[Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 30 12:11:08 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-01-30 07:11 EST -------
Well,

* This package (seedit) is good.
* md5sum of source coincides.
* Your pre-review looks good to a certain content.
- Note:
  My recognition is that setting the id of vendor as 
  "fedora" is still recommended if upstream does not
  set vendor id.
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

Okay!!
------------------------------------------------------------
  This package (seedit) is APPROVED by me.
------------------------------------------------------------

  Please go forward according to 
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
  I will sponsor you when you do a procedure and I receive
  a mail which tells that you need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list