[Bug 212984] Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 20 04:26:14 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-06-20 00:26 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
See below - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
28c3b7dce962051d55b23ac5e51f264b ./buckwalter_morphan_1_hunspell_patch.tar.gz
28c3b7dce962051d55b23ac5e51f264b ./buckwalter_morphan_1_hunspell_patch.tar.gz.1
b3ccdcacb32e57e2653f3e16de707a3e ./buckwalter2unicode.py
b3ccdcacb32e57e2653f3e16de707a3e ./buckwalter2unicode.py.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. The base source file doesn't match this package name, but it matches up with the
other hunspell dicts, so this is not an issue.
2. I was thinking the version didn't look right, but after checking the possible
options I think this will be ok, at least I can't see any better option with the
way upstream names releases.
So, no blockers I can see, so this is re-APPROVED.
Sorry for the delay and detour here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list