A patch is ofcourse
welcome.

Here is a new version:
* Wed Jan 31 2007 Hans de Goede  1.11-2
- Not only create but actually package license-change.txt
- Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
- Use: http://www.t3-i.com/smashteroid.htm as URL

Go get it here:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/smashteroid.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/smashteroid-1.11-2.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 10:17:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:17:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225126] Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol
	Compressor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311017.l0VAHA8n020517@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-01-31 05:16 EST -------
That could be due to a rewrite of the EncodeBuffer/DecodeBuffer code
in 3.9.0. Interestingly, the Debian folk offers this dxpc for AMD64
for several months without any patch in that area of the code:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/dxpc

In the source I see a 32-bit bit-shifting en-/decoding working with
"unsigned int" most of the time in many places, but sometimes only
with simple type-specifiers. Maybe there's an oversight somewhere.
Without an x86_64 test machine I won't even start careful proof-reading,
however. Also, the upstream authors are encouraged to use full
type-specifiers wherever possible, e.g. "unsigned int X" instead
of "unsigned X" and "sizeof(unsigned int)" instead "sizeof(unsigned)".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 13:35:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:35:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] New: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube
	Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client 
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575

           Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a
                    browser-based multilingual IMAP client
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.spec
SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.2.src.rpm
Description: RoundCube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
with an application-like user interface. It provides full
functionality you expect from an e-mail client, including MIME
support, address book, folder manipulation, message searching
and spell checking. RoundCube Webmail is written in PHP and
requires the MySQL database. The user interface is fully
skinnable using XHTML and CSS 2.

I am sponsored already, and this is a Wishlist package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 13:51:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:51:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311351.l0VDpO4G000622@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594





------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp  2007-01-31 08:51 EST -------
I've imported seedit now, and built successfully.

Mamoru, I really appreciate reviewing and sponsoring me.
To all, thanks to very useful comments !
I will close this bug.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 14:03:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:03:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311403.l0VE3OxW001776@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594


ynakam at hitachisoft.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 14:33:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:33:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on
	local and remote systems
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311433.l0VEXYHt004396@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478


limb at jcomserv.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 09:33 EST -------
Following discussion on f-e-l, withdrawing review request to work on re-vamping
yumdiff.  Thanks to all for suggestions, criticism, feedback, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 14:58:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:58:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311458.l0VEwZ1Q005996@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575


lxtnow at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |roundcubemail - Round Cube  |roundcubemail - Round Cube
                   |Webmail is a browser-based  |Webmail is a browser-based
                   |multilingual IMAP client    |multilingual IMAP client




------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-01-31 09:58 EST -------
---Spec file review ---

* your %define is not especially necessary
* Buildroot doesn't right, it misses one "-" just after "root" (must be fix).
* Use 'mkdir -p' instead of 'install -d' as below in you field %install
* Use 'install -m 644 *' instead of 'cp -pr *' for install all files in
%{_datadir}/roundcubemail with 644 permission, like that, you will not have to
atribute permissions to each files and sub-directories in %files.
* You should comment why you modify or remove file from main tarball in spec
file for more understanding and best review.
* Doc INSTALL should not be includes in the package (must be fix)
* Many of files listed twice in %files section (must be fix).
* %attr(0644-root,root) can be set in %intall section.
* You shoul define the default maccros in %files.

--- rpmlint error ---

* from srpm: clean

* from rpm: 

E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /usr/share/roundcubemail/temp apache
E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/roundcubemail/temp 0775
E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /usr/share/roundcubemail/logs apache
E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/roundcubemail/logs 0775

All must be Fix.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 15:16:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:16:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225130] Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311516.l0VFG5ls007237@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smashteroid - Astrosmash Remake
Alias: smashteroid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225130


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-31 10:16 EST -------
Looks like all MUST FIX items have been fixed.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 16:00:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:00:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 223943] Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME -
	point, click, debug!
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311600.l0VG0gq8010454@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Nemiver - A C/C++ Debugger for GNOME - point, click, debug!
Alias: nemiver

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223943


paul at city-fan.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul at city-fan.org




------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2007-01-31 11:00 EST -------
Adding the following three lines to %build before the %configure line certainly
results in all compiles getting -fPIC; hopefully Gianluca can let us know if
that fixes the execmod problem.

# Make sure everything is compiled with -fPIC to avoid execmod problems
export CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC"
export CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC"


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 16:31:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:31:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311631.l0VGVodM012769@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com  2007-01-31 11:31 EST -------
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245#c2

says it bundles code incompatible with GPL. is it a blocker?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 16:36:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:36:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311636.l0VGaC5D013119@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 11:36 EST -------
Which code?  I'll ask on that thread as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 16:36:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:36:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311636.l0VGaw9A013177@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245


limb at jcomserv.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |limb at jcomserv.net




------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 11:36 EST -------
Hi, I'm working on packaging roundcube.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575  Which code is
GPL-incompatible?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:23:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:23:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225604] New: Review Request: etherape - Graphical network
	monitor for Unix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225604

           Summary: Review Request: etherape - Graphical network monitor for
                    Unix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: miker5slow at grandecom.net
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


SPEC URL: http://fluxbox-wiki.org/packages/fedora/etherape.spec
SRPM URL: http://fluxbox-wiki.org/packages/fedora/etherape-0.9.7-1.src.rpm
Description: 
EtherApe is a graphical network monitor for Unix modeled after etherman.

No noise from rpmlint, I dont have mock setup right now so I was unable to test the mock build.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:30:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:30:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311730.l0VHUtpL017589@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mr.ecik at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-31 12:30 EST -------
Don't you think that the first part of a description is almost identical
as the Possibilities of the program list? It just talks two times about the 
same.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:31:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:31:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311731.l0VHVYxL017608@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575


tokul at users.sourceforge.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tokul at users.sourceforge.net




------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net  2007-01-31 12:31 EST -------
PHP Pear libraries are licensed under PHP license. 
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses

I am not a lawyer, but I suspect that you can't bundle GPL code with code
incompatible with GPL.

If code can't handle plural forms and is difficult to maintain translations, I
wouldn't call it multilingual.

$messages['searchsuccessful'] = '$nr messages found';

This string can have up to four different translations, that depend in $nr value.

Translation should not contain variables. sprintf('%d messages found',$nr)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:36:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:36:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311736.l0VHaLBU018012@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 12:36 EST -------
Roundcube ships Googiespell 2.1, which says it's MIT Licensed, so that's fine. 
The current is 3.4, which is GPL.

It also includes code Licensed under PHP License 3.0 and 2.02, which are GPL
incompatible.

Based on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb001ba9763d95e2792e825,
I don't think any of this is a problem.  Will post to the squirrelmail bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:36:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:36:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224245] Review Request: squirrelmail
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311736.l0VHajW2018063@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: squirrelmail


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 12:36 EST -------
I found it, I think.  Roundcube ships Googiespell 2.1, which says it's MIT
Licensed, so that's fine.  The current is 3.4, which is GPL.

It also includes code Licensed under PHP License 3.0 and 2.02, which are GPL
incompatible.

Based on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb001ba9763d95e2792e825,
I don't think any of this is a problem.  Has been posted to the roundcube bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:37:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:37:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311737.l0VHbPCM018098@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500





------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com  2007-01-31 12:37 EST -------
Sure, will fix.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:43:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:43:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311743.l0VHhNFN018553@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575


rdieter at math.unl.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rdieter at math.unl.edu




------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2007-01-31 12:43 EST -------
> I don't think any of this is a problem

It *is* a problem, roundcubemail is GPL and it is including/using
GPL-incompatible (php license) code.  roundcude upstream developers should be
made aware of this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:44:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225608] New: Merge Review: basesystem
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225608

           Summary: Merge Review: basesystem
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: basesystem

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/basesystem/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:44:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225607] New: Merge Review: axis
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225607

           Summary: Merge Review: axis
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: axis

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/axis/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:44:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225609] New: Merge Review: bash
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225609

           Summary: Merge Review: bash
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bash

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bash/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:44:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225610] New: Merge Review: bcel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610

           Summary: Merge Review: bcel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bcel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bcel/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:44:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225611] New: Merge Review: bc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225611

           Summary: Merge Review: bc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bc/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225612] New: Merge Review: beagle
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225612

           Summary: Merge Review: beagle
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: beagle

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/beagle/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225613] New: Merge Review: beecrypt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225613

           Summary: Merge Review: beecrypt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: beecrypt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/beecrypt/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225614] New: Merge Review: bind
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225614

           Summary: Merge Review: bind
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bind

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bind/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225615] New: Merge Review: binutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225615

           Summary: Merge Review: binutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: binutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/binutils/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225616] New: Merge Review: bison
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225616

           Summary: Merge Review: bison
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: roland at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bison

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bison/
Initial Owner: roland at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:45:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:45:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225617] New: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617

           Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bitmap-fonts/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225618] New: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225618

           Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225619] New: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225619

           Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bluez-hcidump

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bluez-hcidump/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225620] New: Merge Review: bluez-libs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225620

           Summary: Merge Review: bluez-libs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bluez-libs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bluez-libs/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225621] New: Merge Review: bluez-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225621

           Summary: Merge Review: bluez-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bluez-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bluez-utils/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225622] New: Merge Review: boost
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622

           Summary: Merge Review: boost
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: bkoz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: boost

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/boost/
Initial Owner: bkoz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225623] New: Merge Review: bootparamd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225623

           Summary: Merge Review: bootparamd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bootparamd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bootparamd/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:46:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:46:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225624] New: Merge Review: booty
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225624

           Summary: Merge Review: booty
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: booty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/booty/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:47:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:47:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225625] New: Merge Review: bridge-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225625

           Summary: Merge Review: bridge-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bridge-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bridge-utils/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:47:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:47:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225626] New: Merge Review: brltty
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225626

           Summary: Merge Review: brltty
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tjanouse at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: brltty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/brltty/
Initial Owner: tjanouse at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:47:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:47:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225627] New: Merge Review: bsf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225627

           Summary: Merge Review: bsf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bsf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bsf/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:47:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:47:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225628] New: Merge Review: bsh
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628

           Summary: Merge Review: bsh
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bsh

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bsh/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225629] New: Merge Review: bug-buddy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225629

           Summary: Merge Review: bug-buddy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bug-buddy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bug-buddy/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225630] New: Merge Review: buildsys-macros
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225630

           Summary: Merge Review: buildsys-macros
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dgregor at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: buildsys-macros

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/buildsys-macros/
Initial Owner: dgregor at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225631] New: Merge Review: busybox
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225631

           Summary: Merge Review: busybox
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: busybox

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/busybox/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225632] New: Merge Review: byacc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225632

           Summary: Merge Review: byacc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: byacc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/byacc/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311748.l0VHmkF6019241@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500


mr.ecik at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-31 12:48 EST -------
I'll review it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225633] New: Merge Review: bzip2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633

           Summary: Merge Review: bzip2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: bzip2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/bzip2/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:48:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:48:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225634] New: Merge Review: cadaver
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225634

           Summary: Merge Review: cadaver
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cadaver

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cadaver/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225635] New: Merge Review: cairo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635

           Summary: Merge Review: cairo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cairo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cairo/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225636] New: Merge Review: cairo-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225636

           Summary: Merge Review: cairo-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cairo-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cairo-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225637] New: Merge Review: castor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225637

           Summary: Merge Review: castor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: castor

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/castor/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225638] New: Merge Review: cdparanoia
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225638

           Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cdparanoia

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cdparanoia/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311749.l0VHn0oB019314@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 12:48 EST -------
Ok. I'll notify them.  If they won't re-release without the PHP-Licensed code,
I'll close the bug.

I'd think they could.  It looks like it's stuff from PEAR anyway, and the DB
part at least is in Extras.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225639] New: Merge Review: cdrdao
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225639

           Summary: Merge Review: cdrdao
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cdrdao

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cdrdao/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225640] New: Merge Review: cdrtools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225640

           Summary: Merge Review: cdrtools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cdrtools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cdrtools/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225641] New: Merge Review: chkconfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225641

           Summary: Merge Review: chkconfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: notting at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: chkconfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/chkconfig/
Initial Owner: notting at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311749.l0VHnjkA019462@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wtogami at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-31 12:49 EST -------
(While the GPL compatibility issue must be fixed upstream, this is a separate
question.)

Why is roundcube including a copy of a PHP Pear library within its own source?

If software uses a Pear library, that library sholud be packaged independently
for Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225642] New: Merge Review: chkfontpath
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225642

           Summary: Merge Review: chkfontpath
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: chkfontpath

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/chkfontpath/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:49:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:49:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225643] New: Merge Review: classpathx-jaf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225643

           Summary: Merge Review: classpathx-jaf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: classpathx-jaf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/classpathx-jaf/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225644] New: Merge Review: classpathx-mail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225644

           Summary: Merge Review: classpathx-mail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: classpathx-mail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/classpathx-mail/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225645] New: Merge Review: cleanfeed
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225645

           Summary: Merge Review: cleanfeed
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cleanfeed

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cleanfeed/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225646] New: Merge Review: cman
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225646

           Summary: Merge Review: cman
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jbrassow at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cman

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cman/
Initial Owner: jbrassow at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225647] New: Merge Review: compat-db
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225647

           Summary: Merge Review: compat-db
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: compat-db

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/compat-db/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225648] New: Merge Review: compat-gcc-296
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225648

           Summary: Merge Review: compat-gcc-296
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: compat-gcc-296

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/compat-gcc-296/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:50:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:50:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225649] New: Merge Review: compat-gcc-32
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225649

           Summary: Merge Review: compat-gcc-32
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: compat-gcc-32

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/compat-gcc-32/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225650] New: Merge Review: compat-readline43
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225650

           Summary: Merge Review: compat-readline43
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: compat-readline43

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/compat-readline43/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225651] New: Merge Review: compat-slang
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225651

           Summary: Merge Review: compat-slang
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: compat-slang

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/compat-slang/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225652] New: Merge Review: comps-extras
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225652

           Summary: Merge Review: comps-extras
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: comps-extras

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/comps-extras/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225653] New: Merge Review: concurrent
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225653

           Summary: Merge Review: concurrent
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: concurrent

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/concurrent/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225654] New: Merge Review: control-center
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225654

           Summary: Merge Review: control-center
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: control-center

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/control-center/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225655] New: Merge Review: coreutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225655

           Summary: Merge Review: coreutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: coreutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/coreutils/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:51:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225656] New: Merge Review: cpio
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225656

           Summary: Merge Review: cpio
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cpio

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpio/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:52:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:52:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225657] New: Merge Review: cpufreq-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225657

           Summary: Merge Review: cpufreq-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lizhang at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cpufreq-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpufreq-utils/
Initial Owner: lizhang at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:52:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:52:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225658] New: Merge Review: cpuspeed
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225658

           Summary: Merge Review: cpuspeed
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cpuspeed

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpuspeed/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:52:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:52:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225659] New: Merge Review: cracklib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225659

           Summary: Merge Review: cracklib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cracklib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cracklib/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:52:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:52:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225660] New: Merge Review: crash
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225660

           Summary: Merge Review: crash
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: anderson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: crash

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/crash/
Initial Owner: anderson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:53:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:53:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225661] New: Merge Review: createrepo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225661

           Summary: Merge Review: createrepo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: createrepo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/createrepo/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:53:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:53:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225662] New: Merge Review: crontabs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225662

           Summary: Merge Review: crontabs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: crontabs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/crontabs/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:53:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:53:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225663] New: Merge Review: cryptix-asn1
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225663

           Summary: Merge Review: cryptix-asn1
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cryptix-asn1

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cryptix-asn1/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:53:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:53:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225664] New: Merge Review: cryptix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225664

           Summary: Merge Review: cryptix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cryptix

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cryptix/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:53:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:53:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225666] New: Merge Review: crypto-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225666

           Summary: Merge Review: crypto-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: crypto-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/crypto-utils/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225667] New: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225667

           Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cryptsetup-luks/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225668] New: Merge Review: cscope
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668

           Summary: Merge Review: cscope
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nhorman at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cscope

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cscope/
Initial Owner: nhorman at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225669] New: Merge Review: ctags
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225669

           Summary: Merge Review: ctags
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ctags

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ctags/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225670] New: Merge Review: cups
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225670

           Summary: Merge Review: cups
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cups

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cups/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225671] New: Merge Review: curl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225671

           Summary: Merge Review: curl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: curl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/curl/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225672] New: Merge Review: cvs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225672

           Summary: Merge Review: cvs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cvs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cvs/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:54:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:54:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225673] New: Merge Review: cyrus-sasl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225673

           Summary: Merge Review: cyrus-sasl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: cyrus-sasl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cyrus-sasl/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:55:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:55:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225674] New: Merge Review: dasher
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225674

           Summary: Merge Review: dasher
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dasher

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dasher/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:55:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:55:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225675] New: Merge Review: db4
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225675

           Summary: Merge Review: db4
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: db4

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/db4/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:55:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:55:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225676] New: Merge Review: dbus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225676

           Summary: Merge Review: dbus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: johnp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dbus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dbus/
Initial Owner: johnp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:55:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:55:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225677] New: Merge Review: dbus-python
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225677

           Summary: Merge Review: dbus-python
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: johnp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dbus-python

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dbus-python/
Initial Owner: johnp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:55:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:55:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225678] New: Merge Review: dcraw
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225678

           Summary: Merge Review: dcraw
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dcraw

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dcraw/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:56:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:56:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225679] New: Merge Review: dejagnu
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225679

           Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dejagnu

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dejagnu/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:56:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:56:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225680] New: Merge Review: desktop-backgrounds
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225680

           Summary: Merge Review: desktop-backgrounds
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: desktop-backgrounds

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/desktop-backgrounds/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:56:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:56:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225681] New: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225681

           Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: desktop-file-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/desktop-file-utils/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:56:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:56:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225682] New: Merge Review: desktop-printing
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225682

           Summary: Merge Review: desktop-printing
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: desktop-printing

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/desktop-printing/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:57:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:57:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225683] New: Merge Review: dev86
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225683

           Summary: Merge Review: dev86
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dev86

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dev86/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:57:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:57:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225684] New: Merge Review: devhelp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225684

           Summary: Merge Review: devhelp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: devhelp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/devhelp/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:57:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:57:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225685] New: Merge Review: device-mapper
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225685

           Summary: Merge Review: device-mapper
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lvm-team at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: device-mapper

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/device-mapper/
Initial Owner: lvm-team at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:57:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:57:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225686] New: Merge Review: device-mapper-multipath
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225686

           Summary: Merge Review: device-mapper-multipath
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lvm-team at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: device-mapper-multipath

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/device-mapper-multipath/
Initial Owner: lvm-team at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 17:58:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:58:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311758.l0VHwvZb020451@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 12:58 EST -------
Agreed.  That's very strange.  I sent this upstream:

Hi.

