[Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 26 18:35:45 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-06-26 14:35 EST -------
Good:
+ Package meets the naming guideline
+ Package versioning schema idicates, that a unversion source was used
+ Package source was renamed to contains a timestamp, becaused it was unversioned
+ License of the package is GPL
+ Package contains a mail from upstream with explicit GPL permission
+ License field metches with mail.
+ Spec is written in english.
+ RPM macros are used consistently
+ Tar ball matches with upsream
  (md5sum: 656a18c6e731f5ff405d69279c897b1f)
+ Package has correct buildroot
+ Package has no BuildRequires
+ Package has no Requires
+ Package has no subpackages
+ Package use optflags
+ Package use %{_smp_mflags}
+ Local build works
+ Package contains proper %defattr 
+ Package has a %clean section and buildroot will clean at the start of %install
+ Package filelist has no duplicates
+ Package contains no files own by an other package
+ Application does not crash on startup
+ Changelog section look ok.
+ Rpmlint is quite on source and binary rpm.
+ Debuginfo package contains source files
* Mock build works fine for Devel and F-7 (x86_64)

Bad:
- Package doesn't contains a file with the verbatim license text

*** APPROVED ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list