[Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 29 02:11:18 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-06-28 22:11 EST -------
You shouldn't need a build dependency on pkgconfig; audacious-devel should have
its own dependency (and indeed it does). But of course it doesn't hurt anything.
It seems there's directory ownership problem; /usr/lib/audacious/Input is owned
by audacious-plugins, but they're not required by this package. This seems like
the kind of thing the base audacious package should own.
Review:
* source files match upstream:
deafc2c95dc7a1a67a83b53b7871686fa280c8ed18547df51988b648dbe5519b
audacious-plugin-fc-0.2.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
libfc.so()(64bit)
audacious-plugin-fc = 0.2-1
=
audacious >= 1.3
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libaudacious.so.5()(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libmcs.so.1()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpng12.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
* %check is not present; no upstream test suite. I've no ability to actually
test this as I have no speakers on this machine.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
X Ownership issues with /usr/lib/audacious/Input.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list