[Bug 220969] Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969





------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl  2007-01-15 17:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> APPROVED
> 
> You seem to have no other package submitted,

I created packages for a few applications (see my webpage:
http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms.html) which I recognized as useful and which
hadn't had RPMs already. Some of them (like p7zip) were already added to FE by
other people (based on my SPEC files). I made a proposal with isomaster to gain
experience with passing FE requirements and I plan to add some other packages too.

I've already submited review request of fuse-smb (bug 222742).

> but I can sponsor you nevertheless. You would continue at this step:

Thanks Michael.

>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907

It doesn't look to be user friendly :)

> Packaging subtleties:
> 
> * .desktop category "Application" is deprecated, might be rejected
> by a newer desktop-file-install and desktop-file-validate
> 
> * %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1.gz => %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1*
> would make the spec not fail if automatic compression of manual
> pages is disabled or changed

One question. Should I:
 - respect those suggestions in the "final" version uploaded to CVS,
 - wait with fixes until next "big" sotware version,
 - fix those things and ask once again for aproval?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.