[Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-19 17:53 EST -------
Interesting. I hope that EPSG and FSF would make some
pleasant decision.

Then....
Well, I almost forgot my previous review, however,
* The default is "all make the option active which can
  be available".
  I forgot what option GDAL has, however, at least
------------------------------------------
	--without-netcdf \
------------------------------------------
  if you _really_ want to do for some reason,
  please explain why because netcdf is available from
  Fedora Extras.

  Well, a spec file written by me is left on
  bug 205955 comment 32.
  (For this spec file, I don't think that we should make
   "-bin" subpackage).

* Related to this, the use of internal copy of other
  libraries are forbidden on Fedora when they (the libraies)
  are available seperately.
  For example you have to submit another "libgeotiff" review
  request and make this package use libgeotiff  package
  you created.

* I forgot why -python subpackage is created, however,
  consider to make -python subpackage if it is of any
  sense.


For packaging issue :
* Well, there are several issues which must be fixed...
  please read 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.