[Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 30 12:11:08 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-01-30 07:11 EST -------
Well,
* This package (seedit) is good.
* md5sum of source coincides.
* Your pre-review looks good to a certain content.
- Note:
My recognition is that setting the id of vendor as
"fedora" is still recommended if upstream does not
set vendor id.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
Okay!!
------------------------------------------------------------
This package (seedit) is APPROVED by me.
------------------------------------------------------------
Please go forward according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
I will sponsor you when you do a procedure and I receive
a mail which tells that you need a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list