[Bug 226535] Merge Review: w3m

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: w3m


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226535





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-03-27 00:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Created an attachment (id=150834)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150834&action=view) [edit] [edit]
> > w3m.spec with some fixes (0.5.1-18)
> > 
> > Well, for 0.5.1-17.fc7:
> > 
> > * Source0
> >   - Please check:
> >     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> > (A) It seems that newest gc is 6.8.
> > 
> > * CFlags
> >     (Please see the attached mock build log)
> >   - Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed
> >     (for gc.a).
> >     For gc.a, it seems okay when ABI_FLAG is set as
> >     RPM_OPT_FLAGS
> >     And.. actually this changes debuginfo contents.
>      Agree.
> 
> > (B) NOTE:
> >     Usually gc should be seperated from this package (w3m)
> >     and other packages for gc should be created.
> >     In this case, gc package should provide shared library
> >     (not static archive). 
> >     However is this too late for F7?
>       Don't think so. Yes static library should be removed.

What I meant here is
* can you split gc tarball from w3m srpm, create gc package
  (with providing gc shared library)
  from gc tarball and have w3m use gc package before F7?
* would you upgrade gc to the newest version?


> > (D) Question:
> >     - Should all the documents in doc-jp/ files should be
> >       converted from EUC-JP to UTF-8?
> >       I think so, however, if you want to do so, please keep
> >       timestamps on these files even after encodings are converted,
> >       as these documents are 3-6 years old.
> 
>         Agree.

"Agree" means that you will change Japanese documents to
UTF-8 with timestamps kept as original?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.