[Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807





------- Additional Comments From eric at brouhaha.com  2007-06-02 18:21 EST -------
I don't think you understood my questions; perhaps I didn't explain clearly
enough, so I'll try again.

I understand the reason it is 0.nsomething.

My first question was why you wanted the "something" part to be build55 rather
than bld55.  The upstream designation is bld55, not build55.

My second question was why you wanted the n in 0.n to be 1.  I started with 1
(0.1bld55), and the SRPM I submitted for review was my eighth build release, so
the n had been incremented to 8, thus 0.8bld55.  This seems consistent with the
packaging and naming guidelines, which state that the packager is supposed to
increment the build release for each build change from the same upstream
package; that's exactly what I've done.

The packaging and naming guidelines do NOT anywhere say that the build release
number should be reverted to 1 when the package is submitted for review.  If
this is really the correct and intended process, I'm willing to do it, but it
should be documented as such.

Thanks,
Eric


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.