From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 01:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010125.l211P1dI024317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-02-28 20:24 EST ------- Sorry, I steered you wrong! *%{?dist} should be appended to Release, not Version. My fault! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 01:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230071] Review Request: libkexiv2 - A library to manipulate EXIF/IPTC information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010142.l211g3Vi025168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkexiv2 - A library to manipulate EXIF/IPTC information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230071 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-02-28 20:42 EST ------- First of all, it would have been nice if the URL of spec from comment #7 would have been the modified one. Second, I think that the Description tag in -devel should match the one from the main package. You have modified only the main one... As a comment prior to the review: examining the build log and then the sources, I have noticed that %configure looks for doxygen and some doxygen related scripts seem to exist in the admin directory. Unfortunately my experience with doxygen is limited to installing it via yum. Just adding doxygen as BR makes configure pick it, but nothing seems to be changed afterwards: nothing is built in the admin directory andthe build log has some failures which _seem_ to look like missing QT requirements. Explicitely requiring qt-devel does not help either and unfortunately the machine where I have done all the tests just suffered yet another kernel crash. OTOH the admin folder does not seem to contain anything else but a bunch of scripts so I guess there is no need to struggle with it (could be a leftover from a more comprehensive package from which this tar has been separated). If I am wrong here, I would appreciate if someone would correct me. Good: - rpmlint checks do not return anything on the source and binary rpm. the -devel package gives: W: libkexiv2-devel no-documentation which I guess that can be ignored. The doc is in the main package. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, is the latest available version, sha1sum 7218bb8b81955fc4ef376f302bda9b94bd2b68bd libkexiv2-0.1.1.tar.bz2 - package compiles on devel (x86_64 and i386) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other files/directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI so no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files (correctly removed in %install) - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel correctly requires pkgconfig - separation of libs between main and devel packages respects versioning (once again, I kindly ask someone more experienced to verify and correct me if I am wrong) SHOULD - successfully builds in mock for fc6 and devel, i386 and x86_64 warning: I cannot verify if the libs are actually working, nothing to test them with - no scriptlets except usage of ldconfig which is OK - pkgconfig(.pc) files are in -devel - devel requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency. What I would like to see - including of AUTHORS, ChangeLog and maybe even the RELEASE.rev files as %doc - the same Description in -devel as in main Both are minor and non blockers, they can be fixed before uploading to cvs. >From my point of view the package is OK (minus the minor caveats I have mentioned ). However I kindly ask someone more experienced to have a second look, therefore I will leave this bug in REVIEW state for another day or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 01:45:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230071] Review Request: libkexiv2 - A library to manipulate EXIF/IPTC information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010145.l211j3Ta025305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkexiv2 - A library to manipulate EXIF/IPTC information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230071 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-02-28 20:45 EST ------- I take that back, description in %devel is just fine. I was looking in a wrong place. Sorry :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 02:02:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226641] Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010202.l21225u0025995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226641 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-02-28 21:01 EST ------- Normally the %doc macro is used (to put it in the rpm-defined docdir of /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} - the way you've done it makes it not actually use the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 02:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010242.l212gefR027760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-28 21:42 EST ------- First off, does newt have an upstream? Or is Red Hat the upstream? If there is an upstream, a URL tag would be good if possible, and either a full URL in the Source tag, or some instruction on making the tarball from CVS or whatever is needed. Some rpmlint complaints: W: newt summary-ended-with-dot A development library for text mode user interfaces. W: newt-devel summary-ended-with-dot Newt windowing toolkit development files. Trivial fixes. E: newt tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: newt non-utf8-spec-file newt.spec This is due to Trond's name; in the changelog; a quick pass through iconv fixes things. W: newt no-url-tag Depends on whether there's an upstream to link to. E: newt configure-without-libdir-spec rpmlint is confused by the commented out "./configure" line. W: newt macro-in-%changelog release W: newt macro-in-%changelog version E: newt script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/snack.py This is executable; if the user is supposed to run it, it should have a shebang line. If not, then it shouldn't be executable. It has no main, so I'm pretty sure it's not supposed to be run. After that, the only real issue is the static library. This is obviously justified as the installer needs it, so all that's needed is a bit of justification in a comment and a -static subpackage. I'll attach a patch which fixes up the summaries, the non-utf8 bits, and the macros in %changelog. It also splits the static library off into a -static subpackage and includes some justification. (Obviously the installer will need to be fixed to pull in the -static package.) After this patch, all that remains are the questions of the where upstream is and where the source comes from. Checklist: X can't compare source with upstream. (Perhaps this is the upstream.) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. ? latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints * final provides and requires are sane: newt-0.52.5-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm _snackmodule.so()(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52()(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52(NEWT_0.52)(64bit) snack = 0.52.5-1.fc7 newt = 0.52.5-1.fc7 = /sbin/ldconfig libnewt.so.0.52()(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52(NEWT_0.52)(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libslang.so.2()(64bit) libslang.so.2(SLANG2)(64bit) python(abi) = 2.5 newt-devel-0.52.5-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm newt-devel = 0.52.5-1.fc7 = libnewt.so.0.52()(64bit) newt = 0.52.5 slang-devel * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * shared libraries present; ldconfig are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * find-lang used appropriately. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * no pkgconfig files. X static libraries present, not in -static and no justification. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 02:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010243.l212heTw027794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-28 21:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148984) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148984&action=view) Suggested specfile patch fixing several issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 03:21:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010321.l213Ldml029585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-02-28 22:21 EST ------- Hey Thomas. Any news from upstream about this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 03:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: newt-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010331.l213VRt1030406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 03:49:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010349.l213nDKe031706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010406.l2146KYG000345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-02-28 23:06 EST ------- As mentioned on the wiki (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages#nomaint), this package was orphaned a few months ago, most likely as its upstream (Imendio) dropped development. However, Carlos Mart?n Nieto has volunteered to pick up where its upstream left off (http://www.cmartin.tk/blam.html). Thus, I'd like to claim ownership of this package in Extras and continue from there. Please change the owner to my address (peter at thecodergeek.com). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] New: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bojan at rexursive.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: ViewVC is a browser interface for CVS and Subversion version control repositories. It generates templatized HTML to present navigable directory, revision, and change log listings. It can display specific versions of files as well as diffs between those versions. Basically, ViewVC provides the bulk of the report-like functionality you expect out of your version control tool, but much more prettily than the average textual command-line program output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:26:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: newt-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010426.l214Qtim002127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-28 23:26 EST ------- This is just a simple perl module so this should be easy, but this package seems to be very old and has some interesting things in it. First off, I'm sure it predates any kind of naming guidelines, but it really should be called perl-Newt. rpmlint says: W: newt-perl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.08-12 1.08-13 This just looks like a typo in the last changelog entry. E: newt-perl zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Newt/Newt.bs The usual Perl specfile template deletes these zero-length droppings with find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';' newt-devel is listed twice in BuildRequires. The license should be "GPL or Artistic", as it is released under the same terms as Perl. Nobody I asked could come up with any reason why brp-compress would have to be run manually in %install. This is an arch-specific package so generally you need to pass OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" in %build. However, if you don't it just uses the flags that Perl was built with, which are actually OK. The permissions come out a bit odd, with no owner write bit set. These are generally fixed up with a quick chmod. I also didn't see a reason for the "fix Newt.so perms" bit as those permissions are set just fine without any manuall setting. I'll attach a patch which fixes these issues. I've left the issue of the name along, as I'm not sure it's feasible to fix during the F7 test process. * source files match upstream: 35e78461b24ea7544d030fe71c82b6f633ea56f9bf0fa924ea61e1497863821f Newt-1.08.tar.gz X package should be named perl-Newt. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * build root is OK (Actually I'm assuming that the latest packaging committee output will be ratified on Thursday; I'll correct this review if it isn't.) X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (newt-devel is listed twice, but that doesn't really hurt) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks OK. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: newt-perl-1.08-13.x86_64.rpm Newt.so()(64bit) perl(Newt) = 1.8 newt-perl = 1.08-13 = libnewt.so.0.52()(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52(NEWT_0.52)(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is not present; test suite is present but interactive. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are a bit odd. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: newt-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010427.l214Rggl002201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-02-28 23:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148989) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148989&action=view) Suggested specfile patch fixing several issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010428.l214SHwO002253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-02-28 23:28 EST ------- Example repository (Subversion) view using this RPM: http://www.rexursive.com/viewvc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:46:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010446.l214kD4P003840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-02-28 23:46 EST ------- http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/fvwm.spec http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/fvwm-2.5.21-2.src.rpm - Shorten description - Enable auto-generate menus in the Setup Form config generator - Use htmlview instead of netscape - Use mimeopen instead of EDITOR - Add more Requires Note that the copyright notices have been added upstream. I didn't include a patch for it here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 04:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010459.l214xOn1005092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010514.l215EHOj006977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 00:14 EST ------- Hmm, this fails to build for me: checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 ./configure: line 3878: =yes: command not found checking for libwrap... configure: error: *** libwrap missing error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.58495 (%build) Also, I can't get the Source1 link. I think sourceforge has undergone several reorganizations since that file was last fetched. In fact, all of the information I can find about nfs.doc.tar.gz indicates that it was out of date as of 2000. Perhaps it shouldn't be shipped at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:22:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010522.l215MnIU007840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010530.l215UOSA008528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From jerone at gmail.com 2007-03-01 00:30 EST ------- It's no problem. Another update to reflect this change. http://jgotech.net/jerone/grub-1.95/grub2-1.95-4.src.rpm http://jgotech.net/jerone/grub-1.95/grub2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:43:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224365] Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010543.l215hFCD009113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdrkit - cdrtools replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224365 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229319] Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010546.l215kaPf009260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229319 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229657] Review Request: iverilog - Icarus Verilg is a verilog compiler, simulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010548.l215mvmv009323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iverilog - Icarus Verilg is a verilog compiler, simulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229657 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:49:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010549.l215nrgk009351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010550.l215oQo3009401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:53:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010553.l215rkHf009479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 00:53 EST ------- Mock build is successful. But build.log showed warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/TrueType warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/TrueType/fonts.cache-1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/TrueType/fonts.dir warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/TrueType/fonts.scale warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/misc warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/misc/fonts.cache-1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/misc/fonts.dir warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/chinese/misc/fonts.scale Also rpmlint on SRPM and RPM reported W: fonts-chinese invalid-license Arphic Public License (GPL-like) The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License", "CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License", "Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License", "GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License", "Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license", "Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License", "Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib/libpng License", "Creative Commons Attribution", "Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial", "Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike", "Design Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware", "Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware". If the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. W: fonts-chinese no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. W: fonts-chinese strange-permission fonts-chinese-modified.spec 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. E: fonts-chinese invalid-spec-name fonts-chinese-modified.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_CN The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-zh_TW The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-moe_sung The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-moe_kai The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-arphic_bming The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttf-arphic_bkai The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes taipeifonts The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-chinese mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. W: fonts-chinese no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttf-moe_sung The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttf-moe_kai The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttf-arphic_bming The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided ttf-arphic_bkai The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-chinese obsolete-not-provided taipeifonts The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_CN A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_TW A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.zh_TW A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.zh_CN A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-chinese dangerous-command-in-%post ln For Obsoletes warning you may like to see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d Also for fonts package you need to add fonts scriptlet. Check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-4863fc4c93cec14292719d8901d83f5d90c3e477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 05:58:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 00:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010558.l215wQvh009573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 00:58 EST ------- Oops original SPEC is not having following problems as i commented last. My mistake W: fonts-chinese strange-permission fonts-chinese-modified.spec 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. E: fonts-chinese invalid-spec-name fonts-chinese-modified.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:04:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010604.l2164H2V009861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 01:04 EST ------- System update ended. I will re-review this later. > Since you seems to be interested in some package reviews i have submitted > (cinepaint pyopengl, some help for aqsis) Will you accept to sponsor me? Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010614.l216EroW010131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From cr33dog at gmail.com 2007-03-01 01:14 EST ------- - It builds cleanly in mock fc6 i386. - It passes rpmlint - Spec file looks OK Building it in mock devel now - as long as that goes as expected, I see no blockers. I have no x86_64 or ppc devel environment to build on though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:16:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010616.l216GJhc010193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 01:16 EST ------- Also i miss to paste following rpmlint warnings W: fonts-chinese summary-ended-with-dot Chinese TrueType Font -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face. Summary ends with a dot. E: fonts-chinese description-line-too-long Chinese TTF Fonts donated by Arphic company, with additional Hong Kong characters by Hong Kong font project and bitmap by F Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. W: fonts-chinese wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/fonts-chinese-3.03/doc/arphicpl.txt This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010622.l216MOWU010474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 01:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148992) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148992&action=view) Some Changes to SPEC file Here is what you SHOULD do 1)Use attached SPEC 2)Add versions to Obsoletes 3)Add provides for each packages listed in Obsoletes 4)Add fonts scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010623.l216N7qN010536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-03-01 01:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jeta Short Description: Horde Java SSH Application Owners: fedora at theholbrooks.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 06:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 01:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010655.l216tJHt011547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 01:55 EST ------- Mock build is fine but build.log reported warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/encodings.dir warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/fonts.alias warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/fonts.cache-1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/fonts.dir rpmlint on SRPM and RPMS reported W: fonts-japanese no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-ja The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jisksp14 The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jisksp16-1990 The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kappa20 The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes knm_new The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes fonts-ja The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: fonts-japanese rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure --disable-bold --disable-italic --with-fontdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{bmpfontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. W: fonts-japanese mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 40, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-ja The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided jisksp14 The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided jisksp16-1990 The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided kappa20 The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided knm_new The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided fonts-ja The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: fonts-japanese file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType/fonts.alias A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files in /etc/ instead. E: fonts-japanese file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc/fonts.alias A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files in /etc/ instead. W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.ja A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.ja A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.ja A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 07:02:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 02:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010702.l2172vfr011818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 02:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148997) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148997&action=view) Some Changes to SPEC file Here is what you SHOULD do 1)Use attached SPEC 2)Add versions to Obsoletes 3)Add provides for each packages listed in Obsoletes For Obsoletes warning you may like to see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d 4)Add fonts scriptlets.Check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-4863fc4c93cec14292719d8901d83f5d90c3e477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 07:08:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 02:08:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010708.l2178rfs011983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-01 02:08 EST ------- I was about to package this as well, so I'll provide you a review for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 07:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010720.l217KmvM012207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 02:20 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010801.l2181CVx013339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 03:01 EST ------- I've been thinking this over a bit, and although I don't like deviating from upstream when not necessary, this is not _that_ important to me. Since Ralf feels strongly about putting it in a separate dir, put it in a separate dir under ./etc, as Ralf suggested. About moving it to /usr/share, I'm not in favor of that, it is a config file, it may be changed by the end user to support strange or new devices, so lets just leave it in /etc . Now with that solved, can you please post a new version then we can get this moving forward again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010816.l218GeIs013961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-01 03:16 EST ------- Here are just a few things you should look into before we get started in earnest. 1) If you have rpmdevtools installed, you can generate a spec file template that is made for a python program with 'fedora-newrpmspec -t python' 2) You are doing some things the hard way, which will make the package harder to maintain in the longer run. Read up on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python regarding automatic byte compilation, and basic python packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010817.l218HdVP013999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-01 03:17 EST ------- fixing my flag for review... twiddled the wrong bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010822.l218MZn8014169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-01 03:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I've been thinking this over a bit, and although I don't like deviating from > upstream when not necessary, this is not _that_ important to me. Since Ralf > feels strongly about putting it in a separate dir, put it in a separate dir > under ./etc, as Ralf suggested. Well, I do NOT feel strong about it. It has only a recommendation and I argued against you objecting my recommendation. As usual, in such occasions, I leave the final word on things like this to the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:23:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010823.l218NSP0014219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-03-01 03:23 EST ------- The package was indeed orphaned because blam didn't build on FC6 and upstream stated that development on blam would not continue. I was unaware of the project beeing picked up by Carlos Martin Nieto untill now. I am willing to continue maintaing blam under the new circumstances, or let Peter take over if he wishes to do so. Either is fine by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 08:33:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 03:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010833.l218XhfZ014721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 03:33 EST ------- Ok Trond, so it looks like you can choose between /etc/avrdude.conf and /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf Either way you need todo in %prep: sed -i 's|/usr/local/etc/avrdude.conf||g' doc/avrdude.info And if you go for /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf also: sed -i 's|/etc/avrdude.conf||g' doc/avrdude.info avrdude.1 To fixup the docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 09:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: newt-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010918.l219Ib8k018629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-03-01 04:18 EST ------- Thanks a lot for the review and patch! I've applied this in -14. I'm not sure now is a good time to rename the package, but I've changed crypto-utils (the only package which uses newt-perl) to use Require/BuildRequire: perl(Newt) to facilitate that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 09:31:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010931.l219VFce019566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 09:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230531] New: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230531 Summary: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauravanim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: majain at redhat.com Description of problem: There is no Drqueue (Open Source Distributed Render Queue) rpm in FC5 . As mandriva and debian have a package for Drqueue blender 3d : www.blender.org drqueue : www.drqueue.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 09:46:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230531] DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703010946.l219kv5j020595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230531 gauravanim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230531] DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011010.l21AAUkD022096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230531 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-01 05:10 EST ------- You can submit the package if you want: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Otherwise, unless I'm wrong, the bugzilla isn't the place to request packages, especially with the 'Package Review' component (although I don't know exactly where people who are not fedora members already may request packages, except on the mailing lists). Maybe there is a wishlist bugzilla component, but I don't know where it is, so I close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011021.l21ALXV3022970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 05:21 EST ------- Thanks for your quick feedback. I'm not a Python guy (just like viewvc :-), so I had no idea how good the spec file that I pinched off Dag's site was. I'll work on getting that in line with your suggestions and I'll let you know when I have something new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229319] Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011024.l21AOhTx023206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229319 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230531] DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011053.l21ArDWT025706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230531 ------- Additional Comments From majain at redhat.com 2007-03-01 05:53 EST ------- Gaurav, My bad - you need to add your package to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList?action=show&redirect=WishlistExtras page. Gaurav, also have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230531] DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011057.l21AvmiZ026160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DrQueue rpm on FC5 not exist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-01 05:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Gaurav, > My bad - you need to add your package to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList?action=show&redirect=WishlistExtras > page. Unless I'm wrong, this page seems to be only writable for people with right to write in the wiki. Or maybe only a wiki account is needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 10:58:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011058.l21AwBRT026198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 05:58 EST ------- Hopefully there is some improvement here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-2.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:07:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011107.l21B74xe027075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 06:07 EST ------- I decided to create a separate folder for it, even though it is only one file. I have also added generation of documentation, and fixed the things that have been mentioned in the comments. rpmlint reports no errors. Updated files are here: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/avrdude/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011111.l21BBrQb027520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 06:11 EST ------- I was thinking about adding a Fedora specific README file, describing why the binaries are not installed directly into /usr/bin. But I was wondering if this is common practice or neccessary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011119.l21BJRNb027842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 06:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > I was thinking about adding a Fedora specific README file, describing why the > binaries are not installed directly into /usr/bin. But I was wondering if this > is common practice or neccessary? Yes thats a good idea and it _should_ be common practice :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:47:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011147.l21BlbI4029332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 06:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > So for now I assume that -x11 should work normally. So > would you update srpm/spec with the left issues fixed? Done, new version here: * Thu Mar 1 2007 Hans de Goede 2.10.4-2 - Use sf.net sourceforge URL from the Guidelines (bz 229476) - Keep timestamp while installing the wrapper (bz 229476) - Sanitize and install the manpage (bz 229476) - Add "Requires: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi" to xblast-x11 (bz 229476) - Make xblast look for translations under /usr/share/locale (bz 229476) Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xblast.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xblast-2.10.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011148.l21BmQmO029373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 06:48 EST ------- New version with the Source URL fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xblast-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xblast-data-2.10.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011149.l21Bnl86029431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 06:49 EST ------- Mock build for rawhide is fine. rpmlint on SRPM reported W: fontconfig prereq-use freetype >= %{freetype_version}, coreutils The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. W: fontconfig make-check-outside-check-section make check Make check or other automated regression test should be run in %check, as they can be disabled with a rpm macro for short circuiting purposes. W: fontconfig macro-in-%changelog 5x Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. rpmlint on RPMS reported W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-no-sub-pixel.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-bgr.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-vbgr.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-vrgb.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-unhinted.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/20-fix-globaladvance.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/20-lohit-gujarati.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/20-unhint-small-vera.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/30-amt-aliases.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/30-urw-aliases.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/40-generic.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/49-sansserif.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/50-user.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/51-local.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/60-latin.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-fonts-persian.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-nonlatin.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/69-unifont.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/80-delicious.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/90-synthetic.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-fix-globaladvance.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-lohit-gujarati.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-vera.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-no-hint-fedora.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-amt-aliases.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-urw-aliases.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/40-generic-fedora.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/40-generic.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/49-sansserif.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/51-local.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-latin.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-nonlatin-fedora.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-fonts-persian.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/69-unifont.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/75-blacklist-fedora.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/80-delicious.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/fonts.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: fontconfig non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fonts/fonts.dtd A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fontconfig non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fonts/conf.avail/README A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: fontconfig dangerous-command-in-%post rm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 11:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011151.l21Bp00p029528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2007-03-01 06:50 EST ------- There are 2 lines before kernel error in messages: Mar 1 11:33:47 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Your kernel does not support key module [openssl] Mar 1 11:33:59 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Mount opts: [ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,] # uname -a Linux rawhide64 2.6.20-1.2949.fc7 #1 SMP Mon Feb 26 18:33:03 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011201.l21C1EUW029908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 07:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149010&action=view) Some Changes to Original SPEC You SHOULD 1) Use attached SPEC 2) run rpmlint and check for further errors 3) I saw rpath is used for building this package. Remove rpath. 4) rpmlint reported rm is used in $post section. Can you give reasons for that? 5) Can't /etc/fonts/conf.avail/README be installed under /usr/share/doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011212.l21CCoAW030645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 07:12 EST ------- Still needs some work. MUST FIX: ========= * rpmlint says: [hans at shalem ~]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/avrdude-5.3.1-3.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/avrdude-5.3.1-3.x86_64.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/avrdude-debuginfo-5.3.1-3.x86_64.rpm E: avrdude info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir Wether or not this happen may depend on the build environment (I don't use mock with my slow internet connection). So add: "rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}/dir" At the end of %install, the -f ensure that this won't cause the build to fail when the dir file isn't generated. And change under %files: "%{_infodir}/*" to "%{_infodir}/%{name}.info" I would like to recommend not to use too much wildcards under %files in general, so that errors like this one get caught by the checking for missing files check. * Since you've enabled rebuilding off the docs, using the sed line I gave you on avrdude.info doesn't help, instead use it on avrdude.texi * Since you've choosen for /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf, you must also use sed to search replace /etc/avrdude.conf with /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf in both doc/avrdude.texi and avrdude.1, like this: sed -i 's|/etc/avrdude.conf|/etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf|g' doc/avrdude.texi avrdude.