[Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631





------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com  2007-06-27 19:36 EST -------
Yes, leaving the provides for sendmail was wrong. 
I'm still concerned with the use of alternatives. 20 is low enough not to be
auto chosen by alternatives.

repoquery --whatrequires /usr/sbin/sendmail

mutt-5:1.5.14-4.fc7.x86_64
arpwatch-14:2.1a15-3.fc7.x86_64
pgp-tools-0:0.4.9-1.fc7.noarch
redhat-lsb-0:3.1-14.fc7.x86_64
mdadm-0:2.6.1-4.fc7.x86_64
bcfg2-server-0:0.9.3-2.fc7.noarch
quilt-0:0.46-1.fc6.x86_64
otrs-0:2.1.5-2.fc7.noarch
squirrelmail-0:1.4.10a-1.fc7.noarch
dbmail-0:2.2.5-2.fc7.x86_64
websec-0:1.9.0-4.noarch
fvwm-0:2.5.21-4.fc7.x86_64
uudeview-0:0.5.20-12.x86_64
fcron-0:3.0.2-2.fc7.x86_64

So it's not just mutt. And there is a chance that one of these doesn't work with
msmtp. Maybe because of the lack of local delivery or the account(or user)
oriented configuration or something else. 
And mutt requires sendmail interface so it must require sendmail binary.

So it seems it's better just not to tell mutt that it can use msmtp.



The packages for libntlm and libgsasl were successfully built in koji. So I can
add BuildRequires for libgsasl.  




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.