From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 00:57:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010057.l610v27C006807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 01:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010102.l6112jdF007127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at ebourne.me.uk 2007-06-30 21:02 EST ------- Updated package to address all comments above. All built and should appear in updates-testing for fc6, f7 and in rawhide sometime soon. Everyone please give me any feedback you can (good or bad) so I'll know when to mark it stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 01:03:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010103.l6113nUP007201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-06-30 21:03 EST ------- Trying to build this on F7... src/lib/FLACFile.cpp: In member function 'void FLACFile_real::load(std::string)': src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:167: error: 'set_filename' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:169: error: no matching function for call to 'FLACFile_real::init()' /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:226: note: candidates are: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(FILE*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:227: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const char*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:228: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const std::string&) src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:170: error: 'FLAC__FILE_DECODER_OK' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:174: error: 'process_until_end_of_file' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [src/FLACFile.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3' make: *** [hydrogenPlayer] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... src/lib/FLACFile.cpp: In member function 'void FLACFile_real::load(std::string)': src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:167: error: 'set_filename' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:169: error: no matching function for call to 'FLACFile_real::init()' /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:226: note: candidates are: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(FILE*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:227: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const char*) /usr/include/FLAC++/decoder.h:228: note: virtual FLAC__StreamDecoderInitStatus FLAC::Decoder::File::init(const std::string&) src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:170: error: 'FLAC__FILE_DECODER_OK' was not declared in this scope src/lib/FLACFile.cpp:174: error: 'process_until_end_of_file' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [src/FLACFile.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3' make: *** [hydrogen] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.93730 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 01:11:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245694] Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010111.l611BREV007520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245694 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-06-30 21:11 EST ------- I can change the description to not reference the package name. I will also contact the author about running the test suite. I included the license, because I thought it was the "RIGHT THING" to do. Also, I had no other docs, and rpmlint complains about that IIRC. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Phlickr Short Description: PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API Owners: mastahnke at gmail.com Branches: FC6, F7, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 01:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010115.l611FCX1007677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-06-30 21:15 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 01:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225288] Merge Review: at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010142.l611gph7008509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mastahnke at gmail.com |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-06-30 21:42 EST ------- Re-reviewed. Any reason why '%define major_ver 3.1.10' is needed when %{version} is the same value? This is not a blocker, just a quetsion. Everything else looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 02:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010211.l612B3aE009629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-06-30 22:11 EST ------- Also built for EL-4 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 02:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010212.l612CVLj009725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-06-30 22:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > > Christoph: Are you still interested in reviewing this? Yes, but this really is a hard one, especially as there is confusion (about the name) and regressions. As I said before, the 2 latest packages don't work at all because of the not executable files. (In reply to comment #46) > Getting packages into Fedora Extras seems quite impossible :-) Lee, I'm very sorry about that, of course this is partly my fault. On the other hand: The binary package you gave me in comment #40 simply doesn't work and I don't think this is because of machine but of the package itself. I promise (once again) to look at this more deeply tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 02:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226218] Merge Review: openssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010223.l612NNgH010171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226218 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mastahnke at gmail.com |tmraz at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-06-30 22:23 EST ------- Looks good now. I like the spec file cleanup. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 02:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222515] Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010245.l612jWG5011063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222515 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-06-30 22:45 EST ------- I think for now I'll just close it... I haven't even attempted to build this against pidgin/libpurple and I don't have the spare cycles to handle any problems getting the two to work together. I'll reopen it later if I find the time to test it out. Or someone else is welcome to take over packaging if they want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 03:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010311.l613BE24012139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 mkpai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mkpai at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-06-30 23:11 EST ------- Hi Jason, I am having some trouble with my privileges. I am working on it at the moment. Thanks and regards, -- Pai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 03:19:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246368] New: Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246368 Summary: Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/pbbuttonsd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/pbbuttonsd-0.8.0-1.src.rpm Description: The pbbuttonsd daemon supports special hotkeys, and handles power management, light sensors, and keyboard backlighting on Apple laptops, of both ppc and i386 variety. It also offers generic support for a wider range of other laptops and notebooks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 05:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 01:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010506.l6156DAQ016390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-01 01:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-0.5.2-5.fc8.src.rpm Okay, take 5. Fixed the summaries, the nasty use of spaces instead of tabs and hopefully I understood how obsoletes and provides work now. Fixed up macro use in changelog. Now all that remains is to make mock love us.. I hope. This seems to be a mock bug, maybe opening a bug against mock and letting it block this one would be acceptable? I would really not like to release ndesk-dbus on the world without being able to have it at least on all supported releases at the same time since depend specs are likely to need alterations to not use bundled copies and that would create ugly unless done at the same time (keeping if nesting to weed out devel would be the pinnacle of ugly). Upstream is intending on renaming future tarball releases to ndesk-dbus so a lot of the ugly should go away in the future, they do however request that packagers put up with ugly for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 06:01:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 02:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010601.l6161xHg018834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-01 02:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/perl-Text-Markdown-1.0.3-2.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/perl-Text-Markdown-1.0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm add BRs for missing modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 06:20:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 02:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243664] Review Request: innotop - Console MySQL Monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010620.l616K7Ji019523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: innotop - Console MySQL Monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243664 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-01 02:20 EST ------- Imported and built successfully on Fedora branches (EL branches are a WOP ;-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 06:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 02:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010634.l616YaFT020032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-01 02:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, for 0.9.0-2: > > * Comments > - Are the comments above Summary entry needed? > I suggest to remove them I'm confused here. Which comments do you mean? There are a few empty lines above "Summary" in the spec file, but those are mandated by my support of other RPM based distributions (SUSE 10.2 and 10.3). > * Requires > - Check the Requires for -devel subpackage. > Especially, check the description in > libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc . You are right. Those requirements was different. I've added the requirements for libIDL and ORBit2 to the devel package. > ? Conflicts > - By the way, currently Fedora's newest evolution-brutus is > 1.1.26.2-2.fc7. This srpm means that Fedora's > evolution-brutus has to be updated? Yes. e-b<=1.1.28 installs brutus-keyring by itself. Separating brutus-keyring and e-b is really the right thing to do technically. I've pushed the e-b modifications to svn (svn.brutus.net) for Brian to pick up. > * Documents > - Please install the following > ---------------------------------------------- > AUTHORS > ChangeLog OK, done. > ---------------------------------------------- > - On the other hand, I suggest to remove the following > ---------------------------------------------- > INSTALL - This file is needed for people who want to > build and install this package by themselves and > is not needed for people who use rpm package. > ---------------------------------------------- OK, removed. New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SPECS/brutus-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SRPMS/brutus-keyring-0.9.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 06:36:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 02:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010636.l616am80020135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-01 02:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > ? Conflicts > > - By the way, currently Fedora's newest evolution-brutus is > > 1.1.26.2-2.fc7. This srpm means that Fedora's > > evolution-brutus has to be updated? > > Yes. e-b<=1.1.28 installs brutus-keyring by itself. This should be "e-b<1.1.28" _not_ "e-b<=1.1.28". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 07:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 03:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707010741.l617fkYM022608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mola.mp at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc5 |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 10:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 06:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011034.l61AYkQu002056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-01 06:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > - Check the Requires for -devel subpackage. > > Especially, check the description in > > libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc . > > You are right. Those requirements was different. I've added the requirements for > libIDL and ORBit2 to the devel package. On second thoughts... the devel package require the non-devel package which require libIDL and ORBit2 so the devel package shouldn't require any of those by itself. Right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 12:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 08:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011248.l61CmRr2007926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-01 08:48 EST ------- I have modified the description according to your recommendation. It's weird, but I don't get any error about rpaths (I'm building on 2 processors, i386). I have checked the binaries with chrpath. Anyway, I have added a --disable-rapth to %configure Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/qfits-6.2.0-0.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 14:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011401.l61E198B012417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-01 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Well, for 0.9.0-2: > > > > * Comments > > - Are the comments above Summary entry needed? > > I suggest to remove them > > I'm confused here. Which comments do you mean? > There are a few empty lines above > "Summary" in the spec file, but those are mandated by my support of other RPM > based distributions (SUSE 10.2 and 10.3). - What I meant here is the parts of ------------------------------------------------ # RPM spec file for the Brutus Keyring. # Copyright (C) 2007 OMC Denmark ApS # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, # MA 02111-1307 USA # ------------------------------------------------ (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > - Check the Requires for -devel subpackage. > > > Especially, check the description in > > > libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc . > > > On second thoughts... the devel package require the non-devel package which > require libIDL and ORBit2 so the devel package shouldn't > require any of those by > itself. Right? - The point is not there. /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc contains the line: --------------------------------------------------- Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1 --------------------------------------------------- This means that brutus-keyring-devel must have "Requires: ORBit2*-devel*" (and /usr/include/brutus-keyring-1.0/brutus-keyring.h also requires ORBit2-devel) (the dependency for ORBit2 is automatically pulled). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 14:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011413.l61EDp2B013025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-01 10:13 EST ------- Ahh, I see. New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SPECS/brutus-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SRPMS/brutus-keyring-0.9.0-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 14:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 10:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011416.l61EGW01013204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-01 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Well, for 0.9.0-2: > > > > > > * Comments > > > - Are the comments above Summary entry needed? > > > I suggest to remove them > > > > I'm confused here. Which comments do you mean? > > There are a few empty lines above > > "Summary" in the spec file, but those are mandated by my support of other RPM > > based distributions (SUSE 10.2 and 10.3). > - What I meant here is the parts of > ------------------------------------------------ > # RPM spec file for the Brutus Keyring. > # Copyright (C) 2007 OMC Denmark ApS > > # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, > # MA 02111-1307 USA > # > ------------------------------------------------ So I should remove the more or less standard GPL license notice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011518.l61FIbUN016326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:18 EST ------- yes it appears to be down. I am actually out of town now so I have mirrored the files on another server that I have access to. http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/proxychains.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/proxychains-3.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011524.l61FOO93016662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:24 EST ------- My server that hosts the spec and srpm appears to be down and I am out of town now so I have mirrored the files on another server that I have access to. http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-goodweather.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-goodweather-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011527.l61FR8Ji016804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:27 EST ------- My server that hosts the spec and srpm appears to be down and I am out of town now so I have mirrored the files on another server that I have access to. http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:28:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011528.l61FSAhD016857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:28 EST ------- My server that hosts the spec and srpm appears to be down and I am out of town now so I have mirrored the files on another server that I have access to. http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011536.l61FabXC017240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:36 EST ------- Ville, Thanks :) "Just a little question: since all the .desktop files seem to be OnlyShowIn=KDE, does the GTK icon cache be updated in scriptlets?" ... Umm, something tells me I shouldn't be calling gtk-update-icon-cache on %pre and %post, right? I'll look into the :9/:10 problem. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243951] Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011542.l61Fgwn2017653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language Alias: pbm2l7k-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243951 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-01 11:42 EST ------- CVS done (last night; my connection has been extremely poor lately) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 15:48:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011548.l61Fmki2017891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-01 11:48 EST ------- ... Though... Does anyone see any reason why kdebluetooth icons should be system-wide instead of KDE-only? (Read: OnlyShowIn!=KDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 16:45:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011645.l61Gj6Pu020550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-07-01 12:45 EST ------- Hi Axel, is there any chance you could push builds for this on FC-6 and/or F-7? I don't mean to hassle you, I'm just curious... thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 16:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] New: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ois.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ois-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Object Oriented Input System (OIS) is meant to be a cross platform, simple solution for using all kinds of Input Devices (KeyBoards, Mice, Joysticks, etc) and feedback devices (e.g. forcefeedback). Written in C++ using Object Oriented Design patterns. --- Note this is needed to be able to upgrade ogre to 1.4.x, and thus to fix the unresolved dependency problem ogre is having in rawhide, because of the new cegui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011707.l61H7UFU021624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-07-01 13:07 EST ------- Thanks, setting to needinfo on me to bubble up in the frontpage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] New: Review Request: libibcommon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 Summary: Review Request: libibcommon Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com libibcommon is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213658] Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011710.l61HAm5T021806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213658 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |246387 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:10:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011710.l61HApBH021851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241900 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011711.l61HBXYP021938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-07-01 13:11 EST ------- Actually I'm pushing builds starting a month and they fail in the Java parts. I can't reproduce it locally though. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33921-vtk-5.0.3-18.fc6/ppc/build.log Similar for F7. I tend to turn off the java builds to get something in and then care about the java errors. What do you say? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:12:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246388] New: Review Request: libibmad Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246388 Summary: Review Request: libibmad Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246387 +++ libibmad is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:12:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011712.l61HCGPJ022045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246388 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246389] New: Review Request: libibumad Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246389 Summary: Review Request: libibumad Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246388 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246387 +++ libibumad is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246388] Review Request: libibmad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011713.l61HDBcc022134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibmad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246388 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246389 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:15:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246390] New: Review Request: opensm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246390 Summary: Review Request: opensm Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246389 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246388 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246387 +++ opensm is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and networks. The opensm package implements the subnet manager necessary to make an infiniband network operational (infiniband cards use static subnet routing, this package scans the fabric and updates all the attached nodes with the routes needed to access other nodes). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:15:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246389] Review Request: libibumad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011715.l61HFT3D022280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibumad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246389 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246390 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:17:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246391] New: Review Request: infiniband-diags Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246391 Summary: Review Request: infiniband-diags Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246390 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246389 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246388 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #246387 +++ infiniband-diags is part of the infiniband stack for managing Infiniband hardware and networks. This package contains useful utilities for seeing the status of infiniband ports on the hosts and on switches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:17:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246390] Review Request: opensm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011717.l61HHD3X022393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opensm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246390 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246391 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 17:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222515] Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011745.l61HjNMx023635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofiasip-gaim-prpl - SIP/SIMPLE plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222515 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 18:07:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 14:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011807.l61I7vqI024707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-07-01 14:07 EST ------- Oh, I wasn't aware of the Java build problems! That's annoying. VTK is very useful and, in my experience over the past few months, your package works quite nicely for C++, python, and tcl development. I fully support your idea of initially disabling Java. It can always be added as an update once the build problems get sorted out. And I'm wondering -- are there any Java coders/packagers following this bug who might like to look into the above build problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 18:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 14:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011822.l61IMDr1025361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-01 14:22 EST ------- Usually Fedora's spec files does not contain such license comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 18:39:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 14:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011839.l61Id5Xf026082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-01 14:39 EST ------- I have tested the Confilct mechanisms and is look to works, so I can APPROVE your package. Unfortunately, something is wrong with my BZ accoount, because BZ don't accept the change for the fedora-review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011903.l61J3KCP027274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-01 15:03 EST ------- Hello, Now the Rpmlint output is OK for me, so I can APPROVED the package. Unfortanately, I can't change the fedora-review flag thue a technical issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011904.l61J4h6L027353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|241900 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-07-01 15:04 EST ------- * rpmlint: W: ois-devel no-documentation Harmless and ignorable. W: ois unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libOIS-1.0.0.so /usr/lib/libXaw.so.7 W: ois unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libOIS-1.0.0.so /lib/libm.so.6 These can be a total PITA to try and fix, but not a blocker. * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: N/A * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence field matches: Yes * Licence file installed: Yes (and included upstream) * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: Yes * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock: fc6/ppc, f7/i386, f8/x86_64) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: Yes * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * %doc affects runtime: No * Headers and static libs in -devel: Yes * .pc files in -devel: Yes * .so in -devel: Yes * -devel requires base: Yes * Contains .la files: No * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files installed correctly: N/A Just noticed the changelog says "Sat Jul 1 2007" but July 1st is a sunday :-) APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011905.l61J5IvW027443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:06:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011906.l61J63ur027491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-01 15:05 EST ------- >From the author: "It's BSD. Pygments was licensed under the LGPL in a previous version, and I missed to update that spot." He has updated the FAQ to BSD licensed. - Changed LGPL to BSD Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pygments.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pygments-0.8.1-1.fc7.src.rpm md5sums: 942400cc31ec431958908fadb6d9a26a python-pygments.spec e7b5deb2dc2d033d4b5deed67de0ca0c python-pygments-0.8.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011921.l61JL5lm028173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-01 15:21 EST ------- Thanks! Can you set the fedora-review flag to + please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 19:41:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707011941.l61JfPQh029417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 15:41 EST ------- Can you please provide correct urls to the specfile and the srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012001.l61K1eF3030561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-01 16:01 EST ------- I have sent a bug and a patch upstream to solve the parallel make problem. the falliure of the test suite on x86_64 systems is also an open bug upstream. So I have disabled the entire %check rule. I have also added Requires: glibc-headers rule in the -devel subpackage to get /usr/include/pthread.h Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib-0.1.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012015.l61KF90p031110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-01 16:15 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/perl-Time-Duration-1.04-1.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/perl-Time-Duration-1.04-1.fc6.src.rpm Boy, I must have been half asleep when I posted those other urls... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012020.l61KKABR031298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 16:20 EST ------- The third test is only executed if you do an export TEST_POD=true in the %check section. When you do that, however, this test fails because not all functions have documentation. So I think there are 2 options: - Have upstream fix their test - Don't run the 03podcoverage test. If you do that, there's no need to BuildRequire Test::Pod::Coverage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012020.l61KKq6r031363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012028.l61KStcR031777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 16:28 EST ------- Ah, thanks Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source Time-Duration-1.04.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Checks are present and run successfully * I wrote a small test script, and functionality is ok. Needs work: * BuildRequires: perl should not be included (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:32:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012032.l61KWrM0032014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 16:32 EST ------- Hi Jeffrey, It looks like this review is a duplicate of #242311 Maybe you and Marc can co-maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012034.l61KY7Ah032071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-01 16:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ois Short Description: Open Input System, OO gaming input library Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Notice, this package has been approved, see above, but the reviewer has forgotten to set fedora-review to +. I've already requested him to remedy this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:44:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012044.l61Kio50032576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-01 16:44 EST ------- I'll defer to Marc to get the package reviewed and voluteer my services as co-maintainer. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 242311 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012044.l61KipvT032596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-01 16:44 EST ------- *** Bug 243733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:51:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012051.l61KpYWg000383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-01 16:51 EST ------- > 1. You added AUTHORS and NEWS to your chmod line, but didn't add them in %doc > under files, so they are still not shipped. :-) fixed > 2. perhaps for now this shouldn't have any icon? What about image-viewer.png from gnome-icon-theme? Seems like a good fit. I see that gv is doing the same thing (using postscript-viewer.png from gnome-icon-theme). Also added xterm add to req, as the help is based on forking a xterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012052.l61KqbtU000451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-01 16:52 EST ------- Marc, I'm willing to comaintain once you get this package approved and get sponsored (unfortunately I can't sponsor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:53:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012053.l61KrZD4000503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 16:53 EST ------- It might be me, but I tried to checkout perl-XML-Simple, and the FC-5, FC-6, F-7 and devel branches are empty. The latest version is 2.14, in the FC-4 branch. My CVSROOT is set to :ext:ruben at cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs Am I doing something wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:53:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012053.l61KrwvX000537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-01 16:53 EST ------- spec: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/xzgv/xzgv.spec srpm: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/xzgv/xzgv-0.8-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 20:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012058.l61KwTr7000825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-01 16:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158315&action=view) build log from mock I have tried to build your package on mock (devel, x86_64). Unfortunately, the build failed. The build log is attached to this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 21:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012102.l61L2ert001037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-01 17:02 EST ------- I can't sponsor either, but I had a look, and it looks good to me: Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source Time-Duration-1.04.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * package contains tests and they run OK * package has sane Requires and Provides Just a suggestion, it may be nice to include the ChangeLog file in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 21:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012111.l61LBGgZ001420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-01 17:11 EST ------- I didn't expect it to build (on x86_64, although it should work on i386). That's why I said it's "not quite ready for review". :-) I think only two tests are failing, so that should be easy enough to fix. There are also a bunch of rpmlint warnings, IIRC. I'm going to try to fix all this in the next couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 22:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012217.l61MH4Kx004644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-01 18:17 EST ------- setting the fedora+ flag on behalf of Jochen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 22:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012217.l61MHmfX004702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-01 18:17 EST ------- Setting the fedora+ flag on behalf of Jochen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 22:18:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012218.l61MI2kh004744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 22:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] New: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/mysql-proxy.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/mysql-proxy-0.5.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: MySQL Proxy is a simple program that sits between your client and MySQL server(s) that can monitor, analyze or transform their communication. Its flexibility allows for unlimited uses, common ones include: load balancing, failover, query analysis, query filtering and modification and many more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 23:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012335.l61NZ9Op008076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-07-01 19:35 EST ------- Changed the flag to + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 23:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012338.l61Nc8UY008220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 1 23:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707012339.l61NdAJd008334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 00:32:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020032.l620WmIp010995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-01 20:32 EST ------- Ok, lets talk about the errors that need to be fixed upstream first: E: hylafax binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/faxalter ['/usr/lib64']: Same for all other binaries. This is a no-go for fedora, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 Although we could fix this in the spec I think it should be done properly upstream. E: hylafax subdir-in-bin /usr/sbin/faxmail Same for the subdirs of /usr/sbin/faxmail. IMO a no-go to because it is a violation of the FHS. Should be in /usr/lib/ I guess. E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4 libfaxserver.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.0.4 libfaxutil.so this is related to W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so I brought this up on fedora-extras-list back in October 2006, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00496.html and especially Michaels mails https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00505.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00508.html W: hylafax undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4 _Z11vlogWarningPKcP13__va_list_tag Much more undefined symbols, need to be fixed too. W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4 /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 Same for a couple more libs and same with libfaxutil too. Sorry, I did not have the time to look into the spec more deeply today, but I think we should focus on fixing these first because the packaging bugs are easier. If you have a questions about a specific rpmlint error, run "rpmlint -I ". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 00:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020050.l620ojjY011815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyparted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 01:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242537] Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020119.l621JV7p013160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242537 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-01 21:19 EST ------- Have you managed to get mksh built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 01:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020123.l621Ntlk013358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|fedora_contrib | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-01 21:23 EST ------- I've removed the Fedora Contributors security group from the bug, looking at the nature of the spec file, it doesn't seem private. (plus it gets defeated by the f-p-r at rh.com CC) Oh a side note, I'll look into doing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 02:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243076] Review Request: reciteword - Recite Word Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020237.l622bhrQ016668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: reciteword - Recite Word Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243076 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-01 22:37 EST ------- Click the help button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 02:59:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020259.l622xsdg017788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-01 22:59 EST ------- This doesn't build; you'll need at least a build dependency on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). There's also a test suite, but you'll need many more modules to run it (at least perl(Test::More), perl(Danga::Socket), perl(Gearman::Objects) and perl(Gearman::Server). (The last one isn't yet available.) Even then I'm not sure it's possible to run the test in mock or within the buildsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 03:34:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 23:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020334.l623YpJm019237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-01 23:34 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. f164dcb24b1084e1cfa2b1cb63d590e6 stardict-dictd_www.dict.org_wn-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - no %doc files as I think dictd_www.dict.org_wn.ifo is not %doc + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Requires: stardict >= 2.4.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:00:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020400.l6240voL020260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 00:00 EST ------- Notice, because of bandwidth issue, I didn't upload the newest SRPM, you can download the old srpm, replace the spec file with the newest one and rebuild to get the newest srpm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020401.l62414HO020300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 00:00 EST ------- Notice, because of bandwidth issue, I didn't upload the newest SRPM, you can download the old srpm, replace the spec file with the newest one and rebuild to get the newest srpm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020401.l6241C0s020335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 00:01 EST ------- Notice, because of bandwidth issue, I didn't upload the newest SRPM, you can download the old srpm, replace the spec file with the newest one and rebuild to get the newest srpm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:01:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020401.l6241bL7020421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 00:01 EST ------- Notice, because of bandwidth issue, I didn't upload the newest SRPM, you can download the old srpm, replace the spec file with the newest one and rebuild to get the newest srpm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020401.l6241e8k020453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 00:01 EST ------- Notice, because of bandwidth issue, I didn't upload the newest SRPM, you can download the old srpm, replace the spec file with the newest one and rebuild to get the newest srpm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:04:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020404.l6244BPI020678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-02 00:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 096f25252d2809191ff4fea041364841 stardict-mueller7-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - no %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Requires: stardict >= 2.4.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020407.l6247sjY020898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-02 00:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 0aa46b7d589a01663c3fb465152db85d stardict-edict-2.4.2.tar.bz2 e0f60d6acc4e3df6784805816b2e136f stardict-jmdict-en-ja-2.4.2.tar.bz2 2c574aef86a5d7bab45395d7e8ee7f6b stardict-jmdict-ja-en-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - no %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Requires: stardict >= 2.4.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020430.l624UnIe021810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-02 00:30 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 0349198b9dfcecd9a0f505512bb21d8b stardict-cdict-big5-2.4.2.tar.bz2 80b13d05bd5e975c35afcf4a13113673 stardict-cedict-big5-2.4.2.tar.bz2 50b9423fa578988b5b0544c5b663058a stardict-langdao-ce-big5-2.4.2.tar.bz2 61ceeec1b056a171645af723d3e956fe stardict-langdao-ec-big5-2.4.2.tar.bz2 e54da1d0759ce59f8fbddff7979e9300 stardict-oxford-big5-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - no %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Requires: stardict >= 2.4.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 04:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020432.l624W4eP021885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-02 00:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 68e539f362de416490b78fed97aba780 stardict-cdict-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 d8db9bdbf0dd4856d03e04d3f73d9c5a stardict-cedict-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 8e9700798a0ffeed23207b7cf2592246 stardict-langdao-ce-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 41a71f5b3952709746dd7e52cf155b8b stardict-langdao-ec-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 c175f9bcb88e7513380ad05b291a8a03 stardict-oxford-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 745727367e22ab9740256ceaf16cb83d stardict-xdict-ce-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 364bcecc126d6d8560728dc487ea9eaf stardict-xdict-ec-gb-2.4.2.tar.bz2 4467d7941f9388f0e01ee3025c400b5c stardict-stardict1.3-2.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - no %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Requires: stardict >= 2.4.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:28:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242537] Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020528.l625SKol024509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242537 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-02 01:28 EST ------- Package: mksh-29f-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Package: mksh-29f-1.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete 34295 (mksh): Build on target fedora-6-extras succeeded. 34296 (mksh): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. 34297 (mksh): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221776] Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020529.l625Tnax024600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digitemp - Dallas Semiconductor 1-wire device reading console application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221776 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-02 01:29 EST ------- ...done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:30:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020530.l625UidD024672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 zhu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 01:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-en Short Description: English(en) dictionaries for StarDict Owners: zhu at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020531.l625VfXq024753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 zhu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 01:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-ru Short Description: Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict Owners: zhu at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020532.l625WBqQ024808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 zhu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 01:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-ja Short Description: Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict Owners: zhu at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:32:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020532.l625Wwnl024874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 01:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-zh_TW Short Description: Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict Owners: zhu at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:33:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020533.l625XV19024930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 zhu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 05:33:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020533.l625XuMr024979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 zhu at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-07-02 01:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stardict-dic-zh_CN Short Description: Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict Owners: zhu at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 06:08:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020608.l6268iiT027443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-02 02:08 EST ------- I added a BuildRequires for perl-Gearman-Server (which is not in the repo yet) and enabled the tests, and it seems to work in mock. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 06:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020620.l626KCAI027899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-02 02:20 EST ------- As I understand nobody really wants to help me out and my project stuck as many others. Well, anyway i'm gonna continue developing it... just for fun Here are links of new release: SRPM Url : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2-2.src.rpm Spec Url :http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 06:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020640.l626ebZv029001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 02:40 EST ------- Umm.. while I can review this, the trouble for me is that I don't understand Xen *completely*. Is this program surely working for you? Perhaps I cannot understand how to use this immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 06:47:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020647.l626lse3029333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-02 02:47 EST ------- it works for me, but you know that it's better to test it on different systems if you have any question fell free to ask, also i can send steps how i test that, so if you have 2 systems with xen installed i can provide information how to test it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 06:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020654.l626sjoS029661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-02 02:54 EST ------- Ruben: Good point, ChangeLog should indeed be in %doc, it has been added. SRPM: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/SRPMS/perl-Time-Duration-1.04-4.src.rpm Jeffrey: I would be happy to have a co-maintainer. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 07:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 03:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020718.l627IAfx030978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-02 03:18 EST ------- No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep the header if it isn't to annoying. It is not a matter of being a legalese nitpicker. I just prefer to have a license notice on the top of each and every file (except for the really insignificant ones) to avoid any possible legal ambiguities. I'll certainly remove it if it is a problem, but I would rather keep the license notice if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 07:32:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 03:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020732.l627WGVd031805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 03:32 EST ------- Actually I have only one machine :) However now I can trust you. By the first glance at 0.2-2: For packaging of 0.2-2, some issues must be fixed. * Version - On rpm packaging, "0.2-2" is considered as Version (as hyphen is not allowed for rpm version, for this case the rpm version is 0.2.2) So the EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) is 0.2.2-%{?dist}. * Descriptsion - contains too long line (must not exceed 79 characters) * Arch - This package contains only text files and architecture must be noarch. * Macros - Please use macros (please check %_sysconfdir, %_mandir, %_initrddir for example) * scripts --------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/rc3.d %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/ --------------------------------------------------- - Why is this needed? * Permission - The permissions of the following files are incorrect. ----------------------------------------------------- E: profugus script-without-shebang /etc/profugus.conf W: profugus spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/profugus.8.gz ----------------------------------------------------- * File entry - /etc/profugus.conf is listed twice. * Requires - Add proper %Requires(post), etc (check: "Services" subsection of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) * defattr Now we recommend: %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 07:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 03:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020740.l627e8T7032190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 03:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep > the header if it isn't to annoying. Well, okay. I don't force you to remove them. ----------------------------------------------- Requires: ORBit2*-devel* ----------------------------------------------- - Oops.. I just wanted to emphasize "-devel". The name is "ORBit2-devel". Sorry for confusing you.. - By the way did you modify the Source tarball itself silently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 08:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 04:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] New: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/blitz.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/blitz-0.9-0.1.src.rpm Description: Blitz++ is a C++ class library for scientific computing which provides performance on par with Fortran 77/90. It uses template techniques to achieve high performance. Blitz++ provides dense arrays and vectors, random number generators, and small vectors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244346] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020914.l629Edsh009993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities Alias: mailutils-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244346 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-02 05:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) Patrice: Much thanks for your comments. > You don't use some features, like > libgsasl, guile, or emacs-mh. I think these should be shipped. That sounds sane. I will add those. > I think it is bad to conflict with nmh. I think that > you should use > --with-mh-bindir > instead. This was intentional. If you look at the spec file, I already use --with-mh-bindir=%{_bindir}, that overrides the default bin/mh location of mh compatibility files. The original reason was that rpmlint objected having a subdirectory of bin. I tend to agree with rpmlint -- I would not call having binaries such weird places as subdirectories of bin a good practice. Moreover, I think there is no use of having both mh-s installed, at a time, and conflicts are about the best and most standard way to deal with situations such as this. If not conflicting with nmh is important for you, and you insist on removing the conflict, please either suggest an alternative resolution, or explain where would you put the conflicting files and why. > Some suggestions: > > * put the %post and friends before the %files section. There is no > reason, except that it is how all the other spec files are done > in fedora. That's fair, I'll move that. > * use wildcards for man pages and info pages in %files, like > %{_infodir}/%{name}.info* > > %{_mandir}/man1/popauth.1* > > * don't use .gz in the install-info %preun, install-info is able to > figure out itself what compression it should use. I was already wondering wheter manual pages are always gzipped. Thus, thanks for the explanation and be sure I'll change it. I will probably have to change it also in some other packages. > * use > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.a > instead of > rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.a > that way build will break if something changed upstream. Makes sense. Will change that. > * It seems to me that COPYING.LESSER should be in libs %doc > I also guess that devel subpackage is LGPL licensed. > I would also add COPYING in all the subpackages, since > the doc subpackage may not be installed. > > Alternatively you could have all packages depend on -doc > since it is tiny, and more like a common package that really > a doc package in my opinion. I was thinking about the second option already, though it was for different reasons and first one also makes sense. I'll think for a while about this and pick one of the solutions for the next revision of the package. > * since this package is heavily split it would be nice, in my > opinion, to try to have a similar layout than in other repos. > I haven't really found other repos packaging mailutils, except > for alt linux, but I may have missed something. Maybe you could > use the split from the upstream specfile, as long as it makes sense > (no -dev subpackage, for example). Will look at this later. The revised packages with most of your suggestions incorporated will be available either in today's evening (CET), or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020932.l629W8Pq011753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-02 05:31 EST ------- I added a note to bug 239004. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243951] Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020948.l629mf8u013425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language Alias: pbm2l7k-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243951 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-02 05:48 EST ------- Thanks Marek and Jason. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226294] Merge Review: php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020955.l629tiJf014263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php Alias: php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226294 Bug 226294 depends on bug 246210, which changed state. Bug 246210 Summary: php-dbase conflict with php-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243947] Review Request: c2050 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2050 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020957.l629vYxE014535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c2050 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2050 printer language Alias: c2050-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243947 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-02 05:57 EST ------- Thanks Marek and Kevin. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 09:59:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 05:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707020959.l629xsmm014886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-02 05:59 EST ------- I discovered by testing the package that I made some mistakes on the files (I had lost the html interface) There is a corrected version who is working: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-7.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 10:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 06:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021012.l62ACBUn015975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2007-07-02 06:12 EST ------- Kevin, are there any news after last FESCo discussion? (In reply to comment #37) > cvs done. > > Please note that FESCo is planning on discussing if rsyslog should replace > sysklogd in it's thursday meeting. You might hold off on building until after > that. Also, be very carefull when pushing to F-7. I don't think we want to > replace sysklogd in a released version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 10:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 06:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021042.l62Ag3HI017632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-02 06:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep > > the header if it isn't to annoying. > > Well, okay. I don't force you to remove them. Thanks :-) > ----------------------------------------------- > Requires: ORBit2*-devel* > ----------------------------------------------- > - Oops.. I just wanted to emphasize "-devel". > The name is "ORBit2-devel". Sorry for confusing you.. Silly me... > - By the way did you modify the Source tarball itself silently? Sigh, yes. The spec file revision number didn't make it to the tar-ball version string. I've now changed my ways and will increase the third version digit for each spec file modification so that any source change will be reflected by the tar-ball version. New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SPECS/brutus-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SRPMS/brutus-keyring-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 12:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021210.l62CAbh5025175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-02 08:10 EST ------- I just uploaded the new texlive packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ Main features/differences from the previous version: 1. dropped former texjive zip list for the texmf trees and texlive now uses the zips generated from the scheme-tetex.tpm from upstream 2. reintroduced texlive-errata updating scheme Tom, this means the pdflatex will work for you since fmtutil now regenerates all fmt files correctly due to correct dependency resolution. Seems like we have the first functional texlive release based on scheme-tetex now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 12:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021218.l62CIEY8025965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-02 08:18 EST ------- I just uploaded the new texlive packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ Main features/differences from the previous version: 1. dropped former texjive zip list for the texmf trees and texlive now uses the zips generated from the scheme-tetex.tpm from upstream 2. reintroduced texlive-errata updating scheme Seems like we have the first functional texlive release based on scheme-tetex now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 12:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021220.l62CK0Y0026087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-02 08:19 EST ------- Matej, could you please try it again with the new (0.4) packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ It should build successfully. Main features/differences from the previous version: 1. dropped former texjive zip list for the texmf trees and texlive now uses the zips generated from the scheme-tetex.tpm from upstream 2. reintroduced texlive-errata updating scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 12:50:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021250.l62CoF8Y028382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-02 08:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > Okay, > > * For this package, the last remaining is (I just found): > --------------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/share/doc/ppl/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text > /usr/share/doc/ppl/TODO: ISO-8859 English text > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Please change to UTF-8 (by iconv for example). Done. I have simply changed http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-docfiles.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 13:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021340.l62Dedm1001571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-02 09:40 EST ------- I don't think you're doing anything wrong. It looks like the package was in extras pre-FC5, but was moved to core in FC5. I'll request that the package be added to those branches in CVS. Thanks for catching this. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: New Branches: FC-5, FC-6, F-7, devel Guys, some of the branches for this package were apparently lost when extras was merged. Perhaps because the package went from extras -> core. I assume the proper thing to do is request that it be added to those branches, like I did above. If not, please do whatever the right thing is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 13:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021343.l62Dhqf8001854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 09:43 EST ------- Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new package review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:00:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] New: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-2.src.rpm %description Qtpfsgui is a Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging. $ rpmlint RPMS/qtpfsgui-*1.8.9-2*.rpm SRPMS/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-2.src.rpm $ echo $? 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:01:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021401.l62E169n003504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021401.l62E1Yuf003579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-02 10:01 EST ------- Currently working on bug 241403 as my primary sponsorship bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:02:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021402.l62E226h003658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-02 10:01 EST ------- I've added bug 246460. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:16:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021416.l62EGuJr005099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-02 10:16 EST ------- Updated spec and srpm in the same place as before. Changes: - update Description to be informative - document the motivation for the --libdir=%{_datadir} hack - add %dir %{_datadir}/xcb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021435.l62EZFCr007099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2007-07-02 10:35 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/rsyslog-1.14.1-1.src.rpm IPv6 support completed(tcp,udp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021446.l62Ektam008165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-02 10:46 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: postgis New Branches : F-7 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 14:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021448.l62EmRlP008334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-02 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. New SPEC: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl.spec New SRPM: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-9.src.rpm > And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or > submit a new package review request. I am trying to select a project for which I have a minimum of qualification, but I am having problems: all such projects seem to have requests that are either stuck (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570) or by people that is unlikely to need my reviewe (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679). I am confused about how to proceed: any hints? Meanwhile I am reading again the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 15:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021538.l62FcC3b014142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-07-02 11:38 EST ------- It seems that "winbind" name changes must be applied for all releases... Consider the system boot/shutdown process. According to /etc/inittab, "l0:0:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 0" or "l6:6:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 6" In "/etc/rc.d/rc" script we have such a fragment: ---start here---- # First, run the KILL scripts. for i in /etc/rc$runlevel.d/K* ; do check_runlevel "$i" || continue # Check if the subsystem is already up. subsys=${i#/etc/rc$runlevel.d/K??} [ -f /var/lock/subsys/$subsys -o -f /var/lock/subsys/$subsys.init ] \ || continue # Bring the subsystem down. if LC_ALL=C egrep -q "(killproc |action )" $i ; then $i stop else action $"Stopping $subsys: " $i stop fi done ---end here--- For winbind we have "/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K35winbind" symlink. The "subsys" value, computed from this filename, is "winbind". But when we check /var/lock/subsys/$subsys , we find nothing, as "/var/lock/subsys/winbindd" exists there (double-d at the end instead of one). IOW, it seems that with "winbindd" name, the init script will not be invoked for "stop" at halt/reboot . And the similar when changing between runlevels (from 3 to 5 etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 15:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021541.l62Ffgff014768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > I fixed the icon problem by just copying it from the installed location, so > that should provide the needed documentation. This is okay. No problem. (In reply to comment #40) > I've added bug 246460. Just glanced at your spec file and it seems almost okay (well some points should be fixed so I will comment about that, however I may not be able to review bug 246460 because currently I am reviewing and watching about 20 review request....) OKAY!! ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (qgis) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure above), please make a note on this bug that you did so. If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. If you have some questions, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 15:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021542.l62FgR1a015109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #154749|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-07-02 11:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158345) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158345&action=view) .spec file changes to work wiith winbindd to winbind renaming This variant seems more safe. First, just duplicate "new" subsys lock, if old is present, then remove the old lock, if it still exists. No idea what about FC6 (and RHEL?) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 15:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021552.l62FqTxV016335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) There was high level discussion about features in general, but nothing specific to rsyslog. ;( I will ask for it to be added to the schedule for this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021607.l62G7XTm018222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-02 12:07 EST ------- JSDoc-1.10.2-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021611.l62GBAVT019121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-02 12:11 EST ------- pybackpack-0.5.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021611.l62GBFhe019196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021611.l62GBOYK019257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 12:11 EST ------- Well, would you choose from newer review requests of others, not choosing older ones? (Currently the newest review requests is bug 246460) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:12:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021612.l62GC13Q019629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-02 12:12 EST ------- libntlm-0.3.13-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:12:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021612.l62GC4YA019670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.3.13-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021616.l62GGdbk020258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-02 12:16 EST ------- Ping Andres, Please put a CVS Admin request on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 16:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171801] Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021658.l62GwTY1024282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171801 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-07-02 12:58 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libspectrum Updated Fedora Owners: packages at amiga-hardware.com,paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libdsk Updated Fedora Owners: packages at amiga-hardware.com,paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lib765 Updated Fedora Owners: packages at amiga-hardware.com,paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Note, the review requests appear to have taken place for all three packages under the same Review bug, so I'm placing all 3 CVS requests here. The current maintainer (paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk) appears to be AWOL at the moment due to personal reasons. I was given explicit permission to take over "fuse-emulator" and "fuse-emulator-libs" but lib765, libdsk and libspectrum also need updating in order to maintain the former. The original maintainer should be left as co-maintainer in case he wishes to resume in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 17:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021704.l62H4L1M024830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-02 13:04 EST ------- OK: I will try to write a review for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 17:45:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021745.l62HjxKu029753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 afb at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-07-02 13:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slim Short Description: Simple Login Manager Owners: afb at users.sourceforge.net Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 17:48:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021748.l62Hmugu030180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 17:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021752.l62HqTWR030676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-02 13:52 EST ------- Axel - Are you sure the %bcond_with/without macros work in the Fedora build system? Don't seem to do anything for me in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021803.l62I3fdY032032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 14:03 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:05:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021805.l62I5JIH032286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-02 14:05 EST ------- Being sponsored by mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (bug 241403) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021809.l62I9np1000358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 14:09 EST ------- Very rapid comment: * Don't write the packages to Requires explicitly which are selected by the dependency check of the libraries checked by rpmbuild itself. Perhaps all the Requires currently written is not needed. ( Currently I may have no time to review this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:26:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021826.l62IQukn001903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-02 14:26 EST ------- > These are a bit strange. Upstream has these in their Makefile.am as:: > languages_DATA = $(LANGUAGES) language.rng language2.rng language.dtd \ > check.sh convert.py After consulting upstream, I've removed these. > * Missing BuildRequire: pcre-devel I've patched configure now to use the GRegex provided by GLib 2.13.x, and it builds fine in mock without pcre-devel > * Only a subset of the *.lang files pass the check.sh script. The check script fails for old-format language specs. The library can handle both formats. > In this case, the Guidelines specify that the latest version should be > [basename] and previous versions should be [basename][version]. The guidelines are misguided here... New versions up at http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2-1.90.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:30:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246351] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gnokii - plugin for using gnokii with opensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021830.l62IUxuo002249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gnokii - plugin for using gnokii with opensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246351 cheese at nosuchhost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021831.l62IV6Am002343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021835.l62IZkQ8002694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021839.l62IdQiD003103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021842.l62IgjIF003482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:47:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245431] Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021847.l62IlS6i003814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:48:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021848.l62Im1jP003858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical |Review request: qtpfsgui - A |user interface that provides|Qt4 graphical user interface |a workflow for HDR imaging |that provides a workflow for | |HDR imaging ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-02 14:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Very rapid comment: > * Don't write the packages to Requires explicitly which are selected > by the dependency check of the libraries checked by rpmbuild itself. > Perhaps all the Requires currently written is not needed. Sorry about that; fixed up now. > ( Currently I may have no time to review this) No problems. Thanks for the sponsorship. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 02 2007 Douglas E. Warner 1.8.9-3 - removing explicit Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021850.l62IoGrH004015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021854.l62IsqTF004545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:54 EST ------- cvs done. Note that you are supposed to set the fedora-cvs flag to ?, not +. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021857.l62IvQbr004948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-02 14:57 EST ------- 1.) Local build works for me (F7, x86_64) 2.) I don't unserstand the advantage of texlive-errata updating scheme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 18:58:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021858.l62Iw8En005065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 14:58 EST ------- Comment #3 looks like it's in the wrong review request? cvs done. Note again that you should set fedora-cvs to ? and a cvsadmin will set it to + when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:00:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245432] Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021900.l62J0VJa005332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245432 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 15:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021901.l62J1X01005471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-02 15:01 EST ------- SPEC provided and spec in SRPM difer: [limb at fawkes fedora]$ diff postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec 14d13 < BuildArch: noarch Which is right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021903.l62J31gv005613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-02 15:02 EST ------- Known issue, see vdrift review bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245743] Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021905.l62J58qJ005866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245743 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 15:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:07:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021907.l62J7uc4006079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 15:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021909.l62J9CE6006301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-02 15:09 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #9) > Which is right? Ouch. BuildArch: noarch is ok. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021910.l62JAGT1006416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 15:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021912.l62JCU2N006672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-07-02 15:12 EST ------- Yes, the bcond macros could at most deactivate the Java builds, but the error is due to the Java build being attempted. You can see from the build logs that the bcond macros didn't mess up anything. Could you reproduce the failure of the Java builds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245694] Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021914.l62JEpHD006917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245694 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-02 15:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021918.l62JIHlu007376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-02 15:18 EST ------- Ok. But. . . [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35249 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/pgpool-ha-1.1.0.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35249 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export FFLAGS ++ find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=noarch-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --bindir=/usr/bin --sysconfdir=/etc --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking for /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat... yes checking for psql... /usr/bin/psql checking for pgpool... /usr/bin/pgpool configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating src/Makefile + make -C src make: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgpool-ha-1.1.0/src' sed -e 's#@_PSQL_@#/usr/bin/psql#g' < pgpool.monitor.in | \ sed -e 's#@_PGPOOL_@#/usr/bin/pgpool#g' > pgpool.monitor sed -e 's#@_PSQL_@#/usr/bin/psql#g' < pgpool.in | \ sed -e 's#@_PGPOOL_@#/usr/bin/pgpool#g' > pgpool make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgpool-ha-1.1.0/src' + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-1.fc7-root-limb + cd src + make install /usr/bin/install -c -m 755 pgpool /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/ /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/pgpool': Permission denied make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021947.l62Jl5Br011724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-02 15:47 EST ------- I could reproduce the java failure if I explicitly set with_java. I fixed it by removing %{?_smp_flags} from the make command. Looks like a parallel build dependency issue - probably trying to compile the wrappers before they are all generated. Also, why not build with OSMesa? I believe it is only FC-5 that didn't have OSMesa support. Compiles fine for me on devel. Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version like is done with paraview. Probably not a big win though since I think most mpi users will compile their own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 19:53:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707021953.l62Jr12h012534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-02 15:52 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. Note I'm also building this F-7 updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022013.l62KDa5T014140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-02 16:13 EST ------- + rpmlint W: ctags summary-ended-with-dot A C programming language indexing and/or cross-reference tool. E: ctags tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: ctags non-utf8-spec-file ctags.spec W: ctags summary-ended-with-dot A C programming language indexing and/or cross-reference tool. E: ctags tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: ctags-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog Comment: * fix utf-8 with iconv(1) * Both Summary and description should be reworked, they don't match the package as of today. + naming : ok + guidelines * changelog is 10 years old (sic!), could be a be shorter? * disttag is missing * source url is wrong, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 * I prefer this buildroot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) * add %{?_smp_mflags} to make * preserve timestamp on man files (cp -p/install -p) * don't use %makeinstall http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 * don't shiop INSTALL the rest seems ok. + License: ok + American English: ok, however as noted the summary and description is outdated and should be fixed. + legible: ok + src: md54sum: 9026a6c6950751bc4fd1be37e8a2070f : ok + build: ok (with correct build opts) + buildreq: ok + dirs and dups: ok + I prefer %defattr(...) as %defattr(-, root, root, -) + clean: ok + debuginfo: ok Then a issue maybe outside the scope of this review, I really like to see etags enabled and included. Perhaps in a ctags-etags subpackage like this: %package etags Summary: Exuberant Ctags for emacs tag format Group: Development/Tools Requires: ctags = %{version}-%{release} %description This package will generate tags in a format which GNU Emacs understand, it's a alternativ implementation of the GNU etags program. Note: some command line options is not compatible with GNU etags. Then change %configure line to include --enable-etags . There are several other /usr/bin/etags coming from emacs and xemacs, hence you must use alternatives to setup /usr/bin/etags.ctags as alternativ. I can help with the details if you want, it goes something like this: move files (after install): mv /usr/bin/etags to /usr/bin/etags.ctags mv /usr/share/man/man1/etags.1 /usr/share/man/man1/etags.ctags.1 set up alternatives with slave (in %post and %preun): alternatives --install /usr/bin/etags etags /usr/bin/etags.ctags 20 \ --slave /usr/share/man/man1/etags.1.gz etags-etagsman /usr/share/man/man1/etags.ctags.1.gz alternatives --remove etags /usr/bin/etags.ctags With low prio as 20, xemacs and emacs should ne affected. and included the files with %files etags %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc COPYING %{_bindir}/etags.ctags %{_mandir}/man1/etags* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022014.l62KEGJ3014231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-07-02 16:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > I could reproduce the java failure if I explicitly set with_java. Yes, that's the default if you don't pass anything on the command line. > I fixed it by removing %{?_smp_flags} from the make command. Looks like a > parallel build dependency issue Argh, I hate %{?_smp_flags}. I only added it because I was hoping to get the review happen due to comment #5. I should ask the FPC to forbid smp_flags. Anyway thanks for spotting this! > Also, why not build with OSMesa? But, it's already built with it. The default it to build with java and OSMesa. > Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version Yes, but let's first make the first entry :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:17:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245743] Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022017.l62KHpJZ014643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245743 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-02 16:17 EST ------- Packages imported and builds submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:19:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] New: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid-4.0-1.src.rpm Description: This library contains the grid generator (called xpand) and contouring routine (called contour) in the QuikGrid program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] New: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/mini.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/mini-8.1-1.src.rpm Description: The Mini library is the core of the high-performance terrain renderer which is described in the paper "Real-Time Generation of Continuous Levels of Detail for Height Fields". The Mini library applies a view-dependent mesh simplification scheme to render large-scale terrain data at real-time. For this purpose, a quadtree representation of a height field is built. This quadtree is also utilized for fast view frustum culling and geomorphing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] New: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/minizip.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/minizip-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246527] New: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 Summary: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-070331-1.src.rpm Description: The VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) software consists of a collection of applications and libraries related to virtual terrain generation and display. The main libraries include vtdata and vtlib, while the primary applications are VTBuilder and Enviro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:25:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022025.l62KPERf015706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libquikgrid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022025.l62KPKPJ015747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022025.l62KPVXO015837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |minizip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246527] Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022026.l62KQIlS015950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Alias: vtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |246524, 246525, 246526 Alias| |vtp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022026.l62KQKgA015988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246527 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022026.l62KQM0Z016026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246527 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022026.l62KQP1m016068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246527 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:31:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022031.l62KVgRi016533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-02 16:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #63) > (In reply to comment #62) > > Also, why not build with OSMesa? > > But, it's already built with it. The default it to build with java and OSMesa. > Hmm, guess I really just don't understand %bcond. > > Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version > > Yes, but let's first make the first entry :) Yeah, yeah... :-) BTW - I usually do "make VERBOSE=1" with my cmake packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:49:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217735] Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022049.l62KnZYW019248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wart at kobold.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217806] Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022049.l62KnjN9019289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(wart at kobold.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022050.l62KoCie019353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sconklin at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:50:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022050.l62KosFu019454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(trond.danielsen at gm | |ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022051.l62Kp3d9019491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(trond.danielsen at gm | |ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:52:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022052.l62KqE2n019583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar | |tenment.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:56:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022056.l62KuLBi022143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(trond.danielsen at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-07-02 16:56 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I am very busy this week, but will finish the package during the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 20:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022057.l62Kv8lm022283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(trond.danielsen at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-07-02 16:57 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I am very busy this week, but will finish the package during the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022103.l62L3MtG022837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-02 17:03 EST ------- Thanks Kev, I must have been sleeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022103.l62L3Og2022869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 Bug 245697 depends on bug 245655, which changed state. Bug 245655 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:03:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022103.l62L3p0K022950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-02 17:03 EST ------- Hi I think that since minizip is included in the contrib directory of zlib, you should request the zlib maintainer to enable minizip... Mostly because he may enable it sooner of later if possible... This seems to be stated here: http://www.winimage.com/zLibDll/minizip.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022116.l62LG0bT023969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-02 17:15 EST ------- I added a BuildRequires for perl-Gearman-Server (#245697, will build that one toninght for rawhide) and enabled the tests, and all test pass in mock for devel. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:21:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022121.l62LL4QH024234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-02 17:21 EST ------- MUST: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - *** Upstream package name appears to be 'tgt'. While scsi-target-utils is certainly more informative, is there a particular reason for the disconnect? I also notice the upstream project name is 'stgt' while upstream source is 'tgt'. - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - OK - License file included in package - *** A copy of GPL2 is not included. Doesn't appear to be included upstream, either. - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - No - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - N/A - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A - .la files are removed. - N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. *** Source rpm: W: scsi-target-utils strange-permission tgtd.init 0755 - can be ignored Binary rpm: E: scsi-target-utils init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd E: scsi-target-utils init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd See below. E: scsi-target-utils incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd tgtd] Typo? W: scsi-target-utils no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd See below. W: scsi-target-utils incoherent-init-script-name tgtd Not sure what to make of this warning. - final provides and requires are sane: See below about chkconfig. Otherwise reasonable. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK - Should build on all supported archs - only tested x86_64 - Should function as described. - did not test - Should have sane scriptlets. - *** Missing the proper scriptlets for adding/removing scripts. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets See the section on chkconfig Requires: there as well; as it is now, they're wrong. - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - OK Other comments: 1. Versioning - this uses 0.1 for the package version. Upstream versioning is done by date; the package should reflect that. 2. The init script - various issues 1) doesn't actually do anything sane if it fails to start 2) doesn't have a reload entry (if it's possible) 3) doesn't use the proper LSB return codes 3. Xen support - is not built. Should it be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022134.l62LYY7R025242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call "router" and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217735] Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022141.l62LfkWZ025879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(wart at kobold.org) | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-02 17:41 EST ------- Imported and built on rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:53:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Output/perl-Test-Output.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Output-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Output provides a simple interface for testing output sent to STDOUT or STDERR. A number of different utilies are included to try and be as flexible as possible to the tester. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022154.l62LsZxM026671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246534 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:55:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246538] New: Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246538 Summary: Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: (attached to bug) Description: A programming environment providing object and heap memory sizing, profiling and analysis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 21:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246538] Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022157.l62LvDha026848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246538 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-07-02 17:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158382) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158382&action=view) spec file Original upstream tarball is: http://guppy-pe.sourceforge.net/guppy-0.1.6.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 22:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] New: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A tabular style data object where most data is stored outside main memory. A buffer is used to speed up access to data. I am still seeking for a sponsor :-) Thanks for your comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 22:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022203.l62M3Jgl027189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 22:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022250.l62MoH3i029799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 18:50 EST ------- This builds fine for me; rpmlint complains about the lack of a changelog entry, which you need. The upstream URL seems to make no mention of this package. Is it really the correct URL? Given that this is a git snapshot, is it really a good idea to ship static libraries? I'd imagine that it would be a bad idea to link statically against in-development code. (And if you really need the static library, please include a comment in your spec as to why it's required.) To be kind to the potential reviewers of your packages, please include the text from the spec's Summary: in the Summary field of the ticket and include actual links to the spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 23:06:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022306.l62N6ssG030701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 19:06 EST ------- OK, this builds fine for me. According to your explanation above, the debuginfo package is OK. Summary looks good. However, there's one rather significant blocker which I should have noticed before: I simply cannot approve a package which includes files with such common names as /usr/include/Key.h or /usr/include/Tuple.h. These really need to be installed into a subdirectory of /usr/include; the potential for conflicts is just too great otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 2 23:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707022311.l62NBb8f031082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 19:11 EST ------- Note that at this time I cannot actually test this package as I have an existing zoneminder installation which I cannot yet upgrade. Frankly I wouldn't wait release this; best to get it out there and deal with any bug reports afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 00:21:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030021.l630LMtI002628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-02 20:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qgis Short Description: A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System Owners: silfreed at silfreed.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 00:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 20:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217806] Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030043.l630hBcf003764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(wart at kobold.org) | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-02 20:43 EST ------- Installed and built on rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 01:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030117.l631H5RR005418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 21:17 EST ------- OK, now we're getting somewhere. Here are the remaining issues that I see: This packager is still missing a dependency on R. You should own the directory /usr/share/R/library/widgetTools. The easiest way to do this without recursively pulling in everything below is to have %dir %{_datadir}/R/library/%{packname} in your %files section. I think the latex directory is documentation as well. These are all minor. However, here's a tough one: The reference to %{_libdir} in %post means that this isn't actually a noarch package. I built it in x86_64 rawhide, and being noarch it should install fine on i386 rawhide, but it doesn't: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97210: line 1: /usr/lib64/R/doc/html/search/index.txt: No such file or directory error: %post(R-widgetTools-1.12.0-7.fc8.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 This is bad; either you need to figure out the directory at runtime or this can't be a noarch package. And ignoring that, don't your scriptlets as is ignore the arch-specific R modules that might be installed by looking only in _datadir? I'm beginning to wonder whether it's at all worth it to have noarch R packages. I know this is tougher than it needs to be because we have no R packaging guidelines and I'm just sort of guessing as to what R actually needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 01:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030146.l631ktg7006819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-02 21:46 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name: Well i would suggest to uses libMini as this a library only package and upstream (are you upstream ?) seems to call it libMini whereas archive name is only MINI. We usually should uses archive name indeed (which is MINI in this example)... Is it subject to change ? * Source MINI-8.1.zip is the same as upstream (for stable) Uses %{version} for the Source0 version as this is the same as the package. Also, using a dist tag is hightly encouraged for the release field see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). This is bring by other dependencies at this time, but i wonder if they are required ? (Mini.pc suggest that programs that links against it links also to them) * Mini.pc includes /usr/X11/include whereas this directory doesn't exist ( usually it is /usr/include or /usr/include/X11 ) * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of mini src.rpm W: mini mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 27, tab: line 1) * rpmlint of mini looks OK * rpmlint of mini-debuginfo looks OK * File list of mini-devel looks OK * File list of mini looks OK * File list of mini-debuginfo looks OK * OK at install/uninstall (no runtime test for now) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake) Ok - comments are here - good (whereas I didn't experience it) * rpmlint mini on installed files: rpmlint mini W: mini no-documentation W: mini unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libMini.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.3 W: mini unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libMini.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3 You should report theses upstream * The package should contain the text of the license (license seems to be LGPL as your spec file suggest, but uses have to find the full license text in writting in the %doc directory) * You can uses --disable-static instead of --enable-static=no which works also anyway, but this first one is the usual command... --- Is it possible to have the license bundled ? What do you think about the package name ? I would suggest MINI (archive name ) or libMini (name on the website) The second choice seems better from cosmectic view. Have you submitted your patch upstream ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 01:50:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030150.l631oePu007040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 02:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030202.l6322KsY007916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-02 22:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > For FC-6, FC7 and devel, please. dist-fc6-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54654 dist-fc7-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54673 dist-f8-candidate: *wouldn't let me build for some reason dist-f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54684 Everything is imported into CVS (devel, F-7, FC-6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 02:20:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030220.l632K2jb009420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 22:20 EST ------- I am now confused. Would you tell me what you actually did? * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4551 shows that there are no builds against mrxvt done. * On FC-6, build must be done by plague buildsys, not by koji buildsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 02:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030223.l632NpZW009722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 22:23 EST ------- On koji buildsys, when rebuild is done properly the entries like below should appear. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2157 On plague buildsys the entries like below should appear. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=34629 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 02:26:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030226.l632QxWU009987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-02 22:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > * SourceURL > - As this is sourceforge source, please follow: > the section "Sourceforge.net" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Fixed in the latest spec. > * Newest version > - It seems 1.21 is released on Jun 21... So please update. Fixed in the latest spec and build. Please see... http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/FEDORA/RPMS/astyle/current/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 02:54:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030254.l632sJLJ012133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-02 22:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > On koji buildsys, when rebuild is done properly the entries > like below should appear. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2157 > > On plague buildsys the entries like below should appear. > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=34629 Ahh... I was doing koji build --scratch 'target-release' mrxvt-*-.src.rpm and NOT building from CVS like koji build --scratch 'target-release' http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/mrxvt/ I'm getting the following... [a at buildbox SOURCES]$ koji build --scratch dist-fc7-updates-candidate http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/mrxvt/ Uploading srpm: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/mrxvt/ : [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/mrxvt/' When I got that IO error before I resolved to copying the SRPM locally and doing... koji build --scratch 'target-release' /path/to/mrxvt.srpm Any suggestions? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:03:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030303.l6333ktW012799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-02 23:03 EST ------- Well, I don't know how to use "koji" command directly and to get the rebuild actually registered to koji buildsys. Would you just try the following? $ cvs co mrxvt $ cd mrxvt/devel $ make tag build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030310.l633AqP6013260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 23:10 EST ------- OK, cool. The license is fixed, the errant python dependency is gone, the specfile is named properly, and you even moved the manpage. Everything looks good to me. APPROVED Go ahead and apply for cvsextras membership and I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030314.l633EFLZ013551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 23:14 EST ------- OK, this looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226290] Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030317.l633Hg5m013800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226290 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rnorwood at redhat.com |jpo at di.uminho.pt Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-02 23:17 EST ------- Thanks for the package review, sorry for the (long) delay applying the patch. I've also: o upgraded to .16 o Moved the 'requires' filter into the spec file o Added a 'provides' filter to remove the unversioned 'Provides: perl(XML::SAX)' o Fixed the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226290] Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030332.l633W5Mr014773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226290 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-02 23:32 EST ------- oh, and built .16 for F8/devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030339.l633dDCh015245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-02 23:39 EST ------- applied patch, built for devel/f8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 03:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030353.l633rEIe016387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-02 23:53 EST ------- Now that xcb-proto is done, I can take a look at this. It builds fine and rpmlint only says W: libxcb-devel no-documentation which is not an issue. Actually I'm not sure about the point of the -doc package; it has only three files which are already in the main package. Review: * source files match upstream: 19d6b2ac380fd3e613a3730e791f197f186f940bffec97f8a4f9443bb727d11d libxcb-1.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libxcb-1.0-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libxcb-composite.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-damage.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-dpms.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-glx.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-randr.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-record.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-render.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-res.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-screensaver.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shape.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shm.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-sync.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xevie.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xf86dri.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xfixes.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xinerama.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xlib.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xprint.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xtest.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xv.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xvmc.so.0()(64bit) libxcb.so.1()(64bit) libxcb = 1.0-1.fc8 = /sbin/ldconfig libXau.so.6()(64bit) libXdmcp.so.6()(64bit) libxcb-composite.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-damage.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-dpms.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-glx.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-randr.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-record.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-render.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-res.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-screensaver.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shape.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shm.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-sync.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xevie.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xf86dri.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xfixes.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xinerama.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xlib.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xprint.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xtest.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xv.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xvmc.so.0()(64bit) libxcb.so.1()(64bit) libxcb-devel-1.0-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libxcb-devel = 1.0-1.fc8 = libxcb = 1.0-1.fc8 libxcb-composite.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-damage.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-dpms.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-glx.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-randr.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-record.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-render.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-res.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-screensaver.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shape.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-shm.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-sync.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xevie.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xf86dri.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xfixes.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xinerama.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xlib.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xprint.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xtest.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xv.so.0()(64bit) libxcb-xvmc.so.0()(64bit) libxcb.so.1()(64bit) pkgconfig libxcb-doc-1.0-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libxcb-doc = 1.0-1.fc8 = * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared present; ldconfig called as necessary. Unversioned .so files are in the -debug package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X documentation files are duplicated in -doc package. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is there. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 04:08:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030408.l6348VRQ017437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-07-03 00:08 EST ------- I am no longer interested in sponsoring this person... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 04:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030410.l634Axra017596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-07-03 00:10 EST ------- I am no longer interested in sponsoring this person... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 04:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030413.l634D3gr017732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-07-03 00:13 EST ------- Joe, whats up here? I need pear 1.6.0 in devel ... Whats going on with you? PING. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 04:27:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030427.l634RVc3018765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dhollis at davehollis | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 00:27 EST ------- Yes, it's been over six weeks and as far as I can tell there's been no progress here and no other tickets filed or commented on. Setting needinfo for one final week; after that I'll close this ticket out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 04:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030431.l634V4VW019038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libibcommon |Review Request: libibcommon | |- OpenFabrics Alliance | |InfiniBand management common | |library ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-07-03 00:31 EST ------- That can be added, but needs to be added by upstream. The spec file is autogenerated from the actual code repo, so any changes to the spec file that aren't done in the upstream repo would be lost. In the actual tarball is the file libibcommon.spec.in that is used to generate the actual spec file. Yes, www.openfabrics.org is the right URL. The lack of mention of this particular package is because they really don't talk a lot about the individual packages on their web site, they tend to only talk about their largish (40MB+ src.rpm) Open Fabrics Enterprise Distribution, which includes this package and about 15 others in one single src.rpm. To see how that rpm builds out, look at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/openib/1.2/1.el5/ and see for yourself just how much crap they pack into one rpm. I didn't think that was suitable for Fedora, so I'm breaking it back out into individual rpms based upon their git repos with properly crafted spec files (in terms of BuildRequires: and such, little details they get to skip entirely by putting it all into one rpm) and then pushing the changes upstream. The maintainer of the repo that this package comes from has accepted my changes in, but that doesn't mean he's gotten around to making any official releases of this package separate from the larger conglomerate package yet. Hence why the URL doesn't say much about this package, but only talks about their mondo package instead. As for the git snapshot, I created a make.dist script for the person that maintains this repo, and that script will spit out either a libibcommon-git.tgz file or a libibcommon-%{version}.tgz file and tags the version in the repo and does some other checking. It's not my place to spit out that versioned, tagged, official tarball, and since he doesn't have any up on the web site outside of the mondo rpm, I created this with a git snapshot. Once we've worked through the review process and have things on track, I'm going to be helping the upstream maintainer through the process of becoming a Fedora contributor and then through the process of taking over the maintenance of this package. He can readily create the official tarball and official release package instead of a git snapshot where as I can't. As for the static library, that's a common request of the people that make use of this code. The customers I here from most are people running anywhere from 256 to 8000 node clusters with Infiniband hardware and they have been requesting we make static libs available. Thanks for the suggestions on the reviewing, I'll make sure and do those things in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 05:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030522.l635MMoF022425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-07-03 01:22 EST ------- Some comments (i use latest pear for a while). 1/ install-pear-nozlib.phar only available for 1.5.4 (i'm used to create my own for my need) 2/ It seems there is a problem when packaging extensions using PEAR 1.6.1 : rpmbuild fails with an error : download directory "/var/cache/php-pear" is not writeable. Change download_dir config variable to a writeable dir So we need to investigate this before requiring devel update. For my latest spec, i used : %{__pear} -d download_dir=/tmp install --nodeps --packagingroot ... Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 05:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030532.l635WXp4023214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-03 01:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid-4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 05:33:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246527] Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030533.l635XU6L023277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Alias: vtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-03 01:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-070331-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 05:43:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030543.l635hUQA023747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-03 01:43 EST ------- Thanks. I think this has everything addressed (I also updated libquikgrid and VTP to address most of these issues, but I'll hold off on changes to minizip until I find out if I can get it built as part of zlib). Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-8.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Here's the changelog: - Changed source and patch to use version tag - Changed package name to libMini - Added dist tag - Added pkgconfig requires devel - Fixed X11 include header in Mini.pc - Changed enable-static=no to disable-static in configure As for the license, README.html contains the license and a link to gnu.org for the actual LGPL terms. I have submitted the patch upstream, but it's likely to be awhile as the upstream author mentioned he is busy relocating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 05:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030553.l635rfYi024233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 01:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > That can be added, but needs to be added by upstream. I assume you're referring to the changelog. The problem is that the spec is part of Fedora, not the upstream source. It's maintained in Fedora CVS; someone else might come along and fix a bug or bump the release and rebuild the package, and at that point you'd end up with a change that's not upstream. > Yes, www.openfabrics.org is the right URL. OK, just checking. > As for the git snapshot, I created a make.dist script for the person that > maintains this repo, Well, as long as you're willing to deal with the pain of dealing with unversioned upstream source, there's no problem with it. > As for the static library, that's a common request of the people that make use > of this code. It just seems like a really poor idea for anyone to link statically against moving-target development code. Still, it's OK as long as nothing in Fedora actually links against those static libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 06:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030636.l636aEP6027229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 06:36:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030636.l636aq27027306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-03 02:36 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dcf67296e04a41a9f73f70c10fe5f825 Test-Output-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load............# Testing Test::Output 0.10 ok t/combined_is........ok t/combined_isnt......ok t/combined_like......ok t/combined_unlike....ok t/output_is..........ok t/output_isnt........ok t/output_like........ok t/output_unlike......ok t/pod-coverage.......ok t/pod................ok t/stderr_is..........ok t/stderr_isnt........ok t/stderr_like........ok t/stderr_unlike......ok t/stdout_is..........ok t/stdout_isnt........ok t/stdout_like........ok t/stdout_unlike......ok All tests successful. Files=19, Tests=1209, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.46 cusr + 0.22 csys = 1.68 CPU) + Provides: perl(Test::Output) = 0.10 perl(Test::Output::Tie) + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Output::Tie) perl(Test::Tester) >= 0.103 perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 06:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030644.l636ihRA027905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Fixed In Version| |2.11-2 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-03 02:44 EST ------- Ok, I think we can consider this done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 07:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030707.l6377MgH029849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-03 03:07 EST ------- Fixed, the files are now under directory /usr/include/loki Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib-0.1.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 07:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030726.l637Qa3k032145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-03 03:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tailor Short Description: VCS repository conversion tool Owners: dan at danny.cz Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 07:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030728.l637SHoL032242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-03 03:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I am removing the FE-REVIEW blocker bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 08:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 04:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030814.l638EaTq004747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 navid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sconklin at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-03 04:14 EST ------- I have built a new package trying to address all the problems mentioned in this BZ and tagged it with r1-6 on svn. The source code from upstream can be checked out with the following command: svn checkout https://sos.108.redhat.com/svn/sos/tags/r1-6 sos-r1-6 rpmlint is not returning any error. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos-1.6-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos.spec Thank you. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 09:00:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030900.l6390BdX009695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-07-03 05:00 EST ------- Let's use bug 246588 to track the 1.6.x update; Remi can you add your comments on the problems there? To be clear, this is a problem with PEAR packages not the 1.6.x php-pear source RPM build itself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 09:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244523] Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030911.l639BELZ010707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244523 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-07-03 05:11 EST ------- Blocker: Fedora contains "ddrescue" and "dd_rescue". There are several versions of the tool. The current Fedora package "Obsoletes: ddrescue"! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 09:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030919.l639JkKO011420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-03 05:19 EST ------- Ok I have tried to do a full noarch rpm there are the results: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-8.fc6.src.rpm Let me know... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 09:25:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 05:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707030925.l639PCoU012026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-07-03 05:25 EST ------- A brief look at the spec as a start: Run rpmlint on the source and binary rpms. > %package devel > Summary: Development and doc files for {%name} Typo in the summary. > Beside a 2D plot widget it provides scales, sliders, dials, compasses, Besides... > %description devel > Cotains the development files. Contains... > %prep > %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} -n %{name}-%{version} is the default > %install > make install "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" must be the first command in the %install section. > %files %defattr definition is missing > %files devel same here > %{_includedir}/%{name}/* directory %{_includedir}/%{name} is not included > %changelog > * Mon Jun 11 2007 Frank B?ttner - 5.0.2-1%{?dist} Don't use %dist in %changelog, as it alters history whenever %dist changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 10:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031010.l63AAPe4017422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-03 06:10 EST ------- I have justed made some tests, If you remove the package that is the only one in /usr/share the scriplet %postun failed (of course as he does not find the file CONTENT) So I have made some changes and now it seems to work better SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-9.fc6.src.rpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 10:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031011.l63ABs6I017516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |karsten at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-07-03 06:11 EST ------- I've followed http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and list 'not OK' issues here: - description NAK Normal users won't know what all this is about, please add some text here - compiler flags NAK All packages (even such small ones) should use %{?_smp_mflags} . If this breaks anything, a short note should be added as a comment in the spec file - macros OK, but you're mixing p.e. %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, try to stay with one style /var can be written as %{_localstatedir} SHOULD: - source package doesn't include license text as a separate file from upstream, please query upstream about it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 10:26:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031026.l63AQds7018348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-03 06:26 EST ------- Ok fine! Actually there is two remaining things. - It is usually better to have a full license text (not in html) in the main package. If you have contacted upstream about your patch, I would suggest that you submit also a COPYING file from the full LGPL license...so that could be bundled in the main package. - Mini.pc could be renamed libMini.pc (so library, pc file and package name are the same). Mini.pc can be allowed also anyway... Usually you should split libs that are required by your package at runtime from libs that package that link to the -lMini needs (Requires: field instead of Libs: field). See man pkg-config... Anyway since not all Required libs are pkgconfig compatible (mesa's are not it seems), you could add Requires: xmu xt x11 (or only xmu since it already return -lXmu -lXt -lX11 ). Those will be returned also when using pkg-config --libs Mini (or libMini), then leave mesa from the Libs field. About /usr/include/X11, you can leave it empty as /usr/include is used and this is the default (x11.pc don't writte it for a sample). Since all autotools are patched, i would suggest that upstream include your patch first. So if for any reason, upstream decide to uses cmake, the tweaks will be differents.. (well that would be a shame, since you've done all the work well...) I will review others packages to have a better overview of them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 10:28:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031028.l63ASTLg018512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mini - A |Review Request: libMini - A |high-performance terrain |high-performance terrain |rendering library |rendering library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 11:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031149.l63BnwPQ024741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-03 07:49 EST ------- from spec file: mv lesser.txt LICENSE you should better use this. That will prevent timestramp (install used as a better cp ) install -pm 0644 lesser.txt LICENSE Also i wonder if this: "Permission to copy for non commercial purposes is granted provided the source is acknowledged." is allowded by LGPL as this suggest that commercial distribution (like RHEL), is not allowed to redistribute it freely...?! Also this http://www.perspectiveedge.com/disclaimer.html disagree with the LGPL license. (Does this page plan be updated ?) Does this license change have been made recently ? Upstream suggest that 5.3 is avaible but only 0.4 source is downloadable... You should usually not uses %{version} for patch (unless changes are made for the patch between each version) This will prevent to uses cvs history for the file... For that, that would be better to merge your patch upstream also... >From build.log: ckward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one depreca ted or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in s ection 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the heade r for the header for C++ includes, or instead of the deprecated header . To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. -> This should be reported upstream (only warnings anyway) That would be better that archive name follow the name package, i don't knwo if upstream will change it also. I think that you set the right package name... sum-up: License in unclear Merge autotools patch upstream (with the license in the main package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 11:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031150.l63BocEs024831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 11:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031158.l63BwMkZ025726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-03 07:58 EST ------- Ok. Got it. I submitted the devel build, but my certificate is messed up. I will fix that when I get home from work this evening and resubmit the builds. Thank you for clarification on how to formally build in koji versus web submission like I was doing earlier... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 12:43:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031243.l63ChH0G029448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 mricon at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-07-03 08:43 EST ------- Built -- should show up in f8 and f7-testing in the near future. Thanks, all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 12:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031249.l63Cnc6h030292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-03 08:49 EST ------- All of the builds were submitted before I left for work. They appear to have built properly, but again, I don't think they're signed properly. I will regenerate my upload/server certs this evening and resubmit them to koji through the CVS build mechanism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 13:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234484] Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031311.l63DBFZX001625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234484 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-07-03 09:11 EST ------- Arnd and I discussed dtc maintainership this morning. We're going to co-maintain it. Time for another cvs request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: foobar Updated Fedora Owners: arnd at arndb.de, jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 13:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031317.l63DH0XY002370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 09:16 EST ------- Here is a pre-review for your review request. As you will see, it is almost OK, but a few of the "MUST" items need attention. > - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint -i rkward-0.4.7-1.fc6.src.rpm W: rkward strange-permission rkward.spec 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. W: rkward rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/R/library $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. The first warning is easy to fix. The second one boils down to the question: what is that mkdir for? > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license > and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of > Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. OK. > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text > of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: COPYING is included in %doc. >- - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer > is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform > a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated > Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the > upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use > md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this > package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with > this. OK. > - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms > on at least one supported architecture. OK. > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work > on an architecture, then those architectures should be > listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in > ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the > reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that > architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next > to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have > bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this > description in the comment until the package is approved, then file > the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug > number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or > more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: > FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, > FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 It works on x86 and x86_64, I don't know about other architectures. > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, > except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging > Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply > common sense. OK. > - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done > by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly > forbidden. OK. > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library > files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default > paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has > multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have > a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the > correct syntax for this is: > > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig These are missing. Yet the package installs rkward.so. > - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager > must state this fact in the request for review, along with the > rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without > this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it > does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a > package which does create that directory. The exception to this are > directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard > (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to > assume that those directories exist. OK. > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables > should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files > section must include a %defattr(...) line. See the warnings given by rpmlint. > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains > rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the > macros section of Packaging Guidelines. The package uses the variable style (e.g., $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) almost consistently, with only two occurrences of %{buildroot}: these should probably become $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This > is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging > Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc > subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's > best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to > either size or quantity) OK. > - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect > the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, > the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK. > - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' > (for directory ownership and usability). OK. > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix > (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so > (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. > - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should > be removed in the spec. > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a > %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with > desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in > detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you > feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop > file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. How is rkward.desktop installed? > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run > rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). > See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 13:51:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031351.l63Dppv5007424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 09:51 EST ------- I have written a pre-review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031445.l63EjeoW015234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:46:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031446.l63EkQHj015502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031450.l63EonAg015946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:51:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031451.l63EpZwf016043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031452.l63EqVjv016249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243980] Review Request: pbm2l2030 - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 2030 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031453.l63ErWQY016405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l2030 - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 2030 printer language Alias: pbm2l2030-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243980 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:54:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243978] Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031454.l63EsUuW016529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language Alias: cjet-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243978 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243975] Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031455.l63EtJPv016660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language Alias: c2070-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243975 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243974] Review Request: lx - Converts PBM data to Lexmark 1000 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031457.l63Ev0sj017026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lx - Converts PBM data to Lexmark 1000 printer language Alias: lx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243974 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 14:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 10:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031459.l63Ex7Fx017229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:00:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031500.l63F0FsF017345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:02:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234484] Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031502.l63F29Wp017595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234484 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:04:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231267] Review Request: stardict-dic - dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031504.l63F4Q7K017911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic - dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231267 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-03 11:04 EST ------- removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031511.l63FBat8018814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-03 11:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Output Short Description: Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031512.l63FCOYY018952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031514.l63FEK2R019160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031533.l63FXfKE021310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:37:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031537.l63FbxCN021790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(andreac81 at hotmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 11:37 EST ------- * For pre-review: - Well, it seems you chose one of difficult review requests. For your pre-review: * When you want to use check-list style, please also write the summary which shows what are the issues to be left so that everyone can read your review easily. * For ldconfig. where is rkward.so installed? If this is installed under %{_libdir}/R/library/%{name}, then ldconfig is not needed because this directory is not standard paths. Well, okay. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (ppl) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure above), please make a note on this bug that you did so. If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. If you have some questions, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031542.l63FgODx022195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-03 11:42 EST ------- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #6) > MUST: > - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - *** > > Upstream package name appears to be 'tgt'. While scsi-target-utils is certainly > more informative, is there a particular reason for the disconnect? I also notice > the upstream project name is 'stgt' while upstream source is 'tgt'. > Upstream, we renamed the project a couple times. Originally it was stgt for scsi target project, then we decided to support all block targets so we dropped the 's'. And we are not good at naming so people have been recomending new names still :) The scsi-target-utils naming for fedora was used to match the existnig naming style we have. For Fedora we have iscsi-initiator-utils which has tools and daemon for iscsi clients (initiator in scsi terms means cleint). The scsi-target-utils then has tools and daemon for scsi targets. Does that make sense or do you think it is confusing? I will fix other issues you found and resend. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031544.l63FicM5022372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 11:44 EST ------- * Well, for F-7 and F-devel, build (on koji) seems to have done properly (by http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4551 ). - Now for F-7, you have to request to push mrxvt to Fedora 7 updates. (please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT ) * For FC-6 (on plague buildsys), I still cannot see your rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:46:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031546.l63FkD48022561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 11:46 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031550.l63Fo5wN022984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 15:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245985] Review Request: gerbv - Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031554.l63FsRl1023464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245985 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 11:54 EST ------- Can you close this bug now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:00:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031600.l63G0tE4024127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-07-03 12:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - as this seems to be the a new package for Fedora, i don't understand the > migration of conf files from /etc/safekeep.d to /etc/safekeep/backup.d I'll say more concerning the other items later tonight....but the migration stuff is there primary to help users transition from previous rpm versions as provided by upstream. I've been working closely with upstream to develop the rpm version for a number of minor releases. The goal with transition scripts is to make sure that fedora users who were previously using upstream rpms can easily migrate to the fedora rpms once they hit the repos. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031601.l63G1wOP024287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(john at curioussymbol | |s.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 12:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031609.l63G9eln025111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 12:09 EST ------- I wrote: > > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library > > files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default > > paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has > > multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have > > a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the > > correct syntax for this is: > > > > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > > > > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > These are missing. Yet the package installs rkward.so. Please forget about this: rkward.so is not installed in one of the dynamic linker's default paths. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031612.l63GCYJI025547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 12:12 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (brutus-keyring) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031613.l63GDaBx025679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(luya_tfz at thefinalz | |one.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 12:13 EST ------- Would you upload new spec/srpm anyway? PLEASE!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245985] Review Request: gerbv - Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031614.l63GEaAg025770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - Gerber file viewer from the gEDA toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245985 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:17:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031617.l63GHFES026020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 12:17 EST ------- > For your pre-review: > * When you want to use check-list style, please also write the > summary which shows what are the issues to be left so that > everyone can read your review easily. OK. > * For ldconfig. where is rkward.so installed? If this is > installed under %{_libdir}/R/library/%{name}, then ldconfig is > not needed because this directory is not standard paths. You are right: I updated 244597 consequently. > Well, okay. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This package (ppl) is APPROVED by me > ------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks! > Please follow the procedure written on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account" > When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure > above), please make a note on this bug that you did so. Done: I need a sponsor for membership in the cvsextras group and I need approval for membership in the fedorabugs group. > If you want to push this package also on F-7, you > also have to check: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > after the URL above. Will do. > If you have some questions, please let me know. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:18:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031618.l63GIu4E026261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-03 12:18 EST ------- atanks-2.4-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031620.l63GKta8026463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-03 12:20 EST ------- audacious-plugin-fc-0.2-1 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:24:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031624.l63GOE4H027210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-03 12:24 EST ------- sofia-sip-1.12.6-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031624.l63GOJqU027261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.12.6-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226277] Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031625.l63GP1RI027500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226277 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-03 12:24 EST ------- fixed in 1.51-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031627.l63GR7Kt027863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-03 12:27 EST ------- zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220931] Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031627.l63GRBID027907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ZoneMinder - Linux CCTV package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220931 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.22.3-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031631.l63GVJHa028362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-07-03 12:31 EST ------- I got the ok to assist in co-maintaining this package. Here's the latest: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/bacula/bacula.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-3fc6.src.rpm Changes: - Chmod -x the example scripts to remove any unwanted requires - Added a LANG=C above alternatives in the init scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 16:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031654.l63GsYul030685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-03 12:54 EST ------- Ok thanks for your comments, I thinks I took all of them into account :-) There are the new spec file and the new srpm: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/rkward/rkward.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/rkward/rkward-0.4.7-2.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031704.l63H4VOi031599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2007-07-03 13:04 EST ------- Jindrich, I'm confirming that the most-recent build fixed the can't-find-the-format-file problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031709.l63H9sAj032196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-03 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > * Well, for F-7 and F-devel, build (on koji) seems to have done > properly > (by http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4551 ). > - Now for F-7, you have to request to push mrxvt to Fedora 7 updates. > (please check: Update created in bodhi: Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: enhancement ... Requested: push ... Submitted: 2007-07-03 10:03:17 ... > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT ) > > * For FC-6 (on plague buildsys), I still cannot see your rebuild. > Will fix tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:10:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031710.l63HAgKk032451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-03 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 1) doesn't actually do anything sane if it fails to start For this one, it just ends up printing failed instead of ok, is that ok? Something like this: daemon tgtd RETVAL=$? [ $RETVAL -eq "0" ] && touch /var/lock/subsys/tgtd echo return $RETVAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:14:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226241] Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031714.l63HE1Fs000340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226241 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-03 13:13 EST ------- Fixed and built 6.4-3.fc8. Also removed unversioned Provides: perl(Bit::Vector) that rpmlint was complaining about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031718.l63HILLG000770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-03 13:18 EST ------- That looks better - I think just the spacing was odd when I first ran it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031738.l63HcDIk002807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 13:38 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received within one week, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226292] Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031738.l63HcwpV002867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig Alias: perl-XML-Twig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226292 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031756.l63Hu3Jl004572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at web.de 2007-07-03 13:55 EST ------- Thanks for fixing the doc/requires issue. I recompiled Andreas' SRPM on CentOS 5 (with clients for CentOS 4 i386 and FC 6 x86_64) and so far it worked flawlessly in a small office environment with MySQL (besides the hopefully fixed LANG issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031757.l63Hv035004733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 13:56 EST ------- By the way, who will become the maintainer of this package? Adam, are you working together with Mary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 17:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031757.l63Hv31m004771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-03 13:56 EST ------- Well, here's a new one: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/kicker-compiz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031803.l63I37VR005237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:03 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227291] Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031804.l63I4wgb005514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227291 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:04 EST ------- This bug will be closed if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031807.l63I78hT005702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:07 EST ------- What is the state of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:17:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226242] Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031817.l63IHoVF006991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226242 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-03 14:17 EST ------- fixed, and built in 1.28-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:17:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031817.l63IHqgb007028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(johan at x-tnd.be) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:17 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031818.l63IIAOW007076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lephilousophe at user | |s.sourceforge.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:18 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:19:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031819.l63IJa0r007204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-03 14:19 EST ------- Thanks. The latest version cleans up all the issues raised in the last review. Just waiting on accumulating enough votes to relax the naming guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031826.l63IQwxP007929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-06-22 00:26 EST ------- ping? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 14:26 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031842.l63IgA1D009928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-07-03 14:42 EST ------- Jeff, Thank you for the clarification. However, since we're past the big "1.0" release, I have decided to remove the migration scripts, since those were meat to help people migrate from the format used by the very first release. I am quite sure all affected people have upgraded already, and so to avoid any discussion on the topic I just removed them in 1.0.1. They were meant as a temporary solution anyway, and this is a time as good as other to remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031843.l63Ih4Hk010010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 bagnara at cs.unipr.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 14:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ppl Short Description: The Parma Polyhedra Library: a library of numerical abstractions Owners: bagnara at cs.unipr.it Branches: F-7 InitialCC: ppl-devel at cs.unipr.it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246117] Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031851.l63IpVK9010713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246117 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-03 14:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drawtiming Short Description: A command line tool for generating timing diagrams Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:53:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241971] Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031853.l63Ir68c010966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241971 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-03 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I'll wait for your answer before asking cvs access. No news since 5 days, I'm : * requesting cvs access for the approved drawtiming spec file, and * closing this bug as duplicate 246117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241971] Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031853.l63Irbus011024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - Generates digital signal timing diagrams from a textual description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241971 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-03 14:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 246117 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:53:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246117] Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031853.l63Irdcp011073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246117 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at brouhaha.com ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-03 14:53 EST ------- *** Bug 241971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 18:56:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031856.l63IuB7M011250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-03 14:56 EST ------- Xavier, is there any progress with the bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 19:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031917.l63JH5ko013171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johan at x-tnd.be) | ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-07-03 15:17 EST ------- The package is now on the repositories for FC6 and F7, this bug should be closed (I don't know if I can do this, and even, how to...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 19:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246538] Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031919.l63JJUgl013392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-guppy - Python heap analysis library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246538 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-03 15:19 EST ------- sorry, it will be nice, if you can make a proper review request. Please uploads the SPEC file and the Source RPM to a webspace and post the links on this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 19:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707031942.l63JgWtb015332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-03 15:42 EST ------- Here's a revised version: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-8.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: - Added a copy of the LGPL v2.1 to the patch - Revised the pkgconfig .pc file in the patch to add x11 dependencies - Renamed to autotools patch - Remove mini/GL prior to building As for the license, I added a copy. I'll also ask upstream to add a copy of the license as well. But, I don't think there is anything wrong with adding the verbatim license for now since the license is specified in the distributed README.html and on the author's website. As for Mini.pc, I'd rather leave it as Mini.pc. I dislike putting the lib in front, since .pc files are all libraries. Thanks for pointing out the xmu.pc; I didn't realize it had a pkgconfig file. >From a brief exchange of E-mails with the upstream, he mentioned that he had always wanted to incorporate autotools and just hadn't. So, it might be awhile till the next release, but it sounds like he'll probably go with autotools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032007.l63K74nL017944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-03 16:06 EST ------- There is one last warning that you may want to get rid of: $ rpmlint -i rkward-0.4.7-2.x86_64.rpm W: rkward dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/rkward/common ../common The relative symbolic link points nowhere. All the rest seems OK to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032017.l63KHBVQ019102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-03 16:17 EST ------- Here's the latest version: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid-4.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: - Removed version from autotools patch - Removed renaming of license and readme files - Fixed CFLAGS in quikgrid.pc.in - Fixed deprecated c++ headers in patch Rather than messing with the install option I'll just leave the files alone and put them in the docs. With respect to the license, I think there are two issues. The version 5.3 refers to the QuikGrid windows application which is at version 5.3, whereas this package is the quikgrid grid generation and contouring library which is at version 4.0. I was also a little confused about the way the license was worded, since the non-commercial seemed contradictory to the statement that it was under the LGPL. What you sometimes see is statements like "licensed under the LGPL except for commercial purposes", etc. I wasn't sure if it was dual-licensed, originally licensed non-commercial then then LGPL added, etc. To clarify I contacted the author and his reply was: "Is the problem that first line "Permission to copy for non commercial purposes is granted"? If so I will delete it - I had no intention of putting any limitations on the LGPL license. My general feeling is that I would like to see the software used where it is useful and I don't want to put a lot of roadblocks in front of people who want to do that and are willing to share changes to just those functions... If I simply repackage it with a reference to the new LGPL and place it on my web site I assume that is all that is required? I hope I can put this off until August when we get back from our cruising." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:24:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032024.l63KOwR1019924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 16:24 EST ------- All the blocker issues I see are solved in the 1.0.5 version in comment #25. I would still like to see upstream move the include files into a /usr/include/redland/ dir, but thats not a blocker. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:30:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032030.l63KUYh1020516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |2.8.2-12.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032033.l63KXECk020923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-03 16:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Jochen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032033.l63KXsIr020985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032041.l63KfRXk021925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 16:41 EST ------- Yeah, using that icon seems like a good solution. However, should you not then require gnome-icon-theme? Or is there some dependency here that would bring it in? I don't see one off hand... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:42:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032042.l63KgJW4022257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-03 16:42 EST ------- I haven't heard from Mary. If she is unable to maintain the package I will. Can you please chime in Mary and let us know either way? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 20:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032058.l63KwCic024153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-03 16:58 EST ------- > However, should you not then require gnome-icon-theme? Done. > Or is there some > dependency here that would bring it in? I don't see one off hand... only gtk2 and hicolor-icon-theme which in turn requires coreutils. gnome-session also need gnome-icon-theme, hence g-i-t is most likely installed on most systems already. spec: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/xzgv/xzgv.spec srpms: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/xzgv/xzgv-0.8-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:11:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032111.l63LBQvH025414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 17:11 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to close this one up. Built for fc6, f7 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032112.l63LCr5U025604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 17:12 EST ------- ok, that looks good. I see no further blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider going and reviewing some other packages waiting in the queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032147.l63LlCDr027928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-03 17:47 EST ------- > ok, that looks good. I see no further blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. Thanks! > Also, do consider going and reviewing some other packages waiting in the queue. yes, just did one yesterday. BTW: could you please have a look at #229521 . New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xzgv Short Description: A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X Owners: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:51:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032151.l63LpCKG028105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 17:51 EST ------- Is there a reason you removed the fedora-review + flag? That should stay to show this package is approved. > BTW: could you please have a look at #229521 Apparently not. "You are not authorized to access bug #229521" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032159.l63LxNE7028503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From haircut at gmail.com 2007-07-03 17:59 EST ------- I've also not heard from Mary. I don't have a formal working relationship with Mary, I just wanted an updated astyle RPM package so I helped out a little. I'm happy to be a 3rd string maintainer. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 21:59:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032159.l63LxnPo028559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-03 17:59 EST ------- > Is there a reason you removed the fedora-review + flag? > That should stay to show this package is approved. Mistake, I set fedora-review to ?, realised that was wrong, fedora-cvs should be ?, then set fedora-review to which is of course also wrong. Sorry. > Apparently not. "You are not authorized to access bug #229521" I need some sleep (past midnight here..), typo it's: #229591 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 22:20:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032220.l63MKUrx030303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-03 18:20 EST ------- > > * For FC-6 (on plague buildsys), I still cannot see your rebuild. > > > > Will fix tonight. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?email=gnome at dux-linux.org&uid=34736 It is building.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 22:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032221.l63MLmAq030389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-03 18:21 EST ------- Hi, Based on that review, I do not know if there is anyway to get rid of that warning... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222589 It is seems to be a features of some KDE packages... Anyway, thanks for your review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 22:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032253.l63MrD43000300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-07-03 18:53 EST ------- I fixed the package so that it works on Fedora 7, but I got totally lost in dealing with translation files. Are there any standard tools how to what you are saying for the set of all languages supported by the package (I guess, I should not limit myself to just one translation, right)? The working SRPMS without any language stuff is http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.182-2.fc7.src.rpm and its SPEC is in the same location. Messed up and unfinished attempt to fix SPEC file is on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-working.spec Do you have any idea how to fix it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 22:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032254.l63MsPcL000372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-07-03 18:54 EST ------- I guess the easiest way would be to write some Python script to do all that stuff, but wasn't such script already written? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 23:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230282] Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032301.l63N19mR000766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230282 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX BugsThisDependsOn| |246591 Bug 230282 depends on bug 246591, which changed state. Bug 246591 Summary: Freshly compiled java program crashes with "Incorrect library ABI version detected." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246591 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-07-03 19:01 EST ------- Closing this review as I am probably not able to make it work -- if you are interested in this bug, feel free to reopen and take over the bug. Some notes about problems related to compiling this package are in bug 246591. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 23:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032315.l63NF9vV001370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno at postle.net ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-07-03 19:15 EST ------- Looks good to me, I was going to submit this myself. My suggestions, though you don't have to follow them: The summary could be a bit less cryptic: A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images ..and the description should say a bit more: Qtpfsgui is a graphical program for assembling bracketed photos into High Dynamic Range (HDR) images. It also provides a number of tone-mapping operators for creating low dynamic range versions of HDR images. I would fix the newlines in %prep and not %install, but this isn't important. You can call 'desktop-file-install' with '--delete-original', then you don't have to manually delete it afterwards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 3 23:58:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707032358.l63Nw60k003445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 19:58 EST ------- Dangling relative symlinks are OK as long as the symlink destinations are contained within the dependencies. So once this package and all of its dependencies are installed, those symlinks must all point somewhere. Any package that uses the KDE help system will trigger this rpmlint complaint. Dealing with rpmlint complaints is something of an art; some packages come up clean, which is great but it doesn't necessarily mean that the pakage is OK. Some packages elicit all kinds of warnings but are quite acceptable. The trick is to understand the source of the complaints and to understand whether they point to an actual packaging problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040140.l641e45r009063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 21:40 EST ------- Builds OK, rpmlint is quiet and everything looks good to me. There's really not much at all to this package. Terribly minor: there's a stray leading space on the last line of the %description. Note that this is a plain PHP package, not a PEAR package. Review: * source files match upstream: 8598d8dbc77b79743c633345cfe47c2e8adbb8eff0d44b2d52401150dc056a3b spyc-0.2.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-spyc = 0.2.5-1.fc8 = php * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040140.l641eIdc009120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 21:40 EST ------- The InitialCC: address doesn't seem to have a bugzilla account... can you create one for it and resubmit once thats done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246117] Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040144.l641iOwQ009321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246117 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 21:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:47:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040147.l641lBnc009445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-07-03 21:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > That can be added, but needs to be added by upstream. > > I assume you're referring to the changelog. Correct. > The problem is that the spec is > part of Fedora, not the upstream source. Yes, but the upstream maintainer is working on becoming a Fedora contributor and would like to be the maintainer of the Fedora package for this library. At that point, any distinction between upstream and Fedora is moot. In any case, I can add a placeholder changelog entry. > > Yes, www.openfabrics.org is the right URL. > > OK, just checking. > > > As for the git snapshot, I created a make.dist script for the person that > > maintains this repo, > > Well, as long as you're willing to deal with the pain of dealing with > unversioned upstream source, there's no problem with it. It's really not that bad in this case. > > As for the static library, that's a common request of the people that make use > > of this code. > > It just seems like a really poor idea for anyone to link statically against > moving-target development code. Still, it's OK as long as nothing in Fedora > actually links against those static libs. They do it. I guess when a job takes weeks to complete on 1000s of nodes, they *really* care about their performance. They also do it precisely *because* the code is still moving. When they find a version they know works well, they may statically link their longer running cluster apps so they know they won't crash with the next library update, while letting shorter lived apps try things out. In any case, I don't use any of them in the various packages I'm building for Fedora, they are just used by end users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040147.l641lZcX009501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 21:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 01:54:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040154.l641sujZ009965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 21:54 EST ------- Odd. I see all those branches already there, but they are all completely empty. You should be able to import into them... or are you getting an error with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040212.l642CDOI010975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-07-03 22:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-spyc Short Description: A simple php yaml class Owners: mastahnke at gmail.com Branches: EL-5, F-7, FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:12:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040212.l642CEj9011009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-03 22:12 EST ------- Ok, there are only two showstopper issues to resolve before this is accepted. Firstly, the EVR of your Provides, when evaluated by RPM, actually is _less_ than that of your Provides for dbus-sharp. Please ensure that your Provides EVR is larger. Also, the current EVR of dbus-sharp is 0.63-6, so I'd probably do something such as the following: Provides: dbus-sharp = 0.64 Obsoletes: dbus-sharp < 0.64 Also, your %defattr lines should contain all four fields: E.g., "%defattr(-,root,root,-)". Those two issues are the only remaining blockers that I see in this packaging. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:19:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040219.l642JW91011417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 22:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040221.l642LgQd011597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 22:21 EST ------- Where did you fix the issues? I don't see an updated package, just the 2.0.0-0 package that was posted initially. Please bump the release and post a fresh package. I went ahead and built the srpm linked above; here's what I noticed: If you must ship static libraries, you must add a comment indicating why they're needed to the spec and they must be in a separate -static subpackage. Don't ship .la files; if they are required for some reason, you must document that fact in the spec. The rpmlint issues noted above: W: fann devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so W: fann devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfixedfann.so W: fann devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libfann.so W: fann devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libdoublefann.so And some additional ones: W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so.2.0.0 floor W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so.2.0.0 expf W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so.2.0.0 log W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so.2.0.0 exp W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfloatfann.so.2.0.0 pow W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfann.so.2.0.0 floor W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfann.so.2.0.0 expf W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfann.so.2.0.0 log W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfann.so.2.0.0 exp W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfann.so.2.0.0 pow W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfixedfann.so.2.0.0 log W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfixedfann.so.2.0.0 pow W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libdoublefann.so.2.0.0 floor W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libdoublefann.so.2.0.0 log W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libdoublefann.so.2.0.0 exp W: fann undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libdoublefann.so.2.0.0 pow It looks like the library needs to be linked against libm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:28:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040228.l642Sw7P012134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 22:28 EST ------- It's been nearly two weeks; any progress with this package? Patrice, did you intend to review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:37:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040237.l642bRS4012744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-07-03 22:37 EST ------- Sorry forgot this package works without PHP5. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-spyc Short Description: A simple php yaml class Owners: mastahnke at gmail.com Branches: EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040245.l642jOkw013424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(john at curioussymbol| |s.com) | ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-03 22:45 EST ------- I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do next. I have got a Fedora Account now, but the instructions say that I need to create a Review Request, which AFAICT this already is. What's next? My fedora account is 'jpye'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040248.l642mRNR013663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-03 22:48 EST ------- Woops. Missed your preceding comments. I will work through those instructions. Cheers JP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 02:56:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040256.l642uPsC014316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 22:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, but the upstream maintainer is working on becoming a Fedora contributor > and would like to be the maintainer of the Fedora package for this library. > At that point, any distinction between upstream and Fedora is moot. Unless there's some legal issue with the CLA or something like that, why not have the upstream author contribute here directly and get sponsored and such as part of getting this package in? > In any case, I can add a placeholder changelog entry. Well, it should be a proper changelog and should reflect the changes made in this review, sure. In any case, I think this package is close to being done. Just give a link to an updated srpm and I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 03:02:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 23:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040302.l6432BL9014727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-03 23:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 03:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 23:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040309.l6439unM015312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-03 23:09 EST ------- Still need to s/GPL/BSD/ on the License: tag. I'm OK with the skipped tests; it's OK to keep the additional build dependencies because once the docs are complete upstream will probably enable them by default. If you want to set TEST_POD and delete t/03podcoverage.t then go ahead; I'll leave that up to you. So there's just the license tag, which is of significant importance but is trivial to fix. I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 1191bb1a1ba0268a8d940dcc10c767ac68e18bc5fe4cc38f559210d4c62c35b3 Text-Markdown-1.0.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package (in the README file). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::Markdown) = 1.0.3 perl-Text-Markdown = 1.0.3-2.fc8 = perl >= 0:5.006_000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=4, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.33 cusr + 0.11 csys = 0.44 CPU) The skipped tests are just documentation tests. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just fix the License: tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 03:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 23:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040322.l643M7VW016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-03 23:22 EST ------- Just to change "Bug Status Change" written below. For now I will change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040416.l644G7vB019816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 00:16 EST ------- Hmm, this fails to build for me, due to one of the tests failing: t/err8............Can't call method "watch_read" on an undefined value at t/err8.t line 57. # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040419.l644JTpE020158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-04 00:19 EST ------- Thanks for the review, I'll get the license tag fixed before I import! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Markdown Short Description: A text-to-HTML filter Owners: jeff at ocjtech.us Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244547] Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040419.l644JhI4020197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244547 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040424.l644OA4B020509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-04 00:24 EST ------- After removing and re-checking-out perl-XML-Simple, I see FC-5, FC-6, F-7, but no devel. If you can create a devel branch, I can import a new srpm to those branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040427.l644R852020795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 00:27 EST ------- devel is there, but it's empty. Make sure you aren't passing -p to your cvs update (either on the command line or in .cvsrc) because if you pass -p then cvs will delete the empty directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 04:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040440.l644eS4g021932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 00:40 EST ------- It looks like all the dependencies are in, but this is failing to build for me. The build log is rather long and I don't understand most of it, but here are a few odd things I noticed: ocamlc -o extract_args -custom str.cma extract_args.ml + tools/extract_args/extract_args -o src/findlib/ocaml_args.ml ocamlc ocamlcp ocamlmktop ocamlopt ocamldep ocamldoc sh: ocamldoc: command not found + cat src/findlib/ocaml_args.ml [massive snippage of needless output] Configuring libraries... labltk: found camlp4: not present Configuration for dbm written to site-lib-src/dbm/META Configuration for dynlink written to site-lib-src/dynlink/META [...] + make all for p in findlib findlib-toolbox; do ( cd src/$p; make all ); done make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/findlib-1.1.2pl1/src/findlib' Makefile:129: depend: No such file or directory ocamllex fl_meta.mll 22 states, 392 transitions, table size 1700 bytes camlp4 pa_o.cmo pa_op.cmo pr_o.cmo -- -impl fl_metascanner.src -o fl_metascanner.ml make[1]: camlp4: Command not found make[1]: *** [fl_metascanner.ml] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/findlib-1.1.2pl1/src/findlib' make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/findlib-1.1.2pl1/src/findlib-toolbox' ocamlc -o make_wizard -I +labltk -I ../findlib unix.cma str.cma labltk.cma \ findlib.cma make_wizard.ml File "make_wizard.ml", line 1288, characters 6-12: Warning Y: unused variable update. File "make_wizard.ml", line 497, characters 5-25: Unbound value Fl_split.in_words_ws make[1]: *** [make_wizard] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/findlib-1.1.2pl1/src/findlib-toolbox' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46804 (%build) I note that ocaml-camlp4 was indeed installed; I've no idea why it doesn't seem to be found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 05:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040527.l645RcOL024305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 bagnara at cs.unipr.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-04 01:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ppl Short Description: The Parma Polyhedra Library: a library of numerical abstractions Owners: bagnara at cs.unipr.it Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 05:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040545.l645jY2N025282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-04 01:45 EST ------- Hi Jason, I think Danga::Socket was missing in the BR. Does this version fix it for you? http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 06:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040605.l64658op026409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 02:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 06:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040658.l646wd4r029232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-04 02:58 EST ------- Yes I intend to review it, but if somebody else wants, then fine. But there are many issues I raised in Comment #7 that are not answered or acted upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 08:05:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 04:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040805.l6485ZWn001798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-04 04:05 EST ------- Great - thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 09:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 05:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040922.l649MDXs010815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-04 05:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ois New Branches: FC-6 After some discussion on the devel list it has been decided to update FC-6 to the new ogre, which requires ois. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 09:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 05:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040945.l649jsEa013593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-04 05:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-0.5.2-6.fc8.src.rpm Fixed those two.. this spec will scar me for life. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 09:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 05:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707040956.l649u39I014918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-04 05:56 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib-0.3-4.fc8.src.rpm Fix a few problems found during the ndesk-dbus review which also applied to this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 10:23:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041023.l64ANKid017290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-04 06:23 EST ------- I think I have not understood the role of the InitialCC fiel. Now I am caught by a doubt: should I have mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 10:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041037.l64AbMgF018015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-07-04 06:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/initscripts/parallel/prcsys.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/initscripts/parallel/prcsys-0-0.2.20070622svn.src.rpm next release :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 10:41:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041041.l64Afh4L018314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 ------- Additional Comments From rgerhards at hq.adiscon.com 2007-07-04 06:41 EST ------- I have changed the generic download server name. It now is download.rsyslog.com. The previous one (download.adiscon.com) is still valid and will remain so for the foreseeable future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 10:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041045.l64AjB9w018589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-04 06:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dx New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 10:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041045.l64AjI7S018620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-04 06:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dx-samples New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:12:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243980] Review Request: pbm2l2030 - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 2030 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041112.l64BCjET020502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l2030 - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 2030 printer language Alias: pbm2l2030-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243980 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 07:12 EST ------- Much thanks Marek, Josh, Warren. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243975] Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041116.l64BGDdL020714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language Alias: c2070-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243975 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 07:16 EST ------- Thanks to Marek, Josh and Warren. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:16:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243978] Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041116.l64BGFXR020744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language Alias: cjet-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243978 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 07:16 EST ------- Thanks to Marek, Josh and Warren. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243975] Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041118.l64BIl0A020880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c2070 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2070 printer language Alias: c2070-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243975 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:18:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243978] Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041118.l64BIw6W020917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language Alias: cjet-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243978 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041119.l64BJ9hP020953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 07:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > should I have mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp there? You don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243974] Review Request: lx - Converts PBM data to Lexmark 1000 printer language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041119.l64BJ9VL020983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lx - Converts PBM data to Lexmark 1000 printer language Alias: lx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243974 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 07:19 EST ------- Much thanks, Marek, Josh and Warren. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:31:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041131.l64BV7W0021640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-04 07:31 EST ------- package imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 11:41:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 07:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] New: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/ruby-RMagick.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SRPMS/ Mock build log on rawhide i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/LOGS/MOCK-ruby-RMagick.log Description: RMagick is an interface between the Ruby programming language and the ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick image processing libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 12:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] New: Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 Summary: Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/printer-drivers.