[Bug 221065] Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 22 06:43:27 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: warzone2100 - Innovative 3D real-time strategy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065
faucamp at csir.co.za changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-01-22 01:43 EST -------
Thanks for requesting the tests. Now at least we are sure. :-)
MUST items:
* rpmlint output:
W: warzone2100-data no-documentation --- can be ignored, silent otherwise
* package is named well
* spec file is named well
* package meets Packaging Guidelines
* package license is GPL, COPYING file included
* License field in spec file matches actual license
* license file is included in %doc
* spec file is written in American English and legible
* package source md5sum matches upstream source:
56e83a64d5b7aa60ced3d7ac7281bb42 warzone2100-2.0.5.tar.bz2
* package builds successfully on fc6/i386, PPC
(PPC builds not done by me, but tested throughout review)
* BuildRequires are good
* package handles locales properly (no locales)
* package has no need for %post and %postun sections
* package is not relocatable
* package owns directories it creates
* no duplicate entries in %files
* file permissions are good
* proper %clean section
* spec file macros are used consistently
* main package contains code, -data subpackage contains permissable content
* no -doc, -devel subpackages necessary
* contents in %doc not required for runtime functionality of application
* .desktop file present and properly handled
SHOULD items:
* package builds in mock (fc6/i386)
* package functions properly on i386 and PPC
- ExludeArch x86_64 is present until this issue is can be resolved
(see comments #16 and #20 for resolution)
* subpackages require the base package using a fully versioned dependency
Everything has been met.
-------------------------
This package is APPROVED.
-------------------------
After importing this package, please file a bug against it detailing the 64-bit
pointer issues as discussed in comment #18. The bug number should then also be
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line in the spec file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list