[Bug 242537] Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 17 04:14:11 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mksh - MirBSD enhanced version of the Korn Shell


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242537


dev at nigelj.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com  2007-06-17 00:14 EST -------
Package name:             OK (mksh)
License:                  OK (BSD)
Spec Legible:             OK (en_US)
md5sum matches:           OK (83b4ca84faa1a1ea4cf6db6eb41a0384)
rpmlint clean:            OK (Acceptable warnings)
Builds correctly:         OK (i386)
Spec has %clean:          OK
Macro use consistant:     OK
Contains code/content:    OK
-doc subpackage:          NA
-devel subpackage:        NA
-static subpackage:       NA
pkgconfig depend:         NA
Contains %doc:            OK (copyright dot.mkshrc)
Library suffix:           NA
No .la files:             NA
Use desktop-file-install: NA
No duplicate ownerships:  OK
rm -rf %{buildroot}:      OK
RPM uses valid UTF-8:     OK
%defattr is set:          OK
No duplicate %files:      OK
Not relocatable:          OK
Calls ldconfig:           NA
Supports Locales:         NA
BR's are correct:         OK

MUST FIX:
mksh.spec:
if [ ! -f %{_sysconfdir}/shells ]; then
  echo "%{_bindir}/%{name}" >> %%{_sysconfdir}/shells
else
  grep -q "^%{_bindir}/%{name}$" %{_sysconfdir}/shells || \
  echo "%{_bindir}/%{name}" >> %{_sysconfdir}/shells
fi

Please remove the double %

APPROVED (n.b. it builds on EL-5 (and should on EL-4)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list