I was attempting to package Roundcube for inclusion in Fedora Extras.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575

During the review process, we hit a snag.  Portions of the code distributed with
Roundcube are Licensed under the PHP 3.0 and PHP 2.02 licenses, which are
GPL-incompatible.  

This is a legal no-no:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation

I wanted to make you aware of this:

A: For your protection

B: So that, if this is corrected, we can continue our efforts to include
Roundcube in Fedora Extras.

Please let me know what action you intend to take, if any.

Thank you!

Jon Ciesla

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:26:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:26:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225690] New: Merge Review: dhcdbd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225690

           Summary: Merge Review: dhcdbd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dhcdbd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dhcdbd/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:26:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:26:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225691] New: Merge Review: dhcp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225691

           Summary: Merge Review: dhcp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dhcp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dhcp/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:26:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:26:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225692] New: Merge Review: dhcpv6
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225692

           Summary: Merge Review: dhcpv6
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dhcpv6

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dhcpv6/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:26:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:26:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225693] New: Merge Review: dialog
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225693

           Summary: Merge Review: dialog
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dialog

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dialog/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:27:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:27:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225694] New: Merge Review: dictd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225694

           Summary: Merge Review: dictd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dictd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dictd/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:27:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:27:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225695] New: Merge Review: diffstat
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225695

           Summary: Merge Review: diffstat
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: diffstat

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/diffstat/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:27:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:27:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225696] New: Merge Review: diffutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225696

           Summary: Merge Review: diffutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: diffutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/diffutils/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:27:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:27:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225697] New: Merge Review: distcache
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225697

           Summary: Merge Review: distcache
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: distcache

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/distcache/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:28:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:28:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225698] New: Merge Review: dmidecode
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225698

           Summary: Merge Review: dmidecode
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alan at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dmidecode

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dmidecode/
Initial Owner: alan at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:28:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:28:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225699] New: Merge Review: dmraid
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225699

           Summary: Merge Review: dmraid
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lvm-team at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dmraid

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dmraid/
Initial Owner: lvm-team at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:28:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:28:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225700] New: Merge Review: docbook-dtds
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225700

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-dtds
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-dtds

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-dtds/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:28:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:28:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225701] New: Merge Review: docbook-simple
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225701

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-simple
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-simple

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-simple/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225702] New: Merge Review: docbook-slides
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225702

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-slides
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-slides

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-slides/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225703] New: Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225703

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-style-dsssl/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225704] New: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225704

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-style-xsl/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225705] New: Merge Review: docbook-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225705

           Summary: Merge Review: docbook-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: docbook-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/docbook-utils/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225706] New: Merge Review: dos2unix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225706

           Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dos2unix

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dos2unix/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:29:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:29:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225707] New: Merge Review: dosfstools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225707

           Summary: Merge Review: dosfstools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dosfstools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dosfstools/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:30:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225708] New: Merge Review: dovecot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225708

           Summary: Merge Review: dovecot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tjanouse at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dovecot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dovecot/
Initial Owner: tjanouse at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:30:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225709] New: Merge Review: doxygen
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225709

           Summary: Merge Review: doxygen
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: doxygen

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/doxygen/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:30:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225710] New: Merge Review: dtach
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225710

           Summary: Merge Review: dtach
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lhh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dtach

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dtach/
Initial Owner: lhh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:30:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225711] New: Merge Review: dump
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225711

           Summary: Merge Review: dump
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dump

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dump/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:30:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:30:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225712] New: Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225712

           Summary: Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dvd+rw-tools/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225713] New: Merge Review: dvgrab
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225713

           Summary: Merge Review: dvgrab
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: dvgrab

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/dvgrab/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225714] New: Merge Review: e2fsprogs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225714

           Summary: Merge Review: e2fsprogs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: e2fsprogs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/e2fsprogs/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225715] New: Merge Review: echo-icon-theme
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225715

           Summary: Merge Review: echo-icon-theme
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: echo-icon-theme

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/echo-icon-theme/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225716] New: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME
	Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716

           Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME
                    Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description: 
gnome-screensaver-frogs is an addon screen saver for GNOME Screensaver
that provides a slideshow of freely distributable frog pictures.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225717] New: Merge Review: ed
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225717

           Summary: Merge Review: ed
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ed

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ed/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225718] New: Merge Review: eel2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718

           Summary: Merge Review: eel2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: eel2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/eel2/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:31:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:31:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225719] New: Merge Review: efax
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225719

           Summary: Merge Review: efax
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: efax

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/efax/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225720] New: Merge Review: eject
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225720

           Summary: Merge Review: eject
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: eject

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/eject/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225721] New: Merge Review: ekiga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721

           Summary: Merge Review: ekiga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ekiga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ekiga/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225722] New: Merge Review: ElectricFence
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225722

           Summary: Merge Review: ElectricFence
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ElectricFence

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ElectricFence/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225724] New: Merge Review: elilo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225724

           Summary: Merge Review: elilo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: elilo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/elilo/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225723] New: Merge Review: elfutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225723

           Summary: Merge Review: elfutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: roland at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: elfutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/elfutils/
Initial Owner: roland at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225725] New: Merge Review: elinks
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225725

           Summary: Merge Review: elinks
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: elinks

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/elinks/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225726] New: Merge Review: emacs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225726

           Summary: Merge Review: emacs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: coldwell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: emacs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/emacs/
Initial Owner: coldwell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:32:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225727] New: Merge Review: emacspeak
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225727

           Summary: Merge Review: emacspeak
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: emacspeak

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/emacspeak/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225729] New: Merge Review: enscript
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225729

           Summary: Merge Review: enscript
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: enscript

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/enscript/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225730] New: Merge Review: eog
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225730

           Summary: Merge Review: eog
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: eog

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/eog/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225731] New: Merge Review: epic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225731

           Summary: Merge Review: epic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: epic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/epic/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225732] New: Merge Review: epiphany
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225732

           Summary: Merge Review: epiphany
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: epiphany

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/epiphany/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225733] New: Merge Review: eruby
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225733

           Summary: Merge Review: eruby
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: eruby

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/eruby/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311833.l0VIXkil024213@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cscope


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668


nhorman at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |nhorman at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com  2007-01-31 13:33 EST -------
Don't Think anything needs to be done here.  I assume that merge review implies
merge to fedora core, but cscope has been in core for some time now.  Please
reopen if this is not the case

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:33:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225734] New: Merge Review: esound
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225734

           Summary: Merge Review: esound
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: esound

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/esound/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225735] New: Merge Review: ethtool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225735

           Summary: Merge Review: ethtool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jgarzik at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ethtool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ethtool/
Initial Owner: jgarzik at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225736] New: Merge Review: evince
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225736

           Summary: Merge Review: evince
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evince

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evince/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225737] New: Merge Review: evolution-connector
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225737

           Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evolution-connector

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-connector/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225738] New: Merge Review: evolution-data-server
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225738

           Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evolution-data-server

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-data-server/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225739] New: Merge Review: evolution
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225739

           Summary: Merge Review: evolution
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evolution

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225740] New: Merge Review: evolution-sharp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225740

           Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evolution-sharp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-sharp/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225741] New: Merge Review: evolution-webcal
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225741

           Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: evolution-webcal

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-webcal/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225742] New: Merge Review: expat
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225742

           Summary: Merge Review: expat
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: expat

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/expat/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:34:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:34:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311834.l0VIYvGU024416@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cscope


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668


nhorman at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE
   Fixed In Version|                            |15.5




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:35:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:35:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225743] New: Merge Review: expect
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225743

           Summary: Merge Review: expect
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: expect

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/expect/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:35:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:35:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225744] New: Merge Review: fbset
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225744

           Summary: Merge Review: fbset
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fbset

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fbset/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:35:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:35:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225745] New: Merge Review: fedora-logos
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225745

           Summary: Merge Review: fedora-logos
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fedora-logos

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fedora-logos/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:35:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:35:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225746] New: Merge Review: fedora-release
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225746

           Summary: Merge Review: fedora-release
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jkeating at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fedora-release

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fedora-release/
Initial Owner: jkeating at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:35:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:35:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225748] New: Merge Review: festival
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225748

           Summary: Merge Review: festival
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: festival

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/festival/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:36:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311836.l0VIa7BB024622@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: boost


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622





------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat.com  2007-01-31 13:36 EST -------
What is to be done?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:36:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225749] New: Merge Review: fetchmail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225749

           Summary: Merge Review: fetchmail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fetchmail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fetchmail/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:36:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225750] New: Merge Review: file
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225750

           Summary: Merge Review: file
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: file

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/file/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:36:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225751] New: Merge Review: file-roller
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225751

           Summary: Merge Review: file-roller
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: file-roller

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/file-roller/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:36:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225752] New: Merge Review: filesystem
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225752

           Summary: Merge Review: filesystem
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: filesystem

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/filesystem/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:37:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225753] New: Merge Review: findutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225753

           Summary: Merge Review: findutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: findutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/findutils/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:37:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225754] New: Merge Review: finger
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225754

           Summary: Merge Review: finger
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: finger

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/finger/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:37:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225755] New: Merge Review: firefox
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225755

           Summary: Merge Review: firefox
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: firefox

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/firefox/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:37:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225756] New: Merge Review: firstboot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225756

           Summary: Merge Review: firstboot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: firstboot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/firstboot/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:38:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:38:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225757] New: Merge Review: flac
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225757

           Summary: Merge Review: flac
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: flac

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/flac/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:37:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:37:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311837.l0VIbw4U024880@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 13:37 EST -------
Response from upstream:
2007/1/31, Jon Ciesla :
>
> During the review process, we hit a snag.  Portions of the code
> distributed with Roundcube are Licensed under the PHP 3.0 and PHP 2.02
> licenses, which are GPL-incompatible.

Hmm, which parts are not GPL? I wasn't aware of that.

> Please let me know what action you intend to take, if any.

Could we just describe those files/packages as a dependency instead of
including them with the package? Please sorry for this stupid question
but license stuff always confuses me.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Jon Ciesla
>
Regards,
Thomas

My reply:
The parts from PEAR, namely DB, Auth, Net and Mail.  You need to let the end
user install them on their own, since they're readily available and
GPL-incompatible.  This won't be an issue for Fedora, as they're all available
as Extras packages which Roundcube can require as dependencies. 

Also, where are the .map files in program/lib/encoding from?  How are they
licensed?  There's a contact address in them from microsoft, which in the
absence of concrete licensing information in the utf8.class.php file makes it
likely that it can't be redistributed with GPL code.

Taking care of the PEAR parts shouldn't be a problem, but the utf stuff probably
should go and be replaced with something using this:

http://us2.php.net/manual-lookup.php?pattern=utf&lang=en

I hope this is helpful.

-------------

We'll see where it goes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:38:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:38:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225758] New: Merge Review: flex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758

           Summary: Merge Review: flex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: flex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/flex/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:38:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:38:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225760] New: Merge Review: fonts-arabic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225760

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-arabic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dsantani at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-arabic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-arabic/
Initial Owner: dsantani at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:38:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:38:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225759] New: Merge Review: fontconfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759

           Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fontconfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fontconfig/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:38:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:38:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225761] New: Merge Review: fonts-chinese
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cchance at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-chinese

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-chinese/
Initial Owner: cchance at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225762] New: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-hebrew

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-hebrew/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225763] New: Merge Review: fonts-indic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnemade at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-indic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-indic/
Initial Owner: pnemade at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225764] New: Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225764

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-ISO8859-2/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225765] New: Merge Review: fonts-japanese
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-japanese

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-japanese/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225766] New: Merge Review: fonts-KOI8-R
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225766

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-KOI8-R
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-KOI8-R

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-KOI8-R/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225767] New: Merge Review: fonts-korean
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767

           Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cchance at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fonts-korean

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-korean/
Initial Owner: cchance at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:39:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:39:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225768] New: Merge Review: foomatic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225768

           Summary: Merge Review: foomatic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: foomatic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/foomatic/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225769] New: Merge Review: freeradius
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225769

           Summary: Merge Review: freeradius
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: freeradius

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/freeradius/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225770] New: Merge Review: freetype
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225770

           Summary: Merge Review: freetype
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: freetype

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/freetype/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225771] New: Merge Review: fribidi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225771

           Summary: Merge Review: fribidi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: fribidi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fribidi/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225772] New: Merge Review: frysk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225772

           Summary: Merge Review: frysk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cagney at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: frysk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/frysk/
Initial Owner: cagney at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225774] New: Merge Review: ftp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225774

           Summary: Merge Review: ftp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ftp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ftp/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225775] New: Merge Review: gail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225775

           Summary: Merge Review: gail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gail/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225773] New: Merge Review: f-spot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225773

           Summary: Merge Review: f-spot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: f-spot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/f-spot/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225776] New: Merge Review: gamin
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225776

           Summary: Merge Review: gamin
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gamin

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gamin/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225777] New: Merge Review: gawk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225777

           Summary: Merge Review: gawk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gawk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gawk/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225778] New: Merge Review: gcc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225778

           Summary: Merge Review: gcc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gcc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gcc/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:40:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:40:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225779] New: Merge Review: GConf2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225779

           Summary: Merge Review: GConf2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: GConf2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/GConf2/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:41:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:41:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225780] New: Merge Review: gconf-editor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225780

           Summary: Merge Review: gconf-editor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gconf-editor

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gconf-editor/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:41:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:41:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225783] New: Merge Review: gdb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225783

           Summary: Merge Review: gdb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jkratoch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gdb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gdb/
Initial Owner: jkratoch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:41:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:41:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225784] New: Merge Review: gdbm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225784

           Summary: Merge Review: gdbm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jbj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gdbm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gdbm/
Initial Owner: jbj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:41:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:41:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225785] New: Merge Review: gdm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225785

           Summary: Merge Review: gdm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gdm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gdm/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:41:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:41:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225786] New: Merge Review: gd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225786

           Summary: Merge Review: gd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gd/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:42:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225787] New: Merge Review: gecko-sharp2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225787

           Summary: Merge Review: gecko-sharp2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gecko-sharp2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gecko-sharp2/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:42:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225788] New: Merge Review: gedit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225788

           Summary: Merge Review: gedit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gedit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gedit/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:42:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225789] New: Merge Review: genromfs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225789

           Summary: Merge Review: genromfs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: genromfs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/genromfs/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:42:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225790] New: Merge Review: geronimo-specs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225790

           Summary: Merge Review: geronimo-specs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: geronimo-specs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/geronimo-specs/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:42:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225791] New: Merge Review: gettext
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225791

           Summary: Merge Review: gettext
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gettext

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gettext/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225792] New: Merge Review: gfs2-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225792

           Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cfeist at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gfs2-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gfs2-utils/
Initial Owner: cfeist at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225793] New: Merge Review: gftp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225793

           Summary: Merge Review: gftp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gftp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gftp/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225794] New: Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225794

           Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ghostscript-fonts/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225795] New: Merge Review: ghostscript
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795

           Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ghostscript

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ghostscript/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225796] New: Merge Review: giflib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225796

           Summary: Merge Review: giflib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nmurray at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: giflib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/giflib/
Initial Owner: nmurray at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:43:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:43:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225797] New: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225797

           Summary: Merge Review: gimp-data-extras
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gimp-data-extras

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gimp-data-extras/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:44:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225798] New: Merge Review: gimp-help
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225798

           Summary: Merge Review: gimp-help
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gimp-help

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gimp-help/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:44:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225799] New: Merge Review: gimp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225799

           Summary: Merge Review: gimp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gimp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gimp/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:44:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225801] New: Merge Review: gimp-print
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225801

           Summary: Merge Review: gimp-print
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gimp-print

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gimp-print/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:44:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225802] New: Merge Review: gjdoc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225802

           Summary: Merge Review: gjdoc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: overholt at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gjdoc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gjdoc/
Initial Owner: overholt at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:44:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:44:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225803] New: Merge Review: glade2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225803

           Summary: Merge Review: glade2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: glade2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/glade2/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:45:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:45:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225804] New: Merge Review: glib2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225804

           Summary: Merge Review: glib2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: glib2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/glib2/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:45:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:45:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311845.l0VIjFFT026566@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-31 13:45 EST -------
Is there anything else I need to fix?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:49:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:49:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225604] Review Request: etherape - Graphical network monitor
	for Unix
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311849.l0VInWwd027022@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: etherape - Graphical network monitor for Unix


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225604


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-31 13:49 EST -------
First notice after a quick glimpse
- you are using both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. You should settle to
either one, but use only that one
- glibc-headers is on the exception list, no need to buildrequire it
- you have some duplicates in buildrequires: libglade2-devel pulls gtk2-devel
which in turn pulls glib2-devel
- you have some missing build-requires: libgnomeui-devel scrollkeeper
After those additions it will build in mock.