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011218.l21CIo61030792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 07:18 EST ------- README.fedora added, and premissions in debuginfo-package fixed. Updated files at: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/sdcc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225773] Merge Review: f-spot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011224.l21COP41031046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: f-spot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225773 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225773] Merge Review: f-spot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011228.l21CSbsY031240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: f-spot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225773 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-01 07:28 EST ------- rpmlint reported invalid desktop files Use desktop-file-validate on f-spot.desktop and f-spot-view.desktop More on how to install .desktop files in SPEC is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Kindly update SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011233.l21CXtmn031446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 07:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149014&action=view) lof for failed build for rawhide/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011235.l21CZq0Y031583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 07:35 EST ------- just a note: make should use smp_flags, if possible (or add a comment if it is not). build on x86_64/devel failed in mock, I have attached the build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:36:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011236.l21CaOWR031636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #149014|lof for failed build for |log for failed build for description|rawhide/x86_64 |rawhide/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 12:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011252.l21CqAES032702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Still needs some work. > > MUST FIX: > ========= > * rpmlint says: > [hans at shalem ~]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/avrdude-5.3.1-3.src.rpm > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/avrdude-5.3.1-3.x86_64.rpm > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/avrdude-debuginfo-5.3.1-3.x86_64.rpm > E: avrdude info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir > Wether or not this happen may depend on the build environment (I don't > use mock with my slow internet connection). So add: > "rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}/dir" > At the end of %install, the -f ensure that this won't cause the build to > fail when the dir file isn't generated. I could not reproduce this error, but I added "rm [..]" anyway. Works fine now. > And change under %files: "%{_infodir}/*" to "%{_infodir}/%{name}.info" > I would like to recommend not to use too much wildcards under %files in > general, so that errors like this one get caught by the checking for missing > files check. Fixed. No more wildcards :) > * Since you've enabled rebuilding off the docs, using the sed line I gave you on > avrdude.info doesn't help, instead use it on avrdude.texi > > * Since you've choosen for /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf, you must also use sed > to search replace /etc/avrdude.conf with /etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf in both > doc/avrdude.texi and avrdude.1, like this: > sed -i 's|/etc/avrdude.conf|/etc/avrdude/avrdude.conf|g' doc/avrdude.texi > avrdude.1 Fixed. I checked the man and info page, and they are both ok. Updated files at: ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/avrdude (as usual...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:11:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011311.l21DBRtV001470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-03-01 08:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chmsee Short Description: A Gtk+2 CHM document viewer Owners: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: pertusus at free.fr, jungleji at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011315.l21DFOvo001673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-03-01 08:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > W: fonts-japanese no-url-tag > The URL tag is missing. It's hard to write down in URL tag because this packages includes a lot of fonts that shipped on the different places. I mean, it's not a vendor-specific package, but just collection. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes ttfonts-ja Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jisksp14 Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jisksp16-1990 Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kappa20 Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes knm_new Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese unversioned-explicit-obsoletes fonts-ja Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure --disable-bold > --disable-italic --with-fontdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{bmpfontdir} > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it > will break short circuiting. Actually that line doesn't break anything. just lazy workaround to install the font files under the proper place to be packaged, without any patches to Makefile and extra parameters to make because DESTDIR isn't helpful since it doesn't use automake. > W: fonts-japanese mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 40, tab: line 1) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a > cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-ja Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided jisksp14 Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided jisksp16-1990 Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided kappa20 Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided knm_new Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese obsolete-not-provided fonts-ja Fixed. > E: fonts-japanese file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Waiting for the conclusion on the list > E: fonts-japanese file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Likewise. > W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/CIDFnmap.ja Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/cidfmap.ja Fixed. > W: fonts-japanese non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ghostscript/FAPIcidfmap.ja Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:19:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011319.l21DJDWh002048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-03-01 08:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 4)Add fonts scriptlets.Check out Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011330.l21DUvpL002702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 08:30 EST ------- Looking good: Approved by Hans de Goede Now go get yourself a Fedora Account if you haven't done that already sign the CLA and then request cvs-extras group member ship. One you've done that I'll be notified by the account system that someone (you) needs a sponsor and I'll sponsor you. When this is completed (IOW you are a cvs-extras member) you can then ask for CVS-branches as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure And then get your system ready to import packages and import the package as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011331.l21DVS1w002747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 08:31 EST ------- Looking good: Approved by Hans de Goede Now go get yourself a Fedora Account if you haven't done that already sign the CLA and then request cvs-extras group member ship. One you've done that I'll be notified by the account system that someone (you) needs a sponsor and I'll sponsor you. When this is completed (IOW you are a cvs-extras member) you can then ask for CVS-branches as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure And then get your system ready to import packages and import the package as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225910] Merge Review: ipv6calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011340.l21DeA64003294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ipv6calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225910 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-01 08:39 EST ------- Looks ok for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:49:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011349.l21DnHxZ003922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-03-01 08:49 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Red Hat is the upstream, CVS is at elvis.redhat.com, you can checkout sources with cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous at elvis.redhat.com:/usr/local/CVS co newt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 13:58:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230549] New: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: oxine is a lightweight gui for the famous xine engine which uses the on screen display functionality of xine to display its user interface elements like buttons, lists sliders and so on. Due to this, oxine can easily be ported to any video output device the xine library provides (e.g. frame buffer, dxr3,...) and is particularly suitable for appliances like set-top boxes, home entertainment systems or kiosk systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011418.l21EIvFu007018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 09:18 EST ------- http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-lirc/python-lirc.spec http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-lirc/python-lirc-0.0.5-3.src.rpm * Thu Mar 1 2007 Matthias Saou 0.0.5-3 - Prefix all our own documentation source files. - Include a README about our license changes and added docs. This should basically include all of what you suggested. Please confirm before I import the package ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228299] Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011421.l21ELlsu007312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 09:21 EST ------- Please note that this is a totally trivial package from the packaging point of view, so it should be really easy and quick to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011423.l21ENTFQ007436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 09:23 EST ------- Please note that this is a totally trivial package from the packaging point of view, so it should be really easy and quick to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:25:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228298] Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011425.l21EPYeN007522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-louie - Dispatches signals between Python objects in a wide variety of contexts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228298 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 09:25 EST ------- Please note that this is a totally trivial package from the packaging point of view, so it should be really easy and quick to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:34:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011434.l21EYlKa008018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 09:34 EST ------- Just FYI, I've moved the files to this location : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/clamsmtp/ The package probably still needs to include the suggestions from above, as well as someone inclined to make a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 14:48:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011448.l21Emufs008988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psmisc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-01 09:48 EST ------- Fixed. Update to psmisc-22.3-1.fc7. Thanks for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:07:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011507.l21F71kg011383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-03-01 10:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I tried this way: > ls -s ../..%{_datadir}/%{name}/src/main.py %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} > > it's work but symlink point like that : > > /usr/bin/pypar2 -> ../../usr/share/pypar2/src/main.py This method assumes that %{_bindir} is two directory levels down from the root directory, which is OK for Fedora but might cause issues for people wanting to use the package elsewhere (e.g. with %{_bindir} = /usr/site/bin etc.) A simple way to avoid the problem is to create the symlink as absolute within the buildroot and then use the symlinks utility to convert it to an optimized relative link: ln -s %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/src/main.py %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} symlinks -cs %{buildroot}%{_bindir} Result on Fedora: /usr/bin/pypar2 -> ../share/pypar2/src/main.py If you take this approach, you'll need to add symlinks as a buildrequire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:21:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226530] Merge Review: vlock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011521.l21FLDVB012545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vlock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226530 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-01 10:21 EST ------- Fixed. Update to vlock-1.3-24.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011529.l21FTuHh013056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 10:29 EST ------- INFO: 1.3 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:32:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230560] New: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fangqq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmapfont.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmapfont-0.8.0-6.src.rpm Description: The Wen Quan Yi bitmap fonts include complete CJK Unified Ideograph (U4E00 - U9FA5) glyphs at four different sizes (9pt-12X12 pixel, 10pt-13X13 pixel, 11pt-15X15 pixel, 12pt-16x16 pixel) and two weights (medium and bold). Use of these bitmap fonts for on-screen display of Chinese (traditional and simplified) in web pages and elsewhere eliminates the annoying "blurring" problem caused by the high stroke density of many Chinese characters and insufficient "hinting" of anti-aliased Chinese fonts. These fonts also provide bitmap glyphs for Japanese Hiragana (U3040 - U309F), Katakana (U30A0 - U30FF) and for Korean Hangul (UAC00 - UD7A3). (PS: This is my first submission, I did my best to follow the guideline, however, if anything is not right, please be gentle to me :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:37:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011537.l21Fb8wZ013634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 10:37 EST ------- Show stopper: missing requires, usage of chkconfig and service impose Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:48:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226530] Merge Review: vlock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011548.l21FmIEr014513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vlock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226530 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-01 10:48 EST ------- Note, I forgot install -p, fixed in the -25 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011548.l21Fmnca014581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-03-01 10:48 EST ------- Sorry, dropped the ball on this one - I'll look into it today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011549.l21FnWcQ014632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-01 10:49 EST ------- Looks like an improvement to me, thanks. However, there's breakage - Both python-lirc-API and python-lirc-README are Source1, and Source4 doesn't exist. Approval still stands, I'm sure you'll fix those before the first build :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:52:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011552.l21FqrY5014808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 10:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149019) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149019&action=view) mock build log of gdal-1.4.0-9.fc7 mockbuild of gdal-1.4.0-9 fails on FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011552.l21FqsKY014815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 10:52 EST ------- D'oh! Typical last second changes which... break. Good, that's fixed, and I just tested a rebuild & install. All seems fine. I'll go ahead and request CVS branches to be created now, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011555.l21FtCUw014945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 10:55 EST ------- Well, A. for xblast-2.10.4-2: * Timestamps --------------------------------------------- install -m 644 %{name}.man $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man6/%{name}.6 --------------------------------------------- - Please use "install -p" (gzip keeps timestamp, so the timestamp of this file is finally kept). Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (xblast) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:56:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011556.l21FuVpV015056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 10:56 EST ------- Well, A. for xblast-2.10.4-2: * Timestamps --------------------------------------------- install -m 644 %{name}.man $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man6/%{name}.6 --------------------------------------------- - Please use "install -p" (gzip keeps timestamp, so the timestamp of this file is finally kept). Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (xblast) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 15:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011558.l21FwfdY015216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 10:58 EST ------- Oops.. I wrote on the different bug... Well, B. for xblast-data: - Nothing issues are left ---------------------------------------------- This package (xblast-data) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011608.l21G81uv015872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 11:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Well, > > A. for xblast-2.10.4-2: > * Timestamps > --------------------------------------------- > install -m 644 %{name}.man $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man6/%{name}.6 > --------------------------------------------- > - Please use "install -p" (gzip keeps timestamp, so the timestamp > of this file is finally kept). That file gets patched and thus the timestamp gets set to the build time, so there is no use in using -p. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xblast Short Description: Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011610.l21GAlKY016054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-01 11:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xblast-data Short Description: Data files for the game xblast Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: Note, this is a noarch rpm of 10 Mb not sure wether or not to use the disttag less, copy over from release to release approach here. If you want me to, only a devel branch needs to be created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:13:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:13:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011613.l21GDNK2016255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > A. for xblast-2.10.4-2: > > * Timestamps > > --------------------------------------------- > > install -m 644 %{name}.man $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man6/%{name}.6 > > --------------------------------------------- > > - Please use "install -p" (gzip keeps timestamp, so the timestamp > > of this file is finally kept). > > > That file gets patched and thus the timestamp gets set to the build time, so > there is no use in using -p. Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011621.l21GLSmg016886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|paul at city-fan.org |rnorwood at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-03-01 11:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-RPM2 Short Description: Perl bindings for RPM Owners: rnorwood at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011626.l21GQIYG017581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 11:26 EST ------- Well, for 0.1.35-5: * Directory ownership - The following directories are not owned by any packages. ---------------------------------------------------- /etc/pythoncad/ ---------------------------------------------------- Well, the following is the only issue to block this bug. So please fix the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:41:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011641.l21GfjIg019302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-01 11:41 EST ------- Looks good, test run succeeded. APPROVED. I'll trust you'll add the debuginfo bit after import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011643.l21GhGr8019554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-01 11:43 EST ------- ping, address items from comment #10 and comment #11, and I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011645.l21GjELX020021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lsof https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-01 11:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. Not possible. We create our own tarball with linux dialect only. The rest is fixed. Update to lsof-4.78-5.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 16:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011645.l21GjRNg020071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-03-01 11:45 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure In the future, please follow the CVS procedure here. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-lirc Short Description: Linux Infrared Remote Control python module Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: FC-5, FC-6, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011703.l21H3U3c022764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lsof https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 12:03 EST ------- How is the source tarball created, then? The procedure needs to be documented in the specfile; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Or is this a case where Fedora has simply forked the upstream code completely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230585] New: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230585 Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Contains xdg-user-dirs-update that updates folders in a users homedirectory based on the defaults configured by the administrator. See http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fxdg_2duser_2ddirs for more info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:17:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] New: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Contains some integration of xdg-user-dirs with the gnome desktop, including creating default bookmarks and detecting locale changes. review bug for xdg-user-dirs in bug 230585 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011718.l21HIZ9V024046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 12:18 EST ------- Well, for 1.2.0-1: * rpmlint - is not silent. The followings cannot be ignored. --------------------------------------------------------------- W: aqsis-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/pdiff/LPyramid.h E: aqsis-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/pdiff/LPyramid.h E: aqsis-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/pdiff/LPyramid.cpp E: aqsis-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/aqsis-1.2.0/build/thirdparty/pdiff/LPyramid.cpp --------------------------------------------------------------- Permission issue. Please change to 0644. * Directory ownership issue - The following directories are not owned by any package. --------------------------------------------------------------- /etc/aqsis/ --------------------------------------------------------------- * File conflict - I cannot upgrade to 1.2.0-1 (So I have not checked 1.2.0-1 with this version actually installed). --------------------------------------------------------------- Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Updating: aqsis i386 1.2.0-1.fc7 LOCAL 1.9 M aqsis-data i386 1.2.0-1.fc7 LOCAL 14 k aqsis-devel i386 1.2.0-1.fc7 LOCAL 29 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 0 Package(s) Update 3 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 1.9 M Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/pdiff from install of aqsis-1.2.0-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package a2ps-4.13b-61.fc7 Error Summary ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:28:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011728.l21HSW1X025016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-01 12:28 EST ------- New release cames up SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/ntfs-config.spec SRPM: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/devel/SRPMS/ntfs-config-0.5.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock log: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/devel/Logs/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011731.l21HVPgO025251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011732.l21HWFLU025343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 12:32 EST ------- Could you include info in the specfile which details how to create the tarball you're using? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#RevisionControl I'm not sure that just pulling the CVS HEAD is the best idea, because you lose repeatability as new code is committed. Usually you want to pull a tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011733.l21HXoGF025426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 12:33 EST ------- ... Why did you reopen this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011752.l21HqkHj028466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-03-01 12:52 EST ------- > W: mysql++ no-soname /usr/lib/libmysqlpp.so You can patch the linker options to set a soname. Even better would be to talk to upstream and ask whether there is any reason why they don't use a versioned soname. > W: mysql++-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm chmod -x inside the extracted source archive, e.g. in %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 17:53:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: newt-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011753.l21Hr6MZ028529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-03-01 12:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks a lot for the review and patch! > > I've applied this in -14. I'm not sure now is a good time to rename the > package, but I've changed crypto-utils (the only package which uses newt-perl) > to use Require/BuildRequire: perl(Newt) to facilitate that. > So long as you coordinate with those that need newt-perl the rename now should be fine. You'll be doing an obsoletes/provides though right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011801.l21I1Eld030046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-01 13:01 EST ------- SRPM: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PythonCAD/PythonCAD-0.1.35-6.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/PythonCAD/PythonCAD.spec Description: PythonCAD scriptable CAD package Fixed i've used %dir %{_sysconfdir}/pythoncad That should own the directory without double list files... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:13:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011813.l21IDGmE030896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 13:13 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (pythoncad) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------------- Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221405] Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011814.l21IE0ul030963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdirac - Dirac is an open source video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221405 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 13:13 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR by bug 225119) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:14:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011814.l21IERF9031010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:15:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011815.l21IF8OY031070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225632] Merge Review: byacc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011821.l21ILHgd031674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: byacc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225632 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-03-01 13:21 EST ------- Cleaned up and commited. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011829.l21ITdJQ000792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lsof https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-01 13:29 EST ------- No fork. The reason are licences -- we have to remove non-linux things from original tarball. There is README.maintainer in CVS that describe the way. http://cvs.devel.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/rpms/lsof/devel/README.maintainer?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fplain Well, I'll add some notes to spec file (according to "When Upstream uses Prohibited Code" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-b46af5567f2338faafa13aff9855caa3c91f2c8c) It's probably better than the README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011835.l21IZkVs001787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-01 13:35 EST ------- This make me wonder!?!: a2ps.x86_64 4.13b-57.fc6.3 installed Matched from: /usr/bin/pdiff aqsis.x86_64 1.2.0-1.kwizart.fc6 installed Matched from: /usr/bin/pdiff I wonder why this package also bundle it! Anyway this mean that i do not need to enable pdiff (perceptual diff) third part inside aqsis... I also wonder if a2ps should bundle it or requires package reviewed in #223657... I would do more testing with this version and see if there is some tweak to do. Preliminary test is good but some errors messages appear while trying to load textures files , this should be tweak... About co-maintainership... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/EncourageComaintainership I can propose to be primary maintainer of the package. This can be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 18:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011858.l21IwPxD004711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |230608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011901.l21J1sUT005111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-01 14:01 EST ------- becouse latest perl sucks ... filled bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:02:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011902.l21J2pZ6005227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-01 14:02 EST ------- Sorry Warren, I didn't know there was now a better documented way to make those CVS requests. Now I do. Ville : I'm pretty sure some people will be interested in running their HTPC on "stable" distros like RHEL... are you planning on getting lirc into EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230585] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011903.l21J3LfV005337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230585 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 14:03 EST ------- - rpmlint is silent both on source and binary rpm - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL ) is OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream,is latest available version, sha1sum ddb6299faae1e23da524b113eb5d7a27c734630a xdg-user-dirs-0.3.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales properly handled via find_lang - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no scriptlets - no static, .la or .pc files SHOULD - package builds in mock/devel/x86_64 - works as advertised TODO - I suggest including the Changelog (including the one for translations) - I think that it would be a good idea to use "-p" when installing %Source1, in order to preserve the timestamp - MUSTFIX: include the license file, it exists in the tar.gz but is not included in %doc Package is APPROVED but please add the license before uploading to CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011903.l21J3vVB005460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |230608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011904.l21J491k005533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|230608 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011911.l21JB0NP006681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 14:10 EST ------- Build in mock/devel/x86_64 failed: checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for intltool >= 0.35.0... 0.35.5 found checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11780 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011915.l21JFDA5006995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 14:15 EST ------- another stop after that: checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) no checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... ./configure: line 6758: no: command not found no checking for GTK... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make sure it is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full path to pkg-config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011920.l21JKidA007778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 14:20 EST ------- And the show goes on... checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GTK... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0) were not met: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:24:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228294] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011924.l21JOLoY008373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228294 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-01 14:24 EST ------- ok. Today FESCO ratified the buildroot proposal at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot The buildroot here meets those guidelines, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:25:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228293] Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011925.l21JPotS008534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228293 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-01 14:25 EST ------- ok. Today FESCO ratified the buildroot proposal at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot The buildroot here meets those guidelines, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:41:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195846] Review Request: pengupop - Networked Game in the vein of Move/Puzzle Bobble In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011941.l21Jf9Gi010332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pengupop - Networked Game in the vein of Move/Puzzle Bobble https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195846 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-01 14:41 EST ------- Add lxtnow at gmail.com as co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011941.l21JfHuV010372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-01 14:41 EST ------- That was it. gtk2-devel, pkgconfig and perl-XML-Parser seem to be needed. After adding those the package builds in mock, yielding [wolfy at wolfy xdg-user-dirs-gtk]$ rpmlint ~/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.1*rpm [wolfy at wolfy xdg-user-dirs-gtk]$ rpmlint xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.1-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: xdg-user-dirs-gtk non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/user-dirs-update-gtk.desktop Please submit a fixed spec/rpm and I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:41:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011941.l21Jfbek010415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-01 14:41 EST ------- Add lxtnow at gmail.com as co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011942.l21JgHCp010501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-01 14:42 EST ------- Add lxtnow at gmail.com as co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:45:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011945.l21JjGpv010802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 14:44 EST ------- Actually, now that I look at the -2 version of the spec file, it seems to me that I may have misunderstood the %{python_sitelib} usage on the Packaging Python page. This directory holds pure python stuff, right? It's not meant as a replacement for /usr/share/packagename (i.e. architecture independent files)? Or is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011948.l21Jm40s011057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-01 14:48 EST ------- > # sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others (remove the unneeded one) %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} You can remove the sitearch line if your package is a noarch. > Requires: httpd, mod_python, subversion >= 1.2, rcs, diffutils You require both cvs (rcs) and subversion file even though someone could use one or the other. Is there a better way to do this? You are also setting up the include file for cvsgraph, but not requiring cvsgraph. GNU enscript is already available in Extras. If you require and configure for enscript you can have sytax highlighting. The INSTALL files says that you need subversion python bindings - it appears that those are in the main subversion package? > %doc CHANGES README INSTALL TODO Normally we don't include INSTALL files, except in this case it has additional instruction on how to setup the mysql commit database (if someone wants to do that at a later time), so it is useful. The COMMITTERS file lists the contributors to the project, so it should be included in %doc. Are ./www and ./viewvc.org useful docs? In viewvc.conf: > AddHandler python-program .py > PythonHandler handler will require mod_python (which you do). This is only one way of running viewvc. Is there any particular reason that you've chosen this method? Is this the best way? In viewvc.conf: > # PythonDebug On remove :) > Requires: httpd, mod_python, subversion >= 1.2, rcs, diffutils If you require mod_python, you don't need httpd because it will be found by dependency of mod_python on httpd. I'll have to dig into the substitutions you're doing, but that will take me a little longer. Here are the rpmlint complaints for you package: E: viewvc script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/mod_python/query.py E: viewvc script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/mod_python/handler.py E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/vclib/ccvs/blame.py 0644 E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/py2html.py 0644 E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/compat_difflib.py 0644 E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/compat_ndiff.py 0644 E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/query.py 0644 E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/ezt.py 0644 E: viewvc htaccess-file /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/mod_python/.htaccess E: viewvc script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/mod_python/.htaccess E: viewvc script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/mod_python/viewvc.py E: viewvc non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/lib/blame.py 0644 W: viewvc setup-not-quiet W: viewvc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 41) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 19:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703011958.l21JwMg3012090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-01 14:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually, now that I look at the -2 version of the spec file, it seems to me > that I may have misunderstood the %{python_sitelib} usage on the Packaging > Python page. This directory holds pure python stuff, right? It's not meant as a > replacement for /usr/share/packagename (i.e. architecture independent files)? Or > is it? You will see packaging done in both places. Certainly "module" type packages will live in the sitelib (like the subversion bindings). I believe that for applications like this is is more a matter of taste. I'm no python expert (or packing expert), but I just recently finished TMDA package that lives in sitelib. Some people believe that /usr/share is strictly for arch independent data files (not program). And just as an example: MoinMoin (web wiki) : sitelib Yum : %{datadir} Your packages templates should definately live in %{datadir} though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012002.l21K2jtS012482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-03-01 15:02 EST ------- Since this is your first submission, you probably need a sponsor. You should ask for one here, and mark the bugzilla ticket as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored for details. According to the specfile, the upstream source should be available at http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.0-6.tar.gz. I can't find it there. The upstream source tarball must be available for download, and match the tarball in the src.rpm. The specfile: * You lack an url tag. You should add an URL tag pointing to the main page of the project. * The version and release tags doesn't match the latest changelog item. * The package obsoletes an earlier version of itself. This is uneccessary, and may lead to strange problems. rpm will upgrade the package correctly without this. * The package uses chkfontpath without adding it as a requirement. Parts of the %post scriptlet tests if chkfontpath is installed. It would be simpler to just make sure it is installed by adding it as a requirement. If chkfontpath is not installed, The %post scriptlet also edits xorg.conf, adding the needed. fontpaths. I find this way too intrusive. Just make sure chkfontpath is installed. * The %preun scriptlet is a bit too aggressive too, at least in my eyes, deleting and moving files around, and editing xorg.conf. I am no font expert, but I thought chkfontpath and its relatives was made to avoid such hacks. The rpm builds without errors on my fc6 system. rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint wqy-bitmapfont-0.8.0-6.src.rpm W: wqy-bitmapfont no-url-tag W: wqy-bitmapfont strange-permission wqy-bitmapfont.spec 0600 This is probably because you have built the source rpm from at tarball with the specfile built-in. Copy the sources to /path/to/rpm/SOURCES, and the specfile to /path/to/rpm/SPECS, and do a rpmbuild -bs on the specfile. W: wqy-bitmapfont mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 59) This one is easy :-) $ rpmlint wqy-bitmapfont-0.8.0-6.noarch.rpm W: wqy-bitmapfont incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8.0 0.8.0-6 W: wqy-bitmapfont no-url-tag E: wqy-bitmapfont obsolete-on-name W: wqy-bitmapfont dangerous-command-in-%post cp E: wqy-bitmapfont no-prereq-on chkfontpath W: wqy-bitmapfont dangerous-command-in-%preun rm E: wqy-bitmapfont no-prereq-on chkfontpath Keep on the good work! Ingvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:06:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012006.l21K6QcO012792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-03-01 15:06 EST ------- W: wqy-bitmapfont strange-permission wqy-bitmapfont.spec 0600 This is probably because you have built the source rpm from at tarball with the specfile built-in. Copy the sources to /path/to/rpm/SOURCES, and the specfile to /path/to/rpm/SPECS, + and change the permissions of the specfile to 644 and do a rpmbuild -bs on the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:12:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012012.l21KC10X013160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 15:11 EST ------- Regarding, comment #8, I did a quick -3 of the spec file to illustrate what I meant. It is here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-3.