[Bug 222555] Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 29 07:44:02 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme-extras - Extra icons from the Tango Project
Alias: tango-icons-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222555


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-01-29 02:43 EST -------
Ok, here we go.



- package conforms to package naming guidlines
- spec file name matches basename
- the package is licensed with an open source compatible license
- package includes license in %doc
- spec file is written in american english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream (sha1sum)
   1bed3023139187c36e851df19506f4942bf2d1c1  tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0.tar.gz
   1bed3023139187c36e851df19506f4942bf2d1c1  tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0.tar.gz.1
- package successfully built on my test box (i386)
- no need for exclude arch
- BR are present and make sense
- no libraries, no need to run ldconfig
- not relocatable
- package owns everything it creates
- package does not duplicate files it owns
- file attributes are set appropriatly
- %clean section present and removes buildroot
- consistently uses macros
- no large documentation
- files in %doc does not affect runtime of application
- does not contain a pkgconfig file
- does not contain any libraries
- does not have a devel package
- does not contain any .la files
- package does not have a gui
- package does not own files/directories owned by other packages.

Peter, have you considered reporting the missing CC lincense to the rpmlint maintainer?

I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED.





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list