[Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807





------- Additional Comments From eric at brouhaha.com  2007-06-03 18:36 EST -------
Thanks for the further clarifications.  Since there was a discrepancy between
the build release and changelog history, I'll use 1 for the build release for
the next spec as you've requested.

After re-reading the "Non-Numeric Version in Release" portion of the
Packaging/Naming Guidelines, I can't find anything suggesting that "bld" needs
to be expanded to "build":

   %{alphatag} is the string that came from the version.

In this case, "the string that came from the version" is clearly "bld".  I don't
see any documentation suggesting that the alphatag should be converted into a
canonical form.

However, it does say that there should be a dot between my build number and the
alpha tag, so it appears that I should submit a packaged named
asl-1.42-0.1.bld55  If there is documentation supporting replacing "bld" with
"build", please provide a reference, and I'll do it.

Thanks!
Eric


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.