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:24:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012024.l21KO8K9013975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 15:24 EST ------- > You can remove the sitearch line if your package is a noarch. Shall do. > You require both cvs (rcs) and subversion file even though someone could use one or the other. Is there a better way to do this? Yeah, I was also thinking about this. On one hand, if I don't require this and someone configures one of the two options (CVS or SVN), it may or may not work, depending on the current state of their system. So, I thought, better err on the side of caution and make sure at least minimum requirements for both (since Fedora ships both CVS and SVN) are satisfied, so that things just work. But, if there is a better way to do this, I'd be happy to change... > You are also setting up the include file for cvsgraph, but not requiring cvsgraph. > GNU enscript is already available in Extras. If you require and configure for enscript you can have sytax highlighting. Yeah, not consistent eh? It's easy to put both in as dependencies, I guess. Will change. > The INSTALL files says that you need subversion python bindings - it appears that those are in the main subversion package? Looks that way on FC6. I'll check devel to see if things have been split up some more. > The COMMITTERS file lists the contributors to the project, so it should be included in %doc. > Are ./www and ./viewvc.org useful docs? Yes, to both. Just copied Dag's stuff here, without looking at it much. Will include. > will require mod_python (which you do). This is only one way of running viewvc. > Is there any particular reason that you've chosen this method? Is this the best way? Well, I was guessing that Python programs run best within mod_python, like Perl programs do under mod_perl. Not a Python programmer myself, so I have no proof... I mean, CGI stuff is still there, so if someone wants to reconfigure to run like that, they still can. >> # PythonDebug On >remove :) Shall do ;-) > If you require mod_python, you don't need httpd because it will be found by dependency of mod_python on httpd. Shall fix. > Here are the rpmlint complaints for you package: I'll look into that. > Your packages templates should definately live in %{datadir} though. Yeah, that's how -3 spec file does it. Thanks for your time! I'll work on improvements and report back when I have them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012030.l21KU48H014500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 15:30 EST ------- > Looks that way on FC6. I'll check devel to see if things have been split up some more. Devel still ships python bindings with subversion package, so we should be OK there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:36:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226641] Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012036.l21KahL8015213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226641 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-03-01 15:36 EST ------- Imagine that I don't understand how %doc works (I don't) and that the RPM manual doesn't document it very well (it doesn't). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 20:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226641] Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012050.l21Kow32016420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-proto-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226641 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-03-01 15:50 EST ------- %doc is a magic macro interpreted by RPM during the build process. If it is present, rpm, after the %install, %brp-compress, etc. processes, does: cd mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} It then marks all these files as 'documentation' in the package header. So, all paths in %doc are relative to the rpm build directory (exploded source tree). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 21:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228296] Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012113.l21LDAUG018150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lirc - Linux Infrared Remote Control python module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228296 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-01 16:13 EST ------- I am one of those people, but can't tell for sure yet - one big factor for me regarding various multimedia related packages is whether RHEL5/CentOS5 kernels will include DVB drivers (or if not, whether I feel like packaging them myself or can get them sanely packaged from somewhere else) and if I get past this point, how well I can get my VDR HTPC/PVR to run on it. If this turns out to be too much work for my taste, it's unlikely that I would be interested in maintaining LIRC in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 21:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012117.l21LHr4Q018598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo at redhat.com 2007-03-01 16:17 EST ------- We don't want to mark those config files as noreplace, as they should not be touched. That has saved us when switching to fontconfig 2.4 already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 21:21:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012121.l21LLRja019022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fvwm - window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223724 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-01 16:21 EST ------- rpmlint output is ignorable: W: fvwm devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/fvwm-config I am not convinced that it is right to provide the perl provides since they are not in the perl module dir. It means filtering out all the provides, and from the requires: perl(FVWM::*) perl(FvwmCommand) perl(General::FileSystem) perl(General::Parse) Suggestions: add a trailing / to directories in %files to show visually that these are directories, like %{_datadir}/%{name}/ Give permission on install command line call, even if the result is righht by now: install -D -p -m755 %{SOURCE2} \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/fvwm-xdg-menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 22:00:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012200.l21M0gJI026243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-03-01 17:00 EST ------- change owner to fedora at deadbabylon.de Current owner is AWOL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-February/msg00426.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 22:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012203.l21M3AKG026614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-03-01 17:03 EST ------- Sindre: If you'd like, I'd have no trouble handing over primary maintainership to you or comaintaining it. :] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 22:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221015] Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012221.l21MLvsi028026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksplash-engine-moodin - Moodin is a splash engine for KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:02:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012302.l21N2oDG031145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 18:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avrdude Short Description: Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012314.l21NEpqv031855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-03-01 18:14 EST ------- Kevin Fenzi (kevin at tummy.com) wrote: > 1. Might include the following as %doc files: > AUTHORS NEWS THANKS Done. > On point 2, you might consider litterally having: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > in the spec. Done. > So, the module wasn't loaded and it didn't autoload it. > I did a manual 'modprobe ecryptfs' and then tried again. > It seems to work, but I don't see anything with df, and looking in > dmesg I get: > > mount.ecryptfs[4322] general protection rip:3226c5e4b9 > rsp:7fffa5c67a80 error:0 > mount.ecryptfs[4568] general protection rip:3226c5e4b9 > rsp:7fff15962c10 error:0 There was a bug in the error path (free bogus pointer). Fixed in the ecryptfs-utils-10 release. Peter Vrabec (pvrabec at redhat.com) wrote: > There are 2 lines before kernel error in messages: > Mar 1 11:33:47 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Your kernel does not > support key module [openssl] > Mar 1 11:33:59 rawhide64 mount.ecryptfs: Mount opts: > [ecryptfs_sig=945f0e28ae2dfba0,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,] The mount helper is overly verbose; fixed in the ecryptfs-utils-10 release. I also changed the key module build in ecryptfs-utils-10 so that it is now possible to disable building the OpenSSL key module; however, that should not affect the RPM. Future releases will likely include many more key modules, and if they are all included in the same RPM, then there could be an extra dependency for each key module (openCryptoki, TrouSerS, etc.), whether the user wants the key module or not. If it would be acceptable to break the key modules into individual RPM's (ecryptfs-keymodule-openssl, ecryptfs-keymodule-tss, ecryptfs-keymodule-ock, etc.), then that would reduce the dependencies for ecryptfs-utils. Updated SPEC is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils.spec?use_mirror=osdn Updated SRPM is here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ecryptfs/ecryptfs-utils-10-0.src.rpm There are also a number of minor kernel bugfixes that Red Hat may want to pick up as separate patches in its 2.6.20 kernel. Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012315.l21NF5CU031910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 18:15 EST ------- OK, there is -4 now, located here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-4.FC6.src.rpm Most of the above issues should be now addressed. Enscript stuff still doesn't work dues to SELinux issues. I'm looking into that now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:15:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012315.l21NFw4M031969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-01 18:15 EST ------- I have checked that gperf isn't needed when source file timestamps are not modified (as why I can't find gperf, I guess there is something broken somewhere...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:36:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012336.l21NaRNV000964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:41:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012341.l21Nf7bF001133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:43:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012343.l21NhP5m001281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 18:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avrdude Short Description: Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: (sorry, forgot the fedora-cvs flag the first time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012345.l21NjLSu001586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-01 18:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sdcc Short Description: Small Device C Compiler Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 1 23:50:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703012350.l21Novd4002188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020018.l220IZVA003990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020041.l220f8WZ004819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020045.l220jAuE005196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228894] Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020045.l220jRHs005229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpcbind - converts RPC program numbers into universal addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228894 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Core Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020049.l220nTBJ005372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-03-01 19:49 EST ------- Ping.... I'm getting pressure to make sure this is included in FC7... I'm hoping that since I opened this bz well be for the feature freeze, there should not be a problem getting this in... right?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:53:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020053.l220rnS4005527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 00:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020059.l220xN6o005730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 19:59 EST ------- This got missed by many because you set the fedora-review flag to '?' indicating it's already under review. I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 01:02:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195846] Review Request: pengupop - Networked Game in the vein of Move/Puzzle Bobble In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020102.l2212HqT005928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pengupop - Networked Game in the vein of Move/Puzzle Bobble https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195846 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 01:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020120.l221KqnU006593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-03-01 20:20 EST ------- Added fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com in CC too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 01:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020130.l221UZCd007062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-03-01 20:30 EST ------- that was my mistake... in the RHEL world '?' means needs attention. I guess I need to go back a re-read the guidelines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 02:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020244.l222ieIL009989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 21:44 EST ------- Let's see if I can avoid losing this review because of an intervening comment.... I note 0.3.0 came out yesterday. Let's check rpmlint: W: nfs4-acl-tools non-standard-group System Environment/Tools Not a problem; group is pretty much meaningless and what you have at least seems accurate. W: nfs4-acl-tools no-version-in-last-changelog W: nfs4-acl-tools-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog Changelog entries must include the relevant version info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs W: nfs4-acl-tools no-documentation There is documentation included in the tarball, including two contradictory license statements. Great. But that documentation needs to get into the final package. W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%post W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%preun W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%postun These should go if there's nothing to put in them. This package seems to have three licenses, BSD, LGPL and GPL, and it's not entirely clear to me which parts are under which license. As a bonus, there are two COPYING files and one LICENSE file. They've managed to make a relatively simple package quite complicated. However, doc/README seems to indicate that only the build scripts remain from the GPL-licensed package, so I suppose all of the actual code is under the 3-clause BSD license included in COPYING (not doc/COPYING). Did you intend to build the graphical bits? The summary seems to indicate so, but they aren't built. And the INSTALL file talks of naughty things like static linking. Scary. The way that CFLAGS gets set is a bit weird. $ARCH_OPT_FLAGS doesn't seem to be defined on any platform I have access to. ANd the whole configure thing is pretty bad; you shouldn't put the buildroot in --prefix or --bindir. But the package fails to install if you do that. And to boot, the resulting binaries are statically linked. I know this isn't your fault as you're just working around what seems to be a really broken upstream build process, but I think this package is busted enough that I'd like someone else with more experience dealing with really broken upstreams to comment. I'll attach a patch that fixes some of the issues, but perhaps a rebase to 0.3.0 is in order just to see if the build process has improved. Checklist: * source files match upstream: f4a55f18bda2df3ea6b7afb8b755a9f3f95010c7c022c66b4102a030720f9045 nfs4-acl-tools-0.2.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named X macros should probably be used instead of * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text is not included in package. X latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: nfs4-acl-tools-0.2.0-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm nfs4-acl-tools = 0.2.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh libattr.so.1()(64bit) libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I personally have no NFS4 install and so no way to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (but perhaps it should be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 02:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020245.l222jVf1010028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-03-01 21:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149085) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149085&action=view) Quick patching fixing a few minor issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 02:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020249.l222nuWt010161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 21:49 EST ------- OK, I've just uploaded the SELinux enabled version: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-5.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 04:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020427.l224R9rr015213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai | |l.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-01 23:27 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 04:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020454.l224sDLM017245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-01 23:54 EST ------- BTW, output of rpmlint is: -------------------------------- $ rpmlint viewvc-1.0.3-5.FC6.noarch.rpm W: viewvc incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.3-5 1.0.3-5.FC6 E: viewvc non-standard-uid /var/spool/viewvc apache E: viewvc non-standard-gid /var/spool/viewvc apache E: viewvc non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/viewvc 0700 E: viewvc unknown-key GPG#b832d3e3 -------------------------------- Hmm, not sure how to avoid the above - that's how things are supposed to be (bar unknown GPG key, of course). And for selinux package: -------------------------------- $ rpmlint viewvc-selinux-1.0.3-5.FC6.noarch.rpm W: viewvc-selinux no-documentation E: viewvc-selinux unknown-key GPG#b832d3e3 E: viewvc-selinux forbidden-selinux-command-in-%post chcon -------------------------------- Equally confusing - the chcon bit I pinched directly from the Fedora Wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/#head-a81109d3dfc8d5798d761d332c3153af0668e065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020615.l226FVq8022681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-02 01:15 EST ------- Thanks for updating SPEC. But still i saw rpmlint reports some messages for files installed under /etc which are not marked as %config(noreplace) also there are still some files that are getting installed twice. Can you check build.log? Easy fix is to do following under %files -%{bmpfontdir} +%{bmpfontdir}/*.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020619.l226Jmwt022773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-02 01:19 EST ------- The *-devel split-out seems to break building of all perl-modules. IMO, it's too late in F7's release cycle for such a massive change. I'd recommend you to reconsider your decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020627.l226R8TV023096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-02 01:27 EST ------- rpmlint reports follwoing messages on SRPM and RPMS W: scim prereq-use %{_sbindir}/alternatives The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. W: scim mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 10) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. W: scim patch-not-applied Patch2: gtkimm-clear-preedit-on-reset-174143.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. E: scim obsolete-not-provided iiimf-gtk The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim obsolete-not-provided iiimf-gnome-im-switcher The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim obsolete-not-provided iiimf-server The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim obsolete-not-provided iiimf-x The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. E: scim binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/Helper/setup.so ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. E: scim binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/aaa-imengine-setup.so ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. E: scim binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/aaa-frontend-setup.so ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. E: scim binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/panel-gtk-setup.so ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. W: scim non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: scim zero-length /usr/share/doc/scim-1.4.5/NEWS E: scim-gtk binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-scim.so ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. E: scim-libs obsolete-not-provided iiimf-libs The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim-libs obsolete-not-provided iiimf-csconv The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.8.1.1 ['/usr//lib'] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH'. Usually this is a bad thing because it hardcodes the path to search libraries and so makes it difficult to move libraries around. Most likely you will find a Makefile with a line like: gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath. Also, sometimes configure scripts provide a --disable-rpath flag to avoid this. W: scim-libs no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. W: scim-libs one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. W: scim-libs one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig You should use %postun -p instead of using: %postun It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. E: scim-devel obsolete-not-provided iiimf-libs-devel The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020632.l226WJOR023374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-02 01:32 EST ------- To CVS admin, correction could you make that (iow add me to the initialCC): New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sdcc Short Description: Small Device C Compiler Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:32:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020632.l226Wu7J023432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-02 01:32 EST ------- To CVS admin, correction could you make that (iow add me to the initialCC): New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avrdude Short Description: Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:46:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020646.l226k13P024034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-03-02 01:45 EST ------- If it's really only a mass rebuild which includes the perl-devel to _all_ perl modules, this should be handable like in the past. Announce to the maintainers to fix their packages until a specified date, otherwise one mass-fixing and rebuild will be done. IMHO this should be possible for the Core packages, too. But from what I read now, we're not sure what has to be moved to -devel, or did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020648.l226mSAv024106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 01:48 EST ------- ... however does scim _really_ provide iiimf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 06:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020658.l226wdAd024446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-02 01:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > If it's really only a mass rebuild which includes the perl-devel to _all_ perl > modules, I am not sure if it's all, but all of my today's perl-module builds fail. > this should be handable like in the past. We are talking about 100s of packages ... > Announce to the maintainers > to fix their packages until a specified date, otherwise one mass-fixing and > rebuild will be done. IMHO this should be possible for the Core packages, too. > But from what I read now, we're not sure what has to be moved to -devel, > or did > > I miss something? This at least matchew with how I understand the current situation. To me, the question boils down to: Is the decision on to have perl-devel firm/fix wrt. FC7 or not. AFAIU, it isn't - It's an accident. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:06:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020706.l22764v4024712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-03-02 02:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ... however does scim _really_ provide iiimf? Right I don't think it should. I think an exception can be made following "Renaming/replacing existing packages". Maybe rpmlint should treat the case "Obsoletes: package <= version" as a warning not an error? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:07:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020707.l22774lB024759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 02:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The *-devel split-out seems to break building of all perl-modules. This happened not only to you, but also to me.. > > IMO, it's too late in F7's release cycle for such a massive change. +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020712.l227CaFa024930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:17:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226399] Merge Review: scim-tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020717.l227H104025023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226399 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-02 02:16 EST ------- mock build is fine. But rpmlint on SRPM and RPMs reported following messages(Combined output) W: scim-tables unversioned-explicit-obsoletes scim-tables-zh The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: scim-tables unversioned-explicit-obsoletes scim-tables-ja The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: scim-tables unversioned-explicit-obsoletes scim-tables-ko The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: scim-tables macro-in-%changelog _datadir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: scim-tables mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 488, tab: line 7) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. E: scim-tables obsolete-not-provided scim-tables-japanese The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim-tables obsolete-not-provided scim-tables-korean The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: scim-tables-chinese obsolete-not-provided scim-tables-zh The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020718.l227IhBT025113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-02 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > ... however does scim _really_ provide iiimf? > > Right I don't think it should. I think an exception can be made following > "Renaming/replacing existing packages". Maybe rpmlint should treat the case > "Obsoletes: package <= version" as a warning not an error? Agree. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218342] Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020740.l227ev6E025874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-03-02 02:40 EST ------- The current feedback I got from the fedora lists is that it may be better to package the fonts separately and keep the name tibetan-machine-uni-fonts. Considering also the lack of complete consensus on the fonts-* name I feel this is probably the most reasonable result. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 07:47:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 02:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230585] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020747.l227lv6N026143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230585 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 02:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xdg-user-dirs Short Description: Handling of user well-known folders Owners: alexl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 08:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020809.l2289AdF026691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 03:09 EST ------- New versions at: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk.spec http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 09:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 04:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703020930.l229U26q032086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 daniil.ivanov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai| |l.com) | ------- Additional Comments From daniil.ivanov at gmail.com 2007-03-02 04:29 EST ------- Can't reproduce the problem on my machine. ~Daniil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 10:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 05:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021041.l22Af5D8004531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-02 05:41 EST ------- GOOD - rpmlint checks do not return anything either on source or on binary package - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPL ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, sha1sum 09ccb33dd147d969ec33a9e3d08daa1ca0c37202 xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.1.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - MINOR: unnecessary BR: pkgconfig is pulled in by gtk2-devel - no locales, despite what the build log seems to say - not relocatable - owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - MUSTFIX the .desktop file does not contain all needed entries: /usr/bin/desktop-file-validate *desktop user-dirs-update-gtk.desktop: error: required key "Type" not found user-dirs-update-gtk.desktop: warning: non-standard key "OnlyShownIn" lacks the "X-" prefix According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop there are a few missing entries - MUSTFIX: still according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop, "It is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, one MUST run desktop-file-install in %install (and have BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils), to help ensure .desktop file safety and spec-compliance." - no .la, .pc, static content - devel not needed SHOULD - builds without problems in mock/devel/x86_64 - does not segfault at run. I am not a Gnome user, so I cannot really test if it creates what it supposed to create; a dry run in strace seems to appear OK Please fix the desktop issues (I suggest either a patch or going with the simpler version of a separate file included as Source1) and I will approve the package. You might also remove pkgconfig from BR if you wish since it's not really needed to be included separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 10:53:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 05:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021053.l22ArHaF005910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 05:53 EST ------- Xavier, would you review this review again? Note: I cannot still approve this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 11:06:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021106.l22B6b21006813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From fly80 at mclink.it 2007-03-02 06:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149100) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149100&action=view) build log on ppc64 using the last src rpm build log on ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 11:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021119.l22BJPul007349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 Bug 222042 depends on bug 230608, which changed state. Bug 230608 Summary: missing config.h in latest -14 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230608 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 11:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021138.l22BcaW2007881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-02 06:38 EST ------- I just came across an interesting thread here : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051450.html Looks like the current content of the source might not be acceptable and might need to be modified. Some possibilities are discussed further in the thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 11:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021155.l22BtmtR008505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 06:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #59) > Created an attachment (id=149100) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149100&action=view) [edit] > build log on ppc64 using the last src rpm > > build log on ppc64 still ignore this. one nit: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60412: line 48: ogdi-config: command not found You havent build this in mock again !!! can you show me output of this: yum list installed | grep e2fsprogs-devel Please wait for -10 becouse i need update this package for latest python plus perl changes in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021203.l22C3Dv3008852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:03 EST ------- I fixed the desktop file upstream and made a new release: http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk.spec http://people.redhat.com/alexl/temp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm However, i disagree with using desktop-file-install. I'm using a desktop file as per the autostart spec, not for something in the menus, so the guidelines don't really affect this use. (And in fact, it would be pretty weird to use it in this case.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226129] Merge Review: man-pages-ru In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021208.l22C8Z27009078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ru https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226129 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:08 EST ------- Fixed in man-pages-ru-0.97-2.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021217.l22CHa4S009402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > becouse latest perl sucks ... > filled bug report. > ok perl is solved nowdays perl-devel is required. Now python sucks it report wrong lookup paths (old 2.4) instead of 2.5 ... I still fight to look into, so will come up with -11 shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021222.l22CMNSQ009644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-03-02 07:22 EST ------- After some consideration I've come to the conclusion that I'm really lazy: I'm hereby giving up any claim of maintainership of blam. You take it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226128] Merge Review: man-pages-pl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021229.l22CT1d1009993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226128 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:28 EST ------- Fixed in man-pages-pl-0.24-3.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:30:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021230.l22CUj50010128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From fly80 at mclink.it 2007-03-02 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > one nit: > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60412: line 48: ogdi-config: command not found > > You havent build this in mock again !!! > > can you show me output of this: > yum list installed | grep e2fsprogs-devel > > Please wait for -10 becouse i need update this package for latest python plus > perl changes in devel. yum list installed | grep e2fsprogs-devel e2fsprogs-devel.ppc64 1.39-7.fc6 installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021243.l22Ch5TC010756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-02 07:42 EST ------- Except for Source0 which is wrong (you have left 0.1 instead of 0.2) the rest is OK. New sha1sum for source file is 4184311e587a49b73a1fc5a00811bcc2d2df2fa7 /tmp/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.2.tar.gz 4184311e587a49b73a1fc5a00811bcc2d2df2fa7 /home/wolfy/xdg-user-dirs-gtk-0.2.tar.gz Your choice of using the desktop file seems (to me at least) to correspond with http://standards.freedesktop.org/autostart-spec/autostart-spec-0.5.html#id2452086 so I guess that in this particular case the guidelines do not apply. Package APPROVED. Please do not forget to fix Source0 before uploading to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021243.l22ChLwG010788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > (In reply to comment #60) > > > one nit: > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60412: line 48: ogdi-config: command not found > > > > You havent build this in mock again !!! > > > > can you show me output of this: > > yum list installed | grep e2fsprogs-devel > > > > Please wait for -10 becouse i need update this package for latest python plus > > perl changes in devel. > > yum list installed | grep e2fsprogs-devel > e2fsprogs-devel.ppc64 1.39-7.fc6 installed ah you miss this 32 bit lib ! 'yum install e2fsprogs-devel.ppc' please install it and than post result. But i would like remind you to build it from scratch in mock session. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021253.l22CrDC8011520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 07:52 EST ------- Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021255.l22Ctu12011698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 07:55 EST ------- Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 12:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226122] Merge Review: man-pages-da In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021259.l22CxAgU011979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-da https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226122 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-02 07:58 EST ------- Fixed in man-pages-da-0.1.1-13.