Please fix the above and I will do a full review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:49:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:49:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225806] New: Merge Review: glibc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225806

           Summary: Merge Review: glibc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: glibc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/glibc/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225807] New: Merge Review: glib-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225807

           Summary: Merge Review: glib-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: glib-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/glib-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225808] New: Merge Review: gmime
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225808

           Summary: Merge Review: gmime
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gmime

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gmime/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225809] New: Merge Review: gmp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809

           Summary: Merge Review: gmp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gmp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gmp/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225810] New: Merge Review: gnome-applets
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225810

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-applets
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-applets

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-applets/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225811] New: Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225811

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-applet-vm/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225812] New: Merge Review: gnome-audio
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225812

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-audio
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-audio

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-audio/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311850.l0VIogW7027191@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-31 13:50 EST -------
The gtk-errors can IMO be ignored, but the segfault should be fixed, at least
before this enters the stable release of fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225813] New: Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225813

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-backgrounds

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-backgrounds/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225814] New: Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225814

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-bluetooth/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225815] New: Merge Review: gnome-desktop
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225815

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-desktop
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-desktop

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-desktop/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:50:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:50:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225816] New: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225816

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-doc-utils/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225817] New: Merge Review: gnome-games
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225817

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-games
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-games

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-games/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225818] New: Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225818

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-icon-theme/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225819] New: Merge Review: gnome-keyring
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225819

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-keyring
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-keyring

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-keyring/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225820] New: Merge Review: gnome-keyring-manager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225820

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-keyring-manager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-keyring-manager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-keyring-manager/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225821] New: Merge Review: gnome-mag
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225821

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-mag
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-mag

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-mag/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:51:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:51:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225822] New: Merge Review: gnome-media
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225822

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-media
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-media

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-media/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:52:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:52:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225823] New: Merge Review: gnome-menus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225823

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-menus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-menus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-menus/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:52:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:52:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225824] New: Merge Review: gnome-mime-data
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225824

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-mime-data
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-mime-data

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-mime-data/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:52:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:52:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311852.l0VIqRaJ027559@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500





------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-31 13:52 EST -------
REVIEW:
 * dist tag present
 * sources match upstream (8bd5c2f78e7b1a7ac7910de8b9420d93)
!* package is licensed under a GPL license *not* included in %doc 
!* rpmlint output:
/tmp/cycle-0.3.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm.5098/usr/share/applications/fedora-
cycle.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the 
desktop entry specification.  Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", 
"Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", 
"Settings", "System", "Utility" instead
/tmp/cycle-0.3.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm.5098/usr/share/applications/fedora-
cycle.desktop: warning: Categories values must be one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", 
"Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", 
"Settings", "System", "Utility", "Building", "Debugger", "IDE", "GUIDesigner", 
"Profiling", "RevisionControl", "Translation", "Calendar", "ContactManagement", 
"Database", "Dictionary", "Chart", "Email", "Finance", "FlowChart", "PDA", 
"ProjectManagement", "Presentation", "Spreadsheet", "WordProcessor", 
"2DGraphics", "VectorGraphics", "RasterGraphics", "3DGraphics", "Scanning", 
"OCR", "Photography", "Viewer", "DesktopSettings", "HardwareSettings", 
"PackageManager", "Dialup", "InstantMessaging", "IRCClient", "FileTransfer", 
"HamRadio", "News", "P2P", "RemoteAccess", "Telephony", "WebBrowser", 
"WebDevelopment", "Midi", "Mixer", "Sequencer", "Tuner", "TV", 
"AudioVideoEditing", "Player", "Recorder", "DiscBurning", "ActionGame", 
"AdventureGame", "ArcadeGame", "BoardGame", "BlocksGame", "CardGame", 
"KidsGame", "LogicGame", "RolePlaying", "Simulation", "SportsGame", 
"StrategyGame", "Art", "Construction", "Music", "Languages", "Science", 
"Astronomy", "Biology", "Chemistry", "Geology", "Math", "MedicalSoftware", 
"Physics", "Amusement", "Archiving", "Electronics", "Emulator", "Engineering", 
"FileManager", "TerminalEmulator", "Filesystem", "Monitor", "Security", 
"Accessibility", "Calculator", "Clock", "TextEditor", "Core", "KDE", "GNOME", 
"GTK", "Qt", "Motif", "Java", "ConsoleOnly", "Screensaver", "TrayIcon", 
"Applet", "Shell" (found "Utilities")
Application and Utilities categories are now deprecated. Use one of listed 
above instead.

 * latest version is being packaged
 * mock builds fine, however there are gettext dependency listed two times; 
also I would recommend to use python-devel rather than python BR
 * requires and provides:
cycle-0.3.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm
cycle = 0.3.1-1.fc7
=
/usr/bin/env
python >= 2.3
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
wxPython

cycle-0.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm
(none)=
gettext
desktop-file-utils
python >= 2.3
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1

 * package isn't designed to be relocatable
 * package owns all directories well
 * %clean section is present and looks good
 * build root's fine
 * no objections to %files section
 * no scriptlets required
 * no need to any subpackages
 * no .la files
!* gui application, but .desktop file looks bad: wrong categories and X-Fedora 
argument to desktop-file-install ought to be removed as well. Also it refers to 
not existing /usr/share/icons/cycle.xpm path.

There are two identical files: README.Debian and README.Fedora - seems that we 
can get rid of the first one,
README doesn't also look like a helpful file. On the other hand, you forgot to 
include CHANGELOG, COPYRIGHT and THANKS files.
There's man file available, so there's no reason not to include it in package
This is not in fact a blocker but your %install section doesn't look clear. I'd 
like to see it more legible.

THINGS TO DO:
 * change categories in .desktop file
 * correct Icon path in .desktop
 * get rid of one gettext BR
 * change python BR to python-devel (AFAIK it is safer)
 * remove --add-category=X-Fedora \ from desktop-file-install (we should use an 
X-Fedora category no longer)
 * change (shorten) %description of a package
 * add CHANGELOG, COPYRIGHT and THANKS to %doc
 * remove README.Debian file
 * include cycle.1 file
 * make %install more legible

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:52:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:52:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225825] New: Merge Review: gnome-mount
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225825

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-mount
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-mount

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-mount/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:52:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:52:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225826] New: Merge Review: gnome-netstatus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225826

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-netstatus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-netstatus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-netstatus/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:53:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225827] New: Merge Review: gnome-nettool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225827

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-nettool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-nettool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-nettool/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:53:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225828] New: Merge Review: gnome-panel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225828

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-panel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-panel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-panel/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:53:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225830] New: Merge Review: gnome-pilot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225830

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-pilot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-pilot/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:53:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225829] New: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225829

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-pilot-conduits/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:53:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225831] New: Merge Review: gnome-power-manager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225831

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-power-manager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-power-manager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-power-manager/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225832] New: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225832

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-python2-desktop/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225833] New: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225833

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-python2-extras/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225834] New: Merge Review: gnome-python2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225834

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-python2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-python2/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225835] New: Merge Review: gnome-session
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225835

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-session
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-session

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-session/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225836] New: Merge Review: gnome-speech
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225836

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-speech
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-speech

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-speech/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311854.l0VIsfBZ027807@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From josef at toxicpanda.com  2007-01-31 13:54 EST -------
the segfault is fixed, I included the patch in the -6 release

Patch0:         tilda-segfault-fix.patch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:54:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:54:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225837] New: Merge Review: gnome-spell
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225837

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-spell

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-spell/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225838] New: Merge Review: gnome-system-monitor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225838

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-system-monitor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-system-monitor

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-system-monitor/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225839] New: Merge Review: gnome-terminal
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225839

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-terminal
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-terminal

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-terminal/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225840] New: Merge Review: gnome-themes
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225840

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-themes
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-themes

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-themes/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225841] New: Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225841

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-user-docs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-user-docs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-user-docs/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225842] New: Merge Review: gnome-user-share
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225842

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-user-share
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-user-share

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-user-share/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:55:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:55:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225843] New: Merge Review: gnome-vfs2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225843

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-vfs2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-vfs2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-vfs2/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225844] New: Merge Review: gnome-volume-manager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225844

           Summary: Merge Review: gnome-volume-manager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnome-volume-manager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-volume-manager/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225846] New: Merge Review: gnu-efi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225846

           Summary: Merge Review: gnu-efi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnu-efi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnu-efi/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225845] New: Merge Review: gnu-crypto
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225845

           Summary: Merge Review: gnu-crypto
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnu-crypto

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnu-crypto/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225847] New: Merge Review: gnupg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225847

           Summary: Merge Review: gnupg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnupg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnupg/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225849] New: Merge Review: gnuplot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225849

           Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnuplot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnuplot/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225850] New: Merge Review: gnutls
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225850

           Summary: Merge Review: gnutls
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gnutls

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnutls/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:56:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:56:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225851] New: Merge Review: gob2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225851

           Summary: Merge Review: gob2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gob2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gob2/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:57:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225852] New: Merge Review: gok
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225852

           Summary: Merge Review: gok
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gok

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gok/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:57:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225853] New: Merge Review: gpart
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225853

           Summary: Merge Review: gpart
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gpart

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gpart/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:57:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225854] New: Merge Review: gperf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225854

           Summary: Merge Review: gperf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: laroche at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gperf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gperf/
Initial Owner: laroche at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:57:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225855] New: Merge Review: gphoto2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225855

           Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gphoto2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gphoto2/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:57:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225856] New: Merge Review: gpm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225856

           Summary: Merge Review: gpm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tjanouse at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gpm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gpm/
Initial Owner: tjanouse at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225857] New: Merge Review: grep
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225857

           Summary: Merge Review: grep
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: grep

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/grep/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225859] New: Merge Review: groff
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225859

           Summary: Merge Review: groff
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: groff

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/groff/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311858.l0VIwhmk028422@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-31 13:58 EST -------
Ah, I see. Because of your comment #13 I thought it's still segfaulting. I will
look at this package tonight.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225861] New: Merge Review: grub
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225861

           Summary: Merge Review: grub
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: grub

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/grub/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225862] New: Merge Review: gsf-sharp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225862

           Summary: Merge Review: gsf-sharp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gsf-sharp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gsf-sharp/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311858.l0VIwcrq028395@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net  2007-01-31 13:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Also, where are the .map files in program/lib/encoding from?  How are they
> licensed?  There's a contact address in them from microsoft, which in the
> absence of concrete licensing information in the utf8.class.php file makes it
> likely that it can't be redistributed with GPL code.

Mappings are distributed by Unicode consortium.

http://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:58:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225863] New: Merge Review: gsl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225863

           Summary: Merge Review: gsl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gsl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gsl/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225864] New: Merge Review: gstreamer
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225864

           Summary: Merge Review: gstreamer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gstreamer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gstreamer/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225865] New: Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225865

           Summary: Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gstreamer-plugins-base/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225866] New: Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-good
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225866

           Summary: Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-good
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-good

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gstreamer-plugins-good/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225867] New: Merge Review: gthumb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225867

           Summary: Merge Review: gthumb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gthumb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gthumb/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225868] New: Merge Review: gtk2-engines
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225868

           Summary: Merge Review: gtk2-engines
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtk2-engines

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtk2-engines/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225772] Merge Review: frysk
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311859.l0VIxlYB028682@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: frysk


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225772





------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat.com  2007-01-31 13:59 EST -------
I believe this got review (or at least fixes) when first added, will need to see
if there's a bug.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225869] New: Merge Review: gtk2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225869

           Summary: Merge Review: gtk2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtk2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtk2/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 18:59:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225870] New: Merge Review: gtk-doc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225870

           Summary: Merge Review: gtk-doc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtk-doc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtk-doc/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:00:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:00:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225871] New: Merge Review: gtkhtml2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225871

           Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtkhtml2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtkhtml2/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:00:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:00:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225872] New: Merge Review: gtkhtml3
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225872

           Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml3
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtkhtml3

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtkhtml3/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:00:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:00:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225874] New: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225874

           Summary: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtk-sharp2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtk-sharp2/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:00:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:00:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225875] New: Merge Review: gtksourceview
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225875

           Summary: Merge Review: gtksourceview
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtksourceview

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtksourceview/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:01:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:01:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225876] New: Merge Review: gtkspell
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225876

           Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gtkspell

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gtkspell/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:01:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:01:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225877] New: Merge Review: guile
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225877

           Summary: Merge Review: guile
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: guile

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/guile/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:01:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:01:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225878] New: Merge Review: gzip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225878

           Summary: Merge Review: gzip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: gzip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gzip/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:02:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:02:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225879] New: Merge Review: hal-cups-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225879

           Summary: Merge Review: hal-cups-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hal-cups-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hal-cups-utils/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:02:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:02:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225880] New: Merge Review: hal
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225880

           Summary: Merge Review: hal
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hal

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hal/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:02:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:02:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225881] New: Merge Review: hardlink
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225881

           Summary: Merge Review: hardlink
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hardlink

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hardlink/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225882] New: Merge Review: hdparm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225882

           Summary: Merge Review: hdparm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hdparm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hdparm/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225883] New: Merge Review: hesinfo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225883

           Summary: Merge Review: hesinfo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hesinfo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hesinfo/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225884] New: Merge Review: hesiod
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225884

           Summary: Merge Review: hesiod
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hesiod

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hesiod/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225885] New: Merge Review: hexedit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225885

           Summary: Merge Review: hexedit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hexedit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hexedit/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225886] New: Merge Review: hfsutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225886

           Summary: Merge Review: hfsutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hfsutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hfsutils/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:03:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:03:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225887] New: Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225887

           Summary: Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hicolor-icon-theme/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225888] New: Merge Review: hsqldb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225888

           Summary: Merge Review: hsqldb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hsqldb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hsqldb/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225889] New: Merge Review: htdig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225889

           Summary: Merge Review: htdig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: htdig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/htdig/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225890] New: Merge Review: htmlview
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225890

           Summary: Merge Review: htmlview
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: htmlview

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/htmlview/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225891] New: Merge Review: httpd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225891

           Summary: Merge Review: httpd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: httpd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/httpd/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225892] New: Merge Review: hwbrowser
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892

           Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hwbrowser

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hwbrowser/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225893] New: Merge Review: hwdata
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225893

           Summary: Merge Review: hwdata
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: hwdata

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/hwdata/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225894] New: Merge Review: icon-naming-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225894

           Summary: Merge Review: icon-naming-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: icon-naming-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/icon-naming-utils/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225895] New: Merge Review: icon-slicer
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225895

           Summary: Merge Review: icon-slicer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: icon-slicer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/icon-slicer/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225896] New: Merge Review: icu
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225896

           Summary: Merge Review: icu
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: icu

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/icu/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:04:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:04:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225897] New: Merge Review: ImageMagick
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225897

           Summary: Merge Review: ImageMagick
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nmurray at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ImageMagick

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ImageMagick/
Initial Owner: nmurray at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225898] New: Merge Review: imake
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225898

           Summary: Merge Review: imake
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: imake

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/imake/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225899] New: Merge Review: indent
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225899

           Summary: Merge Review: indent
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: indent

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/indent/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225900] New: Merge Review: initscripts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225900

           Summary: Merge Review: initscripts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: notting at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: initscripts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/initscripts/
Initial Owner: notting at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225901] New: Merge Review: inn
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225901

           Summary: Merge Review: inn
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: inn

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/inn/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225902] New: Merge Review: intltool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225902

           Summary: Merge Review: intltool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: intltool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/intltool/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225903] New: Merge Review: iproute
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225903

           Summary: Merge Review: iproute
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iproute

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iproute/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:05:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225904] New: Merge Review: iprutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225904

           Summary: Merge Review: iprutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iprutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iprutils/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225905] New: Merge Review: ipsec-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225905

           Summary: Merge Review: ipsec-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ipsec-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ipsec-tools/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225906] New: Merge Review: iptables
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225906

           Summary: Merge Review: iptables
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iptables

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iptables/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225907] New: Merge Review: iptraf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225907

           Summary: Merge Review: iptraf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iptraf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iptraf/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225908] New: Merge Review: iptstate
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225908

           Summary: Merge Review: iptstate
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iptstate

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iptstate/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225909] New: Merge Review: iputils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225909

           Summary: Merge Review: iputils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iputils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iputils/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:06:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:06:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225910] New: Merge Review: ipv6calc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225910

           Summary: Merge Review: ipv6calc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ipv6calc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ipv6calc/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225911] New: Merge Review: ipvsadm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225911

           Summary: Merge Review: ipvsadm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kupcevic at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ipvsadm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ipvsadm/
Initial Owner: kupcevic at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225912] New: Merge Review: irda-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225912

           Summary: Merge Review: irda-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: irda-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/irda-utils/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225913] New: Merge Review: irqbalance
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225913

           Summary: Merge Review: irqbalance
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nhorman at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: irqbalance

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/irqbalance/
Initial Owner: nhorman at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225915] New: Merge Review: iscsi-initiator-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225915

           Summary: Merge Review: iscsi-initiator-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mchristi at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iscsi-initiator-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iscsi-initiator-utils/
Initial Owner: mchristi at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225916] New: Merge Review: isdn4k-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225916

           Summary: Merge Review: isdn4k-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: isdn4k-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/isdn4k-utils/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225917] New: Merge Review: isicom
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225917

           Summary: Merge Review: isicom
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: isicom

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/isicom/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:07:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:07:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225918] New: Merge Review: iso-codes
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225918

           Summary: Merge Review: iso-codes
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dsantani at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: iso-codes

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/iso-codes/
Initial Owner: dsantani at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:08:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:08:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225921] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-beanutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225921

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-beanutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-beanutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-beanutils/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:08:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:08:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225920] New: Merge Review: jadetex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225920

           Summary: Merge Review: jadetex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jadetex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jadetex/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:08:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:08:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225922] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-codec/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:08:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:08:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225923] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-collections/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:08:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:08:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225924] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225924

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-daemon

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-daemon/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225925] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-dbcp/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225926] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-digester
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225926

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-digester
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-digester

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-digester/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225927] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-discovery/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225928] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-el
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225928

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-el
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-el

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-el/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225929] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225929

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-fileupload

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-fileupload/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is
	a browser-based multilingual IMAP client
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311909.l0VJ9Igb030365@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-01-31 14:09 EST -------
Ah. So all he has to do is pull the PEAR code and I'll get on fixing the many
.spec issues. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225930] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-httpclient
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225930

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-httpclient
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-httpclient

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-httpclient/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225931] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225931

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pcheung at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-lang

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-lang/
Initial Owner: pcheung at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225933] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-logging
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225933

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-logging
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-logging

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-logging/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:09:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:09:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225932] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-launcher
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225932

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-launcher
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-launcher

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-launcher/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225934] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-modeler/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225935] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-pool/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225936] New: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-validator
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225936

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-validator
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-commons-validator

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-commons-validator/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225937] New: Merge Review: jakarta-oro
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225937

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-oro
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-oro

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-oro/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:10:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225938] New: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938

           Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jakarta-taglibs-standard/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:11:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:11:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225939] New: Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225939

