[Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 9 09:06:24 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: scim


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226395





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-03-09 04:06 EST -------
For 1.4.5-9:

* Directory ownership
  - Currently the structure of the directories owned is wrong.
    * scim requires scim-libs, not opposite
      This means that the directories which scim and scim-libs
      use and are created by either scim or scim-libs must
      be owned by scim-libs, not scim.

      Example:
----------------------------------------------------
[root at localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/lib/scim-1.0
scim-1.4.5-9.fc7
[root at localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/
scim-libs-1.4.5-9.fc7
scim-1.4.5-9.fc7
----------------------------------------------------
      This is not right.
      And:
----------------------------------------------------
[root at localhost mock]# rpm -qlp scim-*i386*rpm | sort | uniq -d
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine
----------------------------------------------------
      Please check which directories should be owned by what
      package.

* Desktop file
----------------------------------------------------
Categories=Applications;Settings;X-Fedora;
----------------------------------------------------
  - categories 
    * "X-Fedora" is deprecated
    * "Applications" is deprecated
    and both should be removed.

* Timestamps
  - This package contains manu
    * image files (such as png files)
    * text files (such as header files)
    and keeping timestamps on those files are recommended.

* Source
  - Specify the URL of Source2 if possible.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list