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021301.l22D1426012128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 08:01 EST ------- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021301.l22D1KaT012177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 08:01 EST ------- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021304.l22D4nbn012359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:04 EST ------- err... $ brew latest-pkg dist-fc7 k3b Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- k3b-1.0.0-0.rc6.1.fc7 dist-fc7 harald -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:06:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021306.l22D6Cvw012451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:06:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230585] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021306.l22D6qP4012519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs - Handling of well known folders in homedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230585 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 08:06 EST ------- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229927] Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021318.l22DIvpD013186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229927 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 08:18 EST ------- Hans, will you have a time to review mecab-jumandic again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226121] Merge Review: man-pages-cs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021322.l22DMBKX013327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-cs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226121 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:21 EST ------- Fixed in man-pages-cs-0.16-7.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:25:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021325.l22DPtGk013474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:25 EST ------- updated Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/gdal.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/gdal-1.4.0-10.src.rpm should build x86_64, i386 in mock. oh, please do 'setarch i686' before launch your mock session for i386 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021333.l22DXOFl013785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: newt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:33 EST ------- Ok, should be fixed in newt-0.52.6-1.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225237] Merge Review: acpid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021334.l22DY8GI013822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: acpid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225237 pknirsch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:34 EST ------- Ok, closing it as RAWHIDE. Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:35:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021335.l22DZtmq013914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-02 08:35 EST ------- So, I take it then that you incorporated the Ed's suggestions already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:37:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021337.l22DbPa0014050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-02 08:37 EST ------- Hrm, looking closer, turns out besides .la files, Ed didn't have any suggestions. Ed, anything else blocking approval here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:38:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021338.l22DcGa8014141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-02 08:38 EST ------- When orphaning, is the same procedure to be followed? I mean the package is not retired, simply orphaned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230710] New: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff-0.1.10-1.src.rpm Description: This library contains an algorithm that converts a boolean expression binary tree into the Disjunctive Normal Form. The NOT operator is supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 13:56:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021356.l22DubRO016103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 08:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xdg-user-dirs-gtk Short Description: Gnome integration for xdg-user-dirs Owners: alexl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021416.l22EG9R8018022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 09:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149114) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149114&action=view) mockbuild log of gdal-1.4.0-10.fc7.i386 This time mockbuild on FC-devel i386 is okay (1.4.0-10). Check the log if this is what you expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021428.l22ESBti018718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 09:28 EST ------- Thanks a lot Tasaka ! Yes its fine, no files are missing obviously from packages. Can give help to review issues for final approval ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021431.l22EVxEc018998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-03-02 09:31 EST ------- Well, I only saw three warning like: W: fonts-japanese no-url-tag W: fonts-japanese rpm-buildroot-usage %build %configure --disable-bold --disable-italic --with-fontdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{bmpfontdir} W: fonts-japanese mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 149, tab: line 1) I may be missing something but how did you see %config stuff? spaces vs tabs issue and listing-files-twice issue was fixed in CVS with revision 1.21 FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021434.l22EYtWa019298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 09:34 EST ------- It seems that a2ps pdiff (print diff) and bug 223657 PerceptualDiff are of no relation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021439.l22Ed3v0019615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2007-03-02 09:38 EST ------- Mar 2 14:25:26 rawhide64 kernel: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.20-1.2949.fc7 #1 --------------------------------------------- bash/3868 is trying to acquire lock: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e but task is already holding lock: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by bash/3868: #0: (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e stack backtrace: Call Trace: [] __lock_acquire+0x151/0xbc4 [] :ecryptfs:ecryptfs_filldir+0x0/0x7d [] lock_acquire+0x4c/0x65 [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xff/0x299 [] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e [] vfs_readdir+0x61/0xb1 [] filldir+0x0/0xc5 [] :ecryptfs:ecryptfs_readdir+0x6c/0xb2 [] filldir+0x0/0xc5 [] vfs_readdir+0x7c/0xb1 [] sys_getdents+0x7a/0xc4 [] tracesys+0x71/0xe1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 14:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021443.l22EhxOT019927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 09:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149119) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149119&action=view) mock build log of grass-6.2.1-8.fc7.i386 mockbuild of 6.2.1-8 doesn't seem okay (and I couldn't find -9 or 6.2.3?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:01:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021501.l22F1gXk021451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dovecot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tjanouse at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-03-02 10:01 EST ------- Hi Jef, thanks for your review, I applied your diff and commited, just changed the section removing .la/.a files to use find instead. My comments follow: (In reply to comment #1) > ? MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just > symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in > %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each > subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. > Comment: shared libs exist in /usr/lib/dovecot but they appear to be simple > plugins for dovecot's own runtime use and not meant for linking. if this is the > case, then no corrections need to be made. Please confirm that the items in > /usr/lib/dovecot are not meant to be dynamically linkable libraries. I confirm that. > E: dovecot configure-without-libdir-spec > ????? I am not sure what rpmlint is trying to tell us here. This is probably a rpmlint bug, the libdir is passed by %configure itself. > E: dovecot non-readable /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem 0600 > E: dovecot non-standard-uid /var/lib/dovecot dovecot > E: dovecot non-standard-gid /var/lib/dovecot dovecot > E: dovecot non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/dovecot 0750 > E: dovecot non-standard-gid /var/run/dovecot/login dovecot > E: dovecot non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/dovecot/login 0750 > E: dovecot non-readable /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem 0600 > .... all of these rpmlint errors appear to be bogus to me. Please confirm that > the permissions and ownership are as intended for these. Yes, they are. > W: dovecot dangerous-command-in-%pre rm > W: dovecot dangerous-command-in-%post mv > W: dovecot dangerous-command-in-%preun userdel > .... I think these warnings are bogus. Though you may want to look back over > the use of the rm and mv commands to see if they are still needed. > I think I understand why the restart_flag logic is present. > But I do not understand why the ssl cert manipulation logic block is in > %post. All the file location testing and conditional use of mv. What > cases trigger the mv commands? Is this logic meant for now EOL'd fedora > and rhl releases? Yeah, the certificate paths used to be different, this block moves them to new location. (In reply to comment #4) > If there is no -devel package, does that stop someone from being able to build > something like http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve?highlight=%28dovecot-sieve%29 > against it? I know that Sieve will not build the way dovecot is currently > packaged, because the Sieve program needs to be able to find a file called > dovecot-config in the "compiled Dovecot sources". I do not know what the correct > way to handle this but I ask that you take my comments into consideration, in > case someone would like to use Dovecot-Sive with this package. I didn't find any easy way to make dovecot-sieve compile against packaged version. It just wants access to the dovecot build dir. I might create a -devel package in the future as upstream added an option to install headers, but the location of things is probably still not ok. Regarding dovecot-sieve, we'll probably build that from the same source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:03:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021503.l22F3i13021591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 bbbush.yuan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-03-02 10:03 EST ------- Package co-maintainer Change Request ======================= Package Name: chmsee Short Description: A Gtk+2 CHM document viewer Owners: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com, pertusus at free.fr Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:09:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021509.l22F9EoI022017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-02 10:09 EST ------- Sorry I hadn't assigned this to myself yet so I didn't see any of your replies (oops). I'll get around to reviewing this as time permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:10:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021510.l22FAvZe022127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-02 10:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Package co-maintainer Change Request > ======================= > Branches: FC-6 Only for FC-6? Not for all the branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] New: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-exit/xmoto-edit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-exit/xmoto-edit-0.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: Level editor or xmoto. With the last release, this was split out of the upstream tarball. The spec is basically a modified xmoto.spec. rpmlint is clean for srpm, rpm and debuginfo. I am already sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021520.l22FKgPa022809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2007-03-02 10:20 EST ------- Sorry it took a while to get to do the fixes. Here first my comments on the findings: > W: basesystem summary-ended-with-dot The skeleton package which defines a simple Red Hat Linux system. Fixed > W: basesystem invalid-license public domain Fixed, now using Public Domain (as requested below). > W: basesystem no-url-tag There is now upstream for this package, so the only option would be to either make it http://www.redhat.com/ or http://www.fedoraproject.org/ > W: basesystem prereq-use setup filesystem Fixed. Now it's Requires(Pre): setup filesystem > W: basesystem hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/basesystem-root Fixed. Using the latest recommended BuildRoot > E: basesystem no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install Fixed. Added empty %install section > E: basesystem no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean Fixed. Added empty %clean section > W: basesystem no-%prep-section Fixed. Added empty %prep section > W: basesystem no-%build-section Fixed. Added empty %build section > W: basesystem no-%install-section Fixed. Added empty %install section > W: basesystem no-%clean-section Fixed. Added empty %clean section RPM: > W: basesystem summary-ended-with-dot The skeleton package which defines a simple Red Hat Linux system. Fixed. See above. > W: basesystem invalid-license public domain Fixed. See above. > W: basesystem no-url-tag Possible "fixes" listed above. > W: basesystem no-documentation basesystem doesn't have a source, nor does it contain any files. so unecessary. Random issues: > * Change "Red Hat Linux" to "Fedora" (both in summary and description). blocker. Fixed. > * What is the version "8.0"?! I can't say this follows naming guidelines. Version of basesystem is arbitrary. > * Make release integer (6?). Fixed, but release can (and often will) consiste of X.Y.Z components. > * Using Prereq is bad. Change to Requires. blocker. Absolutely agreed. Fixed. > * Capitalize "Public Domain". Fixed. See above. > * Change BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed. Used the even newer recommended BuildRoot entry as per fedoraproject.org > * description says this should be the first package installed on a system, but the package Prereq's "setup" and "filesystem". Confusing. Uhm, yea. Thats one of the things i'd like to go over with some folks and discuss on f-d-l. Imo the "correct" order of those 3 packages would be: basesystem filesystem setup For the simple reason as basesystem (as the description also already says) should be the first package on a system. Then filesystem, as it creates the basic directory structure of the system. And third setup, which contains the basic setup for the system. I think one of the problems though is that in order to basesystem, filesystem and setup pulled in glibc requires basesystem, which then in turn pulls in filesystem and setup via the Requires(Pre): [phil at kfurt tmp]$ rpm -q --whatrequires basesystem glibc-2.5-9 [phil at kfurt tmp]$ rpm -q --whatrequires filesystem basesystem-8.0-5.1.1 lockdev-1.0.1-10 SysVinit-2.86-14 mkinitrd-5.1.19.2-1 nautilus-2.16.2-5.el5 [phil at kfurt tmp]$ rpm -q --whatrequires setup filesystem-2.4.0-1 basesystem-8.0-5.1.1 dump-0.4b41-2.fc6 sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 * Add empty sections for %prep, %build, %install, and %clean. blocker. Fixed. Added empty sections for those. * Theoretically, the %files section should contain a %defattr line. Fixed. Added it, just for completeness. Summary: Overall should contain now nearly all recommended fixes. Only 2 questions are: - What to do with URL? Really not happy about any "arbitrary" URL there. - Discuss on f-d-l how to go about fixing the requires chain. Read ya, Phil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021521.l22FLmVt022955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-02 10:21 EST ------- Oops, bad URLs: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-edit/xmoto-edit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-edit/xmoto-edit-0.2.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021524.l22FO7hA023109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 10:24 EST ------- Balint, please close this bug when rebuilding is done (perhaps now you can close this). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:31:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230344] Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021531.l22FVUrW023686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bacula - Cross platform network backup for Linux, Unix, Mac and Windows. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230344 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-03-02 10:31 EST ------- I'm glad to see that, unlike upstream, you've split the storage daemon off from the director package. I can't look at this in detail at the moment as I'm very busy with $DAYJOB but I'll keep an eye on this ticket and will hopefully be able to comment more later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222039] Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021536.l22FaE1o024019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:36:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021536.l22FaRDf024065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 Bug 222042 depends on bug 222039, which changed state. Bug 222039 Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021536.l22FaY4S024104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 Bug 227646 depends on bug 222039, which changed state. Bug 222039 Summary: Review Request: ogdi - Open Geographic Datastore Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222039 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021537.l22Fb6mW024240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-02 10:37 EST ------- $ rpmlint -I forbidden-selinux-command-in-%post forbidden-selinux-command-in-%post : A command which requires intimate knowledge about a specific SELinux policy type was found in the scriptlet. These types are subject to change on a policy version upgrade. Use the restorecon command which queries the currently loaded policy for the correct type instead. See also bug 214605 (the reporter, Steve, might be able to provide more info how to do the SELinux stuff better if needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:38:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021538.l22FcFuJ024340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 10:38 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------- This package (gdal) is APPROVED by me. ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021540.l22FeCvM024561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:41:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021541.l22FfWxW024646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-03-02 10:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > > > Branches: FC-6 > > Only for FC-6? Not for all the branches? > It is said that "devel" branch is always implied. Isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:43:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021543.l22FhtT2024836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-02 10:43 EST ------- No strong opinions on whether to roll the -devel split back now or not, but there are some other rebuild-requiring changes that would be nice to have in the future - move architecture independent lib dirs (core, vendor) to /usr/share and all of site stuff to /usr/local/(lib(64)|share|man|bin). Perhaps save the -devel split and all of the additional changes to until after F7 so it all could be taken care of in one swoop? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:47:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021547.l22Fl12W025176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 10:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdal Short Description: Geospatial Data Abstraction Library Owners: cbalint at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021548.l22FmtlK025308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 10:48 EST ------- updated. Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/grass.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/grass-6.2.3-9.src.rpm changelog reflect the details. should build now in mock i386/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:49:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021549.l22FnLQ3025343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-02 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > It is said that "devel" branch is always implied. Isn't it? If I'm not wrong not for co-maintainers. A co-maintainer may only co-maintain a given branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021550.l22FoVrk025438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-03-02 10:50 EST ------- good. always rushy mistake ... Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/grass.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/grass-6.2.1-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:54:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021554.l22FsaLe025663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #56) > Here is an update, but note: > 1) Ntop is terminating on my system after 5-20 minutes. I ran for about 11 hours but no problem occurred... > 2) javascript generated graphics are not displaying on my system I am not familiar with javascript... I will review this later. Please wait... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021556.l22FuxcT025903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-02 10:56 EST ------- In fact unless I am wrong, there a 2 way of becoming co-maintainer, be added to owners.list, or have an entry in pkg.acl. Since the fedora-cvs request is to be added to owners.list, you are right that branches are irrelevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 15:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226511] Merge Review: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021559.l22FxqFk026330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226511 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-03-02 10:59 EST ------- Well, since unifdef is largely unmaintained as far as I can tell, shall we drop the package? Would you like to co-maintain sunifdef? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] New: Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 Summary: Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mystheme at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://visionfutur.com/fedora/jwm.spec SRPM URL: http://visionfutur.com/fedora/jwm-1.8-1.src.rpm Description: JWM is a window manager for the X Window System. It's very simple and fast. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021619.l22GJx7j027730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mystheme at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021621.l22GLXIQ027797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-03-02 11:21 EST ------- > I note 0.3.0 came out yesterday. Updated to this version which now include man pages. > W: nfs4-acl-tools no-version-in-last-changelog > W: nfs4-acl-tools-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog > W: nfs4-acl-tools no-documentation > W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%post > W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%preun > W: nfs4-acl-tools empty-%postun All fixed by applying patch in Comment #5 (thank you very much!) > Did you intend to build the graphical bits? No, since I was not able to build them. I'll add them in an upcoming release. > you shouldn't put the buildroot in --prefix or --bindir. But the > package fails to install if you do that. With the addition of the man pages, I also had to add --mandir to this configuration line... But by setting these during the configuration, removed the need to set the DESTDIR during the "make install" Updated Spec is in: http://people.redhat.com/steved/nfs4-acl-tools/nfs4-acl-tools.spec Updated SRPM is in http://people.redhat.com/steved/nfs4-acl-tools/nfs4-acl-tools-0.3.0-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228425] Review Request: gtkpod - Graphical song management program for Apple's iPod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021623.l22GNR3o027928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkpod - Graphical song management program for Apple's iPod Alias: gtkpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228425 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:34:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021634.l22GY6c1028680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-03-02 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, I was guessing that Python programs run best within mod_python, like Perl > programs do under mod_perl. This is not always the case; moin for example, runs significantly faster as a FastCGI application (e.g. with mod_fcgid) than with mod_python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 16:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021657.l22Gvu5W030849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jwm - Very light window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mystheme at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:00:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] First package - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021700.l22H05G4031017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: First package - jwm - Very light window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mystheme at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: jwm - Very |First package - jwm - Very |light window manager |light window manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021708.l22H8lPZ031796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-02 12:08 EST ------- I would say you should follow the procedure to cvs rm the files, and put a dead.package file in CVS. That way people will know it's not built. If someone wants to bring it back they can do so from that state. Thats probibly going to have to happen to all the other orphans at some point... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021725.l22HPhJR000669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-02 12:25 EST ------- Ok, i will -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:27:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021727.l22HRam5000888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-03-02 12:27 EST ------- What's the %{_mandir}/mang/xmoto-edit.6.gz? Why not to use man6 instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021727.l22HRcpr000905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 12:27 EST ------- Well, for 3.3-0.3.20060227cvs.fc7: * conditional dependency (check again...) ---------------------------------------------- checking for pcre_refcount in -lpcre... no ---------------------------------------------- - Perhaps adding "BuildRequires: pcre-devel" will change this to yes. ---------------------------------------------- checking security/pam_appl.h usability... no checking security/pam_appl.h presence... no ---------------------------------------------- - Perhaps pam-devel ---------------------------------------------- checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-mysql_config... no checking for mysql_config... no ---------------------------------------------- - mysql-devel or so? * Unused source? - What is Source4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:29:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021729.l22HTY3a001058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|First package - jwm - Very |Review Request - jwm - Very |light window manager |light window manager OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021757.l22Hvua8004391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-02 12:57 EST ------- Looks like a typo. Should be man6. I see it in xmoto, too. I'll fix both. Should provide that back here? Do you see anything else out of sorts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 17:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021759.l22HxPGZ004463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 Bug 225615 depends on bug 223678, which changed state. Bug 223678 Summary: binutils: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223678 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225075] Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021800.l22I0SIH004598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntfs-config - A front-end to Enable/Disable write support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225075 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-02 13:00 EST ------- New review isn't requires for this updated release, no major changes happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021801.l22I1r4X004778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-02 13:01 EST ------- On second look, it's set that way in the Makefile. Should I patch it and send it upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021811.l22IBdgq005441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-03-02 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Do you see anything else out of sorts? I haven't even chcecked whether package's working, but at first sight I see that you ought to remove X-Fedora category and, if it exists, get rid of Application category as well. Also, if you put icons in %{_datadir}/icons/ hicolor you should add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme (some time ago it was discussed on list). Later I'm going to try to build this package and hopefully make the full review. (In reply to comment #4) > On second look, it's set that way in the Makefile. Should I patch it and send > it upstream? IMHO you should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021811.l22IBhZR005469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-03-02 13:11 EST ------- Regarding the SELinux issue, I think the best option is to: (a) use %{_localstatedir}/cache/viewvc instead of %{_localstatedir}/spool/viewvc (this is just the way I usually do it though) (b) file a bug against selinux-policy requesting that the context type of /var/cache/viewvc(/.*)? be set to httpd_cache_t (c) remove all SElinux-related content from your own package Dan is generally quite responsive to such requests. Whilst waiting for the selinux-policy update to appear (updates appear quite frequently, so it's unlikely to be long), you could just put a README.SELinux file in that suggested the context changes to do manually if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230762] New: Review Request: xawtv - TV applications for video4linux compliant devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230762 Summary: Review Request: xawtv - TV applications for video4linux compliant devices Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmitry at butskoy.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/xawtv/xawtv.spec SRPM URL: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/xawtv/xawtv-3.95-0.src.rpm Description: Xawtv is a simple xaw-based TV program which uses the bttv driver or video4linux. Xawtv contains various command-line utilities for grabbing images and .avi movies, for tuning in to TV stations, etc. Xawtv also includes a grabber driver for vic. Additional info: xawtv was in Fedora Core until FC2 (now tvtime is a base apps to watch TV). Xawtv seems to be a first project capable to show TV, written by the same people as v4l drive. Besides "xawtv" program itself, "xawtv" package includes a lot of another useful things: command line tools, console radio apps, frame buffer tv, teletext web daemon etc. These "addional tools" are the main reason to package xawtv for Fedora. This package includes ability to write avi files with motion jpeg video, as well as raw "YUV 4:2:0" called "yuv4mpeg". All those seem to have no legal issues (avi support is already in Fedora (dvgrab, xine-lib), mjpeg and yum4mpeg are just a stream of images (jpeg and raw YUV respectively)). Another distros like to split xawtv to several subpackages. I dislike that, because initial Fedora's xawtv was a single package, there is no common agreement how to split (various distos do it differently), splitting itself seem to be unuseful (even some pure cmdline tools require X11 libs etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021816.l22IG1Z7005752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 13:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149136) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149136&action=view) mock build log of grass-6.2.1-9.1.fc7.i386 Still was not good.. I added "libtiff-devel libpng-devel" for BuildRequires. Check if this build log is what you expect. (Note: I just rebuilt grass and have not checked any of grass) Especially, check if some "no" return on configure can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:17:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:17:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021817.l22IHl3q005920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 13:17 EST ------- I once go to sleep... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021824.l22IOaKb006487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-02 13:24 EST ------- Existing Package CVS Request ============================ Package Name: python-vorbis NEW Short Description: Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries NEW Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net NEW Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: none Hugo Cisneiros has been AWOL : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/msg00017.html (I still don't have rights to set the fedora-cvs flag...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:24:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021824.l22IOZ3H006477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-02 13:24 EST ------- Existing Package CVS Request ============================ Package Name: python-ogg NEW Short Description: Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries NEW Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net NEW Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: none Hugo Cisneiros has been AWOL : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/msg00017.html (I still don't have rights to set the fedora-cvs flag...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021832.l22IWIG2007137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-03-02 13:32 EST ------- Alright, let's discuss this change on fedora-perl-devel and make the call by Monday. See: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00009.html and replies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228294] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021833.l22IXOPF007221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228294 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-02 13:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gkrellm-sun Short Description: Sun clock plugin for GKrellM Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: (I still don't have rights to set the fedora-cvs flag...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:34:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228293] Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021834.l22IYGoM007280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228293 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-03-02 13:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gkrellm-moon Short Description: Moon clock plugin for GKrellM Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: (I still don't have rights to set the fedora-cvs flag...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021846.l22IkJ1C008135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-03-02 13:46 EST ------- I've created the patch and removed X-Fedora. I'll send the patch upstream after approval. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-edit/xmoto-edit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/xmoto-edit/xmoto-edit-0.2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 18:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021848.l22ImRCB008321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-03-02 13:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Ooops, sorry it is included. The only issue is with files with author > and no license. 0.44 has been released with the licenses added. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr-0.44-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 19:37:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228293] Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021937.l22JbHTH011159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228293 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 19:37:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228294] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021937.l22JbHNY011158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228294 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 19:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227105] Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021939.l22JdbG0011378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227105 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |pcheung at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-03-02 14:39 EST ------- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 19:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227087] Review Request: modello-1.0-0.a8.4jpp - Modello Data Model toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703021940.l22JeLLi011448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: modello-1.0-0.a8.4jpp - Modello Data Model toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227087 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |pcheung at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-03-02 14:40 EST ------- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 20:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022044.l22Kirqp016027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 tbento at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 20:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227099] Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022048.l22KmpFi016466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cdc-1.0-0.a4.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 20:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022049.l22KnqbA016587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-02 15:49 EST ------- The way the license has been added to otsu.c is a bit dubious and looks like Ryan Dibble copyright was taken away since there is no evidence that he transfered it. Anyway this was the only blocker, so it is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 20:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022054.l22KsxF2017378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-03-02 15:54 EST ------- Need initial import and FC-5/6 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 21:37:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227087] Review Request: modello-1.0-0.a8.4jpp - Modello Data Model toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022137.l22Lb7ls023147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: modello-1.0-0.a8.4jpp - Modello Data Model toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227087 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pcheung at redhat.com |tbento at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-03-02 16:36 EST ------- Please fix items marked by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware X license field matches the actual license. I can't find the license for this project, could you please point me to it? * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - please put clear instructions on how to generate the the source drop, the svn export command doesn't work * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) * license text included in package and marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output W: modello non-standard-group Development/Java - this is ok W: modello unversioned-explicit-provides modello-maven-plugin -please fix W: modello mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 36) -please fix * changelog format is ok * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - should have %define _with_gcj_support 1 at the top of the spec file, please get rid of %define _with_gcj_support 0 and %define gcj_support 0, and the %define gcj_support .... doesn't seems like it can be split up into multiple lines * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) X make sure lines are <= 80 characters There are a couple of lines that are > 80, please fix those if possible. * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock will try to build after issues are fixed, and BR's are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022217.l22MH0fM025821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-02 17:16 EST ------- Regarding comment #19, /var/cache has a different purpose than what we need here, according to FHS 2.3. So, I have chosen /var/spool, which seems to fit a bit better, since we cannot use /tmp or /var/tmp (i.e. we could get our directory removed from underneath us). Regarding comment #17, I'll use restorecon. Thanks. Regarding comemnt #18, I really have no data regarding this in relation to viewvc. I filed a bug against selinux-policy (bug #230794), so that selinux support can be removed in future versions of the package, or if the change happens before we get this out the door, then before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022244.l22MiLD2027469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-02 17:44 EST ------- Another bump (-6) here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-6.