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/printer-drivers-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Collection of filters for various printer drivers This is a meta-package that depends on all available printer filters. Installing it via tool that resolves dependencies, such as yum or anaconda, ensures that all printer drivers available from foomatic package that require external filters will work. Note: This package is a part of the ongoing effort to extend hardware support by fixing the foomatic drivers that actually refer to external filters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 12:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041231.l64CVv4R025223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|low |medium Priority|low |medium CC| |twaugh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 08:31 EST ------- Rpmlint output and justification: $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/printer-drivers-1.0-1.noarch.rpm W: printer-drivers no-documentation The printer drivers themselves may contain documentation. $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/printer-drivers-1.0-1.src.rpm E: printer-drivers no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install E: printer-drivers no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean E: printer-drivers no-buildroot-tag The package doesn't build -- no build root. W: printer-drivers no-%prep-section W: printer-drivers no-%build-section W: printer-drivers no-%install-section W: printer-drivers no-%clean-section The very same applies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 12:34:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041234.l64CYdQX025361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-drivers-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |printer-drivers-rev ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 08:34 EST ------- This might be easy to review, as it's short, though it is somehow atypical. I'd appreciate comments on whether there is a better way to make a depend-only package very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 12:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041245.l64CjK7m026054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-drivers - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|printer-drivers-rev |printer-filters-rev ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-04 08:45 EST ------- Tim Waugh suggested avoiding the 'printer-drivers' to avoid confusion with Mandriva's package with that name. So the new files are here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/printer-filters.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/printer-filters-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 12:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041245.l64Cjvhq026105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: printer- |Review Request: printer- |drivers - Collection of |filters - Collection of |filters for various printer |filters for various printer |drivers |drivers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 13:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041304.l64D48lY027811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-04 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The summary could be a bit less cryptic: > > A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images > > ..and the description should say a bit more: > > Qtpfsgui is a graphical program for assembling bracketed photos into High > Dynamic Range (HDR) images. It also provides a number of tone-mapping > operators for creating low dynamic range versions of HDR images. Thanks for the improved summary and description; I was having a hard time coming up with decent ones myself (as you saw ;). > I would fix the newlines in %prep and not %install, but this isn't important. Okay. Is there any general guideline as to what should be done in %prep and what should be done in %install? I've mostly kept my %prep sections to run %setup and %patch, but since I was just fixing a file that was being pulled in by %doc, I could see how it would make more sense to be moved there since it wasn't being installed by %install. > You can call 'desktop-file-install' with '--delete-original', then you don't > have to manually delete it afterwards Excellent! I'll pull that in as well. I should have new packages up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 13:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041304.l64D4ple027894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 09:04 EST ------- http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/ruby-RMagick.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SRPMS/ruby-RMagick-1.15.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -------------------------------------------------- * Wed Jul 4 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.15.7-3 - Add defattr also to doc subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 13:15:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041315.l64DFTKG028654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-04 09:15 EST ------- Currently uploading the spec file. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Jul 04 2007 Douglas E. Warner 1.8.9-4 - cleaning up summary and description - fixing newlines in prep instead of install - updating desktop-file-install to call --delete-original to remove that manual step -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041408.l64E81Ch000632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 10:07 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041409.l64E9nj4000761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 10:09 EST ------- Mary, how do you think about maintainership? Also, I want you to update bug 234612 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:19:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041419.l64EJJkM001827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-07-04 10:19 EST ------- I'd be happy for Adam to take over astyle. I'll reply on the Ice review shortly. I'm sorry, I've been travelling to conferences for the last two weeks; I'm back now and have more time to devote to this stuff again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:20:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041420.l64EKJL6001925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-04 10:20 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:20:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041420.l64EKo8o002000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-04 10:20 EST ------- Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure for the CVS Request procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041421.l64EL5bF002051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-04 10:21 EST ------- There is another version of mrxvt (0.4.2) I would like to get included. Do I register another bug? create the spec, then have another package maintainer review it before I can proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041426.l64EQcHT002766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #50) > It is building.... Okay. This FC-6 build is okay. (In reply to comment #51) > There is another version of mrxvt (0.4.2) I would like to get included. First of all, why do you want it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:29:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041429.l64ETWUg003138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note| |? | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-04 10:29 EST ------- Well, sounds like Jasper is no more interested in kadischi. I'll say, I'll close this bug as WONTFIX on 6 July 2007 (in 2 days) if Jasper doesn't reply. I don't like sponsoring someone who vanishes out of the blue ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041429.l64ETbMZ003184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-04 10:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kicker-compiz Short Description: Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041433.l64EXEje003507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-04 10:33 EST ------- Mamoru, how shall we all proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041438.l64EcXAS003895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-07-04 10:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: brutus-keyring Short Description: small keyring daemon build upon libgcrypt Owners: bdpepple at ameritech.net Branches: F-7 InitialCC: colding at omesc.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:39:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246117] Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041439.l64EdpW0004040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drawtiming - A command line tool for generating timing diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246117 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041440.l64Ee6U0004086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 10:40 EST ------- Well, I must clarify who will maintain this package. Monsen and Dutko, do you want to maintain this package? And will you also want to maintain this package, Mary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041440.l64EeAr5004121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-04 10:40 EST ------- That was it - I had: update -d -P in my .cvsrc I had to remove the -P, but not the -d. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041449.l64En2qG004642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-04 10:49 EST ------- I'm willing to either co-maintain with Foster and Monsen or be primary, or be secondary; it's really up to what they'd prefer. Again, I'm OK with any scenario. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041454.l64EsENW004974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-04 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) Oh... > I don't like sponsoring someone who vanishes out of the blue ! Are there any guidance to deal this situation? Actually I also have a problem that I reviewed one person's review request, I decided to sponsor him, but then he disappeared suddenly and the package is not yet imported... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 14:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041455.l64EtM63005069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-04 10:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > (In reply to comment #50) > > It is building.... > Okay. This FC-6 build is okay. Great. I'm just waiting for the push to testing to go through in Bodhi; it's still pending. > (In reply to comment #51) > > There is another version of mrxvt (0.4.2) I would like to get included. > First of all, why do you want it? It's another branch. 0.5.2 is the latest while 0.4.2 is older (less and/or different bugs I presume). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:21:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041521.l64FLh80007779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 11:21 EST ------- Unfortunately not; it still fails in the same manner. I'm thinking that test is simply broken; my $socket = Danga::Socket->DescriptorMap->{3}; returns undef, but it's making an assumption about which file descriptor is being wrapped. I note that this is the only test which calls Danga::Docket::DescriptorMap. I don't really know why it would consistently fail for me and work for you. I'm building on x86_64; the host is running FC5 and mock is pointed at the development repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:24:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041524.l64FOnpT008197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-07-04 11:24 EST ------- Package passes review guidelines now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041525.l64FPh66008311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-07-04 11:25 EST ------- Hmm, NOTABUG ? Sorry about that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041531.l64FVjEu008703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 11:31 EST ------- Has there been any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041534.l64FYKOE008877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 11:34 EST ------- Has there been any progress on incorporating the review feedback? I'm sure someone will provide a complete review once there's a fixed package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] New: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ip4r/postgresql-ip4r.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ip4r/postgresql-ip4r-1.01-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ip4 and ip4r are types that contain a single IPv4 address and a range of IPv4 addresses respectively. They can be used as a more flexible, indexable version of the cidr type. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:40:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041540.l64Fe5i8009262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 11:40 EST ------- Has there been any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:40:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] New: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhughes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/ohm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/ohm-0.1.0-0.fc7.hughsie.src.rpm Description: OHM is a hardware manager to enforce system policy on embedded devices. It's planed to be used in OLPC for power management. Checkout http://ohm.freedestop.org for more details. The spec probably needs work, and I'm open to ideas about how to deal with the dlopen'd plugins. Advice and experience welcome. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:45:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041545.l64FjTZX009748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 15:54:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041554.l64FsOfl010402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-04 11:54 EST ------- How do I see the full build log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 16:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041613.l64GDxgf011868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 12:13 EST ------- Well, I can build it again and attach the log if you'd like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 16:17:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041617.l64GHNXP012116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-04 12:17 EST ------- ok, imported for F-7 and devel. It should be there for you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 16:56:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041656.l64Gu4ua014602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 12:56 EST ------- I've locked down the initial config, and made the description a bit better. I've added Requires: wget, as it's recommended by upstream. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal-5.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 16:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041656.l64GutMh014671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-04 12:56 EST ------- Not to what I know of. However I'll start discussion on the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:01:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041701.l64H1foW015164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-07-04 13:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Yes, but the upstream maintainer is working on becoming a Fedora contributor > > and would like to be the maintainer of the Fedora package for this library. > > At that point, any distinction between upstream and Fedora is moot. > > Unless there's some legal issue with the CLA or something like that, why not > have the upstream author contribute here directly and get sponsored and such as > part of getting this package in? Because I'm waiting on this package (and a few others) before I can build updated openmpi packages that support Infiniband. I suspect if I waited for the upstream people to do the whole process themselves, it would be next year before it got done. If I get it done, then I can do what needs done until they've completed the process. Even if they *never* complete the process, it's easier for me to handle the individual packages than it is the big openib package that's in RHEL. So getting them in here so I can import them into RHEL is a benefit to me. > In any case, I think this package is close to being done. Just give a link to > an updated srpm and I'll take a look. I didn't make any changes other than to add a changelog ;-) But, they are on the same place that they were before: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ There is an updated src.rpm from 20070703, and the spec files have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244702] Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041707.l64H7aHP015885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xzgv - A GTK+/Imlib-based picture viewer for X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244702 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041716.l64HGPrE016487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-04 13:16 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:21:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041721.l64HLZOY016897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 13:21 EST ------- Culprit found. src/Makefile hard codes the installation paths. It's a short makefile, so you can probably skip make install and just install the file manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:22:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041722.l64HMePo016986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-04 13:22 EST ------- Toshio, I'm afraid that this link doesn't help us, since Mamoru and I were referring to the state of packager's (whom we granted sponsorship) status. The wiki page lacks such information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041735.l64HZkCq017807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 13:35 EST ------- Yup, commenting out the make install line did it, since you're already installing the files. Looks like it includes everything it needs, but you'll have to check. rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on the RPM gives E: postgresql-pgpool-ha only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 17:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041738.l64Hc9sw017972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 13:38 EST ------- Will there be a new spec an SRPM reflecting the above? This is deliciously close to approval. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:04:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041804.l64I4unG019739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041805.l64I5Iig019785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041808.l64I8kaT019971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041810.l64IAXjg020120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:15:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041815.l64IFUCC020354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:15 EST ------- You still seem to have {buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT... can you fix them to all one style before importing? (minor nitpick) Can you resubmit your cvs request with a copy of the cvs request template filled out? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041818.l64IIN8A020534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-04 14:18 EST ------- Good catch. New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041821.l64ILeoE020712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:21 EST ------- InitialCC is a list of addresses that will be added to the CC field in bugzilla for any bugs filed against that package. In order for bugzilla to add it and send email, the email address must be associated with a bugzilla account. So, for copies of bugs to be emailed to your list, you will have to create a bugzilla.redhat.com account for that list with that email address. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041824.l64IOFlf020870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041831.l64IVsR4021273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-04 14:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:32:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041832.l64IWCjC021331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-07-04 14:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Okay. Is there any general guideline as to what should be done in %prep and > what should be done in %install? Not anywhere I know. The packaging guidelines do suggest fixing newline characters in %prep, though I'm sure it doesn't make any practical difference where you do it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-41d4336fa1af8d74500eb89d3a22410cccc4117d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041839.l64IdS2k021705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 14:39 EST ------- rpmlint clean. package and spec names are good. meets packaging guidelines. license good and included. spec is legible American English. source md5 matches. builds on f7 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041851.l64IpvEf022543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-04 14:51 EST ------- So, approved? ;) Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041854.l64Isx9c022734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 bagnara at cs.unipr.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-04 14:54 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ppl Updated InitialCC: ppl-devel at cs.unipr.it Thanks for the explanation. This (having copies of bugs emailed to the developer's list) was precisely what I wanted to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 18:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041856.l64Iu8e7022823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 14:56 EST ------- Soon. :) Working on a mock build to test BRs and then I'll be AFK until tomorrow. Sadly my fast dev box is kaput, and I'm using the slow one. And so it goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:00:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041900.l64J0cdq023045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 15:00 EST ------- Not to step on Nigel's toes, but here are some comments: W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-versions.h W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl.h W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-autogen.h These are expected rpmlint complaints for many arch-specific Perl modules. Something is wrong with the debuginfo package; it misses most of the source. There are many errors like: cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.c: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.xs: No such file or directory cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDockItem.c: No such file or directory in the build log. This is more a bug in find-debuginfo.sh than it is in your package, but generally we try to fix such things when we find them. (This kind of thing happens often with Java packages for some reason.) The problem is that it's not looking in the xs directory. You can alleviate this by the incredibly nasty act of putting "cp xs/* ." at the end of your %build section. Otherwise, this package is clean and I would probably approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041903.l64J3EC0023207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-04 15:03 EST ------- BRs are good, built in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041924.l64JOrPY024767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-04 15:24 EST ------- Jason, Did you build it from FC-6 ? Currently ocaml-3.10 which's require for ocaml-findlib failed to build on f-7_i386|x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:25:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246782] New: Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246782 Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plr/postgresql-plr.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plr/postgresql-plr-8.2.0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Procedural Language Handler for the "R software environment for statistical computing and graphics". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:26:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246782] Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041926.l64JQs3m025011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246782 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:33:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041933.l64JXaNW025503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 marduk at k-d-w.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(marduk at k-d-w.org) | ------- Additional Comments From marduk at k-d-w.org 2007-07-04 15:33 EST ------- New packages of new-stuff-manager 0.2.3 for Fedora 7 are available at http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/index.php?dir=review/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:42:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041942.l64Jgopw026137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 15:42 EST ------- I always build with current rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041948.l64JmRFU026470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 15:48 EST ------- I talked with some other folks about this and the bottom line is that four of us (Brian Pepple, Kevin Fenzi, Toshio Kuratomi and I) all agree that we have issues with the intended method of maintenance of this package. We have packages in the distribution where the spec is maintained as part of the upstream source, but with those packages the spec is actually pulled from Fedora into the upstream source, which is the opposite direction from this package. Ultimately, the following sentence from comment #2 is a deal-breaker for us: The spec file is autogenerated from the actual code repo, so any changes to the spec file that aren't done in the upstream repo would be lost. Is it possible that there's a misunderstanding here? As an act of good faith, let me go ahead and run through a full review so that we can make progress in the event that the above issue is resolved. rpmlint says: W: libibcommon incoherent-version-in-changelog - 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 Your changelog entries need to be in the proper format, which includes the version and release; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs W: libibcommon-devel no-documentation W: libibcommon-static no-documentation These are OK. I can't fetch the upstream source. I don't even know how to fetch a tarball from a git URL. You will need to provide instructions for grabbing the source from upstream; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Note that there are some who are firmly against ever running the autotools in a spec; I happen to not be one of them, but that's really the kind of thing that should be done by upstream as part of making the source snapshot. It's not actually necessary to run ldconfig in the -devel package. Nothing seems to own /usr/include/infiniband. Actually, libibverbs-devel owns it, but it's not in the dependency list. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership Review: X can't compare source files with upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has one valid complaint (changelog format). * final provides and requires are sane: libibcommon-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) libibcommon.so.1(IBCOMMON_1.0)(64bit) libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 = /sbin/ldconfig libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) libibcommon-devel-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm libibcommon-devel = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 = ? /sbin/ldconfig libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) libibcommon-static-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm libibcommon-static = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 = libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. * shared libraries present; ldconfig is called as necessary in the main package and the unversioned .so file is in the -devel subpackage. X nothing owns /usr/lib/infiniband * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries are in the -static subpackage. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 19:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707041952.l64JqR6Z026815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 15:52 EST ------- What needs to be done here? Is this waiting on a reviewier, or for Rahul to make more changes to the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 20:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 16:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042011.l64KBaf9028122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-04 16:11 EST ------- The changes you made look good now. ndesk-dbus 0.5.2-6 is APPROVED. :) Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once you've pushed it to CVS and through the Fedora build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 20:37:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 16:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042037.l64KbKxX029884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-04 16:37 EST ------- I have requested a build and it fails for ppc64. The reason is: No Package Found for gprolog >= 1.2.19 I have checked and, indeed, gprolog.spec containts the line ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc If at all possible, I would like to avoid to esclude ppc64 altogether, since only the GNU Prolog interface is problematic. Is there a way I could disable the gprolog subpackage for ppc64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 20:44:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 16:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042044.l64KiTjk030347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 16:44 EST ------- Odd; this package has grown rpmlint issues since I looked at it last. I'm not sure how you would not be seeing any errors. Maybe you neglected to run it against both the SRPM and the built RPM. W: sos redundant-prefix-tag Please remove Prefix:. While you're at it, remove Vendor: as well. E: sos no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install Somehow "rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" was removed from the %install section of the previous submission. It needs to come back. In fact, it looks like someone junked the almost-complete existing spec and started over with some new spec having , so I need to do a complete re-review. That's really disappointing; I've spent a lot if time on this already. The instructions for fetching the source must be included in the spec. The instructions that you've given in comment #23 don't work for me; I'm prompted for a password and I don't know what to enter. The summary seems to be mostly content-free; it needs to include at least a little information about what the package does. Maybe "System information gethering tools" or somesuch. The dist tag seems to have disappeared. It's not mandatory, but if not present I have to ask: are you sure you don't want it? Do you understand the requirements of multi-branch maintenance without the dist tag? Because you've switched to using the ill-advices --record option to setup.py, you're now not including any of the directories that you should be including. If you put the %python_sitelib definition back in the beginning of the spec (which you simply must do in any case, unless you want some complicated hack that parses the INSTALLED_FILES file to figure out where the directories are), then a %files section consisting simply of: %{_sbindir}/sosreport %{python_sitelib}/sos/ %{_mandir}/man1/sosreport.1* %doc LICENSE README TODO should work fine. Review: ? can't compare source files against upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary is nondescriptive. * description is OK. ? dist tag is not present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: sos = 1.6-3 = /usr/bin/env python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I tested it before and I'll make the assumption that it still works OK. X does not own most of the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042101.l64L15C2031306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:06:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042106.l64L65X2031867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 17:06 EST ------- This one fails to build for me: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libloki.a /usr/lib/libloki.so /usr/lib/libloki.so.0.1.6 RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/loki-lib-0.1.6-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so.0.1.6 File not found by glob: /var/tmp/loki-lib-0.1.6-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so File not found: /var/tmp/loki-lib-0.1.6-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libloki.a Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libloki.a /usr/lib/libloki.so /usr/lib/libloki.so.0.1.6 Error building package from loki-lib-0.1.6-3.fc8.src.rpm, See build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042106.l64L6DNp031891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-04 17:06 EST ------- I am ready to continue the review but Comment #5 seemed to imply a new srpm from Rahul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042107.l64L7w5r032055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-04 17:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ndesk-dbus Short Description: Managed C# implementation of DBus Owners: dnielsen Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:13:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042113.l64LD1Tq032456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I talked with some other folks about this and the bottom line is that four of us > (Brian Pepple, Kevin Fenzi, Toshio Kuratomi and I) all agree that we have issues > with the intended method of maintenance of this package. We have packages in > the distribution where the spec is maintained as part of the upstream source, > but with those packages the spec is actually pulled from Fedora into the > upstream source, which is the opposite direction from this package. Well, that's fine if someone maintains an upstream code base that doesn't go into anything other than Fedora, but what if upstream wants to maintain their own package, and they maintain that package for multiple distributions? Personally, the concept of the spec file flowing from Fedora to upstream is backwards IMO. I'm fine with maintaining a spec file apart from upstream, especially since most upstream repos don't want to maintain a spec at all. But, if they have a spec, it's *their* spec. We can use it or ignore it, but they have no obligation to use ours. And considering that Fedora is no longer the only distro where people can contribute and maintain packages, it would be arrogant to assume that our spec would suit all of their possible needs. That said, I'm perfectly fine ignoring the upstream spec and maintaining our own. It's what I already do for the huge openib rpm that the OpenFabrics.org people put out. So, at least as long as I'm maintaining the package, I'll just do it that way. If the upstream maintainer does get himself vetted through the contributor process, then I'll make sure he's aware of the issues regarding preservation of a suitable spec file and other contributor's changes. > Ultimately, the following sentence from comment #2 is a deal-breaker for us: > > The spec file is autogenerated from the actual code repo, so any changes to the > spec file that aren't done in the upstream repo would be lost. > > Is it possible that there's a misunderstanding here? Well, although it's rendered moot by my agreement to ignore the usptream spec, I'll go ahead and explain this. There's a minor misunderstanding. My comment was that any changes I made would be lost when any hand off to the upstream repo maintainer happened. That's just because his initial CVS co would be up to date, so the first time he copied his generated spec file into CVS, the subsequent check in would proceed without a hitch regardless of changes made. That's a problem that could be solved by a one time merge at the time of hand off. What I left unsaid, but assumed, was that once he's checked things out, if someone else modifies the spec file, than any attempt to just copy his generated spec file into CVS followed by a check in would result in a failed up to date check on the spec file, at which point he would have to check out the changes made by other people and could merge those changes into not just the local spec file but also the spec.in file in his repo (should they be appropriate for that). So, he won't be able to silently overwrite changes other people make. But, that doesn't necessarily mean he'll keep their changes either, just depends on what they are. > As an act of good faith, let me go ahead and run through a full review so that > we can make progress in the event that the above issue is resolved. > > rpmlint says: > W: libibcommon incoherent-version-in-changelog - 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > Your changelog entries need to be in the proper format, which includes the > version and release; see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs I didn't bother with the git package just because the full release is so long. But, I built a new package against an actual released tarball. The new package and spec is at the same URL as before: http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ > W: libibcommon-devel no-documentation > W: libibcommon-static no-documentation > These are OK. > > I can't fetch the upstream source. I don't even know how to fetch a tarball > from a git URL. You will need to provide instructions for grabbing the source > from upstream; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL New URL/Source in the package. As I mentioned before, this particular git repo actually spits out 5 different release tarballs. Only 3 of them from this repo are present at the URL. I've asked the maintainer to go ahead and put up tarballs for the other two from any previous stable release in the git repo so I can use them for those two additional packages as well. > Note that there are some who are firmly against ever running the autotools in a > spec; I happen to not be one of them, but that's really the kind of thing that > should be done by upstream as part of making the source snapshot. When using a tarball, as in the new package, it is done by upstream and dropped from the spec file. > It's not actually necessary to run ldconfig in the -devel package. Dropped. > Nothing seems to own /usr/include/infiniband. Actually, libibverbs-devel owns > it, but it's not in the dependency list. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership Yep. This is correct. Libibverbs is the core layer if you will for the infiniband stack. No infiniband using app can be built without it (well, they could, but it would require writing an actual hardware driver to do so). So any app that wants to link against this library and do useful things must also link against libibverbs in order to have a transport over which to send the output of this library. Therefore, there's an indirect requirement on libibverbs from this package, but it's through the apps that use this library. This library itself doesn't need anything from libibverbs. They do, however share the include directory. But, since apps can be written without this library *much* easier than they can be written without libibverbs, we make libibverbs the directory owner. > Review: > X can't compare source files with upstream. Fixed. > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). > * package installs properly > * debuginfo package looks complete. > X rpmlint has one valid complaint (changelog format). Fixed. > * final provides and requires are sane: > libibcommon-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm > libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) > libibcommon.so.1(IBCOMMON_1.0)(64bit) > libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > = > /sbin/ldconfig > libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) > > libibcommon-devel-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm > libibcommon-devel = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > = > ? /sbin/ldconfig > libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > libibcommon.so.1()(64bit) > > libibcommon-static-1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8.x86_64.rpm > libibcommon-static = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > = > libibcommon = 1.0.3-0.3.20070703git.fc8 > > * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. > * shared libraries present; ldconfig is called as necessary in the main package > and the unversioned .so file is in the -devel subpackage. > X nothing owns /usr/lib/infiniband I think you mean /usr/include/infiniband, and if that's the case see above. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * headers are in the -devel subpackage. > * no pkgconfig files. > * static libraries are in the -static subpackage. > * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:14:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042114.l64LERIM032672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:14 EST ------- I've fixed things up a bit to be more consistent with our other packages and how they generate source tarballs. I'll attach a patch for the specfile and for the tarball-generating script. The patch to disable jregexp and jakarta-regexp will need to be fixed to include jakarta-regexp support as we have a package of that in Fedora: regexp :). There are also a few FIXMEs in the specfile (with the patch applied). Let me know when you've had a chance to look at those and we can do the review then. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042115.l64LF37S032760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158554&action=view) specfile patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042115.l64LFi6q000367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158555&action=view) patch to tarball-generating script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042116.l64LGmQA000518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-04 17:16 EST ------- Unfortunately I have to say that I agree with William. Since audacious now has an own docklet, there is no need to duplicate this functionality. So I suggest to drop this package and remove it from the repos. This also means that audacious needs to obsolete audacious-docklet. Yu: Is this ok for you? This doesn't mean that you "loose" your only package, you still have audacious-itouch and I'm pretty sure you can contribute other packages, too. William: Are there any issuses from upstream's point of view with audacious-itouch we should know about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:22:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042122.l64LMXkt000795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 17:22 EST ------- OK, this builds fine on x86_64 and the built package installs/uninstalls properly on i386. rpmlint has sprouted a new warning: W: R-widgetTools dangerous-command-in-%postun rm which is correct, rm is dangerous and it's used in %postun. Honestly at this point I don't know enough about R to comment on the post section; I'll try and get spot look over it. This is still missing a dependency on R. What's in %{_datadir}/R/library/%{packname}/man? It looks like manpages. Are these supposed to be accessible via man? Because the one in this package (widgetTools.Rd) isn't. If it's for some internal documentation browser then that would be OK (although in either case it should be marked %doc like the rest of the documentation). Anyway, this is very nearly done. Why don't you go ahead and apply for sponsorship so that I can take care of that in anticipation of getting this package imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042123.l64LNjBq000901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042123.l64LNor9000946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:23:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244237] Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042123.l64LNvRD000988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244237 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LO8Hv001034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LOI4Y001090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LOQQp001151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LOWdI001203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LOclA001254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:24:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042124.l64LOnha001317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:29:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042129.l64LTHGE001703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-04 17:29 EST ------- I take a look on this tomorrow and normally I should be able to update the review. There is just little work to do to update the patch because you have done the big part of the job :) Many thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042155.l64Lt0Mt003179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:54 EST ------- Jason, apparently the .spec file generated by bdist_rpm is not what was used in the package you originally reviewed, hence the differences you observed. I will rebuild a package using a custom .spec according to your review and resubmit in the next few days. Thank you. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042155.l64LtpAE003260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-07-04 17:55 EST ------- I will get to it tomorrow guys. I have been struck with other unrelated project work. Same for olpc-logos. Thanks for the patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 21:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042158.l64LwcST003465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From john at ncphotography.com 2007-07-04 17:58 EST ------- The bdist_rpm bits are notoriously... unreliable - at producing a sane spec file. That's why I created an independent spec file and it was updated in parallel with the Makefile way back when. You should be able to recover that spec file and adjust it accordingly - bdist_rpm is bad mojo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:11:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] New: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at commandprompt.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: PL/Ruby is a loadable procedural language for the PostgreSQL database system that enable the Ruby language to create functions and trigger procedures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042213.l64MDfVN004409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042219.l64MJBoa004731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-04 18:19 EST ------- When you say "the instructions for fetching the source must be included in the spec", does that mean that Source0 has to be valid URL or instead just to include a few commented lines explaining how to use svn to fetch the source ? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244523] Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042222.l64MMcfG005008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244523 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bjohnson at symetrix.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-07-04 18:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Blocker: Fedora contains "ddrescue" and "dd_rescue". There are several > versions of the tool. The current Fedora package "Obsoletes: ddrescue"! Hmm. I didn't even notice that since it was named differently. Damien, you probably want to close this as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042232.l64MWj2I005485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-07-04 18:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I fixed the package so that it works on Fedora 7, but I got totally lost in > dealing with translation files. Are there any standard tools how to what you are > saying for the set of all languages supported by the package (I guess, I should > not limit myself to just one translation, right)? (In reply to comment #16) > I guess the easiest way would be to write some Python script to do all that > stuff, but wasn't such script already written? I would guess that the author of the program has a Makefile or something that processes his translation files. It might be worth pinging upstream so see if he can include it if such a program exists. I'm kinda schlepping my way through this too, so I don't think I can help anymore :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 22:54:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042254.l64MsF2u006369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-04 18:54 EST ------- If there's no URL to fetch directly, you need to include instructions for duplicating the source that you include in the SRPM. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 23:01:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230282] Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042301.l64N1Uc0006775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trang - Multi-format schema converter based on RELAX NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230282 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-07-04 19:01 EST ------- It should be probably mentioned for anybody who would like to revive this bug, is that attachment 158415 is a src.rpm package (the last version without -findirect-dispatch modification). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 23:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042309.l64N9NAN007219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name BugsThisDependsOn| |233906 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-07-04 19:09 EST ------- The spec also still mentions "Fedora Core". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 4 23:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707042311.l64NBbH7007402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-04 19:11 EST ------- Hi, I have made some errors with the devel package (the files concerned were not installed). The mistake is not corrected. There are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-2.fc6.src.rpm Thanks (I do have a sponsor now :-) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 00:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050013.l650D77K010245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-04 20:13 EST ------- Here're a fixed spec and srpm files which make mock fine to build. linked here: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/ocaml-findlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 01:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 21:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050108.l6518kTP012878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From yufanyufan at gmail.com 2007-07-04 21:08 EST ------- It's fine with me as long as the audacious built-in docklet is working. The audacious-itouch is replaced by audacious-itouch-control. http://sourceforge.net/projects/itouch-control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 04:11:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050411.l654BWmS024134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 00:11 EST ------- Well, you can try it using %ifnarch macro. i.e. For example ---------------------------------------------------- %ifnarch ppc64 # gprolog is not available on ppc64 package gprolog Summary: The GNU Prolog interface of the Parma Polyhedra Library ......... %endif ......... %build CPPFLAGS="-I%{_includedir}/glpk" %ifnarch ppc64 CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I%{_libdir}/gprolog-`gprolog --version ****`/include" %endif CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I%{_includedir}/Yap" %configure *** CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS **** ......... %ifnarch ppc64 %files gprolog .......... %endif -------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: - Please write a comment in a spec file briefly why you disable gprolog support on ppc64 (like I wrote) - Don't write --------------------------------------------------------------- # gprolog is not available on ppc64 <- Don't write comment here! Here is in the %description of previous subpackage. %ifnarch ppc64 %package gprolog ........... %endif ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 04:14:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050414.l654Ew3O024357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 00:14 EST ------- After rebuild is done, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 04:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050420.l654Kg2X024793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 00:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > NOTE: > - Please write a comment in a spec file briefly why you disable > gprolog support on ppc64 (like I wrote) > - Don't write > --------------------------------------------------------------- > # gprolog is not available on ppc64 <- Don't write comment here! > Here is in the %description of > previous subpackage. > %ifnarch ppc64 > %package gprolog > ........... > %endif > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Oh.. I also made a mistake... The correct way is: %ifnarch ppc64 %package gprolog # gprolog is not available on ppc64 <- please write comment here ......... %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 05:55:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 01:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050555.l655tnST029393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2007-07-05 01:55 EST ------- I have tried the 64 bit version. It is faster than the 32 bit although a bit more crashie. When will the secondlife 64 bit client be avaliable in a repository ? The secondlife.repo doensn't work. I get a missing respond.xml error I made a new 64bit rpm for the xmlrpc-eli to get the 64 bit secondlife client to install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 06:39:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 02:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050639.l656d2Nk031302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-05 02:38 EST ------- Now there is a problem with x86_64, which I cannot reproduce even if x86_64 is my main development platform. On the Fedora build machine, make dies with g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtbeginS.o .libs/ppl_yap.o -lYap ../../../src/.libs/libppl.so -L/usr/lib64 ../../../Watchdog/src/.libs/libpwl.so -lgmpxx -lgmp -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64 -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crtn.o -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,ppl_yap.so -o .libs/ppl_yap.so /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libYap.a(c_interface.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `Yap_REGS' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/libYap.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Whereas the very same command succeeds on my machine: g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtbeginS.o .libs/ppl_yap.o -lYap ../../../src/.libs/libppl.so -L/usr/lib64 ../../../Watchdog/src/.libs/libpwl.so -lgmpxx -lgmp -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64 -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crtn.o -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,ppl_yap.so -o .libs/ppl_yap.so ar cru .libs/ppl_yap.a ppl_yap.o ranlib .libs/ppl_yap.a creating ppl_yap.la (cd .libs && rm -f ppl_yap.la && ln -s ../ppl_yap.la ppl_yap.la) make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/roberto/rpm/BUILD/ppl-0.9/interfaces/Prolog/YAP' ... It seems /usr/lib/libYap.a on the build machine has not been compiled so as to be generally usable. I am unsure about how to proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 07:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 03:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050702.l6572A6V032207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-05 03:02 EST ------- Found: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246815 Now, what is the best course of action? Should I wait and hope that bug is fixed soon or work around the problem by, e.g., temporarily disabling the YAP interface? There is a related problem: I had to work around a `pl' packaging problem due to a missing dependency on `readline-devel'. Now this bug has been fixed by the `pl' maintainer (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243084). The question is: should I keep my workaround or should I remove it and make the dependency from `pl' stricter, requiring at least the first version with the fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 07:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 03:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050719.l657JilX000698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-05 03:19 EST ------- I think I have fixed this. Makefile installs directly in $prefix/lib instead of $libdir Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/loki-lib-0.1.6-0.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 07:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 03:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050734.l657Y85d001314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-05 03:34 EST ------- Comaintening package request Package: kicad Comainteneur: Chitlesh GOORAH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 07:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 03:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050753.l657ri8C002583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #64) > Found: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246815 > > Now, what is the best course of action? Should I wait and hope that bug is > fixed soon or work around the problem by, e.g., temporarily disabling the YAP > interface? I guess you want to disable YAP support now, and I also want to have this rebuilt once anyway. (If you want to disable YAP support, write a comment in the spec file like: ---------------------------------------------------------- # disable YAP support on x86_64 until bug 246815 is fixed ---------------------------------------------------------- > > There is a related problem: I had to work around a `pl' > packaging problem due to > a missing dependency on `readline-devel'. > Now this bug has been fixed by the > `pl' maintainer > The question is: should I keep my workaround > or should I remove it and make the > dependency from `pl' stricter, requiring at least > the first version with the fix? Yes, pl dependency for readline-devel is fixed now and you can revert the workaround for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050903.l65937JH009108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-07-05 05:03 EST ------- fixed buildroot... prcsys-0-0.3.20070622svn.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: prcsys Short Description: Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver Owners: harald at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050904.l6594RhJ009323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-07-05 05:04 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/initscripts/parallel/prcsys-0-0.3.20070622svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050918.l659Ik9G010489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-05 05:18 EST ------- After set up the rpm, I can do ll /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/rkward/ in which I can find: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2007-07-04 09:19 common -> ../common I guess the link is working... (I have the same on the dolphin package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244523] Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050919.l659JHKu010547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244523 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:23:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050923.l659NUIr011017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-05 05:23 EST ------- I reverted back to the custom sos.spec and applied all the suggestions from your review. The new package and .spec file can be found here: http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos-1.6-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos.spec rpmlint now (really) shows no error with both the SRPM and the built RPM. Please let me know if I accidentally left anything out. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 09:47:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 05:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707050947.l659lRaS013874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-05 05:47 EST ------- SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-QuickREx.spec SRPM: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-QuickREx-3.5.0-2.fc7.src.rpm It's done, here are the updated spec and srpms. Updating the patch was more trivial that I have think. PS: I have forgot to say that I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 10:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 06:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051037.l65Abfc1017144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 06:37 EST ------- OKay. Now I approve this package. -------------------------------------------------- This package (astyle) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------- Dukto, please become the maintainer of this package. Monsen and Mary, if you also want to maintain this package, let us know on this bug ticket. Once removing NEEDSPONSOR blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 10:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 06:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051046.l65AkC1r018415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 06:46 EST ------- I don't think that we should support 0.4.2 - It is old by more than one and the half year - And 9 months is passed since 0.5.2 is released. IMO we should regard 0.5.2 as "stable". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 10:50:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 06:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051050.l65AoKEs018689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-05 06:50 EST ------- Yes, you're right, it was the BuildRequires which needed to be fixed. The package in comment 22 builds and works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 12:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051229.l65CTlFY025110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar| |tenment.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-05 08:29 EST ------- Sorry if this is dragging - I've been ill this week. I'll patch out the offending bogus test suite failure and release another version tomorrow or Saturday my time which should clear the remaining issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 12:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051233.l65CXtZd025401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-05 08:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > The audacious-itouch is replaced by audacious-itouch-control. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/itouch-control Then please update bug #218256 and I will do the final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 12:42:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 08:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051242.l65CgJS0025926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: audacious- |Review Request: audacious- |itouch - iTouch keyboard |itouch-control - iTouch |control plugin for the |keyboard control plugin for |Audacious media player |the Audacious media player URL| |http://sourceforge.net/proje | |cts/itouch-control Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-05 08:42 EST ------- Yu is going to update the package and I will do the final review to get this thing done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 13:08:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051308.l65D8fRt028802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-05 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > module has been renamed and should be usable within 18 minutes of this post. > Please let me know if you run into any trouble. Warren, I can see the module but I cannot check it out: cvs co audacious-plugins-docklet cvs [checkout aborted]: there is no repository /cvs/pkgs/rpms/audacious-docklet Apparently CVS still thinks the module is named audacious-docklet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 13:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051311.l65DBcxF029090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-05 09:11 EST ------- > I guess you want to disable YAP support now, and I also want to > have this rebuilt once anyway. (If you want to disable YAP support, > write a comment in the spec file like: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > # disable YAP support on x86_64 until bug 246815 is fixed > ---------------------------------------------------------- Done. I think bug 246815 will be fixed pretty soon: I will re-enable YAP then. > Yes, pl dependency for readline-devel is fixed now and you can revert > the workaround for this. Done. I have completed a successful build with the above two changes. I will study Bodhi now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 13:47:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051347.l65DlIVv001042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 09:47 EST ------- Please try to rebuild this package on Fedora build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 13:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051348.l65DmoAJ001911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 09:48 EST ------- Well, Bodhi is needed for Fedora-7 branch, so first try to rebuild this package also on F-7 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 13:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051351.l65Dp1AA003220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-05 09:50 EST ------- locales ok. no libs of any kind. not relocatable. owns all created directories. no duplicates. perms ok. defattr ok. clean correct. sane macros. code, not content. no large docs, devel, subpackages or pkc file. no .la. not a desktop app. no conflicts of ownership AFAICS. install begins by wiping buildroot. All utk-8 filenames. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:01:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051401.l65E1j8H008719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-05 10:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pgpool-ha Short Description: : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure Owners: devrim at commandprompt.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051407.l65E7bhR010990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-05 10:07 EST ------- Building now; thanks for the prod. I had tried building it previously and something had gone wrong; I hadn't had the time to try it out again until now. I did already get a build report from plague that I need to make a patch for lib64 directory support; I'll be looking into that next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] New: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ghenry at suretecsystems.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.suretecsystems.com/our_docs/ldapvi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.suretecsystems.com/our_docs/ldapvi-1.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals. Using it, you can update LDAP entries with a text editor, which is the same as vi. Think of it as vipw(1) for LDAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051436.l65EaE3K016751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-05 10:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #54) > I don't think that we should support 0.4.2 > - It is old by more than one and the half year > - And 9 months is passed since 0.5.2 is released. IMO we > should regard 0.5.2 as "stable". OK. I will maintain an "unsponsored" version of 0.4.2 on my personal site, which I will not push for inclusion into Fedora proper. UPDATE: I'm still waiting on bodhi approval for a testing push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051438.l65EcIqD016971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-05 10:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > OKay. Now I approve this package. > > -------------------------------------------------- > This package (astyle) is APPROVED by me > -------------------------------------------------- > > Dukto, please become the maintainer of this package. > Monsen and Mary, if you also want to maintain this package, > let us know on this bug ticket. > I will build for FC-6, F-7 and devel and also register for CVS inclusion this evening. Then once verified and built, push through Bodhi. > Once removing NEEDSPONSOR blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051443.l65EhTk7017376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 10:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > UPDATE: I'm still waiting on bodhi approval for a testing push. This may take one or two days. This will be done by rel-eng team manually. Well, now F-devel/7, FC-6 builds are all okay so you can close this as "CLOSED NEXTRELEASE". Even after closing this, please let me know if you have some questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051454.l65EsAaF018782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-05 10:54 EST ------- The build on the F-7 branch completed successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051455.l65Et6pd018871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 14:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051456.l65EuRLg019015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-05 10:56 EST ------- Is it acceptable to e-mail you directly when I have questions, instead of increasing the length of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051503.l65F3SiE019825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 11:03 EST ------- Okay. And now you can also post your questions to fedora-devel/maintainers mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051507.l65F7530020434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 11:07 EST ------- Okay. Then you should request to push ppl to Fedora 7 repository by using bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ After that, you can close this bug as "CLOSED NEXTRELEASE" It may take one or two days before this package is pushed to Fedora 7 formally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] New: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/tgif.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SRPMS/tgif-4.1.45-2.fc8.src.rpm Mock build log on rawhide i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/LOGS/MOCK-tgif.log Description: Tgif - Xlib based interactive 2-D drawing facility under X11. Supports hierarchical construction of drawings and easy navigation between sets of drawings. It's also a hyper-graphics (or hyper-structured-graphics) browser on the World-Wide-Web. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:21:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051521.l65FLamF022152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246537] Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051528.l65FSIXw022741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-05 11:28 EST ------- Branches created. I'm just building this for devel now though. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051553.l65FrYco025217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-05 11:53 EST ------- OK for Mini.pc - good Ok i think this package is good... minor: make %{?_smp_mflags} has no problems for me - can you gives me the build.log when it fails for info ? As the Fedora guidelines say, the license file is a should... But i really would prefer seeing this "full license text" included... You may ask upstream to provides a 8.1a release (with license included). with no modification code so we could integrate this package to the collection... I will review others packages as this one would be integrated, and until others problems are solved, i will reconsider this case... (license is not unsure so that will be easy). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 15:57:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051557.l65Fv5jD025680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 11:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051604.l65G4qQJ026229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 12:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:08:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051608.l65G8VXB026632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051610.l65GAE23026870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 12:10 EST ------- One possible issue here... you are installing into /usr/share/ocf, but I had to move the heartbeat files off to /usr/%{_libdir}/ because it turns out the heartbeat ocf files are arch dependent. ;( Not sure if it will still look in /usr/share/ocf for other ocf files or not. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051612.l65GCRLu027139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-05 12:12 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051614.l65GEpsf027432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 12:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051616.l65GGtTE027647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-05 12:16 EST ------- I see. I erroneously assumed non-binary==noarch. I'm not experienced enough with heartbeat to answer with any certainty. Good catch. Devrim? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051616.l65GGtO9027650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 12:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051619.l65GJm6M028122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 12:19 EST ------- cvs fixed I think. It wasn't entirely changed in the modules file. Try now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051624.l65GOKni028661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-05 12:24 EST ------- qgis apparently can't be built on ppc64 right now due to bug 246324; should I add an ExcludeArch: ppc64 to this package for now, and open a new bug that blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051650.l65GoHOB031027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jamundso at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamundso at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jamundso at gmail.com 2007-07-05 12:50 EST ------- Perhaps this duplication has already been discussed? Bugzilla Bug 197867: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051651.l65Gpes3031168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 jamundso at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamundso at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jamundso at gmail.com 2007-07-05 12:51 EST ------- Perhaps this duplication has already been discussed? Bugzilla Bug 219056: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 16:57:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051657.l65GvrLS031657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 12:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > qgis apparently can't be built on ppc64 right now due to bug 246324; should I > add an ExcludeArch: ppc64 to this package for now, and open a new bug that > blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64? That is reasonable for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051710.l65HAEHG032604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-05 13:10 EST ------- added bug 247152 for ExcludeArch: ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051713.l65HDrKX000505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-05 13:13 EST ------- The problem with this license if more serious... I cannot approve this package because the integrated license from the original package is not compatible with Fedora licenses... As soon as we have a new package from the original website (with the new license), then we can integrate it to the collection... continuing with others reviews... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:39:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051739.l65Hdmlp002706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-05 13:39 EST ------- Devrim, can you close this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221769] Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051742.l65HgB6X002921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcgi - CGI easy as C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221769 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051749.l65Hnm8n003522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 17:50:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051750.l65HoIgh003575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:02:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051802.l65I2hEs004544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-05 14:02 EST ------- Review for release 9: * RPM name is OK * Source which-2.16.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK Rpmlint is not clean. Source RPM: W: which strange-permission which-2.csh 0775 W: which strange-permission which-2.sh 0775 0644 will do just fine, the files are sourced. rpmlint of which: E: which executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/which-2.csh E: which executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/which-2.csh 0755 E: which executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/which-2.sh E: which executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/which-2.sh 0755 Solved quite easy by setting permissions to 0644 W: which incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.16-9.fc7 2.16-9.fc8 Don't use the disttag in the changelog W: which conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/which-2.csh W: which conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/which-2.sh Use %config(noreplace) in your file section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051810.l65IACwh005389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051810.l65IAPwC005426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 Bug 245492 depends on bug 245491, which changed state. Bug 245491 Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051815.l65IFDLO005977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-05 14:15 EST ------- - Please use a full source url - You probably need some requires(post) (pre), etc for ldconfig, useradd, etc - I don't think it is a good idea to use / as the homedir, the wiki says: should usually be a directory created and owned by the package, with appropriately restrictive permissions. One good choice for the location of the directory is the package's data directory in case it has one. - have you requested an official user id for ohm ? - please don't mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in one .spec file - %dir %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d should certainly be owned by dbus, no ? - are libohm.so.* shared libs or modules ? if they are dlopened, they should better live in /usr/lib/ohm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051818.l65IIhYK006211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-05 14:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib-0.3-5.fc8.src.rpm And let's not build this on ppc64, it lacks the proper dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:31:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051831.l65IVNK4007499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051832.l65IW694007576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 14:32 EST ------- This builds fine for me; rpmlint only says: W: ldapvi summary-not-capitalized ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client Generally you shouldn't include the name of the package in the summary; using just "An interactive LDAP client" would fix two issues at once. I thoughht this would be just the ticket, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to support kerberos-based auth. It seems to work well enough doing an anonymous bind, but of course I can't write any changes. Since there's just the minor issue of the summary, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 6f62e92d20ff2ac0d06125024a914b8622e5b8a0a0c2d390bf3e7990cbd2e153 ldapvi-1.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary generally should not contain the name of the package. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint would be silent if Summary: were fixed as above. * final provides and requires are sane: ldapvi = 1.7-1.fc8 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) liblber-2.3.so.0()(64bit) libldap-2.3.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Things seem to work well enough under manual testing. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, just fix up the summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051853.l65IrLvF009721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2007-07-05 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This builds fine for me; rpmlint only says: > W: ldapvi summary-not-capitalized ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client > Generally you shouldn't include the name of the package in the summary; using > just "An interactive LDAP client" would fix two issues at once. Will do. > > I thoughht this would be just the ticket, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to > support kerberos-based auth. It seems to work well enough doing an anonymous > bind, but of course I can't write any changes. It supports SASL, which in turn can do GSSAPI. Any thing ldapsearch/ldapadd can do, ldapvi can do I presume. > > Since there's just the minor issue of the summary, I'll go ahead and approve > this and you can fix it when you check in. > > Review: > * source files match upstream: > 6f62e92d20ff2ac0d06125024a914b8622e5b8a0a0c2d390bf3e7990cbd2e153 > ldapvi-1.7.tar.gz > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > X summary generally should not contain the name of the package. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). > * package installs properly > * debuginfo package looks complete. > * rpmlint would be silent if Summary: were fixed as above. > * final provides and requires are sane: > ldapvi = 1.7-1.fc8 > = > libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) > libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > liblber-2.3.so.0()(64bit) > libldap-2.3.so.0()(64bit) > libncurses.so.5()(64bit) > libpopt.so.0()(64bit) > libreadline.so.5()(64bit) > libssl.so.6()(64bit) > libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) > libz.so.1()(64bit) > * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Things seem to work well > enough under manual testing. > * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no scriptlets present. > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * no headers. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no static libraries. > * no libtool .la files. > > APPROVED, just fix up the summary. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:55:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051855.l65It7AY009863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-05 14:55 EST ------- Builds successfully on x86, x86_64, and ppc. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 18:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051859.l65Ix5Lj010195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-05 14:59 EST ------- Sorry, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:03:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051903.l65J34EP010534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pgpool-ha : |Review Request: postgresql- |Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to |pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses |keep pgpool from being a |heartbeat to keep pgpool |single point of failure |from being a single point of | |failure ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-05 15:02 EST ------- (Ouch... Fixing package name) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postgresql-pgpool-ha Short Description: : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure Owners: devrim at commandprompt.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:11:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051911.l65JBJGB011198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:11 EST ------- mrxvt-0.5.2-9.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051911.l65JBOP2011232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:11 EST ------- libgsasl-0.2.18-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051912.l65JCbN1011643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc- A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:12 EST ------- php-spyc-0.2.5-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:13:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051913.l65JDmhL011913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:13 EST ------- ppl-0.9-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:22:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051922.l65JM0kV014412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:21 EST ------- stardict-dic-en-2.4.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:22:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245878] Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051922.l65JM41L014456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-en - English(en) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245878 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051922.l65JMGbo014508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:22 EST ------- stardict-dic-ja-2.4.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:22:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245879] Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051922.l65JMJZP014550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ja - Japanese(ja) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245879 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JN2nn015005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:23 EST ------- stardict-dic-ru-2.4.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245880] Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JN56d015048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-ru - Russian(ru) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245880 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JNFpX015101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:23 EST ------- stardict-dic-zh_CN-2.4.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245882] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JNKZv015144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245882 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JNRJ1015189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:23 EST ------- stardict-dic-zh_TW-2.4.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:23:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245883] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051923.l65JNVwE015232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_TW - Traditional Chinese(zh_TW) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245883 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:24:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051924.l65JOYNU015481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-05 15:24 EST ------- audacious-plugin-fc-0.2-1 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051924.l65JObCC015521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051925.l65JPHuq015720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2007-07-05 15:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ldapvi Short Description: An interactive LDAP client Owners: ghenry at suretecsystems.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: tibbs at math.uh.edu, notting at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051925.l65JPg2P015847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ldapvi - |Review Request: ldapvi - An |ldapvi is an interactive |interactive LDAP client |LDAP client | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051945.l65Jj0Sl017710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246782] Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051945.l65JjB5Z017885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plr - Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL and R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246782 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051947.l65Jl6Yf018061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243733] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051958.l65Jw9at019348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - Rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243733 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 19:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707051958.l65Jwkfq019411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-05 15:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158616) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158616&action=view) new spec file Attached is a new spec file with all the changes. libohm_*.so.* are dlopened modules so I've made then un-versioned and put them in /usr/lib/ohm/ Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052020.l65KKdcG021689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-05 16:20 EST ------- Strange, my mock is pointed to devel as well, host is running F-7 on i686. I've asked for help on the upstream mailinglist yesterday, I hope someone can reproduce/fix this. Do you consider this as a blocker? The alternative is for me to disable that test, it doesn't seem to really test the functionality of Gearman and Danga::Socket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052029.l65KT8vj022494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-05 16:29 EST ------- It misses at least BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel Still trying to get it to build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052033.l65KXAhc022792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 16:33 EST ------- Devrim: Any thoughts on comment #21? I have talked with upstream and I think things might be fixed up for the upcoming release, but not sure... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052033.l65KXimY022866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-05 16:33 EST ------- one more: BuildRequires: hal-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052043.l65KhXSL023422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 16:43 EST ------- Well, if it doesn't build in the buildsys then you'll have bigger problems. But if you're confident that it's a bug in the test then I'd say just delete t/err8.t in the %check section and add a comment explaining why you're doing it and I'd say it's fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052046.l65Kk38K023639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 matt at truch.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt at truch.net ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-07-05 16:46 EST ------- FYI - I tried kdebluetooth-1.0-0.24.beta3.src.rpm and I get the following selinux related error: [matt at tbc SRPMS]$ kbluetooth kbluetooth: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libkbluetooth.so.0: cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052046.l65KkYNC023814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-05 16:46 EST ------- Do you mean this? New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 20:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052057.l65KvI0W025384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 21:25:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052125.l65LPGKg028047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-05 17:25 EST ------- Ok, with these, I finally got it to build in mock. Initial impression from the built packages: /usr/share/ohm-0.1.1/index.html This looks unusual. Typically, datadirs are not versioned, and if index.html is documentation, it should probably go into /usr/share/doc/ohm-0.1.1 instead. The way to do that is to add %doc index.html to the file list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 21:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052133.l65LXvaM028752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-05 17:33 EST ------- Translations need to be handled with %find_lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 21:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247200] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247200 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rgb at phy.duke.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 21:53:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052153.l65Lr4Bf030516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-05 17:53 EST ------- I publised as requested into bodhi/admin and they (Bugnum and Random) got flagged as ok for testing (possibly by you). However, the following document: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT doesn't mention what the requirements are for pushing something back into koji for use there. Specifically, either: 1) koji takes a bit to pull in new packages 2) koji can't use testing rpms. Either 1, 2 or both is currently still an issue. Neither of which are a problem, but I think they're worth documenting in the FAQ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 21:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052158.l65Lw457030774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-07-05 17:58 EST ------- Sorry :( This package fell between the cracks. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xoo/xoo.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/xoo/xoo-0.7-2.f7.src.rpm Changes: Added BuildRequires (eg GConf2-devel). Tested it builds in mock successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:00:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052200.l65M0jYK031055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-07-05 18:00 EST ------- Heh, I get so involved in nailing down bugs I keep forgetting I haven't uploaded a build in a while. I seem to have nailed the avatar texture baking problem which was the last major annoyance in the open source build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235409] Review Request: petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052233.l65MXIFu000908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: petitboot - graphical kexec-based bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235409 christian.iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:petitboot - |Review Request: petitboot - |graphical kexec-based |graphical kexec-based |bootloader |bootloader ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2007-07-05 18:33 EST ------- Added a space after "Review Request:" in the Summary, to make the Package Status script happy... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:34:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239282] Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052234.l65MYq7Q000991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239282 christian.iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2007-07-05 18:34 EST ------- imported and built. Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052249.l65MnRf4001827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 18:49 EST ------- I get a 404 on that SRPM link, but I grabbed the updated spec and used that. This one builds and installs fine. rpmlint is still quiet, and the include files are now in a non-conflicting location. Everything looks good to me now. APPROVED Thanks for all the work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:52:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052252.l65Mq97j001997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(smilner at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052254.l65Ms7gt002145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-spyc- A |Review Request: php-spyc - A |simple php yaml class |simple php yaml class -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 22:54:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052254.l65MsnlN002246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 18:54 EST ------- Were you going to make your CVS request and get this checked in and built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 23:09:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052309.l65N9E0V003310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 19:09 EST ------- Erm, I set the wrong flag somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 5 23:30:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707052330.l65NUejn004229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 richard at hughsie.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #158616|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-05 19:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158629) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158629&action=view) new spec file Here you go, this should be everything okay. Cheers for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 00:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060015.l660FnHU006652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-05 20:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astyle Short Description: Source code formatter for C-like programming languages Owners: gnome at dux-linux.org Branches: FC6 F7 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp mefoster at gmail.com haircut at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 00:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060018.l660IIE7006769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 00:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060041.l660fFke008014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 20:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 00:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060046.l660kPTl008344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 20:46 EST ------- Humm... will that work with this package being noarch? So, if this noarch package builds on x86_64 host, lib64 will be used, no matter where it is installed. Not sure if there is any way to install the ocf file in a arch specific location when the package is noarch. Again, heartbeat might still look in /usr/share/ocf, but I am not sure. Can you confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 00:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060051.l660pVY6008799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-05 20:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 01:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247200] Review Request: wulfware - A LAN/cluster/beowulf monitoring toolset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060118.l661IITR010163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wulfware - A LAN/cluster/beowulf monitoring toolset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247200 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: -|Review Request: wulfware - A | |monitoring toolset -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 01:46:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] New: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora/trac-mercurial-plugin/trac-mercurial-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora/trac-mercurial-plugin/trac-mercurial-plugin-0.10.0.2-1.20070705svn5798.fc8.src.rpm Description: This plugin for Trac provides support for the Mercurial SCM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 01:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224684] Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060152.l661qG7g011843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jafo at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jafo at tummy.com 2007-07-05 21:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cronolog Short Description: Web log rotation program for Apache Owners: jafo at tummy.com Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 01:54:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060154.l661sw7q011970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 01:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060159.l661x5c5012142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 21:59 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060202.l6622fA7012302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 22:02 EST ------- OK, I can buy the openssl dependency. However, when I look at openssl itself, I note that it has several engines already present, but in /usr/lib/openssl/engines, not /usr/lib/engines. Perhaps this package should place engine_pkcs11.so in the former directory (and not own it) rather than what it's currently doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:04:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060204.l66240I5012424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:03 EST ------- rpmlint: W: trac-mercurial-plugin incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.10.0.2-1.20070705svn5798 0.10.0.2-1.20070705svn5798fc6 Safe to ignore. It's a strange version is all. -------------------- Name looks good Good license and matches upstream Spec file is reasonable Builds fine on FC6 Not so good: No upstream tarball is available, not a blocker. Might be a good idea to contact upstream and ask them do do snapshots. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:06:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] New: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora/trac-git-plugin/trac-git-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkeating/fedora/trac-git-plugin/trac-git-plugin-0.0.1-1.20070705svn1536.fc8.src.rpm Description: This Trac plugin provides support for the GIT SCM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060210.l662AVjL012746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmcgrath at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228214] Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060211.l662B0cW012800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228214 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-05 22:10 EST ------- Has there been any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060213.l662Deq6012988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmcgrath at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:17:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060217.l662HROf013297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:17 EST ------- rpmlint: no output (good) Name looks good Good license and matches upstream Spec file is reasonable Builds fine on FC6 Not so good: No upstream tarball is available, not a blocker. Might be a good idea to contact upstream and ask them do do snapshots. blocker: make sure to Require: git-core (the plugin works but browse source does not). Just make sure you add that before importing and its all good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:21:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060221.l662Lq9h013612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-05 22:21 EST ------- FC-6 PLAGUE BUILD DONE: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=34797 FC-7 KOJI BUILD FAILED: BuildError: package astyle not in list for tag dist-fc7-updates-candidate I think it needs to be promoted to fc7-updates-candidate? F-8 KOJI BUILD FAILED: [a at buildbox devel]$ make build astyle.spec not tagged with tag astyle-1_21-5_fc8 make: *** [build-check] Error 1 I tried to remove from cvs, then readd and even when I do make tag build, it says the tag already exists... I don't see how to remove the tag after it's been created. I'm sleepy so please forgive me if I'm overlooking something simple. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060226.l662Qku2013983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-mercurial-plugin Short Description: Mercurial plugin for Trac Owners: jkeating at redhat.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 EPEL-5 EPEL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:30:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060230.l662UYeB014276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-git-plugin Short Description: GIT version control plugin for Trac Owners: jkeating at redhat.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 EPEL-5 EPEL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060231.l662VZJg014367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 22:31 EST ------- Next don't forget to again request on bodhi to move ppl from testing to stable. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. If you have some questions, please feel free to ask me, or you can ask them on fedora devel/maintainers mailing lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060239.l662drFv014878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 22:39 EST ------- You may have to wait for about one or two hours... Note: I live in Japan and now it is 11:40 AM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224684] Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060253.l662rBF6015749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cronolog - Web log rotation program for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224684 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:53 EST ------- Branch 'EL-5' created for module 'cronolog' from branch 'FC-6' I assume this was a branch request since the module already existed. Please use the proper request form next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:54:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060254.l662s25E015807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060255.l662tNj4015957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 02:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060255.l662tVRO016003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-05 22:55 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 03:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060306.l6636urT016704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-05 23:06 EST ------- Perhaps now you can rebuild astyle on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 04:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060414.l664EKlp021110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 00:14 EST ------- I think that in the new spec there's no reason to use --record or mess with INSTALLED_FILES because it's no longer being used. Generally the name of the package isn't used in the summary. The svn export doesn't match what's in the tarball. The tarball is missing Changelog, example_plugins, install-rpm.sh, Makefile, prep-rpm.sh, pylintrc, sosreport.1 and sos.spec. The checkout is missing PKG-INFO and sosreport.1.gz. Perhaps someone is compressing the manpage manually? There's no point; rpm will do it for you, and the %files section you have will handle it. I don't know about the rest of the mismatched files. The Changelog file seems to be something that should certainly be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 05:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 01:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060518.l665Ixe3024980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-06 01:18 EST ------- With the recent changes that to openmpi in rawhide, I believe this package is now OK to enter Fedora. Latest version for reviews below; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.5p4-1.fc8.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 05:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 01:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] New: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sbehera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/nabi?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=nabi.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/nabi?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=nabi-0.17-2.src.rpm Description: Nabi is a Korean word that means butterfly. Nabi (the program) is an easy to use Korean X input method. It allows you to enter phonetic Korean characters (hangul) and pictographic Korean characters (hanja.) Additional Information: This package was there in FC-3. http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/3/SRPMS/nabi-0.14-3.src.rpm Reference: http://nabi.kldp.net/document_en.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 07:01:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060701.l6671cxd029981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-06 03:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review work also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 07:03:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060703.l6673eqL030089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-06 03:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: loki-lib Short Description: A C++ library of design patterns and idioms Owners: spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 08:34:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060834.l668Y0xO005284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-06 04:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Heh, I get so involved in nailing down bugs I keep forgetting I haven't uploaded > a build in a while. I seem to have nailed the avatar texture baking problem > which was the last major annoyance in the open source build. Thats very good to hear, any chance you can create update patches of the client and all its deps, and post URL's to the reviews? Then we can review them and hopefully get secondlife into Fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 08:52:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060852.l668qej0007265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-06 04:52 EST ------- I made the following changes: * fixed manpage (let rpmbuild compress it) * removed --record and mangling of INSTALL_FILES * fixed summary * svn export and tarball are identical * added ChangeLog to file-set The new files can be found here: http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos-1.6-5.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/neslami/sos/sos.spec Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 09:43:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 05:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707060943.l669hvWU012550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 10:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 06:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061035.l66AZMXB017195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 10:53:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 06:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061053.l66ArC53018786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 06:53 EST ------- Well, as I have some ruby modules packages: Please check the guideline of ruby module packages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby Especially: * the name of ruby modules must be ruby- * the package must have: Requires: ruby(abi) = (and I think the package should have: BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = ) * the package must provide ruby() = - * Usually ruby module packages have Group : Development/Languages For example, I maintain ruby-gettext-package http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/ruby-gettext-package/devel/ruby-gettext-package.spec More complicated example is ruby-gnome2 (maintained by other people, reviewed by me) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/ruby-gnome2/devel/ruby-gnome2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 11:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061119.l66BJR9A020775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 mkpai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-07-06 07:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Callback Short Description: Object interface for function callbacks Owners: M.K.Pai, David Muir Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: muir at idiom.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 11:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061121.l66BLSaN021021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 07:21 EST ------- Well, you may want to check the spec files of other packages. For example, there is scim spec: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/scim/devel/scim.spec Please check the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines * SourceURL must be given with full URL. * Don't rebuild in mock. At least, libhangul-devel is missing for BuildRequires * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. Perhaps this can be resolved by using %configure macro. * Please support parallel make when possible. * "install-strip" is forbidden. This disables to create debuginfo rpm. * Please keep timestamps. When using "install" command, use it with '-p' option. * Use macros (e.g. /usr/share -> %{_datadir}) * Categories 'Application' 'X-Red-Hat-Base' are deprecated and should be removed * desktop file must be installed by using desktop-file-install (BR: desktop-file-utils is needed) * The binaries which are not under normal users' paths must be specified with full path. * gettext .mo files must be registered in %files entry by using %find_lang macro. * files under %_sysconfdir should be marked as %config(noreplace) * We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Please remove unused macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 11:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061134.l66BYu2b022346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 07:34 EST ------- And: * %{_sbindir}/alternatives must be added to Requires(....) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 11:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 07:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061159.l66Bxovb024442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-06 07:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Perhaps now you can rebuild astyle on koji. FC-7 KOJI BUILD SUCCEEDED: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10510 F-8 KOJI BUILD FAILED: [a at buildbox devel]$ make build astyle.spec not tagged with tag astyle-1_21-5_fc8 make: *** [build-check] Error 1 Not sure what I need to do with the F-8 build failure. I'm thinking I might need to delete the directory from CVS and then recreate it? I've pushed astyle in bodhi: Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: enhancement Bugs: 207896 - Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter Requested: push Pushed: False Mail Sent: False ... Submitted: 2007-07-06 04:58:40 Build Logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/astyle/1.21/5.fc7/data/logs The last thing to fix is the devel build issue. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:07:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061207.l66C7rqW025029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-07-06 08:07 EST ------- Hi Adam, Did you import the src or tarball in the CVS branch devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:14:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061214.l66CEOCh025372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 08:14 EST ------- http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/astyle/devel/?root=extras&only_with_tag=astyle-1_21-5_fc8 shows that astyle.spec is not tagged. The easiest way to fix this is to bump release number and retag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061227.l66CRWe5026000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 smilner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(smilner at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-06 08:27 EST ------- Just an update ... I have created a fedora account and am now waiting on the CLA portion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061236.l66CaQ7o026835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-06 08:36 EST ------- php-spyc-0.2.5-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245103] Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061236.l66CaVnA026884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-spyc - A simple php yaml class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245103 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2.5-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 12:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061241.l66CfuRi027324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-06 08:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > Why not? Many people using arpack do so in static builds. But what needs > to be done is to split of the static lib in arpack-static (when the package > was submitted the guideline did not exist yet). OK, I have no objections to shipping static libs as long as they're in a separate subpackage. > Thanks! It does look a bit awkward that freefem++ ships a patch to two files > as those two files in a tarball within its tarball, and for simplicity's sake > I'll better make a real patch out of it. Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 14:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061413.l66ED7ST002938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-06 10:13 EST ------- Will attempt to fix when I get home this evening. Thank you for the suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 14:33:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] New: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anderson.silva at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.the-silvas.com/python-proctor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.the-silvas.com/python-proctor-1.2-2.src.rpm Description: Proctor is a tool for running unit tests. It enhances the standard unittest module to provide the ability to find all tests in a set of code, categorize them via tagging, and run some or all of them. Test output may be generated in a variety of formats to support parsing by another tool or simple, nicely formatted, reports for human review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 15:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061510.l66FAiPX008095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(livinded at deadbytes | |.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 11:10 EST ------- Please update the status of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 15:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061515.l66FFgpi008641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 11:15 EST ------- Please update the status of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 15:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061516.l66FGOqJ008851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 15:32:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061532.l66FWpE2010908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 11:32 EST ------- This failed to build for me: + autoreconf -f -i configure.ac:11: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90064 (%build) I added a build dependency on libtool and it built OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 15:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] New: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Grostesteing is back for troubles: he's kidnapped the Coco Coq's friends to turn them into monsters. Coco must go inside the deadly base, avoids traps, free his friends and beat the bad scientist Grostesteing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061600.l66G0fHF013653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:17:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061617.l66GH213014820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 12:16 EST ------- I'll assume that the libtool build dependency is there for the purposes of this review. rpmlint says: W: libtextcat-devel no-documentation which is OK. This package screws with the compiler flags as noted above. Frankly I don't know what gcc does when it sees -O3 -O2 on the command line, but I'll trust Ralf's assessment above that it doesn't cause problems. Since you're running the autotools anyway, it should be easy to patch them out but I don't think it's mandatory. So I'll approve this, but of course you'll have to add the libtool dependency so that you can build. Review: * source files match upstream: 5677badffc48a8d332e345ea4fe225e3577f53fc95deeec8306000b256829655 libtextcat-2.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (assuming libtool is there) ? compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint output is OK. * final provides and requires are sane: libtextcat-2.2-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm libtextcat.so.0()(64bit) libtextcat = 2.2-4.fc8 = /sbin/ldconfig libtextcat.so.0()(64bit) libtextcat-devel-2.2-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm libtextcat-devel = 2.2-4.fc8 = libtextcat = 2.2-4.fc8 libtextcat.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no way to test this package. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig is called properly and unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED; just add that libtool dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:20:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061620.l66GKP13015034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:31:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061631.l66GV2Vs015971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2007-07-06 12:31 EST ------- k, Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/libtextcat/libtextcat.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/libtextcat/libtextcat-2.2-5.fc8.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtextcat Short Description: Text Categorization Library Owners: caolanm at redhat.com Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247219] Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061637.l66GbeJd016296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-git-plugin - GIT version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247219 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-06 12:37 EST ------- in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247217] Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061638.l66Gc9Ct016350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-mercurial-plugin - Mercurial plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247217 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-06 12:38 EST ------- in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:41:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061641.l66GfpLn016690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-07-06 12:41 EST ------- I'm removing myself from this review. No activity and it's cluttering up my bug views. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061644.l66Gicxk016919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 12:44 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint is clean. The URL is 404 for me. It looks like a typo; should probably be http://membres.lycos.fr/agisite/coco-c.htm Are you sure you removed something from the included zipfile? It has the same size and same contents as the upstream file. Aside from those, this package is is OK. Unfortunately I can't approve it as is because of the upstream zipfile issue. ? source files match upstream, but I don't think they're supposed to. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for content. * license text not included upstream, but communications with the author clarifying the license are included. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: coco-coq = 0.1-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme nagi * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I tested manually (and promptly fell off a cliff); everything seems to work fine. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * GUI app; desktop file installs cleanly and looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:50:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061650.l66GoRWr017479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 kms at passback.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk| |) | ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-06 12:50 EST ------- It looks like the excludes I had in the SPEC for the .sconsign files are not needed on F7 or Rawhide. New SPEC file and SRPM here: http://www.passback.org.uk/maps/rpms/SPECS/mapnik.spec http://www.passback.org.uk/maps/rpms/SRPMS/mapnik-0.4.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061654.l66GsYDF017899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(green at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 12:54 EST ------- Currently it seems as if Andy Green is reviewing this, but he hasn't responded. I'll set needinfo. Andy, if you are reviewing this, please set fedora-review to '?'. Or if you don't want to continue reviewing this, go ahead and assign it back to nobody at fedoraproject.org so someone else can take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 16:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061657.l66GvIaI018244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 12:57 EST ------- Fixed typo. Unzipping the source: [limb at fawkes test]$ unzip cocoe.zip Archive: cocoe.zip inflating: LOGDIR extracting: OBJECT inflating: PICDIR extracting: SNDDIR inflating: VIEWDIR inflating: VOL.0 inflating: WORDS.TOK Which does not match upstream: [limb at fawkes upstream]$ unzip cococe.zip Archive: cococe.zip inflating: agi inflating: agi.com inflating: AGI.PC inflating: AGI.SB inflating: AGIDATA.OVL inflating: CGA_GRAF.OVL inflating: EGA_GRAF.OVL inflating: HGC_FONT inflating: HGC_GRAF.OVL inflating: HGC_OBJS.OVL inflating: IBM_OBJS.OVL inflating: JR_GRAF.OVL inflating: LOGDIR extracting: OBJECT inflating: PICDIR extracting: SNDDIR inflating: VG_GRAF.OVL inflating: VIEWDIR inflating: VOL.0 inflating: WORDS.TOK Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:02:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061702.l66H2YiK019502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(jparsons at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:02 EST ------- Cleaning up blockers. At this point it seems that we've been waiting on a response from the reporter for over a month now. Setting NEEDINFO; I'll close this in a week if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061707.l66H7e7E020206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-07-06 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Currently it seems as if Andy Green is reviewing this, but he hasn't responded. > I'll set needinfo. > > Andy, if you are reviewing this, please set fedora-review to '?'. Or if you > don't want to continue reviewing this, go ahead and assign it back to > nobody at fedoraproject.org so someone else can take it. (I think you mean "Anthony" Green). Yes, I'll continue reviewing this. I don't know how I missed John's reply. I'll look at this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061708.l66H8Avw020293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220402] Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061714.l66HESBJ020940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:14 EST ------- And I still can't fetch the URLs. My understanding is that Paul is unable to work on Fedora at this point. With nobody to drive this review, there's little point in keeping it open. I'll set needinfo and close in a week if there's no response; it can always be reopened if Paul comes back or someone else can submit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:16:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061716.l66HG5HL021187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:16 EST ------- I can't fetch the SRPM from the above URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:24:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061724.l66HOluA021913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:24 EST ------- I think Paul is unable to work on Fedora for the time being. I'll go ahead and set NEEDINFO and close this ticket out if there's no response in a week; it can always be reopened if he returns, or someone else can submit this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061727.l66HRpaC022257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-07-06 13:27 EST ------- So the next try. SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-5.0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:31:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061731.l66HVb9W022699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:31 EST ------- Looks like it wasn't reported here, but FESCo voted against allowing this package to link statically against dietlibc. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061734.l66HY9B8022880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:34 EST ------- FESCo voted against allowing ipsvd to link statically against dietlibc in Fedora. I don't see how the outcome could be different for this package, but if you want it to also be voted upon, please say so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061739.l66HdLtx023409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-06 13:39 EST ------- Jon, any plans on building this for EPEL-5 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061748.l66HmUlM024410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 13:48 EST ------- Yes. There's a new upstrem with GPL-only content, that works great, and was just pushed to F-7-updates. I've built successfully for FC-6, and I've been using it myself, so I think it's ready. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: roundcubemail New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061751.l66Hpicc024891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mricon at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mricon at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-07-06 13:51 EST ------- Same here. What can we do to make this hit Fedora and EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061752.l66Hqwjw025082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at theholbrooks.org ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-06 13:52 EST ------- It appears that php-pear-Mail-Mime owned by fedora at theholbrooks.org also needed to be added to EPEL-5 in order to make this work. You will need to check with that owner to see if they are willing to maintain php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL, or if they are OK with you maintaining it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 17:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061757.l66Hv9FJ025532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 13:57 EST ------- Not finding a review bug. Brandon, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:00:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061800.l66I0EbJ025990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 14:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Same here. What do you mean by this? > What can we do to make this hit Fedora and EPEL? Someone must create new spec/srpm and must have it pass other people's review. So currently who is going to maintain this on Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061800.l66I0IpP026087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 14:00 EST ------- cvs done. Note that you should be setting the fedora-cvs flag to ? to request cvs, not +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:02:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061802.l66I2QRf026394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 14:02 EST ------- Can you resubmit your request with email addresses in the Owners: field? Thats the format the cvs scripts expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061806.l66I66rH026906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 14:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:07:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061807.l66I7B1Z027062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-06 14:07 EST ------- Brad Fitzpatrick will roll out memcached 1.23. I will update the spec/srpm as soon as that is done. ETA sometime between now and the monday memcached hackathon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061810.l66IAmYk027523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-06 14:10 EST ------- qgis-0.8.1-10.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:10:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061810.l66IAsJZ027560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-06 14:10 EST ------- astyle-1.21-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061811.l66IBXQn027724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(belegdol at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 14:11 EST ------- In order to be a package maintainer, you must have some ability to handle basic programming tasks. Not very much, really, but some. So what should happen to this ticket? If the issues can't be fixed, I suppose it should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061813.l66IDf21028170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-06 14:13 EST ------- atanks-2.4-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061813.l66IDirI028217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game "Scorched Earth" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.4-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061817.l66IHAQm028861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-06 14:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Perhaps this duplication has already been discussed? > Bugzilla Bug 219056: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target I do not think anyone knew there was another request and review for IET. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061821.l66ILpHi029464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-07-06 14:21 EST ------- This breaks FC6 and FE6: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg00412.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg00413.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:34:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061834.l66IYZv1031151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-07-06 14:34 EST ------- Jon, I'd really like to see this in EL-4 as well if there are no hangups on dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208679] Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061835.l66IZM2q031468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 14:35 EST ------- This builds for me on rawhide-x86_64, but I get a huge load of rpmlint complaints: This one should be easy to fix: W: vamos-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/vamos-devel-0.5.7/matrixfaq.htm The rest are all undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings, 612 of them. I'll attach them. The mangled symbols make it somewhat difficult to know what's going on, but there are unmangled symbols as well like "tan", "asin", "glGenLists" and "glClear" which make it seem like these libraries aren't even being linked against libm or the GL libraries, much less each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208678] Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061835.l66IZNd3031493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208679] Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061836.l66IaC2j031613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 14:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158683) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158683&action=view) undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061838.l66IcNll031944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-06 14:38 EST ------- rpmlint warns about W: ohm incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.1-0.fc7.hughsie 0.1.1-0.fc8 and it might be a nice idea to add the LSB header to the initscript, to make Harald feel warm and fuzzy... Apart from that, I had to do a few more specfile tweaks to get it to build in mock: Add a BuildRequires: libtool Add rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/ohm-%{version}/index.html Otherwise mock complains about an unpackaged file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:41:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061841.l66IfwjI032414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 14:41 EST ------- No objection here, I'll check and chase down deps. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: roundcubemail New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061844.l66Iikpq032736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061848.l66ImrY4000769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 14:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158690) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158690&action=view) mock build log of mapnik 0.4.0-4 on rawhide i386 Very quick comment: ! Details are written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines * rpmlint: ---------------------------------------------------- W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/boundaries_l.shp.xml W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/boundaries.shp.xml W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/qcdrainage.shp.xml W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/ontdrainage.shp.xml W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/popplaces.shp.xml W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/COPYRIGHT.txt W: mapnik wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mapnik-0.4.0/demo/data/roads.shp.xml W: mapnik summary-ended-with-dot Library providing algorithms for spatial data access and visualization. E: mapnik invalid-soname /usr/lib/libmapnik.so libmapnik.so W: mapnik summary-ended-with-dot Library providing algorithms for spatial data access and visualization. W: mapnik rpm-buildroot-usage %build scons PREFIX=%{_prefix} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} %{?_smp_mflags} W: mapnik macro-in-%changelog _prefix ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: - Some files have Windows-style end-of-file encodings. Please fix them to Unix-style encodings - Summary should not end with dot. ? QUESTION How is libmapnik.so used? - Is this library used only by this package? - Or can this library be linked from other software? - In %changelog, please use %%_prefix. Otherwise %_prefix is expanded in %changelog. * compilation flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. - -O3 flag is generally forbidden (this make debugging difficult) * Fonts - Fedora has dejavu-fonts, dejavu-fonts-experimental and shipping duplicate dejavu fonts in this package is not allowed. * sitelib vs sitearch - This package installs /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mapnik/_mapnik.so , which is arch dependent. python related files must be installed under %python_sitearch. not under %python_sitelib. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061849.l66InK2e000874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-07-06 14:49 EST ------- I've been meaning to put Mail_Mime in EL5 anyway (I've already got a branch), this is just the kick in the pants I needed to actually *do* it :) I'll also request an EL4 branch as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061852.l66IqS93001357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-06 14:52 EST ------- Branched roundcubemail on EL-4 EL-5 Branched php-pear-Mail-Mime on EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061855.l66It65w001679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 ------- Additional Comments From kengert at redhat.com 2007-07-06 14:55 EST ------- Package nspr-4.6.6-2 with support for PR_STATIC_ASSERT built into Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:55:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061855.l66Itx31001929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 14:55 EST ------- Great, I'll build when I see Mail_Mime get built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 18:56:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061856.l66IuCUn002052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:00:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061900.l66J0JOx002642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:00 EST ------- It was submitted after this one. I think I'll just close it as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219056] Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061901.l66J1VBg002801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget - iSCSI Enterprise Target https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:01 EST ------- I'm closing this as a duplicate, since that's what should have been done long ago. Perhaps the submitters could work together. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 197867 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:01:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061901.l66J1jAI002897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david.nalley at fedoraproject.o | |rg ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:01 EST ------- *** Bug 219056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061906.l66J6SXC003522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-06 15:06 EST ------- I'm interested in co-maintaining this as well. I'm already maintaining Perlbal and MogileFS, the other products from the LiveJournal guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061909.l66J9psh003889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 15:09 EST ------- Yeah, I am sure this isn't going to work as a noarch package unless heartbeat looks in libdir _and_ /usr/share/ocf, which it doesn't look like is the case. ;( So, two options: - Make this package arch - Wait and see if the heartbeat fixes upstream will make things ok to move back to datadir for ocf files. (I'm going to unset the cvs flag for now while we figure this out...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061914.l66JEx9K004441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 15:14 EST ------- I vote make it arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227035] Review Request: aspectj-1.2.1-3jpp - AspectJ aspect-oriented language extension to Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061923.l66JNQRC005447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspectj-1.2.1-3jpp - AspectJ aspect-oriented language extension to Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227035 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(rafaels at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:23 EST ------- This also fails to build for me (x86_64, rawhide), due to an unsatisfiable dependency on java-1.4.2. It seems there was no comment from the submitter in the 4.5 months since the previous comment; setting NEEDINFO. Anthony, this is assigned to you; if you want to review it, could you set fedora-review to '?', and if not, could you assign it back to nobody at fedoraproject.org? (And sorry about the "Andy" thing eariler.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061926.l66JQK4j005818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:26 EST ------- Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:26:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061926.l66JQNjv005870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216526] Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061926.l66JQPsu005914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061927.l66JRx40006097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(weston_schmidt at alu | |mni.purdue.edu) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:27 EST ------- Is anything happening with this package? There's been no response from the submitter after receiving commentary two months ago. Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061938.l66Jcj6b007262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 15:38 EST ------- I cannot download the srpm from that page. I visited the index page, copied the URL for the srpm to clipboard and pasted it into my builder script which tries to wget the URL. Unfortunately I just get redirected to some info page. Please just post a plain link, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061945.l66Jjvg0008257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-06 15:45 EST ------- Updated RPM/spec now available Spec URL: http://www.inuus.com/memcached.spec SRPM URL: http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:46:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061946.l66Jk6qx008369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-06 15:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/RutilT-0.15-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices Ok updated to new 0.15 Beginning a testing campaign for Ralinks users and 2.6.21 kernels For now, i expect something wrong with PAM implementation, this is the purpose of the testing... (from this i may ask advices on the pam ml) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061952.l66JqcMK009259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 15:52 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 19:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707061953.l66JrMT1009327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-06 15:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158701) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158701&action=view) fedora-7-x86_64 mock logs 0.15-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062008.l66K89ET011052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-06 16:08 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libggi/libggi-2.2.2-8.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPECS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/libggi/libggi.spec Description: General Graphics Interface toolkit Still in testing phase... Actually some internal tests (demo) seems good, others seem to need futher (user) configuration... This is the case for vlc using General Graphics Interface toolkit output for example... (asking to set some display-x ) About last changes, i was not really aware about how was working multilibs from the repository. Actually all starts from -devel, so the name do not matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062010.l66KACwQ011368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 16:10 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (Artistic) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a26e523e54c511ed8d263f16a7025330 pv-0.9.9.tar.gz a26e523e54c511ed8d263f16a7025330 pv-0.9.9.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Not a blocker, but I see that the during the build the install attempts to install a pv.info file, which doesn't exist. Might ask upstream about either including that or removing the code which refers to it. /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 doc/pv.info \ "/var/tmp/pv-0.9.9-1.fc8-c16338//usr/share/info/pv.info" /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `doc/pv.info': No such file or directory make: [install] Error 1 (ignored) 2. Also, it looks like 'man' is called during build: man doc/quickref.1 | sed 's/.^H//g' | cat -s > doc/quickref.txt || : /bin/sh: man: command not found Should there be a BuildRequires: man ? I suppose only if you wanted to package the quickref.txt file? That file seems to be a copy of the man page... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:18:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] New: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/MyPasswordSafe/MyPasswordSafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/MyPasswordSafe/MyPasswordSafe-0.6.7-0.1.20061216.sky.src.rpm Description: MyPasswordSafe is a straight-forward, easy-to-use password manager that maintains compatibility with Password Safe files. MyPasswordSafe has the following features: * Safes are encrypted when they are stored to disk. * Passwords never have to be seen, because they are copied to the clipboard * Random passwords can be generated. * Window size, position, and column widths are remembered. * Passwords remain encrypted until they need to be decrypted at the dialog and file levels. * A safe can be made active so it will always be opened when MyPasswordSafe starts. * Supports Unicode in the safes * Languages supported: English and French -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:29:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062029.l66KT2Rn014276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 ------- Additional Comments From marduk at k-d-w.org 2007-07-06 16:29 EST ------- http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/review/new-stuff-manager-0.2.3-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/review/new-stuff-manager-0.2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/review/new-stuff-manager-devel-0.2.3-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.k-d-w.org/clipboard/review/new-stuff-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:41:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062041.l66KflP9015251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 16:41 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package, but first: Since this package needs a copy of the openvpn source to build, wouldn't it be better if this was just added to the openvpn package as a subpackage? That would also keep it in sync with the openvpn package version... Or is there some reason that wouldn't work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062042.l66Kgl2c015440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-06 16:42 EST ------- Now that it's approved, what is this package waiting for? :-( Do you want a comaintainer to do the CVS requests, imports and builds for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227054] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062045.l66KjUOd015821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227054 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(mwringe at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 16:45 EST ------- Is this being reviewed? It was assigned to Matt a couple of weeks after submittion, but nothing further has happened. Setting NEEDINFO to Matt; I'll reassign this to nobody if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:46:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062046.l66Kk1qR015882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-06 16:46 EST ------- Err; thanks for the warning, Michael. David, you'll need to add a mono(dbus-sharp) Provides similar to what you did for the plain dbus-sharp package to ensure a proper upgrade path and whatnot. Sorry for not catching that earlier... Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227054] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062048.l66KmYZn016034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227054 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mwringe at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 16:48 EST ------- Sorry, reviewing it right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062051.l66Kp0bL016272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 16:50 EST ------- Thanks. Unfortunately this fails to build for me (in mock, x86_64, rawhide); configure gets down to: checking for MONO... yes checking for gpg... no configure: error: you need to have gpg installed ! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16869 (%build) I can verify that gnupg2 was installed in the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:53:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062053.l66Kr5Uk016438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(rafalzaq at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 16:53 EST ------- There's been no response from the submitter to review comments made 4.5 months ago. Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243109] Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062056.l66KuHA8016720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: loki-lib - Loki C++ Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243109 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062059.l66Kx3Qb016909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(belegdol at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-07-06 16:59 EST ------- Well, I have some very basic knowledge, which was enough for other packages I do maintain, comment #5 was a bit sarcastic. Anyway, I have no interest anymore in this package - LabPlot made it into Fedora without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 20:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227054] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062059.l66KxBxo016938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227054 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 16:59 EST ------- This review request was opened as part of the maven2 review process. The dependency on this package was removed from the maven2 rpm, so this package is no longer needed in Fedora. Closing bug as DEFERRED as it may be needed at another time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231303] Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062102.l66L27xm017179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:02 EST ------- Has this package been built into CVS yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:04:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062104.l66L4H4Q017332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062110.l66LAG4w017744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com Alias| |ndesk-dbus-glib ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-06 17:10 EST ------- I'll review this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062114.l66LEZb5018135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-06 17:14 EST ------- In response to the question in comment #8 about the use of Mapnik. Mapnik can be used either as a Python or a C++ library. Apart from the demo code included you need to write either a python or C++ program to do something useful. Mapnik is mainly used in the OpenStreetMap project, http://www.openstreetmap.org/. The ultimate plan is to submit all of the components of the OSM toolchain to Fedora. The goals of OSM fit neatly with Fedora - free map data to allow the development of novel GIS applications. I'll work through the issues you raise over the next couple of days and submit an updated SPEC and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:16:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062116.l66LGQ3m018437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:16:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062116.l66LGuw3018507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ndesk-dbus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227054] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062119.l66LJPpH018641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-logkit-2.1-8jpp - Excalibur's Logkit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225627] Merge Review: bsf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062126.l66LQmt5019045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225627 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > MUST: > * package is named appropriately > - match upstream tarball or project name > - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for > consistency > - specfile should be %{name}.spec > - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or > something) > - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease > - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be > not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name > OK > * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? > - OSI-approved > - not a kernel module > - not shareware > - is it covered by patents? > - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator > - no binary firmware > OK > * license field matches the actual license. > OK > * license is open source-compatible. > OK > * specfile name matches %{name} > OK > * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - if upstream doesn't release source drops, put *clear* instructions on > how to generate the the source drop; ie. > # svn export blah/tag blah > # tar cjf blah-version-src.tar.bz2 blah > X link for Source0 is dead, and the version for the project does not exist on > the project's webpage. The project is at 2.4 currently and there's no archive of old sources. I asked on their mailing list about a 2.3 source tar ball, but people on the mailing list were not sure where 2.3 source tar ball can be fetched from. > * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > * correct buildroot > - should be: > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > OK > * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % > locations) > OK > * license text included in package and marked with %doc > X do not include the install or build instructions Done > * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? > useless?) > OK > * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > OK > * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > > rpmlint bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.2.src.rpm > W: bsf non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > OK, group warnings can be ignored > > * changelog should be in a proper format: > OK > * Packager tag should not be used > OK > * Vendor tag should not be used > OK > * Distribution tag should not be used > OK > * use License and not Copyright > OK > * Summary tag should not end in a period > OK > * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > OK > * specfile is legible > - this is largely subjective; use your judgement > * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > OK > * BuildRequires are proper > - builds in mock will flush out problems here > Have not yet built in mock > - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: > bash > bzip2 > coreutils > cpio > diffutils > fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) > gcc > gcc-c++ > gzip > make > patch > perl > redhat-rpm-config > rpm-build > sed > tar > unzip > which > OK > * summary should be a short and concise description of the package > OK > * description expands upon summary (don't include installation > instructions) > OK > * make sure description lines are <= 80 characters > OK > * specfile written in American English > OK > * make a -doc sub-package if necessary > - see > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b > OK > * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible > * don't use rpath > * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) > * GUI apps should contain .desktop files > OK, not a gui app > * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? > OK, it shouldn't have one > * use macros appropriately and consistently > - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > OK > * don't use %makeinstall > OK > * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} > OK > * locale data handling correct (find_lang) > - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the > end of %install > OK > * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > OK > * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines > OK > * package should probably not be relocatable > OK > * package contains code > - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent > - in general, there should be no offensive content > OK > * package should own all directories and files > X package needs to require jpackage-utils as this package owns /usr/share/java[doc] Done > * there should be no %files duplicates > X please get rid of the %ghost javadoc Done > > * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present > OK > * %clean should be present > OK > * %doc files should not affect runtime > * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www > * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.2.i386.rpm > W: bsf non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > W: bsf unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/gcj/bsf/bsf-2.3.0.jar.so > > rpmlint /home/matt/topdir/RPMS/i386/bsf-javadoc-2.3.0-11jpp.2.i386.rpm > W: bsf-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation > OK, group warnings can be ignored > > > SHOULD: > * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > OK > * package should build on i386 > OK > * package should build in mock > > New spec file in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231303] Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062127.l66LRlVU019118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:27 EST ------- Yes, it's built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:28:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227074] Review Request: jrexx-1.1.1-3jpp - Automaton based regluar expression API for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062128.l66LSugt019171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jrexx-1.1.1-3jpp - Automaton based regluar expression API for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227074 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:28 EST ------- Build into devel. Closing as NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:32:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062132.l66LWnmS019330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 17:32 EST ------- I wish I could help here, but I haven't the hardware, and even if I had the hardware I'm not sure I understand all the issues. So let me try: Upstream talks about a kernel driver, but it's not packaged here. From ajax's comment above I assume it's already present as /lib/mocules/*/kernel/drivers/input/tablet/wacom.ko. This package includes an X driver. Which is more in ajax's domain (or Kristian's, I guess). I don't see any existing xorg driver package for this, although it begs the question of whether the X driver (and its manpage) should be in a package named xorg-x11-drv-wacom like all the other X drivers. Then there's the control software, which is probably OK as is as long as it's working now without having to downgrade glibc as detailed in comment 25. Finally, I note that 0.7.8 is out, and also that f7 has now been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:34:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225922] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062134.l66LYqTU019471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225922 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:34 EST ------- Closing bug report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:37:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225923] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062137.l66LbH2m019600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225923 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:37 EST ------- Closing bug report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062137.l66LbeRP019646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-06 17:37 EST ------- True except banshee should not depend on dbus-sharp since it uses a bundled version of ndesk-dbus. I've filed a bug for this some time ago but callion has not yet found time to update the spec I guess. Once both ndesk-dbus and ndesk-dbus-glib is in the repos the bundled copy should be replaced with a dependency on ndesk-dbus-devel and ndesk-dbus-glib-devel (banshee has a compile time option for this). The same should go for other packages, no package I know of uses the old obsoleted bindings anymore and instead opt for using a bundled ndesk-dbus. This also explains why dbus use in mono apps currently is broken on Fedora. Basically the dependency is bogus but I will provide an updated package with the next update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225927] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062138.l66LcYdQ019699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225927 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:38 EST ------- Closing bug report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062139.l66LdAt2019751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(green at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 17:39 EST ------- Actually the linked "src.rpm" is nearly 500K of nulls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232555] Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062141.l66LfLhv019910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232555 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:41 EST ------- Has this been built in plague/koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062142.l66LgU34019983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232555] Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062146.l66LkgWV020148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232555 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 17:46 EST ------- Yes, this is already in Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:51:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062151.l66LpYfR020346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-06 17:51 EST ------- Great; thanks for the explanation, David! I'll take care of the ndesk glib package after some food. 8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062155.l66LtopE020679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-07-06 17:55 EST ------- >From my POV it's just waiting for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 21:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062159.l66Lxwhp020913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-06 17:59 EST ------- and wow now that I even corrected the EVR.. thanks Peter, the package should be hitting those build boxes soon.. I'm not entirely sure about f-spot but banshee at least should not depend on dbus-sharp - that's the app I used to test ndesk-dbus with. Sorry for the breakage, hopefully nobody got hurt in the process - I was hoping this would have been less... painful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225637] Merge Review: castor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062207.l66M76mP021249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: castor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225637 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-06 18:07 EST ------- Package cannot be build this the current version of gcj in Fedora due to enum now being a reserved keyword. Please fix this by setting the source level or by patching the files. MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name OK * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware OK, look ok to me * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common OK (its BSD-style) * specfile name matches %{name} OK * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) OK, the md5sums match * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. OK * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) OK * license text included in package and marked with %doc OK * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) OK * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) OK, looks OK to me * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output rpmlint castor-0.9.5-1jpp.9.src.rpm W: castor non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java OK (group warnings can be safely ignored) * changelog should be in a proper formats: OK * Packager tag should not be used OK * Vendor tag should not be used OK * Distribution tag should not be used OK * use License and not Copyright OK * Summary tag should not end in a period OK * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) OK * specfile is legible OK * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 X package does not build * BuildRequires are proper ? Will check when it builds properly * summary should be a short and concise description of the package OK * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) OK * make sure lines are <= 80 characters X Can you make line 134 multiple lines instead? * specfile written in American English OK * make a -doc sub-package if necessary OK * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently OK * don't use %makeinstall OK * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} OK * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps OK * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines OK * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code OK * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present OK * %clean should be present OK * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs ? Waiting until package builds properly * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs ? waiting until package builds properly SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc ? * package should build on i386 ? * package should build in mock ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:08:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062208.l66M8nJq021360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mehmetkaratay at hotmail.com 2007-07-06 18:08 EST ------- Thank you for getting qgis to work on Fedora. Installation was easy but I have not done much with the package yet. If I find any problems I will post them here. I am having one small issue. I cannot access the help pages. I get a message in my browser saying they are located at /usr/share/qgis/doc/index.html but when I look the directory doc does not seem to exist in /usr/share/qgis. I simply installed the package using the command: yum --enablerepo=development install qgis I haven't done anything else to configure qgis. Hope this helps, and thank you again. Mehmet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062242.l66Mg3p1023247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 18:42 EST ------- This is an insanely big package with a mess of rpmlint complaints (mostly unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings), but if I understand correctly it should be very close to the already-approved cernlib package. Is there any chance you could simply list and explain the difference between this package and the cernlib package? I'd be willing to ack it based on that if the differences are small and reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062252.l66MqlvL023836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-06 18:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xcb-proto Short Description: XCB protocol descriptions Owners: ajackson at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:53:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062253.l66MrvYX023898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-06 18:53 EST ------- "No test suite upstream" isn't entirely accurate, but it depends on a newer version of check than we have in rawhide atm. And when I built it, %doc certainly included a whole mess of stuff. I suspect that was a non-clean build with docbook in the runtime path; I'll poke a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 22:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062259.l66MxMoP024254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-06 18:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 6 23:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707062306.l66N6uS1024743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 ------- Additional Comments From kengert at redhat.com 2007-07-06 19:06 EST ------- Today I also built updated NSPR packages for FC6 and F7, and while doing so I included the PR_STATIC_ASSERT, too. However, the packages will first be visible in updates-testing. I plan to move them to final updates by mid of next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 00:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070041.l670fCoR028317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 20:41 EST ------- I guess I didn't look very hard for the test suite. I did another build to get the build log; in it I found this: checking for doxygen... no WARNING: The doxygen program was not found in your execute You may have doxygen installed somewhere not covered by your path. If this is the case make sure you have the packages installed, AND that the doxygen program is in your execute path (see your shell's manual page on setting the $PATH environment variable), OR alternatively, specify the program to use with --with-doxygen. configure: WARNING: Warning: no doxygen detected. Documentation will not be built checking whether documentation is built... no which should explain the documentation issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 00:45:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070045.l670jmok028567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-06 20:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > I am having one small issue. I cannot access the help pages. I get a message in > my browser saying they are located at /usr/share/qgis/doc/index.html but when I > look the directory doc does not seem to exist in /usr/share/qgis. I'll try to take a look at that over the weekend. The doc files should be in /usr/share/doc/qgis-0.8.1, but it doesn't look like they're being included correctly. I'll try to figure out what's going on and get them installed correctly, as well as see if I can fix the help link so it points at the correct place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 00:46:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070046.l670kcxP028626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-06 20:46 EST ------- Well, Starting Review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 01:31:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070131.l671VEec030420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 21:31 EST ------- The requested URL /memcached-1.2.3-1.src.rpm was not found on this server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 01:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070134.l671Y4lT030581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 21:34 EST ------- I think something must be off somewhere; let me show you the entire transaction: > wget http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm --20:32:38-- http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Resolving zanoni.jcomserv.net... 76.204.165.226 Connecting to zanoni.jcomserv.net|76.204.165.226|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 192023 (188K) [application/x-rpm] Saving to: `coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm' 100%[==================================>] 192,023 46.8K/s in 3.9s 20:32:42 (48.0 KB/s) - `coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm' saved [192023/192023] > rpm -ivh coco-coq-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm 1:coco-coq warning: user limb does not exist - using root warning: group limb does not exist - using root warning: user limb does not exist - using root warning: group limb does not exist - using root warning: user limb does not exist - using root warning: group limb does not exist - using root warning: user limb does not exist - using root warning: group limb does not exist - using root warning: user limb does not exist - using root 2%) warning: group limb does not exist - using root warning: user limb does not exist - using root warning: group limb does not exist - using root ########################################### [100%] > cd coco-coq-0.1 > unzip -l cococe.zip Archive: cococe.zip Length Date Time Name -------- ---- ---- ---- 39424 01-07-88 10:15 agi 3121 01-07-88 10:15 agi.com 39424 11-19-87 14:42 AGI.PC 39424 11-19-87 14:42 AGI.SB 8192 12-01-87 08:49 AGIDATA.OVL 1024 12-01-87 08:48 CGA_GRAF.OVL 1024 12-01-87 08:48 EGA_GRAF.OVL 3072 01-26-87 15:47 HGC_FONT 1536 12-01-87 08:48 HGC_GRAF.OVL 1024 12-01-87 08:48 HGC_OBJS.OVL 512 12-01-87 08:48 IBM_OBJS.OVL 512 12-01-87 08:48 JR_GRAF.OVL 672 03-30-04 21:32 LOGDIR 171 03-30-04 20:34 OBJECT 672 03-30-04 21:32 PICDIR 6 03-30-04 21:32 SNDDIR 512 12-01-87 08:48 VG_GRAF.OVL 708 03-30-04 21:32 VIEWDIR 189380 03-30-04 21:32 VOL.0 1556 03-30-04 21:29 WORDS.TOK -------- ------- 331966 20 files So as you can see, what's in the most recent src.rpm you posted still contains the DOS bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 01:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070138.l671cxTD030763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-06 21:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > In response to the question in comment #8 about the use of Mapnik. Mapnik can > be used either as a Python or a C++ library. What is the problem is that is if libmapnik.so *is linked (dynamically)* from other packages, then having no soversion is a problem because the ABI of libmapnik.so may change in the future. At that point, all the applications linking to libmapnik.so silently gets useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 01:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070147.l671lYLD031069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-06 21:47 EST ------- source rpm is now at the correct URL, or you can grab it at http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Apologies for the confusion. Regards, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 01:50:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070150.l671oYG5031245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-06 21:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > I'm interested in co-maintaining this as well. I'm already maintaining Perlbal and MogileFS, the other > products from the LiveJournal guys. Matthias, Ruben, I'm more than happy to work together with others to get this packaged and complete. Regards, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 02:06:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070206.l67265kY031812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 22:05 EST ------- OK, I know I'm really not the best person to review this because I haven't a single piece of hardware that needs this, but nobody more qualified has stepped up in over eight months and it's pointless to let this sit aroud when it would be useful to people. Perhaps you could answer one question which comes immediately to mind: Why are some of the firmware files under /lib/firmware and some under /usr/share/alsa/firmware? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 03:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070327.l673Rp7p004400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-06 23:27 EST ------- That was twisted. This should fix it: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/coco-coq/coco-coq-0.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 05:13:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070513.l675D2vu008752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-07 01:13 EST ------- Yes, that's better. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 05:38:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070538.l675cn8L009547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-07 01:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > This package screws with the compiler flags as noted above. Frankly I don't > know what gcc does when it sees -O3 -O2 on the command line, but I'll trust > Ralf's assessment above that it doesn't cause problems. Normally, in GCC's option processing, later options are supposed to override earlier options, so the -O2 should win. Unfortunately, a corner-case in some versions of GCC had been found recently, where this behavior doesn't apply. I don't know off-head if this issue/bug hits with Fedora's GCCs nor if the flags/options being used inside of this package are affected. > Since you're running the > autotools anyway, it should be easy to patch them out but I don't think it's > mandatory. To be safe, this stuff should be patched out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 05:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070559.l675x01C010138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(akontsevich at mail.r| |u) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 01:58 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone want to maintain this package on Fedora, please file a new bug report, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 07:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070709.l677930r012121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 03:09 EST ------- For 1.2.3-1: Almost okay. * Timestamps - To keep timestamp on man file, please use the following. ----------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" ----------------------------------------------------------- * Changelog - rpm EVR is 1.2.3-1, however the last entry of %changelog is 1.2.2-5. ! (Request: NOT a blocker) - Initscripts We (including me) are now required to fix initscripts to match LSB requirement. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts For now, I found: * force-reload option is missing * starting memcached whe memcached is already running fails: ----------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service memcached start ; echo $? Starting memcached: [ OK ] 0 [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service memcached status ; echo $? memcached (pid 5742) is running... 0 [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service memcached start ; echo $? Starting memcached: bind(): Address already in use failed to listen [FAILED] 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ * Non-impremented option returns 1, not 3 (well, I guess most of current initscripts return 1 for now...) ------------------------------------------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C service memcached foo ; echo $? Usage: /etc/init.d/memcached {start|stop|status|restart|reload|condrestart} 1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Please fix above, for example (but I WON'T treat these as a blocker). And.. as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket, I rewrite for confirmation: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 07:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070714.l677EHoU012365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(weston_schmidt at alu| |mni.purdue.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-07-07 03:14 EST ------- I just make a pass at fixing the problems identified. I updated the revision to 0.4.2 at the following URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=147246 What else do I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 07:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070733.l677XWZH012884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-07 03:33 EST ------- Ok. I'll need to work with upstream to get the following fixed: - Fix the line endings on the XML demo files - Fix the soname/ABI stuff - Fix the compilation flags I could do most of this in the SPEC file but it makes more sense to do it upstream, and they are generally quite responsive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:23:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070823.l678NqGZ016547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-07 04:23 EST ------- The spec diff is only: %if "%fedora" > "6" -%bcond_with gfortran -%else %bcond_without gfortran +%else +%bcond_with gfortran %endif This small diff somehow hides the real changes since the gfortran conditional changes the compiler used, and also the packages names and many file names/directory names to allow for parallel install. So the differences are minimal but real differences have been done in the main spec file by adding the conditional handling. This in turn has been done first to allow to compile with gfortran or g77, and later to have parallel installable packages. The utilities linked against the cernlib compiled with gfortran don't work (Bug 241416) After the package is accepted I plan to use the utilities from this package as default (that is without compiler string). The default library would still be the gfortran compiled library. The rpmlint warnings all seem not problematic to me, including the unused-direct-shlib-dependency. They are the same that for the gfortran compiled package. After filtering out the unused-direct-shlib-dependency, remains: E: cernlib-g77-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I don't really understand this one, maybe it is because the .so symlinks are below a directory. W: cernlib-g77-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cernlib-2006-g77.csh W: cernlib-g77-utils non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cernlib-2006-g77.sh W: cernlib-g77-static no-documentation W: patchy-g77 no-documentation This is right. W: cernlib-g77-packlib symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/cernlib/2006-g77/bin/dzeX11 /usr/bin/dzeX11-g77 E: cernlib-g77-packlib only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: paw-g77 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/cernlib/2006-g77/bin/pawX11 /usr/bin/pawX11-g77 E: paw-g77 only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is linked with the way dze and paw wrapper scripts work. E: geant321-g77 devel-dependency cernlib-g77-devel E: kuipc-g77 devel-dependency cernlib-g77-devel E: cernlib-g77-utils devel-dependency cernlib-g77-devel The cernlib-g77-utils and geant321-g77 packages contains link scripts and env setting scripts, kuipc is for code generation, they are distinct from devel to allow for parallel installation of different cernlib version. It was common practice before and I would certainly have kept the previous version if the differences were big, but now that cernlib is almost dead it is unlikely to be usefull, but I still keep this possibility open. Also this way, even though it isn't in maintained in fedora collection anymore, users can take the cernlib-2005-devel package and install it in parallel with the cernlib-2006-devel package if they want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070832.l678Wvdc017332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2007-07-07 04:32 EST ------- I am tired of such non-technical, political reasoned decisions. I am revoking this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070832.l678Wxxn017365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Bug 176581 depends on bug 176579, which changed state. Bug 176579 Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070833.l678XnH0017433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2007-07-07 04:33 EST ------- I am tired of such non-technical, political reasoned decisions. I am revoking this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070833.l678Xp2h017474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Bug 176581 depends on bug 176582, which changed state. Bug 176582 Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070844.l678i5iu018290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-07-07 04:44 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pylibacl New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: mszpak at wp.pl,kevin at tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 08:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 04:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707070846.l678kuTE018493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-07-07 04:46 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pyxattr New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: mszpak at wp.pl,kevin at tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 10:36:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 06:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071036.l67AaiLb024904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-07-07 06:36 EST ------- Sorry for that... Have no time these days for Fedora things. Remi contacted me to solve the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 10:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 06:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071047.l67Alh54025193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-07-07 06:47 EST ------- Heh, and once again, by the time I have a build ready, they've released a new version. Oh well, here's 1.17.2.0: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife-1.17.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife.spec * Wed Jun 27 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.17.2.0-1 - New upstream. * Tue Jun 26 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.17.1.0-1 - New upstream. * Wed Jun 13 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.17.0.12-1 - New upstream. - Compile for a minimum of a Pentium II on i386. - Include patch for OpenAL audio support. * Sat May 26 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.16.0.5-1 - New upstream. * Tue May 15 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.15.1.3-1 - New upstream. Is there a problem with the deps? AFAIK they should still work. And how controversial is compiling for a minimum of a PII on i386? Official upstream requirements are a minimum of a PIII, the only reason I don't compile for PIII is the Athlon Thunderbird which lacks SSE, and is also supported upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 10:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 06:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071051.l67Ap8xw025354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-07 06:51 EST ------- What about the following? Comments? ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: ohmd # Required-Start: haldaemon # Required-Stop: # Should-Start: # Should-Stop: # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 1 6 # Short-Description: Loads OHM Open Hardware Manager # Description: Loads Open Hardware Manager to enforce power policy on # embedded and small form factor devices. ### END INIT INFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 11:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 07:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071113.l67BDwAZ026108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 11:31:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 07:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071131.l67BV9ra026609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 07:31 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 11:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 07:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071133.l67BXq3W026708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 07:33 EST ------- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 12:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071216.l67CGeNE028811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 08:16 EST ------- For 1.8.9-4.fc8: almost okay. * Timestamps - Keep timestamps on files under %_datadir/%name/html. For this package, the following should work -------------------------------------------------------- make install -e INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} COPY="cp -pf" -------------------------------------------------------- (Check the file "Makefile" on top builddir). * GTK icon cache - Needs updating (please check: "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) * Documents - "INSTALL" is for people who want to rebuild this package by themselves andd is not needed for rpm users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 12:28:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071228.l67CS1QA029256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-07 08:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: coco-coq Short Description: An AGI adventure game Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 12:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071242.l67Cgr2Z029827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pelliott at io.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 08:42 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 12:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071243.l67ChaPJ029867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2007-07-07 08:43 EST ------- Yes you have got a point. I have been working on this one, but it is hard to get it running. Now X11 crashes on my 64 bit laptop when the wacom graphire isn't connected. This doesn't happen op the 32bit version. Although I can get the control software to run on a 64bit pc, the is no need to downgrade glibc. I configure the 64bit version with ./configure --enable-tabletdev --prefix=/usr --enable-wacom I now outcomment the wacom part in the xorg.conf file manually. I haven't tried the 0.7.8 version yet,but I will soon ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 12:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 08:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071255.l67CtqNn030669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-07 08:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Is there a problem with the deps? AFAIK they should still work. > The problem with the deps is that they both have had a detailed review, which stipulates a few small things to fix, and you haven't responded. If yoou could create new version of each fixing the issues raised during review, then they can get approved and into Fedora, which is kinda a must in order to get secondlife itself into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 14:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071409.l67E9eAL001601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-07 10:09 EST ------- There is still an error: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/mailx/mail.help warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/mailx/mail.tildehelp More fundamentaly, the upstream selection seems a bit strange to me. It seems to me that the cleanest thing to do would be to package directly http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/mail/ (using a cvs checkout, as explained here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL ) If you don't want the latest changes you can use an earlier checkout, but I guess that all the patches in openbsd mail cvs fix something. Seems like debian package the cvs, it seems to me that it would be cleaner to do that than to use the (old) repackaged debian source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 14:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071420.l67EKgTG002041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-07 10:20 EST ------- Looks fine to me. You can omit the empty fields. And I think you probably want to add 0 to Default-Stop, not sure if it makes any difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 14:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071449.l67EnWM0002942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-07 10:49 EST ------- Can I get a yay-or-nay on this one, please ? The gtksourceview situation in rawhide is pretty broken right now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 14:58:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071458.l67Ewe8O003289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-07 10:58 EST ------- 1.2.3-2 Added changelog entries pointing at 1.2.3-2 Adjusted init scripts to be more LSB compliant. Found that LSB's start_daemon does not support the -p flag so we're still using daemon with --pidfile args. Adjusted make install to preserve timestamp. Here's the latest: http://www.inuus.com/memcached.spec http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.3-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 15:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071522.l67FMScb004107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 11:22 EST ------- Please try to import this to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 15:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071527.l67FRFp5004318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-07 11:27 EST ------- Anything I can do to help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 15:32:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071532.l67FWRxI004538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-07-07 11:32 EST ------- I'm planning to do this on Monday, since I'm still on vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 15:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071541.l67Ffipt004825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > I'm planning to do this on Monday, since I'm still on vacation. Ah, okay, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 15:58:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071558.l67FwQwS005340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-07-07 11:58 EST ------- Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that each process should be running as its own user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 16:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071604.l67G4iaU005620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 12:04 EST ------- Well, memcached itself is okay. Then I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. (In reply to comment #32) > Should it be running as user nobody? It may well that memcached may create its unique user/group, but I regard it as NOT a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 16:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071649.l67Gn4fb006962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-07-07 12:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Actually the linked "src.rpm" is nearly 500K of nulls. > Fixed. Please try again. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 17:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071700.l67H0I6T007428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-07-07 13:00 EST ------- New 1.0.1-2 srpm and spec file now available. http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.1-2/safekeep-1.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.1-2/safekeep.spec Binaries in: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.1-2/F-7/ http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.1-2/devel/ The new srpm/spec/binaries remove the migration scripts and the manpages have been moved to the server subpackage as per comment #1. Rpmlint runs clean for the common and client subpackages. The server subpackage still illicits messages from rpmlint due to the safekeep user using /var/lib/safekeep/ for its home directory to hold generated ssh keypairs. E: safekeep-server non-standard-uid /var/lib/safekeep safekeep E: safekeep-server non-standard-gid /var/lib/safekeep safekeep bugus errors. /var/lib/safekeep is being as the home directory for the generated safekeep user. There examples of system user home directories in /var/lib/ already including the rpm user E: safekeep-server non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/safekeep 0750 E: safekeep-server non-standard-uid /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh safekeep E: safekeep-server non-standard-gid /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh safekeep W: safekeep-server hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh E: safekeep-server non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh 0700 W: safekeep-server hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh Bugus errors and warnings, the .ssh directory is configured thusly to work correctly with the default sshd configuration for fedora. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 17:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071728.l67HSlsp008354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-07-07 13:28 EST ------- Build for F-8 branch completed successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10605 All branches built, and F-7 in testing repository. DONE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 17:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071754.l67Hsims009389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 13:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158722) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158722&action=view) mock build log of gdesklets-goodweather 0.3-1 on rawhide i386 Some initial comments * Mockbuild - mockbuild failed on rawhide i386. Note that "python" package is removed from minimum build environment (please check the log attached) * Directories - The following directories are not owned by any packages. ----------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/gdesklets/ /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/ /usr/share/gdesklets/Sensors/ ----------------------------------------------------- *For now* this package should own the directories above. (but IMO these directories should be owned by gdesklets. Would you contact with gdesklets maintainer?) * Timestamps - To keep timestamps, please use "install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 17:59:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071759.l67HxHUM009554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 18:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 14:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071809.l67I97uL009984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-07 14:09 EST ------- I can give you a yay with a caveat :-( Sufficient votes were obtained from the Packaging Committee but there wasn't enough time between that and the FESCo meeting for it to be definitively ratified. I sent a message to FESCo with the report on Thursday which probably[1]_ requires 3 business days for any objections to be mentioned so it's not official until Tuesday morning. If you feel comfortable with the fact that you could be asked to rename gtksourceview/gtksourceview2 if FESCo vetoes the relaxation of the policy, you can go ahead and request a branch. If not, please hold off until Tuesday morning. I'm marking this package APPROVED with that caveat. .. [1] the policy stating this was discussed in a FESCo meeting but never written up. I'm writing up the policy before the next meeting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 18:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 14:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071815.l67IFcJU010275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 14:15 EST ------- For proxychains 3.1-2: * Timestamps - To keep timestamps, for this package use below: -------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" -------------------------------------------------- * Requires - As proxyresolv calls dig, this package must have: Requires: bind-utils -------------------------------------------------- As this is NEEDSPONSOR tickets, we must follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored When you fix the issue above and modify gdesklets-weather, I will approve this and sponsor you. -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 18:20:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 14:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071820.l67IKRtK010421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico. | |ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 14:20 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 18:40:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 14:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071840.l67IecN1011256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-07 14:40 EST ------- The base R package has now been updated, and to boot there are complete specfile templates for R subpackages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/R which are nice and simple. Of course, you can only build for rawhide at the moment, but my understanding is that spot intends to push the updated R package to at least F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 19:44:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 15:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071944.l67JiNmf015076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-07 15:44 EST ------- Tyler, are you satisfied now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 19:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 15:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707071947.l67Jlar3015198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-07 15:47 EST ------- Gah, soon we'll need to raise package review fees to finance all the overhead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 20:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 16:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707072037.l67KbPiV016783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-07 16:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tachyon New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 22:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 18:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707072209.l67M9rtj020377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(jasperhartline at ade| |lphia.net) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-07 18:09 EST ------- Closing bug as NOTABUG ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 7 22:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 18:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707072212.l67MCe8v020511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-07 18:12 EST ------- Xavier, please try to import this to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 00:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226290] Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080011.l680BFjx024315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-SAX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226290 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-07 20:11 EST ------- There was actually a bug, reported and fixed here: rhbz#247213 so now we're at .16-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 02:24:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080224.l682ODWr027775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-07 22:24 EST ------- I have fixed the issues listed above. I have also contacted the maintainer of gdesklets and asked them to create/own the above directories. In the interim, this package owns the directories. * Sat Jul 07 2007 Tyler Owen - 0.3-2 - Added Python to Requires - Added -p option to install to preserve timestamps - Fixed missing directory ownership issues Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-goodweather.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-goodweather-0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 02:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080225.l682PB0B027851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-07 22:25 EST ------- I have fixed the above issues. * Sat Jul 07 2007 Tyler Owen - 3.1-3 - Added -p option to install to preserve timestamps - Added Requires for bind-utils Updated SPEC & SRPM: Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/proxychains.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/proxychains-3.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Note: I have also fixed the issues with gdesklets-goodweather too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 02:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080250.l682ouTH028528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-07 22:50 EST ------- http://scurn.net/ still seems no good... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 03:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080308.l6838vFU029041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-07 23:08 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds on at least one supported arch. [ OK ] Mock built on x86_64 [Devel] [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming and Ocaml Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name match the packaging naming Ocaml guidelines. [ Ok ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which mentioned in OCaml guideline. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines. [ CHECK ] Requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Big_int) = 992d682669507b99e689b5a2188c0b9a ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Consistbl) = 47f9cdffda6ba2de99c8e9f0c0c1b34d ocaml(Digest) = a5dd2d89492338578de12105e88c803f ocaml(Env) = 6d0215253b3fde95601c34944cacb607 ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Ident) = ba1acc56fc179d27bd55278cbc2abf40 ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Location) = eed044ad1204a633caad97bdd9048f8c ocaml(Longident) = 46fb8aad4fb2c12a0f301b02d8139f07 ocaml(Map) = dedde7683d54ae7db1eb97cc868dd047 ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87 ocaml(Num) = cfa2705c9c6d6f5a56b83f91fc630d2a ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Outcometree) = 6674fbd870cb2522aca4d851f3559202 ocaml(Parsetree) = b59a1a6771867acd824bde52e6512b5c ocaml(Path) = d8bc8e7163bac3a9a0a93f1cb07092d1 ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Primitive) = 43a2770aed8fbcc536ab39d717fe9a7b ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Ratio) = 7067125cce206dd2bbe93918ba7bdfe9 ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Sort) = 089a51dd8ddc078e57acf2f80b7c06f6 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Topdirs) = 2d07b01227af22b60aee18498198c35e ocaml(Toploop) = ead8879d71c4d5137fe5100fdd682a0b ocaml(Types) = c2ef3369acfd38dafc8294786964051c ocaml(Warnings) = abcb1589615da86f20f475b0ed3bbabc ocaml = 3.10.0-1.fc8 == Rpmlint output: == [ Check ] From rpm: W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/findlib/findlib.a W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/num-top/num_top_printers.cmi W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/num-top/num_top.cmi W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/findlib/topfind.cmi W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/findlib/findlib.cmi W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/findlib/fl_package_base.cmi W: ocaml-findlib devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/findlib/fl_metascanner.cmi W: ocaml-findlib unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ocamlfind [ Check ] From SRPM : E: ocaml-findlib configure-without-libdir-spec W: ocaml-findlib mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 51) === Issues === >From RPM file: According to the OCaml packaging guideloine, these Warning can be ignored. >From SRPM file: Currently Upstream's Configure file doesn't provides --libdir option. On the other hand its provides its own command line to locate and get libraries directory. And doesn't affect the work of the build. So, This error can be ignored. the warning, easy fix ;). Note that, this review has been done with the fixed SRPM which i proposed in [comment #22] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 03:30:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080330.l683ULZ8029542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-07 23:30 EST ------- Ok, Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 03:41:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080341.l683fiSv029851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-07 23:41 EST ------- Anton: ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 03:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080344.l683idPg029944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-07 23:44 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 03:46:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080346.l683kiRP030038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-07 23:46 EST ------- 64 bytes from anton : icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.070 ms 64 bytes from anton : icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 04:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 00:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080452.l684q82q031659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-08 00:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 04:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 00:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235526] Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080455.l684tUIB031778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyxattr - Extended attributes library wrapper for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235526 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-08 00:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 05:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 01:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080500.l6850uf8031932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-08 01:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 05:08:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 01:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080508.l6858ehG032230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-08 01:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 06:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 02:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080617.l686HK3T001421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 02:17 EST ------- Well, I downloaded your srpm from other system. Checking now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 06:44:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 02:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080644.l686iV7W001964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trond.danielsen at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-08 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Some remarks: > > * I'd recommend to let the *-docs package put its doc files into > /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version > I'm afraid thats impossible, as rpmbuild erases that dir before checking %files: Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46262 + umask 022 + cd /home/hans/projects/fedora-extras/wip/avr-libc + cd avr-libc-1.4.6 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 So writing "%doc /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo" won't work because if foo was installed there it will be erased. And using %doc foo, will make it end up as /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo > * I don't think shipping the man pages in /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version/man > is a good idea. It will break avr-man when installing the rpm w/ --exclude-docs > > I'd put them somewhere else, e.g. /usr/share/avr-libc, /usr/avr/share/man or > even /usr/avr/sys-root/usr/share/man. I'd use /usr/avr/share/man. > Here is a new version which moves the manpages to /usr/avr/share/man, Trond any chance you could review this? Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 07:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 03:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080723.l687Ntmi002983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-08 03:23 EST ------- It is a simple and small package :) For KDE users, there is a package "kmenu-gnome". It installs all gnome/gtk applications in a seperate menu if GNOME;GTK; are in the Categories of the desktop file. Edit your desktop file so that the category line looks as follows: Categories=GNOME;GTK;X-Fedora;System; Because right now, gnome/gtk applications are mixed up with kde/qt applications in kmenu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 08:28:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 04:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080828.l688SN0n006930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-08 04:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > So writing "%doc /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo" won't work because if > foo was installed there it will be erased. FWIW, I think rpmbuild does the remove only if the specfile contains any "special %doc" directives, ie. "%doc foo" without an absolute path. See build/files.c in rpm sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 08:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 04:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707080838.l688cUg5007692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-08 04:38 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctapi-common Updated Fedora Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi,frank-buettner at gmx.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 10:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081001.l68A1poe013126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 06:01 EST ------- Weird. I've tested it on 3 machines, two FC7's in enforcing and on -Devel, again, in enforcing. Can you dig out the exact error from messages? Oh, what's the output of ls -lZ /usr/lib/libkbluetooth.so.0 Mine is: ls -lZ /usr/lib64/libkbluetooth.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx root root system_u:object_r:lib_t /usr/lib64/libkbluetooth.so.0 -> libkbluetooth.so.0.0.0 - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 10:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081058.l68AwZ8X015687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 10:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081059.l68AxO8G015730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 11:06:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 07:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081106.l68B6r3K016059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 07:06 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (proxychains) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure above), please make a note on this bug that you did so. If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 11:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 07:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081124.l68BOpbH016685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 07:24 EST ------- Ville, I cannot seem to reproduce the :9/:10 problem and I've tested 4 different phones (3 Nokia's, one SE) and my palm. (E.g. I'm getting :7 with my SE K800). Does it continue to happen with -24? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 11:47:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 07:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081147.l68Bl1aT017690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 07:46 EST ------- Fixed timestamp and directory ownership issues. I have also contacted the gdesklets maintainer to resolve the directory ownership. Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-2.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 11:47:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 07:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081147.l68BlpkT017788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 07:47 EST ------- Fixed timestamp and directory ownership issues. I have also contacted the gdesklets maintainer to resolve the directory ownership. Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-2.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081203.l68C3WbG018794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081204.l68C4miu018899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 08:04 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:04:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081204.l68C4t6N018951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:05:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081205.l68C51VJ019002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-08 08:04 EST ------- There seems to be quite a bit of confusion here. Just forget about any particular channel numbers (dunno if that's the correct term, but I mean the :9 :10 :12 and friends). I no longer know what you might mean by the ":9/:10 problem" so here goes: Problem 1: kdebluetooth doesn't find an OBEX file transfer service on a channel that would work with my N70. The SDP view lists an "OBEX File Transfer" icon but that doesn't work for me (:10), it returns an empty view. Before beta3, I patched kdebluetooth to find additionally the one that works for me (:12, identified by a proprietary PC suite file OBEX transfer thingy ID or something in addition to the usual OBEX file transfer one), but the patch no longer applies. I have the bug/RFE open upstream, and will maybe look into refreshing the patch sometime so it'd apply to post-beta3 sources again. Problem 2: Without URL escaping colons, Konqueror eats my obex2 URLs when I type them into the location bar and hit enter as described in comment 22. URL escaping the colons works, see comment 27. Neither of those problems is a blocker for this package - the first one is an upstream kdebluetooth RFE, and the second either a bug in Konqueror or a problem between chair and keyboard. Just forget about them as far as getting this package to Fedora is concerned. Regarding the first problem, I think Nokia PC Suite for Windows installs something to the phone when it is used the first time - maybe that has done something to OBEX in my phone when I tried it, dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081205.l68C5DRM019149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081210.l68CAHAR019357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 08:10 EST ------- I have created an account (owentl) and requested membership to the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:12:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081212.l68CCnVG019504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 pelliott at io.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pelliott at io.com) | ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-07-08 08:12 EST ------- There will be a new release and spec file within 2 weeks. I was diverted to other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:37:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081237.l68CbE5l020210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 08:37 EST ------- Ville, OK. Now I get the full picture. Can you post the BZ# of the RFE of problem 1 so I can subscribe to it? Either way, I did some monkey coding and adopted your patch to B3. Does it solve the problem? As for problem 2, I can reproduce it on my Nokia 6230 - konq indeed eats my URL when I hit enter. Have you reported it upstream? * Sun Jul 08 2007 Gilboa Davara 1-0.0-25.beta4 - Adopted Ville Skytt? b2 patch to p3. (Hopefully) re-enable Nokia N73 obex support. - Patch out "Configure services". (Disabled in B3) SPEC: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.25.beta3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:42:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081242.l68Cg6kR020476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 08:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158729) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158729&action=view) N70 support. Take/1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081242.l68CgRmB020650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 08:42 EST ------- Well, * NOTE: For now gdesklets itself does not work on rawhide. On Fedora 7, it and this package seem to be working. Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (gdesklets-goodweather) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 12:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081254.l68CsHm1021286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 08:54 EST ------- One last thing. I need someone to review this bug. Anyone up to it? (Before I spam fedora-maintainers?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 13:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081319.l68DJh5f023206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-08 09:19 EST ------- Thanks, but the patch in 0.25 doesn't appear to affect anything. Comment 4 has info about my upstream bug report. I haven't reported the URL eating issue anywhere. One new finding with 0.25 (no idea if it was present in earlier revisions): when browsing my phone, in addition to the (as discussed) non-working-for-me "OBEX File Transfer" icon, I see a "OBEX Object Push" one. When double-clicking it, I get an error dialog saying "Protocol not supported: obex" and nothing more happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 13:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081347.l68DlCwT024201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 09:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158731) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158731&action=view) suggested spec file Well, for me current spec file seems too complicated. Would you check the spec file attached which I suggest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 13:50:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081350.l68Dobl9024313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 09:50 EST ------- Perhaps I think that your spec file can be simplified as bug 245571 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 13:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 09:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081357.l68DvDLZ024522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 09:57 EST ------- * I see you fixed all the above issues. * The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version information. On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console. Appears to be missing requires? [owentl at whisky Download]$ pida 09:47:32 failed to import services.pythonbrowser = pida.services.pythonbrowser:Service Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in __load_entrypoint cls = entrypoint.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__']) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/pythonbrowser.py", line 34, in raise Exception('Bike is not installed') Exception: Bike is not installed 09:47:33 failed to import services.scripts = pida.services.scripts:Service Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in __load_entrypoint cls = entrypoint.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__']) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/scripts.py", line 24, in import pida.pidagtk.contentbook as contentbook ImportError: No module named contentbook 09:47:33 failed to import services.webbrowse = pida.services.webbrowse:Service Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in __load_entrypoint cls = entrypoint.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__']) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowse.py", line 29, in import gtkhtml2 ImportError: No module named gtkhtml2 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window.py:243: GtkWarning: quit: missing action buffermanager+quit_pida self.__uim.ensure_update() It appears that you are missing gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 and others. Are these necessary? Can you disable this support to make the messages go away? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 14:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 10:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081417.l68EHeHF025266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-08 10:17 EST ------- OBEX object push returns the same protocol error in my case. I've reported it upstream. [1] Having a bad code-monkey day (lack of sleep) I tried replacing obex with obex2 in kdebluetooth/kioslave/sdp/btsdp.cpp:247, it works (no error), but I'm getting an empty konq window. - Gilboa [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147678 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 14:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 10:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081445.l68EjYvs026292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-08 10:45 EST ------- > * The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version information. It still is. There is no way I could upload 2 files with the same name on the same server. :-) > On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console. > Appears to be missing requires? There has been a new upstream release-- 0.5.0. I am going to package it and upload a new pair of SPEC and SRPM soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081634.l68GY7Qi030003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:38:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081638.l68GcZEJ030215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 12:38 EST ------- Still no response; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:41:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081641.l68GfbFn030359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(dwmw2 at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 12:41 EST ------- No response in three weeks; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:43:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081643.l68GhnQv030491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 12:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: proxychains Short Description: Provides proxy support to any application Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081645.l68GjQws030590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(caolanm at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 12:45 EST ------- It's been six months since the last comment by the submitter; setting NEEDINFO. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:55:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081655.l68GtPQx030974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 12:55 EST ------- much simpler! Rebuilt srpm per your suggestions Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-3.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-calendar-0.41-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 16:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 12:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081655.l68Gtcv0031007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 12:55 EST ------- I cleaned up the spec file per your suggestions. latest files: Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-3.fc7.src.rpm or http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day.spec http://yes.urapita.net/fedora/gdesklets-quote-of-the-day-0.61-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:00:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081700.l68H0Eoh031176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-08 13:00 EST ------- Do you have an fixed srpm to propose about Mamoru comment ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081715.l68HFaJ8031792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 13:15 EST ------- By the way, do you have a time to review one of my review requests (bug 247124)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081719.l68HJV9u031922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 13:19 EST ------- Okay. This package is now no problem. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (gdesklets-calendar) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:24:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081724.l68HOuLO032134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 13:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdesklets-goodweather Short Description: weather and forcast display for gdesklets Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081725.l68HPHLu032179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:46:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081746.l68Hk17T000323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 13:46 EST ------- Okay. * Please remember to contact with gdesklets maintainer and to discuss directories ownership issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gdesklets-quote-of-the-day) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081746.l68HkRp5000387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081749.l68HnOEM000610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-08 13:49 EST ------- As the new version of R has been released, There is the new spec and srpm resepcting the R packaging guideslines: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm I have tested it when it is the only package installed in %{_datadir} there is no warning any more. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081749.l68Hnlu9000648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 13:49 EST ------- Tyler, as now I am sponsoring you, you can formally review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 17:56:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 13:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081756.l68HuQrI000950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-08 13:56 EST ------- This cannot be closed, this is already in Fedora, was in core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 18:10:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081810.l68IAICS001496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 14:10 EST ------- Oh, joy. Well, then it's essentially a merge review. And so it may come down to this package being pulled from the distro if we can't get any response to review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 18:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081820.l68IKGpo001816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-08 14:20 EST ------- However it seems that there is still a problem: $ mock ../SRPMS/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup No srpm created from specfile from srpm: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-10.fc6.src.rpm ending done I have tried with 3 different RPMs and I have always the same error... whereas the rpmbuild and rpmlint give none... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 18:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707081830.l68IUffe002162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 14:30 EST ------- Thanks for the update. There's really very little to this package, and while I have no understanding of the application itself and no possible way to test this, I doubt anyone else in the reviewer pool does either, so I'll go ahead and finish up this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 20:10:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707082010.l68KAwgc005729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 16:10 EST ------- --------- Summary: --------- * Duplicate BuildRequires: libXt-devel (by libXmu-devel) * RPM builds and functions on both F7 and rawhide. --------- Details: --------- OK - Mock : Built on F-7 (x86) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is QPL OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: 5c1eba8291385c630b8099fa9b042455 tgif-QPL-4.1.45.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. FIX - BuildRequires are not redundant. OK - %build and %install stages are correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - No large doc files not in a -doc package OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Does not contain any .la libtool archives OK - .desktop file installed correctly OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version --------------- Rpmlint output: --------------- OK - silent on both srpm and main package rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 20:13:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707082013.l68KDN6O005843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-08 16:13 EST ------- I will do the formal review. Please post a note when you have updated the package for the latest upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 20:59:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707082059.l68KxuF1007935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-08 16:59 EST ------- See root.log in /var/lib/mock/fedora-[version]-[arch]/result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 21:26:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707082126.l68LQsxJ008770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 nikolay at vladimiroff.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-07-08 17:26 EST ------- msmtp was built successfully with libgsasl support. For now I'm leaving the package as it is and I'm closing the bug. If there is a single user request for using alternatives I'll modify the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 8 22:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707082248.l68MmREA011290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-08 18:48 EST ------- ZI fixed almost everything. I'm going to upload it in 1 or 2 days. I had a busy week at work, that's why it took this long to fix it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 01:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090105.l6915aNP016141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 21:05 EST ------- I note that the %{?dist} tag is not present. This is not an absolute requirement, but I need to make sure you understand how you maintain multiple branches and the necessary orderings between them without out it. (And if you have to ask how you do that, you probably just want to add the dist tag and be happy.) See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag for more info. You don't need the manual libusb runtime dependency, and in fact it's misleading. rpm will find the appropriate library dependency by itself, so there's no reason to tell it. The built package won't work with any libusb with the required version, it will work with only a libusb package that provides the version of the libusb library that it was built against. It's best to just let RPM figure things out, which it does quite well in this case. Review: * source files match upstream: eef7c56d4915880c1faa67d6b20be727352f5002955a29bbd24020462f733792 dfu-programmer-0.4.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. X dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires has unneeded libusb dependency. dfu-programmer = 0.4.2-1 = X libusb >= 0.1.10a libusb-0.1.so.4()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the hardware needed to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 02:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 22:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090238.l692cMcd019576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-08 22:38 EST ------- OK, cool. The source matches upstream, summary looks good, the spec is cneal with no extraneous bits, rpmlint is quiet. I'd say it's ready to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 03:20:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090320.l693KbKx021167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-08 23:20 EST ------- Thank you for your initial comments. Updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/tgif.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SRPMS/tgif-4.1.45-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/Fedora/development/SPECS/tgif-4.1.45-2-3.diff --------------------------------------- * Mon Jul 9 2007 TASAKA Mamoru - 4.1.45-3 - Clean up BuildRequies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 03:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 23:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] New: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui Description: GNU Spice GUI is intended to provide a GUI to freely available Spice electronic cicuit simulators eg.GnuCAP, Ng-Spice. It uses gNetList to convert schematic files to net list files and gWave to display simulation results. gSchem is used as the schematic generation/viewing tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 04:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 00:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] New: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/compiz-bcop.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compiz-bcop/compiz-bcop-0.1.3-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: Bcop is a tool to autogenerate code for working with options in compiz plugins; this is required to build some plugins, and gives a great help to developers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 04:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 00:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] New: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/libcompizconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity through plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains the library for plugins to configure compiz settings. ----- BuildReq: compiz-bcop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 04:39:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 00:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] New: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/SPEC/compizconfig-python.spec SRPM URL: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains bindings to configure Compiz's plugins and the composite window manager. --- BuildReq libcompizconfig - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 05:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090548.l695mf8u027063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(luya_tfz at thefinalz| |one.com) | ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2007-07-09 01:48 EST ------- For some reason, I am unable to create the SRPM for adesklets with that result: $ rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/adesklets.spec error: Unable to open temp file. RPM build errors: Unable to open temp file. I am not sure what cause rpmbuild to not create a temporary file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 06:02:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090602.l6962lU8027637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 02:02 EST ------- Hello, My vote is also for making it arch: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool-II/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-4.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 06:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090630.l696UAIv028818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-09 02:30 EST ------- MUSTFIX: * Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS: # rpmbuild ... ... g++ -c -ggdb -pipe -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8 -I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D__WXGTK__ -pthread -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I. AppGSpiceUI.cpp -o obj/AppGSpiceUI.o ... Also, next time, please provide URLs to the *.src.rpm. It's very inconvenient for reviewers not being able to see the %{version}-%{release}'s of a package under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 06:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090635.l696ZcAi029103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 02:35 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #20) > > - The upstream project is called Slony-I. Why is the package called postgresql-slony1-engine? See configure file for this. > - Source0 is not available. http://main.slony.info/downloads/1.2/source/slony1-1.2.0.tar.bz2 seems to be the right one (there's a doc tarball > as well) > Fixed. (1.2.10) . We don't need doc tarball there; since the main tarball includes doc tarball, too. > - Errors during build: > chmod -R 644 doc/Makefile doc/adminguide doc/concept doc/howto doc/implementation doc/support > chmod: cannot access `doc/adminguide/schemadoc.xml': Permission denied > chmod: cannot access `doc/adminguide/usingslonik.sgml': Permission denied > chmod: cannot access `doc/adminguide/slonyupgrade.sgml': Permission denied > etc... > the chmod -R 644 sets drw-r--r-- permissions on the directory, so you can't reach the files in it. > Maybe you can use something like find doc/ -type f -exec chmod 600 {} \; Done. > - It also seems to be missing yacc: > Missing yacc parser.y parser.c ? No idea what this means. > - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc? > - I'd skip the %if %docs and %if %perltools. It's only one perl module, and that cleans up the specfile a lot. Removed %perltools, but left docs as it is now -- It is needed, because of the low NAMELEN issue on some old RH/FC releases. Some people may skip doc builds. > - This isn't necessary: > # Strip out -ffast-math from CFLAGS.... > > CFLAGS=`echo $CFLAGS|xargs -n 1|grep -v ffast-math|xargs -n 100` > There is no -ffast-math in %{optflags} Ok. > - %configure --includedir %{_includedir}/pgsql --with-pgconfigdir=%{_bindir} > is probably not necessary either, pg_config is in the path, and will tell configure where the libs and headers are Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break (see changelog entry Thu May 17 2007) > - Remove this line: #%define pg_version %(rpm -qv postgresql-devel|head -n 1|awk -F '-' '{print $3}') > - and this one: %define prefix /usr, they're not used Ok done. > This won't work: > if [ -d /etc/rc.d/init.d ] > then > install -d %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/init.d > fi > > You check if the directory exists, and if it exists, you create it. > and replace that path with %{_initrddir}. If you add initscripts as a requirement, that directory should be there Done. Thanks for the review. The new spec will follow shortly. Regards, Devrim > Good luck! > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 06:51:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090651.l696pxGN029688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 02:51 EST ------- Well, * What does "df -k" show? * If you have ~/.rpmmacros, what does it say? * And what does "rpm --eval %_tmppath" show? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] New: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=bouml.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=bouml-2.29-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: BOUML is a Unified Modeling Language editor for Qt. You can use it to create nearly all of UML diagrams. BOUML can generate code from those diagrams in C++, Java and IDL, and can also reverse existing code. The program supports class diagrams, sequence diagrams, collaboration diagrams, object diagrams, use case diagrams, component diagrams, state diagrams, activity diagrams, component diagrams and deployment diagrams. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090731.l697Vqs8031802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 03:31 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec New SRPM http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090741.l697fE7v032518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 03:41 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine.spec New SRPM http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-engine-1.2.10-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090741.l697faYG032569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-09 03:41 EST ------- Rpmlint complains about the absense of any documentation in this package. However since there are separate upstream tarballs for reference and documentation (http://bouml.free.fr/download.html), I am planning to submit a separate -doc sub-package for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:51:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090751.l697pNIl001275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-07-09 03:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Callback Short Description: Object interface for function callbacks Owners: mkpai at redhat.com,muir at idiom.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 07:53:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 03:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090753.l697rI0V001481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 mkpai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 08:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 04:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090834.l698YNnY006618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-07-09 04:34 EST ------- Eh... sorry. The new files are here: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 08:43:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 04:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090843.l698h80m007537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-09 04:43 EST ------- SPEC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=gnome-password-generator-2.spec SRPM: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=gnome-password-generator-1.4-2.fc8.src.rpm I have rectified some issues, but keep getting errors in mock. Looks like there are some problems with 'Requires/BuildRequires', but can not figure out what is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 08:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 04:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226489] Merge Review: tftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090857.l698v9JM008890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226489 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-07-09 04:57 EST ------- Hi, please take a look at last version in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 09:02:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707090902.l6992cUa009467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-09 05:02 EST ------- Mustfix: - Please either disable building the static libs (Append --disable-static tp %configure) or package the *.a's into a *-static sub-packages. - Your buildroot doesn't comply to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines Recommendation: - I recommend to install this package's headers into a subdirectory of %{_includedir} instead of directly installing them into %{_includedir}. (Append --includedir=%{_includedir}/fann (or similar) to %configure) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 10:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091012.l69ACRcR016056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-09 06:12 EST ------- Specs differ: [limb at fawkes fedora]$ diff postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec 4c4 < Name: postgresql-%{short_name} --- > Name: postgresql-pgpool-ha 6c6 < Release: 4%{?dist} --- > Release: 2%{?dist} 13a14 > BuildArch: noarch 49,55d49 < * Mon Jul 9 2007 Devrim GUNDUZ 1.1.0-4 < - Made package arch, per bz review. < - Move ocf path back to datadir/ocf/resource.d . < < * Thu Jul 5 2007 Devrim GUNDUZ 1.1.0-3 < - Fix ocf path < Using URLd spec builds fine, and rpmlint only complains about noarch, which is fine, so I re-affirm my approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 10:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091018.l69AIagP016431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 06:18 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #30) > Specs differ: Maybe you hit your browser's cache? It looks ok to me. Anyway, it's not that important. > Using URLd spec builds fine, and rpmlint only complains about noarch, which is > fine, so I re-affirm my approval. Thanks. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 10:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091020.l69AKKZw016574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 06:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postgresql-pgpool-ha Short Description: : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure Owners: devrim at commandprompt.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 10:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091048.l69AmtJG018630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-09 06:48 EST ------- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 Meanwhile, you may be interested in reviewing the above packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 11:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091114.l69BE08p020574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mr.ecik at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-07-09 07:13 EST ------- Sorry for a late answer. Well, apart from qmpdclient I packaged sonata - another mpd client. It appeared that sonata is much better mpd client for me so I am no longer interested in qmpdclient since I don't use it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 12:16:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091216.l69CGr5K026297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 08:16 EST ------- If you look my my spec file you will see that i comment it for now. cause some option from RPM_OPT_FLAGS doesn't really work well. I'll upload the build log which honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 12:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091233.l69CXPuO028128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-09 08:33 EST ------- Imported and build. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 12:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091244.l69Ci7re029028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-07-09 08:44 EST ------- Fixed in: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 13:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091323.l69DNR5B001299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 09:23 EST ------- Here's my review, I'm not an official reviewer. Anything marked with a **** indicates potential problems that may need to be addressed. MUST Items: * rpmlint - passes, no errors reported. * Package naming is good. Uses same naming of upstream package with postgresql prefix %{parent}-%{name}. Version is all numeric. * Package name and spec file name match. * The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. **** - License is BSD, which corresponds to pgfoundry page. Actual source distribution does not contain any Licensing attribution - No license in source, so no need to include in %doc - The spec file is written in American English, and is legible. - Upstream source matches source in the RPM - RPM builds on i386 - BuildRequires appears sane. The postgresql-devel will contain the appropriate compiler requirements. - Locales are not a problem as they are not supported. ***** - ldconfig is called, however the .so files are not installed in the system library search paths, so it appears that this step is redundant. - Relocation not supported, so no special checks for that. ***** - The package does not own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name} - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. - No duplicate files noted, permissions appear correct, defattr is present. Correct %clean section is present. - Macro usage appears consistent. - RPM contains code, not content, no need for a -doc subpackage. - There are no dependencies on the %doc readme file. - No header files or static libraries, so no need for a -devel package. - rm -rf %buildroot is at the beginning of %install - All filenames are be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: ***** - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ***** - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ---- I do not have mock installed.. Not tested. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ----- Only tested on i386 - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. ----- Works well on i386 ***** - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. It seems to me that this extension might now work with postgres 8.3, 8.4, 9.0?? The following Requires appears overly broad... Requires: postgresql-server >= 8.1 ***** Consider adding the -p flag to the install commands for the sql and the README file to preserve the original timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 13:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091330.l69DUn3n001995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 09:30 EST ------- Starting reviews of other packages, completed 246747 - postgresql-ip4r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 13:39:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091339.l69Ddsu2003480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that > each process should be running as its own user. I'm just starting to read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry These changes appear more involved, and would require some time to get resolved. If possible I'd like to release with memcached running as user nobody for the moment, and then follow the correct process for adding users and registering a memcached user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 13:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234079] Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091354.l69DshCc005821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicker-compiz - Pager applet for kicker to make it work with compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234079 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 09:54 EST ------- Imported and built. thanks to all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 13:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091358.l69DwdUe006513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 09:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Starting reviews of other packages, completed 246747 - postgresql-ip4r Well, I checked your pre-review and it seems good for initial comments. (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that > > each process should be running as its own user. > > I'm just starting to read: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry > > These changes appear more involved, and would require > some time to get resolved. I don't recommend fedora-usermgmt (and I don't request you to use it or not to use it...) Okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (memcached) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. Matthias and Ruben, do you want to co-maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091401.l69E1Du2006867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-09 10:01 EST ------- good. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tgif) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091402.l69E2K1P007127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091405.l69E5hqF007696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 10:05 EST ------- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: ----------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tgif Short Description: 2-D drawling tool Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: t.matsuu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091406.l69E6Kov007797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246747] Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091410.l69EArFZ008652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-ip4r - IPv4 and IPv4 range index types for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246747 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-09 10:10 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #1) > **** - License is BSD, which corresponds to pgfoundry page. Actual source > distribution does not contain any Licensing attribution Yeah, I bugged the developers about this. > ***** - ldconfig is called, however the .so files are not installed in the > system library search paths, so it appears that this step is redundant. 'k, removed. > ***** - The package does not own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name} Ok, fixed. > ***** - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file > should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. There are no translations available. > ***** - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. No subpackage, so no need for this item. > It seems to me that this extension might now work with postgres 8.3, 8.4, > 9.0?? The following Requires appears overly broad... It may work, if one day those releases are out. I don't want to limit it to 8.2. > ***** Consider adding the -p flag to the install commands for the sql and the > README file to preserve the original timestamps. Ok, done. Thanks for the review. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091429.l69ETK3b010746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-09 10:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > If you look my my spec file you will see that i comment it for now. > cause some option from RPM_OPT_FLAGS doesn't really work well. What does "doesn't work well" mean in this context? > I'll upload the build log which honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS I regret having to say this, but make this package build using RPM_OPT_FLAGS, or it won't have a future in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:45:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091445.l69EjSNP012808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 10:45 EST ------- Withdrawing approval and closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 14:47:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247467] New: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467 Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/isabella-coq/isabella-coq.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/isabella-coq/isabella-coq-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This day is the father's day and Isabella Coq must find a present to give to his father Coco. To complete this game, she must meet her friends and buy some things at the downtown. The most present is worth, the more points you get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091501.l69F19Mq014930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-07-09 11:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: urlview Short Description: URL extractor/launcher Owners: mlichvar at redhat.com Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247474] New: python-imaging package for Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jgranado at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-imaging [New Branches: ] [Updated Fedora Owners: ]jamatos at fc.up.pt,jgranado at redhat.com [Updated Fedora CC: ]jamatos at fc.up.pt,jgranado at redhat.com [Updated EPEL Owners: ] [Updated EPEL CC: ] [Updated Description: ] Looking for package co-ownership in fedora. looked at some koji logs and saw that the package is owned by jamatos at fc.up.pt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:11:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247474] python-imaging package for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091511.l69FBYME016234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232555] Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091517.l69FHLkM017221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-commons-apis - APIs for DOM, SAX, and JAXP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232555 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-09 11:17 EST ------- Closing bug report as this is already in F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225934] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091519.l69FJvgm017483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225934 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-09 11:19 EST ------- Closing bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225935] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091521.l69FLlLj017772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225935 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:31:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246286] Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091531.l69FVwm0019158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcb-proto - XCB protocol descriptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246286 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-09 11:31 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225938] Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091532.l69FWkNG019360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-taglibs-standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225938 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:39:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226326] Merge Review: puretls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091539.l69Fd2xB020181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: puretls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226553] Merge Review: xdoclet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091540.l69Fe0VX020307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xdoclet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226553 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091540.l69FejSR020499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xerces-j2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226565] Merge Review: xmlrpc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091541.l69FfROU020628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlrpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226565 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091546.l69FkakC021625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-09 11:46 EST ------- coco-coq-0.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:49:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] New: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe-0.2.0-0.1.sky.src.rpm Description: pwsafe is a unix commandline program that manages encrypted password databases. Comaptible with CounterPane's PasswordSafe Win32 program versions 2.x and 1.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091549.l69FnMfb022532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-09 11:49 EST ------- libgsasl-0.2.18-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245120] Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091549.l69FnPMH022570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2.18-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 15:49:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091549.l69FngW4022673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091603.l69G3Dmt025227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-07-09 12:03 EST ------- So, how do we proceed from here? I think all the technical and stylistic issues with this package's spec file are now all sorted out (if not, please let me know!). What do I need to do to wrap up this review process, get sponsored on the cvs and build machines, and move the new .rpm into live the extras area? Thanks, Alec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:03:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231303] Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091603.l69G3QGD025333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-07-09 12:03 EST ------- Closing as RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:05:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091605.l69G5blt025541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-09 12:05 EST ------- Yay! (note just for competion: it took a note to rel-eng to tag -bignum and -random so that koji could build this without those two being stable) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091605.l69G5emF025574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091605.l69G5kVe025632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 Bug 237338 depends on bug 237334, which changed state. Bug 237334 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:05:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225637] Merge Review: castor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091605.l69G5uAn025673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: castor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225637 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-07-09 12:05 EST ------- The latest version of the spec file is in Fedora cvs, I just tried that and it built fine. Please try that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091626.l69GQF5p028020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 mra at hp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mra at hp.com 2007-07-09 12:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libp11 Short Description: Library for using PKCS#11 modules Owners: mra at hp.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091636.l69GaS3I028938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |zlib ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-07-09 12:36 EST ------- I've changed the component of this bug since I've discussed inclusion with the maintainer of zlib, and minizip will be incorporated into the zlib package. I'm not sure what else needs to be done to transfer the bug over to zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 16:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091645.l69GjUID029620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-09 12:45 EST ------- I was wrong! (It happens) The FSF says: Section 6 of LGPLv2.1 says "You must give prominent notice with each copy of the work that the Library is used in it...." So, when I read the fourth exception of FLTK's license, I think the first paragraph exempts the licensor from many of the requirements of section 6, and then the rest goes on to explain that they're not exempt from this particular requirement, perhaps a little more verbosely than is necessary. The example given is, sure enough, one way to comply with this requirement, though not the only way. It might be helpful to bear in mind that the original BSD advertising clause required you to publish an acknowledgment in advertisements, and not just the software itself. The example provided as a way to comply with FLTK's license -- a statement in the user documentation -- suggests to me that they do not intend to impose on your advertising. ***** Or, in very simple terms, fltk's license is GPL-Compatible. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091710.l69HAVZh032722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 ------- Additional Comments From mra at hp.com 2007-07-09 13:10 EST ------- I've updated the spec file to use the /usr/lib/openssl/engines directory, thanks for catching that. This also has a fixed Source0 with the /files folder added to the URL. Lastly I included > 0.9.6 in the OpenSSL requires, since that is when the engine support was added. The following spec file and srpm built cleanly on i386 and x86_64 and produce no errors with rpmlint. Spec URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/engine_pkcs11/engine_pkcs11.spec SRPM URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/engine_pkcs11/engine_pkcs11-0.1.3-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:13:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091713.l69HDv5Y000523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091717.l69HH4m2000801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091719.l69HJk9R001050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 13:19 EST ------- This has been sitting around for far too long, and it looks as if the major issues detailed above have been fixed. I'll review this and emesene together and, if those reviews go well, I'll sponsor you. A warning, though, emesene might need some work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091720.l69HK4iS001135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091720.l69HKx9G001286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091722.l69HMRoc001405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091723.l69HN6ig001475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:23:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091723.l69HNcv3001559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:28:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091728.l69HSLhA002051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091728.l69HSbNN002114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 13:28 EST ------- Okay, Thank you spot! --------------------------------------------------------- This package (cinepaint) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091729.l69HTlYF002308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-09 13:29 EST ------- Ok, I disabled the test in err8.t New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247474] python-imaging package for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091732.l69HWFP8002552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] New: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkonrath at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/junit4.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/junit4-4.3.1-1jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: JUnit is a regression testing framework written by Erich Gamma and Kent Beck. It is used by the developer who implements unit tests in Java. JUnit is Open Source Software, released under the IBM Public License and hosted on SourceForge. Additional Info: The reason I am proposing a new junit4 package rather than updating the junit3 package is because eclipse 3.3 requires junit 3 and 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091733.l69HX9wB002747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fnasser at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091733.l69HXC1V002785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 13:33 EST ------- Okay, now we can restart this review request as fltk license issue is solved. So would you update the srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:35:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091735.l69HZTJj003082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091738.l69HcCne003305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(john at curioussymbol | |s.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 13:38 EST ------- If you have some questions, please let us know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 17:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091742.l69HgriX003828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > > It might be helpful to bear in mind that the original BSD advertising > clause required you to publish an acknowledgment in advertisements, and not > just the software itself. Ah... thank you for your explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091801.l69I1s7O005249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-09 14:01 EST ------- Good: + Packing Naming is ok. + Name of the SPEC File matches the package name + Package hast consitant macor usage. + Packsge contains %{?dist} tag + SPEC start to use GPL as an license + License is an open source license + License Tag matches with license test in the package + Package contains verbatim copy of the license text + Spec file is written in English + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 4bb36538a2772ecbf1a542bc7d4746c0) + Package has correct buildroot + package doesn't contains subpackages. + Buildroot will cleaned on %clean section an on the beginning of the %install section + Package conatins proper* %defattr and file permissions + %doc section is small * %doc section doen't affect runtime + Package doesn't contains duplicates file in the %file section + Package doesn't contains files or directories owned by ohter packages + Local build works fine + Rpmlint quite on Source rpm. + Rpmlint quite on Debuginfo rpm. + Local install and uninstall works fine + Mock build works fine for Devel and F-7 (x86_64, i386, PPC64, PPC) Bad: - Rpmlint has complaints for the binary package: pmlint pwsafe-0.2.0-0.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: pwsafe file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/pwsafe.1.gz W: pwsafe incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.0-0.1.fc8 0.2.0-0.1.fc7 - When I call 'pwsafe --createdb' I will got the following message: WARNING: pwsafe unable to use secure ram (need to be setuid root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:05:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091805.l69I52Qw005538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-09 14:04 EST ------- package done :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] New: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar-1.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pecl-phar-build.log Description: This is the extension version of PEAR's PHP_Archive package. Support for zlib, bz2 and crc32 is achieved without any dependency other than the external zlib or bz2 extension. .phar files can be read using the phar stream, or with the Phar class. If the SPL extension is available, a Phar object can be used as an array to iterate over a phar's contents or to read files directly from the phar. Phar archives can be created using the streams API or with the Phar class, if the phar.readonly ini variable is set to false. Full support for MD5 and SHA1 signatures is possible. Signatures can be required if the ini variable phar.require_hash is set to true. When PECL extension hash is available then SHA-256 and SHA-512 signatures are supported as well. -- As this package requies php >= 5.2.0, it will be only available in F >= 7 Note : this spec use some new stuff for pecl extension : - register pecl extension (as pear extension) - run test in %check (at least, find a way to do this) The phar.phar command is a good phar example ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091816.l69IG2KX006451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 14:15 EST ------- Okay, getting closer. I've had my fedora account 'plindner' for quite a while now. I tried following the instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure but it appears that I do now have the proper authority to do that yet. regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:16:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091816.l69IGR8Q006591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-09 14:16 EST ------- Alright, new spec and srpm in the same place as before. Added doxygen and graphviz to the buildreqs. Also, had to move --docdir for the package to not be %{name}-%{version}, since that's where %doc will install to, and where %doc will delete before installing. So you now get %{_docdir}/libxcb and %{_docdir}/libxcb-1.0. I guess that's okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:28:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091828.l69IS0OV007644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 14:27 EST ------- According to the account system you have completed the CLA but haven't even applied for cvsextras access yet. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join specifically the "Get Sponsored" step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091833.l69IXxqs008180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-07-09 14:33 EST ------- It's fixed SPEC URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gconf-cleaner/gconf-cleaner.spec SRPMS URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gconf-cleaner/gconf-cleaner-0.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091839.l69Id1sT008672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 14:38 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 18:54:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247124] Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091854.l69IsvrJ009928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tgif - 2-D drawling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247124 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-09 14:54 EST ------- Rebuild on devel, F-7, FC-6, requested on Bodhi to push. Closing. Thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 19:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707091937.l69Jb5gr013938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-09 15:36 EST ------- Hello, > See configure file for this. You mean the PACKAGE_NAME? The tarball is slony1-1.2.10.tar.bz2, the upstream project is called Slony-I, and the first line of the README file says Slony-I. From the NamingGuidelines: When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. > Missing yacc parser.y parser.c >> ? No idea what this means. yacc is provided by bison, and seems to be used by Slony-I: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ > - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires >> I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc? configure is searching for it, so I assume it is used. > Some people may skip doc builds. But doc is a separate package in Fedora, and people can just choose to not install it. > Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break This won't be a problem when the package is build on the Fedora buildservers. I understand that you want to maintain one upstream specfile for all versions of Red Hat and Fedora, but having a clean spec in Fedora makes things more easier in the long run. A few other comments: - Double BuildRequires for docbook-style-dsssl - Is %kerbdir still needed? If not, there's no need to change CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS and a simple %configure will do. And: rpmlint of postgresql-slony1-engine-docs: E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/support 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/adminguide 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/concept 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/howto 0644 E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs- 1.2.10/implementation 0644 Cheers, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 20:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 16:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092014.l69KEDge018416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co|fedora-review? |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-09 16:14 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. Got an update here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libproj4.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libproj4-050319-2.src.rpm * Mon Jul 9 2007 - Orion Poplawski - 050319-2 - Move .so to main package and manual to -devel. Upstream makes no provision for a versioned soname. As I understand it, it is problematic to add one in case upstream decides on a different scheme later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 20:18:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 16:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092018.l69KI2xo018860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 16:18 EST ------- well, i uncommented the fix which make it honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. all files updated and are available from the link below http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gspiceui * Tue Jul 04 2007 Xavier Lamien < lxtnow[at]gmail.com > - 0.8.90-2 - Enabled the fix that make it honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092107.l69L7Zes023826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247406 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 17:07 EST ------- Added block dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092107.l69L7b1Q023858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247408 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092108.l69L8FB5023930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com BugsThisDependsOn| |247405 OtherBugsDependingO|247408 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 17:08 EST ------- Added block dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:08:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092108.l69L8Hkc023960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247406 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092108.l69L8I2E023990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|247406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092122.l69LMY6w025278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-09 17:22 EST ------- Hello Kevin, Thanks for stepping up for the review and for spotting the issues with man and info! I'm on vacation now, so I'll be able to look into the issues you described in more detail when I'm back (22-Jul). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:28:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092128.l69LS2cq025702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-07-09 17:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > - Provides: libglew-devel = %{version}-%{release} > Why do you need this ? No good reason I can think of, gone. > - CFLAGS="-Iinclude $RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > This will replace -Iinclude indeed - so you may need to have this in %prep (to > prevent CFLAGS replacement) > sed -i -e 's|$(POPT)|%{optflags}|' Makefile I can't remember how the CFLAGS got in there in the first place, your fix seems to work, applied. > - Prefer to use this at %prep (if possible for the doc generated before make) > sed -i 's/\r//' README.txt doc/* Heh, I just advised the same to someone else in a different review. It isn't necessary anymore, gone. > - doc sub-package isn't really big, you may consider to merge it with the -devel I'm not sure what the criteria is for splitting or not. As HTML documentation, it really ought to require a web-browser.. Left as separate for now. > - make should uses %{?_smp_mflags} (it seems to work) Done. > W: glew unused-direct-shlib-dependency Don't know what to do about this, I added the extra BuildRequires anyway. > - Shouldn't we block FE-LEGAL for the sgi problem or is this clear enought for > you ? It seems that if it is ok for debian then it ought to be ok for fedora. I'll block FE-LEGAL if it is necessary to bring it to attention? > rpmlint complain about W: glew invalid-license Assorted licenses, See previous comment, according to the debian document the license would be something like "BSD + GPL" Updated package: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/7/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/glew-1.4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/glew.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 21:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092134.l69LYkPP026304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wjhns174 at hardakers.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-09 17:34 EST ------- srpm whine: link should be fc7 (works) not f7 (doesn't work) builds rpmlint clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:19:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092219.l69MJoVW029911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |s.adam at diffingo.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-07-09 18:19 EST ------- There's three changes that need to be made to the package: - Rpmlint isn't silent: W: compiz-bcop non-standard-group Application/Development The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". E: compiz-bcop zero-length /usr/share/doc/compiz-bcop-0.1.3/ChangeLog E: compiz-bcop zero-length /usr/share/doc/compiz-bcop-0.1.3/README ** These two errors are OK W: compiz-bcop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/bcop.pc W: compiz-bcop non-standard-group Application/Development W: compiz-bcop incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.3-0.4.20070703git 0.1.3-0.5.20070708git.fc7 - /usr/share/bcop/ isn't owned by any package. - /usr/share/pkgconfig/bcop.pc must be moved to a devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092222.l69MMl4p030151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-09 18:22 EST ------- Excellent. Have a great vacation! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092233.l69MXqjI031087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232702] Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 - Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092234.l69MYAgE031167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 - Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232702 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:34:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092234.l69MYdHf031225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |s.adam at diffingo.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-07-09 18:34 EST ------- - A trival rpmlint warning: W: libcompizconfig summary-not-capitalized libcompizconfig - Rebuilding libcompizconfig-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.src.rpm returns: error: Failed build dependencies: compiz-devel >= 0.5.1 is needed by libcompizconfig-0.0.1-0.5.20070708git.fc7.i386 I can't continue to review this until compiz >= 0.5.1 had been reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:34:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232703] Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 - Write bzip2 files/buffers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092234.l69MYoYW031279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 - Write bzip2 files/buffers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232703 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234830] Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092235.l69MZ7qo031319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234830 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:35:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245044] Review Request: Parrot - A VM for Dynamic Languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092235.l69MZWEZ031371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Parrot - A VM for Dynamic Languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245044 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245867] Review Request: stardict-dic-{zh_CN, zh_TW, en, ja, ru} - Dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092235.l69MZqFf031434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-{zh_CN, zh_TW, en, ja, ru} - Dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245867 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092237.l69Mb75d031582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-09 18:37 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: i386/fc6 [x] Rpmlint output: [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 9b1911cff0290be0f6eb1f8ba62dcbae MD5SUM upstream package: 9b1911cff0290be0f6eb1f8ba62dcbae [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: [ ] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [ ] File based requires are sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 22:40:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092240.l69Me1vZ031711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |s.adam at diffingo.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092303.l69N3J5L000757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |pachi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092309.l69N9Ro7001056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-07-09 19:09 EST ------- Okay, I've updated the main Ice SRPM following the comments. Sorry for the delay ... I left the Ruby stuff as-is -- it seems from the Ruby packaging guidelines that that's how it should be (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby), but I made the other changes as requested. Spec: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice.spec SRPM: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-5.fc7.src.rpm I'll open the additional review requests shortly and post the links here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:14:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247556] New: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 Summary: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-java.spec SRPM URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-java-3.2.0-3.src.rpm Description: This package contains the noarch Java runtime files for the Internet Communications Engine. This package is split off from the main review request at bug 234612 -- see that bug for the full discussion. The Ice packages are collectively my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247556] Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092315.l69NF5M4001338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:15:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092315.l69NF6T4001369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247556 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] New: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-dotnet.spec SRPM URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-dotnet-3.2.0-2.src.rpm Description: This package contains the noarch .Net runtime files for the Internet Communications Engine. This package is split off from the main review request at bug 234612 -- see that bug for the full discussion. The Ice packages are collectively my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092316.l69NGswZ001509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |234612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092316.l69NGtQr001539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247557 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 9 23:19:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707092319.l69NJsg6001673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-07-09 19:19 EST ------- Here are the additional bugs: ice-java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 ice-dotnet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 I set both bugs to depend on this one -- should the dependency go the other way around? I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 00:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100027.l6A0RAl6005204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|pachi |Package Review Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 20:27 EST ------- It seems that 0.5.1 is now out. I managed to download 0.5.0 from a mirror and will review it here; I don't see significant changes in 0.5.1 so I don't think I need to wait for you to update before I review. I managed to get things from http://mysql.he.net/Downloads/MySQL-Proxy/; I think it's better to list some URL, even a mirror, rather than nothing, but that's really up to you. I suppose a package like this could use an init file, but I don't think it's mandatory. Review: * source files match upstream: e1e1951d8bddfc0813aad1a3a93e63229dd9baa82833569cb44237cb769a2669 mysql-proxy-0.5.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is 0.5.1. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mysql-proxy = 0.5.0-1.fc8 = libevent-1.3b.so.1()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) liblua-5.1.so()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Some basic testing shows that it seems to work. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 00:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100041.l6A0f5iZ006368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-09 20:41 EST ------- How about http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/ohm-0.1.1-0.fc7.src.rpm Should be okay, and seems to build in mock now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 00:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100056.l6A0uwSP007389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(opensource at till.na | |me) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 20:56 EST ------- It doesn't look like this has been built yet. Please build it and either close the ticket or reference this ticket when you push to F7 and bodhi will close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 00:57:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100057.l6A0vWgc007445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-07-09 20:57 EST ------- i will review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100104.l6A14D3R008037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-09 21:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdesklets-calendar Short Description: A calendar showing the entire month for gdesklets Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100105.l6A15qWI008144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-09 21:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gdesklets-goodweather New Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245431] Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100107.l6A17s1Q008314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jeremy at hinegardner | |.org) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 21:07 EST ------- This has already been built; please don't forget to close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100110.l6A1AGZi008431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-09 21:10 EST ------- Fixed, Imported and built ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100115.l6A1FMTA008760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245694] Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100118.l6A1ILNl009162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245694 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 21:18 EST ------- This seems to have been built and pushed already, so I'll close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:19:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100119.l6A1JnaJ009232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 21:19 EST ------- This doesn't seem to have been built yet. Is there a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100125.l6A1P16T009561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-09 21:24 EST ------- Built on devel and F-7. Requested on Bodhi to push. Closing. Thanks for the review and sponsorship!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:37:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100137.l6A1bt4Z010081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 21:37 EST ------- It looks like you lost your reviewer when you neglected to respond. I suppose you'll need to wait for another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100144.l6A1itiW010412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246186] Review Request: dtc - Device Tree Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100159.l6A1xgQV010971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtc - Device Tree Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246186 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-07-09 21:59 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234484 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 01:59:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234484] Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100159.l6A1xid1011007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dtc - device tree compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234484 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-07-09 21:59 EST ------- *** Bug 246186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 02:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100218.l6A2I641012049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 02:55:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100255.l6A2tWG6014754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-09 22:55 EST ------- OK, this looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100309.l6A393bI015647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 mra at hp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:21:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100321.l6A3L4v9016485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100321.l6A3L593016530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247408 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:22:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100322.l6A3MnZQ016696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 23:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: memcached Short Description: High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache Owners: lindner at inuus.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: lindner at inuus.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100324.l6A3ObV2016869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-09 23:24 EST ------- argh... can't set fedora-cvs flag yet... hopefully fedorabugs permission gets propagated... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 03:47:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 23:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100347.l6A3lfKj018639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 04:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100400.l6A40TDk019560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 mra at hp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mra at hp.com 2007-07-10 00:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: engine_pkcs11 Short Description: A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL Owners: mra at hp.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 04:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100431.l6A4VqYs022122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-07-10 00:31 EST ------- perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA, perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random and perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-BigNum haven't appeared yet on the mirrors, so the mock build still fails. I'll try that again tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 04:38:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245431] Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100438.l6A4c0FV022715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(jeremy at hinegardner| |.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 04:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245432] Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100438.l6A4c2Nf022745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245432 Bug 245432 depends on bug 245431, which changed state. Bug 245431 Summary: Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 04:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100439.l6A4dLLd022815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-10 00:39 EST ------- Welcome to the new world. They're available on Koji due to a special tag (I know because I had to request them). They're also published in -testing, so you should be able to grab the rpms from testing or enable the testing repository within mock to get it to build. They've only just been published, so I've been trying to be polite and wait 2 weeks before rolling to stable. (and actually, you using them for this from testing would provide some positive feedback on the fact they work ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 06:13:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100613.l6A6DZq0027455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cr33dog at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-10 02:13 EST ------- I hit the bump in #20 also. I did not know this was up for review and was building from source - I wandered in from google. The meat of this patch will get past the FLAC error: http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/multimedia/hydrogen/hydrogen-0.9.3-flac113.patch?rev=1.1&cvsroot=Extra&only_with_tag=CURRENT&content-type It needs some work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 07:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100742.l6A7gnZH000752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-10 03:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > W: pwsafe file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/pwsafe.1.gz Will fix. > W: pwsafe incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.0-0.1.fc8 0.2.0-0.1.fc7 This will automagically go away when the package is built for rawhide. > - When I call 'pwsafe --createdb' I will got the following message: > WARNING: pwsafe unable to use secure ram (need to be setuid root) Since I have not audited the code I'll not enable suid root for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 09:28:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707100928.l6A9S2gE011726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-10 05:27 EST ------- Charset fixed in this build: http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe.spec http://www.skytale.net/files/pwsafe/pwsafe-0.2.0-0.2.sky.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 10:02:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 06:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245432] Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101002.l6AA2HgJ015940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245432 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 10:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 06:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101021.l6AALJan017997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-10 06:21 EST ------- As it happens there's a new release and it at least builds and tests without compile errors now. Anyone want to give this a spin? Spec URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/perl-Geo-IP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/perl-Geo-IP-1.28-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 10:28:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 06:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245951] Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101028.l6AAS7uP018503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-07-10 06:28 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 10:28:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 06:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101028.l6AAS9UC018536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 Bug 226167 depends on bug 245951, which changed state. Bug 245951 Summary: Review Request: urlview - URL extractor/launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245951 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 12:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 08:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101214.l6ACEqWa026503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-10 08:14 EST ------- The .desktop file isn't too flash, even with my attempts to fix it (a good icon would be nice but my art skills are nonexistent. Given that it's a console app and Real Men Don't Need .Desktop Files, I've dropped it. Most GUI users will likely have picked one of many good GUI XMPP apps available. The .mf appended to the version tag is gone (I'd rather maintain it here than in my own repo) SPEC: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/mcabber.spec SRPM: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/mcabber-0.9.3-2.fc7.src.rpm Enjoy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 12:35:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 08:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101235.l6ACZlAa028033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-10 08:35 EST ------- New links: SRPM URL : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.2-2.src.rpm Spec URL : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.2-2.spec Noarch URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.2-2.noarch.rpm x86_64 URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2.2-2.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 13:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101305.l6AD5DVX031016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 13:12:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] New: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/teckit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/teckit-2.2.1-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: TECkit is a low-level toolkit intended to be used by other applications that need to perform encoding conversions (e.g., when importing legacy data into a Unicode-based application). The primary component of the TECkit package is therefore a library that performs conversions; this is the "TECkit engine". The engine relies on mapping tables in a specific binary format (for which documentation is available); there is a compiler that creates such tables from a human-readable mapping description (a simple text file). --- The main reason to include this is that TeXLive is dependent on it. TeXLive uses its internal version of TECkit and we may want to include/maintain it separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 13:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101325.l6ADPF4N000662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-10 09:25 EST ------- This has lingered long enough... :) 1. MUST: fix scriptlets, add missing 'touch', before gtk-update-icon-cache: touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor ||: 2. MUST: omit stray .la files, add near end of %install: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib*.la and fix %files list accordingly. (unless you've discovered these are actually required) 3. SHOULD remove --add-only-show-in="KDE" This isn't (shouldn't be!?) desktop-specific, and could be of value to users of other desktops. I don't feel strongly about it, tho. 4. SHOULD omit BuildRequires: libutempter-devel not sure why that's included (I suspect due to the kde packaging bug that's long-since been fixed). 5. SHOULD use %{?dist} in Release, something like: Release: 0.25.beta3%{?dist} Address these, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 13:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101335.l6ADZr8p001735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-10 09:35 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.7-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Update to 1.4.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 14:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247624] New: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247624 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 14:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247625] New: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247625 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-NetAddr-IP-4.007-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides an object-oriented abstraction on top of IP addresses or IP subnets, that allows for easy manipulations. Version 4.xx of NetAdder::IP will will work older versions of Perl and does not use Math::BigInt as in previous versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 14:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247624] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101439.l6AEduuO008699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247624 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl- |Review Request: perl- |NetAddr-IP - |here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-10 10:39 EST ------- Sorry, accidentally hit Enter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 14:56:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101456.l6AEupAM010773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 10:56 EST ------- Again I just checked for packaging. For 3.2.0-5: 0. Description stage: * Macros - %_sbindir is /usr/sbin, where service (and so on) is under /sbin, not under %_sbindir (there is no macro which corresponds with /sbin). Same for scriptlets. * php Requirement - -php subpackage has "Requires: php >= 5.1.4". Does this mean that BuildRequires for php dependency should also have version specific dependency, i.e. "BuildRequires: php >= "? 1. %build stage * %optflags - %optflags is still not honored completely. ------------------------------------------------------ make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.0/src/IceUtil' making all in icecpp make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.0/src/icecpp' cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" cccp.c cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" cexp.c cc -c -I../../include -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" prefix.c rm -f ../../bin/icecpp cc -O2 -I. -DPREFIX=\"\" -o ../../bin/icecpp cccp.o cexp.o prefix.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Ice-3.2.0/src/icecpp' ------------------------------------------------------ 2. Scripts * Home directory - It seems that no one owns %_localstatedir/lib/icegrid, or doesn't this directory needed? 3. Others * rpmlint ------------------------------------------------------ W: ice macro-in-%changelog _libdir (etc) ------------------------------------------------------ - In %changelog, please use %%_prefix, %%_libdir, ... so that macros won't be expanded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:08:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247625] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101508.l6AF8rMc011973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247625 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-10 11:08 EST ------- I completely missed that this has been reviewed already (bug #236177), but apparently it hasn't been built yet. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 236177 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101508.l6AF8uGG012015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-10 11:08 EST ------- *** Bug 247625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101521.l6AFLQ8Q013310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-10 11:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > I am having one small issue. I cannot access the help pages. I get a message in > my browser saying they are located at /usr/share/qgis/doc/index.html but when I > look the directory doc does not seem to exist in /usr/share/qgis. Actually, can you go ahead and file this as a new bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:29:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101529.l6AFTZxo014485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 11:29 EST ------- Is there some reason why this hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101532.l6AFW8YE014790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-10 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: memcached Short Description: High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache Owners: lindner at inuus.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: lindner at inuus.com (adding EL-4 and EL-5 branches while we're waiting for cvs approval.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101532.l6AFWE5t014854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:32 EST ------- Well, please check; http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines for general packaging points. For 0.2.2-2: * Source0 cannot be found. * BuildArch is not noarch yet. * Please use macros: please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Usually configuration files under %_sysconfdir should marked as %config(noreplace) * Fix up the permission of the files. (check "-m" option of install), and don't call chmod on %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:42:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101542.l6AFg00t015885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai| |l.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:41 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this into Fedora, please file a new bug report, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101543.l6AFhpK9016142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-10 11:43 EST ------- fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101545.l6AFjuB2016394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:45 EST ------- I give up reviewing this bug... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101546.l6AFkIEA016452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227291] Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101552.l6AFqaf1017033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227291 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(gregmhogan at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:52 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request, thank you!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:54:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101554.l6AFsIfY017277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:54 EST ------- again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 15:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101558.l6AFwAXL017619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 11:58 EST ------- Once removing my sponsorship. This bug will be closed if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101603.l6AG3cf5018219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-10 12:03 EST ------- I'm orphaning this one, the documentation does not say to whom I have to assign this but here is the CVS change request. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: empathy [Updated Fedora Owners: ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:03:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101603.l6AG3ojQ018425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-10 12:03 EST ------- I'm orphaning this one, the documentation does not say to whom I have to assign this but here is the CVS change request. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ndesk-dbus [Updated Fedora Owners: ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101606.l6AG6l6F018781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 12:06 EST ------- Any news ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:08:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101608.l6AG8BX7018926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 12:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101608.l6AG8pel018997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-10 12:08 EST ------- Good: + Package name meets naming guidelines + Name of SPEC file matches with package name. + SPEC file consitant macro usage. + SPEC file contains %{?dist} macro + License is LGPL + Package has the choice to use CPL or LGPL + SPEC in English + SPEC is legible + Sub packages are declared properly + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 6b7538aa53aa844db8bb95c1219d62d1) + Package has correct buildroot + BuildRequires isn't redundant + Local build works properly + Package contains proper %defattr and file permissions + Package has a proper clean section + Buildroot will be cleand in %clean section and on the beginning of the %install section + Package and sub packages doc files don't affect runtine + File size on the %doc section is acceptable + Package doesn't contains static libraries + Package file list doesn't contains duplicates files + Package contains no files or directories owned by other packages Bad: - %{_smp_mflags] wasn't used during make step. Pleae add it or add a comment which described, that the build doesn't works with it - Package doesn't contains verbatim copy of the license The file COPYING refers to a text file which is not included in the package - Rpmlint complaints on source rpm: rpmlint -i teckit-2.2.1-0.1.fc7.src.rpm E: teckit configure-without-libdir-spec Because package use %configure macro, this may be ignored - Package contains zero length file rpmlint teckit-2.2.1-0.1.fc7.x86_64.rpm E: teckit zero-length /usr/share/doc/teckit-2.2.1/ChangeLog - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: rpmlint teckit E: teckit zero-length /usr/share/doc/teckit-2.2.1/ChangeLog W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit_Compiler.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.0 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit_Compiler.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.0 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 - Mock build fails: *** Recreating libtool files libtoolize ./autogen.sh: line 7: libtoolize: command not found *** Recreating aclocal.m4 aclocal ./autogen.sh: line 12: aclocal: command not found *** Recreating configure ./autogen.sh: line 17: autoheader: command not found ./autogen.sh: line 18: autoconf: command not found *** Recreating the Makefile.in files ./autogen.sh: line 22: automake: command not found You have to define the require automake/autoconf tools as BRs. Optimizing Hints: If a entry in the %file section and with a slash, all files and directories beyond it will be included into the package, so you may write %{_includedir}/teckit/ instead of %dir %{_includedir}/teckit/ %{_includedir}/teckit/TECkit_Common.h %{_includedir}/teckit/TECkit_Compiler.h %{_includedir}/teckit/TECkit_Engine.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101610.l6AGAHSi019122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 12:10 EST ------- Paul: Can you please add a CVS template so we know what branches you would like and such? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Add a template and reset fedora-cvs to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101610.l6AGAiH8019354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-10 12:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-NetAddr-IP New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101612.l6AGCaJZ019618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-07-10 12:12 EST ------- I'm dropping this as part of orphaning my packages. I'll leave the package and spec on the server if someone else wants to pick it up at least this might save them some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:14:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101614.l6AGEvBN019778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 12:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101618.l6AGIRAV020109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-10 12:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-5.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 10 2007 Douglas E. Warner 1.8.9-5 - preserving timestamps on install - removed INSTALL file from docs - updating GTK icon cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101619.l6AGJFsF020470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. I talked with tibbs on IRC, and he didn't really want to get cc's on this package, so I left that off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101622.l6AGMDZF021501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101638.l6AGcHfO023334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 12:38 EST ------- Xavier, first would you give me some example so that I can check if the package works as expected? (I guess that Chitlesh know much and much more than me about gEDA related things. He maintains most of gEDA related packages on Fedora) > GNU Spice GUI is intended to provide a GUI to freely available > Spice electronic cicuit simulators eg.GnuCAP, Ng-Spice. > It uses gNetList to convert schematic files to net list files > and gWave to display simulation results. > gSchem is used as the schematic generation/viewing tool. Is this mean that it is preferable that this package has: "Requires: Ngspice, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist"? (while I cannot find gwave on Fedora, Ngspice, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist is maintained by Chitlesh) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:54:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101654.l6AGswW2024943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 12:54 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------- This package (qtpfsgui) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 16:55:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101655.l6AGt18G025010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 12:54 EST ------- Unfortunately the test suite fails for me because it tries to look up yahoo.com, but mock does not run with a configured DNS server. I inserted perl -pi -e 's/yahoo.com.*//' t/2_namelookup.t before the "make test" line and it runs to completion. I guess the test count should be off but it doesn't seem to bother anything. You could also just delete t/2_namelookup.t. Please make consistent use of macros; don't use both "%{__perl}" and "perl", just pick one. But if you want to pick the macro-ized version, you need to use the macroized versions of rm, make, chmod, etc. as well. You don't need the manual dependency on GeoIP; rpm finds the libGeoIP dependency on its own. Review: * source files match upstream: bede8433e200a433cc0defd198136d5d6dd0580542a92f516a707f4829db0c52 Geo-IP-1.28.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires; see extraneous GeoIP dependency. IP.so()(64bit) perl(Geo::IP) = 1.28 perl(Geo::IP::Record) perl(Geo::Mirror) = 1.0 perl-Geo-IP = 1.28-1.fc8 = ? GeoIP libGeoIP.so.1()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Geo::IP::Record) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) X %check is present, but test fail in mock due to missing DNS services: t/2_namelookup.... # Test 11 got: (t/2_namelookup.t at line 18 fail #11) # Expected: "US" # t/2_namelookup.t line 18 is: ok($country, $exp_country); FAILED test 11 Failed 1/11 tests, 90.91% okay t/3_mirror........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/2_namelookup.t 11 1 9.09% 11 Failed 1/4 test scripts, 75.00% okay. 1/33 subtests failed, 96.97% okay. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101702.l6AH2ed2026197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-07-10 13:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qtpfsgui Short Description: A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images Owners: silfreed at silfreed.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101703.l6AH3Ms7026324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-10 13:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtksourceview2 Short Description: A library for viewing source files Owners: rstrode at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] New: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-0.003-1.src.rpm Description: Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is a Net::DNS::Resolver descendant class that allows a virtual DNS to be emulated instead of querying the real DNS. A set of static DNS records may be supplied, or arbitrary code may be specified as a means for retrieving DNS records, or even generating them on the fly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:23:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101723.l6AHNHWj028296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 13:23 EST ------- Well, as Ralf says, please copy the full URL of your spec/srpm on this bug report so that everyone can check them easily. For packaging issue of 0.8.90-2: * Optflags - From src/Makefile, just --------------------------------------------------- make CC="%{__cxx} %{optflags}" %{_smp_mflags} --------------------------------------------------- may work? * Desktop file - Please explain why you want to set vendor of desktop file as null. - Icon entry has typo. - Should the category of this desktop file be "Utility"? IMO category should contain "Education;Science;Engineering;" and "Utility" is not needed. * Documents - I don't think Makefile should be included as %doc. - and html/ should be a subdirectory of the top documentation directory. - Related to this, Help->Manual complains: -------------------------------------------------------------- The base manual page "gSpiceUI.html" couldn't be found in either of the following locations: /usr/share/gspice/html/ /usr/html/ -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:24:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101724.l6AHObGJ028548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-10 13:24 EST ------- SPEC http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070620snap/scsi-target-utils.spec SRC RPM http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070620snap/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070620snap.fc7.src.rpm Here is update spec and rpm with pretty much all the comments handled. Here are the ones I was not sure of or did not apply or I am working on upstream: 1. GPL file. I guess this one is not required since upstream does not have a licensne file (all the source files have proper headers though), but I am working on getting a license file added to upstream package. 2. W: scsi-target-utils incoherent-init-script-name tgtd I could not figure this one out. 3. doesn't have a reload entry (if it's possible). This does not apply right now. We do not have any values which would be reloaded at this time. 4. Xen Support not being built. This pacakge should be usable with Xen in domU or dom0. However, I am not sure how to do get it build in. Ok, I am not even sure what that means :) Is this asking me to set some sort of Arch flag in the spec file so it gets built into some sort of xen arch? This is an all userspace code package, so I was thinking it would not need anything special. You should be able to install the rpm into any dom and off you go. 5. Naming. The iscsi-initiator-utils naming for iscsi tools and daemon was done before I started, so like I said in comment #7 I kept the same style for the scsi target tools not knowing if this was the preferred scheme or if the person that named iscsi-initiator-utils was on drugs :) If my guess was wrong and you want me to change the package name to just be "tgt" like upstream, let me know and I will reroll. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101733.l6AHXv9V029313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 13:33 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101735.l6AHZDlq029419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247556] Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101735.l6AHZIs6029470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-java - Java runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247556 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101741.l6AHfLVu030074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 13:41 EST ------- Ah.. I just glanced at the spec file of bug 247556 and bug 247557 and noticed that both requires Ice-%{version}.tar.gz to be rebuilt. IMO the package using the same source should be rebuilt at once. i.e. IMO both ice-dotnet and ice-java should be included into ice srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101745.l6AHjW0K030557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:45:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101745.l6AHjbi5030628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-10 13:45 EST ------- Eh. Changed again to just not use %doc. I think this should be final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101748.l6AHmZCJ031024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-07-10 13:48 EST ------- Unfortunately, I don't think that's possible. They're split out separately because they're noarch packages (Java and .Net runtime files only), while the rest of Ice is arch-specific. They both BuildRequire some arch pieces, though, so that's why I included the tarball in the other SRPMSs. The alternative is for ice-java to BuildRequire ice-java-devel and similarly for ice-dotnet, but that seems like it could cause problems on the build system. Actually, even that won't completely work, because ice-dotnet BuildRequires some pieces of ice-dotnet-devel, but ice-dotnet-devel Requires some pkg-config files that are part of ice-dotnet. So that's why I'm doing the bootstrapping thing to build the noarch packages. I asked the fedora-packaging list about this issue a few months ago. Here's a link to the discussion: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00134.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101752.l6AHqOi9031323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-10 13:52 EST ------- I have took a further look to your package. The reported issue with the menu icon is caused by the missing icon file in your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:53:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101753.l6AHruKl031413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 13:53 EST ------- The R packaging guidelines have been updated after the comment that I made based on this error and after the meeting so there are the new version : I think this package will be the last release :-) SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-11.fc6.src.rpm Thank for your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:55:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101755.l6AHthkg031717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-10 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Unfortunately, I don't think that's possible. They're split out separately > because they're noarch packages (Java and .Net runtime files only), while the > rest of Ice is arch-specific. When we are to build in one big srpm, this is not a problem. We can just regard them all as arch-specific. > Actually, even that won't completely work, because ice-dotnet > BuildRequires some > pieces of ice-dotnet-devel, but ice-dotnet-devel Requires some > pkg-config files > that are part of ice-dotnet. Even if you set PKG_CONFIG_PATH? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 17:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101755.l6AHti4O031754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 13:55 EST ------- Actually we're in a packaging committee meeting now. I'll take a look when that's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 18:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101807.l6AI7itq000368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-10 14:07 EST ------- Thanks Jason, I'll build 0.5.1 for Fedora. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysql-proxy Short Description: Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 18:26:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101826.l6AIQHJo002228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-10 14:26 EST ------- > Is this mean that it is preferable that > this package has: > "Requires: Ngspice, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist"? To be able to launch they no need to be installed. but as the description mentioned, for a clean work they should installed. I already asked Chitlesh a schematic to imrpove this package. from comment #6 i'll check this out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 18:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101836.l6AIaHat003455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 14:36 EST ------- OK, this all looks good to me; the .desktop file is gone and the release string looks OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 18:47:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707101847.l6AIlTCS004736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #158554|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #158555|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-10 14:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158881) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158881&action=view) patch to fix remaining issues This patch gets rid of an rpmlint warning about no documentation and fixes the symlinks to the jakarta jars. After it's applied, I think we should be good to go with a review. Before we do the review, though, do we really want the ugly capitalization in the name? Will it terribly upset upstream if we just call it eclipse-quickrex? We can add a virtual Provide for eclipse-QuickREx. Let me know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 19:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] New: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.0.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Microarray analysis methods that use BufferedMatrix objects Another R package :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:04:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102004.l6AK4uRB008879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-10 16:04 EST ------- For xen, there's a XEN=1 target in the makefile that builds.... something. Not sure what, as it doesn't appear to build right at the moment. Wasn't sure if this was intentional or an accident. For %post, the chkconfig --add should not be wrapped in the 'if [ "$1"...' statement. It should probably have a %postun that does condrestart, if the service supports it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:11:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102011.l6AKBiPp009513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-10 16:11 EST ------- Re: name - leave it as scsi-target-utils; that's at least legible as to what the package does (unlike 'tgt'). If you want to bribe upstream into renaming, all the better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] New: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gifsicle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gifsicle-1.48-1.src.rpm Description: Gifsicle is a command-line tool for creating, editing, and getting information about GIF images and animations. Some more gifsicle features: * Batch mode for changing GIFs in place. * Prints detailed information about GIFs, including comments. * Control over interlacing, comments, looping, transparency... * Creates well-behaved GIFs: removes redundant colors, only uses local color tables if it absolutely has to (local color tables waste space and can cause viewing artifacts), etc. * It can shrink colormaps and change images to use the Web-safe palette (or any colormap you choose). * It can optimize your animations! This stores only the changed portion of each frame, and can radically shrink your GIFs. You can also use transparency to make them even smaller. Gifsicle?s optimizer is pretty powerful, and usually reduces animations to within a couple bytes of the best commercial optimizers. * Unoptimizing animations, which makes them easier to edit. * A dumb-ass name. Two other programs are included with gifsicle: gifview is a lightweight animated-GIF viewer which can show animations as slideshows or in real time, and gifdiff compares two GIFs for identical visual appearance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:24:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102024.l6AKOY4I010320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED BugsThisDependsOn| |247704 Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-10 16:24 EST ------- Adding dependency on gifsicle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102024.l6AKOaau010357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216536 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102027.l6AKRfQ9010725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-10 16:27 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.7.1-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.7.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Update to 1.4.7.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102033.l6AKXnHv011225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 16:33 EST ------- OK, it looks like you're using the latest version of the template, so that's good. There is one pending change to the noarch template which you will need to add as well, which is a runtime dependency on R: Requires: R rpmlint does have some complaints, but they are both bogus and explained in the guidelines: W: R-widgetTools one-line-command-in-%post /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh W: R-widgetTools one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh Really, that's about it, so I'll trust you to add that dependency when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102047.l6AKlVg3012789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 16:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-widgetTools Short Description: Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets Owners: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:47:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102047.l6AKlsnp012979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102050.l6AKoV0p013223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-10 16:50 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license included. CLP is BSD-like, the remaining is GPL. Some portability files don't have copyright holder, are simple and may be considered public domain, in my opinion. * follow packaging guidelines * match upstream 3857d3d920180f2b9bac32c7b1a2e276 gifsicle-1.48.tar.gz * Sane Provides * %files section right * build and work fine on devel You should keep the timestamp of the source tarball, for example with wget -N or spectool -g. $ ls -l gifsicle-1.48.tar.gz ../SOURCES/gifsicle-1.48.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 248110 mar 17 00:00 gifsicle-1.48.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 248110 jui 10 21:35 ../SOURCES/gifsicle-1.48.tar.gz This is not a blocker. You could consider putting gifview in a separate package if you want to avoid the dependency on X libraries, but I think this should be left to you. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] New: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Mail-SPF/perl-Mail-SPF.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Mail-SPF-2.005-1.src.rpm Description: Mail::SPF is an object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework (SPF). See http://www.openspf.org for more information about SPF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:54:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102054.l6AKsJjT013638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247642 OtherBugsDependingO| |247476 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 20:54:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102054.l6AKsMrW013683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247705 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:02:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102102.l6AL22t4014698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-10 17:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You should keep the timestamp of the source tarball, for example > with wget -N or spectool -g. Fixed. > You could consider putting gifview in a separate package if > you want to avoid the dependency on X libraries, but I think > this should be left to you. Good idea, I like that. I've updated the spec and src.rpm to produce a separate "gifview" package: Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gifsicle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gifsicle-1.48-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:04:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102104.l6AL4Slu015070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-10 17:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gifsicle Short Description: Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations Owners: orion Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102106.l6AL66HQ015256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:05 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files : SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc-1.14.0-3.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:09:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102109.l6AL9ihg015598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-10 17:09 EST ------- The gifview description should end with a dot, instead of a comma. Another comment is that I think the ChangeLog is too detailed to be usefull, but this is also left to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102112.l6ALC2YJ015869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: FuzzyOcr - |Review Request: FuzzyOcr - |Checks for specific keywords|Checks for specific keywords |in image attachments, using |in image attachments |gocr | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-10 17:12 EST ------- New version here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/spamassassin-FuzzyOcr.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/spamassassin-FuzzyOcr-3.5.1-1.src.rpm * Tue Jul 10 2007 - Orion Poplawski - 3.5.1-1 - Update to 3.5.1 - Change Requires to packages, add gifsicle - Get install from smeserver spec One issue looks like that 3.5.1 does not support SA 3.5.X which is in F-7. May need to make a version based on SVN for those releases - or should I move to svn right now for all releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102114.l6ALEZgw016185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-10 17:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The gifview description should end with a dot, instead of a comma. Oops, fixed. > Another comment is that I think the ChangeLog is too detailed to > be usefull, but this is also left to you. Probably, but I'll keep it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102122.l6ALMNtD017162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:22 EST ------- Based on this review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 I have added the Requires section Here are the new files SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.0.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:23:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102123.l6ALNWCQ017307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:23 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines There are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.14.0-4.fc6.src.rpm Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102126.l6ALQFUT017526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:26 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase-1.14.0-3.fc6.src.rpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102127.l6ALRXMQ017654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:27 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-3.fc6.src.rpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:28:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102128.l6ALSilY017767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:28 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.14.0-4.fc6.src.rpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 21:30:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102130.l6ALUHur017908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-10 17:30 EST ------- Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-maanova-1.4/R-maanova.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-maanova-1.4/R-maanova-1.4.0-2.fc6.src.rpm I am not seeking for a sponsor any more Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:05:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102205.l6AM5OHk022082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-10 18:05 EST ------- Ok i will update it... For now, i've tested the build with cinepaint and it seems that the main oyranos package is needed at runtime...So i expect that oyranos is not multilib compatible. This mean that the libs requires the main package (with binaries) so i will drop the -libs subpackage and ask for adding oyranos to some exclude multilib list... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102227.l6AMRsET024409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-10 18:27 EST ------- Good! So for now ftgl-devel (optionnal) oyranos-devel (optionnal) are missing And lcms >= 0.16 (Required) is missing for FC-6 -(I hope we can update it) I will probably request EL-5 when all dependencies will be avaible... Thx you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cinepaint Short Description: CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:39:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102239.l6AMd93C026017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-10 18:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Is this mean that it is preferable that > this package has: > "Requires: Ngspice, geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist"? yes to geda-gnetlist, but not geda-gschem gspiceui gives the user the choice to either use gnucap or ngspice. gnucap is the default simulator. > (while I cannot find gwave on Fedora, Ngspice, geda-gschem, > geda-gnetlist is maintained by Chitlesh) This review *should* wait till gwave is approved and is released ! otherwise the plot feature of spice simulation won't work! OR one way could be replaced gwave with ngspice built in feature to read a raw file. However I'm not for for going in this direction, because gwave is a very good application to read raw files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102244.l6AMiL6l026535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 18:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:47:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102247.l6AMlTIh026824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 18:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102250.l6AMorfc027267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 18:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 22:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102254.l6AMsfJb027697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 18:54 EST ------- Do you really only want a FC-6 (and devel) branch here? Any reason not to also support F-7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:03:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102303.l6AN3QIa028554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102305.l6AN5tRG028766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102308.l6AN88vE028987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102308.l6AN8uUA029124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102318.l6ANI6J5029975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102318.l6ANIKg3030034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102331.l6ANVqX3031509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-10 19:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gtksourceview2 Updated Fedora Owners: mclasen at redhat.com,rstrode at redhat.com Gah, please add me to the owners, too, so that I can do the initial import. Ray is gone already... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:32:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102332.l6ANWdWI031621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102341.l6ANf1l9032350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 19:40 EST ------- Yes, that looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:41:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102341.l6ANf6sK032392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-10 19:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (I guess that Chitlesh know much and much more than me > about gEDA related things. He maintains most of gEDA related > packages on Fedora) I wrote a simple scenario, a RC circuit. Below I'll describe how Mr Joe or Miss Jane will use this gspiceui. We will simulate the charging process of a capacitor. http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1480/1470/1600/fedora-xcircuit.png http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/cir1.ckt describes the spice netlist of the RC circuit with a different voltage source. We will choose our own voltage source. mkdir gspiceui_test copy cir1.ckt to this directory gspiceui_test cp cir1.ckt cir2.ckt We will work with this cir2.ckt leaving cir1.ckt as a backup. launch gspiceui gspiceui& gspiceui uses either the gnucap or ngspice engine for simulation. First of all, we will start with ngspice, because I maintain it, after if you want you can retry doing the procedures with gnucap. Options -> ngspice (and wait a few secs, till gspiceui configures itself) File -> Open -> choose cir2.ckt now, choose "c" under "component" and choose "Transient" then, change "stop time" to 1 sec. ONE SECOND. You should see the following screenshot: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice1.png then choose "vin" at "Voltage Source". Next to it, is a button called "setup ...". Click on it. Fill the dialog as shown in this screenshot: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice2.png and hit OK Then: Simulate -> Create you should see this screenshot: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice3.png Then: Simulate -> Run you should see this screenshot: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice4.png Till now, without gwave, the user can't do more. Hence the data you saw on the screenshot "gspice4.png", is pretty much useless, unless Mr. Joe or Miss Jane knows "LabPlot". LabPlot is already on fedora repositories. (thanks Mamuro for reviewing that package :)) yum install LabPlot then launch LabPlot. File -> Import "cir2.ngspice.tr" As you can see gspiceui stored the simulated data in the file "cir2.ngspice.tr" see http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice5.png And hit OK: you will see the data properly filled into a spreadsheet.: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice6.png Now we will plot the simulated data, which gspiceui should have done if we have gwave. on labplot, Spreadsheet -> Plot -> 2D Plot (XY) That's it, you should see the charging curve: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/gspice7.png http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/gspiceui/out.lpl you can do the same way with the "gnucap" engine. copy cir1.ckt to cir3.ckt and start the hold process again. I did it I'm satisfied. In this example, we started the simulation with a netlist (a simple text file), but there is another way to do the simulation (from a schematic). If the schematic is imported into gspiceui. gspiceui converts the schematic into a netlist with the help of gnetlist (from geda-gnetlist). Hence the package requires geda-gnetlist. I'm uncertain whether gspiceui should requires: * gnucap or * ngspice or * gnucap and ngspice. I'll vote for both! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:42:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102342.l6ANgVuu032560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-10 19:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > For xen, there's a XEN=1 target in the makefile that builds.... something. Not > sure what, as it doesn't appear to build right at the moment. Wasn't sure if > this was intentional or an accident. Ah, I see my fault. Yeah I did not built that on purpose. The Xen code in tgt is for a Xen SCSI target. It is still in development. It is not ready for fedora. > > For %post, the chkconfig --add should not be wrapped in the 'if [ "$1"...' > statement. > > It should probably have a %postun that does condrestart, if the service supports it. > Ok will fix. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 10 23:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707102344.l6ANix6C032751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 19:44 EST ------- Yeah, I wondered about that... ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110000.l6B00ipW001021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-10 20:00 EST ------- SPEC http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/take2/scsi-target-utils.spec SRC RPM http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/take2/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070620snap.fc7.src.rpm Here is the updated src rpm and spec with your comments handled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110014.l6B0EKgQ001862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:16:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110016.l6B0GgXu002063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-10 20:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > yes to geda-gnetlist, > but not geda-gschem I was wrong. geda-gschem should be among the requires, because of the examples in the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:30:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110030.l6B0UW9l002869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 20:30 EST ------- OK, this builds and installs fine in mock on x86_64 running rawhide. rpmlint says: W: mybashburn spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/mybashburn.1.gz which is easily fixed by setting the permissions to 644 when you install it. Unfortunately when I attempted to test this, all I get is a message flashingg by telling me "Terminal size must be fix, the size now is 80x24 Fai MyBashBurn 1.0.2" and then the program exits. This is on an i386 machine running rawhide. You need to be consistent about your macro usage. If you want to use the macroized forms like %{__sed} then you need to use %{__rm}, %{__install}, %{__cp} and %{__ln}. Don't start the summary with the name of the package. You install CREDITS and HOWTO twice. If they're required as internal help files, they shouldn't also be installed as %doc. Review: * source files match upstream: 058395728c295988c3d633f5a2a25224f25babea6117d4b35c26c7b7b93e0d6a mybashburn-1.0.2.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named X specfile does not use macros consistently. X summary should not start with the name of the package. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: mybashburn = 1.0.2-1.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env cdda2wav cdrdao cdrecord coreutils dialog >= 1.0 dvd+rw-tools eject flac mkisofs vorbis-tools * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. X Manual testing was not at all successful. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X CREDITS and and HOWTO are duplicated. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110032.l6B0Wj6E003069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jeff at ocjtech.us) Bug 222478 depends on bug 222475, which changed state. Bug 222475 Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 20:32 EST ------- Any reason this hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110053.l6B0rWM5004226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 00:59:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110059.l6B0xbqe004589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-10 20:59 EST ------- Thanks. Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:04:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110104.l6B14uEH004931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 21:04 EST ------- Not much to say. * source files match upstream: 8d402260941f259c83bf1b2564408e75288df028f604136c29da11a9a6a076ec Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable-v0.003.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable) perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable = 0.003-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Net::DNS::Packet) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(version) perl(warnings) * %check is present, but there aren't any tests to run. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226298] Merge Review: pirut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110107.l6B17XX6005111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pirut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226298 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-10 21:07 EST ------- As this is approved, I'm closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:12:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110112.l6B1CiJj005351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-10 21:12 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/gspiceui-0.8.90-3.src.rpm SPEC: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/RPMS/gspiceui.spec %Changelog * 0.8.90-3 - cleaned spec file - added schematics to %%docs - added spice models to %%{_datadir}/gEDA/sym/local/ - fixed icon on the menus - filled the missing requires The schematics (sch/*) are now among the %doc However, for Mr Joe and Miss Jane to use them, he/she should copy those schematics to a writable directory. The "libraries" (i.e spice model, here) are hardcoded in the schematics. the user can move the schematics into any directory. I've even move the libraries to the geda-symbol umbrella. Hence all the spice models (symbols) are placed in one and only one place, /usr/share/gEDA/sym/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110117.l6B1HGar005654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |246539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110117.l6B1HIl1005685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247699 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:18:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110118.l6B1IxlA005772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-10 21:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The schematics (sch/*) are now among the %doc > However, for Mr Joe and Miss Jane to use them, he/she should copy those > schematics to a writable directory. (continues) since gspiceui will try to write its generated netlists in that particular directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110119.l6B1J1dH005815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 21:18 EST ------- Ping John. Any news on a updated version addressing issues in comment #20? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110122.l6B1MoWm006066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 21:22 EST ------- Any further news? Hopefully they can work something out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110123.l6B1NBND006120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-10 21:23 EST ------- As of now (yum-3.2, ymp-1.1), the conflict is required because of the dbformat change. The defattr suggestion sounds sane; I'll put that in devel (presuming the acl lets me). So, is it fair to consider this one closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110124.l6B1OF5l006192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-10 21:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable Short Description: Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110125.l6B1PV3s006258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-10 21:25 EST ------- Built on devel, F-7 and FC-6 Requested on Bodhi to push. Closing. Thanks for the review and sponsorship!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:27:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110127.l6B1RQo6006372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-10 21:27 EST ------- Built on devel, F-7 and FC-6 Requested on Bodhi to push. Closing. Thanks for the review and sponsorship!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110135.l6B1ZbLr006957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(dhollis at davehollis| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 21:35 EST ------- It's been a week; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247724] New: Package Updater "error updating doftware" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247724 Summary: Package Updater "error updating doftware" Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: travis_linux at 2into-design.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com >From Fresh Install fedora 7 Issue Stem's from "updated gtk2-engines packages available" was able to download the rest of the 76 downloads without choosing that one error [('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/clearlooks.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/clearlooks.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/crux.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/crux.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/glide.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/glide.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/hc.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/hc.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/industrial.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/industrial.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/mist.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/mist.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/redmond.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/redmond.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/smooth.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/smooth.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/gtk-engines/thinice.xml from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/gtk-engines/thinice.xml', 0L)), ('file /usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc from install of gtk2-engines-2.10.2-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package gtk2-engines-2.10.0-3.fc7', (7, '/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc', 0L))] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110151.l6B1pPNO007832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jeff at ocjtech.us) | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-10 21:51 EST ------- I've been trying to figure out some problems with the build of sofia-sip - the tests fail when being built with koji on the buildsystem and ppc64 won't build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247724] Package Updater "error updating doftware" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110153.l6B1rLLN007983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater "error updating doftware" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247724 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |gtk2-engines ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 21:53 EST ------- This sounds like it should be a bug report against the gtk2-engines package... Can you let us know how and where you submitted it as a new package review? (Changing component) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 01:56:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226666] Merge Review: yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110156.l6B1uo8k008186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-10 21:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Issues: > > * Why is it a BuildRequires: python and not Buildrequires: python-devel? > > * it seems to me that the python-devel BuildRequires should be versionned > then Requires: python >= 2.4 would be autodetected Yum uses a Makefile + python to byte compile the code rather than setup.py, so it wouldn't actually BR: python-devel > * Prereq should be replaced with Requires(preun) and so on... These are fixed up already. > * Is the conflict really needed? pirut >= 1.1.4 should requires a > recent enough yum version. pirut < 1.1.4 would blow up with new yum, so the conflict is needed. Now, whether or not yum in F7 and rawhide should care about older pirut is a different issue... > suggestions: > > * use %defattr(-, root, root, -) instead of %defattr(-, root, root) > > * prefix plugin.conf source file by a disambiguating prefix like > yum-plugin.conf > > * remove the -f to be notified when the file doesn't exist/change name... > rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/yum/yum.conf > > * there is an occurence of /etc hardcoded in the specfile, it could be > %_sysconfdir. However the upstream Makefiles and programs have many > paths hardcoded so this is not really an issue. (There is also a /var > and some /usr, but I guess they are also hardcoded in the package). > > * It seems to me that BuildArch is more used that BuildArchitectures > > * There is no need of / after $RPM_BUILD_ROOT defattr, buildarch, and macro suggestions incorporated in devel. Everyone ok with closing this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 02:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110203.l6B23GmR008501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-10 22:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 02:17:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247724] Package Updater "error updating doftware" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110217.l6B2HRdK009773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater "error updating doftware" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247724 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 02:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110234.l6B2YAKt011251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-07-10 22:34 EST ------- Any movement on this package? It would be great to get PyQt4 into Fedora >=7 because I need it for packaging the new version of Picard (MusicBrainz tagger): http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/PicardQt I can pick up the review, if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 02:37:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226325] Merge Review: pump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110237.l6B2bDLv011477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226325 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-10 22:37 EST ------- Pump doesn't exist in the post-merge world, so this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 02:54:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110254.l6B2swv2012960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-07-10 22:54 EST ------- Alex: feel free to reassign to yourself, if you have time for this :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 03:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110304.l6B34DcD013854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-07-10 23:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Alex: feel free to reassign to yourself, if you have time for this :-) Thanks, I'll wait until I hear from Rex about the status of the package and see how much time I have then... ;) Otherwise, will you continue to review the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 03:04:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247474] python-imaging package for Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110304.l6B34MvY013895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: python-imaging package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247474 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 03:20:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110320.l6B3KrRk015267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-10 23:20 EST ------- I noticed the following in the build log: * checking for working latex ...sh: latex: command not found NO Any idea if the lack of latex causes problems? It seems you're not using the recommended template, which is OK, but... If you're going to use macros like %{__rm}, you need to use them consistently, which means using %{__install}, %{__chmod}, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 03:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110349.l6B3nhKA018113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-10 23:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > Matthias and Ruben, do you want to co-maintain this package? I would definitely be interested in doing so! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 04:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110415.l6B4FedM020521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-11 00:15 EST ------- tgtd.init needs an 'echo' after the daemon call. My only question is with the versioning - if this will use 'normal' versioning and the date is just a prerelease snapshot, it's fine. If it's intended to use the date as the *actual* verison going forward, it should be in %{version}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 04:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247467] Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110435.l6B4ZVhV022597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 00:35 EST ------- These are getting pretty routine now. The only question I have is where the 0.1 version comes from; I couldn't find any mention of a version upstream. I installed this and perhaps I'm dense but I couldn't figure out how to select the language at the beginning. It seems to me that the mouse is supposed to work but for me, at least, it doesn't. Is there something special I need to do in order to enable mouse support in nagi? * source files manually compared with upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for content. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: isabella-coq = 0.1-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme nagi * %check is not present; no upstream test suite. ? Manual testing was not terribly successful. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 05:10:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110510.l6B5AawW026134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 01:10 EST ------- Hi Jason, Thanks for testing it. (In reply to comment #37) > OK, this builds and installs fine in mock on x86_64 running rawhide. rpmlint says: > W: mybashburn spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/mybashburn.1.gz > which is easily fixed by setting the permissions to 644 when you install it. Permissions now are correct, Fixed with: install -p m644 mybashburn.1.gz > Unfortunately when I attempted to test this, all I get is a message flashingg by > telling me "Terminal size must be fix, the size now is 80x24 Fai MyBashBurn > 1.0.2" and then the program exits. This is on an i386 machine running rawhide. This is oks, for that MyBashBurn working correctly when is running in any X term is necessary change the window "default size" manually, it not is a bug, does it draw the windows based on internal dialog program, also attempt that the user obtains best experience using the program, tries yourself for example to execute the program in a size of terminal major to 80x20, later resize terminal minor to 80x20 and you know of that I speak to you, whatever with or without resize it simply function right although it is not seen well. :D Finnally the user only must resize/extend a little the terminal and execute mybashburn, made simply, nevertheless when MyBashBurn is running in any not X terminal it working good. > You need to be consistent about your macro usage. If you want to use the > macroized forms like %{__sed} then you need to use %{__rm}, %{__install}, > %{__cp} and %{__ln}. I do not want to use that command macroized forms, s/%{_sed}/sed/ Fixed. > Don't start the summary with the name of the package. Fixed. > You install CREDITS and HOWTO twice. If they're required as internal help > files, they shouldn't also be installed as %doc. oks, you are right, removed CREDITS and HOWTO of %doc. Finnally thanks for your help on getting this worked out Jason. I've posted an updated mybashburn spec/SRPM on its review request, update files are on web project, please refresh: Spec: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec SRPM: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.2-2.src.rpm (In reply to comment #36) > I'll review this and emesene together > and, if those reviews go well, I'll sponsor you. A warning, though, emesene > might need some work. I'll working on a new emesene based on stable SVN version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 05:44:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110544.l6B5iiCI029144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 01:44 EST ------- 1.- Don't start the summary in perl-Mail-Audit.spec with the name of the package. 2.- On perl-Mail-Audit.spec description tag uses Capital Letters. 3.- You need to be consistent about your macro usage. If you want to use the macroized forms like %{__perl} then you need to use %{__rm}, %{__install}, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 06:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110624.l6B6OQ0h000968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-11 02:24 EST ------- Well my computer is still under FC6... Can I ask for a F7 branch without being able to test the package on my computer ? If I can ask for the F7 branch, then I do :-) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 06:35:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110635.l6B6ZZFl001745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2007-07-11 02:35 EST ------- I am stooping working on this package as there is another development seeing on http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-mentors-list/2007-June/msg00000.html. I apologize for delaying packaging as I have lost interesting of packaging this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 06:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226666] Merge Review: yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110641.l6B6fOJX002100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-11 02:41 EST ------- Ok, with me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 06:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110652.l6B6qQH3002961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-11 02:52 EST ------- Ok, here we go with the new fixed TECkit: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/teckit/ The only remaining issue is: W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit_Compiler.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.0 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit_Compiler.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.0 W: teckit unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libTECkit.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 but according to: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-January/msg00158.html and the following discussion it could be safely neglected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 06:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110657.l6B6vIJh003296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-11 02:57 EST ------- I think that I have fixed the error, I just added tetex-latex has a BR. I have also change the macro to the normal one, there are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-4.fc6.src.rpm Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 08:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110822.l6B8M1GL010517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 04:21 EST ------- Some fixed already for review: - naming convention for svn checkout present - Fixed summary, description, and files in %docs rpmlint is silent, package builds in mock is ok. Here is the update: Spec URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtachira.org/review/emesene-1.0-2.20070711svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 08:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110841.l6B8f3bI012761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-11 04:40 EST ------- #176582#c6 says that > FESCo voted against allowing ipsvd to link statically against dietlibc in > Fedora. I don't see how the outcome could be different for this package, but if > you want it to also be voted upon, please say so. Same for this package. Packages depending on this were revoked, so I am refusing also this one. If you feel that it was an incorrect decision, please reopen and let me know. Also, if you would use the same reasoning as in #176582#c2, please do not bother to reopen. Arguments like "are implemented correctly" are not only just not good enough FESCo, but for everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 08:47:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707110847.l6B8lUFT013564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-07-11 04:47 EST ------- Urlview is removed from mutt-1.5.16-2.fc8. Description and requires should be also fixed. I didn't remove the noreplace flag for /etc/Muttrc as I still think it's better to allow the users to have a different system-wide config without forcing them to undo the settings provided by the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:30:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111130.l6BBU7RL029432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-11 07:30 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111137.l6BBbhhI030044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-11 07:37 EST ------- all that's missing is a review(er), only outstanding issues are those from comment #27. Patches welcome. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111140.l6BBeSCt030282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-11 07:40 EST ------- Fine with me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111140.l6BBedWk030396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-07-11 07:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gconf-cleaner Short Description: A Cleaning tool for GConf Owners: splinux at fedoraproject.org Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111140.l6BBehon030428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-07-11 07:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hippo-canvas New Branches: OLPC-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226666] Merge Review: yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111148.l6BBmZmJ031350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111149.l6BBnOl6031438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:57:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111157.l6BBvZUZ032311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-11 07:57 EST ------- 1. sourceforge url should be corrected as stated in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL?highlight=%28sourceforge%29#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 2. URL should now be: http://bluetooth.kmobiletools.org/ 3. I'm experiencing crashes (everytime) on clicking on: * Configuration -> Input Devices * connect (crash) * Add new devices - > setup (crash) (The application KInputWizard (kinputwizard) crashed and caused the signall 11 (SIGSEGV) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 11:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111157.l6BBvxTI032456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-11 07:57 EST ------- SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-quickrex.spec SRPMS http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.src.rpm I'm think that upstream guy should no worry about the name but to be sure I have add a Provides tag. Above patch is applied and I have also renaming some other things according with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:02:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247467] Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111202.l6BC2wgJ000538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 08:02 EST ------- Whoops. Good catch, one i should have made. This one requires AGIMouse, which I can't find. So do a few others I haven't submitted, and now won't. I thought there was a keyboard workaround, but there isn't. Withdrawn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111209.l6BC9skT001016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] New: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/naturette/naturette.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/naturette/naturette-1.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Naturette was made using AgiStudio. Naturette must find eight diamonds to go back to her house. Contains nude scenes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:25:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111225.l6BCPL1q001809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 08:25 EST ------- Built for EPEL5. Brandon, any ETA on building Mail-Mime for 4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:32:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111232.l6BCWf2R002454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2007-07-11 08:32 EST ------- This hasn't appeared in updates even though I requested it via the new F7 webtool. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111243.l6BCh13E003441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 12:52:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111252.l6BCqnRs004658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-11 08:52 EST ------- Gilboa, please consider Chitlesh's suggestions 1,2 as SHOULD items as well. (3) looks like a bug, that afaic, can be addressed post-review (provided the app WORKSFORU, I don't have bluetooth to test myself). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 13:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111318.l6BDIE7u007519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-11 09:18 EST ------- Okay, here's the modification request. For some reason I still do not have access rights to modify the fedora-cvs flag. Could someone with privileges do that? Thanks Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: memcached Updated Owners: lindner at inuus.com,matthias at rpmforge.net Updated CC: lindner at inuus.com,matthias at rpmforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 13:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111325.l6BDPVRs008630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-07-11 09:25 EST ------- If you mean you've marked it as "stable" yet, you still need to wait for rel-eng to push it into the repo. [The bodhi terminology is highly confusing. ldapvi-1.7-1.fc7 is listed as a "Pending update" here https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pending?tg_paginate_limit=63 with a "-" in the "submitted" column, although ghenry is listed as the submitter.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 13:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111328.l6BDSHmw008906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(opensource at till.na| |me) | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-07-11 09:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It doesn't look like this has been built yet. Please build it and either close > the ticket or reference this ticket when you push to F7 and bodhi will close it. Yes, the first time I wanted to build it, koji had an unexpected outage, than I forgot and now it will not build on x86_64 and therefore it does not build for any arch. Buildlog: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=61510&name=build.log I will try to build it sometime only for i386 to see, whether this would fail on the buildsystem, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 13:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111341.l6BDfmBt010295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 14:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111435.l6BEZU8U016406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-07-11 10:35 EST ------- Fixed the group entry , http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/compiz-bcop/compiz-bcop-0.1.3-0.6.20070711git.fc7.src.rpm I have a question about devel package, compiz-bcop is used only by people who are going to build compiz plugins and the package only contains 3 files. A shell script, a xslt file, and the .pc file (which is mainly to tell Makefiles of compiz plugins that the bcop script is installed). Is it really required to separate the script and the pkgconfig file to different rpms? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 14:46:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111446.l6BEkfFE017653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 10:46 EST ------- The UTF-8 issue seems to be fixed. But I disagree agains you opion about the changelog entry. You should write: %changelog * Sun Jul 08 2007 Ralf Ertzinger 0.2.0-0.2 - Initial build for Fedora Ths dist tag should not appear in the changelog entry. As far as I understand the warning, I have complainted, the program try to use an unswappable chunk of memory to store the password. It will be nice, if you can examinate this, but his will not be a blocker for approving your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 14:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111454.l6BEskG5018304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-11 10:54 EST ------- The new version (0.5) of texlive-texmf is now available from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ Main features are that the style list is derived directly from teTeX so no important one should be missing. Also the total size of the texmf srpm is now about 180M. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111505.l6BF5tLe019476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247615 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-11 11:05 EST ------- The new TeXLive binaries package (0.5) is now available again from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ and thanks to cooperation with David Walluck it contains many enhancements: - separated kpathsea from texlive-fonts - applied patches from Debian, SuSE and Mandriva TeXLive distros - TeXLive now links against system freetype2/t1lib - removed kpathsea library building hacks - disabled ttf2pk, so that a dependency on type1 is no more needed - fixed perl requires Jochen, the principle of the texlive-errata scheme is to ship only updated styles to the texmf tree so that the huge texmf package needn't to be pushed as a whole when only a few styles are updated. deltarpm is tricky here as some files are configs/ghosted and frequently modified and so that deltarpm would download the whole package anyway in most cases, therefore the texlive-errata scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111505.l6BF5wCE019496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |242416 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111518.l6BFI8Ao021450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:18 EST ------- qgis-0.8.1-11.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111517.l6BFHrKP021320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:17 EST ------- libp11-0.2.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111518.l6BFIUdJ021582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:18 EST ------- msmtp-1.4.12-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111518.l6BFIhIM021626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:18 EST ------- qtpfsgui-1.8.9-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111519.l6BFJvfH022106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:19 EST ------- astyle-1.21-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111520.l6BFKEo1022204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.21-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111520.l6BFKNx1022296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:20 EST ------- mrxvt-0.5.2-9.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:20:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111520.l6BFKVlr022340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.5.2-9.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111520.l6BFKwAe022492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|242416 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 11:20 EST ------- Fixed: + %{_smp_mflags} added + Empty file was removed from the %doc section + Include whole directory %{_include]/teckit/ + Mock build works fine for Devel (x86_64, i386, ppc64, ppc) Need work: - License.txt refers to two other files which contains the verbatim text of the licenses Accepted unfixed issues: The ununsed-direct-shlib-dependency issue is not a blocker for approvement. It may be nice, if you can notify upstream for fixing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111521.l6BFL1b2022543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|247615 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111521.l6BFLCWY022601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-11 11:21 EST ------- coco-coq-0.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247273] Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111521.l6BFLI7B022653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coco-coq - An AGI Adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247273 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.1-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:38:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111538.l6BFcP9U025464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-11 11:38 EST ------- The remaining licenses are now added in 0.3. I notified upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111544.l6BFiPmt026299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 11:44 EST ------- Package doesn't fullfill the licensing requirements of the Fedora project. The License tas says 'Redistributable, no modification permitted' If you not permitted to make modifications, then this is not a open source license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:45:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247467] Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111545.l6BFjTGQ026423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 11:45 EST ------- Looking through /etc/nagi it looks like it supports mouse input but needs to be enabled somehow. Perhaps with some experimentation you could get it working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111547.l6BFlj5d026736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 11:47 EST ------- This license was specifically OKd by Spot, see:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111555.l6BFtpuV027603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 11:55 EST ------- I know I built this on x86_64 but it now doesn't build in mock for me either. Try disabling parallel make; it seems to have worked for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:58:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111558.l6BFw6SZ027844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 15:59:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111559.l6BFxCOT028078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111600.l6BG0d4g028391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Flag|fedora-review- | ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 12:00 EST ------- I cant see any comment from Spot on the link you fefer too. Because you review request don't agree with my opion of the open source distribution, I will reopen the bug for anyone else who want to review your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111605.l6BG5PNl029111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jochen at herr-schmitt.de |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 12:05 EST ------- This is content, not source, and the license, while perhaps not optimal, is acceptable for content in Fedora, just the same as the firmware licenses are. I'll review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111606.l6BG6lgJ029273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 12:06 EST ------- My mistake, I was thinking of discussion around nagi. "Redistributable, no modification permitted" is a valid Fedora license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111610.l6BGAeLI029800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-11 12:10 EST ------- It's ok to ask for a branch without being able to test, except if you have reason to think that it wont work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111616.l6BGGDZm030256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-11 12:16 EST ------- Then :-)... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-widgetTools Short Description: Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets Owners: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111618.l6BGIkGH030538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-11 12:18 EST ------- Leaving the dist tag out of the changelog entry does not make rpmlint happy, either. It will complain as long as the E-V-R of the package and the E-V-R of the latest changelog entry do not match. As I said, the final build will not have this problem since both the package E-V-R and the changelog E-V-R will be 0.2.0-1.fc8 (for the rawhide build) The secure ram warning is about mlock() (marking a part of memory unswappable). mlock() requires root privileges. This seems to be used all over the place in pwsafe, and I do not feel comfortable at all about letting this effectively run as root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:29:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111629.l6BGTi2E031767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 12:29 EST ------- >From my view, I have interpreted AGI like an interpreter, which should execute the game, which you will package in your review request. In this case the situation is simular to for example a perl programm which will be executed by a perl interpreter. AFAIK in this case the above license may be not valid for this case. So I think, this is a boundary issue between pasive content and code which will be interpreted by a game engine like a program by an interpreter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:29:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111629.l6BGTvoh031828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 12:29 EST ------- >From my view, I have interpreted AGI like an interpreter, which should execute the game, which you will package in your review request. In this case the situation is simular to for example a perl programm which will be executed by a perl interpreter. AFAIK in this case the above license may be not valid for this case. So I think, this is a boundary issue between pasive content and code which will be interpreted by a game engine like a program by an interpreter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:34:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247704] Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111634.l6BGY0uv032158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-11 12:33 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. Added to comps. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111634.l6BGY1pc032183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 Bug 216536 depends on bug 247704, which changed state. Bug 247704 Summary: Review Request: gifsicle - Powerful program for manipulating GIF images and animations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247704 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:35:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247840] New: php-pear maintainer update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247840 Summary: php-pear maintainer update Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,fedora at famillecollet.com,notting at redha t.com,rpm at timj.co.uk Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear Updated Fedora Owners: jorton at redhat.com,rpm at timj.co.uk,fedora at famillecollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:35:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247840] php-pear maintainer update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111635.l6BGZaRt032335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247840 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111636.l6BGaoMh032472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-07-11 12:36 EST ------- Oops. sorry. didnt know about the new template issue. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xoo Short Description: Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest Owners: paul at xelerance.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: paul at xelerance.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:39:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111639.l6BGdxTS000317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-11 12:39 EST ------- I just got a bluetooth usb stick for my birthday. I can take up the review but will only approve if i can get minimum my usb stick working (It's working with gnome-bluetooth, up to now). However I would recommend anyone helping this review to take a look how kubuntu got its kdebluetooth integrated into the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111641.l6BGfJoX000675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111646.l6BGkP4A001333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 12:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Leaving the dist tag out of the changelog entry does not make rpmlint happy, > either. It will complain as long as the E-V-R of the package and the E-V-R of > the latest changelog entry do not match. I have to disagree with your. For demonstration please look at: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pwsafe/pwsafe-0.2.0-0.2.fc7.src.rpm You will find out, that this source rpm makes rpmlint happy. > The secure ram warning is about mlock() (marking a part of memory unswappable). > mlock() requires root privileges. This seems to be used all over the place in > pwsafe, and I do not feel comfortable at all about letting this effectively run > as root. That is ok. It may be nice, if you can contact the upstream to make your improvements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111646.l6BGkx3b001385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-11 12:46 EST ------- Chitlesh, thanks. I think we've got things pretty well in hand review-wise, but feedback on functionality is certainly always welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 16:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111649.l6BGn7LO001662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-07-11 12:49 EST ------- I grabbed them from devel. Missing BuildRequires: > Checking if your kit is complete... > Looks good > Warning: prerequisite Digest::SHA 5.23 not found. > Writing Makefile for Net::DNS::SEC Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86_64/f7 [x] Rpmlint output: [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : a87e3e4c8467ea2d64408abae2abcfc6 MD5SUM upstream package: a87e3e4c8467ea2d64408abae2abcfc6 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Missing Digest::SHA >= 5.23 [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: not tested because some BuildRequires haven't propagated yet [ ] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: x86_64/f7 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [ ] File based requires are sane. APPROVED if the missing buildrequire is added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111702.l6BH2eXL002784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-11 13:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > 3. I'm experiencing crashes (everytime) on clicking on: > * Configuration -> Input Devices > * connect (crash) > * Add new devices - > setup (crash) > (The application KInputWizard (kinputwizard) crashed and caused the signall 11 > (SIGSEGV) Someone on suse is experiencing the same crashes: http://bluetooth.kmobiletools.org/uieforum?c=showthread&ThreadID=8 http://bluetooth.kmobiletools.org/uieforum?c=showthread&ThreadID=9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:08:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111708.l6BH8EvP003344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-11 13:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > tgtd.init needs an 'echo' after the daemon call. > Fixed. I also found another missing echo. > My only question is with the versioning - if this will use 'normal' versioning > and the date is just a prerelease snapshot, it's fine. Yeah, the date versioning is temporary. Those data based tarballs are for users that do not want to grab what is in git and so distros can download something right now. When we do a real first release, we will use a more normal X.Y.Z naming. SPEC http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/take3/scsi-target-utils.spec SRC RPM http://people.redhat.com/mchristi/target/FC7/rpm/scsi-target-utils/take3/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070620snap.fc7.src.rpm Here are links to the updated rpms and spec (spec is the same, just a udpdated tgtd.init in the src rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111713.l6BHDcHB003806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 13:13 EST ------- Builds OK, installs and plays fine. rpmlint says: E: naturette zero-length /usr/share/naturette/snddir which is normal for AGI games which don't include sound. * source files manually compared with upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for content. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: naturette = 1.3-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme nagi * %check is not present; no upstream test suite. Seems fine with manual testing. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop file looks OK and installs without errors. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:18:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111718.l6BHIe4t004185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From tdavis at beeble.homelinux.net 2007-07-11 13:18 EST ------- beta3 should not be released as-is; there is more fixes in the SVN repo at http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/pim/kdebluetooth that should be used, including what appears to be fixed for the kinputwizard crash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111721.l6BHLfia004617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-07-11 13:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I know I built this on x86_64 but it now doesn't build in mock for me either. > Try disabling parallel make; it seems to have worked for me. This makes koji happy, too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111733.l6BHXTHx005863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 13:33 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: naturette Short Description: An AGI adventure game Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111743.l6BHhOw2006739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-11 13:43 EST ------- Re 6/7: In what way would licensing restrictions differ between code and content? In any case, AGI files are best described as a mix between code and content. Open an AGI game in agistudio and look at LOGDIR and VIEWDIR to see what I mean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111744.l6BHidRe006884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-11 13:44 EST ------- Hey Paul, so am I. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 17:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] New: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit-0.8-3.src.rpm Description: This R package contains functions for fitting simultaneous systems of linear and nonlinear equations using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Weighted Least Squares (WLS), Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR), Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), Weighted Two-Stage Least Squares (W2SLS), Three-Stage Least Squares (3SLS), and Weighted Three-Stage Least Squares (W3SLS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] New: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-mvtnorm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-mvtnorm-0.7-2.src.rpm Description: This R package computes multivariate normal and t probabilities, quantiles and densities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:42:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111842.l6BIgNZ6013466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-11 14:42 EST ------- Hi Alphonse, I've finished the review. Lines prefixed with a '?' are where I have a question. Those beginning with a '*' are fine and those marked with an 'X' indicate they must be fixed. The 'MUST' and 'SHOULD' headers just reflect the sections here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?action=show&redirect=PackageReviewGuidelines MUST: ? package is named appropriately - can we get confirmation from upstream about the capitalization issue? I just don't want to go against their wishes. Otherwise, it's fine. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - while I can't verify the md5sum of your tarball, I don't get any differences on a diff of the exploded tarball so I think we're fine. The instructions are also clear. - my only concern is the build.properties and feature.xml files -- did upstream author these or did you? can they not be included upstream? I thought package-build worked fine with packages that didn't have features - does it not? I guess I just want to know what the purpose of these files is and whether or not they will go upstream at some point :) . * no typos in the summary or description * buildroot fine, although this is now the most recommended value: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) * %{?dist} used properly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.src.rpm eclipse-quickrex.src:145: W: strange-permission fetch-quickrex.sh 0764 Can we make it 0755 or something? X changelog fine except for extra space in first line: * Thu Jul 5 2007 Alphonse Van Assche 3.5.0-2 ^ * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary * make sure lines are <= 80 characters - lines that are > 80 are necessary IMO * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no static libraries * no rpath * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary X macros used appropriately and consistently - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- pick one :) * no %makeinstall * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * Requires(pre,post) split into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code and documentation * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions okay; %defattrs present * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * final provides and requires of the binary RPMs fine $ rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/i386/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm QuickREx.jar.so eclipse-QuickREx = 3.5.0-2.fc7 eclipse-quickrex = 3.5.0-2.fc7 $ rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/i386/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh eclipse-platform >= 3.2.1 jakarta-oro java-gcj-compat java-gcj-compat libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcj_bc.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libz.so.1 regexp rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) * rpmlint output when run on the binary RPMs $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar /usr/share/java/regexp.jar eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar /usr/share/java/regexp.jar eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar /usr/share/java/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar /usr/share/java/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar - I think these are fine and I've never been told otherwise :). SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I didn't try but I don't anticipate any problems. Alphonse, can you try this? * package functions as expected (as far as I can tell) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111842.l6BIgxUk013530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2007-07-11 14:42 EST ------- You could name it 3.5.1 and add the SVN changes as a patch - you can get that from the upstream's trac. Eg: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/changeset? format=diff&new=131&old=125&new_path=trunk%2Fdevel&old_path=trunk%2Fdevel Revision 125 was 3.5.1 You can see a summary of all the changes here: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/log/trunk/devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111848.l6BImd7Y014155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 14:48 EST ------- Normally I don't care at all about Group:, but I do wonder why you think Applications/Productivity is appropriate The -devel package must have a dependency on the non-devel package. The manual R dependency unnecessary for arch-specific R packages, but I don't think it's a blocker. You are missing some %doc directories. These are all listed out in the template. You don't own the top-level directory of the package. This, too, is listed in the template. Review: * source files match upstream: 452483454bf11c7d6484164776feccb26e10597df78a9eb7dd8111c209f88af3 BufferedMatrix_1.0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. X final provides and requires: R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm BufferedMatrix.so()(64bit) R-BufferedMatrix = 1.0.1-4.fc8 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) R-BufferedMatrix-devel-1.0.1-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm R-BufferedMatrix-devel = 1.0.1-4.fc8 = X (no dependencies) * %check is present and all tests pass: checking tests ... Running 'Rcodetesting.R' Running 'c_code_level_tests.R' Running 'objectTesting.R' Running 'rawCalltesting.R' OK * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X doesn't own ..R/library/BufferedMatrix * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (R index creation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:49:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111849.l6BInElv014204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-11 14:49 EST ------- Amended change request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: memcached Updated Owners: lindner at inuus.com,matthias at rpmforge.net,ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Updated CC: lindner at inuus.com,matthias at rpmforge.net,ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 18:53:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111853.l6BIrISP014858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-07-11 14:53 EST ------- ping. are you still interested in submitting this to Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111903.l6BJ3q7w016076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-11 15:03 EST ------- For 2.1.2-2: * Timestamps - For this package, please add 'INSTALL="%{__install} -p"' option to "make install" to keep timestamps. * Requires - "Requires: freetype2" in pkgconfig .pc file means that -devel package must have "Requires: freetype-devel" - And more Requires is needed for .pc file (so -devel package). Please check: /usr/include/FTGL/FTGL.h * BuildRequires - Remove redundant BuildRequires. For example: - freeglut-devel Requires libGL-devel, libGLU-devel - libXmu-devel Requires libX11-devel ? Demo program - Still demo program has to be removed? * %clean ------------------------------------------------ %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT unix/__doc ------------------------------------------------ - Why unix/__doc is needed here? At the end, all files under building directory will be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111905.l6BJ55LB016287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 15:05 EST ------- Another clean Perl module.... * source files match upstream: b8ffb09c538bf4fe3b79ff45dad942879fec9c975a08243c0a59ab3e92439b8a Mail-SPF-v2.005.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Mail::SPF) perl(Mail::SPF::Base) perl(Mail::SPF::EAbstractClass) perl(Mail::SPF::EClassMethod) perl(Mail::SPF::EDNSError) perl(Mail::SPF::EDNSTimeout) perl(Mail::SPF::EDuplicateGlobalMod) perl(Mail::SPF::EInstanceMethod) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidMacro) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidMacroString) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidMech) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidMechQualifier) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidMod) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidOptionValue) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidRecordVersion) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidScope) perl(Mail::SPF::EInvalidTerm) perl(Mail::SPF::EJunkInRecord) perl(Mail::SPF::EJunkInTerm) perl(Mail::SPF::EMacroExpansionCtxRequired) perl(Mail::SPF::ENoAcceptableRecord) perl(Mail::SPF::ENoUnparsedText) perl(Mail::SPF::ENothingToParse) perl(Mail::SPF::EOptionRequired) perl(Mail::SPF::EProcessingLimitExceeded) perl(Mail::SPF::EReadOnlyValue) perl(Mail::SPF::ERecordSelectionError) perl(Mail::SPF::ERedundantAcceptableRecords) perl(Mail::SPF::ESyntaxError) perl(Mail::SPF::ETermDomainSpecExpected) perl(Mail::SPF::ETermIPv4AddressExpected) perl(Mail::SPF::ETermIPv4PrefixLengthExpected) perl(Mail::SPF::ETermIPv6AddressExpected) perl(Mail::SPF::ETermIPv6PrefixLengthExpected) perl(Mail::SPF::EUnexpectedTermObject) perl(Mail::SPF::Exception) perl(Mail::SPF::GlobalMod) perl(Mail::SPF::MacroString) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::A) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::All) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::Exists) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::IP4) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::IP6) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::Include) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::MX) perl(Mail::SPF::Mech::PTR) perl(Mail::SPF::Mod) perl(Mail::SPF::Mod::Exp) perl(Mail::SPF::Mod::Redirect) perl(Mail::SPF::PositionalMod) perl(Mail::SPF::Record) perl(Mail::SPF::Request) perl(Mail::SPF::Result) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::Error) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::Fail) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::Neutral) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::NeutralByDefault) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::None) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::Pass) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::PermError) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::SoftFail) perl(Mail::SPF::Result::TempError) perl(Mail::SPF::SenderIPAddrMech) perl(Mail::SPF::Server) perl(Mail::SPF::Term) perl(Mail::SPF::UnknownMod) perl(Mail::SPF::Util) perl(Mail::SPF::v1::Record) perl(Mail::SPF::v2::Record) perl-Mail-SPF = 2.005-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Error) perl(Mail::SPF::Exception) perl(Mail::SPF::MacroString) perl(Mail::SPF::Mod) perl(Mail::SPF::Record) perl(Mail::SPF::Request) perl(Mail::SPF::Result) perl(Mail::SPF::Server) perl(Mail::SPF::Util) perl(Net::DNS) >= 0.58 perl(Net::DNS::Resolver) perl(NetAddr::IP) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(URI) >= 1.13 perl(URI::Escape) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(version) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: t/00.00-class-misc............ok t/00.01-class-util............ok t/00.02-class-request.........ok t/00.03-class-result..........ok t/00.04-class-server..........ok t/00.05-class-macrostring.....ok t/00.99-class-misc............ok t/10.00-rfc4408...............skipped all skipped: Mail::SPF::Test required for testing Mail::SPF's RFC compliance t/10.01-rfc4406...............skipped all skipped: Mail::SPF::Test required for testing Mail::SPF's RFC compliance t/90-author-pod-validation....ok All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=10, Tests=155, 142 wallclock secs ( 1.55 cusr + 0.32 csys = 1.87 CPU) (Skipped tests require a module not yet in Fedora) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111907.l6BJ7lXx016643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-11 15:07 EST ------- By the way, would you have a time to review my package ( bug 246716 )? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111921.l6BJLJGA017920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-07-11 15:21 EST ------- Ping. Any updates on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:24:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111924.l6BJOCwp018296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 15:24 EST ------- OK, looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 8f8fa7722c82a27130224828629b8c680eb99e15e562d17e02d57c3f097826ea Gearman-Client-Async-0.94.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Gearman::Client::Async) = 0.94 perl(Gearman::Client::Async::Connection) perl(Gearman::ResponseParser::Async) perl-Gearman-Client-Async = 0.94-3.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Danga::Socket) >= 1.52 perl(Gearman::Client::Async::Connection) perl(Gearman::JobStatus) perl(Gearman::Objects) perl(Gearman::ResponseParser) perl(Gearman::Task) perl(Gearman::Util) perl(IO::Handle) perl(List::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Socket) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(fields) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=32, 26 wallclock secs ( 1.48 cusr + 0.55 csys = 2.03 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226666] Merge Review: yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111944.l6BJimQc020476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226666 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-11 15:44 EST ------- You should keep timestamps of installed files, for example you could use install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/yum/yum-updatesd.conf For the file are installed by make install nothing can be done, maybe it should be suggested to upstream to use $(INSTALL) instead of install, and set INSTALL = install In any case, this is not blocking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111949.l6BJnW3n020872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-11 15:49 EST ------- I think you understand me not in the right way. I saw, that the license.txt doesn't contains the verbatim copy of ever the LGPL or the CPL. But the package should comtains the verbatim text of the license if abailable. So your statement make no sense from my point of view. If you say, that the package should release under the term of the LGPL, you have to distribute the file with the verbatim text of the LGPL with your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 19:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707111952.l6BJqwVs021401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-07-11 15:52 EST ------- Spec: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/rpms/dbench.spec SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/rpms/dbench-3.04-2.src.rpm New rpms - patch added to have the Makefile.in install the client.txt to the correct location and have dbench.c look for the file in the correct location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112001.l6BK1Aqa022792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-11 16:01 EST ------- Ok I have the requires on the devel package I have corrected the files section I have change the Group I have change the Requires to: Requires(post): R Requires(postun): R Sorry for these stupids mistakes I should have been more carreful... There are the new files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferefMatrix/R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-5.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246403] Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112009.l6BK9eum023876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-proxy - A proxy for the MySQL Client/Server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246403 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112012.l6BKCBKN024344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-07-11 16:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gearman-Client-Async Short Description: Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112020.l6BKKMkh025790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 16:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.14-2.src.rpm Also added some example scripts into the documentation. Full diff of the spec file (the only thing changed) is below: diff -u perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec.old perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec --- perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec.old 2007-07-11 13:19:40.000000000 -0700 +++ perl-Net-DNS-SEC.spec 2007-07-11 13:17:30.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Version: 0.14 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: DNSSEC modules for Perl License: GPL or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Math::BigInt) BuildRequires: perl(Time::Local) BuildRequires: perl(Digest::BubbleBabble) -BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA1) +BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA) # neither are picked up automagically. Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) @@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc Changes README TODO demo/* +%doc Changes README TODO +%doc demo/ %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Wed Jul 11 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.14-2 +- BuildRequire Digest::SHA +- include the demo scripts in the documentation + * Wed Apr 18 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.14-1 - Initial version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:25:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112025.l6BKPWo5026520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-11 16:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > i will review this thanks. final upload is at http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-4.src.rpm Please review that build, it has the known problems basically fixed, the major rpmlint problems have been fixed, the remaining warnings and errors should be ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:29:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112029.l6BKTfQg027248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-11 16:29 EST ------- Works for me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:32:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112032.l6BKWmOb027789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-11 16:32 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/ohm-0.1.1-0.fc8.i386.rpm W: ohm service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ohmd [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/ohm-devel-0.1.1-0.fc8.i386.rpm W: ohm-devel no-documentation both are ignorable, imo package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license file: ok license file included: ok spec file language: ok spec file readability: excellent upstream sources: ok buildable: ok BRs: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: BAD, -devel must require pkgconfig for /usr/lib/pkgconfig file list dupes: ok defattr: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok doc package: n/a %doc: ok headers: ok static libs: n/a .pc files: BAD, see above shared libs: ok -devel requires base: ok la files: ok desktop file: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: BAD, must do rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install utf8 filenames: ok Two mustfix items, and one whishlist item, then you are good to go: - Must require pkgconfig in -devel - Must clean buildroot in %install - Should include AUTHORS and README in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112034.l6BKYAcU028041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-11 16:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > The script /usr/libexec/bacula/make_catalog_backup only works for the > mysql-backend. It should be rewritten to use the alternatives system. I have > installed the following director packages: Noticed that problem. During building different variables are changed in the file. I'm not sure what the right solution is ATM, whether I'll just roll a new backup-catalog script to select the right database at runtime or if the script should be packaged for each backend and added to the alternatives system. This will be fixed before initial import into fedora though and should not be a blocker for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112036.l6BKabLW028419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-11 16:36 EST ------- http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-4.src.rpm is the right url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:43:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112043.l6BKhdqE029380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-11 16:43 EST ------- Cool, thanks for that. I've fixed all the issues you mentioned. New SRPM here: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/ohm-0.1.1-0.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112045.l6BKjLUJ029779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-11 16:45 EST ------- We're going to need jetty for Eclipse 3.3 so I'm going to re-open this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:47:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112047.l6BKlf3A030153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-11 16:47 EST ------- Ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:51:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] New: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-multcomp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-multcomp-0.992-1.src.rpm Description: This R package contains functions for simultaneous tests and confidence intervals for general linear hypotheses in parametric models, including linear, generalized linear, linear mixed effects, and survival models. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 20:51:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112051.l6BKpRh0030833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247894 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 21:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212513] Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112142.l6BLgOc2005142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-07-11 17:42 EST ------- Please transfer ownership of sparse on all branches to Roland McGrath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 21:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112147.l6BLl6Rl005763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 17:47 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-3.src.rpm A couple more clean-ups for newer pecl buildrequires needed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 21:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112152.l6BLqGBl006310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-11 17:52 EST ------- SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-quickrex.spec SRPMS http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-3.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #8) > MUST: > ? package is named appropriately > - can we get confirmation from upstream about the capitalization issue? > I just don't want to go against their wishes. Otherwise, it's fine. Have just send a mail to Bastian (upstream guy), normally that should be ok. > X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - while I can't verify the md5sum of your tarball, I don't get any > differences on a diff of the exploded tarball so I think we're fine. > The instructions are also clear. > - my only concern is the build.properties and feature.xml files -- did > upstream author these or did you? can they not be included upstream? > I thought package-build worked fine with packages that didn't have > features - does it not? I guess I just want to know what the purpose > of these files is and whether or not they will go upstream at some > point :) . I have send both to Bastian and he should include a feature for the next release, so I have fake it for the moment. > X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.src.rpm > eclipse-quickrex.src:145: W: strange-permission fetch-quickrex.sh 0764 > > Can we make it 0755 or something? fixed > X changelog fine except for extra space in first line: > * Thu Jul 5 2007 Alphonse Van Assche 3.5.0-2 fixed > X macros used appropriately and consistently > - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- pick one :) fixed > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps fixed > * rpmlint output when run on the binary RPMs > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm > eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: dangling-symlink > > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar > /usr/share/java/regexp.jar > eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-regexp-1.4.jar > /usr/share/java/regexp.jar > eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: dangling-symlink > > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar > /usr/share/java/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar > eclipse-quickrex.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.babe.eclipse.plugins.QuickREx_3.5.0/lib/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar > /usr/share/java/jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar > > - I think these are fine and I've never been told otherwise :). :) > ? package should build in mock > - I didn't try but I don't anticipate any problems. Alphonse, can you > try this? Naturally ;-), yeah the package build nicely with mock. I have run rpmlint on the binary package build in mock and rpmlint complain only about the symlinks stuffs. Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:24:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112224.l6BMOnV4009173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:24 EST ------- setting to + as agreed above and over jabber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:25:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112225.l6BMPE8l009211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-07-11 18:25 EST ------- I would say so, but ask this on #fedora-devel to be sure/for the exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112225.l6BMPUN2009267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:25 EST ------- ack. wrong package. setting back to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112228.l6BMS4L0009604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:28 EST ------- marking approved based on above comment and jabber conversation about the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:30:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112230.l6BMUUvh009794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Short Description: Perl bindings to the Net::DNS::SEC modules Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 22:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112238.l6BMcapq010534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 18:38 EST ------- Any response to the comments on the debuginfo issue raised above? If I know someone's going to respond I'll go ahead and do a full review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 11 23:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707112342.l6BNgnaZ015415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 mchristi at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-07-11 19:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scsi-target-utils Short Description: SCSI Target Daemon Owners: mchristi at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 00:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120004.l6C04RGM017291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 00:17:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120017.l6C0Hitx018525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-11 20:17 EST ------- Ping... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120122.l6C1MOx2023852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 21:22 EST ------- The URL seems incorrect; I think http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/systemfit.html is the right one, or perhaps http://www.systemfit.org/ You'll need a Requires: R there as well. (The template has been updated to reflect that.) rpmlint has the usual two complaints, plus one other: W: R-systemfit file-not-utf8 /usr/share/R/library/systemfit/man/systemfit.Rd.gz This is due to a single u-with-umlaut on line 244 of systemfit.Rd; a call to iconv should fix it up. The checks are very noisy, with many differences shown in the least significant digits. However, it looks to me as if everything comes out OK. * source files match upstream: 3172eda701ed559443f6e8344263e772ea11dd5401108fe61b84a324949643b5 systemfit_0.8-2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently (follows the R example template). * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: R-systemfit = 0.8-3.fc8 = /bin/sh R * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120134.l6C1Y3Ud024633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2007-07-11 21:33 EST ------- I agree, the rpm itself is pretty decent but there are a lot of upstream issues that need to be fixed in it. I'm assuming that Beta3 is fairly close to a complete rewrite as they've added a lot new features, changed the menus a bit, and they had to add a dbus layer for everything in order to work with BlueZ 3.x. Unfortunately Beta is is REALLY buggy at least in some of it's functionality. I haven't tested the svn builds yet, but I'd assume it would better to checkout source from there at least until a new release is made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120143.l6C1hQch025603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 21:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120143.l6C1hfmq025638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:46:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247840] php-pear maintainer update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120146.l6C1krFE025915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247840 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 21:46 EST ------- cvs done. Note that typically you can use the package review bug for cvs requests (even if it's closed). If there isn't a review bug you can file one against the package itself, no need to file against Package Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120149.l6C1nv7s026105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 21:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 01:58:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212513] Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120158.l6C1wXA6026605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 21:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120206.l6C26RX9027039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120207.l6C27nYh027154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120212.l6C2CaI9027611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:16:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120216.l6C2GaMi027965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:18:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120218.l6C2IXM9028127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-11 22:18 EST ------- Yes, I am... I am having some personal issues this month though... I am planning to upload ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120219.l6C2JVuT028228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120223.l6C2NBbJ028749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:27:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120227.l6C2RigW029138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-11 22:27 EST ------- updated to 0.2.1, which according to the upstream, will address the Glib issue... Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1-7.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: 8b8088e6a9910cf831f439b9115ffb0f sha1sum: cba0910080740696c580008f91b9a1870cea5362 SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1-7.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: 5c03bd610807e573778755257768a0a4 sha1sum: 522c9d58fec2504b157d34afeeed8233eb40f2b6 This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) Hopefully, mock will build fine with this... aside from my GPG key if it isnt imported... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120229.l6C2TXwh029438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-11 22:29 EST ------- Also, I require python because i specify Python's version there... Though I might change that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120231.l6C2VYGn029596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-11 22:31 EST ------- And how long is the description supposed to be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] New: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package was previously approved (Bug #168611), was orphaned and is now maintained by Mike Petullo again. Because it was orphaned for more than three months, it needs to be reviewed again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 02:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120258.l6C2wMFI031691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-11 22:58 EST ------- I realize that Paul said he would approve in comment #6, but it still looks bad for you to set the approval on your own package. (If for record keeping if nothing else). cvs-done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 03:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120300.l6C30NBM031825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-11 23:00 EST ------- Since this package will only ever be used as a BR it makes no sense to separate those files out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 03:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120349.l6C3ncnp002979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-07-11 23:49 EST ------- After branching Mail_Mime for EL4, I found out the hard way that EL4 currently doesn't have the necessary pear infrastructure to build pear packages in epel (Mail-Mime is the only pear package in CVS with an EL4 branch, so I'm the first pear packager who's attempted this). I've started some discussion on fedora-php-devel-list at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-php-devel-list/2007-July/msg00000.html I'll post on here when something changes, but for now no pear packages in EL4 :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 04:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120422.l6C4Mspk005459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 05:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120501.l6C51ZFQ008565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distrubution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 01:01 EST ------- In addition to the expected two rpmlint complaints, I see: W: R-mvtnorm incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.5-2 0.7-2.fc8 Is the version "0.7" or "0.7.5"? I'm afraid I don't understand what the test suite is telling me. One test finds several differences in the sixth decimal place but the ends with OK. I'm making the assumption that it would indicate an actual failure. Review: * source files match upstream: 494048d08b9f11925c207584d55a6bc2c4bf199262e0de421f4f52fc5fb7a1cc mvtnorm_0.7-5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. (Follows R template) * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: mvtnorm.so()(64bit) R-mvtnorm = 0.7-2.fc8 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgfortran.so.1()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass (I think). * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R document index generation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. Really, the changelog thing is trivial to fix, so I'll approve this and you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 05:27:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120527.l6C5RJ2P010234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sbehera at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-12 01:27 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 06:02:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120602.l6C62RIu012722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-12 02:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > As of now (yum-3.2, ymp-1.1), the conflict is required because of the dbformat > change. I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the conflict isn't needed since yum already requires yum-metadata-parser, the requires in yum should be versioned such that yum-3.2 cannot be installed together with ymp < 1.1. If you don't know that guideline already: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts Otherwise rpmlint says: W: yum-metadata-parser no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 06:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120615.l6C6Fbaa013506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-12 02:15 EST ------- The man pages location is wrong. You can patch Makefile.in or use something along make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT mandir=%{_mandir}/man1 Also the timestamps of the man page and client.txt file are not kept. This may be achieved with make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALLCMD='install -p' If you use both tricks, this gives: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT mandir=%{_mandir}/man1 INSTALLCMD='install -p' It seems to me that the leading spaces in %description are not usefull. What is the reason for an explicit BuildRequires: kernel-headers I was under the impression that it was wrong to rely on this package, instead of using the libc headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 06:18:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120618.l6C6IBUD013667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-12 02:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159034) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159034&action=view) mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-1 on rawhide i386 Some comments. * SourceURL - For sourceforge source, please check the section "Sourceforge.net" of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Mock build fails (build log attached) - Note: Now .pyo, .pyc must not be excluded. * File entry - The two lines ---------------------------------------------- %dir %{_datadir}/linkchecker/ %{_datadir}/linkchecker/* ---------------------------------------------- can be replaced with one line: ---------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/linkchecker/ ---------------------------------------------- - And similarly, IMO the part # Collate list of python files can be removed and can be simplified. * ExcludeArch ---------------------------------------------- # Do not have one of these to test on: ExcludeArch: x86_64 ---------------------------------------------- - What do you mean by this? (see "sitearch" comment below) * sitearch - .so module is arch-dependent and should be installed under site_arch directory (on x86_64 and ppc64, site_lib and site_arch directory differs) * Requires - Check Requires for this package * For example, this package requires python-docutils * python-imaging is available on Fedora * And maybe this package requires more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 06:25:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120625.l6C6Pv7I014250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandprom | |pt.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-12 02:25 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 07:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120726.l6C7QwPO020347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-07-12 03:26 EST ------- Everything seems OK to me. But I am unsure I have the authority to approve the package. I will try to find out (an additional problem is that I will be traveling until July 22). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 09:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120901.l6C918EZ031431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-12 05:01 EST ------- In general, I rather not use the SVN. Unlike rawhide, F7 users are not used to having unstable packages getting constantly replaced under their feet and beta3 seems to me as "good enough (tm)" (I can reliably pair and un-pair devices and I can upload/download files to/from my cellphone/palm) Either way, the input devices bug is known (fixed in svn) and beta4 is just around the corner [1] so I guess we can release and wait it out. [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147300 SPEC: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3.src.rpm * Sun Jul 12 2007 Gilboa Davara 1-0.0-27.beta3 - Add missing touch /icon/hicolor. - Menu items: Remove only-in-KDE. - BR: Remove libutempter-devel. - Fix project URL and source URL. - Add missing %%dist. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 09:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244086] Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120910.l6C9AqJJ032537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gconf-cleaner - A Cleaning tool for GConf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244086 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 09:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120939.l6C9d3MH003688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 sbehera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sbehera at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-07-12 05:38 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Thanks for pointing out the probable mistakes. As nabi-0.18 is released by upstream I am planning to build the srpm for the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 09:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707120945.l6C9jOIR004596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 05:45 EST ------- So ... is there anything else which needs to be done on this? I don't see it in Rawhide yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 10:42:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121042.l6CAgt5Y011434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-12 06:42 EST ------- Please reread guidelines regarding the package licenses: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#LicenseText If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, must be included as documentation. That means it's not required to add, say LGPL, license text separately when it's not present in the package. The license files that comes with TECkit contain direct links to the web for both CPL and LGPL so I don't see any reason to add any of these license texts to TECkit separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 10:49:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121049.l6CAnXDv011806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jochen at herr- | |schmitt.de) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-12 06:49 EST ------- Btw. what is wrong with License_CPLv05.txt and License_LGPLv21.txt that are packaged with TECkit since 0.3? Aren't they verbatim texts of the licenses? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 11:12:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121112.l6CBCXGQ013901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-07-12 07:12 EST ------- Fixed SPEC url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnome-specimen/gnome-specimen.spec SRPMS url: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnome-specimen/gnome-specimen-0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 11:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121149.l6CBnc4c016575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-12 07:49 EST ------- Imported and built in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 11:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121158.l6CBw0LF017292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-12 07:57 EST ------- built fine in mock. $rpmlint *.rpm W: kdebluetooth patch-not-applied Patch2: kdebluetooth-nokia.patch (assuming you are purposely including an unused patch). W: kdebluetooth incoherent-version-in-changelog 1-0.0-27.beta3 1.0-0.27.beta3 (looks like you've got a few version typos in changelog) W: kdebluetooth-devel no-documentation (no biggie). Good work, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 12:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121242.l6CCg7uN021123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-12 08:42 EST ------- Just fix the mixed-use-of-space-and-tab ;) but it's harmless. You can do it before import it in cvs. I saw that you requested sponsor membership in cvsextras group. Have you already found a sponsor ? If do, remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 12:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121243.l6CChGK7021575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-12 08:43 EST ------- s|If so|If so|g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 12:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121246.l6CCkZCs021979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-12 08:46 EST ------- Before comment: = Help->Manual now work well = your example on comment 9 also works as you commented. For 0.8.90-3: * URL - IMO generally http://sourceforge.net/projects/ has useless information. Googling gspiceui hits http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gspiceui/index.html first and IMO this URL is more preferable. * Requires/icon - While icons are installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/, why don't you use these icons for desktop file and use gnome-util.png instead and require redhat-artwork? ! OFF TOPIC - I noticed that %_datadir/gEDA is owned by both libgeda and geda-symbols. Is this okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 12:46:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121246.l6CCklOk022039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-12 08:46 EST ------- ... Ooops... had two versions of B27, older one (without the dist) and a new one. Here's the actual build: SPEC: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 12:51:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121251.l6CCpZwa022818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-12 08:51 EST ------- even better... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121310.l6CDAA35025013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 09:10 EST ------- http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-findlib-1.1.2pl1-8.src.rpm http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-findlib.spec This has two changes: (1) Tabs expanded to spaces. (2) I readded the conditional excludes in the main package. I am still looking for a sponsor (and TBH have no idea how to go about getting one). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:27:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121327.l6CDRLjR027105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-07-12 09:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > As of now (yum-3.2, ymp-1.1), the conflict is required because of the dbformat > > change. > > I may be wrong, but it seems to me that the conflict isn't > needed since yum already requires yum-metadata-parser, the requires > in yum should be versioned such that yum-3.2 cannot be installed > together with ymp < 1.1. That's not the problem, though -- the problem is if you have older yum installed and then install newer yum-metadata-parser. This is exactly the case that Conflicts are supposed to be used for > Otherwise rpmlint says: > W: yum-metadata-parser no-version-in-last-changelog That's because the last change is committed in CVS but release wasn't bumped and a build wasn't done because it wasn't worth pushing on its own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWNLO027600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-12 09:32 EST ------- Okay, I'll sponsor you so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWPtA027625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWQB7027645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWRDp027664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWTOd027683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121332.l6CDWUU5027708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243716] Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121339.l6CDdDjw028531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Markdown - A text-to-HTML filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243716 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121346.l6CDk75l029166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-12 09:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libxcb Short Description: C binding to the X11 protocll Owners: ajackson at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:47:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121347.l6CDlgaN029544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-12 09:47 EST ------- D'oh, accidentally been sitting on this for nearly a month... I'll get it imported today... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 13:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121353.l6CDrEWR030174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-12 09:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hdhomerun Short Description: tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun Owners: jwilson at redhat.com, jeff at ocjtech.us Branches: F-7, FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121404.l6CE4goC031374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libhdhomerun|Review Request: hdhomerun - |- tools for the Silicon Dust|tools for the Silicon Dust |HDHomeRun |HDHomeRun ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-12 10:04 EST ------- Nb: version slated for import does have the perl->sed and iconv changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:08:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121408.l6CE8nO7032020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jochen at herr- | |schmitt.de) | ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-12 10:08 EST ------- Yes how Jindrich wrote, the package contains the verbatim copy of the license texts, so why do you don't want to include this files into the package? An ohter situation is, if you can't find a verbatim copy of the license text in the upstream tar ball. In this case, you don't need to include a license text from another source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121422.l6CEMESM001480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-12 10:22 EST ------- it seem that someelse sponsored you (jwilson). So, Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure for the CVS Request procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:23:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121423.l6CEN8s9001667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-12 10:23 EST ------- S/someelse/someone else -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] New: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bert at freudenbergs.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc2.spec SRPM URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc2.src.rpm Description: Squeak VM for OLPC Etoys activity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] New: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bert at freudenbergs.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/etoys-2.0.1434-1.spec SRPM URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/etoys-2.0.1434-1.src.rpm Description: System-installed part of the Etoys activity for OLPC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121444.l6CEidUc004723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 10:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-findlib Short Description: Objective CAML package manager and build helper Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:51:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121451.l6CEpsTI006630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-12 10:51 EST ------- Please check the teckit-2.2.1-0.3: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/teckit/ I added all the licenses present in the package in this version as I wrote in comment #4. Seems like the problems are all fixed now ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 14:58:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121458.l6CEwOPT007620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 10:58 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121502.l6CF2j36008283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-12 11:02 EST ------- Marc, have you done any pre-reviews of other packages? Basically you do everything that you would normally do for a review except that you can't actually approve the package. Doing pre-reviews will show potential sponsors that you have a good grasp of the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121518.l6CFI0vV009538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-12 11:17 EST ------- I agree, but he had asked me to do it over a jabber conversation... Paul, it might be wise if you at least post a note here confirming everything is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:22:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121522.l6CFM9HO010006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-12 11:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tiquit New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:22:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121522.l6CFMUri010056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-12 11:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: archivemail New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:22:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121522.l6CFMxbf010114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-12 11:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: limph New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121529.l6CFT1EP010808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-mvtnorm - |Review Request: R-mvtnorm - |Multivariate normal and T |Multivariate normal and T |distrubution R Package |distribution R Package Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 11:28 EST ------- Version is now 0.7 though it used to be 0.7.5 when I first made the package. Fixed the changelog. Yeah, I'm not terribly sure about the checks but it does seem to skip changes in the final decimal points but does really fail if there is an R error. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-mvtnorm Short Description: Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package Owners: orion Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121530.l6CFUbnM010931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:30:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121530.l6CFUcNv010956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247840] php-pear maintainer update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121537.l6CFbTXC011577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247840 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-07-12 11:37 EST ------- Ah OK - willdo, sorry. Thanks for dealing with this. I'll close this and re-use another bug in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:42:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121542.l6CFgMkj012135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 11:42 EST ------- * Thu Jul 12 2007 Orion Poplawski - 0.8-4 - Fix URL - Add Requires: R http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit-0.8-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 15:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226667] Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121547.l6CFlkWE012591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yum-metadata-parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-12 11:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > That's not the problem, though -- the problem is if you have older yum installed > and then install newer yum-metadata-parser. This is exactly the case that > Conflicts are supposed to be used for Ok. Maybe yum-metadata-parser could Requires yum instead? It seems to me that yum-metadata-parser is useless without yum? Is it because yum already requires it? > That's because the last change is committed in CVS but release wasn't bumped and > a build wasn't done because it wasn't worth pushing on its own. Ah, I see, sorry, I didn't thought about that (although the issue seemed a bit strange given who the packagers are ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:12:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121612.l6CGCFxr015270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-12 12:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: redland Short Description: Redland RDF Application Framework Owners: thomas at apestaart.org,Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Thomas Vander Stichele (the package submitter) agreed to comaintainership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:39:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121639.l6CGd8Qe017441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 12:39 EST ------- I assume that "protocll" was supposed to be "protocol". :) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121641.l6CGf81Y017601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-12 12:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mail-SPF Short Description: Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247642] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121642.l6CGgFmt017925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121642.l6CGgHMq017955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 Bug 247705 depends on bug 247642, which changed state. Bug 247642 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-Resolver-Programmable - Programmable DNS resolver class for offline emulation of DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247642 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121642.l6CGgUpP018012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121645.l6CGjqCG018316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 12:45 EST ------- OK, now it's just down that file-not-utf8 error with systemfit.Rd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121648.l6CGmrE5018736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 12:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:49:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121649.l6CGnnoP019021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 richard at hughsie.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2007-07-12 12:49 EST ------- Package Name: ohm Short Description: Open Hardware Manager Owners: richard at hughsie.com,johnp at redhat.com,mpg at redhat.com Branches: F-7 OLPC-2 InitialCC: richard at hughsie.com,johnp at redhat.com,mpg at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:51:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121651.l6CGph7L019243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 12:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121654.l6CGsBtJ019406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 12:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 16:59:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121659.l6CGx9Gw019797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > cvs done. Um, getting: cvs commit... **** Access denied: orion is not in ACL for rpms/R-mvtnorm cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed **** Access denied: orion is not in ACL for rpms/R-mvtnorm/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! If I try to remove pkg.acl: orion is the package owner - allowing ACL changes for R-mvtnorm. **** Access denied: orion is not in ACL for rpms/R-mvtnorm cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121700.l6CH0fGT019985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 13:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, now it's just down that file-not-utf8 error with systemfit.Rd. Gah, fixed. * Thu Jul 12 2007 Orion Poplawski - 0.8-5 - Convert systemfit.Rd to UTF-8 http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-systemfit-0.8-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121701.l6CH1iU7020113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121707.l6CH7tYn020805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121719.l6CHJ5v0022011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121723.l6CHNMeg022715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121733.l6CHXI91023695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121737.l6CHbOi0024159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-12 13:37 EST ------- Very odd. Can you wait and try again in a bit? Something might not have synced out the acls right... If you see this again, feel free to let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121739.l6CHdj5M024495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 13:39 EST ------- It fails on ppc64, not unexpectedly. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64970 So can I just fix this by adding ExcludeArch: ppc64 and rebuild, or do I need to get approval again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121749.l6CHni9m025718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-12 13:49 EST ------- OK, your package looks nice. You are APPROVED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:56:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121756.l6CHupci026648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 13:56 EST ------- Waiting fixed CVS. Imported and built on devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 17:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121756.l6CHuqB7026673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 Bug 247894 depends on bug 247858, which changed state. Bug 247858 Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI13JE027253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 14:00 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI14AL027281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 Bug 241487 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI1680027307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 Bug 241473 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI1Apa027343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 Bug 241476 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI1BTR027377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 Bug 241486 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121801.l6CI1DAp027391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 Bug 240571 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121819.l6CIJ5cJ029444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-07-12 14:19 EST ------- Finally had some time to work on this. New packages in http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/ I patched out md5 (should be okay -- it's redistributable, just not linkable with GPL/LGPL code) and made a flag which patches from LGPL->GPL if you enable readline, which I've made the default, because it's so handy. Still working with upstream for the better solution -- splitting the command line interface (which benefits from Readline and not from being LGPL) from the library (the opposite). But that may take some time, and I don't think that's a reason to hold up getting this in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:28:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121828.l6CISUrc030440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 14:28 EST ------- You don't need to get additional approvals, but any time you add an ExcludeArch: you meed to file the corresponding ticket to track the issue. Be sure to block the proper tracker tickets as well (probably FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121832.l6CIWHnV030870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-12 14:32 EST ------- It appears that changes were checked in as basesystem-8.1-1. I don't see any explcit approval above, so this still requires another check before approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121844.l6CIiL18032531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-12 14:44 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:46:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121846.l6CIkERo032678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-12 14:46 EST ------- Some quick comments about your SPEC file. you don't cleaned the buildroot in the %clean section and on the beginning of the %install section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121850.l6CIoPeC000522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-12 14:50 EST ------- Some quick comments about your package: - You don't used the %{_smp_mflags} macro in the make step - you don't cleaned the buildroot in the %clean section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 18:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121853.l6CIr7E3000746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-12 14:53 EST ------- Some additional comments: - First in the %install section the buildroot was cleaned, but no in the %clean sectioon. Sorry for my mistake on comment #1 - you don't used the %{?_smp_mflags} makro in the make step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:03:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121903.l6CJ39Fc002366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-12 15:03 EST ------- Built for Fedora 6, 7 and 8, filed in Bodhi (requested direct push to stable) for F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121903.l6CJ3BU9002409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121914.l6CJE3HB003585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-07-12 15:13 EST ------- It's a good question and I was looking into it. I'm pretty sure I tried moving them all to /lib/firmware and it didn't work, so it seemed to be something that's compiled in to ALSA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:25:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121925.l6CJPv96004699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-12 15:25 EST ------- What about replacing the MD5 code with a GPL-compatible implementation instead of zapping it entirely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:28:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121928.l6CJSGtm004951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-12 15:28 EST ------- OK done as bug 248033. BTW, ppc64 ocaml package can easily be built. It will lack ocamlopt, but all my packages can build correctly without ocamlopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121935.l6CJZQkv005739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121935.l6CJZnIC005776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-07-12 15:35 EST ------- I've discussed that with upstream. I'd actually suggested one alternative (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42360&package_id=34443), and the maintainer's lawyer's advice was that that was licensed in an unclear way which made it even more restrictive and less free. I just now discovered the mhash library, and perhaps code from that would be suitable -- or a future version of calc could just use the library directly. However, in a private e-mail, the author noted to me that since md5 has been show to have some weakness, he considers it not very important to have and even suggested just removing it to resolve the problem. So, following that advice seemed to be the best bet for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121948.l6CJm47F007154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-12 15:48 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 19:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247705] Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707121952.l6CJq4wC007686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-SPF - Object-oriented implementation of Sender Policy Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247705 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:08:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122008.l6CK8rYv009336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-12 16:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-4.src.rpm Recent changes in the perl-Net-DNS module caused some problems... This new src rpm contains patches to those. * Thu Jul 12 2007 Wes Hardaker - 1.2-4 - patch to fix a donuts rule for newer perl-Net::DNS update - patch for maketestzone to work around a bug in Net::DNS::RR::DS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122015.l6CKFDLq010067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro ------- Additional Comments From razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro 2007-07-12 16:15 EST ------- Hello, I also subscribe to the general choir that please to add this package in Fedora 7 (which is final now). I've tested Alec's package and works well on my machines (about a hundred). Regards, R?zvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122024.l6CKO1vj011311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-12 16:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-2.fc7.src.rpm Implemented Mamoru's recommendations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:27:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122027.l6CKR0km011724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 john.ellson at comcast.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john.ellson at comcast.net ------- Additional Comments From john.ellson at comcast.net 2007-07-12 16:26 EST ------- Just a side comment from a graphviz developer. If you use PNG format ("dot -Tpng" instead of "dot -Tgif") then you will get better quality anti-aliased line drawings from the new cairo+pango renderer in graphviz. Also you will only need to BR graphviz and not graphviz-gd. Unfortunately cairo provides no support for GIF format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:38:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122038.l6CKcPEW012957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2007-07-12 16:38 EST ------- I've fixed the rpath matter. (HylaFAX source-builds allow the user to specify a non-standard library location. If the user specified anything other than /usr/lib then rpath would be used for portability purposes. This didn't take 64-bit systems with /usr/lib64 into account, and so I've now modified the source repository upstream to not use rpath when /usr/lib64 is the library location. It will be in the next release.) I've moved the /usr/sbin/faxmail items to /usr/lib/fax/faxmail instead. I've removed the DSO symlinks and have linked against the versioned DSO files directly. I honestly don't understand the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. Is this something that's apparently only happening on 64-bit? I think that I've remedied the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings. I'll have to double check that. More to come... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 20:42:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122042.l6CKgm3t013673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-12 16:42 EST ------- The changelog stuff is not really important, I'll drop the disttag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 21:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122100.l6CL0Aph015138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta| |nford.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-12 17:00 EST ------- The offending generated config.h file is no longer installed. I eliminated the need to include this file by other header files in all but a few cases and only one of them might need to be included by a user of the library. For that one, which declares a C++ base class, I found no other alternative than to document that the user needs to create his own config.h file that can be included. Updated... RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.20.7-2.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 21:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122134.l6CLYtJg019366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-07-12 17:34 EST ------- Fixed clean and _smp_mflags Spec URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc3.spec SRPM URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 22:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] New: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/opie.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/opie-2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OPIE is an implementation of the One-Time Password (OTP) System that is being considered for the Internet standards-track. OPIE provides a one-time password system. The system should be secure against the passive attacks now commonplace on the Internet (see RFC 1704 for more details). The system is vulnerable to active dictionary attacks, though these are not widespread at present and can be detected through proper use of system audit software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 22:19:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122219.l6CMJGop023231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-07-12 18:19 EST ------- Submitted opie instead (just the client parts). Bug 248067 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 22:30:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122230.l6CMU9Ws024381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-07-12 18:30 EST ------- What should I put in the 'License' tag? http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/wwiz_detail.php?id=8454741&type=watch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 22:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122246.l6CMk7fa025691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-12 18:46 EST ------- First glance (then I'm off on vacation for a week): Requires(post): /usr/sbin/alternatives Requires(preun):/usr/sbin/alternatives not Requires(post): /usr/sbin/alternative Requires(preun):/usr/sbin/alternative Don't need BR on libX11-devel, libXt-devel pulls it in (at least on EL-5). While not incompatible with openmpi-1.2.3 in rawhide (I was able to install both), we've got some different naming conventions that I'll have to sort out. Also, the following should allow you to change the name of the package when using different compilers: --- mpich2.spec 2007-07-12 16:15:52.000000000 -0600 +++ /data/sw1/test/mpich2.spec 2007-07-12 16:33:28.000000000 -0600 @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ cp -pr CHANGES COPYRIGHT README README.testing README.romio %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ # Silence rpmlint -sed -i '/^#! \//,1 d' %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/mpich2-%{mode}/{mpi*.conf,mpe_help.*} +sed -i '/^#! \//,1 d' %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}-%{mode}/{mpi*.conf,mpe_help.*} # The uninstall script that is installed in this directory is not needed in rpm packaging rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/mpe* @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ %exclude %{_bindir}/mp%{mode}-mpicxx %exclude %{_bindir}/mp%{mode}-mpif90 %exclude %{_bindir}/mp%{mode}-mpif77 -%{_docdir}/mpich2-%{version}/ +%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ %{_mandir}/man1/* %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/log* @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.jar %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.o -%config %{_sysconfdir}/mpich2-%{mode}/ +%config %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}-%{mode}/ %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) (Let's see if we can get this done in under 2 years!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122319.l6CNJRLo027909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 19:19 EST ------- Looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122335.l6CNZq5J029143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-12 19:35 EST ------- naturette-1.3-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:37:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122337.l6CNbKQu029516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-12 19:37 EST ------- ppl-0.9-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122337.l6CNbOV4029548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.9-12.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122338.l6CNcCao029729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-12 19:38 EST ------- sofsip-cli-0.13-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 12 23:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707122338.l6CNcFUa029755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.13-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 00:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130033.l6D0XDq1000445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-12 20:33 EST ------- srpm and spec files with fixes from the last comment; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.5p4-2.fc8.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 01:09:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130109.l6D19Pol002128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-07-12 21:09 EST ------- I just confirmed with the upstream author that the next upstream version will remove md5 functionality. Reimplementing it will be explored in future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 02:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130252.l6D2qJN1009135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 22:52 EST ------- This doesn't build: No Package Found for R >= 2.5.1-2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 03:06:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130306.l6D367U1010380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 03:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130334.l6D3Yhw3012450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-12 23:34 EST ------- This looks mostly OK. I guess it would be good to augment the PHP guidelines with the extra bits like pecl module registration. The spec doesn't use macros consistently. In some places it uses %{__mkdir_p} while others have "mkdir -p". %{__install} needs to be used as well. Since the only issue I can find is four commands that need to be converted to macros, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 83fad1a7946e8355aebf40e4928a2a6323c86f16df41ad9f67fa3b3852229fc8 phar-1.2.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(php-pecl-phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8 phar.so()(64bit) php-pecl(phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8 php-pecl-phar = 1.2.0-1.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pecl /usr/bin/php config(php-pecl-phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8 php(api) = 20041225 php(zend-abi) = 20060613 php-bz2 php-common >= 5.2.0 php-hash * %check is present and all tests pass: TEST RESULT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Exts skipped : 0 Exts tested : 34 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tests : 97 95 Tests skipped : 2 ( 2.1%) -------- Tests warned : 0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) Tests failed : 0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%) Tests passed : 95 ( 97.9%) (100.0%) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pecl module registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, just fix the two "mkdir -p" and two "install" calls to be macros like the rest of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 05:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130518.l6D5ImGR019453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 01:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159123) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159123&action=view) mock build log of HippoDraw 1.20.7-2 on rawhide i386 mock build failed on rawhide i386, more specially desktop-file-utils 0.13-1.fc8 The entry "Version" is the version of "Desktop Entry Standard" you used (see: http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/ ), so * This version value has no relation with the version of the application * The value of Version should be either: 0.9.[3-8] or 1.0 * And the Entry Version is *not needed* So you may want to simply remove Version entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 05:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707130556.l6D5uxVM021461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-13 01:56 EST ------- There are the corrected files: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/ SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc-1.14.0-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 10:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131000.l6DA0Uih012232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 06:00 EST ------- (Please check the contents of .pc file on the review. I filed this as bug 248106 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 11:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131143.l6DBhDKn020641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-13 07:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159155&action=view) fix Provides and Requires I was not able to update bacula 2.0.2 to 2.0.3 with "rpm -Fvh bacula*.rpm" on my FC6/x86_64 machine. There were strange dependency problems. This patch should fix them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 12:00:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] New: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libtimidity.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libtimidity-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This library is based on the TiMidity decoder from SDL_sound library. Purpose to create this library is to avoid unnecessary dependences. SDL_sound requires SDL and some other libraries, that not needed to process MIDI files. In addition libtimidity provides more suitable API to work with MIDI songs, it enables to specify full path to the timidity configuration file, and have function to retrieve meta data from MIDI song. --- Reviewers: note, this is necessary to add midi playback support to gstreamer, since the plugin is currently under development it is in gstreamer-plugins-bad from the repo that must not be named. To test this, install libtimidity-devel and the gstreamer-plugins-bad.src.rpm and rebuild gstreamer-plugins-bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 12:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] New: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/soprano/devel/soprano.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/soprano/devel/soprano-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 12:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131202.l6DC2sff023553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 08:02 EST ------- As promised Kevin... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 12:44:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131244.l6DCiE5N028623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-13 08:44 EST ------- Ok im' not very experienced in ruby. here are few comments: *%define rubyabi 1.8 Is this a hardrequires or is it possible to have someting like in python: %{expand: %%define pyver %(python -c 'import sys;print(sys.version[0:3])')} * why does this is needed : %define repoid 21576 ? * Why do you have BuildRequires: ruby and ruby-devel ? * About # 1. First hack ImageMagick font configuration Does this is a special tweak for RMagick or this could be fixed in ImageMagick pacakge ? build.log: * Why theses dependencies aren't found ? checking for AdaptiveBlurImageChannel... no checking for AdaptiveResizeImage... no ... checking for GetColorHistogram... no checking for GetColorInfoArray... no ... checking for GetImageStatistics... no checking for GetMagickInfoArray... no ... checking for GrayscalePseudoClassImage... no checking for InterpolatePixelColor... no checking for IsImageSimilar... no checking for LinearStretchImage... no checking for OrderedPosterizeImageChannel... no checking for PolaroidImage... no checking for QuantumOperatorRegionImage... no checking for RecolorImage... no checking for SetImageRegistry... no checking for SketchImage... no checking for UniqueImageColors... no checking for PaletteBilevelMatteType enum value... no ... checking if GetImageQuantumDepth has only 1 argument... no checking if GetColorInfoList has only 2 arguments... no checking if GetTypeInfoList has only 2 arguments... no checking if GetMagickInfoList has only 2 arguments... no checking if ColorInfo.color is a MagickPixelPacket... no * -doc Installed docs in $(pwd)/Trash are the same as thoses present in doc from source - good But do # 3. clean up is needed to prevent thoses files to be installed ? Are they installed in $(pwd)/Trash ? Why not to use instead (for -doc) %doc Trash/* * naming - I don't know if this is mandatory but -docs is sometime choosen instead of -doc for documentation sub-package... * rpmlint on installed file is quiet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 12:47:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131247.l6DCl47H029169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-13 08:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: TECkit Short Description: Conversion library and mapping compiler Owners: jnovy at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 13:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131344.l6DDijOX002351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-13 09:44 EST ------- Okay, we have a build in devel for F8. Please test it if you can once the RPM hits the rawhide mirrors. I'm guessing that once we test it out we can mark this bug as NEXTRELEASE? And then, on to F-7 and EPEL.... Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131410.l6DEAGuF005475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 10:10 EST ------- http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/pykdeextensions/pykdeextensions.spec http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/pykdeextensions/pykdeextensions-0.4.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Jul 13 2007 Rex Dieter 0.4.0-2 - omit empty NEWS - use chrpath to fix rpath issue(s) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131411.l6DEBekx005601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-13 10:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl-2.1.2-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl.spec Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 - And more Requires is needed for .pc file (so -devel package). Please check: /usr/include/FTGL/FTGL.h Mesa seems also required but as they do not bundle .pc file, then i down't knwo how to do with them (leaving them in Libs for now...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131424.l6DEOUrd007156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-13 10:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > From COPYING: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > death.wav: Copyright 2003 Manuel Moss (http://armagetron.sf.net/) > break.wav: Copyright 2003 John-Paul Gignac (http://pathological.sf.net) > gameover.wav: Copyright 2002 Pete Shinners (http://www.pygame.org) > These are all under the GPL and thus match this: > Unless otherwise noted above, all material (source code, documentation, > and game data) is licensed under the GNU GPL version 2 as published by > the Free Software Foundation, copyrighted by the owners credited above. > The full text of the license follows. > So I read the text above as everything being GPL except for these: > clicked.wav, rotate.wav, select-confirm.wav, select-move.wav, > and tick.wav: Released into the public domain. If this is not allowed > in your jurisdiction, you may freely copy, distribute, modify, and > distribute modified versions of these files, for any purpose. > And these are public domain and thus fine too. IOW I don't see a license problem here, I hope this helps. Rafal, with that cleared, any chance you can comment on the other parts of the review so kindly done by Jon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131427.l6DER9jA007586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-13 10:27 EST ------- Thx Dan, good catch. http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-5.src.rpm has fixed the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131448.l6DEmbjm009703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 10:48 EST ------- http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/guidance/guidance.spec http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/guidance/guidance-0.8.1-1.src.rpm * Fri Jul 13 2007 Rex Dieter 0.8.0-1 - guidance-0.8.0 - FIXME/TODO: include "^install*" hacks from http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/kde-extras/guidance/trunk/debian/rules?op=file (arg, these install hacks/fixes *really* should be upstreamed, and not required in packaging). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224244] Review Request: gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131452.l6DEqGaM010144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224244 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 10:52 EST ------- Any chance someone could say definitively whether this ticket needs a review or should be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243187] Review Request: edac-utils - user space utilities for EDAC subsystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131455.l6DEt6Ha010338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edac-utils - user space utilities for EDAC subsystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243187 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:56:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131456.l6DEuFnV010468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 10:56 EST ------- Is a review of this still needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 14:56:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131456.l6DEuVMe010555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 10:56 EST ------- fyi, this is a great package, but I have (too) many packages to maintain already, so I would very much prefer if someone else would either take over maintainership or help comaintain this. (same goes for pykdeextensions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 15:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] New: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at seznam.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Nodoka gtk engine as well as Nodoka theme for metacity and gtk. Note: Current upstream is me and Daniel Geiger and we currently release it on the fedora wiki (see the spec file for URL). I however consider submitting a request for inclusion in fedorahosted projects. For more info about the Nodoka theme and engine see fedora-art-list archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 15:32:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131532.l6DFWsA5014328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-13 11:32 EST ------- The permissions on the fetch script are still 0764. However, rpmlint warns when they are 0755 as well so if you change them to 755, we'll be good to go! Have you heard back from Bastian yet on the naming issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:09:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131609.l6DG9HX3019433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 12:09 EST ------- The URL is not correct (or at least it gets me a 404); seems like it should be http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/%{packname}.html rpmlint has the two usual R package complaints, plus: W: R-multcomp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 4) which isn't a problem. Again the test suite spews a bunch of diffs but still succeeds. Since the only real issue is the URL, I'll approve this and you can fix it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 58040d741b4036407b4c8f9967b8c163c0ba3bd2eff615f1cf09735f85542f77 multcomp_0.992-2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-multcomp = 0.992-1.fc8 = /bin/sh R R-mvtnorm * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just fix the URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:12:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131612.l6DGCJZX019680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 12:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159201) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159201&action=view) mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-2 on rawhide i386 For 4.7-2: * File entry ---------------------------------------- %{python_sitearch}/* %{python_sitearch}/linkcheck ---------------------------------------- - This way of listing causes many duplicate file entry on i386 (check the mock build log attached). * again site_lib vs site_arch - While arch-dependent files (usually .so file) must be installed under site_arch directory, arch-independent .py{,o,c} files must be installed under site_lib directory (so you have to use both site_lib and site_arch) * Directory ownership - /usr/share/man/{de,fr}/man1 are already owned by man * rpmlint - Some files' permissions are not correct. ----------------------------------------- W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_urls.sh W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/cgi-bin/lc.cgi W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/cgi-bin/lc.fcgi W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/rest2htmlnav W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_blacklist.sh W: linkchecker spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/examples/check_for_x_errors.sh ----------------------------------------- * Documents * gettext files - /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/{de,fr}.po must be converted by msgfmt (in gettext) and be installed into proper directories and must not be installed as documents * man files - /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-4.7/doc/{de,fr}/linkchecker.1 must not be needed (man files are installed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131613.l6DGD8xV019904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-13 12:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159202) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159202&action=view) fix for %preun scriptlets a copy'n'paste bug that makes the %preun scriptlets fail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:29:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131629.l6DGTT19021861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-13 12:29 EST ------- The spec/package appears to be 'teckit' here, not 'TECkit'... Shouldn't the CVS package name be 'teckit' ? Or are you intending to import it as "TECkit' for some reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:29:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131629.l6DGTYah021911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-13 12:29 EST ------- http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225623] Merge Review: bootparamd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131630.l6DGUX2o022146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bootparamd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(stransky at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131640.l6DGeXko023320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 12:40 EST ------- release should be Release: 0.27.%{reltype}%{?dist} instead of Release: 0.27.%{reltype}%{dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131641.l6DGfiuX023606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 12:41 EST ------- + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh kbluelock No translations found for kbluelock in /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh + : + for PROG in '$PROG_LIST' + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh kbluemon No translations found for kbluemon in /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh + : + for PROG in '$PROG_LIST' + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh kbluetooth No translations found for kbluetooth in /var/tmp/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.27.beta3-root-chitlesh + : + for PROG in '$PROG_LIST' .... This should be corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:48:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131648.l6DGm6Mw024293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 12:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > Either way, the input devices bug is known (fixed in svn) and beta4 is just > around the corner [1] so I guess we can release and wait it out. > [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147300 So why not revert back to beta2 which works as should ? With the beta3(your 0.27) on konqueror bluetooth:/ I can see my mobile phone and click on it sdp://[XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX]/ appears on the URL bar of konqueror, but sees nothing on my mobile phone, while beta2 does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:54:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131654.l6DGs0Mm024744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 12:53 EST ------- Re: comment #58: mock build WORKSFORME: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-7-i386-kde/kdebluetooth/ Re: comment #59: So why not revert back to beta2? If it's already fixed in svn, why not wait for beta4? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 16:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131658.l6DGwADo025150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 12:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > Re: comment #59: So why not revert back to beta2? > If it's already fixed in svn, why not wait for beta4? :) I'm ok if the package isn't released to F-7 until beta4 comes out (since it still contains the crashes I mentioned before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 17:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131701.l6DH1Ouv025680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-13 13:01 EST ------- Gilboa, please go ahead and follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and get this into cvs, so changes/bugs can be tracked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 17:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131704.l6DH4gkJ026124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 13:04 EST ------- For -3: * font requirement - Please add the Requires to -utils the rpm which contains the needed fonts (freefont?) * .pc file > Mesa seems also required but as they do not bundle > .pc file, then i down't know > how to do with them (leaving them in Libs for now...) - While it is okay for now that mesa does not ship .pc file because /usr/include/FTGL/FTGL.h says: --------------------------------------------- #include --------------------------------------------- .pc file contains extra linkage requirement. For the description in the two lines "Libs:" and "Cflags", "-lfreetype" and "-I/usr/include/freetype2" should not be needed because ftgl.pc has "Requires: freetype2". ---------------------------------------------- $ pkg-config --cflags freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2 ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 17:19:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131719.l6DHJnpD027873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 13:19 EST ------- The link to the SRPM in comment #9 above seems to be invalid. I'll be happy to shepherd this package through the system, but, well, I need a package to review first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 17:25:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131725.l6DHPT9K028947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > *%define rubyabi 1.8 > Is this a hardrequires or is it possible to have someting like in python: There is surely some hack (some GLib users use the hack), it is rather complicated (because ruby is not included in minimum build environ) and I find the hack of little sense. NOTE: On rawhide, the hack you mentioned can no longer be used even for python because python is removed from minimum build environ > * why does this is needed : %define repoid 21576 ? This figure is needed for source URL, but I don't want to write the figure directly on URL because this id may change for different version. > * Why do you have BuildRequires: ruby and ruby-devel ? This type of BuildRequires frequently happens when BuildRequires target rpm ship -libs package (i.e. ruby-devel requires ruby-libs but does not require ruby itself). > * About # 1. First hack ImageMagick font configuration > Does this is a special tweak for RMagick or this could be > fixed in ImageMagick pacakge ? This can be fixed by ImageMagick side fix, however to file a bug against ImageMagick, I must explain and justify why the fix is needed against ImageMagick, and before it perhaps I must investigate ImageMagick code... (for now I can only say "after this fix RMagick works, don't know why it is needed in detail" So for now I fixed RMagick side. > build.log: > * Why theses dependencies aren't found ? > > checking for AdaptiveBlurImageChannel... no > checking for AdaptiveResizeImage... no This is because I build against ImageMagick and not against GraphicsMagick. From googling I have a impression that most user uses RMagick with ImageMagick. > * -doc > But do # 3. clean up is needed to prevent thoses files to be installed ? > Are > they installed in $(pwd)/Trash ? Why not to use instead (for -doc) > %doc Trash/* Simply my custom. For documentation I don't want to use installed files by make file because it is usually troublesome. > * naming - I don't know if this is mandatory but -docs is sometime choosen > instead of -doc for documentation sub-package... lftp ftp.kddilabs.jp:/Linux/packages/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora> ls -al *-doc-* | wc -l 87 lftp ftp.kddilabs.jp:/Linux/packages/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora> ls -al *-docs-* | wc -l 33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 18:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131808.l6DI8IIE001093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 14:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > beta3 should not be released as-is; there is more fixes in the SVN repo at > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/extragear/kde3/pim/kdebluetooth that should be > used, including what appears to be fixed for the kinputwizard crash. > Nope, there is no such fix. I'm still encountering crashes even when using svn snapshots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 18:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245160] Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131810.l6DIAXaE001502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 14:10 EST ------- This is looking much better, but I'm still seeing all of the undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints listed in comment #3. I was able to force a link against libm by placing LIBS=-lm export LIBS between the %setup and %configure calls in the spec. With that, I see no rpmlint warnings. This seems to me to be a relatively sane way of getting this to link properly without actually patching and regenerating the autoconf scaffolding, since all four of the generated libraries need to link with libm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 18:14:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226601] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131814.l6DIEjYv001906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226601 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(krh at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 14:14 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 18:15:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131815.l6DIFuet002048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 14:15 EST ------- Any response? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 18:53:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131853.l6DIrC8e007606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-13 14:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl-2.1.2-4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl.spec Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 So now ftgl.pc look like this: ------------------ prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr libdir=/usr/lib64 includedir=/usr/include Name: ftgl Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 Version: 2.0.5 Requires: freetype2 Libs: -lGLU -L/usr/lib64 -lGL -L${libdir} -lftgl Cflags: -I${includedir} -I/usr/include ------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220402] Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131903.l6DJ36Mv008440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220402 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 15:03 EST ------- Closing after one week as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202376] Review Request: openwebmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131903.l6DJ3UlZ008584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openwebmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202376 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the- | |johnsons.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 15:03 EST ------- Closing as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197137] Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131905.l6DJ5ENM008800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Conga - Remote management interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197137 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(jparsons at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 15:05 EST ------- It's been a week; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227035] Review Request: aspectj-1.2.1-3jpp - AspectJ aspect-oriented language extension to Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131906.l6DJ6pKa009060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspectj-1.2.1-3jpp - AspectJ aspect-oriented language extension to Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227035 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(rafaels at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 15:06 EST ------- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131909.l6DJ97uC009243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 15:09 EST ------- I'm going to go ahead and close this out soon if there is no response. There are also several other open tickets from the same submitter; I'll start setting them NEEDINFO and (later) closing them out if Chris doesn't give some indication that he's still around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131927.l6DJRFM7010899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 19:30:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707131930.l6DJU9S5011048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-Dyndoc- |Review Request: R-DynDoc- |1.14.0 - Functions for |1.14.0 - Functions for |dynamic documents |dynamic documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 20:36:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132036.l6DKaUhg018433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-13 16:36 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST ITEMS: * rpmlint results: -> should fix manpages to be zipped, (see below) $ rpmlint avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8.src.rpm E: avr-libc configure-without-libdir-spec $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc7.noarch.rpm W: avr-libc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/avr/include/avr/iomxxhva.h --> repated for all .h files --> This looks OK to me, I dont see that it makes sense to split into avr-libc-devel W: avr-libc manpage-not-gzipped /usr/avr/share/man/man3/strsep.3 --> repeated for all manpages --> This looks like it should be fixed. E: avr-libc arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/avr/lib/avr3/crt43355.o --> repeated for all .o/.a files --> This look OK, as this is truly arch-indep and used for cross-compiling. W: avr-libc non-standard-dir-in-usr avr --> Not sure about this, looks ok (probably needs to be added to packaging guidelines) $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6-3.fc7.noarch.rpm (no output) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 20:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226132] Merge Review: mcelog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132052.l6DKqO0N020444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mcelog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226132 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bugzilla.redhat at beej.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.redhat at beej.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 20:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132055.l6DKtboG021111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-13 16:55 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Here are all the MUST items that have problems - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. --> NOT OK: project: modified BSD, package spec: GPL - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) Possible solution: split out -devel package and have avr-libc require: avr-libc-devel? Or possibly just rename the package. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} --> GOOD (no -devel package, but maybe need one considering other review items) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. --> BAD $ rpm -qf /usr/avr avr-binutils- 2.17-3.fc7.x86_64 avr-libc- 1.4.6-1.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 20:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132057.l6DKvxLX021368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-13 16:57 EST ------- Here is the entire list of MUST items for completeness (including items above which have already been pointed out) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec --> GOOD - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. --> GOOD - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. --> NOT OK: project: modified BSD, package spec: GPL- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. --> GOOD - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. --> GOOD - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. --> GOOD - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. --> GOOD (md5sum match) - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. --> GOOD - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture --> no exclude-arch, GOOD - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires --> GOOD - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. --> GOOD (no locales) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. --> GOOD (no shared libs) - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, --> GOOD (not relocatable) - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. --> GOOD (everything under /usr/avr) - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. --> GOOD - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. --> GOOD - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). --> GOOD - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. --> GOOD - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. --> GOOD - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. --> GOOD (-doc subpackage) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. --> GOOD - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. --> hmm... discuss? - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. --> hmm... discuss? - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files --> GOOD (no pc files) - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. --> GOOD - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} --> GOOD (no -devel package, but maybe need one considering other review items) - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. --> GOOD - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, --> GOOD (no GUI) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. --> BAD $ rpm -qf /usr/avr avr-binutils- 2.17-3.fc7.x86_64 avr-libc- 1.4.6-1.x86_64 - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} --> GOOD - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. --> GOOD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 20:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132059.l6DKx7nj021701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From ddmbox2000 at yahoo.co.uk 2007-07-13 16:59 EST ------- kinputwizard fix has gone into svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132109.l6DL9J4R024056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-13 17:09 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines SHOULD items (no problems here): - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. --> GOOD - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. --> Ok (no translations) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. --> builds - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. --> cant check this myself. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. --> works ok for me. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. --> no scriptlets - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. --> no subpackages - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, --> no pc files - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, --> no additional deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132112.l6DLCdPw024528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 mebrown at michaels-house.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mebrown at michaels-house.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:15:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132115.l6DLFND4024651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-13 17:15 EST ------- file ownership issue possibly not an issue: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 ============================================== Another exception for directory ownership in packages is when there is no clear dependency hierarchy. An example: Foo-Animal-Emu puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Emu Foo-Animal-Llama puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Llama Neither package depends on the other one. Neither package depends on any other package which owns the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory. In this case, each package must own the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory. ============================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:18:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965?= =?iso-8859-1?q?-firmware_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4?= =?iso-8859-1?q?965_A/G/N_network_adaptors?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.15-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors >From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/245379 I don't know if this will be required in the future for EL-5... For now iwl4965 can only be found with recent iwlwifi version from intelwireless.org ( I think 0.35 can support it). As wireless-dev will sync with this version, the question is can this be provided at least from the testing repository until it will be bundled with a standard Fedora kernel I've been requested by someone who own such hardware to do kmod's, but i prefer to patch the kernel (see here for testing: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/kernel/ ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:28:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132128.l6DLSCWU025609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-13 17:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > Here are all the MUST items that have problems > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > --> NOT OK: project: modified BSD, package spec: GPL > Oops, good catch, will fix > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) > > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) > > Possible solution: split out -devel package and have avr-libc require: > avr-libc-devel? Or possibly just rename the package. > As already explained in the mailinglist discussion, the guidelines or just plain bogus in this (exceptional) case, just ignore them. > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > --> BAD > $ rpm -qf /usr/avr > avr-binutils- 2.17-3.fc7.x86_64 > avr-libc- 1.4.6-1.x86_64 > Unfortunately the review checklist is a bit to short / simple when describing this. see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 For the full story, to quote it: "Another exception for directory ownership in packages is when there is no clear dependency hierarchy. An example: Foo-Animal-Emu puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Emu Foo-Animal-Llama puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Llama Neither package depends on the other one. Neither package depends on any other package which owns the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory. In this case, each package must own the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory." Since binutils doesn't need libc and libc doesn't need binutils there is no clear dependency hierarchy, thus they should both own /usr/avr Ah, I just saw your comment you find this ourselves, yes its no an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132130.l6DLU3wr025716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-13 17:30 EST ------- Before I forget many thanks! And once your satisfied with the discussion around the exceptional parts of this package, can you please post a final Must Fix list, I would like to avoud a gazillion iterations :) Sofar I have as Must Fix: -gzip manpages -fix License field in specfile (oops) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:41:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132141.l6DLfAiY026581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-07-13 17:41 EST ------- Fixed _smp_mpflags and cleaning New Spec URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/etoys-2.0.1451-1.spec New SRPM URL: http://etoys.laptop.org/srpm/etoys-2.0.1451-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:48:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132148.l6DLmu3Y027088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 bert at freudenbergs.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132148.l6DLmvcu027118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 bert at freudenbergs.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247984 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:49:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132149.l6DLnUJq027172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-07-13 17:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Any response to the comments on the debuginfo issue raised above? If I know > someone's going to respond I'll go ahead and do a full review this. I'll clean the issues noted in the comment above. Currently out of town, but will get to it next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 21:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] New: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: james.antill at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Hi, I already have a couple of packages, so hopefully this shouldn't be too bad :). rpmlint gives a couple of warnings, but they should be ignored AIUI. Micro string library, very low overhead from plain strdup() (Ave. 44% for 0-20B strings). Very easy to use in existing C code. At it's simplest you can just include a single header file into your .c and start using it. This package also distributes pre-built shared libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 22:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132219.l6DMJCue029266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-13 18:19 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 22:34:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221256] Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132234.l6DMYc8h030441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etswitch - A *nix 'minimizer' for a few games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221256 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(rafalzaq at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 18:34 EST ------- Closing as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 22:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132242.l6DMgWDb030933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 18:42 EST ------- OK, this looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 22:51:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132251.l6DMpLQW031459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-13 18:51 EST ------- This fails to build: init_package.c:5:84: error: /usr/share/R/library/BufferedMatrix/include/doubleBufferedMatrix_stubs.c: No such file or directory make: *** [init_package.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'BufferedMatrixMethods' Looks like it needs a build requirement on R-BufferedMatrix-devel. Could you clean up the commented sections in the spec? Especially the %files list gets a bit confusing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 23:01:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132301.l6DN1xT6031942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-13 19:01 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output OK: SRPM, soprano, soprano-debuginfo produce no warnings W: soprano-devel no-documentation - see "relevant documentation" below + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License LGPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters ! relevant documentation is included While the minimum documentation is present, the upstream package also supports generating Doxygen documentation, which would be useful to package (in a -apidocs subpackage). + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used (%cmake macro) + debuginfo package is valid + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths, at least on i386 (I ran readelf -d on the shared objects) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no executables, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 703f11ca18f50c500b62cd44c84145e5 SHA1SUM: df2179aa29eb1a7d4d21e82ef94699dfc497f388 + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + all build dependencies listed in CMakeLists.txt are listed in BuildRequires (However, an additional BuildRequires: doxygen will be needed for the -apidocs.) + no translations in original tarball, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + all header files in -devel + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + /usr/lib/*.so symlink is correctly in -devel + /usr/lib/soprano/*.so plugin (NOT a symlink) is correctly NOT in -devel + -devel requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + no .la files + no GUI programs (in fact, no executables at all), so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install But I strongly recommend a: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after the: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to prevent a potential symlink attack as pointed out by the OpenSUSE folks. + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream ! I get a weird error in mock (tested FC6 i386 with Plague results and Rawhide i386, both on F7 build host): + %cmake . /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20248: line 28: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20248 (%build) I don't know if this is my fault or if something's screwed in your package or the %cmake macro. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. * Can't really test that the package functions as described without building some KDE 4 stuff against it first, skipping for now. + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies I see no real blockers except the strange error in mock. Thus, consider this APPROVED if you can get it to build in mock. However: 1. It would be useful to package the Doxygen documentation: * add BuildRequires: doxygen * create an -apidocs subpackage 2. I'd also suggest adding the mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 23:06:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132306.l6DN6nRd032174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-13 19:06 EST ------- Uhm, duh, no wonder it doesn't build in mock, you're missing the BuildRequires: cmake! So please add this before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 13 23:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707132320.l6DNK0ZX032704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-13 19:19 EST ------- Just to confirm: After adding the: BuildRequires: cmake the package builds in mock for both Rawhide and FC6, so with this change, it is APPROVED (but see the 2 suggested changes). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 00:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140013.l6E0DU4u001902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-13 20:13 EST ------- Package name: PASS (pykdeextensions) License: PASS (LGPL) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: PASS (5249c7288c1b2bed44a2d91111d3313a) rpmlint clean: NOTES Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: PASS Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: PASS -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: PASS Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: PASS Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: PASS NA - Not Applicable NT - Not Tested rpmlint on build RPMS: E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/qtuicompiler.py 0644 E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/kdedistutils.py 0644 E: pykdeextensions-devel non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/src/prefdialog.py 0644 I'm assuming these scripts are meant to be non-executable, so APPROVED Oh, and If you do need a comaintainer, let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 00:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140036.l6E0aCCu003972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-13 20:36 EST ------- ... and make the compilation log more verbose (i.e. add VERBOSE=1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 00:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140037.l6E0bei1004044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-13 20:37 EST ------- How would that be useful? We don't need useless console spewage. Errors are already printed as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 01:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140132.l6E1WLbc004590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fedora-release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |7.89-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 01:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140158.l6E1wdYY005366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-13 21:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > For 0.8.90-3: > * URL > - IMO generally http://sourceforge.net/projects/ has > useless information. > Googling gspiceui hits > http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gspiceui/index.html first and > IMO this URL is more preferable. As you wish. > * Requires/icon > - While icons are installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/, > why don't you use these icons for desktop file and > use gnome-util.png instead and require redhat-artwork? True, you are right about it. I don't remember why I did so. Xavier in your next release please do take those two into consideration. > ! OFF TOPIC > - I noticed that %_datadir/gEDA is owned by both libgeda and > geda-symbols. Is this okay? [root at goorah ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/gEDA libgeda-20070708-1 Tomorrow I'll commit to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 02:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140238.l6E2c9pr008176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-13 22:38 EST ------- I have been approved. cvsextras requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 02:56:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140256.l6E2u6DA009673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-13 22:56 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds: [ OK ] Mock: built on FC-devel [noarch package] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ Ok ] License type: GPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s) in %doc. [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ CHECK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ OK ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ OK ] Rpmlint output: Silent on both SRPM and RPM. ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 02:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140256.l6E2uX2k009734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-13 22:56 EST ------- Follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure for the CVS Request procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 04:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140449.l6E4n0Zf015225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-14 00:48 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ FAILED ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ FAILED ] Spec file name must match the base package name. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock i386 [FC-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ Ok ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ CHECK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ ? ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ Ok ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ ? ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ ? ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ Ok ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ Ok ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ CHECK ] Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libHalf.so.4()(64bit) libIex.so.4()(64bit) libIlmImf.so.4()(64bit) libImath.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpixiecommon.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libri.so.0()(64bit) libsdr.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libtiff.so.3()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) === ISSUES === # Package Name: The base package name is Pixie (with upper-case letter). Please move it to Pixie instead of pixie. That's also imply to move the name of spec file to the right one. # Timestamps action: This package have many text/documentations files and png/icons files so keeping timestamps is desirable. Does this package accept 'make INSTALL="install -p" install' ? # Some concerns about Large documentation: The final package is mostly documentation.I don't think it's mandatory that it be split into a -doc subpackage. But, it'll be not a bad idea to do so. Also, any reason to mkdir'ed __doc (with double underscore) ? # Ownership: Currently your %file section (main package) sound good. however, i've some comment about ownership (which can be improved). ---------- %dir %{_libdir}/Pixie %{_libdir}/Pixie/displays/ %{_libdir}/Pixie/modules/ ---------- The use of %{_libdir}/Pixie is enough and owned by the package (including sub-folders) ---------- %dir %{_datadir}/Pixie %dir %{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders %{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders/*.sdr %{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders/*.sl ---------- You don't need to own sub-folders if you already own parent directory. And, As above, this can be improved by %{_datadir}/Pixie (which's enough to be owned) # Quick request: Nicolas, will you upload somewhere the packaged x86_64 binaries please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 06:39:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707140639.l6E6dxJ1018674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-14 02:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #9) > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > > --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) > > > > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > > --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output) > > > > Possible solution: split out -devel package and have avr-libc require: > > avr-libc-devel? Or possibly just rename the package. > > > > As already explained in the mailinglist discussion, the guidelines or just plain > bogus in this (exceptional) case, just ignore them. The guidelines are not bogus on this subject. avr-libc's *.a's and *.h's are not host files, they are target files. The rpmlint warning is bogus. Also consider all packages of the avr-toolchain are devel packages. > > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. > > --> BAD > > $ rpm -qf /usr/avr > > avr-binutils- 2.17-3.fc7.x86_64 > > avr-libc- 1.4.6-1.x86_64 > > > > Unfortunately the review checklist is a bit to short / simple when describing > this. see: >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 > > For the full story, to quote it: "Another exception for directory ownership in > packages is when there is no clear dependency hierarchy. These dirs must be owned by all packages using them. Anything else is technically wrong. > Neither package depends on the other one. Exactly this is the point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 10:02:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141002.l6EA2iNx032062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-07-14 06:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-specimen Short Description: A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system Owners: splinux at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 10:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141026.l6EAQ5Ch000428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-14 06:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctapi-common New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: frank-buettner at gmx.net,ville.skytta at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 10:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141034.l6EAY4S3000712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-14 06:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day Short Description: A quote of the day display for gdesklets Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 11:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141119.l6EBJe6d002239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-14 07:19 EST ------- Bastian have confirm me that he don't had problems wih the name, Oups I don't had re-build the srpms with the fixed perms, ti's fixed. SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-quickrex.spec SRPMS http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-quickrex-3.5.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 11:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141134.l6EBYAHJ002744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-14 07:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Sofar I have as Must Fix: > -gzip manpages > -fix License field in specfile (oops) + %doc the man-pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 11:52:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141152.l6EBqvr9003782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-07-14 07:52 EST ------- # rpm -ql gnuplot-emacs /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot-gui.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot-gui.elc /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot.elc /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/info-look.20.2.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/info-look.20.3.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/gnuplot-init.el 0) Subpackage gnuplot-emacs should really be called emacs-gnuplot for consistency with other emacs add-on packages. 1) These files should be installed in their own sub-directory /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot 2) The source elisp (*.el) files should be packaged in a emacs-gnuplot-el subpackage - they are not needed at runtime (basically they are the equivalent to devel files). That is except for gnuplot-init.el. 3) info-look.20.2.el and info-look.20.3.el should be byte compiled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 11:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141157.l6EBvDDm004094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-07-14 07:57 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I was offline. Package is now build -- thank you Jason for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 11:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 07:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141157.l6EBvcAC004159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 15:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:10:31 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141510.l6EFAVFJ014708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-14 11:10 EST ------- I'll go ahead and review this, but I'm not sure if the plan is to maintain a separate iwl4965 package (and rename the existing iwlwifi-firmware package to iwl3945-firmware) or to just add the 4965 firmware to the iwlwifi package. So before anything gets checked in you should coordinate with the iwl3945-firmware maintainer. Anyway, the only issue I see with this package is the file /lib/firmware/LICENSE.iwlwifi-4965-ucode, which doesn't need to be there. The copy in /ur/share/doc is sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 15:47:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141547.l6EFlnPX016026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-14 11:47 EST ------- built for devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 15:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141547.l6EFloul016050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 16:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141625.l6EGPdat017573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-14 12:25 EST ------- Sorry, one more comment... (In reply to comment #9) > So now ftgl.pc look like this: > ------------------ > Version: 2.0.5 > ------------ Please fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 17:28:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 13:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141728.l6EHSuUA019489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-07-14 13:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-phar Short Description: Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files Owners: fedora at famillecollet.com Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 18:01:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141801.l6EI1m4p020719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 smilner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 18:04:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141804.l6EI4H3S020837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-14 14:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pygments Short Description: A syntax highlighting engine written in Python Owners: smilner at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: me at stevemilner.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 18:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141808.l6EI8FDE021049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-14 14:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl-2.1.2-5.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl.spec Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 Used dynamic patch for this... The whole package need to be fixed. but i don't think this is necesarry to use autotools. Whereas this fix may work with future release, I will try to advice the maintainer of ftgl about this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 18:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141832.l6EIWOdO021837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-14 14:32 EST ------- Well, the plugin doesn't seem to need to be updated for each OpenVPN update. The reason it requires the sources is that no openvpn-devel or similar package providing original OpenVPN headers exists... Maybe just ripping out a few headers from the OpenVPN sources would be enough to get it to build, but upstream seems to assume users install OpenVPN from sources, thus can simply point the plugin's configure script to the OpenVPN sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 18:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:32:37 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141832.l6EIWbwu021881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-14 14:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.15-2.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors Drop License from /lib/firmware Use ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64, as this may prevent koji to provide it only for i386 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 19:25:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:25:50 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141925.l6EJPoSp024421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-14 15:25 EST ------- cc'd matthias for having his advice about how to do with iwlwifi-firmware... But i think this is the same case as ipw2100 and ipw2200. there is two separates firmwares for each chipset as there is two separate module. The release date for each firmware are diffenrent. This mean that we can have to update one and not the other Having boht firmwares in iwlfiwif-firmware will lead to problem if we deceide to patch kernel to use versionned firmware... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 19:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141928.l6EJSbuw024553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-07-14 15:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Ping John. Any news on a updated version addressing issues in comment #20? 0.10.4 and some fixes http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/gnome-compiz-manager.spec http://fedorared.org/fedora/review/gnome-compiz-manager-0.10.4-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 19:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707141949.l6EJnPLr025205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pixie - 3D |Review Request: Pixie - 3D |renderer Renderman compliant|renderer Renderman compliant ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-14 15:49 EST ------- Ok, so... - Update to 2.2.1 - Rename to Pixie - Preserve timestamp at install step - Improve directory ownership - Move docs to sub-package - Add a dyn patch to link to shared ftgl # Quick answear: The rpm package was already in the same directory for x86_64 (previous version) Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie-2.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant I've tested to rebuild autotools because if sometime solve the rpath issue at source... But not in this case! so i leave it commented... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 20:09:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707142009.l6EK9Y3L025925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2007-07-14 16:09 EST ------- After making those changes here is the rpmlint output that I see on an x86_64 system (I'll hang a new SRPM and SPEC file soon and will give the URLs here when I do)... (Yet, I'm *still* not seeing any undefined-non-weak-symbol errors.) [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/hylafax-5.1.6-1.x86_64.rpm | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/hylafax/faxmail/application/octet-stream E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/hylafax/faxmail/application/pdf E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/hylafax/faxmail/image/tiff E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 14 21:50:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:50:01 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707142150.l6ELo1rh029942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-14 17:49 EST ------- About the current package, I wouldn't use %{?dist} in order to be able to share the noarch.rpm file across many (all) releases. Then, the current iwlwifi-firmware package will need to be renamed, just like upstream did a while back. I'd suggest keeping the prefix from the original archive and have iwlwifi-3945-firmware and iwlwifi-4965-firmware as the names, both obsoleting iwlwifi-firmware up to its last know version, in order to get iwlwifi-4965-firmware installed on all F-7 installs (for instance fresh installs on laptops applying all updated through the wired connection will automatically get the new firmware). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 01:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150118.l6F1IKGO004631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-14 21:18 EST ------- Your concise Must Fix list is accurate. I'll get to the rest of the review stuff tomorrow most likely (naming/packaging guidelines). I dont anticipate more issues as the spec looks very clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 02:44:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150244.l6F2iRof007049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-14 22:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 02:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] New: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd-0.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this project is built the best server software to serve digital music to the Roku Soundbridge and iTunes; to be able to serve the widest variety of digital music content over the widest range of devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 03:03:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150303.l6F33NtD007680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-07-14 23:03 EST ------- Not a full review, but there are some things that need fixing in your spec: (1) Don't use the %makeinstall macro if at all possible. Use '%make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install' instead. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MakeInstall for more information. (2) Your cp invocations in %install should use the '-P' parameter to preserve timestamp information. (3) You are using hardcoded paths instead of macro-based paths: E.g., "/usr/sbin" instead of "%{_sbindir}" and the like. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros for a full list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 04:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150409.l6F49JTM009731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-15 00:09 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 04:11:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150411.l6F4Bp6l009830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-15 00:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 04:14:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150414.l6F4EOpA009961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-15 00:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 04:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150418.l6F4I9Fs010101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-15 00:18 EST ------- The InitialCC here appears to be an email that doesn't exist in bugzilla. ;( Can you either create a bugzilla account for that email address and resubmit, or resubmit without the CC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 04:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150423.l6F4Nj4B010305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-15 00:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 05:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150554.l6F5ssnv013135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(john at curioussymbol| |s.com) | ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-15 01:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fityk Short Description: Curve-fitting program Owners: john at curioussymbols.com, wojdyr at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: john at curioussymbols.com, wojdyr at gmail.com Please can someone set the fedora-cvs flag to '?'. I can't do it, even though I am a member of the fedora group 'fedorabugs'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150806.l6F86Svp018801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150809.l6F89xxe019219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 04:09 EST ------- Once setting cvs to -. wojdyr at gmail.com doesn't seem to be cvsextras member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150810.l6F8AhG2019321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150817.l6F8Hscp019822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-15 04:17 EST ------- Hi Tasaka That's fine. If he's not in cvsextras then leave him out. He can still be on the CC list though, right? Cheers JP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150846.l6F8kgRP021699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 04:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > He can still be on the > CC list though, right? Okay. Please rewrite cvs request (and set cvs flag if possible) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 08:48:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707150848.l6F8mJMu021862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-15 04:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fityk Short Description: Curve-fitting program Owners: john at curioussymbols.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: john at curioussymbols.com, wojdyr at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 10:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] New: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This packages contains the libXNVCtrl library from the nvidia-settings application. This library provides the NV-CONTROL API for communicating with the proprietary NVidia xorg driver. This package does not contain the nvidia-settings tool itself as that is included with the proprietary drivers themselves. --- Notice to reviewers, yes you've read it correctly this library is of no use except to users of the proprietary nvidia driver, why include it in Fedora then? 1) Its foss (GPL) 2) Its needed for applications like for example gnome-applet-sensors to read the temperature sensors on nvidia cards whe using the proprietary driver. So this enhances the end user experience of applications like gnome-applet-sensors, which is included in Fedora, for users of the proprietary driver, and has no downside. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 10:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151019.l6FAJRST026553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 10:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151030.l6FAUE4Y026870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 11:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:29:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151129.l6FBTEqq028931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 07:29 EST ------- Ok renamed to iwlwifi-4965-firmware I have few experience about two packages obsoleting/providing one... I don't know if it will work with something like this: Provides: iwlwifi-fimware Obsoletes: iwlwifi-firmware =< 2.14.4-1 I think it cannot provides versionned iwlwifi-firmware as this may confict with iwlwifi-3945-firmware ?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 11:46:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151146.l6FBkfh8029740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-15 07:46 EST ------- Chitlesh, If you look closely (at the history of the BZ) beta2 does not support blue-utils >= 3.7 which more of less makes it useless for F7. IMHO, while far from being perfect, b3 is good enough. It's usable. Yes, it is beta, and clearly marked as such. But distributing it as beta will help the developers get more bug reports, and in the long term, get a (much) better kdebluetooth 1.0 release. I see nothing wrong in releasing beta product to Fedora (especially if there's no viable alternative), as long as it is clearly marked as such. As for #58, WORKSFORME - I cannot seem to reproduce this problem. Bad build environment? * Sun Jul 15 2007 Gilboa Davara 1-0.0-28.beta3 - Fix %%dist... again... SPEC: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth.spec SRPM: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/kdebluetooth-1.0-0.28.beta3.fc7.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 12:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151204.l6FC4nTF030837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net)| ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-07-15 08:04 EST ------- No reason besides me forgetting about it, imported now, waiting for some BRs to get into updates before building for F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 12:15:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151215.l6FCFSpZ031290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-07-15 08:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avant-window-manager Short Description: Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 12:31:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151231.l6FCV9Z7031875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-15 08:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdebluetooth Short Description: The KDE Bluetooth Framework Owners: gilboad at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: gilboad at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 13:01:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151301.l6FD1ujC001177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 09:01 EST ------- ok i finally experienced this Out of memory: kill process 9504 (g++) score... (only on x86_64 tought - i386 built fine) I will give a retry, but i think this is more related to swap size (as kswapd has taken most of the ressources - top command show it)... I will give a retry with more swap size (i currently have 2Gio of RAM and 3Gio of swap size) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 14:19:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:19:24 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151419.l6FEJOP3004728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 10:19 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwlwifi-4965-firmware/iwlwifi-4965-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwlwifi-4965-firmware/iwlwifi-4965-firmware-4.44.15-3.src.rpm Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors Ok renamed, i haven't tested if this provides/Obsoletes works... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 14:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151453.l6FErOY9005878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 10:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159277) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159277&action=view) mock build log of linkchecker 4.7-3 on rawhide i386 * This time mockbuild fails again. * And please check directory ownership issue. For example, the directory %{python_sitearch}/linkcheck/ is not owned by any package. Note: on i386, ppc, this directory is the same as %{python_sitelib}/linkcheck/ and on x86_64 and ppc64 this directory is also unowned (for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 15:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151510.l6FFAHpi006524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > I'm guessing that once we test it out we can mark this bug as NEXTRELEASE? Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once you rebuilt this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 15:10:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151510.l6FFAw5Q006623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 11:10 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------- This package (ftgl) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 15:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151513.l6FFDwCW006794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-15 11:12 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 15:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151523.l6FFNlNk007126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 11:23 EST ------- Tested with EL-5 so branching also... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ftgl Short Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 15:26:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151526.l6FFQQuw007243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-07-15 11:26 EST ------- Push to devel only. Waiting some feedback (fedora-php-devel-list) for a proposal of update of PHP Guidelines (pecl module registration). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:07:25 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151607.l6FG7P7x008867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-15 12:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Ok renamed, i haven't tested if this provides/Obsoletes works... Will, but typo in fimware vs. firmware provides :-) BTW, I know rpmlint complains when an obsoletes isn't also provided, but in this case it doesn't make that much sense... Everything else looks good to me, I now have to prepare the rename of iwlwifi-firmware otherwise if this new and different firmware is released now it will replace the different 3945 one and... make many users unhappy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151609.l6FG9XHB008998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-07-15 12:09 EST ------- Hi Axel, is there anything I can do to help here? I'd really like to see VTK in Fedora since I use it and have been recommending it to others. I've done a number of vtk builds with your spec-file (or slightly modified versions of it) on various FC-6 and F-7 systems (i386 and x86_64) and it works nicely. When I remove the %bcond, java, and %{?_smp_flags} bits it also works nicely in mock. Would you be willing to considfer me as a co-maintainer? I use VTK (the C++ and python APIs, anyway), so I have an interest and am willing to test it, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:25:59 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151625.l6FGPxhR009944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-15 12:25 EST ------- With the appearance of the new iwlwifi-4965-firmware (see bug #248224), this package will need to be renamed from iwlwifi-firmware to iwlwifi-3945-firmware. What should I do? Reopen this bug and request CVS changes here by setting the flag to "?" again? I've put the new files here (iwlwifi-3945-firmware-2.14.4-1): http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/iwlwifi-3945-firmware/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:28:55 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151628.l6FGStmS010123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-15 12:28 EST ------- Two more comments : - The LICENSE file name in %description is wrong. - You could do the same as I do in the 3945 package and rename the docs to shorter README and LICENSE names since they'll be in their own directory in the end. The rename of iwlwifi-3945-firmware will be discussed in bug #230096. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:32:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151632.l6FGWSPA010243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG CC| |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 12:32 EST ------- Can this ticket be closed now? It appears approval was given and fedora-review + is assigned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151634.l6FGY77Z010313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 16:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:49:27 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151649.l6FGnRNQ010854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 12:49 EST ------- %description This package contains the firmware required by the iwlwifi driver for Linux. Should be ?!: This package contains the firmware required by the iwl3945 driver for Linux. Well, since it is true that the archive name is iwlwifi from intelwireless, the driver used inside the kernel is named iwl3945.ko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 17:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:02:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151702.l6FH2EFW011365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-15 13:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Should be ?!: > This package contains the firmware required by the iwl3945 driver for Linux. Fixed :-) (didn't bump the release for such a small change) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 17:02:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151702.l6FH2Zhb011435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 13:02 EST ------- Built for FC-6, F-7 and devel. Submitted in Bodhi. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 17:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:04:45 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151704.l6FH4jSn011563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-15 13:04 EST ------- Do you mean i need to drop Provides: iwlwifi-firmware ? if both firmwares obsoletes iwlwifi-firmware this mean that they need to be pushed at the same time on the repositories ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 17:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] New: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.1.beta3.src.rpm Description: * This is my first package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. * LZMA provides very high compression ratio and fast decompression. The core of the LZMA utils is Igor Pavlov's LZMA SDK containing the actual LZMA encoder/decoder. LZMA utils add a few scripts which provide gzip-like command line interface and a couple of other LZMA related tools. Also provides: - Average compression ratio 30% better than that of gzip and 15% better than that of bzip2. - Decompression speed is only little slower than that of gzip, being two to five times faster than bzip2. - In fast mode, compresses faster than bzip2 with a comparable compression ratio. - Achieving the best compression ratios takes four to even twelve times longer than with bzip2. However. this doesn't affect decompressing speed. - Very similar command line interface than what gzip and bzip2 have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 17:49:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151749.l6FHnbgf013237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 18:15:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151815.l6FIFUOt014252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 14:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soprano Short Description: Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions Owners: rdieter at math.unl.edu, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 18:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151819.l6FIJcMP014394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 14:19 EST ------- %changelog * Sun Jul 15 2007 Rex Dieter 0.9.0-2 - BR: cmake (doh) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 18:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151835.l6FIZwH2015060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-15 14:35 EST ------- Ok I have made the changes :) SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.0.0-3.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 18:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151857.l6FIvplG016055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-15 14:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159280) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159280&action=view) Mock build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 18:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151859.l6FIxh3a016234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-15 14:59 EST ------- Good: + Package meets naming guidelines + SPEC filename match with package base name + License is MIT + License tag matches with license included in upstream tar ball. + SPEC file is written in English + Package has correct buildroot + Package has not redundant BuildRequires + File list of package doesn't contains duplicates entries + File list contains no files or directories own by other packages Bad. - Don't use Vendor tag - Source tag contains not a full qualified URI - Unnecessary Provide tag - Condition before deleting of the build root is not require - Missing Version entries in the changelog entries - Inproper use of the rpm macros in the %file section - Package doesn't contains a %defattr statemend - Version 3.9-11 seems not to be an official stable version - Package doesn't contains a %doc section - Package doens't contains verbatim copy of the license text, but you can find the license text in the upstream tar ball - Build doesn't use compiler flags in $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Unnecessary Prefix tag - If you wnat to include all files and directories belang a specific directory, the entry in the file list must ands with a slash - Your package contains file which should be belongs th the nonexisting %doc section - Rpmlint complaints on source rpm: rpmlint squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc3.src.rpm W: squeak-vm hardcoded-prefix-tag %{prefix} W: squeak-vm unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-%{version} W: squeak-vm setup-not-quiet W: squeak-vm rpm-buildroot-usage %build make ROOT=%{buildroot} %{?_smp_mflags} W: squeak-vm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: rpmlint squeak-vm-3.9-11olpc3.x86_64.rpm E: squeak-vm binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/squeak/3.9-11/squeak ['/usr/lib'] - Mock build failed on Devel (ppc64). Build log will be attached Special question: Do you search a sponsor. If yes, Unfortunately, I can't sponsor you. because I'm not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151900.l6FJ01HW016270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151923.l6FJNTX1017510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151924.l6FJOdVD017743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151925.l6FJPsI1017828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:28:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151928.l6FJSCpX017951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:29:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151929.l6FJT2lG018042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-cvs? |needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com), | |fedora-cvs- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151930.l6FJUsRF018239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:35:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151935.l6FJZ2wU018442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 15:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gdesklets-calendar Updated Fedora Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com,luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151935.l6FJZkBY018523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 15:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gdesklets-goodweather Updated Fedora Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com,luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:36:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151936.l6FJauhR018630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 15:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day Updated Fedora Owners: tyler.l.owen at gmail.com,luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 19:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707151944.l6FJiI1F019008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-15 15:44 EST ------- [comment #20] Sound Good. Will you also upload the updated packages x86_64 (including -doc and -devel sub-packages and build.log) thanks. [comment #21] :-).... if this happened with the updated release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:02:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152002.l6FK2GfR019771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 16:02 EST ------- per comment #6, only devel/ and no FC-6/F-7 branches were created. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152013.l6FKD8lO020233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-15 16:13 EST ------- Package name doesn't match upstream (mt-daapd not so long ago was renamed to Firefly). You should add Provides: mt-daapd instead of using old project name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:29:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152029.l6FKTJuD021206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 16:29 EST ------- I'll take you up on the comaint offer... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pykdeextensions Short Description: A collection of python packages to support KDE applications Owners: rdieter at math.unl.edu,dev at nigelj.com Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152038.l6FKcgEt021626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-07-15 16:38 EST ------- Sorry, botched the name. It should be avant-window-navigator. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avant-window-navigator Short Description: Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:50:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152050.l6FKoh6Q022317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 16:50 EST ------- Not sure if it's related, but I can't build in devel/ either, koji reports error: BuildError: package soprano not in list for tag dist-f8 ?? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=67102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 20:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152053.l6FKrlCZ022545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-15 16:53 EST ------- That generally happens for new packages where the information hasn't been propagated to Koji yet (I had that happen to me with redland too), however it shouldn't take more than an hour for the information to propagate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 21:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152101.l6FL1rMf023127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-07-15 17:01 EST ------- Sorry for no response. I was on vacation in last two weeks. Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/angrydd/angrydd.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/angrydd/angrydd-1.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 21:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] New: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/cheese/cheese.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/cheese/cheese-0.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: cheese is a cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam. It also provides some graphical effects in order to please the users play instinct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 21:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152139.l6FLdjmj025500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-15 17:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-BufferedMatrix Short Description: A matrix data storage object held in temporary files Owners: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 22:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152226.l6FMQedD027306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-15 18:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > > I honestly don't understand the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. Is this > something that's apparently only happening on 64-bit? Yes, your guess was correct. (In reply to comment #53) > After making those changes here is the rpmlint output that I see on an x86_64 > system (I'll hang a new SRPM and SPEC file soon and will give the URLs here when > I do)... Make sure to include the following changes to fix the permission issues: 144,145c144,145 < %{_bindir}/* < %{_sbindir}/* --- > %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* > %attr(755,root,root) %{_sbindir}/* 171c171 < %attr(-,root,root) %{faxspool}/bin/* --- > %attr(755,root,root) %{faxspool}/bin/ > (Yet, I'm *still* not seeing any undefined-non-weak-symbol errors.) run "rpmlint hylafax" on the installed package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 22:33:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152233.l6FMXUaU027631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 bert at freudenbergs.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-07-15 18:33 EST ------- Thanks Jochen, I'll work on the "bad" list. The build failure is due to a missing libXt-devel BuildRequire. And I've got someone willing to sponsor me but he's on vacation atm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 15 22:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707152253.l6FMriJ0028330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-15 18:53 EST ------- Make that Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-7 FC-6 All the dependencies seem to be there (but I confess I havn't tried building yet) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 01:35:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160135.l6G1ZltP001882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-15 21:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd-0.2.4-2.fc7.src.rpm This version fixes the issues raised in comment #1. As far as comment #2, as of version 0.2.4 (the latest stable version) this project was still called mt-daapd. I will change the package name to firefly when a stable version is released that bears that name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 01:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160149.l6G1nqkb002611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-15 21:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pygments Short Description: A syntax highlighting engine written in Python Owners: smilner at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 02:02:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160202.l6G221Hx003088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |nabi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 02:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160224.l6G2O15k004040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-15 22:23 EST ------- http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/guidance/guidance.spec http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/guidance/guidance-0.8.1-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jul 15 2007 Rex Dieter 0.8.0-2 - BR: libXScrnSaver-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 02:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160241.l6G2f3vT004722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 22:41 EST ------- Now that I am sponsored, I will perform the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 02:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160253.l6G2r2wJ005286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-15 22:53 EST ------- Package looks good ----------------------------------------------------- This package (bontmia) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 03:24:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160324.l6G3O8FY006544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-15 23:24 EST ------- Hi Patrice, I am also seeking sponsorship so these are some informal suggestions based on a first look at the spec rather than an actual review. Make use of standard macros in Source: http://tukaani.org/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}beta3.tar.gz lzma-devel should have lzma as a dependency The changelog lacks a version Some RPMLint errors need addressing. E: lzma-libs library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/liblzmadec.so.0.0.0 E: lzma-libs library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/liblzmadec.so.0.0.0 W: lzma-libs non-standard-group System/Libraries W: lzma-devel non-standard-group Development/C Man pages should be installed as %doc -M -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 04:31:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160431.l6G4Vpve008653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 00:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248337] New: Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248337 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is a "fake" review request, as gnome-applet-sensors stems from the times before the RH-bugzilla based review system. The purpose of this "fake" review request, is to have a place to make CVS-admin requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248338] New: Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248338 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is a "fake" review request, as gnome-applet-netspeed stems from the times before the RH-bugzilla based review system. The purpose of this "fake" review request, is to have a place to make CVS-admin requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248339] New: Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248339 Summary: Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is a "fake" review request, as feh stems from the times before the RH-bugzilla based review system. The purpose of this "fake" review request, is to have a place to make CVS-admin requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248337] Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160947.l6G9lZwD029763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248337 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-16 05:47 EST ------- Owner change as result of maintainer being AWOL, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00212.html For FESco permission Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-applet-sensors Updated Fedora Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248338] Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160949.l6G9n4ik029866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248338 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl CC| |belegdol at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-16 05:49 EST ------- Owner change as result of maintainer being AWOL, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00212.html For FESco permission Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-applet-netspeed Updated Fedora Owners: belegdol at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 09:50:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248339] Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707160950.l6G9o2EA029926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248339 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-16 05:49 EST ------- Owner change as result of maintainer being AWOL, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00212.html For FESco permission Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: feh Updated Fedora Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 10:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161019.l6GAJP8N031974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-16 06:19 EST ------- Let's rather name it lowercase, even though the TEC is a short for "Text Encoding Conversion": http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&cat_id=TECkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 10:21:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161021.l6GALAwo032097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-16 06:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teckit Short Description: Conversion library and mapping compiler Owners: jnovy at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 11:34:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161134.l6GBYfoL004273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161200.l6GC0xlj006784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161201.l6GC1pX4006906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161224.l6GCOOL3008688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-16 08:24 EST ------- Vacation? What's that? :) Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:30:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161230.l6GCUW2B009131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-16 08:30 EST ------- fyi, koji devel/ builds succeeded this (the next) morning, non-devel branches still awol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] New: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Should help alleviate a few package's Requires: that exist only for directory ownership. Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kde-filesystem/kde-filesystem.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kde-filesystem/kde-filesystem-3.5-6.src.rpm Description: This package provides some directories that are required/used by KDE. %changelog * Fri Dec 01 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-6 - + %%_datadir/templates (kdebase,koffice) * Wed Oct 18 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-5 - + %%_datadir/icons/locolor * Tue Oct 17 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-4 - drop/omit %%_datadir/locale/all_languages * Fri Oct 13 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-3 - + %%_datadir/desktop-directories - + %%_datadir/locale/all_languages * Thu Oct 12 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-2 - + %%_datadir/applnk/.hidden - + %%_sysconfdir/kde/kdm - + %%docdir/HTML/en * Wed Oct 11 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5-1 - first try -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:46:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161246.l6GCkHKf010652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-16 08:46 EST ------- This would presumably be Requires'd by kdelibs (and/or kde-settings ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161247.l6GClt0R010863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-16 08:47 EST ------- If this is for F8, 3.5 might not be that great a version number to use. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 12:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161253.l6GCr2ou011334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-16 08:53 EST ------- I considered that, but does version really matter? It could be Version: 594854587 for all I care. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 13:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] New: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple- precision floating-point computations Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: varekova at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/mpfr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/mpfr-2.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: The MPFR library is a C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations with "correct rounding". The MPFR is efficient and also has a well-defined semantics. It copies the good ideas from the ANSI/IEEE-754 standard for double-precision floating-point arithmetic (53-bit mantissa). MPFR is based on the GMP multiple-precision library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 14:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161452.l6GEqm7H023924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-16 10:52 EST ------- I'm confused about this part of the package review process as well. According to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess "5. Once a package is flagged as fedora-review + (or -), the Reviewer's job is done. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 14:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161456.l6GEudBk024311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 10:56 EST ------- OK, If you have dropt the disttag from your package, I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 14:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161457.l6GEvuAm024453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 10:57 EST ------- Ping Marcin Can you tell me anything about your current state? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 14:59:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161459.l6GExbjG024603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-16 10:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: iksemel New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jeff at ocjtech.us Needed in EPEL as dependency of Zabbix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 15:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161501.l6GF1Y2r024965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 11:01 EST ------- It will be nice, if you can import your package into the cvs and initiate the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 15:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161504.l6GF4hDZ025229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 11:04 EST ------- Ping Sindre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 15:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241097] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161506.l6GF6Eun025521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 11:06 EST ------- Ping agein, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 15:11:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245045] Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161511.l6GFBjSM026239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245045 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 11:11 EST ------- Question: Why did you not have initiate the update process for F-7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 15:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245045] Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161518.l6GFIIFw027180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245045 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-16 11:18 EST ------- Oversight? Sorry. I've requested the push to updates-testing now, and will move it to updates in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161608.l6GG8124032481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 12:07 EST ------- On BZ #248363 a review for a separate mpfr package was started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:08:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161608.l6GG8KrZ032584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-07-16 12:08 EST ------- > I'm not sure I understand these. What's the point of putting just a library > dependency in Requires(pre)? If something in %pre needs those libraries, > won't it have its own dependencies? These libraries are need for some of the daemons in nfs-utils to function. Should the just be Requires;? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161619.l6GGJU1t001096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de BugsThisDependsOn| |225809 Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 12:19 EST ------- Good: + Package meets naming guildlines. + SPEC file name matches with package base name. + License tag says GPL + Project home page says LGPL as package license + Package contains verbatim copy of the license text + SPEC is written in English + SPEC file is legible + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 40bf06f8081461d8db7d6f4ad5b9f6bd) + Package has correct build root + BuildRequires are not redundant + Local build works fine. + package has %defattr an proper file permissions + %doc section is small + %doc section doesn't affect run time + Package contains no duplicates in the %file list + Changelog entries are ok. + Rpmlint is quite on source package. + Rpmlint is quite on binary packages + Mock build works fine for Devel (x86_64, i386, ppp64, ppc) Bad: - Package needs a Conflict tag, because the current gmp package contains the mpfr package - Unnecessary condition on deleting build root in %clean section - Devel package contains static library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161619.l6GGJVUc001120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248363 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] New: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-WordDiff/perl-Text-WordDiff.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-WordDiff-0.02-2.src.rpm Description: This module is a variation on the lovely Text::Diff module. Rather than generating traditional line-oriented diffs, however, it generates word- oriented diffs. This can be useful for tracking changes in narrative documents or documents with very long lines. To diff source code, one is still best off using Text::Diff. But if you want to see how a short story changed from one version to the next, this module will do the job very nicely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245045] Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161655.l6GGtZ0N004721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245045 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-16 12:55 EST ------- re2c-0.12.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161656.l6GGu5tg004776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-16 12:56 EST ------- JSDoc-1.10.2-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:56:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161656.l6GGu9hB004805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.10.2-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:57:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161657.l6GGvCZj005111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-16 12:57 EST ------- naturette-1.3-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161657.l6GGvHr3005157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.3-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161659.l6GGx2Ph005428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-16 12:59 EST ------- qgis-0.8.1-11.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161659.l6GGxF1K005538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-11.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:59:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161659.l6GGxV1M005626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-16 12:59 EST ------- qtpfsgui-1.8.9-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 16:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161659.l6GGxask005676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.8.9-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:01:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] New: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-LevenshteinXS/perl-Text-LevenshteinXS.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-LevenshteinXS-0.03-1.src.rpm Description: This module implements the Levenshtein edit distance in a XS way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248395] New: Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248395 Summary: Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/sysusage/sysusage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/sysusage/sysusage-2.5-3.el5.src.rpm Description: SysUsage is a tool used to continuously monitor a system and generate a daily/weekly/monthly/yearly graphical report using rrdtool and sar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161704.l6GH4n8g006832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-16 13:04 EST ------- Hello Marc, Thanks for your help ! > Make use of standard macros in Source: > http://tukaani.org/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}beta3.tar.gz Done > lzma-devel should have lzma as a dependency Done > The changelog lacks a version Done > E: lzma-libs library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/liblzmadec.so.0.0.0 ldconfig is now called in %post > E: lzma-libs library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/liblzmadec.so.0.0.0 ldconfig is now called in %postun > W: lzma-libs non-standard-group System/Libraries Group set to System Environment/Libraries > W: lzma-devel non-standard-group Development/C Group set to Development/Libraries > Man pages should be installed as %doc Done Should I increase the release number in such a case ? Best regards Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248395] Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161707.l6GH7Nd3007047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysusage - System monitoring based on perl, rrdtool, and sysstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248395 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-07-16 13:07 EST ------- there has been some discussion as to whether or not this package should instead be named perl-SysUsage-Sar. if perl-SysUsage-Sar is a preferred or more correct package name, let me know and i'll be happy to respin it that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-Diff-HTML/perl-Text-Diff-HTML.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Text-Diff-HTML-0.04-2.src.rpm Description: This class subclasses Text::Diff::Unified, a formatting class provided by the Text::Diff module, to add XHTML markup to the unified diff format. For details on the interface of the diff() function, see the Text::Diff documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] New: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-File-Contents/perl-Test-File-Contents.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-File-Contents-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: Test routines for examining the contents of files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248402] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248402 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Class-0.24-1.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Class/perl-Test-Class.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Class-0.24-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Class provides a simple way of creating classes and objects to test your code in an xUnit style. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:39:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248402] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161739.l6GHdTmt009815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248402 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Test- |Review Request: perl-Test- |Class - |Class - Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-16 13:39 EST ------- Hit enter too soon again. Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:40:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161740.l6GHe9bc009900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-07-16 13:40 EST ------- Just to show the output of rpmlint on this package: [ansilva at dhcp227-94 noarch]$ rpmlint python-proctor-1.2-2.noarch.rpm [ansilva at dhcp227-94 noarch]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:41:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:41:23 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161741.l6GHfN1q010062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-16 13:41 EST ------- Considering iwlwifi-firmware never had 4965 firmware, why would you want to provide/obsolete it here? Just have the 3965 version do it. Note that the guidelines say 'Firmware packages should be named -firmware, where is the driver or other hardware component that the firmware is for.' So, that would lead to 'iwl4965-firmware', rather than iwlwifi-4965-firmware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] New: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Term-ReadPassword/perl-Term-ReadPassword.