[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 7 13:58:52 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103


rpm at greysector.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2007-01-07 08:58 EST -------
 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
 3. dist tag is present.
 4. build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 5. license field matches the actual license.
 6. license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text included in package.
 7. source files match upstream:
    d2c45879e4cfb95d410bf603af891e07  dvdauthor-0.6.11.tar.gz
 8. latest version is being packaged.
 9. BuildRequires are proper.
10. package builds in mock (x86_64 devel).
11. rpmlint is silent.
12. final provides and requires are sane:

dvdauthor = 0.6.11-8.fc7
=
/bin/sh  
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libdvdread.so.3()(64bit)  
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)  
libfribidi.so.0()(64bit)  
libm.so.6()(64bit)  
libpng12.so.0()(64bit)  
libxml2.so.2()(64bit)  
libz.so.1()(64bit)  

13. no shared libraries are present.
14. package is not relocatable.
15. owns the directories it creates.
16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
17. no duplicates in %files.
18. file permissions are appropriate.
19. %clean is present.
20. %check is not present and no testsuite.
21. no scriptlets present.
22. code, not content.
23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
25. no headers.
26. no pkgconfig files.
27. no libtool .la droppings.
28. not a GUI app.
29. not a web app.

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list