[Bug 220922] Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 8 18:38:13 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE
Alias: geany

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-01-08 13:38 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output
W: geany devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/geany/filetypes.c
Okay, see comment #7

- package meets package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
2ffaae9b0fa807bdd4be0e6ec0f4a2e5  geany-0.10.tar.bz2
- package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- locales handled properly
- no shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- directories it does not create owned by default packages
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean section
- macro usage consistent
- package contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files with suffix
- no need for devel subpackage
- no .la files
- contains proper .desktop file
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages

*** APPROVED ***

Since you are not yet sponsered, I want to see a couple package reviews from you
before blocking FE-ACCEPT.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list