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Term-ReadPassword-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: This module lets you ask the user for a password in the traditional way, from the keyboard, without echoing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 17:58:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] New: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Params-CallbackRequest/perl-Params-CallbackRequest.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Params-CallbackRequest-1.17-1.src.rpm Description: Params::CallbackRequest provides functional and object-oriented callbacks to method and function parameters. Callbacks may be either code references provided to the new() constructor, or methods defined in subclasses of Params::Callback. Callbacks are triggered either for every call to the Params::CallbackRequest request() method, or by specially named keys in the parameters to request(). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:07:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161807.l6GI7OR6012602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:07:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161807.l6GI7rSS012790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-16 14:07 EST ------- Great. I wanted to package it myself a long time ago. Taking the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248414] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248414 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-SFTP/perl-Net-SFTP.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-SFTP-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Net::SFTP is a pure-Perl implementation of the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) - file transfer built on top of the SSH2 protocol. Net::SFTP uses Net::SSH::Perl to build a secure, encrypted tunnel through which files can be transferred and managed. It provides a subset of the commands listed in the SSH File Transfer Protocol IETF draft, which can be found at http://www.openssh.com/txt/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-00.txt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161814.l6GIEqNO013291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avant-window-navigator - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:14 EST ------- cvs done (I hope). You may also have to modify your Makefile to have the right package name when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245527] Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161819.l6GIJYrS013753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-goodweather - weather and forcast display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245571] Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161819.l6GIJhAp013802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-calendar - Calendar display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245863] Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161819.l6GIJvx6013882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdesklets-quote-of-the-day - A quote of the day display for gdesklets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245863 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161822.l6GIMGQv014200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161824.l6GIO1ZR014393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161827.l6GIR9OM014776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:27 EST ------- Added the F-7 and FC-6 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:29:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248337] Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161829.l6GITi88015643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-sensors - Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248337 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248338] Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161830.l6GIUoIZ015911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-netspeed - GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248338 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:31:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248339] Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161831.l6GIVuLt016111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: feh - Fast command line image viewer using Imlib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248339 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 14:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161834.l6GIYQuf016710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-16 14:34 EST ------- Cool. I've done a quick grep through the code for "Copyright", "License", "Proprietary", "Confidential" and "Sun" and things seem okay, so let's go ahead with this. Approved! Thanks, Alphonse. I don't know where to go from here with sponsorship. I'm willing to sponsor you, Alphonse, but what's the next step? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:41:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] New: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Sync/perl-File-Sync.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Sync-0.09-1.src.rpm Description: The fsync() function takes a Perl file handle as its only argument, and passes its fileno() to the C function fsync(). It returns undef on failure, or true on success. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 18:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] New: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Authen-PAM/perl-Authen-PAM.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Authen-PAM-0.16-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides a Perl interface to the PAM library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161901.l6GJ1ppF020923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 15:01 EST ------- Well, Checked on mock_i386 # About timestamps action 'make INSTALL="install -p" install' doesn't sounds to work well on docs/images files as we want. 'Cause the Makefile called install-sh script to install all shipped data. So you will have to sed or patch the Makefile. Or also, if you like improvment, try this in %install stage 'make install_sh_DATA="$(install_sh) -c -pm 0644" install' # Sub-packages -libs and -devel subpackage don't seem good. this: %{_libdir}/*.so should be moved to -devel. this: %{_libdir}/*.so.* should be moved to -lib(s) if other applications require them for developing work, otherwhise keeping them in main package it's good. Also, don't forget to upload packaged x86_64 rpm files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:41:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] New: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-FTPServer/perl-Net-FTPServer.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Net-FTPServer-1.122-1.src.rpm Description: Net::FTPServer is a secure, extensible and configurable FTP server written in Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:42:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161942.l6GJg1Pi025814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |248425, 248427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:42:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161942.l6GJg6VJ025887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248431 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161942.l6GJg8Q0025924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248431 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161947.l6GJlDo9027159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bpeck at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-16 15:47 EST ------- Going through and checking up on all my bugs... Any progress to report on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:47:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248414] Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161947.l6GJlrsc027275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248414 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-16 15:47 EST ------- Good: + Package meets naming guidelines + SPEC file name matches with package base name + SPEC file has consistantly macro usage + License is GPL or Artistic + Upstream Tar ball contains a verbatim copy of the license + Package contains verbatim copy of the license + License tag matches with license in the tar ball + SPEC file is written in English + SPEC file is legible + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 8383eb0839178cab8cbfe619b232b8c0) + Package has proper build root + Package has no redundant BuildRequires + Package has no sub packages + Local build works properly + Package has proper %clean section + Build root will cleand at the beginning of the %install section + Package has proper %defattr and proper file permissions + Package %doc files doesn't affect runtime + Packages file list has not duplicate files + Package doesn't contains file or directories owned by other packages + Local install and uninstall works fine + Rpmlint is quite for source and binary package + Mock build works fine Devel (x86_64, ppc64, ppc) *** You are APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:55:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-HTTP-DAV/perl-HTTP-DAV.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-HTTP-DAV-0.31-1.src.rpm Description: HTTP::DAV is a Perl API for interacting with and modifying content on webservers using the WebDAV protocol. Now you can LOCK, DELETE and PUT files and much more on a DAV-enabled webserver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 19:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248414] Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707161957.l6GJv95r029009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248414 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-16 15:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-SFTP Short Description: Secure File Transfer Protocol client Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162015.l6GKFvR9032221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 16:15 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock x86_64 [FC-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ SKIP ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ Ok ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ CHECK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which're mentioned in OCaml guideline if present. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines if present. [ ? ] Rpmlint output: * From RPM (main package): W: ocaml-ssl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/ssl/ssl.cmi W: ocaml-ssl devel-file-in-non-devel-package/usr/lib64/ocaml/ssl/ssl_threads.cmi This above can be ignored accroding to the OCaml packaging guideline. W: ocaml-ssl unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllssl_threads_stubs.so W: ocaml-ssl unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllssl_stubs.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:37:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246138] Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162037.l6GKbDDL002816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-QuickREx - QuickREx is a regular-expression test Eclipse Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-07-16 16:37 EST ------- Cool :) Thanks for the review and sponsorship Andrew, Have a good evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] New: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks/perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: MasonX::Interp::WithCallbacks subclasses HTML::Mason::Interp in order to provide a Mason callback system built on Params::CallbackRequest. Callbacks may be either code references provided to the new() constructor, or methods defined in subclasses of Params::Callback. Callbacks are triggered either for every request or by specially named keys in the Mason request arguments, and all callbacks are executed at the beginning of a request, just before Mason creates and executes the request component stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162039.l6GKdH8k003103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |248410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:39:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162039.l6GKdIbK003130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248451 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:50:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Devel-Profiler/perl-Devel-Profiler.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Devel-Profiler-0.04-2.src.rpm Description: This module implements a Perl profiler that outputs profiling data in a format compatible with dprofpp, Devel::DProf's profile analysis tool. It is meant to be a drop-in replacement for Devel::DProf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 20:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162052.l6GKqTNx005036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-16 16:52 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Meets all source URL guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- pkg name: ok -- multiple packages: no (ok) -- spec file name: ok -- package version: numeric only (ok) -- package release: ok -- renaming existing package: no (ok) -- doc subpackage: yes (ok) -- addon package: no (ok) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 21:06:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162106.l6GL6ZTv006483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-07-16 17:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: angrydd Short Description: Falling blocks game Owners: rafalzaq at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 21:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162109.l6GL9C7D006898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-16 17:09 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- license ok -- patents: no (ok) -- emulator: no (ok) -- binary firmware: no (ok) -- prebuilt binaries: no (ok) -- FHS: ok -- rpmlint errors: already posted. -- changelog: ok -- tags: ok -- buildroot: ok -- file dependencies: no (ok) -- buildrequires: ok -- summary and description: ok -- encoding: ok -- documentation: ok -- compiler flags: doesnt apply (cross toolchain) -- static libs: doesnt apply (cross toolchain) -- system lib dups: no (ok) -- rpath: ok -- config files: none (ok) -- init scripts: none (ok) -- desktop files: none (ok) -- macros: ok -- locales: none (ok) -- parallel make: no (documented, breaks build -- ok) -- scriptlets: none (ok) -- conditional deps: none (ok) -- user accounts: none (ok) -- relocatable: no (ok) -- code vs content: code (ok) -- file ownership: ok -- web application: no (ok) -- conflicts: none (ok) -- timestamps: preserved (ok) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 21:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162110.l6GLADTA007047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 mebrown at michaels-house.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mebrown at michaels-house.net 2007-07-16 17:10 EST ------- No additional must fix items found. APPROVED pending fixes to above-listed must-fix items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 21:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162152.l6GLqlej012187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 21:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248414] Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162154.l6GLsqPk012549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248414 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:35:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162235.l6GMZPoG015277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-16 18:35 EST ------- Yes, so any potential reviewers can be sure they are reviewing the latest version you should increment the release and post any new SRPM or SPEC urls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162238.l6GMcJTV015570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235189] Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162238.l6GMcJg9015589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-python - Python bindings for Nautilus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:42:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162242.l6GMgJoH015819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-07-16 18:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avarice Short Description: Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB to allow users to debug their embedded AVR target. Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6,FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162243.l6GMhaSA015905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-07-16 18:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: uisp Short Description: Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:45:45 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162245.l6GMjjLG016050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-16 18:45 EST ------- Well, the main idea was to bring the firmwares for both modules (3945 and 4965) as an update of iwlwifi-firmware. So firmware for 4965 get installed for users that potentially need it... If not, users that need it, will have to get documented about how to install the right package for it... Actually i don't think that's too much to ask. We can choose this way also... This lead to have this: SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.15-5.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 22:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162256.l6GMuGtZ016476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-16 18:56 EST ------- Rathann, can you confirm that something has changed to: 476 /* coriander's Bayer decoding (GPL) */ 477 /* Edge Sensing Interpolation II from http://www-ise.stanford.edu/~tingchen/ ... With the possibilty for a 2.6.22 kernel to hit Fedora Core 6 threre is a need to solve this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162301.l6GN1iYm016763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-16 19:01 EST ------- I removed Version entry from the desktop file. Upstream source updated so RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.20.8-1.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162313.l6GNDtnW017408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-07-16 19:13 EST ------- Thanks for review. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248414] Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162315.l6GNFMGA017492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SFTP - Secure File Transfer Protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248414 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:30:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162330.l6GNUNw8018391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-07-16 19:30 EST ------- Rex: I have time to review this, but not to generate patches against the problems in comment #27. Given that, how would you like to proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:34:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162334.l6GNYkCd018584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-16 19:34 EST ------- review, as usual, I'll (eventually) deal with all blockers (oddly, I didn't see any rpath issues in my own mock builds, but maybe I missed something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162337.l6GNb5DZ018711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-16 19:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: logserial New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 16 23:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707162359.l6GNxcJa019858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 19:59 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 00:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170003.l6H03EbR020076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-07-16 20:03 EST ------- I tried this on fc7 and needed a couple of changes. I don't know what are the best fixes. diff -r f680525e26ba PyQt4.spec --- a/PyQt4.spec Mon Jul 16 20:02:14 2007 -0400 +++ b/PyQt4.spec Mon Jul 16 20:02:27 2007 -0400 @@ -57,8 +57,9 @@ fi %build #QT4DIR="$(pkg-config --variable=prefix QtCore || echo %{_libdir}/qt4)" -QT4DIR=%{_qt4_prefix} -PATH=%{_qt4_bindir}:$PATH ; export PATH +#QT4DIR=%{_qt4_prefix} +QT4DIR=/usr/lib64/qt4 +PATH=$QT4DIR/bin:$PATH ; export PATH # configure.py isn't smart enough to either use qmake or QMAKEPATH QMAKESPEC=$QT4DIR/mkspecs/linux-g++; export QMAKESPEC %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +chrpath --delete $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/QtDesigner.so %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 00:04:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170004.l6H04d67020204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 Bug 241475 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 20:04 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 01:37:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170137.l6H1bUKR024810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-16 21:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 01:55:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170155.l6H1tPMK025509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-16 21:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 01:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170156.l6H1u5Mn025561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 21:56 EST ------- Well, The currently release 1.0-1 fails to build on: /usr/bin/ocamldep.opt -pp camlp4orf -modules pa_ulex.ml > pa_ulex.ml.depends 'cause the BR ocaml-camp4-devel is missing. I fixed this issues and full reviewed with the release 1.0-2 which can be found here : http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/ocaml-ulex/ So, check them out and add a comment if no change happened from upstream or you. and i'll approve it. === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds on at least one supported arch. [ OK ] Mock built on x86_64 [ F-Devel ] [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming and Ocaml Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name match the packaging naming Ocaml guidelines. [ Ok ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which mentioned in OCaml guideline. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines. [ CHECK ] Requires: ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Camlp4) = 2e045826779ef15857e5824a007fea98 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Location) = eed044ad1204a633caad97bdd9048f8c ocaml(Longident) = 46fb8aad4fb2c12a0f301b02d8139f07 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Parsetree) = b59a1a6771867acd824bde52e6512b5c ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Warnings) = abcb1589615da86f20f475b0ed3bbabc ocaml = 3.10.0-1.fc8 == Rpmlint output: == [ Ok ] Silent on both main and -devel package. [ OK ] Silent on SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 02:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170245.l6H2jvJL029453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-16 22:45 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 02:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170258.l6H2wKYo030376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-16 22:58 EST ------- MUST Items: ! rpmlint output: SRPM: > W: kde-filesystem no-url-tag OK, makes sense for a package like that. > W: kde-filesystem mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) OK, not a real issue, you may want to be consistent, but it doesn't really matter. noarch RPM: > W: kde-filesystem no-documentation OK, no documentation needed for a package like that. > W: kde-filesystem hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/.hidden > W: kde-filesystem hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/.hidden OK, this one is really wanted. > E: kde-filesystem standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons ! This one is already owned by filesystem, please omit. > W: kde-filesystem no-url-tag OK, see above. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License Public Domain OK + No patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + no relevant documentation which would need to be included + nothing to compile, so RPM_OPT_FLAGS, debuginfo, static libraries, .la files, duplicated system libraries, rpaths, _smp_mflags don't apply + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no executables, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + no license which would need including (public domain) + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + no source, so no need to check against upstream + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system, FC6 i386 mock, Rawhide i386 mock) + no non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no build dependencies which would need listing as BuildRequires + locales handled properly (with %lang specifications) + no shared libraries, so need to call ldconfig + package not relocatable ! ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) except for %{_datadir}/icons as found by rpmlint + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + no %doc files, so no possible issues with %doc files required at runtime + no header files or .so symlinks which would need a -devel package + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no .la files + no GUI programs (in fact, no executables at all), so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install But I strongly recommend a: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after the: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to prevent a potential symlink attack as pointed out by the OpenSUSE folks. + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + no license which would need to be included + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream + builds in mock (tested FC6 i386 with Plague results and Rawhide i386, both on F7 build host) * skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. There's nothing potentially arch-specific in the package anyway + package only creates directories, so no functionality test needed + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies Please remove: %{_datadir}/icons/ from the file list as this is already owned by the filesystem package. With this change, this is APPROVED. I'd also suggest adding the mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but this isn't a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 03:18:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170318.l6H3IdvH031741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-16 23:18 EST ------- typo: license type is LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170548.l6H5mNCo008467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 01:48 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: soprano Updated Fedora Owners: rdieter at math.unl.edu,Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org My e-mail address is entered with the capital 'K' in the account system so the ACL system doesn't give me access when it's in owners.list with a lowercase 'k'. This mess is mainly because Bugzilla now lowercases all the e-mail addresses, it didn't do that when I registered my Fedora account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170554.l6H5sK6J008750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170555.l6H5t6TB008825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 01:55 EST ------- Scrap the above, I changed it to lowercase in the account system for consistency, I'm going to request it changed to lowercase elsewhere instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:58:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170558.l6H5wjOx009015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 01:58 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: redhat-artwork-kde Updated Fedora Owners: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Please change my e-mail address to lowercase, I changed it in the Fedora Account System to match Bugzilla, which now normalizes all e-mail addresses to lowercase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170559.l6H5xQtU009058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 01:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xchat Updated Fedora Owners: caillon at redhat.com,Fedora at FamilleCollet.com,kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Please change my e-mail address to lowercase, I changed it in the Fedora Account System to match Bugzilla, which now normalizes all e-mail addresses to lowercase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 05:59:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170559.l6H5xx7N009122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 01:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: redland Updated Fedora Owners: thomas at apestaart.org,kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Please change my e-mail address to lowercase, I changed it in the Fedora Account System to match Bugzilla, which now normalizes all e-mail addresses to lowercase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 06:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170611.l6H6BgUZ009937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-17 02:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 06:11:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170611.l6H6BuHx009992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-17 02:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 06:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236792] Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170612.l6H6CDJ3010050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-artwork-kde - KDE portions temporarily split out of redhat-artwork (236633) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236792 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-17 02:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 07:16:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247615] Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170716.l6H7GtAj014919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TECkit - Conversion library and mapping compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247615 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-17 03:16 EST ------- Imported & built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 07:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170734.l6H7YuYm016415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandprom| |pt.com) | ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-17 03:34 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #1) > * the name of ruby modules must be ruby- This is not a ruby module. This is PL/Ruby for PostgreSQL. So, I am inclined to leave the package name as it is now. > * the package must have: Requires: ruby(abi) = Done. > (and I think the package should have: BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = ) Why not ruby-devel ? > * the package must provide ruby() = - But it does not provide it? > * Usually ruby module packages have Group : Development/Languages As I said, this is a PL for PostgreSQL, so let's leave as Applications/Databases. Thanks for the review. I will post the updated spec and srpm shortly. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 07:46:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] New: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot- em-up Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cdogs-sdl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cdogs-sdl-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: C-Dogs SDL is a port of the old DOS arcade game C-Dogs to modern operating systems utilising the SDL Media Libraries. C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up which lets players work alone and cooperatively during missions or fight against each other in the ?dogfight? deathmatch mode. The DOS version of C-Dogs came with several built in missions and dogfight maps. This version does too. The author of the DOS version of C-Dogs was Ronny Wester. We would like to thank Ronny for releasing the C-Dogs sources to the public. --- Reviewers, notice this game requires cdogs-data which I will be submitting shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 07:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] New: Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 Summary: Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cdogs-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cdogs-data-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Data files for the CDogs game. --- Reviewers, notice this is the data for cdogs-sdl which review is bug 248511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 07:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170749.l6H7nQYA017581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-17 03:49 EST ------- The cdogs-data review is bug 248513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 08:02:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170802.l6H82WNW018896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-17 04:02 EST ------- New spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec New SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 08:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] New: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at seznam.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/nodoka-theme-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/nodoka-theme-gnome-0.3.1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Nodoka theme for Metacity window manager and Nodoka metatheme for Gnome, the metatheme requires gtk-nodoka-engine and echo-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 08:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170827.l6H8RtQm021848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |248163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 08:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170827.l6H8RvBK021879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248516 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 08:36:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707170836.l6H8afLJ022713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-07-17 04:36 EST ------- I've splited the metacity and metatheme into separate package - BZ #248516 and released new version the engine. NEW SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec NEW SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.3.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 10:05:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171005.l6HA5SEq031958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-07-17 06:05 EST ------- Seems to have built now, once I finally completed the setup process. Thanks to everybody that helped, and hope it's now working somewhat... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 12:20:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171220.l6HCK8G7010604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-17 08:20 EST ------- The disttag will be dropped in the final import. Thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 12:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171258.l6HCwflW016241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-17 08:58 EST ------- %_qt4_prefix,%_qt4_bindir is (should be!) defined by qt4-devel's /etc/rpm/macros.qt4, but %{_qt4_bindir} is broken in qt4 < 4.3.0-8 (4.3.0-8 is currently in updates-testing). I'll fix it so that it "just works", and add the chrpath in the next build. Still awaiting review blockers... (Bryan?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 13:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248552] New: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc, .md5(sfv-like), md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248552 Summary: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc,.md5(sfv-like),md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is a "fake" review request, as cfv stems from the times before the RH-bugzilla based review system. The purpose of this "fake" review request, is to have a place to make CVS-admin requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 13:25:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248552] cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc, .md5(sfv-like), md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171325.l6HDPvXP019885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc,.md5(sfv-like),md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248552 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-17 09:25 EST ------- I would like to take over cfv, following the discussions which took place in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00211.html Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cfv Updated Fedora Owners: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 14:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244237] Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171434.l6HEYRDd027925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-pls - Multivariate regression by PLSR and PCR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244237 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-17 10:34 EST ------- I have made some changes, above others to take the guidelines into account: There are the new files SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-pls/R-pls.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-pls/R-pls-2.0-3.fc6.src.rpm Thanks :) (PS. I am not looking for a sponsor anymore) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 14:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171440.l6HEef0E028942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-17 10:40 EST ------- Michael, Thanks for the approval, before even seeing the fixed version. I appreciate the trust! For reference here is the version I'll be importing once there is a CVS dir for this: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-4.fc8.src.rpm Changes: * Tue Jul 17 2007 Hans de Goede 1.4.6-4 - Gzip manpages - Make manpages %%doc - Install -docs documentation in same dir as the main package docs - Change License field from GPL to BSD (oops) Note that I also fulfilled Ralf's request to put the -docs docs in the same subdir of %docdir as the main package docs. Thanks Ville, for explaining me how to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 15:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244333] Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171552.l6HFqD6t008642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244333 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-17 11:52 EST ------- Ping... Please close this bug once the packages have been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 15:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171556.l6HFutkF009261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247699 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-17 11:56 EST ------- I have made some others change There are the new files SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods.spec SRPM http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BufferedMatrixMethods/R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.0.0-4.fc6.src.rpm Btw I will be away until the 29th so I do not if I will be able to check my mails over this time Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 15:58:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171558.l6HFwXvW009546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-17 11:58 EST ------- Please close this bug once the packages have been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 16:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171600.l6HG0qnW009766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(eric at brouhaha.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-17 12:00 EST ------- Closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 16:14:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171614.l6HGE76Z011515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-17 12:14 EST ------- Ok, here's the new links. Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.2.beta3.src.rpm Thanks again. Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 16:20:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171620.l6HGKOPJ012184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-17 12:20 EST ------- I Have a problem trying to compile SALOME wich needs vtk ---- checking for vtk python module... ./configure: line 2419: 24091 Segmentation fault $PYTHON -c "import vtk" >&/dev/null no ---- rpm -q vtk (from Axel's rpms repository) vtk-5.0.3-18.fc6 importing the module with ipython work fine but the segmentation fault appears on only exit... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 16:37:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171637.l6HGbRPS014688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-17 12:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.2-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Update to 0.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 16:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171644.l6HGi6IY015416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-17 12:44 EST ------- R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171707.l6HH7JJ8017734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171707.l6HH7Mnl017796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 205955 depends on bug 178162, which changed state. Bug 178162 Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:08:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171708.l6HH8QFC017887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cbalint at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171711.l6HHBOs0018191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449, 205955 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-17 13:11 EST ------- I would like to continue review of this package once now epsg updated the license terms, and Frank Warmerdar will do this week a respin of libgeotiff including new EPSG dataset. I reasigned to myself the bug, i come up with a new spin of package as Frank spinn upstream libgeotiff (should happen today or tomorrow) and Thomas ACk from FSF the license of geodetic dataset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:11:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171711.l6HHBSCG018266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|178162 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171720.l6HHKIS8019116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-07-17 13:20 EST ------- Doh, sorry. Bogus symlink fixed, comment #9 URLs now work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:35:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] New: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wildmidi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wildmidi-0.2.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: WildMidi is a software midi player which has a core softsynth library that can be use with other applications. Originally conceived in December 2001 as a stand alone player, it wasn't until September 2003, and several revisions later, that the library came into existance. The library is designed to process a midi file and stream out the stereo audio data through a buffer which an external program can then process further. --- Reviewers: note, this is necessary to add midi playback support to gstreamer, since the plugin is currently under development it is in gstreamer-plugins-bad from the repo that must not be named. To test this, install wildmidi-devel and the gstreamer-plugins-bad.src.rpm and rebuild gstreamer-plugins-bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:42:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171742.l6HHg5Yh021418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-17 13:41 EST ------- Out of curiousity, what makes this better or worse than timidity for the same sorts of things (as SDL_mixer uses that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:44:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171744.l6HHiNF2021658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-17 13:44 EST ------- Hello Balint: This review request is old and initial reporter differs. Would you close this bug once , ask Frank to open a new review request and mark this bug a duplicate of the new review request to avoid confusion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171749.l6HHnF1G022294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-07-17 13:49 EST ------- so s.adam , do I need to separate or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:53:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171753.l6HHr6mU022768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-17 13:53 EST ------- Now mock build passed on rawhide i386. For 1.20.8-1: * #define macro / file name namespace issue - This time HippoDraw-devel contains named "version.h" and defines _VERSION_H_ macro IMO this will cause file name/define macro namespace conflict. Actually some package badly install header file named "version.h" and this will cause namespace conflict when both packages which use "version.h" are included. Would you rename this to "HippoDraw_version.h" and change to "ifdef _HippoDraw_version_h_" or something, or simply remove version.h from HippoDraw-devel? * Again ifdef judgment - Again what is happening on /usr/include/HippoDraw/numarray/num_util.h? This package contains #ifdef HAVE_NUMPY, however we cannot tell whether HAVE_NUMPY is defined or not when rebuilt (please recheck the comment 43 by Hans). Is your comment 33 still valid? (in that case, is num_util.h really needed for header files?) * Requires - Please remove explicit Requires when libraries' dependency automatically checked by rpmbuild pulls the dependency. For example "Requires: cfitsio" is not needed for main package because main package has the dependency for libcfitsio.so.0. * Desktop file - fedora-HippoDraw.desktop refers to the wrong name icon. * defattr For defattr, we now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * doc subpackage naming - Perhaps simply "HippoDraw-docs" may be better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171753.l6HHrYDR022839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |than at redhat.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-17 13:53 EST ------- It would be nice if one of you could review this one once the high-priority KDE 4 and KDE 3 compat stuff is dealt with. I'm going to submit the ported KWin theme too once the new kdebase is in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 17:58:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171758.l6HHwhCI023409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-17 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Out of curiousity, what makes this better or worse than timidity for the same > sorts of things (as SDL_mixer uses that). The gstreamer midi plugins (both libtimidity and wildmidi) author claims that wildmidi has better quality. SDL_mixer's timidity code and libtimidity which is derived from SDL_mixer's code have had some severe surgery to make them less CPU hogs then the real timidity, sacrificing quality for speed. Try listening to the same midi both through playmus and to the real timidity from timidity++, for the clear difference. wildmidi tries to be fast without sacrificing quality. With that said, the sad comment must be made that all 3 upstreams are in a trouble some state. SDL_mixer (midi) and libtimidity development is dead, and wildmidi development is comatose (sept 2006 post saying there back, after that silence again). My main reason for packaging this is to make both gstreamer midi plugins available to users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 18:22:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174267] Review Request: Goffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171822.l6HIMPHE026592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Goffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174267 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-17 14:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: goffice New Branches: EL-5 Updated Fedora Owners: add notting at redhat.com as co-maintainer Updated EPEL Owners: notting at redhat.com
, j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Updated EPEL CC: I've requested goffice for EPEL as I have a package in EPEL 5 that needs it. I'll be a co-maintainer for Fedora so I can see if/when I need to pull changes back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 18:40:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248120] Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171840.l6HIetEY029006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: soprano - Qt wrapper API to different RDF storage solutions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248120 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 18:51:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171851.l6HIpmZx030206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2007-07-17 14:51 EST ------- Okay, here's where I'm at. I won't post another SRPM and SPEC file just yet... let's see if you can help me through these last rpmlint warnings/errors or if we can agree that they're not blockers. [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-5.1.6-1.src.rpm E: hylafax configure-without-libdir-spec HylaFAX's configure is not a direct derivative from the autoconf versions, and thus there is no --libdir= option for HylaFAX's configure. [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/hylafax-5.1.6-1.x86_64.rpm | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax I'm not sure what to do about these, exactly. These are all executable scripts that are meant to be configurable by the administrator, and we don't want to overwrite the configured script on upgrades. E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 This is intentional. Only the owner should be able to read this file. E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 Again, these are intentional. Only the owner should be accessing these directories. (All activity goes through the server. Local users don't access these files directly.) E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux This file, faxsetup.linux, is a shell script stub. It is included (via ".") from the invoked faxsetup script. W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps While it is true that the example coversheet is not itself a configuration file, it is meant to be configured - i.e. replaced, and it belongs there. [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint hylafax | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps We've covered all of these already above. W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.1.6 /lib64/libm.so.6 W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.1.6 /lib64/libm.so.6 These two are particularly curious to me, and I cannot figure them out. Here are the corresponding build lines: /usr/bin/g++ -shared -fpic -Wl,-soname,libfaxserver.so.5.1.6 -o libfaxserver.so.5.1.6 \ faxApp.o FaxItem.o FaxRequest.o FaxAcctInfo.o FaxMachineInfo.o FaxMachineLog.o FaxPoll.o FaxRecv.o FaxSend.o ModemServer.o FaxServer.o UUCPLock.o ServerConfig.o ClassModem.o FaxModem.o Class0.o Class1.o Class10.o Class1Ersatz.o Class1Poll.o Class1Recv.o Class1Send.o Class2.o Class20.o Class21.o Class2Ersatz.o Class2Poll.o Class2Recv.o Class2Send.o CopyQuality.o G3Decoder.o G3Encoder.o MemoryDecoder.o HDLCFrame.o ModemConfig.o NSF.o FaxFont.o PCFFont.o TagLine.o ../util/libfaxutil.so.5.1.6 -ltiff /usr/bin/g++ -shared -fpic -Wl,-soname,libfaxutil.so.5.1.6 -o libfaxutil.so.5.1.6 Array.o BoolArray.o Dictionary.o Obj.o PageSize.o RE.o REArray.o REDict.o StackBuffer.o Str.o StrArray.o StrDict.o Dispatcher.o IOHandler.o Sys.o SystemLog.o Timeout.o Fatal.o AtSyntax.o DialRules.o FmtTime.o Sequence.o TimeOfDay.o FaxDB.o TextFormat.o Class2Params.o FaxParams.o FaxClient.o FaxConfig.o FaxRecvInfo.o FaxSendInfo.o JobExt.o CallID.o ModemExt.o SendFaxJob.o SendFaxClient.o TypeRules.o Transport.o InetTransport.o UnixTransport.o SNPPClient.o SNPPJob.o cvtfacility.o fxassert.o \ -ltiff -lz -L../regex -lregex Please notice that -lm is not being used here as the rpmlint warning message seems to indicate. Now, -lm is used elsewhere in the build, but not for these DSOs, but even if I remove the -lm from everywhere in the build (it seems unnecessary) this rpmlint warning still occurs. The header file math.h is included in a few source files, but not in any source file that is used to build libfaxutil. So something is very confusing to me here. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:20:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171920.l6HJKl5Y001847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-17 15:20 EST ------- Thanks Kevin New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-filesystem Short Description: KDE filesystem layout Owners: rdieter at math.unl.edu,than at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171926.l6HJQFZG002643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-17 15:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4-4.2-2.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 17 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-2 - remove rpath from QtDesigner.so - BR: qt4-devel > 4.3.0-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:31:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] New: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect-0.6.0-1.src.rpm Description: CDCollect is a simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME written in C# using Mono and GTK#. All data are stored in a sqlite database. notes: - rpmlint output can be ignored for Mono package - builds and runs in FC6/x86_64 and Development/i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171933.l6HJXsji003294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-17 15:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avr-libc Short Description: C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171943.l6HJhgW9003924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-17 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-5.1.6-1.src.rpm > E: hylafax configure-without-libdir-spec > > HylaFAX's configure is not a direct derivative from the autoconf versions, and > thus there is no --libdir= option for HylaFAX's configure. Correct, ignore the warning. > [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/hylafax-5.1.6-1.x86_64.rpm | sort > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax > E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax Safe to ignore as I already said in comment #12 > E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 Ignore, see comment #12 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 > E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 Ignore > E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux > > This file, faxsetup.linux, is a shell script stub. It is included (via ".") > from the invoked faxsetup script. Ok, ignore. > W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps > > While it is true that the example coversheet is not itself a configuration file, > it is meant to be configured - i.e. replaced, and it belongs there. Ok. > [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint hylafax | sort > W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.1.6 > /lib64/libm.so.6 > W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.1.6 > /lib64/libm.so.6 > > These two are particularly curious to me, and I cannot figure them out. ldd -r -u /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4 -- snipped _lots_ of undefined symbols -- Unused direct dependencies: /usr/lib64/libjpeg.so.62 /lib64/libz.so.1 /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 /lib64/libutil.so.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 I haven't looked at this deeper yet, it is not necessarily a blocker, see http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html Could you please take a look at the undefined symbols again? As there are no major blockers you can submit a new srpm for review. Hope we aren't getting any SELinux troubles. What Fedora Version are you running with hylafax? Do you have SELinux enabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 19:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707171956.l6HJuMid005689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From poelstra at redhat.com 2007-07-17 15:56 EST ------- I believe there is a missing BuildRequires for sqlite2-devel. I'm trying to build this package on FC6 PPC and get the following message: "configure: error: Unable to find sqlite.h in standard locations" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172102.l6HL2uFK014080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-17 17:02 EST ------- bodhi is gonna come through and update this a bit later, but what the hey... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172104.l6HL4UjJ014760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-07-17 17:04 EST ------- Will this work on f7? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing info qt4-devel shows only qt4-devel-4.3.0-2.bc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172108.l6HL8UbR016550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-17 17:08 EST ------- qt-4.3.0-8 had been in updates-testing for ~1 week, pushed to stable today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] New: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3-3.5.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Games and gaming libraries for the K Desktop Environment which have not been ported to KDE 4 yet. Included with this package are: atlantik, kasteroids, kenolaba, kfouleggs, klickety, kpoker, ksmiletris, ksnake, ksokoban, ktron. NOTE: This package is only targeted for F8 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] New: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 Summary: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/atlantikdesigner.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/atlantikdesigner-3.5.7-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package includes a game board designer for Atlantik. NOTE: This package is only targeted for F8 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:13:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172113.l6HLDuxE020441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248648 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:17:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247405] Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172117.l6HLHqWO022921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-bcop - Compiz option code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247405 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-07-17 17:17 EST ------- No, ignacio (ivazquez) has much more experience than me in this area, let's follow his advice. The remaining rpmlint errors from the SRPM in comment #2 are safe to ignore. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] New: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/alliance/F-8/alliance.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/alliance/F-8/alliance-5.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Alliance is a complete set of free CAD tools and portable libraries for VLSI design. It includes a VHDL compiler and simulator, logic synthesis tools, and automatic place and route tools. A complete set of portable CMOS libraries is provided, including a RAM generator, a ROM generator and a data-path compiler. Alliance is the result of more than ten years effort spent at ASIM department of LIP6 laboratory of the Pierre et Marie Curie University (Paris VI, France). Alliance has been used for research projects such as the 875 000 transistors StaCS superscalar microprocessor and 400 000 transistors IEEE Gigabit HSL Router. Alliance provides CAD tools covering most of all the digital design flow: * VHDL Compilation and Simulation * Model checking and formal proof * RTL and Logic synthesis * Data-Path compilation * Macro-cells generation * Place and route * Layout edition * Netlist extraction and verification * Design rules checking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:33:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172133.l6HLXStM025603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172133.l6HLXxJf025685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-17 17:33 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 21:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172145.l6HLjfxi026535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-17 17:45 EST ------- Some notes about this package: #1: this is a Hardware Development CAD. The headers included in the main package are not an error or a mistake, but useful for some %_bindir/*. In other words, it is important for the working(normal) environment of the user. (note: don't get confuse with headers of a normal application and the hardware CAD) #2: The design tools at %_bindir/* are used in a collectively way following the design flow. http://www-asim.lip6.fr/recherche/alliance//doc/design-flow/flow.html If one of the %_bindir/* is buggy it may affect the entire design flow. #3: I wrote a simple tutorial for trial: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/full_adder_alliance #4: Alliance depends heavily on %{prefix} (careful not %{_prefix}). Most of the sources have hardcoded paths to %{prefix}. Patching the dozens of Makefiles isn't enough. #5: Makefiles on the -doc Makefiles are present in alliance-examples/*. It is normal because * it gives the VLSI designer a template on how to create his own Makefile for alliance (VLSI designers normally don't know how to do so) * it is not part of the build, but part of the _working_ environment of the user #6: on the build.log there are lines about : libtool: install: warning: `/builddir/build/BUILD/alliance-5.0/mbk/src/libMut.la' has not been installed in `/usr/lib' I have no idea what to do with it. Any suggestion is welcome. http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/alliance/F-8/build.log I tried to comment as much as I can on the SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 22:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172210.l6HMAH2V029988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 22:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172211.l6HMBIKC030143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 17 23:41:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707172341.l6HNfcCY003087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-17 19:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > I believe there is a missing BuildRequires for sqlite2-devel. Mhm, don't think so. For every current fedora release sqlite 3 is used. Only RHEL4 needs sqlite 2. But luckily the devel packages are are named sqlite-devel. Requiring sqlite2-devel is not needed on fedora, as sqlite3 is already pulled in on fedora and sqlite2 get's pulled in by the sqlite-devel dependency on RHEL4. The difference between sqlite2 and 3 thus lies not in the BuildRequire line but in the way configure gets called. For sqlite2 it's --with-sqlite and for sqlite3 it has to be --with-sqlite3. > I'm trying to build this package on FC6 PPC and get the following message: > "configure: error: Unable to find sqlite.h in standard locations" This looks very much as if the configure call is incorrect. I just checked the package in a mock build for fc6-x86_64 and it builds fine. I guess you did not build the package in mock but simply used rpmbuild --rebuild? In this case, please pass at least --define 'fedora 6' and maybe --define 'dist fc6' to your rpmbuild call. That way the right argument for the %configure macro can be selected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 01:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180153.l6I1rYhg011440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-17 21:53 EST ------- Ok so few comments to start: 1 / prefix seems problematic. But since no arch dependant files are installed in it, this could be fine if we can have configs files in /etc actually... Also no %config(no replace) seems to be used for users config files... 2 / evr problem The source has 20060509 but this do not appear in evr wheras this should appear inside the release tag (if release, then >= 1). Others sources have the same version (in OLD_RELEASES ). So this will need to add 20060509snap in the release field to make a difference. 3 / URL has changed to http://www-asim.lip6.fr/recherche/alliance/ 4 / patches macros. - As the pacakge name is good why do you need to uses %{name}? this bring some confusion when looking for the patch instead of having the full name. - Some patches are backport from older version (+ is older than -) This mean that some patches could be usefull with later release ? I cannot see the aim of using %{version} in this case! Unless it will break patch historicy in cvs if no changes are made to the patch for later releases. 5 / desktop files * You missed Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils * I don't know if the shortcuts will be in the right category... * see scriplets - 11 / 6 / About the kindly requested https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg00750.html Why do you choose not to show the "kindly requested" in %description ? 7 / %configure * This package do not conform to the standard paths and use a prefix with --with-alliance-top=%{prefix}. But, do you need to export it to make it work ? * --disable-static is avaible why don't you uses it ? Does it works ? 8 / # applying timestamps What do you mean by this ? This could go in %prep for Source7 9 / # documentation Why do you copy them it "." ? (you do not seems to use them after that...) It could be safer to copy all of them in a created __doc - This will need to be remove just before %install like: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} __doc 10 / #conflicts with man-pages and is a duplicate of log.1.gz This make rise the problem of too much generic names appear (Which I haven't checked yet). Maybe a renamed could be enought if the --program-prefix do not work if this apply. 11 / scriplets * %preun -p /sbin/ldconfig - This is unneeded * Recommand to have this if desktop file has a MimeType key. %post /sbin/ldconfig update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : %postun /sbin/ldconfig update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : 12 / # duplicate and unstripped-binary-or-object %exclude %{_libdir}/debug * This is wrong on x86_64 and also uneeded (tested) 13 / %{_includedir}/* * header are presents in main but not in devel - Is it possible to sort those that should be used at runtime from those that are needed for developping alliance ? 14 / %{_mandir}/man?/* * Check if some of them shouldn't go in -devel 15 / #Makefiles are present in alliance-examples/* * Is it possible to have another sub-package for these examples (which will follow others rules of Requirement eventually ) * Having users to build them is %doc directory is not fair - Thoses can go in %{_datadir}/alliance/examples. 16 / build fails on x86_64 FC6: (i will give a retry ) /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lMvg collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [x2vy] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 03:01:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180301.l6I31RTx016180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-17 23:01 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay here. :( I think a comment at the top that the details may vary from platform to platform might suffice here. Could you add such a comment? Perhaps upstream could even add such a note? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 04:30:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180430.l6I4Uevq022269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-18 00:30 EST ------- All the above items look addressed, except #8, which isn't a blocker, although you might consider switching to the %doc macro so they are in the standard place. I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 04:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180459.l6I4xNom023375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-18 00:59 EST ------- Andreas is right, look for "# Build sqlite director" in the spec file. Similar define is needed for RHEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 05:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180501.l6I51NBj023537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-18 01:01 EST ------- No worries. I always forget that it is summer in the northern hemisphere right now and that people may be on holidays. Adding it to the spec file (sed/perl) would be trivial and probably the only thing we can do until the next release of APR/APU. I can also ask upstream, as I think it makes sense to let people know that what they are seeing should not be relied upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 05:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180507.l6I57UCF023810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-18 01:07 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.8-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Update to 1.4.8 - several important security updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 05:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180540.l6I5eoQK025862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-18 01:40 EST ------- Well, I've just been really busy, not on holiday. However, next week I will be on holiday. ;) Can you post an updated package with the warning comment, and I think then this package will be ready for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 06:23:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248677] New: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Caenorhabditis elegans genome grabbed from UCSC (ce2, Mar. 2004) and stored in Biostrings objects Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 06:29:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248678] New: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51 - osophila melanogaster genome (FlyBase r5.1) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248678 Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51 - osophila melanogaster genome (FlyBase r5.1) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51/R-BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.FlyBase.r51-1.2.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Drosophila melanogaster genome grabbed from FlyBase (r5.1, Dec. 2006) and stored in Biostrings objects Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 06:30:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248679] New: Review Request: R-hgu95av2probe - Probe sequence data for microarrays of type hgu95av2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248679 Summary: Review Request: R-hgu95av2probe - Probe sequence data for microarrays of type hgu95av2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL:http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-hgu95av2probe/R-hgu95av2probe.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-hgu95av2probe/R-hgu95av2probe-1.16.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package was automatically created by package matchprobes version 1.9.2. The probe sequence data was obtained from http://www.affymetrix.com. The file name was HG\_U95Av2\_probe\_tab. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 06:40:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248681] New: Review Request: R-affyio -Tools for parsing Affymetrix data files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248681 Summary: Review Request: R-affyio -Tools for parsing Affymetrix data files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-affyio/R-affyio.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-affyio/R-affyio-1.4.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Routines for parsing Affymetrix data files based upon file format information. Primary focus is on accessing the CEL and CDF file formats. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 07:51:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180751.l6I7pArG001106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-18 03:51 EST ------- I should have that ready tomorrow. BTW, so far upstream feedback has been positive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 09:30:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180930.l6I9Uwhs010704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 05:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok so few comments to start: > 1 / prefix seems problematic. But since no arch dependant files are installed in > it, this could be fine if we can have configs files in /etc actually... > Also no %config(no replace) seems to be used for users config files... Would you like me to put configs files in /etc and just create a symbolic link to /usr/share/alliance/etc ? Note: without this link some %_bindir/* would be broken since this path is hardcoded into the sources. > #2 #3 Ok, will change appropriately. > 4 / patches macros. > - As the pacakge name is good why do you need to uses %{name}? this bring some > confusion when looking for the patch instead of having the full name. > - Some patches are backport from older version (+ is older than -) This mean > that some patches could be usefull with later release ? I cannot see the aim of > using %{version} in this case! Unless it will break patch historicy in cvs if no > changes are made to the patch for later releases. They will break in cvs since upstream Patch0: %{name}-%{version}-addphcon.patch There are 2 bugs in this release: (on ocp and on boog) As for ocp, I've backported to the old release (20060218), till there is a fix. Concerning boog, upstream will be digging on it this week: https://www-asim.lip6.fr/wws/arc/alliance-users/2007-07/msg00017.html Patch1: %{name}-%{version}-examples.patch (is for the documentation/alliance-examples folder) Patch2: %{name}-%{version}-run.patch (is for the documentation/alliance-run folder) Patch3: %{name}-%{version}-perms.patch (setting the proper permissions) will be without %{version}. > 5 / desktop files > * You missed > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils As agreed if MimeType key in desktop files is used, and will be using in the next release. > * I don't know if the shortcuts will be in the right category... You mean in the menus ? > 6 / About the kindly requested > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg00750.html > Why do you choose not to show the "kindly requested" in %description ? There is no big reason behind it, except I had already agreed with upstream on a separate file before Tom proposed. The %description would be too long. I've included it into a separate file alliance.fedora. If you want me to change accordingly, I can do it. > 7 / %configure > * This package do not conform to the standard paths and use a prefix with > --with-alliance-top=%{prefix}. But, do you need to export it to make it work ? You mean - export ALLIANCE_TOP=%{prefix} - %configure --prefix=%{prefix} --enable-alc-shared --disable-static + %configure --prefix=%{prefix} --enable-alc-shared \ --disable-static --with-alliance-top=%{prefix} ? > * --disable-static is avaible why don't you uses it ? Does it works ? will use > 8 / # applying timestamps > What do you mean by this ? This could go in %prep for Source7 will move to %prep > 9 / # documentation > Why do you copy them it "." ? (you do not seems to use them after that...) I need them in the -doc package. > 10 / #conflicts with man-pages and is a duplicate of log.1.gz > This make rise the problem of too much generic names appear (Which I haven't > checked yet). Maybe a renamed could be enought if the --program-prefix do not > work if this apply. It is a duplicate of log.1.gz as well. I see no harm removing a duplicate. > 11 / scriplets > * %preun -p /sbin/ldconfig - This is unneeded > * Recommand to have this if desktop file has a MimeType key. > %post > /sbin/ldconfig > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > %postun > /sbin/ldconfig > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : Will use MimeType key > 12 / # duplicate and unstripped-binary-or-object > %exclude %{_libdir}/debug > * This is wrong on x86_64 and also uneeded (tested) On i386, I have debug files before the script /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh Is there a way to disable this thing and let /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh do the job ? > 13 / %{_includedir}/* > * header are presents in main but not in devel - Is it possible to sort those > that should be used at runtime from those that are needed for developping alliance ? will try > 14 / %{_mandir}/man?/* > * Check if some of them shouldn't go in -devel will try > 15 / #Makefiles are present in alliance-examples/* > * Is it possible to have another sub-package for these examples (which will > follow others rules of Requirement eventually ) > * Having users to build them is %doc directory is not fair - Thoses can go in > %{_datadir}/alliance/examples. Ok, will be opting for a "alliance-examples" sub package. > 16 / build fails on x86_64 FC6: (i will give a retry ) > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lMvg > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [x2vy] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Are you using %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 09:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707180937.l6I9bCE1011375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 05:37 EST ------- reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 5 / desktop files > > * You missed > > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils > > As agreed if MimeType key in desktop files is used, and will be using in the > next release. Actually, I mean "will _not_ be using". > > 11 / scriplets > > * %preun -p /sbin/ldconfig - This is unneeded > > * Recommand to have this if desktop file has a MimeType key. > > %post > > /sbin/ldconfig > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > > > %postun > > /sbin/ldconfig > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > Will use MimeType key Again, will _not_ be using. > > 15 / #Makefiles are present in alliance-examples/* > > * Is it possible to have another sub-package for these examples (which > will > > follow others rules of Requirement eventually ) > > * Having users to build them is %doc directory is not fair - Thoses can go > in > > %{_datadir}/alliance/examples. > > Ok, will be opting for a "alliance-examples" sub package. After a second thought, does it make sense to have a sub package ? I'll be leaving it in -doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248692] New: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248692 Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer-0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Provides an interface to the C implementation of the random number generator with multiple independent streams developed by L'Ecuyer et al (2002). The main purpose of this package is to enable the use of this random number generator in parallel R applications. Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248693] New: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248693 Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-rlecuyer/R-rlecuyer-0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Provides an interface to the C implementation of the random number generator with multiple independent streams developed by L'Ecuyer et al (2002). The main purpose of this package is to enable the use of this random number generator in parallel R applications. Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248693] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181018.l6IAIGF9015039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248693 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-rlecuyer -|Review Request: R-rlecuyer - |R interface to RNG with |R interface to RNG with |multiple streams |multiple streams ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-18 06:18 EST ------- Sorry ie... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244333] Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181019.l6IAJF6h015149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244333 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248693] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181019.l6IAJYUE015174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248693 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-18 06:19 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 248692 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 10:19:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248692] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181019.l6IAJaHQ015205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248692 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-18 06:19 EST ------- *** Bug 248693 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 11:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181145.l6IBj1gA020990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-07-18 07:44 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: postgresql-pgpool New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 13:36:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248552] cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc, .md5(sfv-like), md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181336.l6IDartl032085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc,.md5(sfv-like),md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248552 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 13:54:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] New: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rcritten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: nss_compat_ossl is a source-level porting library to help port a program from using OpenSSL for SSL touse the Network Security System (NSS) libraries instead with minimal changes. It provides a limited OpenSSL-compatible API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 14:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181431.l6IEVxeD005896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-18 10:31 EST ------- Nearly final version 0.6 is now available again from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ It now uses bz2'd texmf tree, which now contains more styles and is more consistent. There was a mistake in generation of style list from tetex in the previous release. The contents of the texmf tree are now close to be final (just in case it is not now) So please have a look at this version and focus on contents. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 14:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181435.l6IEZGsh006500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-18 10:35 EST ------- Nearly final version 0.6 is now available again from: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ It now uses bz2'd texmf tree, which now contains more styles and is more consistent. There was a mistake in generation of style list from tetex in the previous release. The contents of the texmf tree are now close to be final (just in case it is not now) So please have a look at this version and focus on contents. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 14:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181439.l6IEdvaH006898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 16:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181610.l6IGA3Pi018099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-18 12:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 16:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181611.l6IGBb5o018358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-18 12:11 EST ------- * Umm.. still some directories are not owned. Currently, the file entry of your spec file can be simplified as: ----------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) <- Please add this %{_bindir}/linkchecker %{_datadir}/linkchecker/ %{python_sitelib}/linkcheck/ %{python_sitelib}/_linkchecker_configdata.* %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{python_sitearch}/linkcheck/ %endif %{_mandir}/man1/linkchecker.1* %lang(de) %{_mandir}/de/man1/linkchecker.1* %lang(fr) %{_mandir}/fr/man1/linkchecker.1* %doc TODO doc/ cgi-bin/ README COPYING --------------------------------------------------------------- * And still gettext po files are installed. By the way did you check that these .po file actually don't work? * And I noticed that the two files under /usr/share/linkchecker seem to be configuration files. IMO these files should be moved under %_sysconfdir and marked as %config(noreplace). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 16:15:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225295] Merge Review: autoconf213 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181615.l6IGF4HI018892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-07-18 12:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * gawk and perl are also needed during the build, [...] > Therefore they should be buildrequires. A nit (not worth fixing): Both are redundant, as both are in the minimum build environment. Perl is explicitly listed among the exceptions in Packaging/Guidelines. gawk is dragged there indirectly, but it is hard to imagine minimal instal without awk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 16:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248552] cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc, .md5(sfv-like), md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181618.l6IGI8Fh019315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc,.md5(sfv-like),md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248552 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-18 12:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 18:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] New: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf-0.40-1.src.rpm Description: * This is one of my first package, and I'm seeking a sponsor * GtkPerf is an application designed to test GTK+ performance. The point is to create common testing platform to run predefined GTK+ widgets and this way define the speed of device/platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 18:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181805.l6II5r4u006433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 18:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181854.l6IIsff4013815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-18 14:54 EST ------- Tangential question - is it clearly defined what limited portion of the OpenSSL API it supports, to easily tell if it will or will not work with a particular client? Or is it just 'if it builds with it, it works'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 19:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181903.l6IJ3qT4014797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-07-18 15:03 EST ------- A very good question. The biggest problems are CRL management and certificate validation. NSS handles CRLs automatically if they are installed into the security database being used. And it does certificate validation a bit differently. I do have some limited support for using a verify_client callback but it is not quite complete. A broad overview of what it can do are: * Creating an SSL server listener and accepting requests * Creating an SSL client socket and making requests * Ciphers that should be compatible with OpenSSL * Client certificate authentication * Random numbers * Token password prompting/handlng nss_compat_ossl.h has the complete list of the API but that can be a bit misleading because some of the functions are no-ops. It doesn't offer: - Low-level crypto (DES,etc) - BIO (a very small portion of that is provided) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 19:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248692] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181928.l6IJSPgf018003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248692 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-rlecuyer -|Review Request: R-rlecuyer - |R interface to RNG with |R interface to RNG with |multiple streams |multiple streams ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-18 15:28 EST ------- You have put up many packages for review lately; perhaps you should consider doing some package reviews yourself. I believe there are some R packages up for review which were submitted by someone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 19:44:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181944.l6IJiaZX020621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-07-18 15:44 EST ------- ok still alot of rpmlint noise. permissions are ok config files should be noreplace initscripts really should have incoherent warnings fixed E: bacula-common wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-2.0.3/examples/afs-bacula "/usr/afsws/bin/pagsh" make this non executable Builds fine in mock on FC-6 package naming is ok %if 0%{?fedora} %if "%{fedora}" >= "7" BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel %else BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers %endif %endif should really be %if "%{?fedora}" >= "7" BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel %else BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers %endif since im sure we will want tcp_wrappers for epel. nothing owns /etc/bacula/ or /usr/libexec/bacula/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 19:53:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707181953.l6IJrFih021399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 15:53 EST ------- You will laugh at me, but the %{_libdir}/*.so is also required by the main package. I was thinking about having 2 more sub-packages in order to comply with the packaging guidelines: - alliance-lib for %{_libdir}/*.so, and - alliance-headers for %{_includedir}/* both requiring alliance. what do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182017.l6IKHGfC023813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-07-18 16:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > %if 0%{?fedora} > %if "%{fedora}" >= "7" > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel > %else > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers > %endif > %endif > > should really be > %if "%{?fedora}" >= "7" > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel > %else > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers > %endif > > since im sure we will want tcp_wrappers for epel. This could actually be simplified right down to: BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h That would work for all distribution releases without needing any of the conditionals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182018.l6IKInhg023959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-18 16:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > ok still alot of rpmlint noise. permissions are ok The noise is basically the following line: "W: bacula unversioned-explicit-provides bacula-director-%{version}-%{release}" Looks like an ignorable problem with rpmlint as it does no variable expansion. > config files should be noreplace Most of the config files are marked as noreplace. I did leave it out for security relevant files such as /etc/pam.d/gnome-console in order to be able to fix problems with a package update and make sure they are applied and not put into a .rpmnew file. Do we have a policy on that? Same goes for the logwatch files: W: bacula-director-common conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logwatch/conf/logfiles/bacula.conf W: bacula-director-common conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logwatch/conf/services/bacula.conf The logformat does change from time to time. That way we can update the definitions. > initscripts really should have incoherent warnings fixed W: bacula-client incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/bacula-fd $prog The executable is stored in a variable. rpmlint -i gives "It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the script manually." If that's important one could change the initscripts. About the incoherent names: This might not be that easy. We could change the names from the upstream used bacula-fd, -sd and -dir, to bacula-client, bacula-storage and bacula-director, which would conform to the bacula package names. This would however not remove the rpmlint warnings as the real package names are bacula-{director,storage}-{mysql,sqlite,postgresql} and the init script is packaged in the -common file getting its runtime information from the alternatives subsystem. Either way, the warning won't go away. However, I'm open to renaming the initscripts to conform to the package names although the current names are what upstream has been using in the past. > E: bacula-common wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-2.0.3/examples/afs-bacula "/usr/afsws/bin/pagsh" > > make this non executable It actually is. -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-2.0.3/examples/afs-bacula rpmlint issue, ignoring. > %if 0%{?fedora} > %if "%{fedora}" >= "7" > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel > %else > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers > %endif > %endif > > should really be > %if "%{?fedora}" >= "7" > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel > %else > BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers > %endif > > since im sure we will want tcp_wrappers for epel. Right. > nothing owns /etc/bacula/ or /usr/libexec/bacula/ Thx. Try -7 at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182035.l6IKZsAG025714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-07-18 16:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > (In reply to comment #42) > > > ok still alot of rpmlint noise. permissions are ok > > The noise is basically the following line: > "W: bacula unversioned-explicit-provides bacula-director-%{version}-%{release}" > Looks like an ignorable problem with rpmlint as it does no variable expansion. Is there some particular reason you're using this style of virtual provide? How about: Provides: bacula(director) = %{version}-%{release} rpmlint might be happier with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:42:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182042.l6IKgE2x026297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at camperquake.de) ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-18 16:42 EST ------- - %changelog - 0.6.7-0.1.20061216.fc8 There is no need to write the %dist tag here. It is misleading. + make -j3 PREFIX=/usr echo "#ifndef CONFIG_H" > src/config.h qmake -o MyPasswordSafe.mak MyPasswordSafe.pro make: qmake: Command not found make: *** [MyPasswordSafe.mak] Error 127 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... echo "#define CONFIG_H" >> src/config.h echo "#define PREFIX \"/usr\"" >> src/config.h echo "#define VERSION \"0.6.7\"" >> src/config.h echo "#define COMP_DATE \"20070718\"" >> src/config.h echo "#define COMP_USER \"builder1\"" >> src/config.h echo "#define COMP_HOST \"newcaprica\"" >> src/config.h echo "#endif" >> src/config.h error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22443 (%build) Manual build attempt on F7. Some missing buildrequire? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242543] Review Request: AcetoneISO - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182044.l6IKi0e6026466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242543 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-18 16:43 EST ------- First sorry for this delay, but the review is here: OK source files doesn't match upstream, because non-distributable/non-free file (poweriso) is removed, but the rest was checked to be the same OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPL) and license text is included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Development/i386) and native FC6/x86_64 OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint output can be ignored OK final provides and requires look sane: OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. BAD doesn't own the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app and the desktop file is properly installed BAD doesn't own the directories it creates. AcetoneISO.kmdr is placed into %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/scripts, but the directory %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} is unowned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182048.l6IKmBe5026733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-18 16:48 EST ------- Whether both requiring alliance or both required by alliance, if you do so, there is no interest in splitting them... Actually -libs sub-packages are used to provide multibs compatibily on lib64 systems. This needed to have Requires %{main}-libs = %{evr} for -devel, but that's all. - If you uses Requires %{main}-libs on main, this only requires something that rpm would discover by itself... - If you uses Requires %{main} on -libs, then you will break multilibs compatibilty because you will bring i386 binaries into x86_64 repository (and binaries will share the same namespace in %{_bindir} which is wrong ) A good way to have multilibs compatibilty would be to have your prefix in %{_libdir}/alliance (with datadir shared in %{_datadir}/alliance if relevant) About headers, If you can sort them, you can have %{_libdir}/alliance/include for runtime (with main ) and %{_includedir}/alliance for devel (or runtime headers in datadir - but i expect it will break some alliance_top prefix ?!) That could be a good idea if you can uses relative path to find headers to have them in %{_datadir}/alliance/include if you have examples in %{_datadir}/alliance/examples , maybe...) More Answears: 1 / leave this as is work for now... 4 / If upsteam change the name of the patches, you will need to import them into cvs 5 I mean the Menues indeed - I've experienced some problems whith packages that do not handle this in %post, so i don't know if this is mandatory or should. (depend if Minetype is present... anayway it seems not) 7 / indeed 9 / I still do not understand why you need to cp -pr them in "." since you do uses thoses files but thoses present in doc/* 10 / Can you see at which step this /usr/lib/debug directory is created in build.log ? 16 / alliance-examples would be fine as the content is really differents than -docs... (for example -docs may not requires main whereas examples will requires it - because examples may live in %{_datadir}/alliance ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:50:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182050.l6IKoJJV026855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-18 16:50 EST ------- > Is there some particular reason you're using this style of virtual provide? How > about: > > Provides: bacula(director) = %{version}-%{release} > > rpmlint might be happier with that. Actually, that is a very good question. And taking a closer look, I applied rpmlint to older rpms which had fucked up require lines. The current srpms have been fixed by applying the patches from Dan. Rebuilding them in mock and running rpmlint on them looks much better and this junk never appeared. Sorry about that, I guess I should just go to bed for today. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:52:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182052.l6IKq35x027191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-18 16:52 EST ------- R-widgetTools-1.12.0-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:55:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182055.l6IKtAjx028071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-18 16:55 EST ------- hdhomerun-0.0-0.2.20070616.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182055.l6IKtDiE028098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.0-0.2.20070616.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 20:58:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182058.l6IKwEug029207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-18 16:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pwsafe Short Description: A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases Owners: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 21:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182100.l6IL0flo029746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at camperquake.de) | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-18 17:00 EST ------- Dist tag will be removed. qmake comes from qt-devel (which is in BR). Local path issue? Package builds in koji for F-7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/ertzing/task_70007/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 21:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182134.l6ILYhh2000609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-18 17:34 EST ------- unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh Add this near the top of your %build section. This is the standard for all qt-using packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 22:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182203.l6IM3R69003375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 18:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Whether both requiring alliance or both required by alliance, if you do so, > there is no interest in splitting them... I meant "both required by alliance. Ok, then I'll leave it as one package. > A good way to have multilibs compatibilty would be to have your prefix in > %{_libdir}/alliance (with datadir shared in %{_datadir}/alliance if relevant) I guess you haven't understood the contents of %{_datadir}/alliance. It contains the what so called in electronics "libraries" of different electronic components. These "libraries" have nothing to do with the daily word 'libraries' you used in the fedora packaging. Those electronic components does not depend on any architecture ( i386 , x86_64, ppc ). But however if I replace %{_datadir}/alliance by %{_libdir}/alliance, I fear I would break alliance further in terms of multilibs. We will have more bugs in alliance (which were not architecture ( i386 , x86_64, ppc ) dependent) which will vary from architecture to architecture. This is wrong and too risky! more info: Those electronic components are provided by alliance as a startup. However when a VLSI designer will use alliance, he/she will eventually use other electronic components. > 5 I mean the Menues indeed - I've experienced some problems whith packages that > do not handle this in %post, so i don't know if this is mandatory or should. > (depend if Minetype is present... anayway it seems not) The desktop files are very simple and they should be pulled up in the menus. There is no need you use %post or %postun for these desktop files. > 7 / indeed well that's a choice. But the variable "ALLIANCE_TOP" will even be used by the user in his/her working environment (as in any other commercial equivalent to alliance). Exporting ALLIANCE_TOP in the spec makes it more oblivious for debugging purposes, not by me but those who will be using this spec file for troubleshooting. Upstream and I were thinking to use this spec file in other fedora derivatives. In other words, it makes life easier for troubleshooting (maintainance)and share bugfixes between distros! > 9 / I still do not understand why you need to cp -pr them in "." since you do > uses thoses files but thoses present in doc/* those doc/* comes from %{__cp} -pr %{buildroot}%{prefix}/doc/ . Without %{__cp} -pr %{buildroot}%{prefix}/doc/, there is not doc/ directory. here the dot "." refers to the builddir, that is why it is in %files docs I specified only doc/* and not the absolute path. Its mainly experience talking here: _Suppose_ I patch in the Makefiles so that during %install the contents of documentation would not be copied into the buildroot. Then remove %{__cp} -pr %{buildroot}%{prefix}/doc/ as you suggested. And pull the docs ony be one on %file docs.: Each time upstream changes the makefiles or the contents of documentation/, I'll need to update my patch (eventually patches). Thus requiring me a lot of changes for each upstream release. And some contents are either not useful or duplicates (in terms of different format .pdf, .ps or .tex) The contents of the docs (in this case) have already undergone a "make" in the tex/ directories. So right now the pdfs are simply copied to the %buildroot. But if upstream decides to make a "make" during %__make in the future to produce those pdfs from texs, I'll need to dig further and further. This is frustrating. It is simple to let %__make finish, then gather the bits. You happend to see that I prefer everything being done in the SPEC file rather patching every single thing, in the end making life harder to debug or troubleshoot by me and others. > 16 / alliance-examples would be fine as the content is really differents than > -docs... (for example -docs may not requires main whereas examples will requires > it - because examples may live in %{_datadir}/alliance ) hmm the release 1 might say so, because I missed some other directories in tutorials. In release 2, you will see that some docs come with its _own_ examples. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 22:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182204.l6IM4eOg003500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 18:04 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-2.20060509snap.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] New: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: toshio at tiki-lounge.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-1.20070717bzr180.src.rpm Description: This plugin for Trac provides support for the Bazaar SCM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248552] cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc, .md5(sfv-like), md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182312.l6INCDCH008410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: cfv - utility to test and create .sfv, .csv, .crc,.md5(sfv-like),md5sum, bsd md5, sha1sum, and .torrent files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248552 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182316.l6INGD7F008650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 19:16 EST ------- #1: timestamps should be preserved in the %install phase. #2: in accordance to the fedora guideline, "fedora" should be used as vendor #3: the %__make stage should be verbose, in order to virtualise whether the opt_flags were properly pulled up. #4: you should remove "Application" from the desktop file. #5: this package is not intended for FC-6 since it currently doesn't possess gstreamer->= 0.10.12 :-( Required package not found: gstreamer-0.10 >= 0.10.12 :-( toc2_die: exiting with error code 127. Configure failed, sorry! Please make shure that you have installed gstreamer-0.10 >= 0.10.12 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7724 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182317.l6INH5v2008723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-18 19:17 EST ------- rpmlint : E: cheese script-without-shebang /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/cheese.svg E: cheese-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:42:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182342.l6INgK3M009784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-18 19:42 EST ------- I have moved all the files to http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org. The new links are: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader.spec http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader-0.3.1-2.src.rpm http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/buildlogs/ for already build packages (FC6 & devel, i386 and x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 18 23:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707182350.l6INoA7A010258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-18 19:50 EST ------- Sorry, wrong c/p. The src.rpm is http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader-0.3.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 00:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190044.l6J0iwtv013488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-18 20:44 EST ------- Now available: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/apr-api-docs/apr-api-docs.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/apr-api-docs/apr-api-docs-1.2.8-4.fc7.src.rpm We now have that platform specific warning. I also included APU headers, which I missed previously and fixed the years in the changelog (we are in fact in 2007 :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 01:36:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190136.l6J1aIu4016059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-18 21:36 EST ------- I've updated to 0.4.14. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/parrot-0.4.14-1.src.rpm The build still fails on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 05:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231267] Review Request: stardict-dic - dictionaries for StarDict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190528.l6J5SOM1031687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic - dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231267 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 08:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190849.l6J8nluQ016337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 08:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190850.l6J8oLLP016412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |than at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 08:51:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190851.l6J8pCHL016497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-07-19 04:51 EST ------- approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 08:59:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190859.l6J8xfH3017213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 04:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qt4-theme-quarticurve Short Description: Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 Owners: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 09:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] New: change package owner request. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 Summary: change package owner request. Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jgranado at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bc [Updated Fedora Owners: ]jgranado at redhat.com I have been asigned this package in RHEL an will maintain it in fedora. EPEL is not needed as it is in RHEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 09:01:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] change package owner request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190901.l6J91mwR017436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: change package owner request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 09:51:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] New: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: schedtool interfaces with the Linux CPU scheduler. It allows the user to set and query the CPU-affinity and nice-levels of processes, as well as all scheduling policies, like batch or real-time (RR/FIFO) classes and their priorities Note: This is my first package so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 09:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707190953.l6J9r3jn021864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 10:29:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] New: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: The CUPS Driver Development Kit (DDK) provides a suite of standard drivers, a PPD file compiler, and other utilities that can be used to develop printer drivers for CUPS and other printing environments. CUPS provides a portable printing layer for UNIX(r)-based operating systems. The CUPS DDK provides the means for mass-producing PPD files and drivers/filters for CUPS-based printer drivers. The CUPS DDK is licensed under the GNU General Public License. Please contact Easy Software Products for commercial support and "binary distribution" rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 10:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191052.l6JAqG9w025592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-19 06:52 EST ------- There are two problems with your package - please use the full URL (http://freequaos.host.sk/schedtool/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 for instance) in the Source tag - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used: make CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY" schedtool make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/schedtool-1.2.9' gcc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY -c -o schedtool.o schedtool.c schedtool.c: In function 'set_process': schedtool.c:450: warning: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression gcc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY -c -o error.o error.c gcc schedtool.o error.o -o schedtool make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/schedtool-1.2.9' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 11:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191103.l6JB3Aq9026268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 07:03 EST ------- Fixed both: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 11:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191125.l6JBPUBA028241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-19 07:25 EST ------- New Upstream Release: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-3.20070718snap.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 11:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191129.l6JBTgVd028476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-19 07:29 EST ------- Quick glance at http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.9-3.fc7.src.rpm - the rpm_opt_flags problem is still there: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28294 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd schedtool-1.2.9 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make make CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY" schedtool make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/schedtool-1.2.9' gcc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY -c -o schedtool.o schedtool.c schedtool.c: In function 'set_process': schedtool.c:450: warning: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression gcc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -s -pipe -DHAVE_AFFINITY -c -o error.o error.c gcc schedtool.o error.o -o schedtool make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/schedtool-1.2.9' + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28294 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd schedtool-1.2.9 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/schedtool-1.2.9-3.fc7-root-mockbuild + make install 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' D ESTPREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=/var/tmp/schedtool-1.2.9-3.fc7-root-mockbuild make CFLAGS="-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DHAVE_AFFIN ITY" schedtool make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/schedtool-1.2.9' make[1]: `schedtool' is up to date. solution: you have to pass the RPM_OPT_FLAGS flag at build time, not at install - the timestamp of the files is not preserved. you'd better revert to %doc and remove the docdir line - schedtool-debuginfo is empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 12:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191227.l6JCRvOi001338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 08:27 EST ------- fixed package and spec: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.9-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 13:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191302.l6JD2EUx004929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-19 09:02 EST ------- [Un]official package review (due to needsponsor status) coming soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 13:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191304.l6JD4ESh005190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-19 09:04 EST ------- Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: none [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging G uidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL v2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license( s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: ab7743cba970d16ebe6ea8039e4bb57bd26027c8 /home/wolfy/schedtool-1.2.9.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and F7/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and F7/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. None === Final Notes === 1. Everything seems OK I would approve this package if the packager would not be in NEEDSPONSOR status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 13:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191316.l6JDGeXe006578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-19 09:16 EST ------- http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/bacula/bacula-2.0.3-8.src.rpm * Wed Jul 19 2007 Andreas Thienemann 2.0.3-8 - Moved some files around in the %%files section and refactored spec parts a bit - Fixed up the catalog-backup scripts by including them in the alternatives system - Applied tls patch fixing some tls disconnection issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 14:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191403.l6JE3OIc015400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-19 10:03 EST ------- I have added fityk to the fedora CVS and have successfully build in the 'devel' branch and it looks like it will build OK in F-7. I had an error message with plague-client (below), but it looks like it is building now as well. What do I need to do now? Do I close this bug? ----- [john at jdpipe FC-6]$ plague-client list Error: connection to the server timed out. '(110, 'Operation timed out.')' [john at jdpipe FC-6]$ make build /usr/bin/plague-client build fityk fityk-0_8_1-9_fc6 fc6 Package fityk enqueued. Job ID: 35037. [john at jdpipe FC-6]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 14:16:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191416.l6JEG3Y3018124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-19 10:16 EST ------- Yes. Follow the last step in the Contributor process documented here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] New: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdepimlibs/devel/kdepimlibs.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdepimlibs/devel/kdepimlibs-3.91.0-3.src.rpm Description: Personal Information Management (PIM) libraries for the K Desktop Environment 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:11:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191511.l6JFB2QE027953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-07-19 11:10 EST ------- OK, fixed up the problem with the debuginfo package generation. New spec file and SRPM are at the URL listed in the opening comment. Let me know if it's approved or not. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191511.l6JFB9qm028004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 11:11 EST ------- The spec URL doesn't work, it's actually at: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdepimlibs/devel/kdepimlibs4.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191513.l6JFDphm028849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] New: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdelibs3/kdelibs3.spec SRPM URL: n/a, still missing kdelibs-3.5.7-kde3compat.patch Description: Libraries for the K Desktop Environment: KDE Libraries included: kdecore (KDE core library), kdeui (user interface), kfm (file manager), khtmlw (HTML widget), kio (Input/Output, networking), kspell (spelling checker), jscript (javascript), kab (addressbook), kimgio (image manipulation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191515.l6JFFFiU029116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-19 11:15 EST ------- Than, couldn't make a srpm, I'm missing kdelibs-3.5.7-kde3compat.patch (what's that for?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:48:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191548.l6JFmOJw001943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-19 11:48 EST ------- I'd feel better if this were named kdeaddons3, offers more flexibility what can be included. Then, this would simply produce (as is now): kdeaddons3-atlantikdesigner But, if you think that's just silly-talk, feel free to ignore me here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 15:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191550.l6JFoXFZ002299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 11:50 EST ------- A subpackage with no main package? Will that work? I found it's pretty silly to have a kdeaddons3 package with only a single addon in it. ;-) But I'm open to changing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 16:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191645.l6JGjVT0007664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 12:45 EST ------- there some problems with this package: 1) don't use /usr/share use %{_datadir} instead 2) use _smp_mflags for make 3) use RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} 4) no rpmlint warnings/errors ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 16:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191650.l6JGoloP008483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 12:50 EST ------- use %{?dist} as a suffix to the release add %{?_smp_mflags} to make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 16:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191652.l6JGq6Di008720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-07-19 12:52 EST ------- Package finally marked as going to testing after getting prereqs into koji. closing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 16:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191652.l6JGq8X9008757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 16:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191652.l6JGqAX4008787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191717.l6JHHYvK011534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-07-19 13:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159597) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159597&action=view) the missing patch the missing patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191718.l6JHIGcD011649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-19 13:18 EST ------- Ok, this is fixed in the following links: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.3.beta3.fc7.src.rpm Thanks for your help. Patrice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191719.l6JHJeRa011788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 13:19 EST ------- Thanks. I'll review this once I'm done with kdepimlibs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:27:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191727.l6JHRRHH012456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-19 13:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-paramiko Updated Fedora Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us Adding myself as co-maintainer, ref #247626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191728.l6JHSHex012564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-19 13:28 EST ------- I always forget to set the CVS flag... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-paramiko Updated Fedora Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us Adding myself as co-maintainer, ref #247626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191732.l6JHWAJ1013215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 13:32 EST ------- The build (in mock for Rawhide) fails because of this: Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs = 3.91.0-5.fc8 is needed by package kdelibs-devel Missing epoch there. So I can't really review this without a fixed kdelibs 4 SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191734.l6JHYhMx013570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-19 13:34 EST ------- Fixed in the following links. Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf-0.40-2.fc7.src.rpm Thanks again for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191736.l6JHaHDM013795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-19 13:36 EST ------- ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 17:38:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191738.l6JHcKOL014065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 13:38 EST ------- Rex, are you preparing a SRPM or should I do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 18:34:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191834.l6JIYw2J021551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 14:34 EST ------- Before you prepare that SRPM, please make a pass of s/qt3/qt/g as we decided not to rename Qt. Or are you preparing Qt 3 for a future rename (that will need both Provides in the package name and a symlink for qt.sh->qt3.sh)? Moreover, if Qt does get renamed to qt3, do we really need the epoch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 19:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191901.l6JJ1t9Q024081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 15:01 EST ------- here is a unofficial/incomplete review (I am not sponsored yet): MUST items: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. -> ok (no output) MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. -> ok MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. ->ok MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. ->ok MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. ->ok MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. -> NOT ok; please package COPYING MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ->ok MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. -> ok MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. -> ok (4331dde4bb83865e15482885fcb0cc53) MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ->ok (tested on F7 x86_64) MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ->ok MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ->ok MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ->ok MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) ->ok MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ->ok MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. ->ok (no large documentation) MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. ->ok (not relocatable) MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ->ok (no libs in this package) MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ->ok (no devel package) MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ->NOT ok (no desktop file found!) MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ->ok MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ->ok (no header files) MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. ->ok (no static libs;no libs at all) MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ->ok MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ->NOT ok, (no desktop file, license file not installed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 19:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707191903.l6JJ3WVW024268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 15:03 EST ------- Summary: Please Package COPING and include a .desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:02:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192002.l6JK2hJ3032378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-19 16:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192010.l6JKAb5r000651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-19 16:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] change package owner request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192014.l6JKEfuJ001248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: change package owner request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |twoerner at redhat.com, | |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-19 16:14 EST ------- Could I get an ack from the current maintainer who is listed for this? twoerner at redhat dot com (I have added him to cc here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192018.l6JKIEq0001676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-19 16:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192041.l6JKfVbj004677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 16:41 EST ------- ok some more issues: 1) description to long. 2) don't package .a/.la files 3) package the COPYING file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 20:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192050.l6JKo3nT005550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-19 16:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/MyPasswordSafe/MyPasswordSafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/MyPasswordSafe/MyPasswordSafe-0.6.7-0.2.20061216.sky.src.rpm Fixes QT environment Fixes dist-in-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 21:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192111.l6JLBg7P008061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-19 17:11 EST ------- kdelibs 4 fixed now, so here's the review: MUST Items: ! rpmlint output: * W: kdepimlibs no-documentation -> At least the license should be included as %doc. (I'll take the blame for that one. ;-) ) * W: kdepimlibs-devel no-documentation -> OK, this one is acceptable, but like for Soprano, we should generate apidocs for kdelibs and kdepimlibs before the F8 release. * W: kdepimlibs-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/kdepimlibs-3.91.0/mailtransport/servertest.h -> OK, this one is upstream's fault. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines ! spec file name doesn't match base package name, please rename to kdepimlibs.spec before import + Packaging Guidelines: + License LGPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters ! relevant documentation not included See "rpmlint output" above. + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used (%cmake macro) + debuginfo package is valid + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths, at least on i386 (I ran readelf -d on the shared objects) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no executables, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines ! license not included as %doc (see "rpmlint output" above) + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 978712ededae818f2b9225897684b752 SHA1SUM: 9bb8202db3a7a5ee968cfb26c24800e3d08103de + builds on at least one arch (F8 i386 mock) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + all build dependencies listed in CMakeLists.txt as well as cmake itself are listed in BuildRequires (However, an additional BuildRequires: doxygen will be needed for the -apidocs.) + no translations in original tarball, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + no %doc files, so no possible issues with %doc files required at runtime + all header files in -devel + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + /usr/lib/*.so symlinks are correctly in -devel + /usr/lib/kde4/*.so plugins (NOT symlinks) are correctly NOT in -devel + -devel requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + no .la files + no GUI programs (in fact, no executables at all), so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install But you know my usual nitpick by now. ;-) I recommend a: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after the: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to prevent a potential symlink attack as pointed out by the OpenSUSE folks. Though in this case my original packages didn't have it either, so I take part of the blame. Anyway, it's not required by the guidelines, so this is definitely not a blocker. + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream + package builds in mock (Rawhide i386) * Skipping the "all architectures" test. + package functions as expected (at least the F7 version I tested did ;-) ) + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies Please fix these before import: * add at least the license(s) as %doc * rename the specfile to kdepimlibs.spec With these changes, the package is APPROVED. These can be addressed at a later time: * add BuildRequires: doxygen * create an -apidocs subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 22:20:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192220.l6JMK63x014577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 22:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192232.l6JMW6NF015528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 18:32 EST ------- I am not sponsored yet so this is no real review: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. ->ok (no output) MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ->ok MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. ->ok MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ->NOT ok: - please add %{?_smp_mflags} to make - use a URL for Source and not just the tarball's name MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. -> ok MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ->ok MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ->ok MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ->ok MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ->ok MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ->NOT ok: no url provided for Source and URL results in 404 Error => can't check MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. -> ok (builds fine on x86_64; is a noarch package) MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. ->NOT ok: s390 s390x excluded without comments I think this is due to no kdump support on this arches correct? MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. ->ok MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. ->ok MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ->ok (no libs) MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ->ok (not relocateable) MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ->ok MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ->ok MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. ->ok MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ->ok MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ->ok MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ->ok MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. ->ok (no large docs) MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ->ok MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ->ok (no devel package) MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. ->ok (no static libs) MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). ->ok (no pkgconfig files) MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ->ok (no libs) MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ->ok (no devel package) MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ->ok MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ->ok MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ->ok MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ->ok MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ->ok ---- Summary: Package looks good. Only a few issues: - Use a URL for Source - Fix URL - use smp_flags - Add comments to the ExcludeArch (I assume that there is no kdump support on this platforms so no bugreports needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 22:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192235.l6JMZUUj015782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-19 18:35 EST ------- Correction: You can package the static libs but in a different package (-static) but the .la files need to be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 23:57:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248980] New: owners.list changes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248980 Summary: owners.list changes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: toshio at tiki-lounge.com ReportedBy: toshio at tiki-lounge.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The lvm team has requested that owners.list be updated to have the lvm-team user own several lvm related packages. These changes are attached in lvm.patch. I've checked the pkg.acl files and the ownership changes will not affect anyone's ability to commit. Additionally, some packages were branched for epel and olpc without entries being made for them in owners.epel.list and owners.olpc.list. These changes are attached in owner-cleanup.patch ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-19 19:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159625) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159625&action=view) Changes to lvm ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 23:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248980] owners.list changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192358.l6JNwkAb021027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: owners.list changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248980 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-19 19:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159626) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159626&action=view) Add owners to olpc and epel lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 19 23:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248980] owners.list changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707192359.l6JNxcxO021120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: owners.list changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248980 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200015.l6K0FqA7022361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:15 EST ------- Well, it's been another month with no commentary; setting NEEDINFO. I'll close in a week if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200034.l6K0Yjh1023343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:34 EST ------- Umm, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:35:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200035.l6K0ZXh9023454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(weston_schmidt at alu | |mni.purdue.edu) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:35 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:39:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200039.l6K0dG63023796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:39 EST ------- Any reason this hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245485] Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200039.l6K0dddV023839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fityk-0.8.1 - curve-fitting program for X-Y data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245485 john at curioussymbols.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-19 20:39 EST ------- Closed as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200040.l6K0em6V023957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar | |tenment.com) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:40 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200042.l6K0gApR024074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar | |tenment.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200043.l6K0hS8V024243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:43 EST ------- Nothing's going to happen with fedora-cvs still set to "-"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:45:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200045.l6K0j22M024448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-19 20:45 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 00:45:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200045.l6K0jSHt024511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general liner hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200309.l6K3951s000360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-19 23:09 EST ------- The package in comment #17 looks good to me. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200322.l6K3MmTc001365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-19 23:22 EST ------- Thanks! Shall do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200342.l6K3gUTn002744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:43:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200343.l6K3h8he002829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-19 23:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e4ad90ec41816be47db9dd1b55af3fbb Text-WordDiff-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/ansicolor....ok t/base.........ok t/html.........ok t/pod..........ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=41, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.40 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.47 CPU) + Provides: perl(Text::WordDiff) = 0.02 perl(Text::WordDiff::ANSIColor) = 0.02 perl(Text::WordDiff::Base) perl(Text::WordDiff::HTML) = 0.02 + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Algorithm::Diff) perl(Algorithm::Diff) >= 1.19 perl(Carp) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(IO::File) perl(Term::ANSIColor) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200346.l6K3kaS8003099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-19 23:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apr-api-docs Short Description: Apache Portable Runtime API documentation Owners: bojan at rexursive.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200347.l6K3ltM5003220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200349.l6K3nJtC003372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-19 23:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 576d6dc3e6aa9e80686f244969e885e6 Text-LevenshteinXS-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..6 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Thu Jul 19 23:39:29 2007 # Current time GMT: Fri Jul 20 03:39:29 2007 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 + exit 0 + Provides: LevenshteinXS.so perl(Text::LevenshteinXS) = 0.03 + Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:51:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200351.l6K3pNAO003575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:51:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200351.l6K3ph8t003624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200352.l6K3q1B7003674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 03:53:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200353.l6K3rkvn003813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-19 23:53 EST ------- got following mock build error /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltiff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200400.l6K40ArY004243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 00:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cd8a50dd2f9d90be1f949906441035c1 Text-Diff-HTML-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/base....ok t/pod.....ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.15 CPU) + Provides: perl(Text::Diff::HTML) = 0.04 + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(Text::Diff) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200404.l6K44EL1004478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200404.l6K44fPn004531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200404.l6K44qQh004573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200406.l6K46kc3004716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 00:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6bdc15a6345a3ef693a6e2326331b6ec Test-File-Contents-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/00.load.........# Testing Test::File::Contents 0.05 ok t/10.basic........ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=28, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.24 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.29 CPU) +Provides: perl(Test::File::Contents) = 0.05 +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200414.l6K4E0ob005302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 00:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dc27881e002abb283b96e083e7eb49c4 Test-Class-0.24.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/00-load..............# Testing Test::Class::Load 0.02, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl ok t/20-load-classes......ok t/Tests................ok t/_new.................ok t/bad-autoloads........Prototype mismatch: sub CORE::GLOBAL::caller (;$) vs none at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Contextual/Return.pm line 12. ok t/bailout..............ok t/builder..............ok t/compile..............ok t/current_method.......ok t/diag_on_failure......ok t/die_before_plan......ok t/expected_tests.......ok t/fail1................ok t/fail2................ok t/fail3................ok t/header...............ok t/late_header..........ok t/methodinfo...........ok t/named_test...........ok t/num_method_tests.....ok t/num_tests............ok t/override.............ok t/rt15870..............ok t/rt17264..............ok t/run_all_tests........ok t/runtests.............ok t/runtests_die.........ok t/runtests_extra.......ok t/runtests_noplan......ok t/runtests_of..........ok t/runtests_result......ok t/runtests_return......ok t/runtests_trailing....ok t/skip1................ok t/skip2................ok t/skip_class_reason....ok t/spaces...............ok t/startup..............ok t/startup_that_dies....ok t/test_classes.........ok t/test_deep............ok t/test_method..........ok t/test_verbose.........ok t/todo.................ok All tests successful. Files=44, Tests=160, 4 wallclock secs ( 2.93 cusr + 0.60 csys = 3.53 CPU) + exit 0 +Provides: perl(Test::Class) = 0.24 perl(Test::Class::Load) = 0.02 perl(Test::Class::MethodInfo) = 0.02 +Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Attribute::Handlers) perl(Carp) perl(Class::ISA) perl(Devel::Symdump) perl(Devel::Symdump) >= 2.03 perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(Storable) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Class) perl(Test::Class::MethodInfo) perl(Test::Exception) >= 0.15 perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200422.l6K4MGJo005930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-20 00:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:28:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200428.l6K4S3B1006335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-20 00:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200457.l6K4vIR3008170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 00:57 EST ------- Got following all skipped: Testing of apache_req requires Apache::FakeRequest Can you add Apache::FakeRequest as BR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:57:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248980] owners.list changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200457.l6K4vnYW008227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: owners.list changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248980 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-20 00:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 04:59:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200459.l6K4xkfM008335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:00:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200500.l6K504tZ008382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200500.l6K50SCZ008439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:03:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200503.l6K53heZ008668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 bojan at rexursive.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-07-20 01:03 EST ------- Thanks everyone involved! This bug will now be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200504.l6K54rUi008785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 01:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7278471dfa694d9ef312bc92d7099af2 Authen-PAM-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs nothing. + Provides: PAM.so perl(Authen::PAM) = 0.16 + Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libpam.so.0 libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200513.l6K5DFAG009193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 01:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4f5aca0ccff4bf28ca1d039e5ed01fa2 File-Sync-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_fsync....ok t/02_error....ok t/03_sync.....ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=17, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.11 CPU) + exit 0 +Provides: Sync.so perl(File::Sync) = 0.09 +Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200527.l6K5RHBF010088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 01:27 EST ------- Got many errors in make test Can you check SRPM in mock build? some of few lines I got in mock build are t/330perl....................ok t/350filters.................which: no uudecode in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin) skipped all skipped: no reason given t/350generatorlist...........ok t/350generatorzip............error: Tried to add member with zero or undef value for time at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Archive/Zip/Member.pm line 487 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200546.l6K5kgiq010985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 05:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200547.l6K5lM9n011046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 01:47 EST ------- I got tests skipped PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/1_loadme..............ok t/1_utils...............ok t/2_options.............ok 6/6 skipped: no test server t/3_put_get_delete......ok 6/6 skipped: no test server t/4_multistatus.........ok t/5_propfind............ok 9/9 skipped: no test server t/5_proppatch...........ok 14/14 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_copy_move.......ok 14/14 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_get_callback....ok 19/19 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_globs...........ok 11/11 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_lock............ok 13/13 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_lock2...........ok 11/11 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_open_put_get....ok 39/39 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_options.........ok 6/6 skipped: no test server All tests successful, 148 subtests skipped. Files=14, Tests=175, 3 wallclock secs ( 2.37 cusr + 0.31 csys = 2.68 CPU) + exit 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 06:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200627.l6K6RkWR013185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 02:27 EST ------- got following make test result PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01basic.........ok t/02die...........ok t/03goto..........main::goto_bar has 1 unstacked calls in outer main::bar has -1 unstacked calls in outer ok t/04crash.........ok t/05packages......ok t/06caller........ok t/07constants.....ok t/08fork..........ok t/09fcntl.........ok t/10autoload......ok 6/6 skipped: profiling AUTOLOAD not working yet t/11sub_filter....ok All tests successful, 6 subtests skipped. some tests got skipped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:03:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] New: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tla at rasmil.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/iniparse.spec SRPM URL: http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/iniparse-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: iniparse is an INI parser for Python which is API compatible with the standard library's ConfigParser, preserves structure of INI files (order of sections & options, indentation, comments, and blank lines are preserved when data is updated), and is more convenient to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:05:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200705.l6K75LuE016409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-20 03:05 EST ------- 1) you don't need to buildrequire gcc. 2) don't package .la files. 3) static libs should be packaged into a seperate package (-static) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:16:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227073] Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200716.l6K7G8r7017883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227073 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-20 03:16 EST ------- Some comments to the spec file: 1) why are you using an epoch? 2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor" 3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section free" ? 4) use %doc instead of "%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt" 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:16:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227073] Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200716.l6K7GfLA017968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227073 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-20 03:16 EST ------- Some comments to the spec file: 1) why are you using an epoch? 2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor" 3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section free" ? 4) use %doc instead of "%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200740.l6K7e2AW019810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200740.l6K7eSck019888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] New: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-synce.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22-2.src.rpm Description: Synce plugin for libopensync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200745.l6K7ju9D020394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |244917 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 07:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200757.l6K7v1V7021555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-20 03:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159633&action=view) fixed srpm Thanks for your review the attached srpm fixes bugs you mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:05:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200805.l6K85Gi6022848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:05 EST ------- *** Bug 248354 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200805.l6K85iM1022931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:05 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200809.l6K89MIR023400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Nabi - |Review Request: nabi - |hangul and hanja X input |hangul and hanja X input |method |method ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:09 EST ------- Ok, please update with the new .spec file and srpm url when it is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:12:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200812.l6K8C1Cp023774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:11 EST ------- Oops, sorry. I've uploaded a new package which should fix that. Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk-1.2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200814.l6K8EoTv024170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: emacs- |Review Request: emacs- |common-ebib - BibTeX |common-ebib - BibTeX |database manage for Emacsen |database manage for Emacsen ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:14 EST ------- I would suggest renaming this to emacs-ebib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200824.l6K8OWY7025089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 jakub at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:24 EST ------- The mpfr library is released under LGPL2.1, how can saying it is GPL in the License tag be a "Good" thing? Of course you can relicense LGPL2.1 code as GPL, but why would you do that? License: LGPL would be much better (unless with the advent of GPL3, LGPL3, LGPL2.5 we start being more explicit and write GPL2, GPL2+, GPL3, GPL3+, LGPL2, LGPL2+, LGPL2.1, LGPL2.1+, LGPL2.5, LGPL3, LGPL3+ etc. in License tags. Also, upstream mpfr releases stable fixes on top of the last release as a cummulative patch, see http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patches It would be good to apply this in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:41:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200841.l6K8fq1Y026637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-07-20 04:41 EST ------- Please see the package naming guidelines - this builds packages for GNU Emacs and XEmacs. There are emacs-ebib and xemacs-ebib subpackages. As per naming guidelines the main package is called emacs-common-ebib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:46:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200846.l6K8kH6k027076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 08:53:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200853.l6K8rgDS027933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-20 04:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159634&action=view) fixed srpm (again) Thanks Jakub, problems you mention are fixed in this version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:02:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200902.l6K92n9o028923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 05:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159635) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159635&action=view) Modified SPEC I did some work for you. Modified your spec to reduce many rpmlint errors and warnings. But still I prefer you to check it in mock or check for any more rpmlint messages and update release of package and provide new links for formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:18:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200918.l6K9IYD3030421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-07-20 05:18 EST ------- rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-1.src.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag - as I suppose that upstream HTML pages (trac/wiki) is not yet created, please add URL: tag into spec file as soon as they are. rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-devel-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-devel checking W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-documentation - this is OK for now, as the docs (LICENSE, README) are in the base package, later developer docs and user docs should be split and developer docs should be installed into -devel subpackage W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo checking W: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo no-url-tag /usr/lib64/libnss_compat_ossl.la is included in the -devel subpackage, please remove it. As you're upstream maintainer - perhaps the COPYING file with GPL should be removed as the package is LGPL licensed (in LICENSE file) to prevent confusion? The file http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1.tar.gz is missing on the server. The -devel subpackage probably should require the main package of exactly the same nvr and not >=? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:41:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200941.l6K9fhYW032593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:43:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200943.l6K9h8Nn000358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 05:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. f325b7dd9f273c46e77fb7b337325880 libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is NOT present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + shared libraries scriptlet used. + Provides: synce_plugin.so + Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig + Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libglib-2.0.so.0 libopensync.so.0 librapi.so.2 librra.so.0 libsynce.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) +Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] change package owner request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200946.l6K9kwPm000968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: change package owner request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2007-07-20 05:46 EST ------- Here is my ACK for the reassignment of bc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:48:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200948.l6K9mjK3001261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-07-20 05:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libopensync-plugin-synce Short Description: Synce plugin for libopensync Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] New: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains extra multilingualization (m17n) datafiles for m17n-lib which describe input maps, encoding maps, and OpenType font data for many languages which are not present in m17n-db package. With introduction of this package in Fedora, I am trying to split current m17n-db package into m17n-db and m17n-contrib packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 09:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707200958.l6K9wabK002432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 10:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201015.l6KAFXCB004340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-07-20 06:15 EST ------- Thanks. The last remaining rpmlint errors are due to the CUPS ServerBin path, which on Fedora is /usr/lib/cups not %{_libdir}/cups. I've checked that it builds in mock. New package: Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk-1.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 10:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201049.l6KAn06U007638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 06:48 EST ------- Directory ownership is not correct /usr/share/cupsddk/po and /usr/share/cupsddk/include is not owned by any package. Also I got W: cupsddk-drivers non-standard-group System Environment/Drivers The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". and also rpmlint reports E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter/* A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/driver/* A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 10:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201055.l6KAtMn7008514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar|fedora-cvs? |tenment.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-20 06:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mcabber Short Description: Console Jabber instant messaging client Owners: mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 11:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201110.l6KBAWZS010304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-07-20 07:10 EST ------- > /usr/share/cupsddk/po and /usr/share/cupsddk/include is not owned by any package. This broke with the addition of the devel sub-package. Fixed. > W: cupsddk-drivers non-standard-group System Environment/Drivers Fixed. (Oops, forgot to rpmlint the binary packages.) I also fixed an empty debuginfo package problem discovered by rpmlint. > E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter > E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter/* > E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/driver/* See the comment in the spec file about this, and also comment #4 here. /usr/lib/cups is the correct path, and %{_libdir}/cups would be incorrect. Remaining rpmlint warning: W: cupsddk-devel no-documentation The documentation is in the main package. Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/cupsddk/cupsddk-1.2.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 11:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201113.l6KBDCT5010685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mfleming+rpm at enlar| |tenment.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-20 07:13 EST ------- Pong. Patched out that weird namelookup failure Spec URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/perl-Geo-IP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/perl-Geo-IP-1.28-2.fc7.src.rpm Go wild :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 11:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201151.l6KBp49B015241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 07:50 EST ------- The changelog says: - add obsoletes as discussed in #244917 but it looks like you forgot the actual Obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 11:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201155.l6KBtMYA015822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-07-20 07:55 EST ------- Hi Jason, I have successfully built the package for devel. But I have some problems with the FC-6 and F-7 branches. Its the same error. I have attached the session below. [mkpai at mkpai FC-6]$ make upload FILES=Callback-1.07.tar.gz Checking : Callback-1.07.tar.gz on https://cvs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi... This file (270e8cde126409c45294886d34b17408 Callback-1.07.tar.gz) is already uploaded Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file M sources M .cvsignore [mkpai at mkpai FC-6]$ make upload FILES=perl-Callback.spec Checking : perl-Callback.spec on https://cvs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi... This file (74d114962ff13c080befd96c74a543b9 perl-Callback.spec) is already uploaded Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file M sources M .cvsignore [mkpai at mkpai FC-6]$ cvs commit cvs commit: Examining . **** Access allowed: mkpai is in ACL for rpms/perl-Callback/FC-6. Checking in .cvsignore; /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Callback/FC-6/.cvsignore,v <-- .cvsignore new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done Checking in sources; /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Callback/FC-6/sources,v <-- sources new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done Running syncmail... Mailing cvsextras at fedora.redhat.com mkpai at redhat.com... ...syncmail done. cvs diff: [11:47:33] waiting for mkpai's lock in /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Callback/FC-6 Running syncmail... Mailing relnotes at fedoraproject.org... ...syncmail done. cvs diff: [11:48:03] obtained lock in /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Callback/FC-6 [mkpai at mkpai FC-6]$ make tag cvs tag -c perl-Callback-1_07-1_fc6 cvs tag: Tagging . T .cvsignore T Makefile T branch T sources Tagged with: perl-Callback-1_07-1_fc6 [mkpai at mkpai FC-6]$ make build perl-Callback.spec not tagged with tag perl-Callback-1_07-1_fc6 make: *** [build-check] Error 1 The error with the F-7 branch is the same. What should I do ? Thanks for your patience, -- Pai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 11:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201157.l6KBvQFm016052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-07-20 07:57 EST ------- Ups... now that you say that +) I will add them after import. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201210.l6KCAdGd018084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-20 08:10 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:11:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201211.l6KCBuMX018306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-20 08:11 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:12:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201212.l6KCCkib018533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-20 08:12 EST ------- Again, please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:13:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201213.l6KCDJ6R018669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 08:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for RPMs. But not silent for SRPM. Got following errors E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter/* A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/driver/* A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. But above is false for our installation locations/paths. So I think above is ignorable. + source files match upstream. d35b74cbfaa4c48b0d650c34249bab6d cupsddk-1.2.0-source.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + -devel and -drivers subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets used. + cupsddk-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libcups.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + cupsddk-devel-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires Requires: cupsddk = 1.2.0-3.fc8 + cupsddk-drivers-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libcups.so.2 libcupsimage.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libjpeg.so.62 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpng12.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libtiff.so.3 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:35:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201235.l6KCZeN2020962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-20 08:35 EST ------- Hi again, I've just returned from a two week vacation. The vacation was involuntary mail-less and I won't get a chance to access my inbox until Monday. Has there been any build issues or other problems, that has gone directly to my mail address instead of bugzilla, that I should take care of? Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 12:53:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201253.l6KCrg0t022505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 08:53 EST ------- OK, I think I've got something that works now, but I think we may have to (re)enable arts support, at least for now, since there appear to be a bunch of pkgs(*) that currently Requires: libartskde.so.1 which is lacking if built --without-arts, so for now, I'll re-enable arts support, to make testing for review purposes easier. We can toggle that later, if needed. (*) From a quick repoquery: basket kbilliards kdeaccessibility kdeaddons kdeartwork kdebase kdeedu kdegames kdemultimedia kdepim koffice-kpresenter taxipilot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 13:09:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201309.l6KD9t1L024495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 09:09 EST ------- Then let's reenable it for now and look at disabling it again once the rest of KDE is updated. These aRts users will (our should, at least) all go away once KDE is fully upgraded: kdeaccessibility kdeaddons kdeartwork kdebase kdeedu kdegames kdemultimedia kdepim (As I said in our e-mail discussion, nothing in kdegames3 requires aRts.) These ones will have to be dealt with separately: basket kbilliards koffice-kpresenter taxipilot If those will have no KDE 4 version available in time for F8, they will have to be built without sound support if we want to disable aRts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 13:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201335.l6KDZqsb027639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From jean-pierre.dion at bull.net 2007-07-20 09:35 EST ------- Adel, Thank you for your comments. Nadia is not here at the moment and she will be back mid August, so I will try do what I can or wait for her to come back ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 13:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201337.l6KDbPbR027926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 09:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdelibs3/kdelibs3.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kdelibs3/kdelibs3-3.5.7-14.fc8.src.rpm brief changelog from initial submission: * actually builds now. :) * (re)enabled arts support * added kded * dropped kde3compat patch (didn't build with it, don't think it was needed anyway) * cups13 patch Built(1) testing pkgs can be found in: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-i386-kde/ http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-x86_64-kde/ in kdelibs3/ and kdelibs/ (v4) folders. (1) ok, I lied, kdelibs3 pkgs are building as I type this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 13:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201339.l6KDdScu028224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-07-20 09:39 EST ------- Yes, the URL will be added once we get a hom. All other issues addressed. New files uploaded: Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 13:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] New: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john at curioussymbols.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jpye.fedorapeople.org/sundials/sundials.spec SRPM URL: http://jpye.fedorapeople.org/sundials/sundials-2.3.0-0.fc6.src.rpm Description: SUNDIALS is a SUite of Non-linear DIfferential/ALgebraic equation Solvers for use in mathematical software. It includes KINSOL for solving nonlinear algebraic systems of equations, CVODE for solving initial value problems for systems of ordinary differential equations, CVODES for solving ODE IVPs with sensitivity analysis, and IDA for solving differential/algebraic equation systems. SUNDIALS was implemented with the goal of providing robust time integrators and nonlinear solvers that can easily be incorporated into existing simulation codes. The primary design goals were to require minimal information from the user, allow users to easily supply their own data structures underneath the solvers, and allow for easy incorporation of user-supplied linear solvers and preconditioners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:16:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201416.l6KEGcLf032067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 10:16 EST ------- doh, just realized since we're not providing kdelibs-apidocs anymore, that kdelibs3 (or -devel?) probably SHOULD: Obsoletes: kdelibs-apidocs < 6:%{version}-%{release} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:18:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201418.l6KEIe4f032472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 10:18 EST ------- I think we should be providing kdelibs-apidocs for kdelibs 4 instead. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:22:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201422.l6KEMgSa000469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 lindner at inuus.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-20 10:22 EST ------- Rebuild is done. Looks good for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:22:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201422.l6KEMgQA000500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 10:22 EST ------- Until that happens, we have a broken upgrade path. So, when/if kdelibs-apidocs >= 4 exists, we can omit the Obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] change package owner request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201425.l6KEP3TF000869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: change package owner request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-20 10:25 EST ------- Setting this back to fedora-cvs: ? so the next admin can pick it up. Thanks for the ack Thomas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201440.l6KEefgv002910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-20 10:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Has there been any build issues or other problems, that has gone directly to my > mail address instead of bugzilla, that I should take care of? > Well, as you cannot rebuild this on Fedora, I am asking to Brian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 14:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201454.l6KEsdR4005554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-20 10:54 EST ------- (Now I am thinking about how to deal with type-windows.xml in ImageMagick) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201511.l6KFB8Le007959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-07-20 11:11 EST ------- I was able to build brutus-keyring fine, but updating evolution-brutus to 1.1.28.0 is proving to be quite problematic. jules, I sent you an e-mail about it, and hopefully this weekend I'll have some time to track down the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201513.l6KFDw1m008664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-20 11:13 EST ------- It doesn't look to me like you've even imported your sources to the F-7 and FC-6 branches. A checkout doesn't show spec files there. How did you import your package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201523.l6KFNZdm010004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 11:23 EST ------- Maybe we should build apidocs in kdelibs3 and Provide/Obsolete kdelibs-apidocs there for now? Otherwise we'll break deps for kdevelop in test1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201525.l6KFPxWV010519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 11:25 EST ------- Ick, ok (didn't notice kdevelop was missing from the kde-3.91.0 alpha release) another thing: avahi-kdnssd: dropping avahi-kdnssd support yields conflicts with, ha, avahi-kdnssd, so either we need to keep Requires: avahi-kdnssd or +Obsoletes: avahi-kdnssd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:26:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248980] owners.list changes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201526.l6KFQVe1010592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: owners.list changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248980 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201528.l6KFSPZr010924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 11:28 EST ------- For avahi-kdnssd, I think we should just keep shipping it for the KDE 3 compat libs. (KDE 4 now supports avahi natively, yay!) KDevelop is going to be fun. KDevelop 4 won't really be ready at KDE 4.0 and Fedora 8 release. KDevelop 3 has some support for Qt 4 and KDE 4 development though, but we'll have to drop the hard deps on the KDE 3 devel stuff to make it usable for KDE 4 development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201535.l6KFZQBS011861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 11:35 EST ------- ("Support" for KDE 4 in KDevelop 3.4 is limited to: * creating a blank CMake project * support for Qt 4 .ui files but it's better than nothing. We need to drop the hard KDE 3 deps to get around the -devel conflict to allow that use though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:36:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248854] change package owner request. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201536.l6KFaKPK011980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: change package owner request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248854 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-20 11:36 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201538.l6KFcEmf012312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos at ifax.com 2007-07-20 11:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #35) > I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+.tar.gz, too. Christoph, since you are in agreement with changing the name to hylafax+ and so is Lee: > My suggestion, Christoph, would be to see the HylaFAX+ vs. HylaFAX.org thing for > what it is, the usual forking arguments, and move past it so that we can get > this into Extras ... whether the ultimate package name be "hylafax" or "hylafax+". When do you think this will be done? We're looking at submitting HylaFAX for review but would like to clear up this confusion first. Thanks, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:39:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201539.l6KFd0te012511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-07-20 11:38 EST ------- I forgot this one - the -devel file list is missing the %defattr(-,root,root,-) declaration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 15:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201559.l6KFx7Z3019158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-07-20 11:59 EST ------- This requires a little bit of cleanup for rpmlint, but it seems to work for me (I added the demo.xml stuff to jetty.xml and browsed localhost:8080). I'm going to see if I can get someone who actually knows about jetty to take it over. In the meantime, here are the updated SRPM and spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/jetty5.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201607.l6KG7IOD020328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-WordDiff Short Description: Track changes between documents Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:14:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201614.l6KGE9Wb021363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS Short Description: XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201618.l6KGI5fQ021914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Diff-HTML Short Description: XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:20:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201620.l6KGKXeU022236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-07-20 12:20 EST ------- Fixed. Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201638.l6KGcUMc024555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-File-Contents Short Description: Test routines for examining the contents of files Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:40:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201640.l6KGeFIg024888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Class Short Description: Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:41:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201641.l6KGfSgL024984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:41 EST ------- No, that's a mod_perl 1 module. There's no Apache2 (mod_perl 2) equivalent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201643.l6KGh7wG025116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Authen-PAM Short Description: Authen::PAM Perl module Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:44:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201644.l6KGiosL025450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-Sync Short Description: Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201646.l6KGkk1Q025772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 12:46 EST ------- generate -apidocs subpkg keeping Requires: libkdnssd %changelog * Fri Jul 20 2007 Rex Dieter - 6:3.5.7-15 - Obsoletes/Provides: kdelibs-apidocs (f8+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:49:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201649.l6KGn1JM025935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:48 EST ------- I was debating adding BR /usr/bin/uudecode, but that would make more sense if I added a runtime dependency also, and I'm not sure I really want to encourage turning on that functionality in a FTP server. The zip generation is optional functionality. I'm not sure how important the test error is. The build completed fine for me even with that error. I can look into it a little deeper now if you want though. (I planned on looking at that later anyway...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201649.l6KGnuNC026040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:49 EST ------- Those are all network tests that we can't (or at least shouldn't) enable on the build servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 16:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201653.l6KGr36m026389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-20 12:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > some tests got skipped Those tests are marked "skip", so that's normal. SKIP: { skip("profiling AUTOLOAD not working yet", 6); ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 17:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] New: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arozansk at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/arozansk/wdaemon/wdaemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/arozansk/wdaemon/wdaemon-0.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: wdaemon creates and maintains virtual input devices that represent real devices that can be hotplugged on the system at any time. This package is needed while X.org doesn't properly support input devices hotplugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 17:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225853] Merge Review: gpart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201719.l6KHJHPB028300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225853 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bdpepple at ameritech | |.net) ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-07-20 13:19 EST ------- Is this package review done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] New: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P- touch label printers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/ptouch- driver.spec OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/ptouch-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/ptouch-driver-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers This is a CUPS raster filter for Brother P-touch label printers. It is meant to be used by the PostScript Description files of the drivers from the foomatic package. Note: This package is a part of the ongoing effort to extend hardware support by fixing the foomatic drivers that actually refer to external filters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:13:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201813.l6KID1N9001760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ptouch-driver-review ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-20 14:12 EST ------- > E: ptouch-driver hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cups/filter/rastertoptch The only rpmlint complaint is a false alarm -- rastertoptch is not a library, and thus even on 64bit platforms is not in lib64, but still in lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:34:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168189] Review Request: gtk+extra - A library of gtk+ widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201834.l6KIY6jm005542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+extra - A library of gtk+ widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gtk+extras Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201835.l6KIZAkR005658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168190 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gpsim Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:36:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168192] Review Request: utrac - Universal Text Recognizer and Converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201836.l6KIaGYi005789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: utrac - Universal Text Recognizer and Converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168192 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: utrac Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176026] Review Request: pikdev:IDE for development of PICmicro based application (under Linux/KDE) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201837.l6KIbSiO005942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikdev:IDE for development of PICmicro based application (under Linux/KDE) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176026 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pikdev Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201838.l6KIcM39006039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:38 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fcron Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201839.l6KIdZwm006170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kicad Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201840.l6KIemPC006313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kbackup Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201842.l6KIg7G1006499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: piklab Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 18:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201843.l6KIh3AP006589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-20 14:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pikloops Updated Fedora Owners: alain.portal at free.fr Please, add my home email in comps because I'm on vacation for 6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 19:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201923.l6KJNpPe011505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-20 15:23 EST ------- num_util.h is no longer installed. Turns out it was not included by any C++ base class so no user should need it. File version.h has been completely removed in the upstream sources. The function declared in this header file was not called from any place. explict requirement of cfitsio removed. build requirement of cfitsio-devel remains. File name of icon file fixed. change to recommended defattr HippoDraw-devel-docs contains documentation for the class library. Main package has documentation for the application user and the applications's built-in help system. pstream source updated so RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 19:30:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201930.l6KJUWew012781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-20 15:30 EST ------- apr-api-docs-1.2.8-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 19:31:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201931.l6KJVOX6012996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-20 15:31 EST ------- vtk-5.0.3-18.2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 19:35:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201935.l6KJZfOI014336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 15:35 EST ------- Let's start with some fun from rpmlint: Source RPM: > W: kdelibs3 strange-permission kde.sh 0755 > W: kdelibs3 strange-permission kde.csh 0755 Bad: While these are not strange for a shell script, these are /etc/profile.d scripts which are sourced, so they don't need executable perms (see below). > E: kdelibs3 invalid-spec-name kdelibs.spec Bad: The specfile needs renaming. > W: kdelibs3 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 31) OK, who cares? ;-) > W: kdelibs3 patch-not-applied Patch139445: kdelibs-3.5.5-lib_loader-1.2.patch > W: kdelibs3 patch-not-applied Patch41: kdelibs-3.5.6-utempter.patch > W: kdelibs3 patch-not-applied Patch502: kdelibs-3.5.0-101956.patch What about these? i386 RPM: > W: kdelibs3 no-documentation Bad: At least the license should be shipped as %doc, possibly also other stuff (readme files etc.). > W: kdelibs3 devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/kde-config OK, kde-config is used by some non-devel stuff too AFAIK, so this is normal. > E: kdelibs3 executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/kde3.csh > E: kdelibs3 executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/kde3.csh 0755 > E: kdelibs3 executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/kde3.sh > E: kdelibs3 executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/kde3.sh 0755 Bad: These should probably not be executable. > W: kdelibs3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/kfmexec kioexec OK, kioexec is in kdebase 4, and the symlink is needed for backwards compatibility. > E: kdelibs3 setuid-binary /usr/bin/kgrantpty root 04755 > E: kdelibs3 non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/kgrantpty 04755 OK. > W: kdelibs3 incoherent-version-in-changelog 6:3.5.7-14 3.5.7-14.fc8 OK, someone needs to teach rpmlint about epochs and disttags... > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kaddprinterwizard.so libkdeinit_kaddprinterwizard.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_klauncher.so libkdeinit_klauncher.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kio_http_cache_cleaner.so libkdeinit_kio_http_cache_cleaner.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kbuildsycoca.so libkdeinit_kbuildsycoca.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcmshell.so libkdeinit_kcmshell.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kio_uiserver.so libkdeinit_kio_uiserver.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kcookiejar.so libkdeinit_kcookiejar.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kded.so libkdeinit_kded.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kconf_update.so libkdeinit_kconf_update.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_cupsdconf.so libkdeinit_cupsdconf.so > E: kdelibs3 invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkdeinit_dcopserver.so libkdeinit_dcopserver.so OK, rpmlint doesn't understand kdeinit either. > E: kdelibs3 file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/ui/ui_standards.rc OK too. > E: kdelibs3 invalid-desktopfile /tmp/kdelibs3-3.5.7-14.fc8.i386.rpm.16144/usr/share/applications/kde/kresources.desktop Not sure about this one. i386 -devel RPM: > W: kdelibs3-devel no-documentation OK, the documentation is in -apidocs where it belongs to. > W: kdelibs3-devel spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib/libkdefakes_nonpic.a Bad: Static libs aren't supposed to be executable, are they? > W: kdelibs3-devel summary-ended-with-dot Header files and documentation for compiling KDE applications. Bad, this is hairsplitting, but the guidelines explicitly say there should be no dot here. :-) i386 -debuginfo RPM: no output i386 -apidocs RPM: can't check because it hasn't been built yet (I'm looking at -14) x86_64 RPMs: same as the corresponding i386 versions, plus some warnings about object file formats due to me running rpmlint on an i386 machine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 19:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707201948.l6KJmZPh017026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-20 15:48 EST ------- Jon: Please pardon the long delay. Here's the rest of the review, other requirements are met: * Rpmlint complains: E: drupal non-standard-gid /var/lib/drupal apache E: drupal non-standard-gid /etc/cron.hourly/drupal apache As these files have the same modes for the group as for the rest of the world, I see no reason for having these be owned by root group. * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Config files of drupal: /etc/drupal/all/README.txt shouldn't be here. Documentation in /usr/share/doc is the right place for this, preferrably README.Fedora. Otherwise the package is superb. I'll approve it once you deal with the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 20:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202004.l6KK4fjQ018914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-20 16:04 EST ------- Fixed README and buildroot. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal-5.1-5.fc7.src.rpm Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 20:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202026.l6KKQG89029243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 16:26 EST ------- I'm doing the review now. I'd like to discuss this file: /usr/share/config/ui/ui_standards.rc There are at least 2 bad things with this file: 1. It's a config file in /usr. The usual /usr/share/config problem. IMHO that's tolerable. 2. More seriously, this file conflicts with kdelibs 4! This is why Than made the compat patch you dropped. So the patch needs to be made to work, we can't import this without. While we're already patching this, we could also patch the location to a more FHS-compliant one, but that would have to be done on the KDE 4 version too for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 20:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202041.l6KKfspm030971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 21:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202100.l6KL09ql000413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 17:00 EST ------- Now the fun part of the review: the manual checks (on -15). :-) MUST Items: ! rpmlint output: see above (comment #17) + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines ! spec file name doesn't match base package name, please rename to kdelibs3.spec + Packaging Guidelines: + License LGPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description ! except for the dot at the end of the -devel summary ;-) + no non-UTF-8 characters ! relevant documentation not included See rpmlint output. + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used (%configure macro) + debuginfo package is valid * .la files: What's the status of these? Are they still needed with the lib loader patch? + I'll give the static library kdefakes_nonpic.a a pass, as I'm sure there's a reason this is in a .a file, and as creating a -static subpackage doesn't make sense because this lib is static only. + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths (I ran readelf -d on the shared objects and binaries on both the i386 and x86_64 version) + giving the config file in /usr a pass, as KDE has always used /usr/share/config + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI executables, so no .desktop file needed ! rpmlint doesn't like the one included desktop file (kresources.desktop, which calls kcmshell kresources). It isn't being installed according to the guidelines either (desktop-file-install). + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply ! conflicts: + the -devel conflict (explicit Conflicts) is OK ! but the file conflict on /usr/share/config/ui/ui_standards.rc with the KDE 4 kdelibs isn't! + complies with all the legal guidelines ! license not included as %doc (see rpmlint output) + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 50ed644f2ec91963570fe2b155652957 SHA1SUM: 45f278311f20d2eb317f2175259f861c0bcf17a9 + builds on at least one arch (F8 i386 mock, F8 x86_64 mock) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + all required BuildRequires listed (it wouldn't build in mock otherwise ;-) ) + no translations in original tarball, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply ! That makes me think: Do we need a compat kde-i18n too? Looks like we do. :-( + ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) ! duplicate files in %files: %{_bindir}/dcopidl* (in -devel) not excluded from %{_bindir}/* in main package ! permissions: see rpmlint output + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + large API docs are already in -apidocs + no %doc files, so no possible issues with %doc files required at runtime + all header files in -devel + no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + /usr/lib/*.so symlinks are correctly in -devel + /usr/lib/kde3/*.so plugins and /usr/lib/kdeinit_*.so (NOT symlinks) are correctly NOT in -devel + -devel requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * .la files: These are OK iff they're really needed, thus my question whether they really are. ;-) + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (nitpick: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to protect against symlink attack missing here too) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream + package builds in mock (Rawhide i386 and x86_64) * Skipping the "all architectures" test, no access to PPC. * Not testing if package functions as expected. + scriptlets are sane + -apidocs subpackage Requires: %{name} = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}:%{version} which is OK + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies To sum up: * Can you please address the issues found by rpmlint? * Are the .la files still needed with the lib loader patch? * The file conflict on ui_resources.rc needs fixing. * kresources.desktop isn't installed according to the guidelines, and isn't valid according to rpmlint. * please %exclude %{_bindir}/dcopidl* from the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 21:20:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202120.l6KLKlGQ002808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx 2007-07-20 17:20 EST ------- I got to this discussion by chance when searching on Bugzilla and I was about to apply an RFE for updated versions of the Wacom drivers as they are made available by the linuxwacom project. At any rate, I have been successful to run the linuxwacom on several other computers (raging from FC5/6 and now my main system with Fedora 7). I have a little experience building RPM packages and have been mostly successful installing the linuxwacom drivers in 64 and 32-bit systems alike. Currently, though I'm running the bundled 0.7.4_1 package that is part of "Core" and this has some problems when using it namely, the cursor pointer vanishes in GDM to the lower right corner, or in a session the pointer resets to "the origin" to the upper left corner when using any of the PAD devices (buttons and wheel on a Graphire 4). My current setup is a 64-bit Fedora 7 installation, and I'd be willing to look into what could be causing the problems encountered along the way to release this updated version of the driver. Since version 0.7.8 has been already released, and the developers of the project recommend using it, I'll see if I can get it to work fully (i.e. also building the X driver, which I usually don't). I'll share my findings in the next couple of hours as I tamper with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 21:29:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202129.l6KLTkav004002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2007-07-20 17:29 EST ------- Now everything seems to be OK. rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-3.src.