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkpai at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SPEC/perl-Test-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SRPM/perl-Test-Simple-0.67-1.src.rpm Description: This is a basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:52:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227101] Review Request: plexus-container-default-1.0-0.a8.2jpp - Default Plexus Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022252.l22Mqg2k028086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-container-default-1.0-0.a8.2jpp - Default Plexus Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227101 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-03-02 17:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-container-default Short Description: Default Plexus Container Owners: mwringe at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:54:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227106] Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022254.l22Ms5Mj028195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-03-02 17:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-utils Short Description: Plexus Common Utilities Owners: mwringe at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022255.l22MtRPH028289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mystheme at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |jwm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:56:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227105] Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022256.l22MuKJh028346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227105 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pcheung at redhat.com |tbento at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2007-03-02 17:56 EST ------- Please fix items marked by X: MUST: * package is named appropriately - match upstream tarball or project name - try to match previous incarnations in other distributions/packagers for consistency - specfile should be %{name}.spec - non-numeric characters should only be used in Release (ie. cvs or something) - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease - if case sensitivity is requested by upstream or you feel it should be not just lowercase, do so; otherwise, use all lower case for the name * is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? - OSI-approved - not a kernel module - not shareware - is it covered by patents? - it *probably* shouldn't be an emulator - no binary firmware X license field matches the actual license. This is MIT-Style license * license is open source-compatible. - use acronyms for licences where common * specfile name matches %{name} * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - md5sum doesn't match, but diff -r shows no difference * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot - should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) X license text included in package and marked with %doc no license marked with %doc * keep old changelog entries; use judgement when removing (too old? useless?) * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output W: plexus-runtime-builder non-standard-group Development/Java - this is OK W: plexus-runtime-builder mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 53) -please fix this * changelog format is ok * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - should have %define _with_gcj_support 1 at the top of the spec file, please get rid of %define _with_gcj_support 0 and %define gcj_support 0 - the %define gcj_support .... doesn't seems like it can be split up into multiple lines * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper - builds in mock will flush out problems here - the following packages don't need to be listed in BuildRequires: bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release (and/or redhat-release) gcc gcc-c++ gzip make patch perl redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed tar unzip which * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) X make sure lines are <= 80 characters There are a couple of lines that are > 80, please fix those if possible. * specfile written in American English * make a -doc sub-package if necessary - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * don't use rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? * use macros appropriately and consistently - ie. %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS * don't use %makeinstall * locale data handling correct (find_lang) - if translations included, add BR: gettext and use %find_lang %{name} at the end of %install * consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent - in general, there should be no offensive content * package should own all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * if it is a web apps, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs will do these when issues are fixed * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock will try to build after issues are fixed, and BR's are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 22:59:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022259.l22MxsJu028568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com |dbhole at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 17:59 EST ------- Reassigning to package owner to be built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:01:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227106] Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022301.l22N1uPa028789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:01:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227101] Review Request: plexus-container-default-1.0-0.a8.2jpp - Default Plexus Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022301.l22N1mTS028769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-container-default-1.0-0.a8.2jpp - Default Plexus Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227101 mwringe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:04:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022304.l22N4bhg028990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-02 18:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #59) > Well, for 3.3-0.3.20060227cvs.fc7: > > * conditional dependency (check again...) > ---------------------------------------------- > checking for pcre_refcount in -lpcre... no > ---------------------------------------------- > - Perhaps adding "BuildRequires: pcre-devel" will > change this to yes. > This can be used for pattern matching of incoming payloads, so I have enabled it. > ---------------------------------------------- > checking security/pam_appl.h usability... no > checking security/pam_appl.h presence... no > ---------------------------------------------- > - Perhaps pam-devel > > ---------------------------------------------- I looked at the code and all this would give is the ability of the web interface to display that you have pam_appl.h available. It doesn't use it anywhere else that I can find. > checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-mysql_config... no > checking for mysql_config... no > ---------------------------------------------- > - mysql-devel or so? This can be used for longer term storage of net flow data, so I've enabled it, and added mysql-server as a requires. > * Unused source? > - What is Source4? Not currently used. I was looking for a better way to set the ntop password, but I didn't finish this. I removed it. Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.3-0.4.20060227cvs.fc6.src.rpm * Fri Mar 02 2007 Bernard Johnson - 3.3-0.4.20060227cvs - add pcre-devel to BR so payloads can be matched - remove unused Source4 line - enabled mysql storage of net flow data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:09:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227106] Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022309.l22N9fWX029234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-03-02 18:09 EST ------- does this need or not need cvs admin attention? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230802] New: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkpai at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SPEC/perl-Callback.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SRPM/perl-Callback-1.06-1.src.rpm Description: Object interface for function callbacks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022315.l22NFgde029497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-03-02 18:15 EST ------- This is my first package. I need a sponsor. I have also submitted another Perl package at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230806] New: Review Request: tasks - To-do list Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/tasks/tasks.spec SRPM URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/tasks/tasks-0.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Tasks is a simple to do list application that uses libecal, part of Embedded Evolution Data Server. Upstream URL: http://projects.o-hand.com/tasks This is my first package. I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022334.l22NY4sv030250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230726] Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022340.l22NeiOb030611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto-edit - X-Moto level editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230726 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net) ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-03-02 18:40 EST ------- REVIEW: ** it seems that package has some unneeded dependencies, it built fine in mock with: SDL_mixer-devel, libGL-devel, libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel and libpng-devel. So you can get rid of curl-devel, ode-devel, lua-devel, libGLU-devel and replace bzip2-devel with zlib-devel (if there's something wrong with this set of dependencies, please let me know) ** does it make sense not to require main xmoto package? I understand that there's no need xmoto to be installed to make levels for it, but there's a "Play Level" button in xmoto-edit which ends up with very ugly "sh: xmoto: command not found". Thus add xmoto dependency. ** also, you have to add versioned xmoto dependency because of that: "file /usr/ bin/xmoto-edit from install of xmoto-edit-0.2.4-2.fc7 conflicts with file from package xmoto-0.2.2-2.fc6". Now I don't know whether it would be better to have xmoto >= 0.2.4 dependency or xmoto = %{version}. If xmoto and xmoto-edit versions always match, the second solution will be much more sane. ** rpmlint complain about W: xmoto-edit mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) so get rid of that ** [ecik at ecik ~]$ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/fedora-xmoto- edit.desktop /usr/share/applications/fedora-xmoto-edit.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead So just get rid of Application category in your desktop file. Install the newest rawhide version of desktop-file utils if you can't see this error on your desktop-file-validate. ** There's /usr/share/xmoto-edit/xmoto.bin file which contains a lot of binary (?) data. Is it arch-dependent? If so, you cannot put this file in %{_datadir}. Unfortunetaly, I'm unable to identify what kind of data it is, maybe you know something more? ** Desktop file contains "Comment=Xmoto LEvel Editor" - just change LEvel?Level Other things seems ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227061] Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022343.l22NhRgP030738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 18:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: isorelax Short Description: Public interfaces for RELAX Core Owners: vivekl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:46:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022346.l22NkLo5030821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227041] Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022349.l22Nn8NO030880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227041 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 18:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bea-stax Short Description: Streaming API for XML Owners: vivekl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227106] Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022350.l22NoVdf030934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-utils-1.2-1jpp - Plexus Common Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106 ------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com 2007-03-02 18:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > does this need or not need cvs admin attention? Hmm, I might have been given some bad information. I tried to upload this myself but it only halfed worked (it fails halfway through, so I now have an empty devel directory). So I guess only cvs admins can upload new projects? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022354.l22NsDZL031027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-02 18:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Yeah, I was also thinking about this. On one hand, if I don't require this and > someone configures one of the two options (CVS or SVN), it may or may not work, > depending on the current state of their system. So, I thought, better err on the > side of caution and make sure at least minimum requirements for both (since > Fedora ships both CVS and SVN) are satisfied, so that things just work. But, if > there is a better way to do this, I'd be happy to change... Well, looking at the packages required by each of those that you require (subversion, rcs). They have similarities and not too many differences. IMHO, it is not unreasonable to list both as requires rather than create meta packages with the sole purpose of pulling the right dependencies. # repoquery --resolve --requires subversion | sort apr-0:1.2.7-10.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) apr-util-0:1.2.8-1.fc6.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) bash-0:3.1-16.1.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) coreutils-0:5.97-12.3.fc6.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) db4-0:4.3.29-9.fc6.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) e2fsprogs-libs-0:1.39-7.fc6.i386 expat-0:1.95.8-8.2.1.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) glibc-0:2.5-10.fc6.i686 (<-- already required by almost everything) krb5-libs-0:1.5-13.i386 (<-- needed if cvs is installed) neon-0:0.25.5-5.1.i386 (<-- already required by rpm) openldap-0:2.3.27-4.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) openssl-0:0.9.8b-8.3.fc6.i686 (<-- already required by httpd) perl-4:5.8.8-10.i386 (<-- needed if cvs is installed) perl-URI-0:1.35-3.noarch python-0:2.4.4-1.fc6.i386 (<-- required for viewvc) subversion-0:1.4.2-2.fc6.i386 zlib-0:1.2.3-3.i386 (<-- already required by httpd) # repoquery --resolve --requires rcs | sort glibc-0:2.5-10.fc6.i686 But more likely, if you're using viewvc with cvs repositories you also have cvs installed (although this is not a hard requirement) # repoquery --resolve --requires cvs | sort bash-0:3.1-16.1.i386 cvs-0:1.11.22-6.fc6.i386 glibc-0:2.5-10.fc6.i686 info-0:4.8-14.fc6.i386 krb5-libs-0:1.5-13.i386 pam-0:0.99.6.2-3.16.fc6.i386 perl-4:5.8.8-10.i386 vim-minimal-2:7.0.191-2.fc6.i386 zlib-0:1.2.3-3.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022355.l22NtSGs031085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227042] Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022356.l22Nu8vH031115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227042 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 18:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: byaccj Short Description: Parser Generator with Java Extension Owners: vivekl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 2 23:56:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227042] Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703022356.l22NufEq031159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227042 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227114] Review Request: saxon-6.5.3-4jpp - Java XSLT processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030000.l2300d5p031298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon-6.5.3-4jpp - Java XSLT processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227114 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 19:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: saxon Short Description: Java XSLT processor Owners: vivekl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227115] Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030003.l2303KgO031472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227115 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 19:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: saxon8 Short Description: Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation Owners: vivekl at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030007.l2307T6k031576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-02 19:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Well, I was guessing that Python programs run best within mod_python, like Perl > > programs do under mod_perl. > > This is not always the case; moin for example, runs significantly faster as a > FastCGI application (e.g. with mod_fcgid) than with mod_python. I guess some basic benchmarking might be appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:21:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030021.l230Lh4T031926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-02 19:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Another bump (-6) here: > > ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec > ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-6.FC6.src.rpm Another thing I'd like to cover is the ability to push this into the EPEL repo. This provides some more problems to solve. Right off the top of my head EL4 only has subversion 1.1, so viewvc won't be usable with a subversion repository, however, there is no reason that it can't be used with a cvs repository. We need to add some strategic conditionals to take this into consideration. Also, until it is known that enscript and cvsgraph are pushed into the EPEL repo, those should be conditional as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:29:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030029.l230THPQ032077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-02 19:29 EST ------- This comment can be removed since you only have the relevent line anyway: # sitelib for noarch packages, sitearch for others (remove the unneeded one) W: viewvc setup-not-quiet You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example ) W: viewvc macro-in-%changelog python_sitelib Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. This is triggered by your changelog comment in 1.0.3-3. Change "%{python_sitelib}" to "%%{python_sitelib}". W: viewvc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 61) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227061] Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030046.l230kT4J032478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-03-02 19:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: isorelax > Short Description: Public interfaces for RELAX Core > Owners: vivekl at redhat.com > Branches: devel > InitialCC: vivekl at redhat.com,dbhole at redhat.com Do you want dbhole at redhat.com to be a co-maintainer or just on initialCC? And the owner doesn't need to be listed in initialCC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:55:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] New: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL:http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract.spec SRPM URL: http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract-1.0.1-2.src.rpm Description: tcpxtract is a tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures. tcpxtract features the following: * Supports 26 popular file formats out-of-the-box. New formats can be added by simply editing its config file. * With a quick conversion, you can use your old Foremost config file with tcpxtract. * Custom written search algorithm is lightning fast and very scalable. * Search algorithm searches across packet boundries for total coverage and forensic quality. * Uses libpcap, a popular, portable and stable library for network data capture * Can be used against a live network or a tcpdump formatted capture file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030058.l230wcr3000625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-03-02 19:58 EST ------- Peter Vrabec wrote: > INFO: possible recursive locking detected I'm not sure that there's really a problem here. This warning goes away when I insert a few printk() statements, which indicates that the mutex is properly released when some time is given to the code that does this release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 00:58:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227061] Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030058.l230wdT8000643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061 ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 19:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Do you want dbhole at redhat.com to be a co-maintainer or just on initialCC? Just on initial CC please > And the owner doesn't need to be listed in initialCC Ah wasnt quite clear from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure I will refrain from adding it in the future. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 01:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 20:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030103.l2313bHA000931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 mildew at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mildew at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mildew at gmail.com 2007-03-02 20:03 EST ------- (!!) MUST: rpmlint output: **** Review message: W: iputils no-url-tag - URL tag is missing, should be: http://www.tux.org/pub/net/ip-routing/ W: iputils redundant-prefix-tag - Line: 35 "Prefix: %{_prefix}" should be removed. W: iputils buildprereq-use docbook-utils perl-SGMLSpm W: iputils buildprereq-use glibc-kernheaders >= 2.4-8.19 W: iputils prereq-use chkconfig W: iputils macro-in-%changelog files - Line: 404 - List /usr/sbin/rdisc in %files list. Should be: %%files W: iputils mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 131, tab: line 92) ******************** (!!) MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. **** Review message: - Uses BuildPreReq instead of BuildRequires. - Uses PreReq instead of Requires. - BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root Required value is: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ******************** (!!) SHOULD: Packager should query upstream for license text file. **** Review message: - License file is missing. - Missing file "README.bonding" listed in %doc. ******************** (Sorry for the late answer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 01:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 20:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223746] Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030157.l231v3Nr002326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223746 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-03-02 20:57 EST ------- Hi, Sindre. The epiplicious extension is included as part of the upstream epiphany-extensions package version 2.17.92 (which I will push to the build system in a couple of hours after my mock-build testing succeeds). Therefore, I'm going to close this bug as UPSTREAM. Thanks for your efforts in getting this packaged though! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030203.l23232VI002619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-02 21:03 EST ------- OK - Mock Build on FC-6 FC-Devel (i386,x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is GPL OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum for both: 0a1dcb0fa7a1990980aba8ab9a4c3184 konwert-1.8.tar.gz 962c3d339b99656bb37a25c39d7d3dca konwert-forbids_data_member.patch OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't required. OK - Subpackage -devel is present. OK - %prep stage is correct and work. OK - The use of iconv is proper. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - No *.la files is present in -devel subpackage. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - rpmlint output are clean. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version OK - Should have %{?dist} tag but, should be remove to avoid trouble in CVS import/Update/Build procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030209.l23291in002878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:19:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030219.l232JGqe003343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 21:19 EST ------- A comment (well, I am currently reviewing more than 10 bugs, so I hope someone else will review this report). * hardcoded path - The path of DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE is hardcoded, which should be avoided generally. * If it cannot be avoided to use hardcoded path, so don't use %{_sysconfdir} and use hardcoded path in spec file to make them consistent * Generally, the method like ---------------------------------------------------------- %{__sed} -i.path -e '/DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE/s|/usr/local/etc|%{_sysconfdir}||' tcpxtract.c ---------------------------------------------------------- is used to pass macro correctly. * Timestamps - Keep timestamps on man file and conf file. Perhaps ---------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install="%{_install} -c -p" ---------------------------------------------------------- will do the trick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030230.l232UusZ003872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-02 21:30 EST ------- Regarding comment #25, this is all now in: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-7.FC6.src.rpm Regarding comment #24, feel free to send patches to that effect. Regarding comment #23, do you have a setup handy where you can do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030231.l232VIep003896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-02 21:31 EST ------- ... correct one is -e '/DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE/s|/usr/local/etc|%{_sysconfdir}|' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 02:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030239.l232dSbC004093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-03-02 21:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > After some consideration I've come to the conclusion that I'm really lazy: I'm > hereby giving up any claim of maintainership of blam. You take it! Sounds good. :) Would you still like to be on the initial-CC list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227061] Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030314.l233EH26004969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227046] Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030321.l233L28t005096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227046 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:22:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227041] Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030322.l233Mocj005178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bea-stax-1.2.0-0.rc1.2jpp - Streaming API for XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227041 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:33:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030333.l233XbGS005372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-03-02 22:33 EST ------- Matthias: You need to go into the accounts administration on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ and request to join the "fedorabugs" group (if you have not already done so). That's what allows you to modify bug attributes, set/change flags, re-assign bugs, et al. I've set the fedora-cvs flag for you to '?', which lets the CVS admins know about your package request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227046] Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030337.l233b4Sk005454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227046 vivekl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com |fitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com 2007-03-02 22:36 EST ------- I cant build this package. Should have been assigned to fitzsim since according to http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?root=extras&view=markup he is the owner. Reassigning to him now. Unless owners.list is incorrect for this package? In which case we will need to get it updated... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030338.l233cOjt005510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030339.l233dBFC005556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 03:56:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228293] Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030356.l233uhbC006141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-moon - Moon clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228293 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 04:02:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228294] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030402.l23426CH006260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228294 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 05:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 00:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030506.l23566Hr008071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 00:06 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------- This package (ntop) is APPROVED by me. --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 05:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 00:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221004] Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030546.l235kbwQ008754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jeta - Horde SSH Java Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221004 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-03-03 00:46 EST ------- Imported, tagged, built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 06:41:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030641.l236fSaR009839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-03 01:41 EST ------- p.s. Trond, please keep me / us posted on any other cross-compil-ish packages you submit, I don't know if I'll have the time to review all of them but I would like to stay in the loop and I'm not on the review-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 06:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229476] Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030659.l236xLD6010186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast - Lay bombs and Blast the other players of the field (SDL version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229476 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-03 01:59 EST ------- Imported and build, as usual thanks for the review! Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 06:59:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229477] Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030659.l236xsRI010212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xblast-data - Data files for the game xblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229477 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-03 01:59 EST ------- Imported and build, as usual thanks for the review! Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 07:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 02:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030735.l237Z9Mj010728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-03 02:35 EST ------- So far perl(Test::Simple) had been part of the main perl package. Has something changed about this situation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 08:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030820.l238Kxxf011560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-03-03 03:20 EST ------- Nope, its still in the main perl package: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Simple.pm If there is a compelling reason to separate it out, I suppose we could... but I'm not sure there is one. I'd almost rather patch the Test::Simple in core up to current. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 08:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230394] Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030839.l238d4ei012433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql++ - C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230394 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-03-03 03:39 EST ------- > You can patch the linker options to set a soname. Even better would be > to talk to upstream and ask whether there is any reason why they don't > use a versioned soname. I've send a message to the "plusplus" ML. They use "bakefile" to generate the Makefile.in and i found very few informations about this. It seems tag exist for this but i don't find a way to make it working. And bakefile not available in RPM (i've build one for test, but it need a lot of work, latest 0.2.2 doesn't work for mysql++ (need 0.2.0), i don't want to be the maintener for this tools). So t hink we'll have to keep "no-soname" for a while... > chmod -x inside the extracted source archive, e.g. in %prep So simple... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 09:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030904.l239487r014632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-03 04:04 EST ------- I most certainly will. Have you thought more about the SIG that was discussed earlier? I could help to create a page on the wiki, but I am not sure what permissions I need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 09:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226496] Merge Review: tn5250 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030914.l239EeOf015330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tn5250 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226496 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 04:14 EST ------- I saw them growing... The source file timestamp is not the same than upstream, remember to keep it in the future, for example with spectool -g, wget -N. Otherwise source match upstream, and I see no issue. There is %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ which may be unowned, but this should be fixed once for all not here. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 09:54:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230831] New: Review Request: games-menus - Catagorized submenus for the GNOME/KDE Games menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230831 Summary: Review Request: games-menus - Catagorized submenus for the GNOME/KDE Games menu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/games-menus.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/games-menus-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Catagorized submenus for the GNOME/KDE Games menu, for better usuability of the games menu with lots of games installed. --- I'll send a mail with some more info on this to the fedora-games list shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 09:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030955.l239tYdh017113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 04:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > > 2) javascript generated graphics are not displaying on my system > I am not familiar with javascript... > I will review this later. Please wait... Are the javascript graphs working for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 09:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 04:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225655] Merge Review: coreutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703030958.l239wZkM017251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: coreutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225655 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 04:58 EST ------- coreutils-6.7.tar.bz2.sig should certainly be changed. It seems to me that the install-info call with * is unsafe because (from the info page) install-info only takes one file. So if a file is split it will fail. For the delete of legacy sh-utils textutils fileutils it is fine since I guess we can assume that there is only one file. For the other scriptlets I think it would be safer without * (install-info should be able to figure out if the files are compressed). new rpmlint warning (ignorable in my opinion): W: coreutils no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:00:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031000.l23A0p7c017415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-03-03 05:00 EST ------- Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031001.l23A18lv017448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 05:01 EST ------- I think that this package cannot be approved as-is since there is no way to check the source. At least a comment is missing giving the command line that allows to recreate the tarball such that it is easy to recreate it and make a diff. Suggestion: prefix then new patches with ntop, like ntop-shrext.patch ntop-remove-rc0.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031020.l23AKso0018381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 05:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Regarding comment #23, do you have a setup handy where you can do this? I do not. I wasn't thinking of anything overly complex. Just some time-trials with scripted wget for comparison. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:23:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031023.l23AN3kR018595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 05:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149171) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149171&action=view) conditionals for epel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031025.l23APKMY018832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-03-03 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Yes, please. Okey dokey. :) Would a CVS admin please add foolish at guezz.net to the initial-CC list in owners.list for blam? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031035.l23AZ9tu020340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-03 05:35 EST ------- Thanks for the EPEL stuff, I'll incorporate in -8. In relation to benchmarks, I'll have to set up mod_fcgi/viewvc combo here, so it may take some time. I'll keep you posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031041.l23AfGZH021322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 05:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > Are the javascript graphs working for you? I don't know. I am less familiar with ntop than you and I don't know well about javascript. (In reply to comment #63) > I think that this package cannot be approved as-is since there > is no way to check the source. At least a comment is missing > giving the command line that allows to recreate the tarball > such that it is easy to recreate it and make a diff. Simply, "To get source by cvs, check http://www.ntop.org/download.html" is okay for _minimal_ explanation. > Suggestion: prefix then new patches with ntop, I leave this to packager. Anyway I won't get this review back to cvs-review?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031051.l23Ap8v0022512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 05:51 EST ------- Any progress? It seems that version 168 is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:56:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229600] Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031056.l23AuF00022991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229600 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: specto - An |Review Request: specto - An |desktop application that |desktop application that |will watch configurable |will watch configurable |events |events Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 05:56 EST ------- I will review this on Sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 10:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 05:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031059.l23AxwwR023255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 05:59 EST ------- Well, what is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 11:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227256] Review Request: moto4lin - Filemanager and seem editor for Motorola P2k phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031103.l23B3W0u023603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moto4lin - Filemanager and seem editor for Motorola P2k phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227256 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jafo- | |redhat at tummy.