[Bug 219732] Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732





------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com  2007-01-17 14:40 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> Issues:
> 
> 1. Should there really be a devel subpackage just for docs?
> If there does need to be one for some reason it should
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but I don't see a
> reason to have one, unless I am missing something...

The main reason why I did that is because the docs wind up being several times
the size of the actual library; and they are only of interest to developers. But
if you think saving space/bandwidth this way is a bad idea, I'll put them into
the main package.

> 2. Should the 'Requires: gamin' be needed?
> rpm already puts in a requires on libfam.so.0 which is provided by
> the gamin package.

You are right - I removed that explicit dependency.

New stuff:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.