[Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium




------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2007-03-27 07:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The spec file contains wild cards in the %files section.  This makes it
> difficult to verify that the package contains all the files it should.
ok, in moderation

> The docs are huge (2 megabytes).  Please split them into a separate -doc package.
ok

> There are some rpmlint warnings:
> 
> W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so
> W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolymain.a
Since polyml is a compiler, development files are ok (see also gcc, etc.)

> In the spec file, please compress the BuldRequires lines into a single entry. 
I prefer it this way, it is much clearer. I would even go so far as disallow
more than one entry per line.

> Please provide a proper description for the -libs package.
ok

http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/polyml-5.0-2.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.