           Summary: Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fitzsim at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/java-1.4.2-gcj-compat/
Initial Owner: fitzsim at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:11:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:11:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225940] New: Merge Review: javacc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225940

           Summary: Merge Review: javacc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: javacc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/javacc/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:11:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:11:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225941] New: Merge Review: java_cup
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225941

           Summary: Merge Review: java_cup
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: java_cup

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/java_cup/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225942] New: Merge Review: jdepend
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225942

           Summary: Merge Review: jdepend
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jdepend

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jdepend/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225943] New: Merge Review: jdom
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225943

           Summary: Merge Review: jdom
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jdom

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jdom/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225944] New: Merge Review: jessie
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225944

           Summary: Merge Review: jessie
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fitzsim at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jessie

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jessie/
Initial Owner: fitzsim at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225945] New: Merge Review: jfsutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225945

           Summary: Merge Review: jfsutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jgarzik at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jfsutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jfsutils/
Initial Owner: jgarzik at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225946] New: Merge Review: jgroups
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225946

           Summary: Merge Review: jgroups
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jgroups

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jgroups/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225947] New: Merge Review: jlex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225947

           Summary: Merge Review: jlex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jlex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jlex/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:12:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225948] New: Merge Review: joe
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225948

           Summary: Merge Review: joe
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: joe

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/joe/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:13:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:13:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225949] New: Merge Review: joystick
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225949

           Summary: Merge Review: joystick
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: joystick

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/joystick/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:13:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:13:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225950] New: Merge Review: jpackage-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225950

           Summary: Merge Review: jpackage-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fitzsim at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jpackage-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jpackage-utils/
Initial Owner: fitzsim at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:13:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:13:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225951] New: Merge Review: jpilot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225951

           Summary: Merge Review: jpilot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jpilot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jpilot/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:13:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:13:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225952] New: Merge Review: jrefactory
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225952

           Summary: Merge Review: jrefactory
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jrefactory

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jrefactory/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:13:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:13:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225953] New: Merge Review: jsch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225953

           Summary: Merge Review: jsch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jsch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jsch/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225954] New: Merge Review: junit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225954

           Summary: Merge Review: junit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: junit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/junit/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225955] New: Merge Review: jwhois
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225955

           Summary: Merge Review: jwhois
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jwhois

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jwhois/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225867] Merge Review: gthumb
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311914.l0VJEHua031031@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gthumb


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225867


yaneti at declera.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |yaneti at declera.com




------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com  2007-01-31 14:14 EST -------
gthumb-2.9.1-1 packs an unversioned shared library in the system dynamic linker
path without apparent outside users.
%{_libdir}/libgthumb.so

It maybe an upstream development and subject to change, but from a distribution
point of view I think its wise to not include it in the package.
Attaching a patch to built the library static. Not sure if thats the proper way
but it seems to achieve the goal here.
It requires an autoreconf and tweaking the filelist.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225956] New: Merge Review: jzlib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225956

           Summary: Merge Review: jzlib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: jzlib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/jzlib/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225957] New: Merge Review: k3b
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957

           Summary: Merge Review: k3b
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: k3b

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/k3b/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225958] New: Merge Review: kbd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225958

           Summary: Merge Review: kbd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kbd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kbd/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225959] New: Merge Review: kcc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225959

           Summary: Merge Review: kcc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kcc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kcc/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:14:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:14:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225960] New: Merge Review: kdbg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225960

           Summary: Merge Review: kdbg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdbg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdbg/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225961] New: Merge Review: kdebase
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225961

           Summary: Merge Review: kdebase
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdebase

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdebase/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225962] New: Merge Review: kde-i18n
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225962

           Summary: Merge Review: kde-i18n
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kde-i18n

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kde-i18n/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225963] New: Merge Review: kdelibs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225963

           Summary: Merge Review: kdelibs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdelibs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdelibs/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225964] New: Merge Review: kdemultimedia
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225964

           Summary: Merge Review: kdemultimedia
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdemultimedia

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdemultimedia/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225965] New: Merge Review: kdepim
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965

           Summary: Merge Review: kdepim
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdepim

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdepim/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225966] New: Merge Review: kdesdk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225966

           Summary: Merge Review: kdesdk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdesdk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdesdk/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225867] Merge Review: gthumb
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311915.l0VJFTDX031329@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gthumb


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225867





------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com  2007-01-31 14:15 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=147040)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147040&action=view)
build libgthumb static


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225967] New: Merge Review: kdevelop
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225967

           Summary: Merge Review: kdevelop
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdevelop

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdevelop/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225968] New: Merge Review: kdewebdev
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225968

           Summary: Merge Review: kdewebdev
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kdewebdev

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kdewebdev/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:15:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:15:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225969] New: Merge Review: kernel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225969

           Summary: Merge Review: kernel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davej at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kernel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel/
Initial Owner: davej at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225970] New: Merge Review: kernel-xen-2.6
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225970

           Summary: Merge Review: kernel-xen-2.6
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: quintela at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kernel-xen-2.6

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel-xen-2.6/
Initial Owner: quintela at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225971] New: Merge Review: kernel-xen
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225971

           Summary: Merge Review: kernel-xen
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: quintela at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kernel-xen

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel-xen/
Initial Owner: quintela at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225972] New: Merge Review: kexec-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225972

           Summary: Merge Review: kexec-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nhorman at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kexec-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kexec-tools/
Initial Owner: nhorman at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225974] New: Merge Review: krb5
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225974

           Summary: Merge Review: krb5
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: krb5

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/krb5/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225973] New: Merge Review: krb5-auth-dialog
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225973

           Summary: Merge Review: krb5-auth-dialog
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: krb5-auth-dialog

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/krb5-auth-dialog/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:16:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:16:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225975] New: Merge Review: krbafs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225975

           Summary: Merge Review: krbafs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: krbafs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/krbafs/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:17:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:17:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225977] New: Merge Review: ksh
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225977

           Summary: Merge Review: ksh
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ksh

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ksh/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:17:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:17:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225978] New: Merge Review: kudzu
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225978

           Summary: Merge Review: kudzu
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: notting at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: kudzu

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kudzu/
Initial Owner: notting at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:17:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:17:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225979] New: Merge Review: lam
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225979

           Summary: Merge Review: lam
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dledford at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lam

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lam/
Initial Owner: dledford at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:17:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:17:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225980] New: Merge Review: latex2html
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225980

           Summary: Merge Review: latex2html
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: latex2html

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/latex2html/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:17:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:17:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225981] New: Merge Review: lcms
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981

           Summary: Merge Review: lcms
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lcms

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lcms/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225982] New: Merge Review: ldapjdk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225982

           Summary: Merge Review: ldapjdk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ldapjdk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ldapjdk/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225983] New: Merge Review: less
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225983

           Summary: Merge Review: less
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: less

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/less/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225985] New: Merge Review: libaio
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225985

           Summary: Merge Review: libaio
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jmoyer at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libaio

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libaio/
Initial Owner: jmoyer at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225984] New: Merge Review: lftp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984

           Summary: Merge Review: lftp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarabas at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lftp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lftp/
Initial Owner: mbarabas at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225986] New: Merge Review: libao
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225986

           Summary: Merge Review: libao
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libao

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libao/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225987] New: Merge Review: libart_lgpl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225987

           Summary: Merge Review: libart_lgpl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libart_lgpl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libart_lgpl/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:18:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:18:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225988] New: Merge Review: libavc1394
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225988

           Summary: Merge Review: libavc1394
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libavc1394

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libavc1394/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225989] New: Merge Review: libbonobo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225989

           Summary: Merge Review: libbonobo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libbonobo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libbonobo/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225990] New: Merge Review: libbonoboui
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225990

           Summary: Merge Review: libbonoboui
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libbonoboui

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libbonoboui/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225991] New: Merge Review: libbtctl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225991

           Summary: Merge Review: libbtctl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libbtctl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libbtctl/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225993] New: Merge Review: libc-client
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225993

           Summary: Merge Review: libc-client
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libc-client

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libc-client/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225992] New: Merge Review: libcap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225992

           Summary: Merge Review: libcap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libcap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libcap/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225994] New: Merge Review: libcroco
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225994

           Summary: Merge Review: libcroco
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libcroco

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libcroco/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:19:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:19:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225995] New: Merge Review: libdaemon
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225995

           Summary: Merge Review: libdaemon
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdaemon

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdaemon/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:20:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:20:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225996] New: Merge Review: libdbi-drivers
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225996

           Summary: Merge Review: libdbi-drivers
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdbi-drivers

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdbi-drivers/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:20:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:20:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225997] New: Merge Review: libdbi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225997

           Summary: Merge Review: libdbi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdbi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdbi/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:20:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:20:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225998] New: Merge Review: libdmx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225998

           Summary: Merge Review: libdmx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdmx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdmx/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:20:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:20:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225999] New: Merge Review: libdrm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225999

           Summary: Merge Review: libdrm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdrm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdrm/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:20:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:20:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226000] New: Merge Review: libdv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226000

           Summary: Merge Review: libdv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libdv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdv/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226002] New: Merge Review: libevent
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226002

           Summary: Merge Review: libevent
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libevent

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libevent/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226003] New: Merge Review: libexif
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226003

           Summary: Merge Review: libexif
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libexif

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libexif/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226004] New: Merge Review: libfontenc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226004

           Summary: Merge Review: libfontenc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libfontenc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libfontenc/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226005] New: Merge Review: libFS
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226005

           Summary: Merge Review: libFS
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libFS

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libFS/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226006] New: Merge Review: libgail-gnome
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226006

           Summary: Merge Review: libgail-gnome
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgail-gnome

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgail-gnome/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226007] New: Merge Review: libgconf-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226007

           Summary: Merge Review: libgconf-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgconf-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgconf-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:21:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:21:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226008] New: Merge Review: libgcrypt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226008

           Summary: Merge Review: libgcrypt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgcrypt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgcrypt/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226010] New: Merge Review: libglade2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226010

           Summary: Merge Review: libglade2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libglade2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libglade2/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226009] New: Merge Review: libgdiplus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226009

           Summary: Merge Review: libgdiplus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgdiplus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgdiplus/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226011] New: Merge Review: libglade-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226011

           Summary: Merge Review: libglade-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libglade-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libglade-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226012] New: Merge Review: libgnomecanvas
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226012

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomecanvas
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomecanvas

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomecanvas/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226013] New: Merge Review: libgnomecups
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226013

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomecups
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomecups

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomecups/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226014] New: Merge Review: libgnome-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226014

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnome-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnome-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnome-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:22:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226015] New: Merge Review: libgnomekbd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226015

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomekbd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomekbd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomekbd/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:23:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:23:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226016] New: Merge Review: libgnomeprint22
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226016

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomeprint22
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomeprint22

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomeprint22/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:23:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:23:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226017] New: Merge Review: libgnomeprintui22
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226017

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomeprintui22
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomeprintui22

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomeprintui22/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:23:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:23:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226018] New: Merge Review: libgnome
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226018

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnome
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnome

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnome/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:23:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:23:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226019] New: Merge Review: libgnomeui
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226019

           Summary: Merge Review: libgnomeui
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgnomeui

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgnomeui/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:23:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:23:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226021] New: Merge Review: libgpg-error
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226021

           Summary: Merge Review: libgpg-error
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgpg-error

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgpg-error/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:24:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:24:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226022] New: Merge Review: libgpod
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022

           Summary: Merge Review: libgpod
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgpod

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgpod/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:24:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:24:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226023] New: Merge Review: libgsf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226023

           Summary: Merge Review: libgsf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgsf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgsf/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:24:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:24:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226024] New: Merge Review: libgssapi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226024

           Summary: Merge Review: libgssapi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgssapi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgssapi/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:24:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:24:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226025] New: Merge Review: libgtk-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226025

           Summary: Merge Review: libgtk-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgtk-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgtk-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:24:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:24:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226026] New: Merge Review: libgtop2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226026

           Summary: Merge Review: libgtop2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libgtop2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libgtop2/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226027] New: Merge Review: libICE
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226027

           Summary: Merge Review: libICE
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libICE

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libICE/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226028] New: Merge Review: libIDL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226028

           Summary: Merge Review: libIDL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libIDL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libIDL/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226030] New: Merge Review: libiec61883
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226030

           Summary: Merge Review: libiec61883
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libiec61883

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libiec61883/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226029] New: Merge Review: libidn
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226029

           Summary: Merge Review: libidn
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libidn

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libidn/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226031] New: Merge Review: libieee1284
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226031

           Summary: Merge Review: libieee1284
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libieee1284

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libieee1284/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226032] New: Merge Review: libjpeg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226032

           Summary: Merge Review: libjpeg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libjpeg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libjpeg/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226034] New: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226034

           Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libmusicbrainz

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libmusicbrainz/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:25:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:25:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226033] New: Merge Review: libmng
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226033

           Summary: Merge Review: libmng
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nmurray at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libmng

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libmng/
Initial Owner: nmurray at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226035] New: Merge Review: libogg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226035

           Summary: Merge Review: libogg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libogg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libogg/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226036] New: Merge Review: liboil
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226036

           Summary: Merge Review: liboil
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: liboil

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/liboil/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226037] New: Merge Review: libpfm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226037

           Summary: Merge Review: libpfm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wcohen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libpfm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libpfm/
Initial Owner: wcohen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226038] New: Merge Review: libpng
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226038

           Summary: Merge Review: libpng
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libpng

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libpng/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226039] New: Merge Review: libraw1394
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226039

           Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jwilson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libraw1394

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libraw1394/
Initial Owner: jwilson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:26:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226040] New: Merge Review: librsvg2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226040

           Summary: Merge Review: librsvg2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: librsvg2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/librsvg2/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226041] New: Merge Review: librtas
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226041

           Summary: Merge Review: librtas
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: librtas

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/librtas/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226042] New: Merge Review: libselinux
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226042

           Summary: Merge Review: libselinux
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libselinux

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libselinux/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226043] New: Merge Review: libsemanage
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226043

           Summary: Merge Review: libsemanage
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libsemanage

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsemanage/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226044] New: Merge Review: libsepol
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226044

           Summary: Merge Review: libsepol
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libsepol

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsepol/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226045] New: Merge Review: libSM
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226045

           Summary: Merge Review: libSM
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libSM

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libSM/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226046] New: Merge Review: libsoup
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226046

           Summary: Merge Review: libsoup
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libsoup

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsoup/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:27:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:27:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226047] New: Merge Review: libtermcap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226047

           Summary: Merge Review: libtermcap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libtermcap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libtermcap/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226048] New: Merge Review: libtheora
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226048

           Summary: Merge Review: libtheora
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libtheora

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libtheora/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226049] New: Merge Review: libtiff
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226049

           Summary: Merge Review: libtiff
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libtiff

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libtiff/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226050] New: Merge Review: libtool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226050

           Summary: Merge Review: libtool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libtool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libtool/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226052] New: Merge Review: libunwind
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226052

           Summary: Merge Review: libunwind
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jjohnstn at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libunwind

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libunwind/
Initial Owner: jjohnstn at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226053] New: Merge Review: libusb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226053

           Summary: Merge Review: libusb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libusb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libusb/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226054] New: Merge Review: libuser
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226054

           Summary: Merge Review: libuser
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libuser

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libuser/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226055] New: Merge Review: libvirt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226055

           Summary: Merge Review: libvirt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libvirt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libvirt/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226056] New: Merge Review: libvorbis
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056

           Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libvorbis

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libvorbis/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226057] New: Merge Review: libvte-java
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226057

           Summary: Merge Review: libvte-java
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: skasal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libvte-java

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libvte-java/
Initial Owner: skasal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:28:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226058] New: Merge Review: libwmf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226058

           Summary: Merge Review: libwmf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libwmf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libwmf/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226059] New: Merge Review: libwnck
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226059

           Summary: Merge Review: libwnck
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libwnck

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libwnck/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226060] New: Merge Review: libwpd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226060

           Summary: Merge Review: libwpd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libwpd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libwpd/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226061] New: Merge Review: libwvstreams
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226061

           Summary: Merge Review: libwvstreams
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libwvstreams

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libwvstreams/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226062] New: Merge Review: libX11
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226062

           Summary: Merge Review: libX11
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libX11

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libX11/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226063] New: Merge Review: libXau
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226063

           Summary: Merge Review: libXau
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXau

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXau/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226064] New: Merge Review: libXaw
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226064

           Summary: Merge Review: libXaw
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXaw

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXaw/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:29:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:29:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226065] New: Merge Review: libXcomposite
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226065

           Summary: Merge Review: libXcomposite
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXcomposite

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXcomposite/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226066] New: Merge Review: libXcursor
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226066

           Summary: Merge Review: libXcursor
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXcursor

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXcursor/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226067] New: Merge Review: libXdamage
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226067

           Summary: Merge Review: libXdamage
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXdamage

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXdamage/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226068] New: Merge Review: libXdmcp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226068

           Summary: Merge Review: libXdmcp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXdmcp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXdmcp/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226069] New: Merge Review: libXevie
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226069

           Summary: Merge Review: libXevie
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXevie

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXevie/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226070] New: Merge Review: libXext
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226070

           Summary: Merge Review: libXext
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXext

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXext/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226071] New: Merge Review: libXfixes
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226071

           Summary: Merge Review: libXfixes
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXfixes

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXfixes/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226072] New: Merge Review: libXfontcache
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226072

           Summary: Merge Review: libXfontcache
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXfontcache

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXfontcache/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226073] New: Merge Review: libXfont
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226073

           Summary: Merge Review: libXfont
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXfont

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXfont/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226074] New: Merge Review: libXft
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226074

           Summary: Merge Review: libXft
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXft

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXft/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:30:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:30:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226075] New: Merge Review: libXinerama
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226075

           Summary: Merge Review: libXinerama
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXinerama

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXinerama/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226076] New: Merge Review: libXi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226076

           Summary: Merge Review: libXi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXi/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226077] New: Merge Review: libxkbfile
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226077

           Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libxkbfile

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libxkbfile/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226078] New: Merge Review: libxklavier
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226078

           Summary: Merge Review: libxklavier
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libxklavier