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-devel-0.9.1-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-devel checking W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-documentation W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo-0.9.1-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo checking W: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo no-url-tag - the rpmlint output is the same as above so the same comments apply APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 21:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202156.l6KLuZlA006358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-07-20 17:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nss_compat_ossl Short Description: OpenSSL to NSS porting library Owners: rcritten at redhat.com, rrelyea at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202216.l6KMGmkq008002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx 2007-07-20 18:16 EST ------- In my first run down with the package I found a couple things: * Did not know there was a binary-only file: wacomcpl-exec, which ](IMO) should be installed from the "prebuilt" directory of the source instead of supplying it to the SOURCES directory. * Even though the shipped udev rules file is named 60-wacom.rules, it is installed as 49-wacom.rules, fixing the hijack of the INPUT rules by rule 50 (nice, a long needed fix) * For some reason all the development libraries (I'm building for x86_64) seem to go to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64, this yields an error when doing an 'rpmbuild -ba' or 'rpmbuild -bb' of the spec as the files are not found for the architecture: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/linuxwacom-0.7.8_1-1.0/usr/lib64/libwacomcfg*.a File not found by glob: /var/tmp/linuxwacom-0.7.8_1-1.0/usr/lib64/libwacomcfg*.so Maybe this has to do with the "%define _alllib /usr/lib"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202217.l6KMHjmB008085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-20 18:17 EST ------- ping #2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202219.l6KMJbox008181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-20 18:19 EST ------- We are workig on it right now and I'm optimistic, that we can finish this review soon. Howard: Please upload the SRPM you send me some days ago to a location where it is accessible for everybody so others can participate in the review, too. Remember: Fedora is about openness, so everything should happen in public. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:41:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202241.l6KMfDA7009749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2007-07-20 18:41 EST ------- Christoph, I'm in complete agreement about the openness. Understand that in order to put public the SRPM and SPEC file the same as I have in the past that I have to cut a new release upstream. Because there have been some rather serious changes to the DSO build on Linux I have to take some time to test on non-Fedora Linux distros. Please allow me some time (a few days) to do that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202243.l6KMhol2009951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx 2007-07-20 18:43 EST ------- Correcting the problem for the libwacomcfg* files was as easy as to add another variable to the 64-bits test: LIB64=--libdir=/usr/lib64 This fixes the path for the those libraries... Leaving the %define _alllib /usr/lib definition is required for the TkXInput files. I'm in the process of testing the rpms on my system, here they are: http://basilides.homeip.net/RPMS/SPECS/linuxwacom-7.8.spec http://basilides.homeip.net/RPMS/linuxwacom-0.7.8_1-1.x86_64.rpm http://basilides.homeip.net/RPMS/linuxwacom-devel-0.7.8_1-1.x86_64.rpm http://basilides.homeip.net/RPMS/linuxwacom-debuginfo-0.7.8_1-1.x86_64.rpm Please keep in mind this is my home server and the upload speed is 256kbps, and I don't have anywhere else to host these files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:46:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202246.l6KMkKOL010151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx 2007-07-20 18:46 EST ------- Forgot to include the link for the .src.rpm: http://basilides.homeip.net/RPMS/linuxwacom-0.7.8_1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202248.l6KMmS1I010318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-20 18:48 EST ------- Been busy with the bacula stuff and the rest. I'll see what I can do about this here in august. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 22:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202251.l6KMpTQF010490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-07-20 18:51 EST ------- Hi, I noticed that xulrunner was approved as a feature for Fedora 8. In OLPC-2 branch it is even already imported (for quite a while), so now we are only waiting when it lands into rawhide. So, it might have an effect on this review... Do you know whether it can be built against it (the OLPC's SRPM rebuilds fine on Fedora 7)? I think it will need some changes to the Makefiles but the xulrunner(-devel) packages should have got all that is needed to build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 23:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202305.l6KN5DhQ011315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx 2007-07-20 19:05 EST ------- I can confirm the package builds and install, and for what I've been able to see it also works reasonably fine. Wacomcpl works just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 20 23:16:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707202316.l6KNG4oA012139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-20 19:16 EST ------- Yes i will do so when fltk will hit F-7 stable so i can build cinepaint for F-7 for the first time... I can probably close it yet i wonder,!?... As it is already built in devel... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 00:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210014.l6L0EiJC014830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-20 20:14 EST ------- Any news about the ImageMagick problem ? did you advices upstream ? Do you mind you can advices nmurray at redhat dot com which is the maintainer of ImageMagick (whereas reported as jkeating by buggbot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210105.l6L15CMA016889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 21:04 EST ------- * lib_loader patch doesn't apply, besides, most .la files are still required anyway. * ui_resources.rc: I installed kdelibs-3.91... and k;delibs3 side-by-side, and didn't see any file conflict wrt ui_resources.rc (did you?). If this is indeed a problem, we need a fixed patch (the provide one from Than didn't build). MUST items remaining todo: * rpmlint issues... I can sort that out, I'd prefer if you listed explicitly what you require. * kresources.desktop: I doubt this is really a prob, it's a kde-only thing, that probably contains keywords are something not technically valid according to spec. Fixing this may well require patching kde. imo, not worth it. * exclude dcopidl: can do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249122] New: Review Request: cups-appletalk - Appletalk printers via CUPS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249122 Summary: Review Request: cups-appletalk - Appletalk printers via CUPS Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cr33dog at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cr33dog.fedorapeople.org/packages/cups-appletalk.spec SRPM URL: http://cr33dog.fedorapeople.org/packages/cups-appletalk-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package adds the pap backend to cups, providing the ability to print to Appletalk printers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210114.l6L1EPt7017198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 21:14 EST ------- > * lib_loader patch doesn't apply, besides, most .la files are still required > anyway. OK. > * ui_resources.rc: I installed kdelibs-3.91... and k;delibs3 side-by-side, > and didn't see any file conflict wrt ui_resources.rc (did you?). If this is > indeed a problem, we need a fixed patch (the provide one from Than didn't > build). Maybe we get away with the conflict because it's a %config file? I'll take you word for it that it installs anyway. We need to look at the problem sooner or later, but let's not make this a blocker for importing. > MUST items remaining todo: > * rpmlint issues... I can sort that out, I'd prefer if you listed explicitly > what you require. See list of TODOs below. > * kresources.desktop: I doubt this is really a prob, it's a kde-only thing, > that probably contains keywords are something not technically valid according > to spec. Fixing this may well require patching kde. imo, not worth it. Then let's give it a pass. > * exclude dcopidl: can do OK. TODO: * remove execute permissions from /etc/profile.d/kde3.*sh * add %doc COPYING * remove dot at the end of -devel summary * exclude dcopidl* from main package * rename the specfile to the correct name As these are all minor issues, I'm going ahead and approving this, but please address them before or immediately after the import. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210124.l6L1Oad4017617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-20 21:24 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdelibs3 Short Description: K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries Owners: than at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210125.l6L1P7Hq017675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 01:33:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210133.l6L1XlcZ017973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-20 21:33 EST ------- Whoops, correcting myself: > * add %doc COPYING Actually, we want COPYING.LIB and COPYING.BSD there. I don't know why there's even a copy of the ordinary GPL in kdelibs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 02:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] New: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exempi/exempi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/exempi/exempi-1.99.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Exempi provides a library for easy parsing of XMP metadata. It is a port of Adobe XMP SDK to work on UNIX and to be build with GNU automake. It includes XMPCore and XMPFiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 02:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] New: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/flagpoll/flagpoll.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/flagpoll/flagpoll-0.8.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Flagpoll is a tool for developers to use meta-data files for storing information on what is needed to compile their software. Think of it as the rpm of software development. It enables developers total control over which packages, versions, architectures, etc. that they want to use meta-data from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 02:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210215.l6L2FC8B019756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 22:15 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 00f37d225326498756bbdbb93312cac9 HTTP-DAV-0.31.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/1_loadme..............ok t/1_utils...............ok t/2_options.............ok 6/6 skipped: no test server t/3_put_get_delete......ok 6/6 skipped: no test server t/4_multistatus.........ok t/5_propfind............ok 9/9 skipped: no test server t/5_proppatch...........ok 14/14 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_copy_move.......ok 14/14 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_get_callback....ok 19/19 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_globs...........ok 11/11 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_lock............ok 13/13 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_lock2...........ok 11/11 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_open_put_get....ok 39/39 skipped: no test server t/6_dav_options.........ok 6/6 skipped: no test server All tests successful, 148 subtests skipped. Files=14, Tests=175, 3 wallclock secs ( 2.37 cusr + 0.31 csys = 2.68 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: perl(HTTP::DAV) = 0.31 perl(HTTP::DAV::Comms) = 0.21 perl(HTTP::DAV::Headers) perl(HTTP::DAV::Lock) = 0.8 perl(HTTP::DAV::Resource) = 0.29 perl(HTTP::DAV::ResourceList) = 0.10 perl(HTTP::DAV::Response) = 0.13 perl(HTTP::DAV::UserAgent) perl(HTTP::DAV::Utils) = 0.10 +Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Glob) perl(FileHandle) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTTP::DAV) perl(HTTP::DAV::Comms) perl(HTTP::DAV::Lock) perl(HTTP::DAV::Resource) perl(HTTP::DAV::ResourceList) perl(HTTP::DAV::Response) perl(HTTP::DAV::Utils) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(LWP) perl(Pod::Parser) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(Text::ParseWords) perl(Time::Local) perl(URI) perl(URI::Escape) perl(URI::file) perl(XML::DOM) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 03:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210330.l6L3U1am024242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 23:29 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c52d615e3083defd2c71726f21b2127a Devel-Profiler-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01basic.........ok t/02die...........ok t/03goto..........main::goto_bar has 1 unstacked calls in outer main::bar has -1 unstacked calls in outer ok t/04crash.........ok t/05packages......ok t/06caller........ok t/07constants.....ok t/08fork..........ok t/09fcntl.........ok t/10autoload......ok 6/6 skipped: profiling AUTOLOAD not working yet t/11sub_filter....ok All tests successful, 6 subtests skipped. Files=11, Tests=56, 8 wallclock secs ( 3.40 cusr + 1.19 csys = 4.59 CPU) + exit 0 +Provides: perl(Devel::Profiler) = 0.04 perl(Devel::Profiler::Apache) = 0.01 perl(Devel::Profiler::Test) = 0.01 +Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(B) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Path) perl(Test::More) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 04:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210432.l6L4WvGx027989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|alsa-plugins |Review Request: alsa-plugins | |- backend plugins for alsa | |sound system QAContact| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 04:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210450.l6L4oEnU028635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 04:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210451.l6L4pJEX028729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 04:53:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210453.l6L4r4RW028848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |eric.moret at epita.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 06:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210628.l6L6So0q001144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-21 02:28 EST ------- new package and spec: (new upstream release and dropped patch -> merged upstream) http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 08:08:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210808.l6L88RDw007213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-21 04:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > Yes i will do so when fltk will hit F-7 stable so i can build cinepaint for F-7 > for the first time... Well, when you want to rebuild one package against not-yet-released packages, then you can ask rel-eng at fedoraproject.org to add the (not-yet-released) packages to buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 08:35:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707210835.l6L8ZaSs009446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-21 04:35 EST ------- Jon: No. As I said, the package is very fine now. APPROVED. Please request a CVS module now. Thanks for the package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 11:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211107.l6LB7ETb020061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-07-21 07:07 EST ------- As far as I understand, that package cannot be push in Fedora, unless bug #225809 is closed, and libmpfr.a (and mpfr headers) removed from gmp-devel. There is not a log of traffic in bug #225809. I do not even know if somebody is actually maintaining gmp (the version in Fedora is obsolete). Ivana, what is your plan? Waiting for GMP maintainers to fix their package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 13:12:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211312.l6LDC4Y1029837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-07-21 09:12 EST ------- OK, I'll read the mail as soon as I hit the office, which should be Monday morning. evolution-brutus-1.1.28.0 should build fine, but that is naturally on my box. I'll fix whatever is wrong asap on Monday. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 13:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211332.l6LDWhUx031237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-21 09:32 EST ------- Package is still OK, builds fine in mock / F7 / x86_64. Adel, I have a suggestion (it's pretty minor, feel free to ignore it): please consider shipping the file CHANGES. I think it could be useful for some of the users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 13:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211350.l6LDoNEu032104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-21 09:50 EST ------- ok, thx for looking at the package again and for your suggestion. I will ship the CHNAGES file too (nice to have and its not much work to include it ;) ) Will upload a new one tomorrow morning or later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 15:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211503.l6LF3KNR003050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-21 11:03 EST ------- --------- Summary: --------- * License file in tarball but not in %doc * Duplicate BuildRequires: autoconf (by automake), krb5-devel (by openssl-devel), pkgconfig (by libidn-devel) --------- Details: --------- OK - Mock : Built on rawhide (x86) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is GPL OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed FIX - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: a0eb50e18a2ac8e77d6b0df8f94bb5a6 elinks-0.11.3.tar.bz2 OK - Package has correct buildroot. FIX - BuildRequires are not redundant. OK - %build and %install stages are correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - No large doc files not in a -doc package OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version --------------- Rpmlint output: --------------- OK - silent on both srpm and main/sub package rpm Silent on elinks and debuginfo Source RPM: W: elinks unversioned-explicit-provides webclient W: elinks unversioned-explicit-obsoletes links W: elinks unversioned-explicit-provides links -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 16:28:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211628.l6LGSRZP007133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-21 12:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTTP-DAV Short Description: WebDAV client library for Perl5 Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 16:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211629.l6LGTlaG007219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-21 12:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-Profiler Short Description: Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 16:49:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211649.l6LGnUF2008181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-21 12:49 EST ------- Well, for header files #include and #ifdef macros issues, now they seems good for me. For 1.20.9-1: * Requires - Why main subpackage should have "Requires: tetex-latex tetex-dvips"? (I am not asking for BuildRequires). * Also please check for the dependency for netpbm-progs and ghostscript (again, I am not asking for BuildRequires). * python dependency - Well, does HippoDraw require tkinter? (tkinter is not installed by default). ? Files under examples/ - Should the files "SimEvents.fits" "Z0Strip.data" "aptuple.tnt" under %_datadir/%name should be in -python subpackage or in main package? * Dependency of -devel-doc package - Unless you have a special reason, please specify the dependency against -devel subpackage by release number specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 17:19:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211719.l6LHJWUO009656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-21 13:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drupal Short Description: An open-source content-management platform Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Thank you for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 18:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707211842.l6LIgbOp014071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2007-07-21 14:42 EST ------- Okay, I've uploaded new spec and src.rpm files. They can be gotten here: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.1.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 21 20:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707212025.l6LKPsAZ019251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From john.ellson at comcast.net 2007-07-21 16:25 EST ------- Just a report from an interested bystander that: rpmbuild --rebuild HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc7.src.rpm on Fedora-development, x86_64, fails with: RPM build errors: user pfkeb does not exist - using root group ek does not exist - using root user pfkeb does not exist - using root group ek does not exist - using root File not found: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw File not found: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/hippo.pth File not found by glob: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippomodule.* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/*.py File not found by glob: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/*.pyc File not found by glob: /var/tmp/HippoDraw-1.20.9-1.fc8-root-ellson/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/*.pyo File listed twice: /usr/include/HippoDraw/numarray/num_util.h Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsAxis.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsAxis.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsAxis.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsImageNTuple.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsImageNTuple.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsImageNTuple.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsNTuple.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsNTuple.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FitsNTuple.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FunctionBaseDecorator.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FunctionBaseDecorator.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/FunctionBaseDecorator.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fileList.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fileList.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fileList.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fitsarray.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fitsarray.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/fitsarray.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippofft.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippofft.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippofft.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippomodule.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippomodule.so.0 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippomodule.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippoplotter.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippoplotter.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/hippoplotter.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/pyfits.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/pyfits.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/pyfits.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/spectral.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/spectral.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/spectral.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/utilities.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/utilities.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/HippoDraw/utilities.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hippo.pth -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 00:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220016.l6M0GHYN029574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-21 20:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 00:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220023.l6M0Ntov029885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 01:44:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220144.l6M1iFPg000492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-21 21:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/mt-daapd-0.2.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 06:22:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 02:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173345] Review Request: fuse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220622.l6M6MuWr010838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173345 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-22 02:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fuse New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 07:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 03:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220700.l6M70ghc012645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-22 03:00 EST ------- Ok, here is the new one (ship CHANGES too): http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.10-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 08:47:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 04:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220847.l6M8lbOB019851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-07-22 04:47 EST ------- Blocker: * Please s!%{_prefix}/bin/!%{_bindir}/! in %files section Some other notes; please think about them and fix where you agree with them: * the summary starts with "A " -- the rule of tumb iirc is to go without it (e.g. Summary: Tool to foo) * The description starts in lower case; rule of tumb iirc is to start capitalized * Please tell upstream that > Copyright (C) 19yy > Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) 19yy name of author in LICENSE looks bogus ;-) * is there a specific reasons why you excluded TODO? I'd say it should be shipped -- it's small and doesn't do any harm for those not intersted in it * that DESTPREFIX stuff looks intersting, but well, it seems to be needed... * might be better to not let the Makefile gzip the man page as rpm does this on its own (in case rpm starts to use bz2 or whatever in the long term) Will approve the package and sponser you if you fix the blocker and comment on the other stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 09:29:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220929.l6M9TYmu023058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-22 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Blocker: > * Please s!%{_prefix}/bin/!%{_bindir}/! in %files section > ok fixed that one. > Some other notes; please think about them and fix where you agree with them: > > * the summary starts with "A " -- the rule of tumb iirc is to go without it > (e.g. Summary: Tool to foo) > ok, fixed > * The description starts in lower case; rule of tumb iirc is to start capitalized > ok changed. > * Please tell upstream that > > > Copyright (C) 19yy > > Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) 19yy name of author > > in LICENSE looks bogus ;-) > ok mail sent. > * is there a specific reasons why you excluded TODO? I'd say it should be > shipped -- it's small and doesn't do any harm for those not intersted in it > ok shipped now. > * that DESTPREFIX stuff looks intersting, but well, it seems to be needed... > I already contacted upstream (and sent a patch) and they will fix it in the next version. > * might be better to not let the Makefile gzip the man page as rpm does this on > its own (in case rpm starts to use bz2 or whatever in the long term) > this would require patching the makefile... is this really needed? can add a patch to do it if its prefferd that way. > Will approve the package and sponser you if you fix the blocker and comment on > the other stuff. ok, thx here is the new spec and srpm: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.10-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 09:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220930.l6M9UXQd023164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-22 05:30 EST ------- Correct URL is: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.10-3.fc7.src.rpm sorry for the typo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 09:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220944.l6M9iwop023965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-07-22 05:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > * might be better to not let the Makefile gzip the man page as rpm does this on > > its own (in case rpm starts to use bz2 or whatever in the long term) > this would require patching the makefile... is this really needed? No, likely not; I just wanted to make sure you know about it and keep it in mind. > http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/schedtool-1.2.10-3.fc7.src.rpm Approved. Apply for cvs_extras in the accounts system and I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 09:50:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707220950.l6M9osuL024237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-22 05:50 EST ------- > Apply for cvs_extras in the accounts system and I'll sponsor you. done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 10:37:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221037.l6MAbDsB026409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-22 06:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: schedtool Short Description: Tool to query or alter process scheduling policy Owners: adel.gadllah at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 13:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221353.l6MDrtj5004722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-22 09:53 EST ------- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-6-x86_64-core/result W: nspluginwrapper symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.so /usr/lib64/nspluginwrapper/npwrapper.so E: nspluginwrapper non-executable-script /etc/sysconfig/nspluginwrapper 0644 W: nspluginwrapper non-standard-group Networking/WWW W: nspluginwrapper conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/nspluginwrapper W: nspluginwrapper non-standard-group Networking/WWW E: nspluginwrapper hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib E: nspluginwrapper configure-without-libdir-spec W: nspluginwrapper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 104, tab: line 4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 16:05:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221605.l6MG52O1010791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-22 12:04 EST ------- What do I do to make it work? I've installed the 64bit build of nspluginwrapper and put libflashplayer.so in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. nspluginsetup doesn't seem to do anything if I run it and firefox doesn't show Flash plugin in about:plugins after restarting it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 16:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221632.l6MGWF32012154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-07-22 12:32 EST ------- Jens, I've applied your patch with one change (still need to run autoreconf before ./configure in the doc directory). Thanks! This should be the final version of the package, I believe. http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex-2.1.0-3.fc7.src.rpm http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/alex.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 17:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221739.l6MHdn6P015709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-22 13:39 EST ------- The mail archives seem to be inaccessible (I'm getting internal server errors from sourceforge), but the main site doesn't list any new releases, so I'm guessing nothing's changed so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 17:56:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221756.l6MHuia2016463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-22 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > As far as I understand, that package cannot be push in Fedora, unless bug > #225809 is closed, and libmpfr.a (and mpfr headers) removed from gmp-devel. Yes, you right. > There is not a log of traffic in bug #225809. I do not even know if somebody > is actually maintaining gmp (the version in Fedora is obsolete). > Ivana, what is your plan? Waiting for GMP maintainers to fix their package? We have to poke the gmp maintainer to do the split, because without the split we can't release a separate mpfr library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 17:57:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221757.l6MHv2jd016511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-22 13:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > As far as I understand, that package cannot be push in Fedora, unless bug > #225809 is closed, and libmpfr.a (and mpfr headers) removed from gmp-devel. Yes, you right. > There is not a log of traffic in bug #225809. I do not even know if somebody > is actually maintaining gmp (the version in Fedora is obsolete). > Ivana, what is your plan? Waiting for GMP maintainers to fix their package? We have to poke the gmp maintainer to do the split, because without the split we can't release a separate mpfr library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 18:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221822.l6MIMfNo017799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 ------- Additional Comments From hlingler at verizon.net 2007-07-22 14:22 EST ------- Add Item #8) serviceconfig: on serviceconfig start, when reading (is "parsing" the correct term?) the contents of /etc/rc.d/init.d, serviceconfig displays the files /etc/rc.d/init.d/.directory (placed there by konqueror) and /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamav~ (a back-up that I placed there after fixing errors in atrpms' file); if placing/leaving these files in /etc/rc.d/init.d is "taboo", then I am in error, but I do not recall seeing any warning anywhere telling me not to do so; if not, shouldn't serviceconfig be told to ignore hidden and back-up files? Also, serviceconfig fails to read the status of many services, showing a ? instead. I don't recall the standard Fedora system-config-services application having any such problems reading the statuses or trying to read hidden/back-up files, but I can't double-check because I removed it. In response to Comment #7 by R. Dieter: as much as I would like to help, I lack the knowledge/skills to do so - "I would if I could but I can't so I won't." Thank You and Regards, Vince Schiavoni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 18:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221824.l6MIOSTr017934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cr33dog at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-22 14:24 EST ------- The rpmlint error is generated because one or more of the lines in the description is too long. Have a look here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ParagNemade/CommonRpmlintErrors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 18:32:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] New: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/inchi.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/inchi-1.0.1-8.src.rpm Description: The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier (InChITM) is a non-proprietary identifier for chemical substances that can be used in printed and electronic data sources thus enabling easier linking of diverse data compilations. It was developed under IUPAC Project 2000-025-1-800 during the period 2000-2004. Details of the project and the history of its progress are available from the project web site. This was originally built from sources included in openbabel. Release 8 is necessary to maintain a proper upgrade path. I have a pending change for openbabel in devel to build against this already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 19:39:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221939.l6MJd83p021666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-22 15:39 EST ------- I have create a suggested package for the most recent gmp without the mpfr library. I have uploaded it to http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 19:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707221941.l6MJfCEq021906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-22 15:41 EST ------- I have create a suggestion for the gmp package on gmp-4.2.1. So I thing, you should add a 'Conflict: gmp < 4.2.1' statement into your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 19:51:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] New: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alienblaster.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alienblaster-1.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Alien Blaster is an action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game. Your mission in the game is simple: stop the invasion of the aliens by blasting them. Simultaneous two-player mode is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 20:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222008.l6MK8uuP023447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-22 16:08 EST ------- 3) Oyranos seems also to uses it to control color profiles... I will review it soon, then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222103.l6ML3SHN026679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-22 17:03 EST ------- - Passes rpmlint - Builds in mock (i386) - Quick glance thought the package: * nothing in music/ - is this forthcoming or was something left out? - rpm installs/program works on i386 * wasn't able to connect to the server upstream to md5 compare - Freeware license OK I'm not sure if I have the authority to say it passes review - going to check on the devel list or on the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222118.l6MLIH8P027444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cr33dog at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:20:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222120.l6MLKfUh027580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-22 17:20 EST ------- Ok so few comments to start: 1/ You must use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS This will allow to have some debuginfo... (cf 0 blocks ) 2/ About: # ... but apps expect them under NVCtrl: Ok but can you preserve timestamp? ( maybe some install -pm 0644 would be better...) Full review will follow later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222122.l6MLMmkZ027698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cr33dog at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-22 17:22 EST ------- - Passes rpmlint - Builds in mock (i386) - Quick glance through the package - nothing binary/non-utf - rpm installs/program works on i386 * wasn't able to connect to the server upstream to md5 compare - GPL license OK Seems to pass all MUST (and SHOULD) items. I'll give upstream a while to come back online and to a comparison before marking accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222126.l6MLQWJl027872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-22 17:26 EST ------- NO DEVEL ========= Good: - rpmlint checks return: nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime APPROVED. You're getting rather good at this, Hans. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 22 21:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707222143.l6MLhTGE028717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-22 17:41 EST ------- One minor note: The .sh script you're using to launch the alienblaster.bin has a minor bug (preventing the game from launching). Your script make a symlink to "sounds" instead of the correct "sound". You should fix that before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 00:43:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230043.l6N0hrR7004042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-07-22 20:43 EST ------- Any updates from the FSF? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 01:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230130.l6N1UuiL006834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-22 21:30 EST ------- Not yet. They're rather busy with GPLv3 fallout at the time, but I'll poke them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 01:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230147.l6N1lAiN007669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-22 21:47 EST ------- Here is the formal review: Good: + rpmlint clean + license is BSD + checked source md5sum: 17e80d39cc3f1aba28dcea0e358c81e9 alex-2.1.0.tar.gz + directory ownership good Needs attention: - need to exclude ppc64 for this too I guess. All other MUST items are satisfied. Could you please add the ppc64 excludes and open a bug for that making it depend on the ghc ppc64 bug. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 05:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] New: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/sunbird/sunbird.spec SRPM URL: Currently the spec does not compile. I'm looking for assistance on fixing it. The stuff that SHOULD be in the SRPM is here (except for the actual source, which is linked to in the spec file): http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/sunbird/ Description: Mozilla Sunbird? is a cross-platform calendar application, built upon Mozilla Toolkit. Our goal is to bring Mozilla-style ease-of-use to your calendar, without tying you to a particular storage solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 05:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230553.l6N5rAks018963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 01:53 EST ------- I think hi-typewriter.mim should be in m17n-db since it is from: http://cvs.m17n.org/viewcvs/m17n/m17n-db/MIM/. You need to use make in %build and "make install" in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 05:53:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] New: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/pidgin-knotify.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/pidgin-knotify-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Pidgin-KNotify is a plugin for Pidgin that uses KNotify to do notifications. This is for those who like pidgin but don't like the lack of KDE integration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 05:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] New: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kde-style-domino.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kde-style-domino-0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Domino is a style with a soft look. It allows to fine adjust the shininess of the widgets by customizable color gradients.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 06:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230614.l6N6Epv6020156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-07-23 02:14 EST ------- I followed the procedure at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess and successfully imported for the devel branch. If I am required to do something else for FC-6 and F-7, please tell me what it is. I will update the wiki accordingly. Thanks, -- Pai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 06:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230644.l6N6ikk0021703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 02:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159763) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159763&action=view) m17n-contrib.spec-macro.patch Ok here is a patch with a macro to define the subpackages and other improvements. You need to download the missing script from cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 07:08:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230708.l6N78Djh023042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 03:08 EST ------- Thanks for your inputs. here is updated package links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.1.fc8.src.rpm Also, updated m17n-db package is available at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 07:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230715.l6N7Ft4F023574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 03:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > One minor note: > > The .sh script you're using to launch the alienblaster.bin has a minor bug > (preventing the game from launching). > > Your script make a symlink to "sounds" instead of the correct "sound". > Oopsee, good catch. I noticed this myself too, fixed the symlink in my ~ manually, play tested and then forgot all about it :) And many thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 07:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230747.l6N7lQ2b025973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 03:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alienblaster Short Description: Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 07:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230757.l6N7vuUe027224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 03:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159767&action=view) m17n-contrib.spec-1.1.patch missing script should be installed 755 - my bad. Few other bits of cleanup and description improvements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 08:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230837.l6N8bllp031542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-23 04:37 EST ------- Hello, I'm gmp maintainer too so I'd like to update gmp in devel branch too, but I don't want to remove mpfr files from gmp for long time without existence of the separate mpfr package. So I plan to do both these changes (update gmp and remove mpfr files from gmp and add mpfr package) when this review will be approved. I will update the conflict flag when I will build the new gmp version. Thanks for your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 08:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230844.l6N8ikYI032219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Extra m17n-lib datafiles for input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 04:44 EST ------- Ok done with changes, but I kept same release number. So new links are Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 08:51:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230851.l6N8pmDb000528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-07-23 04:51 EST ------- Nice to hear that, Ivana. Do you have a gmp package updated, so that we can test it with the mpfr RPM of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 09:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230900.l6N90xJR001564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-23 05:00 EST ------- you have to build and install the 32-bit version, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 09:05:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707230905.l6N95URi002277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 05:05 EST ------- snip from a mock build: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40708 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd pidgin-knotify-0.1 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make gcc -o knotify-plugin.so -shared knotify-plugin.c `pkg-config pidgin --cflags --libs` -g -Wall /bin/sh: pkg-config: command not found knotify-plugin.c:16:18: error: glib.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:17:26: error: glib/gprintf.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:21:24: error: connection.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:22:26: error: conversation.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:23:18: error: core.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:24:21: error: signals.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:25:21: error: version.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:26:20: error: status.h: No such file or directory knotify-plugin.c:31: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'dcopmessage' knotify-plugin.c:34: error: expected ')' before '*' token knotify-plugin.c:49: error: expected ')' before '*' token knotify-plugin.c:64: error: expected ')' before '*' token knotify-plugin.c:71: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'plugin_load' knotify-plugin.c:84: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'info' knotify-plugin.c:115: error: expected ')' before '*' token knotify-plugin.c:118: warning: data definition has no type or storage class knotify-plugin.c:118: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'PURPLE_INIT_PLUGIN' knotify-plugin.c:118: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration make: *** [knotify-plugin.so] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40708 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 10:15:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] New: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/hardinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/hardinfo-0.4.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: HardInfo can gather information about a system's hardware and operating system, perform benchmarks, and generate printable reports either in HTML or in plain text formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 10:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231059.l6NAxXib012135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:17:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231217.l6NCHlI9018427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 08:17 EST ------- Fixed a bug in the package (detection of "human users"): New URLs: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/hardinfo.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/hardinfo-0.4.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231220.l6NCKDpq018684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-07-23 08:20 EST ------- I'm getting a dist-fc7-updates-candidate error in F-7 (and a similar one in devel) .... not sure if I missing something or if I don't have the build ability yet ... [steve at psycho F-7]$ make build Created task: 73459 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3D73459 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 73459 build (dist-fc7-updates-candidate, F-7:python-pygments-0_8_1-1_fc7): free 73459 build (dist-fc7-updates-candidate, F-7:python-pygments-0_8_1-1_fc7): free -> open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 73460 buildSRPMFromCVS (F-7:python-pygments-0_8_1-1_fc7): open (ppc1.fedora.redhat.com) 73460 buildSRPMFromCVS (F-7:python-pygments-0_8_1-1_fc7): open (ppc1.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 73459 build (dist-fc7-updates-candidate, F-7:python-pygments-0_8_1-1_fc7): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package python-pygments not in list for tag dist-fc7-updates-candidate 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231223.l6NCNRGq019070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: m17n-contrib|Review Request: m17n-contrib |- Extra m17n-lib datafiles |- Contributed m17n input |for input and output |maps ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 08:23 EST ------- In the future please always bump the release that makes the reviewers job easier. I suggest making the tbl2mim.swk script executable in the srpm. For me the above links are still pointing to the old version of the package (ie same as comment 3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:28:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231228.l6NCSCrC019581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-23 08:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159779) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159779&action=view) proposed version of gmp package Oops good idea - so this is the proposed version of gmp package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231237.l6NCb0oV020435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 08:36 EST ------- ackage Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output:none [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: e3ec42cdb5ee03b002aa071d418f951579998408 /home/wolfy/hardinfo-0.4.2.2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F7/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:F7/x86_64, devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. NOTES I would have used a simple sed over the source file (rather than a full blown patch) to fix the start UID of the normal users, but your approach is perfectly fine. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231243.l6NCh759021833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 08:43 EST ------- Well, it seems that all files are installed under site_lib, not site_arch. While this should be for arch-independent files (.py{,c,o}), arch-dependent files (.so, for example) must be installed under site_arch directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:47:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231247.l6NClcWK022368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 08:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In the future please always bump the release that makes the reviewers job easier. > > I suggest making the tbl2mim.swk script executable in the srpm. > > For me the above links are still pointing to the old version of the package > (ie same as comment 3). I rechecked again and new links already have updated SPEC. Ok now I bump release. So new links are Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 12:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231252.l6NCq8Fx022857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 08:52 EST ------- By the way are there any information when upstream will release new version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:04:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231304.l6ND450O024263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 09:03 EST ------- thx for the review. >NOTES >I would have used a simple sed over the source file (rather than a full blown >patch) to fix the start UID of the normal users, but your approach is perfectly >fine. I somehow prefer patches don't ask me why ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231305.l6ND5YAk024407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 09:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hardinfo Short Description: System Profiler and Benchmark Owners: adel.gadllah at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231320.l6NDKM7L026110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 09:20 EST ------- Some notes: * Please try to keep timestamps as much as possible. For recent Makefile, the following method usually works. ------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR= INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" ------------------------------------------------------- * Check the directory ownership ------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost mock]# LANG=C rpm -ivh m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.2.fc8.noarch.rpm m17n-contrib-marathi-1.1.2-1.2.fc8.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:m17n-contrib ########################################### [ 50%] 2:m17n-contrib-marathi ########################################### [100%] [root at localhost mock]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/m17n/icons/mr-inscript.png m17n-contrib-marathi-1.1.2-1.2.fc8 [root at localhost mock]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/m17n/icons/ file /usr/share/m17n/icons is not owned by any package ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:22:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231322.l6NDMgeI026373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 09:22 EST ------- build fails here: make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/linux/rpmbuild/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/pix' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/home/linux/rpmbuild/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/uic alias.ui -o alias.h make[2]: *** No rule to make target `alias.h', needed by `all'. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl alias.h alias.ui -o alias.cpp Conflict in /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.so: Plugin uses incompatible Qt library! expected build key "x86_64 Linux g++-4.* full-config", got "i686 Linux g++-4.* full-config". /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/moc alias.h >> alias.cpp make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/linux/rpmbuild/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/linux/rpmbuild/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55914 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:24:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231324.l6NDOMXQ026561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 09:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ok so few comments to start: > > 1/ You must use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > This will allow to have some debuginfo... (cf 0 blocks ) > > 2/ About: # ... but apps expect them under NVCtrl: > Ok but can you preserve timestamp? ( maybe some install -pm 0644 would be > better...) > New version with these both fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:24:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231324.l6NDOiwr026640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:29:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231329.l6NDT9n6027333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 09:29 EST ------- some NOTES: %configure line to long split it please. use %{_bindir} not /usr/bin %description seems long too. is it necessary to list all features here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 13:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231349.l6NDnSXW030026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 09:49 EST ------- This time: * linkchecker won't work: ----------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost mock]# linkchecker http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr//bin/linkchecker", line 527, in config.init_logging(debug=options.debug) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/linkcheck/configuration/__init__.py", line 161, in init_logging logging.config.fileConfig(filename) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/config.py", line 76, in fileConfig formatters = _create_formatters(cp) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/logging/config.py", line 107, in _create_formatters flist = cp.get("formatters", "keys") File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ConfigParser.py", line 511, in get raise NoSectionError(section) ConfigParser.NoSectionError: No section: 'formatters' ------------------------------------------------------- - linkcheck/configuration/__init__.py really uses logging.conf - The configutaion directory path is set in _linkchecker_configdata.py * gettext .mo files - File entries of gettext .mo files should be marked by using %find_lang. * rpmlint - rpmlint complains: -------------------------------------------------------- E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/lc.cgi 0644 E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_blacklist.sh 0644 E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/lc.fcgi 0644 E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_for_x_errors.sh 0644 E: linkchecker non-executable-script /usr/share/linkchecker/examples/check_urls.sh 0644 --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:04:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231404.l6NE4Fhe031620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 10:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Adel. If I interpret correctly your log, you did not use mock. Could you please try a mock build? As you can see in my buildlogs for devel/x86_64 (which are available at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/buildlogs/devel) on my test machine, under mock, everything seems OK so I would be grateful if you can provide more input on the situation when it does not build I have split the %configure line, I will upload the new spec once more modifications are to be included. As of the description, that's how the author describes it and I would like to leave it as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231416.l6NEGD1v000355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for the review, Adel. > > If I interpret correctly your log, you did not use mock. Could you please try a > mock build? As you can see in my buildlogs for devel/x86_64 (which are available > at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/buildlogs/devel) on my test machine, under > mock, everything seems OK so I would be grateful if you can provide more input > on the situation when it does not build > ok I am building it in mock now. > I have split the %configure line, I will upload the new spec once more > modifications are to be included. As of the description, that's how the author > describes it and I would like to leave it as it is. ok, this comment seems unneeded: "#the category Application is not valid" when you upload the new spec and the build work I will do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231421.l6NEL2YR000959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:27:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231427.l6NERqpE002014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 10:27 EST ------- you also don't need the / when you use the macros: ex: /%{_datadir}/man/man1/* -> %{_datadir}/man/man1/* and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231433.l6NEX9ET002784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 10:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159787) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159787&action=view) mock build log the build failed in mock too (F7 x86_64) log is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231448.l6NEmrN6005375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-07-23 10:48 EST ------- I have updated the spec file. http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/linuxwacom.spec Mainly rpmlint cleanups but some errors which would have been blockers for approval. Unfortunately wacomcpl does *not* work for me - I'm currently investigating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231452.l6NEqHIi005868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 10:52 EST ------- ok it seems not to be smp build safe remove the smp_flags from make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231458.l6NEwAZ4006657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 10:57 EST ------- For 0.1.0-1: * License - While COPYING says this is licensed under LGPL (and you tagged this rpm as such, although COPYING is missing on %doc entry), common.c, instrum.c, etc... are licensed under _GPL_ . ? Dependency - Would you explain why main package should explicitly have "Requires: timidity++"? ? binary executable files - Are test/.libs/{playmidi,midi2raw} of no use? (playmidi seems to be created only with have libao-devel installed). * libtimidity.pc - Why does this need "-lm" on Libs? Linkage against libm.so is already done on libtimidity.so and extra linkage like this must be removed unless header files installed require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 14:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231459.l6NExDwN006746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 10:59 EST ------- It seems that parallel build is not always functional. I've informed upstream who will look into it. New spec + src.rpm are available at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader.spec http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader-0.3.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226427] Merge Review: specspo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231504.l6NF4avG007572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: specspo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226427 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-07-23 11:04 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: specspo Updated Fedora Owners: skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:05:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231505.l6NF5o5E007866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-23 11:05 EST ------- Description is fixed, however upstream package for OggConvert 0.2.1.1 has issues during build that affected upstream, so I notified upstream so that he will fix it. I do not think it would be worth rebuilding because apparently there were files missing in 0.2.1, so I am waiting for 0.2.1.1 to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231510.l6NFAl4L008472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 11:10 EST ------- you still have /usr/bin in %files please use %{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231518.l6NFIJ9k009672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 11:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > For 0.1.0-1: > > * License > - While COPYING says this is licensed under LGPL (and you > tagged this rpm as such, although COPYING is missing on > %doc entry), common.c, instrum.c, etc... are licensed > under _GPL_ . > These files come from timidity (through SDL_mixer, which also is LGPL), when timidity was discontinued it was set free under a choice if GPL / LGPL / artistic, see: http://web.archive.org/web/20010106150700/http://www.cgs.fi/~tt/discontinued.html Also see the first paragraph of the included COPYING which says: Please note that the included source from TiMidity, is also licensed under the following terms (GNU LGPL), but can also be used separately under the GNU GPL, or the Perl Artistic License. Those licensing terms are not reprinted here, but can be found on the web easily. I will include the missing COPYING file, good catch. > ? Dependency > - Would you explain why main package should explicitly have > "Requires: timidity++"? > Because timidity++ provides the necessary patch files containing the wavetable instruments, this is why for example SDL_mixer and allegro also require timidity++. > ? binary executable files > - Are test/.libs/{playmidi,midi2raw} of no use? > (playmidi seems to be created only with have libao-devel > installed). > There already is a cmdline utility called playmidi (or atleast was), also we already have playmus from SDL_mixer and timidity itself through timidity++, notice that the standalone version of timidity is of much better quality (and much more cpu intensive). So I see little use in these test apps, if people want to play or convert midi using timidity they should be using the standalone version. > * libtimidity.pc > - Why does this need "-lm" on Libs? Linkage against libm.so > is already done on libtimidity.so and extra linkage like > this must be removed unless header files installed require > it. Many package config files contain libs in the LDFLAGS against which the lib itself is already linked, this is normal behaviour as not all Unix OS's support .so files having deps, so sometimes the app itself must be linked against the deps, so that the symbols will be there for the lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231525.l6NFPsar011074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-23 11:25 EST ------- Sorry about that. My fault. Can you try it now? It should work... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] New: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cbalint at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff-1.2.4rc1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Libgeotiff is a public domain library normally hosted on top of libtiff for reading, and writing GeoTIFF information tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231536.l6NFadR7012965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 11:36 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 249296 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231536.l6NFagMP013017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mccann0011 at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 11:36 EST ------- *** Bug 178162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231541.l6NFfGOV013676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 11:41 EST ------- Package Review: ================================================== ---------------------------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ---------------------------------- OK, no output. ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- NOT OK! Please replace /usr/bin in %files with %{_bindir} ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ---------------------------------- OK (GPL) ---------------------------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ---------------------------------- OK (mdsum = 165774433c44f721e82552c866e7be87) ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ---------------------------------- OK (Tested on F7 x86_64) ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. ---------------------------------- N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ---------------------------------- OK (not relocateable) ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- NOT OK! Please replace /usr/bin in %files with %{_bindir} ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ---------------------------------- OK (builds fine on F7 x86_64) ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- ================================================== Summary: Package looks ok, one blocker: Please replace /usr/bin in %files with %{_bindir} ================================================== When you fix this blocker I will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:50:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245045] Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231550.l6NFog13016585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245045 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-23 11:50 EST ------- re2c-0.12.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231550.l6NFokww016659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:50:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245045] Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231550.l6NFop9c016716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based recognizers from regular expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245045 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.12.1-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231550.l6NFou9p016766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-23 11:50 EST ------- msmtp-1.4.12-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231551.l6NFp0Vl016806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.4.12-7.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 15:55:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231555.l6NFtQds018051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 11:55 EST ------- New version uploaded. Changes: - fixes the missing macro usage - re-enables parallel build. Please let me know if these build on your system: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader.spec http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader-0.3.1-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231618.l6NGIC6m022497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 12:18 EST ------- build fails in the same way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231622.l6NGMQ4W023088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-23 12:22 EST ------- Well, all you're required to do for the release branches is described in step 11 of that document; I see nothing incorrect there that would need to be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231624.l6NGO19k023291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:26:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231626.l6NGQAMh023658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 12:26 EST ------- tryed in mock here is the output: ------------------------------------ make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/pix' Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' cd .. && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/missing --run automake-1.9 --gnu src/Makefile /builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/missing: line 52: automake-1.9: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.9' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/uic alias.ui -o alias.h make[2]: *** No rule to make target `alias.h', needed by `all'. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl alias.h alias.ui -o alias.cpp /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/moc alias.h >> alias.cpp make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.64731 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.64731 (%build) --------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:27:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231627.l6NGR244023826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff.spec > SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff-1.2.4rc1.fc8.src.rpm Both seems 404? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:37:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231637.l6NGb2Wt024573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 12:35 EST ------- (A note: For pre-versions like rc, the EVR of rpm must be like: 1.2.4-0.X.rcY to avoid broken EVR path.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231637.l6NGb7bc024678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 12:36 EST ------- All right. Please add COPYING on CVS. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (libtimidity) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:51:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231651.l6NGpQVx025917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 12:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtimidity Short Description: MIDI to WAVE converter library Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231651.l6NGpV0M025945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 12:51 EST ------- I am sorry. re-uploaded. Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 16:56:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231656.l6NGuidm026444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 12:56 EST ------- EPSG dataset license is OK now. Confirmed by Thomas Callaway , olso FSF. Minor thing is that EPSG dataset is splitted in csv files, see ChangeLog but without alter the data essence itself, just reorganise original EPSG wich comes as SQl dumps or MS Access files. EPSG hates alter of dataset so I must be carefull looking at that. At a point my plan is to split separate epsg-data.noarch one and re-base gdal and geotiff over it. Thats should be clearest way include EPSG dataset, and trace down how csv files are generated. ~cristian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231730.l6NHUFs1029361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-23 13:30 EST ------- updated to 0.2.1.1, which according to the upstream, will address issues regarding the building of the application without missing files... Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-8.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: d675b34744eb39768c86c46ce55a4964 sha1sum: 7e627bb1aa0f1cac9ac4263b4bb164aa8457916c SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-8.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: ee64a2cb4455a23fd16d819b6dca4815 sha1sum: 2ccec0f23dc34739518602d70db40ad01d980a71 This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) Hopefully, mock will build fine with this... aside from my GPG key if it isnt imported... Also, the description issues were fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:30:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231730.l6NHUjtf029500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review- |needinfo?(eric at brouhaha.com)| ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-23 13:30 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone want to maintain this package, please sumbit a new review request, Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:32:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231732.l6NHW1WV029739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-23 13:31 EST ------- Last ping ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231733.l6NHXEem030128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-23 13:33 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231733.l6NHXPmp030159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-23 13:33 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231737.l6NHbG6s030902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 13:37 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249251] Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231738.l6NHcgsh031083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo - System Profiler and Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249251 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231741.l6NHf3Ud031479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:43:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248899] Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231743.l6NHhk5L032187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs3 - K Desktop Environment 3 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248899 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:50:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231750.l6NHobnN000742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231752.l6NHqSn0000887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231754.l6NHsHcG001273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:55:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231755.l6NHtkmc001495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-23 13:55 EST ------- Actually, Xavier and I are working on packaging the _latest_ gwave . (gwave2-20070514) I repeat _latest_. We are having difficulties and still struggling in rpmbuiling that latest release since it requires many dependencies. V buildrequires W W buildrequires X X buildrequires Y Y buildrequires Z We were able to build the previous release of gwave-20060606 which required only guile-gtk and compat-guile-16. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/gwave/gwave.png But, that gwave-20060606 can't be built on the latest guile-gtk-2. So we opted for now, the 1.2 version of guile-gtk which is only available on the debian repository. We are now working to meet the dependencies of the latest gwave. But I'm not in favour of doing so, since 2 or 3 dependencies are either keep on changing names or being split. In accordance to 2 fedora-geda users (to whom I talked), they would be happy to have at least gwave-20060606 for their simulations. Our work can be found here: * http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ * http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/gwave/ (my specs needs to be polished and are met for testing functional use only) So now, the question is: are we willing to ship *the latest gwave and at the same time shipping lots of old dependencies ? or *the gwave-2006006 and one dependency ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 17:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231757.l6NHvu0J001709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 18:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231801.l6NI1Okj002484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 18:36:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231836.l6NIaOWW007305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 14:36 EST ------- Well, I don't know well about gwave, however is gwave really not bypassed to proceed the review of this package? Current gspiceui does not require gwave, so you can just ignore gwave for now? For gwave: (In reply to comment #16) > So now, the question is: > are we willing to ship > *the latest gwave and at the same time shipping lots of old dependencies ? Absolutely, unless the newest gwave has regression issue problems, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 18:47:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] New: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/yum-updatesd.spec SRPM URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/repos/yum-updatesd/yum-updatesd-0.3-1.fc8.noarch.rpm Description: yum-updatesd provides a daemon which checks for available updates and can notify you when they are available via email, syslog or dbus. Note: this is the new and split out yum-updatesd. It has an epoch of 1 so that it will update the standalone version from the yum package (which will be gone as of yum 3.2.3, and will be removed from rawhide when we push this package into the repo). [katzj at aglarond repo]$ rpmlint yum-updatesd-0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm yum-updatesd-0.3-1.fc8.noarch.rpm W: yum-updatesd invalid-license GPLv2 W: yum-updatesd invalid-license GPLv2 This is pedantically correct. W: yum-updatesd conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/yum-updatesd.conf dbus configs aren't intended to be human editable W: yum-updatesd service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/yum-updatesd We intentionally have the service enabled by default so that users can take advantage of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 18:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231851.l6NIpKOb009708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jbowes at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 18:53:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231853.l6NIrJY6010054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-23 14:53 EST ------- You meant: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/repos/yum-updatesd/yum-updatesd-0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm for the source rpm, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231906.l6NJ6kKu012259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 15:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159804) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159804&action=view) mock build log of libgeotiff 1.2.4-0.1.rc1 on rawhide i386 Very rapid comment because I want to go to bed.. * debuginfo rpm is of no use. It seems that -g option is removed. * I suggest to move the header files to the subdirectory of /usr/include and hide them from /usr/include (as you wrote on .pc file) * Specify the full URL of the source. * I may be wrong, however (for example) /usr/include/geonames.h contains -------------------------------------------- 47 static KeyInfo _keyInfo[] = { 48 # include "geokeys.inc" /* geokey database */ 49 END_LIST -------------------------------------------- but geokeys.inc is missing? * /usr/include/xtiffio.h contains -------------------------------------------- 10 #include "tiffio.h" -------------------------------------------- And it seems that tiffio.h is included in libtiff-devel. So libgeotiff-devel should require libtiff-devel. * Check if -------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR= INSTALL="%{__install} -p" -------------------------------------------- works to keep timestamps on the header files installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:09:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231909.l6NJ9hjh012741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-07-23 15:09 EST ------- Yes. One of these days I'll learn to type what I mean :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231925.l6NJPNKA014426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-07-23 15:25 EST ------- I have 4 minor nits: * use BuildArch instead of BuildArchitectures * use the 4 argument form of defattr * include a full url for source0 (when such a thing exists) * use sh rather than bash for the init script (if possible) These are just my preferences, however. Review: * source files match upstream: Jeremy is the upstream, so this is ok. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F7, i686). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(yum-updatesd) = 1:0.3-1.fc7 yum-updatesd = 1:0.3-1.fc7 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /usr/bin/python config(yum-updatesd) = 1:0.3-1.fc7 dbus-python gamin-python pygobject2 python >= 2.4 yum >= 3.2.0 * %check is not present (no test suite upstream) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriplets are sane. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231930.l6NJUBiQ015122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-07-23 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I have 4 minor nits: > * use BuildArch instead of BuildArchitectures > * use the 4 argument form of defattr Fixed both of these in git for the next version > * include a full url for source0 (when such a thing exists) This is in progress and I'll get it added in the next couple of days > * use sh rather than bash for the init script (if possible) This will break the initscript translation stuff as it's bash-specific how that works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:31:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231931.l6NJVi0g015330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-07-23 15:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-updatesd Short Description: Update notification daemon Owners: katzj at redhat.com Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:36:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231936.l6NJasSD015979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2007-07-23 15:36 EST ------- Could you please build EPEL branches as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 19:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248457] Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707231953.l6NJrmvi018276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Profiler - Perl profiler compatible with dprofpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248457 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 20:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248434] Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232005.l6NK55xF020675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-DAV - WebDAV client library for Perl5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248434 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 20:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232008.l6NK8oPl021028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 20:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232008.l6NK8qkn021058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 Bug 248431 depends on bug 248427, which changed state. Bug 248427 Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 20:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232044.l6NKiWfa025278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-23 16:44 EST ------- First pass through the spec... 1) Why the use of ExclusiveArch, then list just about all possible arches? I think an ExcludeArch for the arch or arches it doesn't build on might be better. So far as I can see, that list is really just s390/s390x, no? 2) %makeinstall is a big no-no :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 3) the CFLAGS aren't being honored. I've actually got a patch in hand that'll make 'make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' work, as well as the CFLAGS honored: ----8<---- --- wdaemon-0.10/Makefile 2007-07-20 12:07:44.000000000 -0400 +++ wdaemon-0.10.updated/Makefile 2007-07-23 16:30:06.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -CFLAGS = -O0 -g -Wall +CFLAGS ?= -O0 -g -Wall OBJS = hotplug.o \ input.o \ monitored.o \ @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ wdaemon: $(OBJS) gcc $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< install: - mkdir -p $(bindir) - cp wdaemon $(bindir)/ - mkdir -p $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/ - cp wdaemon.initrd $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/wdaemon + mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) + cp wdaemon $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/ + mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/ + cp wdaemon.initrd $(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/wdaemon clean: rm -f *.o wdaemon core ----8<---- 4) I'd install is_uinput.sh mode 755 instead of 644, which also eliminates the need for the %attr stuff on that file in %files. That's all I've got so far... rpmlint output is fairly clean, just two warnings about the udev rules files not being marked as config files. Not sure yet if they should be, or if we just ignore those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 20:45:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232045.l6NKjDxv025466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249214] Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232101.l6NL14q8027158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alienblaster - Action-loaded 2D arcade shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249214 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-23 17:01 EST ------- imported, build and submitted as F-7 update, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:05:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232105.l6NL53J7027499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:05:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232105.l6NL5p38027578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232106.l6NL6uQ1027727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:08:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] New: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/popt.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/popt-1.12-1.src.rpm Description: Popt is a C library for parsing command line parameters. Popt was heavily influenced by the getopt() and getopt_long() functions, but it improves on them by allowing more powerful argument expansion. Popt can parse arbitrary argv[] style arrays and automatically set variables based on command line arguments. Popt allows command line arguments to be aliased via configuration files and includes utility functions for parsing arbitrary strings into argv[] arrays using shell-like rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232109.l6NL99ST027928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232110.l6NLAQQt028111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:11:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232111.l6NLBlCK028431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232113.l6NLDnMJ028591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:14:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232114.l6NLEWjC028663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232115.l6NLFsqA028807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232120.l6NLKecM029313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226427] Merge Review: specspo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232128.l6NLSoM1029965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: specspo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226427 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:29:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232129.l6NLTWeh030125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-23 17:29 EST ------- Sorry, we can't do this. Owners must match your Bugzilla account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232130.l6NLUGNA030187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-23 17:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Is this what you want? Yes, thank you. BTW, I was trying to access your source rpm at http://matej.ceplovi.cz/progs/rpms/alsa-plugins/alsa-plugins-1.0.14-0.3.rc2.src.rpm but the link seems to be dead. Would you mind to bring it backup. I'd like to update to latest upstream. Still waiting for an official review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:46:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232146.l6NLk2er031415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-07-23 17:45 EST ------- > 1) Why the use of ExclusiveArch, then list just about all possible arches? I > think an ExcludeArch for the arch or arches it doesn't build on might be better. > So far as I can see, that list is really just s390/s390x, no? well, yes. But I'd prefer to add new supported architectures instead of allowing everything that could appear. This is really needed? > 2) %makeinstall is a big no-no :) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 fixed. > 3) the CFLAGS aren't being honored. fixed. > I've actually got a patch in hand that'll make 'make install > DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' work, as well as the CFLAGS honored: > > ----8<---- > --- wdaemon-0.10/Makefile 2007-07-20 12:07:44.000000000 -0400 > +++ wdaemon-0.10.updated/Makefile 2007-07-23 16:30:06.000000000 -0400 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -CFLAGS = -O0 -g -Wall > +CFLAGS ?= -O0 -g -Wall > OBJS = hotplug.o \ > input.o \ > monitored.o \ > @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ wdaemon: $(OBJS) > gcc $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< > > install: > - mkdir -p $(bindir) > - cp wdaemon $(bindir)/ > - mkdir -p $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/ > - cp wdaemon.initrd $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/wdaemon > + mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) > + cp wdaemon $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/ > + mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/ > + cp wdaemon.initrd $(DESTDIR)$(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/wdaemon > > clean: > rm -f *.o wdaemon core > ----8<---- > > 4) I'd install is_uinput.sh mode 755 instead of 644, which also eliminates the > need for the %attr stuff on that file in %files. fixed. > That's all I've got so far... rpmlint output is fairly clean, just two warnings > about the udev rules files not being marked as config files. Not sure yet if > they should be, or if we just ignore those. I don't think they're configuration files because the user has no reason to change the rules, only add more and that could be done in a different file. I've fixed all your comments but #1 and the updated version is on: http://people.redhat.com/arozansk/ Thanks for the review Jarod -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:47:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249235] Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232147.l6NLlUsj031650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-knotify - KNotify plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-07-23 17:47 EST ------- Fixed. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/pidgin-knotify.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/pidgin-knotify-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232157.l6NLvHhb000350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232157.l6NLvKSB000381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 Bug 248431 depends on bug 248425, which changed state. Bug 248425 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:57:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248403] Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232157.l6NLvgAI000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Class - Easily create test classes in an xUnit/JUnit style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248403 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:58:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248400] Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232158.l6NLw6D4000523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File-Contents - Test routines for examining the contents of files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248400 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248396] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232158.l6NLwSba000678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-HTML - XHTML format for Text::Diff::Unified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248396 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 21:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248393] Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232158.l6NLwnGq000807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-WordDiff - Track changes between documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248393 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:07:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248394] Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232207.l6NM73Ae001964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-LevenshteinXS - XS implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248394 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232224.l6NMOOQJ004204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-23 18:24 EST ------- Any luck with that review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232234.l6NMYOv4004914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 18:34 EST ------- New version including a modified patch which hopefully really enables SMP building uploaded at http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader-0.3.1-7.fc7.src.rpm http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/qfaxreader.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232234.l6NMYt1p004953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 smilner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232245.l6NMjj14005503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-23 18:45 EST ------- builds fine on smp now, package still ok. I would preffer a s/Url/URL/ in the spec file (breaks syntax highlight in gedit) but thats ok. ============ =>APROVED ============ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 22:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232257.l6NMvKZF006498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-07-23 18:57 EST ------- What choice do you let me? - ask alain.portal AT free.fr for co-maintaining the package? - orphaning all packages? If I can't receive bug reports when I'm on vacation, sure, I can't be a Fedora contributor. I'll never check my work email (my Fedora account) while I'm on vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:08:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232308.l6NN8EMB007598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-07-23 19:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159821) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159821&action=view) Output from stdout This is the stdout log from the compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:09:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232309.l6NN9BAs007798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-07-23 19:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159822) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159822&action=view) Output from stderr This is the output from stderr during compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:14:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232314.l6NNEwcM008264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 19:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qfaxreader Short Description: a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes Owners: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232318.l6NNI0V5008824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 19:17 EST ------- > [root at localhost mock]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/m17n/icons/ > file /usr/share/m17n/icons is not owned by any package Yep I spotted that too: it is actually an old m17n-db bug. We should have it owned by m17n-db, which will be required by m17n-contrib, which m17n-contrib-* will require. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232330.l6NNUvB8009856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 19:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.2.rc1.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Jul 23 2007 Balint Cristian 1.2.4-0.2.rc1 - fix debuginfo usability - move header files to the subdirectory - specify the full URL of the source - leave *.inc headers included - libgeotiff-devel should require libtiff-devel - works to keep timestamps on the header files installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:33:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232333.l6NNX0Ck010021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 19:32 EST ------- It was already released on the 8th, see: http://kldp.net/frs/?group_id=275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232335.l6NNZ1hi010180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-23 19:34 EST ------- - docs file proper triage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:36:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232336.l6NNaa3j010355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232347.l6NNlA1u010977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 19:47 EST ------- succesfull built in mock/centos. adding EPEL to list of branches. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qfaxreader Short Description: a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes Owners: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel El-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] New: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec SRPM URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.999-2.src.rpm Description: This is my first Fedora package, and I am seeking a sponsor. Alpine is a tool for reading, sending, and managing electronic messages. Alpine is the successor to Pine and was developed by Computing & Communications at the University of Washington. Though originally designed for inexperienced email users, Alpine supports many advanced features, and an ever-growing number of configuration and personal-preference options. Changes and enhancements over pine: * Released under a new license, the Apache License, Version 2.0. * Internationalization built around new internal Unicode support. * Ground-up reorganization of source code around new "pith/" core routine library. * Ground-up reorganization of build and install procedure based on GNU Build System's autotools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232349.l6NNndbh011128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #145932|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #148174|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #149908|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-23 19:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159824) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159824&action=view) Updated spec to latest upstream version Updating to latest upstream version: ftp://zouric.com/public/alsa-plugins/alsa-plugins.spec ftp://zouric.com/public/alsa-plugins/alsa-plugins-1.0.14-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:50:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232350.l6NNoStC011207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 23 23:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707232359.l6NNxgrs011845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sbehera at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 19:59 EST ------- Subhransu, if you can update your submission fixing the issues raised so far I am happy to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 00:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240023.l6O0NwMi013339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-23 20:23 EST ------- Quick glance over the spec: - Ditch the vendor and packager tags; fedora build system will fill in the correct values. See Packaging/Guidelines#tags for details - Is the Conflict tag really needed? couldn't it be replaced with a proper versioned Obsoletes? - Are you sure that the Description tag needs the second and third paragraph? For most users, those pieces of info will tell nothing - Ditch the '[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] &&' part from %clean and %install. It is no longer needed for ages. - It would be wiser to use the 4 arguments form of %defattr - I have to recheck that, but I think Applications/Mail does not seem to be a standard group - Apache 2.0 does not seem to be the proper value for the license tag (according to http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php I guess it should be "Apache License, Version 2.0") - last but not least, mock build fails with: checking for make... /usr/bin/make checking for setupterm in -ltinfo... no checking for setupterm in -lncurses... no checking for tgetent in -ltermlib... no checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no configure: error: Terminfo/termcap not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76610 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76610 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 00:27:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240027.l6O0RhPV013599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 20:27 EST ------- Tasaka-san, > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" BTW I was wondering if it wouldn't make sense to redefine %makeinstall to be the above, in say redhat-rpm-config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 00:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240042.l6O0gDiE014381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 20:42 EST ------- Parag, your version is still without my last patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 00:49:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240049.l6O0ntGm014907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 20:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159825) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159825&action=view) m17n-contrib.spec-1.2.patch Here is the patch again - I bumped the release for you. Please apply or merge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:12:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240112.l6O1CHuo015924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 21:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=159825) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159825&action=view) [edit] > m17n-contrib.spec-1.2.patch > > Here is the patch again - I bumped the release for you. > > Please apply or merge. Don't know what happened but I was applied patch successfully I guess. Anyway, reapplying patch. here are new links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-1.2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240125.l6O1PXZO016615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 21:25 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240127.l6O1RHRm016681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 21:27 EST ------- ping? I think we can consider this review as DEAD review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:27:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240127.l6O1RVsn016701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 21:27 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240144.l6O1ihgU017654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatilai at redhat.com, | |pnasrat at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-23 21:44 EST ------- I'm assuming it's intended to split this out of rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 01:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240159.l6O1xo3c018308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-23 21:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Tasaka-san, > > > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" > > BTW I was wondering if it wouldn't make sense to redefine %makeinstall > to be the above, in say redhat-rpm-config. I think it would make sense. Most Makefile (created by recent autotool, for example) will accept this method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 02:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240230.l6O2UIUb020315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 02:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240245.l6O2j1VD021230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-23 22:44 EST ------- > I think it would make sense. Most Makefile (created by recent > autotool, for example) will accept this method. Ok - perhaps you can submit a patch for that. Might be best to grep all the current spec files to check how many use %makeinstall currently though - some of them might break... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 02:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240252.l6O2qacO021734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-23 22:52 EST ------- oops I thought after applying patch I do not need to bump release. ok here are updated links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 05:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240517.l6O5HdE8032064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 01:17 EST ------- you can ask then to fix this issue to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 05:42:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240542.l6O5gc9H001328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-24 01:42 EST ------- Yes, same like mutt <-> urlview or gmp <-> mpfr or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 06:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240604.l6O64eAR002764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-07-24 02:04 EST ------- Looks good now. sha1sum matches upstream ef58c91243bd819e0ac278b91aeae16639d6c8ce bacula-2.0.3.tar.gz ef58c91243bd819e0ac278b91aeae16639d6c8ce bacula-2.0.3.tar.gz Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 06:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240615.l6O6Fvgw003412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-07-24 02:15 EST ------- Bill: Yes, the intent is to split it out, having a separate library with it's own versioning coming out of rpm package is a huge pita and I want to see this done in time for F8. But this needs to be carefully coordinated to avoid making a total mess as rpm is quite intimately married to popt, hold it for a moment, need to discuss this with Paul first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 06:26:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240626.l6O6Q1BM003975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 06:35:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240635.l6O6ZKfB004643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 02:35 EST ------- Upstream released new version 1.1.3 Here are updated links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm But I got following rpmlint on binary m17n-contrib rpm E: m17n-contrib non-executable-script /usr/share/m17n/scripts/tbl2mim.awk 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 06:36:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240636.l6O6akkS004776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 02:36 EST ------- as per comment 6 , I kept tbl2mim.awk script with 755 permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240715.l6O7FOHu006961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 sbehera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sbehera at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-07-24 03:15 EST ------- I am waiting for newer version of libhangul (0.18) to be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240717.l6O7HKMt007102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 03:17 EST ------- Right probably nabi-0.18 requires libhangul-0.0.6 and the current version in fedora in 0.0.4. I asked the owner to update it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:21:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240721.l6O7Lxki007383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-24 03:21 EST ------- Panu: Well, splitting popt out of rpm is not that huge problem as it currently looks like to you. Finally popt ever had it's own versioning (just read the popt changelog inside of the popt directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240727.l6O7RAPW007898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 03:27 EST ------- Now debuginfo rpm is correct. For 1.2.4-0.2: * License - Under which is the whole package of libgeotiff licensed ? Public domain or MIT? As far as I checked the source codes, many codes are under MIT (X). * pkgconfig .pc file - Currently pkg-config returns: -------------------------------------------------- $ pkg-config --cflags libgeotiff -I/usr/include/libgeotiff/libgeotiff -------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue -------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/epsg_csv/alias.csv libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.2.rc1.fc8 $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/epsg_csv/ file /usr/share/epsg_csv is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #5) > At a point my plan is to split separate epsg-data.noarch one and re-base > gdal and geotiff over it. Thats should be clearest way include EPSG > dataset, and trace down how csv files are generated. * A question: - Are there any other (splitted) source which contains only EPSG data or are you going to create epsg-data rpm as a subpackage of libgeotiff? - When epsg-data is splitted out, will epsg-data be needed only to rebuild libgeotiff or gdal, or will it be needed even for runtime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:29:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240729.l6O7THc7008075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 03:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159837&action=view) m17n-contrib.spec-1.1.3-script-perm.patch This worksaround the script being installed 644. Could you report it upstream please when you have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:44:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240744.l6O7iZTJ009548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 03:43 EST ------- This bug will be closed if no response will be received from the reported within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 07:58:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240758.l6O7whIj011273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 03:58 EST ------- Above patch fixes the above rpmlint warning. The rpmlint warnings like "W: m17n-contrib-assamese no-documentation" can be waived since the main m17n-contrib package carries the %doc files and is required by m17n-contrib-*. Formal review follows: + package follow naming guidelines + meets packaging guidelines (formerly part of m17n-db) + license is LGPL, included + spec file is clean + verified source tarball is pristine: f9a6c6d19cb4f27be15db3ec11f95247 m17n-contrib-1.1.3.tar.gz + noarch build fine + buildrequires m17n-db + uses find_lang + requires m17n-db for directory ownership (please add icons dir ownership there) + filelists and perms ok with above patch + macros consistently used Package is APPROVED. Please fix the script permission before importing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240822.l6O8MlVW014105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-07-24 04:22 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240838.l6O8c2TC015611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 04:37 EST ------- Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:42:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240842.l6O8gNGJ016039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 04:42 EST ------- here are updated links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/m17n/m17n-contrib-1.1.3-1.1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240848.l6O8mdod016516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 04:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: m17n-contrib Short Description: Contributed m17n input maps Owners: pnemade at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:58:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240858.l6O8w2cL018268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-24 04:57 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sipp New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 08:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206872] Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240859.l6O8xYnG018486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206872 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-24 04:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sipsak New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 09:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240907.l6O978jw019323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 schauer at cruxy.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |schauer at cruxy.net ------- Additional Comments From schauer at cruxy.net 2007-07-24 05:07 EST ------- In the spec file that comes with #38 there is an error in the install section: # fix/remove rpath chrpath --delete $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_python_sitelib}/PyQt4/QtDesigner.so _python_sitelib should be python_site_lib, cause the first one is never defined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 09:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224244] Review Request: gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240911.l6O9BAsD019781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224244 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-24 05:11 EST ------- I vote for closing this bug. There is no such application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 09:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240911.l6O9BaPJ019841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From schauer at cruxy.net 2007-07-24 05:11 EST ------- ok. also my version was wrong: python_sitelib should be the name... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 09:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707240914.l6O9Eo5m020217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-07-24 05:14 EST ------- Still here, just very busy with $DAYJOB at the moment. I'll do a formal review as soon as I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241001.l6OA1CXc026332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-07-24 06:01 EST ------- OK please find the following new release: http://download.berlios.de/peless/peless-1.156.tar.bz2 and a new spec file: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora BTW;Berlios seems to have let its certificates slip. You might have to override certification to download these files. I have tried to fix most of the problems noted above. Please notify me of any further problems! Thank You. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241024.l6OAOSq4029179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-24 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Well, I don't know well about gwave, however is gwave really > not bypassed to proceed the review of this package? To review the package ? well ok, but not functional for _proper_ use ! > Current gspiceui does not require gwave, so you can just ignore > gwave for now? It does require gwave. See its "plot" function depends on gwave. > For gwave: > (In reply to comment #16) > > So now, the question is: > > are we willing to ship > > *the latest gwave and at the same time shipping lots of old dependencies ? > Absolutely, unless the newest gwave has regression issue problems, > for example. Ok, then we will work on that latest gwave. gspiceui's review isn't a problem at all, and will be approved very quickly. But I do care about its functionality (gwave) and have no intention of releasing it half ready. gspiceui is just a GUI upon gwave. We can't release the GUI without the engine which does the whole job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:25:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241025.l6OAPa3P029284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-24 06:25 EST ------- There is a new upstream release: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gspiceui The Changelog related to this release is as follows: * Added a sinusoid function to the NG-Spice signal source configuration dialog. * Tidy up of the Makefiles. * The title line/s in user generated circuit description files are now preserved in the simulation file generated by gSpiceUI. Requested by Andres M. * Fixed a bugs in the GNU-Cap DC and AC command parsers causing them to break when the start and stop sweep values where equal. * Adjustments to the size and position of display components. * For GNU-Cap the option BASIC has been appended to all analysis lines to suppress the use of alpha abbreviations instead of an exponent eg. 3.1u now becomes 3.1E-6. Requested by Andres M. * Introduced an .OPTIONS button on each analysis panel and removed the .OPTIONS option in the Options menu. * Added tooltips to the NG-Spice source component setup dialog and the GNU-Cap generator component dialog. * Improvements to src/Makefile. * NG-Spice negative node values in .PRINT statements were not processed correctly. Eg. PRINT TRAN V(0,1) V(0,2) (2 parameters) is interpreted as PRINT TRAN (-V(1)-V(2)) (1 parameter); I've found through experiment that PRINT TRAN 0-V(1) 0-V(2) results in the correct intepretation. Fixed. * Fixed warnings generated by GCC v4.1.1. * Added tool tips to the OPTIONS line setup dialogs. * gSpiceUI can now be compiled against wxWidgets v2.8.4. * Addition of a man page. Minor updates to the documentation. * The SpinCtrl control is now right justified. * Implement the application preferences dialog. * Some modifications to the PnlValue class. * The main frame's system close button now works. * Automated the creation of dependencies. Added target "deps" to the Makefile in the C++ sources Makefile. This target creates the file Makefile.deps which contains a list of dependencies which are included in the Makefile. * Many bug fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:26:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241026.l6OAQtpo029576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-24 06:26 EST ------- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:43:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241043.l6OAhdCO031467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 06:43 EST ------- any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241049.l6OAnPTG031853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 06:49 EST ------- any plans to build this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241051.l6OApDX1032020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 06:51 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:52:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241052.l6OAqvfP032170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 06:52 EST ------- Would you have some new information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241054.l6OAs7ia032299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kuznetsovaval at yaho | |o.ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 06:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225295] Merge Review: autoconf213 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241056.l6OAuWZb032479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-24 06:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Both are redundant, as both are in the minimum build environment. > > Perl is explicitly listed among the exceptions in Packaging/Guidelines. > gawk is dragged there indirectly, but it is hard to imagine minimal instal > without awk. Personally, I think that they shouldn't be in the minimal install and hopefully won't be in the future. Moreover they are really direct build dependencies and it was only a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 10:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241057.l6OAvpRM032586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-24 06:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.3.rc1.fc8.src.rpm * Tue Jul 24 2007 Balint Cristian 1.2.4-0.3.rc1 - codes are under MIT - pkg-config cflags return fix - epsg_csv ownership RE for #5: I would like to split out epsg data for 3 reasons: - 1) would be nice to have noarch epsg dataset separatley so any time i can respin agains newer versions independently agains gdal/geotiff - 2) this way i can include all _original_ dataset and people can see how it explode in .csv and .inc ones, EPSG loves to see we NOT alter their database just copy portions and re-arange tham, however their sql dumps arent usefull when you fopen() at all. SO license statement will be not brake at all. - 3) gdal and geotiff with small patch can pick up tham on the fly from specific folder, and any respin off epsg would NOT imply rebuild of gdal/geotiff code, actualy they fopen and search through it. However i still discuss with Frank how splitting works i need to find a way for do it in %build section of files. It might be strange since now he use postgresql query to dump in csv files, but in %build time i cannot do like this, so need to rewrite script wich simply parse sql file dumps the same way. Its hard but would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 11:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241114.l6OBEMNc001451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 07:14 EST ------- For epsg data: - So, currently epsg data is included in libgeotiff tarball, however you mean that you (and Frank) want to create new tarball of epsg data and distribute epsg data tarball and libgeotiff tarball seperately, am I correct? In such case, when splitting is done, you have to create a new review request for epsg data (and for now I want to proceed the review of libgeotiff as it is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 11:16:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246068] Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241116.l6OBGucU001879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcabber - Console Jabber instant messaging client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246068 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-07-24 07:16 EST ------- Imported and built on -devel OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 11:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241124.l6OBO7Hd002517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-24 07:24 EST ------- 1) It will take a while. 2) Yes I will subbmit new FE-REW one. 3) For now lets follow what we have at all, i agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 12:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241227.l6OCRTpJ008682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-24 08:27 EST ------- I'll do it tonight. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 12:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225295] Merge Review: autoconf213 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241235.l6OCZYBA009274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-24 08:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > Personally, I think that they shouldn't be in the minimal > install and hopefully won't be in the future. awk is part of the POSIX standard run-time environment. Unless POSIX changes, you will always find awk installed on any POSIX compliant system. > Moreover they are > really direct build dependencies and it was only a suggestion. Fedora not having them always installed is a bug in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225295] Merge Review: autoconf213 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241301.l6OD1ZOk011949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-24 09:01 EST ------- The minimal install and minimal build environment needs not be POSIX compliant. There could be a POSIX meta package (I guess the LSB package already bring in everything needed for POSIX). I am not saying that it should not be POSIX compliant but it should only if it makes sense, we shouldn't tie ourselves to standards -- while still giving the possibility to conform. More precisely, I personally think that using a comps that has not been tuned should give a minimal install that is POSIX compliant, but in my opinion we should give room for minimal sets that are more minimal than POSIX, and in those minimal install dependencies should still be correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241324.l6ODOpHH014748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kuznetsovaval at yaho| |o.ca) | ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-07-24 09:24 EST ------- i'm still alive :) i haven't fixed everything yet. I have really hard time at work and next 2 weeks will be like hell for me. After that time i should be able to fix everything and make serious changes to the code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:28:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241328.l6ODSp7J015721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 09:28 EST ------- No EL-5 branch needed since it would conflict with m17n-db in RHEL5. Please bump release number to 2 when importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241348.l6ODmgxr020008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 09:48 EST ------- Updated with current git build: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman-0.9.0-20070724.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241350.l6ODoMK0020994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241242 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 13:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241357.l6ODv1Ij022455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-24 09:56 EST ------- quick view over the package: 1) $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used 2) no disttag 3) download link for srpm broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241407.l6OE7sLG024865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > quick view over the package: > 1) $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used Done for me by %configure. > 2) no disttag Eh, package isn't actually useful for anything pre-F8, but sure, why not. > 3) download link for srpm broken Erk. Fixed: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman-0.9.0-0.20070724.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:17:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241417.l6OEHwSn026539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-24 10:17 EST ------- There's nothing to fix. This module works with both mod_perl 1 and 2. That test is mod_perl 1-specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241425.l6OEPcxR028067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 10:25 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (libgeotiff) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241433.l6OEXwGq029946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-24 10:33 EST ------- Package Review: ================================================== ---------------------------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. ---------------------------------- OK, output: W: pixman no-documentation W: pixman-devel no-documentation upstream only has empty files. ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ---------------------------------- OK (MIT) Note: Please ask upstream to fix the empty COPYING file ---------------------------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ---------------------------------- File exits but empty so OK (not packaged) ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ---------------------------------- N/A (git snapshot) ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ---------------------------------- OK (Tested on F7 x86_64) ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. ---------------------------------- N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ---------------------------------- OK (not relocateable) ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. ---------------------------------- N/A ---------------------------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ---------------------------------- OK (builds fine on F7 x86_64) ---------------------------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. ---------------------------------- OK ---------------------------------- ================================================== Summary: Package looks ok, some issues have to be fixed upstream (empty doc files) ================================================== ############ => APPROVED! ############ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241436.l6OEaguF030365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pixman Short Description: Pixel manipulation library for cairo and X Owners: xgl-maint at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:42:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241442.l6OEgqPZ031725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:42 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241444.l6OEiDUS031855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:44 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241447.l6OEl8uV032730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-24 10:47 EST ------- Does normal compile {not rpm build} work ? I reckon that's the first step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:52:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206872] Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241452.l6OEq9bi001615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipsak - SIP swiss army knife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206872 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:52 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 14:53:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241453.l6OErWJq001920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 10:53 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241507.l6OF78PU003903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:06 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:09:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241509.l6OF9oKM004056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:09 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241513.l6OFDjg0004306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:13 EST ------- cvsadmin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:16:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241516.l6OFGxfd004577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:16 EST ------- Fedora Package Review: wdaemon ------------------------------ MUST Items: * rpmlint output acceptable (post full output w/waiver notes where needed): $ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/wdaemon-*0.10-2* W: wdaemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/61-uinput-wacom.rules W: wdaemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/61-uinput-stddev.rules I'm thinking it wouldn't hurt to just mark these %config(noreplace), in the event a user does go and edit them/append to them. It completely silences rpmlint if we go that route, and I don't see any real reason not to just do it. * Meets Package Naming Guidelines: PASS * spec file name matches %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec (nb: there are a few exceptions): PASS * The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines: PASS * open-source compatible license and meets fedora legal reqs: PASS * License field in spec matches actual license: PASS * If source includes text of license(s) in its own file, that file must be in %doc: PASS * spec file legible and in American English: PASS * sources used match the upstream source, as provided in spec URL. Verify with md5sum (if no upstream URL, source creation method must be documented and can be verified using diff): PASS $ md5sum wdaemon-0.10.tar.bz2* 9c90cefbe4ae7d6c79ded408f9a435a7 wdaemon-0.10.tar.bz2 9c90cefbe4ae7d6c79ded408f9a435a7 wdaemon-0.10.tar.bz2.1 * produces binary rpms on at least one arch: PASS (f7/x86_64) * If ExcludeArch used, must be documented why (and a bug filed against ExArch tracker once approved): NEEDS WORK Generally, we're to assume the package will build on any architecture, and only exclude it from building on a certain arch if there's a good reason to do so. ExclusiveArch is really frowned upon, unless its a package that really only makes sense on a very limited set or arches. * BuildRequires are sane: PASS * locales, if necessary, handled properly with %find_lang: N/A * if package contains shared libs, calls ldconfig in %post/postun: N/A * if package is relocatable, must justify: N/A * package owns all directories it creates: PASS * no duplicates in %files: PASS * Permissions on %files sane: PASS -- though I might suggest some further updates to the Makefile to use 'install -mXXXX' to install the binaries and init script, rather than having to use %attr in the %files section. * %clean includes rm -rf %{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT: PASS * macros used consistently: PASS * package contains code, or permissable content: PASS * Large/lots of docs, if present, should go in a -doc subpackage: N/A * files in %doc aren't required for package to work: PASS * Header files in -devel package: N/A * Static libs in -static package: N/A * package Reqs: pkgconfig if pkgconfig(.pc) files present: N/A * if package has versioned libs, unversioned ones go in -devel package: N/A * if present, -devel packages must require the base package NVR (w/some rare exceptions): N/A * no libtool archives (w/some rare exceptions): PASS * if GUI app, include a %{name}.desktop file, installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section (or justify why not): N/A * don't own files or folders other package own (or justify why you must): PASS * %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT: PASS * filenames in packages must be valid UTF-8: PASS SHOULD Items (not absolutely mandatory, but highly encouraged) * If source does not include license text(s), ask upstream to include it: N/A (already included) * description and summary sections in spec should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available: N/A * package should build in mock: PASS (f7/x86_64) * package should build on all supported architectures: not tested * package should function as expected: don't have hardware to test myself * any scriptlets must be sane: N/A * subpackages other than -devel require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: N/A * pkgconfig files go in -devel pkg, unless package is a devel tool itself: N/A * If package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself: N/A ------------------------------ So for the short version, I'd add %config(noreplace) for the two udev rules files, since it looks like it only helps and use ExcludeArch: if you really need to have this not build on a specific arch. Although I suppose that could start to get equally messy (mips, arm, s390, s390x...). Okay, if you do want to stick with ExcludeArch, I suppose that's fine. One note though: do you really want to exclude ppc64? Only other minor spec cleanup I'd suggest is to remove the extraneous slashes between $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{_sysconfdir} on lines 36 and 37. Package APPROVED, none of the above are blockers to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241518.l6OFIbPI004713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159855) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159855&action=view) cleanup specfile * Tue Jul 24 2007 Than Ngo - 3.91.0-4 - add BuildRequires: doxygen - add README COPYING COPYING.BSD COPYING.LIB - rename to kdepimlibs Kevin, could you please approve this, so we can commit into kde4-branch CVS? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241524.l6OFOhGR005711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #159855|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:25:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241525.l6OFPRF6005788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:25 EST ------- Excerpt from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 I believe something similar should be done if ExclusiveArch is used instead of ExcludeArch, particularly if the ppc64 exclusion was intentional. If ppc64 is added to the ExclusiveArch for this package, then I think there probably isn't anything extra to be done here -- not building this for s390 just seems like common sense, no need to file a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:25:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241525.l6OFPoxU005883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-24 11:25 EST ------- I already did (fedora-review is already +, I've also just checked your changes and can confirm that they adress the 2 points I raised), all that's missing is the CVS request. I can fill it out if you want, but normally it's the submitter doing it. :-) Your BuildRequires: doxygen won't do anything by itself. It also needs the "make apidox" or something like that and the -apidocs subpackage. But as I already said, this can be addressed later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241526.l6OFQTib006192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159857) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159857&action=view) cleanup specfile correct specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225295] Merge Review: autoconf213 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241528.l6OFSOwX006527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: autoconf213 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225295 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-24 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > The minimal install and minimal build environment needs not > be POSIX compliant. Once again: POSIX is an official standard (IEEE Std 1003.1), not an arbitrary vendor package set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241529.l6OFTd8F006629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-07-24 11:29 EST ------- Kevin, it's nice if you could fill it out please. So i can commit it into CVS ASAP. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:32:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241532.l6OFWl41007165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-24 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdepimlibs Short Description: K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries Owners: than at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.edu Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241550.l6OFoHVr008900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 15:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241551.l6OFpkiq009142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-24 11:51 EST ------- I have been unsuccessful in getting any response from Chris for some time now. He was active on IRC about four days ago (according to the server, at least) but he didn't respond to my pings. I'm getting ready to start closing some of his other tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:08:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241608.l6OG80DN010800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 12:07 EST ------- Sorry about all that. Real Life is taking a sustained toll on me and I'm finding myself unable to dedicate much time to Fedora at the moment; fortunately things are starting to clear up. I'll request branching and import -- Sorry about that Parag, I didn't see the flag being set w/o the canonical "APPROVED" comment :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241609.l6OG9Lkh010971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView Short Description: Sensible default end action for view renders Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-6, F-7, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:09:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241609.l6OG9Qod010998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:16:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241616.l6OGGKbn011667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 12:16 EST ------- Pong :) SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.02-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Devel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241619.l6OGJ1As011829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From arozansk at redhat.com 2007-07-24 12:18 EST ------- > * rpmlint output acceptable (post full output w/waiver notes where needed): > $ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/wdaemon-*0.10-2* > W: wdaemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/61-uinput-wacom.rules > W: wdaemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/61-uinput-stddev.rules > > I'm thinking it wouldn't hurt to just mark these %config(noreplace), in the > event a user does go and edit them/append to them. It completely silences > rpmlint if we go that route, and I don't see any real reason not to just do it. fixed > * If ExcludeArch used, must be documented why (and a bug filed against ExArch > tracker once approved): NEEDS WORK ok, removed excludearch/exclusivearch: the package will compile and work on all architectures. It may be not useful if the machine doesn't has USB ports to use a tablet. > * Permissions on %files sane: PASS -- though I might suggest some further > updates to the Makefile to use 'install -mXXXX' to install the binaries and init > script, rather than having to use %attr in the %files section. fixed. All the fixes included as patches are queued for next upstream release http://people.redhat.com/arozansk/wdaemon/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241623.l6OGNFtC012124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-24 12:23 EST ------- Review of version - release : 5.0-3.20070718snap * From Previous comments: - multilibs, As there is no more -devel package, the multilibs problems on repository is solved. This mean there is no headers to write plugins for alliance ? Then OK. - 5 Ok for not using desktop-file-utils. But on my Gnome environnement, the menues are showed in Edutainment which is not a right name in my view (mostly because it is not translated) Also X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.10 in sources desktop files is wrong. This field is added at install time..Be carefull that desktop-file-install in F8 rawhide is no more permissive with theses littles errors. (not tested yet...) - 7 / 9 / 16 : OK - Still i don't understand why you used macro for name of patches. That might be better to have them in full name (as the name will not change) * New comments: (now it builds in mock on x86_64) (rpmlint on rpm packages ) - Names are too generic. For headers in %{_includedir}/*.h and libraries in %{_libdir}/*.so, maybe you can at least uses a subdirectory with them (and put a path for in /etc/ld.so.conf.d ) When trying to install it: ----------- le fichier /usr/include/btr.h de l'installation de alliance-5.0-3.20070718snap.fc6 entre en conflit avec le fichier du paquetage mx-2.0.6-2.2.2 le fichier /usr/share/man/man3/log.3.gz de l'installation de alliance-5.0-3.20070718snap.fc6 entre en conflit avec le fichier du paquetage man-pages-2.39-7.fc6 ---------- - E: alliance non-executable-script /etc/alliance/attila.conf 0644 See why this is considered as script (may be safe to ignore... Also, maybe not all files in /etc/%{name} will need %config(no replace) This can be better to have only %{config} for some of them. For example if they are changing between release and need to be updated with no user choice... For files that depend on users choice , the better way could be to have files to be sourced in a sub-directory... (maybe not relevant, in this case...) - W: alliance non-conffile-in-etc /etc/alliance/alc_env.csh Not sure it is the right place for it...?! why this have changed from profiles.d ? (rpmlint on installed file : rpmlint alliance ) - Untested - (package cannot be installed becaue mx is in use) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:26:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241626.l6OGQMLT012398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-24 12:26 EST ------- Please write the CVS Request according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:34:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241634.l6OGYZ6X013041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-24 12:33 EST ------- [reply to comment #18] > > *the latest gwave and at the same time shipping lots of old dependencies ? > Absolutely, unless the newest gwave has regression issue problems, > for example. > Ok, then we will work on that latest gwave. note: the lastest gwave is named gwave2 > gspiceui is just a GUI upon gwave. We can't release the GUI without the engine > which does the whole job. +1 [comment #19] i'll do some workaround on it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241634.l6OGYeio013081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-07-24 12:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgeotiff Short Description: GeoTIFF format library Owners: cbalint at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241639.l6OGdvlP013384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > any updates? To what exactly? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 16:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:59:03 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241659.l6OGx3sv015367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-07-24 12:58 EST ------- notting makes a good point here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224#c10 Perhaps iwl3945-firmware is a better name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 17:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:08:19 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241708.l6OH8J3u016085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-24 13:08 EST ------- Yes, absolutely! Here is the re-renamed package : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/iwl3945-firmware/ All we need to do now is : 1) Get the iwl4965-firmware package passed review. 2) Get iwlwifi-firmware (this package) renamed (cvs, bugzilla... the "usual"). 3) Push both at the same time to at least devel (but possibly F-7 too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 17:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241729.l6OHTnml018659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 17:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241738.l6OHcXPK019470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 17:39:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241739.l6OHdEW3019531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 17:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241749.l6OHn8vA021325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at camperquake.de) ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-24 13:49 EST ------- error 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248730] Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241806.l6OI6SdN023353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-07-24 14:06 EST ------- I've only built this on rawhide right now but we have the FC-6 and F-7 branches available if desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241823.l6OINbMQ025387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-24 14:23 EST ------- > License: LGPL Not necessary to do this in the -devel package. > If you are going to develop programs which will use this library > you should install inchi-devel. You'll also need to have the > inchi package installed. Is this part necessary? http://www.iupac.org/inchi/license.html Licensing is confusing... - It implies trademark integrity within the context of copyright terms. - It implies a "request" of copyright advertisement clause, but it seems non-binding by this language. Is this the intent? - None of the source files contain proper copyright notices. Recommendation: 1) Upstream should clear up this confusion by creating a clear separation between the copyright and trademark rights. Copyright explicitly LGPL, and have a separate page/file containing the trademark guidelines. http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html As an example, Mozilla uses a trademark guideline to protect the integrity of their mark, without running afoul of the (L)GPL requirement of "no additional restrictions" on the copyright. 2) All source files must contain a proper and explicit copyright notice. To quote LGPL: " You must give prominent notice with each copy of the work that the Library is used in it and that the Library and its use are covered by this License." Under the terms of the LGPL, those copyright statements would of course not be removed by others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241825.l6OIPU6c025588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-24 14:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-sqlalchemy New Branches: EL-5 Updated Fedora Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Updated Fedora CC: Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Officially adding comaintainers and branching for EPEL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241827.l6OIRFRM025790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241834.l6OIYgJB026567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-07-24 14:34 EST ------- Thanks very much for taking a look. I began with the SPEC provided at the alpine download site, and will try to get the changes upstream. That's also why this is release 2 instead of 1. > - Is the Conflict tag really needed? couldn't it be replaced with a proper > versioned Obsoletes? I used the Conflicts tag instead of Obsoletes because there are important differences between pine and alpine. For example, non-ASCII encoded saved passwords will break because of the change to Unicode. There are also many patches to pine floating around that for political/technical reasons will not be integrated into alpine. (I'd like to stay out of it... just search "Mark Crispin maildir" for the gory details.) Since licensing prevents a Fedora pine package, I have no idea what configuration users might have and so want to warn them instead of automatically replacing their pine install with an alpine that could break their configuration. (It is also possible to run pine and alpine concurrently, but the names of /usr/bin/pico and /usr/bin/pilot conflict.) > Quick glance over the spec: > - Ditch the vendor and packager tags; fedora build system will fill in the Done. > - Are you sure that the Description tag needs the second and third paragraph? Well, I don't think a little more description hurts anything. The 2nd paragraph is for non-technical users, and the 3rd for technical. I see that mutt has a description similar to the 2nd paragraph: "You should install mutt if you have used it in the past and you prefer it, or if you are new to mail programs and have not decided which one you are going to use." > - Ditch the '[ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] &&' part from %clean and %install. It Done. > - It would be wiser to use the 4 arguments form of %defattr OK, done. > - I have to recheck that, but I think Applications/Mail does not seem to be a > standard group I changed it to "Applications/Internet" which is the same at mutt. > - Apache 2.0 does not seem to be the proper value for the license tag (according > to http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php I guess it should be "Apache > License, Version 2.0") I looks like it's been standardized on "Apache Software License": http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-June/msg00072.html I guess you only have to specify version if it's 1.1 or 1.0. Here's a couple examples I found: rpm -qi httpd tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api|grep License Size : 2572641 License: Apache Software License Size : 143766 License: Apache Software License > - last but not least, mock build fails with: OK, fixed. I was building on my existing RHEL4 build system which doesn't have mock (yet?), but now I set up a Fedora 7 build system and used mock. Building the autocache is wicked slow, maybe that could be mirrored. New SPEC and SRPM are at the same places: spec URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec SRPM URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.999-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241846.l6OIkYJP027808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-24 14:46 EST ------- Imported but not built, because: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=75713 "BuildError: package pixman not in list for tag dist-f8" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 18:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248119] Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241858.l6OIwxZi029229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtimidity - MIDI to WAVE converter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248119 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-24 14:58 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241932.l6OJW5Zi031926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-07-24 15:31 EST ------- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:35:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241935.l6OJZtwr032423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 15:35 EST ------- Please update: Owner: Robin Norwood Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241941.l6OJfEkB000787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-07-24 15:41 EST ------- Hmmm, I'm trying to get some patches upstreamed. I should probably get a new package out in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:47:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241947.l6OJlKoU001562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-24 15:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Review of version - release : 5.0-3.20070718snap > - 5 Ok for not using desktop-file-utils. But on my Gnome environnement, the > menues are showed in Edutainment which is not a right name in my view (mostly > because it is not translated) All scientific apps of fedora are placed at that location: * ktechlab * geda/gaf * magic * xcircuit * qucs * labplot (to name a few) > Not sure it is the right place for it...?! why this have changed from profiles.d ? It has always been this way, i.e in all my releases there were 2 symbolic links on /etc/profile.d In my previous releases, the alc_env* scripts were at /usr/share/alliance/etc, in the release 3 they were moved to /etc/allliance. I'll include your other comments in the release 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241949.l6OJn3R4001946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-24 15:48 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-paramiko Updated Fedora Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Adding Ignacio Vasquez as a comaintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:49:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241949.l6OJnYcu002006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241949.l6OJnm7c002052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-24 15:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bacula Short Description: Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows Owners: andreas at bawue.net,mmcgrath at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 19:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707241954.l6OJsL0j002642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-24 15:54 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pygpgme New Branches: EL-5 Updated Fedora Owners: toshio at tiki-lounge.com,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Updated EPEL Owners: toshio at tiki-lounge.com,ivazqueznet at gmail.com Branch for EPEL-5 and add Ignacio Vazquez as a comaintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 20:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:50:21 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242050.l6OKoLIN018517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-07-24 16:50 EST ------- Current version is 4.44.17 fwiw... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242104.l6OL485X021258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-07-24 17:03 EST ------- I guess I should have publicized my (in-my-spare-time) efforts at packaging Alpine more widely than in #fedora-devel and the alpine-alpha mailing list. :-P It looks like you caught most of the snags I did, but if you want to eyeball my spec, see: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alpine/alpine.spec Your rpdoc.patch and my alpine-manpages.patch are effectively identical, I see, aside from the directory name being in mine (necessitating -p1 instead of -p0, big whup). I still hadn't made up my mind about whether the s/%{version}/%{version}-%{release}/ is a good idea. I'd be happy to comaintain Alpine with you, although I can't sponsor you (as I'm not a sponsor). :-( Also, you might want to fix your SRPM link to reflect the dist tag. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:07:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242107.l6OL7mJJ022051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-07-24 17:07 EST ------- MUST items: 1. rpmlint is quiet 2. package named properly 3. spec filename matches package name 4. meets packaging guidelines 5. open source license 6. license field matches actual license 7. specfile written in AmE 8. specfile is legible 9. sources match upstream: cc1a611fbb6dfd4d6e96e54434bb20b8 Term-ReadPassword-0.07.tar.gz 10. builds properly on devel/x86_64 11. no ExcludeArch necessary 12. proper BuildRequires 13. doesn't have locales 14. no shared libraries 15. not relocatable 16. owns all directories it creates 17. no duplicates in %files 18. proper file permissions 19. proper %clean section 20. consistent macro usage 21. code, not content 22. no large docs 23. %doc not necessary for runtime operation 24. no headers 25. no static libs 26. no pkgconfig files 27. no libraries with suffix 28. no devel subpackage 29. no .la files 30. no GUI 31. owns directories owned by other packages: perl-Term-ProgressBar, perl-Term-UI -> we don't have any package owning %{perl_vendorlib}/Term, though, so this is OK. 32. cleans buildroot in %install 33. filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: 1. source package doesn't include any license file, please ask upstream to include it 2. no translations of summary/description available 3. builds in mock/devel/x86_64 4. noarch package 5. software works as intended 6. no scriptlets used 7. no subpackages 8. no pkgconfig files 9. no file dependencies APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242109.l6OL9DDT022471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-24 17:09 EST ------- Bastien, I am happy if Eric maintains this package. I am not directly involved upstream with this code, so I'd prefer to stay a specatator on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242115.l6OLFs9b023879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co|fedora-cvs? |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-24 17:15 EST ------- Sorry, on vacation. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-systemfit Short Description: Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package Owners: orion Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242119.l6OLJ0bi024723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-multcomp -|Review Request: R-multcomp - |Simultaneous inference for |Simultaneous inference for |general liner hypotheses R |general linear hypotheses R |Package |Package Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.co|fedora-cvs? |m) | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-24 17:18 EST ------- URL fixed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-multcomp Short Description: Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package Owners: orion Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:40:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:40:29 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwlwifi-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_3945_A/B?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242140.l6OLeTRu031404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwlwifi-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-24 17:40 EST ------- Notting suggested that since the new iwl4965-firmware was not bundled with iwlwifi-firmware, there is no need to have Provides: iwlwifi-firmware for iwl4965-firmware also... Thats a matter of choice, maybe tha'ts easier... Iv'e tryed to experiment versionned firmwares (using alternatives methode, and this should work also with a patched kernel using versionned firmwares...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:45:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:45:07 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242145.l6OLj7En000342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-24 17:45 EST ------- Hello! J.Linville Does this mean that this version will be used from a Fedora kernel (F8 F7 ?) which version of the kernel for which firmware ? Or does we are allowed to use versionned firmware ? Can we parallele install firmware (and switch from one to the other with alternative for example..) Then we have differents choice: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.17-1.src.rpm http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec-1 (with alternatives - you can try an update or a parrallele install from the previous 4.44.15-6 )... http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware-4.44.17-2.src.rpm http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/iwl4965-firmware/iwl4965-firmware.spec-2 (without alternatives) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242154.l6OLsdLA003253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at beer.tclug.org ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-07-24 17:54 EST ------- Once I got that out, I sat down to actually look over the differences between our specs. My first and foremost concern is that your tarball still contains a file that a number of Fedora developers have agreed is of fairly serious concern, namely, pico/cc5.sol, due to this: # THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT&T # The copyright notice above does not evidence any # actual or intended publication of such source code. Steve Hubert from upstream said it'd be removed, but until it is, it's legally dicey for us to even distribute it in the SRPM. I've re-rolled my tarball to reflect that. Beyond that, I have the following BRs you don't: aspell-devel inews openldap-devel passwd sendmail My aspell-devel BR may in fact be the erroneous way to go about it; I was merely going with the default, possibly autopilot, method to satisfy the configure script's search for a spellchecker. Your --with-spellcheck-prog=aspell may well take care of that better than my solution. (Err, yeah, I think my BR didn't even help anything. So you win there. :-) The inews BR was simply to fulfill another "not found" in the configure script. Ditto on passwd and sendmail. Your BR on /usr/sbin/sendmail will actually probably cause exim to get pulled into the build chroot, due to it being the shortest-named package providing that file. I'm not sure if that actually causes any problems. Your Require on /usr/sbin/sendmail is another good thing I didn't think of. I do believe, however, that my openldap-devel BR does enable LDAP functionality in Alpine. You may want to add that. I included /etc/pine.conf and /etc/pine.conf.fixed in my package. The former was actually generated from `alpine -conf` in the %install section, the latter is just a placeholder with some explanatory text. I think I caught some things you didn't, but you definitely caught some I flat-out screwed up on. Yay for open source collaboration. :-) I'm throwing your package into mock to see what comes out. Oh, done already. Nice. Here we go: W: alpine no-version-in-last-changelog W: alpine-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 -- you need to put the EVR of the package (without the dist tag -- in this case, 0.999-2) somewhere in the changelog entry, in one of the three formats. W: alpine-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/alpine-0.999/alpine/arg.c W: alpine-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/alpine-0.999/pico/main.c Oh yeah, I forgot about them. I had this in my %prep: chmod -x alpine/arg.c pico/main.c Upstream said they'd fix that, IIRC. There was also (at some point) some oddness about mlock being included, but I'll need to rebuild my package to verify that. Gotta go for now, but nice job with this package! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 21:55:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244752] Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242155.l6OLtlLb003558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244752 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-24 17:55 EST ------- Ignacio: thanks for packaging this. I'd love to be added as a CC for bugs. Hmm, DNSSDAutoRegisterUserDir might not have worked on your machine due to a couple of reasons: 1. You hit the trivial bug i fixed in upstream r63. (Ignacio, you probably want to add this patch to your package!) 2. Your userdir is a symlink? 3. Your userdir is not accessible for the user apache uses? Most likely is reason #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 22:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242234.l6OMY5kQ007060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-24 18:34 EST ------- OK, i've saw that you just have build libXNVCtrl but is there other libraries to build from the standard package or only the nvidia-settings binary is missing? About this don't you think that might be possible to build it also ? For now i don't know how to bring nvidia users to uses this ? does your program will have a Requires (or BR) libXNVCtrl ?! Then this library will be bring on the system whereas the hardware may be not present... The other way of doing this is to have Requires: libXNVCtrl from the proprietary nvidia driver, then does others problems will be able to dlopen this library to talk to the hardware... ?! I think the first solution is the better, (maybe the two can be done...) Anyway we may need to have for now (if only the proprietary drivers is required...) ExclusiveArchs: %{ix86} x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 22:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242249.l6OMnT7M007916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-24 18:49 EST ------- Thanks very much again for very careful review. As for comments in #59 Both the buildrequires and requires list tetex-latex, et al. The build requires so that Doxygen used for documentation generation will work, and the reqires for the runtime of the application. HippoDraw does not require tkinter. The files in the examples directory can be used for the stand-a-lone application. Only mention of them in in the example Python scripts and documentation. release number added to the -devel-doc subpackage. As for commetns in #60 and #61 The problem appears to stem from the fact that the autoconf/automake generated Makefile does not install python modules in lib64/python. I don't know how to work around it. Other packages that do not use Python's distutils must have solved it. Any clues on how to handle this would be appreciated. pstream source updated so RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.21.0-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 22:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242253.l6OMrBO7008088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-24 18:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-ReadPassword Short Description: Asking the user for a password Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242320.l6ONKH56009816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 19:20 EST ------- Closing for the reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:22:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242322.l6ONMkvk009946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-07-24 19:22 EST ------- Nice, I'd love to have a comaintainer, or you're even welcome to it if you were excited about it. I've mostly done RHEL (see http://www.google.com/search?q=Joshua+Daniel+Franklin+site:redhat.com ) but I've maintained a few custom RPMs including pine for local users. I just decided to package alpine since I didn't see why not since it's now nearing 1.0. I turned off the alpine-alpha list after the maildir issue came up again. It's a good idea to include all functionality, I missed LDAP and inews since I'm not using them, but I'm sure someone is. I can't take credit for "/usr/sbin/sendmail" I copied from mutt's spec. :) That's really all that's required, it can be really be exim or sendmail or whatever. I don't think uw-imap-utils is required, mlock is a file-locking program that shouldn't be needed at all on Linux and definitely not by alpine. OK, I just added the changes, rebuilt and rsync'ed the updates. Thanks for catching the SRPM distag issue, I symlinked the old URL but here are the links which match the mock-produced SRPM filename: spec URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec SRPM URL: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.999-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242323.l6ONNrNh010011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 19:23 EST ------- I am not really sure about pushing this to FC6 and F7 (at least not yet) since it will break Indic users updating from current m17n-db. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242327.l6ONRcTO010253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-24 19:27 EST ------- OK I was looking at 'URL' instead of 'Source0'. Hopefully their site will come back up, but in the meantime the md5sums check out. I don't see anything missing from the Review List. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242327.l6ONRgNm010284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 19:27 EST ------- Please also use lowercase for the name of the esperanto subpackage to be consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242328.l6ONS8V2010317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-24 19:28 EST ------- Request for review, rebuilt source rpm file: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paprefs.spec ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paprefs-0.9.5-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242330.l6ONU4mZ010481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogd-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 cr33dog at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-07-24 19:29 EST ------- After a long tour of the wiki I'm marking this accepted. The 'Url' link is still down, but the 'Source0' checks out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242330.l6ONUGDe010520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-24 19:30 EST ------- Thanks. Missed the ping in all the bugzilla mail or so. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242333.l6ONX3gZ010668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 19:32 EST ------- Not a problem -- just wanted to get it off my frontpage ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 24 23:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244752] Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707242356.l6ONuOYV013258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244752 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-24 19:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mod_dnssd Updated Fedora CC: lpoetter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 00:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250042.l6P0gUST022472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-07-24 20:42 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 00:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237741] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250042.l6P0gWpr022488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-AsCGI - Setup a CGI enviroment from a HTTP::Request Alias: HTTP-Request-AsCGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237741 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 00:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250042.l6P0gYSW022506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 Bug 238238 depends on bug 238230, which changed state. Bug 238230 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 00:48:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250048.l6P0mk8w024350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review-, fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 20:48 EST ------- any reason why am i removed from fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 00:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250054.l6P0sa34026538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 20:54 EST ------- Adel Gadllah, If you see I am waiting for this review since last 2 months and even after pinging you 2 times you replied yesterday and got it approved quickly. Any reason must have been specified before removing current reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 01:23:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250123.l6P1Nx94030012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-24 21:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-5.fc7.src.rpm This should fix the three problems listed in comment #9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 01:24:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250124.l6P1Ofmx030068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-24 21:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-6.fc7.src.rpm This should fix the three problems listed in comment #9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 01:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250146.l6P1kJgR003986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 21:46 EST ------- Built successfully. Thanks for review Jens. Do I need to build m17n-db without m17n-contrib now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 01:51:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250151.l6P1puiw004246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-24 21:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9db73e6e2f39cd4648ada030013414e7 Params-CallbackRequest-1.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/01basic.............ok t/02priority..........ok t/03keys..............ok t/04errors............ok t/05object............ok t/06object_request....ok t/07combined..........ok t/08apache............skipped all skipped: Testing of apache_req requires Apache::FakeRequest t/09pod...............ok All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=9, Tests=421, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.76 cusr + 0.10 csys = 0.86 CPU) +Provides: perl(Params::Callback) = 1.17 perl(Params::CallbackRequest) = 1.17 perl(Params::CallbackRequest::Exceptions) = 1.17 +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exception::Class) >= 1.10 perl(Params::CallbackRequest::Exceptions) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.59 perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 02:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250205.l6P25YI6005754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-24 22:05 EST ------- Yes please update m17n-db otherwise there will be conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 02:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250227.l6P2RFLl009623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-24 22:27 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-4.20070718snap.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec Build.log (i386): http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 02:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250235.l6P2ZMeB010071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-07-24 22:35 EST ------- Package has been built successfully for F7, FC-6 and rawhide. EL-4 and EL-5 still have unmet dependencies, which should be fixed soon however. Thx for all the comments and the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 02:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250248.l6P2mcvd010833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cmarcelo at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmarcelo at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 02:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250256.l6P2umnr011392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-24 22:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Params-CallbackRequest Short Description: Functional and object-oriented callback architecture Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 03:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250307.l6P3741w012053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-24 23:06 EST ------- Package build. Thanks to all who helped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 03:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250328.l6P3SX5c013414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-24 23:28 EST ------- "BuildError: package pixman not in list for tag dist-f8" This has since been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 04:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249006] Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250404.l6P44pGf014838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: m17n-contrib - Contributed m17n input maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249006 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 00:04 EST ------- m17n-db-1.4.0-2.1 is built now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 04:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250457.l6P4v1eW017097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 00:56 EST ------- I got following in build.log [ error] Can't resolve host: 'localhost' (check /etc/hosts) Checking whether your kit is complete... Looks good Checking prerequisites... Looks good error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19544 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19544 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250514.l6P5EA2Q018101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-25 01:14 EST ------- qfaxreader-0.3.1-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250514.l6P5EKDp018132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.3.1-7.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:16:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250516.l6P5GijO018414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-25 01:16 EST ------- drupal-5.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:16:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250516.l6P5Gq03018448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |5.1-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250519.l6P5JCJC018763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-25 01:19 EST ------- R-mvtnorm-0.8-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:19:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247858] Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250519.l6P5JJtU018805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-mvtnorm - Multivariate normal and T distribution R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247858 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.8-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:21:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250521.l6P5LEmG019123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-25 01:21 EST ------- apr-api-docs-1.2.8-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250521.l6P5LQNq019173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.8-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250547.l6P5ljPH020580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-25 01:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > OK, i've saw that you just have build libXNVCtrl but is there other libraries to > build from the standard package or only the nvidia-settings binary is missing? > There are no other libs AFAIK. > About this don't you think that might be possible to build it also ? > I don't want to be conflicting with the proprietary drivers from that other repo, these do not contain this lib (as its linked staticly into nvidea-settings), but do contain nvidea-settings itself, and maybe a later version. > For now i don't know how to bring nvidia users to uses this ? does your program > will have a Requires (or BR) libXNVCtrl ?! Then this library will be bring on > the system whereas the hardware may be not present... Yes, gnome-applet-sensors will BR libXNVCtrl-devel, and then the build binary will automatically require libXNVCtrl.so.0 . This is not a problem for non nvidia driver users, this library just gives access to an X extension, just like extensions as MITSHM, Xvideo and Xxf86dga. If the extension isn't available the program will not use it and stay to function normally (except that it won't show the temperature for any nvidia cards). So basicly with this lib, and an X-server with the extension, nvidia card temp gets added as an additional feature. If the server is missing the extension, then the app keeps functioning as before. > The other way of doing this is to have Requires: libXNVCtrl from the proprietary > nvidia driver, then does others problems will be able to dlopen this library to > talk to the hardware... ?! > As explained above this is not necessary. > I think the first solution is the better, (maybe the two can be done...) > > Anyway we may need to have for now (if only the proprietary drivers is required...) > ExclusiveArchs: %{ix86} x86_64 > This is not necessary either, on ppc the extension will simple not be there and if nvidia does a ppc driver release, then things will start working without needing a rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250550.l6P5owuQ020776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cdogd-data -|Review Request: cdogs-data - |Data files for the CDogs |Data files for the CDogs |game |game Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-25 01:50 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cdogs-data Short Description: Data files for the CDogs game Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 05:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250551.l6P5pjPT020838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-25 01:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cdogs-sdl Short Description: C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 06:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250633.l6P6XA3I022864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 02:33 EST ------- warren, Do we have any policies on hijacking other's reviews? If yes then I will be happy to see that. May be I can also use that in future for taking over other's review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 07:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250710.l6P7AW2c024695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 03:10 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 09dd471b600f4dddadc57ee5b56b2d02 Catalyst-Devel-1.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01use............ok t/02pod............ok t/03podcoverage....ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=8, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.40 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: perl(Catalyst::Devel) = 1.02 perl(Catalyst::Helper) perl(Catalyst::Module::Install) perl(Module::Install::Catalyst) + Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Catalyst) >= 5.7000 perl(Catalyst::Action::RenderView) >= 0.04 perl(Catalyst::Devel) perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Catalyst::Helper) perl(Catalyst::Manual) >= 5.7000 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Static::Simple) >= 0.14 perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Config) perl(File::Copy::Recursive) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Module::Install) >= 0.64 perl(Module::Install::Base) perl(POSIX) perl(Path::Class) >= 0.09 perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Template) perl(YAML) >= 0.55 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 07:27:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250727.l6P7RGjU025636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-25 03:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Adel Gadllah, > If you see I am waiting for this review since last 2 months and even after > pinging you 2 times you replied yesterday and got it approved quickly. Any > reason must have been specified before removing current reviewer. Sorry, ajax asked yesterday in #fedora-devel that he want this reviewed quickly to get it into rawhide before the test1 freeze (which was yesterday too). So don't did this to hijack your review or something like this. But you are correct I should have explained the reason why I am doing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 07:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250757.l6P7vj8j027931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-25 03:57 EST ------- Okay, there's an update what should fix that file-moving issue. It's here: http://devserv.devel.redhat.com/~stransky/ (it's not public because i don't have enough space for it on my people.redhat.com account) All plugins are installed to common location in /usr/lib(64)/mozilla/plugins. The modified firefox package uses plugins from /usr/lib(64)/mozilla/plugins-wrapped. The plugins are linked (or wrapped, if the nspluginwrapper package is installed) to mozilla/plugins-wrapped directory by firefox-plugin-config utility. firefox-plugin-config is called when firefox is starting and all should work out-of-the-box (all you need to do is restart the browser). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 08:26:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250826.l6P8QY0p030984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 04:26 EST ------- license inclusion in upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 08:45:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250845.l6P8jm7J032630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 kms at passback.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk| |) | ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-25 04:45 EST ------- Sorry, I've been busy at work and this slipped my mind. I've sent an email upstream and hope to hear back in the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 09:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] New: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd-0.3.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: GDHCPD is an easy to use GTK+ administration tool for ISC DHCPD. It handles dynamic scopes, hosts, ranges and settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 09:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707250958.l6P9wK4j006084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 10:57:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] New: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gnome-sshman.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gnome-sshman-0.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Gnome-sshman is an SSH session manager for GNOME. It is easy and fast to use, and is useful for system administrators that need to connect to many SSH servers. Gnome-sshman saves ssh sessions and allows you to open a saved session with a double click in nautilus or opening a new session running gnome-sshman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 11:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251104.l6PB4hwo011926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-07-25 07:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #81) > (it's not public because i don't have enough space for it on my > people.redhat.com account) You should have enough space on your people.fedoraproject.org account, see the recent announcement on fedora-maintainers-list (or was it -devel/-devel-announce? I don't quite remember). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 11:09:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251109.l6PB9UQ3012461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-25 07:09 EST ------- I'm still around :-) Very busy, but will look at this & ocaml-ssl (bug 241473) soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 11:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251130.l6PBUsUL014673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 11:51:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251151.l6PBpoGj016759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-07-25 07:51 EST ------- I had omitted to cvs add the spec file after copying. That was the problem. The packages have been built now. Please let me know if I should now close this BZ. Thanks a lot again. -- Pai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 11:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251156.l6PBum3X017129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-25 07:56 EST ------- ahh. so it's there, too. http://people.fedoraproject.org/~stransky/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:01:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] New: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SRPM URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4-0.403.beta.fc7.src.rpm Description: Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL (SE-PostgreSQL) is an extension built-in PostgreSQL. It applies fine grained mandatory access control to database objects based on the security policy of SELinux. This enables consistent application of access controls, as the kernel and SE-PostgreSQL share a unified security policy scheme. These features allow the implementation of consistent information flow control schemes integrated at both the operating system and database levels. This significantly enhances the security capabilities of the system, to more robustly protect against security threats such as information leaking, unauthorized manipulation and destruction of information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] New: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/wxdfast-0.6.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: wxDownload Fast (also known as wxDFast) is an open source multi-threaded download manager.This means that it can split a file into several pieces and download the pieces simultaneously -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251221.l6PCLsV1019258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-25 08:21 EST ------- iniparse-0.2-1.fc7.noarch.rpm: W: iniparse spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/iniparse-0.2/index.html iniparse-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm: W: iniparse strange-permission iniparse.spec 0600 Also, the package should be named "python-iniparse". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:28:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251228.l6PCSvGp019680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166343] Review Request: nail - An enhanced implementation of the mailx command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251235.l6PCZwEr020445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nail - An enhanced implementation of the mailx command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166343 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-07-25 08:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nail New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251249.l6PCn6e0021383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-25 08:48 EST ------- wildmidi-0.2.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm: wildmidi-0.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm: wildmidi-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm: wildmidi-devel-0.2.