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 06:03 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 11:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031104.l23B4TG3023699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 06:04 EST ------- > In relation to benchmarks, I'll have to set up mod_fcgi/viewvc combo here, > so it may take some time. I'll keep you posted. No problem, we want it to be a quality package, so take as much time as you need. Suggestions: 1) In your %post and %postun section, use full pathnames of the programs you run (ie. semanage & restorecon) 2) Use -b with patch to create a backup file. This is recommended by other fedora packages. Question: You have: # Set mode 755 on executable scripts %{__grep} -rl '^#!' %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/viewvc | xargs %{__chmod} 0755 but then later: # mod_python files do not have to be executable (make rpmlint happy) %{__chmod} 0644 %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/viewvc/bin/mod_python/*.py So, do any of the file need to be +x ?? Nice job on the selinux integration, I see you fixed the packaging draft too :) I will try to do the formal review by Tuesday morning if you're ready by then. I still want to look into the setup/installation before then. Oops, my patch tests for <= "5" but it should have been < "5". You probably want to fix that. I didn't have an EL5 to build against to check if the dependencies were right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 11:11:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031111.l23BBNqe024138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 06:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #64) > (In reply to comment #63) > > I think that this package cannot be approved as-is since there > > is no way to check the source. At least a comment is missing > > giving the command line that allows to recreate the tarball > > such that it is easy to recreate it and make a diff. > Simply, "To get source by cvs, check http://www.ntop.org/download.html" > is okay for _minimal_ explanation. Of course it is still possible to find out how to get the source tarball oneself, but it is far easier if the submitter helps. It is in the guidelines now: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 No problem for me if you find that acceptable, though. > > Suggestion: prefix then new patches with ntop, > I leave this to packager. That's a suggestion, it means that I think it is to be left to the packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 11:17:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031117.l23BHiTT024467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 06:17 EST ------- * rpmlint on installed package gives a lot of warnings, showing unneeded linking and missing linking. It is certainly more an upstream issue, though. * there is a rpmlint warning: W: ntop non-standard-dir-in-var ntop I think it would be better if ntop wasn't directly under /var, but maybe under /var/lib/. Still may be more an upstream issue. * are /usr/lib/libicmpPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/liblastSeenPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libnetflowPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libpdaPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libremotePlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/librrdPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libsflowPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libsnmpPlugin-3.3.so /usr/lib/libxmldumpPlugin-3.3.so useful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 11:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:44:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031144.l23BimsA025677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2007-03-03 06:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Any progress? > It seems that version 168 is released. No noteworthy changes.. I just implemented the RGB->YCbCr conversion as defined by ITU-R BT.709 (before it was BT.601). Only the conversion matrix changed, a normal user shouldn't notice any changes in the picture quality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 12:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031210.l23CAi0U026652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-03 07:10 EST ------- Any split out perl-module split-out from the main perl package is "good", because this allows updating the module independently. Test::Simple being shipped as part of the main perl package (and it not having been upgraded), in the past had been a problem to upgrading other perl modules. I am not sure if Test::Simple can be split-out from main, though. I think it is possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 12:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226237] Merge Review: pcmciautils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031213.l23CDrXu026765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pcmciautils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226237 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-03 07:13 EST ------- Doesn't use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. A simple fix is to do 'make OPTIMIZATION="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' instead of 'make' in %build but that trumps the upstream -Os vs -O2 selection. Not a big deal, I think, but if there's a compelling reason to use -Os, pcmciautils-fedora.patch could be changed to do this in order to preserve it: CFLAGS += $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) $(OPTIMIZATION) -D_GNU_SOURCE URL tag missing, a suitable one could be eg. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/pcmcia/pcmcia.html Are the pcmcia-cs and kernel-pcmcia-cs Obsoletes still needed? If no, drop; if yes, should be made versioned. No PCMCIA hardware here so I'll leave rest of the review to someone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 12:27:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 07:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226199] Merge Review: nhpf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031227.l23CRG0I027339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nhpf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226199 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-03 07:27 EST ------- Built without $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. One way to fix it is 'make CFLAG="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"' instead of 'make' in %build (note CFLAG, not CFLAGS). URL points to a "this page has moved" page, and where it's moved to doesn't look too useful. Any better one available? "Distributable" as a license is frowned upon, but I'm not sure what else to put there in this case. nhpf.c does contain the license text, it looks pretty much like BSD but isn't quite the same. Perhaps it's close enough to use "BSDish" instead of "Distributable". Anyway, it'd be nice to have the license text available in the binary packages. I'm not able to log into the Source0 FTP server to verify sources nor do I actually have much clue at all what this package is about so I'll leave rest of the review to someone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031303.l23D3wUh028960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-03-03 08:03 EST ------- The review is complete, however I'm waiting for some functionality to finish in the software before I build packages for it. As of now the software won't work so there is little point in packaging it, I was just doing my part in the grand scheme of getting Koji up and running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031312.l23DCAlb029223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sgrubb at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-03 08:12 EST ------- Just for the record, regarding SELinux things: while using restorecon instead of chcon could be seen as a slight improvement, the real problem which is presumed knowledge of existence and semantics of a particular type (httpd_sys_script_exec_t in this case) remains. I'm sure rpmlint could still be improved here [0], but it'd be better if someone more well versed with SELinux than me would supply patches. Steve, comments? If anyone has improvement ideas, feel free to submit bugs against rpmlint here or upstream. [0] Should semanage when used with a type be flagged as an error/warning? If yes, the -I message needs work too as restorecon doesn't suffice alone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031322.l23DMfac029525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 08:22 EST ------- While we're at it, could someone (Steve?) reconcile the difference between what is recommended on the draft packaging page (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/#head-a81109d3dfc8d5798d761d332c3153af0668e065) and what rpmlint is (or should be) advising? It seems like we are taking a circular path that always comes back to "the policy package must always know about the needs of your package before your package will work with selinux". Am I misunderstanding something here, or is that what we are being told? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:23:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031323.l23DN5xJ029560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 08:23 EST ------- Also is the Requires: mysql-server really needed? I have tested without having mysql-server and it seems to work right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031343.l23Dh4rT030363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2007-03-03 08:42 EST ------- Regarding comment #31, spec file should have no knowlege of types. Policy could change without warning and break this package's install. Yes, semanage with a -t arg should be flagged by rpmlint as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:45:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031345.l23DjxLL030532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 08:45 EST ------- When running ntop, I get in logs: Database support not compiled into ntop That's strange. Maybe a configure flag missing? During run, there are many error messages like these ones: **WARNING** RRD: rrd_create(/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd) error: Invalid alpha: must be between 0 and 1 **WARNING** RRD: rrd_update(/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd) error: opening '/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd': (null) with the file name changing I also get **WARNING** Unable to open file /var/ntop/rrd/graphics/1172875647-4.png - graphic not sent EPIPE during sending of page to web client I guess all this stems from the same issue. Maybe a directory with wrong permissions (ie root and not ntop?) Looking at /var/ntop/rrd I don't see anything wrong, though: # ls -lR /var/ntop/rrd /var/ntop/rrd: total 12 drwxrwx--- 2 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:13 flows drwxrwx--- 2 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:13 graphics drwxrwx--- 3 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:56 interfaces /var/ntop/rrd/flows: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/graphics: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces: total 4 drwx------ 3 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 eth0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0: total 4 drwx------ 7 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:11 AS /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS: total 20 drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 12322 drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:06 137 drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 2200 drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:11 22753 drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 2422 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/12322: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/137: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/2200: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/22753: total 0 /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/2422: total 0 That may be linked with the fact that I don't graphs on the interface where the rrd graphs should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 13:55:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 08:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031355.l23DtaLc031435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2007-03-03 08:55 EST ------- Regarding comment #32, I asked some people to review and help with the guidelines. The bottom line is that embedding knowlege of a specific type can be bad for long term use of the package. There are always ways to ask selinux to figure out the right type. The problem mentioned is that currently we ship a monolithic policy. We are working on a way to break up the policy so each package can supply its own policy bits. However, this means changing a lot of infrastructure including rpm, anaconda, and even the kernel. We are moving to self service, but it will still be a while before everything is in place. Meanwhile, Dan is always happy to take policy patches and is pretty quick to push new packages to rawhide. Hope this helps... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 14:09:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031409.l23E9QV6032638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 09:09 EST ------- Until I can confirm that the javascript is working correctly (this broke between 3.2 and cvs best I can tell), I'm not going to put this in fedora cvs. Since I'm traveling next week, it might be awhile. This release resolves the comments from Patrice, except regarding /var/ntop. I'll look into that when I get a chance, it does seem logical that it should be /var/lib/ntop. (I see you also posted comment #68, which this doesn't account for) Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/ntop-3.3-0.5.20060227cvs.fc6.src.rpm * Sat Mar 03 2007 Bernard Johnson - 3.3-0.5.20060207cvs - prefix patches with ntop- - explanation on how to retrieve cvs source - fix removal of %%{_libdir}/.so plugin files no matter the version - reduce dependency on mysql-server to just mysql -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 14:22:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031422.l23EM0UW000708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-03-03 09:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #68) > Database support not compiled into ntop > That's strange. Maybe a configure flag missing? I thought it picked it up with configure, but I have to give it --enable-mysql, so I'll add that. > During run, there are many error messages like these ones: > **WARNING** RRD: rrd_create(/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd) error: > Invalid alpha: must be between 0 and 1 > **WARNING** RRD: rrd_update(/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd) error: > opening '/var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/throughput.rrd': (null) > > with the file name changing > > I also get > **WARNING** Unable to open file /var/ntop/rrd/graphics/1172875647-4.png - > graphic not sent > EPIPE during sending of page to web client > > I guess all this stems from the same issue. Maybe a directory > with wrong permissions (ie root and not ntop?) Looking at > /var/ntop/rrd I don't see anything wrong, though: > > # ls -lR /var/ntop/rrd > /var/ntop/rrd: > total 12 > drwxrwx--- 2 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:13 flows > drwxrwx--- 2 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:13 graphics > drwxrwx--- 3 root ntop 4096 mar 3 11:56 interfaces > > /var/ntop/rrd/flows: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/graphics: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces: > total 4 > drwx------ 3 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 eth0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0: > total 4 > drwx------ 7 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:11 AS > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS: > total 20 > drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 12322 > drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:06 137 > drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 2200 > drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:11 22753 > drwx------ 2 ntop ntop 4096 mar 3 12:01 2422 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/12322: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/137: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/2200: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/22753: > total 0 > > /var/ntop/rrd/interfaces/eth0/AS/2422: > total 0 > > That may be linked with the fact that I don't graphs on the interface > where the rrd graphs should be. I'm not having these errors on my system. Are you sure ntop is running as "ntop" and not another id? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 14:24:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031424.l23EOtrO000843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-03-03 09:24 EST ------- > INFO: 1.3 is out. yep!! Spec URL: http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2.spec Read it online at http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2.spec.html SRPM URL: http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2-1.3-1.fc6.src.rpm * rpmlint is now quiet (In reply to comment #9) Thanks Paul, I followed your advices. * I tried fedora-qa script i added gettext as BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 14:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031434.l23EY7fl001089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-03 09:34 EST ------- Thank you for your comments, Mamoru I hope you have noticed that exactly because of the hard coded path of DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE I have included a patch (in release -2). However, because your method seems cleaner (will work even if sometime in the future the sysconfdir is modified), I have removed the patch and used your method (release -3) Since the man page is compressed during build, the timestamp of the file which is included in the binary rpm will be the time of the rpm build, not the one of the original man page, so no real reason for using "install -p" for it. However I have added "install -p" for the sake of compliance with the general accepted usage and for the config file. New versions are available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract.spec http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract-1.0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 15:35:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 10:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031535.l23FZ8Jc002918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-03 10:35 EST ------- OK, sound goog... Just a comment: why set "Requires: to complete." Are you thinking about missing Requires ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 15:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 10:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031553.l23Frq8E003367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-03-03 10:53 EST ------- Thanks for the commments, Steve. rpmlint RFE filed in bug 230845, feel free to chime in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 15:57:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 10:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031557.l23FvWWL003452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 10:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #69) > Since > I'm traveling next week, it might be awhile. Well, I don't like a approved request left open without any activity, so I pull back to "currently reviewing" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:01:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031601.l23G1jJq003564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-03-03 11:01 EST ------- yes. I thought rpm was able to find all requires by itsefl, but it doesn't seem so. I need to make some few more tests. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0711805dd733fe3b31741e9d5236d72941a79d94 Actually, only librairies are found by rpm (if I understand right). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031622.l23GMCco003976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 11:22 EST ------- Well, I changed the default encoding of the dictionary data to UTF-8. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab-jumandic.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-jumandic-5.1.20051121-3.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-mecab-jumandic.log -------------------------------------------------- * Sat Mar 3 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 5.1.20051121-3 - Change default to UTF-8 and make EUC-JP charset package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031643.l23GhIOa004925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 11:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > (In reply to comment #68) > > Database support not compiled into ntop > > That's strange. Maybe a configure flag missing? > > I thought it picked it up with configure, but I have to give it --enable-mysql, > so I'll add that. It won't be that simple. In fact upon reading configure.in, I have found that: * --enable/disable-mysql setting is ignored. * mysql support isn't compiled in because mysql.h isn't found. And it isn't found for 2 reasons. First it isn't searched for because if the mysql lib is found mysql support isn't used. The second reason is that it uses INCS to store the include flags but this variable isn't used when compiling autoconf tests. it should be CPPFLAGS instead. * instead of mysql_config --cflags, mysql_config --include should be used. I'll attach a patch that solves all those issues. I also have remarked another things that is very broken: for snmp net-snmp-config --cflags gives a lot of junk, although nothing at all is needed on fedora. For that I suggest just patching the configure. > I'm not having these errors on my system. Are you sure ntop is running as > "ntop" and not another id? It is what is said in the log. And I start it with the init script. It only happens when I click on the interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031644.l23GisCE005027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 11:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149182) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149182&action=view) fix mysql detection -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031647.l23GlmrO005176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 11:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149183) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149183&action=view) don't use the output of net-snmp-config --cflags I haven't tested that patch. If not using cvs version I suggest patching configure instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 16:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031650.l23GotRa005353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-03 11:50 EST ------- I think that once ntop is linked against mysql, mysql will be put automatically as a dependency since ntop should depend on libmysqlclient_r.so.15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 17:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 12:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031705.l23H5xZ8006027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-03-03 12:05 EST ------- Ok Spec URL: http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2.spec Read it online at http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2.spec.html SRPM URL: http://carron.maxime.free.fr/fedora/rpms/pypar2-1.3-2.fc6.src.rpm I added some requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 17:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 12:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031705.l23H5s84006018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 12:05 EST ------- Sorry. I once more go to sleep and then review this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 17:58:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 12:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228434] Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031758.l23Hw8ML007248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228434 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-03 12:58 EST ------- seems okay also to me, except that I don't think the following lines are needed: ------------------------------------------ pwd ls ------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 18:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230806] Review Request: tasks - To-do list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031808.l23I838c007454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasks - To-do list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230806 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-03-03 13:08 EST ------- ** We no longer add X-Fedora Category in desktop files. Also, you ought to remove Application category: fedora-tasks.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead If you can't see this error on your own system, install the newest dekstop-file- validate version from rawhide. ** Why do you use -n %{name}-%{version} parameter to setup? This is RPM default setting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 18:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226026] Merge Review: libgtop2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031820.l23IKgOU007924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgtop2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226026 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproje | |ct.org) ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-03-03 13:20 EST ------- That's my first review of someone's else package so please be understanding and make your suggestions to my review. REVIEW: - rpmlint reports warning (see below) + packagename is fine + specfile name is fine + license GPL, inlcuded in %doc + md5sum matches upstream - BuildRequires - suggestions below + locales OK + ldconfig in %post and %postun + no problems with directories + no duplicates in %files + %defattr is set + %clean section looks good + macros are used + headres in -devel + .la files removed + pkgconfig in Requires (due to .pc files) - not clear build options (see below) THINGS: rpmlint warings: W: libgtop2 summary-not-capitalized libgtop library (version 2) W: libgtop2 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line 7) Summary sections SHOULD be extended. "libgtop library (version 2)" doesn't say too much for most people. BuildRequires: texinfo doesn't seem to be required (in my opinion) and SHOULD be removed. info file is created without it (and is deleted anyway by a command in spec file). texinfo depends on several other packages. gtk-doc package won't be needed in gtk-doc files are not intended (see below) building: gtk-doc files are created despite of the option --disable-gtk-doc in configure. It could be problem with upstream. I'm not sure if gtk-doc are intended or not because in %files section there is "%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/libgtop". In libgtop2-devel for FC5 there are not that files. In FC7 they are. When gtk-doc is not available in a system libgtop is built without them, so if those files are not needed gtk-doc (depends on several other packages) could be removed from BuildRequires list (if the next point was changed). In SRPMS there is a patch (libgtop-2.0.2-prog_as.patch) which adds "AM_PROG_AS" to configure.in. I'm not an expert of automake, but I'm not sure if it's required, because without it libgtop2 builds just fine. Maybe it was required only in libgtop-2.0.x series? This patch has also one side effect. Because it changes configure.in configure script has to be rebuilt and to do that gtk-doc is required (which wouldn't be omited if gtk-doc's files are not intended to be in a package). Btw, I changed status to NEEDINFO from Assignee (should be the owner of a package), but I'm not sure about that status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 18:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031835.l23IZVbG008531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-03-03 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > Doesn't really build on current Development: Hi David, I am now running F7T2 and have update to Rawhide 3/3/07. I cannot replicate your above bug. Could you re-test with current tree? Can anyone else try building in mock with rawhide as the target? Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 19:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031904.l23J4UwM009505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-03-03 14:04 EST ------- Still getting that on todays tree.. 64 bit issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 19:16:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031916.l23JGorp010010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 19:25:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703031925.l23JPbk9010585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-03-03 14:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #56) > Still getting that on todays tree.. 64 bit issue? Yes it could well be. I have had someone on #fedora run it through mock on 64 bit with target of rawhide and it has built fine for them however. It would be good for someone else to confirm this before I go chasing it down... Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 20:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228434] Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703032011.l23KBGuL012672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228434 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-03 15:11 EST ------- Ho...I omited to mentione that. Michael, remove "pwd" and "ls" commands before request CVSSync. Mamoru, i wonder whether the %{?dist} tag shouldn't be used to avoid trouble in cvs import/build procedure ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 20:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226191] Merge Review: netpbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703032048.l23KmVqC013502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netpbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226191 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 22:11:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703032211.l23MBIFU015480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-03 17:10 EST ------- Regarding comment #30, all of that + EPEL patch is now in -8: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc.spec ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/viewvc/viewvc-1.0.3-8.FC6.src.rpm In relation to +x, if I don't do that to any file that has #! in th first line, rpmlint won't like it. So, it should stay, I guess. Regarding SELinux comments, looks like the only real fix here is to integrate the whole thing with official policy. I'll leave it in the spec for now, but the moment bug #230794 is resolved, I'll drop the lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 3 22:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703032248.l23MmWcw016456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-03-03 17:48 EST ------- > Since the man page is compressed during build, the timestamp of the > file which is included in the binary rpm will be the time of the rpm > build, not the one of the original man page, so no real reason for > using "install -p" for it Just for the record, this is not right if gzip is used correctly. gzip does by default not change the timestamp on a file after it is compressed. $ LANG=C date Sat Mar 3 23:44:52 CET 2007 $ ls -l foo -rw-rw-r-- 1 ingvar ingvar 860866 feb 20 20:51 foo $ gzip foo; ls -l foo.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 ingvar ingvar 146748 feb 20 20:51 foo.gz Ingvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 00:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040051.l240p0Uq019013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-03-03 19:50 EST ------- Not really...there was one regression introduced during the review: directory /usr/share/mailx is no longer owned by mailx which should be the case. Ivana, please fix this for the next rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 01:25:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225695] Merge Review: diffstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040125.l241Pa2B019745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225695 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rafalzaq at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-03-03 20:25 EST ------- Needs work: * Source 0 is not available (ftp://invisible-island.net/diffstat/diffstat-1.43.tar.gz) * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * BuildRequires: gzip and bzip2 should not be included (exceptions) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment * The %makeinstall macro should not be used * deffattr should be (-,root,root,-) instead of (-,root,root) * rpmlint output: Source RPM: W: diffstat summary-ended-with-dot A utility which provides statistics based on the output of diff. W: diffstat invalid-license distributable W: diffstat macro-in-%changelog configure rpmlint of diffstat: W: diffstat summary-ended-with-dot A utility which provides statistics based on the output of diff. W: diffstat invalid-license distributable rpmlint of diffstat-debuginfo: W: diffstat-debuginfo invalid-license distributable Is there a text of license somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 03:47:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040347.l243l9fW021974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-03 22:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149198) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149198&action=view) Benchmarks under mod_python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 03:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229930] Review Request: thunar-volman - Automatic management of removable drives and media for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040347.l243lVDu022002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-volman - Automatic management of removable drives and media for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229930 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-03 22:47 EST ------- Sorry it took so long for me to chime in on this one... 1. I don't think I care much. Sticking with the upstream name has some value however (ie, people reading upstream docs will look for that package name, etc), so I think it's marginally better to stick with thunar-volman. 2. Is thunar-volman useful in any way by itself or to other programs? If it's just simply a Thunar plugin only, then libexecdir does make more sense. If it's useful otherwise, then perhaps bindir is ok. Have you had a chance to bring this up to upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 03:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230812] tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040348.l243mgq0022032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: tcpxtract - tool for extracting files from network traffic based on file signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230812 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-03 22:48 EST ------- New version of spec and src.rpm uploaded at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract.spec http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/tcpxtract/tcpxtract-1.0.1-4.src.rpm This time it really keeps the timestamps. A couple of errors were present in the timestamp preservation part of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 03:59:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040359.l243xV13022219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-03 22:59 EST ------- Probably a stupid question to ask, but did anyone here ever use viewvc under mod_fcgid? If so, it would be good to know configuration details, as I'm getting a bit of pain when trying to make this run: -------------------------------------------------- Status: 301 Moved Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Location: / This document is located here. [Sun Mar 04 14:38:55 2007] [warn] (104)Connection reset by peer: mod_fcgid: read data from fastcgi server error. [Sun Mar 04 14:38:55 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: viewvc.cgi [Sun Mar 04 14:38:58 2007] [notice] mod_fcgid: process /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/cgi/viewvc.cgi(18965) exit(communication error), terminated by calling exit(), return code: 0 -------------------------------------------------- There are no files called .fcg, .fcgi or .fpl, so I'm guessing the only other option is to run a straight .cgi file, right? I had this in my configuration: fcgid.conf: -------------------------------------------------- AddHandler fcgid-script fcg fcgi fpl cgi -------------------------------------------------- viewvc.conf: -------------------------------------------------- ScriptAlias /viewvc /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/viewvc/bin/cgi/viewvc.cgi Alias /viewvc-static /usr/share/viewvc/templates/docroot Options ExecCGI -------------------------------------------------- And, of course, all mod_python stuff commented out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228434] Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040410.l244AH8C022481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228434 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-03 23:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: x2vnc Short Description: Dual screen hack for VNC Owners: mastahnke at gmail.com Branches: FC6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228434] Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040411.l244B5MZ022502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228434 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-03 23:11 EST ------- I also removed the pwd and ls, and will put that new version in CVS . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226273] Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040414.l244Efdb022561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226273 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jbrassow at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:15:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226273] Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040415.l244Frax022597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226273 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226273] Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040416.l244GeI0022625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-Telnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226273 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-03 23:16 EST ------- Sorry I had the wrong review flag here. Should be ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226239] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040422.l244Mio4022748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226239 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-03 23:22 EST ------- Everything looks good, but I do this is changelog is odd. I don't know if it is common policy to go back and fix something like this or not. * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - sh: line 0: fg: no job control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 04:39:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225288] Merge Review: at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040439.l244dge7022938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-03 23:39 EST ------- >W: at strange-permission atd.init 0775 >W: at strange-permission test.pl 0755 > Generally these aren't worth bothering with, but having a file group writable >in your checkout could be problematic. I don't see that, but I think my umask >doesn't allow it. Someone should try to understand where this is coming from. I see atd.init and test.pl at 0755 permissions in the source. It looks like those two files are not in upstream and added to make this package. So basically, the question is can they have better perms? I think the answer is yes. I am also still seeing a difference between debian's upstream sum and the source used for this package. I am not sure why that is. When I unpack both soruces and run a diff, I see no difference. >From the package review guidelines: - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 05:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 00:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226218] Merge Review: openssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040515.l245FVha023509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226218 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mastahnke at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-03-04 00:15 EST ------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL , it looks like we need just a tiny bit more detail on howto generate the source file used for this package form upstream. I assume that you just download upstream's version and run openssh-nukeacss.sh, is there anything more to it than that? Even if that is all, please place that comment in the spec. I am trying to find the right way to approcah the /etc/profile.d/ files. They are quite similar to init scripts in that many people think they shouldn't be edited, if so, they don't have to be %config. If they are %config they should probably be noreplace to preserve edits. Also, if they are only sourced and not executed, could they be 644 permissions rather than 755? [builder at rawhide i386]$ rpmlint openssh-askpass-4.5p1-4.i386.rpm W: openssh-askpass conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.csh W: openssh-askpass conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.sh W: openssh-askpass no-documentation E: openssh-askpass executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.sh E: openssh-askpass executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.sh 0755 E: openssh-askpass executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.csh E: openssh-askpass executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/gnome-ssh-askpass.csh 0755 [builder at rawhide i386]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 05:45:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 00:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040545.l245jR2w023889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-04 00:45 EST ------- ok, buildroot is now fine. > The functions are supposed to be sourced, so they don't need to be executable. ok, but then do they need the #!