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libxklavier/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226079] New: Merge Review: libxml2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226079

           Summary: Merge Review: libxml2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libxml2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libxml2/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226080] New: Merge Review: libXmu
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226080

           Summary: Merge Review: libXmu
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXmu

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXmu/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:31:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226081] New: Merge Review: libXpm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226081

           Summary: Merge Review: libXpm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXpm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXpm/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:32:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226082] New: Merge Review: libXp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226082

           Summary: Merge Review: libXp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXp/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:32:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226083] New: Merge Review: libXrandr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226083

           Summary: Merge Review: libXrandr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXrandr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXrandr/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:32:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226084] New: Merge Review: libXrender
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226084

           Summary: Merge Review: libXrender
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXrender

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXrender/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:32:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226086] New: Merge Review: libXres
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226086

           Summary: Merge Review: libXres
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXres

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXres/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:32:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226087] New: Merge Review: libXScrnSaver
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226087

           Summary: Merge Review: libXScrnSaver
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXScrnSaver

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXScrnSaver/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226088] New: Merge Review: libxslt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226088

           Summary: Merge Review: libxslt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libxslt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libxslt/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226089] New: Merge Review: libXTrap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226089

           Summary: Merge Review: libXTrap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXTrap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXTrap/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226090] New: Merge Review: libXt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226090

           Summary: Merge Review: libXt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXt/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226091] New: Merge Review: libXtst
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226091

           Summary: Merge Review: libXtst
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXtst

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXtst/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226092] New: Merge Review: libXvMC
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226092

           Summary: Merge Review: libXvMC
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXvMC

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXvMC/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226093] New: Merge Review: libXv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226093

           Summary: Merge Review: libXv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXv/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226094] New: Merge Review: libXxf86dga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226094

           Summary: Merge Review: libXxf86dga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXxf86dga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXxf86dga/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226095] New: Merge Review: libXxf86misc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226095

           Summary: Merge Review: libXxf86misc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXxf86misc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXxf86misc/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226096] New: Merge Review: libXxf86vm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226096

           Summary: Merge Review: libXxf86vm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: libXxf86vm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libXxf86vm/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226097] New: Merge Review: linux-atm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226097

           Summary: Merge Review: linux-atm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: linux-atm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/linux-atm/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:33:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226098] New: Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226098

           Summary: Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/linuxdoc-tools/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226099] New: Merge Review: linuxwacom
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226099

           Summary: Merge Review: linuxwacom
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: linuxwacom

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/linuxwacom/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226100] New: Merge Review: lksctp-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226100

           Summary: Merge Review: lksctp-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lksctp-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lksctp-tools/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226101] New: Merge Review: lm_sensors
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226101

           Summary: Merge Review: lm_sensors
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lm_sensors

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lm_sensors/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226102] New: Merge Review: lockdev
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226102

           Summary: Merge Review: lockdev
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lockdev

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lockdev/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226103] New: Merge Review: log4j
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226103

           Summary: Merge Review: log4j
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: log4j

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/log4j/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:34:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:34:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226104] New: Merge Review: logrotate
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226104

           Summary: Merge Review: logrotate
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: logrotate

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/logrotate/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226105] New: Merge Review: logwatch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226105

           Summary: Merge Review: logwatch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: logwatch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/logwatch/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226106] New: Merge Review: lrzsz
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226106

           Summary: Merge Review: lrzsz
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lrzsz

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lrzsz/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226107] New: Merge Review: lslk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226107

           Summary: Merge Review: lslk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lslk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lslk/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226108] New: Merge Review: lsof
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226108

           Summary: Merge Review: lsof
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lsof

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lsof/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226109] New: Merge Review: ltrace
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226109

           Summary: Merge Review: ltrace
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ltrace

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ltrace/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:35:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226110] New: Merge Review: lucene
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226110

           Summary: Merge Review: lucene
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lucene

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lucene/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226112] New: Merge Review: lv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226112

           Summary: Merge Review: lv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lv/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226111] New: Merge Review: lvm2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226111

           Summary: Merge Review: lvm2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lvm-team at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lvm2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lvm2/
Initial Owner: lvm-team at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226114] New: Merge Review: m2crypto
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226114

           Summary: Merge Review: m2crypto
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: m2crypto

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/m2crypto/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226113] New: Merge Review: lynx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113

           Summary: Merge Review: lynx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: lynx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/lynx/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226115] New: Merge Review: m4
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226115

           Summary: Merge Review: m4
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: m4

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/m4/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226118] New: Merge Review: mailx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118

           Summary: Merge Review: mailx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mailx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mailx/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226116] New: Merge Review: mailcap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226116

           Summary: Merge Review: mailcap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mailcap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mailcap/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226117] New: Merge Review: mailman
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226117

           Summary: Merge Review: mailman
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mailman

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mailman/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226119] New: Merge Review: MAKEDEV
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226119

           Summary: Merge Review: MAKEDEV
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: MAKEDEV

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/MAKEDEV/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226120] New: Merge Review: make
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226120

           Summary: Merge Review: make
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: make

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/make/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:36:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:36:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226121] New: Merge Review: man-pages-cs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226121

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-cs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-cs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-cs/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226122] New: Merge Review: man-pages-da
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226122

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-da
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-da

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-da/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226123] New: Merge Review: man-pages-de
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226123

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-de
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-de

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-de/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226124] New: Merge Review: man-pages-es
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226124

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-es
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: bgroh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-es

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-es/
Initial Owner: bgroh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226125] New: Merge Review: man-pages-it
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226125

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-it
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: bgroh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-it

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-it/
Initial Owner: bgroh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226126] New: Merge Review: man-pages-ja
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226126

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-ja

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-ja/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:37:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226127] New: Merge Review: man-pages-ko
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226127

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ko
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dsantani at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-ko

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-ko/
Initial Owner: dsantani at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:38:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:38:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226128] New: Merge Review: man-pages-pl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226128

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-pl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-pl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-pl/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226129] New: Merge Review: man-pages-ru
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226129

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ru
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages-ru

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages-ru/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226130] New: Merge Review: man-pages
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226130

           Summary: Merge Review: man-pages
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man-pages

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man-pages/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311939.l0VJd7ZP003326@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: binutils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225615


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223678




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226131] New: Merge Review: man
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226131

           Summary: Merge Review: man
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: man

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/man/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226132] New: Merge Review: mcelog
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226132

           Summary: Merge Review: mcelog
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jcm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mcelog

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mcelog/
Initial Owner: jcm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226133] New: Merge Review: mc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226133

           Summary: Merge Review: mc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mc/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226134] New: Merge Review: mdadm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134

           Summary: Merge Review: mdadm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dledford at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mdadm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mdadm/
Initial Owner: dledford at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:39:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:39:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226135] New: Merge Review: memtest86+
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226135

           Summary: Merge Review: memtest86+
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: memtest86+

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/memtest86+/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226136] New: Merge Review: mesa
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226136

           Summary: Merge Review: mesa
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mesa

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mesa/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226137] New: Merge Review: Mesa
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226137

           Summary: Merge Review: Mesa
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: Mesa

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/Mesa/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226139] New: Merge Review: mgetty
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226139

           Summary: Merge Review: mgetty
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarabas at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mgetty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mgetty/
Initial Owner: mbarabas at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226138] New: Merge Review: metacity
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226138

           Summary: Merge Review: metacity
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: metacity

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/metacity/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226140] New: Merge Review: microcode_ctl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226140

           Summary: Merge Review: microcode_ctl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jcm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: microcode_ctl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/microcode_ctl/
Initial Owner: jcm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225245] Merge Review: am-utils
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311940.l0VJegaa003596@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: am-utils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225245


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223675




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:40:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:40:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226142] New: Merge Review: mikmod
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142

           Summary: Merge Review: mikmod
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mikmod

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mikmod/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226143] New: Merge Review: mingetty
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226143

           Summary: Merge Review: mingetty
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: laroche at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mingetty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mingetty/
Initial Owner: laroche at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226144] New: Merge Review: minicom
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226144

           Summary: Merge Review: minicom
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: minicom

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/minicom/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226145] New: Merge Review: mkbootdisk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226145

           Summary: Merge Review: mkbootdisk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mkbootdisk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mkbootdisk/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226146] New: Merge Review: mkinitrd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226146

           Summary: Merge Review: mkinitrd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mkinitrd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mkinitrd/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226147] New: Merge Review: mktemp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226147

           Summary: Merge Review: mktemp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mktemp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mktemp/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226148] New: Merge Review: mlocate
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226148

           Summary: Merge Review: mlocate
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mlocate

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mlocate/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225777] Merge Review: gawk
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311941.l0VJfwDY003809@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gawk


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225777


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223686




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:41:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:41:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226149] New: Merge Review: mockobjects
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226149

           Summary: Merge Review: mockobjects
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mockobjects

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mockobjects/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226150] New: Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226150

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_auth_kerb/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226152] New: Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226152

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_auth_mysql/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226153] New: Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226153

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_auth_pgsql/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226154] New: Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226154

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_authz_ldap/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226155] New: Merge Review: mod_perl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226155

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_perl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_perl/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226156] New: Merge Review: mod_python
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226156

           Summary: Merge Review: mod_python
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mod_python

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mod_python/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:42:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:42:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226157] New: Merge Review: module-init-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226157

           Summary: Merge Review: module-init-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jcm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: module-init-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/module-init-tools/
Initial Owner: jcm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226158] New: Merge Review: mono
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226158

           Summary: Merge Review: mono
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mono

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mono/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226159] New: Merge Review: mozplugger
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226159

           Summary: Merge Review: mozplugger
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mozplugger

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mozplugger/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226160] New: Merge Review: mpage
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226160

           Summary: Merge Review: mpage
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mpage

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mpage/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226161] New: Merge Review: mrtg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226161

           Summary: Merge Review: mrtg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mrtg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mrtg/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225801] Merge Review: gimp-print
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311943.l0VJhaUS004153@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gimp-print


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225801


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223690

Bug 225801 depends on bug 223690, which changed state.

Bug 223690 Summary: gimp-print: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223690

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226162] New: Merge Review: mtools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226162

           Summary: Merge Review: mtools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mtools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mtools/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226164] New: Merge Review: mtr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226164

           Summary: Merge Review: mtr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mtr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mtr/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226165] New: Merge Review: mt-st
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226165

           Summary: Merge Review: mt-st
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mt-st

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mt-st/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226166] New: Merge Review: mtx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226166

           Summary: Merge Review: mtx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mtx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mtx/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:43:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226167] New: Merge Review: mutt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226167

           Summary: Merge Review: mutt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mutt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mutt/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:44:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:44:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226168] New: Merge Review: mx4j
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226168

           Summary: Merge Review: mx4j
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mx4j

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mx4j/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:46:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:46:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311946.l0VJk6e6004424@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gdbm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225784


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rvokal at redhat.com
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223688




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-01-31 14:46 EST -------
Based on changes made in bug 223688, initial owner should be rvokal instead of jbj?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:46:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:46:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225791] Merge Review: gettext
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311946.l0VJkScq004460@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gettext


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225791


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223689




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:47:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:47:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311947.l0VJlNKB004583@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gmp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223692




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:48:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:48:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311948.l0VJm4gC004690@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: glibc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225806


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223691




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:48:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:48:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225850] Merge Review: gnutls
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311948.l0VJmeeU004782@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gnutls


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225850


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223694




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:49:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:49:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311949.l0VJna3L004853@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: grub


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225861


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223699




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 19:52:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:52:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226142] Merge Review: mikmod
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701311952.l0VJqH7K005211@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: mikmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223711




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:02:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:02:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226137] Merge Review: Mesa
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312002.l0VK2iOD006346@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: Mesa


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226137


ajackson at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com  2007-01-31 15:02 EST -------
Uh what.  Mesa (capital M) hasn't been a real package since RHL 7.2.  These are
not the droids you're looking for.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:04:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:04:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226037] Merge Review: libpfm
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312004.l0VK4YpC006522@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libpfm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226037





------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat.com  2007-01-31 15:04 EST -------
I am willing to take this. I am a bit confused why this was marked as Nobody's
working on this and a in extra. Isn't libpfm marked as core? Why isn't pfmon not
marked in a similar manner?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:13:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:13:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226175] New: Merge Review: mx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226175

           Summary: Merge Review: mx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mx/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:13:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:13:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226176] New: Merge Review: mysqlclient10
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226176

           Summary: Merge Review: mysqlclient10
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mysqlclient10

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mysqlclient10/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:13:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:13:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226177] New: Merge Review: mysqlclient14
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226177

           Summary: Merge Review: mysqlclient14
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mysqlclient14

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mysqlclient14/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226178] New: Merge Review: mysql-connector-odbc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226178

           Summary: Merge Review: mysql-connector-odbc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mysql-connector-odbc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mysql-connector-odbc/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226179] New: Merge Review: MySQL-python
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226179

           Summary: Merge Review: MySQL-python
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: MySQL-python

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/MySQL-python/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226180] New: Merge Review: mysql
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226180

           Summary: Merge Review: mysql
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: mysql

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mysql/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226181] New: Merge Review: nano
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226181

           Summary: Merge Review: nano
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nano

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nano/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226182] New: Merge Review: nasm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226182

           Summary: Merge Review: nasm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nasm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nasm/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:14:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:14:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226183] New: Merge Review: nautilus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226183

           Summary: Merge Review: nautilus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nautilus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nautilus/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226184] New: Merge Review: nautilus-cd-burner
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226184

           Summary: Merge Review: nautilus-cd-burner
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nautilus-cd-burner

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nautilus-cd-burner/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226185] New: Merge Review: ncompress
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226185

           Summary: Merge Review: ncompress
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ncompress

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ncompress/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226186] New: Merge Review: ncpfs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226186

           Summary: Merge Review: ncpfs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ncpfs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ncpfs/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226187] New: Merge Review: nc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226187

           Summary: Merge Review: nc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nc/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226188] New: Merge Review: ncurses
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226188

           Summary: Merge Review: ncurses
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ncurses

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ncurses/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226189] New: Merge Review: neon
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226189

           Summary: Merge Review: neon
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: neon

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/neon/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226190] New: Merge Review: netatalk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226190

           Summary: Merge Review: netatalk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarabas at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: netatalk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/netatalk/
Initial Owner: mbarabas at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226191] New: Merge Review: netpbm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226191

           Summary: Merge Review: netpbm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: netpbm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/netpbm/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226192] New: Merge Review: net-snmp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226192

           Summary: Merge Review: net-snmp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: net-snmp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/net-snmp/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226193] New: Merge Review: net-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226193

           Summary: Merge Review: net-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: net-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/net-tools/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:15:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:15:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226194] New: Merge Review: NetworkManager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226194

           Summary: Merge Review: NetworkManager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: NetworkManager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/NetworkManager/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226195] New: Merge Review: newt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195

           Summary: Merge Review: newt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: newt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/newt/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226196] New: Merge Review: newt-perl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196

           Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: newt-perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/newt-perl/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226197] New: Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226197

           Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nfs-utils-lib/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226199] New: Merge Review: nhpf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226199

           Summary: Merge Review: nhpf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cchance at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nhpf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nhpf/
Initial Owner: cchance at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226198] New: Merge Review: nfs-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198

           Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nfs-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nfs-utils/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:16:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:16:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226200] New: Merge Review: nkf
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226200

           Summary: Merge Review: nkf
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nkf

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nkf/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226201] New: Merge Review: nmap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226201

           Summary: Merge Review: nmap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nmap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nmap/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226180] Merge Review: mysql
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312017.l0VKH0TD007871@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: mysql


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226180


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |223713




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226203] New: Merge Review: nss_db
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226203

           Summary: Merge Review: nss_db
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nss_db

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nss_db/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226204] New: Merge Review: nss
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226204

           Summary: Merge Review: nss
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kengert at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nss

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nss/
Initial Owner: kengert at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226202] New: Merge Review: nspr
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226202

           Summary: Merge Review: nspr
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kengert at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nspr

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nspr/
Initial Owner: kengert at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226205] New: Merge Review: nss_ldap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226205

           Summary: Merge Review: nss_ldap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nss_ldap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nss_ldap/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226206] New: Merge Review: ntp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226206

           Summary: Merge Review: ntp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ntp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ntp/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226207] New: Merge Review: numactl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226207

           Summary: Merge Review: numactl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nhorman at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: numactl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/numactl/
Initial Owner: nhorman at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:17:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:17:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226209] New: Merge Review: nut
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226209

           Summary: Merge Review: nut
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: nut

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/nut/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226210] New: Merge Review: opal
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226210

           Summary: Merge Review: opal
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: opal

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/opal/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226211] New: Merge Review: openhpi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226211

           Summary: Merge Review: openhpi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openhpi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openhpi/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226212] New: Merge Review: OpenIPMI
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226212

           Summary: Merge Review: OpenIPMI
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: OpenIPMI

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/OpenIPMI/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226213] New: Merge Review: openjade
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226213

           Summary: Merge Review: openjade
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openjade

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openjade/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226214] New: Merge Review: openldap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226214

           Summary: Merge Review: openldap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openldap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openldap/
Initial Owner: fenlason at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:18:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226215] New: Merge Review: openobex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226215

           Summary: Merge Review: openobex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openobex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openobex/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226216] New: Merge Review: openoffice.org
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226216

           Summary: Merge Review: openoffice.org
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openoffice.org

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openoffice.org/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226217] New: Merge Review: opensp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226217

           Summary: Merge Review: opensp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: opensp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/opensp/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226218] New: Merge Review: openssh
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226218

           Summary: Merge Review: openssh
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openssh

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openssh/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226219] New: Merge Review: openssl097a
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226219

           Summary: Merge Review: openssl097a
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openssl097a

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openssl097a/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226222] New: Merge Review: oprofile
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226222

           Summary: Merge Review: oprofile
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wcohen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: oprofile

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/oprofile/
Initial Owner: wcohen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226220] New: Merge Review: openssl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226220

           Summary: Merge Review: openssl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openssl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openssl/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226221] New: Merge Review: openswan
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226221

           Summary: Merge Review: openswan
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: openswan

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/openswan/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226223] New: Merge Review: ORBit2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226223

           Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ORBit2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ORBit2/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226224] New: Merge Review: pam_ccreds
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226224

           Summary: Merge Review: pam_ccreds
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pam_ccreds

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pam_ccreds/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226225] New: Merge Review: pam_krb5
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226225

           Summary: Merge Review: pam_krb5
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pam_krb5

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pam_krb5/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:19:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:19:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226226] New: Merge Review: pam_passwdqc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226226

           Summary: Merge Review: pam_passwdqc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pam_passwdqc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pam_passwdqc/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:20:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:20:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226227] New: Merge Review: pam_smb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226227

           Summary: Merge Review: pam_smb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pam_smb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pam_smb/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:20:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:20:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226228] New: Merge Review: pam
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226228

           Summary: Merge Review: pam
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pam

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pam/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:20:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:20:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226229] New: Merge Review: pango
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226229

           Summary: Merge Review: pango
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pango

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pango/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:20:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:20:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226230] New: Merge Review: parted
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230

           Summary: Merge Review: parted
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: parted

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/parted/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:20:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:20:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226231] New: Merge Review: passivetex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226231

           Summary: Merge Review: passivetex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: passivetex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/passivetex/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226232] New: Merge Review: passwd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226232

           Summary: Merge Review: passwd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: passwd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/passwd/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226233] New: Merge Review: patch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226233

           Summary: Merge Review: patch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: patch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/patch/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226234] New: Merge Review: patchutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226234

           Summary: Merge Review: patchutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: patchutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/patchutils/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226235] New: Merge Review: pax
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226235

           Summary: Merge Review: pax
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pax

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pax/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226236] New: Merge Review: pciutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226236

           Summary: Merge Review: pciutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pciutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pciutils/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226237] New: Merge Review: pcmciautils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226237

           Summary: Merge Review: pcmciautils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pcmciautils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pcmciautils/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226238] New: Merge Review: pcre
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226238

           Summary: Merge Review: pcre
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pcre

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pcre/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226239] New: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226239

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Archive-Tar/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226240] New: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226240

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Archive-Zip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Archive-Zip/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:21:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:21:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226241] New: Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226241

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Bit-Vector/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:22:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:22:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226242] New: Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226242

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-BSD-Resource/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:22:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:22:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312022.l0VKMZnq009082@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056





------- Additional Comments From david.nalley at fedoraproject.org  2007-01-31 15:22 EST -------
Ok, fixed here:
Spec URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget.spec
SRPM URL: http://nalley.sc/david/fedora/iscsitarget-0.4.14-9.src.rpm

Thanks for the review! 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226244] New: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226244

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Carp-Clan/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226245] New: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226245

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Carp-Clan/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226246] New: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226246

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Compress-Zlib/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226247] New: Merge Review: perl-Convert-ASN1
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226247

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Convert-ASN1
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Convert-ASN1

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Convert-ASN1/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226248] New: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226248

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Crypt-SSLeay/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226249] New: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226249

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Date-Calc/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226250] New: Merge Review: perl-DateManip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226250

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-DateManip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-DateManip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-DateManip/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226251] New: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226251

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-DBD-MySQL/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:34:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:34:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226252] New: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226252

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-DBD-Pg/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226253] New: Merge Review: perl-DBI
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226253

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBI
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-DBI

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-DBI/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226254] New: Merge Review: perl-Devel-Symdump
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226254

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Devel-Symdump
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Devel-Symdump

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Devel-Symdump/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226255] New: Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226255

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Digest-HMAC/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226256] New: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Digest-SHA1/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226257] New: Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226257

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-File-MMagic/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226258] New: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226258

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Frontier-RPC/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226260] New: Merge Review: perl-HTML-Parser
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226260

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-HTML-Parser
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-HTML-Parser

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-HTML-Parser/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:35:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:35:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226261] New: Merge Review: perl-HTML-Tagset
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226261

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-HTML-Tagset
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-HTML-Tagset

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-HTML-Tagset/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226262] New: Merge Review: perl-Inline
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226262

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Inline

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Inline/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226263] New: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226263

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226264] New: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226264

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226265] New: Merge Review: perl-IO-String
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226265

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-String
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-IO-String

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-IO-String/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226266] New: Merge Review: perl-IO-Zlib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226266

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Zlib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-IO-Zlib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-IO-Zlib/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226267] New: Merge Review: perl-LDAP
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-LDAP

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-LDAP/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226268] New: Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226268

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-libwww-perl/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226269] New: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226269

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-libxml-perl/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226270] New: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Net-DNS/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226271] New: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Net-IP

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Net-IP/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:36:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:36:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226272] New: Merge Review: perl-Net-SSLeay
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226272

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-SSLeay
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Net-SSLeay

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Net-SSLeay/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226273] New: Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226273

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jbrassow at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Net-Telnet/
Initial Owner: jbrassow at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226274] New: Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226274

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Parse-RecDescent/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226275] New: Merge Review: perl-PDL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-PDL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-PDL/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226277] New: Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226277

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-RPM-Specfile/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226276] New: Merge Review: perl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276

           Summary: Merge Review: perl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:37:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:37:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226278] New: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226278

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-SGMLSpm/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226279] New: Merge Review: perl-Socket6
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226279

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-Socket6
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-Socket6

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Socket6/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226280] New: Merge Review: perl-String-CRC32
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226280

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-String-CRC32
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-String-CRC32

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-String-CRC32/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226281] New: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226281

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-TermReadKey/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226282] New: Merge Review: perl-TimeDate
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226282

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-TimeDate
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-TimeDate

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-TimeDate/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226283] New: Merge Review: perl-URI
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226283

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-URI

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-URI/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226284] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226284

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-Dumper/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226285] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226285

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-Grove/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226286] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226286

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-LibXML-Common/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226287] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226287

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-LibXML/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:38:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226288] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226288

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-NamespaceSupport

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-NamespaceSupport/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226289] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-Parser/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226037] Merge Review: libpfm
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312039.l0VKdGRY011648@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libpfm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226037





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2007-01-31 15:39 EST -------
this is the review for the merge of Core and extras. you can't take it as you 
are the maintainer.  someone else needs to do the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226290] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226290

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-SAX/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226291] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-Simple/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226293] New: Merge Review: pfmon
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226293

           Summary: Merge Review: pfmon
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wcohen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pfmon

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pfmon/
Initial Owner: wcohen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226292] New: Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226292

           Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rnorwood at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-XML-Twig/
Initial Owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:39:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:39:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226294] New: Merge Review: php
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226294

           Summary: Merge Review: php
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: php

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/php/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226295] New: Merge Review: php-pear
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295

           Summary: Merge Review: php-pear
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: php-pear

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/php-pear/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226296] New: Merge Review: pilot-link
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226296

           Summary: Merge Review: pilot-link
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pilot-link

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pilot-link/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226297] New: Merge Review: pinfo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226297

           Summary: Merge Review: pinfo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pinfo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pinfo/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226298] New: Merge Review: pirut
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226298

           Summary: Merge Review: pirut
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pirut

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pirut/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226299] New: Merge Review: pkgconfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226299

           Summary: Merge Review: pkgconfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pkgconfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pkgconfig/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:40:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:40:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226300] New: Merge Review: pkinit-nss
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226300

           Summary: Merge Review: pkinit-nss
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pkinit-nss

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pkinit-nss/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226301] New: Merge Review: planner
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226301

           Summary: Merge Review: planner
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caolanm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: planner

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/planner/
Initial Owner: caolanm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226302] New: Merge Review: pm-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226302

           Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pm-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pm-utils/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226303] New: Merge Review: pnm2ppa
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226303

           Summary: Merge Review: pnm2ppa
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pnm2ppa

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pnm2ppa/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226304] New: Merge Review: policycoreutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226304

           Summary: Merge Review: policycoreutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: policycoreutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/policycoreutils/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226305] New: Merge Review: poppler
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226305

           Summary: Merge Review: poppler
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: poppler

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/poppler/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226306] New: Merge Review: portmap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226306

           Summary: Merge Review: portmap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: portmap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/portmap/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:41:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:41:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226307] New: Merge Review: postfix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226307

           Summary: Merge Review: postfix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: postfix

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/postfix/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226309] New: Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226309

           Summary: Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/postgresql-jdbc/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226310] New: Merge Review: postgresql-odbc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226310

           Summary: Merge Review: postgresql-odbc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: postgresql-odbc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/postgresql-odbc/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226311] New: Merge Review: postgresql
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226311

           Summary: Merge Review: postgresql
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: postgresql

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/postgresql/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226312] New: Merge Review: ppc64-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226312

           Summary: Merge Review: ppc64-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ppc64-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ppc64-utils/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226313] New: Merge Review: ppp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226313

           Summary: Merge Review: ppp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ppp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ppp/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:42:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:42:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226314] New: Merge Review: prctl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226314

           Summary: Merge Review: prctl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: prctl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/prctl/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226315] New: Merge Review: prelink
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226315

           Summary: Merge Review: prelink
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: prelink

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/prelink/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226316] New: Merge Review: privoxy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226316

           Summary: Merge Review: privoxy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: privoxy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/privoxy/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226317] New: Merge Review: procinfo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226317

           Summary: Merge Review: procinfo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: procinfo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/procinfo/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226318] New: Merge Review: procmail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226318

           Summary: Merge Review: procmail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: procmail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/procmail/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226319] New: Merge Review: procps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226319

           Summary: Merge Review: procps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: procps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/procps/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226320] New: Merge Review: psacct
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226320

           Summary: Merge Review: psacct
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: psacct

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/psacct/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226321] New: Merge Review: psgml
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226321

           Summary: Merge Review: psgml
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: psgml

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/psgml/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:43:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:43:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226322] New: Merge Review: psmisc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322

           Summary: Merge Review: psmisc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: psmisc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/psmisc/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226323] New: Merge Review: pstack
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226323

           Summary: Merge Review: pstack
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: roland at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pstack

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pstack/
Initial Owner: roland at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226324] New: Merge Review: psutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226324

           Summary: Merge Review: psutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: psutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/psutils/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226325] New: Merge Review: pump
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226325

           Summary: Merge Review: pump
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pump

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pump/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226326] New: Merge Review: puretls
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326

           Summary: Merge Review: puretls
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: puretls

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/puretls/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226327] New: Merge Review: pvm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226327

           Summary: Merge Review: pvm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dledford at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pvm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pvm/
Initial Owner: dledford at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:44:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:44:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226328] New: Merge Review: pwlib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226328

           Summary: Merge Review: pwlib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pwlib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pwlib/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226329] New: Merge Review: pycairo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226329

           Summary: Merge Review: pycairo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pycairo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pycairo/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226331] New: Merge Review: pydict
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226331

           Summary: Merge Review: pydict
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pydict

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pydict/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226330] New: Merge Review: pychecker
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226330

           Summary: Merge Review: pychecker
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pychecker

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pychecker/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226332] New: Merge Review: pygobject2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226332

           Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pygobject2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pygobject2/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226333] New: Merge Review: pygtk2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226333

           Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pygtk2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pygtk2/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226334] New: Merge Review: pykickstart
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226334

           Summary: Merge Review: pykickstart
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pykickstart

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pykickstart/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226335] New: Merge Review: pyOpenSSL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226335

           Summary: Merge Review: pyOpenSSL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pyOpenSSL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pyOpenSSL/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226336] New: Merge Review: pyorbit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226336

           Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pyorbit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pyorbit/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226337] New: Merge Review: pyparted
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337

           Summary: Merge Review: pyparted
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcantrell at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pyparted

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pyparted/
Initial Owner: dcantrell at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226338] New: Merge Review: PyQt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226338

           Summary: Merge Review: PyQt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: PyQt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/PyQt/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:45:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:45:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312045.l0VKjugg013195@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cscope


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225668


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |NEW
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
         Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE              |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-31 15:45 EST -------
This is part of the merge of core and extras into the grand unified Fedora. 
All core packages are going to need reviewed as part of this process. 

Reopening to allow this package to get reviewed. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226339] New: Merge Review: Pyrex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226339

           Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: Pyrex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/Pyrex/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226340] New: Merge Review: pyspi
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226340

           Summary: Merge Review: pyspi
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: zcerza at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pyspi

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pyspi/
Initial Owner: zcerza at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226341] New: Merge Review: python-docs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226341

           Summary: Merge Review: python-docs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-docs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-docs/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226342] New: Merge Review: python
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226342

           Summary: Merge Review: python
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226343] New: Merge Review: python-ldap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226343

           Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-ldap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-ldap/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226345] New: Merge Review: python-numeric
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226345

           Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-numeric

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-numeric/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226346] New: Merge Review: python-pyblock
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226346

           Summary: Merge Review: python-pyblock
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-pyblock

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-pyblock/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:46:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:46:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226347] New: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226347

           Summary: Merge Review: python-urlgrabber
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-urlgrabber

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-urlgrabber/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226348] New: Merge Review: python-virtinst
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226348

           Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: python-virtinst

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/python-virtinst/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226349] New: Merge Review: pyxf86config
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226349

           Summary: Merge Review: pyxf86config
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: pyxf86config

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/pyxf86config/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226350] New: Merge Review: PyXML
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226350

           Summary: Merge Review: PyXML
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: laroche at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: PyXML

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/PyXML/
Initial Owner: laroche at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226352] New: Merge Review: quagga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226352

           Summary: Merge Review: quagga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: quagga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/quagga/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226351] New: Merge Review: qt
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226351

           Summary: Merge Review: qt
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: qt

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/qt/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:47:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226353] New: Merge Review: quota
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226353

           Summary: Merge Review: quota
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: quota

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/quota/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226354] New: Merge Review: radvd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226354

           Summary: Merge Review: radvd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: radvd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/radvd/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226355] New: Merge Review: rarpd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226355

           Summary: Merge Review: rarpd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rarpd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rarpd/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226356] New: Merge Review: rcs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226356

           Summary: Merge Review: rcs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rcs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rcs/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226357] New: Merge Review: rdate
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226357

           Summary: Merge Review: rdate
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rdate

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rdate/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226358] New: Merge Review: rdesktop
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226358

           Summary: Merge Review: rdesktop
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rdesktop

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rdesktop/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226359] New: Merge Review: rdist
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226359

           Summary: Merge Review: rdist
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rdist

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rdist/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226360] New: Merge Review: readahead
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226360

           Summary: Merge Review: readahead
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: readahead

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/readahead/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226361] New: Merge Review: readline
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226361

           Summary: Merge Review: readline
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: readline

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/readline/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:48:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:48:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226362] New: Merge Review: redhat-artwork
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226362

           Summary: Merge Review: redhat-artwork
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: redhat-artwork

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/redhat-artwork/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:49:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:49:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226363] New: Merge Review: redhat-lsb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363

           Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: llim at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: redhat-lsb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/redhat-lsb/
Initial Owner: llim at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:49:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:49:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226364] New: Merge Review: redhat-menus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226364

           Summary: Merge Review: redhat-menus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: redhat-menus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/redhat-menus/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:49:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:49:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226365] New: Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226365

           Summary: Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jcm at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/redhat-rpm-config/
Initial Owner: jcm at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:49:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:49:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226366] New: Merge Review: regexp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226366

           Summary: Merge Review: regexp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: regexp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/regexp/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:49:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:49:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226367] New: Merge Review: reiserfs-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226367

           Summary: Merge Review: reiserfs-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jgarzik at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: reiserfs-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/reiserfs-utils/
Initial Owner: jgarzik at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:50:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:50:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226369] New: Merge Review: rgmanager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226369

           Summary: Merge Review: rgmanager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lhh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rgmanager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rgmanager/
Initial Owner: lhh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:50:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:50:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226370] New: Merge Review: rhdb-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226370

           Summary: Merge Review: rhdb-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rhdb-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhdb-utils/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:50:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:50:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226371] New: Merge Review: rhgb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226371

           Summary: Merge Review: rhgb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rhgb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhgb/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:50:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:50:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226372] New: Merge Review: rhpl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226372

           Summary: Merge Review: rhpl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rhpl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhpl/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:51:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:51:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226373] New: Merge Review: rhpxl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226373

           Summary: Merge Review: rhpxl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rhpxl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhpxl/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:51:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:51:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226374] New: Merge Review: rhythmbox
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226374

           Summary: Merge Review: rhythmbox
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rhythmbox

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rhythmbox/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:51:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:51:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226375] New: Merge Review: rng-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226375

           Summary: Merge Review: rng-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jgarzik at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rng-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rng-utils/
Initial Owner: jgarzik at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:51:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:51:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226376] New: Merge Review: rootfiles
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226376

           Summary: Merge Review: rootfiles
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rootfiles

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rootfiles/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:51:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:51:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226377] New: Merge Review: rpm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377

           Summary: Merge Review: rpm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rpm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rpm/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:52:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226378] New: Merge Review: rp-pppoe
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226378

           Summary: Merge Review: rp-pppoe
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rp-pppoe

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rp-pppoe/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:52:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226379] New: Merge Review: rsh
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226379

           Summary: Merge Review: rsh
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rsh

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rsh/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:52:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226380] New: Merge Review: rsync
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226380

           Summary: Merge Review: rsync
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rsync

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rsync/
Initial Owner: fenlason at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:52:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226381] New: Merge Review: ruby
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226381

           Summary: Merge Review: ruby
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ruby

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ruby/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:53:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:53:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226382] New: Merge Review: rusers
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226382

           Summary: Merge Review: rusers
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rusers

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rusers/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:53:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:53:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226383] New: Merge Review: rwall
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226383

           Summary: Merge Review: rwall
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rwall

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rwall/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:53:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:53:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226384] New: Merge Review: rwho
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226384

           Summary: Merge Review: rwho
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: rwho

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/rwho/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:53:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:53:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226385] New: Merge Review: s390utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226385

           Summary: Merge Review: s390utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: s390utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/s390utils/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:54:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:54:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226386] New: Merge Review: salinfo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226386

           Summary: Merge Review: salinfo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: prarit at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: salinfo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/salinfo/
Initial Owner: prarit at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:54:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:54:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226387] New: Merge Review: samba
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387

           Summary: Merge Review: samba
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: samba

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/samba/
Initial Owner: fenlason at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:54:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:54:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226388] New: Merge Review: sane-backends
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226388

