[Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 15 13:20:07 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225849
varekova at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED
Flag|needinfo? |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-15 09:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> * BuildRoot isn't the right one
fixed
> * Wouldn't it be a good idea to add directories holding truetype
> fonts located in %{_datatdir}/fonts to the gnuplot-4.0.0-refers_to.patch
> patch?
The fonts directories are changed too often to have them here.
> * A suggestion: depend on the font packages. It has pros and cons.
I'm not sure I like to discuss this with gnuplot upstream.
> * unuseful requires:
> Requires: libpng
fixed
> * I don't like the License tag. It appears not to be free software as it
> is now, although it is. Maybe it would be better to have something like
> License: Gnuplot
> And in a comment say something along
> # changes must be distributed as patches
fixed
> * RPM_OPT_FLAGS is unuseful on make command line, and %{?_smp_mflags}
> is missing. I tested that replacing with
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
> seems right.
fixed
> Is
> PATH=$RPM_BUILD_DIR/gnuplot-%{version}:$PATH
> really needed?
fixed
> * The %post scriptlet should be run everytime not only at install time
fixed
>
> * A suggestion: in %{files} use wildcard to handle different compression or
> no compression:
>
> %{_mandir}/man1/gnuplot.1*
> %{_infodir}/gnuplot.info*
I think the present version is right and it will help to reveal changes in new
versions.
>
>
> * The doc in psdoc isn't generated rightly. I suggested cd to the directory
> and
> make ps_symbols.ps ps_fontfile_doc.pdf
>
> Then distribute only
> ps_fontfile_doc.pdf ps_guide.ps ps_symbols.ps ps_file.doc
fixed
> It implies a BuildRequires on latex for pdflatex
>
>
Add comment #2
version 4.2.0 will be put to fc8 now it is too late to upgrade.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list