/bin/zsh at the top of each file if they aren't going to be executed? rpmlint says now: (the non executable script errors from before) 1.E: zsh use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use that in the following construct: for i in zshrc zlogin zlogout zshenv zprofile; do install -m 644 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/${i}.rhs ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/$i done Can't RPM_SOURCE_DIR just be removed from that? The install section should be run with a current working dir of the top of the source dir I think... 2. W: zsh mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 72, tab: line 108) Only a nitpick. Remove if you like while making other changes. 3. W: zsh patch-not-applied Patch1: zsh-4.0.6-make-test-fail.patch Remove old patch? 4. W: zsh prereq-use fileutils grep /sbin/install-info Those Requires you added shouldn't be needed. You should remove the Requires: line you added in -5, and also remove the Prereq: line. Replacing it with: Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info 5. One thing I just noticed that I missed. You should not be using %makeinstall if you can avoid it. Can you use 'make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install' instead? Thanks for the quick fixes! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 09:09:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040909.l2499cZX029303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dovecot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-03-04 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Yeah, the certificate paths used to be different, this block moves them to new > location. Would it be possible to drop these? When did the paths change? How far back in terms of fedora releases is this actually useful? Or if it can't be dropped can this be converted to a trigger? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 09:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040936.l249a6P0027545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trond.danielsen at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-03-04 04:36 EST ------- I believe that the package should own the folders, and not the content: %{_datadir}/new-stuff-manager/* %{_libdir}/new-stuff-manager/* should be %{_datadir}/new-stuff-manager %{_libdir}/new-stuff-manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 09:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703040949.l249niiM028080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2007-03-04 04:49 EST ------- CGI scripts need to be adapted to work in FastCGI mode; if viewvc doesn't include documentation on running in FastCGI mode, it almost certainly doesn't support it. Regarding SELinux, an alternative (and IMHO much better from a package maintainability point of view) approach is to use a loadable policy module containing the policy for your app. This will use the interfaces provided by the main policy package and is a little more robust, though still needs knowledge of types from the main policy. The mod_fcgid package takes this approach, which is documented, from a packaging perspective, here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/PolicyModules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:11:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041011.l24ABJ7a028810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-04 05:11 EST ------- OK, we can forget FastCGI then. I don't see anything documented anywhere in viewvc regarding that. Regarding SELinux, that was actually the first page I found on the topic and we could sure do one of those. Hopefully, we won't have to, if Dan beats us to it :-) Anyhow, I was initially looking for a "common" Apache area that would have httpd_sys_script_rw_t in order to reuse it, but couldn't find anything on my FS. If there is such a place, we can just point viewvc to it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226239] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041018.l24AIAOs029141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226239 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 05:18 EST ------- It is ok to correct changelogs after the fact, especially in that case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041031.l24AVduS030205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2007-03-04 05:31 EST ------- (From update of attachment 149198) The benchmarking was done on this hardware: http://www.rexursive.com/articles/linuxondell6400.html OS was Fedora Core 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041035.l24AZSvF030444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 05:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149205) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149205&action=view) rpmlint log of grass-6.2.1-9 with two BR added Well, for -9: * BuildRequires: - As said before, "libtiff-devel libpng-devel" are missing at least. - Please check the following. ------------------------------------------------------ checking for mysql_config... /usr/bin/mysql_config checking for mysql_server_init... no configure: warning: libmysqld not found ------------------------------------------------------ * Requires (expecially for -devel) package - Check the Requirement for -devel package. @ Usually this can be checked by what files the header files in -devel package try to "include". @ And usually these dependencies should correcly appear on pkgconfig .pc file as "Requires:" section @ And the requirement for pkgconfig is missing * Source - Please specify URLs of all sources (if possible), especially Source2. * Timestamps - This package contains a lot of text files (such as header files, scripts), image files and so. Please keep timestamps on those files. * rpmlint (check attached) + incoherent-version-in-changelog (This is because I increased the release number to add missing BuildRequires) - unused-direct-shlib-dependency This can be usually ignored. - undefined-non-weak-symbol @ As this has -devel package and linkage is done for the libraries in -devel package, this cannot be ignored. Perhaps linkage against libm.so is missing. * Compiler flags - Well, would you explain a bit more in detail what happens with "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" (on this bug)? And is it not-so-easy problem to fix? * Desktop file - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. * Documentation total size - Well, I wonder if -doc subpackage should be created for grass because the documentation included in main packages seems a bit large in total.. * Documentation - I think the following documentations should be added ---------------------------------------------------------- CHANGES - to main ChangeLog_6.2.1.gz - to -devel TODO - to devel ----------------------------------------------------------- * License - Well, just a question, what are the following files? ---------------------------------------------------------- ./lib/gis/datum.table ./lib/gis/datumtransform.table ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] New: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/recordmydesktop.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: recordMyDesktop is a desktop session recorder for linux that attempts to be easy to use, yet also effective at it's primary task. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230892] New: Review Request: gtk-recordmydesktop - GUI Desktop session recorder with audio and video Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230892 Summary: Review Request: gtk-recordmydesktop - GUI Desktop session recorder with audio and video Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/gtk-recordmydesktop.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/gtk-recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: Graphical frontend for the recordmydesktop desktop session recorder. recordMyDesktop is a desktop session recorder for linux that attempts to be easy to use, yet also effective at it's primary task. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:47:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230892] Review Request: gtk-recordmydesktop - GUI Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041047.l24AlUr3031224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-recordmydesktop - GUI Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230892 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |230891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 10:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 05:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041047.l24AlVPl031232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |230892 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 11:06:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 06:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041106.l24B6tdl031725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-03-04 06:06 EST ------- I'm also willing to take over as primary maintainer, since i'm already sponsored it might save some time, but it's totally up to you guys. I'll sign up for co-maintainance otherwise. I maintain K-3D, a modeler that's pretty useless without aqsis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 11:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 06:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041113.l24BDTIb031916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-04 06:13 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: mecab-jumandic no-binary E: mecab-jumandic only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: mecab-jumandic-EUCJP only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are "normal" for this package and can be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs 0 No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * no .desktop file required Must Fix: ========= * add %defattr(-,root,root,-) to %files EUCJP * add || : at the end of the %post sed lines, so that if sed fails for some reason this doesn't cause the entire rpm transaction to fail Questions: ========== * If one installs multiple dictionaries, the config file will only contain the last one installed, can mecab handle multiple dicts in the config file? * What happens if all dicts get uninstalled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 12:01:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041201.l24C1gDA032711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 07:01 EST ------- Thank you for first reviewing!! Well, before fixing spec/srpm: > Questions: > ========== > > * If one installs multiple dictionaries, the config file will only contain > the last one installed, can mecab handle multiple dicts in the config file? Only one. So always the last one is used unless mecab user overwrites what dictionary to use from command line option. However allowing to install multiple dictionaries even if only the last one is used by default is not bad IMO because sysadmin can manually edit mecabrc if he/she wants. > * What happens if all dicts get uninstalled? The core "mecab" binary becomes useless, because "mecab" is a utility to analyze the "structure" of Japanese sentence and it surely requires one dictionary. Still some other binaries (under /usr/libexec/mecab) can be used (mainly for compiling dictionaries) and rebuilding mecab dictionary (currently mecab-jumandic) uses the binaries under /usr/libexec/mecab, which don't require /etc/mecabrc . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 12:25:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230831] Review Request: games-menus - Catagorized submenus for the GNOME/KDE Games menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041225.l24CPYwd000704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: games-menus - Catagorized submenus for the GNOME/KDE Games menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230831 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-03-04 07:25 EST ------- ** Package should own %{_datadir}/desktop-directories directory since it will remain unowned if someone doesn't have gnome-menus nor kdebase installed ** rpmlint complains don't look important ** The much more important thing for me would be translating this package. In my opinion we should try to make translations as many as it's possible, because it doesn't look fine if I have some categories in Polish and the rest in English. ** Is there anything we shall do with URL tag? Maybe we could put your last fedora-games-list mail somewhere on the wiki and link to it, couldn't we? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 14:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041431.l24EVqq8005775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-03-04 09:31 EST ------- Sure guys, feel free to take it over. I am happy with that, especially since I don't have access to a fedora box over here for the next year. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 14:38:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041438.l24Ec6Sw006008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 09:38 EST ------- Well, so please someone fix the issue on comment 63? Especially, how do you want to solve the file conflict issue against a2ps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041503.l24F3Gr7006718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-03-04 10:03 EST ------- You should use the macro %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. You souldn't mix macro and variable style. "You should pick a style and use it consistently throughout your packaging." (http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041505.l24F5N7Y006801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 10:05 EST ------- Just updated according to MUSTFIX. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab-jumandic.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-jumandic-5.1.20051121-4.fc7.src.rpm -------------------------------------- * Sun Mar 4 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 5.1.20051121-4 - Add missing defattr and make sed script safer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041545.l24FjQSC007945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aportal at univ-montp2.fr ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2007-03-04 10:45 EST ------- Sorry, I can't sponsor you. This isn't a full review, I just found some thing you have to fix. BuildRequires: libX11 isn't needed jwm doesn't honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, which means it's built without any compiler provided security features and other distro wide CFLAGS. Also, the debuginfo package is useless because the binary is explicitly stripped. One way to fix these issues is to add these after %configure: sed -i -e 's/^\(CFLAGS.*\)/\1 $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS)/' src/Makefile sed -i -e '/^\s*strip /d' src/Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041550.l24FoP0b008122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-03-04 10:50 EST ------- pdiff shouldn't be included in the RPM at all. That's why it is is put into a seperate package. See bug 223657 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:56:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041556.l24Fu4tP008408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You should use the macro %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > You souldn't mix macro and variable style. > > "You should pick a style and use it consistently throughout your packaging." > (http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf) In the spec file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is used consistently, no need to use %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041556.l24FuDXa008437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-04 10:56 EST ------- The solution to comment to #63 would be to disable this thid party package and leave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223657 control the name change. PerceptualDiff isn't required so it do not depend of this. But some study must be done that if package a2ps is installed, it will take Printdiff in place of Perceptual diff? This is no replace because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147#c27 %config %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/aqsisrc http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis.spec http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Summary: Open source RenderMan-compliant 3D rendering solution @Denis Thx you for your help.I can also import it since Mamoru Tasaka has sponsored me. Since this is your first message on this review (as far as i know) i would prefer to be the first maintainer for now. So you are welcome to co-maintain it with me (and tobias?) @Tobias Would you like someone to work on PerceptualDiff review if you cannot do this for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 15:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 10:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041559.l24Fxh9W008534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From cgtobi at gmail.com 2007-03-04 10:59 EST ------- @Nicolas This would be highly appreciated. If you want to go for it, feel free to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 16:06:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041606.l24G6V9C008754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > This is no replace because of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147#c27 > %config %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/aqsisrc I don't mention about noreplace issue. What I said is that the directory %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} is not owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 16:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041611.l24GBE4f008925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > jwm doesn't honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, which means it's built without any compiler > provided security features and other distro wide CFLAGS. As far as I can see it does. > Also, the debuginfo package is useless because the binary is explicitly > stripped. Indeed. > One way to fix these issues is to add these after %configure: As a suggestion, an even better solution would be to make a patch for src/Makefile.in to remove the strip, such that it doesn't fail silently if the Makefile.in is changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 16:16:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041616.l24GGloZ009018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 11:16 EST ------- Remove: Requires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg think about vnc or ssh session. There seems to be many missing BuildRequires, as shown by the build log, along (to be verified): libpng-devel fribidi-devel libXpm-devel libXinerama-devel libXft-devel libfreetype-devel pkgconfig. A file installed in /usr/share/xsessions is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 16:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041628.l24GSkk5009325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-04 11:28 EST ------- http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis.spec http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/aqsis/aqsis-1.2.0-4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Summary: Open source RenderMan-compliant 3D rendering solution Ok sorry to miss this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 16:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 11:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229600] Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041639.l24GdVEp009663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 11:39 EST ------- Well, for 0.2.0-1: * Requires - No package provides "glade-python" (perhaps pygtk2-libglade?) - Requires "python" is redundant. - Some python-related requirements are missing ---------------------------------------------------- import gconf - gnome-python2-gconf import gnomevfs - gnome-python2-gnomevfs ---------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership - Some directory under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ are already owned by other packages (especially hicolor-icon-theme) * Desktop file - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228434] Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041702.l24H2AHj010763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x2vnc - Dual screen hack for VNC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228434 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:27:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041727.l24HR5Ug011699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 12:27 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (aqsis) is APPROVED by me. ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041730.l24HUogo011850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 12:30 EST ------- One note: Currently I cannot access to http://download.aqsis.org/stable/source/tar/aqsis-1.2.0.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041734.l24HYgMQ012021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-04 12:34 EST ------- Yes, i also have this problem... This may prevent the build to success... As i remember the timestramp should be good (wget -N ). The URL also but it fails sometime... I may need to download from another place if it's really cause failures... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:42:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041742.l24Hgq57012302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-04 12:42 EST ------- all must fix items fixed: Approved by Hans de Goede -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226239] Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041751.l24Hpjau012597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Archive-Tar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226239 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-03-04 12:51 EST ------- The changelog entry should have been: < * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - sh: line 0: fg: no job control --- > * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.29-1.1 Note: Almost every core package has a similar changelog entry (a script used for one of the mass FC-6 rebuilds mishaved). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041752.l24HqBsv012649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 12:52 EST ------- Thank you!! Request to CVS admin for new package: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mecab-jumandic Short Description: JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ======================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 17:53:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041753.l24HrvGj012762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 12:53 EST ------- Oops... changing to fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 18:42:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041842.l24IgkfM014414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-04 13:42 EST ------- ok. I think the items that I was seeing are all fixed in the latest version. rpmlint now says: E: a2ps file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/a2ps/afm/fonts.map W: a2ps file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/a2ps.info.gz W: a2ps dangerous-command-in-%post mv Did we determine anything about the fonts.map file? Is there any way to move that or should we just ignore it? As for the auto* patches, I haven't tested them... I do have a x86_64 box if you would like to do some testing there Patrice? Or would you be willing to try using them Tim? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 19:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041922.l24JMSfc015777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-04 14:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aqsis Short Description: Open source RenderMan-compliant 3D rendering solution Owners: kwizart at gmail.com denis at poolshark.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel InitialCC: cgtobi at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 19:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041924.l24JOeuH015918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-04 14:24 EST ------- Setting fedora-cvs for kwizart per irc conversation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 19:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041942.l24Jg7Wp016821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-03-04 14:41 EST ------- Where are the srpms? I downloaded http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.9-1.20070225svn.src.rpm and was able to build it in mock development on x86_64. But the spec file doesn't have all the fixes reported in previous comments so I'm unsure if I'm building the latest version (that was based off an older revision by mistake) or if i'm building something totally foreign. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 19:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703041958.l24Jwf3U017431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-03-04 14:58 EST ------- Hi Tom - you've been quiet a while on this, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 20:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042011.l24KBAib018203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat.com 2007-03-04 15:11 EST ------- Sorry, I've been on the road and I've just been catching up. Why wouldn't we start with your spec file instead of mine? You've clearly thought through the issues more completely. Is there any particular thing mine did better? About the buildreq issue -- I did not look to see whether VM defines any macros that BBDB must use. I think that would be the only potential problem. In re #7, I just copied some other package. I don't think there is any deeper thing than that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 20:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042017.l24KHZ4L018645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-03-04 15:17 EST ------- To be clear, I am attempting to build the latest src.rpm from http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher/ - namely: http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher/jokosher-0.9-1.20070225svn.src.rpm The traceback happens right after changing mode of build/scripts-2.5/jokosher from 644 to 755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 20:35:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] New: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/aircrack-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/aircrack-ng-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: aircrack-ng is a set of tools for auditing wireless networks. It's an enhanced/reborn version of aircrack. It consists of airodump-ng (an 802.11 packet capture program), aireplay-ng (an 802.11 packet injection program), aircrack (static WEP and WPA-PSK cracking), airdecap-ng (decrypts WEP/WPA capture files), and some tools to handle capture files (merge, convert, etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 20:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 15:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042038.l24Kcel9019309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Alias: aircrack-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.aircrack-ng.org/ Alias| |aircrack-ng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:23:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042123.l24LN9Bc020527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-04 16:23 EST ------- ok, all the package issues I saw seem to have been solved... I would still like to get it working on x86_64 before we import the package however. With the -10 release here I get: Attempting to mount with the following options: ecryptfs_cipher=aes ecryptfs_key_bytes=16 ecryptfs_sig=dba5ed7952a1184d Error mounting eCryptfs; rc = [-2]; strerr = [No such file or directory] Any idea on that one? Nothing at all in dmesg, so those things seem solved to me, but it doesn't appear to work still. ;( Could someone try a rawhide i386 machine? I don't have one handy right at the moment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042127.l24LRjmF020678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 16:27 EST ------- In my opinion the autotools issue is a must fix, particularly since I did a patch. Regarding E: a2ps file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/a2ps/afm/fonts.map it is clearly wrong in my opinion. There are many ways to override the defaults. Moreover there is no reason to have that file as %config, and not, say, encoding.map. In my opinion what should be done would be to add, in a2ps-4.13-etc.patch, $(sysconfdir)/$(PACKAGE) on the libpath line, in etc/Makefile.in and etc/Makefile.am. and add %dir %{_sysconfdir}/a2ps to %files. I can do a patch if desired (and after the auto* issue is solved) Other issues: * gzip %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/* || : is unneeded * %{_sysconfdir}/a2ps.cfg shouldn't be (noreplace) and I even think that it shouldn't be %config at all. * missing BuildRequires psutils, gv, tetex-dvips, makeinfo, tetex-latex. Missing Requires ImageMagick, texinfo-tex, gv, gzip, bzip2, groff-perl, tetex-dvips, tetex-latex, tetex-fonts Suggestions: * for consistency use the info scriptlets from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db and also remove the .gz. * use %defattr(-,root,root,-) * use sed instead of perl for simple substitution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:30:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042130.l24LULos020737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 16:30 EST ------- Another Requires seems to be missing, Requires: file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:36:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042136.l24La8rr020849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 16:36 EST ------- Another suggestion would be to use libpaper, with --with-medium=libpaper unless _glibc is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042141.l24LfeWU020978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-03-04 16:41 EST ------- Package Name: PythonCAD Short Description: PythonCAD scriptable CAD package Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:46:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042146.l24Lkfbs021092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Alias: aircrack-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency. | |de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194276] Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042148.l24LmQpT021138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaccessibility: KDE accessibility tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:48:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194278] Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042148.l24Lmin2021171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeadmin: Administrative tools for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194278 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042152.l24LqLft021288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042155.l24LtOEZ021407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-03-04 16:55 EST ------- Set, but please use the template in the future as described on CVSAdminProcedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042157.l24Lvhpi021508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 21:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042158.l24Lwxor021557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From dbateman at free.fr 2007-03-04 16:58 EST ------- Is there any progress on FE-Legal's side on the above statement from Sorensen? He seemed quite willing to help out and it was just the amount of time it would take him to negotiate with his universities lawyers that worried him. If I can have a clarification of exactly what clarifying statement you'd need from him to resolve this issue, I'm willing to recontact him. D. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227256] Review Request: moto4lin - Filemanager and seem editor for Motorola P2k phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042203.l24M3W5U021747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moto4lin - Filemanager and seem editor for Motorola P2k phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227256 jafo-redhat at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(jafo- | |redhat at tummy.com) | ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2007-03-04 17:03 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to get it closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227042] Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042204.l24M4C13021795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: byaccj-1.11-2jpp - Parser Generator with Java Extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227042 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042205.l24M5rd6021889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Alias: aircrack-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-03-04 17:05 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - - rpmlint is silent - - package is named according to guidelines - - spec file name is ok - - software is licensed under the GPL - - spec file license matches actual license - - license is included as doc - - spec is written in AE (as far is I can tell) - - spec is readable - - sources matches upstream: [awjb at alkaid] md5sum aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz ../SOURCES/aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz 34c0447951d438d76fa32d08eab5da01 aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz 34c0447951d438d76fa32d08eab5da01 ../SOURCES/aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz - - builds fine (fc6: mock/x86_64) - - no BR are needed - - no locales are part of the package - - no shared libraries are part of the package - - package is not relocatable - - package does not create any directories - - package does not contain duplicate files - - file permissions are correct - - package contains %clean section - - use of macros is ok - - doc size is ok - - no header/static lib files in package - - no pkgconfig files in package - - no lib files in package - - no devel package - - no libtool archives in package - - no gui applications included - - no files are owned by other packages - - source package contains license file package looks good to go. APPROVED. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF60KKQEQyPsWM8csRAj0OAJsHhXQPeSYSYnNqaNqDPJwDRIYQggCaAoY5 4yA+xA+26RPJomQxUy1cZiw= =qvkj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042206.l24M6Idr021922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:06 EST ------- Not approved (afaict), reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194375] Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042207.l24M7YDL022002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeutils: K Desktop Environment - Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194375 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:08:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:08:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042208.l24M8PAs022094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:08 EST ------- John? We'd really like to get the KDE stack merged asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042211.l24MB58D022197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-04 17:11 EST ------- * appropriate Requires(...) for scriptlets should be used (instead of Requires). * use rpm macros * %attr(755,daemon,daemon) /etc/rc.d/init.d/crond seems wrong to me, it should be owned by root. * timestamp of data files should be kept with -p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:16:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042216.l24MGYb9022310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Alias: aircrack-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-03-04 17:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aircrack-ng Short Description: 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Owners: opensource till name Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: My e-mail is not in the correct format because bugzilla does display e-mails that are in comments for not loggid in users. I hope this is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:20:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042220.l24MK63R022367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:20 EST ------- Re: comment #12 > Please note that the development is currently on hold."""""" > Is this the reason why we aren't including this support? Fedora is missing the required library, which is the biggest blocker, imo. Re: comment #13 Of course, but let's not muddy the review with extraneous items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225965] Merge Review: kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042220.l24MKaS5022411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225965] Merge Review: kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042222.l24MMZZs022475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:22 EST ------- $rpmlint kdepim-3.5.6-2.fc7.i386.rpm E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libremotekonnector.so libremotekonnector.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libknodecommon.so libknodecommon.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkmailprivate.so libkmailprivate.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkcalkonnector.so libkcalkonnector.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libqtopiakonnector.so libqtopiakonnector.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/liblocalkonnector.so liblocalkonnector.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.so libakregatorprivate.so E: kdepim invalid-soname /usr/lib/libkabckonnector.so libkabckonnector.so E: kdepim file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kmail.antispamrc E: kdepim file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kmail.antivirusrc E: kdepim file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/libkleopatrarc E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_bookmark_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libindex.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kpilot.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_todoplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkitchensyncui.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_groupwise.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_pluckerpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_korganizerplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libgroupwisewizard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabc_slox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_knodeplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libakregatorpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/ldifvcardthumbnail.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kded_networkstatus.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kfile_palm.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_distributionlist.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_summaryplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_knotesplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_sdsummary.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkpimidentities.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_tableview.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_address.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_specialdatesplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libknodepart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/knotes_kolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabckonnector.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmail/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmail/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kfile_vcf.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_resourceselection.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libexchangewizard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libksync2.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkitchensyncpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddressbookpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkgroupwaredav.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkorganizer.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabinterfaces.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkmail_bodypartformatter_application_octetstream.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabc_groupdav.