[Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-01-10 00:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a pre-review.
> 
> Thanks for looking at it.
> 
> > 
> > What I am unsure about is this. It seems to me that this includes both gnomescan
> > (flegita - the actual scanning application) and libgnomescan. Should the two be
> > packaged separately?

 I don' think we need both packaged separately.
> > 
> I believe it's okay as is, seems like flegita is sort of a codename or nickname,
> and people who want to use the libs part can make use of the -devel subpackage.
> 

However, I found that you don't need pkgconfig as BR for main package.
Also, do we really need libtool as BR and all other make LIBTOOL? I removed them
and did mock test and it went fine.
Can you check that with testing application??
 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.