[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-06-11 13:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> > * About %{_datadir}/%{name}
> >   - Well, according to the explanation by upstream on the URL
> >     above, it may well that all files under %{_datadir}/%{name}
> >     be moved into main package and nuke -devel subpackage?
> 
> Done. However we may now have to live with some 'rpmlint' warnings from the
> built RPM:
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/gnugetopt.h
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/getopt.c
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/getopt1.c

Judging from the upstream comment, for this package
these messages can be ignored.

> What about this:
> checking for bison... no
> checking for byacc... no
> checking for flex... no
> checking for lex... no

Can be ignored.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.