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/multisynk/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/multisynk/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/share/apps/kconf_update/korn-3-5-metadata-update.pl E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkgroupwarebase.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_kolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkaddressbook.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_weatherplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_viewer.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_newexchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_localdir.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_groupwise.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkorganizer_calendar.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libqtopiakonnector.la W: kdepim devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/indexlib-config E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksfilter_addressbook.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libknotes_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_popmail.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkorganizer_eventviewer.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_ldif_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libsloxwizard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_newexchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libmultisynkpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_kabc.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konsolekalendar/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konsolekalendar/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/liblocalkonnector.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabc_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkpinterfaces.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_akregator.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kio_mbox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorg_hebrew.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_knode.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kpilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libakregator_mk4storage_plugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_karm.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kfile_ics.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_kmailplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_csv_xxport.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kalarm/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kalarm/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libmimelib.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_syncerpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kontactsummary.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kabconfig.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_memofile.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer/kdepimwidgets.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_groupdav.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_time.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_local.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_iconview.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_debugger.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkpimexchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_newexchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_cryptosettings.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libknodecommon.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_groupdav.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_resourcefeatureplan.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libmultisynk.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcalkonnector.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_newstickerplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer/kpartsdesignerplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_notepad.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/akregator/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/akregator/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kabldapconfig.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkmail_bodypartformatter_text_calendar.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_kolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libksieve.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkpilot.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_slox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kleopatra.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkmail_bodypartformatter_text_vcard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkolabwizard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libqgpgme.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_remote.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkonnector.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libktnef.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_resourceremote.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkmail_bodypartformatter_text_xdiff.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/share/apps/kconf_update/korn-3-5-ssl-update.pl E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorg_exchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_slox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_knotes.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_restore.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libgpgme++.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_eudora_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkorg_stdprinting.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libksync.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_pab_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_todo.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkmime.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/knotes_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kontactknt.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kwatchgnupg/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kwatchgnupg/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_groupdav.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kontact/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kontact/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorg_journalprint.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcal_resourcefeatureplan.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kio_sieve.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaddressbook/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaddressbook/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorg_datenums.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kio_groupwise.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_journalplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_vcard_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksfilter_calendar.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_vcal.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_kaddressbookplugin.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kio_imap4.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libremotekonnector.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_sysinfo.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_opera_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/resourcecalendarexchange.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/karm/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/karm/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_slox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kabcustomfields.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_korgsummary.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkode.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabc_newexchange.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkpgp.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkleopatra.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/conduit_doc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libknoteskolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kmail.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kandy/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kandy/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/korganizer/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/korganizer/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabckolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorganizerpart.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knotes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knotes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkocorehelper.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkabc_groupwise.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kabc_groupwise.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkgantt.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/korn/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/korn/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktnef/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktnef/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkorg_yearlyprint.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/knotes_local.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcal_xmlrpc.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkholidays.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkarmpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkmailpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_cardview.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/liboverviewpart.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_kpilotplugin.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knode/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/knode/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libksync_backup.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkcalkolab.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_korganizer.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkmailprivate.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkslox.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkontact.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kmailsummary.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkdepim.la W: kdepim dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kleopatra/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdepim symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kleopatra/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kcm_kontact.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libegroupwarewizard.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkaddrbk_kde2_xxport.la E: kdepim script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/libkontact_multisynk.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:31:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225965] Merge Review: kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042231.l24MVrjw022691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225965 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:31 EST ------- rpmlint's output is all mostly harmless, not a blocker, imo. SHOULD include: +%doc README korganizer/COPYING The rest is clean and conformant, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194279] Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042240.l24MeSic023102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork: Extra KDE artwork (themes, sound themes, ...) for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194279 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | CC| |than at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-03-04 17:40 EST ------- Mike? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 22:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 17:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227114] Review Request: saxon-6.5.3-4jpp - Java XSLT processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042249.l24MnWDT023613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon-6.5.3-4jpp - Java XSLT processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227114 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 23:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227115] Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042310.l24NAjeD024411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227115 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 23:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042334.l24NYu0C024973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta| |nford.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-03-04 18:34 EST ------- I velieve I've takedn care of all the items mentioned in comment #14 above SRPMS ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.19.2-1.src.rpm SPEC ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec Note the version number of the upstream sources has been bumped up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 23:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229826] Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042342.l24Ngeg3025206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Chmsee - a GTK2 CHM viewer based on chmlib and gecko https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229826 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 4 23:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703042354.l24NsxZm025517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:02:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050002.l2502NFL025717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167147] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050007.l2507P0B025863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:11:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050011.l250BxIQ025970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Alias: aircrack-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-03-04 19:11 EST ------- IMHO better to avoid parentheses in the Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:29:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050029.l250TcLG026375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-03-04 19:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > Where are the srpms? I downloaded > http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.9-1.20070225svn.src.rpm > and was able to build it in mock development on x86_64. But the spec file > doesn't have all the fixes reported in previous comments so I'm unsure if I'm > building the latest version (that was based off an older revision by mistake) or > if i'm building something totally foreign. The fixes in previous comments have either been applied upstream or are no longer relevant. I'm not sure exactly what you're asking. The build now runs from the setup.py file. The srpms are at the URI you indicated. I am building pre-release packages from svn in readiness for 0.9 final which is due in a few weeks. Good to know it is building okay for you in x86_64. I'm still concerned about David's issue however - any thoughts? What needs to happen now to get this accepted? Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229600] Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050049.l250nsQu026701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229600 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-03-04 19:49 EST ------- >* Requires > - No package provides "glade-python" (perhaps pygtk2-libglade?) > - Requires "python" is redundant. > - Some python-related requirements are missing > ---------------------------------------------------- > import gconf - gnome-python2-gconf > import gnomevfs - gnome-python2-gnomevfs > ---------------------------------------------------- I know but, the fact is they seem to be redundant too (like python). as gnome-python2-gnomevfs required gnome-python2 which is required by some default installed packages such as system-config-network. Is that really necessary to add both to Requires tag ? > * Directory ownership > - Some directory under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/ are already > owned by other packages (especially hicolor-icon-theme) > > * Desktop file > - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. My bad, i uploaded the wrong spec file (which is already fixed). Anyway..i'm waitting your answer about the redundant requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:49:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050049.l250nrGC026695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-03-04 19:49 EST ------- Hi Tom, OK, when I get a chance, I'll confirm (or otherwise) on #7 and the buildreq issue. One thing you spotted that I hadn't was the need to convert the info file to UTF-8. Doesn't matter to me which spec we use as the starting point though, but it's great to have a couple of us working on it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 00:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050056.l250ught026860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229927] Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050110.l251AC9H027160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229927 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 20:10 EST ------- Well, importing done for all branching, closing. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:10:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050110.l251ANGu027184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 Bug 229929 depends on bug 229927, which changed state. Bug 229927 Summary: Review Request: mecab - Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229927 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:11:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229929] Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050111.l251Bk9t027235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-jumandic - JUMAN dictorionary for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229929 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 20:11 EST ------- Importing done on all branches. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050125.l251P03f027559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-04 20:24 EST ------- Just a quick note: there are several duplicate BuildRequires: libXfixes-devel (by libXdamage-devel), libICE-devel (by libSM-devel), libogg-devel (by libtheora-devel) (all those are minor problems) and at least one missing BR (zlib-devel probably - that is a MUSTFIX): In file included from ../include/recordmydesktop.h:35, from recordmydesktop.c:28: ../include/rmdtypes.h:56:18: error: zlib.h: No such file or directory In file included from ../include/recordmydesktop.h:35, from recordmydesktop.c:28: ../include/rmdtypes.h:229: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'gzFile' In file included from ../include/recordmydesktop.h:37, from recordmydesktop.c:28: ../include/rmdfunc.h:465: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'gzFile' ../include/rmdfunc.h:481: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'gzFile' make[2]: *** [recordmydesktop-recordmydesktop.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72949 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72949 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050143.l251hQjm027924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-04 20:43 EST ------- here is a short patch which fixes the above and also preserves timestamps of installed files. Please use it to fix your package and I guess we have a winner. #diff -Nupr recordmydesktop.spec recordmydesktop-new.spec --- recordmydesktop.spec 2007-03-05 03:26:39.000000000 +0200 +++ recordmydesktop-new.spec 2007-03-05 03:37:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: recordmydesktop Version: 0.3.3.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Desktop session recorder with audio and video Group: Applications/Multimedia @@ -36,13 +36,11 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - +make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 01:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229600] Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050153.l251rSrG028216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: specto - An desktop application that will watch configurable events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 20:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > >* Requires > > - No package provides "glade-python" (perhaps pygtk2-libglade?) > > - Requires "python" is redundant. > > - Some python-related requirements are missing > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > import gconf - gnome-python2-gconf > > import gnomevfs - gnome-python2-gnomevfs > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > I know but, the fact is they seem to be redundant too (like python). > as gnome-python2-gnomevfs required gnome-python2 which is required by some > default installed packages such as system-config-network. > > Is that really necessary to add both to Requires tag ? Well, * system-config-??? are of no relation with this package and the requirements must be added. * gnome-vfs2 and gnome-vfs-gnomevfs have circular dependencies and adding both dependencies is not a bad idea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 02:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050202.l2522uTO028516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-03-04 21:02 EST ------- I think the Summary should be simply "Python scriptable CAD package". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 02:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050240.l252ehcu029631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 21:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=149234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=149234&action=view) mock build log of HippoDraw-1.19.2-1.fc7 I just tried mockbuild of HippoDraw-1.19.2-1 on FC-devel i386 but it failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 02:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 21:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050259.l252xhwj030019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - PythonCAD scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 03:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225119] Review Request: pythoncad - Python scriptable CAD package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050311.l253BhFm030409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pythoncad - Python scriptable CAD package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225119 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pythoncad - |Review Request: pythoncad - |PythonCAD scriptable CAD |Python scriptable CAD |package |package ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-04 22:11 EST ------- (Just changed Summary according to owners.list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 03:42:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050342.l253guLC031229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-03-04 22:42 EST ------- Hi folks, my apologies for the slow response--have been quite busy with ${WORK}. My two main suggestions were the removal of *.la files [which I now understand are needed by many KDE apps--sorry!], and the creation of a -devel subpackage. I see that the -devel package was created on Feb 15th so thats good. And I don't see anything else at odds with the packaging guidelines so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 03:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050344.l253iwmU031286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 06:18:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 01:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225777] Merge Review: gawk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050618.l256I2rt002396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gawk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225777 petrosyan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petrosyan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From petrosyan at gmail.com 2007-03-05 01:17 EST ------- The first sentence in the package description of gawk has a grammatical error. "The gawk packages contains the GNU version of awk, a text processing utility." it should be "The gawk package contains the GNU version of awk, a text processing utility." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 07:10:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050710.l257AZng003691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-03-05 02:10 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing my request on a weekend :) I want to contribute the GeniusTrader application to Fedora Extras. This application needed me to update my Test::Simple. That is why, I thought it wiser to add this as a separate module to Fedora Extras. I am not sure it needs to be split from Perl main. But I think it might be wiser to let some people upgrade to this version if they need to - an option. I am willing to take responsibility of updating the versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 07:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050727.l257RBxd004060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-05 02:27 EST ------- > Thanks for reviewing my request on a weekend :) That's the difference between paid workers and volunteers. The latter primarily work on Fedora on weekends ;) > This application needed me to update my Test::Simple. I don't fully understand - What is your problem? Does your GeniusTrader-spec fail to detect Test::Simple or does it claim to require a newer version as that shipped with the main perl package? Does GeniusTrader requires Test::Simple at build-time or at run-time? Depending on these details there would be several approaches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:12:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050812.l258C6Gk005564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - grub next generation tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From jerone at gmail.com 2007-03-05 03:11 EST ------- I'm looking into the the _start being missing now (not sure exactly what this is, or why it's now gone in x86-64 fc7 gcc). I've update the spec though to add smp to building. It appears to work fine (tried up to -j4 and it worked). http://jgotech.net/jerone/grub-1.95/grub2.spec http://jgotech.net/jerone/grub-1.95/grub2-1.95-5.src.rpm I'm going to see how grub cvs works under x86 and x86-64 fc7. Though currently grub 2 cvs needs a little kicking into shape. I'll see what I can do about it this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:26:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050826.l258QYBt006210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-03-05 03:26 EST ------- The GeniusTrader application is not available in rpm format yet. At the moment, it is a set of Perl scripts that needs some Perl modules in order to work. The upstream maintainers do not want to spend time on packaging it. They prefer to install individual components separately. They have no objections to others packaging it. I will, in due course, want to package these other modules for Fedora as well. In fact, I think packaging GT for Fedora will be sensible only if all other requirements are in Fedora. The Test::Simple is needed at build time. The Test::Simple is detected but the upgrade is suggested at install time. I did not experiment to see if the upgrade was mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226451] Merge Review: sysstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050828.l258SIm7006342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226451 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-05 03:28 EST ------- There should be a major changes which I want to discuss with upstream, so it will take some time to fix these problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225777] Merge Review: gawk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050842.l258gL4d006999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gawk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225777 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-03-05 03:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > The first sentence in the package description of gawk has a grammatical error. The typo has been fixed in CVS. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226118] Merge Review: mailx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050848.l258mMcB007404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226118 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-05 03:48 EST ------- Thanks for your notice, you are right - the directory is added in mailx-8.1.1-46.fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:54:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225288] Merge Review: at In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050854.l258sl95007953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225288 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-03-05 03:54 EST ------- It was stupid differnce between at_... and at-... Now are the sums the same. debian source 6e5857e23b3c32ea6995fb7f8989987e at_3.1.10.tar.gz cat sources 6e5857e23b3c32ea6995fb7f8989987e at_3.1.10.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 08:55:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 03:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050855.l258t3Sq007997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-03-05 03:54 EST ------- AFAIK, we have other packages which come with media that may only be used with that package, and that has never been a problem. remember sounds == content != code. For content the only demands are that: 1 its usefull for some program, iow no random photo collections, 2 its freely redistributable (together with the program using it). So I see no problem to just use the asterisk sounds, other wise ask Spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 09:39:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 04:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050939.l259diZQ011619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-05 04:39 EST ------- > The Test::Simple is needed at build time. OK. > The Test::Simple is detected but the > upgrade is suggested at install time. Then something probably is broken with GeniusTrader. Using "Test::Simple" at run-time normally doesn't make any sense, nor does "suggesting to upgrade" at install-time. I'd suggest you to submit a GeniusTrader-rpm for review, so we can look into the details and suggest to close this Request until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 09:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 04:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226123] Merge Review: man-pages-de In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703050943.l259hjcm011889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-de https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226123 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-05 04:43 EST ------- - add dist flag - the newer version is released - change the BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) rpmlint outut: srpm: W: man-pages-de summary-ended-with-dot German man pages from the Linux Documentation Project. E: man-pages-de tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: man-pages-de non-utf8-spec-file man-pages-de.spec W: man-pages-de mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 46, tab: line 39) W: man-pages-de patch-not-applied Patch0: man-pages-de-0.2-rofffixes.patch noarch.rpm W: man-pages-de summary-ended-with-dot German man pages from the Linux Documentation Project. E: man-pages-de tag-not-utf8 %changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051005.l25A5rBU013223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-03-05 05:05 EST ------- Thanks. I'm closing this request until I sort out the GT spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230798] Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051007.l25A7AUx013302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Simple - A basic Perl testing framework for creating tests to be run either standalone or under Test::Harness. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230798 mkpai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051008.l25A8WDc013467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 mkpai at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl- |Review Request: perl- |Callback - Object interface |Callback - Object interface |for function callbacks |for function callbacks ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-03-05 05:08 EST ------- I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230586] Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051014.l25AE2tZ013732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdg-user-dirs-gtk - gnome/gtk+ integration of xdg-user-dirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230586 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-03-05 05:13 EST ------- imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051015.l25AFI5r013808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-03-05 05:15 EST ------- Changes: - Remove duplicate BR - Add missing zlib-devel BR - Applied patch to Preserve timestamps Updated: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/recordmydesktop.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225255] Merge Review: arptables_jf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051018.l25AI8Qi013985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: arptables_jf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225255 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-05 05:18 EST ------- MUSTFIX - Epoch tag can be removed (0 is the default value) - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n - no URL provided - "BuildPrereq: /usr/bin/perl" can be removed, perl is on the exception list; if you plan to keep it then you should use "BuildRequires(pre)" (and eventually explain why you explicitely want it ) - "Requires(post,postun): chkconfig" should be split in Requires(post), Requires(postun) - You should stick with either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not both - "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is not needed in %prep - "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" is missing in %install - "service" should be added to Requires - Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS is not used - "%config /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf" should use a macro, not a fixed path SHOULD FIX - Summary ended with dot - adding "INSTALL="%{__install} -c -p" to the make install line would preserve timestamps rpmlint has some info for us, too: rpmlint of arptables_jf: W: arptables_jf summary-ended-with-dot Userspace control program for the arptables network filter. W: arptables_jf no-url-tag - We know about these two already W: arptables_jf conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf E: arptables_jf executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf - /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf should not be marked as %config; could be left as such till F8T1 according to last week's guidelines W: arptables_jf service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf - that's a good point. Do we need/want it enabled at start time? E: arptables_jf incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf arptables E: arptables_jf incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf arptables E: arptables_jf incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf arptables - Harmless, but maybe should be discussed. Why is the package called arptables_jf and not arptables ? W: arptables_jf no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf - harmless, although a reload which does just start+stop would be easy to implement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225255] Merge Review: arptables_jf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051022.l25AM33r014380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: arptables_jf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225255 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-05 05:22 EST ------- wrt "BuildRequires(pre)" .. should be read "BuildRequires" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051040.l25Ae3QL016065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-03-05 05:40 EST ------- Do you think that helps? The other requires looks to me fine. Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig /etc/init.d /sbin/service Requires(postun): /sbin/chkconfig /etc/init.d /sbin/service Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig /etc/init.d /sbin/service > %attr(755,daemon,daemon) /etc/rc.d/init.d/crond Right, I changed it. > macro changed > timestamps changed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 10:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 05:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230891] Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051058.l25AwxjC018516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: recordmydesktop - Desktop session recorder with audio and video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230891 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-03-05 05:58 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks do not return anything on source and binary rpm; the debuginfo package reports: W: recordmydesktop-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1/src/load_cache.c W: recordmydesktop-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1/include/rmdtypes.h W: recordmydesktop-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1/src/cache_frame.c Probably a chmod -x on these three files in %prep should make rpmlint happy. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) is OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, is latest version, sha1sum 3eb2ffe79a0fcf5e04962bd3d120c1e5587c178b recordmydesktop-0.3.3.1.tar.gz - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all file/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of foreign files/directories - no duplicate files - permissions ok (see rpmlint output on -debuginfo above) - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - not a GUI, so no need for .desktop file - no need for a separate -devel package - no .la files - no scriptlets - no static files SHOULD: - builds in mock for devel/x86_64 - works as advertised APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 11:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226316] Merge Review: privoxy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051107.l25B7U00019455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: privoxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226316 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-03-05 06:07 EST ------- dynamic pcre patch and a patch for bug #193159 added to privoxy-3.0.6-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 11:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051115.l25BFCeJ020082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-05 06:15 EST ------- rpmlint output: W: tclx make-check-outside-check-section make test W: tclx no-documentation W: tclx-devel no-documentation E: tclx-doc standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/mann - is the groff BuildRequire necessary? - change the BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - I'm not sure whether the present structure of tclx package is right - it is divided into 4 packages 2 of them contains 1 and 3 files. - in dir /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/tclx8.4/ should be owned by tclx - is it possible to add %{?_smp_mflags}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 11:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051139.l25BdnQD020994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ttcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-05 06:39 EST ------- rpmlint output: srpm W: ttcp summary-ended-with-dot A tool for testing TCP connections. W: ttcp no-url-tag W: ttcp setup-not-quiet - add dist tag - change the BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - is it possible to add %{?_smp_mflags}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 11:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051145.l25BjoOp021246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-03-05 06:45 EST ------- MUSTFIX: ... License: CHECK(GPL or Artistic) ... The license of this package isn't clear to me: All I can find inside of the sources is this: Copyright (C) 1994, 2000, 2002 David Muir Sharnoff. All rights reserved. License hearby granted for anyone to use this module at their own risk. Please feed useful changes back to muir at idiom.com. This is not the standard Perl "GPL or Artistic" license, but something different. In particular, this only covers usage ("use"), but doesn't cover "modification". I'd suggest you to contact the author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 11:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051150.l25Bo6E7021403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dovecot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-03-05 06:50 EST ------- The newest fedora rls in which the old paths are used is FC-3. They are used in RHEL-4 as well. Should I remove the block then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 5 12:01:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200703051201.l25C133Q021714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-03-05 07:00 EST ------- Instead of checking subsys, you could use the standard scriptlet. It will be safer, too. if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/service