[Bug 231303] Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xmlunit - Provides classes to do asserts on xml


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303





------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com  2007-03-20 15:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> X The summary is a little unclear. It should probably be something more like
> "Unit Testing framework for XML"
Done
> * rpmlint on <this package>.srpm gives no output
> X rpmlint xmlunit-1.0-4jpp.1.src.rpm
> W: xmlunit non-standard-group Development/Testing
> W: xmlunit invalid-license BSD Style Software License
> 
> The "Software License" part of the license should be removed to get rid of the
> rpmlint warning.
Done

> X doesn't build
> * BuildRequires are proper
>  - builds in mock will flush out problems here
> X doesn't build in mock

> * summary should be a short and concise description of the package
> X summary should probably be changed (see above)
> * description expands upon summary (don't include installation
> instructions)
Done
> X should the pdf be part of a manual package?
Since there's only 1 pdf file, it should be ok to stay in there.

> X can't build package
> 
> SHOULD:
> * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc
> * package should build on i386
> * package should build in mock
> 
> I will finish the review once the package can be built
> 
I think we need to wait for mock on to-fcjpp1 to sync up with the latest
java-1.5.0-gcj.

Spec file and SRPM at the same location.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.