[Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 13 21:28:12 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-07-13 17:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
>
> Here are all the MUST items that have problems
>
> - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> --> NOT OK: project: modified BSD, package spec: GPL
>
Oops, good catch, will fix
> - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
> --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output)
>
> - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
> --> hmm... discuss? (see rpmlint output)
>
> Possible solution: split out -devel package and have avr-libc require:
> avr-libc-devel? Or possibly just rename the package.
>
As already explained in the mailinglist discussion, the guidelines or just plain
bogus in this (exceptional) case, just ignore them.
> - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
> --> BAD
> $ rpm -qf /usr/avr
> avr-binutils- 2.17-3.fc7.x86_64
> avr-libc- 1.4.6-1.x86_64
>
Unfortunately the review checklist is a bit to short / simple when describing
this. see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4
For the full story, to quote it: "Another exception for directory ownership in
packages is when there is no clear dependency hierarchy.
An example:
Foo-Animal-Emu puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Emu
Foo-Animal-Llama puts files into /usr/share/Foo/Animal/Llama
Neither package depends on the other one. Neither package depends on any other
package which owns the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory. In this case, each
package must own the /usr/share/Foo/Animal/ directory."
Since binutils doesn't need libc and libc doesn't need binutils there is no
clear dependency hierarchy, thus they should both own /usr/avr
Ah, I just saw your comment you find this ourselves, yes its no an issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list