[Bug 244333] Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GConf2-dbus - D-Bus port of GConf2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244333


jeff at ocjtech.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us  2007-06-15 23:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> The obsolete and provides is still needed as we inherit from the F7 repository.
>  If you wish for me to version it what is the right format?

GConf2 is currently at 2.18.0.1-2.fc7, so it'll need to look like:

Provides: GConf2 = 2.18.0.1-3
Obsoletes: GConf2 <= 2.18.0.1-2

This will need manual updating if GConf2 is updated in F7, but is
necessary if we ever want to have a GConf2 package again.

> the -n after %setup is needed because if you look closely the package spits out
> a GConf-%{version} directory not a GConf2-%{version} directory.  We use GConf2
> in the package name to be in sync with the GConf2 package which at one time was
> parallel installable with GConf.  
> 
> As for the the package URL, GConf2-dbus has not been officaly released yet. 
> When it does it will be merged into GConf.  I have made it a seperate package
> because for the forseable future one may want to choose between installing the
> offical GConf2 or the embedable GConf2-dbus.  For instance when I create
> LiveCD's with full GNOME environments.

Looks like everything else is taken care of, so if you add the
versioned provides/obsoletes this is APPROVED.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.