[Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 29 07:22:43 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine
Alias: perl-XML-DOM-XPath

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233846


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium

panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-03-29 03:22 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
276b4863d2886df313f849b329b9e090  XML-DOM-XPath-0.13.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/1...................................ok
t/pod.................................ok
t/pod_coverage........................ok
t/test_bugs...........................ok
t/test_non_ascii......................ok
t/test_xml_xpath_and_xml_dom_xpath....ok
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
276b4863d2886df313f849b329b9e090  XML-DOM-XPath-0.13.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/1...................................ok
t/pod.................................ok
t/pod_coverage........................ok
t/test_bugs...........................ok
t/test_non_ascii......................ok
t/test_xml_xpath_and_xml_dom_xpath....ok
t/test_non_ascii......................ok
t/test_xml_xpath_and_xml_dom_xpath....ok
t/xmlxpath_01basic....................ok
t/xmlxpath_02descendant...............ok
t/xmlxpath_03star.....................ok
t/xmlxpath_04pos......................ok
t/xmlxpath_05attrib...................ok
t/xmlxpath_06attrib_val...............ok
t/xmlxpath_07count....................ok
t/xmlxpath_08name.....................ok
t/xmlxpath_09a_string_length..........ok
t/xmlxpath_09string_length............ok
t/xmlxpath_10pipe.....................ok
t/xmlxpath_12axisdescendant...........ok
t/xmlxpath_13axisparent...............ok
t/xmlxpath_14axisancestor.............ok
t/xmlxpath_15axisfol_sib..............ok
t/xmlxpath_16axisprec_sib.............ok
t/xmlxpath_17axisfollowing............ok
t/xmlxpath_18axispreceding............ok
t/xmlxpath_19axisd_or_s...............ok
t/xmlxpath_20axisa_or_s...............ok
t/xmlxpath_21allnodes.................ok
t/xmlxpath_22name_select..............ok
t/xmlxpath_23func.....................ok
t/xmlxpath_24namespaces...............ok
t/xmlxpath_25scope....................ok
t/xmlxpath_26predicate................ok
t/xmlxpath_28ancestor2................ok
t/xmlxpath_29desc_with_predicate......ok
t/xmlxpath_30lang.....................ok
All tests successful.
Files=35, Tests=182, 10 wallclock secs ( 6.39 cusr +  0.85 csys =  7.24 CPU)
+ Provides: perl(XML::DOM::Attr) perl(XML::DOM::Comment)
perl(XML::DOM::Document) perl(XML::DOM::Element) perl(XML::DOM::Namespace)
perl(XML::DOM::Node) perl(XML::DOM::ProcessingInstruction) perl(XML::DOM::Text)
perl(XML::DOM::XPath)

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list