[Bug 244704] Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 19 23:52:40 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bontmia - Backup over network to multiple incremental archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244704
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-06-19 19:52 EST -------
This is not an official review as I am not sponsored yet.
-------------------------------------------
Summary:
-------------------------------------------
Looks good.
Package builds, installs and runs on F7
-------------------------------------------
Details:
-------------------------------------------
OK - Mock : Built on F-7 (x86)
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License is GPL
OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed
OK - License file is included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum:
6b97833d6b897fe0120bd0c0964da0c2 bontmia-0.14.tar.gz
OK - Package has correct buildroot.
OK - BuildRequires are not redundant.
OK - %build and %install stages are correct and work.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - No large doc files
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own.
OK - Changelog section is correct.
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should package latest version
-------------------------------------------
Rpmlint output:
-------------------------------------------
OK - silent on both srpm and main package rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list