           Summary: Merge Review: sane-backends
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sane-backends

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sane-backends/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:54:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:54:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226389] New: Merge Review: sane-frontends
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226389

           Summary: Merge Review: sane-frontends
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sane-frontends

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sane-frontends/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:54:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:54:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226390] New: Merge Review: scim-anthy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226390

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-anthy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-anthy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-anthy/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226391] New: Merge Review: scim-bridge
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226391

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-bridge
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-bridge

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-bridge/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226392] New: Merge Review: scim-chewing
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226392

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-chewing
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: cchance at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-chewing

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-chewing/
Initial Owner: cchance at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226393] New: Merge Review: scim-hangul
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226393

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-hangul
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-hangul

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-hangul/
Initial Owner: tagoh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226394] New: Merge Review: scim-m17n
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226394

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-m17n
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-m17n

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-m17n/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226395] New: Merge Review: scim
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395

           Summary: Merge Review: scim
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226396] New: Merge Review: scim-pinyin
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226396

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-pinyin
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: phuang at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-pinyin

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-pinyin/
Initial Owner: phuang at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226397] New: Merge Review: scim-qtimm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226397

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-qtimm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-qtimm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-qtimm/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:55:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:55:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226398] New: Merge Review: scim-sinhala
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226398

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-sinhala
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-sinhala

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-sinhala/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:56:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226399] New: Merge Review: scim-tables
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399

           Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: petersen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scim-tables

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scim-tables/
Initial Owner: petersen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:56:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226400] New: Merge Review: screen
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226400

           Summary: Merge Review: screen
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: screen

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/screen/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:56:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226401] New: Merge Review: scrollkeeper
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226401

           Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: scrollkeeper

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/scrollkeeper/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:56:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226402] New: Merge Review: SDL
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402

           Summary: Merge Review: SDL
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: SDL

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/SDL/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:56:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226403] New: Merge Review: seamonkey
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226403

           Summary: Merge Review: seamonkey
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: seamonkey

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/seamonkey/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226404] New: Merge Review: sed
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226404

           Summary: Merge Review: sed
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sed

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sed/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226405] New: Merge Review: selinux-doc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226405

           Summary: Merge Review: selinux-doc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: selinux-doc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/selinux-doc/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226406] New: Merge Review: selinux-policy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226406

           Summary: Merge Review: selinux-policy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: selinux-policy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/selinux-policy/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226407] New: Merge Review: sendmail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226407

           Summary: Merge Review: sendmail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sendmail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sendmail/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226408] New: Merge Review: setarch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226408

           Summary: Merge Review: setarch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setarch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setarch/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:57:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226409] New: Merge Review: setools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226409

           Summary: Merge Review: setools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwalsh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setools/
Initial Owner: dwalsh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226410] New: Merge Review: setroubleshoot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226410

           Summary: Merge Review: setroubleshoot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jdennis at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setroubleshoot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setroubleshoot/
Initial Owner: jdennis at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226340] Merge Review: pyspi
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312058.l0VKwM8Q014931@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pyspi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226340





------- Additional Comments From zcerza at redhat.com  2007-01-31 15:58 EST -------
pyspi is in FC6 and RHEL5. Does it really need a review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:17 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226411] New: Merge Review: setserial
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226411

           Summary: Merge Review: setserial
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setserial

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setserial/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226412] New: Merge Review: setup
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226412

           Summary: Merge Review: setup
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setup

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setup/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226413] New: Merge Review: setuptool
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226413

           Summary: Merge Review: setuptool
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: setuptool

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/setuptool/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226415] New: Merge Review: sgml-common
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226415

           Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sgml-common

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sgml-common/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:58:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226414] New: Merge Review: sg3_utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226414

           Summary: Merge Review: sg3_utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sg3_utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sg3_utils/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226416] New: Merge Review: shadow-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226416

           Summary: Merge Review: shadow-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: shadow-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/shadow-utils/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226417] New: Merge Review: shared-mime-info
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226417

           Summary: Merge Review: shared-mime-info
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: shared-mime-info

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/shared-mime-info/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226418] New: Merge Review: sharutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226418

           Summary: Merge Review: sharutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sharutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sharutils/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226419] New: Merge Review: sip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226419

           Summary: Merge Review: sip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sip/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226420] New: Merge Review: slang
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226420

           Summary: Merge Review: slang
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: slang

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/slang/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226421] New: Merge Review: slib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226421

           Summary: Merge Review: slib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: slib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/slib/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 20:59:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:59:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226422] New: Merge Review: slrn
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226422

           Summary: Merge Review: slrn
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: slrn

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/slrn/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226423] New: Merge Review: smartmontools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226423

           Summary: Merge Review: smartmontools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tmraz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: smartmontools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/smartmontools/
Initial Owner: tmraz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226323] Merge Review: pstack
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312100.l0VL0Bdn015175@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pstack


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226323





------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com  2007-01-31 16:00 EST -------
This package exists now only because of rpm upgrade problems in the past.
Can we finally get rid of it now?  Would Obsoletes: pstack in a gdb package that
provides the pstack -> gstack symlink be sufficient?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226424] New: Merge Review: sound-juicer
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226424

           Summary: Merge Review: sound-juicer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sound-juicer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sound-juicer/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226425] New: Merge Review: sox
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226425

           Summary: Merge Review: sox
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sox

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sox/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226426] New: Merge Review: spamassassin
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226426

           Summary: Merge Review: spamassassin
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: spamassassin

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/spamassassin/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226427] New: Merge Review: specspo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226427

           Summary: Merge Review: specspo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: specspo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/specspo/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:00:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226428] New: Merge Review: speex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226428

           Summary: Merge Review: speex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davidz at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: speex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/speex/
Initial Owner: davidz at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226429] New: Merge Review: sqlite
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226429

           Summary: Merge Review: sqlite
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sqlite

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sqlite/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226430] New: Merge Review: squashfs-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226430

           Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: squashfs-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/squashfs-tools/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226431] New: Merge Review: squid
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226431

           Summary: Merge Review: squid
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: squid

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/squid/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226432] New: Merge Review: squirrelmail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226432

           Summary: Merge Review: squirrelmail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: wtogami at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: squirrelmail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/squirrelmail/
Initial Owner: wtogami at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226433] New: Merge Review: stardict
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226433

           Summary: Merge Review: stardict
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: majain at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: stardict

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/stardict/
Initial Owner: majain at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226434] New: Merge Review: star
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226434

           Summary: Merge Review: star
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: star

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/star/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:01:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:01:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226435] New: Merge Review: startup-notification
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226435

           Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: startup-notification

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/startup-notification/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226436] New: Merge Review: statserial
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226436

           Summary: Merge Review: statserial
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: statserial

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/statserial/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226437] New: Merge Review: strace
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226437

           Summary: Merge Review: strace
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: roland at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: strace

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/strace/
Initial Owner: roland at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226438] New: Merge Review: struts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226438

           Summary: Merge Review: struts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: struts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/struts/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226440] New: Merge Review: subversion
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226440

           Summary: Merge Review: subversion
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: subversion

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/subversion/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226439] New: Merge Review: stunnel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226439

           Summary: Merge Review: stunnel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: stunnel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/stunnel/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:02:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:02:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226441] New: Merge Review: sudo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226441

           Summary: Merge Review: sudo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sudo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sudo/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312103.l0VL37un015600@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226426





------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-31 16:03 EST -------
*** Bug 224477 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 224477] Review Request: spamassassin
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312103.l0VL37Xe015596@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: spamassassin


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224477


wtogami at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2007-01-31 16:03 EST -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226426 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226442] New: Merge Review: swig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226442

           Summary: Merge Review: swig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: swig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/swig/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226443] New: Merge Review: switchdesk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226443

           Summary: Merge Review: switchdesk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: switchdesk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/switchdesk/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226445] New: Merge Review: symlinks
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226445

           Summary: Merge Review: symlinks
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: symlinks

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/symlinks/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226446] New: Merge Review: synaptics
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226446

           Summary: Merge Review: synaptics
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: synaptics

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/synaptics/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226447] New: Merge Review: sysfsutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226447

           Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nhorman at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sysfsutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sysfsutils/
Initial Owner: nhorman at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:03:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:03:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226448] New: Merge Review: sysklogd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226448

           Summary: Merge Review: sysklogd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sysklogd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sysklogd/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226449] New: Merge Review: syslinux
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226449

           Summary: Merge Review: syslinux
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pjones at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: syslinux

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/syslinux/
Initial Owner: pjones at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226340] Merge Review: pyspi
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312104.l0VL43Ew015834@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pyspi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226340





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-01-31 16:04 EST -------
Yes, all packages from Fedora Core will need reviews before they can become part
of Fedora 7.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226450] New: Merge Review: sysreport
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226450

           Summary: Merge Review: sysreport
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sysreport

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sysreport/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226451] New: Merge Review: sysstat
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226451

           Summary: Merge Review: sysstat
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: sysstat

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/sysstat/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226452] New: Merge Review: system-config-bind
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226452

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-bind

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-bind/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226453] New: Merge Review: system-config-boot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226453

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-boot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-boot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-boot/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226454] New: Merge Review: system-config-cluster
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226454

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-cluster
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jparsons at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-cluster

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-cluster/
Initial Owner: jparsons at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226455] New: Merge Review: system-config-date
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226455

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-date
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-date

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-date/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226456] New: Merge Review: system-config-display
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226456

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-display
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-display

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-display/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:04:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226457] New: Merge Review: system-config-httpd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226457

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-httpd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-httpd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-httpd/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:05:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226458] New: Merge Review: system-config-keyboard
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226458

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-keyboard
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-keyboard

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-keyboard/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:05:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:05:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226459] New: Merge Review: system-config-kickstart
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226459

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-kickstart
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: clumens at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-kickstart

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-kickstart/
Initial Owner: clumens at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:05:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:05:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226461] New: Merge Review: system-config-language
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226461

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-language

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-language/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226462] New: Merge Review: system-config-lvm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226462

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-lvm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jparsons at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-lvm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-lvm/
Initial Owner: jparsons at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226463] New: Merge Review: system-config-netboot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226463

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-netboot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fleite at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-netboot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-netboot/
Initial Owner: fleite at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226464] New: Merge Review: system-config-network
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226464

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-network

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-network/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226465] New: Merge Review: system-config-nfs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226465

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-nfs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-nfs/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226466] New: Merge Review: system-config-printer
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226466

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-printer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-printer/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226467] New: Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226467

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-rootpassword/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:06:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:06:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226468] New: Merge Review: system-config-samba
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226468

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-samba

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-samba/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226469] New: Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226469

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-securitylevel/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226470] New: Merge Review: system-config-services
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226470

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-services

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-services/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226471] New: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226471

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: stransky at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-soundcard

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-soundcard/
Initial Owner: stransky at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226472] New: Merge Review: system-config-users
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226472

           Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-config-users

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-config-users/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:42 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226473] New: Merge Review: system-switch-mail
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226473

           Summary: Merge Review: system-switch-mail
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: system-switch-mail

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/system-switch-mail/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:07:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:07:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226474] New: Merge Review: systemtap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226474

           Summary: Merge Review: systemtap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fche at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: systemtap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/systemtap/
Initial Owner: fche at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:02 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226475] New: Merge Review: SysVinit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226475

           Summary: Merge Review: SysVinit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: notting at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: SysVinit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/SysVinit/
Initial Owner: notting at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226476] New: Merge Review: talk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226476

           Summary: Merge Review: talk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: talk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/talk/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226477] New: Merge Review: tanukiwrapper
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226477

           Summary: Merge Review: tanukiwrapper
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tanukiwrapper

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tanukiwrapper/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226478] New: Merge Review: tar
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226478

           Summary: Merge Review: tar
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tar

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tar/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226479] New: Merge Review: tcl
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226479

           Summary: Merge Review: tcl
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tcl

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tcl/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:08:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:08:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226480] New: Merge Review: tclx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226480

           Summary: Merge Review: tclx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tclx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tclx/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226481] New: Merge Review: tcpdump
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226481

           Summary: Merge Review: tcpdump
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tcpdump

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tcpdump/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226482] New: Merge Review: tcp_wrappers
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226482

           Summary: Merge Review: tcp_wrappers
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tcp_wrappers

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tcp_wrappers/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226483] New: Merge Review: tcsh
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226483

           Summary: Merge Review: tcsh
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tcsh

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tcsh/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226484] New: Merge Review: telnet
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226484

           Summary: Merge Review: telnet
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: telnet

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/telnet/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226485] New: Merge Review: termcap
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226485

           Summary: Merge Review: termcap
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: termcap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/termcap/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:09:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:09:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226486] New: Merge Review: tetex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226486

           Summary: Merge Review: tetex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tetex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tetex/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226487] New: Merge Review: texi2html
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487

           Summary: Merge Review: texi2html
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jnovy at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: texi2html

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/texi2html/
Initial Owner: jnovy at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226488] New: Merge Review: texinfo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226488

           Summary: Merge Review: texinfo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: texinfo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/texinfo/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226489] New: Merge Review: tftp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226489

           Summary: Merge Review: tftp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarabas at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tftp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tftp/
Initial Owner: mbarabas at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:29 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226490] New: Merge Review: thunderbird
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226490

           Summary: Merge Review: thunderbird
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: thunderbird

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/thunderbird/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226491] New: Merge Review: time
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226491

           Summary: Merge Review: time
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: laroche at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: time

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/time/
Initial Owner: laroche at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226492] New: Merge Review: timidity++
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226492

           Summary: Merge Review: timidity++
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: timidity++

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/timidity++/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226493] New: Merge Review: tix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226493

           Summary: Merge Review: tix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tix

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tix/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:10:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:10:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226494] New: Merge Review: tk
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226494

           Summary: Merge Review: tk
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tk

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tk/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226495] New: Merge Review: tmpwatch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226495

           Summary: Merge Review: tmpwatch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mitr at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tmpwatch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tmpwatch/
Initial Owner: mitr at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226496] New: Merge Review: tn5250
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226496

           Summary: Merge Review: tn5250
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tn5250

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tn5250/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226497] New: Merge Review: tog-pegasus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226497

           Summary: Merge Review: tog-pegasus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nalin at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tog-pegasus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tog-pegasus/
Initial Owner: nalin at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226498] New: Merge Review: tomboy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226498

           Summary: Merge Review: tomboy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rstrode at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tomboy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tomboy/
Initial Owner: rstrode at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226499] New: Merge Review: tomcat5
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226499

           Summary: Merge Review: tomcat5
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rafaels at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tomcat5

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tomcat5/
Initial Owner: rafaels at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:11:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:11:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226500] New: Merge Review: totem
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226500

           Summary: Merge Review: totem
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: alexl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: totem

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/totem/
Initial Owner: alexl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226501] New: Merge Review: traceroute
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226501

           Summary: Merge Review: traceroute
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: traceroute

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/traceroute/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226502] New: Merge Review: transfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226502

           Summary: Merge Review: transfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: transfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/transfig/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226503] New: Merge Review: tree
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503

           Summary: Merge Review: tree
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tree

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tree/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226504] New: Merge Review: tsclient
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226504

           Summary: Merge Review: tsclient
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tsclient

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tsclient/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226505] New: Merge Review: ttcp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226505

           Summary: Merge Review: ttcp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ttcp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ttcp/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226507] New: Merge Review: tux
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226507

           Summary: Merge Review: tux
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mingo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tux

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tux/
Initial Owner: mingo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226506] New: Merge Review: ttmkfdir
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226506

           Summary: Merge Review: ttmkfdir
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: lizhang at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ttmkfdir

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ttmkfdir/
Initial Owner: lizhang at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226508] New: Merge Review: tvtime
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226508

           Summary: Merge Review: tvtime
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tvtime

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tvtime/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226509] New: Merge Review: tzdata
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226509

           Summary: Merge Review: tzdata
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pmachata at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: tzdata

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tzdata/
Initial Owner: pmachata at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226510] New: Merge Review: udev
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226510

           Summary: Merge Review: udev
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: udev

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/udev/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:12:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226511] New: Merge Review: unifdef
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226511

           Summary: Merge Review: unifdef
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dwmw2 at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: unifdef

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unifdef/
Initial Owner: dwmw2 at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226513] New: Merge Review: units
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226513

           Summary: Merge Review: units
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: units

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/units/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:08 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226514] New: Merge Review: unix2dos
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226514

           Summary: Merge Review: unix2dos
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: unix2dos

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unix2dos/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226515] New: Merge Review: unixODBC
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226515

           Summary: Merge Review: unixODBC
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: tgl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: unixODBC

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unixODBC/
Initial Owner: tgl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226516] New: Merge Review: unzip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226516

           Summary: Merge Review: unzip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: unzip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unzip/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226517] New: Merge Review: urw-fonts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226517

           Summary: Merge Review: urw-fonts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: urw-fonts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/urw-fonts/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:13:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:13:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226518] New: Merge Review: usbutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226518

           Summary: Merge Review: usbutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twoerner at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: usbutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/usbutils/
Initial Owner: twoerner at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:14:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226519] New: Merge Review: usermode
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226519

           Summary: Merge Review: usermode
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbacovsk at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: usermode

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/usermode/
Initial Owner: mbacovsk at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:14:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226520] New: Merge Review: util-linux
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226520

           Summary: Merge Review: util-linux
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: util-linux

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/util-linux/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:14:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226521] New: Merge Review: uucp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226521

           Summary: Merge Review: uucp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pvrabec at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: uucp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/uucp/
Initial Owner: pvrabec at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:14:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226522] New: Merge Review: valgrind
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226522

           Summary: Merge Review: valgrind
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jakub at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: valgrind

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/valgrind/
Initial Owner: jakub at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:14:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:14:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226523] New: Merge Review: vconfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226523

           Summary: Merge Review: vconfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pknirsch at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vconfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vconfig/
Initial Owner: pknirsch at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226525] New: Merge Review: velocity
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226525

           Summary: Merge Review: velocity
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: velocity

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/velocity/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226526] New: Merge Review: vim
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226526

           Summary: Merge Review: vim
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vim

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vim/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226527] New: Merge Review: vino
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226527

           Summary: Merge Review: vino
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vino

