[Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jun 2 05:43:01 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807





------- Additional Comments From eric at brouhaha.com  2007-06-02 01:42 EST -------
Thank you for the review.  I will make the changes you have requested.

Why should the release be "0.1build55" rather than "0.1bld55"?  The author names
the source file and changelog entries with "bld" and "Bld", but not "build".

It is not clear to me where the naming guidelines require me to submit the
package for review with the release number of 1. The guidelines say:

    The release number (referred to in some older documentation as a "vepoch")
is how the maintainer marks build revisions, starting from 1.

I have followed that guideline, and the package I submitted for review was the
eighth build revision.

I'm not disputing whether the build revision of the package initially submitted
for review should be 1, bur rather suggesting that the documentation is not
clear on this point, and perhaps it should be made more explicit.

When I submit my next build revision, I'll set it to 1, though I dislike the
loss of build traceability.

Eric


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list