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm: W: wildmidi-devel no-documentation I find it a bit... pathological... to require a whole other package just for a config file. It might be better to just add a config file to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 12:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251257.l6PCvTFW022128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-25 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I find it a bit... pathological... to require a whole other package just for a > config file. It might be better to just add a config file to the package. Wildmidi is a wavetable synthesizer, wavetable synths work by using recordings of the original instruments. timidity++ not only contains the config file, but also the "patch" files (the recordings) this config file refers to, for this reason it is for example also required by SDL_mixer and allegro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 13:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251302.l6PD2U78023008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 13:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251339.l6PDdaiK027099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-25 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > iniparse-0.2-1.fc7.noarch.rpm: > W: iniparse spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/iniparse-0.2/index.html > > iniparse-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm: > W: iniparse strange-permission iniparse.spec 0600 > I will take a look at these warnings > Also, the package should be named "python-iniparse". Do you know any smart way to do this, without renaming the upstream source ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251405.l6PE5DtP031017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-25 10:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159925) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159925&action=view) Patch for spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:18:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242539] Review Request: freetds - Implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251418.l6PEIwWF032651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetds - Implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242539 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-07-25 10:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: freetds New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251419.l6PEJ8Ys032685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] New: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/fedora-ds-admin.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.0-0.1.20070725.src.rpm Description: This is the package for the Fedora Administration Server used to manage Fedora Directory Server and related servers. It uses Apache as its http engine to provide a simple CGI based management web application. It also provides CGIs used by the directory server and admin server console. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251430.l6PEUpYX001791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-07-25 10:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159929) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159929&action=view) rpmlint of srpm The complaint is about a shell script used to generate the source tarball from CVS. I think this should be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251438.l6PEcowW002847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-07-25 10:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159930) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159930&action=view) rpmlint of rpm There are a number of issues here: > E: fedora-ds-admin script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/fedora-ds/perl/AdminMigration.pm This is not meant to be executable - it is a perl module (.pm extension). So I'm not sure why rpmlint is complaining about this. > E: fedora-ds-admin binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/fedora-ds/cgi-bin/ds_restart ['/usr/lib64'] This has me baffled. I'm not doing anything with rpath. I'm just using the standard autotools on FC6 x86_64. I've tried putting %configure --disable-rpath in the spec file - no effect. I believe this is some sort of autotool problem that forces the use of rpath. What can I do about this? > E: fedora-ds-admin subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/fedora-ds-admin It actually does use the locking subsys, but not directly in the initscript itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:44:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251444.l6PEi20H003450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-25 10:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-ssl Short Description: SSL bindings for OCaml Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 14:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251444.l6PEi7UR003476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-07-25 10:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-ulex Short Description: OCaml lexer generator for Unicode Owners: rjones at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: rjones at redhat.com,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 15:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251514.l6PFEoxG007049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-25 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > HippoDraw does not require tkinter. - Oops.. I meant "does HippoDraw-python require tkinter?" hippoplotter.py imports Tkinter. > release number added to the -devel-doc subpackage. - I meant that currently -devel-doc subpackage has "Requires: %{name}-devel", which should be "Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}" > As for commetns in #60 and #61 > > The problem appears to stem from the fact that the autoconf/automake generated > Makefile does not install python modules in lib64/python. I don't know how to > work around it. - As I said in comment 61, while .py{,o,c} files (i.e. arch-independent files) should be installed under site_lib, .so files (arch-dependent) should be installed under site_arch. on x86_64 and ppc64, they differ. You can workarround: -------------------------------------------------------------- %{!?python_sitelib: %define ......} %{!?python_sitearch: %define .....} .... .... %install ..... %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/hippomodule.so* \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %endif .... %files python %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitelib}/hippo.pth %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %endif %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples/ %changelog ........... --------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-25 11:14 EST ------- (In case my comment is not delivered by mail, I will post again) (In reply to comment #62) > HippoDraw does not require tkinter. - Oops.. I meant "does HippoDraw-python require tkinter?" hippoplotter.py imports Tkinter. > release number added to the -devel-doc subpackage. - I meant that currently -devel-doc subpackage has "Requires: %{name}-devel", which should be "Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}" > As for commetns in #60 and #61 > > The problem appears to stem from the fact that the autoconf/automake generated > Makefile does not install python modules in lib64/python. I don't know how to > work around it. - As I said in comment 61, while .py{,o,c} files (i.e. arch-independent files) should be installed under site_lib, .so files (arch-dependent) should be installed under site_arch. on x86_64 and ppc64, they differ. You can workarround: -------------------------------------------------------------- %{!?python_sitelib: %define ......} %{!?python_sitearch: %define .....} .... .... %install ..... %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/hippomodule.so* \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %endif .... %files python %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitelib}/hippo.pth %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %endif %{_datadir}/%{name}/examples/ %changelog ........... --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 15:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251524.l6PFOcof009856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-07-25 11:24 EST ------- EPEL for EL-5 coming, also FC6. EL-4 not yet, since it seems that libevent-devel isn't available in that repo.... I'll investigate... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 15:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251527.l6PFRkDs010446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-25 11:27 EST ------- Can I get all the mock logs? It builds fine for me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251614.l6PGEATA015865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251615.l6PGFxSJ015974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:17:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247852] Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251617.l6PGHbax016231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-systemfit - Simultaneous Equation Estimation R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247852 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251619.l6PGJhRN016413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251621.l6PGLrrU016538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251623.l6PGNdFG016696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:25:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251625.l6PGPMcG016837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251626.l6PGQRWv017029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-25 12:26 EST ------- > 1) description to long. Description is five lines long now. > 2) don't package .a/.la files Done > 3) package the COPYING file Done The new files: Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/lzma-4.32.0-0.4.beta3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251627.l6PGRpOJ017322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:28:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251628.l6PGSfTh017565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-25 12:28 EST ------- Well, * Still _linkchecker_configdata.py (and configuration/__init__.py) expects that linkcheckerrc and logging.conf are installed under /usr/share/linkchecker, not under /etc/linkchecker/. _linkchecker_configdata.py should be modified so that config_dir points to /etc/linkchecker. Also both logging.conf and linkcheckerrc should be moved under /etc/linkchecker and be marked as %config(noreplace) * And it seems to me that files under /usr/share/linkchecker/examples are documents and can be moved under /usr/share/doc/linkchecker-. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:40:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251640.l6PGeDP3018410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-25 12:40 EST ------- package looks good now and also builds fine in mock. ;) (I am not a sponsor so I can't sponsor you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] New: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm Description: The auto nice daemon renices and even kills jobs according to their CPU time, owner, and command name. This is especially useful on production machines with lots of concurrent CPU-intensive jobs and users that tend to forget to nice their jobs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:51:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248410] Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251651.l6PGpdkF020033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:51:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251651.l6PGpfbI020067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 Bug 248451 depends on bug 248410, which changed state. Bug 248410 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-CallbackRequest - Functional and object-oriented callback architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 16:52:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251652.l6PGq0Uw020122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249595] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249595 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheese at nosuchhost.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/twc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/twf-0.2.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer The Widget Factory is a program designed to show a wide range of widgets on a single window. It can be used to easily check gtk2-themes. I named the package twf, as upstream the binary is named that too, despite the source-file has a much longer name. I need a Sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249595] Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251728.l6PHSeP5023761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249595 cheese at nosuchhost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |widget viewer ------- Additional Comments From cheese at nosuchhost.net 2007-07-25 13:28 EST ------- and again i missed the Summary. sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249595] Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251737.l6PHb1g9024578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249595 cheese at nosuchhost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:40:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251740.l6PHeTCu024991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-25 13:40 EST ------- Some comments as one of sponsor members: * If -devel subpackage is licensed under LGPL, the corresponding documents should be installed as a %doc of -devel subpackage (i.e. add LICENSE.LIB to %doc of -devel subpackage). * Add ChangeLog to %doc * Usually the dependency against main or subpackage should be version-release specific. i.e. main package should have: Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} and -devel package should have: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * Provides: %{name}-devel = ... on -devel subpackage is not needed * Explain why -devel package *must* have Provides: lzmadec-devel = %{version}-%{release} (I suggest to remove this) * Please use the following to keep timestamps on header files and man pages. ---------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{_install} -p" ----------------------------------------------------- * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * and %defattr(0644,root,root,-755) on -devel package is not needed. * You define %{src_version} and it seems that it can be used also for source tarball name. * Files under %{_mandir} is automatically tagged as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:52:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251752.l6PHqoXb026118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-07-25 13:52 EST ------- Whoops, I found a problem in the spec file - I forgot to include BuildRequires: adminutil-devel. This has been fixed and the links updated. If your spec file does not contain BuildRequires: adminutil-devel, just hit reload until it does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 17:56:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251756.l6PHuaX4026822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From patrice.bouchand.fedora at gmail.com 2007-07-25 13:56 EST ------- > Please Package COPING and include a .desktop file. Done. I set the "Categories" to "Graphics" in desktop file ? Do you have a better idea ? Spec URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf.spec SRPM URL: http://patrice.bouchand.free.fr/rpm/gtkperf-0.40-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251801.l6PI1JB0027408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-25 14:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > Please Package COPING and include a .desktop file. > Done. > > I set the "Categories" to "Graphics" in desktop file ? Do you have a better idea ? > Use "System" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251814.l6PIEZci028653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251825.l6PIPKjv029720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu)| ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-25 14:25 EST ------- I didn't assign this to myself and I'm out of time at the moment. Maybe later, but at this point anyone is free to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:35:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251835.l6PIZOVh030760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-25 14:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159970) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159970&action=view) mock build log of ustr 1.0.0-2 Well, actually a lot of rpmlint complaints... ----------------------------------------------------- W: ustr incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 1.0.0-2.fc8 W: ustr invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD W: ustr unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libustr-1.0.so.1.0.0 W: ustr invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD W: ustr strange-permission ustr.spec 0600 W: ustr-debug no-documentation E: ustr-debug library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.0 E: ustr-debug library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.0 W: ustr-debug no-dependency-on ustr W: ustr-debug summary-ended-with-dot String library, very very low memory overhead, simple to import. W: ustr-debug invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD W: ustr-debug unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.0 W: ustr-debug-static no-documentation W: ustr-debug-static summary-ended-with-dot String library, very very low memory overhead, simple to import. W: ustr-debug-static invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD E: ustr-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package W: ustr-debuginfo invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD W: ustr-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/ustr-1.0.0/.gdbinit W: ustr-devel summary-ended-with-dot String library, very very low memory overhead, simple to import. W: ustr-devel invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD W: ustr-static no-documentation W: ustr-static summary-ended-with-dot String library, very very low memory overhead, simple to import. W: ustr-static invalid-license MIT, LGPL, BSD ------------------------------------------------------ Summary * version mismatch between the last entry of %changelog and rpm EVR. * Perhaps MIT/LGPL/BSD will remove rpmlint complaint. * Please change the permission of spec/tarball to 0644 * Calling ldconfig is needed for library * "unstripped-binary-or-object" is usually due to wrong permission (i.e. this binary should have executable permission, usually 0755) * Please remove dot from the end of summary * debuginfo rpm is empty. This means that debug option "-g" flag is not used on compile. I checked the build log (attached) but no useful information is gained from the build log. - Please make the build log more verbose - and Fedora specific compilation flags are perhaps not honored. * What is the file /usr/share/ustr-1.0.0/.gdbinit for? Other quick comment: * Source must be written with full URL. * Please check directories' ownership. * Usually the dependency for main or subpackage should be version-release number specific * summary seems all the same for all packages?? * Please use %_includedir * Files under %_datadir/doc or %_mandir are automatically tagged as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:37:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251837.l6PIbbsG030970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251849.l6PInd7q000583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-07-25 14:49 EST ------- This meta-package looks sane. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 18:56:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251856.l6PIufE0002731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-25 14:56 EST ------- * version mismatch between the last entry of %changelog and rpm EVR. Fair enough. * Perhaps MIT/LGPL/BSD will remove rpmlint complaint. I'll try that. * Please change the permission of spec/tarball to 0644 This will happen automatically when it goes into Fedora CVS, no? Doing this outside of Fedora CVS means playing with my umask settings. * Calling ldconfig is needed for library AIUI this isn't required. You either need to call ldconfig, or explicitly generate the symlinks that ldconfig would do ... but not both. And the former is preferred. If you could point to something official that says otherwise, I'll gladly change it. * "unstripped-binary-or-object" is usually due to wrong permission (i.e. this binary should have executable permission, usually 0755) Fixed. * Please remove dot from the end of summary Yeh, I thought I'd done that but I only did the main package. * debuginfo rpm is empty. This means that debug option "-g" flag is not used on compile. I checked the build log (attached) but no useful information is gained from the build log. - Please make the build log more verbose - and Fedora specific compilation flags are perhaps not honored. I'll look into this, it doesn't use autoconf ... so I might well need to pass something for CFLAGS. * What is the file /usr/share/ustr-1.0.0/.gdbinit for? It can be copied to a users (developer using the library) home dir, and is copied via. the ustr-import to the working directory. I can change the library to call it gdbinit.txt, if I really need to ... it just seems like a false warning (and as with all lints there's no good way to turn it off). Other quick comment: * Source must be written with full URL. Fixed. * Please check directories' ownership. Which directories? * Usually the dependency for main or subpackage should be version-release number specific As far as I can see they all do. Which one isn't? * summary seems all the same for all packages?? This is common for libraries, no? For instance glib2 and glib2-devel have the same summary but different descriptions ... what else should I be doing? * Please use %_includedir Fixed. * Files under %_datadir/doc or %_mandir are automatically tagged as %doc Ok, removed the doc tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 19:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251905.l6PJ5hX7004916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-25 15:05 EST ------- * Calling ldconfig is needed for library Nevermind, I've fixed this. I was thinking of something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 19:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] New: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/x11iraf.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/x11iraf-1.5-0.4.DEV.fc6.src.rpm Description: The X11IRAF project provides GUI applications for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility). XGterm provides a Tek 4012 compatible graphics terminal emulation plus a datastream driven widget server capability. XTapemon is a conventional Xt/Athena application which allows the status of an IRAF tape job to be monitored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 19:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251910.l6PJAJ9w006252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-07-25 15:10 EST ------- [+] source files match upstream [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license is correct. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] %clean is present. [+] package installs properly [/] rpmlint is silent. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. Package looks sane. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 19:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251923.l6PJN6kQ009936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-25 15:23 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Update to 1.4.9 - another security update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 19:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707251936.l6PJa8VW011314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252011.l6PKB0A5014897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-25 16:10 EST ------- You bumped the release number in the changelog, but not in the release field. Not sure if I'll be able to review it, might see what my workload is like tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:14:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252014.l6PKEiRe015366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2007-07-25 16:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 10. 21 outstanding bugs. None appear to be directly packaging related. Bug 216733 is packaging related, if you count files in the tarball that should be installed by the rpm a packaging problem (I would). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249325] Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252032.l6PKWj2S017552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-updatesd - Update notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249325 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:51:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252051.l6PKpoBg019373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From smooge at mindspring.com 2007-07-25 16:51 EST ------- Hmmm I was wondering if we could put this into 3 packages but I realized that it might be hard to get them to work together ... alpine -- contains alpine alpine-utils -- contains pico/pilot Conflicts with pine for 80% solution I would look at the livna or rpmforge versions of pine . alpine-web -- contains web bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252057.l6PKv9tS019808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:57:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252057.l6PKvBQu019827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 Bug 241487 depends on bug 241475, which changed state. Bug 241475 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 20:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252057.l6PKvDnw019853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 Bug 241476 depends on bug 241475, which changed state. Bug 241475 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252135.l6PLZnlD022663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-25 17:35 EST ------- Will start at tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252135.l6PLZrqb022684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-25 17:35 EST ------- Will start at tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252140.l6PLeRZl023014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-07-25 17:40 EST ------- Perhaps I'm taking the wrong approach, but my philosophy is that since pine is not a Fedora package I have no way of providing compatibility for whatever "pine" RPM a user might have installed. The differences between what patches the RPMforge and Livna packagers decided to include is a good demonstration of what could go wrong (for example, maildir). As mentioned in the spec, I disabled "Web Alpine". I am UW staff so I am sometimes forced to use "WebPine" and it's OK if you want a CGI frontend slapped onto pine, but isn't very impressive compared to for example Squirrelmail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252141.l6PLfnfv023307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-25 17:41 EST ------- fixed fedora-review flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252142.l6PLgHGQ023360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-25 17:42 EST ------- fixed fedora-review flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 21:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252143.l6PLhYbY023578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-25 17:43 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 25 23:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707252310.l6PNAoqp029651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-25 19:10 EST ------- As the livna pine maintainer, I promise to commit to any compatibility needs that are required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 00:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260034.l6Q0YOgI032715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-25 20:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linkchecker-4.7-7.fc7.src.rpm I got rid of the examples entirely. The installer does not put them is a good spot. I'm not sure the value of installing example code in /usr/share/doc anyway. I did modify the installer to put the configuration files in /etc/linkchecker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 00:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260059.l6Q0xKK7001297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-07-25 20:59 EST ------- 0.2.1.1-8 had too many issues in build process when i tried to make it build in SUSE with a cross-build script which had been included in the spec, that i trashed it all and reverted, but moved the improvements up... Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-9.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: 4f1ec103aa6666de132fa76698a225f9 sha1sum: 35865f862bfc89a3c0c0593b9c8f6b6b632a28e0 SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-9.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: f55af9a6d30a049f8be8358f8e0b70da sha1sum: 528bac97e0994f3403f4fcdfff68f84bf58a55a7 This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) mock should build fine for this, aside from my GPG key if it isn't imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 03:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260327.l6Q3RXCo008605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-25 23:27 EST ------- Ok I rebuilt srpm locally and got it working now. can you also add t/* to %doc? Also, I will suggest to add t/* directory to %doc in your existing packages and in future submission. If you will be happy to add t/* in this package. Kindly provide new SRPM links and will review it formally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 05:01:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260501.l6Q512V0015391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 05:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260502.l6Q5243L015496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 05:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260508.l6Q58v9I015922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-26 01:08 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-3.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-3.fc7.src.rpm * Wed Jul 25 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-3 - Add app_conference * Wed Jul 25 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-2 - Use plain useradd/groupadd rather than the fedora-usermgmt - Clean up requirements - Clean up build requirements by moving them to package sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 05:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260556.l6Q5uj4p021410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-26 01:56 EST ------- New versions of both the srpm and spec file at: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.fc7.src.rpm ...rpmlint on all the generated binaries gives: W: ustr strange-permission ustr.spec 0600 W: ustr-debug no-documentation W: ustr-debug no-dependency-on ustr W: ustr-debug-static no-documentation W: ustr-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/ustr-1.0.1/.gdbinit W: ustr-static no-documentation ...the "no docs" are false positives, as is the .gdbinit file. The no-dep-on ustr is just wrong, and the ustr.spec snafu will be fixed by getting it in CVS. Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260715.l6Q7FvvF025670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-07-26 03:15 EST ------- Hmmm... What's wrong with this bug? I have no idea why it's still not approved... Maybe some things-to-do still remains? Jeff, could you please summarize them if any? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260726.l6Q7QWCK026380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-07-26 03:26 EST ------- Upgraded to 0.18 release. Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/nabi-0.18-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260733.l6Q7Xwv6026849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260751.l6Q7pJLb028237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-26 03:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=159993) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=159993&action=view) Final Cleaned SPEC Use this SPEC file. Though this is not rpmlint silent SPEC. you need to add versions to Obsoletes and Provides. Everything else is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260752.l6Q7qDsG028477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:52:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260752.l6Q7qIkD028520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-26 03:52 EST ------- Is there any other problem? Could somebody approved this package review please? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 07:55:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260755.l6Q7tG2X028848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-26 03:55 EST ------- Can we please move forward with that review? Package for review is here: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/nsplugin/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-7.fc7.src.rpm Spec file for review is here: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/nsplugin/nspluginwrapper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225762] Merge Review: fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260802.l6Q82qCV029851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|majain at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:03:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225760] Merge Review: fonts-arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260803.l6Q830Es029964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225760 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dsantani at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260844.l6Q8iD9v002784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-26 04:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: printer-filters Short Description: Collection of filters for various printer drivers Owners: lkundrak at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260844.l6Q8is8h003653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-26 04:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ptouch-driver Short Description: CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Owners: lkundrak at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260847.l6Q8lHZ5003973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 08:48:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225631] Merge Review: busybox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260848.l6Q8mhLY004123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: busybox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225631 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 09:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707260924.l6Q9O3TV007606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-26 05:23 EST ------- Thanks for the patch. Here is a new spec & srpm. http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/python-iniparse.spec http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/python-iniparse-0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Changes: Changed name to python-iniparse. silent rpmlint on rpm & srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 10:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261050.l6QAofFP016367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ajackson at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-26 06:50 EST ------- Ajax, Any reason why you not responded to my pings? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 12:08:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261208.l6QC8XgS022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 navid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-26 08:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sos Short Description: A set of tools to gather troubleshooting information from a system Owners: neslami at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 InitialCC: sos-project at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 12:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261213.l6QCDx51023087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-26 08:13 EST ------- Ok so i've asked the #nouveau project and they don't seems to uses this for now... But this could be done eventually whereas this is not the first item from their TODO list. And as adviced by D. Woodhouse "They have to detect at runtime whether the X extension is present or not anyway", this also is usefull to have the libs present in case of using a remote X... So it is safe to drop ExclusiveArchs:... Using fedora-review: ? , as this should already be set... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 13:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261323.l6QDNbxJ031181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 09:23 EST ------- Imported and build long ago, forgot to close, closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 13:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261339.l6QDdV4Q001011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 ------- Additional Comments From jorge at konnekt.org 2007-07-26 09:39 EST ------- Hello Wilmer, Thank you for your comments. The changes you suggested has been made, the files are in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 13:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261347.l6QDlMMW002378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 09:47 EST ------- I'm waiting to see a package, where are complaints are fixed. If I see this package, I will be able to approve your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 13:48:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:48:30 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261348.l6QDmUw1002568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 linville at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linville at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-07-26 09:48 EST ------- FWIW, current iwlwifi sources don't support firmware versioning. Perhaps they should, but they don't. Is the "alternatives" stuff really the best way to handle versioned firmware packages anyway? It seems a little heavy for firmware. Dunno, maybe there is no other appropriate mechanism...? The above is brainstorming, and should NOT be interpreted as a NAK of any sort. I think both versions are acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 13:59:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:59:44 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261359.l6QDxi68004343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-07-26 09:59 EST ------- Using alternatives seems plain wrong. It's not like anyone wants to "choose" the firmware they use with a given kernel. The solution is to try and convince Intel to go back to how they were doing things previously, as it was very easy to bundle the older firmwares along with the latest, so that people could downgrade and upgrade kernels all they wanted (basically, the latest package always worked with all kernels from the first one of the install media, to the very latest errata one). If they don't want to do it... well... either try to implement something similar inside the Fedora kernel (ugh!), or continue trying to convince them, as I'm pretty sure they'll be "suffering" from the situation too, with feedback about problems related to the firmware version not being the right one, over and over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:00:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261400.l6QE0edx004524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-26 10:00 EST ------- So this requires a modified firefox? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261401.l6QE1A7h004823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-26 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > can you also add t/* to %doc? At this point, I'd rather not. I still haven't decided if I think this is necessarily a good idea. If I decide to do it, I need to be consistent. I'll want to go through all 100+ perl packages that I maintain and add that to all of them, as well as modify cpanspec. Honestly, I don't have the time to do all that right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261402.l6QE2kJ6005096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-26 10:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > So this requires a modified firefox? Exactly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261403.l6QE3Cng005310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-26 10:03 EST ------- The srpm from comment #5 should have all fixes. Is there any problem with this package? (perhaps I overlook some comment?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:20:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261420.l6QEK78C008879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-26 10:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #110) > What's wrong with this bug? > I have no idea why it's still not approved... > > Maybe some things-to-do still remains? Jeff, could you please summarize them if > any? The big blocker is that the sound files that Asterisk depends on haven't had a proper license. That should be fixed "any day now" and I'm 95% certain that the license will be free enough to be included in Fedora. While the sounds aren't absolutely necessary it'd be very very difficult to do without them. If Digium's license for the sounds isn't free enough it may be necessary to re-record the sounds, perhaps initially using the OpenPBX/CallWeaver sounds as a base to start from. The other blocker is that no one has been interested enough to do a review - David Woodhouse initially indicated interest but once OpenPBX.org/CallWeaver was included he lost interest. However, there is a new proposal to set up an Asterisk server for the Fedora Project[1] so that conference calls can be run. Dennis Gilmore indicated yesterday on IRC that he would be taking over the review. Over the next few days I'll be reviewing all of the comments to make sure that I have addressed all of the concerns raised so far. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR/AsteriskServerInstance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:20:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261420.l6QEKvUJ009201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-26 10:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gmp: Updated Fedora Owners: varekova at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:24:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:24:22 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261424.l6QEOMae009835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-26 10:24 EST ------- I think there is a missunderstanding about the alternative: When an update of the firmware is avaible, it takes the newer version of the firmware (this is not a user choice at this step, because of the priority field is upper with a newer version - tested) Also updating the symlink when the interface is used; this won't lead to problems as the firmware is already loaded, (it might be problematic if there is firmware reload but there will be also with package upgrade )... This method is compatible with both non-versionned-firmwares used by kernel and (if later avaible) versionned-firmwares used by kernel. If versionned_firmware methode exist, then the alternatives method will only be usefull for non-versionned_firmware kernels. And users will need to run alternatives --config iwl4965-firmware before to reboot with the relative kernel... Of cource, the better way is to have versionned firmwares into kernel for iwlwifi (and maybe others), But if there is one, there is still the same question we raised for compat-kernel without versionned firmware we will have to solve...) TODO: Have support for parrallele installable firmwares via yum (same as kernel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261436.l6QEahC7011441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Bug 225809 depends on bug 223692, which changed state. Bug 223692 Summary: gmp: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223692 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261439.l6QEdbEc011744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 10:39 EST ------- Soory for my mistake. I have got a look on it and it's looks fine. *** YOU ARE APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:45:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261445.l6QEjmrF012722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-26 10:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #111) > Dennis Gilmore indicated yesterday on IRC that he would be taking over the review. If he doesn't, I will (once the license issue with the sounds is resolved). Right now, without the sounds, the package is just a bit too broken for me to approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261447.l6QEl5FC013040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-07-26 10:47 EST ------- Package Name: mpfr Short Description: A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations Owners: varekova at redhat.com Branches: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 14:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261457.l6QEv79Q014624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 10:57 EST ------- Some Improvements: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:18:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261518.l6QFIdA3018626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 11:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160029) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160029&action=view) mock build log of ustr 1.0.1-0 on rawhide i386 * I just tried to rebuild, but it failed (please check the bug attached) * And please make the build log more verbose. The log like ------------------------------------------------- Compiling for A DBG lib: ustr-b-dbg-code.c ------------------------------------------------- is not useful. We cannot check if compilation flags are correct from this log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:35:18 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261535.l6QFZIxN021289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-26 11:35 EST ------- Is is possible to run a script early enough in the boot process to detect the current kernel version and make a symlink to the appropriate bit of firmware so that the loader will always see the right thing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:42:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261542.l6QFgI7F022549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-26 11:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #112) > > Right now, without the sounds, the package is just a bit too broken for me to > approve it. I do have packages for the sounds available, just waiting for the license issue to be resolved to open up review tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225631] Merge Review: busybox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261548.l6QFmsuU023327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: busybox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225631 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-07-26 11:48 EST ------- >> * At least the selinux patch should be proposed upstream. Has it >> been done? > I'm investigating it. The upstreamed selinux patch cannot apply busybox 1.2.x as is. These are implemented for the latest busybox (1.6.x), and not completed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261555.l6QFtsw3024319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 11:55 EST ------- Good: + Package meets naming guidelines + SPACE file name matches with packabe base name + Package has consitant macoro usage + License is GPL + License tag matches with License in the tar ball + Package contains a verbatim copy of the license text + SPEC is in English + SPEC is legible + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: a59be9812f7cf39c1401aa68b601ca68) + Package has correct buildroot + Package contains no sub packages + BuildRequies doesn't redundant + Local build works properly + Local install and uninstall works fine + Local start of the application works fine + application has a proper menu entry + Package has proper %defattr and file permissions + Package has a connect %clean section + Buildroot will be cleaned properly on start of the %install section + File list doesn't contains duplicates files + File list doesn't contains file or directories owned be other packages + %doc section is small + File in %doc section doesn't affect runtime + Rpmlint is quite on source package + Rpmlint is quite on binary package + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo package + Mock works fine on Devel(x86_65, ppp64, ppc) + Bad: - I will prefer gettext-devel over gettext as a BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 15:59:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261559.l6QFxCDG024842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 11:59 EST ------- Almost okay, assiging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261601.l6QG156R025772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 12:00 EST ------- Question: Did you start the update process in bodthi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261602.l6QG2jn2026236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 12:02 EST ------- Ping Jakub -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261614.l6QGEX23029051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-26 12:14 EST ------- Pong :-) I'm sorry for not being responsive, I was on vacation for the last two weeks and I'm still somehow catching up (I should probably have updated a related wiki page..). I'll return to this review later this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261618.l6QGI0QO029262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 12:17 EST ------- thx for the review. Fixed the BuildRequires: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd-0.3.2-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261618.l6QGIgg7029333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 12:18 EST ------- Sorry, typo correct urls: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd-0.3.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261619.l6QGJPaE029416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 12:19 EST ------- Okay. for -7: * gettext .po files - Well, actually "LANG=de_DE linkchecker " works, however non-ascii characters are corrupted (same for fr, perhaps and for es) Changing the encoding from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8 (by iconv) seems to work. Other things seems okay. Please fix the issue above and I think I can approve this package (if I did not overlook anything). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261633.l6QGXFfM030624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 12:33 EST ------- Some optimizing work: If you use %configure you don't need --prefix, --sysconfdir and --sbindir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:38:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261638.l6QGc5AU031263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-26 12:37 EST ------- Review for release 2.fc6: * RPM name is OK * Source nvidia-settings-1.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST As linking with oyranos work and runtime of oyranos works, then run test for the library works... Good! * running rpmlint on installed files: [root at Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# rpmlint libXNVCtrl W: libXNVCtrl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-2 1.0-2.kwizart.fc6 W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XReply W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XMissingExtension W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XFlush W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XEatData W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextRemoveDisplay W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextCreateExtension W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XRead W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSetLastRequestRead W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextFindDisplay W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSend W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 XextAddDisplay [root at Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# ldd /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaaace7000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000) I wonder if this can be solved by adding -lX11 (or something else) which seems needed by BR, i'm searching how to works with thoses issues... where they could be safety ignored for the review (we need at least to advices upstream about this...), i wonder if this could be solved by some tweaks ?... Notes: Thats the only issue it remains (for what i am aware...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261648.l6QGmrj6000389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 12:48 EST ------- ok removed: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd-0.3.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261649.l6QGnx3t000512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-26 12:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > can you also add t/* to %doc? > > At this point, I'd rather not. I still haven't decided if I think this is > necessarily a good idea. If I decide to do it, I need to be consistent. I'll > want to go through all 100+ perl packages that I maintain and add that to all of > them, as well as modify cpanspec. Honestly, I don't have the time to do all > that right now. No worries :) make test gave me t/01basic.............ok t/02priority..........ok t/03keys..............ok t/04errors............ok t/05object............ok t/06object_request....ok t/07combined..........ok t/08apache............skipped all skipped: Testing of apache_req requires Apache::FakeRequest t/09pod...............ok I assume this also will not a problem. Am i right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261652.l6QGq19J000773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-26 12:51 EST ------- David did a new release and new srpms here: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/release-o-rama-july-2007/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 16:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245016] PolicyKit-gnome package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261652.l6QGqAte000816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit-gnome package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245016 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-26 12:52 EST ------- David did a new release and new srpms here: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/release-o-rama-july-2007/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261700.l6QH0ult001430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-26 13:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > t/08apache............skipped > all skipped: Testing of apache_req requires Apache::FakeRequest [...] > I assume this also will not a problem. Am i right? Right. That's a mod_perl 1 test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261718.l6QHIonB003846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnome-sshman|Review Request: gnome-sshman |- SSH session manager for |- SSH session manager for |GNOME |GNOME Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review-, | |needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 13:18 EST ------- Good: + Package meets naming guidelines + SPEC file matches with package base name + Package has consitant macro usage + License is GPL + License tag matches with license in upstream tar ball + Package contains verbatim copy of the license text + SPEC is written in English + SPEC is legible + Tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 4a4d64d6064770bc5a914ca47c418c4f) + Package contains correct buildroot + BuildRequies aren't redundant + Packages doesn't contains sub packages + Local build works fine + Local instal works fine + Package contains proper %defattr and file permissions + Package contains no duplicate files + package contains no file or directories owned by other packes. + Package contains correct %clean section + buildroot will cleaned in %clean section and at the beginning of the %install section + %doc section is small + File in %doc section don't affect runtime + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm Bad: - When I try to connect to an sshd server, I get only a empty terminal window after I have type in my ssh passphrase - Mock build failes. You have to add a BR to desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261721.l6QHLf21004440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 13:21 EST ------- Unfortunately, I have find an addtional issue: You should add %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gdhcpd/ instaed of %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gdhcpd/gdhcpd.png in the filelist to make sure that the directory %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gdhcpd will be owned by your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:21:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261721.l6QHLoNm004551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: iniparse - A|Review Request: python- |better INI parser for Python|iniparse - A better INI | |parser for Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:24:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261724.l6QHOXAk005036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-26 13:24 EST ------- Some of the earlier comments still apply: - Shouldn't have to BR both dbus-glib-devel and dbus-glib. Isn't one requiring the other anyway ? - -devel package needs to require pkgconfig - -docs package needs to require gtk-doc - must require pam, for /etc/pam.d - must own /etc/PolicyKit, /usr/lib/PolicyKit, /usr/lib/PolicyKit/modules - %post and %postun should just do -p /sbin/ldconfig if thats all they do - The errors about permissions should probably be handled by adding a comment explaining why these permissions are necessary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261734.l6QHYRnW006562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-07-26 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gdhcpd/gdhcpd.png > > in the filelist to make sure that the directory %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gdhcpd will > be owned by your package. Or you should check why the same pixmap must be installed into 2 different places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261741.l6QHfJ22007161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 13:41 EST ------- >- When I try to connect to an sshd server, I get only a empty terminal window >after I have type in my ssh passphrase Works here... have you confused the gnome-keyring-passphrase with the ssh one? >Mock build failes. You have to add a BR to desktop-file-utils it is already there: BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel BuildRequires: gnome-python2-devel BuildRequires: python-crypto BuildRequires: pexpect BuildRequires: gettext BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils I will try a mock build and see whats causing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] New: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier-0.8.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Fly an ncurses plane over an ncurses city, and try to level the buildings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261750.l6QHolSJ008982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 13:50 EST ------- fixed: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gdhcpd-0.3.2-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:58:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261758.l6QHw3Vj009534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-26 13:58 EST ------- Thanks again for you very careful review HippoDraw no longre imports Tkinter. The feature implemented by the contributed package that imported Tkinter has been implemented in the C++ sources. The -devel-doc subpackage requires has been fixed for requiring verison of -devel subpackage. I found the way autoconf/automake handles installing in /usr/lib64/python25/site-packages so did not need any workarounds. For reference to thing to do is for the arch dependent shared library to be declared like this pkgpyexec_LTLIBRARIES = hippomodule.la The %file section of the spec file has been adjusted accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261758.l6QHwa67009607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 13:58 EST ------- It's look nice for mee. *** Your are APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:58:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261758.l6QHwmfK009640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-07-26 13:58 EST ------- Thank you. Your livna pine package is vanilla so upgrading should work fine for your users, with the possible exception of encoded passwords with non-ASCII characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 17:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261758.l6QHwxUM009697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-26 13:58 EST ------- It would be good to add a .desktop file that launches the game in a terminal window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261802.l6QI2bef010041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 14:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdhcpd Short Description: GTK+ administration tool for ISC DHCPD Owners: adel.gadllah at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261806.l6QI6xgM010570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 14:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160051) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160051&action=view) mock build log it builds fine in mock for me (F-7 x86_64) log attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261807.l6QI70xt010600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-26 14:06 EST ------- I can do that, but then what do I use for an icon? Should I roll my own? I've done that for other ncurses games before. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:08:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261808.l6QI8tcr010772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 14:08 EST ------- * Do CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, PKG_CONFIG_PATH need to be set explicitly? %configure sets CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS (please check what %configure does by 'rpm --eval %configure') and pkg-config automatically searched %_libdir/pkgconfig and no .pc files must be installed under %_datadir/pkgconfig. * desktop file should be installed by using desktop-file-install (in desktop-file-utils) * Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Please use macros. /usr should be replaced with %_prefix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261809.l6QI9dhO010831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-26 14:09 EST ------- For some curses based games, I made a graphic of the character that represents the player ('@' in rogue and ularn). You could do the same with the airplane in bombardier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245016] PolicyKit-gnome package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261811.l6QIBoWm011077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit-gnome package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245016 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-26 14:11 EST ------- Some comments still apply: - why do you need to BR both dbus-glib and dbus-glib-devel ? - might be worthwhile to drop the libgnomeui dependency But both are not blockers, so I'll say APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248511] Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261818.l6QII1Xu011668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-sdl - C-Dogs is an arcade shoot-em-up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248511 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 14:17 EST ------- Imported and build. Chris, normally this is the moment when the package gets closed, so next review please let it open, so that the submitter can close the review when the package has been build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261818.l6QIIA4W011711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 14:18 EST ------- Imported and build. Chris, normally this is the moment when the package gets closed, so next review please let it open, so that the submitter can close the review when the package has been build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:18:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261818.l6QIIegr011884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-26 14:18 EST ------- That's what I had in mind. I'm polishing an ncurses homage to defender that I've not even released yet, and it's icon is the player's ship, <_==>. :) I'll do that and re-upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:25:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261825.l6QIPuRa012776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226207] Merge Review: numactl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261845.l6QIjBYf015594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: numactl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226207 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-26 14:45 EST ------- Problems: rpmlint: W: numactl summary-not-capitalized library for tuning for Non Uniform Memory Access machines W: numactl-devel no-dependency-on numactl E: numactl-devel useless-explicit-provides numactl-devel This should fix: --- numactl.spec 12 Jan 2007 14:37:41 -0000 1.39 +++ numactl.spec 26 Jul 2007 18:36:20 -0000 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: numactl -Summary: library for tuning for Non Uniform Memory Access machines +Summary: Library for tuning for Non Uniform Memory Access machines Version: 0.9.8 Release: 2%{dist} License: LGPL/GPL @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ %package devel Summary: Development package for building Applications that use numa Group: System Environment/Libraries -Provides: numactl-devel +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} %description devel Provides development headers for numa library calls Please consider the missing Requires a bug that should be fixed in FC-6 and up - it breaks builds. Buildroot needs fixing: The recommended values for the BuildRoot tag are (in descending order of preference) : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Need to add to %files: %doc README you might also add CHANGES Good: - package meets naming guidelines - license (LGPL/GPL) OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok Suggestion: Why not: %prep -%setup -q -c -a 0 -%patch1 -%patch2 -p1 +%setup -q +%patch1 -p1 +%patch2 -p2 %build -cd numactl-%{version} make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -I. -fPIC" %install @@ -44,7 +43,6 @@ mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man5 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man8 -cd numactl-%{version} make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} install %clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261845.l6QIjNJs015741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-26 14:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier-0.8.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Done, but the terminal opens 80x24, and bombardier needs 80x25. Is there a way to set that in the .desktop file? I've dug around and can't find anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 18:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261855.l6QItoBN016771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 14:55 EST ------- OK, I have solve the mock issue. It was a 'you have no space left' issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261904.l6QJ4lDm017642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 15:04 EST ------- ok, I uploaded a new one with BuildRequires gettext-devel instead of gettext: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gnome-sshman.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/gnome-sshman-0.5.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Does it still not work for you? (gnome-keyring-manager vs ssh passpharse?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261907.l6QJ78i3017956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-26 15:07 EST ------- One possibility to solve the size problem is to change the HEIGHT setting in values.h from 24 to 23. The game still seems to play fine with this smaller setting. GOOD ==== * Sources matches upstream: 1a557bdfc61a7d53963a7637624a99e4 bombardier_0.8.2.2.tar.gz * Packages runs without crashing * Package named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Compiles and builds on F7-x86_64 * No locales * No shared libs * Not relocatable * Does not create directories that it should own * No need for -devel or -static subpackages * Filenames are UTF-8 MUSTFIX ======= * Include the manpage * Package does not honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS * desktop-file-utils should be part of BuildRequires, not Requires SHOULD ====== * Include a .desktop file that launches the game in a terminal window * Enable the shared highscore file via a setgid executable. Ideally this highscore file would be moved out of its own directory from /var/games/bombardier/bdscore to /var/games/bdscore, but that's just a minor nit. NOTES ===== * You can further simplify the %install section by creating the destination directory and installing the executable in one step: install -pD -m 755 bombardier %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/bombardier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261915.l6QJFADW018876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-26 15:15 EST ------- OK, I'm back :) I queried upstream about the info file, I'll update this bug report when the reply comes. Per the quickref issue - I personally don't think that including that file is necessary since it adds nothing compared to the man page..should I tune the install phase so it doesn't look for the quickref file? What are your thoughts on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261922.l6QJM1OW019458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-26 15:21 EST ------- Unfortunately, it doesn't works for me. I will get a blan screen. But I can find out, that ssh is running and holding a connection to the foreigh host. I have installed pexpect-2.1-4.fc7 if that may be helpful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261932.l6QJWBS9020720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-26 15:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier-0.8.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm Added man page, rpm_opt_flags, moves d-f-u to br. Used single install line. Might address shared high score file in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261932.l6QJWbiG020772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-26 15:32 EST ------- Oh, and added patch for height. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261939.l6QJdjxe021597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ivazqueznet at gmail.com |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:39 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261940.l6QJeK7b021668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arm-gp2x- |Review Request: arm-gp2x- |linux-kernel-headers - |linux-kernel-headers - |Kernel headers for Cross |Kernel headers for Cross |Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux |Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:40 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261940.l6QJeg3r021724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arm-gp2x- |Review Request: arm-gp2x- |linux-gcc - Cross Compiling |linux-gcc - Cross Compiling |GNU GCC targeted at arm- |GNU GCC targeted at arm- |gp2x-linux |gp2x-linux AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:40 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:41:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261941.l6QJf77K021808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arm-gp2x- |Review Request: arm-gp2x- |linux-glibc - Cross Compiled|linux-glibc - Cross Compiled |GNU C Library targeted at |GNU C Library targeted at |arm-gp2x-linux |arm-gp2x-linux AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:41 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:41:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261941.l6QJfdNX021953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:41 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:42:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249513] Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261942.l6QJgTCM022097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sshman - SSH session manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249513 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-26 15:42 EST ------- ok same version here. can you run it from a terminal and show me the output? does file->open with nautilus work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261942.l6QJgbVk022146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:42 EST ------- Reviewing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:53:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261953.l6QJrVG6023646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 15:53 EST ------- So first of all, using FSF Binutils for a Linux/glibc target is not a problem. The "Linux Binutils" H.J.Lu releases are actually snapshots from FSF CVS (this is why they usually have 2.x.90 numbering) with some patches applied, and only tested for Linux targets. FSF releases go through an actual release process, they aren't snapshotted straight out of CVS like the "Linux Binutils". This has both advantages (more testing, less regressions) and disadvantages (not always the latest bugfixes). If FSF Binutils is what all the other SDKs for this targets use, it is the right choice here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 19:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707261958.l6QJwubj024135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-26 15:58 EST ------- Moved to brand new fedorapeople Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits-6.2.0-0.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 20:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262008.l6QK8Y9u025402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 16:08 EST ------- The bootstrap hack is fun. :-) Have you tried -Dinhibit_libc? If that doesn't work, then I guess your solution is the best we can do. (TIGCC has its own fun way to deal with this problem: we simply have our own implementation of all the libgcc routines we need in our C library (TIGCCLIB) and my compiling scripts simply run the GCC compilation up to the first error (somewhere in libgcc). ;-) But this won't work for a standard target which does need libgcc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 20:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262052.l6QKqx8T029394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 16:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > So first of all, using FSF Binutils for a Linux/glibc target is not a problem. > The "Linux Binutils" H.J.Lu releases are actually snapshots from FSF CVS (this > is why they usually have 2.x.90 numbering) with some patches applied, and only > tested for Linux targets. FSF releases go through an actual release process, > they aren't snapshotted straight out of CVS like the "Linux Binutils". This has > both advantages (more testing, less regressions) and disadvantages (not always > the latest bugfixes). If FSF Binutils is what all the other SDKs for this > targets use, it is the right choice here. Yes, fsf binutils is what the other sdk's use, including open2x's sdk, which is the closest thing to upstream the arm-gp2x-linux packages have, see: http://open2x.org/open2x/index.html So I definetively want to stick with fsf binutils 2.16.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 20:57:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] New: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: law at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~law/funionfs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~law/funionfs-0.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: FunionFS implements a union filesystem in userspace using FUSE. FUSE provides a Linux kernel module which allows virtual filesystems to be written in userspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 20:58:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262058.l6QKwrI2030504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 16:58 EST ------- gcc for Linux with glibc may not be compiled with inhibit_libc, so this is the only way to go. The really big problem was: - getting this to build inside a dir, without it trying to install headers to the filesystem during the build - then install inside a buildroot - and then run without wanting to find some of its file inside the buildroot instead of there regular patches. After many days of messing around I found mandrake's patch which makes it possible to use --with-build-sysroot, without also using --with-sysroot, fixing the puzzle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262101.l6QL14p5030823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-07-26 17:01 EST ------- Moved to Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-0.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262104.l6QL4eiD031337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2007-07-26 17:04 EST ------- FSF binutils being more tested and less regressions is just an illusion, as I see it the fact is that they have fewer testers and already by the time they are released they are helplessly outdated. Especially 2.16.1 binutils are more than 2 years old codebase, has many severe known bugs and isn't really supported upstream anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262107.l6QL7CAU031649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 17:07 EST ------- Sounds good, thanks for the explanation. Another thing I noticed: > # In general, building GCC is not smp-safe > make FYI, they are at least trying to use "serialization dependencies" and similar hacks to make it work. But I don't know whether it actually works, I never use parallel make. So assuming it doesn't is probably safest anyway. The good news is that I don't see anything fundamentally bad with your packages, so I'm going to run these through the regular checklist (of course taking into account that these are cross-compiling packages, so they'll get away with things like using /usr/%{target} which other packages wouldn't ;-) ) next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:32:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262132.l6QLWmji001413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 17:32 EST ------- Hans already explained the reason for using 2.16.1: > Ah well, so it turns out that glibc-2.3.x doesn't compile with binutils 2.17, > so back to 2.16.1 it is And from the arm-gp2x-linux-gcc changelog: > - Glibc-2.3.5 is used because the arm is not supported in version 2.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262134.l6QLYuUJ001737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-26 17:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > And from the arm-gp2x-linux-gcc changelog: > > - Glibc-2.3.5 is used because the arm is not supported in version 2.5 I'm afraid that is an erroneous changelog entry the arm is supported in glibc-25 through the ports addon. The main reason for staying with glibc-2.3.5 and binutils 2.16.1 is because this is what all the gp2x sdk's use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262148.l6QLm8X9002778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-26 17:48 EST ------- More importantly, if the device is running 2.3.5, it doesn't make sense to use anything higher in the cross toolchain because programs dynamically linked against e.g. 2.5 won't run on 2.3.5. So IMHO your choice of versions makes perfect sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 21:57:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262157.l6QLvVR5003231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-26 17:57 EST ------- * The 'Version' field in the desktop file refers to the .desktop file specification version, not the application version. Should be '1.0'. * Use the %{_mandir} macro for the man page directory. You also don't need to compress it yourself; rpm will do that for you: install -pD -m 644 bombardier.6 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man6/bombardier.6 * RPM_OPT_FLAGS is still not being used on the compile line. You can add a single colon in the Makefile to get it to pick up CFLAGS from the command line: Makefile: CFLAGS:=-Wall -g -Werror -O2 ...and in %build: make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 26 23:04:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707262304.l6QN42wq007466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-07-26 19:04 EST ------- On my system, I don't see any corrupted characters. Both "LANG=de_DE man linkchecker" and "LANG=de_DE linkchecker http://www.flyn.org" look fine. No corrupt characters with linkchecker-4.7-7.fc7 here. I tested this using gnome-terminal and a text console. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 01:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270112.l6R1Cb0F032459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-26 21:12 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c0103a91c48b1fe79329dbd3ad977a44 MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks-1.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/01basic.............ok t/02priority..........ok t/03keys..............ok t/04errors............ok t/05object............ok t/06object_request....ok t/07combined..........ok t/07combined..........ok t/08apache............skipped all skipped: Testing of apache_req requires Apache::FakeRequest t/09pod...............ok All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=9, Tests=421, 7 wallclock secs ( 1.05 cusr + 0.14 csys = 1.19 CPU) + exit 0 + Provides: perl(Params::Callback) = 1.17 perl(Params::CallbackRequest) = 1.17 perl(Params::CallbackRequest::Exceptions) = 1.17 + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exception::Class) >= 1.10 perl(Params::CallbackRequest::Exceptions) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.59 perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 01:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270121.l6R1LUj2000862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 01:42:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270142.l6R1gtma002172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-26 21:42 EST ------- * I just tried to rebuild, but it failed (please check the bug attached) Ahh, a bug! That'll teach me to not check i386 too. * And please make the build log more verbose. This is a really bizarre request, but OK. I've put a mildly horrible hack in so it'll spam all the details to the build.log. New version at the same URLs as last time: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 02:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270210.l6R2AUQ2003327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-26 22:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-1.fc8.src.rpm There has been a new upstream release, version 2.29.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270313.l6R3DhAC008470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |ORBit ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-26 23:13 EST ------- I finally have some free time now, so.... This builds fine; rpmlint says: W: alsa-firmware strange-permission alsa-firmware.spec 0660 Kind of weird and quite insecure on many systems. Should be 644. I don't know if this matters at all once things are in CVS. W: alsa-firmware mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 1) I don't see this as a problem; fix it if you like. W: alsa-firmware incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.0.12-1 1.0.12-1.fc8 rpmlint doesn't like seeing the epoch there, but I think this is an rpmlint issue. E: alsa-firmware arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/share/alsa/firmware/mixartloader/miXart8.elf E: alsa-firmware arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /lib/firmware/mixart/miXart8.elf You explained these initially. So no big rpmlint problems. This does not install, due to an unsatisfied dependency on alsa-tools-firmware >= 1.0.12. I guess this is a subpackage of alsa-tools which is currently disabled. You own alsa-tools so it should be pretty easy to get it turned on. I have no hope of testing this anyway so not being able to install it isn't much of an impediment to a review. The license does concern me (GPL but there's no real source, just C files containing data) but if spot has already acked it then I suppose it's OK. I'll ping him on it before I approve anything. The specfile does not consistently use macros. If you want to use %{__make} and %{__rm}, you need to use them everywhere and also use %{__mv} and %{__cp}. The current version seems to be 1.0.14, which came out in June. Any reason not to package it? Because of the missing dependency, I can't determine whether /usr/share/alsa is properly owned. It's provided by alsa-utils, but I can't tell if it's in the dependency chain since alsa-tools-firmware doesn't exist. * source files match upstream: 6e7d3104c4de7d031790c1e750067b13e9481bf2855b0806a300d1e697549fbd alsa-firmware-1.0.12.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is not being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate (not that it matters for a noarch package). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X package fails to install properly due to a missing dependency. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: alsa-firmware = 1.0.12-1.fc8 = alsa-tools-firmware >= 1.0.12 udev * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no hope of testing this pacakge. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. ? owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * This is acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:14:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270314.l6R3EL3Q008546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-26 23:14 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ FAILED ] Package successfully to build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock x86_64 [FC-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ SKIP ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ Ok ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ CHECK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which're mentioned in OCaml guideline if present. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines if present. === Issues === # Mock Mock fails on : -------------------------------------------------------------- [...] sh: ocamldoc: command not found Exit Code 127 - Stopped error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54888 (%install) -------------------------------------------------------------- Which mean that ocmal-ocamldoc is missing as BR. Just add it. # some comment about __docdir you don't need to past doc files to __docdir/%{name}-%{version}-devel in %files devel %doc already do this job ;-). just add your subdirectory to %doc like this: %doc extlib-doc/* Of course, thats imply to re-manage your "# Move the HTML documentation somewhere sensible." by then, you should just have something like this: -------------------------------------------------- # Move the HTML documentation somewhere sensible. mkdir extlib-doc mv $extlibdir/extlib-doc extlib-doc -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247930] Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270321.l6R3LUg4009109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkchecker - checks HTML documents for broken links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247930 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 23:21 EST ------- Ah... I had to specify locale explicitly "LANG=de_DE.UTF-8"... Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (linkchecker) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:32:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270332.l6R3WYrk009925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-26 23:32 EST ------- >From next time please bump release number every time you modify your spec/srpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes -------------------------------------------------------------- ncrease the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change. -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270334.l6R3Y9gW010064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-26 23:34 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock x86_64 [FC-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ SKIP ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ Ok ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ CHECK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ CHECK ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. According to OCaml Packaging Guideline: [ OK ] OCaml modules / libs should be named ocaml-foo. [ OK ] The spec file should still build bytecode libraries and binaries. [ OK ] Should Test if the native compiler is present. [ OK ] main package should contain files matching all files which're mentioned in OCaml guideline if present. [ OK ] -devel sub-package Should contains all files which're mentioned in OCaml guidelines if present. [ ? ] Rpmlint output: * Silent on SRPM and -devel packages. * From RPM (main package): W: ocaml-pcre devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ocaml/pcre/pcre.cmi W: ocaml-pcre unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllpcre_stubs.so This above can be ignored accroding to the OCaml packaging guideline ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:41:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270341.l6R3fo5O010638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |ORBit ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-26 23:41 EST ------- > These libraries are need for some of the daemons in nfs-utils to > function. Should the just be Requires; Well, if the dependencies are needed at runtime, they should be Requires:, not Requires(pre):. But generally RPM will happily figure out any library dependencies automatically. I was going to do a build and continue moving forward with this review, but then I noticed that the devel branch seems to be older than the F-7 branch. Should I wait for devel to catch up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270343.l6R3hSCg010780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-26 23:43 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 03:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270344.l6R3ib6S010866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 Bug 241483 depends on bug 240557, which changed state. Bug 240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-26 23:44 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 04:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270419.l6R4J6bo013405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |ORBit ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 00:19 EST ------- I'm just now finding some time to get back to these reviews. This builds fine and rpmlint now finds nothing to complain about. I'm afraid I don't understand your comments about the necessary size of the window. Perhaps what you're not understanding is that it fails to run regardless of the size of the window; even on a full screen shell window with an 8pt font on a 24" monitor. It flashes an almost unreadable message which I thihnk tells me that the window size is 80x24 (which is most certainly isn't) and then exits. A minor nit: I think a summary of "Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs" is slightly more correct English. Otherwise, though, the package is looking good and I'd approve it if I could run it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225763] Merge Review: fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270536.l6R5aZJw017353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:39:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225763] Merge Review: fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270539.l6R5d2qm017479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pnemade at redhat.com |rbhalera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 01:39 EST ------- Initial Owner: rbhalera at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:42:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225763] Merge Review: fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270542.l6R5gNID017631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 01:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160096) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160096&action=view) rpmlint silent SPEC file update cvs with this SPEC and build new package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:42:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225760] Merge Review: fonts-arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270542.l6R5ggGM017674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225760 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 01:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160097) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160097&action=view) rpmlint silent SPEC file update cvs with this SPEC and build new package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225762] Merge Review: fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270542.l6R5gnAj017703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #148860|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 01:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160098) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160098&action=view) rpmlint silent SPEC file update cvs with this SPEC and build new package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:53:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270553.l6R5r0a7018634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-27 01:52 EST ------- ldapvi-1.7-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247115] Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270553.l6R5r3eJ018680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - An interactive LDAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247115 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.7-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270556.l6R5uRAE019165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ORBit |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 01:56 EST ------- I'd pay good money if someone would figure out why on earth the component keeps changing.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:56:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270556.l6R5uvOW019242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ORBit |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 05:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270557.l6R5vxrr019333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ORBit |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 06:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270630.l6R6UJef020915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |ORBit ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 02:30 EST ------- OK, now that mybashburn is getting close to being done, I'll take a look at this. It builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to complain about. I can't compare the sources with upstream, because this is a checkout from a subversion tree. It's OK to package snapshots like this, but you need to provide instructions on creating the tarball you are packaging. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL You're using the versioning scheme for post-release snapshots, but according to the upstream URL it seems to me that version 1.0 has not been released. Thus you'd have to use a version-release of something like 1.0-0.2.20070711svn, so that when 1.0 is finally released you can go to just 1.0-1. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines (look for the "Pre-Release packages" section). I would remove "It's" from the summary, as I can't think of any summaries that begin with pronouns. This isn't a big deal, however. Your call to desktop-file-install is a little weird; why is it indented like that? /usr/share/emesene is unowned; change %{_datadir}/%{name}/* in %files to %{_datadir}/%{name} to fix it. ? Can't compare source with upstream. X package does not meet naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. ? latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: emesene = 1.0-2.20070711svn.fc8 = /bin/sh dbus-python gtk2 pygtk2 python * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed and ran it; it seemed to start OK but I have no MSN account to actually log in with. X does not own /usr/share/emesene * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (desktop database update) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 06:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270637.l6R6b6HK021342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 02:37 EST ------- This fails to build for me: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/caps-0.3.0-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ladspa/*.so error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ladspa/caps.so I think this comes from %install where "/usr" is passed explicitly, even on x86-64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 06:47:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270647.l6R6lIB5021884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 02:47 EST ------- I'm a bit confused because there's currently a linuxwacom package in Fedora that contains a good portion of what this package contains. I understand that package doesn't contain everything the proposed package contains. However, it seems to me that the best thing to do would be to work with the maintainers of the current linuxwacom package to get those extra bits included. Failing that, this package would need to be renamed and those files which conflict with linuxwacom would need to be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 06:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270649.l6R6n4rF022023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 02:49 EST ------- Closing as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 06:58:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270658.l6R6wv3I022523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 02:58 EST ------- I'm still getting the same failure. I don't see anything in the spec which would mess with the failing test The package still uses macros inconsistently. It seems like you just want to change the single instance of "%{__perl}" to just "perl", unless you want to change all of the perl, make, rm, and chmod calls to %{__whatever}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 07:07:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270707.l6R77qv2022964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ORBit |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 07:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270755.l6R7tKSp026280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-07-27 03:55 EST ------- This review request was created AFAICS because the linuxwacom package already in fedora: a) Doesn't follow upstream closely enough b) Does not provide the required functionality - ie. wacomcpl The maintainer has stated in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219060 that he will update to 0.7.8 soon however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225814] Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270809.l6R891S2028140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225814 ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:08 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-bluetooth Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270810.l6R8AFQ4028307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-dtds Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225701] Merge Review: docbook-simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270812.l6R8CAh9028520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225701 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-simple Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225702] Merge Review: docbook-slides In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270812.l6R8CrAh028622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225702 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:12 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-slides Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248513] Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270813.l6R8DcUJ028843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdogs-data - Data files for the CDogs game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248513 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 04:13 EST ------- Hmm, I thought you had closed this one too, but appearantly not, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270817.l6R8H0Qc029410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:16 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-style-dsssl Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225704] Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270817.l6R8HmYq029491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225704 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:17 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-style-xsl Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225705] Merge Review: docbook-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270818.l6R8IWsd029592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225705 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docbook-utils Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:20:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225991] Merge Review: libbtctl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270820.l6R8Kr9a029805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libbtctl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225991 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libbtctl Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226098] Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270821.l6R8LjVe029915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226098 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:21 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: linuxdoc-tools Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:22:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270822.l6R8MXfZ030020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openjade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: openjade Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270823.l6R8NFUK030110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: opensp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: opensp Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:26:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270826.l6R8Qjb9030490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-SGMLSpm Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270826.l6R8QwpS030543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 04:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Review for release 2.fc6: > * running rpmlint on installed files: > [root at Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# rpmlint libXNVCtrl > W: libXNVCtrl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-2 1.0-2.kwizart.fc6 > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XReply > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > XMissingExtension > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XFlush > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XEatData > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > XextRemoveDisplay > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > XextCreateExtension > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XRead > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > _XSetLastRequestRead > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > XextFindDisplay > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSend > W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 > XextAddDisplay > Here is a new version fixing these: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:27:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225920] Merge Review: jadetex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270827.l6R8Ro03030627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jadetex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225920 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jadetex Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:30:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270830.l6R8UUxs030977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmltex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xmltex Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270831.l6R8VZpG031084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlto https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xmlto Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:32:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270832.l6R8Wwbh031353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passivetex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: passivetex Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:43:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270843.l6R8hUPp032270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openjade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 04:43 EST ------- Can it be possible to ask "fedora-cvs?" without formal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:43:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225704] Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270843.l6R8hZPQ032300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225704 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 04:43 EST ------- Can it be possible to ask "fedora-cvs?" without formal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270843.l6R8hfk9032327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlto https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 04:43 EST ------- Can it be possible to ask "fedora-cvs?" without formal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270843.l6R8hxfS032369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 04:43 EST ------- Reviewing as promised -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:46:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270846.l6R8kDHv032643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270849.l6R8n3nW000624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:49 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: elinks Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226415] Merge Review: sgml-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270850.l6R8oQ6N000766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226415 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-07-27 04:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sgml-common Updated Fedora Owners: ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 08:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270853.l6R8riQB001152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 04:53 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 0cc320624b335a68847c447c9625410b funionfs-0.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets used. + Requires: fuse >= 2.5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfuse.so.2 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270901.l6R91Xlt001850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-27 05:01 EST ------- Behdad, maybe someone in the i18n team can take up this package for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270921.l6R9Lvtj004004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-27 05:21 EST ------- Unfortunately: + gcc -o ./libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0~ -shared -Wl,-soname,libXNVCtrl.so.0 NVCtrl.o -lX11 -lXext -lc /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext You missed to add BR: libXext-devel also i wonder if this line should also have some CFLAGS... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270926.l6R9QTwT004577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 05:26 EST ------- Here we go, starting directly wiht a full review. MUST ---- 0 rpmlint output is: W: kdegames3 macro-in-%changelog _bindir This mist be fixed, always use %% in the changelog W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktron/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpoker/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksmiletris/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksokoban/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kenolaba/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kfouleggs/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/atlantik/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kasteroids/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksnake/common ../common W: kdegames3 dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klickety/common ../common These are normal for KDE apps. E: kdegames3 file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kasteroids.kcfg W: kdegames3 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kasteroids.kcfg E: kdegames3 file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kfouleggs.kcfg W: kdegames3 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kfouleggs.kcfg E: kdegames3 file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/ksnake.kcfg W: kdegames3 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/ksnake.kcfg E: kdegames3 file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktron.kcfg W: kdegames3 conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktron.kcfg Either these are config files and should be moved to /etc/kde and be made %config(noreplace) or they are merely defaults / template files and should not be %config at all. kdebase puts files under /usr/share/config.kcfg and doesn't mark them %config. E: kdegames3 invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/kde/kpoker.desktop This is caused by the faulty / obsolete "Miniicon=kpoker" line, remove this and all is fine. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * locales handled properly * Shared libraries, ldconfig run as required * Not relocatable 0 Package owns or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * .desktop file as required MUST _really_ FIX ----------------- * this one is so important I just invented a new catagory for it :) Currently the specfile contains: %if 0%{?rhel} > 1 %define patch_name -patched %else %define patch_name %{nil} %endif And: Source: ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/%{version}/src/kdegames-%{version}%{patch_name}.tar.bz2 However there is no kdegames-3.5.7-patch.tar.bz2 on the kde site, so RHEL uses a different tarbal, which doesn't come from upstream, which leads to the following: 1) Why? 2) Please do this with patches and or binary (small tarbal) overlays, since its fine for Fedora, there isn't a legal problem so no reason to use a modified tarbal 3) If you must use a modified tarbal, then a) Add a comment above the Source tag explaining in detail what was changed b) make the Source tag just the filename instead of a non existing URL MUST fix -------- * Various rpmlint errors, see above * Add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/* dir ownership * unowned directory /usr/share/config.kcfg (own, or maybe better file a bug against kdelibs3 that it should own it). Should fix ---------- * This would seem like a good moment to prune the changelog a bit * Are the debug final and cvs defines + conditional code still needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:28:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270928.l6R9Sn1d004849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270931.l6R9V8po005272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 05:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Unfortunately: > + gcc -o ./libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0~ -shared -Wl,-soname,libXNVCtrl.so.0 NVCtrl.o > -lX11 -lXext -lc > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext > You missed to add BR: libXext-devel Oops, sorry about that. > also i wonder if this line should also have some CFLAGS... No thats not necessary, CFLAGS are for _C_ompiling not for linking, for some reason many makefiles also pass them to GCC while linking, but that has zero effect unless someone has put linking specific flags in there, which is not the case with RPM_OPT_FLAGS New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libXNVCtrl-1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270933.l6R9XMau005582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 05:33 EST ------- AFAIK, the strange "-patched" tarball is because RH lawyers historically had a problem with KSokoban, probably because it used to contain the levels ported from the original game (arguably a copyright violation). This is no longer the case (it only comes with its own original (in the other sense of this confusing word) levels now), so IMHO this point is moot. The only remaining possible issue is a trademark issue, which if it is really an issue, can be solved by rebranding like you did with Gnometris. So I'm going to zap the strange RHEL conditionals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270944.l6R9iLoL006982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 05:44 EST ------- > * unowned directory /usr/share/config.kcfg (own, or maybe better file a bug > against kdelibs3 that it should own it). This is owned by kde-filesystem now. I'm going to add a Requires on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270948.l6R9mNZ3007581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 05:48 EST ------- > * Are the debug final and cvs defines + conditional code still needed? Yes, KDE 3 needs these. Disabling final speeds up compilation and can work around compiler bugs where the compiler just crashes on the big source file from --enable-final on some arches (one of the 3.5.7 packages triggered that on ppc64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 09:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707270950.l6R9oAXR007813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-27 05:50 EST ------- * build in mock (tested in FC6 x86_64) * rpmlint is quite on both rpms and installed files Good! This is the "first package" I ever said: ---------------------- This package (libXNVCtrl) is APPROVED by me (kwizart) ---------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225762] Merge Review: fonts-hebrew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271002.l6RA2SpS009250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225762 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 06:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6c018eb1b1ce33db8b0fdf64cb09182c culmus-0.100.tar.gz fdce7a1e5844bdf133c752a722220cf5 LICENSE-BITSTREAM + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225763] Merge Review: fonts-indic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271003.l6RA3l1l009412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-indic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225763 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 06:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bb9497ee772062b97ff00a1a68b17c98 fonts-indic-2.1.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:05:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225760] Merge Review: fonts-arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271005.l6RA5AvQ009588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225760 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 06:05 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d27ec36204feb4e8e6c50eebffd76f55 KacstArabicFonts-1.5.tar.gz cd75bd7fa714f307d25407a61f8bc43c paktype-20061222.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Merge Review: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271007.l6RA705N009797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fonts-thai |Merge Review: fonts-thai -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271013.l6RADhe3010743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 06:13 EST ------- Updated (should fix all the MUST issues you found): Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3-3.5.7-2.fc7.src.rpm - drop RHEL conditional using patched tarball - fix macro in changelog - don't mark %%{_datadir}/config.kcfg/* as %%config - add Requires on hicolor-icon-theme and kde-filesystem for dir ownership - patch out obsolete Miniicon= line from kpoker.desktop (Note: Don't get confused by the SRPM disttag, this is still targeted at F8+ only, possibly even F9+ only if we decide not to ship kdegames 4 in F8 yet.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271020.l6RAKBro011346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 06:20 EST ------- I haven't looked at your new version yet, but I just hit a snag with your old version, I tried to actual install it and I got: file /usr/bin/ksokoban from install of kdegames3-3.5.7-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package kdegames-3.5.7-1.fc8 And many more of these. I think this needs a "Conflicts: kdegames < 4" adding a "Obsoletes: kdegames < 4" would solve my problem, but might result in people updating only getting kdegames3-3.5.7 and not kdegames-4.0.0, depending on the order things get done. So a conflict is probably the best solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271023.l6RANZAJ011541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 06:23 EST ------- That should be: Conflicts: kdegames < 6:3.80 actually. The kdegames package has Epoch 6 and the first KDE 4 alpha was numbered 3.80.1. I'm adding it in that form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:24:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271024.l6RAOiZ4011634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 06:24 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libXNVCtrl Short Description: Library providing the NV-CONTROL API Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:28:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271028.l6RASmnM011818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 06:28 EST ------- Reviewing this, as promised. (In reply to comment #2) > A subpackage with no main package? Will that work? Yes that will work, when you have no %files for the mainpackage, no mainpackage will be build. > I found it's pretty silly to have a kdeaddons3 package with only a single addon > in it. ;-) But I'm open to changing it. I don't know whats best here, are you sure all the other addons will be available for kde4? Then I agree that atlantikdesigner is a better name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:32:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271032.l6RAW74W012013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 06:32 EST ------- Updated (adds the Conflicts): Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdegames3-3.5.7-3.fc7.src.rpm - Conflicts with pre-KDE-4 kdegames -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271033.l6RAXQ4g012123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 06:33 EST ------- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 10:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271038.l6RAcueF012362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atlantikdesigner - Atlantik Designer (from KDE 3 kdeaddons) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 06:38 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: atlantikdesigner obsolete-not-provided kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * no Shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required Must Fix: --------- * Add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" for dir ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249824] New: Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249824 Summary: Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/last.fm/last.fm.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/last.fm/last.fm-1.3.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Last.fm allows you to listen to last.fm radio stations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271114.l6RBEppi014296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 07:14 EST ------- + rpmlint output OK: + SRPM and -debuginfo have empty output. + main package has this: W: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils non-standard-dir-in-usr arm-gp2x-linux which is OK for a cross-toolchain package + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License GPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (with the cross-toolchain exception for %{_prefix}/%{target}) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires (none needed), BuildRequires (likewise), Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used + debuginfo package is valid + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries (libiberty is always static, bfd is target-specific, so neither of those can be shared with the native version) + no rpaths, at least on i386 (I ran readelf -d on the executables) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible (very clear actually, I don't know why everyone was scared away ;-) ) + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 6a9d529efb285071dad10e1f3d2b2967 SHA1SUM: 5c80fd5657da47efc16a63fdd93ef7395319fbbf + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR (none needed) + translations are disabled (because they'd conflict with the native versions), so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%configure not used for several reasons, including it playing jokes with --target and upstream recommending building outside the source directory) + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + all header files in -devel + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (Nitpick: But I recommend a: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after the: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to prevent a potential symlink attack as pointed out by the OpenSUSE folks. Sure, building outside of mock is not recommended, but this doesn't mean people doing it and not redefining %{_tmpdir} deserve to get 0wn3d by the first script kiddie with a shell account on the machine.) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. + package functions as described (tested arm-gp2x-linux-as and arm-gp2x-linux-objdump on this trivial source: add r1,r1,r1 add r1,r1,r1) + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271124.l6RBOSei014898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-27 07:24 EST ------- Reply from the maintainer: > I work on packaging pv for Fedora and have one issue that I'd like to > ask you about - it seems that during install, the install attempts > to install a pv.info file, which doesn't exist: Oops. There used to be one, but I stopped maintaining the Texinfo documentation because I failed to see the point. Because the install command ignores failures (I think I did that so that installation would still work on systems without texinfo) I never noticed. The next release will fix this, but I've no idea when that will be. In the meantime, something like "sed -i '/\.info/d' autoconf/make/unreal.mk" just before running "configure" will stop the warning by removing the relevant bits from the Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271131.l6RBV8W4015131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(stransky at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-07-27 07:31 EST ------- rpmlint says: E: nspluginwrapper hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib - if no sophisticated solution exists (like %{_exec_prefix}/{target_libdir})leave this be... E: nspluginwrapper configure-without-libdir-spec - doesn't matter, %{_prefix} is defined and --with-lib{32,64} is specified additional questions: - why statements like %if "%{target_bits}" == "64" export CFLAGS="-g -m64 -DDEBUG" %else export CFLAGS="-g -m32 -DDEBUG" %endif I think it could be substituted with export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -DDEBUG" - this statement isn't needed %if "%{target_bits}" == "64" export LDFLAGS="-m64 -L%{libdir64}" %else export LDFLAGS="-m32 -L%{libdir32}" %endif -in %install section I've found ln -s %{pkglibdir}/npwrapper.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{plugindir}/npwrapper.so isn't it typo? (ln -s $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{pkglibdir}/npwrapper.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{plugindir}/npwrapper.so) Other things look fine. Please only check potential problems written upper. If I'm wrong leave them be... Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:39:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271139.l6RBdpWm015878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-27 07:39 EST ------- * rpmlint on package: (only one of each) W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/include/msl.h As taken as a compiler, this is acceptable, the path in acceptable also... W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/lib/libCtp.so This one also, as this is not arch dependant...but this may lead to problem later... But: E: alliance arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/alliance/lib/libBtr.so.1 .0.3 This one is wrong - This would be better to have them in libdir/alliance (with the previous symlink as i expect, it will be easier to have them in the same directory). Also maybe this is related to our shlib problem we discussed on #IRC: "libtool: install: warning: `/builddir/build/BUILD/alliance-5.0/abt/src/libAbt.la' has not been installed in `/usr/share/alliance/lib'" Does the .la source file exist ? Here are the output of "rpmlint alliance" on installed files: This is sometime the result of missing libraries LDFLAGS (see attachment) Also i wonder if the binaries aren't subject to the same problem with generic names...(i have'nt checked this...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271145.l6RBj59u016329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-07-27 07:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160109) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160109&action=view) rpmlint alliance (release 4) - problem with shlib See if unused-direct-shlib-dependency and undefined-non-weak-symbol can be solved by adding the right links LDFLAGS for each library (or if this information have been lost during the prep of the build process...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:47:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249831] New: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249831 Summary: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gromacs.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gromacs-3.3.1-2.src.rpm Description: GROMACS is a versatile and extremely well optimized package to perform molecular dynamics computer simulations and subsequent trajectory analysis. It is developed for biomolecules like proteins, but the extremely high performance means it is used also in several other field like polymer chemistry and solid state physics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271154.l6RBsDeY017041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(stransky at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-27 07:54 EST ------- Fixed CFLAGS are here: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/nsplugin/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-8.fc7.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/stransky/nsplugin/nspluginwrapper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 11:57:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271157.l6RBvLZx017452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-27 07:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #87) > additional questions: > - why statements like > %if "%{target_bits}" == "64" > export CFLAGS="-g -m64 -DDEBUG" > %else > export CFLAGS="-g -m32 -DDEBUG" > %endif Fixed in package above (nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-8.fc7.src.rpm) > - this statement isn't needed > %if "%{target_bits}" == "64" > export LDFLAGS="-m64 -L%{libdir64}" > %else > export LDFLAGS="-m32 -L%{libdir32}" > %endif It has to be there (this package uses his own ./configure & make) > -in %install section I've found > ln -s %{pkglibdir}/npwrapper.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{plugindir}/npwrapper.so > isn't it typo? (ln -s $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{pkglibdir}/npwrapper.so > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{plugindir}/npwrapper.so) It's correct, you can check a binary package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271202.l6RC2Mgl018116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 08:02 EST ------- + rpmlint output OK: + SRPM has empty output. + main package has these: W: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/include/linux/list.h (and many more like this) which is OK because this is a -headers package :-) and this: W: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers non-standard-dir-in-usr arm-gp2x-linux which is OK for a cross-toolchain package + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License GPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (with the cross-toolchain exception for %{_prefix}/%{target}) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires (none needed), BuildRequires (likewise), Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + nothing to build, so RPM_OPT_FLAGS are irrelevant + no debuginfo package because this is noarch and nothing is compiled + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths as there are no binaries + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no executables, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags irrelevant because nothing is compiled + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines ! This package is missing a copy of the GPL (as COPYING) + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: eae2f562afe224ad50f65a6acfb4252c SHA1SUM: e72c9b260995b269c9fb9248ed468c18fb01f3fd + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR (none needed) + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + this is a -headers package, so it's normal that it contains header files ;-) + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs (in fact, no executables at all), so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (same nitpick about mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as for arm-gp2x-linux-binutils) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: ! license (the Linux kernel COPYING, not LICENSE which just refers to it) not included upstream. Upstream being dead, it's unlikely they'll ever add it, so I'd suggest adding it yourself. + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. This is noarch anyway. + package functions as described (includes the headers it's supposed to provide) + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies A copy of the Linux kernel COPYING (GPL v2 with the "v2 only" annotation at the top) SHOULD be included. As this is only a SHOULD item, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271214.l6RCE2lI018936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-27 08:14 EST ------- With the package name change the docs should be under %{_docdir}/python-iniparse-%{version}, not %{_docdir}/iniparse-%{version}. Fix that small problem and it's approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271215.l6RCF5VL019021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-27 08:15 EST ------- Works for me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271225.l6RCP7dE020063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-27 08:25 EST ------- Fixed the above. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier-0.8.2.2-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271236.l6RCaZE1021219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-07-27 08:36 EST ------- ping? Do you still want this package to be in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:42:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271242.l6RCgVhv021692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-07-27 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > So since libperl.so is in perl-libs (on moonshine), will perl-libs be a > dependency on perl or will it be strictly independent of perl? perl requires perl-libs. Or, strictly speaking, perl requires libperl.so which is provided by perl-libs. If your system contains perl.rpm but nor perl-libs.rpm, your dependencies are broken. It might be beacuse of a bug in yum, see bug #240540. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 12:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271259.l6RCxOfV023277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-27 08:59 EST ------- Here is a new spec & srpm. http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/python-iniparse.spec http://timlau.fedorapeople.org/python-iniparse-0.2-3.fc7.src.rpm doc relocated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:09:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271309.l6RD9Yti024441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: kdeaddons3 - |atlantikdesigner - Atlantik |KDE 3 addons not ported to |Designer (from KDE 3 |KDE 4 |kdeaddons) | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 09:09 EST ------- I discussed the naming again with Rex Dieter on IRC, and we decided that renaming this to kdeaddons3 (and building only a kdeaddons3-atlantikdesigner subpackage) is safest in case we want to build other addons later, although still only the Atlantik Designer is built. I'm going to submit a new specfile with the new name and the missing Requires ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271314.l6RDE0BH024838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-07-27 09:13 EST ------- Yes... Due to some travel I have not update the devel branch... I will asap... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:18:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225836] Merge Review: gnome-speech In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271318.l6RDIT7v025237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-speech https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225836 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-07-27 09:18 EST ------- I was passing by and I noticed some problems. I don't have the time for a formal review though. Maybe later. The following line at the beginning of the spec file is not needed: %define po_package gnome-speech It should be deleted. %makeinstall macro should not be used, if possible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28package%29%7C%28review%29#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 If it is not possible you should put a remark to avoid reports from people like me :) gnome-speech-espeak subpackage should require espeak. I think you should also make a separate subpackage for festival like you did with espeak. It should be possible to use espeak without having festival installed. Therefore the Requires tag for festival should be moved from the main package. Are you sure gettext is required? I cannot see no translation neither in the original source package nor in the spec file. HTH. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271342.l6RDgAcl027969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From didier.moens at dmbr.ugent.be 2007-07-27 09:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160116) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160116&action=view) gnome-compiz-preferences crash dump compiz-tray-icon works, but gnome-compiz-preferences crashes (dump with gnome-compiz-manager-debuginfo 0.10.4-1.fc7 attached) on a fully updated F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271350.l6RDocM8028921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-27 09:50 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdeaddons3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdeaddons3-3.5.7-4.fc7.src.rpm - rename (again) to kdeaddons3 - build (only) kdeaddons3-atlantikdesigner subpackage - Conflicts with pre-KDE-4 kdeaddons-extras - add Requires on hicolor-icon-theme for directory ownership - remove Requires({pre,post}): ldconfig because no shared libs are shipped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271359.l6RDxQMX029844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2007-07-27 09:59 EST ------- Looks fine for me now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 13:59:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271359.l6RDxtGE030015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-07-27 09:59 EST ------- And after you change the owner... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 (I assume it's easier for you cvs guys to do both at once. I can file another request if it would be more convenient for you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 14:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271400.l6RE00ee030076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 atkac at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 14:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271400.l6RE01SI030095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 201480 depends on bug 201477, which changed state. Bug 201477 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 14:01:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271401.l6RE11WE030328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 14:13:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271413.l6REDWhG031531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-27 10:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nspluginwrapper Short Description: A compatibility layer for Netscape 4 plugins Owners: stransky at redhat.com caillon at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172042] Review Request: cfitsio -- library to read and write FITS files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271500.l6RF0g56003774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfitsio -- library to read and write FITS files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172042 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matt at truch.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2007-07-27 11:00 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cfitsio New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271538.l6RFchPC008134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-27 11:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks Short Description: Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271539.l6RFdkeV008238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-27 11:39 EST ------- Almost there... /usr/share/man still needs to be macroized in the %files section. You also don't need to explicitly create the /usr/share/man/man6 directory in %install anymore, since this is done by the 'install -pD ...' line now. Mixed use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Either is ok, but you should consistently use one or the other. rpmlint out out is clean (good!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271547.l6RFljaU009061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-27 11:47 EST ------- Is the new firefox going into F7 updates prior to this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:51:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271551.l6RFpSlY009559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 11:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271551.l6RFpv2X009621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-27 11:51 EST ------- Addressed the above: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/bombardier/bombardier-0.8.2.2-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271552.l6RFqRiP009678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 11:52 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers Short Description: Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271553.l6RFrS89009852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 11:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wildmidi Short Description: Midi Wavetable Synth Lib Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249505] Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271554.l6RFssWG010069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdhcpd - GTK+ administration tool for DHCPD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249505 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271555.l6RFtgmb010309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:56:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271556.l6RFuoXc010467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 15:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271558.l6RFwTAl010828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271610.l6RGAdfI012740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-27 12:10 EST ------- Fixes to use a more generic name for the java BR, and to handle upgrades properly in the post scripts. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.5p4-3.fc8.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:27:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271627.l6RGR1Bn015457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-27 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Some of the earlier comments still apply: > > - Shouldn't have to BR both dbus-glib-devel and dbus-glib. Isn't one requiring > the other anyway ? Fixed. > - -devel package needs to require pkgconfig Fixed. > - -docs package needs to require gtk-doc Fixed (with a vengeful comment). > - must require pam, for /etc/pam.d Fixed. > - must own /etc/PolicyKit, /usr/lib/PolicyKit, /usr/lib/PolicyKit/modules Fixed. The latter does not exist anymore FWIW. > - %post and %postun should just do -p /sbin/ldconfig if thats all they do Gee. Fixed, anyway. > - The errors about permissions should probably be handled > by adding a comment explaining why these permissions are necessary I've added a comment that this is explained in the upstream design docs. Will attach new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271629.l6RGT43u015601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-27 12:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160123) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160123&action=view) new spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:30:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271630.l6RGUjkb015822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-27 12:30 EST ------- Looks fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:37:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271637.l6RGbkpw016736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271638.l6RGcQTv016815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271638.l6RGckYe016882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-27 12:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PolicyKit Short Description: Fine-grained policy management Owners: davidz at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:38:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245016] PolicyKit-gnome package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271638.l6RGcv95016969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit-gnome package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245016 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-27 12:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PolicyKit-gnome Short Description: GNOME auth dialogs for PolicyKit Owners: davidz at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244752] Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271639.l6RGdKMW017037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_dnssd - An Apache HTTPD module which adds Zeroconf support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244752 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:40:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271640.l6RGe182017149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:40:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271640.l6RGels1017215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:41:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271641.l6RGf6VF017251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-27 12:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160126) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160126&action=view) mock build log of ustr 1.0.1-0 on rawhide i386 (2nd time) (Assuming that you are the upstream of this package and you have not yet released 1.0.1 formally) * For /sbin/ldconfig, usually we don't write Requires(post) and so on. * rpm (sub)packages which contains pkgconfig .pc files should have "Requires: pkgconfig" * mock build log says that fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. * The following directories are not owned by any packages. ------------------------------------------------------ %{_datadir}/ustr-%{version}/ %{_datadir}/doc/ustr-devel-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------ * Usually the dependency for other subpackages must be version-release specific. i.e. -devel package should have Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, for example * Use %_includedir for /usr/include. * I have not installed ustr yet, however would you check the dependencies between subpackages? For example, why does -debug subpackage require -static subpackage? (well, this is a question) * For summary (In reply to comment #2) > * summary seems all the same for all packages?? > This is common for libraries, no? For instance glib2 and glib2-devel > have the same summary but different descriptions ... Strange... Anyway as you can try "rpmdev-newspec libfoo" to create skeleton spec file, usually summary and description for -devel subpackage are like: -------------------------------------------------------- %package devel Summary: Development files for %{name} Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} %description devel The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use %{name}. ---------------------------------------------------------- * And please increase release number (Perhaps you want to set release number as 1 when review is done and wants to set release number 0 during review, but please don't. At least please increase release number as 0.1, 0.2, ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271643.l6RGhRe3017533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249824] Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271647.l6RGlH0B017804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249824 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-07-27 12:47 EST ------- Doing a quick look at the source code (specifically the source in src/mp3transcode), this can't go into Fedora since it contains patent infringing code. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems?highlight=%28mp3%29#head-69c9770fc2ef79ea9a691d03aa2f475eed113bfa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 16:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271651.l6RGpUnB018337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271707.l6RH7Er1020564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:08:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271708.l6RH8RaD020660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-27 13:08 EST ------- Some trivia: - version of spec file and src.rpm don't match - please use a full src url, if practical - no need to do the obsoletes/provides dance for something that has not ever been in a fedora release. - please don't --enable-animation. I as the gtk2 maintainer am going to veto any theme engine that tries to do that behind the toolkits or apps back. - need to require gtk2 for the engines directory ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:12:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271712.l6RHCWMG021397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:35:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271735.l6RHZCia024132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:40:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271740.l6RHeTdW024505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-27 13:40 EST ------- Trivia: - please use a full source url, if practical - the emmpty %doc in the file list looks odd, I'd remove that the description of the main package is a bit misleading: "The Nodoka Theme Pack for Gnome includes Nodoka Metacity theme, Nodoka gtk2 theme and Echo Icon set." since it does not actually include these things, but just pull them in via dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271740.l6RHeSZN024486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:40:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271740.l6RHexOV024594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-27 13:40 EST ------- The package was imported into CVS. Thanks Marek and Warren! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271741.l6RHf1MF024631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-27 13:40 EST ------- The package was imported into CVS. Thanks Marek and Warren! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242539] Review Request: freetds - Implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271741.l6RHfFW3024690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetds - Implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242539 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248451] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271741.l6RHfJ0v024718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Interp-WithCallbacks - Mason callback support via Params::CallbackRequest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248451 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249065] Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271743.l6RHhNB3025017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptouch-driver CUPS driver for Brother P-touch label printers Alias: ptouch-driver-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249065 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246719] Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271743.l6RHhYpT025087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: printer-filters - Collection of filters for various printer drivers Alias: printer-filters-rev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246719 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271753.l6RHrT2w026139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-27 13:53 EST ------- (Assuming that you are the upstream of this package and you have not yet released 1.0.1 formally) Yes. * For /sbin/ldconfig, usually we don't write Requires(post) and so on. Why? What is best practice, no deps. or just a normal requires? * rpm (sub)packages which contains pkgconfig .pc files should have "Requires: pkgconfig" This is true even if it's not required. From the upstream POV it isn't required, it can be used if you find pkg-config easier to use ... or you can just do -lustr etc. Obviously I can add it to the rpm anyway, if you want though. * mock build log says that fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. Ok, I thought: CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; ...was enough, as that's what the %configure macro seems to be using. I can't find any documentation on what I should be calling here (there is no ./configure). * The following directories are not owned by any packages. ------------------------------------------------------ %{_datadir}/ustr-%{version}/ %{_datadir}/doc/ustr-devel-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------ My bad, I assumed dir/* got dir too. * Usually the dependency for other subpackages must be version-release specific. i.e. -devel package should have Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, for example Fixed. * Use %_includedir for /usr/include. In the %files section? Fixed. * I have not installed ustr yet, however would you check the dependencies between subpackages? For example, why does -debug subpackage require -static subpackage? (well, this is a question) I can't remember :(. I've changed debug to just depend on devel, and debug-static to depend on debug. * For summary (In reply to comment #2) > * summary seems all the same for all packages?? > This is common for libraries, no? For instance glib2 and glib2-devel > have the same summary but different descriptions ... Strange... Anyway as you can try "rpmdev-newspec libfoo" to create skeleton spec file, usually summary and description for -devel subpackage are like: Summary: Development files for %{name} Ok, I guess the other stuff just hasn't been fixed yet. Fixed. * And please increase release number (Perhaps you want to set release number as 1 when review is done and wants to set release number 0 during review, but please don't. At least please increase release number as 0.1, 0.2, ...) Yeh, I didn't want rel=1 until it's 1.0.1 is released upstream, I'll upload a 0.2 version as soon as I can find out what to do about: requires for pkg-config requires for ldconfig CFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249595] Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271757.l6RHvQ4e026878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twf - The Widget Factory is a gtk2 widget viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249595 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-27 13:57 EST ------- Umm.. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 211718 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 17:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211718] Review Request: thewidgetfactory - A tool for previewing widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271757.l6RHvTaF026915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thewidgetfactory - A tool for previewing widgets Alias: thewidgetfactory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211718 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheese at nosuchhost.net ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-27 13:57 EST ------- *** Bug 249595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] New: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-doc-2.29.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Documentation of the BOUML tool provided in HTML and PDF formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:08:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271808.l6RI8ald027831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-27 14:08 EST ------- I have submitted a review request for the bouml-doc package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271809.l6RI9w6b027928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-27 14:09 EST ------- I have submitted a review request for the bouml package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:19:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271819.l6RIJOYs028739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:21:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225701] Merge Review: docbook-simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271821.l6RILExo028904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225701 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225702] Merge Review: docbook-slides In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271821.l6RILII2028932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225702 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271821.l6RILQ0S028966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225704] Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271821.l6RILfjD029000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225704 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225705] Merge Review: docbook-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271821.l6RILniU029030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225705 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271822.l6RIMsuT029180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271823.l6RINMlj029329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:26:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271826.l6RIQoeb029643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmlto https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271826.l6RIQvAY029676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xmltex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226415] Merge Review: sgml-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIREaO029710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226415 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRMKB029770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRQAl029796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: passivetex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRX5T029827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: opensp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRhan029859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openjade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226098] Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRnWc029930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: linuxdoc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226098 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225991] Merge Review: libbtctl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271827.l6RIRuNq029960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libbtctl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225991 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:28:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225920] Merge Review: jadetex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271828.l6RIS2X2029990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jadetex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225920 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225814] Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271828.l6RISBZ7030081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225814 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:31:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271831.l6RIVGax030663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-27 14:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * For /sbin/ldconfig, usually we don't write Requires(post) and > so on. > > Why? What is best practice, no deps. or just a normal requires? - The most unkind answer is that "it is as written on packaging guideline". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets I guess /sbin/ldconfig is so common? Note: while I don't know if rpm adds the dependency for Requires(post) or etc, at least if %post -p is written, rpm seems to add automatically the to Requires. > * rpm (sub)packages which contains pkgconfig .pc files should > have "Requires: pkgconfig" > Obviously I can add it to the rpm anyway, if you want though. - Well, though I wrote "should", this is a "MUST" item of the review http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (As written, the reason is directory ownership and usability for .pc file) > * mock build log says that fedora specific compilation flags are > not honored. > > Ok, I thought: > CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; > ...was enough, as that's what the %configure macro seems to be using. > I can't find any documentation on what I should be calling here > (there is no ./configure). %optflags is autually the flags we want to use. It is just CFLAGS you set is not honored by this way for this package (i.e. If normal way is not used to honor %optflags, you have to make %optflags honored *somehow*. Perhaps you have to investigate Makefile how compilation flags are used.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:35:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271835.l6RIZJA1031312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245016] PolicyKit-gnome package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271837.l6RIb0lm031537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit-gnome package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245016 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271839.l6RIdJ6a031845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271840.l6RIeiwD032118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-27 14:40 EST ------- Only glanced at your spec file but perhaps pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} ln -s ../lib/bouml/projectControl projectControl ln -s ../lib/bouml/projectSynchro projectSynchro popd and %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/* causes a problem on 64 bit machine (I have only i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 18:41:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271841.l6RIfT71032332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-07-27 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Some trivia: > > - version of spec file and src.rpm don't match > Hm... I see both are 0.3.2.1-1 though Daniel meanwhile updated the src.rpm to 0.5-1. I'll fix the other things in next release and they should match by then. > - please use a full src url, if practical > As we use wiki currently for upstream I think it's impractical ATM > - no need to do the obsoletes/provides dance for something that has not ever > been in a fedora release. > I'll remove them in next release. They were there because older releases were differently handled and I provided the rpms for testing to community and so I added obsoletes/provides for easier upgrade > - please don't --enable-animation. I as the gtk2 maintainer am going to veto > any theme engine that tries to do that behind the toolkits or apps back. > I don't prefer the animation myself so I am OK with that... will remove it in next release. But on the other side... I noticed the Murrine engine has the animation enabled as well and the code behind is exactly the same as in Nodoka engine. > - need to require gtk2 for the engines directory ownership I will add it in next release. I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271902.l6RJ2SQd002941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-07-27 15:02 EST ------- New release, fixes the above mentioned issues: NEW SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/gtk-nodoka-engine.spec NEW SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/gtk-nodoka-engine-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271905.l6RJ5kpx003450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-07-27 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Trivia: > > - please use a full source url, if practical > Same as with gtk-nodoka-theme: as we currently use wiki for upstream I think it's impractical ATM > - the emmpty %doc in the file list looks odd, I'd remove that > True, removed > the description of the main package is a bit misleading: > "The Nodoka Theme Pack for Gnome includes Nodoka Metacity theme, Nodoka gtk2 > theme and Echo Icon set." > since it does not actually include these things, but just pull them in > via dependencies. Yes, I changed the includes to make use. Seems saner to me... New release: New SPEC: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SPECS/nodoka-theme-gnome.spec New SRPM: http://feannatar.hostuju.cz/fedora/files/development/SRPMS/nodoka-theme-gnome-0.3.1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271915.l6RJFmVQ004209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-27 15:15 EST ------- Spec file: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.spec I have replaced 'lib' with '_lib' in the first case. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros says %{_libdir} is %{_exec_prefix}/%{_lib}, so the second case should not be an issue. However I do not have a 64 bit Fedora system to check this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271938.l6RJcFev006274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-07-27 15:38 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED I'll spend some time this weekend to try to come up with a usable setgid solution to allow the shared scoreboard file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271949.l6RJnMxj007260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-07-27 15:49 EST ------- Excellent. Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bombardier Short Description: The GNU bombing utility Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 19:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707271957.l6RJv65d007911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 20:29:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247312] Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272029.l6RKT3La010360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyPasswordSafe - A graphical password management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247312 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at camperquake.de) | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-07-27 16:29 EST ------- unset QTDIR || : This isn't incorrect, but curious as to how this could ever fail to necessitate the || :? Package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:02:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272102.l6RL2BI7013304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(ajackson at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-07-27 17:02 EST ------- Because I was busy. And this package wasn't critical for anything I needed done at the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:07:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:07:26 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272107.l6RL7QGn014090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2007-07-27 17:07 EST ------- Latest patches from iwlwifi now _DO_ support API versioning for the iwlwifi firmware packages...FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:13:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:13:42 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_248224=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl4965-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_4965_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272113.l6RLDgTH014746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl4965-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 4965 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248224 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 17:13 EST ------- So I guess the fundamental question now is when packages will be able to take advantage of that, and what changes are required in this package to make use of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:16:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272116.l6RLGFvs015084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 17:16 EST ------- imported and build, closing. Nicolas, this will also become available for F-7 with the next updates push, so then you can build against it if you want. Once its pushed for F-7, I will also build it for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:51:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272151.l6RLppSk018075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 17:51 EST ------- You should close this ticket once the package is built and pushed to the repos. Bodhi will do this for you if you reference the ticket number when you create the push request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272154.l6RLskPp018388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 17:54 EST ------- Must fix: --------- * make "%post" "%post atlantikdesigner" * idem for %postun Should fix: ----------- * Remove update-desktop-database from %post scripts, as atlantikdesigner.desktop doesn't define any mimetimes (you might want to check this for kdegames3 too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:55:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272155.l6RLtHF6018462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 17:55 EST ------- imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 21:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272155.l6RLtZ53018506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-27 17:55 EST ------- imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 22:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272206.l6RM6c9w019372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 18:06 EST ------- Is there some reason this package has not been pushed to the stable repository? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 22:12:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245760] Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272212.l6RMCPiJ019881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: engine_pkcs11 - A PKCS11 engine for use with OpenSSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245760 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 18:12 EST ------- Is there some reason this isn't in F-7 yet? It looks like it failed to build because a dependency had not yet been pushed to F-7, and indeed libp11 is in testing and has not been pushed to the stable F-7 repository. Do you need assistance getting these packages built and pushed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:19:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201477] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272319.l6RNJQW4024191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 19:19 EST ------- I don't think this ticket should have been opened; setting back to CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201480] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272319.l6RNJT89024228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201480 Bug 201480 depends on bug 201477, which changed state. Bug 201477 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201477 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272321.l6RNLUEM024347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 19:21 EST ------- It's been 2.5 months since the last response from the submitter; setting NEEDINFO. I'll close this ticket soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272329.l6RNTmnl024621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-27 19:29 EST ------- Hopefully this fixes all of the above: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.1-0.2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:48:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272348.l6RNmAP6025349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 19:47 EST ------- This fails to build for me; at the end of the build process, I get: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /var/tmp/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/jetty5/jetty5-5.1.12_classes.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/jetty5/template_classes.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/jetty5/jsp-examples.war.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/jetty5/servlets-examples.war.so.debug matches Found '/var/tmp/jetty5-5.1.12-1jpp.1.fc8-root-mockbuild' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.85229 (%install) So somehow the buildroot is leaking into the build package. It seems pretty bogus to me but you should double-check that there's nothing going wrong and if everything is OK then you can export QA_SKIP_BUILD_ROOT=1 in %install and the test should be skipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 27 23:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707272358.l6RNwqXO025792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 19:58 EST ------- This fails to build for me: + desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /var/tmp/RutilT-0.15-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications --delete-original --mode 644 rutilt.desktop rutilt.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing /var/tmp/RutilT-0.15-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-rutilt.desktop: error: value "0.14" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version This is in mock on x86_64 rawhide. I think desktop-file-utils has grown some additional checks. The killer here is Version, which is supposed to be the version of the desktop file specification that your .desktop file follows, not the version of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 00:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Merge Review: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280007.l6S07ZS9026220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-07-27 20:07 EST ------- Jens, anyone should feel free to finish this. I still think that it's not productive to close bugs for the sake of doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 00:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280052.l6S0qHaf027950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|eric.moret at epita.fr |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 20:52 EST ------- I really have no idea why this is still sitting around; it's really unfortunate. It builds fine and looks clean. I'm not sure I have any way to test it, but it runs without crashing and puts up some buttons, and nobody who understands what it's actually supposed to do has stepped up to review it, so.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 01:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280104.l6S14wva028581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: fonts-thai |Review request: fonts-thai ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 21:04 EST ------- It's not productive to have a "review" ticket open when the submitter won't even bother to respond to review commentary. And now for some reason someone has come along and renamed this as a merge review when we have no existing fonts-thai package which was merged. I really don't understand the point of putting this package out here and then not even having the common courtesy to respond when a volunteer comes along and provides review commentary. So, fine, leave this ticket open and just sitting here. Perhaps this final message will discourage any other reviewiers from wasting their time: If you try to review, you'll be ignored and if you follow policy and close this bug because the submitter is ignoring comments, you'll get flamed and the ticket will be reopened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 01:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280131.l6S1VITZ029639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 21:31 EST ------- * source files match upstream: afef8ecadcf81101ccc198589f8e8aadb0b7ec942703e69544613d6801c1c728 paprefs-0.9.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: paprefs = 0.9.5-1.fc8 = libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcairomm-1.0.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgconfmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglademm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtkmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangomm-1.4.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) pulseaudio-module-gconf * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Package seems to run fine for me, although I have no audio on the test machine so I've no idea if it works. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * GUI app; desktop files exists and looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 01:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280133.l6S1XMHO029740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-27 21:33 EST ------- thanks for giving me your time to reply my question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 01:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280149.l6S1n2Yt030250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 21:48 EST ------- So is there any point in keeping this ticket open, given that the package submitted for review can never be approved? Perhaps the submitter could offer to co-maintain the existing linuxwacom package that's already in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 01:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228214] Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280152.l6S1qLrK030429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228214 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(arbiter at arbiterlab | |.net) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 21:52 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 02:03:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280203.l6S2308Z030793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 22:02 EST ------- perl-Net-Packet is in rawhide now, so this could be built, but the issues in comment #1 still apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 02:08:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280208.l6S28d95031066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 22:08 EST ------- Wow, I lost track of this. Yes, the updated package works fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 02:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280238.l6S2cgmP000367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 22:38 EST ------- rpmlint says: W: Perlbal mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) which is no big deal; fix it if you like. You probably want to use "perl" instead of "%{__perl}" in your specfile; otherwise you should be consistent and use %{__make}, %{__rm}, %{__mv}, etc. Since that's the only real issue, I'll approve this and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 974d684dd02b0a04f8203ff407c876cc1b253ba5066c7673e232dab850a07922 Perlbal-1.59.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named. X specfile does not use macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(Perlbal) = 1.59-1.fc8 perl(PalImg) perl(PaletteModify) perl(Perlbal) = 1.59 perl(Perlbal::AIO) perl(Perlbal::BackendHTTP) perl(Perlbal::Cache) = 1.0 perl(Perlbal::ChunkedUploadState) perl(Perlbal::ClientHTTP) perl(Perlbal::ClientHTTPBase) perl(Perlbal::ClientManage) perl(Perlbal::ClientProxy) perl(Perlbal::CommandContext) perl(Perlbal::HTTPHeaders) perl(Perlbal::ManageCommand) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::AccessControl) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::AutoRemoveLeadingDir) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::EchoService) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::EchoService::Client) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Highpri) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::LazyCDN) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::NotModified) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Palimg) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Queues) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Stats) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Stats::Storage) perl(Perlbal::Plugin::Vhosts) perl(Perlbal::Pool) perl(Perlbal::ReproxyManager) perl(Perlbal::Service) perl(Perlbal::Socket) perl(Perlbal::TCPListener) perl(Perlbal::Test) perl(Perlbal::Test::WebClient) perl(Perlbal::Test::WebServer) perl(Perlbal::UploadListener) perl(Perlbal::Util) Perlbal = 1.59-1.fc8 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /usr/bin/perl config(Perlbal) = 1.59-1.fc8 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(BSD::Resource) perl(Carp) perl(Danga::Socket) >= 1.44 perl(Devel::Peek) perl(Errno) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Path) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(IO::AIO) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(POSIX) perl(Perlbal) perl(Perlbal::AIO) perl(Perlbal::BackendHTTP) perl(Perlbal::Cache) perl(Perlbal::ChunkedUploadState) perl(Perlbal::ClientHTTP) perl(Perlbal::ClientHTTPBase) perl(Perlbal::ClientManage) perl(Perlbal::ClientProxy) perl(Perlbal::CommandContext) perl(Perlbal::HTTPHeaders) perl(Perlbal::ManageCommand) perl(Perlbal::Pool) perl(Perlbal::ReproxyManager) perl(Perlbal::Service) perl(Perlbal::Socket) perl(Perlbal::TCPListener) perl(Perlbal::Test) perl(Perlbal::Test::WebClient) perl(Perlbal::UploadListener) perl(Perlbal::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Socket) perl(Storable) perl(Sys::Syscall) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(fields) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=17, Tests=406, 40 wallclock secs ( 1.83 cusr + 0.59 csys = 2.42 CPU) (One test is skipped intentionally.) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (chkconfig calls from ScriptletSnippets). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 02:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280256.l6S2uWSg001549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 22:56 EST ------- Any response to that conflict? I don't know whether this will still be an issue with the proposed texlive packages; I guess you should check. But any conflict need to either be made explicit (with "Conflicts: tetex-tex4ht") or handled with alternatives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 03:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280325.l6S3PKbb003136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 03:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280344.l6S3imVQ004459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-27 23:44 EST ------- SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-2.fc8.src.rpm It takes quite sometime to rpmbuild the package, so could not post it earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 04:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280406.l6S46Icx005980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 00:06 EST ------- I guess this looks just like the other two trac SCM plugins already in the distro. You can probably remove the initial comment from the spec. The only thing I can complain about is inconsistent macroization (%{__python} but not %{__rm}). I vaguely remember something special about python that exempted it from the usual "consistent use of macros" rule, but I can't recall the details. In any case, I trust you to fix things up as appropriate. * source files match upstream. Verified manually by generating the tarball according to the instructions in the spec and comparing the contents. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: trac-bazaar-plugin = 0.2-1.20070717bzr180.fc8 = bzr python(abi) = 2.5 python-setuptools trac * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the means to test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 04:10:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280410.l6S4AcPE006365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 04:13:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280413.l6S4D4ev006599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 00:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > It takes quite sometime to rpmbuild the package, so could not post it earlier. Actually this package has >7000 files, which is the largest in the packages I have reviewed (second is grass, which has >5000 files)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 04:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280424.l6S4Oakc007129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 00:24 EST ------- http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-2.fc8.src.rpm seems to fail to build. Koji taskinfo: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80231 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 04:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280434.l6S4Y2Is007372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 00:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-2.fc8.src.rpm seems to fail to build. > Koji taskinfo: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80231 * Umm? Does this mean that we can try to rebuild srpm by koji which is not yet approved? * For build failure itself: Anyway on 64bit arch, arch-dependent files must be installed under /usr/lib64, not under /usr/lib and this must be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:08:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280508.l6S58Q4F008452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(andreas at bawue.net)| ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-28 01:08 EST ------- Package name: PASS (ngircd) License: PASS (GPL) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: PASS rpmlint clean: NOTES Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: PASS Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: PASS Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: PASS Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: NOTES I believe the tcp_wrappers issue still exists, so does the patch issue (please fix at some point) E: ngircd non-standard-gid /var/run/ngircd ngircd E: ngircd non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/ngircd 0775 E: ngircd non-standard-gid /etc/ngircd.motd ngircd E: ngircd non-readable /etc/ngircd.motd 0660 E: ngircd non-standard-gid /etc/ngircd.conf ngircd E: ngircd non-readable /etc/ngircd.conf 0660 E: ngircd use-tmp-in-%pre non-standard/non-readable messages can be ignored, use-tmp-in-%pre appears to be a bug. The IPv6 stuff isn't actually policy like I was led to believe, sorry for holding it up though. (Although you might want to file a bug blocking against bug 195271 if you want). Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] New: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/dynagen.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/dynagen-0.9.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Dynagen is a text-based front end for Dynamips, that uses the Hypervisor mode for communication with Dynamips. Dynagen can simplify building and working with virtual networks. rpmlint etc clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:15:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280515.l6S5FQp9008760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |246150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:15:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280515.l6S5FRhs008785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249929 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:21:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280521.l6S5L3fX009192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 01:21 EST ------- Yes, it is possible to have koji build arbitrary SRPMs: koji build --scratch target blah-1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:21:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280521.l6S5LwEp009279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 01:21 EST ------- > * For build failure itself: > Anyway on 64bit arch, arch-dependent files must be installed > under /usr/lib64, not under /usr/lib and this must be fixed. Should this be fixed for both x86_64 and ppc64 or only the former? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233388] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280527.l6S5RxJZ009627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton - Gtk2::Ex::CalendarButton Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 01:27 EST ------- Why isn't this ticket assigned to anyone? I don't think Parag even saw the ping as he's not even in the CC list for this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280533.l6S5XO6b009878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 01:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Yes, it is possible to have koji build arbitrary SRPMs: > koji build --scratch target blah-1-1.src.rpm Oh, that is wonderful!! This makes reviewing easier. Thank you. (In reply to comment #11) > > * For build failure itself: > > Anyway on 64bit arch, arch-dependent files must be installed > > under /usr/lib64, not under /usr/lib and this must be fixed. > > Should this be fixed for both x86_64 and ppc64 or only the former? For both, however the needed fix is the same, I guess (although I have not investigated where to fix) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 05:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280550.l6S5o8b9010342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 01:50 EST ------- I have figured out the problem. This program does not use a Autoconf/Automake generated Makefile. In the top-most Makefile it sets BOUML_LIB = /usr/lib/bouml and thus irrespective of the host machine it puts everything in /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64, where that is applicable. Hence using %{_lib} and %{_libdir} leads to the failure. One more thing which concerns me are the following lines in src/Makefile : CFLAGS = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT CXXFLAGS = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT Will the use of -march=i386 in the C and C++ compiler flags also lead to problems? For your reference I had tried a build by prepending the following line to the SPEC file: %define _lib lib ...and it successfully built. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280605.l6S65WsJ010919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 02:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > One more thing which concerns me are the following lines in src/Makefile : > CFLAGS = > > Will the use of -march=i386 in the C and C++ compiler > flags also lead to problems? Perhaps no. For example, x86_64 compilation log shows no -march=i386 option. Well, for some reason I will reboot my system... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280608.l6S684jw011012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280608.l6S68WcY011054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 02:08 EST ------- I took a quick look at this. Frankly I have no idea what should be used for the License: tag. spot has been doing much work in this area so perhaps you could ping him about it. There's no %check section but I guess the package runs a test suite at make time. It fails pretty badly for me: opietest: completed 13 tests. 5 tests passed, 2 tests skipped, 6 tests failed. opietest: please correct the following failures before attempting to use OPIE: opieatob8 opieetob opiegenerator opiehash(MD4) opiehash(MD5) opiekeycrunch The build does continue after that but it's still troubling. This is a mock build on x86_64 rawhide; perhaps there are 64 bit issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280610.l6S6A5xN011120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 02:10 EST ------- Well, I just tried to rebuild -0.2 on koji target dist-f8: * Still fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (partially). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=80296&name=build.log * Rebuild seems to fail on ppc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280615.l6S6F9e2011279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 02:15 EST ------- Would it be alright if I change the value of BOUML_LIB by checking whether value of `uname -m` indicates x86_64 or ppc64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280627.l6S6RU6x011591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-07-28 02:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #92) > Is the new firefox going into F7 updates prior to this? Yes, we'll update firefox/seamonkey according to this package. But it will be released and tested in devel/f8, first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:42:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280642.l6S6g1tP012096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2007-07-28 02:41 EST ------- Yes close this ticket, it has had it's use. There are 18 new wacom reports since I filed this request. So I ques there now are plenty people working on this one. And yes I got the wacom tools running on 64 bit (it doesn't do this on 32 bit), but I can't figure out why the X-server is crashing when the tablet isn't connected. (outcommenting some lines in the xorg.conf file after the x-server helps) Anyhow I have got little time, I am building a new world in secondlife and this consumes lots of my time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280646.l6S6kptL012259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 02:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Would it be alright if I change the value of BOUML_LIB by checking whether value > of `uname -m` indicates x86_64 or ppc64? If you want to change something on some arch, you may want to use -------------------------------------- %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %endif -------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:50:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280650.l6S6o2xo012346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 02:50 EST ------- (Well, now we can use koji scratch build, however still please write the URL of spec/srpm to be checked so that we can review them easily) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 06:57:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280657.l6S6vFUA012756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-28 02:57 EST ------- The correct (tm) approach to your issues would be to propagate rpm's values into the Makefile. One approach would be to apply sed to replace the hard-coded values inside of the Makefile with the contents of %{_bindir}, %{_libdir} etc. I.e. the BOUML_LIB issue could be remedied by using sed -i -e "s,^BOUML_LIB = .*$,BOUML_LIB = %{_libdir}/bouml," Makefile in %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 07:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 03:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280729.l6S7TUMU013983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-07-28 03:29 EST ------- Hm, must have missed your first comment. Sorry. I guess a Conflicts: tetex-tex4ht would be sufficient because it is not really an alternative ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 08:40:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248597] Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280840.l6S8eBAu019503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wildmidi - Midi Wavetable Synth Lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248597 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 04:40 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 09:15:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280915.l6S9FYd7021869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 05:15 EST ------- Hi, I see that you already have a reviewer, so your request for one to the mailinglist is a bit strange. I know Mamoru as a good and quick reviewer, I guess he is just waiting for you to fix the libdir and cflag issues. Anyways now I'm here I've taken a quick look, so here are some things to work on for starters. Mamoru, I assume you will still do the full review once these are addressed? Must FIX ---------- * use %{_libdir} for arch specific files, you can do this by invoking make as follows in %build: make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} and like this in %install: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} * the .desktop files do not contain mimetypes, so there is no reason to run update-desktop-database in %post[un] * the %post[un] icon-cache scriptlets are wrong, the touch line misses || : and the gtk-update-icon-cache line must only be executed if gtk-update-icon-cache is present, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda * Add: "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/* dirs ownership Should FIX ---------- The CFLAGS are not really an issue as bouml uses qmake to generate the makefile and qmake puts the right flags into the generated makefiles itself. However to be _really_ sure the right flags get used, for example when RPM_OPT_FLAGS get changed (qmake uses RPM_OPT_FLAGS as defined when it was build), use the following in %build: make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 09:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707280953.l6S9rMqt025365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 05:53 EST ------- Hello, Hans. (In reply to comment #19) > Hi, > Mamoru, I assume you will still do the full review once these are > addressed? Yes. I am just waiting for a new srpm anyway so that I want to make it sure that Debarshi and I and you are watching the same spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281206.l6SC6uwg030290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 08:06 EST ------- > * make "%post" "%post atlantikdesigner" > * idem for %postun Whoops, good catch. ;-) > * Remove update-desktop-database from %post scripts, as > atlantikdesigner.desktop doesn't define any mimetimes (you might want to > check this for kdegames3 too) Oh, I wasn't aware of that one (that update-desktop-database is only needed when MIME types are touched). I'm going to remove it. Kevin Kofler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281207.l6SC7NcQ030351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 08:07 EST ------- 2 done, 4 to go... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:14:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] New: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/beldi.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/beldi-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: BeLDi, the Belug (Linux) Distribution Burner, is a program designed to burn distributions. BeLDi consist of a simple graphic user interface where the main screen shows the available distributions in a list. When the user selects one, a dialog will ask which version and for which architecture, the distribution has to be burned. Once the architecture and version are selected the burn procedure starts. You can watch the progress on the progression bar. All user operations can be completed with the mouse or a touchscreen. It is designed to require the less administration and knowledge as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:30:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281230.l6SCUimu031291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-28 08:30 EST ------- I know the *.desktop file is missing, but I would like to get some support regarding this, as I never did such a thing before. Christoph, do you have the time and interest in reviewing and maybe maintaining or co-maintaining this package as mentioned at the LinuxTag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:37:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281237.l6SCbsic031495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-07-28 08:37 EST ------- OK I believe I have fixed these problems with a new spec file at: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora beware of berlios' expired certificate. Please let me know of further problems you discover. Thank You. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281246.l6SCksa8031823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 08:46 EST ------- Well, please also create a SRPM and post the URL of it so that we can download and rebuild it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281248.l6SCmLdB031941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 08:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I see that you already have a reviewer, so your request for one to the > mailinglist is a bit strange. That happened only after I posted on the list. :-) > Must FIX > ---------- > * use %{_libdir} for arch specific files, you can do this by invoking make as > follows in %build: > make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} > and like this in %install: > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} Fixed. > * the .desktop files do not contain mimetypes, so there is no reason to run > update-desktop-database in %post[un] Fixed. > * the %post[un] icon-cache scriptlets are wrong, the touch line misses || : Fixed. I don't see it at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- maybe the Wiki needs to be updated. > and the gtk-update-icon-cache line must only be executed if > gtk-update-icon-cache is present, see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda Fixed. I had taken the snippet from that page itself, but seems that the page has been updated since. :-) > * Add: "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" for /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/* dirs > ownership Fixed. > Should FIX > ---------- > The CFLAGS are not really an issue as bouml uses qmake to generate the makefile > and qmake puts the right flags into the generated makefiles itself. However to > be _really_ sure the right flags get used, for example when RPM_OPT_FLAGS get > changed (qmake uses RPM_OPT_FLAGS as defined when it was build), use the > following in %build: > make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Fixed. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-3.spec I shall upload the SRPM once I finish building it, which takes quite some time. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 12:49:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281249.l6SCnCut032099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 08:49 EST ------- And from next time please increment the release number every time you modify your spec file/srpm (when version number is increased you can again set release number as 1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Increase the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 13:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242203] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281328.l6SDS8Fg002332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers - Kernel headers for Cross Compiling to arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242203 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 09:28 EST ------- Michael Schwendt noticed that the %files section is missing the required %defattr: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-July/msg01631.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 13:28:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243254] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281328.l6SDSTvE002415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-zlib - Cross Compiled zlib Library targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 09:28 EST ------- This one is also missing the %defattr in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 13:28:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243147] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281328.l6SDSqEM002453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-SDL - Cross Compiled SDL Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243147 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 09:28 EST ------- This one is also missing the %defattr in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 14:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281404.l6SE4pZe003865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-28 10:04 EST ------- Yes, I do. I'll look at this tomorow. Thanks for submitting this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 14:45:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248778] Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281445.l6SEj3v9005188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkperf - Test GTK+ performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248778 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 10:45 EST ------- Some comments (just watched your spec file and tried to rebuild) * For sourceforge source, please refert to the section "Sourceforge.net" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Please follow the fedora usage of build root (section: "BuildRoot tag" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" This is not needed as %configure sets it (please check what %configure actually does by "rpm --eval %configure") * Please set vendor id for desktop file (the section "desktop-file-install usage" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * rebuild failed. At least desktop-file-utils is missing from BuildRequires. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 14:56:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281456.l6SEuUCm005568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-28 10:56 EST ------- bandsaw review: (In reply to comment #4) > new spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/bandsaw/bandsaw.spec Disclaimer: I am not a reviewer nor sponsor, and this is my first "review like" submission. >BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel, gnome-python2-devel, gnome-doc-utils, gettext, desktop-file-utils, scrollkeeper My personal preference is to limit each line to 80 chars. You can have multiple BR entries, perhaps splitting of the last two/3 items. > %post > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||: - I don't know if it makes a difference, but the snippet shows || : yum localinstall the .src.rpm emits the following: warning: user damien does not exist - using root warning: group damien does not exist - using root Installing: bandsaw ###################### [29/30]warning: user damien does not exist - using root warning: group damien does not exist - using root - I think this is not a problem (on the fedora buils sys), but can be solved by installing mock and building the src.rpm as the mock user ? New lines: - please be consistent with the new line approach {double} you took between BR and %description, but haven't continued with all the way through. spelling: postum MUST Items: .x rpmlint result: W: bandsaw non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/bandsaw.schemas E: bandsaw no-binary - Please use the output of rpmlint -i for more info to solve these. ./ named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: matches upstream project and source download name. ./ spec file name matches the base package bandsaw.spec . package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ./ package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license: - web site indicates GPL and upstream source includes GPLv2. ./ License field in the package spec file must match the actual license: - GPL ./ source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, so text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc: - COPYING is included as required. ./ The spec file must be written in American English. .? spec file for the package MUST be legible: - at this stage, it is not obvious to me the need for: %define debug_package %{nil} %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} Can you point to an existing fedora spec that uses similar ? ./ source in .src.rpm matches upstream md5sum: - md5sum bandsaw-0.3.0.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/bandsaw-0.3.0.tar.gz 22312a8bccc283d29db55074c69b6073 bandsaw-0.3.0.tar.gz 22312a8bccc283d29db55074c69b6073 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/bandsaw-0.3.0.tar.gz ./ successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms: i386 {athlon} .? If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - : - only tried on i386{i686/athlon} and no excludearchs listed. - have you tested on x86_64 or other arch ? .? build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: - no listed BR is in the auto included list, the package built on my system after yum localinstall the .src.rpm installed lots of -devel rpms. - yet to try mock build. .? spec file MUST handle locales properly: - neither find_lang macro nor %{_datadir}/locale are used. ./ has no shared library files ./ not relocatable and does not use Prefix: /usr .? package must own all directories that it creates: - doesn't install anything currently. ./ A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing: - does not appear to. .? Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. .? must have a %clean section, containing rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): - Included. Is there a preference for the %{x} style ? .? Each package must consistently use macros: - debug_package doesn't seem to be used. What is it's purpose ? ./ The package must contain code, or permissable content. - contains a GUI app ./ Large documentation files: - total doc is 35kB .x %doc files must not affect the runtime of the application: - currently no files are installed at all. ./ Header files must be in a -devel package: - no header files. ./ Static libraries must be in a -static package: - no static libraries. ./ has no pkgconfig(.pc) files. ./ library files with a suffix: no libraries ./ devel packages must require the base package: - no -devel package ./ Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives - no .la's .x Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install >+ desktop-file-install --vendor= --delete-original --dir /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root/usr/share/applications /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root//usr/share/applications/bandsaw.desktop /var/tmp/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7-root-root/usr/share/applications/bandsaw.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead - Application category is not defined in: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html. Please remove. - GTK;Monitor; would be additional suitable categories - no GenericName= is defined - .desktop does not get installed. .? Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. .? At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): - it includes $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as required, but then uses eg %{_datadir} in the same command. I think it would make sense to keep to the % method. ./ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: ./ If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it: included. ./ The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages: - no other translations available .todo package builds in mock. - package does not install anything currently; I'll get to this once other issues have been taken care of. .? The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures: - this is a python/gtk/glade program. Is python bytecode crossplatform, ie will it just work on any platform ? If so should it be noarch ? .x package functions as described - the package did not install it's bits. typing bands{tab} there is no autocomplete, and updatedb shows only my /usr/src/ bandsaw files. . If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. . Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ./ no pkgconfig(.pc) files: python. ./ no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281500.l6SF09SD005830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 11:00 EST ------- Well, if you create new srpm, please upload it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:01:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281501.l6SF1fTA005932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 11:01 EST ------- Is " (Fedora %{version}-%{release})" really the right VERSUFFIX to use here? This GCC is very different from the native Fedora GCC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:11:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281511.l6SFBUGI006644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:11 EST ------- This is terribly old; I don't know why nobody has even commented. I tried to build, but had no luck. It looks to me like the code is not 64-bit clean: database/contacts_db.cpp: In function 'int db_contact_lookup(long unsigned int, int, long unsigned int**)': database/contacts_db.cpp:255: error: cast from 'long unsigned int*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision database/contacts_db.cpp:255: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' make: *** [database/contacts_db.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281515.l6SFFVDQ006888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:27:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281527.l6SFRbJN007545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:27 EST ------- Is this one really being reviewed? I see no comments from the person it's assigned to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:30:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281530.l6SFUcnJ007704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209614] Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281532.l6SFW2qu007808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmmemload - windowmaker dock app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209614 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(dkovalsk at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:31 EST ------- No progress in three months; setting NEEDINFO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281534.l6SFYRVJ007932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 navid at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-28 11:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sos [Updated InitialCC: ] Looks like InitialCC requires the email to have an associated BZ account. sos-project is a mailing-list, let's just leave it empty for now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281542.l6SFgpQD008394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:42 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:50:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281550.l6SFoBqM008666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:50 EST ------- This is a really confusing ticket. It's under review, but blocking FE-NEW, which I'll fix. mcepl set the fedora-review flag, but it's assigned to stransky. And I'm not sure I've seen a ticket in the "POST" state before. So, who's reviewing? And what does "POST" mean in the context of a review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 15:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281553.l6SFrKNP008901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 11:53 EST ------- This isn't showing up in the list of tickets to be reviewed because the status is set to "POST". I only saw it because I'm cleaning up the old FE-NEW tracker. Let me see if I can get it to show up properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281610.l6SGAKEp009618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 12:10 EST ------- (Well, I want to recheck after you upload the new srpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281619.l6SGJ3rq009914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 12:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Is " (Fedora %{version}-%{release})" really the right VERSUFFIX to use here? > This GCC is very different from the native Fedora GCC. I don't know, maybe " (Fedora GP2X %{version}-%{release})" or " (GP2X %{version}-%{release})", I think I like " (Fedora GP2X %{version}-%{release})" the best. Before I roll a new release, do you see any other issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:20:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281620.l6SGKAXX009966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 12:20 EST ------- Not for now, but I haven't run it through the long review checklist yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281622.l6SGMK1k010063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Not for now, but I haven't run it through the long review checklist yet. I'll wait for that then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281622.l6SGMSlD010082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 12:22 EST ------- This has been sitting around for a really long time; is there anything that's stopping it from being reviewed? I assume it needs redland; is that done now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:23:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281623.l6SGNLKm010158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 12:23 EST ------- I'm still not sure what's going on here, but I'l at least clear the FE-NEW blocker. It looks like notting didn't see my past comment because he's not cc'd on the ticket. I generally avoid CCing others on tickets but in this case I guess I have to. So, notting, you set fedora-review and made some comments, but never assigned yourself or CC'd yourself on this ticket, so it dropped off of the new ticket list but received no further review commentary. Did you want to finish reviewing it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281623.l6SGNZtE010224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 12:23 EST ------- (Only I tried to rebuild this package) (In reply to comment #1) > I have rectified some issues, but keep getting errors in mock. What problem are you seeing? I just tried to rebuild and it passed. Also rebuild by koji seems fine. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:23:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281623.l6SGNxbI010292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-28 12:23 EST ------- I'd really like a review on this. Should take about 12 seconds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281636.l6SGaEcA010831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-28 12:36 EST ------- Thanks tibbs! (In reply to comment #1) > > You can probably remove the initial comment from the spec. > Done. > The only thing I can complain about is inconsistent macroization (%{__python} > but not %{__rm}). I vaguely remember something special about python that > exempted it from the usual "consistent use of macros" rule, but I can't recall > the details. In any case, I trust you to fix things up as appropriate. > I'm unable to find details either so I made this consistent as well. > * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't the means to test this package. This is running on the Fedora Infrastructure trac instance ATM:: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/packagedb/browser URLs for packages that will be imported:: http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~toshio/packages/trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-2.20070717bzr180.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281639.l6SGdwbC010986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-07-28 12:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-bazaar-plugin Short Description: Bazaar plugin for Trac Owners: toshio at tiki-lounge.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248815] Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281641.l6SGftUC011104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-bazaar-plugin - Support for Bazaar source repositories in trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248815 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 12:41 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:56:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281656.l6SGubVG011721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From pelliott at io.com 2007-07-28 12:56 EST ------- OK, I have increased the release number. Please find: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/peless/spec/peless.spec.fedora (the spec) and ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless-1.156-2.src.rpm (.SRPM) Thank You. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 16:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281658.l6SGwcqr011879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 12:58 EST ------- > > make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ > > CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > Fixed. > > Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-3.spec This spec file fails to build on i386. However it succeeds on replacing... make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} \ CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ...with... make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281703.l6SH3cwU012174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-28 13:03 EST ------- Well, I don't have rebuild bouml with using spec file in comment 21, however would you attach how it failed? (Note: Perhaps I will go to bed because it is 2 AM in Japan. Maybe someone will resolve your problem while I am sleeping...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:06:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281706.l6SH6MXC012317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 13:06 EST ------- rpmlint complains about these: E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/libiberty.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/install-tools E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/*.la E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/gcc/%{target}/ E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/lib*c++.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/include/c++ E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/lib*c++.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/include/c++ Shouldn't these be using %{_libdir}? (My computer is i386, so I can't really test this.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:08:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281708.l6SH8B5I012401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 13:08 EST ------- Since it is failing to build, I have nothing other than the spec file for it. :-( All you need to build are the spec file (http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-3.spec) and the upstream source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281710.l6SHAB1t012508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-07-28 13:10 EST ------- Jason, has the sos-project email address been removed as InitialCC ? The reason I'm asking is subscribers to that mailing-list are receiving automated requests asking to join BZ. Thanks. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:15:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281715.l6SHF1Rf012759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 13:15 EST ------- Alright, maybe I was seeing things. :-) Those were early days for me with mock, and maybe I made a stupid mistake. One question: is it necessary to have... make install prefix=%{_prefix} bindir=%{_bindir} datadir=%{_datadir} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ...instead of... make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ...since the hard-coded defaults are good enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281726.l6SHQK9N013474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 13:26 EST ------- Looking at what these files actually are, they are all target files, so /usr/lib is OK in principle. But if you can test on an x86_64 machine to make sure the files really do end up in /usr/lib when building for x86_64, this would be useful. Otherwise, I guess we'll see with the first Koji build. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281732.l6SHWIKx013741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 13:32 EST ------- Yes, I removed the CC as requested. Check owners.list for yourself if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281735.l6SHZVMi013920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 13:35 EST ------- (NOTE: The parts where a binary RPM is needed were checked against the bootstrap version.) MUST Items: + rpmlint output: + SPRM has this: W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -e 's,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libexecdir,' $a > $b This one is OK. E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/libiberty.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/install-tools E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/*.la E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/gcc/%{target}/ E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/lib*c++.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/include/c++ E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/lib*c++.a E: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc/%{target}/%{version}/include/c++ (see comment #9 and comment #10). These are OK in principle, assuming the files actually do end up in /usr/lib even on x86_64. It's OK for them to be there because they're target files. + main package has this: W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/stdarg.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/stddef.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/varargs.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/linux/a.out.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/mmintrin.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/libgcc_eh.a W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/libgcov.a W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/syslimits.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/stdbool.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/float.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/unwind.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/libgcc.a W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/iso646.h W: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc/arm-gp2x-linux/4.1.2/include/limits.h These are all OK, as this is a developer package. + -debuginfo has empty output. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License GPL OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used + debuginfo package is valid + no host static libraries nor .la files (I think we can give the target static libraries (libgcc.a, libgcc_eh.a and libgcov.a) a pass.) + no duplicated system libraries (libiberty is always static, so it can't be shared with the native version) + no rpaths, at least on i386 (I ran readelf -d on the executables) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + omission of _smp_mflags justified by a comment + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING included as %doc + spec file written in American English (nitpick: s/usefull/useful/) + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: 2af3fb599635219171c6ae1f3034888a SHA1SUM: d6875295f6df1bec4a6f4ab8f0da54bfb8d97306 glibc-2.3.6.tar.bz2: MD5SUM: bfdce99f82d6dbcb64b7f11c05d6bc96 SHA1SUM: 82d0487419f1bdbf2dee439c344e89d6af47e558 glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.6.tar.bz2: MD5SUM: d4eeda37472666a15cc1f407e9c987a9 SHA1SUM: 10190168bf948556afdfff46f87f9208402d810f + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR + translations are disabled (because they'd conflict with the native versions), so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly (%defattr present) + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%configure not used for several reasons, including it playing jokes with --target and upstream recommending building outside the source directory) + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + no host headers, target headers are OK in this cross-development package + no host static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (same nitpick about mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as for arm-gp2x-linux-binutils) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. + package functions as described: I can at least compile this: int main(void) { return 0; } up to an .o file with the bootstrap compiler. It doesn't link because there's no crt1.o without glibc. + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281754.l6SHsRuh014622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-28 13:54 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdeaddons3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdeaddons3-3.5.7-5.fc7.src.rpm - fix post and postun scriptlets to run for the subpackage - don't run update-desktop-database because no MIME types are touched -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281757.l6SHvG92014797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 13:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Looking at what these files actually are, they are all target files, > so /usr/lib is OK in principle. But if you can test on an x86_64 machine to > make sure the files really do end up in /usr/lib when building for x86_64, this > would be useful. Otherwise, I guess we'll see with the first Koji build. ;-) gcc always puts its files under /usr/lib even on a mutlilib system, becasue the multilib gcc can build binaries for both libs. I have an x86_64 as my main workstation, and Fedora's x86_64 gcc has its files under /usr/lib, so this is really 100% normal. (In reply to comment #11) > > APPROVED Thanks, I really appreciate these reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281758.l6SHwAXQ014851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 13:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 17:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248648] Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281759.l6SHxaHl014913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons3 - KDE 3 addons not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248648 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 13:59 EST ------- APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 18:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281803.l6SI3fwj015133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-28 14:03 EST ------- My bad, okay, this one should work: make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} \ CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags qt-mt`" \ CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags qt-mt`" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 19:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707281907.l6SJ7oMx017529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 15:07 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator-1.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Here are the current spec and SRPM. Koji taskinfo: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 20:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707282028.l6SKSSpx021213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-07-28 16:28 EST ------- I did up load it, but forgor to say so. Here they are... RPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.21.1-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 20:34:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707282034.l6SKYwOo021544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 16:34 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 28 21:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707282122.l6SLM50Q023635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-28 17:22 EST ------- * Still fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (partially). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=80296&name=build.log On what? The unit tests? Or the fact that the -debug version of the library turns some of the optimizations down? I don't see anything else, but maybe I'm just missing it. * Rebuild seems to fail on ppc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80293 Damn, I'll see if I can reproduce this on a fedora-devel-i386 mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 00:56:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290056.l6T0uFf2030549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-28 20:56 EST ------- It doesn't but I can reproduce the failure with: koji build --scratch --arch-override=ppc dist-f8 /home/james/work/build/ustr/ustr-1.0.1-0.2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 01:02:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290102.l6T12GTI030773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-28 21:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > My bad, okay, this one should work: > > make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} \ > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags qt-mt`" \ > CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags qt-mt`" > It still fails to build on i386. g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/default -I. -I../Tools -I../CppGenerator -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o CppRefType.o CppRefType.cpp g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/default -I. -I../Tools -I../CppGenerator -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o UmlAttribute.o UmlAttribute.cpp g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/default -I. -I../Tools -I../CppGenerator -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o UmlClass.o UmlClass.cpp UmlAttribute.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlAttribute::compute_dependency(QPtrList&, const QCString&, bool)': UmlAttribute.cpp:41: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlAttribute.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlAttribute::generate_decl(aVisibility&, QTextOStream&, const QCString&, QCString, bool&, bool)': UmlAttribute.cpp:76: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlAttribute.cpp:115: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlAttribute.cpp:165: error: 'isCppMutable' was not declared in this scope UmlAttribute.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlAttribute::generate_def(QTextOStream&, QCString, bool, QCString, QCString, QCString, QCString)': UmlAttribute.cpp:184: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlAttribute.cpp:233: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared make[1]: *** [UmlAttribute.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CppRefType.cpp: In static member function 'static void CppRefType::compute(QPtrList&, const QCString&, const QCString&, QCString&, QCString&, QCString&, UmlArtifact*)': CppRefType.cpp:160: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:166: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:171: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:176: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:193: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:201: error: 'class UmlClass' has no member named 'isCppExternal' CppRefType.cpp:202: error: 'class UmlClass' has no member named 'cppDecl' CppRefType.cpp:236: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'QCString UmlClass::cpp_stereotype()': UmlClass.cpp:49: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlClass::generate()': UmlClass.cpp:59: error: 'isCppExternal' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp:59: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope CppRefType.cpp:244: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared CppRefType.cpp:260: error: 'class UmlClass' has no member named 'isCppExternal' UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlClass::compute_dependency(QPtrList&, const QCString&, bool)': UmlClass.cpp:96: error: 'class UmlClassItem' has no member named 'cppDecl' UmlClass.cpp:122: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'void UmlClass::generate_decl(QTextOStream&, QCString)': UmlClass.cpp:154: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp:192: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlClass.cpp:238: error: 'class UmlClassItem' has no member named 'cppDecl' UmlClass.cpp:284: error: 'class UmlRelation' has no member named 'cppDecl'make[1]: *** [CppRefType.o] Error 1 UmlClass.cpp:304: error: 'class UmlClassItem' has no member named 'cppDecl' UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'void UmlClass::generate_def(QTextOStream&, QCString, bool)': UmlClass.cpp:359: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'virtual void UmlClass::generate_def(QTextOStream&, QCString, bool, QCString, QCString, QCString, QCString)': UmlClass.cpp:379: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'QCString UmlClass::decl()': UmlClass.cpp:457: error: 'class UmlPackage' has no member named 'cppNamespace' UmlClass.cpp: In static member function 'static void UmlClass::write(QTextOStream&, const UmlTypeSpec&, bool)': UmlClass.cpp:491: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlClass.cpp: In member function 'void UmlClass::write(QTextOStream&, bool, const QValueList&)': UmlClass.cpp:508: error: 'class UmlPackage' has no member named 'cppNamespace' UmlClass.cpp:510: error: 'CppSettings' has not been declared UmlClass.cpp:511: error: 'class UmlPackage' has no member named 'cppNamespace' UmlClass.cpp:516: error: 'isCppExternal' was not declared in this scope UmlClass.cpp:517: error: 'cppDecl' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [UmlClass.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/bouml_2.29.1/src/CppGenerator' make: *** [compile] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95841 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95841 (%build) This is the spec that I was using: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-3.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 03:07:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290307.l6T37Blc001960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-28 23:07 EST ------- Well I've "fixed" the ppc problem. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80882 Although the fix implies I need to fix a bunch of other points. Anyway, if you can let me know about the build flags I'll do an another update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 04:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms at iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: GLGlobe is an OpenGL - globe simulation for Linux. It was inspired by XGlobe or XEarth and can use the marker-files of these programs. The simulation includes day light and night time rendering, and the globe can be rotated and scaled interactively, or automatically rotated based on the current time of day -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 04:05:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290405.l6T45nJ7003426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 dtimms at iinet.net.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |simulation ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-29 00:05 EST ------- I do have some queries about the compile process: gcc -Wall -O3 -I/usr/X11/include -c -o vmath.o vmath.c gcc -Wall -O3 -I/usr/X11/include -c -o globe.o globe.c globe.c: In function 'make_globe_old2': globe.c:507: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules globe.c:511: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness globe.c: In function 'make_globe': globe.c:663: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules globe.c:665: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules Should I be concerned about these warnings ? Should I attempt to patch around them ? Thanks, DaveT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 04:08:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290408.l6T48dRg003552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 00:08 EST ------- For some reason, attempting to fetch the -2 package redirects me to the -1 package: Connecting to www.herr-schmitt.de|82.165.107.151|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm [following] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 04:11:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290411.l6T4BROc003643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 00:11 EST ------- This fails to build for me due to missing BuildRequires: - ERROR: Test::More is not installed and then all of the tests fail: FAILED--11 test scripts could be run, alas--no output ever seen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 04:20:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290420.l6T4Kne3003991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 00:20 EST ------- I wouldn't worry overmuch about the warnings, but I would worry quite a bit about the fact that your package doesn't seem to honor %{optflags}. You'll need to figure out how to pass the proper compiler flags. Also, to answer your question about commenting out %configure, % macros are still expanded if the line begins with '#'. Either double the '%' or remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 05:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290517.l6T5HLkg005628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-29 01:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: paprefs Short Description: Management GUI tool for PulseAudio Owners: eric.moret at epita.fr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 05:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290543.l6T5hWFd006660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 01:43 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 05:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290549.l6T5n0PD006810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-29 01:48 EST ------- Jason, is that dis-honouring caused by removing the %configure ? Did you determine that it doesn't by the params passed to gcc ? {Hoping for a hint on where to look} Will it be the source's make file ? Can the package patch the make file to solve it ? commented macros: Is it because the macros expanded out are multi-line, and perhaps even start with a new line that the expanded part does not stay commented ? An offside: The upstream developer hasn't touched the source in years, from what I can tell. I remember both Hans and yourself mentioned on fedora-devel that non-activity is not necessarily a blocker. In any case, I have requested of Florian whether he has/can make some nicer icons. ps. This is my first package up for review, and I'll eventually need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 05:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290549.l6T5n2Nb006846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 01:49 EST ------- Hmm, this package creates license files which are not in the original package. There's no reason to do this, and I've always been of the opinion that you generally shouldn't do this. Otherwise, this package is fine. Let's get this and perl-Config-Std done and then I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290605.l6T65xR4007510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 02:05 EST ------- I did not investigate how this package builds, so at this point I can't tell you how to pass the proper compiler flags to it. I don't see any configure script in the package, so I'm not sure what good a call to %configure could possibly do. If there's just a plain Makefile, you probably just need check that it will allow you to pass CFLAGS on the make line, or patch it to allow that. > Is it because the macros expanded out are multi-line, and perhaps even start > with a new line that the expanded part does not stay commented ? Perhaps; I'm not intimately familiar with the details of how RPM expands macros. > ps. This is my first package up for review, and I'll eventually need a > sponsor. This should block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290609.l6T69M3a007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 02:09 EST ------- OK, this is showing up in the new package list now. However, I don't see any indication that the issues raised in comment 12 have been addressed, and I view this as unapprovable until they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:16:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290616.l6T6GJ8p008013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 02:16 EST ------- Thanks for the explanation. I guess it would be preferrable for Jose Matos to ack this since he did the original cernlib review, but he doesn't seem to be around as much lately, so I'll go ahead and ack this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290623.l6T6N12t008230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:32:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] New: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-File-chmod.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-File-chmod-0.32-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Perl dist implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes This perl-module is a prerequisite to be able to upgrade perl-Test-Inline. Special thanks to J. Pinyan (File::chmod maintainer), M. Schwern and A. Kennedy (Test::Inline maintainers) for having changed File::chmod's licensing upon request, remarkably fast in a way, such that File::chmod now can be shipped with Fedora. Thank you, guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:37:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290637.l6T6b9Rm008576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |249807 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290640.l6T6eL53008681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-29 02:40 EST ------- Imported and build, I'm leaving the bug open until glibc is there, so that I can build it with "%define boostrap 0" I forgot to change the VERSUFFIX, I'll do that in the non bootstrapped build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 06:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707290651.l6T6pPUY008917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-29 02:51 EST ------- ARGHHH Okay, after further digging I've found out that this piece of #$$^%$ (makefile wise) compiles some files several times into different libs / binaries, with different defines used, so overriding CFLAGS is not possible easily. Since qmake already puts RPM_OPT_FLAGS in there (albeit RPM_OPT_FLAGS as they were when qt was build), I say lets forget about this hypothetical problem of RPM_OPT_FLAGS changing and just use: make %{?_smp_mflags} BOUML_LIB=%{_libdir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 12:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291209.l6TC9Xwm024646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-29 08:09 EST ------- Following comments from Jason Tibbetts, I have uploaded a new version of the .spec file and .src.rpm. They are both at: http://jpye.fedorapeople.org/sundials/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 12:53:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291253.l6TCr18E026287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-29 08:52 EST ------- Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec Updated src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm - del commenting about non-existent %configure. - add export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" so that rpm flags are used during build. - add makefile patch to use environment CFLAGS if they are defined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 13:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291353.l6TDrMrT031086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-29 09:53 EST ------- ho yeah, Will fix this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 13:55:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291355.l6TDtnj0031225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-29 09:55 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-3.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-3.fc8.src.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 15:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291535.l6TFZA2U002834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-29 11:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160193) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160193&action=view) Little changes on last attachment from Parag. Used attachment# 159993, with following changes: - Replaced /usr/bin by macro %{_binsir} and /usr/sbin by macro %{_sbindir}. - Minor alignments. P.S. We still need font.alias for this package before into build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 15:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291535.l6TFZUhH002893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-29 11:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160194) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160194&action=view) Little changes on last attachment from Parag. Used attachment# 159993, with following changes: - Replaced /usr/bin by macro %{_binsir} and /usr/sbin by macro %{_sbindir}. - Minor alignments. P.S. We still need font.alias for this package before into build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 15:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291538.l6TFcFZi003038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-29 11:38 EST ------- Hi Jens, would you like to have a look? Cheers, Caius. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 15:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291548.l6TFmEBn003481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-29 11:48 EST ------- Only the fact that I was on vacation away from internet :-) and that I did not want to do it before. It is corrected ! Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 16:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291637.l6TGbLFZ005281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-29 12:37 EST ------- Well, now ustr is rebuilt on all archs as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80889 Then for -0.6: > * Still fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (partially). > On what? > The unit tests? - Oh, yes, for tests. Perhaps this can be ignored. * File entry - I just noticed that: ------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -qlp ustr-*rpm | sort | uniq -d /usr/include/ustr-conf-debug.h /usr/include/ustr-debug.h ------------------------------------------------- ? Perhaps it is better that all header files are hidden under /usr/include/ustr. * Compilation flags ? On compiling debugging source code: ------------------------------------------------- Compiling for A DBG lib: ustr-io-dbg-code.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wundef -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wno-format-zero-length -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -O1 -ggdb3 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -o ustr-cmp-code-a-dbg.o -c ustr-cmp-dbg-code.c ------------------------------------------------- the fedora compilation flags (-O2) is overwritten by -O1. Is this intentional? * File name ? Well, it is okay, however would you rename the file which contains white space in its name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 16:57:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291657.l6TGvtme006006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-29 12:57 EST ------- Updated: SRPM: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance-5.0-5.20070718snap.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/alliance.spec Build.log (i386): http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/build.log rpmlint: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/alliance/rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291727.l6THRU1o007419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-29 13:27 EST ------- Almost okay. Now rebuid succeeds on all archs as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80875 * Just file entry: ------------------------------------------------- %ghost %{_includedir}/%{name}/numarray/num_util.h ------------------------------------------------- - Perhaps you want to use %exclude? %ghost means that "this file may be missing, but it is okay". Actually num_util.h is installed on my system. ------------------------------------------------- %files python %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitearch}/hippo.pth %{python_sitelib}/hippo.pth -------------------------------------------------- - on i386 and ppc, these are the same. So: -------------------------------------------------- %{python_sitelib}/hippo.pth %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{python_sitearch}/hippo.pth %endif --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291742.l6THglGH008085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-29 13:42 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-5.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.9-5.fc7.src.rpm * Fri Jul 27 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-5 - Update patches so we don't need to run auto* tools, because autoconf 2.60 is required and FC-6 and RHEL5 only have autoconf 2.59. * Thu Jul 26 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.9-4 - Don't build app_mp3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:44:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291744.l6THi9hF008288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 13:44 EST ------- I have to admit that I have no idea what this package does, and no way to test it as it's a library that has no test suite. But it's a simple and clean package, so... rpmlint says: W: exempi unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexempi.so.2.3.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 It links against libm (which seems to be the default for autoconf packages) but doesn't call any functions from it. I don't see this as a really big deal. W: exempi-devel no-documentation Not a problem. I guess it would be nice if there were some programming information included, but it's not your responsibility to produce it. Review: * source files match upstream: f1783d5a85ec81cb3a7be3ce24fd2178e1acbc5229c719c1496160d62f57a104 exempi-1.99.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: exempi-1.99.3-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libexempi.so.2()(64bit) exempi = 1.99.3-1.fc8 = /sbin/ldconfig libexempi.so.2()(64bit) libexpat.so.0()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) exempi-devel-1.99.3-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm exempi-devel = 1.99.3-1.fc8 = exempi = 1.99.3-1.fc8 libexempi.so.2()(64bit) pkgconfig * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries present; ldconfig is called as necessary and unversioned .so files are in the -devel subpackage. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel subpackage; pkgconfig dependency is there. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291747.l6THlACE008441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 13:47 EST ------- This fails to build for me due to a missing dependency on ocaml-extlib-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291754.l6THsTum008673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-29 13:54 EST ------- I have uploaded the package again and tested the download on my own machine. The download should works now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 17:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291754.l6THsxSB008729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 18:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291807.l6TI7EfV009214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 14:07 EST ------- Looks clean and builds fine; there's not much to say. The description is a bit thin but I don't think it's a blocker. * source files match upstream: ec54997c4274ca27e8e8d25585223569b15b16ed2bfdf5d0507c57787d6d05a9 File-chmod-0.32.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::chmod) = 0.32 perl-File-chmod = 0.32-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: ok 1 original state of chmod.pm: 00644 calling: chmod('+x', 'chmod.pm')... chmod.pm: 00755 calling: chmod('-x', 'chmod.pm')... chmod.pm: 00644 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 18:09:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291809.l6TI9a28009314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 14:09 EST ------- I was something from Chris in another ticket, so: One final ping before I close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 18:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291847.l6TIlmUN010921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 14:47 EST ------- Just a few comments; I can't build this because the dependency isn't in, but I slanced over the spec file. Don't use Prefix: or Vendor:. http://www.squeakland.org/ looks to be a better URL. There's no need for the [ -n "%{buildroot}" -a "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && rm -rf "%{buildroot}" magic. You set the buildroot in the spec; it won't be '/'. It's not really necessary to include the full upstream changelog as your changelog, although it's OK if that's what you want to do. The unversioned doc directory is odd. Most packages use %doc to mark documentation in the source directory; rpm will copy it into a versioned directory under /usr/share/doc. I'm honestly not sure if an unversioned documentation directory is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 18:51:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291851.l6TIpuM1011064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 14:51 EST ------- I'm still getting redirected: > wget http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm --13:49:51-- http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm Resolving www.herr-schmitt.de... 82.165.107.151 Connecting to www.herr-schmitt.de|82.165.107.151|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm [following] --13:49:52-- http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm Connecting to www.herr-schmitt.de|82.165.107.151|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 33569 (33K) [audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin] Saving to: `and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm' 100%[=====================================================================================>] 33,569 86.7K/s in 0.4s 13:49:53 (86.7 KB/s) - `and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm' saved [33569/33569] Firefox gets redirected as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 18:59:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291859.l6TIxTHv011430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 14:59 EST ------- I finally have some more free time.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291906.l6TJ6Fwb011800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-29 15:06 EST ------- OK. I have delete and recreate the and directory. Now, you may get the 301 respone from the server, but the right package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291917.l6TJHjmK012348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-29 15:17 EST ------- Thanks for doing the review. XMP is the Adobe's extensible metadata platform, and exempi provides the library for extracting the metadata under linux. New version of tracker support it and uses exempi for the job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291919.l6TJJFSl012435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-29 15:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: exempi Short Description: Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata Owners: dakingun at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291919.l6TJJZbC012488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291926.l6TJQ46Y012850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 15:26 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291952.l6TJqQBV014343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 15:52 EST ------- OK, this is a special package, since it's just a collection of crontab files. We actually have guidelines for how to deal with this; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (the "We Are Upstream" section). I note that you're not using the dist tag. This isn't a requirement (and for a package like this which shouldn't need changes between distro versions it's completely acceptable), but I want to make sure you understand how you'll need to keep ordering consistent. I would use "BuildArch" instead of "BuildArchitectures", but that's personal preference. You have no dependencies for your scriptlets. For example, if you call /sbin/chkconfig in %post, you need Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig. So you'll need at least these: Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/service Requires(postun): /sbin/service See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets. Conversely, you don't need /sbin/chkconfig and /sbin/service in your Requires: list, because they aren't actually called by the files installed as part of this package. The scriptlets themselves have a few issues. I guess it's OK to append to /dev/null, although it does look a bit odd. But you also need to redirect STDERR (with 2>&1). Otherwise they look OK. There's a bunch of stuff going with init scripts which frankly I don't yet understand. I don't think the init script in this package conforms. There's some information at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts but there are still a bunch of unanswered questions and frankly I'm not going to block this package based on what's in that document. So there are a few minor things to fix up. Do those and apply for cvsextras access and I'll sponsor you. Review: X This package is the upstream, but this is not explained in the spec. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. X dist tag is not present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires: config(yum-cron) = 0.2-4 yum-cron = 0.2-4 = /bin/bash /bin/sh X /sbin/chkconfig X /sbin/service config(yum-cron) = 0.2-4 crontabs vixie-cron yum /sbin/chkconfig and /sbin/service should not be in the runtine dependency list. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. There's plenty of evidence of successful testing in this review ticket. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets are completely missing dependencies. X scriptlets should redirect STDERR but otherwise look OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 19:57:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707291957.l6TJvbt9014662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-29 15:57 EST ------- Nope: > wget http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm --14:53:28-- http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm Resolving www.herr-schmitt.de... 82.165.107.151 Connecting to www.herr-schmitt.de|82.165.107.151|:80... ^[[6~connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 300 Multiple Choices Length: unspecified [text/html] Saving to: `and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm' [ <=> ] 475 --.-K/s in 0s 14:53:28 (36.9 MB/s) - `and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm' saved [475] The 475 bytes I get are: 300 Multiple Choices

Multiple Choices

The document name you requested (/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.src.rpm) could not be found on this server. However, we found documents with names similar to the one you requested.

Available documents:

Oh, the links aren't correct. It really shouldn't be this difficult to put up a couple of files for downloading. I think I have managed to fetch the proper file now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 20:11:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248692] Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292011.l6TKBJEn015180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-rlecuyer - R interface to RNG with multiple streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248692 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-29 16:11 EST ------- Sorry I was on vacation, I do not mind to do R reviews as I start to know how to do the packages ;-). I have found on the list 2 R package that you have approved by that time, but I will try to keep me in touch with the new R package to review them. For the numbers of package that I submitted to review, most of them are only dependances for other package the R CMD check ask not only for the package required but also for the package suggested (which sometime are only data files http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.0/bioc/html/annotate.html => hgu95av2 is only data file) I do have problems packaging it, each package ask for many dependances and as it is the beginning I have a lot to do to finally being able to package the software of interest... Thanks anyway for your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 20:17:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292017.l6TKH21j015439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-07-29 16:17 EST ------- Thanks for your suggestions. I'll be on vacation in August, but will get back to this afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 20:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292040.l6TKejEs016280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-29 16:40 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: # rpmlint ~/gnome-screensaver-frogs-0.2-2.src.rpm W: gnome-screensaver-frogs invalid-license CC Attribution 2.0/CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0/Public Domain # rpmlint /home/wolfy/reports/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs-0.2-2.noarch.rpm W: gnome-screensaver-frogs invalid-license CC Attribution 2.0/CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0/Public Domain It's the first time I see several licenses listed in the License tag, but since all of them are GPL compatible and you are the expert in this area, I'll trust you. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (CC Attribution 2.0/CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0/Public Domain ) OK, text in %doc, matches source, full list of files + corresponding licenses included - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - nothing to compile, the package is just a collection of pictures - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok [*] - %clean ok - macro use consistent - only content (pictures) - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - the included .desktop file is installed under the gnome screenserver hierarchy Note: [*] I would have preferred %defaultattr(-,root,root,-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 23:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249125] Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292315.l6TNFXlg022775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exempi - Library for easy parsing of XMP metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249125 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-29 19:15 EST ------- Built successfully in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 23:28:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292328.l6TNSfMn023359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-29 19:28 EST ------- Hi Jason, Sorry for reopening the ticket again. I don't want to get into any flame-wars but this package is important to for the i18n team, so we give it a higher priority than Behdad. I just feel more comfortable leaving it open so that it does not fall-off our radar but I also understand your wish to get it off the review list in a timely manner. Anyway I think the i18n team should be able to get this moving again. But if it is better to start a new ticket, we can do it that way too. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 29 23:51:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707292351.l6TNpZ6A025205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-29 19:51 EST ------- BTW I am still thinking we should rename fonts-* to -fonts for F8 - let me send out a mail about it to the fedora devel and i18n lists for comments. But maybe it is better to finish the reviews first before renaming anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 00:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300027.l6U0Rgs8028155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-29 20:27 EST ------- (FYI, creation of fonts.alias is not necessary because there is an existing one within archive file: baekmuk-2.1.tar.gz) For srpm review: http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070729_f-k/fonts-korean-1.0.11-10.fc8.src.rpm http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070729_f-k/fonts-korean.spec ===== Do you mean "baekmuk-fonts"? If so, do we need a meta-package to let user able to install korean support in CLI by just installing font-korean package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 01:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] New: Review Request: new - A simple template system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: New is a template system, especially useful in conjunction with a simple text editor such as vi. The user maintains templates which may contain format strings. At run time, new replaces the format strings in a template with appropriate values to create a new file. New has been orphaned for six months so it needs to be reviewed again. I would like to un-orphan it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 01:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300120.l6U1Kt4g030679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 02:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300232.l6U2Wb9g003495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-07-29 22:32 EST ------- I am somewhat confused by this package. The screenshots show it is for administrating xen servers. It depends on python-paramaibo, which is the python-ssh client. Yet it requires xen on the local machine? People tend to have more then 1 xen server (if only to be able to migrate). It would be great if this GUI would support adding remote xen servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 03:02:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222374] Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300302.l6U32t5V005286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paprefs - Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222374 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 03:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300305.l6U35IYS005422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-29 23:05 EST ------- Following comments from Debarshi ray, new files are located at http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 03:28:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248163] Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300328.l6U3SGwZ006237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-nodoka-engine - The Nodoka gtk engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248163 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-29 23:28 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on the produced rpm package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: yes upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build requires: ok locales: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok file list dupes: ok file permissions: ok %clean section: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok doc subpackage: n/a %doc content: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared lib symlinks: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui app: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 04:01:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248516] Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300401.l6U41HGg007405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nodoka-theme-gnome - The Nodoka Metacity theme and Gnome metatheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248516 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-30 00:01 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on the produced rpms package name: ok, I think. spec name: ok packaging guidelines: mostly ok - might be a good idea to put a comment pointing to the wiki location of the upstream sources - should add a comment about the "inverse relationship" between main and subpackage, where the main package requires the subpackage license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locales: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: there is a conflict where both the gtk theme package and the metacity theme package own /usr/share/themes/Nodoka. Possible solution: make the metacity theme package require the gtk theme package file list dupes: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared lib symlinks: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: n/a file ownership: see above %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 04:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300424.l6U4OkGL008278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-30 00:24 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM gave me W: fonts-korean unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-ko The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-korean unversioned-explicit-provides ttfonts-ko The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 05:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300537.l6U5bq7e011061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #148910|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #159993|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #160193|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #160194|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-30 01:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160215) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160215&action=view) SPEC with Provides & Obsoletes version specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 05:38:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300538.l6U5ct2w011150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 05:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300550.l6U5oALd011592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-07-30 01:50 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Updated package files, with your concerns addressed: Spec URL: http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/yum-cron.spec SRPM URL: http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/yum-cron-0.2-5.src.rpm Questions/comments: Regarding the "We Are Upstream" bit: Added the comments. Momentarily took out the URL field (which points to the main yum website) since, well, We Are Upstream. But rpmlint didn't like not having a URL. What's the appropriate URL to use in this case? Regarding the dist tag: went and read all about it, and think that it's not appropriate here. The same spec file will happily work for all dists which are using the yum after which the cron files were yanked, yum-3.0. So, I changed the "requires" to yum >= 3.0, which should cover all the bases. I see what you mean about the initscripts - it's moving to a whole new format, while this script is of the old format. I'll work on understanding and porting to the new standards, but that won't happen for a while and I appreciate you not blocking things while I do so. One warning - I'm about to embark on a two-week combination of moving my family to another town (on sabbatical this coming year) and camping/vacation trip, so will have spotty net.access in the interim. So, please don't be offended if I'm not so responsive till mid-August. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 05:53:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300553.l6U5rdD4011831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 01:53 EST ------- Further corrections have been added, as annotated in the .spec file. See http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 05:58:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300558.l6U5wbfV012092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 01:58 EST ------- Some of the flags that you are passing manually to './configure' in the %build stanza are automatically taken care of by the %configure macro. You could remove the unnecessary ones and use the rpmbuild defaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:09:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300609.l6U69kS3012869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(llim at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-30 02:09 EST ------- llim, Are you current owner for redhat-lsb or you left maintaining this package? Is this package not so important as no one is responding to my ping here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:15:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300615.l6U6FM8d013171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300628.l6U6SkI8013850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-30 02:28 EST ------- > Do you mean "baekmuk-fonts"? If so, do we need a meta-package to let user able > to install korean support in CLI by just installing font-korean package? Actually looking at fonts-korean now, it seems it only includes baekmuk fonts so it could probably just be a straightward rename to "baekmuk-fonts". :) Perhaps it could provide fonts-korean if necessary or a meta package might still be useful for pulling other common korean fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300631.l6U6VSSM014033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:41:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300641.l6U6fQS0014438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-30 02:41 EST ------- Please update the source and source url to http://kldp.net/frs/?group_id=57&release_id=865 The current version is 2.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:43:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300643.l6U6hUMJ014589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 02:43 EST ------- I have checked this on Fedora Core 5, as emailed, and I found that there weren't any excess flags. Can you please tell me which ones are superfluous? Perhaps the %configure macro has changed in newer versions of RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 06:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 02:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300646.l6U6kR8a014772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 02:46 EST ------- For the record, here is the email discussion thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-July/msg00400.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 07:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300717.l6U7HVIg016921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-07-30 03:17 EST ------- Please, try the following version: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/IServerd-2.4.14-3.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 07:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300718.l6U7IJGI016967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-30 03:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160216) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160216&action=view) nabi.spec-4.patch some more fixes - please check I didn't break anything. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 07:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300719.l6U7J8jL017045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-30 03:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160217) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160217&action=view) nabi.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 07:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300719.l6U7JbLQ017115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-30 03:19 EST ------- ? Perhaps it is better that all header files are hidden under /usr/include/ustr. ...if I did that the users would have to alter their -I build flags to use the headers, saying that I think I'll be forced to move at least ustr-conf.h out to /usr/lib/ and /ustr/lib64/ if multilib. development is to be supported. I'll have to think about this more. ? the fedora compilation flags (-O2) is overwritten by -O1. Is this intentional? Yes, GCC/GDB gets confused at -O2 so for a "debug mode" you want to reduce that confusion as much as possible. ? Well, it is okay, however would you rename the file which contains white space in its name? This is part of upstream, is it policy to rename upstream files? I guess I can change the spaces to dashes at install time, but it means html documentation pointing to the file won't work unless I run that through sed etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 07:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300721.l6U7LIem017288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-30 03:21 EST ------- thanks for your reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 08:01:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300801.l6U81lLT020640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-30 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > > ? the fedora compilation flags (-O2) is overwritten > by -O1. Is this intentional? > > Yes, GCC/GDB gets confused at -O2 so for a "debug mode" > you want to reduce that confusion as much as possible. Either this package is obeying RPM_OPT_FLAGS, or ... if it can't, it has to be considered broken or you are triggering a bug in GCC. In any case, this is a MUSTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 08:13:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300813.l6U8D0g1022208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-07-30 04:12 EST ------- Didn't say it was a huge problem, just that it needs to be coordinated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 08:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300816.l6U8Gm5F022685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ynakam at hitachisoft.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ynakam at hitachisoft.jp ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-07-30 04:16 EST ------- Hi, I am not a sponsor, but I saw you spec file. 1) >Buildrequires: checkpolicy libselinux-devel >= 2.0.13 selinux-policy-devel = 2.6.4-26.sepgsql.fc7 >Requires: policycoreutils >= 2.0.16 libselinux >= 2.0.13 selinux-policy = 2.6.4-26.sepgsql.fc7 I could not build your package. What is selinux-policy-devel = "2.6.4-26.sepgsql.fc7"? It it included in fedora? 2) You have to use more macros throughout spec file. Such as: sepostgresql -> %{name} /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile -> %{__datadir}/selinux/devel/Makefile and also /usr/sbin etc, you can replace them with macros. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros 3) Your package does not include documentation. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. 4) Are you using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags}? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 08:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300832.l6U8WQNs024049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From ynakam at hitachisoft.jp 2007-07-30 04:32 EST ------- One more comment, I can not find download url for source files. This may be useful: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 09:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300917.l6U9Has2027277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-30 05:17 EST ------- I've taken a look at the spec and had the src.rpm built in mock. There is a small problem with the Source tag, the URL listed over there (http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/sundials-2.3.0.tar.gz) is not reachable. And it is not the link provided by upstream. The fact that one has to actually agree to the BSD license and provide a username+email address before using http://www.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/download/download.html for downloading the source is a bit of nuisance, but I would still use this URL as Source0 rather then a copy placed somewhere else. Minor problems which you might want to fix before uploading to cvs - autoconf is already a BR of automake - rpmlint on the source rpm gives:Source RPM: W: sundials macro-in-%changelog configure W: sundials mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 1) These are easy to fix, just replace '%configure' with '%%configure' in changelog and stick with either tabs or spaces in the spec. rpmlint sundials-devel-2.3.0-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm gives W: sundials-devel no-documentation which can be ignored, since we have a separate -doc rpm. Looking at the mock build log, the flags used during compile seem OK to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 09:40:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707300940.l6U9eqGC030209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-07-30 05:40 EST ------- I apologize for not reviewing the package for such long time. This is a really big and complex package that's why it took so long for me. What was not clear to me was the copyright/license for each of the the photos. It is not clear who authored which picture, and what is the copying policy for it. Second one was kind of a "pseudo-security" issue -- I haven't look at it yet, but are you sure none of the pictures contain EXIF thumbnail of an uncropped or unprocessed photo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 10:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301023.l6UANiDc001374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 06:23 EST ------- Regarding the Source0 URL, my view is that a URL that does not work with a simple 'wget' does not count as a download URL. So, I have added a comment to that effect, and have also corrected the URL to my mirror copy of the source tarball. Any person looking at the .spec file will be able to use the original download location, while automated tools such as 'spectool' will succeed through the use of my mirrored copy. I have removed 'autoconf' as a build-time dependency and corrected teh macro-in-%changelog problem, and changed all tags to spaces. http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ Any other issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 11:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301106.l6UB6STN004676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-30 07:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-iniparse Short Description: A better INI parser for Python Owners: tla at rasmil.dk Branches: EL-5 FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 11:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301107.l6UB7T4B004773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-30 07:07 EST ------- Ups, wrong flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 11:39:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301139.l6UBdsIf008370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 eric.moret at epita.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #159824|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-30 07:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160236) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160236&action=view) New spec file with added dist tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 11:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222248] Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301145.l6UBjBQN008839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248 ------- Additional Comments From eric.moret at epita.fr 2007-07-30 07:45 EST ------- Added dist tag: ftp://zouric.com/public/alsa-plugins/alsa-plugins.spec ftp://zouric.com/public/alsa-plugins/alsa-plugins-1.0.14-1.fc7.src.rpm The above questions regarding "POST" state and reviewer still stand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:01:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301201.l6UC1HJ6010502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-30 08:01 EST ------- There's a README file, which lists the copyright/license for each of the photos, and the author. As to the EXIF thumbnail, I didn't even think to check. I'll do that before committing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:19:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301219.l6UCJINN012082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 08:19 EST ------- You need not pass the "CC=gcc CXX=g++" flags to %configure. They are set by default. Why are these commented lines kept in the spec file: #aclocal #autoconf #autoheader ? I will do a formal review once I am back on my own machine tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301222.l6UCMcxE012377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 08:22 EST ------- For the '-doc' subpackage use 'Documentation' as the value of the 'Group' tag. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301222.l6UCMw58012435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-30 08:22 EST ------- FYI, build 29 disables PPC/PPC64 (obexftp missing). Tada! (Closing, next-release.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301228.l6UCSbe3013007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 08:28 EST ------- Instead of passing '--enable-static=no' '%configure', you could use '--disable-static' as mentioned at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 12:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301258.l6UCwYgw015702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 08:58 EST ------- http://www.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/download/code/sundials-2.3.0.tar.gz can be used as the Source0 value. rishi at fencepost:~$ wget http://www.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/download/code/sundials-2.3.0.tar.gz --08:59:13-- http://www.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/download/code/sundials-2.3.0.tar.gz => `sundials-2.3.0.tar.gz' Resolving www.llnl.gov... 198.128.246.160 Connecting to www.llnl.gov|198.128.246.160|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 6,469,146 (6.2M) [application/x-tar] 27% [=========> ] 1,767,968 335.33K/s ETA 00:14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301303.l6UD3sT4016346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 09:03 EST ------- The 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' in the '%install' stanza is not needed. Is there any specific reason you used it? Otherwise, consider removing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:14:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301314.l6UDEUIh017887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 09:14 EST ------- Hi Debarshi, Have updated: - download location - Group for -doc pkg - removed mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - CC and CXX args Have ignored ;-) New stuff at http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301322.l6UDMs9K018864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 09:22 EST ------- Update the '%changelog' stanza, and optionally give the '%release' a bump. My question regarding: %build # Building this RPM on some platforms requires the following #aclocal #autoconf #autoheader ...still stands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:30:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301330.l6UDU8qB019722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 09:30 EST ------- I *did* update the changelog stanza. I choose not to bump %release. Does it really matter that I leave some comments there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301333.l6UDXiIx020389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 09:33 EST ------- OK I see now, 'Mon 29 Jul' is wrong. Will upload again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301340.l6UDejaO021410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-30 09:40 EST ------- New stuff at http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301348.l6UDmNPW022460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 09:48 EST ------- For bouml-2.29.1-3 * Desktop file - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. - Well, when I launch projectControl or projectSynchro, a dialog appears that shows "BOUML_ID is not defined" and then immediately the program exits. This behavior is not expected for programs launched by desktop files. * Source - Ah.. 2.30 is released... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 13:59:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301359.l6UDxZ5j024353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 09:59 EST ------- I am in office and I don't have access to my machine now. In the meantime could you have a look at the bouml-doc package. Ofcourse that would also need a version bump now that 2.30 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 14:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301403.l6UE35ME024657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-07-30 10:02 EST ------- you have filed a bug for ppc missing obexftp? added it to the arch tracker bug? now that kdebluetooth is in i want to update kmobiletools but I dont want to drop ppc support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 14:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] New: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mzazrivec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/mzazrivec/dbxml.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/mzazrivec/dbxml-2.3.10-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: Oracle Berkeley DB XML is an open source, embeddable XML database with XQuery-based access to documents stored in containers and indexed based on their content. Oracle Berkeley DB XML is built on top of Oracle Berkeley DB and inherits its rich features and attributes. Like Oracle Berkeley DB, it runs in process with the application with no need for human administration. Oracle Berkeley DB XML adds a document parser, XML indexer and XQuery engine on top of Oracle Berkeley DB to enable the fastest, most efficient retrieval of data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 14:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301406.l6UE6jvU025158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 10:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Upgraded to 0.18 release. > Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/nabi.spec (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=160216) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160216&action=view) [edit] > nabi.spec-4.patch > > some more fixes - please check I didn't break anything. :) (I only glanced at both spec files) More cleanup: * Please use full path for the commands which are not under normal users' paths. * The following is smarter ----------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/ \ %SOURCE1 ----------------------------------------------------------- ! Note: desktop-file-install automatically fix the following, however Categories must be seperated by semicolon: i.e. ----------------------------------------------------------- Categories=System; ----------------------------------------------------------- * What is the use of the line: ----------------------------------------------------------- %attr(755,root,root) ----------------------------------------------------------- ? Question Which package should own %_sysconfdir/X11/xinit/xinput.d ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 14:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301408.l6UE89wp025305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 10:08 EST ------- There has been a new upstream release for BOUML-- version 2.30. However the documentation was last revised on May 20th 2007 and is compatible with BOUML releases since 2.26.2. See http://bouml.free.fr/download.html How do I handle the value for the Version tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 14:42:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301442.l6UEgqN6029569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 10:42 EST ------- Feature requests like this should really go upstream, shouldn't they? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301507.l6UF7Ulu001399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-30 11:07 EST ------- At first, I'm very sorry for any inconvenience caused by this technical issue. I have found out, that my ISP has installed a mechanism which try to guess the rigth name of the document on the webserver if you type in a wrong URL. The following URL should works properly: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230164] Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301509.l6UF9JYW001572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-07-30 11:09 EST ------- It seems you forgot to block Fe-Legal and to assign this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301515.l6UFFe7o002181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 11:15 EST ------- For 1.4-3: * BuildRequires - I just watched Makefile and I don't think this package must have gnome-python2 pygtk2-devel as BuildRequires. * Requires - It may well that this package has "Requires: redhat-artwork". -------------------------------------------------------- 102 menu_items = ( 103 ("/_File", None, None, 0, ""), 104 ("/File/_Quit", "Q", self.DestroyCallback, 0, "", gtk.STOCK_QUIT), 105 ("/_Help", None, None, 0, ""), 106 ("/_Help/_About", None, self.AboutCallback, 0, "", "gnome-stock-about") 107 ) -------------------------------------------------------- * icon - By the way, why do you have to install icon under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, even though it is also installed under %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:31:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221677] Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301531.l6UFVDFN004311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atmel-firmware - Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless network chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221677 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-07-30 11:31 EST ------- I'll take it, but I might not get to it for a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301534.l6UFYhgq004709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 11:34 EST ------- IMO it is better that the EVR is 0-0.date20070520, for example http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301536.l6UFagTx005167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 11:36 EST ------- Ah.. 0-0.X.date20070520 is better, where X is incremented as 1, 2, 3, ..... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 15:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301554.l6UFsDAF008110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 16:15:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301615.l6UGF8US009595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 law at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From law at redhat.com 2007-07-30 12:15 EST ------- First package, thus I need a sponsor. Sorry that information wasn't included in the original submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301703.l6UH3MGO013892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-30 13:03 EST ------- libgeotiff-1.2.4-0.3.rc1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:03:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249296] Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301703.l6UH3QAX013943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff - GeoTIFF format handler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249296 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.4-0.3.rc1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301704.l6UH4973014204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-30 13:04 EST ------- bombardier-0.8.2.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249725] Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301704.l6UH4ENY014251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bombardier - The GNU bombing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249725 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.8.2.2-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301704.l6UH4LVv014294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-30 13:04 EST ------- R-BufferedMatrix-1.0.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246539] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301704.l6UH4P8X014336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrix - A matrix data storage object held in temporary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246539 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:05:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301705.l6UH5UQP014604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-30 13:05 EST ------- R-widgetTools-1.12.0-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301705.l6UH5YDK014649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.12.0-12.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301720.l6UHKIh2017002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-07-30 13:20 EST ------- > I am somewhat confused by this package. The screenshots show it is for > administrating xen servers. It depends on python-paramaibo, which is the > python-ssh client. Yet it requires xen on the local machine? only for local administration (i.e local managing domain) > People tend to have more then 1 xen server (if only to be able to migrate). > It would be great if this GUI would support adding remote xen servers. actually it able to do so (through ssh). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301722.l6UHMEAn017213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-30 13:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-paramiko Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com,jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301722.l6UHMGYr017241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-30 13:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-sqlalchemy Updated EPEL Owners: shahms at shahms.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301722.l6UHMKjh017284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-07-30 13:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pygpgme Updated EPEL Owners: toshio at tiki-lounge.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:30:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301730.l6UHUt0X018576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-07-30 13:30 EST ------- I'd be OK with making a openvpn-devel package that included whatever a plugin needed to compile. If you can narrow down what we'd need to include for me, that would be great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301734.l6UHYg2u019160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pavucontrol Updated Fedora Owners: lpoetter at redhat.com,drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:36:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301736.l6UHaN6C019326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pulseaudio Updated Fedora Owners: lpoetter at redhat.com,drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx I am upstream of this package and Pierre agreed to co-maintain this package with me from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301737.l6UHbTWU019494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:37 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot the justification for the owner change: I am upstream for this package and Pierre agreed to co-maintain this package with me from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301737.l6UHbqoP019585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:37:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301737.l6UHbsGh019662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:37 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301739.l6UHdOw0019834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: padevchooser Updated Fedora Owners: lpoetter at redhat.com,drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx I am upstream of this package and Pierre agreed to co-maintain this package with me from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301739.l6UHdVVd019881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:39 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:40:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301740.l6UHeBoH020008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pavumeter Updated Fedora Owners: lpoetter at redhat.com,drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx I am upstream of this package and Pierre agreed to co-maintain this package with me from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301740.l6UHenZp020087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lpoetter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: paman Updated Fedora Owners: lpoetter at redhat.com,drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx I am upstream of this package and Pierre agreed to co-maintain this package with me from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188740] Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301744.l6UHiQEG020650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-paramiko - a SSH2 protocol library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188740 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:44 EST ------- I have removed ivazqueznet at gmail.com as a co-maintainer from the EPEL branches only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:47:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301747.l6UHlrfq021177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:47 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:48:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210217] Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301748.l6UHm6u9021226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygpgme - Python module for working with OpenPGP messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210217 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:48 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301750.l6UHofdY021593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:50 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301750.l6UHotUU021645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:50 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301751.l6UHp79q021728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 13:51 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301752.l6UHqhrb022228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-30 13:52 EST ------- Ralf, I'm not sure if you know the context for the above. The Fedora flags are, roughly: -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic ...and you appear to be saying that adding other options is fine, as long as you don't change the behaviour of any of the above? (although I'd be shocked if nothing did -Wno-* which turned off a -Wall option). I can sort of understand it for all of them apart from -O1, but what is the rationale for requiring optimizations at that specific level? This is esp. true given that we are talking about _sub-package_ specifically for development, with the main package using the exact CFLAGS you want. You are requiring making the debugging worse in Fedora, for no good reason that I can see. If you are going to hold to that line, due to it being policy, I'd like to know how I can go about getting this policy fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 17:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301757.l6UHvYKF023203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-30 13:57 EST ------- Help? HOWTO/FAQ? - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301815.l6UIFcgH026910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 14:15 EST ------- I think something is wrong with your scriptlet dependencies; post does not call /sbin/service. I think perhaps you meant Requires(postun): /sbin/service Since this is just a two-character typo and is the only thing I see wrong with this package, I'll go ahead and approve it and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: d34a09d7a396bcf19beb0002195c5862b62292b04fd1fb5a83ae382955f28118 and-1.2.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(and) = 1.2.2-2.fc8 and = 1.2.2-2.fc8 = /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service config(and) = 1.2.2-2.fc8 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed the package and made sure the service would start and stop properly. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets look OK but dependencies are slightly off. * init script looks good and seems to conform to LSB requirements. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, just fix the %postun scriptlet dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] New: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbarnes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://baloo.boston.redhat.com/~mbarnes/rarian/rarian.spec SRPM URL: http://baloo.boston.redhat.com/~mbarnes/rarian/rarian-0.5.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Rarian is a documentation meta-data library, designed as a replacement for Scrollkeeper. I've split this into a main package and two subpackages: rarian Contains the Rarian library ("librarian"). rarian-devel Contains a pkg-config file and some header files. rarian-compat Provides all the old scrollkeeper commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:35:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301835.l6UIZ2Ok029762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-07-30 14:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: and Short Description: Auto nice daemon Owners: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:39:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301839.l6UIddmH030698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarnes at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301840.l6UIe34t030773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 14:40 EST ------- Yes, better to start a new ticket submitted by the person who will be driving the submission. I'm sure we can get it reviewed relatively quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301842.l6UIg75O031114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:39:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301839.l6UIdFSm030575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 14:39 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301842.l6UIg8Wx031140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301842.l6UIgAnf031184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:48:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301848.l6UImC1P032417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-30 14:48 EST ------- ok, sounds good. Neither of those issues seems to be blockers, just wanted to make sure they were addressed. Sounds like the info issue will be fixed upstream. I don't think it adds much to package quickref.txt, as it's just a duplicate of the man page. You can package it if you like, or leave it out, it's up to you. I see no further issues, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. Also, do consider going and reviewing another waiting package to help spread out the review load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226136] Merge Review: mesa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301848.l6UImYv7032453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mesa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226136 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226643] Merge Review: xorg-x11-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301849.l6UInMSd032505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226643 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 18:53:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301853.l6UIrRqE000632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-30 14:53 EST ------- Did my own CVS. Here's the record of it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: winpdb Short Description: An advanced python debugger Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: EL-4 EL-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226581] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301901.l6UJ1V88002009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:01 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. This seems to be building now. ebc446e74eea72d391104b1ce3b2a5376bced098154ec089a944f4311d240904 xf86-input-calcomp-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-calcomp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is not a problem. This looks fine to me; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:16:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301916.l6UJGgYX004753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-07-30 15:16 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226585] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301929.l6UJTgXQ005813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226585 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:29 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. d6a66778e0f6ddd907cba5784386bd6bb526f773b5db9faa35875ba67c2ca6ad xf86-video-cyrix-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix invalid-license MIT/X11 Should be just MIT, it seems: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing W: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix macro-in-%changelog ix86 Need to double that percent sign. W: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) No big deal. The first two are minor but should be fixed; I can fix them myself if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226585] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301932.l6UJWKDJ006106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226585 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:32 EST ------- Doh, I hit submit too early. This also shouldn't own %{moduledir} and %{driverdir}. Again a quick fix that I can make if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226590] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301934.l6UJYnGM006531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-elo2300 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226590 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:34 EST ------- I think this was removed from the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226592] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301941.l6UJfZ1q008060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226592 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:41 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 8b479702f61e6798a3dca73bad2f2053082a157e1608d9d87f0a2f1d91e75b95 xf86-input-evdev-1.1.2.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-evdev mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 5) which is OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:43:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226602] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301943.l6UJhAvZ008336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-joystick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226602 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:43 EST ------- This package seems to have been removed from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301945.l6UJjg8w008706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2007-07-30 15:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-lxml Updated Fedora Owners: shahms at shahms.com,jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226610] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301949.l6UJncmi009512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226610 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:49 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. d6497080967b8285b663fedd7cafd4457578282ebd7da0b216b6fa214dd88a86 xf86-video-neomagic-1.1.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic incoherent-version-in-changelog control 1.1.1-2.1 Looks like some script backfired; this could easily be fixed. W: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic invalid-license MIT/X11 Should be just MIT. W: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) No big deal. This shouldn't own %{moduledir} or %{driverdir}. I can fix all of these up if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301954.l6UJsDGQ010589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-07-30 15:54 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?highlight=%28excludearch%29 Besides, obexftp is in the ppc tree for both Fedora 7 and devel. http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/7/Everything/ppc/os/Fedora/obexftp-0.22-0.2.pre4.ppc.rpm http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/ppc/os/Fedora/obexftp-0.22-0.2.pre4.ppc.rpm But the ppc64 is AWOL indeed. There's no Exclu(de|sive)Arch in the obextftp specfile - Dominik, ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226611] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301955.l6UJtg8b010988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226611 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:55 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. c8c0b14b2ed2e9f2b51e0f46d474e52db0eac0345dbfea845f1d62028ec8fec0 xf86-video-nsc-2.8.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-nsc incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.8.1-2 2.8.1-3.fc8 I think this is just a typo; -2 should be -3. W: xorg-x11-drv-nsc invalid-license MIT/X11 Should be MIT W: xorg-x11-drv-nsc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) No big deal. I can fix these if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:57:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247513] Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301957.l6UJv55n011197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: junit4 - java regression testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247513 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|fnasser at redhat.com |vivekl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-07-30 15:57 EST ------- I will start on the review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 19:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226611] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707301957.l6UJvjpU011344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226611 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 15:57 EST ------- Doh, again I hit submit too soon. This also shouldn't own %{moduledir} and %{driverdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 20:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302005.l6UK5BLq012147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 16:05 EST ------- ACK is in bug 245690. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 20:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302029.l6UKTrI1015112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-30 16:29 EST ------- Upstream have agreed to make some changes and I'll need to do the rest in the SPEC file. Currently working with the package maintainers for other distributions to coordinate the changes and get a new version released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 20:31:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302031.l6UKV26E015350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-07-30 16:31 EST ------- fyi, PyQt-4.3 released today, but it requires sip-3.7 (not yet in rawhide), so please continue with review of PyQt4-4.2. Alex, Bryan? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 20:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302041.l6UKfCmq016993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-07-30 16:41 EST ------- I'll have a more complete review up later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 21:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302106.l6UL6SfU019452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-07-30 17:06 EST ------- OK, here's my review. The following files most likely belong in the -devel package, not the main PyQt4 package: /usr/bin/pylupdate4 /usr/bin/pyrcc4 /usr/bin/pyuic4 Must fix rpmlint errors: E: PyQt4 non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/uic/pyuic.py 0644 E: PyQt4 script-without-shebang /usr/bin/pyuic4 E: PyQt4 binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/QtDesigner.so ['/home/bos/rpms/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/qpy/QtDesigner'] Also, it would be good to fix the 228 (!) rpmlint warnings on the -devel package, which I attached several months ago. Beyond the above, all other MUSTs look good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 21:47:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302147.l6ULlkwC023034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 besfahbo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |fontconfig ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-07-30 17:47 EST ------- bureaucracy. I'm reassigning this to fontconfig, so you are not bothered by an open bug for a real issue. If you cannot respect the fact that I don't have the free time to follow up with this, I don't think you should be responsible for a bugzilla product. Get a lesson on what issue tracking means. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 22:41:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226614] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302241.l6UMfDpF026135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-palmax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226614 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 18:41 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 5c00c85eed2950a575362bee2f21c2fa68eb8af81e7f1d451273a1302eac4145 xf86-input-palmax-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-palmax mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. Looks good to me; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 22:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226616] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302255.l6UMtX5v027524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-rendition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226616 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 18:55 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 37e7aef72f7466485f5a3bafd0d43190cb7439de16868bfba2c59bb4c9df4408 xf86-video-rendition-4.1.3.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-rendition mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 22:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226617] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302259.l6UMxKBZ027839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226617 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 18:59 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 4a1206cb1a200aad8881216547d9913d0e24928138f3b1bb912a3336b9c05c97 xf86-video-s3-0.5.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-s3 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) W: xorg-x11-drv-s3 no-documentation which are OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:02:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226618] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302302.l6UN2mkW028469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226618 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:02 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. cef5702963f49e737fb8b1472dc0241f7a5da49f844ac77f2df3e693a84bc822 xf86-video-s3virge-1.9.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-s3virge mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:03:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242207] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302303.l6UN39n8028517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc - Cross Compiled GNU C Library targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242207 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-30 19:03 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output: + SRPM has empty output + noarch RPM has these: W: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libcrypt.so (and many more like this). OK because this is a cross-development package, and these are all target development files. It would make no sense to make a separate devel vs. runtime part because we aren't going to run ARM GP2X binaries on i386/x86_64/ppc/... Fedora anyway. E: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/arm-gp2x-linux/lib/libBrokenLocale-2.3.6.so (and many more like this). Again, this is OK because those are target files. W: arm-gp2x-linux-glibc non-standard-dir-in-usr arm-gp2x-linux This one's OK too for a cross-toolchain package. + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: ! License tag says GPL, actually LGPL, must fix! + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (with the cross-toolchain exception for %{_prefix}/%{target}) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + It would make no sense to use RPM_OPT_FLAGS here because this is a target package, which is built using a cross GCC which won't understand stuff like -fstack-protector, and for which x86 -march and -mtune switches definitely don't make sense. Thus the omission of RPM_OPT_FLAGS is correct. + no -debuginfo package because this is noarch + no host static libraries nor .la files (I think we can give the target static libraries a pass. This isn't a Fedora target, so trying to apply our static library policies to the target wouldn't make much sense.) + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths (no host executables or libraries at all, I also ran readelf -d on the target libraries to make sure and there's no rpath there either) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING.LIB included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: glibc-2.3.6.tar.bz2: MD5SUM: bfdce99f82d6dbcb64b7f11c05d6bc96 SHA1SUM: 82d0487419f1bdbf2dee439c344e89d6af47e558 glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.6.tar.bz2: MD5SUM: d4eeda37472666a15cc1f407e9c987a9 SHA1SUM: 10190168bf948556afdfff46f87f9208402d810f (The applied patches are also well-documented, i.e. where they come from and what they fix.) + builds on at least one arch (F7 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BR + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no host shared libraries, so no ldconfig calls needed + package not relocatable ! directory ownership: %{_prefix}/%{target} and %{_prefix}/%{target}/include are already owned by arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers which this package Requires, so this package shouldn't own them + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly (%defattr present) + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%configure not used for several reasons, including it playing jokes with --target and using host-specific RPM_OPT_FLAGS) + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + %doc files not required at runtime + no host headers, target headers are OK in this cross-development package + no host static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no host shared libraries, so .so symlink guidelines don't apply + no -devel package, so the guideline to require the main package in it doesn't apply + no .la files + no GUI programs, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install (same nitpick about mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as for arm-gp2x-linux-binutils) + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * Skipping mock test. * Skipping the "all architectures" test, I only have i386. + package functions as described: I installed this, rebuilt arm-gp2x-linux-gcc with %define bootstrap 0 and can now compile and link this C program: #include int main(void) { puts("Hello World!"); return 0; } I'm not having the same success with C++, but that's probably GCC's fault, so I'm posting the problems there to the GCC review. + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies MUST FIX: * fix License to say LGPL, not GPL * don't own %{_prefix}/%{target} and %{_prefix}/%{target}/include (owned by arm-gp2x-linux-kernel-headers) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242206] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302308.l6UN8clS028881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at arm-gp2x-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242206 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-07-30 19:08 EST ------- I built glibc now and built a non-bootstrap GCC against it. C works, but C++ chokes on this simple program: #include int main(void) { std::cout << "Hello World!" << std::endl; return 0; } This compiles fine with the native g++, but arm-gp2x-linux-g++ gives me tons of undefined references to `_Unwind_SjLj_Register', `_Unwind_SjLj_Unregister' and`_Unwind_SjLj_Resume'. -fno-exceptions doesn't help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226619] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302309.l6UN98gq028912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-savage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226619 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:09 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 1a9aa442152c139e3c54bc6c323bd13edf0bfff70a81c03969bcb1159317edb2 xf86-video-savage-2.1.2.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-savage mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226620] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302315.l6UNFxBF029288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226620 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:15 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 54cf791695a53d4836d32f899b7d34b969edf5415f02e36956b6e72993e21cd7 xf86-video-siliconmotion-1.5.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226621] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302339.l6UNd1uI030196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226621 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:38 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 898ee8fb16fff89ba8ac5c83b9f5a2371084719db0cf034140427229191436f6 xf86-video-sis-0.9.3.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-sis mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226622] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302343.l6UNheq5030568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226622 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:43 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 1596b79ab3e33263bde2d456cc0376808abee80b4cde059605f176d98bdb45cb xf86-video-sisusb-0.8.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK, and E: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man which is problematic. It's just a matter of removing "%dir %{_mandir}" from the spec. X directory ownership problems as above. * debuginfo package looks good. I can fix this up for you quickly if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226623] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302348.l6UNmYpG030894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226623 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:48 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 9cd53cb719bf401ff3f72233d3a88c59539b94eaf11e586e307c807a325f0815 xf86-input-spaceorb-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-spaceorb no-documentation which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good (one whole file and no directories) * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226624] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302352.l6UNq74s031104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-summa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226624 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:52 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. f10f2cadd4120b40b3658000c87f910e3005f4d787441c7dd83b48ebbf2a11f2 xf86-input-summa-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-summa no-documentation which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247402] Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302354.l6UNsERK031233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GspiceUI - A GUI to freely available Spice Electronic circuit similators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247402 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-30 19:54 EST ------- Ok, I guess now we are back on track, concerning gwave! http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/gwave.png I have a working copy of gwave 2 (20070514) along with its missing dependencies.: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gwave/ I haven't yet mock anything, and more polishing should be done. The next question is who will maintain what of those ? I'm wiling to take gwave, since it's closer to gEDA. Xavier, will to take the guiles :) ? here's upstream response: -------------------------------------------------- Note that gwave2 (for gtk+-2.0) doesn't include any of the much-needed improvements that gtk+-2.0 will eventually enable me to write, but it does appear to build and work no worse than the gtk-1.0-based gwave - once the dependencies are dealt with. Dependencies are the main reason I haven't really announced this version although you are of course welcome to download it and test. > I was planning to include gwave2 into the Fedora Collection so that fedora > users can just install gwave2 via yum. That would be great. I've been trying to deal with the dependencies before announcing something that was easier for people to use. I've also been building FC6 RPMs for my own development, and had recently looked at the Fedora guidelines and the process for getting my rpms into Fedora. I'd be very pleased if you got the whole guile-gnome-platform stack into Fedora, and wouldn't mind colaborating to help make that happen. > As fedora policy suggests to ship latest versions of packages, I was thinking > to build gwave2 under: > * guile-1.8 > * guile-gtk-2.0 > * guile-lib-0.1.4 > * guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93 > * g-wrap-1.9.8 > However I was unable to build the dependencies. That is why I'm writing > to you to have more details and what do you recommend gwave2 to be built > on. here's what I know: guile-gtk-2.0 isn't needed guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93 is the right choice, but it requires g-wrap 1.9.9, which unfortunately isn't released yet. 1.9.9RC1 required a few patches. I successfully built everything using g-wrap from CVS of a few weeks ago. I think the current CVS should work OK too. I haven't tried pestering the maintainer for a release or release candidate. guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93 also needs guile-cairo, which I have been building RPMs for. The last time I built gwave2, guile-cairo was at 1.3.91; but I think the current 1.4.0 should work; try: > Right now, I was able to build the gwave-20060606 with > * guile-1.6 > * guile-gtk-1.2 Yes, that's what I'd recommend for the old one. -------------------------------------------------- I'll invite him to join in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 30 23:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226625] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707302355.l6UNtMmp031355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226625 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 19:55 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 6b1a00df5c9628817d08f07c6f18f578950744f3eb63b4397be8b0754e728624 xf86-video-tdfx-1.3.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-tdfx mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:03:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226626] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310003.l6V03Nrr031885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226626 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 20:03 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 09b9506d1bb1deaaf69872392bc56e1d75997bb8157e85a9121749bf5fe15727 xf86-input-tek4957-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-tek4957 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:06:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226627] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310006.l6V06Tk9032149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-trident https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226627 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 20:06 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. d23eb8fa165d238ddf64da63dcd60c70a01cd761608a18402cfb95aed6722495 xf86-video-trident-1.2.3.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-trident mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226628] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310009.l6V09MZL032396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-tseng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226628 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 20:09 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 83928db30ad38e51d10f8736b9788429d50e95ea59ad3802325da7a8cf08acc5 xf86-video-tseng-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-tseng mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:29:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226629] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310029.l6V0TJnc001389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-ur98 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226629 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 20:29 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 214bceb0fd52a932d448ce03d66539eed2e6660617e3d42977704cb7eec6472a xf86-input-ur98-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-ur98 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:32:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310032.l6V0Wp6G001629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-30 20:32 EST ------- Updated URL http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/moreutils-0.20-2.src.rpm http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/moreutils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226630] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310033.l6V0XfTk001693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-v4l https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-30 20:33 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 33ad549ea3f6a8da7f58d9964f3f2d83aabc6d64c2ebc2ea0033ac8dacaec870 xf86-video-v4l-0.1.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-v4l mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310035.l6V0ZSvn001777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-30 20:35 EST ------- I do try and contribute where possible. Updated URLs http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/perl-Time-Duration-1.04-4.src.rpm http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/perl-Time-Duration.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 00:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310035.l6V0ZxqV001828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-07-30 20:35 EST ------- Updated URLs http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/phpTodo-0.8.1-0.5.beta.src.rpm http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/phpTodo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 01:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] New: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ewan at macmahon.me.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SPECS/gimp-resynthesizer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SRPMS/gimp-resynthesizer-0.15-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Resynthesizer is a Gimp plug-in for texture synthesis. Given a sample of a texture, it can create more of that texture. This has uses including: - Creating more of a texture (including creation of tileable textures) - Removing objects from images (by extending the surrounding texture) - Creating themed images (by transferring a texture from one image to another) The original home page is at: http://logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer This is my first Fedora package, so I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 01:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310155.l6V1tVKc006286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 02:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310217.l6V2H4so007584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 22:17 EST ------- > * BuildRequires > - I just watched Makefile and I don't think this package > must have gnome-python2 pygtk2-devel as BuildRequires. Fixed. I wonder why the Dag Apt and FC6 package had them. > * Requires > - It may well that this package has "Requires: redhat-artwork". Fixed. > * icon > - By the way, why do you have to install icon under > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, even though it is > also installed under %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ ? While creating the initial build, I was told on #fedora-devel that only icons placed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor are themeable, while stuff under %{_datadir}/pixmaps are non-themeable. I was advised to put the icons under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps. However the icon size is 96x96, and so I have now put it under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/apps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 02:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310221.l6V2LfAr008011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 22:21 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator-4.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator-1.4-4.fc8.src.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:05:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean (with baekmuk updation from upstream). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310305.l6V35Lk6012370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean (with baekmuk updation from upstream). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: fonts-korean |Merge Review: fonts-korean | |(with baekmuk updation from | |upstream). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310318.l6V3ItUU013433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 23:18 EST ------- +---------------+ | FORMAL REVIEW | +---------------+ - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Fine. Warning can be ignored since separate -doc subpackage is being provided. [rishi at ginger i386]$ rpmlint sundials-2.3.0-2.fc8.i386.rpm [rishi at ginger i386]$ rpmlint sundials-debuginfo-2.3.0-2.fc8.i386.rpm [rishi at ginger i386]$ rpmlint sundials-devel-2.3.0-2.fc8.i386.rpm W: sundials-devel no-documentation [rishi at ginger i386]$ rpmlint sundials-doc-2.3.0-2.fc8.i386.rpm [rishi at ginger i386]$ [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ rpmlint sundials-2.3.0-2.fc8.src.rpm [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Fine. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Fine. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. You need not install the INSTALL_NOTES as documentation. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Fine. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Fine. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Fine. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. A few sentences in the '%changelog' stanza lack full stops. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Fine. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Fine. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Fine. Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82674 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Not applicable. Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82674 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Why is 'BuildRequires: automake' necessary? I don't find any use of 'automake' during the build process. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Fine. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. You need to invoke /sbin/ldconfig for the -devel subpackage too, since it also includes shared libraries. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Is the '# --with-mpi-root=/usr/share/openmpi' line in '%build' stanza necessary? If you _must_ keep it, then replace /usr/share with %{_datadir}. John, just have look at the above comments. I will go through the remaining issues (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines), and let you know further. Mamoru, feel free to let me know if I have slipped up somewhere. Since this is my first review, your help might be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310319.l6V3JclE013525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: fonts-korean |Merge Review: fonts-korean |(with baekmuk updation from | |upstream). | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:32:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310332.l6V3WrOY014301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-30 23:32 EST ------- That results in a strange looking /usr/share/doc/bouml-doc-0 as the documentation directory. Is that fine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310336.l6V3aS4e014629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-30 23:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-chmod Short Description: Implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes Owners: rc040203 at freenet.de Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310337.l6V3bGAA014722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 03:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249892] Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310345.l6V3j0TW015291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml-doc - Documentation for the BOUML tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249892 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-30 23:44 EST ------- Um, then: -------------------------------------------------- %install # Reorganizing PDF. cp -p %{SOURCE1} ./pdf cp -p %{SOURCE2} ./pdf mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name cp -pr html pdf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_datadir/doc/%name %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %_datadir/doc/%name ---------------------------------------------------- is admitted. Just note: files under %_datadir/doc is automatically marked as %doc. * Please use "cp -p" to keep timestamp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 04:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310403.l6V43fKL016449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-31 00:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Ralf, I'm not sure if you know the context for the above. The Fedora flags are, > roughly: > > -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic > > ...and you appear to be saying that adding other options is fine, as long as you > don't change the behaviour of any of the above? More or less, yes, that's what I am saying. The core behind this is: A package's CFLAGS must not use a different ABI. > (although I'd be shocked if > nothing did -Wno-* which turned off a -Wall option). -W* options are warnings. They don't change the ABI. > I can sort of understand it for all of them apart from -O1, but what is the > rationale for requiring optimizations at that specific level? -O* flags imply many other flags and have many side-effects (such as inlining, certain optimizations, certain arch-dependent optimizations etc.), which implicitly gradually change over time. I.e. what you currently think about -O1 might be true on your current setup, but is not unlikely not apply in 2 years and on other archs. Therefore, using a consistent set of optimizations (RPM_OPT_FLAGS) and not to play tricks with them is important for a distro's quality. That said, unless there is an inevitable technical requirement (which I don't see in this case), things like -ggdb3 are just silly. Requiring -O1 in almost all cases means a major bug inside of a package and questions its usability. > You are requiring making the debugging worse in Fedora, for no good reason that > I can see. > If you are going to hold to that line, due to it being policy, I'd > like to know how I can go about getting this policy fixed. In this case, I am going to be hard - Fix the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 04:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310427.l6V4RgaV018196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From john at curioussymbols.com 2007-07-31 00:27 EST ------- * INSTALL_NOTES removed. * Corrected punct in changelog. * removed automake dep * added %post and %postun for -devel pkg (not sure about this, as the shared libraries contained in the -devel package are only symlinks and contain no new SONAMEs. But have done as requested). * it is definitely desirable that MPI support be added once build issues with that are resolved. So this is a valid reminder. Regarding %{_datadir} I'm not sure I totally see the logic there, but have changed it anyway. No stress. * bumped release to 3. New files at http://ascend.cheme.cmu.edu/ftp/jpye/ Note new filename for .src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 05:02:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310502.l6V52T5P020439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-31 01:02 EST ------- Jens, it had been updated: http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070731_f-k/fonts-korean.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070731_f-k/fonts-korean-1.0.11-10.fc8.src.rpm Parag, ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 05:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310505.l6V55wHF020707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #160215|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 05:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310521.l6V5L1QS021715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-31 01:20 EST ------- Seems to me the version numbering is a bit strange, no? I think it should reflect the upstream version which is 2.2 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 05:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249996] Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310548.l6V5mEMR023844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-31 01:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:02:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310602.l6V62whk024667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-31 02:02 EST ------- > The core behind this is: A package's CFLAGS must not use a different ABI. Your definition of ABI is vastly different to mine, apparently. > -O* flags imply many other flags and have many side-effects (such as inlining, > certain optimizations, certain arch-dependent optimizations etc.), which > implicitly gradually change over time. Indeed they do, none of those change the Application Binary Interface though. And, as I would normally presume you'd know, they do affect things like hampering debugging of code (which, being the -debug package might be kind of the point). > > You are requiring making the debugging worse in Fedora, for no good reason that > > I can see. > > If you are going to hold to that line, due to it being policy, I'd > > like to know how I can go about getting this policy fixed. > In this case, I am going to be hard - Fix the package. As I said I can make the package worse so it passes review (I'll upload a 0.7 package tomorrow), but again I'd like to know how I get this problem with policy fixed ... so at some point in the future I can unbreak the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:10:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310610.l6V6A93b025023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-31 02:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Seems to me the version numbering is a bit strange, no? > I think it should reflect the upstream version which is 2.2 now. yes. it should be changed to 2.2 version. else package looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:14:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310614.l6V6EjgJ025349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-31 02:14 EST ------- 1.0.11-10 is fonts-korean's version. 2.2 is baekmuk's version. IMHO, if one day fonts-korean be renamed to baekmuk-fonts, then we could change to 2.2 then. BTW FYI, a renaming will redirect all the previous fonts-korean history to baekmuk-fonts, and it might be lots of work to do if there is a meta package fonts-korean reintroduced in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310620.l6V6KWhY025581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 02:20 EST ------- I am back from hollidays, and you ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310627.l6V6RYxh025915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-07-31 02:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > 1.0.11-10 is fonts-korean's version. > 2.2 is baekmuk's version. Yes, but fonts-korean is just a collection of baekmuk fonts, so it should follow the upstream version number. > renaming will redirect all the previous fonts-korean > history to baekmuk-fonts, and it might be lots of work to do if there is a > meta package fonts-korean reintroduced in future. Yes it will be some work to rename the package but I think it is a meaningful and correct change to make. change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:31:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310631.l6V6V3jn026069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-07-31 02:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > > -O* flags imply many other flags and have many side-effects (such as inlining, > > certain optimizations, certain arch-dependent optimizations etc.), which > > implicitly gradually change over time. > > Indeed they do, none of those change the Application Binary Interface though. * -ggdb3 does. If GCC doesn't support it, your package won't build nor will it be usable. > And, as I would normally presume you'd know, they do affect things like > hampering debugging of code (which, being the -debug package might be kind of > the point). Yes, -O2 always reduces debug-ability of the code, so what is the problem you are trying to solve? > > > You are requiring making the debugging worse in Fedora, for no good reason that > > > I can see. > > > If you are going to hold to that line, due to it being policy, I'd > > > like to know how I can go about getting this policy fixed. > > > In this case, I am going to be hard - Fix the package. > > As I said I can make the package worse so it passes review (I'll upload a 0.7 > package tomorrow), but again I'd like to know how I get this problem with policy > fixed ... so at some point in the future I can unbreak the package. I guess you will understand, that I consider your answer to be non-acceptable and inappropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310644.l6V6iOuQ026748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-31 02:44 EST ------- Changed: http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070731_f-k/fonts-korean.spec http://hiro.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/20070731_f-k/fonts-korean-2.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244597] Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310645.l6V6j00W026824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkward - Graphical frontend for R language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 02:44 EST ------- Based on this list it seems that you have been sponsored so you should be able to approve the package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cvsextras&role_type=user&format=html You can have a look there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 06:58:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310658.l6V6wV00027345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-31 02:58 EST ------- Looks ok to me and ready for review. will post formal review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:02:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310702.l6V72VoE027586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-31 03:02 EST ------- can't find source url tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310705.l6V75tDe027864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 03:05 EST ------- Hi This is my first review so I will do my best but I might need help :-) At a first look: you should use install rather than cp to install the files you can change %{_mandir}/man1/dynagen.1.gz by %{name}.1.gz I am surprise by your %{_bindir}/* in the %files section I will have a further look later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310707.l6V77o0V028070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310710.l6V7AKt7028248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:22:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310722.l6V7MHJZ029368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-07-31 03:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160296) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160296&action=view) Spec file. Spec file with URL tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 07:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310745.l6V7jXiq031192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 03:45 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #19) > Mamoru, feel free to let me know if I have slipped up somewhere. Since this is > my first review, your help might be useful. Okay, I will check your review later (I have to check other person's package first..), but: (In reply to comment #20) > * added %post and %postun for -devel pkg (not sure about this, as the shared > libraries contained in the -devel package are only symlinks and contain no new > SONAMEs. But have done as requested). Acutally this is not needed. I will check if there is something else to fix anyway -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 08:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225767] Merge Review: fonts-korean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310818.l6V8II10003548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-korean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225767 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-31 04:18 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 48c0405ffbdf45e1311a978b65b47f4c baekmuk-bdf-2.2.tar.gz a6f4349179cbe3557641782cefba4d70 baekmuk-ttf-2.2.tar.gz e8f61c1ad118bc0f22e9373864866c60 cidfmap.ko 53056f07c8eefbcc63a3f14cb3faa724 FAPIcidfmap.ko + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 08:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310849.l6V8n7uc006242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-31 04:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi > This is my first review so I will do my best but I might need help :-) > At a first look: > you should use install rather than cp to install the files As there is no make, it doesn't _really_ matter, and there isn't really any advantages either way that I'm aware of (although I'll most likely change it later on). > you can change %{_mandir}/man1/dynagen.1.gz by %{name}.1.gz I won't do this, as it breaks the logical layout of the files section, (i.e. by removing all the context), plus it's not consistent with other packages (nothing personal, just a style thing). > I am surprise by your %{_bindir}/* in the %files section As there isn't a make install (where by the contents of bindir may change without warning), and instead I'm explicatly copying the two executable scripts, it's not too much of an issue in comparison to other packages, I will look at changing if there is anything major wrong. > I will have a further look later on. Please look at bug 246150 (dynamips which dynagen depends on) before reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 09:10:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707310910.l6V9A1S1007953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-07-31 05:09 EST ------- > ping? > > Do you still want this package to be in Fedora? Summer vacation... Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bontmia Short Description: Backup over network to multiple incremental archives Owners: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 10:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] New: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Linkage a bittorent lightweight client, it includes most common features found in other BitTorrent clients. Features include DHT, PEX, UPnP, desktop notifications and torrent creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 11:27:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189250] Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311127.l6VBRinj020752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lxml - ElementTree-like python bindings for libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189250 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-07-31 07:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-lxml New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 11:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311158.l6VBwPiH022942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-31 07:58 EST ------- Fixed the plugin location in a better/cleaner way: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 12:01:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311201.l6VC1kZh023194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-31 08:01 EST ------- Remove the .la files in the new location: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/linkage-0.1.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 12:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311256.l6VCuucR027066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-31 08:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pv Short Description: A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline Owners: jhrozek at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 13:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311310.l6VDAAXN028457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-31 09:10 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing my package, Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 13:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311332.l6VDWQkF031265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-31 09:32 EST ------- mock build ends with: mkdir .libs g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp- buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 - I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/incl ude/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/pa ngo-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libtorrent -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/d bus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -DPLUGIN_DIR=\"/usr/lib64/linkage/plugins\" -O 2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generi c -MT liblinkage_1_la-keyfile.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/liblinkage_1_la-keyfile.Tpo -c gtkmm_extra/keyfile.cc -fPIC -DPI C -o .libs/liblinkage_1_la-keyfile.o gtkmm_extra/keyfile.cc:28: error: redefinition of 'struct Glib::Container_Helpers::TypeTraits' /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/containerhandle_shared.h:322: error: previous definition of 'struct Glib::Container_H elpers::TypeTraits' make[3]: *** [liblinkage_1_la-keyfile.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/linkage-0.1.2/lib' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/linkage-0.1.2/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/linkage-0.1.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76956 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.76956 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 13:46:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311346.l6VDkHph000715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-31 09:46 EST ------- works fine here (F7 x86_64 in mock) can you attach your build.log file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 13:54:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249992] Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311354.l6VDsQnu001856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glglobe - OpenGl Globe - Earth simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249992 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2007-07-31 09:54 EST ------- Current spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe.spec Updated src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/glglobe/glglobe-0.2-3.fc7.src.rpm It didn't build in mock due to desktop-file-install not being available: - add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils so that it build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311404.l6VE4YA3002943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:13:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311413.l6VEDExh004064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-31 10:13 EST ------- Trivia: - please use a full source url - devel package needs to require pkgconfig - compat needs to Requires(post): rarian, I think - mock build fails with make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/rarian-0.5.4/util' Moving Files if needed mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lib/rarian': Permission denied make[3]: *** [install-exec-hook] Error 1 I guess there is some DESTDIR missing somewhere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311413.l6VEDrgY004167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbarnes at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311420.l6VEKI46004661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-31 10:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160324) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160324&action=view) failed build log This is the log after trying to build in devel/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311421.l6VELPvW004772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From tomasoni.claudio at gmail.com 2007-07-31 10:21 EST ------- Problems in building octaviz too. There are some relative paths in /usr/lib/vtk-5.0/vtkCommonKit.cmake that shouldn't be there. There are already patches to solve the problem at http://tinyurl.com/3auz54. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311430.l6VEUf6e007171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From kelvin at bughunter.co.uk 2007-07-31 10:30 EST ------- There is still a clash between LAM and MPICH in that the manual files are the same between packages. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:39:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311439.l6VEdP4Q012128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-07-31 10:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160325) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160325&action=view) mock root log for mock buildroot when build failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 14:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311447.l6VElFgH012875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-07-31 10:47 EST ------- ok, thx for the log. seems that it does not build against the gtkmm24 version in rawhide. added maintainer to CC... any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311510.l6VFALhj015844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-07-31 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > There is still a clash between LAM and MPICH in that the manual files are the > same between packages. > > Thanks! I've had an idea of splitting out a mpi-manpages subpackage from the main package to contain these manuals (they are MPI routines manuals and are the same for mpich2, lam and openmpi). For the split to be effective, both lam and openmpi will need to create similar subpackage and have it conflict each other. I have a package with this split at ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.5p4-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311514.l6VFEtXe018492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 11:14 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311516.l6VFGhEQ018663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 11:16 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311553.l6VFr2vr026704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 11:52 EST ------- Much better!! For -2: * Desktop file - Catetory "Application" is deprecated and should be removed (use --remove-category Application) - Use fedora as vendir_id. i.e. desktop-file-install --vendor fedora .... and this will create fedora-peless.desktop (and this case, use "--remove-original": please check the section "Desktop files" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * Packager/URL - Please remove the line "Packager". This is automatically set on Fedora side - And use https://developer.berlios.de/projects/peless/ as URL. * Documents - Why do you want to include philo.txt as documents? * Changelog - Please also add the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) to %changelog entry. For example: -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Sat Jul 28 2007 Paul Elliott - 1.156-2 - implement changes requested by Mamoru Tasaka on 2007-07-26 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Okay, this package will be (almost?) okay if you fix the issues above. However, as this is a sponsor requested ticket, please read below: -------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:54:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311554.l6VFs2Fi027464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-07-31 11:54 EST ------- Thanks for the link(s). Build 31 only excludes PPC64. Missing PPC64 BZ [1] added to PPC64 tracker. [2]. - Gilboa [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250260 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 15:57:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311557.l6VFvZJj028724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-31 11:57 EST ------- Do you agree with my proposals, such that I can provide you with a patch or are you disagreeing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311600.l6VG0QTd029031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-31 12:00 EST ------- *** Bug 203538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311600.l6VG0S8h029094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 Bug 226377 depends on bug 203538, which changed state. Bug 203538 Summary: a popt-devel package should be split out of popt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203538 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311603.l6VG3BRN029814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-07-31 12:03 EST ------- Also popt-devel will have to be added to a lot of BR, unless my rough analysis in Bug 203538 is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:07:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311607.l6VG7pBS030422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 12:07 EST ------- Ah, I forgot to write (although I noticed: ) - Desktop file Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. Everything else is okay. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gnome-password-generator) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311612.l6VGCNtF031142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-07-31 12:12 EST ------- > Some files have Windows-style end-of-file encodings. Please fix them > to Unix-style encodings Files removed in upstream SVN. > Summary should not end with dot. Fixed. > QUESTION How is libmapnik.so used? > - Is this library used only by this package? > - Or can this library be linked from other software? Still waiting on upstream. > - In %changelog, please use %%_prefix. Otherwise %_prefix is expanded > in %changelog. Fixed. > * compilation flags > - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. > - -O3 flag is generally forbidden (this make debugging difficult) Fixed in SPEC file / patches. Upstream did not want to change. > * Fonts > - Fedora has dejavu-fonts, dejavu-fonts-experimental and > shipping duplicate dejavu fonts in this package is not > allowed. Fixed in SPEC file / patches. Still needed in upstream to build on other platforms (eg Windows). > * sitelib vs sitearch > - This package installs > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mapnik/_mapnik.so , > which is arch dependent. > python related files must be installed under %python_sitearch. > not under %python_sitelib. Fixed. I am still waiting on upstream to fix the soversion and then to make a release. I have not published an updated version of my SPEC file as I have switched to building from SVN prior to the upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311612.l6VGCdrv031203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-07-31 12:12 EST ------- Thanks for your reviewing. The packages are updated based on them. http://code.google.com/p/sepgsql/downloads/list Spec URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql.spec SRPM URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-8.2.4- 0.407.beta.fc8.src.rpm > (1). > I could not build your package. > What is selinux-policy-devel = "2.6.4-26.sepgsql.fc7"? > It it included in fedora? It is a modified selinux-policy package. Several Definitions for database related object classes and access vectores are added. Because these definitons are currently included in the default selinux- policy package, we also have to submit the additional definitions into the default selinux-policy package. You can obtain the additional definitions from here: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/svn/policy/refpolicy-add-sepgsql- definitions.fedora8.patch > (2) > You have to use more macros throughout spec file. > Such as: > sepostgresql -> %{name} > /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile -> %{__datadir}/selinux/devel/Makefile > and also /usr/sbin etc, you can replace them with macros. Several standard paths are replaced by the macros. /etc/rc.d/init.d -> %{_initrddir} /usr/share -> %{_datadir} However, I kept a part using /usr/sbin as a path of commands, like semodule, because these are not changed when %{_prefix} of sepostgresql is over-written. In addition, this manner follows the "Packaging SELinux Policy Modules (draft)". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/PolicyModules > (3) > Your package does not include documentation. The following line was added. %doc COPYRIGHT README HISTORY SE-PostgreSQL is distributed under BSD license, as PostgreSQL. > (4) > I can not find download url for source files. "Source0" got a full location to indicate full location, as follows: Source0: ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v%{version}/postgresql-% {version}.tar.gz Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311610.l6VGADTC030880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 226557 depends on bug 211796, which changed state. Bug 211796 Summary: update to newer release of xfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211796 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:33:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311633.l6VGXGXJ003341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-07-31 12:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cupsddk Short Description: CUPS Driver Development Kit Owners: twaugh at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:47:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311647.l6VGlbrt004874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 12:47 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311650.l6VGoXZ9005285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 bouml at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bouml at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From bouml at free.fr 2007-07-31 12:50 EST ------- Hi, I am Bruno Pag?s, author of Bouml I see you have many problems to compile Bouml and this is a big surprise : the other distributions made images without problem nor changes from the source distribution I give, except changing definition of BOUML_LIB and other variables in the toplevel Makefile. Note : in all the cases qmake is used to produce the Makefiles (except the toplevel one written by hand) like the toplevel Makefile ask for I am also able to compile Bouml without any changes under a (old !) red hat 2.6.9-42 (i686 athlon) using Qt 3.3 On the download page of the site (http://bouml.free.fr/download.html) I point to several Bouml distributions, can I add a pointer to yours ? Do you have a page associated to Bouml, or a constant link to the rpm (http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/bouml-2.29.1-1.fc8.src.rpm depend on the release and may be more because I don't know the meaning of 'fc8'), or a way to find it through a query (like for FreeBSD) ? Best regards and thank you to compile Bouml for Fedora users Bruno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 16:59:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311659.l6VGxWRt006548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-07-31 12:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-iniparse Short Description: A better INI parser for Python Owners: tla at rasmil.dk Branches: EL-5 FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 17:04:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311704.l6VH4G3K007024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 law at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From law at redhat.com 2007-07-31 13:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: funionfs Short Description: Union filesystem in user space Owners: Jeff Law Branches: F7 InitialCC: law at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 17:16:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311716.l6VHGIGr008002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 17:44:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250150] Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311744.l6VHifYv012003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rarian - a replacement for scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250150 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-07-31 13:44 EST ------- Posted an update with your suggestions. SRPM URL: http://baloo.boston.redhat.com/~mbarnes/rarian/rarian-0.5.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Still investigating what's causing the mock failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 17:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311753.l6VHrSg7013007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-31 13:53 EST ------- Correct, initscripts and mkinitrd (nash) would be two important ones except rpm. IIRC static linking is required for initscripts, maybe I'm wrong, just what my brain thinks to know ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311821.l6VILi8b016150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-31 14:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311825.l6VIPD36016521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-31 14:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311826.l6VIQS3l016632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-07-31 14:26 EST ------- The desktop file is no big deal, but what troubles me is that we need write access to /var/lib/beldi [?], so we have two possibilities: 1. make /var/lib/beldi writable for a special "beldi" group and require the user to be added to this group 2. install beldi to /usr/sbin and call it through consolehelper for normal users Robert, what do you prefer? [?] Have you tested what happens when everything is downloaded? Do we still need special permissions for burning the CDs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:27:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311827.l6VIRON7016735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-31 14:27 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator-5.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-password-generator-1.4-5.fc8.src.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311830.l6VIUCwV017057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-07-31 14:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-password-generator Short Description: Graphical secure password generator. Owners: debarshi.ray at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311831.l6VIVJvZ017210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249034] Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311838.l6VIcfar018275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sundials - nonlinear differential/algebraic solvers from LLNL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 14:38 EST ------- Well, * /sbin/ldconfig call - calling /sbin/ldconfig is not needed for -devel package * static archive - split static archives from -devel package, move them to -static subpackage and make -static subpackage require -devel subpackge (check: Packaging Static Libraries of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * dependency for main/subpackage - Usually the dependency for main/subpackage must be version-release specific i.e. -devel package must have: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" * defattr - We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Also this must be added to all subpackages. (In reply to comment #19) > Mamoru, feel free to let me know if I have slipped up somewhere. > Since this is > my first review, your help might be useful. Well, when you want to review in this style, please also write the summary of where to fix so that your review can be read easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 18:45:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311845.l6VIjxKo018785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-07-31 14:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311933.l6VJXFtV006293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245515] Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311945.l6VJjuKf007547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pv - A tool for monitoring the progress of data through a pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245515 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-07-31 15:45 EST ------- The package has been successfully built for the devel branch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83662 I'm closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250315] New: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250315 Summary: Review Request: Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery- HOWTO - bare metal recovery scripts & docs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: charlescurley at charlescurley.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO.spec SRPM URL: http://www.charlescurley.com/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO/Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO-2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A set of scripts to back up and restore a mimimal system for bare metal restoration. They are useful on i386 systems. Patches for others are welcome. Install this package on clients, and the documentation package where you want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:54:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245015] PolicyKit package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311954.l6VJsmOo009376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245015 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-31 15:54 EST ------- Built in pkg cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:55:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245016] PolicyKit-gnome package review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311955.l6VJt37c009432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: PolicyKit-gnome package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245016 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-07-31 15:54 EST ------- Built in pkg cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311957.l6VJvXII010063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(patrice.bouchand.f | |edora at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 15:57 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 19:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707311959.l6VJxmVk010681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(andreas.utterberg@| |thundera.se) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-07-31 15:59 EST ------- CLOSING If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 20:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312040.l6VKefma016191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 16:40 EST ------- First complains here : $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/dynagen-0.9.3-1.fc6.noarch.rpm E: dynagen non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/console.py 0644 W: dynagen spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/dynagen-0.9.3/sample_labs/all_config_options.txt W: dynagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dynagen-0.9.3/README.txt E: dynagen non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/dynamips_lib.py 0644 E: dynagen wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/dynamips_lib.py W: dynagen hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/dynagen-0.9.3/sample_labs/.DS_Store E: dynagen script-without-shebang /usr/bin/configspec W: dynagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dynagen-0.9.3/COPYING W: dynagen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dynagen-0.9.3/docs/tutorial.htm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:04:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312104.l6VL4uYH019917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-07-31 17:04 EST ------- Okay, I've now put everything into one big SRPM. I'm not sure this is the way to go -- non-noarch Java and C# packages are sort of weird -- but this does make things neater. http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice.spec http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/ice/ice-3.2.0-6.fc7.lcg.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312121.l6VLLCQe021939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-07-31 17:21 EST ------- Good question. I don't know what's better and I also don't know whether we need special permissions for burning the CDs. Option 1 IMHO requires an upstream modification while second could be downstream only, right? Otherwise we would have to maintain a patch for beldi or am I wrong? Second has the issue, that userhelper involves root permissions for beldi which are maybe not required and which could be a security issue?! I'll talk with Andy about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312137.l6VLbPfr024038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 17:37 EST ------- Hi >MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/dynamips-0.2.7-1.fc6.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/dynamips-0.2.7-1.fc6.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/dynamips-debuginfo-0.2.7-1.fc6.i386.rpm => clean >MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Ok >MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Ok >MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. License Text => absent whereas the COPYING is present in the original tarball (I think README can also be included) >MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok >MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok >MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc No (see above) >MUST: The spec file must be written in American English Ok >MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Ok >MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Ok >MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Built Ok on i386 >MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires Ok >MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. There is no so Ok >MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Ok >MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Ok >MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. I would prefer a more detailled one [ie {%_mandir}/man1/ is not owned by the software as it contains other files (that would lead to a confusion on rpm -qf I think)] %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/nvram_export %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz %{_mandir}/man1/nvram_export.1.gz %{_mandir}/man7/hypervisor_mode.7.gz >MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Ok >MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok >MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok >MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok >MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok >MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. Ok >MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. Ok >MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package Ok >MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok >MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability) Ok >MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Ok >MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Ok >MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Ok >MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Ok >MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. This is why I would prefer a more detailed %files section >MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Ok >MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Ok I did not find any big issue with the SHOULD condition. Regards, P.Y. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312138.l6VLcqtU024173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:50:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312150.l6VLoKHA025330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-07-31 17:50 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:55:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312155.l6VLtGgv026035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-31 17:55 EST ------- rpmlint: W: perl-PDL macro-in-%changelog description - can be ignored W: perl-PDL mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) - Fixed in patch I think the Summary should be changed to something like "The Perl Data Language". - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL/Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Consider including some more files in %doc: BUGS Changes Known_problems Release_Notes A number of PDL modules are not being built that could be. I'll be attaching a number of patches that enable them as well as getting PDL to build for devel again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312158.l6VLwMF3026372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-31 17:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160366) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160366&action=view) patch to devel Patch to spec and perl-PDL-settings.patch that: - turns on 3D/GL - turns on IO Browser - changes tabs to spaces - adds a bunch of BRs to enable more modules - removes unneeded Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:59:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312159.l6VLx6Oq026438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-31 17:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160367) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160367&action=view) patch to look for hdf devel files in the right place -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 21:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312159.l6VLxcaF026485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-31 17:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160368) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160368&action=view) patch to fix some tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226275] Merge Review: perl-PDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312200.l6VM0AqL026577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-07-31 18:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=160369) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160369&action=view) patch to find 64-bit libraries for certain modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226631] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312205.l6VM5Yf9027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vesa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226631 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:05 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. b96c80ae81f5123ecef344dac4c734b2e281143d3ab7a7e633d6bf04c893e203 xf86-video-vesa-1.3.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-vesa mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250340] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250340 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-F77 - Simple interface to F77 libs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-ExtUtils-F77.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: This module tries to figure out how to link C programs with Fortran subroutines on your system. Basically one must add a list of Fortran runtime libraries. The problem is their location and name varies with each OS/compiler combination! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:09:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226632] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312209.l6VM9maf027592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226632 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:09 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. ca25f4c0f706688cbc2dcd03ffaf6a57a17290290257f0cc1b1f1bb261f95b41 xf86-video-vga-4.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-vga invalid-license MIT/X11 This needs fixing. W: xorg-x11-drv-vga mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) This is OK. %{moduledir} and %{driverdir} shouldn't be owned. I can fix these minor issues if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248231] Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312213.l6VMDj8F027948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory overhead, simple to import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231 ------- Additional Comments From james.antill at redhat.com 2007-07-31 18:13 EST ------- > * -ggdb3 does. If GCC doesn't support it, your package won't build nor will it > be usable You are saying -ggdb3 Changes the ABI? I don't think so. Yes, that is somewhat of a GCC specific option. As are all the -W flags. If that's the only objection, I'm not that bothered about droping that. > Yes, -O2 always reduces debug-ability of the code, so what is the problem you > are trying to solve? Ok, so explaining again: . The srpm currently produces 6 packages, the most relevant to this are the two "main" ones: ustr-1.0.1-0.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm ustr-debug-1.0.1-0.7.fc7.x86_64.rpm ...the first is the library built for "production", and is what all the people using a program that uses the library will see. The second is _the same code_ built using as much debugging as possible, so (expensive) internal consistency checks are called often; optimizations are turned down; etc. The idea being that anyone developing code using the library can use the debugging version while doing development and it will actively alert them to errors. Forcing build flags that make debugging harder when using this package is not doing to help anyone. > I guess you will understand, that I consider your answer to be non-acceptable > and inappropriate. Actually I didn't, and still don't, understand that ... I said I would do what you wanted to follow policy, even though it was wrong, and I repeatedly asked how I could fix policy. Is one not allowed to point out that policy is wrong? I can't imagine what I said that was inappropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312215.l6VMFEht028080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-07-31 18:15 EST ------- I realize looking at the official website that I will not be able to test the package. I am sorry but I can not do the review for the two packages. Sorry again Regards, P.Y. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249929] Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312215.l6VMFaA6028167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dynagen - Dynamips Hypervisor Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249929 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:15:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312215.l6VMFpV2028220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226633] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312233.l6VMXiSc029568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226633 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:33 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 5026bdaf644178fee66a26190453b0dddb99558b8c97c4a592a482a2434dc862 xf86-video-via-0.2.2.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 I think these are problematic. Or is there some reason an ldconfig pass isn't needed here? W: xorg-x11-drv-via-devel no-documentation W: xorg-x11-drv-via mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 3) Not problematic. Plus 56 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints in /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0 and /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0. I note that the same issues are present in the XvMC libs from the i810 driver. Maybe there's something special about XvMC libraries? * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250342] New: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250342 Summary: Review Request: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO - Perl extension for using the cfitsio library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.05-1.src.rpm Description: Perl interface to William Pence's cfitsio subroutine library. For more information on cfitsio, see http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/fitsio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226634] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312240.l6VMeLKP030084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226634 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:40 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 383e0973aad0e96812fc019cb579abaf016f97427fc07466b150fe15739ba63c xf86-input-vmmouse-12.4.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:43:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226635] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312243.l6VMh9rZ030277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vmware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226635 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:43 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. 1971fd356ba54204c3611edb9144c43c25c21167a5fa5ee725d3f2e3f9864fa9 xf86-video-vmware-10.14.1.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-vmware mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:51:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249590] Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312251.l6VMpL54031009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-07-31 18:51 EST ------- and-1.2.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226636] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-void In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312251.l6VMpWjr031051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-void https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226636 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:51 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. b43c5d920821bd06b6a1a131dd071ab838bf024c3cb092c6d1f10d57b648b0e4 xf86-input-void-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-void mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK E: xorg-x11-drv-void standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man which is quite problematic. The only real issue is that this package shouldn't own %{_mandir}. I can fix it for you if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 22:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226637] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312254.l6VMsdtF031693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226637 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:54 EST ------- Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages. f6f606698a5d635daa4a4cba8dc42ad2ef77bda5e5fe2086cdaf7b3b63e5f376 xf86-video-voodoo-1.1.0.tar.bz2 rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-voodoo mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) which is OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 23:01:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226576] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312301.l6VN1H4X032255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226576 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 19:01 EST ------- Looks like there's been an update since my last comment, so I'll do an abbreviated review. There's no URL for the upstream tarball; it seems to be from a git checkout. Some basic instructions on how to fetch the source are needed. The URL tag seems to be invalid; I get "403 Forbidden - No such project". rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-amd invalid-license MIT/X11 Should be MIT. W: xorg-x11-drv-amd mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 3) W: xorg-x11-drv-amd no-documentation These are OK. * File and directory ownership looks good. * debuginfo package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 23:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226587] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312317.l6VNHAf0000626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226587 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 19:17 EST ------- Currently failing to build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 31 23:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226589] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200707312318.l6VNIOiJ000669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226589 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 19:18 EST ------- Currently fails to start building due to a missing patch: error: File /home/tibbs/work/extras-cvs/xorg-x11-drv-dynapro/devel/dynapro-1.1.0-calibration.patch: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.