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vino/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226528] New: Merge Review: virt-manager
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226528

           Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: berrange at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: virt-manager

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/virt-manager/
Initial Owner: berrange at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226529] New: Merge Review: vixie-cron
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529

           Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mmaslano at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vixie-cron

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vixie-cron/
Initial Owner: mmaslano at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:15:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226530] New: Merge Review: vlock
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226530

           Summary: Merge Review: vlock
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vlock

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vlock/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226531] New: Merge Review: vnc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226531

           Summary: Merge Review: vnc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vnc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vnc/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226532] New: Merge Review: vorbis-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226532

           Summary: Merge Review: vorbis-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vorbis-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vorbis-tools/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226533] New: Merge Review: vsftpd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226533

           Summary: Merge Review: vsftpd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarabas at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vsftpd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vsftpd/
Initial Owner: mbarabas at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226534] New: Merge Review: vte
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226534

           Summary: Merge Review: vte
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: vte

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/vte/
Initial Owner: besfahbo at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226535] New: Merge Review: w3m
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226535

           Summary: Merge Review: w3m
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dsantani at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: w3m

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/w3m/
Initial Owner: dsantani at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226536] New: Merge Review: webalizer
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226536

           Summary: Merge Review: webalizer
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jorton at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: webalizer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/webalizer/
Initial Owner: jorton at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226537] New: Merge Review: werken-xpath
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226537

           Summary: Merge Review: werken-xpath
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: werken-xpath

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/werken-xpath/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226538] New: Merge Review: wget
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226538

           Summary: Merge Review: wget
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: karsten at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wget

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wget/
Initial Owner: karsten at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226539] New: Merge Review: which
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539

           Summary: Merge Review: which
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: which

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/which/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226540] New: Merge Review: wireless-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226540

           Summary: Merge Review: wireless-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wireless-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wireless-tools/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226541] New: Merge Review: wireshark
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226541

           Summary: Merge Review: wireshark
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: rvokal at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wireshark

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wireshark/
Initial Owner: rvokal at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:48 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226542] New: Merge Review: words
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226542

           Summary: Merge Review: words
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: kzak at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: words

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/words/
Initial Owner: kzak at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:16:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226543] New: Merge Review: wordtrans
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226543

           Summary: Merge Review: wordtrans
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wordtrans

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wordtrans/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:17:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226544] New: Merge Review: wpa_supplicant
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226544

           Summary: Merge Review: wpa_supplicant
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dcbw at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wpa_supplicant

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wpa_supplicant/
Initial Owner: dcbw at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:17:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226545] New: Merge Review: wsdl4j
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226545

           Summary: Merge Review: wsdl4j
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wsdl4j

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wsdl4j/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:17:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226546] New: Merge Review: wvdial
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226546

           Summary: Merge Review: wvdial
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: wvdial

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wvdial/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:17:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226547] New: Merge Review: x86info
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226547

           Summary: Merge Review: x86info
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: davej at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: x86info

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/x86info/
Initial Owner: davej at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226548] New: Merge Review: xalan-j2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226548

           Summary: Merge Review: xalan-j2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xalan-j2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xalan-j2/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226549] New: Merge Review: Xaw3d
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226549

           Summary: Merge Review: Xaw3d
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: Xaw3d

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/Xaw3d/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226550] New: Merge Review: xcdroast
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226550

           Summary: Merge Review: xcdroast
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xcdroast

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xcdroast/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226551] New: Merge Review: xchat
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551

           Summary: Merge Review: xchat
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: caillon at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xchat

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xchat/
Initial Owner: caillon at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226552] New: Merge Review: xdelta
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226552

           Summary: Merge Review: xdelta
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: atkac at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xdelta

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xdelta/
Initial Owner: atkac at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226553] New: Merge Review: xdoclet
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553

           Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xdoclet

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xdoclet/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226554] New: Merge Review: xen
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226554

           Summary: Merge Review: xen
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: riel at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xen

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xen/
Initial Owner: riel at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:18:58 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:18:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226555] New: Merge Review: xerces-j2
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555

           Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mwringe at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xerces-j2

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xerces-j2/
Initial Owner: mwringe at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:00 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226556] New: Merge Review: xferstats
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226556

           Summary: Merge Review: xferstats
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xferstats

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xferstats/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:12 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226557] New: Merge Review: xfig
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557

           Summary: Merge Review: xfig
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: than at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xfig

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xfig/
Initial Owner: than at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226558] New: Merge Review: xfsprogs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558

           Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: jgarzik at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xfsprogs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xfsprogs/
Initial Owner: jgarzik at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226559] New: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226559

           Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xhtml1-dtds/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226560] New: Merge Review: xinetd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226560

           Summary: Merge Review: xinetd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fenlason at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xinetd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xinetd/
Initial Owner: fenlason at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:19:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:19:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226561] New: Merge Review: xjavadoc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226561

           Summary: Merge Review: xjavadoc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: dbhole at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xjavadoc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xjavadoc/
Initial Owner: dbhole at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226562] New: Merge Review: xkeyboard-config
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226562

           Summary: Merge Review: xkeyboard-config
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xkeyboard-config

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xkeyboard-config/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226563] New: Merge Review: xml-commons
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226563

           Summary: Merge Review: xml-commons
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xml-commons

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xml-commons/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226564] New: Merge Review: xml-commons-resolver
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226564

           Summary: Merge Review: xml-commons-resolver
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: fnasser at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xml-commons-resolver

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xml-commons-resolver/
Initial Owner: fnasser at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:35 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226565] New: Merge Review: xmlrpc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565

           Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: vivekl at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xmlrpc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xmlrpc/
Initial Owner: vivekl at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226566] New: Merge Review: xmlsec1
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226566

           Summary: Merge Review: xmlsec1
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: veillard at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xmlsec1

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xmlsec1/
Initial Owner: veillard at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:20:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:20:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226567] New: Merge Review: xmltex
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226567

           Summary: Merge Review: xmltex
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xmltex

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xmltex/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:04 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226568] New: Merge Review: xmlto
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226568

           Summary: Merge Review: xmlto
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: twaugh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xmlto

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xmlto/
Initial Owner: twaugh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226569] New: Merge Review: xorg-sgml-doctools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226569

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-sgml-doctools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-sgml-doctools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-sgml-doctools/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226571] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-apps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226571

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-apps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-apps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-apps/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226572] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-docs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226572

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-docs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-docs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-docs/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226573] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drivers
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226573

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drivers
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drivers

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drivers/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:21:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226574] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-acecad
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226574

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-acecad
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-acecad

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-acecad/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226575] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226575

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-aiptek/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226576] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226576

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-amd/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226577] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-apm/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226578] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ark
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226578

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ark
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ark

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-ark/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226579] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ast
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226579

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ast
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ast

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-ast/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:22:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:22:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226580] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ati
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226580

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ati
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ati

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-ati/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:23:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:23:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226581] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226581

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-calcomp/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:23:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:23:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226582] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-chips
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226582

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-chips
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-chips

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-chips/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:23:53 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:23:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226584] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-citron
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226584

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-citron
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-citron

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-citron/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:23:50 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:23:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226583] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cirrus
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226583

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cirrus
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cirrus

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-cirrus/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226585] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226585

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-cyrix/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226586] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-digitaledge
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226586

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-digitaledge
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-digitaledge

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-digitaledge/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226587] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226587

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-dmc/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:32 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226588] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dummy
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226588

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dummy
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dummy

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-dummy/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:45 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226589] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226589

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-dynapro/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:24:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:24:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226590] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226590

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-elo2300/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226591] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elographics
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226591

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elographics
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elographics

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-elographics/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226592] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226592

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-evdev/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226593] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fbdev
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226593

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fbdev
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fbdev

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-fbdev/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226594] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fpit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226594

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fpit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-fpit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-fpit/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312125.l0VLPbtM019272@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: SDL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402


ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |217389




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226595] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-glint
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226595

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-glint
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-glint

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-glint/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226596] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-hyperpen
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226596

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-hyperpen
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-hyperpen

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-hyperpen/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:25:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:25:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226597] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i128
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226597

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i128
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i128

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-i128/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:26:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226598] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i740
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226598

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i740
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i740

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-i740/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:26:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226599] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226599

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-i810/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:26:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226601] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226601

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:26:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226602] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226602

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-joystick/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226604] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magellan
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226604

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magellan
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magellan

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-magellan/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:26:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:26:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226603] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-keyboard
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226603

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-keyboard
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-keyboard

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-keyboard/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226605] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magictouch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226605

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magictouch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-magictouch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-magictouch/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226606] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226606

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-mga/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226607] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-microtouch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226607

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-microtouch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-microtouch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-microtouch/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226608] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mouse
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226608

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mouse
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mouse

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-mouse/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:27:55 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:27:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226609] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mutouch
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226609

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mutouch
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-mutouch

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-mutouch/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:07 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226610] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226610

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-neomagic/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226611] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226611

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-nsc/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226612] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226612

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-nv/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:23 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226614] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226614

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-palmax/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:36 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226615] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-penmount
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226615

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-penmount
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-penmount

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-penmount/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:28:49 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:28:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226616] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226616

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-rendition/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226617] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226617

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-s3/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226618] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226618

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-s3virge/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226619] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226619

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-savage/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:38 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226620] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226620

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:40 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226621] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226621

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-sis/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:29:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:29:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226622] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226622

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-sisusb/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:03 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226623] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226623

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226624] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226624

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-summa/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226625] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226625

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-tdfx/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226626] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226626

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-tek4957/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226627] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226627

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-trident/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:30:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:30:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226628] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226628

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-tseng/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226629] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226629

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-ur98/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226630] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226630

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-v4l/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226631] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226631

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-vesa/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:22 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226632] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226632

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-vga/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226633] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226633

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-via/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226634] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226634

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:31:51 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226635] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226635

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-vmware/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226636] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-void
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226636

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-void
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-void

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-void/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:20 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226637] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226637

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-drv-voodoo/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:24 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312132.l0VLWOvE020141@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226558





------- Additional Comments From jgarzik at redhat.com  2007-01-31 16:32 EST -------
I hereby disclaim all package ownership (and the same goes for jfsutils and
reiserfsutils).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226638] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226638

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-filesystem/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:44 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226639] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226639

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-fonts/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:32:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226640] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-font-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226640

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-font-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-font-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-font-utils/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:10 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226641] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226641

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-proto-devel/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226642] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-resutils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226642

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-resutils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-resutils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-resutils/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:15 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226643] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-server
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226643

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-server
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-server

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-server/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226644] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-server-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226644

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-server-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-server-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-server-utils/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226645] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-twm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226645

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-twm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-twm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-twm/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226646] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-util-macros
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226646

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-util-macros
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-util-macros

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-util-macros/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:57 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226647] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226647

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: ajackson at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-utils/
Initial Owner: ajackson at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:33:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:33:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226648] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xauth
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226648

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xauth
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xauth

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xauth/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226649] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226649

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xbitmaps/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:14 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226650] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226650

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xdm/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226651] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfs
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226651

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfs
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfs

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xfs/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:28 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226652] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfwp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226652

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfwp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xfwp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xfwp/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:31 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226653] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xinit
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226653

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xinit
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xinit

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xinit/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:43 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226654] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226654

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: krh at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xkb-utils/
Initial Owner: krh at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:34:56 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226655] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xsm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226655

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xsm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xsm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xsm/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226656] New: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226656

           Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xtrans-devel/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226657] New: Merge Review: xrestop
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226657

           Summary: Merge Review: xrestop
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xrestop

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xrestop/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:27 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226658] New: Merge Review: xsane
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226658

           Summary: Merge Review: xsane
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: nphilipp at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xsane

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xsane/
Initial Owner: nphilipp at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:34 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226659] New: Merge Review: xsri
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226659

           Summary: Merge Review: xsri
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: sandmann at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xsri

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xsri/
Initial Owner: sandmann at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:39 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226661] New: Merge Review: yaboot
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226661

           Summary: Merge Review: yaboot
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: pnasrat at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: yaboot

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/yaboot/
Initial Owner: pnasrat at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:37 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226660] New: Merge Review: xterm
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226660

           Summary: Merge Review: xterm
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mlichvar at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: xterm

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xterm/
Initial Owner: mlichvar at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:35:52 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226662] New: Merge Review: yelp
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226662

           Summary: Merge Review: yelp
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mbarnes at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: yelp

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/yelp/
Initial Owner: mbarnes at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226663] New: Merge Review: ypbind
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226663

           Summary: Merge Review: ypbind
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ypbind

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ypbind/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:18 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226664] New: Merge Review: ypserv
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226664

           Summary: Merge Review: ypserv
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: ypserv

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ypserv/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:30 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226665] New: Merge Review: yp-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226665

           Summary: Merge Review: yp-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: steved at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: yp-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/yp-tools/
Initial Owner: steved at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:33 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226666] New: Merge Review: yum
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666

           Summary: Merge Review: yum
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: yum

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/yum/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:47 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226667] New: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667

           Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: katzj at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/yum-metadata-parser/
Initial Owner: katzj at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:36:59 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:36:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226668] New: Merge Review: zenity
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226668

           Summary: Merge Review: zenity
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: mclasen at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: zenity

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/zenity/
Initial Owner: mclasen at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:37:01 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:37:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226669] New: Merge Review: zip
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226669

           Summary: Merge Review: zip
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: zip

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/zip/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:37:06 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:37:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226670] New: Merge Review: zisofs-tools
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670

           Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: harald at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: zisofs-tools

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/zisofs-tools/
Initial Owner: harald at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:41:54 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:41:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225604] Review Request: etherape - Graphical network monitor
	for Unix
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312141.l0VLfsKf021139@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: etherape - Graphical network monitor for Unix


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225604





------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net  2007-01-31 16:41 EST -------
Thanks for checking it in mock. I hope to have my mock enviroment set back up soon.


http://fluxbox-wiki.org/packages/fedora/etherape.spec
http://fluxbox-wiki.org/packages/fedora/etherape-0.9.7-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:37:19 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:37:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226671] New: Merge Review: zlib
Message-ID: 

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671

           Summary: Merge Review: zlib
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: nobody at fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
                CC: varekova at redhat.com


Fedora Merge Review: zlib

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/zlib/
Initial Owner: varekova at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:56:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:56:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312156.l0VLuDXe021927@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225286


enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-
                   |                            |chemnitz.de




------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de  2007-01-31 16:56 EST -------
BLOCKER:

* dependency bloat by adding huge perl requirement due to a small utility 
  (aspell-import) which is not needed for core functionality

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 21:57:25 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:57:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312157.l0VLvPqw021974@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-31 16:57 EST -------
Would it make sense to put the pear classes this package needs into different
SRPMS?  Such as php-pear-Archive-Tar, php-pear-Console-Getargs etc.  Then put a
circular dependency on them?  This would allow upgrades to the classes without
actually updating pear itself.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:08:41 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:08:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226219] Merge Review: openssl097a
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312208.l0VM8fRH022902@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: openssl097a


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226219


tmraz at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:08 EST -------
Old compat package. It should be dropped from Fedora 7 just now.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:10:05 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:10:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312210.l0VMA5SF023011@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:10 EST -------
I don't see why this would be particularly useful; the PEAR install-pear-*.phar
bootstraps itself without needing existing PEAR classes already.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:13:09 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:13:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226246] Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312213.l0VMD9j3023269@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226246


jorton at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rnorwood at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:13 EST -------
The big database in the sky is still confused about this one.

Initial owner: rnorwood at redhat.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:28:21 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:28:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312228.l0VMSLPQ024380@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-31 17:28 EST -------
The only advantage is that you get to update the Archive-Tar, Console-Getargs,
etc packages without having to update php-pear.  However there is the extra
burden of supporting 4-5 additional packages, but I would be willing to maintain
the additional packages myself.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:45:16 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:45:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226176] Merge Review: mysqlclient10
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312245.l0VMjGoU026113@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: mysqlclient10


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226176


tgl at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:45 EST -------
This isn't going to be shipped in Fedora, so no need to review it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:46:26 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:46:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 226177] Merge Review: mysqlclient14
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312246.l0VMkQWG026187@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: mysqlclient14


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226177


tgl at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




------- Additional Comments From tgl at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:46 EST -------
This isn't going to be shipped in Fedora, so no need to review it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 22:53:46 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:53:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312253.l0VMrkHc026542@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500





------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com  2007-01-31 17:53 EST -------
Updated. New URLs:

Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/cycle.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/cycle-0.3.1-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 23:17:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:17:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a
	few games
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312317.l0VNHBuF027979@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256





------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com  2007-01-31 18:17 EST -------
"Allows games to be minimized using keyboard shortcut" will be ok?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 23:31:13 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:31:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 225500] Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312331.l0VNVDM7028534@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cycle - Calendar program for women


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225500





------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com  2007-01-31 18:31 EST -------
rpmlint is still not quiet:
/tmp/cycle-0.3.1-2.fc7.noarch.rpm.10444/usr/share/applications/fedora-
cycle.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the 
desktop entry specification.  Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", 
"Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", 
"Settings", "System", "Utility" instead

Just get rid of 'Application' category because it is deprecated now.
Also, a few things I haven't noticed before:
 * you don't need to pass python dependency, because wxPython already requires
it; so just leave Requires with only wxPython
 * it's surely not Applications/Multimedia. After a short talk at #fedora-extras
I suggest to use Applications/Productivity category (other calendars are put
there)
 * don't gzip man page by hand - rpm does it automatically


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Jan 31 23:44:11 2007
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:44:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 222372] Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down
	terminal for GNOME
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: <200701312344.l0VNiBnX029626@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tilda - a quake like drop down terminal for GNOME


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222372


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-01-31 18:44 EST -------
Another quick REVIEW for

33ffdba098c3778711c17cd072e1919c  tilda-0.9.4-6.src.rpm

OK - rpmlint is silent now
OK - BuildRequires are correct now
OK - desktop file is valid and correctly installed now
OK - Package works as described: Roll up/drop down works, no more segfault. The
gtk-error can be ignored ("gtk_window_resize: assertion `height > 0' failed" is
a quite common error).

All issues are fixed so this package is ACCEPTED.

I think you should send your patch to the author of the program so this fix can
be included upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.